White House Fence-jumper

Tongue in cheek but serious as the same time: White House fence-jumper, note in hand, barges through the White House doors while exclaiming, "Have you seen this!": Ex-US Officials Demanded 30 Billion Dollar Bribe (and work closely with US Congress,.), -> http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/09/gov-sundquist-sen-sheldon-songstad-tn-involved-in-extortion-death-threat-involving-5-10-billion-doll.html <-

(Note: Not to be demeaning but you are supposed to follow the above link or you are missing what this is about and you are 100% retarded if that does not occur to you. I find myself having to spell it out because a lot of people are simply visiting this particular post.)

September 20, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink


These are just some of the reasons that GodAddy illegally shut down my website on back September 9, 2014, and 17 other websites by September 10.  We should be back online by Monday or before.

These websites are still up and info will be posted there if my website does not come back online.  http://lonewolfterritory.com   http:the-1-way.info  

Also remember if dot COM sites do not work try dot INFO with the same domain name. Also http://ka-ni.info is still functioning.  Though, update info may be found on http://tekgnosis.typepad.com as well.

The SirDavidAndrew webpage will be temporarily posted at Lexrexx.com  if the website master is able to get it to function. The front page will hopefully soon be there, however, most of the links may not work.

Obviously someone did not want me reporting on the murder of Edgar Steele by the gestapo.  http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/09/us-government-murders-edgar-steele-will-the-perpetrators-get-away-with-it.html

Nor did they want me expose the attempted blackmail and plot to murder Ambassador Lee Wanta by former Governor Sundquist of Tennessee and former Senator Sheldon Songstad of South Dakota. 


Folks, keep your eye on the vote in Scotland.  Freedom smells so sweet.  "Free, free at last!" However, there is trouble already afoot, since the International banksters are trying to force the new Scottish government before it even exists to enter into contract with them.  I certainly hope that the people have sense enough to tell these bankster gangsters to take a hike.  Too, I would hope that Scotland will join BRICS, which would totally destroy the Zionist banksters' death grip on this old world.

Then too, the Scots may decide to reinstate their monarchy.  Oops!  Queen Elizabeth abdicated the Scottish Throne in October 1996 and she returned King David's Throne Chair to Edinburgh Castle in May of 1997.  The Throne of David is vacant, and the new age knocks at the door, 2016 looks to be very import year in history.   I wonder who the prospective candidates may be.  Hum!

Keep your powder dry and your sword handy, things are about to boil.

Sir David-Andrew.

-------- Original Message --------
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:51:28 -0400

With the stock market and US Dollar looking rock solid  due to massive manipulation the Sheeple are fast asleep.
But behind the scenes the battles are RAGING!!!
A few things to take place OVER THE NEXT FEW DAYS/WEEKS:
1) Ron Paul's original Audit the Fed Bill gets voted on today. Not sure what to expect but a YES vote speaks volumes as to who is winning the secret battles.
2) Scotland votes tomorrow on their independence and either way the vote goes there should be chaos in the FX Derivative Market...as William Wallace says "FREEDOM!" :-)
3) All eyes are on the Fed's FOMC meeting with an announcement due out today. Timing is everything!
4) The new physical gold market, the Shanghai Gold Exchange, made a surprise announcement today that they will begin trading TOMORROW!!!
and finally... 
5) Senator Carl Levin waits in the wings to BEGIN THE HEARINGS on commodity manipulation.
Hmmm. And everyone thinks the gold and silver markets will NEVER be released from their control.
...and this is just through the rest of September!!!
May the Road you choose be the Right Road.
Bix Weir
PO Box 10626, Oakland, CA 94610, USA

September 18, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Greg Szymanski's 2006 Interviews with Lee Wanta the 27.5 Trillion Dollar Man (Full transcript)


Some of the latest confirmations:

Gov. Sundquist (TN), Sen. Songstad (SD) involved in extortion, conspiracy to murder (involving 5-10 billion dollars) in reference to Leo Wanta the 27.5 trillion dollar man



GREG: Investigative Journal is travelling to Switzerland today and my guest [is] Leo Wanta. Tell us how this all started for you.

LEO: Okay in 1980... But going way back prior to that, I was being mentored by the Chairman of the Senate Foriegn Relations Commitee, Senator Alexander Wiley. I was trained in financials and government, intelligence and so on and so forth.

So in 1980, when President Regan won the election he retained the services of William French Smith a[n] attorney in California who was going to be his Attorney General. So then we all got together with Casey and Colby, William French Smith and President-elect Reagan.

GREG: And you're sitting in talking with these guys correct?

LEO: Yeah, I was already known within a very tight group through Senator Wiley of my background and my management training and my engineering training.

Uncle Sam, arranged for me to get a 5 year apprenticeship in tool and die. When I'm in foriegn countries, I can kind of glance at it and know what they're doing. I didn't have to have blueprints. I can design my own blueprints, because I had an engineering degree as well.

So I was introduced to the future Attorney General Wiliam French Smith, and Bill Casey, which I'd already known through Bill Colby. We started having some meetings prior to him being elected on how he could control the East European environment.

So then, after a number of meetings and discussions, it was decided by the new Reagan administration that I should be the Inspector General of the Department of Defense because that would give me kind of a chance to review things. "Cap" Weinberger, who was now the Secretary of Defense, said: "He's the last S.O.B. I need walking around me. He'll have my job in a couple of months."

So Pen James, who was the director of Whitehouse personnel, and Rick Shelby, [who] was now a senator, decided we should be doing some other stuff. So Bill Casey decided I should work hand-in-hand with him.

So they were all talking about Krushchev and the old days, and him pounding the desk at the United Nations. [How] they're going to bury us with our own shovels, and so on, and so forth.

President Reagan was a union guy in California. So they were looking at ways to get our country back through the apprenticeship programs and things of that nature; to rebuild infrastructure of the American people. The youth... give them some skilled trades, training, education, and medical services, and things of that nature.

The biggest problem was the expenses [that] were always going out to fight the Cold War on the Soviet Union. They kept spending money for the military industrial giants and nothing for the average person. They agreed to my idea going back to Maynard Keynes, 'the best way to control a country is to control the economy and the currency.'

President Reagan, he was not a politician; didn't feel he should be a politician. He was a simple person and he wanted to undermine the USSR by destabilzing their military [and] their economy, and to get the people to understand that the rubles were only of value within the USSR.

President Reagan wanted to destabilize the USSR because they were a pain and he didn't trust them at all. He could not depend on anybody over there and he still had a lot of wounds from the past. So we decided, with William French Smith and a few other guys, how we could figure out a mission to destabilze the USSR so they couldn't buy anything. This is why you had the Star Wars [Strategic Defense Initiative] and everything. So President Reagan, started all kinds of development programs to spend a lot of money, but only on paper not in actual cash. That got the Soviets. Nobody understands a Soviets a Soviet; a Russians a Russian. They're not the same.

After a number of meetings and discussions with people within the military and everything else, we agreed we would get a grant from the US Treasury for $150 billion. And we would start to destabilize their economy, their military, their GRU [Main Intelligence Directorate], and the like, by picking up their internal currency.

So we got together Mr. Kwok [Kok Howie Kwong], who was part of the Chinese intelligence group in Peking at that time. [We] were off to Vienna where we established New Republic/USA Financial Groupe, which was the security code of the Contras way back when. [Vienna] was where the core of all the Soviet rubles were because they were not allowed to leave the USSR. They could not buy any food, any refrigerators, any medicine, they couldn't buy anything. Anything you want to buy was all internal to the USSR and you couldn't take out the currency.

Yet, the Soviet Central Bank [Gosbank] said that every ruble is worth $1.20. Of course nobody's going to give you $1.20 because there's nothing to buy with a ruble.

So we were based in Vienna, in June 1988. We started to trade rubles through Brinks in Holland, into the the GRU, military, the postal savings accounts, the manufacturing facilities in the USSR. We would give them hard currency for their rubles. They knew their rubles were worth zero.

We purchased Aneko Credit Pte Ltd. Singapore which was grandfathered to do these kind of things in Singapore. We would run all of these rubles through Aneko Credit and Asia-Europa Development Group and Trans-Asia Resources and New Republic/USA Financial Groupe in Austria. So I was sent to Austria in June 1988. I was a permenent resident of Austria.

We were starting through the KGB and the GRU, and anybody and everybody that was trying to make a fast buck, to gather up all of the rubles. So suddenly, we were getting all of the rubles. They wrote stories about this in major magazines and newspapers, that we were idiots in buying all these Soviet rubles. So more people came to us all the time and we were negotiating between 18 to 28 cents a ruble. We would pay them off outside of the USSR in all the major banks, Hungarian banks as well. We had 109 accounts. If you got the rubles credited to our account we would would give you the hard currency of your choice. We had PROMIS software, four units of [equ..s?]. It's a specialized banking center software, of Inslaw in Washington, DC. So people were bringing us rubles, rubles, rubles, left and right in [to] Brinks in Holland, and other banks, and we were paying them in hard currency.

So here we are. We're all in Vienna. I speak very little German, but I'm there. We started to meet with a number of people within the Soviet bloc, and Hungary, and Iran, Iraq, so on, and so forth. And they're, shall we say, in an economic pinch because the USSR had no food, no meat, no nothing, no jet fuel. Because nobody would accept the ruble outside the country. So we used Brinks in Holland, and started to purchase rubles. Not purchase, say swap, you can't purchase currency but you can swap currencies. Something for something.

GREG: Okay. So basically, your job was to destabilize the ruble in an effort to bring the Cold War to an end, correct?

LEO: Correct. Because then they had no funds for the military. No funds for their intelligence. No funds for the KGB and the GRU and the like.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Now during this period of time, you set to work on this goal and you were pretty sucessful at it, correct? Your system worked.

LEO WANTA: Oh yes, very good at it. We had a draw from the US Treasury of $150 billion. Using the PROMIS software, we were bringing to the Russians and the postal savings accounts and certain manufacturers an opportunity to get hard currency for their rubles at a swap value much less... Well it was really much more than it was worth, because it was worth zero. And we were paying between 18 and 28 cents per ruble in hard currency of Swiss francs, Italian lira, deutchmarks?, British pounds sterling and the like.

So based on that we entertained with the Development Bank of Singapore. We sent them 70 billion rubles, worth $84 billion US. We met with the big shots at the USSR embassy in Singapore and they were screaming at us, and yelling at us, that we were destroying their economy.


GREG SZYMANSKI: And, at that point is there any particular reason why the money wasn't immediately returned? What was the whole idea behind this, how did it get lost? That's one question people ask me.

LEO WANTA: [We] have Brinks in Holland counting, and wrapping, and packaging, and sorting out all the rubles. And making sure there were no counterfeits.

And then the Central Bank of the USSR, [it] was deemed that they had to [do the] exchange because they're the ones who set the benchmark and all that.

We met with the bigshots at the Soviet Embassy in Singapore and they were telling my Chinese partner Mr. Kok that there is no way, no way in the world that they were going to give us $1.20 per ruble. And we argued back and forth, back and forth, and they said, "No, we're never going to give you $1.20."

So after a lot of arguing, and them drinking their goofy drinks, they came and said that the Kremlin authorized [them] to only pay us $1.08. I jumped up and down [on] the top of the tables and I said, "$1.08, Howie, we got more than that invested in the program!"

They were really happy that we were going to lose out. Unknown to them that we're [paying] 18, 22, 28 cents, a ruble which is a very good mark up of 4 or 5 times value. So we have the agreements with the Bank of China, that they sent all of the wire transfers to, that they would pay us $1.08. If we didn't like it we could get the hell out of town.

So I left. Howie stayed behind. They didn't trust me, being an American, but they would trust him because he was a Chinese authority. So, we have all the landmark agreements and the benchmarks at $1.08. Now, we were in the foriegn exchange of off-station rubles.

So the Russian people were now getting hard currency. Now they were bringing back in refrigerators from Budapest, and from Vienna. Everyday they were going from Budapest to Vienna, buying anything that wasn't parked. Bring it back to Budapest and trade it back for rubles.

We had a number of Budapest main banks accepting rubles on our behalf and paying them in hard currency.

They wrote articles that all the rubles were missing from the street, so they had to reprint new rubles. The finance minister was screaming that I, Wanta of New Republic, has all the rubles in my possesion and they had no rubles. So we kept bringing them rubles back to the Central Bank.

Suddenly, they were short of rubles; so we had to figure out another way to get rubles back. So Howie and I talked to India, Pakistan, China, Malaysia and all these countries and says, "Look you guys all have a national debt to the USSR and the Central Bank. What if we paid that debt off and we gave you rubles at 88 cents a ruble?"

They thought we were crazy but as long as we had the receipts and confirmation that their national debts were paid, perfect. So now all of these countries are paying their national debt to zero into the Central Bank of the USSR. Now [Sheshanko?] and everybody there are really, really excited that all of these countries are paying their debts back to the USSR. But keep in mind the rubles are worth [benchmarked at] $1.20. They took all the rubles and started paying all their national debts, based on about two-thirds the value, but getting 100% value.

So that worked out real good. They [USSR] were getting the hard currency, they were buying refrigerators, carpets, medicine in Vienna, Austria and everything else. We were bringing them meat through [authraw?] Poland.

We were negotiating with Pabst Brewery in Milwaukee to pick up their whole brewery and move it to Russia. The same with Intercontinental Baking or Continental Baking, they were closing their whole facility; we were going to bring that thing lock, stock and barrel. We bought horses from Mexico that they wanted, and everyone was having a real great time by buying something with hard currency.

All of these countries are buying them from Howie and I at 88 cents. Not buying, but trading their hard currencies for what we wanted. So now the Central Bank is flooded with rubles, but they don't have any real hard currency, because everybody is paying them in rubles. So [Greshanko?] and everybody they says, "We got 2000 [tons] bullion of gold." In 75 kilos, 35, 35.5 kilos, 25 kilos, all mixed, one-off, and all this crap. And they gave us a huge discount if we would pay them in hard currency.

So now you've got 2000 tons in hard currency that we already made three or four-hundred percent on if not more.

We missed 246 tons in Latvia/Lithuania and Jim Baker said I was not doing my job because they still had 200 some tons of gold. If nobody tells me that how do I know to find it? We still had 2000 tons of bling, which is pretty good. We had to resmelt it at [Johnson Matthey] at Singapore under heavy security and made out to our name. And paid cash.


So that worked out real good. And Gorbachev was very much involved, the Central Bank was involved; everybody knew. So suddently they were very pleased in the USSR, because they're gettting all these rubles. Everybody's paying their national debts and they had all this currency coming back into the Central Bank in Moscow. Unknown to them, that President Reagan could stop at anytime the swapping, or the trading, of the rubles for hard currency which was in Swiss francs, or German marks and so on so forth. And they were getting, running low out of hard currency because they were paying everybody $1.20, $1.08 and so on and so forth. So now they are low on hard currency of the G7 for example. So we decided that we would do them a favor. We purchased 2000 tons of their gold that was in the Central Bank in USSR, and naturally they ripped us off. They would only give us $1.08 for every ruble, still unknown to the important people that we were paying less than 28 cents a piece. So now we have 2000 tons of gold based on actual cost of 28 cents but getting market value of $1.08 per ruble.

So that went on very well and then everybody decided in the Whitehouse that there will be no more treaty arrangements of trading rubles for hard currency. Therefore, now the USSR is absolutely bankrupt, the GRU is bankrupt, the KGB is bankrupt but in reality they're really not bankrupt because Gorbachev, Yeltsin, and Yegor Gaidar the Prime Minister took all of their rubles which really had a 'Monopoly' value in a kids game and have hard currency, in German marks, and Swiss francs, and British pounds sterling, and everything else.

Now the USSR is absolutely bankrupt. They make a deal with Boris Yeltsin he has, he fakes this, uh, coup, that he was being attacked by his military, Gorbachev was you know - which was all part of his way for an exit. So therefore, we have all the hard currency, they have rubles. Nobody wants rubles. So we had agreed with Putin and everybody, who at that time was Vice Mayor in Leningrad (which turned out to be St. Petersburg eventually, it was on the [?] commission), that we would give a non-returnable grant to the USSR under the new image of the Russian Federation of $30 billion US dollars and that's to rebuild.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Where was this money earmarked for once you make this money back then?

LEO WANTA: Well, the money was earmarked for the US Department of the Treasury, except for $30 billion that was authorized by President Reagan through AmeriTrust to the Russian Federation in Mockba, which is Moscow, for redevelopment programs. As long as there are none military. We would have been monitoring all of that $30 billion. We paid back the $150 billion, that we got forwarded from the US Department of the Treasury, within 6 months.

We had a tremendous amount of real hard currency and of that $70 billion that was set aside: $5 billion was going to Canada, $5 billion to UK, and $5 billion to Mexico and so on so forth, a total of $70 billion. But at the same time down in Western American Samoa, we were setting up a $5 million oil refinery to back up the US oil needs.

We were [also] buying medium term bank... Well at that time they were called prime bank guarantees, at 7.5% annual interest, 10 year plus one day maturity. We were buying them at 68%, 66% per $100 million par value and we could either loan 'em, or sell 'em, or transfer, at 88 to 92[%]. In reality, we're making $20 million for every $100 million par value prime bank guarantee. And we're doing this repetitively, every hour on the hour. That generated a tremendous amount of money, that we would reduce any and all debt obligations of the USA. And that is what President Reagan wanted to do.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So this money, so you're sucessful at bringing the ruble down. In the meantime, you amass a lot of dollars. And you become the caretaker of this through Ronald Reagan. Who appoints you, through what you told me earlier, his trust in you.

LEO WANTA: Oh yes.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. So the years go by now, this fund is there, I mean the money is there now invested in the different things.

LEO WANTA: Yeah, in prime bank guarantees.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. Now how does that transition remain American assets, but remain out of the country?

LEO WANTA: Yeah, offshore bank deposits.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So basically Reagan must have been really pleased with what you guys were doing?

LEO WANTA: Oh, he was overly excited. The Soviet Union had no money to buy anything for military arms, and Star Wars, and stuff of that nature. That's why Gorbachev [publically] in Helsinki was so mad. Gorbachev, [meaning the USSR] had zero, zero in cash.

We paid him $10 billion through the Gorbachev Foundation. So he was happy to sell out his country. What are you going to do? It's easier to pay these guys a couple of bucks.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Now, Reagans intention was always to bring this money back. Now you guys amassed a lot of money, it was constantly compounding interest...

LEO WANTA: Reagan's first intention was to have US security thoughout the world and the Soviet Union - being [unknown] - to nothing, so he [would] not have to spend money on military.

So all of these funds then... We paid back the treasury the $150 billion. There was security throughout the world. There was no more USSR. They were gone.

The Russians had a Federation; they needed money. Boris Yeltsin and Putin, the Deputy Mayor in Leningrad, was going to receive through the Reagan Group, which was us, $30 billion to rebuild their countries. But for no arms, and no tanks, and no nothing [military].

And we were rebuilding the US dollar economy. We were buying prime bank guarantees of 66% to 69% and retrading those at 88% to 92% which was making us around $20 million for every $100 million prime bank guarantee. That was the money that was rebuilding all of the banking community, money in the United States, so the banks could give out loans and mortgages and do whatever you want. And also, more foriegn aid to the countries of acceptance to the US State Department. So this money was coming back, and it was also being used and generated to make more money for the USA to be a super-economy.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Well tell us how did you save his [Reagan's] life.

LEO WANTA: Well being in the intelligence community we, you know, we're reaching out to a number of people throughout the world at all times. We had a certain person that was a foriegner as a guest of the United States. I don't think he had a green card since he was in the political regime.

He had called me and he was extremely nervous. He said he had people staying in his Washington office for months, and months, and today was the day they were going to assassinate President Reagan. I asked really clear what was going on? How can I know for sure? He told me all of the details.

I immediately called Treasury Special Agent Bill Lecates. He got on the phone to Special Agent of the Secret Service Glen Speedy, along with Frank B. Ingram, who is a liason with the FBI. That's why his initials are F.B. Ingram.

We immediately pulled President Reagan out of the Whitehouse.

We pick[ed] up everybody that came via Texas, to come into the Washington area. They were being groomed and being hosted by this gentleman, who will remain anonymous, except [to] the people that need to know. The Secret Service came immediately to his place, grabbed him for his own security and protection. He wasn't sure who I sent to get him.

So he's there; they're coming in with all their Secret Service garb, and everything else, and the Secret Service agent said he went all over the floor. I said, "Well I would too, if they came in running with all of those machine guns and everything else."

He said, "You should have warned him."

I said, "I was kind of busy."

GREG SZYMANSKI: What year was this just to give us...

LEO WANTA: That was... I'll say a Friday the 13th. I'll let you track it back from there.


LEO WANTA: But you can talk to the Secret Service, because we all got plaques and all this other good stuff. Glen Speedy, the Secret Service, and Bill Lecates who was Direc. in US Treasury and national at that time. So you know everybody was happy, happy, happy. We were all happy that the threat, [that] wasn't sure at that time, [and] when we verified that it was absolutely a threat. We picked up everybody. To the best of our knowledge, we got them all.


GREG SZYMANSKI: [Who do you work for?]

LEO WANTA: For the Office of the President. That's who I work for.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. So when did the whole problem begin, when you wanted to put the money back. But I think you were talked to by someone. Did somebody want to really take it from you, is what I'm getting at.

LEO WANTA: Well here, first of all you have to understand we have all of [this] in our control, Howie and I. We had all the money in foriegn accounts, prime bank guarantees, and other collateral, and gold bullion, and the like.

George Bush was finishing up his travel time in Singapore. This was about April, 1992, [January 3-5, 1992] because Howie died in May, 1992. He [Bush] realized that all of the assets, which was about $864 billion in Aneko Credit in Singapore, was owned by a Chinese guy named Howie Kwong. [He] was the chairman of our group bank and [with] myself as managing director. He was curious that he was now the President of the United States, and we had all these funds. Then when Bill Clinton became President of the United States, he decided that all three of us were no good. He's the only guy that can handle that kind of money with authority and maturity.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. This is one part of the story, I think you need to explain, because I gotta make that transition from the good days of Reagan; and all of a sudden things change.

LEO WANTA: Okay. Well it's really strange.

GREG SZYMANSKI: How did that happen?

LEO WANTA: The last tour of President George Herbert Walker Bush, he goes to Singapore of all places. Unknown to him, the Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, sold Aneko Credit PTA Ltd. in Singapore, to my Chinese partner and I. Now we are [running] the intel community banking. Which everybody who was anybody in the Bush Administration and previous administrations used for their, let's call it, set-aside allocations.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Now you told me you were made the trustee by Reagan.

LEO WANTA: Oh, I was the trustor sure, for the Presidential Task Force, yeah.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. Go ahead. So that gives you some power over this money still?

LEO WANTA: No. Guarded power.


LEO WANTA: That doesn't mean I can spend it. I'm just guarding it.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay, so go ahead now we're in the...

LEO WANTA: Okay, so I am in Vienna working with the Chinese against the USSR, because they are also buying rubles to take down their debts. And I'm off to Singapore to meet my Chinese counterpart, Mr. Kok Howie Kwong. His dad is a wheeler dealer within the Chinese administration and a warlord and all this stuff. We had a number of operations with the ruble with PRC [People's Republic of China] and ROC [Taiwan] in China. They're in Pakistan and India and everything else.

His father says to Howie that the Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, must sell his stock in Aneko Credit PTA Ltd. [Since] he's the Prime Minister he can't do both. So Howie's dad says to Howie and I, "[Leo] if you put up $25 million, I'll put up $25 million for my son, and you and he will own Aneko Credit PTA Ltd."

[Aneko Credit] is a grandfathered bank [with] underwriters and all of this stuff and this was great for us.

So I take $25 million from New Republic. Where his dad got the money is not material to me, but I'm sure it came out of Hong Kong/Shanghai. So I bought Mrs. Lee's one share and Howie bought the Prime Minister's one share. Now we have all of these funds, and we move in more funds that we are developing. Prime bank guarantees, because we're also now bank underwriters by contract in Singapore under the grandfather clause. The Chinese and Singaporeans had [this clause] long before I even knew Singapore existed.

So here's President Bush sitting in Singapore, in fact we gave the instructions to the Secret Service to move him from one hotel to the Shangri-La. The Secret Service guys in my hotel room at the Marina Manor agreed, let's move him to the Shangri-la which is much safer. He can still do the meetings at the other hotels but at least we'll take over the Shangri-La. So we got credit for that.

So George Bush Sr. comes on his worldwide tour at the end of his campaign and he's in Singapore. He meets Howie and I. He finds out from the Prime Minister that Howie and I own Aneko Credit and now we are holding his special set-aside allocations. We knew all of his set-aside allocations, and George Schultz, and Jimmy Baker, and everybody else.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Oh boy, you had the information now on him.

LEO WANTA: But, I wasn't doing anything with it.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Right, right.

LEO WANTA: You know it didn't bother me, because I had enough to do with what I was doing.

Howie and I [had] in our accounts, our personal accounts under the agreements we had with President Reagan, [we] had total assets in Aneko Credit of $864 billion U.S. which is entirely, shall we say, stock profit. Which would be split between Mr. Kwok and myself, $432 billion a piece.

He [George Bush, Sr.] was very upset that he did not realize that Howie and I collectively owned Aneko Credit.

Okay? See because Howie's got a share and I got a share. That's $432 billion a piece, well, [Carol Courtney's?] there from state and [George Bush] Sr. says that since I report to Bush, the Office of the President, I should consider half to go away and Howie should give half to go away [Bush wanted half of each of their $432 billion].

Howie jumped right out of that chair. He said, "You are S...H... boomp-boomp-boomp. I pay you nothing more,  boomp-boomp-boomp."

We got another North Korean conflict going on. Howie died a couple weeks later.


LEO WANTA: By rat poison.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Rat poisoning?

LEO WANTA: They believe, by rat poisoning because his face got real puffy, yellow jaundice, and he was terrible. I was supposed to die within 10, 15 minutes after him.

I got a call from Singapore Internal Affairs that Howie's in the hospital, he's going into a coma, he's dying. Instead of going out the front door using the company car, I just got the first taxi. The taxi driver took me to the emergency entrance, instead of the front door, where I would naturally go as a tourist.

I got up there and Leo [Tetses?] says to me, "How the hell did you get up here?"

I said, "What are you talking about? You called me, said he's going into a coma."

"How did you get up here!"

I said, "I went out the front door, took the taxi, and the taxidriver says go through the emergency."

He said, "Ohhh!"

So then, he [Howie] died his just...

GREG SZYMANSKI: And you were sure you were slated for the same uh...

LEO WANTA: Yeah, I should never have got to the hotel room. This has been verified by General Vernon Walters. I was going to be hit long before I got to that floor.

So, what happens [is] when you get rat poison in a human being, you create a vacuum in your brain and you blow the stem. That's what happened.

[Carol Courtney's?] there from U.S. State and she's really [offended] now because a Chinese spoke so terrible to the President of the United States. But you know, trying to get Howie for $216 billion, Howie was not interested in paying $216 billion.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And where was that going to go?

LEO WANTA: Who knows?

He [Howie] jumped right out of his chair screaming, I says, "Howie, you put me in a terrible position."

He says, "You stay here with me; you still got $432 billion."

I says, "Howie, that's not the way it works in the United States. He's my superior."

[Howie makes a noise] "Rahrrrararar!!!"

A couple weeks later he died, at Singapore General Hospital.

[Then] they came to get me.

I went to Canada. Dan Qualye arranged for me to get to Canada, for whatever reason. I stayed in Toronto. And then I went per Uncle Sam to Switzerland to meet Vince Foster. And that's when I was taken down.

GREG SZYMANSKI: [Back to when] you're sitting across from Bush...

LEO WANTA: Oh yeah. He's staring at me. I was always quizzed by him in the old days with Reagan, because Reagan wouldn't trust him. Reagan wouldn't ever tell him what we were doing.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Reagan didn't trust Bush back then?

LEO WANTA: No. He never told him anything. When he would ask me or Larry Eagleburger, would ask me questions or something, I would always refer back to Dutch [Reagan]. Or, [to] William French Smith, or Casey, because [with] what I was doing, I was told to just shut up and get it done.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And that's when you were made the Ambassador [for] Somalia [to] Switzerland and Canada. To work with [William] Sessions and Vince Foster. And basically that's where we're at now.

LEO WANTA: That's correct.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And at this point you end up in a Swiss jail.

LEO WANTA: Well, it really wasn't a jail. It was a dungeon.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay a dungeon for 134 days. And really for... Did they ever give you an official reason?

LEO WANTA: Well for the first three days they didn't even know I was there. So I was starving to death.

And then they said they had a phone call from the State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue, the Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin, to hold me for tax evasion from 1982 and '88.

I kinda laughed, I thought it was a political joke. Because I lived in China since 1985. And in 1986, I spent the whole year in the Phillipines, during that coup against Marcos. We were very busy running between Singapore, Malaysia and the Phillipines. So how could I be a resident of the State of Wisconsin? My wife divorced me because I abandoned her in '82. I was too much involved in the government; which she wasn't too happy with.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. So how did they want to get their hands on this money and what did you tell them?

LEO WANTA: After Howie died, they had started giving me a lot of heat in Singapore, so I went on to Canada. I spent a year in Canada trying to figure out how I was going to get the money back into US Treasury.

We were working with Vince Foster and he was kind of a help to us.

In June 1993, I got orders through Vince Foster and [Cupper?] who I think was his boss at the time. We had some transactions that were going to help me move to Lake Geneva and I would buy a beautiful home there and I would settle up on the paybacks. And I said, "That's not a problem as long as I can pay back the US Department of the Treasury."

And they said, "What do you want to do that for?"

I said, "Because two, three years down the road you're going to say I never paid anybody; and I'm going to be arrested for embezzling US federal funds."

So I went to Switzerland and Foster's going to meet me on July 7. We transferred $250 million to the Children's Defense Fund through Credit Suisse, [through] Guy Stewart, the chairman of the board at Credit Suisse. And, I automatically went to Swiss prison, and he [Foster] automatically died on July 20.

GREG SZYMANSKI: It's said this fund that was started, the Global Security Fund, and what Bush and Clinton wanted to do now; was to somehow copycat what you were doing. But, to use the money privately, instead of bringing it back to the Treasury? Correct?

LEO WANTA: Correct and to pay taxes on that money.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. So that's what they wanted to do with you and that's really why they wanted you out of the picture, correct?

LEO WANTA: Yeah, they wanted me out of the game. But at the same time, return all of the trust assets to individuals, and not to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. I feared that in a couple of years, somebody's gonna ask for an audit and I'm not going to have the money, and I'm gonna be in prison for life.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Bingo. And we're talking about how much money, you think?

LEO WANTA: Oh, at that time we had let's see, boomp-boomp-boomp. I would estimate in 1993, we had assets well over $16-18 trillion in prime bank guarantees, 2000 tons of gold, [another] 167 tons of gold, cash-wise we probably had, oh, $500 billion assorted currencies.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Which you're still the trustor for right?

LEO WANTA: Yeah. And I'm also the owner of it because Howe's dead. And I still owe 50% of the final outlay to his estate, which he has two beautiful kids.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Clinton, Bush the rest of them [are] trying to get it into private hands. You want to take the money; put it back into the Treasury.

LEO WANTA: Per the original protocol agreements, yes.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And there, is the reason they are after you, correct?

LEO WANTA: Yeah, but they can't kill me right away because they don't know where all the money is.

GREG SZYMANSKI: They don't know where it's at?

LEO WANTA: Well, they know some of it. They have ripped off 4 or 5 of my computers already. But a lot of this stuff is based on custodial safekeeping reciepts in banks, which open up other assets and numbers and passcodes and stuff.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So the CIA has discredited you, even had you declared dead. Didn't they?

LEO WANTA: Correct. So they could go through all the banking community, and the bank managers, and say he's never showing up here; so now we're in charge of these accounts.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And they've tried discrediting you, now tell us how this backstabbing occurred and what really happened to this money?

LEO WANTA: Well, we had a trading program for 5 T [trillion] through the World Bank; and it was going to be generated by the Swiss banks.

I was in Toronto and I left Toronto [for] Paris to meet President [Haji maheelamashi?] because I was now being appointed the Ambassador of Somalia to Canada and to Switzerland. So under cover of that we had the 5 T contracts with the World Bank and the UN under Contract #4.

[This] would also rebuild Somalia and [give] us a naval supply depot there. Mogadishu Airport would have been a US Airforce station and we would have a rapid deployment force there to protect and control the Middle East from idiots that want to cause war.

So we were in Switzerland. One of the major banks started the first leg of the 5 T [trillion] contract which would have generated $210 billion. Of which $70 billion was set aside for, let's see: $30 billion to Russia, $5 billion to Canada, $5 billion to Mexico, $5 billion to London, $5 billion to France, $500 million to Western Samoa to build an oil refinery [which was] only feeding [to] the United States. We would have had a brand new high-tech refinery in Western Samoa. And $70 billion would have went back into AmeriTrust, and $70 billion would have went into the US Treasury, for whatever the Economic Presidential Council [sic] wanted to do. Laura D Tyson and all these people.

So we would have been very secure and very satisfied with the influx of cash.


Vince Foster made a special request through the Whitehouse at that time. He needed 250 million dollars set aside for the Childrens Defense Fund, which was approved by the Whitehouse at that time, by a Laura D'Andrea Tyson who was the chairperson of the Whitehouse Economic Counsel. So he was in Geneve. We arranged 250 million dollars for the Childrens Defense Fund from their request, based on the 5T [trillion] UN Contract #4.

We moved the first initial traunches of 243 million dollars, which would have gave them a face value of 300 million to start the computers working as a dry run more or less and that was three 81 million dollar transfers. [This] would give you a par value prime bank guarantee of 100 million dollars per each 81 million dollars released.

Vince Foster was staying there. Suddenly, all heck broke loose. I was arrested and detained by the Swiss Sûreté for failure to pay Wisconsin taxes, although I haven't lived in Wisconsin since 1985, being on US government seal operations.

[They] threw me in a dungeon. Vince Foster came to my rescue. He came back to Washington DC, to assist in getting my immediate release from all this nonsense.

Then he was murdered. I know he didn't commit suicide. No one with $250 million in his briefcase commits suicide.

They had me incognito. Only a handful of people knew I was in the Swiss dungeon in Lausanne.

Then Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, came to my rescue because he was part of an agreement we had between the Palestinians and the State of Israel. The Ameritrust corporation, of which I'm the Chairman of the Board, was going to grant the State of Israel 5 billion, and the Palestine government at that time, $5 billion a piece. To [encourage] a solid peace program. Which we would have controlled all the funds, so the funds would not be removed from the recovery, the redevelopment of roads and infrastructure.

He notified the Swiss government that he was coming to rearrange the furniture, as we say.

I was immediately extradited to New York, without any arrest warrants, without anything at all. Just put me on a plane, under armed guard, and shackles. I ended up in New York, and the FBI was saying, "What the hell are you doing here?"

I didn't have an American passport, I had a Somalian passport, a diplomatic passport, so they figured they were being swindled by somebody.

In the meantime, Yitzhak Rabin, got murdered.

I went to the Brooklyn House of Detention. They were supposed to remove me to Madison, Wisconsin, so I could get a hearing and get released.

The Federal Judge Alyce Ross says, "You know Mr. Ambassador, I don't know what you're here for and I don't want you here. Get the hell out of here." More or less [that's what she said].

But before she dismissed everything against me by the State of Wisconsin, which I haven't lived in since 1985, she asked me, "Why are you carrying these $1 billion notes, these securities."

I started to explain it and immediately the US Attorney jumped in and he says, "We dismiss all the charges. He's free to go, he's free to go. We make a motion, US government."

And I went to the [courthouse] steps only to be arrested by New York detectives, without a warrant, but, based on a phone call from the State of Wisconsin to hold me for civil tax evasion for 1982.

GREG SZYMANSKI: We left off where you were named the Ambassador [of] Somalia [to] Switzerland and Canada. Basically to deal with the Vince Foster issue and Marc Rich?

LEO WANTA: We had [a] tremendous [number] of security plans to use in Mogadishu And it would have helped all the people, remember the Cubans were fighting in the upper part of Somaliland.


LEO WANTA: We had a vested interest in there.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Now what happened to...You were also there for Rich, correct? Marc Rich?

LEO WANTA: Well yeah, we were there because we were doing this settlement, and we were also taking down Marc Rich. Because the FBI Director Bill Sessions, gave us a live open arrest warrant to take down Marc Rich at any cost and bring him on back. So we were going to coax him [into] going to a french casino across the lake in Lausanne. But Lorrayne Fine somehow tipped him off, and knew somehow from her cohorts, what we might be doing in Switzerland. We were going to arrest him in the middle between Lausanne and France on the ferry boat.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And what happened?

LEO WANTA: (Laughs) He refused to come at the last minute. And on July 7, 1993 I was arrested for Wisconsin civil tax evasion.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And this was...

LEO WANTA: And he was free to travel and he went back to Zug.

Keep in mind, one of the persons who had talked to him and tipped him off to what we were doing was a Miss Lorrayne Fine. We have photographs that they met at the Hotel Aulac in Lausanne. She was a Mossad agent. We feel that she's the one that told Marc we were going to take him down.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So then basically Clinton orders his release?

LEO WANTA: Yeah. You have to understand, he doesn't really have [the] pardon that he thinks he's got. He's got pardon for a crime once he's arrested. Since we didn't arrest him, we don't consider the pardon a real pardon. The pardon only releases him after somebody makes the arrest and we [still] have the arrest warrant.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay, Leo I think it would be good to maybe take us back to when you were taken away and put in that Swiss dungeon and explain to our listeners exactly why you ended up going through all these legal battles. They basically wanted to copy this. They wanted the money now into private hands, instead of Treasury hands, but [besides] this was there anything more? Is that basically it or is there more behind why you were jailed?

LEO WANTA: Well, there's a lot more behind it. Keep in mind they came to the hotel in Lausanne, Hotel Aulac, because we were now going to meet Vince Foster. Vince Foster had arrived in Geneva to meet with us.

They take my diplomatic passports. I have two of them. One for each country. I don't have an American passport because Warren Christopher, the Secretary of State, said I couldn't have passports for both countries. So I surrendered my U.S. passport, he almost flipped.

And, Mossad was with Lorrayne Fine. And they were very much involved with Hillary Clinton, on a number of financial programs with Marc Rich. He works for the Israelis. They had a number of things on their agenda which [were] contrary to what we wanted to do within the United States, and [in] the Middle East per se. So they had to get me out. They had to get the money. I had already gave Foster $250 million from Credit Suisse and Vince Foster was going to testify against Bill Clinton on a number of things. He agreed to [do this] with the U.S. attorneys.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And then he turned up dead of course.

LEO WANTA: Absolutely. But, he did come and try to save me and get me out of the dungeons. The superintendent came and said he died. Why would the superintendent want to tell me that he died? Except, somebody was sending me a veiled threat.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Right. When's the last time you saw him before he was killed?

LEO WANTA: July 7th.


LEO WANTA: Of 1993 because we gave him $250 million from Credit Suisse. He needed $250 million for the Children's Defense Fund. He made lodging arrangements for us at the Hotel De la Paix in Geneva. He got his $250 million from Credit Suisse. He got murdered, and I went to the Swiss dungeon for 134 days. We still don't know who got the $250 million, but I know it was debited to our corporate account.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So you have verification that Vince Foster was with you in Switzerland two weeks before he was murdered, he was there with you correct?

LEO WANTA: Correct. And we were staying at the Hotel De la Paix. In fact we were all on his American Express card, because he wanted to keep it quiet and didn't want anyone to know we were having a group meeting.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And so you give back the $250 million to the Children's fund, both of you, well at least you not knowing, that later that the Children's fund turns out to be under an Executive Order, a slush fund really. And, so Foster gets killed. But, if they were going to run a fair investigation [of Foster's death] don't you think they would want to talk to you?

LEO WANTA: Oh yeah, but [Kenneth] Starr knew about it. So Starr doing what he did, is really not a cover-up, it's obstruction of justice.

Starr wanted to represent me [on the tax evasion charges] in the State of Wisconsin and the Department of Justice Attorney General Doyle at that time gave him a job as a contract lawyer [in the] Department of Education. So he dropped me like a cheapskate and he went with the Department of Education. We all knew Starr was given a plum job on the behalf of the State of Wisconsin to avoid me. That's another case of obstruction of justice. He knew my case inside and out and he bailed on me to go to the Department of Education.

GREG SZYMANSKI: ...they cover up their own investigations...

LEO WANTA: Yeah but you have to keep in mind Marc Rich was in the Hotel Au Lac in Lausanne, and he was going to take the ferry. His attorney at the time, of all people, was I. Lewis Libby, also known a 'Scooter'. That's one of Marc Rich's main attorneys, Scooter Libby. So how do you think they get the inside track?

GREG SZYMANSKI: That's interesting, I didn't know that.

LEO WANTA: Ken Starr knows it because we talked about it.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Interesting. And of course these things have never been investigated properly.

LEO WANTA: Why, I've been talking about it for years.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And like I said they've never been investigated. And there you sit...

LEO WANTA: I told everybody in Congress, everybody in the Senate, I told everybody and anybody.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And let's get back to Hillary. Here I'm reading something that was sent to me, that Hillary had been in control of an organization called the Children's Defense Fund and that was listed under Executive Order 12333 in 1981 under President Reagan. Okay?

LEO WANTA: I don't think so.

GREG SZYMANSKI: That's what it said here, but that's not it?

LEO WANTA: Because the Executive Order allowed us to have CIA proprietary corporations. Now, that's not saying the Children's Defense Fund wasn't a CIA proprietary corporation. I wasn't a member of the Children's Defense Fund.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. Anyway, we have the Executive Order now. Hillary Clinton then... Basically, this corporation has been used for intelligence purposes. Money being used for intelligence purposes, not for a children's defense fund. And she basically is in control of this, and also treating it maybe, as her own private little slush fund.

LEO WANTA: She is the chairman.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So is there anything in there that you had found out about how she was using the money.

LEO WANTA: No. All we were told by Andrea Tyson, who was the chairperson of the Presidents Economic Counsel, that she [had] approved the request from Vince Foster for us to set aside $250 million for the Children's Defense Fund. Since they're in the Whitehouse, and I'm not in the Whitehouse, I'm not going to argue about it.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So then she, this money then is... What ever happened to that $250 million?

LEO WANTA: I'm in a dungeon, I haven't the slightest idea.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Right. And let's trace that then, tell me what was your... You were put in there for 134 days, correct?

LEO WANTA: Uh-huh.

GREG SZYMANSKI: What kind of treatment did you get when you were there?

LEO WANTA: I was... Well, first of all they didn't know I was there for 2 or 3 days. They were probably hoping I would have a heart attack but I didn't. It was terrible. I was in a pre-Nazi dungeon of probably 1930 vintage.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And you stayed there 134 days until Rabin got you out, correct?

LEO WANTA: Correct. They came and rushed me to the airport. And at the airport they gave me the letter from Yitzhak Rabin that he was coming to my rescue, so they flew me right to New York immediately on Air Swiss.

GREG SZYMANSKI: It seems like everybody surrounding you who tried to help you ended up dead.

LEO WANTA: I agree.

GREG SZYMANSKI: I just wanted to go step by step here, after you get out jail, out of the Swiss dungeon, what happened?

LEO WANTA: They took me in shackles and chains and they put me on Swiss Air. Flew me to New York. I end up at JFK.

I have my Somalian passport, no American passport. They look at my Somalian, my diplomatic passport, and the FBI says, "What the hell we picking you up for?"

"Hey, I'm here, take off the chains and shackles if you don't mind."

They took me right away to the Brooklyn House of Detention where I sat for a bit. And, no, no, it was the Federal, the Metropolitan uh, jail for the feds [Metropolitan Detention Center, Brooklyn]. So I spent a couple of days there; then they took me to the judge.

The judge looked at me, looked at my papers, and asked me a number of questions. [She wanted to know] how come I'm an Ambassador. I started to tell her, then she asked me why I'm carrying these $1 billion treasury notes. I started to tell her who I was and everything else. And the Assistant U.S. Attorney jumps up yelling and hollering, "We move for immediate dismissal, and stop the conversation, boomp-boomp-boomp."

And she says, "Well I didn't want to hear it anyhow, Mr. Ambassador you're free to go."

I leave, I figured that a guy had finally [come] and saved me from these characters.

I walked down the steps [of] the Federal Court House and two New York detectives come up to me and said they have a phone call from the State of Wisconsin. They're holding me for tax evasion.

I said, "You're out of your mind."

So they took me over, kept me there at the Brooklyn House of Detention for 30, 40 days.

Wisconsin finally decided to come and get me, without any extradition or anything. No papers, no arrest warrants, or nothing. Put me in more shackles. Embarassed me walking through airports, which is illegal under the Air Act. You cannot carry guns, even if you are a deputy sheriff.

So they take me to Madison, and for 2 years they put me in the county jail on the floor.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And you spent 2 years in the county jail?

LEO WANTA: Excuse me?

GREG SZYMANSKI: How long did you spend in county jail?

LEO WANTA: A couple of years.


LEO WANTA: On and off. It was a county jail, that there wasn't even a crime commited in, it was terrible. And I don't like to sleep on cement floors.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So the money is now in the trillions of dollars. What happens now is, the Clinton and Bush people backstab you guys, and they begin to loot this money. Correct?

LEO WANTA: Well, they took charge of the money. My business partner he got killed by rat poison. Vince Foster met his demise in Washington, DC. Francois de Grosseurve the spymaster of France, he got murdered. [Leno Barris?] who was working with us to uncover the Red Merc 20/20 that was used by the Iraqis, against the Kurds, he got killed in Hong Kong. All of the people working special assignment and feeding [information to] President Reagan all decided to die. And they put me in a Swiss dungeon because I had all the banking codes.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And Yitzhak Rabin, he was also assasinated after...

LEO WANTA: He was getting $10 billion from President Reagan. We had the money for him for the Peace Accord.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And Rabin tries to come to your rescue and there's a letter basically verifying that.

LEO WANTA: He did come to my rescue. The moment he served the Swiss administration, they picked me out of there, and flew me to New York.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Why do you think they wanted you out of the way? Out of the picture here?

LEO WANTA: They wanted me out of the way because I controlled all of the money, all of the bank accounts. I was the holder of all of the accounts.

In the old days under Colby and Casey, they would give me the banking instructions. I would follow the banking instructions under certain passcodes to do whatever operations they required.

If you look, when I came to New York in shackles and chains from the Swiss adminitration, Judge Alyce Ross, Federal Judge Alyce Ross asked me how and why I had 18 one billion dollar Treasury notes in my briefcase. I had 18 one billion dollar notes, and now there's an argument between the Federal Court in New York and the Treasurer of the State of Wisconsin, [over] what happened to the 18 one billion dollar notes. It's in the transcripts. That's 18 billion dollars missing right now. Parked between the New York Federal Court, who denies that they have it. [They say] they gave it to the State of Wisconsin.

The State of Wisconsin, the Treasurer of the State of Wisconsin [unknown] says, "Yeah, I heard that story. I know it's here someplace but we don't know where."

Wouldn't you look in your bedroom for 18 one billion dollar notes if you wanted to buy a pack of cigarettes or something?

GREG SZYMANSKI: How much money was involved in your tax evasion charge?

LEO WANTA: According to the audit the feds did, if I was a resident I would have owed 15 cents. If I'm a resident, which I'm not. They never had a case. In fact the case was held in Dane County, I've never lived in Dane County in my life. There's statutes that say you have to be tried in the county where the crime [was commited]. The only thing I ever did in Madison, was going to a Bucks game.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Now what about getting a fair trial? Were you able to mount any kind of trial?

LEO WANTA: No, they would not allow me to have private counsel. They hired a Major retired from the US Army Adjutant General. And he did absolutely nothing except ask what he should do from the Attorney General.

GREG SZYMANSKI: It doesn't sound like the Constitution was being adhered to in the Leo Wanta case.

LEO WANTA: No and I wasn't even allowed one witness to show who I was, and where I lived, and where I resided.

GREG SZYMANSKI: No. And finally how did you ever secure your release into house arrest? How is this working?

LEO WANTA: We don't know yet. Suddenly, they decided I should not be where I was. They moved me down to Sayre, Oklahoma. We filed a number of papers with the federal courts down there, that I'd been kidnapped from Switzerland. I'm an Ambassador. They have no authority, no jurisdiction.

They kept me in a private prison under the Corrections Corporation of America, which is owned by the U.S. military. They sent me back to Wisconsin. Wisconsin didn't want to hold me any longer because they were getting all these questions and no answers. So they decided that I should not be in the prison system. I should just go on house arrest and fend for myself.

There's a lot of good people that cared in these jails and prisons. They did their check with their FBI buddies and deputy sheriffs, and said I got screwed and tattooed.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So why did they let you out of jail finally?

LEO WANTA: They couldn't get the rest of the money because I had the security codes and passwords. And also to quiet down all the exterior noise that we were making with the special investigators in Europe. They decided to quiet this thing down and try to get some kind of low cost settlement.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Yeah. Which you did and now you're sitting there with all this information. I noticed that you have made a list also, of reciepts identified in handwritten notes, on some of the transactions involving these giga-financing operations.

LEO WANTA: Yeah, I thought I was dying.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Amazing, Francis Driscoll Trust, uh, we go on and on and on. Incredible.

LEO WANTA: Those are Fed Reserve reciepts right there.

LEO WANTA: By Judge Lee's ruling, I think you have a copy of that? That says, I should recover all of this money. [When] I recover all this money 38.6% of that immediately goes to the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And then of course we have George Bush, President Clinton, and Jim Doyle, the former Attorney General of Wisconsin [who] helped to prosecute you, correct? On trumped up charges?

LEO WANTA: Correct. Knowing that I was innocent. I wasn't a resident of Wisconsin, they knew this.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Who can you trust? From your perspective, right now?

LEO WANTA: Well, the only one I can trust right now is Judge Lee who ruled in the favor of the people. He's got tremendous [sic] other judges. If all those judges get together in the judiciary, things will stop quickly because they can put a huge oar in the water, as well as a number of senators and congressmen that can no longer live with the manipulation... and take charge, the people win, win, win.

GREG SZYMANSKI: I want you to explain to us who is Judge Lee and what was his ruling.

LEO WANTA: Judge Lee at Alexandria, Virginia ruled that I am in charge of all of these government corporations and private corporations as chairman and full shareholder under the Reagan administration. [I] should legally and immediately recover all of these funds and pay it to the US Department of the Treasury. And also notify the Internal Revenue Service of the payment. This is what Judge Lee went way out of his way to [do to] help all of us.

GREG SZYMANSKI: I just wanted to verify from you that this amount of money is a real amount, correct?

LEO WANTA: The money is a real amount correct, but like you said it's the minimum amount because each day it accrues.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And so there could be at this point it's more that $27 trillion?

LEO WANTA: Oh, sure. The last time the IRS and the US Treasury did an audit, I think it was $26-$27 T and that's when they were giving me more pressure. And, I wasn't moving.

GREG SZYMANSKI: I wanted to set the record straight that this court ruling does protect this money for the American people and puts you as basically trustor, the caretaker of this money, correct?

LEO WANTA: Right, the judge ruled that I should go recover the money and pay taxes on all the recovery directly to the IRS. We're going to give copies to his clerk so he knows that he did his part.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Now, if people wanted to check this out how would they be able to find the court document?

LEO WANTA: It's 02-1363-A and it was filed April 15, 2003 by Federal Judge Gerald Bruce Lee in Alexandria, Virginia.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Now, many people say it's a rarity to see an honest judge anymore, he appears to be one...

LEO WANTA: A senior one at that, a senior federal judge. And he's got all these exhibits and sealed documents and he's shocked, absolutely shocked.

GREG SZYMANSKI: An interesting part of this story, is how much money that's been traced that's missing so far. Tell us [about] the trail to track this money down, how hard that's been.

LEO WANTA: It's really hard, because you have to keep in mind that the banks that have this money were probably told I was dead or missing. Or, they paid certain things into other private banking relationships and used it for collateral. So they're taking loans they know they don't have to pay back. Everything they borrow from us and they loan out is really all profit to the banks. Plus, the banks can use that for their asset control.

GREG SZYMANSKI: I've seen a list of some of those accounts. Some traced back to Bush and other people. That's a fact right?

LEO WANTA: Oh yes, yes. That was on the (fencin doc?) and that was a tremendous amount of money. An audit was done and that is all [in] records from the Fed Reserve that we got. Because we can use PROMIS software from Inslaw. We have four units.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So you can bring this money back to the Treasury right?

LEO WANTA: Correct. But we're going to go through Judge Lee's clerk of courts.

GREG SZYMANSKI: You've gone this route to protect yourself right?

LEO WANTA: Correct and we even filed suit in the US Supreme Court and they refused to take the case because it was too political. I didn't know the Supreme Court was under a political arm.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Tell us how you came to this agreement [to collect and turn over $4.5 trillion].

LEO WANTA: Well, we had to go to the courts in Virginia to prove that we had an agreement and [that] these funds were set aside for all of the protocol agreements.

The judge ruled that the United States had immunity, but he did not rule that I was the trustor of all the funds. He just ruled that all the powers: The CIA, and the Treasury Department, and the State Department, and everybody else had immunity. So they didn't have to testify one way or the other which was strange.

But the judge did go ahead and order that we go recover all the money. He wanted to know why the money wasn't in the US Treasury and why taxes hadn't been paid on it. And why, whoever thought they were in charge, refused to allow us to repatriate all this offshore money. So then we argued that; and started to contact a number of investigators. They went to all of the european banks of record, about 109 bank accounts. And the banks decided that, oh my god, if this program keeps going and all the audits are done, so many things are going to be exposed.

So they came and agreed to $4.5 trillion just to shut [us] up. And, no audits and life goes on. I don't talk to them and they don't talk to us. We'd get a gag order and we'd get $4.5 trillion. We immediately notified the Treasury and they agreed that right now the tax base is around 35% or $1.575 trillion [on the $4.5 trillion] and since we're incorporated in the state of Virginia, we would have to set aside $270 billion for the state. We still don't know what the city and county taxes would be.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay, so this agreement was signed, the money transferred on June 12, (2006) it is there. The Fed is blocking it for some unknown reason, we'll get to that later. Tell us about, who did you actually enter in to this agreement with?

LEO WANTA: Well we have gag orders, but a number of attorneys that represent the pool of all the banks. They protect their clients. They just put the money on the table and say go away.

GREG SZYMANSKI: You also met years ago with John Roberts, you think he may have helped you get this agreement together, correct?

LEO WANTA: Yeah, John Roberts. Roberts worked with all of us when we were at the Whitehouse with Reagan in '81 through '88. They all knew who I was. They could not deny who I was, because you know, I was one of the few guys that went into certain quarters underneath the Whitehouse to get from place to place. And remember that Casey at that time was in the old exec office building and at the FBI we would go behind the stage and get through the FBI without being, shall we say, filed or reported.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So you're basically dealing with US authorities, and...

LEO WANTA: And corporate attorneys and bank attorneys and so on and so forth.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Talk a little bit about why you think the Fed is holding this up?

LEO WANTA: Well I have a problem with the Fed Reserve involved with this at all because this was a private deal between the United States and us; and these bankers that consorted in the pool of $4.5 T.

Under the HR 3723, everything that we were doing was protected under federal statute. Under the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. Which protects all of our proprietary economic information. There was no reason for them to be involved. They're not invoved. We don't need their services. They're a clearing house; we have our own banks that will do all of these things.

We have got all the boilerplate protection that we need and we don't need other groups to come in and try to participate for a fee. Or not participate, by not allowing a deal to go through. They're not in charge. They have no money involved, so why should they be in charge?

GREG SZYMANSKI: And if they don't release the money? You still can, as the trustor go after the whole amount, correct?

LEO WANTA: Well, yeah. They're in default. The banks [would be] in default. The banks would be extremely upset. They settled a $27.5 trillion claim in the federal courts for $4.5 trillion and this reopens everything for resettlement. They certainly would pay more not less. They already have acknowledged that they had property of [mine] that didn't belong to them. They've been using it internally for whatever reasons, and I don't care, since we have agreed to quietly be quiet. And we get the $4.5 T and the Treasury gets paid and Virginia gets paid and life goes on at a very fast pace.


Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 11 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski


Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 12 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski


Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 13 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski


Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 14 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski



September 15, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Democracy or Republic?

Henry Morgan relays:

From: joodd1 [mailto:joodd1@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 3:01 AM
To: Lynda Kvasnikoff
Subject: Re: Fw: FW: Fw: Fwd: Democracy or Republic?

He's telling the TRUTH!

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: John Porter <johnporter1939@cox.net>
Sent: Saturday, September 6, 2014 12:36 PM
Subject: Fwd: Democracy or Republic?

John Porter;
September 6, 2014

To: Americans everywhere;

Thank you for your time and attention.

First, please let me be very clear, what I have written here for your consideration is not about the Republican Party, Democrat Party, Independent Party, Libertarian Party, Tea Party or any other Party. It is about an idea conceived over two centuries ago, a country, a people, a document, our current president and his intentions for America.

Two hundred and twenty seven years ago (1787) a group of men whom we now refer to as the "founding fathers," following a long and bloody battle for their independence from a dictatorial Monarchy, assembled themselves together in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and did their best to establish a country governed in a God-fearing way by representatives who were selected by the people who were to be governed.

Nowhere in the history of all mankind were there any examples or even political theory in existence that offered them any hope that a republican form of government, based on the new concept of consent of the governed, could succeed on a wilderness continent which was much larger than any European state.

These men met there on the world stage to carry out the first of three acts in this epic political drama, the drafting of the United States Constitution. The final document was the culmination of a fierce political struggle that had been waged for four sweltering summer months in secret behind guarded closed doors. The document sought to reconcile individual personal liberty with the perceived need for a central government with powers to forge a political and economic common market among thirteen separate and sovereign states.

The next two acts to be performed on this world stage were the ratification of the document and the translation from words on parchment paper to institutional form and structure. In 1789 the first congress approved and sent to the states for ratification, a bill of rights of individual liberty, and additional rights reserved to the states. Those ten amendments, ratified on December 15, 1791, became an extremely vital part of the Constitution and crucial to greatly limiting the power of the Federal Government over both that of the people and separate states. The Republic of the United States of America, an experiment in people governing themselves was now a reality for the first time in the history of man. Newcomers from other countries, willing to be governed by it's Constitution and Bill of Rights and themselves, came in droves to this new land of government by the governed.

I here bring to your attention that the United States of America was formed as a Republic and not a Democracy. All our lives you and I have been conditioned to believe we are a Democracy in America. How long has it been since you have heard of America referred to as a Republic? You see, there was purpose behind the words in the Pledge of Allegiance to our flag referring to our country as, "the Republic for which it stands." Ladies and gentlemen rest assured there is a very good reason the term "democracy" does not exist either in our Constitution or the Declaration of our Independence from the Monarchial King of England. A true Democracy is mob rule. Any government set up as a Democracy is the same government we would have if we were set up as a Socialist, Communist, or Marxist government. In these forms the government is a mob ruling over the people with absolutely no rights for individuals or minorities.

It has been written, "The Founders were extremely knowledgeable about the issue of democracy and feared democracy as much as a monarchy. They understood that the only entity that can take away the people's freedom is their own government, either by being too weak to protect them from external threats or by becoming too powerful and taking over every aspect of life." Democracy and/or Socialism is mob rule by government. The founders of America were all too familiar with democracies/socialism, and deliberately did everything in their power to prevent a Democracy. It has been written, "In a Republic, the sovereignty resides with the people themselves. In a Republic, one may act on his own or through his representatives when he chooses to solve a problem." The people have no obligation to the government; the government is a servant of the people, and obliged to them, for they are its owner. Not only have many politicians, Republican and Democrat, lost sight of this fact, but a great many of the American people.

A Constitutional Republic has a Constitution that limits the powers of the government. The goal of our founding fathers in forming a Constitutional Republic was to avoid the disastrous extremes of either tyranny (absolute ruler) or "mobocracy." (government mob).

I submit for your consideration, we are witnessing today president Barack Obama, who by way of his own actions and words, is demonstrating his aspirations of becoming an absolute ruler. When he makes public statements of, "Fundamentally changing America," he is promising us to change the workings of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, for they ARE the fundamentals of America. His promising to "redistribute the wealth because of income inequality" is purposely designed to divide the American people. When he publicly promises, and I quote, "If congress doesn't do the things I think necessary, I will not wait on them." "I will do it myself." And again only last week, "I've got a pen and I've got a phone--and I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and adminstrative actions that move the ball forward." This kind of talk is deliberately crafted to condition our minds and dumb us down to his way of Socialistic and absolute ruler thinking. It very well may be that he will never willingly relinquish the office of president.

Barack Obama is not an incompetent fool, ladies and gentlemen. He knows exactly what he is doing and why he is doing it. For five years he has been conditioning the minds of all who will listen and very carefully and cunningly crafting the country for his possible absolute rulership through ignoring the Constitution and the people's congress. Please familiarize yourself with this man's past. He is the most dangerous man in American history, to the Constitutional Republic and individual freedoms, which our founding fathers established and left for us. It will be up to us to defend and preserve it. Make no mistake, his view of America is very different than that of our founding fathers, and most Americans today.

Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution states: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of Government"...If we the American people don't stop this and start a reversal of the present trend, the free Republic of America will be lost for generations to come to a Socialist, tyrannical government mob. It begs the question, "Do we really care enough?" There needs to be a great awakening of all freedom loving Americans to the fact, that a people can become slaves to an absolute ruler, and the government, as well as a plantation owner. Do you really care enough? The voting booths will open again this November 4th for 37 Senate seats and all 435 House seats. America's destiny in in our hands!!

You have my permission to leave my information below intact as you please forward to all you can in any method you wish.

May God bless America at this critical time in our history.

Until next time:
Your friend in freedom;

John Porter
118 Approach Drive
Harrison, Arkansas 72601



There was once a time when Americans could control their government simply by shutting off the money.

Citizens could get Unkle Sam's hand out of their pocket by refusing to buy imported goods, thereby avoiding Federal Excise Taxes and reducing Federal Revenue.

States could bring great pressure on Federal Senators to curb Federal spending because Senators were elected from within the State Legislatures...by the State Legislatures....to represent the States in the US Congress.....and States had to cough up the money if the Federal Government spent more than it took in....in any given year. (The People were to be represented directly by Congressmen in the US House of Representatives, the States were to be represented directly by Senators in the US Senate. )

But with the advent of the 17th Amendment (1913) which effectively removed control of Senators from States,the advent of the Federal Reserve Act (1913) which effectively allowed a private bank to create unlimited amounts of fiat money, "lend" it to the US government and charge interest on it, and with the advent of the 16th Amendment (1913) which effectively (if not legally) allowed the Federal Government to bypass the States, and go directly into the pockets of individual Americans.....to collect the interest to be paid on the "money" it "borrowed" from the Federal Reserve.....

Americans lost their ability to control the Federal Government with the "Power of the Purse".

Not only can the Federal Government now (since 1913) spend without limit, not only can the citizen not refuse to pay without enduring dire consequences, but the insult of the Income Tax is compounded by the fact that the dollars remaining in the Citizen's pocket after taxes constantly lose purchasing power due to the continuous expansion of the money supply (called inflation) through the creation of more and more government debt (money) owed to the Federal Reserve. (The Federal Reserve creates the "money" it "loans" to the government out of thin air with the flick of a computer key.)

And so Americans are no longer in control of the Federal Government.....they are effectively slaves to it....milk cows on the Federal Plantation.

Americans will never again be in control of their government....or their own financial destinies....... until they take back the power of the purse,  by repealing the 16th, 17th Amendments and the Federal Reserve Act.

~~~ Henry "Jake" Morgan

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the Earth.
Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the
flick of a pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it
away from them, and all the fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to
disappear, for this world would be a happier and better world to live in. But if you
wish to remain slaves of the Bankers and pay for the cost of your own slavery, let
them continue to create deposits."
~~~ Sir Josiah Stamp,
President of the Bank of England
in the 1920s, the second richest
man in Britain.

I bet you didn't know that.... the so-called "Federal Income Tax" was not needed to, and didn't, fund the Federal Government during the first 155 years of our history ...from 1787 until 1942.

Consider....no truly free person would ever give up the details of his personal economic life to the government....any government .... voluntarily .... even once.....never mind on an annual basis.

To do so would be to give up one's 4th amendment privacy rights to be secure in one's person, property, papers and effects. (personal finances are none of the federal government's damned business)

The recent debacle in which the IRS was used as a political weapon highlights the folly of putting up with this bizarre, ridiculous, tyrannical, anti-constitutional, fraudulent, oppressive criminal custom.

If you would like to know the proper, liberty sustaining, prosperity generating, budget balancing system for funding the Federal Government, designed early on by Tom Jefferson and Alex Hamilton, you need a copy of the little book:
"Prosperity Restored by the State Rate Tax Plan" by Edward A. Ellison, Jr., J.D. and John William Kurowski and its essential little companion on money "The Miracle on Main Street" by F. Tupper Saussy.

Together they lay out the simple economic system that made America more prosperous in 100 years than all other civilizations in all of history combined. It is the core of what really made America exceptional and a piece of American history that not one American in 10,000 today...much to their financial detriment...knows anything about.

You can learn more about them here: WWW.CurrencyAlert.US

You can usually find both books available here: http://www.bookfinder.com/



Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA via meetup.com
Sep 9 (2 days ago)

to ronpaul-48



Sep 9 (2 days ago)

to ronpaul-48

What is Hilarious about it?


Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA via meetup.com
Sep 9 (2 days ago)

to ronpaul-48

Thank you for asking why I think that this is hilarious. It's because it's comical disinformation. It floats around regularly because the masses are so clueless that they don't know the source of the word "republic" which is from the Roman Republic which had annual elections for all public offices.

Mark A. Adams JD/MBA


Henry Morgan via meetup.com
Sep 9 (2 days ago)

to ronpaul-48

Picking nits ain'tcha Mark. The fact that our American Republic wasn't the first republic is irrelevant to the point of the piece......distinguishing between Republics and Democracies


Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA via meetup.com
Sep 9 (2 days ago)

to ronpaul-48

Not really. The meaning or words either matters or it doesn't.

The Roman Republic was a democracy. It had annual elections for both the legislature and the counsels, a.k.a. presidents. Power was distributed between 3 branches, and it had a basic set of rules, a.k.a. a constitution, which the people in power were supposed to follow. That is what a Republic is and what the Framers intended to establish in the U.S.

Plus, as Jefferson and Madison discussed, there are in essence only two forms of government, aristocracy or democracy. Either you have to beg the ruling elite for justice or you ask citizens to do justice.

By the way, the King's attempt to undermine the means to secure justice through citizens via the grand juries and trial juries are what the Founders' generation complained about the most in that quaint old Declaration of Independence.

The "we are a Republic not a Democracy" disinformation is nothing more than an effort to belittle rule by the people and distract the clueless masses from the roots of our problems which is that we now live under an aristocracy as all of the rights which were supposed to allow us to ask other citizens to help us secure justice have been stolen. Plus, the votes are unconstitutionally "counted" in secret, but who cares about that because democracy is bad, right?

Mark A. Adams JD/MBA


Henry Morgan via meetup.com
Sep 9 (2 days ago)

to ronpaul-48

In a pure democracy, a 51% majority can dispose, at its whim, of the life, liberty and/or property of the other 49%.

"Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths." --- James Madison Federalist #10

In contrast, in the Constitutionally Limited Republic crafted by the Framers in 1787, the democratic "majority" rule was restricted to 17 specific, and enumerated areas of a public nature.

I believe that it was this distinction that Franklin had in mind when, as he was leaving the Constitutional Convention a when a lady asked him.....

"What sort of government have you given us, Dr. Franklin" and he replied "A republic, madam, if you can keep it.”

so I entirely understand and agree with the desire of Mr. Porter to discourage making reference to the Constitutionally Limited Republic crafted by the Framers as a "Democracy".


Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA via meetup.com
8:05 PM (1 hour ago)

to ronpaul-48

You are talking about Madison's comments about the problems with pure democracies both making and enforcing the law by majority vote while Porter doesn't understand that a socialist or communist government is rule by an aristocracy, not a democracy or a democratic republic.

In the Federalist Number 10, Madison was referring to the problem with allowing the majority to decide whether life, liberty or property could be taken by a simple majority vote as it was in ancient Athenian democracy; however, Madison was obviously aware that the British jury system prevented that problem and sought to make sure that the protections of the jury system were supposed to be guaranteed to us.

However, those rights which the Founders generation complained about being taken in the Declaration of Independence and went to war over have been stolen once again, and instead of focusing on restoring the rights which once upon a time kept the people in power from unjustly taking life, liberty and property at their whim, far too many simply regurgitate comical nonsense. Of course, those who want to rule like the kings of old understand that by keeping the masses in the dark and feeding them BS, they can get away with nearly anything. See a short film by Orson Welles explaining what Plato said about this:


By the way, in the Federalist Number 10, Madison is comparing and contrasting a pure democracy with a republic. He said, "The two great points of difference between a democracy and a republic are: first, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest; secondly, the greater number of citizens, and greater sphere of country, over which the latter may be extended." He also said, "“If a faction consists of less than a majority, relief is supplied by the republican principle, which enables the majority to defeat its sinister views by regular vote.” So, clearly as I pointed out in my email below, the Framers were basing their use of the term Republic on the Roman Republic which had annual elections for the legislative and executive branches.

Madison goes on to say, "“When a majority is included in a faction, the form of popular government, on the other hand, enables it to sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest both the public good and the rights of other citizens. To secure the public good and private rights against the danger of such a faction, and at the same time to preserve the spirit and the form of popular government, is then the great object to which our inquiries are directed.” Once again, Madison understood that the jury system injects democracy into the law enforcement function of government and that unanimous agreement of the jurors is necessary to take life, liberty or property based upon any criminal charge and a super-majority vote of the jury to take property in a civil action.

Anyway, read The Federalist Number 10 at http://constitution.org/fed/federa10.htm

Then, note that the fascist scumbags who took over our country 70 years ago have stolen the right to a jury trial in all civil actions and in criminal actions unless you are charged with a felony. If you don't believe me, see for yourself:

You Don't Have Any Right to a Jury Trial!!!

by Mark A. Adams JD/MBA

We no longer have any right to a jury trial. Those rights have been stolen by power mad, greedy, fascist scum.

Most of you are saying, "No way! My teachers told me that we did, and I read the Constitution once, and it said that we had a right to a jury trial, too! Plus, I didn't see anyone on TV, any expert or any reform organization say anything about not having a right to a jury trial anymore. You must be wrong!"

Others are saying, "Big deal. Judges are wise honest old people who almost always do the right thing like in all of those court shows on TV! I wouldn't want to have to waste my time on jury duty. Judges should make all of the decisions. It is so much more efficient."

Although most are clueless, those in power are well aware that Thomas Jefferson said, "If a Nation expects to be ignorant and free., it expects what never was and never will be.... If we are to guard against ignorance and remain free, it is the responsibility of every American to be informed."

So naturally, the rulers want to make sure that the public remains ignorant of the fundamental rights to control the government which were supposed to be secured by the Constitution. Their efforts to maintain widespread ignorance of these rights has been very effective. As a result, ironically, many people complain about government abuses, but then call for the passage of laws which clearly violate the Constitution, undermine our fundamental rights, and ignore the need to seek an amendment if anyone wants to change the Constitution while remaining a government based on the rule of law.

Unfortunately, the rulers are so afraid that the people might figure out that they have stolen the fundamental rights which we were supposed to have to control them that they have an army of enforcers and propagandists ready to attack people who undertake any meaningful action to defend those rights or raise awareness about them. Has anyone else noticed that? If not, do you really enjoy having all that sand in your eyes?

The Rights to Trial by Juries Have Been Stolen to Enslave and Impoverish You!

Now, court decisions are determined by a judge based upon who has the most influence over him. Naturally, in proceedings in which the state is not a party, this is the better connected attorney who "loses" more money to the judge on the golf course, and when the state is a party, it is the state unless you have a well connected attorney who "loses" a lot of money to the judge or has a picture of the judge with a _______ in his _______ (Fill in the blanks yourself). I'm sure that some people, such as fools and shills, will think that my claim that judges are for sale is unbelievable. However, I've been involved in many cases in which the judge ignored the law and the facts to rule in favor of a party in spite of the fact that the decision was against both the law and the facts. In fact, I was involved in one case in which the opposing party repeatedly boasted that his attorneys were connected, had the judge in their pocket and would bury my client, and they did in spite of the law and the facts and the efforts to get the authorities who are supposed to make sure that judges don't break the law to take action.

Furthermore, Alexander Hamilton, a Founder, Framer and attorney, said that trial by jury is the best way to protect our rights and secure justice because there is much more time and opportunity to improperly influence judges than there is to improperly influence a jury summoned to hear a case.

Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry and a lot of the other attorneys who were involved in founding our country thought that they had ended the tyranny of the judiciary by requiring jury trials in all proceedings; however, in 1840, the U.S. Supreme Court claimed that those Framers didn't know what they were talking about and decided that no jury trials were necessary in "equitable" proceedings, like probate, family law and mortgage foreclosure. We all know that the judges never ignore the law in those proceedings, right?

Our right to jury trials has also been eliminated in all other civil proceedings by the grant of the power of summary judgment to the judiciary without anyone bothering to amend the Constitution. The Constitution says that it is the supreme law of the land, but the judges say that their rules rule, summary judgment granted or denied depending on who has the judge's favor.

The fascist scum even had the audacity to claim that you do not have a right to a jury trial when charged with a crime unless it is a felony even though both Article III, § 2 and the Sixth Amendment clearly provide that the trial of all crimes shall be by jury. See Lewis v U.S. 518 U.S. 322(1996). By the way, this decision is supported by the so-called conservative or strict constructionist judges who found the word "serious" written in invisible ink in both clauses in the Constitution.

Please note that I'm not saying that trampling the Constitution is right. I'm saying that the powers that be are doing it, and if more people don't get a clue and demand that our rights to control the government are restored, then things will continue to go downhill. If you want to know what those rights are, read Why does the government ignore our wishes? and don't miss my speech.

Mark A. Adams JD/MBA

Ref: http://americanjurypower.org/home/no_right.php

P.S. I talked about this problem just a couple of months ago:



Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA via meetup.com
3:45 PM (5 hours ago)

to ronpaul-48
What? No one wants to try to explain that a republic is magically special and democracy is especially bad except for all of the other forms of government which are actually aristocracies?

That's right. Once again, there are only two forms of government, rule by the rulers or rule by the people. Ours was designed to be the latter, but was converted to the former although almost no one can believe it. After all, they still have jury trials on TV shows, don't they?

Mark A. Adams JD/MBA

P.S. Note that I have copied the person who wrote the Republic not a Democracy email that set me off, and I have yet to hear back from him.



Federal Judicial/Governmental Insanity Has Corrupted And Destroyed Our Republic / A Call For A Grand Jury Investigation Of Richard C. “Dick” Tallman (Ninth Circuit)


Godel's Proof on how the US Constitution has a flaw that could allow a dictatorship


Private Attorney General in USA Comments on: “Democratic Dictatorship”: The Transition towards Authoritarian Rule in America, by Dr. Robert P. Abele



September 11, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Gov. Sundquist (TN), Sen. Songstad (SD) involved in extortion, conspiracy to murder (involving 5-10 billion dollars) in reference to Leo Wanta the 27.5 trillion dollar man (audio recording w/ Sundquist now in possession of Wanta & Federal authorities)

Updated: 9/20/14 [Note: Please share. Investigate. Report. Get this into the public arena.]

To: President Barack H Obama <info@mail.whitehouse.gov>; POTUS_U.S. President Barack H. Obama <scheduling@who.eop.gov>; U.S. President Barack H. Obama <potus44@whitehouse.gov>; OMB_President Barack Obama <bom.omb@whitehouse.gov>; Chief Justice_John G Roberts <jroberts@supremecourt.gov>; US Supreme Court_Chief Justice John G Roberts <johnroberts@supremecourt.gov>; U.S. SECY TREASURY_JACK LEW <jlew@who.eop.gov>; United States of America <USUNPublicAffairs@state.gov>; Officer in Charge <criminal.division@usdoj.gov>; FBI_Director James Comey <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>

Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 11:31 AM
Subject: Ex - US Officials Demanded a 30 Billion Dollar Bribe

Whereas, The President of the United States of America, having signed H.R. 3723 on October 11, 1996, has protected this transaction by allowing Corporations the right to declare their Contracts, Clients, Internal Procedures and Information, and the transactions they engage in as a Corporate or Trade Secret fully protected under the Economic and Industrial Espionage Laws of the United States of America and the International Economic Community.


DUTY, HONOR and COUNTRY - w / Calm and American Courage Forever and a Day



On a forum that I thought would be good for discussion and research, but now which I will call "Nazi-ist" forum (http://www.discussionist.com/101457795), they prevented me from even responding to their e-mails on their site because they locked me out from being able to do anything after my first two posts to their news discussion forum re: this unprecedented and monumental news story. Way to stifle real discussion and real research! Too disjointed, long or doesn't make sense? Got ADHD or water on the brain much?


Huge extortion conspiracy case: Will you be the one that provides the contact that gets the most attention to it - tinyurl.com/q3yfztu?

Ref: https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20140913070147AAEusyf

image from www.adapt.org

Gov. Don Sundquist - [Former Tennessee Governor Don Sundquist (R-1/1995 – 1/2003)]

image from www.memphisflyer.com

Gov. Sundquist with GHW Bush (aka Papi Bush)


Sheldon R. Songstad [Former South Dakota State Senator (District 11) (1975-1988) (Doc. ref. R-1995R-1986)

Hello. You just can't make this shit up. How stupid and corrupt are these rat bastards? Plus the media is afraid to report on this or is told not to report on this to boot. I'm sure this corruption goes to the very highest levels of various branches of our federal government. Recording mp3 link is below that has the approximately 6 minute 18 seconds audio recording of Sundquist and Songstad conspiring to extort and conspiring to have Leo Wanta murdered if he doesn't give them what they want, which was picked up by Leo's answering service recorder (unbeknowst to them) - right-click 'save-as' to save the mp3: or press play or play the YouTube clip. If you can't believe this then after listening to the clip scroll down to the 'Civility for Effective Governance' video below which was a talk sponsored by the Howard Baker Center for Public Policy just a month ago and prove it for yourself that it is Sundquist speaking in the clip (he is the one who takes his seat on the left). Trillian dollar question: Who is "all of us" that Gov. Sundquist refers to in the below 6 minute clip? (Sidenote: It seems that they also don't like people who post what they perceive as negative commentary in comment sections about their oppressive political system and corrupt officials but they take heart that, according to them, we are not a representation of most of the populace - See Civility for Effective Governance video. I guess we are supposed to just sit back, enjoy our slavery and allow ourselves to be run over roughshod by their corruption):


Above is the clip I extracted of their conversation from the below audio in which it was exposed. Here is the YouTube clip I created of it:

See the below audio for even more information on these guys who assert in Lee Wanta's own words:

"They claim they are puppet masters, they decide who runs for election, how many funds go to the people that are going to be elected by their price. They decide... they're puppet masters. That's how they run Congress and the lobbyists and everybody. They do what they're told and they pay well to compromise the people of the United States."

In answer to Sundquist and Songstad's phone conversation and their conspiring to have Leo killed Leo responded in regards to his having a federal security detail and whether authorities have been alerted:

“I have one. But right now I can’t tell you the location and what they’re doing. They’re readily available. But this has popped up this morning that they left me a voicemail and didn’t realize they were live. I reported it to the FBI, reported it to the Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice Criminal Division but that all depends on Obama’s going to authorize them to save an American life.”

There is more info. in the MP3 which Webb points to in his e-mail he sent out that contains Wanta's communication to various public officials in regards to this matter. At the very bottom of this Teknosis blog post is AMBASSADOR LEE EMIL WANTA VIDEO INTERVIEW that I have included which is very informative. It is a clip from a documentary movie that will be released in near future called Eagle One to Wanta. Eagle One was the code name for President Ronald Reagan. Wanta worked directly for the Office of the President under Reagan. There are more links below as well.

I have done the best I could to transcribe the above approximately 6 minute 18 second span of conversation between Sundquist and Songstad (it is the best one out there as to attempted transcription - trust me, I've done this before and I use headphones and requisite software) although you do need to listen to the above actual clip, of course, for the real flavor of the conversation. Note: if you find anything I may have gotten wrong or can clarify anything let me know:

Sundquist: Need to go to Cookeville…

Songstad: Oh.

Sundquist: and that’s about a 4 hour drive… and then… 3 and a half… and then we’re… and then we’re going to drive to Knoxville. I got a doctors appointment too I think... tomorrow afternoon… in Knoxville and then we’ll be home..

Songstad: OK.

Sundquist: tomorrow evening. But I’ll be in the car all day long.. so..

Songstad: OK. I’ll uh.. I’ll work on this deal and then I’ll let.. I’ll.. I’ll keep in touch with ya.

Sundquist: Sounds good…

Songstad: OK.

Sundquist: What’s your thinking? What’s.. What’s your thinking? He obviously doesn’t want to talk to us.

Songstad: No.. I don’t.. I’m sure that Lon would have called me back…

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: (unintelligible word).. he had to have talked to Lee.. or he would have called me back and Lees..

Sundquist: Yes. Absolutely.

Songstad: and Lees inspired now not to call me back.

Sundquist:  Yeah. Well why would he act that way? Does he blame us for Marilyn or is he just.. we just spare.. spare fuel right now.. He dudn’t need us anymore?

Songstad: I don’t know.

Sundquist: And dudn’t want to pay us.

Songstad: I don’t know. Well..

Sundquist: It looks…

Songstad: after we get done with this deal then we’ll decide the next move. Cuz I want…

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: half of that money now.

Sundquist: And you think you got any chance of gettin it?

Songstad:  Well, we’re gonna find out.

Sundquist: Yeah. Well, ya know um it’s one thing not to pay us in the future, but it’s another thing not to pay us for the past.

Songstad: Well, (starts to say because but jumbled together) bec.. we earned it once… ya know

Sundquist: Yea.

Songstad: that’s my point.

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: We’re doing it the second time for free because we’re only gettin paid once.

Sundquist: Right.

Songstad: I mean I had that all done two years ago and he..

Sundquist: Well…

Songstad: (unintelligible.. sounds like “and he shows up”).. OK…

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: and keeps sending all those fuckin emails out.. are you on speaker?

Sundquist: No, no..

Songstad: OK. Try to quit sending all those emails.. (unintelligible but what follows is what I think he is saying or trying to say) if he hadn’t sent all those emails out we wouldn’t have 90% of our troubles.

Sundquist: And he’s still sending that crap out.

Songstad: I know.

Sundquist: He’s.. he’s insulting and scaring people.

Songstad: He doesn’t understand the word stealth, and in my world you better know what that word means.

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: You don’t want to know. You want people to forget you’re alive.

Sundquist: Well he.. he owns us (I think he means owes but it sounds like he says owns) all of us .. but we’ll settle for half of it.. just to get..

Songstad: Right.

Sundquist: out of this.. just to get away and forget about it. He won’t ever have to hear.. worry about us again.

Songstad: Right.

Sundquist: But he does owe us that money. So.. anyway.. and.. and.. and if he does.. if he says he doesn’t then.. then I.. I’m gonna ask him what does he think.. what do you think Lee that you owe us… anything for all that work? Anything?

Songstad: Well.

Sundquist: See what he says.

Songstad: I hear you, say anything you want…

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: I don’t care anymore.

Sundquist: Alright. Let’s figure out what.. what’s happening.

Songstad: Nice old Sheldon…

Sundquist: Before we k…

Songstad: ain’t nice old Sheldon anymore..

Sundquist: Well we’ll just have ta… Nice old Sheldon is gonna have to ask your friends to help.

Songstad: Yeah. That’s no problem.

Sundquist:  Yeah. And the.. the question is gonna be how fast can they act?

Songstad: Well I’d say pretty (begins to laugh while talking) fast… (laughing hahaha).

Sundquist: Yeah. Hunh. And they have ways to find out where he is and how to reach him?

Songstad: Well ah.. I’m sure that’s not a problem… I don’t know how they do all that but I don’t.. that part I don't..

Sundquist: Yeah. Well you don’t want to know.

Songstad: I don’t want to know some of that stuff so..

Sundquist: No, but does he have government protection?

Songstad: Who?

Sundquist: Lee.

Songstad: Oh. Ahh.

Sundquist: They know that too I guess huh?

Songstad: He claims to but.. you know.. ahh.. I would. If a.. I would hope he does.. but ya know…

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: If he does.. he's.. I just can’t imagine anybody as smart as he is going to be screwing around over 10 billion dollars… you know…

Sundquist:  or even 5…

Songstad: or 5 even… you know

Sundquist: Yeah. Hmm.

Songstad: If I had that kind of money I’d.. and dealing with us two.. I’d give him 10 so fast it’d make your head spin just to get rid of me.

Sundquist: Me too. (Pause) Me too.

(crosstalk.. Sundquist begins to say something but unintelligible)

Songstad: We’ll give him the choice that if you want rid of us give us 5 and we’ll call it even.

Sundquist: Yeah. That’s it…

Songstad: No less… no less…

Sundquist: That’s it…

Songstad: No negotiations.. one time offer.. take it or leave it…

Sundquist: There ya go…

Songstad: No.. not take it or leave it. (kind of laughs here but in a menacing way for emphasis)…

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: ..YOU BETTER TAKE IT I MEAN (starts to laugh kinda evilly) hahaha

Sundquist: There ya go. Yes. It’s pretty serious.

(both start to talk at the same time again.. crosstalk.. )

Songstad: but we got / Sundquist: It’s (unintelligible but an audio forensics specialist might be able to decipher it) serious…

Songstad: But we gotta do it this week… because.. ah… I can’t (unintelligible)

Sundquist: I understand.

Songstad:  I can’t..

Sundquist: Yeah. I understand…

Songstad: I can’t… I can’t go on any longer..

Sundquist: I know.. so we’ll just go to it…

Songstad: I mean this is a once in a lifetime thing I got together for us and (unintelligible)

Sundquist: I know. I know.

Songstad: and (unintelligible) I don’t want to lose that.

Sundquist: Ah.. I don’t want to lose it either.. so..

Songstad: And it’s getting better since I first talked to you…

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: It’s getting better by the month…

Sundquist: Hunh. Do you think he’ll offer us.. I.. I.. just don’t think he’ll offer us anything..

Songstad: Well. We’ll just have to wait and see now…

Sundquist: OK… sounds good.

Songstad: OK… I’ll…

Sundquist: OK.. sounds good.. I’ll.. I’ll be ready ahh.. I’ll be ready anytime tomorrow so.

Songstad: OK.

Sundquist: I’ll be in the car.. so call. Thanks.

Songstad: OK. Alright.

Sundquist: So long.

Note: Just because the recording has been put in possession of federal authorities doesn't mean this shouldn't continue to be exposed because they will just ignore doing anything about it unless We The People stand up and let them know we know about this and that there needs to be action to get the trillions back to pay off the national debt plus more. Share this out, report on it, appropriate the info, etc. by whatever means. This is public domain. Be creative - but seize the day! A transcript needs to be made of the pertinent/relevant sections of the audio in re: Sundquist and Songstad as well as Sundquist's words at The Civility for Effective Governance talk sponsored by the Howard Baker Center for Public Policy.

Sent By:
Sent By Emil, Ambassador On:Sep 09/04/14 6:01 PM
To: To Durham, V.
Reply to: Reply to Emil, Ambassador
Ambassador Lee Emil

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Stew Webb
Date: Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 6:10 PM

September 3 2014 Veterans Today Radio News Reports

(right-click "save as"):

http://www.stewwebb.com/2014-09-03-VeteransToday-Radio-StewWebb-2.mp3 [starts at approx. 26:30 minutes]


To: “HPSCI_Intelligence Committee”
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 12:18:08 PM


—– Forwarded Message —–

To: President Barack H Obama ; POTUS_U.S. President Barack H. Obama ; OVP_Vice President Joe Biden ; Attorney General Eric Holder ; U.S. SECY TREASURY_JACK LEW ; Chief Justice_John G Roberts ; HPSCI_Intelligence Committee ; U.S. Congress_INTEL Archive ; Governor Scott Walker ; U.S. President Barack H. Obama ; OMB_President Barack Obama
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 12:58 PM

Whereas, The President of the United States of America, having signed H.R. 3723 on October 11, 1996, has protected this transaction by allowing Corporations the right to declare their Contracts, Clients, Internal Procedures and Information, and the transactions they engage in as a Corporate or Trade Secret fully protected under the Economic and Industrial Espionage Laws of the United States of America and the International Economic Community.


DUTY, HONOR and COUNTRY – w / Calm and American Courage Forever and a Day

—– Forwarded Message —–
From: Lee Wanta
To: info@mail.whitehouse.gov
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 12:28 PM
Subject: Voicemail (Callback: 605-595-3834)

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Lee Wanta
Date: Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:23 AM
Subject: Voicemail (Callback: 605-595-3834)
To: Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov
Cc: info@mail.whitehouse.gov, potus44@whitehouse.gov, ombdirector@omb.eop.gov, scheduling@who.eop.gov, scheduling@ovp.eop.gov, ahoffman@ovp.gov, breed@ovp.eop.gov, jlew@who.oep.gov, Chief Justice John G Roberts , johnroberts@supremecourt.gov, Attorney General Eric Holder , usunpublicaffairs@state.gov, govgeneral@wisconsin.gov, office@messages.speaker.gov, inspector.general@usdoj.com, ops@cia.gov, erin_eagan@reid.senate.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, vjarrett@who.oep.gov

To: Assistant Attorney General, Leslie R Caldwell
United States Department of Justice / Criminal Division
950 Pennslyvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C., USA 20530.0001

email : Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov

Background : US CODE – CHAPTER 11 – PART 1 – TITLE 18 USC SECTION 201



———- Forwarded message ———-
From: 605-595-3834
Date: Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:34 PM
Subject: eVoice Voicemail (Callback: 605-595-3834)
To: ameritrustusa@gmail.com
eVoice – A Better Way to Connect
Voicemail Transcription
Message Details
DIALED 202-379-2904

RECEIVED Tue, Sep 2 2014 : 9:33 PM
FROM 605-595-3834

LENGTH 6 minutes and 16 seconds

cc: Veterans Today – Lee E Wanta
Bureau Chief / Editor
A – 1010, Vienna, Austria – Europa

Blessing of Saint Francis

May the Lord bless you and keep you.
May He show His face to you
and have mercy on you.

May He look upon you with kindness
and grant you His Peace.

May the Lord bless you.


Related (in re: recording above in which Sundquist speaks, see the below presentation in which he speaks to see that it is him speaking in the recording.)

Civility for Effective Governance: Governors Bill Haslam, Phil Bredesen, and Don Sundquist


Former governors Bredesen, Sundquist and Dunn join Campaign to Fix the Debt group

Oct 10, 2013, 12:34pm CDT

Phil Bredesen, Don Sundquist and Winfield Dunn, all former Tennessee governors, have joined a nonpartisan group created to shed light on and address the national debt.

The Governors Fiscal Leadership Council is a newly created piece of the Campaign to Fix the Debt that includes 41 former governors, including 20 Republicans and 21 Democrats.



Here you can hear Sheldon Songstad speak and it's the same person in the 6 minute 18 second clip above.



Story related links:


Ex-US Officials Demanded a 30 Billion Dollar Bribe

“Former Tenn. Gov. Don Sundquist and S. Dakota Sen. Sheldon Songstad may face not just the largest bribery charge in history but conspiracy to murder as well.”
by Gordon Duff, VT Sr. Editor, … with New Eastern Outlook, Moscow

Lee Wanta, tough as nails, and still kicking

Lee Wanta, tough as nails, and still kicking

[Editors Note: You just can't make this stuff up. Two crooked aging politicians, who appear to be uber bagmen for Capitol Hill, don't disconnect a voice mail message left for shakedown victim, and then the caller rings up his co-conspirator to discuss their next move, including killing their target if they don't get paid.

But there is just one problem. The whole six minute conversation goes onto Lee Wanta's voice mail, which the jury is going to enjoy immensely.

This murder conspiracy case might also break the media blackout on the Wanta case which has gone on since 2006, after the Treasury Dept. snatched his $4.5 million wire transfer from China into the Federal Reserve bank of Richmond, only to be transferred to Golden Sachs the next day and off to Europe it went as part of the $16 trillion of liquidity pumped into the banking system there during the meltdown.

I wish I could say this was an unusual case, but really only the amounts involved are. These two yoyos - there is army of ex office holders who would be doing exactly what these two thought was going to be their final wet dream. 

If we were really to round up all of them doing this kind of stuff, there would be so many special elections going on that they would run out of press people to cover them. And no, I am not exaggerating... Jim W. Dean ]


- First published … September 18, 2014 on NEO -


Political corruption in America is an epidemic. They think it is their right.A day after former Republican Virginia governor, Bob McDonnell and his wife were convicted of 20 counts of bribery and influence peddling, former Republican Tennessee governor Don Sundquist and South Dakota Senator Sheldon Songstad may face not just the largest bribery charge in world history but indictment for conspiracy to murder as well.

What is amazing about this case is the amount of money involved, totaling $9.5 trillion US dollars, in fact the entire GNP of the United States for several years.

Sundquist and Songstad, wanted $30 billion out of the proceeds to pay themselves along with Congress, the US Treasury Department, five Supreme Court justices and two former US presidents.

Best of all, the whole thing is on tape, a “shakedown” attempt against Ambassador Lee Wanta, former White House intelligence chief under President Ronald Reagan and editor at Veterans Today.

Sundquist and Songstad left, on a recording at Wanta’s embassy, full details, not only of their ability to virtually buy the entire US government and deliver a multi-trillion dollar settlement authorized to Wanta by the US Supreme Court, but were recorded making arrangements for the murder of Wanta as well.

As American humorist, Jim W. Dean so often says, “You just can’t make things like this up.” The recording was forwarded to the US Department of Justice yesterday and a copy presented to President Obama.



What drives successful old timers like Sundquist to want to make a multi-billion dollar score at the public's expense? During the 1980s, Lee Wanta was brought into the White House as the first National Intelligence Coordinator.

He was tasked by President Reagan and CIA Director William Colby to destabilize the Soviet Union through establishment, with funds from the US Treasury, of a worldwide currency trading scheme.

Wanta, with the help of Reagan, amassed a fortune of $27 trillion, funds earmarked by Reagan to pay America’s national debt, restore the nation’s infrastructure and fund a world free of debt based currencies.

However, after Reagan left office and George H.W. Bush assumed the Presidency, Wanta was kidnapped and imprisoned in Switzerland, transferred to an American prison where he was held without due process for years and the money disappeared, taken by the Bush family.

The rest is history, stolen elections, 9/11, war upon war, and a world that has descended into crashing debt with nearly every currency floating on “air,” derivatives and a sea of Rothschild debt.

Wanta’s story is soon to be featured in a Hollywood film currently under production.


The Fixers

Sheldon Nobody has heard of Sheldon Songstad, who with former congressman and governor, Don Sundquist, admit demanding a $30 billion dollar bribe from Wanta in order to compel the Supreme Court to issue a pay order on Wanta’s personal funds, based on the case he won - $4.5 trillion plus interest - totaling $9.5 trillion.

This would make Lee Wanta personally the wealthiest nation on earth. While this case has dragged on through the courts, thoroughly and carefully documented, Wanta friends and advisors, many former intelligence officers, including the author, have worked to keep him secure.

The recording of Songstad and Sundquist, 6.18 minutes, was aired on radio yesterday with commentary by Lee Wanta, on the Veterans Today Radio Network to over two million listeners.

The audience heard Sundquist describe how they would settle for as little as $5 billion, as a “retirement nest egg” and how, if Wanta fails to pay, they would arrange for his murder.

Current US Senator Bob Corker, Republican from Tennessee had been on a conference call earlier, that included Sheldon Songstad, telling Wanta that his funds would be paid.

In fact, a majority of members of Congress including almost all Republicans and many Democrats were to receive shares of the Wanta “payoff.” What had angered so many of them and had precipitated the death threat is Wanta’s statement to all of them that he would file Federal Income Tax Form 1099's to accompany all payments.

This would identify, as required by law, where money went and what services were paid for.

Were Wanta murdered to stop that process, it would require control of not only the Department of Internal Revenue but Treasury as well, to suppress the existence of these documents that would eventually lead to the imprisonment of almost the entire US government.


Beyond Idiocy

As the radio audience listened on, the two Republican Party political “fixers” made several things very clear. The US government was entirely “up for sale” and that they had the connections to arrange for the purchase.

What was amazing is that these two, after phoning Wanta and getting the recording notice on the line, assumed their conference call was private, paying no attention to the fact that the recording continued on while they confessed to what legal experts have identified as dozens of crimes and laid out a trail of bribery and corruption that crosses nearly every level of government, every court and over a hundred of America's highest elected officials.


Shadow Government

This conspiracy involves, at its heart, politicians who have long advocated cuts in public health and education, in veterans benefits, lowering of wages, infringement of individual rights while supporting America’s wars.

These are also politicians at the heart of the Israel lobby in Washington. According to the Jewish Virtual Library, Governor Sundquist is a close friend of Israel:

“- 1996: Gov. Don Sundquist signed the Tennessee-Israel Cooperation Agreement to promote cooperation between the two countries in trade, arts, culture, education, tourism and university/industry alliances.”

What is made clear is that the United States is far more a criminal organization than a nation. Those who don’t understand how America can say one thing and, with amazing consistency, do something else, often something totally bereft of moral responsibility, I think we may well have made the reasons abundantly clear.


Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War that has worked on veterans and POW issues for decades and consulted with governments challenged by security issues. He’s a senior editor and chairman of the board of Veterans Today, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.

Editing: Jim W. Dean

http://kauilapele.wordpress.com/2014/09/18/gordon-duff-vt-9-18-14-ex-us-officials-demanded-a-30-billion-dollar-bribe/feed/ 0 kauilapele veterans_today_gordon_duff_banner_20 Lee Wanta, tough as nails, and still kicking Political corruption in America is an epidemic. They think it is their right. What drives successful old timers like Sundquist to want to make a multi-billion dollar score at the public's expense? Sheldon

Ref: http://kauilapele.wordpress.com/2014/09/18/gordon-duff-vt-9-18-14-ex-us-officials-demanded-a-30-billion-dollar-bribe/


V.K. Durham: 

My husband was involved in these presidential directives also! HOWEVER!  There are criminal rogue operatives impressed with their "power" they will do anything, kill anyone 'for money.'
This group of rogue operatives at the highest levels of state and federal government which Ambassador Wanta writes and speaks murdered my husband thinking he owned something he did not own!  You have no knowledge of the magnitude and scope of what goes on in the shadows of 'government'.. read the following! 

P U B L I C N O T I C E (Caution: Some image links contained in this page lead to images that are of a very graphic nature.


and ...



Dec 19, 2006 - Cash payoffs, bonds and murder linked to White House 911 finance .... an as yet unidentified operation; however,

a far more important piece. 




Read the following
Above ref: email communication of VKD to Teknosis
Additional ref: http://nesaranews.blogspot.sg/2014/09/the-real-world-of-shadow-government.html


(Informative Reddit thread - please upvote)



This man wishes to pay off the national debt that the united states has acquired, but the Federal reserve will not let him! The 27 trillion dollar man!

(please upvote)  http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/2fvctg/this_man_wishes_to_pay_off_the_national_debt_that/

Mentioned under Newsworthy Items on: http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/ http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2014_09_01_archive.html?m=1 | http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2014/09/newsworthy-items.html


My message to various Yahoo Groups:

These people are holding We The People and our country back. Expose this corruption.
Gov. Sundquist, Sen. Sheldon Songstad (TN) involved in extortion, conspiracy to murder (involving 5-10 billion dollars) in reference to Leo Wanta the 27.5 trillion dollar man (audio recording w/ Sundquist now in possession of Wanta & Federal authorities)
Their plotting captured on Lee Wantas answering service recorder (unbeknownst to them):

Comments in re: NY elections:

How often do you hear of reports on money and political corruption in US Congress? NY at least speaks about it, but then again I guess the winner is being investigated for shutting down an anti-corruption committee? Federal prosecutors going to investigate corruption in the US Congress now? Got corruption? http://goo.gl/0UjIJO #Extortion #Conspiracy #Murder #RICO #FBI #DOJ #WHITEHOUSE RT

Someone added me to a group on Facebook called "What could go wrong?" This is my first post: You are a couple of corrupt, mafioso, ex-politicians, one an ex-governor and the other an ex-state senator, who work with a group other corrupt politicians in Congress, helping to corrupt and select other politicians to run for office while at the same time raping the American people. You are trying to shake down someone for billions of dollars and if they don't want to cooperate you are going to contract some hitmen to kill that person. You accidentally leave yourselves conversing, planning to do this on the other persons answering service. OMG, what could go wrong? There is this huge elephant standing in the middle of the room and nobody reports on it? http://goo.gl/0UjIJO


Story related comment communicated to others:

Folks, you need to take the time and listen to Leo Wanta and Stew Webb.
Leo caught, on tape, the former Governor Sundquist of Tennessee and Senator Songstad plotting Leo Wanta's assassination.
There are a lot of government officials, who are at this moment in DEEP TROUBLE.
The house of cards is about to crumble.  Every man for himself!
The Attorney General has done NOTHING.
The FBI has done NOTHING.
The Secret Service has done NOTHING.

Sir David-Andrew.
Share this with others!
GC writes:

VeteransToday has what certainly appears to be a death threat against former Ambassador, Lee Wanta and it’s all been caught on tape! Lee Wanta identified the men on the tape who are conspiring to murder him as former Senator Sheldon R. Songstad (SD) and former Governor of Tennessee, Don Sundquist. I have verified that these are the men by listening to videos of both of them on Youtube. Here’s the strange part that I would like all of you to verify and contact me through my Facebook. I can’t find anything on Google for Sheldon R Songstad. Try it yourself! I know he was a Republican Senator from South Dakota and I have found when he was elected but it’s like he’s been scrubbed entirely from Google! I can’t find one picture of him! I finally was given one by somebody with access to things that will never be on Google! :) As you can see by the picture at the top of the page, nothing comes up for a search on Sheldon Songstad on Google News except for when he was going around giving disinformation to alternative media but in all those interviews he did – not a single photo of him was shown! By the way, Rick Wiles of TruNews pushed the disinformation being given out by Sheldon Songstad but so far will NOT post this article or information about the death threat from the man he promoted to alternative media! Be sure to contact Rick Wiles to find out WHEN he’s going to post the death threat by Senator Songstad that he promoted! You can find some stuff by Rick Wiles on Youtube when Songstad was going around spreading disinformation to select alternative media radio show hosts. Are these radio shows disinformation? We will see by who puts out the new information on Songstad.
In the taped conversation above, Ambassador Wanta says that Sheldon R. Songstad told him that he was the “puppet master”! He said that he controlled who got elected and who got the money! I’ve never in my life not being able to find a picture of a public servant on Google images so it’s obvious that Songstad has lots of power. He’s not even showing up in Wikipedia! How does a Senator not show up on Wikipedia!? Anyway, back to the story. Lee Wanta says the following people were aware of what Senator Sheldon R. Songstand and Governor Don Sundquist were doing with him – Senator Tom Daschle, Senator John Thune, and Senator Bob Corker! So these men will need to be thoroughly investigated to see if they are involved in the plot to murder Lee Wanta. Again, get the word out on this so that the “puppet master” and his cronies can’t escape justice and make sure all in alternative media that promoted Songstad put up this story or you’ll know they work for the bad guys too! Hit all groups on Facebook too becuase they have blocked me from being to post to groups to shut me up!

Who is Lee Wanta?
Lee Wanta as an Ambassador for President Reagan who helped to bring down the Russian Ruble during the 80s and avert World War 3. He was also tasked with refunding the American economy but has been prevented from doing that by all Presidents after Reagan. He is owed trillions of dollars as are the American people! You can read some of his story here.

Lee Wanta, American Hero

I’m asking all truth warriors to get this story out through all means possible so we can prevent a murder of an American hero that most of you never knew about because it was censored by “tip of the spear” types in alternative media who said he was as “Real as the Easter Bunny”! Lee writes for VeteransToday! He’s very real and now it’s up to all of you to share this on Facebook, Twitter, email lists and websites so this murder plot can be thoroughly investigated. Please investigate Sheldon R. Songstad and tell me if you can find his picture! A US Senator and we can’t find his picture and Wikipedia has nothing on him! Tell me if you don’t agree that somebody has scrubbed almost everything about him off Google! He doesn’t show up in Google News even though he’s been all over alternative media putting out disinformation! Please get this information out now! Thank you! With your help, we can get the word out about this murder plot caught on tape!

Ref: http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/09/senator-songstad-and-governor-sundquist-caught-on-tape-planning-murder-3023332.html


Snippets from Gordon Duff’s upcoming article (not yet published, so I just put highlights)

“A day after former Republican Virginia governor, Bob McDonnell and his wife were convicted of 20 counts of bribery and influence peddling, former Republican Tennessee governor Don Sundquist and South Dakota Senator Sheldon Songstad may face, not just the largest bribery charge in world history but indictment for conspiracy to murder as well.

“What is amazing about this case is the amount of money involved, totaling $9.5 trillion US dollars, in fact the entire GNP of the United States for several years. Sundquist and Songstad, wanted $30 billion out of the proceeds to pay themselves along with congress, the US Treasury Department, 5 Supreme Court justices and two former US presidents.

“During the 1980s, Lee Wanta was… was tasked by President Reagan and CIA Director William Colby to destabilize the Soviet Union through establishment, with funds from the US Treasury, of a worldwide currency trading scheme.

“Wanta, with the help of Reagan, amassed a fortune of $27 trillion, funds earmarked by Reagan to pay America’s national debt, restore the nation’s infrastructure and fund a world free of debt based currencies.

“However, after Reagan left office and George H.W. Bush assumed the Presidency, Wanta was kidnapped and imprisoned in Switzerland, transferred to an American prison where he was held without due process for years and the money disappeared, taken by the Bush family.

“Nobody has heard of Sheldon Songstad, who with former congressman and governor, Don Sundquist, admit demanding a $30 billion dollar bribe from Wanta in order to compel the Supreme Court to issue a pay order on Wanta’s personal funds, based on the case he won, $4.5 trillion plus interest, totaling $9.5 trillion.

“The audience heard Sundquist describe how they would settle for as little as $5 billion, as a “retirement nest egg” and how, if Wanta fails to pay, they would arrange for his murder… Current US Senator Bob Corker, Republican from Tennessee had been on a conference call earlier that included Sheldon Songstad, telling Wanta that his funds would be paid.

“…they confessed to what legal experts have identified as dozens of crimes and laid out a trail of bribery and corruption that crosses nearly every level of government, every court and over a hundred of Americas’ highest elected officials.

What is made clear is that the United States is far more a criminal organization than a nation. Those who don’t understand how America can say one thing and, with amazing consistency, do something else, often something totally bereft of moral responsibility, I think we may well have made the reasons abundantly clear.” 







Greg Szymanski's 2006 Interviews with Lee Wanta the 27.5 Trillian Dollar Man (Full transcript)



Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 11 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski


Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 12 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski


Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 13 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski


Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 14 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski



US Department of State visits Teknosis re: Gov. Sundquist (TN), Sen. Songstad (SD) involved in extortion, conspiracy to murder over 5-10 Billion Dollars USD



Create a Twitter storm:

White House fence-jumper http://bit.ly/ZzdUNB #whitehouse RT

September 6, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Enjoying your Century of Enslavement? The History of The Federal Reserve


Click here to download an mp3 audio version of this documentary.

Click here to download an mp4 video version of this documentary.

Click here to download a color information pamphlet on The Federal Reserve (right-click and “Save Link As” to download).

Click here to download a black and white information pamphlet on The Federal Reserve (right-click and “Save Link As” to download).

See transcript. Ref: http://www.corbettreport.com/federalreserve/


The Money Masters





-----Original Message-----
From: paycheck-piracy@mail-list.com [mailto:paycheck-piracy@mail-list.com] On Behalf Of Paycheck-Piracy-list-owner@mail-list.com
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 4:28 PM
To: henrymorgan@tampabay.rr.com
 finance: An Idiot's Guide To The Federal Reserve SCAM


Finance: An Idiot's Guide To The Federal Reserve SCAM


In reality the Fed was created to and continues to destabilize

the economy. Why would the owners & controllers of the Fed want

to do this? Because the goal is to bring control of the United

States into the hands of the bankers behind the Fed. The US, with

its roots in freedom and free markets, is a very hard nation to

control. Taking over financial control of a nation is one of the

best ways to control a nation. This has been done time and time

again in many other nations.







A consortium of services for people and companies.



This is a one-way announcement list. Only the list moderators are able to post a message.

To subscribe: <mailto:Paycheck-Piracy-on@mail-list.com>

To research the free archived files: http://archive.mail-list.com/paycheck-piracy


mail-list.com    1302 Waugh Dr. #438    Houston, Texas    77019    USA


This message was launched into cyberspace to henrymorgan@tampabay.rr.com

September 5, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

US Government Murders Edgar Steele - Will The Perpetrators Get Away With It?


Today, September 4, 2014, early afternoon, a California mortuary notified Mrs. Cyndi Steele that her husband Edgar was dead. At this time, specific circumstances regarding Mr. Steele's death are being confirmed. The Free Edgar Steele website and the Edgar Steele Defense Fund (ESDF) will release more information when available.

Mrs. Steele contacted the ESDF Board, saying she was utterly devastated by this information, and is furious that no Victorville representative contacted her in the last few days regarding his failing health and did not even call her regarding the death of her husband. It was cruel to allow the mortuary to make the call.

Based on the best knowledge at hand, the following are the most likely causes of death: drug overdoses, persistently delayed, insufficient, improper medical treatment and medical neglect.  The federal government and Victorville Penitentiary bears responsibility for the lives of the inmates who reside there and has refused to be accountable for the decline in Edgar Steele's health.

Some hours before Mrs. Steele was contacted by the mortuary, ESDF President Robert Magnuson received an email corroborating Ms. Steele's concern for her husband's health and safety that showed Mr. Steele's health has been in a sharp decline for the past month, which fact was obscured, if not hidden by the federal government.

First, Mr. Steele was the victim of a false prosecution, then he was imprisoned in the most dangerous prison facility in America. Then his wife was never allowed to visit him despite a court order allowing visitation. Then, his health was compromised because of neglect, and finally, the reports came in that he had been drugged out of his mind earlier this week, which was the final blow that killed him. Call it anything else you like, but it is murder.

The facts of this tragic situation will be disclosed as the information is gathered.

Related: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=19437


"Steele, who was a target of the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, has proclaimed his innocence to this newspaper over several occasions through audio interviews conducting from prison. This reporter interviewed Mr. Steele in June, 2011, his first interview since his arrest, which can be heard below. Additional audio interviews will be made available through this website when they are processed. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=19437#sthash.uq16uKUf.dpuf"

Steele, who was a target of the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, has proclaimed his innocence to this newspaper over several occasions through audio interviews conducting from prison. This reporter interviewed Mr. Steele in June, 2011, his first interview since his arrest, which can be heard below. Additional audio interviews will be made available through this website when they are processed. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=19437#sthash.uq16uKUf.dpuf


Steele, who was a target of the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, has proclaimed his innocence to this newspaper over several occasions through audio interviews conducting from prison. This reporter interviewed Mr. Steele in June, 2011, his first interview since his arrest, which can be heard below. Additional audio interviews will be made available through this website when they are processed. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=19437#sthash.uq16uKUf.dpuf
Steele, who was a target of the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, has proclaimed his innocence to this newspaper over several occasions through audio interviews conducting from prison. This reporter interviewed Mr. Steele in June, 2011, his first interview since his arrest, which can be heard below. Additional audio interviews will be made available through this website when they are processed. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=19437#sthash.uq16uKUf.dpuf
Steele, who was a target of the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, has proclaimed his innocence to this newspaper over several occasions through audio interviews conducting from prison. This reporter interviewed Mr. Steele in June, 2011, his first interview since his arrest, which can be heard below. Additional audio interviews will be made available through this website when they are processed. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=19437#sthash.uq16uKUf.dpuf"
Steele, who was a target of the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, has proclaimed his innocence to this newspaper over several occasions through audio interviews conducting from prison. This reporter interviewed Mr. Steele in June, 2011, his first interview since his arrest, which can be heard below. Additional audio interviews will be made available through this website when they are processed. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=19437#sthash.uq16uKUf.dpuf

Edgar Steele

Edgar James Steele was a Prisoner of War, however, he was MURDERED by the present Communist Regime on September 4, 2014. May he rest in peace. He was innocent of the charges trumped up against him by the Federal Baby Incinerators (FBI). This is another case where the Federal Government lacked jurisdiction and where they handpicked and put in place an uninformed jury - even though the so-called victims in this case testified that they were not victimized by Edgar Steele but were victimized by Federal Agents. The Federal Government sentenced Edgar to 50 years in federal prison. If Edgar was guilty of the so-called bombing it should have been a State matter of prosecution, not Federal. The jury in Edgar's lynching was most certainly not a fully informed jury. Please click on this link http://sirdavidandrew.com/Edgar.html  for further details as to what the government does not wish to you know about the loss of liberty.


People WAKE UP! The gestapo is MURDERING us one at time. Who will they murder next? Will it be my partner Larry-Mikiel: Myers, or will it be Dan: Peterson, Russell-Dean Landers, Richard: Clark, Richard: McLaren, Erwin Schiff or Paul-Mitchell: Modeleski. I can assure you that the bureaucrats in the District of Criminals want all of these gentlemen DEAD. Just as Edgar Steele, the bureaucrats consider these men to be a threat, because of the knowledge and skills that they possess. And now bureaucrats have been caught plotting the assassination of Ambassador Leo Wanta.




The Gestapo Communist Obamanation Regime has murdered Edgar Steele. They have wanted to silence this brilliant lawyer for his outspokenness as to corrupt government; and they wish to remove his writings from public view.

Edgar wrote several articles on how to fix the problems with the federal government. His recommendation were hated by those in power. Even his wife has failed or refused to publish Edgar's writing on how to fix government. Cyndi promised me, over a year ago on live talk radio, on RBN, that she would publish those articles on Free Edgar Steele website and to this day Edgar's articles have not been published there; whether due to her refusal or failure I know not which.

I published Edgar's article entitled Modern Sense on my homepage http://sirdavidandrew.com  Please go there and scroll down to Edgar Steele and click on the link to download the PDF file. Do so quickly since there is a possibly that my website may be shutdown on September 9 or 10. I have heard rumors that Andrew Cuomo, the butcher of WACO, plans to have me taken out come October or November by his mafia controlled stormtroopers. 

Obamanation and his comrades and cronies are systematically taking out anyone who may pose a threat to the soon coming takeover. Joan Rivers was taken out on August 28, 2014, for speaking out against Obamanation. They claim that she went into cardiac arrest while having oral surgery. However, under Obamanation Care, if you are over 80 years of age and come in for treatment the doctor is to terminate you. Obamanation Euthanasia Care is working! Joan was 81, and she recently had accused Barack Hussein Obama (Barry Soetoro) of being a Sodomite and Michelle Obama (Michael Robinson) of being a transvestite. Obviously dissent will not be tolerated. Strange is it not, sodomites demand others to be tolerant of their behavior, but they are not tolerant of other people's views or right of free speech.

The gestapo gave Susan Mokdad the same treatment back in February 2003. Susan had taken badly ill, I believe the government induced her illness. On January 31, 2003, I sent out a letter stating that the gestapo was planning Susan's death. They denied Susan medical treatment, which apparently was the same method used here with Edgar Steele. The gestapo intentionally terminated Susan on February 14, 2003, Saint Valentine Day, an obvious sign of a mob hit. Susan died of internal bleeding. See articles on Pro Se Litigates on http://sirdavidandrew and Florida Republics on http://militias.info

I was put in state prison shortly after Susan went to federal prison. Over a three year period I was thrown into state prison three times without being tried or convicted of any crimes. In one prison they tried to poison me and I contracted skin cancer which grew extremely rapid. The prison doctor wrote in his report that I was delusional because I had self-diagnosed that I had cancer. About a month later I was released. I immediately went to my own doctor. He took a biopsy and scheduled me for surgery that very afternoon, because he stated that my condition was that serious. In prison they tried to kill me by causing me to contract a cancer virus, either through the food they were feeding or the drugs they forced me to take.

About four months later they threw me into another state prison, again without trial or conviction. At that prison they told my cellmates before they brought me to my cell that I was a white supremacist and that they should take care of me. There were five Haitians, one Cuban and one Japanese waiting to greet me as the guards shoved me into the cell block. I could hear the guards laughing as they slammed the cell door closed behind since they thought I was about to take a beating. However, one of the Haitians ran at me and threw his arms around me, and shouted for all to hear, "Mon amie, David!" I said, "Yvon, what's going on here?" He told me that the guards told them that they were bringing a white supremacist into the cell block and that they should kill him and no one would know nothing.

The two guards were Cubans. There were only two guards at that prison who were white. Guards were 75% black and 24.9% Cuban. The warden and assistant warden were black. The medical staff were mainly black or Cuban, except of the doctors who were mostly Jewish or Oriental; I saw two doctors, who were white while I was there. However, amazingly the majority of the staff were good to me and several became friends. A large number of the inmates were murderers, rapists or violent criminals - definitely not a safe place to be.

At the time I was arrested and thrown into prison, I was associate pastor of a Haitian Mission in Florida, where one of my main jobs was to translate Haitian documents from Creole into French or English for easier processing of refugees by Immigration and Naturalization.

The prison guards did not know that I had saved Yvon's life in another jail and that Yvon and I had been arrested by the same PIGS at different places and times, and he, too, had been beaten by them. In the previous jail the guards stuck Yvon in a cell block with seven white men with intent to get him hurt. But we did not hurt him, and because I speak some French, I was able to communicate with Yvon.

About a month later the guards moved us to another cell block and a couple of the new guards attempted to kill Yvon and I stepped in to stop them, which is why Yvon returned the favor at the new prison. The cops that arrested Yvon beat him up because he did not answer their questions. Yvon could not speak English.

I also speak some Spanish and a little Japanese - the guards were grossly misinformed as to my background. At the state prison they took Yvon out of the cell block and in his place they brought in a man who had full blown AIDS with open sores all over his body; and they made me sit with him in the dining hall for every meal. Do you think that they were attempting to have me catch AIDS?

Two weeks before I was scheduled to be released, they moved two COP killers in the cell block with me; and eleven days before my release the prison counselor told these two men, one Haitian and one Cuban, that I was a COP. It was arranged for them to kill me by guards slipping one a shank and the other a club. However, there was a surprise cell block search and they lost their weapons the next morning. But that night they attacked me from behind and smashed my head into a concrete wall. I ended up with two broken ribs and two broken facial bones and several lacerations. The guards just picked me up, threw me into my bed and left me there to die.

Just as the guards closed the cell door, I could hear inmates shouting up and down the halls "Jimmy, they beat David; Jimmy, they beat David." The captain of the guard came into our cell block and demanded to know what was going on. The guard told him that I had gotten hurt, but that I would be okay. Jimmy did not buy their story and demanded that my cell be opened and the lights turned on. He took a look at me all covered with blood and looked all around my cell, blood was everywhere. He reached down, pulled out his cell phone and dialed 911. The guards asked him what he was doing. He ordered them to prepare the prisoner for transport. "Hello, please send an ambulance." I spent the next 24 hours in ICU. Jimmy also assigned his three most trusted guards to watch over me while I was in the hospital, which was greatly appreciated.

What most of the guards did not know, was that Jimmy and I spent three nights per week, when no one else was around, studying the Bible together. Yah is not finished with me yet, or I would have been dead in those hell holes. And, I have a clean bill of health, no AIDS and no cancer. These are only a few of the ordeals that I was put through. I was beaten once by three city pigs and six times by jailers, pistolwhipped to unconsciousness, shot in the leg, forcefully administered intoxicating drugs for 10 weeks and attacked two other times, without explanation or provocation, by inmates, one tried to kill me. From the drugs, I was to a point where I could not stay awake for more then 15 to 20 minutes at time. They even locked me in a steel 6x8 box with no windows and only a 25 watt light bulb for for three weeks, as well as, they locked me in a cell for four days with no clothing and assigned women to guard me. For the most part so-called correctional officers are very sick and sorry individuals; several are worse animals than those whom they cage. Someone wanted me DEAD!

I know what the gestapo did to Edgar Steele: cold-blooded MURDER.  They tortured him, drugged, then they killed him; and took great pleasure in doing so. I hope that my giving details of my personal experience will help people understand what these evil demoniacs did to Edgar Steele.

These demoniacs practice witchcraft and usually do these type of ritualistic murders in threes, just as they did with the murders of Esquire Johnny Cochrane (scapegoat offered up unto Mercury, Mammon or Commerce; March 29), Terri Schiavo (sacrificial lamb offered up unto Jupiter, Zeus; March 31 at 09:05), and Pope John-Paul II (bull sacrifice offered up unto Saturn, Cronus or Baal; April 2 at 21:38) back in 2005.

The Pope was murdered by three blows to the head with a brass hammer; and his death was set at 2 and 22 minutes (222) before the stroke of midnight. Both times of Terri's and Pope's deaths total five, the number of demonology. Those in power consider that he was too old to be Pope. Their sacrifices that week were to establish euthanasia as the norm; terminate the sick, the weak and the old. 2 is the number representing destruction, and they destroyed 3 lives. The Scriptures state, "fear not those who can kill the body, but Him who can kill the body and soul."

The shootings in Arizona, 2011 of U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (the scapegoat), Christina-Taylor Green (who was 9, born 9-11-2001, the sacrificial lamb) and Federal Judge John Roll (63, the bull sacrifice).   These deaths were supposed to have brought about the "completion" of some sinister plot, however, I believe that the plot failed. 6 plus 3 equals 9. 9 is completion or the number of man.

It appears that Joan Rivers may have been the sacrificial lamb and Edgar Steele their bull sacrifice. Therefore, who was their scapegoat sacrifice? Their deaths were seven days apart. Joan was euthanized on the east coast and Edgar on the west coast. The Statue of Liberty (Semiramis - Ishtar) is in New York and the Bohemian Owl is in California (Tammuz - Molech). I suspect the scapegoat to be someone in or from the District of Criminals where the Temple of Baal (Nimrod - Saturn - Washington Monument) is located. Obamanation claims to be direct descendant of Semiramis and Tammuz. You connect the dots. These murders may be the prelude to an upcoming major orchestrated event.

May Edgar Steele never be forgotten; may his recommendations be implemented in the District of Criminals; and may those, who were responsible for his death lie dead in the streets while dogs pick their bones. Cursed are those who wrongfully and deceitfully murder us, one-at-a-time; while others stand idle, doing nothing.

Sir David-Andrew.



Framing Edgar Steele




Framing Steele: A Case Study of Sovietized American "Justice"


Written by Will Grigg  //  October 18, 2011  //  Article  //  No comments


Edgar Steele (r.) confers with political activist Paul Venable.


Yes, I’d give the Devil the benefit of the law — for my own safety’s sake.


– Sir Thomas Moore, as depicted in A Man for All Seasons


When Edgar Steele was told on the morning of June 11, 2010, that his wife Cyndi had been killed when her SUV was run off the road in Oregon, his first reaction, understandably, was shock. That reaction mutated into panic minutes later when FBI Agent Michael Sotka told Steele that his mother-in-law had also been shot and killed.


“He wanted to contact family members and find out if they were okay,” testified State Trooper Jess Spike, who was at Steele’s home in Sagle, Idaho when the dire tidings were delivered. Asked by Agent Sotka who might have perpetrated those crimes and “who his enemies were,” Steele named “a number of organizations that may have been against him,” Spike continued. “There was like the Anti-Defamation League, Southern Poverty – there were one or two others. I don’t recall the acronyms or names of them.”


Trooper Spike was referring to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which bankrupted the northern Idaho-based Aryan Nation white supremacist group in a 2000 lawsuit. Steele, a controversial lawyer who described himself as the “Attorney for the Damned,” had represented the Aryan Nation in court, thereby earning the abiding enmity of the SPLC and its allies, including the Anti-Defamation League — both of which are quasi-private affiliates of the Homeland Security apparatus.

In addition to his legal work, Steele was a polemicist on behalf of worldview that can fairly be characterized as white supremacist. The author of a book entitled Defensive Racism, Steele disavowed aggressive violence. This wasn’t true of at least some of his detractors: Prior to June 11, 2010, Edgar Steele had received death threats that the FBI had traced back to the the so-called Jewish Defense League, which has been implicated in more than adozen domestic terrorist incidents in the United States.

In the months leading up to June 11, Steele had endured a near-fatal heart attack. On the morning he received the news, he was still recuperating from a second health crisis, a nasal aneurysm that had left him hospitalized just a few weeks earlier. So he was in pretty fragile condition as horrible news accumulated suggesting that his enemies were laying siege to his family. But that wasn’t the final shock he was to endure on that crowded morning: Agent Sotka suddenly announced, “Your wife is not dead … you’re under arrest.”



As Sotka hauled the stunned and shaken Steele from his home, the FBI Agent encountered Dr. Allen Banks, a local biochemist family friend who had arrived that morning to help Steele haul a load of lumber from the Home Depot in nearby Coeur d’Alene.


Brandishing a recorder, Sotka triumphantly told Banks: “We’ve got everything we need right here.” A few hours after being led to believe that his wife and mother-in-law had been murdered, Steele was charged with hiring a local handyman named Larry Fairfax to kill them.


Trooper Spike would later admit in court that there was nothing in the June 11 conversation that indicated Steele’s guilt. The elaborate fiction created by Sotka was a “ruse” intended to get Steele to incriminate himself. Rather than reacting to a confession or a critical disclosure by Steele, Sotka arrested him when it became clear that he “wasn’t going to crack,” Trooper Spike recounted on the witness stand.


As it happens, within four days of arresting Steele, the FBI had a confession from a suspect who admitted to placing a pipe bomb on the automobile Cyndi Steele drove to Oregon City to visit her cancer-stricken mother: Larry Fairfax himself, who had reportedly carried out the plot with unnamed “accomplices.” The bomb was accidentally discovered when Mrs. Steele took the van to a Jiffy Lube. Fairfax, who we’re told approached the FBI on June 9 to report that Steele had hired him to murder his wife and mother-in-law, hadn’t disclosed the existence of the pipe bomb.


It wouldn’t have gone off — but the jury wasn’t told.


Fairfax, who had done some remodeling work on the Steele home, was supposedly asked to carry out the double murder for $25,000 that would come from an insurance pay-off. (Fairfax wasn’t aware that Steele had cancelled his wife’s insurance policy two years earlier.) This arrangement was supposedly made on May 27, just a few weeks after Steele had been hospitalized for his second life-threatening aneurysm.


Prior to Steele’s arrest, Fairfax had cashed in roughly $10,000 in silver. Edgar and Cyndi claimed that Fairfax — who knew where the family had cached precious metals on their property — had stolen the silver. Fairfax insists it was part of the pay-off for his role in the murder plot. All that is known for certain is that the silver had belonged to the Steeles before Fairfax cashed it in.


It is likewise known for sure that Fairfax — with the help of his still-unknown accomplices — built the pipe bomb and placed it on the undercarriage of Cyndi Steele’s vehicle. Edgar Steele’s only connection to the pipe bomb was a recorded June 10 conversation with Fairfax in which the phrase “car bomb” was spoken. Fairfax and the FBI insisted that the conversation made reference to an earlier, unrecorded agreement between the two of them that Fairfax would kill Cyndi Steele and her ailing mother.


During his testimony in Edgar Steele’s trial, Agent Sotka admitted that the FBI had given Fairfax and James Maher $500 and that “we decided to send Mr. Fairfax over to Portland in case Mr. Steele asked for a phone call from him.” That call, according to Agent Sotka, was intended to be Steele’s alibi, proving that he was nowhere near the scene of the crime when it occurred.


A stronger case can be made that this call was designed to be the finishing touch on the frame the Feds had constructed to entrap Steele. By calling from Oregon, Fairfax would create an interstate “nexus” that supposedly justified federal charges against Steele. It’s important to note that this element of the case against Steele involves something he didn’t do — namely, contacting Fairfax in Portland — while Sotka admitted under oath that it was the FBI that sent Fairfax to Portland.


Last May, following a trial that lasted less than a week, a federal jury convicted Steele on four counts, including conspiracy to commit murder. He faces a mandatory minimum of 30 years in prison – which, owing to his age and fragile health, is a life sentence. The prosecution case that resulted in that sentence is miraculously untainted by reliable evidence.


The alleged victim, Cyndi Steele, has been her husband’s most consistent and vocal defender, despite what she has described as intimidation by Agent Sotka. The so-called pipe bomb was little more than a stage prop incapable of exploding – a fact withheld by the Feds until the day after Steele’s trial ended, when it was introduced, without Government objections, during Larry Fairfax’s sentencing hearing.


Fairfax, who manufactured a supposedly “lethal” weapon of mass destruction as part of a plot to murder two innocent people, was charged with possession of an “unregistered firearm” and given a sentence of 27 months in prison (with credit for time served), followed by three years of supervised release. He was ordered to pay Cyndi Steele — his victim — a total of $900 in compensation. That detail eloquently testifies of the contemptuous hostility the Feds have for the uncooperative “victim.”



As with so many other prosecutions of this kind, this case shouldn’t have been in federal court in the first place.


Edgar Steele “did not `cause’ anyone to travel in interstate commerce,” points out his attorney Wesley Hoyt in a motion for a new trial. “Government informants Larry Fairfax and James Maher were dispatched from Idaho on June 11, 2010 by the Government, not the defendant. They were paid $500 by the FBI to travel to Oregon … so that FBI Agent Sotka could have Fairfax call Mr. Steele from an Oregon prefix” – thereby creating a supposed “jurisdictional link” to justify a federal prosecution.


This is a familiar FBI tactic: Where there is no clear federal “nexus,” create one through a letter or an interstate telephone call. In the 1991 case U.S. v. Coats, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that an FBI-instigated interstate phone call that “was contrived by the Government for that reason alone” did not provide the desired “jurisdictional link.”


The FBI’s claim that Steele had actually hired Fairfax to kill his wife depends on two dubious pieces of evidence, neither of which is sufficient alone but that supposedly validate each other: The ambiguous and disputed recording of a conversation between Fairfax and Steele on June10, 2010, and Fairfax’s testimony.


Judge Winmill (l.) with Russian Judge Vladimir Soloyev in 2002.


During the trial in Boise, the defense repeatedly objected to the introduction of the recording, and the Government-provided transcript, on the basis that they were offered without “foundation.”


Addressing that objection, Federal District Judge Lynn Winmill ruled that “if he [Fairfax] testifies that he has listened to it and it accurately sets forth what was said at the time, then that is the foundation.” In its closing arguments, the prosecution heavily emphasized the claim that the recordings likewise “corroborated” Fairfax’s account. The problem here is that both of those pieces of “evidence” are terminally flawed – and since each of them is thoroughly impeachable, they can’t be used to validate each other.


The chain of custody necessary to authenticate the recordings breaks down at the very first link. Fairfax’s demonstrated dishonesty (the Feds were forced to admit that he was “not completely forthcoming” about the pipe bomb) makes him unsuitable as a corroborative witness regarding their reliability. “In order to authenticate the records, the Government presented the testimony of an admitted liar … who during trial stated that on June 9, 2010 he lied to the FBI when he did not tell them about the existence of a bomb on Mrs. Steele’s car,” notes the motion for a new trial.


FBI Agent Sotka claimed that Fairfax and Steele were under constant surveillance on the Steele family’s property while the recorded conversations took place. However, the discussion took place in a barn, while the two of them were concealed from view. Since the device concealed on Fairfax was a recorder rather than a “wire,” nobody heard the conversations as they actually occurred.


On the witness stand Agent Sotka described how he downloaded the digital audio file from the recording device onto an FBI computer in Coeur d’Alene with a special proprietary software program. From there, the file was reportedly uploaded to a database at an FBI lab in Virginia. Sotka did this without listening to the recorded conversation. He then copied the file onto a compact disc, from which the file was re-copied onto a second disc. At that point, according to Sotka, he purged the original digital file from the recording device, since “part of the procedure is to delete the conversation and have the recorder clear for the next time you need to use it.”


Sotka appears to be selectively fastidious about following FBI procedures, since he did all of this by himself, without having a second Agent present, as dictated by Bureau policy. What this means is that the recordings heard by the court – and that had been played to Cyndi Steele by Agent Sotka prior to the trial – were, at the very best, a third-generation copy of the original digital file, which was destroyed by Sotka without being heard by himself or anybody else.

When the version of the recording was played for Cyndi Steele, the alleged victim and target of the purported murder-for-hire plot was not convinced that what she heard was an actual conversation involving her husband. Furthermore, the version of the recording played in court contained an odd repetitive clicking noise, which the prosecution insisted was the sound of “Tic-Tacs” rattling in Fairfax’s pocket. That noise, which wasn’t present on the pre-trial version, is the kind of audio artifact that can result when a recording is digitally assembled from several different sources.


Dr. George Papcun, a forensic scientist who has served as an expert witness and law enforcement consultant for several decades, detected numerous “transients” and other anomalies – by one count, roughly 300 of them — in the pre-trial version of the FBI recordings. Dr. Papcun concluded that there was “a reasonable degree of scientific probability that [the recordings] do not represent a true and valid representation of reality and they are unreliable.” That assessment provides ample, if not unassailable, grounds for reasonable doubt, especially in light of Dr. Papcun’s credentials.


After finishing his undergraduate degree in mathematics at the University of Arizona, Papcun went on to earn a Master’s Degree in Formal Linguistics and a Ph.D. in Linguistics (with a specialization in Acoustic Phonetics) from UCLA. As a graduate student, Papcun was awarded Ford Foundation and National Defense education fellowships; his professional work earned an award from Johns Hopkins University and a place on the R&D-100 list of top achievers in “Technological Innovation.” He has been an advisor to local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security, and an expert forensic witness in numerous high-profile cases.


Not surprisingly, the prosecution attempted to exclude both Dr. Papcun’s report and his testimony from the trial. On May 2, Judge Winmill held a hearing to determine whether the defense would be permitted to present Papcun’s testimony. At the time, Papcun was vacationing in Bora Bora, and Winmill initially ruled that he could testify via video conference on the following day. However, the prosecution complained that this arrangement would be unacceptable, since it wouldn’t permit them to “confront” the witness – a right that is guaranteed to the defendant, not the prosecution, by the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.


On May 3, Judge Winmill, exhibiting his habitual, undisguised bias in favor of the prosecution, dutifully reversed his ruling and issued an entirely whimsical demand that Dr. Papcun be physically present in Boise, Idaho no later than 8:30 a.m. the following morning – Wednesday, May 4 – in order to testify at the trial.

Since neither teleportation nor sub-orbital commercial flight is presently available, the earliest Papcun could be available was Thursday, May 5. Papcun was willing to interrupt his vacation, and the defense was willing to pay the expense. However, Judge Winmill – who was consistently flexible in meeting the prosecution’s demands – maintained that there wasn’t sufficient wiggle room in his schedule to permit Papcun to testify on Thursday. None of this would have been necessary, of course, if Winmill had simply stuck to his initial ruling and permitted Dr. Papcun to offer fully interactive testimony by way of a video conference held at the nearest U.S. consulate.


Judge Winmill’s earnest concern for the supposed right of the prosecution to “confront” Dr. Papcun stands in stark contrast to his indifference to Edgar Steele’s constitutionally protected right to confront a key prosecution witness, Ukrainian resident Tatyana Loginova – whom Steele had contacted as part of what he and his wife Cyndi both described as his research into the Russian “mail-0rder bride” scam. 


Steele’s daughter Kesley testified under oath that both she and her mother were aware of that research, and often joked about it. That account was confirmed from the witness stand by family friend Allan Banks, who said that Steele had told him about contacting several women from the former Soviet Union as “part of a legal case.”



The question of motive was probably the biggest of the numerous weaknesses in the prosecution’s case: Why would a man who had just recovered from a near-fatal aortic aneurysm seek to murder the wife whose personal care had been indispensable to his recovery?

The prosecution confected a story in which Steele – a senior citizen in fragile health – was secretly trolling the Web in search of a nubile young girlfriend, and had developed a schoolboy crush on Miss Loginova.


Loginova’s testimony was critical to the prosecution’s case, and the “right to confront” protected by the Sixth Amendment required that Steele and his counsel be given an opportunity to cross-examine her. However, Winmill permitted the prosecution to enter into evidence a videotaped deposition conducted via video conference with the aid of a Russian language translator. Loginova’s story included a claim that Steele had promised to visit her in Ukraine in August 2010.


While the Edgar Steele jury was permitted to hear Loginova’s videotaped testimony, it was not permitted to hear the testimony of Dr. Robert Stoll, who had spent several hours in Steele’s company on June 10 – the day he supposedly planned to murder his wife. Dr. Stoll, a local veterinarian, has filed an affidavit recounting how he had discussed Steele’s health problems and how he was impressed by “the manner of Edgar’s tender affection for his wife and family. I believe that this man’s intent … when I visited him was not to kill anyone, especially his wife.”


Cyndi Steele and attorney Wesley Hoyt.


To understand the deeply prejudicial nature of Winmill’s rulings in this regard it’s necessary to take into account the composition of the jury: In a case involving an alleged plot by a husband to murder his middle-aged wife, the jury consisted of eleven women and one man.


The panel that emerged from voir dire was ideal for the prosecution’s theory of the case, which could have been the plot from any of several dozen made-for-TV movies of the kind broadcast incessantly on the “Lifetime” cable network: The scheming, unfaithful husband, driven by ego and what remains of his mid-life libido, plots to murder his long-suffering wife in order to take up with a pneumatic trophy bimbo.

Edgar Steele is a widely despised figure. His legal practice was devoted to defending the rights of similarly marginalized and disreputable people out of the conviction that “it is the … politically incorrect whose rights are first infringed and then eliminated,” as he pointed out in a speech he delivered in Jekyll Island, Georgia almost exactly two years before his Stalinist show trial in Boise.

Actually, the comparison to the Soviet-era Russian legal system is unfair, given that a defendant hauled before a Soviet criminal tribunal actually enjoyed a small but measurable chance of acquittal.

After the Bolsheviks seized power in 1917, the jury system — which had been established under Alexander II in 1864 — was abolished and replaced with”People’s Courts” composed of a judge and a panel of two to six Party-appointed “assessors” who heard all of the evidence and decided all questions of both fact and law. The assessors “became known as `nodders’ for simply nodding in agreement with the judge,” wrote federal Judge John C. Coughenour in an article published by the Seattle University Law Review. “People’s assessors virtually always agreed with judges; acquittals were virtually nonexistent…. [U]nlike our adversarial system, the Soviet inquisitorial criminal justice system neither prioritized nor emphasized the rights of individual defendants, but instead paid homage to the interests of the state.”


What Judge Coughenour describes as a contrast between the Soviet and American legal systems is actually one of the strongest points of similarity. Lew Rockwell recently pointed out that in the pseudo-legal proceedings referred to as “trials” by the federal Leviathan, the defendant “wins once every 212 times” — a respectable approximation of “never.” During the late Stalin era, Soviet procurators were ordered to achieve a 100 percent conviction rate; their counterparts in contemporary U.S. federal courts have essentially accomplished that feat. This is because the federal system, like its Soviet predecessor, is designed to serve the interests of the State — and federal juries are typically purged of anyone unwilling to play the role of “nodder” in a show trial.


During jury selection in the Edgar Steele “trial,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Traci Whelan, who presided over the prosecution, carefully scrutinized potential jurors for what she called “hidden biases” against “the United States Government.” Neither Whelan nor Judge Winmill was willing to abide the presence of any juror who understood that the jury’s role is to force the government to overcome the constitutionally prescribed “bias” in favor of the defendant. They needn’t have worried.


In Idaho, the most “anti-government” state in the Soyuz, the Feds were able to win a murder conspiracy conviction in a case without a victim, a murder weapon, or a motive, using only a doctored audio recording and the self-exculpating testimony of an admitted liar who confessed to manufacturing and planting the non-functional bomb. Andrei Vyshinsky would be suitably impressed.


Ref: http://sirdavidandrew.com/Edgar/FramingEdgarSteele.html



Edgar Steel wrote Modern Sense back in December 2002.  It was the result of a series of six emails.  I compiled those emails and put it in booklet form and then added my two cents and sent it out in the attached format the 3rd week of January 2003.

Edgar's Modern Sense is based on Thomas Paine's Common Sense and he recommends a replacement form of government.  I did not agree with all of his recommendations; however, it was better than what we have now.    It is food for thought.

Discussion on fixing the CON CON is a waste of time, since it is not possible to fix that which was fraud on its face from the beginning.  Did I mention that the CON CON was FRAUD. 

Done that, been there!  And, the exposure of this back in the mid-90s cost me 704 days and four days of my life and almost my life.

Wow!  Where have you been?  How many folks even know the true history and origin behind the CON CON?


Subject: Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
From: "Sir David-Andrew" <davidtheherald@a-znet.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 04:33:18 -0500
To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:;@mail.a-znet.com;>
Twenty-sixth Day First Month, A.D. Two Thousand Three
Common Sense – Modern Sense
Edgar J. Steele has been out there shaking the trees and rattling the cages of politicians and bureau-rats
for several years. Esquire Steele is not the ordinary Attorney, however. This man knows quit a lot about
the law; as is evident in the following treatise; therefore, it would be truthful to call him a Lawyer, and
not an Attorney. Lawyers are those who are knowledgeable in the law, but Attorneys are twisters who
belong to the BAR and have been taught court procedure (Baal Worship), not law. Most Attorneys are an
incompetent lot, who lust after Mammon. The Florida Bar (one of the worst) claims 70,000+ members, but
acknowledges in its own publications that less than 2,800 are board certified as competent. However, one
must realize that in most states, membership to the BAR is mandatory in order to ‘practice law’; and
Lawyers across this great Land are rebelling and organizing against this unconstitutional requirement. It is
obvious by the following writing that even though he is, or should I say was, a member of the BAR [British
Aristocratic Regency – British Accreditation Registry], he will not be for long, for surely it is ‘off with his
Thomas Jefferson, a Lawyer and a good one I might add, despised Attorneys and stated that if they were
ever allowed to hold public office that they would be the destruction of this great Nation. He detested
them as much as he did Banksters. He, also, stated that there was need for a Revolution every 70 years
just to keep this Nation as a free Republic. [Fussy Math -- 1776 + 210 = 1996] The time for a Revolution is
long over due. All the wars for the past one hundred and five years have been sideshows to distract the
People from the real business at hand. Thomas Jefferson and Noah Webster avidly fought to keep Bible
reading in public schools; by law, when Bible reading ended in public schools, statehood ceased to exist.
The united States of America died.
Edgar Steele does not demonstrate any allegiance to the Crown or the Just-US Dynasty run by her
"Majesty’s" irresponsible Cousins here on these shores. The United States is a British Crown State and has
been since 1871. Folks wake up King Shrub is as bad, if not worse, then his double Cousins Slick Willie.
Slick is the grandson of John D. Rockefeller and Grand Nephew of Thomas Woodrow Wilson. Slick, Bob
Dole and Jack Kemp are all direct descendants of Henry VII. That is correct, they are all Cousins. In fact,
all Presidents since the War of Aggression (or second Revolution, depending upon one’s perception,) have
been direct blood descendants of the Kings and Queens of England. Then, we must not forget their Cousin
Dick and Cousin Colon, too. Daily, it is becoming more obvious that we are being scrxxxx, well you should
get the picture. Edgar Steele has poured out his soul in this following plea to conscious and sanity, Modern
Sense. He could and most likely will be disbarred for willful defiance and disloyalty to the Crown, if not
‘off with his head’.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
2 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
Am I afraid? No, but I do not like the idea of being at ground zero, the second or third wave would be
whole lot nicer. What do I have to lose by supporting Edgar’s effort? I do not have much to lose, since in
October of 1998 I was the number ONE Patriot under Siege in America. If you the reader could just
comprehend how cruel and wicked your Masters are, and when your name goes on the list "it ain’t comin’
off"; so, you might as well stand and fight. Cousin Elizabeth apparently does not like me much already,
since she has never answered any of the correspondence that I have sent to her since 1998, warning her of
this very day. It is ironic, that I am both of the House of Paine and the House of Stewart; and am known by
the troops as Major Paine. Though, too, I am a Herald, the keeper of the genealogical records and records
of crests, shields and heraldry; and I received my Heraldry without the Queen’s blessing, for I am a
servant of the King of kings, and Lord of lords; and, it is His blessings that I seek. And, being that I am of
the House of Stewart: I am David, son of David, King of Israel. My ancestral Stewart-Paine families were
Revolutionary War Soldiers, who fought King George III.
I do not believe that Edgar has written this for these British Royalties’ benefit, since they have not eyes to
see or ears to hear, and they speak with forked tongues. They are deaf, dumb and blind, worshippers of
idols and practitioners of witchcraft and sorcery. It appears that King Shrub intends to bring about an
all-out-assault upon this Land by May Day; sending almost all American soldiers overseas while using
foreign communist troops to invade our shores. It is time to buy more powder, not beer. Edgar has written
Modern Sense for your admonition; hopefully each of you will take this to heart; your future depends on
I do not agree with some of Edgar’s conclusions and recommendations, and you may not either; but that is
not important. What is important is that some reasonable directions has been brought forward and now
lies on the table for consideration. I had considered doing this every thing six years ago, but circumstance
beyond my control prevented me do much of anything of value. I comprehend the reasoning and the logic
behind certain conclusions and recommendations that Edgar has drawn; and that these may be workable
under certain conditions or restraints. We are Gentlemen who can work it when the time comes.
However, public forum is not the place to debate matters such as these, since the likes of Morris Sleeze
(who would turn the debate into a circus, majoring on prejudice, bigotry and hate, not morals, logic or
reason. And, I have a hunch that Edgar has already made Morris’ sleaze list, along with thousands of other
great Patriots. Folks, if you remember Morris Sleeze has accused some my friends and myself of being
anti-Shemites; this spelling is correct, it is Sleeze and his friends who do not know how to spell this
Hebrew word correctly. Several times his railing accusation against me have appeared on front page
News, since August 1996. How dare he, a son of Gomer, call me, a descendant of King David, an
Thomas Paine, gave the ultimate sacrifice, he died a forgotten hero. Only, five friends attend his funeral
when he was buried in southern New York state. He was without children. His only daughter died in
England at the age of thirteen, of cholera or diphtheria, I forget which. Thomas had two wives, but
neither of them ever came to America. Thomas’ body was later resumed and taken back to England to be
buried with one of his wives. Why should his body remain here, since the People too soon had already
forgotten the price that he had paid for their freedom. On January 1, 1776, his pamphlet Common Sense
first appeared.
I hope Edgar likes this and finds it to be a fitting Introduction. I have taken the liberty to cleanup the type
set, typo errors, spelling, some grammatical structure or punctuation being careful to maintain form and
intent, and general appearance and readability. In this form it should be ready for easy Pamphleteering;
start the presses.
Maybe, these Master’s of the m-asses will take time to read this; though, if they do it will make them
shake in their boots. Maybe even worse, because I imagine if they have read this far that they are already
quit angry; but that is too bad. Hang on bureau-rats it is about to get a whole lot worse for you.
Especially, if you the People take this to heart. We are about to take a walk in the light and the things
these humans do in the dark, will be exposed. Are you ready, or are you just going to sit back, pop
another beer and watch these tyrants murder your children? I am not dead yet, though Yah knows how
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
3 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
often they have plotted and tried and failed, my body still aches from the wounds, but if I should fall, who
will carry the Banner? If I should fall, who will carry the Banner? Today, Edgar is quit stately carrying the
Banner; but if he should fall, who will carry the Banner? We are on the verge of War.
"Let us not, I beseech you, deceive ourselves (any) longer. We have done everything that
could be done to avert the storm, which is now coming on. If we wish to be free – we must
fight! I repeat, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to (our Heavenly Father) is all that is
left us! They tell us, that we are weak – unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But
when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next, or the next year? Will it be when we are
totally disarmed and when a guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather
strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by
lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusion phantom of hope, until our enemies
shall have bound us hand and foot? We are not weak, if we make a proper use of those means
which (our Creator) has placed in our power...The battle, is not to the strong alone: it is the
vigilant, the active, the brave." – Christian Patriot, Patrick Henry.
A few day ago, I mailed out Common Sense written by Thomas Paine 1776, and now Modern Sense by
Edgar Steele 2003. What is that I hear on the streets of Boston, Dallas or L.A.! Is it the clanking of chains
or musket's roar? May I present, Edgar Steele with Modern Sense.
Sir David-Andrew.
Modern Sense
(Part I, revised)
(With absolutely no apologies to Thomas Paine)
by Edgar J. Steele
December 26, 2002
Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its
state an intolerable one; for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries by a government,
we might expect in a country without government, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we
furnish the means by which we suffer. --- Thomas Paine, "Common Sense" (Feb 1776)
There are a remarkable number of parallels between pre-Revolutionary America and the America of
today. It is downright spooky how, in their writings of that time, our founding fathers might have been
speaking directly to this
generation of Americans. Then again, I do not believe in coincidence so perhaps, in a sense, they were.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
4 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
How appropriate that those of us who advocate a return to the ideals of those days are called "patriots," a
word which has taken on as derisive a meaning when mouthed by government agents today as those
uttered about our
forebears by King George's men during the first American revolution.
Nor is it coincidence that those of us labeled as "Patriots" wear the mark with respect and honor. I count
myself proudly among their number and pray only that my work be worthy of inclusion.
It takes a little work to update the founding fathers' works to modern forms of language and phrasing, but
the result is nothing short of amazing, particularly when we replace "England" with "Federal Government"
and "King
George" with "The President."
I have presumed to do just that with Thomas Paine's "Common Sense" in this series, a four-part work
written and published in early 1776 as part of a broad effort to convince the American settlers to declare
independence from
In several places, I have retained Paine's wording intact, where it has particular impact in its original
form. In others, I have edited and rephrased mercilessly, while trying to hew to the apparent intent of his
I do not suggest that this is an improvement upon what Thomas Paine had to say. I believe only that this is
how he might have said it, were he alive today and speaking of the grotesquerie that our government has
As you read this section, you might find it useful to compare it with its counterpart in the original
"Common Sense." One of many on-line sources for Thomas Paine's "Common Sense":
I have maintained the original's organization and structure in this rewrite, in order to facilitate direct
To the Inhabitants of America on the following interesting subjects
I. Of the origin and design of government in general, with concise remarks on the American
Constitution. (12/26/02)
II. Of the imperial presidency and hereditary succession. (Released 12/28/02)
III. Thoughts on the present state of American affairs. (Subpart a released 1/2/03; subpart b
released 1/8/03; subpart c released 1/15/03)
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
5 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
IV. Of the present ability of America, with some miscellaneous reflections. (Released
Part I: Of the origin and design of government in general, with concise remarks on the American
Virtually all Americans have so confused society with government, as to leave little distinction between
them, though they are different and have different origins.
Society is produced by our wants, government by our wantonness. Society promotes our happiness;
government restrains our vices. Society is our patron; government is our punisher.
Society is our blessing, while government is but a necessary evil. At its worst, a government is intolerable
because we provide it the very means by which it oppresses us.
Since man is not guided always by the finer dictates of conscience, some form of government is necessary.
Thus, we choose to give up a portion of our wealth to sustain government, though that decision must
involve selection of the least among evils.
Security being the purpose of government, we prefer that which provides it at the least cost, with the
greatest benefit.
To gain a clear idea of the purpose of government, imagine a small number of people settling in a distant
land, with no connection to any others. In this natural state, society will be their first thought, since a
division of labor among them will produce the greatest common and individual good. Each member of the
society will do that for which he or she is best suited, with the whole providing protection and producing
far more than the sum of
its parts.
But, as the base necessities of life are ensured, human nature being what it is, a group discussion of
problems will ensue. Initially, rules will be informal and their violation met with mere group disapproval.
Each member
of society, naturally, will be heard at first.
As the group's members increase, so will the problems, as will the distance members must travel to
discuss the problems. It will become convenient to select a few of the group's members, who have the
same concerns as those selecting them, and who will act as the whole group would, if assembled. As the
society grows ever larger, it will be necessary to add to the select governing group, so as to ensure
representation of all the interests present in the burgeoning society.
To ensure that the members elected to the governing body not form interests separate from those
electing them, prudence dictates frequent elections, with the members elected returning to general
society. Because the elected
return in a short time to become a part of the governed, the fidelity of the government is assured and the
support of the people guaranteed. This is the basis for the strength of government and the happiness of
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
6 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
the governed.
Thus, government is seen to be necessary due to the failure of moral virtue to govern. The purpose of
government also is clear: freedom and security.
Clear reason shows all else concerning government merely to be contrived. Nature shows us that the
simplest things are least likely to fail, yet, are easily repaired when they do fail. This maxim illustrates my
idea of government and provides the basis for a few remarks on the American Constitution.
The American Constitution was noble for its time, and provided much-needed respite from a world
overrun with tyranny and disorder. But, that it is imperfect, subject to misinterpretation and incapable of
producing what it
seems to promise, it is easy to see.
Totalitarian governments have the advantage of simplicity; if the people suffer, they know who to blame
what to do and are not confused by discussions of causes and cures.
But the American Constitution has brought forth a body of federal and state laws so complex that the
nation has suffered for years with nobody able to say in which part the fault lies. Some say in one portion
and some in another, and every political physician prescribes a different medicine.
Though it may be difficult to get over old prejudices, if we examine the component parts of the American
Constitution, we shall find it to contain the remains of two ancient tyrannies, together with some new
First, the remains of monarchical tyranny in the person of the President; second, the remains of
aristocratical tyranny in the persons of the judiciary. Third, the new republican ills in the persons of the
legislatures at all level of government.
The first two, though originally derived from popular support and selected from the people, now have
become independent of the people. In a constitutional sense, they contribute nothing toward the freedom
of America.
To say that the Constitution is a union of three branches, reciprocally checking one another, is nonsense.
To say that the Congress is a check upon the President presupposes two things: First, that the President is
not to be trusted or, in other words, that a thirst for absolute power is the natural disease of those
President. Second, that Congressmen, being elected to check upon the President, are either wiser or
worthier of confidence than the President.
But, as the same Constitution gives Congress power to stymie the President by withholding spending
power, it gives the President power to stymie Congress by empowering him to veto their bills. Thus, the
supposes the President wiser than those, it has already supposed to be wiser than he, a patent absurdity.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
7 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
There is something ridiculous about the composition of the Presidency: the man is excluded from
information concerning common society, yet empowered to act in cases requiring the highest judgment.
The state of the office
shuts its occupant off from the world, yet its business requires him to know it thoroughly.
How did the Presidency come by a power, which the people are afraid to trust and always obliged to
check? Such a power could not be the gift of a wise people; neither can any power which needs checking
be from God. Yet the
Constitution supposes such a power to exist.
But the Constitution is unequal to the task; the means will not accomplish the end. As all the wheels of a
machine are put in motion by one, it only remains to know which power in the Constitution has the most
weight, for
that will govern. Though the other powers may slow its motion, so long as they cannot stop it, they will be
ineffectual. The first moving power will at last have its way, and what it wants in speed will be supplied
by time.
That the Presidency is the overbearing part in the American Constitution needs not be mentioned, and
that it derives its power from being the giver of positions and wager of war is self-evident. Though we
have been wise enough to lock the door against absolute monarchy, we have been foolish enough to
deliver the key to the President.
The prejudice of Americans, in favor of their own government by executive, legislative and judicial
branches, arises as much or more from national pride than reason. Individuals are undoubtedly safer in
America than in
some other countries, but the will of the President is as much the law of the land in America as was the
King's in old England, with but one difference: Instead of always proceeding directly from his mouth by
fiat or Executive Order, it is handed to the people under the guise of an act of Congress. The fate of kings
of old has made their modern counterparts only more subtle - not more just.
Laying aside all national pride and prejudice, the plain truth is that, wholly owing to the constitution of
the people, and not to the Constitution of America, the Presidency is not as oppressive in America as in,
say, Iraq or Zimbabwe.
An inquiry into the constitutional errors in the American form of government is necessary. As we are
incapable of meting out justice to others while we labor under the influence of partiality, neither are we
capable of critiquing ourselves while our judgment is clouded by prejudice. As a man taken with a
mistress is unfit to judge his wife, so any predilection for a rotten constitution will disable us from
discerning a good one.
Modern Sense (Part II)
(With absolutely no apologies to Thomas Paine)
by Edgar J. Steele
December 28, 2002
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
8 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
(I)t is the republican and not the monarchical part of the constitution of England which Englishmen glory
in, viz., the liberty of choosing a house of commons from out of their own body- and it is easy to see that
when the republican virtue fails, slavery ensues. ---Thomas Paine, "Common Sense" (Feb 1776)
Part II: Of the imperial presidency and hereditary succession.
All men are created equal, but they need not stay that way. Some become rich and some poor, rarely due
either to oppression or by means of avarice.
While wealth may produce oppression, it is rarely attained by oppression. And, though the avaricious may
avoid poverty, they generally lack the discipline to attain wealth.
But there is a more significant distinction between men, for which no natural or religious reason can be
given: the difference between citizen and ruler.
Male and female are distinctions of nature, good and bad, distinctions of morality. But, how a group of
men came into the world so exalted above the other, distinguished like some new species, begs
examination. Of equal importance: whether this new distinction is the source of happiness or of misery.
Originally, when there were no rulers in the world; there was no war. Generally, those countries that have
continued without strong leaders have been the most peaceful. History as recorded in the Bible shows
patriarchies, which gave way to Jewish royalty and concomitant misery. Heathens first showed the way
with Kings, idolized in their death. Christian nations have done them one better by idolizing their rulers
while still alive.
Just as setting one man above others cannot be justified from the natural scheme of things, neither can it
be defended in scripture, where the Almighty expressly disapproves of government by kings.
Three thousand years elapsed from the Biblical account of Creation until the Jews sought to replace their
republican form of government with a king. Gideon, who prevailed against the Midianites, Israel's stronger
oppressor, rejected the crown thrust upon him, saying, "I will not rule over you, neither shall my son rule
over you. The Lord shall rule over you." Gideon properly rejected not only the crown, but also the right of
the people, even, to give a crown.
One Hundred-thirty years after Gideon, Samuel also fought against the popular outcry for the naming of a
king (so that Israel might be "like other nations"). Samuel noted that, not only would the king take the
best of everything then owned by the citizens, "The Lord will not hear you in that day."
Hereditary succession, in addition to the degradation of accepting an absolute ruler, is both an insult and
an imposition on posterity. If all are created equal, then nobody by birth should have the right to set up
his own family in preference to others. While one may deserve the honor of his contemporaries, his
descendants would only rarely be worthy to inherit that honor.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
9 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
Hereditary succession includes, not just from father to son, but from circumstance to circumstance, and
the whimsical designation of one in power.
The strongest natural proof of the folly of hereditary right is that nature disapproves it, else she would
not so frequently turn it into ridicule by giving mankind the likes of George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton or any
of the House of Windsor.
As no man should possess any public honors other than those bestowed upon himself, so the givers of
those honors should have no right to give away the right of posterity. Though the people may choose one
for their ruler, they could not, without manifest injustice, say, "Your children shall rule over ours,"
because the next succession might put them under the rule of a fool.
Even true kings, traced to their first rise, likely were nothing better than the principal ruffian of some
restless gang, whose savage manners earned him the title of chief among plunderers. Hereditary
succession, in the early ages of monarchy, could not have taken place as a matter of divine claim, but
only endowed with such after the lapse of a few generations, as the result of some trumped-up
superstitious tale. Thus was hereditary right crammed down the throats of the vulgar.
The office of the American president has become akin to hereditary right, with very few able to lay claim
to it, all of a stripe with differences in appearance only, and all beholden to the moneyed class that
selects their number, time and again. None but those so chosen are offered to the citizens in the
primaries, so that it is irrelevant precisely who is ultimately elected.
America, since the first revolution, has known some good presidents, but groaned beneath a larger
number of bad ones, particularly of late.
It is no coincidence that the Twentieth Century saw the American presidency become a truly imperial
office, resplendent with the tokens and privileges of rank previously reserved to the mightiest and richest
of kings
throughout history.
It is no coincidence that the current American president is but a poor reflection of his father, who
occupied that position less than a generation previous, a man plucked from nowhere and anointed with
sufficient money and influence to carry through the entire electoral process.
It is no coincidence that the current president's father was head of the American secret police for a time.
It is no coincidence that the current president was born into a moneyed and privileged family, one that
travels in the top levels of society throughout the world.
It is no coincidence that one rumored to be preparing to seek the presidency is the wife of the last man to
hold the office.
The plain truth is that the validity of presidential succession in America will not bear looking into.
It is not so much the absurdity as the evil of American presidential succession that concerns us. As it opens
a door to the foolish, the wicked and the improper, it has in it the nature of oppression.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
10 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
Men who look upon themselves born to reign, and others to obey, soon grow insolent; selected from the
rest of mankind, their minds are early poisoned by importance. The world they act in differs so materially
from the world
at large, that they have but little opportunity of knowing its true interests.
The most plausible plea in favor of the American presidency is that it preserves the nation from civil wars.
Were this true, it would be persuasive, yet it is among the most barefaced of falsities. Abraham Lincoln,
believed to be among the greatest of presidents, fomented and prosecuted the bloodiest war known to
America, and the only one fought entirely on its own soil, a civil war of the first order.
Lincoln was the first to gather to the office of the presidency many of the rights, privileges and powers
now taken for granted to be a part of the American presidency, yet which specifically the nation's
founders had eschewed.
There have been others since Lincoln, who have singularly usurped the power of other offices, so that the
presidency has become the power unto itself now witnessed astride America. Franklin Roosevelt comes to
mind, as do Woodrow Wilson, Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon. William Clinton seemed a part of the
same class until George W. Bush showed what a piker Clinton really was.
The American presidency today is as close to being a truly imperial office as ever it has been. In terms of
real power and organization, the American presidency far outstrips the regal reach of any king in history.
In terms of effect, the Supreme Court and Congress are nothing by comparison with the executive branch,
which employs literally millions of Americans at home and abroad. The presidency has become a virtual
dictatorship through the accretion of powers by each subsequent occupant of the office.
The nearer any government approaches to a republic, the less business there is for a ruler. America's ruler
is very busy, indeed. It is somewhat difficult to find a proper name for the government of America. Its
constitution calls it a republic; but in its present state it is unworthy of the name because of the corrupt
influence of the presidency. By having all the offices of government at its disposal, the presidency has so
effectively swallowed up the power and eaten out the virtue of the Congress (the republican part of the
constitution) that the government of America is
even more monarchical than that of old England.
Men fall out with names without understanding them, for it is the republican and not the monarchical part
of the constitution of America in which Americans glory; i.e., the liberty of choosing the members of
Congress from out of their own body.
It is easy to see that, when republican virtue fails, slavery ensues. Why is the American constitution sickly?
Because the presidency has poisoned the republic, thereby appending the Congress to itself.
Yet, Congress is not blameless in its current ineffectualness. In their own right, Congressmen have become
separated from the American public. Generally, only the rich and well-connected can run for office. Only
politically-correct receive the blessings of the media, all of which is controlled by the same moneyed
interests that select and fund the presidential candidates.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
11 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
And they run again and again, never returning to private life, so that they need never feel the heel of the
governmental boot brought to bear upon the average citizen's neck. Term limits are universally stricken by
that are the lapdogs of the same moneyed interests as previously described, with the result that
congressmen continue in the same position in perpetuity, with family members often assuming that
position upon the death
of their forebear.
And Congress has proven itself to be those moneyed interests' lapdog, as well, giving over to the imperial
presidency all the powers constitutionally prescribed to itself, all the while submitting itself and its
employees and functions to executive oversight.
Truly, Congress has ceased to be the sole remaining republican element prescribed by the American
Modern Sense (Part IIIa)
(With absolutely no apologies to Thomas Paine)
by Edgar J. Steele
January 2, 2003
O ye that love mankind! Ye that dare oppose, not only the tyranny, but the tyrant, stand forth! Every
spot of the old world is overrun with oppression. Freedom hath been hunted round the globe. Asia and
Africa have long expelled her. Europe regards her like a stranger, and England hath given her warning to
depart. O! Receive the fugitive, and prepare in time an asylum for mankind... ---Thomas Paine, "Common
Sense" (Feb 1776)
Part IIIa. Thoughts on the present state of American affairs.
In the following, I offer only simple facts, plain arguments and common sense. I ask nothing more of the
reader than the setting aside of prejudice and rigidity of thinking, so that reason and feelings alone guide
one's response. Put on the true character of an independent thinker and enlarge your views beyond the
present day.
Volumes have been written concerning the emerging American police state. People of every stripe have
weighed in on the controversy, from different motives and with various designs. As all have been
ineffectual in stemming
the growth of tyranny, the debate may as well be closed. Arms, as a last resort, will not decide the
matter, save in favor of an imperial Federal government that has overwhelming firepower and resources.
Massive group
action on the part of the American citizenry is all that now is left to us.
It has been reported that Bush the Second and John Ashcroft have stated that their measures are only of a
temporary kind. Should the American public adopt this belief generally, our progeny will curse our names
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
12 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
The sun never shined on a cause of greater worth. Ours is not the affair of a city, a state, a region or,
even, a country, but of a continent – of at least one-eighth part of the habitable globe. This is not the
concern of a day, a year, or an age; posterity is bound up in this contest, to be affected, even to the end
of time, by today's proceedings. Now is the seedtime of a New America, of faith and honor.
By referring the matter from argument to action, a new era for politics is begun. All plans and proposals
predating September 11, 2001, are like the almanacs of a bygone era which, though proper then, are
superceded and useless now. Whatever was advanced by the advocates on either side of the question
then, crumbled with the World Trade Center. Before that time, the only difference was the method of
effecting change in American society by working within the system, with one side proposing force and the
other friendship. The first has failed due to lapsed opportunity; the latter has withdrawn influence in
favor of complete capitulation to neo-conservatism.
Much has been said for conciliatory methods of working within the system, which have now passed away
like an agreeable dream and left us as we find ourselves. Now we should examine the counter-argument
and inquire into some of the many injuries that the American public has sustained, and always will
sustain, by being subservient to the Federal government. Our task now is to examine that connection and
dependence, on the principles of nature
and common sense, to see what might become of us, if separated, and what we are to expect, if
Some maintain that, as America flourished under her former connection with her Federal government, the
same connection is necessary for her future happiness, and will always have the same effect. Nothing
could be more wrong. We may as well assert that the first twenty-year period of our life is to be a pattern
for the next twenty. But, even this gives up too much, because I maintain that America would have
flourished as much, and probably much more, without the burgeoning Federal government upon her back.
Commerce, by which America has enriched herself, is the necessaries of life, and will always have a
market while eating is the custom of the rest
of the world.
But the Federal government has protected us, some say. Though this is true, consider that the motive was
interest and not attachment. Our government has not protected us from our enemies on our own account,
from its own enemies on its own account, often those who had no quarrel with us on any other account,
yet who will always be our enemies solely because of the Federal government's account.
If we could shrug off the Federal government tomorrow, we would be at peace with Islam, though it is at
war with our government. The miseries of last century's wars should be enough to warn us against foreign
entanglements of the sort that has become our government's stock in trade. No Islamic country was, nor
perhaps ever would be, our enemy as Americans, but only as we are citizens of the United States of
But the Federal government is America's parent, say some. Then the more shame upon her conduct. Even
brutes do not devour their young, nor savages make war upon their own families; wherefore the assertion,
if true, turns to our government's reproach. But, it happens not to be so, or only partly true, and the
words "homeland" and "patriot" have been disingenuously adopted by the President and his parasites, with
the low design of gaining an unfair bias by virtue of the weakness of our minds. The Constitution, not the
Federal government, is the parent of America.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
13 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
America once was the asylum for the persecuted lovers of civil and religious liberty from every part of
Europe. Here they fled, not from the tender embraces of the mother, but from the cruelty of the
monster. How tragic that the same tyranny, which drove the first emigrants from home, pursues their
descendants still. Much has been said of the strength of America, that it might bid defiance to the world.
But this is mere presumption. The fate of war is uncertain, particularly given the prevalence of weapons
of mass destruction.
What have we to do with setting the world at odds, one part to another? Our plan from the start was
commerce, which, well attended to, would secure us the peace and friendship of all the rest of the world.
It has been in
the interest of other countries to have America be a free port, a trading partner.
I challenge the warmest advocate for support of the Federal government to show a single advantage to
accrue to America by imposing its will on other countries, as it has been wont to do, of late. The injuries
disadvantages that we suffer by pursuit of the Federal government's policies, both foreign and domestic,
are without number.
Our duty to mankind at large, as well as to ourselves, instructs us to renounce the path upon which our
Federal government has set us. That path directly involves America in wars and quarrels throughout the
world, and
sets us at variance with nations who would otherwise seek our friendship and against whom we have
neither anger nor complaint. As the world at large is our market for trade, we ought to form no partial
connection with any part of it. It is in the true interest of America to steer clear of Middle East
entanglements, which she can never do while she
is the make-weight on the scale of Israeli politics.
The next war may not turn out like the last, and is guaranteed only to be followed by another, then
another. It will take but one debilitating loss for the advocates of conciliation with our Federal
government to be wishing
for separation then, because neutrality then will be a safer convoy than a battleship.
Everything that is right or natural pleads for separation from the behemoth that the Federal Government
has become. The blood of the slain, the weeping voice of nature cries, "It is time to part."
Our forefathers fled tyranny by coming to America. We have no sanctuary to which to retreat, so the time
has come or a division of America into diverse parts, as many as necessary to secure internal peace, quell
current strife and insulate from the current spate of wars those of us who disagree with the policies of the
Federal government.
The current authority of the Federal government over America is a form of government, which, sooner or
later, must have an end. A serious mind can draw no true pleasure by looking forward, under the painful
and positive
conviction that what is called the "present state of freedom" is merely temporary.
As parents, we can have no joy knowing that this government is not sufficiently lasting to ensure anything
that we may bequeath to posterity. Since we are running the next generation into debt, we ought to do its
work, else we use them meanly and pitifully. To see our duty with clarity, we should take our children in
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
14 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
hand, and fix our view but a few years further into life; that eminence will present a prospect which only
wishful thinking and self delusion conceals from our sight.
Though I do not wish unnecessarily to give offense, I am inclined to believe that all those who espouse
unswerving support of our government's course abroad may be found among the following descriptions:
men, who are not to be trusted; weak men, who cannot see; prejudiced men, who will not see; and a
certain set of moderate men, who think better of the Federal government than it deserves. This last class,
by ill-judged
deliberation, will be the cause of more calamities to this continent, than all the other three.
The inevitable breaking apart of America can be seen in the intent of Mexicans, both citizen and ethnic,
to retake the southwest portion of this country, including California, Arizona, New Mexico and parts of
Nevada, Utah, Colorado and Texas, a region which they have already renamed "Aztlan." The Federal
government has facilitated this insurrection by throwing open America's borders.
Further potential breakups loom as the result of racial strife, born of the very "civil rights" revolution
which was designed by the Federal government to quell inequity between the races in America. Instead,
that inequity has
been redistributed among the populace and increased, with the result that interracial tensions today far
surpass any, which has ever been known to America.
Regardless, the separation which I advocate today is political in nature, with the Federal government and
as much of America that wishes to follow its lead, going in one direction, while the rest of us peacefully
our steps to the constitutional republic which once was the singular hallmark of America: New America, if
you will. I anticipate that would constitute much of the Midwest, some of New England, some of the South
virtually the entire West that does not fall under Mexico's sway.
Modern Sense (Part IIIb)
(With absolutely no apologies to Thomas Paine)
by Edgar J. Steele
January 8, 2003
Ye that oppose independence now, ye know not what ye do; ye are opening a door to eternal tyranny, by
keeping vacant the seat of government. There are thousands and tens of thousands; who would think it
glorious to expel
from the continent, that barbarous and hellish power, which hath stirred up the Indians and Negroes to
destroy us; the cruelty hath a double guilt, it is dealing brutally by us, and treacherously by them.
---Thomas Paine, "Common Sense" (Feb 1776)
Part IIIb: Thoughts on the present state of American affairs.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
15 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
Many in America are fortunate in being physically removed from the growing tyranny and injustice meted
out by the Federal government. The evil is not yet close enough to their doors to make them feel the
precariousness with
which all of America is now possessed.
Those more passive than others look lightly upon the many recent offenses of the Federal government
and, hoping for the best, are apt to say, "Come, come, we shall be friends again, for all this." But,
consider human nature
and tell me whether you can hereafter, love, honor and serve the power that has brought such manifest
injustice and tyranny to America. If you cannot do this, then you are deceiving yourself and, by your
delay, bringing ruin
upon your posterity.
Your future allegiance to this government will be forced and unnatural and, being formed only on the plan
of present convenience, will in time fall into a state more wretched than now.
If you say that you can overlook the transgressions, I ask:
Has your home been taken from you; because you were unable to pay the
property taxes they demanded?
Has your son been arrested and held in a secret place, without charges, now
subject to torture and summary execution because a Federal Bureaucrat has labeled him an "enemy
Have your children been denied admission to a decent school in the name of
affirmative action?
Have you been denied employment in favor of those whose only qualification
is their skin color?
Have your grandchildren been stolen by the state on trumped-up allegations
of child abuse, the sole basis for which is the fact that they are not
fat...or are home schooled...or are Christians?
Have your wages been taken in the form of taxes and given to illegal
immigrants in the form of medicine, schooling and housing, none of which
you can afford your own family in equal measure?
Have your brothers and sisters been executed in a fiery conflagration such
as Waco because they dared to be different?
Has your son been shot in the back, like Randy Weaver's?
If you have not, then you are not a judge of those who have. But, if you have, and still can shake hands
with the murderers, then you are unworthy of the name of husband, father, friend or lover, and,
whatever may be your
rank or title in life, you have the heart of a coward and the spirit of a sycophant.
I do not conjure up the horror of everyday life experienced by some Americans for the purpose of
provoking revenge, but to awaken us from our slumber. It is not in the power of the Federal government
to enslave us if
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
16 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
we do not enslave ourselves by delay and timidity. The season now upon us is worth an age if rightly
employed; if neglected, every American will suffer the misfortune that today inflicts the few among us.
It is repugnant to reason that America should longer remain subject to the grasping power that its central
government has gathered to itself. Reconciliation to this government is a false dream. As Milton wisely
"never can true reconcilement grow where wounds of deadly hate have pierced so deep."
Every quiet method for peace has been ineffectual. Our pleas have been rejected with disdain by the
courts at every level. Our petitions have only tended to convince us that nothing flatters vanity, or
obstinacy in our government more than repeated petitioning. Nothing has contributed more than such
pointless entreaties to the consolidation of power by Kings in other countries in times past. Since it
appears that
nothing but blows will do, let us come to a final separation and not leave the next generation to be
cutting throats for the sake of violated family members.
It is not in the power of the Federal government to do America justice. It has become too weighty,
intricate and inextricably bound up with the affairs of all men to afford even a modicum of the freedom
upon which
America was founded. There was a time when a central government over us all was proper...and there is a
proper time for it to cease.
There is something absurd in supposing a continent to be perpetually governed by an island the size of the
District of Columbia. In no instance has nature made the satellite larger than its primary planet. As
now reverses the common order of nature, it is obvious the time has come to effect a separation between
America, for those who wish to extend the current state of affairs, and New America, for those who wish
to reenter
the constitutional republic that once was all of America.
I am not moved by motives of pride, party or resentment to espouse the doctrine of separation and
independence. I am clearly and conscientiously persuaded that it is in the best interest of all Americans to
effect this
separation; that anything short of separation is mere patchwork that will afford no lasting peace; that it is
leaving the sword to our children and shrinking back at a time when a little farther, a little more, would
deliver to this continent a lasting peace.
As the Federal government has manifested not the least inclination toward a compromise, we may be
assured that no terms can be obtained worthy of acceptance or justifying the tyranny and injustice to
which we already have
been subjected.
If all of America must take up arms, if every man must be a soldier, it is scarcely worth our while to fight
against a contemptible ministry only. Dearly would we pay for the repeal of Acts and Executive Orders, if
that is,
all for which we fight! It is as great a folly to pay a Civil War price for law, as for land. The inevitability of
this government's demise, whether by hands domestic or foreign, makes the waging of war against our
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
17 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
own government like the wasting of an estate upon a lawsuit to evict a tenant whose lease is just
No man wished more to work within the system than myself, before the fatal eleventh of September 2001.
The moment the events of that day were made known to have occurred, at minimum, by sufferance of our
own government, I rejected the hardened, sullen-tempered Executive Branch of American government
forever. Taken together with the sure knowledge of our government's complicity in the Oklahoma City
Bombing, Waco and Ruby Ridge, along with a host of lesser-known indignities to our national conscience, I
disdain the wretch with the pretended title, Father of His People, that he can unfeelingly hear of their
slaughter and composedly sleep with their
blood upon his soul.
But, even assuming we could make our peace with the Federal government today, what would be the
result? I answer, the ruin of America, still - for several reasons:
First, the powers of governing still being concentrated in the hands of the President; he will have a
negative influence over the whole legislation of America. As each occupant of that office for the past 150
years has shown
himself to be such an inveterate enemy to liberty, and discovered such a thirst for arbitrary power, the
President is not a proper man to say, "You shall make no laws but what I please."
Is there any inhabitant in America so ignorant as not to know that, despite the American Constitution, no
laws can be made but that to which the President gives leave? After all is said and done, can there be any
but the whole power of the Federal government will be exerted to keep the common man as low,
subservient and humble as possible? We are already freer than the President wishes us to be; will he not
hereafter endeavor to
make us less so?
Is the power that is so suspicious of our freedom a proper power to govern us? Whoever says "No!" to this
question is a separatist, for separation means no more than whether we shall make our own laws or
whether the
Presidency, which is among the greatest enemies this continent has, shall tell us, "There shall be no laws
but such as I like."
The citizenry of America is only secondary in the system of American politics. The Federal government
advances the good of the people no farther than serves its own purposes. Our government's interest leads
to suppress the growth of ours in every case, which does not promote its own advantage or in the least
interferes with it.
To show that reconciliation now is a dangerous doctrine, consider the following: it would be advisable for
the President at this time to repeal the Patriot Act, the Homeland Security Act and the many Executive
issued which have further bound the population of America, for the sake of re-ingratiating himself with all
the people of America. That way, he might accomplish, via artifice and subtlety, in the long run, that
which he will
not be able to do by force and violence in the short one. Reconciliation and ruin are nearly one and the
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
18 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
Second, even the best terms which we can hope to obtain amount to no more than a temporary
expedient, which can last no longer than until America is taken by force by its foreign enemies, whose
number have become legion.
Even now, citizens have begun to dispose of their effects, moving to remote portions of the country, with
some emigrating to other countries altogether.
But, the most powerful of arguments is that nothing but true separation of America will keep the peace
and preserve it inviolate from civil war. I dread the event of reconciliation with the Federal government
now, as it is
more than probable that it will be followed by a revolt somewhere or other, the consequences of which
may be far more fatal than all the malice of Washington, DC.
Modern Sense (Part IIIc)
(With absolutely no apologies to Thomas Paine)
by Edgar J. Steele
January 15, 2003
I make the sufferers' case my own, and I protest, that were I driven from house and home, my property
destroyed, and my circumstances ruined, that as a man, sensible of injuries, I could never relish the
doctrine of
reconciliation, or consider myself bound thereby. ---Thomas Paine, "Common Sense" (Feb 1776)
Part IIIc: Thoughts on the present state of American affairs.
Thousands of Americans have been ruined by their government's invasive, intrusive and tyrannical
behavior. Thousands more, perhaps millions, will suffer a similar fate in the times ahead. Their
experience of reality is different from those of us who have suffered nothing. They certainly have nothing
to lose by refusing now to submit.
Many of us refuse to question our government's actions, fearful of a similar outcome. We believe we have
much to lose, but have already forfeited the most important of our rights in refusing to stand for the
fundamental rights of our countrymen.
A government that cannot protect us, that cannot preserve the peace, is no government at all. Many have
declined to foster confrontation, fearful that a civil war will result. There is ten times more to fear from
government at the end of our current path, and a civil war thereby more certain, than from the
consequences of choosing another path altogether. I take the part of those maligned thus far. If I were
similarly situated,
I could never support the government that has so blatantly torn asunder the lives of its own citizenry.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
19 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
If there is any true cause of fear respecting independence from our imperialistic government, it is because
no alternative yet is offered. Men do not see their way out. As an opening, I offer the following, while
affirming that I have no desire of them myself, other than they might be the means of giving rise to
something better.
Let us form a New America, forged from as much of the country as becomes desirous of change. Let there
be a parliamentary form of government, with the current Constitution modified only somewhat to serve as
its charter,
the modifications to ensure the limited scope and reach of the central government.
Convene at first a Constitutional Congress for the purpose of amending and adopting the Constitution,
with its membership chosen by popular vote, each member elected by a particular and equal portion of
the general citizenry.
Upon adoption of the Constitution, this body to dissolve and legislators, governors and other elective
officeholders to be selected by popular vote, as prescribed.
Let the States be more like sovereigns themselves, with no necessity for overriding statute or authority,
save only as is necessary to allow the central government the performance of its limited duties of common
Let the right of secession be absolute and evocable on the vote of 75% of the population of any definable
geographic region. Let the assemblies be annual, concern themselves solely with domestic affairs and
their membership serve without pay or benefit of any sort. Let there be no recurring occupancy by any
member, even of differing
position. These strictures are to apply to State and local elective office, as well.
Let the senate be of two houses: the Senate composed solely of men, two from each state; the House of
Representatives, comprised solely of women, will total the same as the Senate, with its membership
elected by districts made equal on the basis of population.
Let the assemblies select the Executive, whose tenure will be for a single one-year term, unpaid and
without benefit, other than living arrangements, whose function will be administrative and procedural,
with no ability to
negotiate with foreign entities or enter into treaties and no ability to originate or suggest legislation at
any level. All foreign entanglements, which will be constitutionally discouraged, must be individually
into by the States.
A similar representative form of government is to be guaranteed to the states and local municipalities.
States' rights will be supreme, with the right to move between states absolute.
States may hold no more than 5% of the land of a state in local or state name. Central government
landholdings are forbidden.
Government pensions, welfare and individual or corporate subsidy of every type to be abolished and
forbidden at all levels of government.
All practicing lawyers will be disbarred. All existing judges will be discharged. All existing statutes and
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
20 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
case law to be forgone. Lawyers will read for their positions, in the time-honored manner of bygone eras.
Judges will be drawn from the ranks of lawyers, to serve in their area of specialization without pay or
benefit each month, for that percentage of time necessary to satisfy the requirements of justice. Juries
will decide
all questions of fact and law, with sentences and verdicts executed immediately. Lawyers will be
forbidden from holding elective office. The right to a jury for any proceeding will be absolute, with secret
proceedings forbidden.
Victimless crimes will not be prosecuted. There will be no hate laws. Prisons will be segregated racially.
English will be the official language, with all governmental proceedings conducted solely in English.
The existing school system will be abolished, to be replaced by community-based schools, with teachers
compensated directly by student parents.
Civil rights will be absolute, with no preference to be shown by any government, at any level, to any
individual for any reason. Individual and private discrimination shall neither be illegal or discouraged.
Immigration will be an issue for each State to resolve. Illegal immigrants and their progeny are to be
ejected immediately upon adoption of the new Constitution.
The rights to assemble, freely associate or not, travel, be free of governmental intrusion, privacy, bear
arms, free speech and the free practice of religion in any and all venues to be inviolate.
The income, sales and property taxes will be abolished, with governments required to exist upon the
proceeds of tariff and import/export taxes alone. A strictly balanced budget will be required of every
entity, especially the central government, every year. Local use districts may be formed upon approval of
75% of the affected population.
No business monopolies are to be allowed. Unions are forbidden. Death sentences may be meted to
corporations for grievous crimes. Media enterprise, particularly, is to be dispersed, with no concentration
of more than 1% total ownership of a particular medium in any single person, group or entity.
All able-bodied members of society are considered potentially to be part of the militia, with participation
strictly voluntary. A modest uniformed, all-volunteer military force will be maintained for the common
only, and strictly prohibited for non-defensive use within the borders of the States.
The dollar will be repudiated, to be replaced by government-minted gold and silver coins. Any and all
currency will be produced by the central government and strictly backed by 100% value holdings in
precious metals.
Central banking is prohibited. Fractional-reserve banking is prohibited.
A government of our own is our natural right. It is wiser and safer to separate the country now and
peacefully select its governing charter, than to trust such to time and chance. Else, one may hereafter
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
21 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
arise who, laying hold of popular disquietude, may collect together the desperate and discontented and,
by assuming to themselves the powers of government, may sweep away the remaining liberties of the
continent like a deluge. Should
the government of all of America continue on its current path, there will be a temptation for some
adventurer to try his fortune and effect a coup, taking the current structure of government as his own to
use in a manner
most oppressive.
Ye that oppose separation now, ye know not what ye do. You open a door to eternal tyranny by keeping in
the seat of power that faction which has stirred up the groups of this country, one against the other,
whereby it
deals brutally by one and treacherously by the other.
Every day wears out what little remains of kindred between these (would be) Masters and us. Can there
be any reason to hope that, as the relationship expires, the affection will increase or that we will agree
better, when we
have ten times more and greater concerns over which to quarrel than before?
To those that urge harmony and reconciliation: can you restore to us the time that is passed? Can you give
to prostitution its former innocence? Neither can you reconcile America and New America. The last straw
has been
tossed. The government now prepares further to oppress us.
There are injuries which nature cannot forgive; she would cease to be nature if she did. The Almighty has
implanted in us these inextinguishable feelings for good and wise purposes. They are the guardians of His
in our hearts. They distinguish us from the herd of common animals. The robber and murderer would often
escape unpunished, did not the injuries which our tempers sustain provoke us into justice.
O ye that love mankind! Ye that dare oppose, not only the tyranny, but also the tyrant, stand forth! Every
spot of the Old World is overrun with oppression. Freedom hath been hunted round the globe. Asia and
have long expelled her. Europe regards her like a stranger, and America hath given her warning to depart.
O! Receive the fugitive, and prepare in time an asylum for mankind.
--------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Modern Sense (Part IV)
(With absolutely no apologies to Thomas Paine)
by Edgar J. Steele
January 19, 2003
The more men have to lose, the less willing are they to venture. The rich are in general slaves to fear,
and submit to courtly power with the trembling duplicity of a Spaniel. ---Thomas Paine, "Common Sense"
(Feb 1776)
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
22 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
Part IV: Of the present ability of America, with some miscellaneous reflections.
I have never conversed with anyone related to the Movement who has not seen a wholesale revamping of
America's government, if not America's outright breakup, as inevitable. The present course of foreign
welfare, citizen control (oppression), economic opportunism and privilege for the few lead inevitably to
economic catastrophe and revolt.
As so many agree as to the event, but disagree only as to its timing, let us take a general survey of things
and endeavor, if possible, to find out the very time. But we need not go far. The inquiry ceases at once,
fact, for the time has found us. Inevitability has a way of bringing things to a head.
Many bewail the fact that we seem so few in the face of the overwhelming masses of government agents
and employees. It is not in numbers, but in unity, which our great strength lies. Besides, should the
government move
against us in wholesale form, masses of the American population will rise up in number sufficient to repel
the force of the entire world.
America has, at this time; the largest body of armed and disciplined private citizens of any power under
Heaven, should armed force become necessary. Huge portions of the government's forces will refuse to
upon us and, instead, will join with us against the sweeping tyranny then apparent for all to see.
The present government never will allow formation of an organized citizen militia. Witness what has been
done in the face of small forms of organization, as at Waco. Never will we be allowed openly to organize
form an effective resistance force. Even now, the government is taking opposition leaders, our leaders,
into custody and jailing them on sundry manufactured charges. What it fails to realize is that its enemy is
an idea, a spirit, generated by its own tyranny. For every leader taken away and jailed on trumped-up
charges, ten more will take his place.
At present, we have little to defend; therefore little defense is necessary. If we actually possessed a
foothold for our People, the more would we have to defend - and lose.
Neither have we debts, for the massive indebtedness of the current American government, is attributable
to the very forces arrayed against us. When the time comes, the assumption of debt in furtherance of our
cause will be
worthy and worthwhile.
For now, to expend millions for the sake of getting a few vile acts repealed, and routing the present
Administration, only, is unworthy the charge, and is using posterity with the utmost cruelty because it is
leaving them the great work to do, with a debt upon their backs, from which they derive no advantage.
Such a thought is unworthy a man of honor and is the true characteristic of a narrow heart and the
peddling politician.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
23 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
America is burdened with a total debt of upwards of twenty-seven trillion dollars, for which she pays
interest of over a trillion dollars. Another twenty-two trillion dollars' debt burdens private American
companies and
individuals. Somewhat less than another trillion dollars' interest, for a total of about two trillion dollars in
interest alone, paid primarily to bankers, most of them foreign, a sum equal to the entirety of the
government budget today and approximately one-third America's total annual economy.
America's current budget deficit is one-fourth that paid in interest, or about five hundred billion dollars. A
similar figure is the amount by which America's foreign trade deficit grows each year, representing the
outflow of American assets to foreign shores. Another four-hundred billion dollars is spent on America's
military, primarily in support of foreign imperialism and intervention in the affairs of other countries;
funds spent on destroying other economies, all while many of America's citizens do without the necessities
of life.
A cancer both foreign and hostile to America sits astride her, sucking her dry and directing her policies
and government to ends inconsistent with those set forth by her founding fathers. This is our real enemy,
make no
mistake. Most of those employed in the service of the American government are ordinary people, like any
other, people who will rally to our cause when the time comes.
That portion of the American government, which will oppose us past the point of open and notorious
tyranny, is small. We will have a force greater, by far, should that dark and fateful day befall us.
Some say that we can reform government - just pass the right bill, repeal the appropriate act, or elect the
right president. Then, once we have made it up with the federal government, it will protect us. Common
sense will tell
us that the power which has endeavored to subdue us is, of all others, the most improper to defend us.
The average American's knowledge of government tyranny and oppression, both domestic and foreign, is
hourly improving. Resolution is our inherent character and courage has never forsaken us. Wherefore,
what is it that we
want? Why is it that we hesitate now to demand our own portion of American, free from rule by the
federal government? From the federal government we can expect nothing but ruin. While it holds sway
over us
all, this country will not be worth living in. Jealousies always will be arising; insurrections constantly will
be happening.
The economic fortunes of the average citizen, perhaps, have not yet declined sufficient to engender a
passion for change. Trade being the consequence of population, men become too much absorbed thereby
to attend to anything
else. Commerce diminishes the spirit, both of patriotism and military defense.
History sufficiently informs us that the bravest achievements always were accomplished in the birth of a
nation. With the increase of commerce, America has lost its spirit. Notwithstanding her numbers, America
to continued insults with the patience of a coward. The more men have to lose, the less willing are they
to venture. The rich are in general slaves to fear, and submit to courtly power with the trembling
duplicity of a Spaniel.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
24 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
Youth is the seedtime of good habits, as well in nations as in individuals. Now is the time for New America
to be formed and separated from those who wish to continue the policies and plunder of Old America.
However, the vast variety of interests occasioned by an increase of trade and population has created
When William the Conqueror subdued England, he gave them law at the point of the sword. Until we form
a New America, immune to the tyranny and oppression now afoot in the land, we shall be in danger of
having the seat
of power filled by some true and awful despot, who will treat us in the same manner. Then, where will be
our freedom? Where our property?
Some say that despot already has assumed power, thus more the need for us to move swiftly. Bush the
Second has engineered passage of the Patriot Act and the Homeland Defense Act, blueprints for tyranny
passed by the Congress
without even being read. Should the general Electorate of America know the contents of these Acts and
the manner of their adoption, it would not hesitate a moment to think its elected Representatives
unworthy of their
trust. Immediate necessity makes many things convenient, which if continued would grow into
oppressions. Expedience and right are different things.
To conclude, however strange it may appear to some, or however unwilling they may be to think so,
matters not, but many reasons can be given to show that nothing can settle our affairs so expeditiously as
an open and determined declaration for separation of New America from America.
First, it is the custom of nations, when any two are at odds, for some other powers, not engaged in the
quarrel, to step in as mediators. While we call ourselves a part of America, no power, however well
disposed she may be, can offer her mediation. In our present state, we may quarrel on forever.
Second, it is unreasonable of any foreign power to lend us their support if they suppose it will go to
merely mending our internal relations, thereby strengthening America; those powers would thereby suffer
by the consequences.
Third, while we profess ourselves to be a part of America, we must, in the eye of foreign nations, be
considered as rebels. The precedent is somewhat dangerous to their peace.
Fourth, were a manifesto to be published and dispatched to foreign courts, setting forth the miseries we
have endured and the peaceable methods we have ineffectually used for redress; declaring, at the same
time that not
being able, any longer, to live happily or safely under the cruel disposition of the American federal
government, we had been driven to the necessity of breaking off all connection with her; at the same
assuring all such courts of our peaceable disposition towards them - such a memorial would produce more
good effect to this country than if a boxcar were freighted with petitions to Washington, DC.
Under our present denomination of American citizens, we can neither be received nor heard abroad. The
custom of all courts is against us, and will be so, until by independence, we take rank with other nations.
Just as America allows Mexicans to hold dual citizenship, that of Mexico and America, and Israelis, of both
Israel and America, so should we now designate ourselves citizens of both America and New America. We
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
25 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
concentrate ourselves geographically in those portions of America most likely to be allotted to a New
America in a breakup of the country, just as Mexicans have concentrated themselves in Southwest
America, which they have
taken to calling Aztlan. Already, fully a quarter of the productive white population of California has left in
the past decade, resettling mainly in Northwest America, thereby providing an example to us all.
Until a separation is effected from that portion of America over which the federal government will
continue to hold sway, we will feel like a man who continues putting off some unpleasant business from
day to day, yet knows
it must be done, hates to set about it, wishes it over, and is continually haunted with the thoughts of its
New America - an idea whose time has come. –Ed
"I didn't say it would be easy. I just said it would be the truth." --– Morpheus
Copyright ©2003 Edgar J. Steele
Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate among private individuals and groups, post on all
sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit publications. Contact author for all other rights, which are
On-line link to this article in HTML format: http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/columns/modern4.htm
Subscribe: Send email with "subscribe" in subject line to: subscribe@conspiracypenpal.com
Unsubscribe: Send email with "unsubscribe" in subject line to: unsubscribe@conspiracypenpal.com
Anti-Spam Policy and Disclaimer: If you have received this email and it was unsolicited, please accept our
apologies. If received directly from us, merely click the Unsubscribe link above and click send. Please
understand that there is nothing we can do to stop this message being forwarded by another, which you
can determine by inspecting the header that is embedded herein. Under legislation passed by the 105th
U.S. Congress, mail cannot be considered spam if it bears a noncommercial message, nor if it includes
contact information and a link for removal from the underlying mailing list.
Make a difference! The Patriot Civil Liberties Union (PCLU) needs your support to continue its work
fighting for the right of Americans to be free of government tyranny at all levels and for restoration of the
US Constitution as America’s guiding charter. Please mail donations to PCLU, PO Box 1255, Sagle, Idaho
83860. Credit cards: PayPal.com for: Donate@PCLU.org.
Death to the New World Order
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
26 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
We are on the March
The Empire is on the run
We shall prevail!
"It is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful
truth. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed
to be of the number of those, who have eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not the things, which so
nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing
to know the whole truth; to know the worst and to provide for it."
"I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided; and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way
of judging the future but the past. Let us not, I beseech you, deceive ourselves (any) longer. We have
done everything that could be done to avert the storm, which is now coming on. If we wish to be free -
we must fight! I repeat, we must fight! An appeal to arms and the (our Heavenly Father) is all that is left
"We are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the (Creator) has placed in our power.
Millions of people armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are
invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, we shall not fight our battles
alone. There is a just (Sovereign, King) who presides over the (future) of Nations, who will raise up
friends [our brothers in Ireland and Scotland, maybe even those in England] to fight our battles [with or]
for us. The battle, in not to the strong alone: it is the vigilant, the active, the brave. If we were bias
enough to desire it, it is now to o late to retreat from the contest, there is no retreat but into
submission and slavery. Our chains are forged: Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston. The
War is inevitable and let it come. I repeat Sir, let it come. It is in vein to extenuate the matter."
"The Gentleman may cry, "Peace, Peace"; but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale
that sweeps from the North shall bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms. Our Brethren our
already in the field. Why stand we here idle? What is it Gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so
dear or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty (Yah)! I
know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" -- The Christian
Patriot, Patrick Henry; speech give March 1775 in Virginia Assembly. {An honest Lawyer, one of the best.}
"If I seek to dwell in the secret place of the Most High, I shall find safety in the shadow of the Almighty. I
will say of Yah, He is my refuge and my fortress, my Salvation, in Him I will trust. Surely he will deliver
me from the snare of the fowler, and from the destroying plague. He shall cover me with His Feathers,
and under His wings I shall trust. His truth shall be my shield and buckler. I shall not be afraid because of
the terror by night: or because of the bullets that fly by day; nor for the plague [Smallpox, Anthrax] that
walks in darkness: nor for the destruction that lays waste [Case Hardened Shells and Nukes] at noonday.
A thousand shall fall at my side and ten thousand at my right hand; but it shall not come near me. Only
with my eyes shall I look and see that reward of the wicked. Because You, O Yah, are my refuge. I have
made the Most high my dwelling-place; no evil shall befall me, neither shall any plague [Chemtrails, CS,
Biological Weapons] come near my dwelling. For Yah shall give His Spirit charge over me, to keep me in
all my ways. The hands of Thy Spirit shall bear me up, lest I dash my foot against a stone. I shall tread on
the lion and adder, the young lion and the jackal I shall trample underfoot. Because I have set my love on
Yah, therefore, He will deliver me: Yah will set my on high, because I have known His Name. I shall call
on Him and He will answer me; He will be with me in trouble; Yah will deliver me and honor me. With
long life He will satisfy me and show me His Salvation." The Soldier's Prayer, Psalm 91. You do well, my
son, to learn and heed these words.
Major Paine
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
27 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM

September 5, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Our home supercluster redefined: Laniakea (immeasurable heaven)

Superclusters – regions of space that are densely packed with galaxies – are the biggest structures in the Universe. But scientists have struggled to define exactly where one supercluster ends and another begins. Now, a team based in Hawaii has come up with a new technique that maps the Universe according to the flow of galaxies across space. Redrawing the boundaries of the cosmic map, they redefine our home supercluster and name it Laniakea, which means ‘immeasurable heaven’ in Hawaiian and would take 100,000,000 light years to traverse.


Read the research paper: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13674

September 4, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Roger Stone's blockbuster updated 2nd edition on Serial Murderer Lyndon Johnson



Media Contact: Joe Hunter
Happy Birthday, LBJ!
Updated book exposes Johnson as America's most amoral, corrupt president
(New York, NY) - President Lyndon Baines Johnson's birthday is today, August 27th. That's the same birthday as New York Times bestselling author Roger Stone! 
To celebrate their shared anniversary, Stone has a special present for LBJ: the 40-year Washington insider just released the new edition of "The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ." The updated bestseller includes two new chapters and an afterword that supply new information on the man Stone calls "the most amoral, corrupt, greedy, coarse, ruthless, psychopath to ever occupy the White House."
Stone establishes LBJ's motive, means and opportunity to orchestrate Kennedy's murder and uses
both eyewitness testimony and fingerprint evidence to tie convicted murderer and long-time
Johnson hit man Malcolm ‘Mac' Wallace to the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository and
John F. Kennedy's murder on November 22, 1963.
Stone reveals how LBJ ordered the murder of at least 17 men, according to White House Aide Clif
Carter, to cover-up voter-fraud and corruption. "LBJ would order a murder the way you or I would order a ham sandwich," said Stone.
Stone reveals the plans of syndicated columnist Drew Pearson, who had written a story accusing
LBJ of bribery in a $7 billion dollar jet fighter contract doled out to Texas firm General Dynamics.
Bobby Baker associate Don Reynolds, in testimony on the morning of the assassination, detailed
Baker carrying a suitcase containing $100,000 to LBJ in payment for steering the contract to the
Fort Worth company. The story with details of the sweetheart deal were to hit newsstands and 700
newspapers November 24, 1963. Instead, it was spiked after LBJ became President.
Stone outlines how Attorney General Robert Kennedy intended to prosecute LBJ for corruption in
both the Bobby Baker and Billie Sol Estes cases. Johnson knew he was being dropped from the
1964 Democratic ticket and his federal prosecution were both imminent.
Stone establishes that LBJ authorized the false flag attack on the USS ship Liberty by the Israeli air
force in a military operation designed to provide a pretext for war with Egypt. 34 American servicemen were killed on Johnson's orders.
Stone reveals Johnson even found a way to desecrate the USS Sequoia, a presidential yacht that
serviced Presidents from Herbert Hoover to Jimmy Carter, with masturbatory excess: “Lyndon
Johnson would put a film projector on this table and come up here and watch stag movies,” said
boat owner Gary Silversmith, “reportedly in a robe and in his underwear so he was relaxed and
alone, and they would sail to Mount Vernon.” 
Stone names names, identifying at least three illegitimate children fathered by LBJ while President
or Vice President and revealing Johnson's simultaneous sexual affairs with five women in the
White House Secretarial pool.
Stone outlines how LBJ stole $1 B in Gold bullion from the US Government, had the gold flown to
the LBJ ranch and then later to Canada for smelting. Stone also documents Johnson's daughters
unloading the gold on the International market after LBJ's death.
Stone tells the compelling tale of the Vietnam war profiteering of Lyndon and Lady Bird Johnson. He
exposes their stock ownership in defense contractors who benefited from multi-million dollar
contracts that were part of Johnson's escalation of the Vietnam war. Stone even outlines how
contracts for military helicopters with one company, Kaman, were abruptly canceled and re-awarded
to Bell Helicopter where the Johnsons owned stock, just days after LBJ became President.
Stone exposes Johnson and his right hand man Bobby Baker's ownership of a San Juan abortion
clinic and affiliated Capital Hill Travel Agency. Pregnant women seeking an illegal abortion could
purchase a "Weekend Holiday Package" that included their round-trip flight, abortion and hotel
Stone exposes how Johnson learned about and canceled a military plane ordered by Vice President
Hubert Humphrey that was to fly a Boston brain surgeon from Boston to Los Angeles in an attempt
to save the wounded Robert F. Kennedy's life. "Is he dead yet? Is he dead yet?" Johnson barked,
when informed of Kennedy's condition.
The hardcover edition of The Man Who Killed Kennedy - the Case Against LBJ" reached number 15
on the New York Times bestseller list last Fall. Now the new updated paperback edition greatly
expands the case against the most evil and mentally unbalanced man to ever occupy the White
House. And it is out just in time for LBJ's birthday!
Order your Copy Today - Now in Paperback - The new UPDATED edition of The Man Who Killed
Kennedy the Case Against LBJ- with two new blockbuster chapters.
SPECIAL  BOOK SIGNING -- AUSTIN TEXAS -- Sept 16.  Book People, 603 N. Lamar Blvd
Austin, TX - 7 PM.
For more on Roger Stone, please visit www.stonezone.com and follow him on Twitter(@RogerJStoneJr) and Facebook.

August 27, 2014 in Books | Permalink

Ferguson police shooting of Michael Brown used by Feds as Federal Emergency Powers test run? ISIS / ISIL Tie-In re: them capturing 88 pounds of Uranium to use as a dirty bomb in the US?

Update: Dan Page - a psyop or not a psyop, that is the question 




First off – I listened to his presentation. But something is wrong. I have over 20 years of a military background….. CSM Mark Ripka served as CSM of AFRICOM from its beginning until 2011. Command Chief Master Sergeant Jack Johnson Jr. followed him….and the it was Command Sergeant Major Darrin J. Bohn (current).

Watch at 23:59.
I call Fake….sorry ya’ll

Ref: http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/05/1000-russian-spetsnaz-arriving-monthly-oathkeeper-sgt-maj-dan-page-joins-the-john-moore-show-2955344.html







Reddit discussion: http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/2ebi64/my_post_yesterday_that_exposed_cnn_and_dan_page/



The Weird Case of Dan Page



Dan Page & CNN: Real Protest vs Fake Protest 

Published on Aug 25, 2014

What's real and what isn't; Infiltration of the "Patriot Movement".

If you don't get it after this, I can't help you, good luck.


Ref: http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2627796/pg1




Updated comment:

Dan Page is either a total liar, telling the truth or part of some government psyop, or fbi agent/informant out there to cook up cases against dummies, the gullible or just plain innocent people. Watch the videos. If he is lying about his experience in re: 9/11 as to a colonel flying into Bosnia, showing a group of special forces a presentation that had the photo listing of each of the 19 9/11 hijackers a month before 9/11 happened then he falls into either the liar category or the liar and a person conducting psyops, sting ops for the military/fed gov.? 35:27 on the first 1 hr video he mentions about the Fed gov. getting ready to take thousands of acres of land (alluding to Cliven Bundy events earlier this year. The latest info. re: ISIS / ISIL is that they have been working with Mexican drug gangs to get past our borders to strike us at their leisure, supposedly 1000's of malls across the US, and that 88 pounds of uranium was stolen by them (dirty bombs anyone?), and that the beheader of Mr. Foley is some British rapper. British rapping dirty bombers for breakfast anyone? Geez, what is the world coming to? (The deft of mind realize I am being facetious here.)


P.S. Question, either way how do you like your slavery? re: 14th Amendment info.


Update: Mr. US Military former top brass psyops officer Dan Page suspended from St. Louis County Police Department. Search:


One alternative media search:


Good thread: http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2626022/pg1

Poor attempt by Mother Jones to cover what is being discussed in the alternative media which doesn't talk about or bring up about Mr. Page being a DHS or other government agency shill involved in psyops,.



Sat Aug 23, 2014 15:03


There was a mistake in a story I read about Dan Page. Not surprising, seeing how media misleads on everything.

His speech to the Oath Keepers was April 2014, not April 2012.

And when he says America only has 18 months before TSHTF, this means we are in the final phase - NOW - if we are going to prevent this!

Ref: http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=151706


This Dan Page guy also mentions towards the end of the first video certain information about 9/11 as to he and other military officers having been shown the whole photo list of the 19 9/11 hijackers before 9/11 and that there was going to be an attack on the United States.

"I was the very first soldier, you can look at that, I was the very first ones into Afghanistan when the war started. I was already there. And I want to tell you about what I know about 9/11. I told you I would. Colonel Capil (sic) a full-bird Colonel, commander of SOCEUR (Special Forces Command Europe) flew into Bonia and he assembled all of the SF guys under one, up in the green house, that would be in that building over there, he assembled us all in there. And this was in 1999 (Teknosis: I think he means 2001 unless of course he is making this whole thing up), this was August the 1st if I remember correctly. He says gentlemen, no men sorry, there's about to be an attack upon the United States and he put on a presentation like I'm putting on to you, and he put up on the screen all the people that were involved, gonna be involved in it. They were already there. 19 of em were from Saudi Arabia, only 1 of em was from somewhere else, but we attacked Afghanistan, hmm, that sounds logical to me. Saudi Arabia sent em in, go blow up Afghanistan. And he says after that happens the United States will be forever changed. And this man was highly respected. With that in mind he went down to Charlie, that'd be the place to go home, he flew home and he retired. He said I'm not going to be part of what America's going to turn into. 30 days later you know what happened."



by Glenn Canady


Okay, this is pretty strange and has been well researched by many amateur researchers on the internet. The man in the top photo is retired Sgt Major Dan Page (Army Ranger) who has been shown many times in the alternative media giving a speech to some Oath Keepers in the St. Louis area. The video of the entire speech is here for you to watch later. To get to the meat of this quickly watch the shorter second video which ties it all together.



In the video he explains the dangers that are coming to America and that if we don’t change things at the ballot box we will have to go to the bullet box.  He seems like a pretty patriotic guy in this video. Hey says we have the right to get rid of our current government.


 Here are some of his important quotes from the speech:


“Contractors are going to come in – maybe me.” -


“They’re going to kill you. That person sitting next to you won’t  be sitting there because they’re going to be gone because somebody like me is going to come in and kill you.”


“The new constitution is all ready to go. They only need the right incident to bring it down and they’re working on that right now. We’re not very far away from an event that’s going to bring what you call, martial law, that term will never be used by the way Emergency Police Powers will be.”   


During the speech he said he still carries a secret clearance and had just left Fort Leonard Wood (military base in the Missouri Ozarks). He said he gets briefed every six months.  


Here’s some more quotes:


“The news media is going to start banging on something – could be Ukraine, could be we don’t know. That’s how psychological warfare works. They talk about THIS and this is happening over here. It’s called a distraction.”


“So number one is – there’s going to be an emphasis on an international event – the news media is going to pound it, pound it, pound it. The second thing is you’re going to see a group or a person guilty of racism or something along those lines and they’re going to start pounding on that. They want your attention over here. The third thing you’re going to start seeing is people will be arrested for domestic terrorism. The fourth thing you’re going to see and this is what I’m going to talk to the ladies about – it’s what I call ancient hate, ancient madness, ancient revenge. When these things start to happen, people are going to start rioting. The EBT cards are going to shut down. Can you imagine what’s going to happen in St Louis County when the EBT cards go down, when the ATM machines don’t work?”  


“When the inner cities start to erupt, people are going to start killing people they don’t like."


“Right now in the United States, most Chiefs of Police and Sheriffs and Lieutenants and above will go to the FBI academy. When they go to the FBI academy, they come back brainwashed for some reason. Now I know that the St. Louis County police has that policy, I do not know about the rest of them but every Sheriff will go to the FBI academy.”


“Incidentally, there is a movie out with Sylvester Stallone and Arnold Schwarzenegger, it’s called  Escape… that boat exists, it’s real. That boat does exist, I’m telling you for a fact.”


“So I have to get permission from the Army to do this. I’m theirs, they own me.”


Note by Glenn: Okay so how does a “patriot” go from telling the truth about what’s going to come to actually being a part of the event he said was coming to America! Now for the record, I have found out that Dan Page did tell everybody after that speech that he was going to work for law enforcement and it’s probably safe to assume that he lived in the St. Louis area since the speech he gave to the oath keepers was in the St. Louis area and by his own admission he was checking in with Fort Leonard Wood which is in the Missouri Ozarks. So that’s not a huge deal.  


But what is a HUGE deal is when Dan Page tells us exactly what is going to happen in 2012 and then is a part of it all in 2014! He tells us in the speech that he still checks in with Fort Leonard Wood for a briefing every six months and he still has an active secret clearance! I’ve been told by people at VeteransToday.com that it’s pretty common for somebody that is a contractor for the DoD to get briefings every six months and that people like this are working for the Department of Homeland Security all over the place! He even says at the speech that they “own him”. He had to get the okay for him to speak to them. Just what is Dan Page’s mission here?


Dan Page is the officer involved in the CNN psyop that looks totally staged! How did he go from being a “good  guy” warning us as to what would happen to part of the “bad guys” actually doing the psyop?  Did he go to the FBI academy after 2012 that he admitted was brainwashing everybody? And in the last video on this page, Dan admits that he worked in special forces and his specialty was psychological warfare (at about the 16:30 mark of the speech video) where he learned “how to destroy a nation from within without direct military contact”. What are the odds of this?   


I believe this is VERY important information! Was Dan Page completely mind controlled at the FBI Academy or through Fort Leonard Wood? What exactly is his mission? I don’t know what this all means but what does seem absolutely clear is that the Ferguson event is a STAGED event and Dan Page knew all about something just like this that would come to pass. How did he know this unless he had access to the plans? He seems to be following the script he talked about in 2012! That’s really the big deal here as well as his background in psychological warfare. 


Video that ties Dan Page the “patriot” to the Cop Part of the CNN Psyop. This is a MUST SEE! There’s no doubt this is the same man! Same voice, and Dan admitted he was going to be a law enforcement officer and he was from the area!



This is a RED ALERT! Get this post out to everybody through social networks and email lists. I don’t believe in coincidences such as one of the main players at Ferguson being trained in Psychological Warfare and admitting there was major brainwashing going on in the police departments and then being part of it all! Who knows if Michael Brown was mind controlled to get aggressive with a cop or if they just waited for a white cop to kill a black kid before they sprang into action. It really doesn’t matter at this point because we now have the proof that this entire thing was scripted and they want to start using “Emergency Police Powers” everywhere! Dan Page told us EXACTLY what was going to happen in 2014 back in 2012! He even mentioned that “Ukraine” could be used as one of the two events as well as a racial event! They are using Ukraine and ISIS now as the “other” event Dan talked about in the speech to the Oath Keepers and Ferguson is being used as the “racial” event!


Here’s the interview with Dan Page where I found out that he specialized in Psychological Warfare and Asymmetrical Warfare which is “how to destroy a nation from within without direct military contact.” You’ll hear that at about the 16:30 mark in this video. Get the word out everywhere so everybody knows that Ferguson is a staged event! They are following the exact script that Dan Page talked about in 2012!


UPDATE 6-23-14: Because of everybody sharing the information on Dan Page, he has now been suspended from the police department! They said that he made disturbing comments about gays, President Obama and said he would be killing people!  He said police hate everybody and that he’ll kill anybody! I want to thank everybody that shared this story on BeforeItsNews! We all did our part! Great job everybody! Enjoy the video where they talk about Dan Page being relieved of duty for his bizarre statements. I still want to know what his REAL mission is for the military! And one other bit of strangenesss is that the fake news people say he has been a cop for 35 years but Dan Page said he has recently retired from the military around the 2012 timeframe because of Obama.  There’s still a story here we don’t know yet!

Ref: http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/08/the-smoking-gun-proving-ferguson-was-staged-share-3015746.html?utm_content=beforeit39snews-verticalresponse&utm_medium=verticalresponse&utm_source=direct-b4in.info&utm_campaign=&utm_term=http%3A%2F%2Fb4in.info%2FidzX


Related in regards to our slavery:

The cat is out of the bag............

So what is this all about?

It has recently been widely discovered that the 14th Amendment which was supposed to free the slaves, was never properly legislated and is null and void. [Teknosis: much information can be gleaned here: http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/07/notice-of-errors-and-of-clarifications-5-cfr-13205-214-cr-00027-ndf-2.html] but check out the info. and vids in the Scanned Retina post below:

So why is this important? The Congress deliberately deceived the American people.

Also see:

Special Ops Deployed to Ferguson http://sgtreport.com/2014/08/breaking-special-ops-deployed-to-ferguson/

Updated post:
Is it really going to take a new constitution where all our inalienable rights will be denigrated or can we just come to the realization that we are all equal before any fraudulent 14th Amendment and the tyranny of a rogue government? Also Dan Page said Black Robed Perverts (re: some Supreme Court Federal Judges) and not anything about the color of anyones skin? But Dan Page is either a total liar, telling the truth or part of some government  (or fbi agent/informant out there to cook up cases against the dummies, the gullible or just plain innocent people). Watch the videos. If he is lying about his experience in re: 9/11 as to a colonel flying into Bosnia, showing a group of special forces a presentation that had the photo listing of each of the 19 9/11 hijackers a month before 9/11 happened then he falls into either the liar category or the liar and a person conducting psyops, sting ops for the military/fed gov.?

P.S. Question, either way how do you like your slavery? See 14th Amendment info.
Re: Ferguson Psyop,Sargent Dan, and his predictions of major events
Ferguson Gang Leader says “Eric Holder Paid Us To Start Riots”

heating up today

Eric Holder’s career has survived a long list of scandals; The 2008 Black Panther
debacle, overturning Arizona’s immigration laws and ‘Fast and Furious‘ immediately
spring to mind. These, however, pale in comparison to the recent allegations against
Holder, the likes of which could easily land the Attorney General behind bars.
Evidence has been uncovered showing Eric Holder contributed funds to Ferguson’s
gang population as incentive to loot and spread civil unrest in the area. These angry,
government-sponsored terrorists have systematically infiltrated peaceful protests with
the intention of escalating the situation and inciting riots.

More here



August 22, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink