Primary in creating a SHIFT in realization and accomplishment and to move to the new page in your own life as a personal challenge - is the need for purification. If you don't purify, the nervous system doesn't get handled, doesn't get smoothed out, calmed and fortified with powerful foundation of centeredness and purpose. So purification is the foundation or work that everyone needs to do to have centeredness and focus. That means purification of your body, colon, bloodstream, lungs and eventually of your brain.

When your body gets purified what happens? Your nervous system, which is connected to your thinking processes, mind and the way you feel, and the way you react, and the way you act, changes. You enter into the state that philosophers and writers call 'the superman.' It is characterised by bliss, a brain simmering with creative ideas, a feeling of love for and forgiveness toward - everyone. It's a good thing, too, so, the conditions for purification must be established. Are you anywhere close? Let's look at what's happening with you now...

What's the state of your nervous system, have trouble sleeping? What's the state of your colon, which reflects your eating habits? Toxic? Constipated? Look at your breathing habits, little nervous, shallow breathing probably. What about your exercise habits, can you run a mile?  Look at your meditation habits. Can you still your mind when it's giving you yammer? Tell me what you read or watch on television. The anguish of the nightly news? Crime shows? Mysteries? Porn?

How you nutrify your brain and body and perceive life to be has to be looked at and evaluated every moment that you're alive to see if you're making the right choices in those particular things to bring about purification of your physical body which will bring about purification of your emotional body, your mental body and eventually, your spiritual body.

These are connected to your physicalness, the physical thing, what you exist in, this bag of bones. This body has a nervous system, a brain. We cannot function in this world in equanimity without doing some purification. It doesn't matter if you're a millionaire or a homeless bum. If you don't purify, you will not be able to fly. You will not be able to feel powerful. You will not be courageous. You will not be creative.

Remind yourself right now: the most important thing is to be creative, satisfied, happy, fulfilled, serving, giving, having everything you want, creating your dreams, creating your vision, being in the space called I am one with the universe, I am God, I am powerful to be a Jesus, to be a Buddha, to be an enlightened being - feeling that love and bliss.

Those guys were the simplest, most purified people that we've ever encountered. If you read the actual words of Jesus, he was the sharpest, most convoluted thinker, no country hick. He had immersed himself in the Essene texts of Jewish mysticism that were a thousand years old, copied in the Qumran monastery, stashed in jars, thousands of chapters. You know them as the Dead Sea Scrolls, full of the most sophisticated philosophy. He spent years reading and talking it over at the Synagogue with the rabbis and more years digesting and distilling his own unique take on it, bouncing it off life around him.

Then, he went out in the countryside to share the good news with the humble people who didn't read. And they just loved him. He was better than TV,  a revelation to them. In those days they used to stone women for adultery, so the Gospel of love and forgiveness had them awestruck. It was bold.

He said that we who followed him could create change in people and in ourselves, intrinsically do the same as he did. He said that we'd do him one better.  Therefore, we have to become the most simple, purified people to be able to be like Jesus or Buddha.. that's where the process starts and it goes on and on by being devoted to this godliness, this centeredness, this oneness, this simplicity, this egolessness, this spiritually attuned, open-minded person, every minute that you're alive. You cannot let one second escape that you're not devoted to your God self. That's where you really live, in your soul, your spirit. When you're devoted to that, you're on the right path.

To do that, you have to purify yourself from the things that are keeping you from being there. The things that make your nervous system NOT be able to do that. The entertainment that dyes your mind black, the foods that give you insomnia, the things that keep your mind reactive instead of creative, bummed out instead of blissed out, without problems. I feel that if you think you have a problem and have to deal with it - THAT is the problem. That continual, negative approach can only be eliminated by not dealing with the problem, looking at the problem or seeing any problem.

You have to go the opposite end which is to see where the solution is, where the clarity and spiritual truth is, where the fundamental reality and light of the truth is, that dispels the problem. When you shine the light in the darkness, there's no more darkness. What happened to it? Well, you found out there was no darkness, it was an illusion called darkness. As soon as the light shows up, there's no darkness, there is no problem. And you say 'What happened to the problem? I don't know, it isn't here anymore. I can't see it. I can't find any problem.'

As soon as you say 'I have feelings of not being adequate,' that's the case. When you say 'This person is a thief, this other person is a liar' you get stuck with that person tearing at you. A man says "I only feel great if I have a relationship based on possessiveness where this person wants and needs me." He's got the wrong formula to open the safe, but it'll keep him tinkering with the combination to the safe and spinning dials for most of his adult life.

These misbeliefs are all really illusions. They're problems that you created in your life and they grow long roots and take over like vines that seize hold of your entire life and strangle it. You're no longer the cause, they are.

When you believe in problems they start to grow fat. They soon exist without any solution. The clarity, the satisfaction that you need in order to create, never comes. The vines grow bigger and create nothing but more dissent in your mind. You're utterly on the path to madness. So never study your problems or lacks.

If you feel inadequate, and that sends you looking for ways to show up as adequate, you will constantly be fortifying inadequacy. We laugh at the guy in midlife crisis who buys a red convertible to advertise he's a sexy, attractive, hot guy.  Certain women can read that and lo, he's created a life destroyer.

If you have a desire.. you want something.. and you constantly want this something and try to find out how to get what you want, all you're doing is fortifying and magnifying what you want and inviting total nemesis. When it seems to someone that the only solution to the problem is having what you want, you're nuts. When you actually have what you want, like the guy in the red car with the peroxide blonde, guaranteed you won't want it anymore. If you still do want it when you have it, then you're insane.

The process is too difficult to look at in terms of any logic. You have to get completely out of your mind. The creation of what you want is a process in which you act as the creator, to act out the process of being the thing that you wish to create.'  If you want to be attractive to women and you're fifty, work out, swim, get tan, be interested in the interesting things.

If you want to be rich, be consciously rich. Be absolutely certain and secure in your richness. Feel it, live it, act it, know it in every fiber of your being. Without having any evidence for it. Be the solution not the problem.

This is the teachings and training of Science of Mind, how they heal. Don't be ill, be healed. It's the metaphysics of transformation, of higher consciousness, of God-training. How do you get someone to be Christ, to be as God, to BE God, in the moment, to see things already done - believing it is already done?

You have to first have the thought, the idea, the belief and the process. Start with the thought, idea, understanding and then transfer it into the belief, the acting out, the acting 'as if.'   Follow through with every fiber of your being, with every action, with every feeling, with every re-action to be a creativeness. That's it. You can't teach this. You only have to see it, and see it, and practice it, and read it, and hear it, and then become it.

Everyone you or I know are living the opposite. They think in terms of I can or I can't, or I'm poor or I'm rich, bouncing back and forth like a ball off the wall. People think in a reactive way, they react to the way others maybe think they are. or the way they have been or the way things are that week or the way things look.

You are doomed to be the ball eternally slammed by the wall thinking those things. You are the creation of your beliefs, thoughts and  reactions. What is the difference between being slammed around by your mind and God consciousness, and wanting to create in a moment the power to change things and create them the way you want them? The difference is, the wise man is busy being creative every moment and not ever being up in his head, thinking, counting, score-keeping and reactive. To be or not to be, that is the question.

So let's not let the ball play us. Let's put the ball in play. When you're on the court playing this tennis game and you're McEnroe, there's no ego there, there's only the ball and the racquet and the perfect hit and that's called the zen of tennis. Of course McEnroe wasn't perfect. When the umpire says the ball was out and McEnroe goes crazy and says it was in, he took himself totally out of the zen of the game. What happened to him? He got enough money, ego and bullshit in his life to become involved, addicted to winning and not be the zen master of tennis anymore. Now the experience of all that is a great lesson in humility, maturity and non-attachment.

Therefore, our job is to stay as the zen master, student, disciple, teacher, 'God neophyte', always playing every side at every moment. Our job is being receptive, open, surrendered and totally confident in every moment. It's the ultimate position. You're playing all the positions at every moment because there is no you. You're every side, every mind.

The part of anybody's life that is an expression of the beauty and the power and creativity, eloquence, the mastery, the talent, the real creative part of you, whether it's creating a house, sculpture, painting, novel, song, music - that part of us that is able to create that, to make a dinner or make love, clean a house, drive a car, swim in the ocean.. that part that allows us to do and master and learn those things and be able to create, is the part that is truly soulful, truly a student, truly open, accepting, willing, disciplined, aware and conscious.

The part that lives and functions as a truly magnificent, high minded teacher or student or lover or one who is loved, one who can give and receive, that part of us which is the true creator is not ego, is not selfish, reactive, bound up in survival. That part of us is truly the one who is free and working on mastery whether you're Streisand, Monroe or Einstein. That part of those people, doing the thing they love to do, was in ecstasy and was totally free of the constraints of ego and survival and hurt and pain.

The part that lives in pain and hurt is the part involved in the conversation of the ego, 'I want more from life or from my lover, It's not good enough, I'd like to be greater, Is this all there is? Is this enough money? Do people like me? What about my next business deal, novel, movie, song or sculpture?' That part of us that speaks that way is the defensive survivalist, egotistical, needy, wanting one more big score.

As long as we stay in our desires, as Buddha said, we suffer. When we stay non-attached, then we're on the path, the open road, the path of non-attachment, the middle way.

Ego and spirit can't live in the same house. Just like problems and solutions can't live in the same house. If a person is afraid, they go in the ocean but they're afraid, they can't really enjoy the waves. So what do they have? Fear? They want to get out. If you're in a relationship and you're afraid, or jealous, it can't last. The only way you can be in the ocean, in a relationship or in a job is to be free of the self that talks to itself about 'What if?' What if she left me? What if he cheated? Keep pushing fear away.

The state of being Godly is the state of being free, selfless. People take drugs to get there, but the problem with drugs is the downside, they exhaust and age. They mask the ego for a few hours but they don't decimate it, and next day when you're tired, the ego is worse than ever.

What's the problem with ego? It'll kill anything good in your life. You have a relationship, you fall in love. You think that being in the mating game, you will now have someone you're close to. You can depend on each other and you always will be OK.

BUT as soon as that person isn't the way you want them to be, you feel hurt, in pain. You feel lost, you feel fear. You feel like "I don't know what to do now. I don't like them anymore. I want to pull away from them."  That's ego.

Or "this person is pulling away from me, now I want them, need them. I'm in love with them and they're not in love with me." All those things occur in a mind that talks to itself, being identified with desires. That's ego.

Only in the desireless state, where you don't care what occurs in the external world.. you only care about your internal state - that it's calm, peaceful, secure, happy and one with your spirit and has no fears and has no desires. It only creates. It doesn't react. Only in that state can you live in Paradise every second.

Practice gets you there. How do you play the piano? Practice. How do you make sculpture? Practice. That nagging, desiring voice of the Ego is always there, so you have to constantly silence it. You can't just clean for five minutes and when your ego tells you that you're tired, quit and hope the house is clean. You have to push beyond your usual limits of boredom. Gurdgieff taught that. He asked huge time and effort commitments from his students, and they got to that bliss place as they'd killed their own egos and all of them wrote books about the miracles of consciousness the old guy was able to squeeze from them. (click on that pg, read APHORISMS)

You use anything, yoga, swimming, housecleaning as a push past your own ego exercise. Like ancient monks in hairshirts or fakirs sitting on nailboards. You can even use more painful things, like your own insecurity and jealousy. Let the sweetheart go on that weekend without you. Let it burn. Monday morning you just say hello and give them a kiss. No questions, just silence and bliss. Assume the pose.

You use everything that's at hand to constantly practice burning up the ego until it actually dies and that practice period is ended. You have to constantly be aware of quieting the voice that is talking with you. It's about consistency.

To see then, all the phobias and mischief and foibles that we create in our life, how we are, how we listen to our crazy inner yammer, just look in the mirror and see our unhappiness, our broken hearts because our yammer drove off loving friends. We must look at our poor posture, our sagging spines, the blubber drooping down like a mudslide. We must look at our poor health, how our cruddy bodies cannot even taste or smell food anymore. So toxic are they. We must observe our poor habits, the indulgences we have whether it's drugs, sugar, tea, coffee, carbs, sugar, alcohol or envy and jealousy. Or mouthing off negatively - rage. That's a big one. For some rage is wound. Whatever it is, when we see those addictions, we put that on our list. Finished with that. We write it down, we sign our name, it's a vow, we break those habits.

When you see that you're anxious all the time, you stop. When you see that you're speeding all the time, stop. And you see what's creating it. Is it coffee giving you mind yammer? Sugar giving you highs then lows? Bad food making you sludgey? Too much toxicity in your system? Too much fear? What is the habit?

Knowing your habits are wrong is hopeless. Understanding and knowing are sort of a booby prize. The real prize is wisdom which is the application of knowing and understanding. When you apply what you know and understand you practice which makes perfect. If you know sugar is bad for you, or cigarettes, being way overweight is bad for you, not exercising is bad for you, being angry all the time, speedy and anxious is bad for you, you work on changing that.

If you don't work on it, you're the mischievous one in your own life. Remember, 'Who is the problem in your life?' YOU are. 'Who is the barrier?' I am.

You have to see the program you've put into your mind. If you're using cigarettes and you know you have to give them up because they're screwing up your body, your lungs, your ability to taste food, enjoy simple food, or even exercise or make love, they're screwing up more than just the way you smell and if you keep on smoking - life continues to be miserable and you'll die.

Some people, dumb people, refuse to wake up from the sleep. They should recognize they're asleep, say to themselves 'I will wake up'. That's a great start by the way. Then, they have to work at it, read, study, get a teacher, a buddy system, 'Did you smoke today?' You know a truthteller of a pal. They have to practice, they have to remember that they are aware, you have always been awake. You know, the good stuff.

They have to breath walk until their lungs come back. Breath walk as a baby, don't look at what is keeping you from walking, just keep practicing walking until your lungs and your legs get strong. You can feel the muscles get stronger. You can quit smoking and your lungs will heal and you'll feel better.

The speed junkie can quit coffee and white sugar and pop a raw green juice which will really get him high and he won't have anxieties and be speeding around dithering like an idiot with his eyes bulging and his heart going 120. And he starts digging personifying calm wisdom, not agitated yammer, nervous in the service.

You and others will see you as a powerful, healthy person when you're doing meditation, reading the great books, listening to the really thoughtful, deep FM radio talk shows (great nutrition for the mind), going to classes, swimming, doing yoga. You will impress.

There are a million ways to improve but you can't deal with improvement if you're dealing with your faults. You have to throw all memory of your faults away, burn them in the fire of willingness to let go. Surrender. You burn all your attachments, negativity in total surrender. Let it go. Drop it. Let it be in the background. Just that conversation that's constantly in your mind, put it on the back burner. Let it be. It's always there. Just like the crickets are always there, the sky and air are always there. We don't have to pay attention to that conversation in our heads. Just let it be. Like you let the air be.

You can strengthen your lungs by breathing, and you can strengthen your psyche by taking in the right thoughts, affirmations, prayer, awareness of God, awareness of self, higher consciousness and putting those thoughts into your brain computer and don't worry, when they're digested, you will start to exude a sweet perfume but also you'll start to mend your own fences.

You know how when you're worried, you go to a film, you focus on something else so much like a meditation that everything else is on the back burner. It's a form of letting go of the question and then you come out of the movie and the answer comes.

You want to get past that point, where you don't have a question about the right thing to do. You do the right thing because you're conscious of what the right thing is, rather than having to make a decision. Decisions have to be eliminated eventually, replaced by choices. The choice for the truth is simple.

What is reality? What is the truth about reality? What's the real skivvy on the whole deal? It's that I'm here, you're there, they are over there, three distinct human beings, five billion distinct human beings, entities throughout the universe, there's the chair, wall and lamp, the floor, sky, ocean, the planet... all distinct and material entities, objects that we call the external world.

You can touch and rub your hand and you can say that's the external world. I can feel the skin, bone, fingernail. That's outside. Where I'm sensing, experiencing and feeling it and where I live is INSIDE. But the inside is not inside and the outside is not outside, they're just relative terms. I'm experiencing inside what is outside. What is that reality? There isn't any inside, outside. The inside is you, the experiencer, the energy. The outside is what you're touching and looking at and feeling and seeing. And it's all the same thing.

In other words, everything has an internal and external reality but it's all this God source, this creative energy that is expressing itself in different forms which we as human beings have had the power and insight to see. With our imagination and in our minds and thoughts we can actually create and mold things to be a tiled bathroom, a house, a saxophone, a swimming pool. We have the ability to write a book, to speak words that touch others so much that the words trigger a new them. Five hundred years ago, the human mind considered children were small adults. As soon as the child was weaned, it was on its own, an adult to be left to wander, starve or be misused. Was it any wonder that so many people of that day were sociopath killers and warriors? Considering the childhoods they had? Even so close as a hundred years ago, children had to work in factories 10 hours a day, until Queen Victoria's time. One writer named Dickens changed all that. His novels were about compassion for the child. The thinking about child labor, in the western world at least, changed and laws changed. Fifty years ago, a black man could be mistreated in the cruelest ways, sanctioned by popular consensus. What happened? Evolution happened. Now half of films and TV is full of happy blacks enjoying equality, and that reality has happened.

We can create evolution through sharing our thoughts whether as TV scripts, novels, laws, music or language. We function with each other and think and reflect about life and create our insights about reality and share them, and almost effortlessly life moves a click up and evolves and improves.

All of that should affirm for you the mysterious power of basic energy, the same energy being expressed everywhere, constantly, instantaneously in the now. In this moment. That's all there is. The wave upon which matter is moved. The unseen photon. The moment that just occurred and the moment that is now and the moment that is coming... that is now... is all there is. And that continuous continuum of now, that constant reality is what, who, where, when we are. Play and make things, know yourself as all there is, and above all, forward the action.

Realize that you are playing tennis with God. If you're lame, do you think He wants to stay on the court where you are stumbling about with your racket? It would be tedious for him. But if you practice and avoid petty thinking and take yourself into what works, exercise, healthfoods, charity to your brothers, watchfulness in speech and word, compassion for the amazing sensitivity of children, the spirit of service which is you forwarding the action, then God is going to want to play with you. Those God photons are going to be available on your energy continuum.

Have faith in the invisible Photon. Recognize the God principle that is your life - that is everyone's life, that is the life of the universe, and recognize that it exists everywhere simultaneously, so all truth and energy is you and is surrounding you and is intimately expressed everywhere. You wake up and 99 other monkeys will too. Have faith in that invisible law. Time and space are nothing but a projection of our inside insight and perception... just a projection of that... doesn't mean they exist as they exist, they exist as structures but the reality that sees all the structures is not a structure. It doesn't have a form. It's formless. There is something beyond that is unseen but which contains you, is you, generates you and in turn, you generate IT. This is the key to the puzzle, when you know that you who perceives and knows all the changes are changeless, that the part that knows and perceives all the forms is formless, the changeless, formless Being, the eternal, internal being that has no structure and no form. Therefore, when you know this, you know that you're one with the Creator and you're one with all other Creators because in the formless state everything is joined. Everything is. Everything is infinite throughout the universe and it's not in a state of measurement, nor in perceivability, nor in form. It just is. And that is why we can never talk about, or put into words or express that which is inexpressible but we can point to it with our words (philosophies, religions, spirituality, enlightenment) and with our actions. I'm reminded by the scene in Indiana Jones where he knows the diving board is there, though it's invisible and he walks out over the edge of the cliff on the invisible diving board. Well the feats of magic that you can do when you know you're supported by the invisible Matrix, are immense.

You have to be able to see what's not real to see what IS real. If we keep seeing the world of negativity and fear and want and greed and all this competition as real, we will never get to the real. There was an educator who won the greatest educator award and all he was saying in essence was 'we have to go back to the turn of the century when people went to school twelve to fourteen weeks a year and knew more and learned more and read more. There was no illiteracy because everybody taught everyone. A schoolroom was five different grades in one room with one teacher teaching eighty children who all became teachers of each other and there was no competitiveness. Now, children are kept children, little babies with balloons and birthday parties and craving the new in toys until they're twelve years old. Then, they're thrown into the zoo of having to compete and see who's going to get the best score and we have the Bell Curve and it's all insanity and the government thinks everybody needs to go to college until they're twenty-nine and then they'll be OK. The only OK is when people educate themselves to be truly their own, committed, responsible person and try to be the master of themselves. Mastery is the only game. And until that occurs, everyone has the karma of being buffeted about thinking that they have to score, to make it, to do something and be somebody, all the words involved with keeping score.

Everyone who is well-read, did it on their own. When you become a musician, it doesn't matter how many music schools you go to, it's how much you practice. My mother and your mother and all immigrants that came to this country from the old country, didn't have educations. My mother never finished grade school. She could read beautifully, read books all her life, spoke three languages. She ran a grocery store for her parents at age eleven as they couldn't speak English. My father came to Pittsburg when he was l7, had never gone to school. He put himself through college, got a master's degree and became a college professor. How did they do that? Initiative. But what makes initiative?

It's about being interested, not trying to be interesting, about being interested in the books put in front of you, the history, the English books, interested in having your life be a wondrous thing that you love and loving to do the things that excite you the most. It's about being very excited, interested and inspired and passionate about working on something, anything and everything that life is about.

Be interested,  you become a person of value, a person that enjoys your life because you can do things, play, make things work. You can know about understanding others. You can travel, enjoy yourself, be in the world but not of it. You can be a child of God playing in the ocean of love and light.

See, what happens from the idea that you are God in the universe is that your word is law in the universe, that you are one with God, that there is no difference between your consciousness and the mind of God. You're not just a mind, ego or powerless victim. The truth of the thought that you're not an ego, but that you are God comes about when you give up all thought about having to want anything rather than just getting busy creating it.

Just create and enjoy your creation. That rumor that Life unfolds in a linear way is the illusion. The truth is that we live in the now always so the only time we can ever be happy is now. The only time we can feel abundant and healthy is now, no matter what it is, no matter what's happening to you. You put yourself in the now. You say "I'm having this pain but I know that it will pass because I can create whatever I want." And your consciousness extends out into the universe to see what it takes to be healthy, what it takes to be happy, it is all now, it is all right, being conscious, aware and sensitive every minute to do the right thing.

The right thing comes out of your ability to know that you are God. You are not an ego. You are spirit connected to everything in the universe and your vibes which you send out which are your actions and thoughts, your sponsoring thoughts, the real thought behind your thoughts. That vibe that you're sending out, that vibration, that wave goes throughout the universe. That's why thoughts are things that never stop creating a reality. So, the sponsoring thought of your life is the thought that is behind your thinking, behind your desires and fears. Those sponsoring thoughts are the ones you have to be totally conscious of to change. If you want things to be different, if you want your life to be a certain way and it isn't that way, then you look to yourself and see what way have you been thinking, acting. How have you been spending your time? Because it's a cause and effect role. You're the cause and the effects. You say, you think, you feel powerful, wonderful, creative, intelligent, or practice, train yourself, master yourself to be a great, powerful, masterful being. Then you will be sponsoring those thoughts which create mastery.

If you create and sponsor thoughts which create weakness, victimhood, ignorance, poverty, alcoholism, then you'll be producing those results. Nobody is out there dictating that you should be intelligent or stupid. In fact, you can come from the lowest level of stupidity to the highest level of intelligence by training. By putting your attention and awareness on the reality you sponsor.

The caution and the reality of this physical world is to realize that we have all potential, good or bad. It doesn't matter what you do. What matters is that you understand who you are - that you are God in the universe, that you have the same substance to create as God does. Be the creator.

That's the important thing, not to realize why you've failed or succeeded, but to see how you succeed and how you fail is by the way you sponsor your own feelings, language, attitude and your way of being in the world.

Underneath it all, we're all one, we're all God, all perfect. It's when we react and talk, have misbeliefs that we become imperfect, fearful, insecure, paranoid, without time for creating. When we have faith, silence and organize our time we become commanding, creative, talented. It's a choice. Study, read, go to college, learn the most important things, bring your awareness, attention to the highest level or don't. But be interested.

If you're Albert Einstein and you don't see how you're Einstein, then you're obviously not at the library looking at stimulating books on math, numbers and science, are you? If you're not looking, you're not at the highest level. The highest level is to be the interested researcher, reader, observer, experiencer, to see who you are in the matter, that you're cause, that you create your life.

Nobody is doing anything to you. You are able to control all circumstances by being the sponsor of your circumstances. No matter what comes up, you handle it. If someone hates you, causes you pain, you don't have to suffer the hurt. You can say 'this is temporary, this will pass. It's only a mistake.' Forgive them, 'they know not what they do.'  Or the better thing to say is, 'If they're like that, who needs them? It's a good thing they're leaving.' And you bless it. And you're at one with how it is.

Of course, your ego can whisper to you and you can be reactive and lash out and go load a few guns and create a war with them and create more pain - centuries of Israel and Arabs killing each other - or you can stop immediately by saying we're all the same, let's love each other and live in harmony.

Order, balance, growth is what leads you to harmony. If you don't have order, you can't be balanced. Order your life, the way you spend your time, order your priorities, the way you think about what is satisfying to your inner soul.

When those are ordered, your life will create a balance of health, well-being, harmony in your relationships. When this growing self which is constantly changing to be better, closer to being God-like, happy, talented, creative and powerful creates the harmony that you wish to have in your life that gives you the God-perception that is necessary which comes because you're able to see that everything and everybody is like you, is you.

The whole universe is you. There's no difference. You're not different, better, or smarter than anybody else. Potentially, you're the same. And that's what God perception is. That everyone is God, created by him and you see God in every thing. And you perceive yourself as God perceiving God in everything. And then, what else can there be but love because you see the whole universe as one unified thing and then you can only have compassion for everything in the universe because you know to love without prejudice - without prejudice is true compassion.

Behind it all you've always been there, always OK; you were always God. You always were this higher consciousness but one day you realized it. You realize that there never was time, it was always now and all you had to do was reach this point of perception where you saw the truth. And that's the truth, you've always been there. It's all right now.

When you're asleep, you can't see this truth about who you really are so then you act out of selfishness, self-preservation, survival rather than selflessness. The definition of selfishness as juxtaposed against selflessness, is simply when you think of yourself first and others afterwards, you're selfish; when you think of others first and yourself after, you're selfless - and when you're selfless you're high as a kite. That's a very simple equation.

A Christ, a Buddha, always thought about others first. They were Christ conscious. They knew they were going to bring the light to the world. They ate light, spoke light. They never had to worry about what others were thinking, or if that belly ache was too much pork the night before. They could focus on the ideas, and how to phrase it for the level of the listener. They were out there, being effective communicators, not in here, scorekeeping.

The first meditation, action to reach a higher state of consciousness is to stop your thinking and stop your thoughts. Whatever they are, don't pay attention to them. They aren't going to get you there. The only thing that is going to get you there is to live and to be, to communicate, to serve, to forward the action. Live this consciousness. Be this consciousness. Not to think, worry, desire, fantacize  about a future that isn't here yet, and how you're 'going somewhere' and always planning what you're going to have or get. That's a waste of time.

Just live in a state of God consciousness and command life to be as wonderful and powerful and abundant and beautiful as you can possibly ambition. Just command it to be that way for you. Affirm it for others. Use the verb form 'this will happen' a lot. It's very affirming.

Know that all evil things pass. When you're sick, if you're not attached to eating, you won't be sick very long. you'll get well. When you're hurt by someone, and you're not attached to what that person thinks of you, or what they did to you, you won't be hurt for very long. It will go away. This too shall pass. So it is attachments which keep us locked in to misery and suffering. It's non-attachment which keeps us happy and harmonious, where we're not allowing anything to attack our invulnerability.

God is invulnerable. He can't be hurt by anything because he's not attached to anything. He's not attached to pleasure or pain. He's not attached to tasty food and pleasureable sex and He's not attached to how dull brown rice tastes. He's not attached to the thread count of sheets or the marble floors keeping their luster. He's not attached to Bentleys and what is the plural of Lexus, Lexi? He's not attached to wealth. Whatever comes around, he ignores it and goes on with being non-attached. And because He's relaxed, guess what, He gets wealthy. Stress impoverishes us. The relaxed mind naturally evolves.

Ponder what action of non-attachment you need to take, what course of non-attachment do you need to follow to be non-attached? What way does your mind have to think, what way does your action and reaction have to be? What way do you have to control your desires and enter a little monastery up in your head to be non-attached? When you make your monk's list, you will find yourself to be in harmony.


When you're asking questions, when you're talking intellectually, when you want to know things and find things, you're already coming from a place in which the mind is talking to itself. It's saying "I want to know the difference between consciousness and being, between awareness and consciousness. I want to know the difference between reality and unreality, the ego and the real self, the difference between mind and God."

Those questions are ultimate questions, but they're coming from some idea you have about the way it is. What you want to do is give up all ideas and all thoughts and all reactions and all wanting anything, rather observe them.

What I mean by giving them up is that you don't actually express them as questions or as statements or as the way you see it or react to it. Observe, be able to see that your mind is talking to itself and constantly creating thoughts, ideas, feelings and reactions. As in Blavatsky's quote, 'the mind is the slayer of the real, slay the slayer'. Whatever your mind is doing, that is not it. So what is it? When you slay the slayer called the mind, then you see reality.

You see reality by seeing that your soulular self, your essence, the silence in you, the watcher, the experiencer, the observer, the one that notes and perceives all the changes, who is changeless.That soul, that real self, that one which is united in silence with the eternal now and the eternal presence of God consciousness, awareness, being, whatever you want to call it. Only words to describe the undescribable, pointing at your real consciousness. God, self, soul, no-thing. It is you, you the one, that notes and perceives, the one who listens and walks and talks and speaks, that one. That's the one you have to come to each moment of your existence as a blank canvas, not to try to be intelligent about it, not to talk about and not to know anything about it.

This is all a metaphor for the reality that we wish to accomplish in everything in life which means I have to stop my thoughts. This private conversation is tyrannizing me, dominating and running my life and making me think I know something, think that I am something, think that there's some value in my thoughts, reactions, whereas the truth exists in becoming silent, conscious and aware and totally in the moment, seeing my vision, my goal, my promise. What am I accomplishing, moving the action forward today to push myself in a way that I don't usually do. How am I going to change those things that I wish to change. How am I going to accomplish those things that I wish to accomplish? How am I going to become greater than I am today and yesterday? By giving up my mind. Only by giving up my thoughts, any idea I have about it, and in that space there's power. In that space of silence and awareness, there is the motivation and awareness to push me in a powerful way to react and act consciously to accomplish the very things that I envision.

The only problem that arises in all of this is our old way of being, reacting, our old posture, our old habits of being, our way of speaking, our old mind which talks and reacts. Stop paying attention to the old ways, old thoughts. Only pay attention to expanding your way of becoming more honest than you were yesterday, more real than you were yesterday. The expansion of your consciousness, that you can push yourself to accomplish right now, this now, this now, constantly paying attention to more creativity, organization, perfection, mastery, giving up your old self to have a new self. You can't pour new wine into old bottles. They have to be cleansed of the old, then you put the new wine in. There's only this now, when you're sleeping, dreaming, creating, washing the car, painting the house. The now in which you engage God, in which you involve yourself with God, in which you propose to yourself that you will love, praise, worship and adore and thank God - your true self - which is united with the true self of the whole cosmic universe. It doesn't matter what it is, but to know to be it. To be it is to know it and you can't know it with your mind. Killing the mind is total silence, awareness.

The books we read, the words we hear are inspirational. The truth that's been perennially told to us by every philosopher, poet, saint and wiseman has always been the insight into God's truth. Our job is to be one of those poets, one of those saints, one of those Christs ourself so we must consciously be an open channel to receive the word of God, the wisdom of the universe, the knowledge. And you can only do that by having a blank canvas mind on which this beautiful truth is painted every moment, every now that you exist.

Let your mind expand every minute to ask 'how, where, what' you should be doing, knowing, practicing, promising, envisioning, mastering and becoming. Whatever you're doing, no matter how low it is or how high, in terms of your evaluation, has nothing to do with reality. You can be scrubbing a floor or a toilet bowl or playing a musical instrument on a stage before a hundred thousand people, they are the same consciousness. The same consciousness is to be created doing any of those tasks. To be in conscious awareness unified and linked with the God source, your real, soulular source.. it doesn't matter what you do or where you are.

You will be led to do what your real heart, soul wants to create by being in the moment, loving and enjoying it, whether you're having a massage, mastering your instrument or writing the greatest book in the world. It's all the same. This moment is the same moment that has existed forever, it is perfect in itself. We're not going anywhere and there's no place to go. All you need to do is be in this moment now and enjoy. Praise and thank God for the love and wisdom that is pouring to you from every atom and cosmic ray of the universe. It is all vibration, unseen photons that shape matter.

There's no judgement about anything you're doing or anybody else is doing. The only thing that you ever need is to be conscious and aware, now, in this moment and have no reaction and no ego about it and constantly be in thankful gratitude, love and praise for the opportunity to be in ecstasy this moment.

The truth is always that the mind is the slayer of reality, slay the slayer. You are the changeless, soul, this silent watcher and everything that comes to your mind as a reaction, need, desire, feeling, idea has only the value of a movie. You watch it and you see if it's important to your goal and your vision that you gave yourself to accomplish.

The truth is, in essence that you can never find the truth in the false and you can never find the false in the truth. By pointing out somebody's faults, you can never get them to see the truth. And by pointing out the truth to someone who lives in the false or in their faults, they will never see that truth. The only way is to live and be the truth yourself and then to no man can you be false.

You have it today. You'll have it forever.

September 23, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

White House Fence-jumper

Tongue in cheek but serious as the same time: White House fence-jumper, note in hand, barges through the White House doors while exclaiming, "Have you seen this!": Ex-US Officials Demanded 30 Billion Dollar Bribe (and work closely with US Congress,.), -> <-

(Note: Please click on the above story/research link to get to the main meat of this, it's rather important, especially if you live here in the USA [although this does affect the rest of the world too.)

September 20, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink


These are just some of the reasons that GodAddy illegally shut down my website on back September 9, 2014, and 17 other websites by September 10.  We should be back online by Monday or before.

These websites are still up and info will be posted there if my website does not come back online.  

Also remember if dot COM sites do not work try dot INFO with the same domain name. Also is still functioning.  Though, update info may be found on as well.

The SirDavidAndrew webpage will be temporarily posted at  if the website master is able to get it to function. The front page will hopefully soon be there, however, most of the links may not work.

Obviously someone did not want me reporting on the murder of Edgar Steele by the gestapo.

Nor did they want me expose the attempted blackmail and plot to murder Ambassador Lee Wanta by former Governor Sundquist of Tennessee and former Senator Sheldon Songstad of South Dakota.

Folks, keep your eye on the vote in Scotland.  Freedom smells so sweet.  "Free, free at last!" However, there is trouble already afoot, since the International banksters are trying to force the new Scottish government before it even exists to enter into contract with them.  I certainly hope that the people have sense enough to tell these bankster gangsters to take a hike.  Too, I would hope that Scotland will join BRICS, which would totally destroy the Zionist banksters' death grip on this old world.

Then too, the Scots may decide to reinstate their monarchy.  Oops!  Queen Elizabeth abdicated the Scottish Throne in October 1996 and she returned King David's Throne Chair to Edinburgh Castle in May of 1997.  The Throne of David is vacant, and the new age knocks at the door, 2016 looks to be very import year in history.   I wonder who the prospective candidates may be.  Hum!

Keep your powder dry and your sword handy, things are about to boil.

Sir David-Andrew.

-------- Original Message --------
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:51:28 -0400

With the stock market and US Dollar looking rock solid  due to massive manipulation the Sheeple are fast asleep.
But behind the scenes the battles are RAGING!!!
A few things to take place OVER THE NEXT FEW DAYS/WEEKS:
1) Ron Paul's original Audit the Fed Bill gets voted on today. Not sure what to expect but a YES vote speaks volumes as to who is winning the secret battles.
2) Scotland votes tomorrow on their independence and either way the vote goes there should be chaos in the FX Derivative William Wallace says "FREEDOM!" :-)
3) All eyes are on the Fed's FOMC meeting with an announcement due out today. Timing is everything!
4) The new physical gold market, the Shanghai Gold Exchange, made a surprise announcement today that they will begin trading TOMORROW!!!
and finally... 
5) Senator Carl Levin waits in the wings to BEGIN THE HEARINGS on commodity manipulation.
Hmmm. And everyone thinks the gold and silver markets will NEVER be released from their control.
...and this is just through the rest of September!!!
May the Road you choose be the Right Road.
Bix Weir
PO Box 10626, Oakland, CA 94610, USA

September 18, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Greg Szymanski's 2006 Interviews with Lee Wanta the 27.5 Trillion Dollar Man (Full transcript)


Some of the latest confirmations:

Gov. Sundquist (TN), Sen. Songstad (SD) involved in extortion, conspiracy to murder (involving 5-10 billion dollars) in reference to Leo Wanta the 27.5 trillion dollar man


GREG: Investigative Journal is travelling to Switzerland today and my guest [is] Leo Wanta. Tell us how this all started for you.

LEO: Okay in 1980... But going way back prior to that, I was being mentored by the Chairman of the Senate Foriegn Relations Commitee, Senator Alexander Wiley. I was trained in financials and government, intelligence and so on and so forth.

So in 1980, when President Regan won the election he retained the services of William French Smith a[n] attorney in California who was going to be his Attorney General. So then we all got together with Casey and Colby, William French Smith and President-elect Reagan.

GREG: And you're sitting in talking with these guys correct?

LEO: Yeah, I was already known within a very tight group through Senator Wiley of my background and my management training and my engineering training.

Uncle Sam, arranged for me to get a 5 year apprenticeship in tool and die. When I'm in foriegn countries, I can kind of glance at it and know what they're doing. I didn't have to have blueprints. I can design my own blueprints, because I had an engineering degree as well.

So I was introduced to the future Attorney General Wiliam French Smith, and Bill Casey, which I'd already known through Bill Colby. We started having some meetings prior to him being elected on how he could control the East European environment.

So then, after a number of meetings and discussions, it was decided by the new Reagan administration that I should be the Inspector General of the Department of Defense because that would give me kind of a chance to review things. "Cap" Weinberger, who was now the Secretary of Defense, said: "He's the last S.O.B. I need walking around me. He'll have my job in a couple of months."

So Pen James, who was the director of Whitehouse personnel, and Rick Shelby, [who] was now a senator, decided we should be doing some other stuff. So Bill Casey decided I should work hand-in-hand with him.

So they were all talking about Krushchev and the old days, and him pounding the desk at the United Nations. [How] they're going to bury us with our own shovels, and so on, and so forth.

President Reagan was a union guy in California. So they were looking at ways to get our country back through the apprenticeship programs and things of that nature; to rebuild infrastructure of the American people. The youth... give them some skilled trades, training, education, and medical services, and things of that nature.

The biggest problem was the expenses [that] were always going out to fight the Cold War on the Soviet Union. They kept spending money for the military industrial giants and nothing for the average person. They agreed to my idea going back to Maynard Keynes, 'the best way to control a country is to control the economy and the currency.'

President Reagan, he was not a politician; didn't feel he should be a politician. He was a simple person and he wanted to undermine the USSR by destabilzing their military [and] their economy, and to get the people to understand that the rubles were only of value within the USSR.

President Reagan wanted to destabilize the USSR because they were a pain and he didn't trust them at all. He could not depend on anybody over there and he still had a lot of wounds from the past. So we decided, with William French Smith and a few other guys, how we could figure out a mission to destabilze the USSR so they couldn't buy anything. This is why you had the Star Wars [Strategic Defense Initiative] and everything. So President Reagan, started all kinds of development programs to spend a lot of money, but only on paper not in actual cash. That got the Soviets. Nobody understands a Soviets a Soviet; a Russians a Russian. They're not the same.

After a number of meetings and discussions with people within the military and everything else, we agreed we would get a grant from the US Treasury for $150 billion. And we would start to destabilize their economy, their military, their GRU [Main Intelligence Directorate], and the like, by picking up their internal currency.

So we got together Mr. Kwok [Kok Howie Kwong], who was part of the Chinese intelligence group in Peking at that time. [We] were off to Vienna where we established New Republic/USA Financial Groupe, which was the security code of the Contras way back when. [Vienna] was where the core of all the Soviet rubles were because they were not allowed to leave the USSR. They could not buy any food, any refrigerators, any medicine, they couldn't buy anything. Anything you want to buy was all internal to the USSR and you couldn't take out the currency.

Yet, the Soviet Central Bank [Gosbank] said that every ruble is worth $1.20. Of course nobody's going to give you $1.20 because there's nothing to buy with a ruble.

So we were based in Vienna, in June 1988. We started to trade rubles through Brinks in Holland, into the the GRU, military, the postal savings accounts, the manufacturing facilities in the USSR. We would give them hard currency for their rubles. They knew their rubles were worth zero.

We purchased Aneko Credit Pte Ltd. Singapore which was grandfathered to do these kind of things in Singapore. We would run all of these rubles through Aneko Credit and Asia-Europa Development Group and Trans-Asia Resources and New Republic/USA Financial Groupe in Austria. So I was sent to Austria in June 1988. I was a permenent resident of Austria.

We were starting through the KGB and the GRU, and anybody and everybody that was trying to make a fast buck, to gather up all of the rubles. So suddenly, we were getting all of the rubles. They wrote stories about this in major magazines and newspapers, that we were idiots in buying all these Soviet rubles. So more people came to us all the time and we were negotiating between 18 to 28 cents a ruble. We would pay them off outside of the USSR in all the major banks, Hungarian banks as well. We had 109 accounts. If you got the rubles credited to our account we would would give you the hard currency of your choice. We had PROMIS software, four units of [equ..s?]. It's a specialized banking center software, of Inslaw in Washington, DC. So people were bringing us rubles, rubles, rubles, left and right in [to] Brinks in Holland, and other banks, and we were paying them in hard currency.

So here we are. We're all in Vienna. I speak very little German, but I'm there. We started to meet with a number of people within the Soviet bloc, and Hungary, and Iran, Iraq, so on, and so forth. And they're, shall we say, in an economic pinch because the USSR had no food, no meat, no nothing, no jet fuel. Because nobody would accept the ruble outside the country. So we used Brinks in Holland, and started to purchase rubles. Not purchase, say swap, you can't purchase currency but you can swap currencies. Something for something.

GREG: Okay. So basically, your job was to destabilize the ruble in an effort to bring the Cold War to an end, correct?

LEO: Correct. Because then they had no funds for the military. No funds for their intelligence. No funds for the KGB and the GRU and the like.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Now during this period of time, you set to work on this goal and you were pretty sucessful at it, correct? Your system worked.

LEO WANTA: Oh yes, very good at it. We had a draw from the US Treasury of $150 billion. Using the PROMIS software, we were bringing to the Russians and the postal savings accounts and certain manufacturers an opportunity to get hard currency for their rubles at a swap value much less... Well it was really much more than it was worth, because it was worth zero. And we were paying between 18 and 28 cents per ruble in hard currency of Swiss francs, Italian lira, deutchmarks?, British pounds sterling and the like.

So based on that we entertained with the Development Bank of Singapore. We sent them 70 billion rubles, worth $84 billion US. We met with the big shots at the USSR embassy in Singapore and they were screaming at us, and yelling at us, that we were destroying their economy.


GREG SZYMANSKI: And, at that point is there any particular reason why the money wasn't immediately returned? What was the whole idea behind this, how did it get lost? That's one question people ask me.

LEO WANTA: [We] have Brinks in Holland counting, and wrapping, and packaging, and sorting out all the rubles. And making sure there were no counterfeits.

And then the Central Bank of the USSR, [it] was deemed that they had to [do the] exchange because they're the ones who set the benchmark and all that.

We met with the bigshots at the Soviet Embassy in Singapore and they were telling my Chinese partner Mr. Kok that there is no way, no way in the world that they were going to give us $1.20 per ruble. And we argued back and forth, back and forth, and they said, "No, we're never going to give you $1.20."

So after a lot of arguing, and them drinking their goofy drinks, they came and said that the Kremlin authorized [them] to only pay us $1.08. I jumped up and down [on] the top of the tables and I said, "$1.08, Howie, we got more than that invested in the program!"

They were really happy that we were going to lose out. Unknown to them that we're [paying] 18, 22, 28 cents, a ruble which is a very good mark up of 4 or 5 times value. So we have the agreements with the Bank of China, that they sent all of the wire transfers to, that they would pay us $1.08. If we didn't like it we could get the hell out of town.

So I left. Howie stayed behind. They didn't trust me, being an American, but they would trust him because he was a Chinese authority. So, we have all the landmark agreements and the benchmarks at $1.08. Now, we were in the foriegn exchange of off-station rubles.

So the Russian people were now getting hard currency. Now they were bringing back in refrigerators from Budapest, and from Vienna. Everyday they were going from Budapest to Vienna, buying anything that wasn't parked. Bring it back to Budapest and trade it back for rubles.

We had a number of Budapest main banks accepting rubles on our behalf and paying them in hard currency.

They wrote articles that all the rubles were missing from the street, so they had to reprint new rubles. The finance minister was screaming that I, Wanta of New Republic, has all the rubles in my possesion and they had no rubles. So we kept bringing them rubles back to the Central Bank.

Suddenly, they were short of rubles; so we had to figure out another way to get rubles back. So Howie and I talked to India, Pakistan, China, Malaysia and all these countries and says, "Look you guys all have a national debt to the USSR and the Central Bank. What if we paid that debt off and we gave you rubles at 88 cents a ruble?"

They thought we were crazy but as long as we had the receipts and confirmation that their national debts were paid, perfect. So now all of these countries are paying their national debt to zero into the Central Bank of the USSR. Now [Sheshanko?] and everybody there are really, really excited that all of these countries are paying their debts back to the USSR. But keep in mind the rubles are worth [benchmarked at] $1.20. They took all the rubles and started paying all their national debts, based on about two-thirds the value, but getting 100% value.

So that worked out real good. They [USSR] were getting the hard currency, they were buying refrigerators, carpets, medicine in Vienna, Austria and everything else. We were bringing them meat through [authraw?] Poland.

We were negotiating with Pabst Brewery in Milwaukee to pick up their whole brewery and move it to Russia. The same with Intercontinental Baking or Continental Baking, they were closing their whole facility; we were going to bring that thing lock, stock and barrel. We bought horses from Mexico that they wanted, and everyone was having a real great time by buying something with hard currency.

All of these countries are buying them from Howie and I at 88 cents. Not buying, but trading their hard currencies for what we wanted. So now the Central Bank is flooded with rubles, but they don't have any real hard currency, because everybody is paying them in rubles. So [Greshanko?] and everybody they says, "We got 2000 [tons] bullion of gold." In 75 kilos, 35, 35.5 kilos, 25 kilos, all mixed, one-off, and all this crap. And they gave us a huge discount if we would pay them in hard currency.

So now you've got 2000 tons in hard currency that we already made three or four-hundred percent on if not more.

We missed 246 tons in Latvia/Lithuania and Jim Baker said I was not doing my job because they still had 200 some tons of gold. If nobody tells me that how do I know to find it? We still had 2000 tons of bling, which is pretty good. We had to resmelt it at [Johnson Matthey] at Singapore under heavy security and made out to our name. And paid cash.


So that worked out real good. And Gorbachev was very much involved, the Central Bank was involved; everybody knew. So suddently they were very pleased in the USSR, because they're gettting all these rubles. Everybody's paying their national debts and they had all this currency coming back into the Central Bank in Moscow. Unknown to them, that President Reagan could stop at anytime the swapping, or the trading, of the rubles for hard currency which was in Swiss francs, or German marks and so on so forth. And they were getting, running low out of hard currency because they were paying everybody $1.20, $1.08 and so on and so forth. So now they are low on hard currency of the G7 for example. So we decided that we would do them a favor. We purchased 2000 tons of their gold that was in the Central Bank in USSR, and naturally they ripped us off. They would only give us $1.08 for every ruble, still unknown to the important people that we were paying less than 28 cents a piece. So now we have 2000 tons of gold based on actual cost of 28 cents but getting market value of $1.08 per ruble.

So that went on very well and then everybody decided in the Whitehouse that there will be no more treaty arrangements of trading rubles for hard currency. Therefore, now the USSR is absolutely bankrupt, the GRU is bankrupt, the KGB is bankrupt but in reality they're really not bankrupt because Gorbachev, Yeltsin, and Yegor Gaidar the Prime Minister took all of their rubles which really had a 'Monopoly' value in a kids game and have hard currency, in German marks, and Swiss francs, and British pounds sterling, and everything else.

Now the USSR is absolutely bankrupt. They make a deal with Boris Yeltsin he has, he fakes this, uh, coup, that he was being attacked by his military, Gorbachev was you know - which was all part of his way for an exit. So therefore, we have all the hard currency, they have rubles. Nobody wants rubles. So we had agreed with Putin and everybody, who at that time was Vice Mayor in Leningrad (which turned out to be St. Petersburg eventually, it was on the [?] commission), that we would give a non-returnable grant to the USSR under the new image of the Russian Federation of $30 billion US dollars and that's to rebuild.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Where was this money earmarked for once you make this money back then?

LEO WANTA: Well, the money was earmarked for the US Department of the Treasury, except for $30 billion that was authorized by President Reagan through AmeriTrust to the Russian Federation in Mockba, which is Moscow, for redevelopment programs. As long as there are none military. We would have been monitoring all of that $30 billion. We paid back the $150 billion, that we got forwarded from the US Department of the Treasury, within 6 months.

We had a tremendous amount of real hard currency and of that $70 billion that was set aside: $5 billion was going to Canada, $5 billion to UK, and $5 billion to Mexico and so on so forth, a total of $70 billion. But at the same time down in Western American Samoa, we were setting up a $5 million oil refinery to back up the US oil needs.

We were [also] buying medium term bank... Well at that time they were called prime bank guarantees, at 7.5% annual interest, 10 year plus one day maturity. We were buying them at 68%, 66% per $100 million par value and we could either loan 'em, or sell 'em, or transfer, at 88 to 92[%]. In reality, we're making $20 million for every $100 million par value prime bank guarantee. And we're doing this repetitively, every hour on the hour. That generated a tremendous amount of money, that we would reduce any and all debt obligations of the USA. And that is what President Reagan wanted to do.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So this money, so you're sucessful at bringing the ruble down. In the meantime, you amass a lot of dollars. And you become the caretaker of this through Ronald Reagan. Who appoints you, through what you told me earlier, his trust in you.

LEO WANTA: Oh yes.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. So the years go by now, this fund is there, I mean the money is there now invested in the different things.

LEO WANTA: Yeah, in prime bank guarantees.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. Now how does that transition remain American assets, but remain out of the country?

LEO WANTA: Yeah, offshore bank deposits.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So basically Reagan must have been really pleased with what you guys were doing?

LEO WANTA: Oh, he was overly excited. The Soviet Union had no money to buy anything for military arms, and Star Wars, and stuff of that nature. That's why Gorbachev [publically] in Helsinki was so mad. Gorbachev, [meaning the USSR] had zero, zero in cash.

We paid him $10 billion through the Gorbachev Foundation. So he was happy to sell out his country. What are you going to do? It's easier to pay these guys a couple of bucks.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Now, Reagans intention was always to bring this money back. Now you guys amassed a lot of money, it was constantly compounding interest...

LEO WANTA: Reagan's first intention was to have US security thoughout the world and the Soviet Union - being [unknown] - to nothing, so he [would] not have to spend money on military.

So all of these funds then... We paid back the treasury the $150 billion. There was security throughout the world. There was no more USSR. They were gone.

The Russians had a Federation; they needed money. Boris Yeltsin and Putin, the Deputy Mayor in Leningrad, was going to receive through the Reagan Group, which was us, $30 billion to rebuild their countries. But for no arms, and no tanks, and no nothing [military].

And we were rebuilding the US dollar economy. We were buying prime bank guarantees of 66% to 69% and retrading those at 88% to 92% which was making us around $20 million for every $100 million prime bank guarantee. That was the money that was rebuilding all of the banking community, money in the United States, so the banks could give out loans and mortgages and do whatever you want. And also, more foriegn aid to the countries of acceptance to the US State Department. So this money was coming back, and it was also being used and generated to make more money for the USA to be a super-economy.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Well tell us how did you save his [Reagan's] life.

LEO WANTA: Well being in the intelligence community we, you know, we're reaching out to a number of people throughout the world at all times. We had a certain person that was a foriegner as a guest of the United States. I don't think he had a green card since he was in the political regime.

He had called me and he was extremely nervous. He said he had people staying in his Washington office for months, and months, and today was the day they were going to assassinate President Reagan. I asked really clear what was going on? How can I know for sure? He told me all of the details.

I immediately called Treasury Special Agent Bill Lecates. He got on the phone to Special Agent of the Secret Service Glen Speedy, along with Frank B. Ingram, who is a liason with the FBI. That's why his initials are F.B. Ingram.

We immediately pulled President Reagan out of the Whitehouse.

We pick[ed] up everybody that came via Texas, to come into the Washington area. They were being groomed and being hosted by this gentleman, who will remain anonymous, except [to] the people that need to know. The Secret Service came immediately to his place, grabbed him for his own security and protection. He wasn't sure who I sent to get him.

So he's there; they're coming in with all their Secret Service garb, and everything else, and the Secret Service agent said he went all over the floor. I said, "Well I would too, if they came in running with all of those machine guns and everything else."

He said, "You should have warned him."

I said, "I was kind of busy."

GREG SZYMANSKI: What year was this just to give us...

LEO WANTA: That was... I'll say a Friday the 13th. I'll let you track it back from there.


LEO WANTA: But you can talk to the Secret Service, because we all got plaques and all this other good stuff. Glen Speedy, the Secret Service, and Bill Lecates who was Direc. in US Treasury and national at that time. So you know everybody was happy, happy, happy. We were all happy that the threat, [that] wasn't sure at that time, [and] when we verified that it was absolutely a threat. We picked up everybody. To the best of our knowledge, we got them all.


GREG SZYMANSKI: [Who do you work for?]

LEO WANTA: For the Office of the President. That's who I work for.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. So when did the whole problem begin, when you wanted to put the money back. But I think you were talked to by someone. Did somebody want to really take it from you, is what I'm getting at.

LEO WANTA: Well here, first of all you have to understand we have all of [this] in our control, Howie and I. We had all the money in foriegn accounts, prime bank guarantees, and other collateral, and gold bullion, and the like.

George Bush was finishing up his travel time in Singapore. This was about April, 1992, [January 3-5, 1992] because Howie died in May, 1992. He [Bush] realized that all of the assets, which was about $864 billion in Aneko Credit in Singapore, was owned by a Chinese guy named Howie Kwong. [He] was the chairman of our group bank and [with] myself as managing director. He was curious that he was now the President of the United States, and we had all these funds. Then when Bill Clinton became President of the United States, he decided that all three of us were no good. He's the only guy that can handle that kind of money with authority and maturity.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. This is one part of the story, I think you need to explain, because I gotta make that transition from the good days of Reagan; and all of a sudden things change.

LEO WANTA: Okay. Well it's really strange.

GREG SZYMANSKI: How did that happen?

LEO WANTA: The last tour of President George Herbert Walker Bush, he goes to Singapore of all places. Unknown to him, the Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, sold Aneko Credit PTA Ltd. in Singapore, to my Chinese partner and I. Now we are [running] the intel community banking. Which everybody who was anybody in the Bush Administration and previous administrations used for their, let's call it, set-aside allocations.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Now you told me you were made the trustee by Reagan.

LEO WANTA: Oh, I was the trustor sure, for the Presidential Task Force, yeah.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. Go ahead. So that gives you some power over this money still?

LEO WANTA: No. Guarded power.


LEO WANTA: That doesn't mean I can spend it. I'm just guarding it.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay, so go ahead now we're in the...

LEO WANTA: Okay, so I am in Vienna working with the Chinese against the USSR, because they are also buying rubles to take down their debts. And I'm off to Singapore to meet my Chinese counterpart, Mr. Kok Howie Kwong. His dad is a wheeler dealer within the Chinese administration and a warlord and all this stuff. We had a number of operations with the ruble with PRC [People's Republic of China] and ROC [Taiwan] in China. They're in Pakistan and India and everything else.

His father says to Howie that the Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, must sell his stock in Aneko Credit PTA Ltd. [Since] he's the Prime Minister he can't do both. So Howie's dad says to Howie and I, "[Leo] if you put up $25 million, I'll put up $25 million for my son, and you and he will own Aneko Credit PTA Ltd."

[Aneko Credit] is a grandfathered bank [with] underwriters and all of this stuff and this was great for us.

So I take $25 million from New Republic. Where his dad got the money is not material to me, but I'm sure it came out of Hong Kong/Shanghai. So I bought Mrs. Lee's one share and Howie bought the Prime Minister's one share. Now we have all of these funds, and we move in more funds that we are developing. Prime bank guarantees, because we're also now bank underwriters by contract in Singapore under the grandfather clause. The Chinese and Singaporeans had [this clause] long before I even knew Singapore existed.

So here's President Bush sitting in Singapore, in fact we gave the instructions to the Secret Service to move him from one hotel to the Shangri-La. The Secret Service guys in my hotel room at the Marina Manor agreed, let's move him to the Shangri-la which is much safer. He can still do the meetings at the other hotels but at least we'll take over the Shangri-La. So we got credit for that.

So George Bush Sr. comes on his worldwide tour at the end of his campaign and he's in Singapore. He meets Howie and I. He finds out from the Prime Minister that Howie and I own Aneko Credit and now we are holding his special set-aside allocations. We knew all of his set-aside allocations, and George Schultz, and Jimmy Baker, and everybody else.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Oh boy, you had the information now on him.

LEO WANTA: But, I wasn't doing anything with it.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Right, right.

LEO WANTA: You know it didn't bother me, because I had enough to do with what I was doing.

Howie and I [had] in our accounts, our personal accounts under the agreements we had with President Reagan, [we] had total assets in Aneko Credit of $864 billion U.S. which is entirely, shall we say, stock profit. Which would be split between Mr. Kwok and myself, $432 billion a piece.

He [George Bush, Sr.] was very upset that he did not realize that Howie and I collectively owned Aneko Credit.

Okay? See because Howie's got a share and I got a share. That's $432 billion a piece, well, [Carol Courtney's?] there from state and [George Bush] Sr. says that since I report to Bush, the Office of the President, I should consider half to go away and Howie should give half to go away [Bush wanted half of each of their $432 billion].

Howie jumped right out of that chair. He said, "You are S...H... boomp-boomp-boomp. I pay you nothing more,  boomp-boomp-boomp."

We got another North Korean conflict going on. Howie died a couple weeks later.


LEO WANTA: By rat poison.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Rat poisoning?

LEO WANTA: They believe, by rat poisoning because his face got real puffy, yellow jaundice, and he was terrible. I was supposed to die within 10, 15 minutes after him.

I got a call from Singapore Internal Affairs that Howie's in the hospital, he's going into a coma, he's dying. Instead of going out the front door using the company car, I just got the first taxi. The taxi driver took me to the emergency entrance, instead of the front door, where I would naturally go as a tourist.

I got up there and Leo [Tetses?] says to me, "How the hell did you get up here?"

I said, "What are you talking about? You called me, said he's going into a coma."

"How did you get up here!"

I said, "I went out the front door, took the taxi, and the taxidriver says go through the emergency."

He said, "Ohhh!"

So then, he [Howie] died his just...

GREG SZYMANSKI: And you were sure you were slated for the same uh...

LEO WANTA: Yeah, I should never have got to the hotel room. This has been verified by General Vernon Walters. I was going to be hit long before I got to that floor.

So, what happens [is] when you get rat poison in a human being, you create a vacuum in your brain and you blow the stem. That's what happened.

[Carol Courtney's?] there from U.S. State and she's really [offended] now because a Chinese spoke so terrible to the President of the United States. But you know, trying to get Howie for $216 billion, Howie was not interested in paying $216 billion.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And where was that going to go?

LEO WANTA: Who knows?

He [Howie] jumped right out of his chair screaming, I says, "Howie, you put me in a terrible position."

He says, "You stay here with me; you still got $432 billion."

I says, "Howie, that's not the way it works in the United States. He's my superior."

[Howie makes a noise] "Rahrrrararar!!!"

A couple weeks later he died, at Singapore General Hospital.

[Then] they came to get me.

I went to Canada. Dan Qualye arranged for me to get to Canada, for whatever reason. I stayed in Toronto. And then I went per Uncle Sam to Switzerland to meet Vince Foster. And that's when I was taken down.

GREG SZYMANSKI: [Back to when] you're sitting across from Bush...

LEO WANTA: Oh yeah. He's staring at me. I was always quizzed by him in the old days with Reagan, because Reagan wouldn't trust him. Reagan wouldn't ever tell him what we were doing.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Reagan didn't trust Bush back then?

LEO WANTA: No. He never told him anything. When he would ask me or Larry Eagleburger, would ask me questions or something, I would always refer back to Dutch [Reagan]. Or, [to] William French Smith, or Casey, because [with] what I was doing, I was told to just shut up and get it done.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And that's when you were made the Ambassador [for] Somalia [to] Switzerland and Canada. To work with [William] Sessions and Vince Foster. And basically that's where we're at now.

LEO WANTA: That's correct.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And at this point you end up in a Swiss jail.

LEO WANTA: Well, it really wasn't a jail. It was a dungeon.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay a dungeon for 134 days. And really for... Did they ever give you an official reason?

LEO WANTA: Well for the first three days they didn't even know I was there. So I was starving to death.

And then they said they had a phone call from the State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue, the Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin, to hold me for tax evasion from 1982 and '88.

I kinda laughed, I thought it was a political joke. Because I lived in China since 1985. And in 1986, I spent the whole year in the Phillipines, during that coup against Marcos. We were very busy running between Singapore, Malaysia and the Phillipines. So how could I be a resident of the State of Wisconsin? My wife divorced me because I abandoned her in '82. I was too much involved in the government; which she wasn't too happy with.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. So how did they want to get their hands on this money and what did you tell them?

LEO WANTA: After Howie died, they had started giving me a lot of heat in Singapore, so I went on to Canada. I spent a year in Canada trying to figure out how I was going to get the money back into US Treasury.

We were working with Vince Foster and he was kind of a help to us.

In June 1993, I got orders through Vince Foster and [Cupper?] who I think was his boss at the time. We had some transactions that were going to help me move to Lake Geneva and I would buy a beautiful home there and I would settle up on the paybacks. And I said, "That's not a problem as long as I can pay back the US Department of the Treasury."

And they said, "What do you want to do that for?"

I said, "Because two, three years down the road you're going to say I never paid anybody; and I'm going to be arrested for embezzling US federal funds."

So I went to Switzerland and Foster's going to meet me on July 7. We transferred $250 million to the Children's Defense Fund through Credit Suisse, [through] Guy Stewart, the chairman of the board at Credit Suisse. And, I automatically went to Swiss prison, and he [Foster] automatically died on July 20.

GREG SZYMANSKI: It's said this fund that was started, the Global Security Fund, and what Bush and Clinton wanted to do now; was to somehow copycat what you were doing. But, to use the money privately, instead of bringing it back to the Treasury? Correct?

LEO WANTA: Correct and to pay taxes on that money.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. So that's what they wanted to do with you and that's really why they wanted you out of the picture, correct?

LEO WANTA: Yeah, they wanted me out of the game. But at the same time, return all of the trust assets to individuals, and not to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. I feared that in a couple of years, somebody's gonna ask for an audit and I'm not going to have the money, and I'm gonna be in prison for life.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Bingo. And we're talking about how much money, you think?

LEO WANTA: Oh, at that time we had let's see, boomp-boomp-boomp. I would estimate in 1993, we had assets well over $16-18 trillion in prime bank guarantees, 2000 tons of gold, [another] 167 tons of gold, cash-wise we probably had, oh, $500 billion assorted currencies.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Which you're still the trustor for right?

LEO WANTA: Yeah. And I'm also the owner of it because Howe's dead. And I still owe 50% of the final outlay to his estate, which he has two beautiful kids.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Clinton, Bush the rest of them [are] trying to get it into private hands. You want to take the money; put it back into the Treasury.

LEO WANTA: Per the original protocol agreements, yes.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And there, is the reason they are after you, correct?

LEO WANTA: Yeah, but they can't kill me right away because they don't know where all the money is.

GREG SZYMANSKI: They don't know where it's at?

LEO WANTA: Well, they know some of it. They have ripped off 4 or 5 of my computers already. But a lot of this stuff is based on custodial safekeeping reciepts in banks, which open up other assets and numbers and passcodes and stuff.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So the CIA has discredited you, even had you declared dead. Didn't they?

LEO WANTA: Correct. So they could go through all the banking community, and the bank managers, and say he's never showing up here; so now we're in charge of these accounts.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And they've tried discrediting you, now tell us how this backstabbing occurred and what really happened to this money?

LEO WANTA: Well, we had a trading program for 5 T [trillion] through the World Bank; and it was going to be generated by the Swiss banks.

I was in Toronto and I left Toronto [for] Paris to meet President [Haji maheelamashi?] because I was now being appointed the Ambassador of Somalia to Canada and to Switzerland. So under cover of that we had the 5 T contracts with the World Bank and the UN under Contract #4.

[This] would also rebuild Somalia and [give] us a naval supply depot there. Mogadishu Airport would have been a US Airforce station and we would have a rapid deployment force there to protect and control the Middle East from idiots that want to cause war.

So we were in Switzerland. One of the major banks started the first leg of the 5 T [trillion] contract which would have generated $210 billion. Of which $70 billion was set aside for, let's see: $30 billion to Russia, $5 billion to Canada, $5 billion to Mexico, $5 billion to London, $5 billion to France, $500 million to Western Samoa to build an oil refinery [which was] only feeding [to] the United States. We would have had a brand new high-tech refinery in Western Samoa. And $70 billion would have went back into AmeriTrust, and $70 billion would have went into the US Treasury, for whatever the Economic Presidential Council [sic] wanted to do. Laura D Tyson and all these people.

So we would have been very secure and very satisfied with the influx of cash.


Vince Foster made a special request through the Whitehouse at that time. He needed 250 million dollars set aside for the Childrens Defense Fund, which was approved by the Whitehouse at that time, by a Laura D'Andrea Tyson who was the chairperson of the Whitehouse Economic Counsel. So he was in Geneve. We arranged 250 million dollars for the Childrens Defense Fund from their request, based on the 5T [trillion] UN Contract #4.

We moved the first initial traunches of 243 million dollars, which would have gave them a face value of 300 million to start the computers working as a dry run more or less and that was three 81 million dollar transfers. [This] would give you a par value prime bank guarantee of 100 million dollars per each 81 million dollars released.

Vince Foster was staying there. Suddenly, all heck broke loose. I was arrested and detained by the Swiss Sûreté for failure to pay Wisconsin taxes, although I haven't lived in Wisconsin since 1985, being on US government seal operations.

[They] threw me in a dungeon. Vince Foster came to my rescue. He came back to Washington DC, to assist in getting my immediate release from all this nonsense.

Then he was murdered. I know he didn't commit suicide. No one with $250 million in his briefcase commits suicide.

They had me incognito. Only a handful of people knew I was in the Swiss dungeon in Lausanne.

Then Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, came to my rescue because he was part of an agreement we had between the Palestinians and the State of Israel. The Ameritrust corporation, of which I'm the Chairman of the Board, was going to grant the State of Israel 5 billion, and the Palestine government at that time, $5 billion a piece. To [encourage] a solid peace program. Which we would have controlled all the funds, so the funds would not be removed from the recovery, the redevelopment of roads and infrastructure.

He notified the Swiss government that he was coming to rearrange the furniture, as we say.

I was immediately extradited to New York, without any arrest warrants, without anything at all. Just put me on a plane, under armed guard, and shackles. I ended up in New York, and the FBI was saying, "What the hell are you doing here?"

I didn't have an American passport, I had a Somalian passport, a diplomatic passport, so they figured they were being swindled by somebody.

In the meantime, Yitzhak Rabin, got murdered.

I went to the Brooklyn House of Detention. They were supposed to remove me to Madison, Wisconsin, so I could get a hearing and get released.

The Federal Judge Alyce Ross says, "You know Mr. Ambassador, I don't know what you're here for and I don't want you here. Get the hell out of here." More or less [that's what she said].

But before she dismissed everything against me by the State of Wisconsin, which I haven't lived in since 1985, she asked me, "Why are you carrying these $1 billion notes, these securities."

I started to explain it and immediately the US Attorney jumped in and he says, "We dismiss all the charges. He's free to go, he's free to go. We make a motion, US government."

And I went to the [courthouse] steps only to be arrested by New York detectives, without a warrant, but, based on a phone call from the State of Wisconsin to hold me for civil tax evasion for 1982.

GREG SZYMANSKI: We left off where you were named the Ambassador [of] Somalia [to] Switzerland and Canada. Basically to deal with the Vince Foster issue and Marc Rich?

LEO WANTA: We had [a] tremendous [number] of security plans to use in Mogadishu And it would have helped all the people, remember the Cubans were fighting in the upper part of Somaliland.


LEO WANTA: We had a vested interest in there.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Now what happened to...You were also there for Rich, correct? Marc Rich?

LEO WANTA: Well yeah, we were there because we were doing this settlement, and we were also taking down Marc Rich. Because the FBI Director Bill Sessions, gave us a live open arrest warrant to take down Marc Rich at any cost and bring him on back. So we were going to coax him [into] going to a french casino across the lake in Lausanne. But Lorrayne Fine somehow tipped him off, and knew somehow from her cohorts, what we might be doing in Switzerland. We were going to arrest him in the middle between Lausanne and France on the ferry boat.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And what happened?

LEO WANTA: (Laughs) He refused to come at the last minute. And on July 7, 1993 I was arrested for Wisconsin civil tax evasion.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And this was...

LEO WANTA: And he was free to travel and he went back to Zug.

Keep in mind, one of the persons who had talked to him and tipped him off to what we were doing was a Miss Lorrayne Fine. We have photographs that they met at the Hotel Aulac in Lausanne. She was a Mossad agent. We feel that she's the one that told Marc we were going to take him down.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So then basically Clinton orders his release?

LEO WANTA: Yeah. You have to understand, he doesn't really have [the] pardon that he thinks he's got. He's got pardon for a crime once he's arrested. Since we didn't arrest him, we don't consider the pardon a real pardon. The pardon only releases him after somebody makes the arrest and we [still] have the arrest warrant.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay, Leo I think it would be good to maybe take us back to when you were taken away and put in that Swiss dungeon and explain to our listeners exactly why you ended up going through all these legal battles. They basically wanted to copy this. They wanted the money now into private hands, instead of Treasury hands, but [besides] this was there anything more? Is that basically it or is there more behind why you were jailed?

LEO WANTA: Well, there's a lot more behind it. Keep in mind they came to the hotel in Lausanne, Hotel Aulac, because we were now going to meet Vince Foster. Vince Foster had arrived in Geneva to meet with us.

They take my diplomatic passports. I have two of them. One for each country. I don't have an American passport because Warren Christopher, the Secretary of State, said I couldn't have passports for both countries. So I surrendered my U.S. passport, he almost flipped.

And, Mossad was with Lorrayne Fine. And they were very much involved with Hillary Clinton, on a number of financial programs with Marc Rich. He works for the Israelis. They had a number of things on their agenda which [were] contrary to what we wanted to do within the United States, and [in] the Middle East per se. So they had to get me out. They had to get the money. I had already gave Foster $250 million from Credit Suisse and Vince Foster was going to testify against Bill Clinton on a number of things. He agreed to [do this] with the U.S. attorneys.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And then he turned up dead of course.

LEO WANTA: Absolutely. But, he did come and try to save me and get me out of the dungeons. The superintendent came and said he died. Why would the superintendent want to tell me that he died? Except, somebody was sending me a veiled threat.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Right. When's the last time you saw him before he was killed?

LEO WANTA: July 7th.


LEO WANTA: Of 1993 because we gave him $250 million from Credit Suisse. He needed $250 million for the Children's Defense Fund. He made lodging arrangements for us at the Hotel De la Paix in Geneva. He got his $250 million from Credit Suisse. He got murdered, and I went to the Swiss dungeon for 134 days. We still don't know who got the $250 million, but I know it was debited to our corporate account.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So you have verification that Vince Foster was with you in Switzerland two weeks before he was murdered, he was there with you correct?

LEO WANTA: Correct. And we were staying at the Hotel De la Paix. In fact we were all on his American Express card, because he wanted to keep it quiet and didn't want anyone to know we were having a group meeting.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And so you give back the $250 million to the Children's fund, both of you, well at least you not knowing, that later that the Children's fund turns out to be under an Executive Order, a slush fund really. And, so Foster gets killed. But, if they were going to run a fair investigation [of Foster's death] don't you think they would want to talk to you?

LEO WANTA: Oh yeah, but [Kenneth] Starr knew about it. So Starr doing what he did, is really not a cover-up, it's obstruction of justice.

Starr wanted to represent me [on the tax evasion charges] in the State of Wisconsin and the Department of Justice Attorney General Doyle at that time gave him a job as a contract lawyer [in the] Department of Education. So he dropped me like a cheapskate and he went with the Department of Education. We all knew Starr was given a plum job on the behalf of the State of Wisconsin to avoid me. That's another case of obstruction of justice. He knew my case inside and out and he bailed on me to go to the Department of Education.

GREG SZYMANSKI: ...they cover up their own investigations...

LEO WANTA: Yeah but you have to keep in mind Marc Rich was in the Hotel Au Lac in Lausanne, and he was going to take the ferry. His attorney at the time, of all people, was I. Lewis Libby, also known a 'Scooter'. That's one of Marc Rich's main attorneys, Scooter Libby. So how do you think they get the inside track?

GREG SZYMANSKI: That's interesting, I didn't know that.

LEO WANTA: Ken Starr knows it because we talked about it.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Interesting. And of course these things have never been investigated properly.

LEO WANTA: Why, I've been talking about it for years.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And like I said they've never been investigated. And there you sit...

LEO WANTA: I told everybody in Congress, everybody in the Senate, I told everybody and anybody.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And let's get back to Hillary. Here I'm reading something that was sent to me, that Hillary had been in control of an organization called the Children's Defense Fund and that was listed under Executive Order 12333 in 1981 under President Reagan. Okay?

LEO WANTA: I don't think so.

GREG SZYMANSKI: That's what it said here, but that's not it?

LEO WANTA: Because the Executive Order allowed us to have CIA proprietary corporations. Now, that's not saying the Children's Defense Fund wasn't a CIA proprietary corporation. I wasn't a member of the Children's Defense Fund.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. Anyway, we have the Executive Order now. Hillary Clinton then... Basically, this corporation has been used for intelligence purposes. Money being used for intelligence purposes, not for a children's defense fund. And she basically is in control of this, and also treating it maybe, as her own private little slush fund.

LEO WANTA: She is the chairman.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So is there anything in there that you had found out about how she was using the money.

LEO WANTA: No. All we were told by Andrea Tyson, who was the chairperson of the Presidents Economic Counsel, that she [had] approved the request from Vince Foster for us to set aside $250 million for the Children's Defense Fund. Since they're in the Whitehouse, and I'm not in the Whitehouse, I'm not going to argue about it.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So then she, this money then is... What ever happened to that $250 million?

LEO WANTA: I'm in a dungeon, I haven't the slightest idea.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Right. And let's trace that then, tell me what was your... You were put in there for 134 days, correct?

LEO WANTA: Uh-huh.

GREG SZYMANSKI: What kind of treatment did you get when you were there?

LEO WANTA: I was... Well, first of all they didn't know I was there for 2 or 3 days. They were probably hoping I would have a heart attack but I didn't. It was terrible. I was in a pre-Nazi dungeon of probably 1930 vintage.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And you stayed there 134 days until Rabin got you out, correct?

LEO WANTA: Correct. They came and rushed me to the airport. And at the airport they gave me the letter from Yitzhak Rabin that he was coming to my rescue, so they flew me right to New York immediately on Air Swiss.

GREG SZYMANSKI: It seems like everybody surrounding you who tried to help you ended up dead.

LEO WANTA: I agree.

GREG SZYMANSKI: I just wanted to go step by step here, after you get out jail, out of the Swiss dungeon, what happened?

LEO WANTA: They took me in shackles and chains and they put me on Swiss Air. Flew me to New York. I end up at JFK.

I have my Somalian passport, no American passport. They look at my Somalian, my diplomatic passport, and the FBI says, "What the hell we picking you up for?"

"Hey, I'm here, take off the chains and shackles if you don't mind."

They took me right away to the Brooklyn House of Detention where I sat for a bit. And, no, no, it was the Federal, the Metropolitan uh, jail for the feds [Metropolitan Detention Center, Brooklyn]. So I spent a couple of days there; then they took me to the judge.

The judge looked at me, looked at my papers, and asked me a number of questions. [She wanted to know] how come I'm an Ambassador. I started to tell her, then she asked me why I'm carrying these $1 billion treasury notes. I started to tell her who I was and everything else. And the Assistant U.S. Attorney jumps up yelling and hollering, "We move for immediate dismissal, and stop the conversation, boomp-boomp-boomp."

And she says, "Well I didn't want to hear it anyhow, Mr. Ambassador you're free to go."

I leave, I figured that a guy had finally [come] and saved me from these characters.

I walked down the steps [of] the Federal Court House and two New York detectives come up to me and said they have a phone call from the State of Wisconsin. They're holding me for tax evasion.

I said, "You're out of your mind."

So they took me over, kept me there at the Brooklyn House of Detention for 30, 40 days.

Wisconsin finally decided to come and get me, without any extradition or anything. No papers, no arrest warrants, or nothing. Put me in more shackles. Embarassed me walking through airports, which is illegal under the Air Act. You cannot carry guns, even if you are a deputy sheriff.

So they take me to Madison, and for 2 years they put me in the county jail on the floor.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And you spent 2 years in the county jail?

LEO WANTA: Excuse me?

GREG SZYMANSKI: How long did you spend in county jail?

LEO WANTA: A couple of years.


LEO WANTA: On and off. It was a county jail, that there wasn't even a crime commited in, it was terrible. And I don't like to sleep on cement floors.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So the money is now in the trillions of dollars. What happens now is, the Clinton and Bush people backstab you guys, and they begin to loot this money. Correct?

LEO WANTA: Well, they took charge of the money. My business partner he got killed by rat poison. Vince Foster met his demise in Washington, DC. Francois de Grosseurve the spymaster of France, he got murdered. [Leno Barris?] who was working with us to uncover the Red Merc 20/20 that was used by the Iraqis, against the Kurds, he got killed in Hong Kong. All of the people working special assignment and feeding [information to] President Reagan all decided to die. And they put me in a Swiss dungeon because I had all the banking codes.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And Yitzhak Rabin, he was also assasinated after...

LEO WANTA: He was getting $10 billion from President Reagan. We had the money for him for the Peace Accord.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And Rabin tries to come to your rescue and there's a letter basically verifying that.

LEO WANTA: He did come to my rescue. The moment he served the Swiss administration, they picked me out of there, and flew me to New York.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Why do you think they wanted you out of the way? Out of the picture here?

LEO WANTA: They wanted me out of the way because I controlled all of the money, all of the bank accounts. I was the holder of all of the accounts.

In the old days under Colby and Casey, they would give me the banking instructions. I would follow the banking instructions under certain passcodes to do whatever operations they required.

If you look, when I came to New York in shackles and chains from the Swiss adminitration, Judge Alyce Ross, Federal Judge Alyce Ross asked me how and why I had 18 one billion dollar Treasury notes in my briefcase. I had 18 one billion dollar notes, and now there's an argument between the Federal Court in New York and the Treasurer of the State of Wisconsin, [over] what happened to the 18 one billion dollar notes. It's in the transcripts. That's 18 billion dollars missing right now. Parked between the New York Federal Court, who denies that they have it. [They say] they gave it to the State of Wisconsin.

The State of Wisconsin, the Treasurer of the State of Wisconsin [unknown] says, "Yeah, I heard that story. I know it's here someplace but we don't know where."

Wouldn't you look in your bedroom for 18 one billion dollar notes if you wanted to buy a pack of cigarettes or something?

GREG SZYMANSKI: How much money was involved in your tax evasion charge?

LEO WANTA: According to the audit the feds did, if I was a resident I would have owed 15 cents. If I'm a resident, which I'm not. They never had a case. In fact the case was held in Dane County, I've never lived in Dane County in my life. There's statutes that say you have to be tried in the county where the crime [was commited]. The only thing I ever did in Madison, was going to a Bucks game.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Now what about getting a fair trial? Were you able to mount any kind of trial?

LEO WANTA: No, they would not allow me to have private counsel. They hired a Major retired from the US Army Adjutant General. And he did absolutely nothing except ask what he should do from the Attorney General.

GREG SZYMANSKI: It doesn't sound like the Constitution was being adhered to in the Leo Wanta case.

LEO WANTA: No and I wasn't even allowed one witness to show who I was, and where I lived, and where I resided.

GREG SZYMANSKI: No. And finally how did you ever secure your release into house arrest? How is this working?

LEO WANTA: We don't know yet. Suddenly, they decided I should not be where I was. They moved me down to Sayre, Oklahoma. We filed a number of papers with the federal courts down there, that I'd been kidnapped from Switzerland. I'm an Ambassador. They have no authority, no jurisdiction.

They kept me in a private prison under the Corrections Corporation of America, which is owned by the U.S. military. They sent me back to Wisconsin. Wisconsin didn't want to hold me any longer because they were getting all these questions and no answers. So they decided that I should not be in the prison system. I should just go on house arrest and fend for myself.

There's a lot of good people that cared in these jails and prisons. They did their check with their FBI buddies and deputy sheriffs, and said I got screwed and tattooed.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So why did they let you out of jail finally?

LEO WANTA: They couldn't get the rest of the money because I had the security codes and passwords. And also to quiet down all the exterior noise that we were making with the special investigators in Europe. They decided to quiet this thing down and try to get some kind of low cost settlement.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Yeah. Which you did and now you're sitting there with all this information. I noticed that you have made a list also, of reciepts identified in handwritten notes, on some of the transactions involving these giga-financing operations.

LEO WANTA: Yeah, I thought I was dying.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Amazing, Francis Driscoll Trust, uh, we go on and on and on. Incredible.

LEO WANTA: Those are Fed Reserve reciepts right there.

LEO WANTA: By Judge Lee's ruling, I think you have a copy of that? That says, I should recover all of this money. [When] I recover all this money 38.6% of that immediately goes to the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And then of course we have George Bush, President Clinton, and Jim Doyle, the former Attorney General of Wisconsin [who] helped to prosecute you, correct? On trumped up charges?

LEO WANTA: Correct. Knowing that I was innocent. I wasn't a resident of Wisconsin, they knew this.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Who can you trust? From your perspective, right now?

LEO WANTA: Well, the only one I can trust right now is Judge Lee who ruled in the favor of the people. He's got tremendous [sic] other judges. If all those judges get together in the judiciary, things will stop quickly because they can put a huge oar in the water, as well as a number of senators and congressmen that can no longer live with the manipulation... and take charge, the people win, win, win.

GREG SZYMANSKI: I want you to explain to us who is Judge Lee and what was his ruling.

LEO WANTA: Judge Lee at Alexandria, Virginia ruled that I am in charge of all of these government corporations and private corporations as chairman and full shareholder under the Reagan administration. [I] should legally and immediately recover all of these funds and pay it to the US Department of the Treasury. And also notify the Internal Revenue Service of the payment. This is what Judge Lee went way out of his way to [do to] help all of us.

GREG SZYMANSKI: I just wanted to verify from you that this amount of money is a real amount, correct?

LEO WANTA: The money is a real amount correct, but like you said it's the minimum amount because each day it accrues.

GREG SZYMANSKI: And so there could be at this point it's more that $27 trillion?

LEO WANTA: Oh, sure. The last time the IRS and the US Treasury did an audit, I think it was $26-$27 T and that's when they were giving me more pressure. And, I wasn't moving.

GREG SZYMANSKI: I wanted to set the record straight that this court ruling does protect this money for the American people and puts you as basically trustor, the caretaker of this money, correct?

LEO WANTA: Right, the judge ruled that I should go recover the money and pay taxes on all the recovery directly to the IRS. We're going to give copies to his clerk so he knows that he did his part.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Now, if people wanted to check this out how would they be able to find the court document?

LEO WANTA: It's 02-1363-A and it was filed April 15, 2003 by Federal Judge Gerald Bruce Lee in Alexandria, Virginia.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Now, many people say it's a rarity to see an honest judge anymore, he appears to be one...

LEO WANTA: A senior one at that, a senior federal judge. And he's got all these exhibits and sealed documents and he's shocked, absolutely shocked.

GREG SZYMANSKI: An interesting part of this story, is how much money that's been traced that's missing so far. Tell us [about] the trail to track this money down, how hard that's been.

LEO WANTA: It's really hard, because you have to keep in mind that the banks that have this money were probably told I was dead or missing. Or, they paid certain things into other private banking relationships and used it for collateral. So they're taking loans they know they don't have to pay back. Everything they borrow from us and they loan out is really all profit to the banks. Plus, the banks can use that for their asset control.

GREG SZYMANSKI: I've seen a list of some of those accounts. Some traced back to Bush and other people. That's a fact right?

LEO WANTA: Oh yes, yes. That was on the (fencin doc?) and that was a tremendous amount of money. An audit was done and that is all [in] records from the Fed Reserve that we got. Because we can use PROMIS software from Inslaw. We have four units.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So you can bring this money back to the Treasury right?

LEO WANTA: Correct. But we're going to go through Judge Lee's clerk of courts.

GREG SZYMANSKI: You've gone this route to protect yourself right?

LEO WANTA: Correct and we even filed suit in the US Supreme Court and they refused to take the case because it was too political. I didn't know the Supreme Court was under a political arm.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Tell us how you came to this agreement [to collect and turn over $4.5 trillion].

LEO WANTA: Well, we had to go to the courts in Virginia to prove that we had an agreement and [that] these funds were set aside for all of the protocol agreements.

The judge ruled that the United States had immunity, but he did not rule that I was the trustor of all the funds. He just ruled that all the powers: The CIA, and the Treasury Department, and the State Department, and everybody else had immunity. So they didn't have to testify one way or the other which was strange.

But the judge did go ahead and order that we go recover all the money. He wanted to know why the money wasn't in the US Treasury and why taxes hadn't been paid on it. And why, whoever thought they were in charge, refused to allow us to repatriate all this offshore money. So then we argued that; and started to contact a number of investigators. They went to all of the european banks of record, about 109 bank accounts. And the banks decided that, oh my god, if this program keeps going and all the audits are done, so many things are going to be exposed.

So they came and agreed to $4.5 trillion just to shut [us] up. And, no audits and life goes on. I don't talk to them and they don't talk to us. We'd get a gag order and we'd get $4.5 trillion. We immediately notified the Treasury and they agreed that right now the tax base is around 35% or $1.575 trillion [on the $4.5 trillion] and since we're incorporated in the state of Virginia, we would have to set aside $270 billion for the state. We still don't know what the city and county taxes would be.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay, so this agreement was signed, the money transferred on June 12, (2006) it is there. The Fed is blocking it for some unknown reason, we'll get to that later. Tell us about, who did you actually enter in to this agreement with?

LEO WANTA: Well we have gag orders, but a number of attorneys that represent the pool of all the banks. They protect their clients. They just put the money on the table and say go away.

GREG SZYMANSKI: You also met years ago with John Roberts, you think he may have helped you get this agreement together, correct?

LEO WANTA: Yeah, John Roberts. Roberts worked with all of us when we were at the Whitehouse with Reagan in '81 through '88. They all knew who I was. They could not deny who I was, because you know, I was one of the few guys that went into certain quarters underneath the Whitehouse to get from place to place. And remember that Casey at that time was in the old exec office building and at the FBI we would go behind the stage and get through the FBI without being, shall we say, filed or reported.

GREG SZYMANSKI: So you're basically dealing with US authorities, and...

LEO WANTA: And corporate attorneys and bank attorneys and so on and so forth.

GREG SZYMANSKI: Talk a little bit about why you think the Fed is holding this up?

LEO WANTA: Well I have a problem with the Fed Reserve involved with this at all because this was a private deal between the United States and us; and these bankers that consorted in the pool of $4.5 T.

Under the HR 3723, everything that we were doing was protected under federal statute. Under the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. Which protects all of our proprietary economic information. There was no reason for them to be involved. They're not invoved. We don't need their services. They're a clearing house; we have our own banks that will do all of these things.

We have got all the boilerplate protection that we need and we don't need other groups to come in and try to participate for a fee. Or not participate, by not allowing a deal to go through. They're not in charge. They have no money involved, so why should they be in charge?

GREG SZYMANSKI: And if they don't release the money? You still can, as the trustor go after the whole amount, correct?

LEO WANTA: Well, yeah. They're in default. The banks [would be] in default. The banks would be extremely upset. They settled a $27.5 trillion claim in the federal courts for $4.5 trillion and this reopens everything for resettlement. They certainly would pay more not less. They already have acknowledged that they had property of [mine] that didn't belong to them. They've been using it internally for whatever reasons, and I don't care, since we have agreed to quietly be quiet. And we get the $4.5 T and the Treasury gets paid and Virginia gets paid and life goes on at a very fast pace.


Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 11 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski

Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 12 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski

Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 13 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski

Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 14 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski


September 15, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Democracy or Republic?

Henry Morgan relays:

From: joodd1 []
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 3:01 AM
To: Lynda Kvasnikoff
Subject: Re: Fw: FW: Fw: Fwd: Democracy or Republic?

He's telling the TRUTH!

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: John Porter <>
Sent: Saturday, September 6, 2014 12:36 PM
Subject: Fwd: Democracy or Republic?

John Porter;
September 6, 2014

To: Americans everywhere;

Thank you for your time and attention.

First, please let me be very clear, what I have written here for your consideration is not about the Republican Party, Democrat Party, Independent Party, Libertarian Party, Tea Party or any other Party. It is about an idea conceived over two centuries ago, a country, a people, a document, our current president and his intentions for America.

Two hundred and twenty seven years ago (1787) a group of men whom we now refer to as the "founding fathers," following a long and bloody battle for their independence from a dictatorial Monarchy, assembled themselves together in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and did their best to establish a country governed in a God-fearing way by representatives who were selected by the people who were to be governed.

Nowhere in the history of all mankind were there any examples or even political theory in existence that offered them any hope that a republican form of government, based on the new concept of consent of the governed, could succeed on a wilderness continent which was much larger than any European state.

These men met there on the world stage to carry out the first of three acts in this epic political drama, the drafting of the United States Constitution. The final document was the culmination of a fierce political struggle that had been waged for four sweltering summer months in secret behind guarded closed doors. The document sought to reconcile individual personal liberty with the perceived need for a central government with powers to forge a political and economic common market among thirteen separate and sovereign states.

The next two acts to be performed on this world stage were the ratification of the document and the translation from words on parchment paper to institutional form and structure. In 1789 the first congress approved and sent to the states for ratification, a bill of rights of individual liberty, and additional rights reserved to the states. Those ten amendments, ratified on December 15, 1791, became an extremely vital part of the Constitution and crucial to greatly limiting the power of the Federal Government over both that of the people and separate states. The Republic of the United States of America, an experiment in people governing themselves was now a reality for the first time in the history of man. Newcomers from other countries, willing to be governed by it's Constitution and Bill of Rights and themselves, came in droves to this new land of government by the governed.

I here bring to your attention that the United States of America was formed as a Republic and not a Democracy. All our lives you and I have been conditioned to believe we are a Democracy in America. How long has it been since you have heard of America referred to as a Republic? You see, there was purpose behind the words in the Pledge of Allegiance to our flag referring to our country as, "the Republic for which it stands." Ladies and gentlemen rest assured there is a very good reason the term "democracy" does not exist either in our Constitution or the Declaration of our Independence from the Monarchial King of England. A true Democracy is mob rule. Any government set up as a Democracy is the same government we would have if we were set up as a Socialist, Communist, or Marxist government. In these forms the government is a mob ruling over the people with absolutely no rights for individuals or minorities.

It has been written, "The Founders were extremely knowledgeable about the issue of democracy and feared democracy as much as a monarchy. They understood that the only entity that can take away the people's freedom is their own government, either by being too weak to protect them from external threats or by becoming too powerful and taking over every aspect of life." Democracy and/or Socialism is mob rule by government. The founders of America were all too familiar with democracies/socialism, and deliberately did everything in their power to prevent a Democracy. It has been written, "In a Republic, the sovereignty resides with the people themselves. In a Republic, one may act on his own or through his representatives when he chooses to solve a problem." The people have no obligation to the government; the government is a servant of the people, and obliged to them, for they are its owner. Not only have many politicians, Republican and Democrat, lost sight of this fact, but a great many of the American people.

A Constitutional Republic has a Constitution that limits the powers of the government. The goal of our founding fathers in forming a Constitutional Republic was to avoid the disastrous extremes of either tyranny (absolute ruler) or "mobocracy." (government mob).

I submit for your consideration, we are witnessing today president Barack Obama, who by way of his own actions and words, is demonstrating his aspirations of becoming an absolute ruler. When he makes public statements of, "Fundamentally changing America," he is promising us to change the workings of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, for they ARE the fundamentals of America. His promising to "redistribute the wealth because of income inequality" is purposely designed to divide the American people. When he publicly promises, and I quote, "If congress doesn't do the things I think necessary, I will not wait on them." "I will do it myself." And again only last week, "I've got a pen and I've got a phone--and I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and adminstrative actions that move the ball forward." This kind of talk is deliberately crafted to condition our minds and dumb us down to his way of Socialistic and absolute ruler thinking. It very well may be that he will never willingly relinquish the office of president.

Barack Obama is not an incompetent fool, ladies and gentlemen. He knows exactly what he is doing and why he is doing it. For five years he has been conditioning the minds of all who will listen and very carefully and cunningly crafting the country for his possible absolute rulership through ignoring the Constitution and the people's congress. Please familiarize yourself with this man's past. He is the most dangerous man in American history, to the Constitutional Republic and individual freedoms, which our founding fathers established and left for us. It will be up to us to defend and preserve it. Make no mistake, his view of America is very different than that of our founding fathers, and most Americans today.

Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution states: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of Government"...If we the American people don't stop this and start a reversal of the present trend, the free Republic of America will be lost for generations to come to a Socialist, tyrannical government mob. It begs the question, "Do we really care enough?" There needs to be a great awakening of all freedom loving Americans to the fact, that a people can become slaves to an absolute ruler, and the government, as well as a plantation owner. Do you really care enough? The voting booths will open again this November 4th for 37 Senate seats and all 435 House seats. America's destiny in in our hands!!

You have my permission to leave my information below intact as you please forward to all you can in any method you wish.

May God bless America at this critical time in our history.

Until next time:
Your friend in freedom;

John Porter
118 Approach Drive
Harrison, Arkansas 72601



There was once a time when Americans could control their government simply by shutting off the money.

Citizens could get Unkle Sam's hand out of their pocket by refusing to buy imported goods, thereby avoiding Federal Excise Taxes and reducing Federal Revenue.

States could bring great pressure on Federal Senators to curb Federal spending because Senators were elected from within the State the State represent the States in the US Congress.....and States had to cough up the money if the Federal Government spent more than it took any given year. (The People were to be represented directly by Congressmen in the US House of Representatives, the States were to be represented directly by Senators in the US Senate. )

But with the advent of the 17th Amendment (1913) which effectively removed control of Senators from States,the advent of the Federal Reserve Act (1913) which effectively allowed a private bank to create unlimited amounts of fiat money, "lend" it to the US government and charge interest on it, and with the advent of the 16th Amendment (1913) which effectively (if not legally) allowed the Federal Government to bypass the States, and go directly into the pockets of individual collect the interest to be paid on the "money" it "borrowed" from the Federal Reserve.....

Americans lost their ability to control the Federal Government with the "Power of the Purse".

Not only can the Federal Government now (since 1913) spend without limit, not only can the citizen not refuse to pay without enduring dire consequences, but the insult of the Income Tax is compounded by the fact that the dollars remaining in the Citizen's pocket after taxes constantly lose purchasing power due to the continuous expansion of the money supply (called inflation) through the creation of more and more government debt (money) owed to the Federal Reserve. (The Federal Reserve creates the "money" it "loans" to the government out of thin air with the flick of a computer key.)

And so Americans are no longer in control of the Federal Government.....they are effectively slaves to it....milk cows on the Federal Plantation.

Americans will never again be in control of their government....or their own financial destinies....... until they take back the power of the purse,  by repealing the 16th, 17th Amendments and the Federal Reserve Act.

~~~ Henry "Jake" Morgan

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the Earth.
Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the
flick of a pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it
away from them, and all the fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to
disappear, for this world would be a happier and better world to live in. But if you
wish to remain slaves of the Bankers and pay for the cost of your own slavery, let
them continue to create deposits."
~~~ Sir Josiah Stamp,
President of the Bank of England
in the 1920s, the second richest
man in Britain.

I bet you didn't know that.... the so-called "Federal Income Tax" was not needed to, and didn't, fund the Federal Government during the first 155 years of our history ...from 1787 until 1942. truly free person would ever give up the details of his personal economic life to the government....any government .... voluntarily .... even once.....never mind on an annual basis.

To do so would be to give up one's 4th amendment privacy rights to be secure in one's person, property, papers and effects. (personal finances are none of the federal government's damned business)

The recent debacle in which the IRS was used as a political weapon highlights the folly of putting up with this bizarre, ridiculous, tyrannical, anti-constitutional, fraudulent, oppressive criminal custom.

If you would like to know the proper, liberty sustaining, prosperity generating, budget balancing system for funding the Federal Government, designed early on by Tom Jefferson and Alex Hamilton, you need a copy of the little book:
"Prosperity Restored by the State Rate Tax Plan" by Edward A. Ellison, Jr., J.D. and John William Kurowski and its essential little companion on money "The Miracle on Main Street" by F. Tupper Saussy.

Together they lay out the simple economic system that made America more prosperous in 100 years than all other civilizations in all of history combined. It is the core of what really made America exceptional and a piece of American history that not one American in 10,000 today...much to their financial detriment...knows anything about.

You can learn more about them here: WWW.CurrencyAlert.US

You can usually find both books available here:



Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA via
Sep 9 (2 days ago)

to ronpaul-48



Sep 9 (2 days ago)

to ronpaul-48

What is Hilarious about it?


Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA via
Sep 9 (2 days ago)

to ronpaul-48

Thank you for asking why I think that this is hilarious. It's because it's comical disinformation. It floats around regularly because the masses are so clueless that they don't know the source of the word "republic" which is from the Roman Republic which had annual elections for all public offices.

Mark A. Adams JD/MBA


Henry Morgan via
Sep 9 (2 days ago)

to ronpaul-48

Picking nits ain'tcha Mark. The fact that our American Republic wasn't the first republic is irrelevant to the point of the piece......distinguishing between Republics and Democracies


Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA via
Sep 9 (2 days ago)

to ronpaul-48

Not really. The meaning or words either matters or it doesn't.

The Roman Republic was a democracy. It had annual elections for both the legislature and the counsels, a.k.a. presidents. Power was distributed between 3 branches, and it had a basic set of rules, a.k.a. a constitution, which the people in power were supposed to follow. That is what a Republic is and what the Framers intended to establish in the U.S.

Plus, as Jefferson and Madison discussed, there are in essence only two forms of government, aristocracy or democracy. Either you have to beg the ruling elite for justice or you ask citizens to do justice.

By the way, the King's attempt to undermine the means to secure justice through citizens via the grand juries and trial juries are what the Founders' generation complained about the most in that quaint old Declaration of Independence.

The "we are a Republic not a Democracy" disinformation is nothing more than an effort to belittle rule by the people and distract the clueless masses from the roots of our problems which is that we now live under an aristocracy as all of the rights which were supposed to allow us to ask other citizens to help us secure justice have been stolen. Plus, the votes are unconstitutionally "counted" in secret, but who cares about that because democracy is bad, right?

Mark A. Adams JD/MBA


Henry Morgan via
Sep 9 (2 days ago)

to ronpaul-48

In a pure democracy, a 51% majority can dispose, at its whim, of the life, liberty and/or property of the other 49%.

"Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths." --- James Madison Federalist #10

In contrast, in the Constitutionally Limited Republic crafted by the Framers in 1787, the democratic "majority" rule was restricted to 17 specific, and enumerated areas of a public nature.

I believe that it was this distinction that Franklin had in mind when, as he was leaving the Constitutional Convention a when a lady asked him.....

"What sort of government have you given us, Dr. Franklin" and he replied "A republic, madam, if you can keep it.”

so I entirely understand and agree with the desire of Mr. Porter to discourage making reference to the Constitutionally Limited Republic crafted by the Framers as a "Democracy".


Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA via
8:05 PM (1 hour ago)

to ronpaul-48

You are talking about Madison's comments about the problems with pure democracies both making and enforcing the law by majority vote while Porter doesn't understand that a socialist or communist government is rule by an aristocracy, not a democracy or a democratic republic.

In the Federalist Number 10, Madison was referring to the problem with allowing the majority to decide whether life, liberty or property could be taken by a simple majority vote as it was in ancient Athenian democracy; however, Madison was obviously aware that the British jury system prevented that problem and sought to make sure that the protections of the jury system were supposed to be guaranteed to us.

However, those rights which the Founders generation complained about being taken in the Declaration of Independence and went to war over have been stolen once again, and instead of focusing on restoring the rights which once upon a time kept the people in power from unjustly taking life, liberty and property at their whim, far too many simply regurgitate comical nonsense. Of course, those who want to rule like the kings of old understand that by keeping the masses in the dark and feeding them BS, they can get away with nearly anything. See a short film by Orson Welles explaining what Plato said about this:

By the way, in the Federalist Number 10, Madison is comparing and contrasting a pure democracy with a republic. He said, "The two great points of difference between a democracy and a republic are: first, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest; secondly, the greater number of citizens, and greater sphere of country, over which the latter may be extended." He also said, "“If a faction consists of less than a majority, relief is supplied by the republican principle, which enables the majority to defeat its sinister views by regular vote.” So, clearly as I pointed out in my email below, the Framers were basing their use of the term Republic on the Roman Republic which had annual elections for the legislative and executive branches.

Madison goes on to say, "“When a majority is included in a faction, the form of popular government, on the other hand, enables it to sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest both the public good and the rights of other citizens. To secure the public good and private rights against the danger of such a faction, and at the same time to preserve the spirit and the form of popular government, is then the great object to which our inquiries are directed.” Once again, Madison understood that the jury system injects democracy into the law enforcement function of government and that unanimous agreement of the jurors is necessary to take life, liberty or property based upon any criminal charge and a super-majority vote of the jury to take property in a civil action.

Anyway, read The Federalist Number 10 at

Then, note that the fascist scumbags who took over our country 70 years ago have stolen the right to a jury trial in all civil actions and in criminal actions unless you are charged with a felony. If you don't believe me, see for yourself:

You Don't Have Any Right to a Jury Trial!!!

by Mark A. Adams JD/MBA

We no longer have any right to a jury trial. Those rights have been stolen by power mad, greedy, fascist scum.

Most of you are saying, "No way! My teachers told me that we did, and I read the Constitution once, and it said that we had a right to a jury trial, too! Plus, I didn't see anyone on TV, any expert or any reform organization say anything about not having a right to a jury trial anymore. You must be wrong!"

Others are saying, "Big deal. Judges are wise honest old people who almost always do the right thing like in all of those court shows on TV! I wouldn't want to have to waste my time on jury duty. Judges should make all of the decisions. It is so much more efficient."

Although most are clueless, those in power are well aware that Thomas Jefferson said, "If a Nation expects to be ignorant and free., it expects what never was and never will be.... If we are to guard against ignorance and remain free, it is the responsibility of every American to be informed."

So naturally, the rulers want to make sure that the public remains ignorant of the fundamental rights to control the government which were supposed to be secured by the Constitution. Their efforts to maintain widespread ignorance of these rights has been very effective. As a result, ironically, many people complain about government abuses, but then call for the passage of laws which clearly violate the Constitution, undermine our fundamental rights, and ignore the need to seek an amendment if anyone wants to change the Constitution while remaining a government based on the rule of law.

Unfortunately, the rulers are so afraid that the people might figure out that they have stolen the fundamental rights which we were supposed to have to control them that they have an army of enforcers and propagandists ready to attack people who undertake any meaningful action to defend those rights or raise awareness about them. Has anyone else noticed that? If not, do you really enjoy having all that sand in your eyes?

The Rights to Trial by Juries Have Been Stolen to Enslave and Impoverish You!

Now, court decisions are determined by a judge based upon who has the most influence over him. Naturally, in proceedings in which the state is not a party, this is the better connected attorney who "loses" more money to the judge on the golf course, and when the state is a party, it is the state unless you have a well connected attorney who "loses" a lot of money to the judge or has a picture of the judge with a _______ in his _______ (Fill in the blanks yourself). I'm sure that some people, such as fools and shills, will think that my claim that judges are for sale is unbelievable. However, I've been involved in many cases in which the judge ignored the law and the facts to rule in favor of a party in spite of the fact that the decision was against both the law and the facts. In fact, I was involved in one case in which the opposing party repeatedly boasted that his attorneys were connected, had the judge in their pocket and would bury my client, and they did in spite of the law and the facts and the efforts to get the authorities who are supposed to make sure that judges don't break the law to take action.

Furthermore, Alexander Hamilton, a Founder, Framer and attorney, said that trial by jury is the best way to protect our rights and secure justice because there is much more time and opportunity to improperly influence judges than there is to improperly influence a jury summoned to hear a case.

Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry and a lot of the other attorneys who were involved in founding our country thought that they had ended the tyranny of the judiciary by requiring jury trials in all proceedings; however, in 1840, the U.S. Supreme Court claimed that those Framers didn't know what they were talking about and decided that no jury trials were necessary in "equitable" proceedings, like probate, family law and mortgage foreclosure. We all know that the judges never ignore the law in those proceedings, right?

Our right to jury trials has also been eliminated in all other civil proceedings by the grant of the power of summary judgment to the judiciary without anyone bothering to amend the Constitution. The Constitution says that it is the supreme law of the land, but the judges say that their rules rule, summary judgment granted or denied depending on who has the judge's favor.

The fascist scum even had the audacity to claim that you do not have a right to a jury trial when charged with a crime unless it is a felony even though both Article III, § 2 and the Sixth Amendment clearly provide that the trial of all crimes shall be by jury. See Lewis v U.S. 518 U.S. 322(1996). By the way, this decision is supported by the so-called conservative or strict constructionist judges who found the word "serious" written in invisible ink in both clauses in the Constitution.

Please note that I'm not saying that trampling the Constitution is right. I'm saying that the powers that be are doing it, and if more people don't get a clue and demand that our rights to control the government are restored, then things will continue to go downhill. If you want to know what those rights are, read Why does the government ignore our wishes? and don't miss my speech.

Mark A. Adams JD/MBA


P.S. I talked about this problem just a couple of months ago:


Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA via
3:45 PM (5 hours ago)

to ronpaul-48
What? No one wants to try to explain that a republic is magically special and democracy is especially bad except for all of the other forms of government which are actually aristocracies?

That's right. Once again, there are only two forms of government, rule by the rulers or rule by the people. Ours was designed to be the latter, but was converted to the former although almost no one can believe it. After all, they still have jury trials on TV shows, don't they?

Mark A. Adams JD/MBA

P.S. Note that I have copied the person who wrote the Republic not a Democracy email that set me off, and I have yet to hear back from him.



Federal Judicial/Governmental Insanity Has Corrupted And Destroyed Our Republic / A Call For A Grand Jury Investigation Of Richard C. “Dick” Tallman (Ninth Circuit)

Godel's Proof on how the US Constitution has a flaw that could allow a dictatorship

Private Attorney General in USA Comments on: “Democratic Dictatorship”: The Transition towards Authoritarian Rule in America, by Dr. Robert P. Abele


September 11, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Gov. Sundquist (TN), Sen. Songstad (SD) involved in extortion, conspiracy to murder (involving 5-10 billion dollars) in reference to Leo Wanta the 27.5 trillion dollar man (audio recording w/ Sundquist now in possession of Wanta & Federal authorities)

Updated: 9/23/14 [Note: Please share. Investigate. Report. Get this into the public arena. If there is anything in error let me know.]

To: President Barack H Obama <>; POTUS_U.S. President Barack H. Obama <>; U.S. President Barack H. Obama <>; OMB_President Barack Obama <>; Chief Justice_John G Roberts <>; US Supreme Court_Chief Justice John G Roberts <>; U.S. SECY TREASURY_JACK LEW <>; United States of America <>; Officer in Charge <>; FBI_Director James Comey <>

Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 11:31 AM
Subject: Ex - US Officials Demanded a 30 Billion Dollar Bribe

Whereas, The President of the United States of America, having signed H.R. 3723 on October 11, 1996, has protected this transaction by allowing Corporations the right to declare their Contracts, Clients, Internal Procedures and Information, and the transactions they engage in as a Corporate or Trade Secret fully protected under the Economic and Industrial Espionage Laws of the United States of America and the International Economic Community.


DUTY, HONOR and COUNTRY - w / Calm and American Courage Forever and a Day



On a forum that I thought would be good for discussion and research, but now which I will call "Nazi-ist" forum (, they prevented me from even responding to their e-mails on their site because they locked me out from being able to do anything after my first two posts to their news discussion forum re: this unprecedented and monumental news story. Way to stifle real discussion and real research! Too disjointed, long or doesn't make sense? Got ADHD or water on the brain much?


Huge extortion conspiracy case: Will you be the one that provides the contact that gets the most attention to it -


image from

Gov. Don Sundquist - [Former Tennessee Governor Don Sundquist (R-1/1995 – 1/2003)]

image from

Gov. Sundquist with GHW Bush (aka Papi Bush)


Sheldon R. Songstad [Former South Dakota State Senator (District 11) (1975-1988) (Doc. ref. R-1995R-1986)

Hello. You just can't make this shit up. How stupid and corrupt are these rat bastards? Plus the media is afraid to report on this or is told not to report on this to boot? I'm sure this corruption goes to the very highest levels of various branches of our federal government and our corporate "mainstream" media outlets. Recording MP3 link is below that has the approximately 6 minute 18 seconds audio recording of Sundquist and Songstad conspiring to extort and conspiring to have Leo Wanta murdered if he doesn't give them what they want, which was picked up by Leo's answering service recorder (unbeknowst to them) - right-click 'save-as' to save the MP3: or press play or play the YouTube clip. If you can't believe this then after listening to the clip scroll down to the 'Civility for Effective Governance' video below which was a talk sponsored by the Howard Baker Center for Public Policy just a month ago and prove it for yourself that it is Sundquist speaking in the clip (he is the one who takes his seat on the left). Trillian dollar question: Who is "all of us" that Gov. Sundquist refers to in the below 6 minute clip? (Sidenote: It seems that they also don't like people who post what they perceive as negative commentary in comment sections about their oppressive political system and corrupt officials but they take heart that, according to them, we are not a representation of most of the populace - See Civility for Effective Governance video. I guess we are supposed to just sit back, enjoy our slavery and allow ourselves to be run over roughshod by their corruption):


Above is the clip I extracted of their conversation from the below audio in which it was exposed. Here is the YouTube clip I created of it:

See the below audio for even more information on these guys who assert in Lee Wanta's own words:

"They claim they are puppet masters, they decide who runs for election, how many funds go to the people that are going to be elected by their price. They decide... they're puppet masters. That's how they run Congress and the lobbyists and everybody. They do what they're told and they pay well to compromise the people of the United States."

In answer to Sundquist and Songstad's phone conversation and their conspiring to have Leo killed, Leo responded as to having a federal security detail and whether authorities have been alerted:

“I have one. But right now I can’t tell you the location and what they’re doing. They’re readily available. But this has popped up this morning that they left me a voicemail and didn’t realize they were 'live'. I reported it to the FBI, reported it to the Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice Criminal Division but that all depends on Obama’s going to authorize them to save an American life.”

There is more info. in the MP3 which a Mr. Webb points to in his e-mail he sent out that contains Wanta's communication to various public officials in regards to this matter. At the very bottom of this Teknosis blog post is AMBASSADOR LEE EMIL WANTA VIDEO INTERVIEW that I have included which is very informative. It is a clip from a documentary movie that will be released in near future called Eagle One to Wanta. Eagle One was the code name for President Ronald Reagan. Wanta worked directly for the Office of the President under Reagan. There are more links below as well.

I have done the best I could to transcribe the above approximately 6 minute 18 second span of conversation between Sundquist and Songstad (it is the best one out there as to attempted transcription - trust me, I've done this before and I use headphones and requisite software) although you do need to listen to the above actual clip, of course, for the real flavor of the conversation. Note: if you find anything I may have gotten wrong or can clarify anything let me know:

Sundquist: Need to go to Cookeville…

Songstad: Oh.

Sundquist: and that’s about a 4 hour drive… and then… 3 and a half… and then we’re… and then we’re going to drive to Knoxville. I got a doctors appointment too I think... tomorrow afternoon… in Knoxville and then we’ll be home..

Songstad: OK.

Sundquist: tomorrow evening. But I’ll be in the car all day long.. so..

Songstad: OK. I’ll uh.. I’ll work on this deal and then I’ll let.. I’ll.. I’ll keep in touch with ya.

Sundquist: Sounds good…

Songstad: OK.

Sundquist: What’s your thinking? What’s.. What’s your thinking? He obviously doesn’t want to talk to us.

Songstad: No.. I don’t.. I’m sure that Lon would have called me back…

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: (unintelligible word).. he had to have talked to Lee.. or he would have called me back and Lees..

Sundquist: Yes. Absolutely.

Songstad: and Lees inspired now not to call me back.

Sundquist:  Yeah. Well why would he act that way? Does he blame us for Marilyn or is he just.. we just spare.. spare fuel right now.. He dudn’t need us anymore?

Songstad: I don’t know.

Sundquist: And dudn’t want to pay us.

Songstad: I don’t know. Well..

Sundquist: It looks…

Songstad: after we get done with this deal then we’ll decide the next move. Cuz I want…

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: half of that money now.

Sundquist: And you think you got any chance of gettin it?

Songstad:  Well, we’re gonna find out.

Sundquist: Yeah. Well, ya know um it’s one thing not to pay us in the future, but it’s another thing not to pay us for the past.

Songstad: Well, (starts to say because but jumbled together) bec.. we earned it once… ya know

Sundquist: Yea.

Songstad: that’s my point.

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: We’re doing it the second time for free because we’re only gettin paid once.

Sundquist: Right.

Songstad: I mean I had that all done two years ago and he..

Sundquist: Well…

Songstad: (unintelligible.. sounds like “and he shows up”).. OK…

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: and keeps sending all those fuckin emails out.. are you on speaker?

Sundquist: No, no..

Songstad: OK. Try to quit sending all those emails.. (unintelligible but what follows is what I think he is saying or trying to say) if he hadn’t sent all those emails out we wouldn’t have 90% of our troubles.

Sundquist: And he’s still sending that crap out.

Songstad: I know.

Sundquist: He’s.. he’s insulting and scaring people.

Songstad: He doesn’t understand the word stealth, and in my world you better know what that word means.

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: You don’t want to know. You want people to forget you’re alive.

Sundquist: Well he.. he owns us (I think he means owes but it sounds like he says owns) all of us .. but we’ll settle for half of it.. just to get..

Songstad: Right.

Sundquist: out of this.. just to get away and forget about it. He won’t ever have to hear.. worry about us again.

Songstad: Right.

Sundquist: But he does owe us that money. So.. anyway.. and.. and.. and if he does.. if he says he doesn’t then.. then I.. I’m gonna ask him what does he think.. what do you think Lee that you owe us… anything for all that work? Anything?

Songstad: Well.

Sundquist: See what he says.

Songstad: I hear you, say anything you want…

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: I don’t care anymore.

Sundquist: Alright. Let’s figure out what.. what’s happening.

Songstad: Nice old Sheldon…

Sundquist: Before we k…

Songstad: ain’t nice old Sheldon anymore..

Sundquist: Well we’ll just have ta… Nice old Sheldon is gonna have to ask your friends to help.

Songstad: Yeah. That’s no problem.

Sundquist:  Yeah. And the.. the question is gonna be how fast can they act?

Songstad: Well I’d say pretty (begins to laugh while talking) fast… (laughing hahaha).

Sundquist: Yeah. Hunh. And they have ways to find out where he is and how to reach him?

Songstad: Well ah.. I’m sure that’s not a problem… I don’t know how they do all that but I don’t.. that part I don't..

Sundquist: Yeah. Well you don’t want to know.

Songstad: I don’t want to know some of that stuff so..

Sundquist: No, but does he have government protection?

Songstad: Who?

Sundquist: Lee.

Songstad: Oh. Ahh.

Sundquist: They know that too I guess huh?

Songstad: He claims to but.. you know.. ahh.. I would. If a.. I would hope he does.. but ya know…

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: If he does.. he's.. I just can’t imagine anybody as smart as he is going to be screwing around over 10 billion dollars… you know…

Sundquist:  or even 5…

Songstad: or 5 even… you know

Sundquist: Yeah. Hmm.

Songstad: If I had that kind of money I’d.. and dealing with us two.. I’d give him 10 so fast it’d make your head spin just to get rid of me.

Sundquist: Me too. (Pause) Me too.

(crosstalk.. Sundquist begins to say something but unintelligible)

Songstad: We’ll give him the choice that if you want rid of us give us 5 and we’ll call it even.

Sundquist: Yeah. That’s it…

Songstad: No less… no less…

Sundquist: That’s it…

Songstad: No negotiations.. one time offer.. take it or leave it…

Sundquist: There ya go…

Songstad: No.. not take it or leave it. (kind of laughs here but in a menacing way for emphasis)…

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: ..YOU BETTER TAKE IT I MEAN (starts to laugh kinda evilly) hahaha

Sundquist: There ya go. Yes. It’s pretty serious.

(both start to talk at the same time again.. crosstalk.. )

Songstad: but we got / Sundquist: It’s (unintelligible but an audio forensics specialist might be able to decipher it) serious…

Songstad: But we gotta do it this week… because.. ah… I can’t (unintelligible)

Sundquist: I understand.

Songstad:  I can’t..

Sundquist: Yeah. I understand…

Songstad: I can’t… I can’t go on any longer..

Sundquist: I know.. so we’ll just go to it…

Songstad: I mean this is a once in a lifetime thing I got together for us and (unintelligible)

Sundquist: I know. I know.

Songstad: and (unintelligible) I don’t want to lose that.

Sundquist: Ah.. I don’t want to lose it either.. so..

Songstad: And it’s getting better since I first talked to you…

Sundquist: Yeah.

Songstad: It’s getting better by the month…

Sundquist: Hunh. Do you think he’ll offer us.. I.. I.. just don’t think he’ll offer us anything..

Songstad: Well. We’ll just have to wait and see now…

Sundquist: OK… sounds good.

Songstad: OK… I’ll…

Sundquist: OK.. sounds good.. I’ll.. I’ll be ready ahh.. I’ll be ready anytime tomorrow so.

Songstad: OK.

Sundquist: I’ll be in the car.. so call. Thanks.

Songstad: OK. Alright.

Sundquist: So long.

Note: Just because the recording has been put in possession of federal authorities doesn't mean this shouldn't continue to be exposed because they will just ignore doing anything about it unless We The People stand up and let them know we know about this and that there needs to be action to get the trillions back to pay off the national debt plus more. 


Sent By:
Sent By Emil, Ambassador On:Sep 09/04/14 6:01 PM
To: To Durham, V.
Reply to: Reply to Emil, Ambassador
Ambassador Lee Emil

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Stew Webb
Date: Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 6:10 PM

September 3 2014 Veterans Today Radio News Reports

(right-click "save as"): [starts at approx. 26:30 minutes]


To: “HPSCI_Intelligence Committee”
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 12:18:08 PM


—– Forwarded Message —–

To: President Barack H Obama ; POTUS_U.S. President Barack H. Obama ; OVP_Vice President Joe Biden ; Attorney General Eric Holder ; U.S. SECY TREASURY_JACK LEW ; Chief Justice_John G Roberts ; HPSCI_Intelligence Committee ; U.S. Congress_INTEL Archive ; Governor Scott Walker ; U.S. President Barack H. Obama ; OMB_President Barack Obama
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 12:58 PM

Whereas, The President of the United States of America, having signed H.R. 3723 on October 11, 1996, has protected this transaction by allowing Corporations the right to declare their Contracts, Clients, Internal Procedures and Information, and the transactions they engage in as a Corporate or Trade Secret fully protected under the Economic and Industrial Espionage Laws of the United States of America and the International Economic Community.


DUTY, HONOR and COUNTRY – w / Calm and American Courage Forever and a Day

—– Forwarded Message —–
From: Lee Wanta
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 12:28 PM
Subject: Voicemail (Callback: 605-595-3834)

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Lee Wanta
Date: Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:23 AM
Subject: Voicemail (Callback: 605-595-3834)
Cc:,,,,,,,, Chief Justice John G Roberts ,, Attorney General Eric Holder ,,,,,,,,

To: Assistant Attorney General, Leslie R Caldwell
United States Department of Justice / Criminal Division
950 Pennslyvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C., USA 20530.0001

email :

Background : US CODE – CHAPTER 11 – PART 1 – TITLE 18 USC SECTION 201



———- Forwarded message ———-
From: 605-595-3834
Date: Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:34 PM
Subject: eVoice Voicemail (Callback: 605-595-3834)
eVoice – A Better Way to Connect
Voicemail Transcription
Message Details
DIALED 202-379-2904

RECEIVED Tue, Sep 2 2014 : 9:33 PM
FROM 605-595-3834

LENGTH 6 minutes and 16 seconds

cc: Veterans Today – Lee E Wanta
Bureau Chief / Editor
A – 1010, Vienna, Austria – Europa

Blessing of Saint Francis

May the Lord bless you and keep you.
May He show His face to you
and have mercy on you.

May He look upon you with kindness
and grant you His Peace.

May the Lord bless you.


Former governors Bredesen, Sundquist and Dunn join 'Campaign to Fix the Debt' group

Oct 10, 2013, 12:34pm CDT

Phil Bredesen, Don Sundquist and Winfield Dunn, all former Tennessee governors, have joined a nonpartisan group created to shed light on and address the national debt.

The Governors Fiscal Leadership Council is a newly created piece of the Campaign to Fix the Debt that includes 41 former governors, including 20 Republicans and 21 Democrats.


Related (in re: recording above in which Sundquist speaks, see the below presentation in which he speaks to see that it is him speaking in the recording.)

Civility for Effective Governance: Governors Bill Haslam, Phil Bredesen, and Don Sundquist



Here you can hear Sheldon Songstad speak and it's the same person in the 6 minute 18 second clip above.



Story related links:


Ex-US Officials Demanded a 30 Billion Dollar Bribe

“Former Tenn. Gov. Don Sundquist and S. Dakota Sen. Sheldon Songstad may face not just the largest bribery charge in history but conspiracy to murder as well.”
by Gordon Duff, VT Sr. Editor, … with New Eastern Outlook, Moscow

Lee Wanta, tough as nails, and still kicking

Lee Wanta, tough as nails, and still kicking

[Editors Note: You just can't make this stuff up. Two crooked aging politicians, who appear to be uber bagmen for Capitol Hill, don't disconnect a voice mail message left for shakedown victim, and then the caller rings up his co-conspirator to discuss their next move, including killing their target if they don't get paid.

But there is just one problem. The whole six minute conversation goes onto Lee Wanta's voice mail, which the jury is going to enjoy immensely.

This murder conspiracy case might also break the media blackout on the Wanta case which has gone on since 2006, after the Treasury Dept. snatched his $4.5 million wire transfer from China into the Federal Reserve bank of Richmond, only to be transferred to Golden Sachs the next day and off to Europe it went as part of the $16 trillion of liquidity pumped into the banking system there during the meltdown.

I wish I could say this was an unusual case, but really only the amounts involved are. These two yoyos - there is army of ex office holders who would be doing exactly what these two thought was going to be their final wet dream. 

If we were really to round up all of them doing this kind of stuff, there would be so many special elections going on that they would run out of press people to cover them. And no, I am not exaggerating... Jim W. Dean ]


- First published … September 18, 2014 on NEO -


Political corruption in America is an epidemic. They think it is their right. A day after former Republican Virginia governor, Bob McDonnell and his wife were convicted of 20 counts of bribery and influence peddling, former Republican Tennessee governor Don Sundquist and South Dakota Senator Sheldon Songstad may face not just the largest bribery charge in world history but indictment for conspiracy to murder as well.

What is amazing about this case is the amount of money involved, totaling $9.5 trillion US dollars, in fact the entire GNP of the United States for several years.

Sundquist and Songstad, wanted $30 billion out of the proceeds to pay themselves along with Congress, the US Treasury Department, five Supreme Court justices and two former US presidents.

Best of all, the whole thing is on tape, a “shakedown” attempt against Ambassador Lee Wanta, former White House intelligence chief under President Ronald Reagan and editor at Veterans Today.

Sundquist and Songstad left, on a recording at Wanta’s embassy, full details, not only of their ability to virtually buy the entire US government and deliver a multi-trillion dollar settlement authorized to Wanta by the US Supreme Court, but were recorded making arrangements for the murder of Wanta as well.

As American humorist, Jim W. Dean so often says, “You just can’t make things like this up.” The recording was forwarded to the US Department of Justice yesterday and a copy presented to President Obama.



What drives successful old timers like Sundquist to want to make a multi-billion dollar score at the public's expense? During the 1980s, Lee Wanta was brought into the White House as the first National Intelligence Coordinator.

He was tasked by President Reagan and CIA Director William Colby to destabilize the Soviet Union through establishment, with funds from the US Treasury, of a worldwide currency trading scheme.

Wanta, with the help of Reagan, amassed a fortune of $27 trillion, funds earmarked by Reagan to pay America’s national debt, restore the nation’s infrastructure and fund a world free of debt based currencies.

However, after Reagan left office and George H.W. Bush assumed the Presidency, Wanta was kidnapped and imprisoned in Switzerland, transferred to an American prison where he was held without due process for years and the money disappeared, taken by the Bush family.

The rest is history, stolen elections, 9/11, war upon war, and a world that has descended into crashing debt with nearly every currency floating on “air,” derivatives and a sea of Rothschild debt.

Wanta’s story is soon to be featured in a Hollywood film currently under production.


The Fixers

Sheldon Nobody has heard of Sheldon Songstad, who with former congressman and governor, Don Sundquist, admit demanding a $30 billion dollar bribe from Wanta in order to compel the Supreme Court to issue a pay order on Wanta’s personal funds, based on the case he won - $4.5 trillion plus interest - totaling $9.5 trillion.

This would make Lee Wanta personally the wealthiest nation on earth. While this case has dragged on through the courts, thoroughly and carefully documented, Wanta friends and advisors, many former intelligence officers, including the author, have worked to keep him secure.

The recording of Songstad and Sundquist, 6.18 minutes, was aired on radio yesterday with commentary by Lee Wanta, on the Veterans Today Radio Network to over two million listeners.

The audience heard Sundquist describe how they would settle for as little as $5 billion, as a “retirement nest egg” and how, if Wanta fails to pay, they would arrange for his murder.

Current US Senator Bob Corker, Republican from Tennessee had been on a conference call earlier, that included Sheldon Songstad, telling Wanta that his funds would be paid.

In fact, a majority of members of Congress including almost all Republicans and many Democrats were to receive shares of the Wanta “payoff.” What had angered so many of them and had precipitated the death threat is Wanta’s statement to all of them that he would file Federal Income Tax Form 1099's to accompany all payments.

This would identify, as required by law, where money went and what services were paid for.

Were Wanta murdered to stop that process, it would require control of not only the Department of Internal Revenue but Treasury as well, to suppress the existence of these documents that would eventually lead to the imprisonment of almost the entire US government.


Beyond Idiocy

As the radio audience listened on, the two Republican Party political “fixers” made several things very clear. The US government was entirely “up for sale” and that they had the connections to arrange for the purchase.

What was amazing is that these two, after phoning Wanta and getting the recording notice on the line, assumed their conference call was private, paying no attention to the fact that the recording continued on while they confessed to what legal experts have identified as dozens of crimes and laid out a trail of bribery and corruption that crosses nearly every level of government, every court and over a hundred of America's highest elected officials.


Shadow Government

This conspiracy involves, at its heart, politicians who have long advocated cuts in public health and education, in veterans benefits, lowering of wages, infringement of individual rights while supporting America’s wars.

These are also politicians at the heart of the Israel lobby in Washington. According to the Jewish Virtual Library, Governor Sundquist is a close friend of Israel:

“- 1996: Gov. Don Sundquist signed the Tennessee-Israel Cooperation Agreement to promote cooperation between the two countries in trade, arts, culture, education, tourism and university/industry alliances.”

What is made clear is that the United States is far more a criminal organization than a nation. Those who don’t understand how America can say one thing and, with amazing consistency, do something else, often something totally bereft of moral responsibility, I think we may well have made the reasons abundantly clear.


Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War that has worked on veterans and POW issues for decades and consulted with governments challenged by security issues. He’s a senior editor and chairman of the board of Veterans Today, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.

Editing: Jim W. Dean 0 kauilapele veterans_today_gordon_duff_banner_20 Lee Wanta, tough as nails, and still kicking Political corruption in America is an epidemic. They think it is their right. What drives successful old timers like Sundquist to want to make a multi-billion dollar score at the public's expense? Sheldon



V.K. Durham: 

My husband was involved in these presidential directives also! HOWEVER!  There are criminal rogue operatives impressed with their "power", they will do anything, kill anyone 'for money.'
This group of rogue operatives at the highest levels of state and federal government about which Ambassador Wanta writes and speaks murdered my husband thinking he owned something he did not own!  You have no knowledge of the magnitude and scope of what goes on in the shadows of 'government'.. read the following! 

P U B L I C N O T I C E (Caution: Some image links contained in this page lead to images that are of a very graphic nature.

and ...


Dec 19, 2006 - Cash payoffs, bonds and murder linked to White House 911 finance .... an as yet unidentified operation; however,

a far more important piece. 



Read the following
Above ref: email communication of VKD to Teknosis
Additional ref:


(Informative Reddit thread - please upvote)

This man wishes to pay off the national debt that the united states has acquired, but the Federal reserve will not let him! The 27 trillion dollar man!

(please upvote)

Mentioned under Newsworthy Items on: |


My message to various Yahoo Groups:

These people are holding We The People and our country back. Expose this corruption.
Gov. Sundquist, Sen. Sheldon Songstad (TN) involved in extortion, conspiracy to murder (involving 5-10 billion dollars) in reference to Leo Wanta the 27.5 trillion dollar man (audio recording w/ Sundquist now in possession of Wanta & Federal authorities)
Their plotting captured on Lee Wantas answering service recorder (unbeknownst to them):

Comments in re: NY elections:

How often do you hear of reports on money and political corruption in US Congress? NY at least speaks about it, but then again I guess the winner is being investigated for shutting down an anti-corruption committee? Federal prosecutors going to investigate corruption in the US Congress now? Got corruption? #Extortion #Conspiracy #Murder #RICO #FBI #DOJ #WHITEHOUSE RT

Someone added me to a group on Facebook called "What could go wrong?" This is my first post: You are a couple of corrupt, mafioso, ex-politicians, one an ex-governor and the other an ex-state senator, who work with a group other corrupt politicians in Congress, helping to corrupt and select other politicians to run for office while at the same time raping the American people. You are trying to shake down someone for billions of dollars and if they don't want to cooperate you are going to contract some hitmen to kill that person. You accidentally leave yourselves conversing, planning to do this on the other persons answering service. OMG, what could go wrong? There is this huge elephant standing in the middle of the room and nobody reports on it?


Story related comment communicated to others:

Folks, you need to take the time and listen to Leo Wanta and Stew Webb.
Leo caught, on tape, the former Governor Sundquist of Tennessee and Senator Songstad plotting Leo Wanta's assassination.
There are a lot of government officials, who are at this moment in DEEP TROUBLE.
The house of cards is about to crumble.  Every man for himself!
The Attorney General has done NOTHING.
The FBI has done NOTHING.
The Secret Service has done NOTHING.

Sir David-Andrew.
Share this with others!
GC writes:

VeteransToday has what certainly appears to be a death threat against former Ambassador, Lee Wanta and it’s all been caught on tape! Lee Wanta identified the men on the tape who are conspiring to murder him as former Senator Sheldon R. Songstad (SD) and former Governor of Tennessee, Don Sundquist. I have verified that these are the men by listening to videos of both of them on Youtube. Here’s the strange part that I would like all of you to verify and contact me through my Facebook. I can’t find anything on Google for Sheldon R Songstad. Try it yourself! I know he was a Republican Senator from South Dakota and I have found when he was elected but it’s like he’s been scrubbed entirely from Google! I can’t find one picture of him! I finally was given one by somebody with access to things that will never be on Google! :) As you can see by the picture at the top of the page, nothing comes up for a search on Sheldon Songstad on Google News except for when he was going around giving disinformation to alternative media but in all those interviews he did – not a single photo of him was shown! By the way, Rick Wiles of TruNews pushed the disinformation being given out by Sheldon Songstad but so far will NOT post this article or information about the death threat from the man he promoted to alternative media! Be sure to contact Rick Wiles to find out WHEN he’s going to post the death threat by Senator Songstad that he promoted! You can find some stuff by Rick Wiles on Youtube when Songstad was going around spreading disinformation to select alternative media radio show hosts. Are these radio shows disinformation? We will see by who puts out the new information on Songstad.
In the taped conversation above, Ambassador Wanta says that Sheldon R. Songstad told him that he was the “puppet master”! He said that he controlled who got elected and who got the money! I’ve never in my life not being able to find a picture of a public servant on Google images so it’s obvious that Songstad has lots of power. He’s not even showing up in Wikipedia! How does a Senator not show up on Wikipedia!? Anyway, back to the story. Lee Wanta says the following people were aware of what Senator Sheldon R. Songstand and Governor Don Sundquist were doing with him – Senator Tom Daschle, Senator John Thune, and Senator Bob Corker! So these men will need to be thoroughly investigated to see if they are involved in the plot to murder Lee Wanta. Again, get the word out on this so that the “puppet master” and his cronies can’t escape justice and make sure all in alternative media that promoted Songstad put up this story or you’ll know they work for the bad guys too! Hit all groups on Facebook too becuase they have blocked me from being to post to groups to shut me up!

Who is Lee Wanta?
Lee Wanta as an Ambassador for President Reagan who helped to bring down the Russian Ruble during the 80s and avert World War 3. He was also tasked with refunding the American economy but has been prevented from doing that by all Presidents after Reagan. He is owed trillions of dollars as are the American people! You can read some of his story here.

Lee Wanta, American Hero

I’m asking all truth warriors to get this story out through all means possible so we can prevent a murder of an American hero that most of you never knew about because it was censored by “tip of the spear” types in alternative media who said he was as “Real as the Easter Bunny”! Lee writes for VeteransToday! He’s very real and now it’s up to all of you to share this on Facebook, Twitter, email lists and websites so this murder plot can be thoroughly investigated. Please investigate Sheldon R. Songstad and tell me if you can find his picture! A US Senator and we can’t find his picture and Wikipedia has nothing on him! Tell me if you don’t agree that somebody has scrubbed almost everything about him off Google! He doesn’t show up in Google News even though he’s been all over alternative media putting out disinformation! Please get this information out now! Thank you! With your help, we can get the word out about this murder plot caught on tape!



Snippets from Gordon Duff’s upcoming article (not yet published, so I just put highlights)

“A day after former Republican Virginia governor, Bob McDonnell and his wife were convicted of 20 counts of bribery and influence peddling, former Republican Tennessee governor Don Sundquist and South Dakota Senator Sheldon Songstad may face, not just the largest bribery charge in world history but indictment for conspiracy to murder as well.

“What is amazing about this case is the amount of money involved, totaling $9.5 trillion US dollars, in fact the entire GNP of the United States for several years. Sundquist and Songstad, wanted $30 billion out of the proceeds to pay themselves along with congress, the US Treasury Department, 5 Supreme Court justices and two former US presidents.

“During the 1980s, Lee Wanta was… was tasked by President Reagan and CIA Director William Colby to destabilize the Soviet Union through establishment, with funds from the US Treasury, of a worldwide currency trading scheme.

“Wanta, with the help of Reagan, amassed a fortune of $27 trillion, funds earmarked by Reagan to pay America’s national debt, restore the nation’s infrastructure and fund a world free of debt based currencies.

“However, after Reagan left office and George H.W. Bush assumed the Presidency, Wanta was kidnapped and imprisoned in Switzerland, transferred to an American prison where he was held without due process for years and the money disappeared, taken by the Bush family.

“Nobody has heard of Sheldon Songstad, who with former congressman and governor, Don Sundquist, admit demanding a $30 billion dollar bribe from Wanta in order to compel the Supreme Court to issue a pay order on Wanta’s personal funds, based on the case he won, $4.5 trillion plus interest, totaling $9.5 trillion.

“The audience heard Sundquist describe how they would settle for as little as $5 billion, as a “retirement nest egg” and how, if Wanta fails to pay, they would arrange for his murder… Current US Senator Bob Corker, Republican from Tennessee had been on a conference call earlier that included Sheldon Songstad, telling Wanta that his funds would be paid.

“…they confessed to what legal experts have identified as dozens of crimes and laid out a trail of bribery and corruption that crosses nearly every level of government, every court and over a hundred of Americas’ highest elected officials.

What is made clear is that the United States is far more a criminal organization than a nation. Those who don’t understand how America can say one thing and, with amazing consistency, do something else, often something totally bereft of moral responsibility, I think we may well have made the reasons abundantly clear.”





Greg Szymanski's 2006 Interviews with Lee Wanta the 27.5 Trillian Dollar Man (Full transcript)


Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 11 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski

Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 12 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski

Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 13 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski

Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 14 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski


The Continuing Saga of Leo Wanta

'Wanta was buying rubles from Russia at the request of the President,
Ronald Reagan. Wanta had worked at the White House, the National
Security Council, the Central Intelligence Agency and six other
government agencies during his career.


TITLE: Vreeland Faxes - Leo E. Wanta - Money Laundering
Faxed Documents
The Sixth Fax is a Summary of Transactions 
Promissory Bank Notes (PBNs) are one form of bank instrument used 
by countries in their nation debt financing. They are also used as 
the basis of arbitrage transactions, which are illegal in the United 
States, but not elsewhere. In this transaction for an overall face 
value of $27.5 trillion US DOLLARS, the PBNs have been purchased by a 
consortium of funders, predominately from the Far East and Europe. 
The funders have agreed to purchase the PBNs at 71.5% of their face 
value, to be repaid at par in 20 years and 1 day, together with an 
annual interest of 7 1/2%. The PBNs have been sold by a consortium 
of some 200 banks at a cost of 61.5%. The 10.0% difference is made 
up of bank fees, suppliers (collateral) fees, funding agents fees
and various commission fees, together with monies going to various 
countries to fund projects.
This loan transaction is the largest ever ever put together, and some
two thirds have been completed, resulting in some 1.76 trillion
dollars worth of foreign monies having been put up for
conversation. We do not know the discount employed, but we believe
that it was between 10 and as much as 25% in some cases, hence
the remaining monies for disbursement must lie somewhere between
1.3 and 1.6 trillion US dollars, ie the United States has already
received a minimum of $150 billion dollars in "conversation" fees.
The remaining monies for disbursement have been held by the US
banks, for the reasons which can only be described as fraudulent,
under the direct instruction of the US Government, for over a
year and a half. In addition, there has been a conspiracy of
misinformation, orchestrated by the highest levels of the US
Government, regarding the exact whereabouts of these monies and
the timing of their payout. These monies should have been paid
out in June, 1989, or shortly thereafter.

More Wanta Files to Help Connect the Dots....


CIA Proprietary Companies?

Cui Bono?

Which of the following companies are US government/CIA proprietary companies under USCA Title 18, Section 6, Line 11? And what is their relationship to some well-known present/former/dead government officials?


AmeriChina (Philippines) Corporation

and its relationship with Bambang Trihatmodjo?

AmeriChina Global Management Group

and its relationship with deceased DCI Bill Casey?

Aneko Credit Pte Limited (Singapore)

and its relationship with Lippo Bank?

AmeriChina Global

and its relationship with the State of Arkansas and Robert Nash?

Asian Trust Bank Limited

and its relationship with George Bush?

Asia Europa Development Group, Ltd.

and its relationship with Mochtar Riady?

White Cloud Petroleum

and its relationship with Ron Brown and Hazel O'Leary?

AmeriTrust Corporation (Missouri)

and its relationship with the White House and the U.S. Treasury?

AmeriTrust (Suisse) Societe

and its relationship with Vince Foster?

Leo E. Wanta & Associates, Inc.

and its relationship with Bill Casey and George Bush?

MiApollo Investments Ltd (Hong Kong)

and its relationship with Bill Clinton and Lloyd Bentsen?

Aneko Credit Pte Limited

and its relationship with Kuwait?

New Republic (US and Austria)

and its relationship with the Iraqi military command?




Aneko Credit -LT. Vreeland


More Wanta Files to Help Connect the Dots....-Lt. Vreeland


Anthem-Lt. Vreeland



Facsimile Transmission
9-21-97 Tom of Venice

TOM: Are you under house arrest in Wisconsin?
WANTA: Yes. It's illegal.

T: When did you go to work for the U.S. government?
W: September 20, 1963.

T: In what capacity were you hired?
W: DEA and CIA with Senator Alexander Wiley(R-WI) as my sponsor.

T: What were your overall project jobs?
W: Aerospace, munitions, and currency.

T: When did you go to work for the Republican Party?
W: 1965.

T: Did you work for the Nixon campaign in 1968?
W: Yes, with Ray Fleming in communications.

T: Did you play a role in the Indochina conflict?
W: Yes, in tank projects and "B" bombers.

T: What was your capacity or role with the president?
W: I worked in the Department of Defense.

T: Did this role continue in the Carter Administration?
W: Yes. It was non-political. My skills were in demand.

T: In 1980 when President Reagan was elected, did your role in government 
W: Yes, I went to work for Jim Baker who helped me get work with Bill Casey 
in the CIA special operations branch -- Black Ops.

T: What role did Vice President George Bush play?
W: He was the Supervisor of Record.

T: Please explain your operation in the old Soviet Union.
W: We dealt with the fusion bomb and the destabilization of the Soviet 
economy. My partner was Kok Howie Kwong of the Chinese Secret Service.

T: The Chinese worked with the United States in the ruble destabilization?
W: You bet!

T: You were detained in Switzerland on July 7, 1993?
W: Yes. The Swiss police arrested me on Wisconsin State tax charges.

T: What happened next?
W: I spent 130 days in a dungeon.

T: What happened next?
W: Prime Minister Rabin of Israel wrote a letter to the Swiss demanding my 
release, given I was chairman of the AmeriTrust account.

T: What happened next?
W: The Swiss government released me and I was sent to New York state.

T: What happened next?
W: The federal judge in New York state released me, but I was arrested by 
the state of Wisconsin on the steps of the federal courthouse as I left the building.

T: This is while you were still Somalian Ambassador to Switzerland?
W: Yes, of course. I had previously been Ambassador to Canada.

T: You were in Switzerland to execute a 70 billion dollar credit for the U.S. Treasury?
W: Yes. Along with Vince Foster and Geneva Farrell. We were to meet at the 
Hotel Dekpix in Switzerland.

T: What was the role of George Bush in the AmeriTrust account?
W: Bush felt he could never lose the election and would be able to grab(??) 
all the money himself.

T: Of course, Clinton won the election.
W: Yes. And Vince Foster and Mickey Lee Cantor called me and drew up an 
instrument for $250,000,000 for the credit of the Children's Defense Fund.

T: What about the rest of the fund?
W: There was $210 billion in the account, $250 million to the Children's 
Defense Fund, $70 billion was to be assigned to the White House, and some 
to be directed to foreign nations.

T: Why was Vince Foster silenced?
W: He was upset about me and felt the AmeriTrust funds were being misdirected.

T: What was Foster's role with Bill Casey?
W: The Contra/arms laundering in Arkansas.

T: What is your understanding of the role of Ken Starr?
W: Protect the Clintons.

T: Explain to us your meeting with John Brown of Little Rock, Arkansas.
W: Mr. Brown drove up to Lacrosse, Wisconsin and said he was a Registered 
Agent of Ken Starr. He demanded that I give him documents in my possession.

T: Did you give him the documents?
W: Yes. I was under house arrest and felt a great deal of pressure.

T: What were the documents about?
W: They were files relating to Mena, the DEA, Barry Seal, and the Chinese 
COLA accounts.

T: What do you know about Mena?
W: It involved the Arkansas Development Finance Authority run by Bob Nash 
which used Mitsui Mfg Bank to launder Japanese yen.

T: What else do you know about Mena?
W: It involved Bill Clinton, George Bush, Vince Foster, Bill Hakr and Webb 
Hubbell. Japanese yen was laundered through the Bank of China in exchange 
for U.S. dollars.

T: What else should we know about Mena?
W: Of course Barry Seal was the pilot bringing in the drugs. He reported to Bill Casey.

T: Did George Bush know about the murder of Barry Seal?
W: You bet!

T: What about the arms operation in Arkansas?
W: Arms were shipped through Honduras through the Chinese COLAs accounts. 
My partner was eventually murdered with the help of Chinese Intelligence.

T: That partner was Kwong?
W: Yes.

T: What was the role of Hillary Clinton?
W: She was president of Standard LaFarge and helped launder the arms 
profits through its headquarters in Quebec, Canada.

T: There is a hearing due on the 23rd of September, 1997.
W: I am hoping that my attorney's request for a summary judgment will be accepted.

T: That would lead to your release?
W: Yes, I hope.

T: Would you testify before the Senate Intelligence or Banking Committee?
W: Certainly.

T: Thanks for your cooperation.

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and 
opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those 
who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible 
government which is the true ruling power of our country." Edward Bernays
From a trusted source, posted at Vreeland's forum:

With these thoughts in mind I would like to get down to some points that I think are fact:

1. Vreeland taken down during the Clinton admin
2. Wanta taken down during the Clinton admin
3. Look at the posts regarding others in similar position all taken down during the Clinton admin.
4. If anyone would research these situations I am of the opinion that you would learn that this
type of agent removal happened more during the Clinton admin that in any other period of time in
5. A fact to research. There have been news articles posted that a plan was presented by military
intelligence to Clinton that if they would take out five of OBL cells they could neutralize this
enemy. I am sure you all recall the first WTC event, the Cole, the African American Embassies
etc., all during the Clinton admin. I am sure all are familiar with Somalia. Military action and a
recommended take out of OBL were squashed by Clinton admin. I appreciate that there was a
plan for military action on the Presidents desk for Afganistan prior to 9/11. There is also the
likelihood that this plan may have been the same plan that was on Clintons desk. I do not know
but the facts would be better than bashing.
6. A fact that is known. In todays news there are stories about the shoulder fired missile threat. If
you research Wanta stories you will note that during the Bush Sr. admin there was a plan in place
of buying back the stingers from OBL and Afgan. In fact in the financial papers that have been
published most recently I can assure you that not all of the money was going into the hands of
private people. Part of these financial transactions were used to do such business. Can you
imagine going to the Congress for a budget increase to buy back Stingers. Give me a break.
What brought this to a close was taking Wanta down. 
7. There are also stories of the Russian briefcase dirty bomb. These were also being tracked and
monies from Wanta programs used to buy. There were biological weapons in the Philippines
money was needed to buy. The programs to buy these items and the Russian briefcase dirty
bombs went bye, bye during the Clinton admin in taking down Wanta and others. WHERE DID
 I question where some of the money ended up. I have stated before Marc Rich gets
pardoned and Wanta falls. 
8. I realize I mention facts but I would also like to toss a hypothetical on the table and let you bash
(ha!ha!) around. From the financial sheets you have seen published there are many instances
where money was needed to pay for intelligence information. You all think you know the Lt's
personality. If his character is as some of you describe I am sure you can accept that he got
information by buying and not through charm. Some what of a joke but the fact of life is dirty
people that give up information will give up to anyone who can pay. This system of paying
virtually fell apart during the Clinton admin. During the Clinton admin there were those who
thought we could all walk around holding hands and melt into beloved brotherhood. Lets share
our weapons and technology and make everyone love each other. I do not believe anyone
questions who sold advance military technology to China. While we were selling technology,
making paper chase funny loans to Mexico, ignoring South America and blowing up Bosnia. Our
intelligence system fell apart.
9. Look at the Phoenix report and the info from the FBI in Minneapolis. The recent letter from the
female FBI agent to Mueller clearly describes an effort to go to the FBI and when that failed an
attempt was made to go to the CIA and the agents were scolded. When did these two events
happen. Not the disclosure of
the information. When did the events arise.
10. Look at the FBI wiretap story on the taps being tossed out. When did this happen.
11. Does anyone really know the true story on the 250 or more FBI files that just popped up at the
White House.
12. I have heard several posts about the list of tenants and vacancies at the WTC on 9/11. Are
there any records of offices that may have had active leases and there is a probability some
entire offices may not have shown up for work on 9/11. 
13. What happened to the 1995 report sent to USA by the Philippines specifically describing plans
given to them by an arrested terrorist in Manila to use commercial aircraft as weapons against
USA targets.
14. I am sure the congressional intelligence committees received much of this information. What
did they do with it? Someone must have been in a position to present reasons for them to
discount such information. 


More info on Wanta from board:

Dear Vreeland:

I have been reading information concerning your situation for some period of time. On one or
more instances you have mentioned other individuals associated with the USG that have (in a
manner similar to your situation) been subjected to gross injustice. It is apparent that this gross
injustice is not orchestrated by common staff people. 

During the past year or more I have become associated with the legal team working with one
such individual by the name of Leo Wanta who I believe you have referenced on one or more

On many instances your site and others make reference to information and disinformation.
Similar to yourself there are several web references to Wanta. If one was to look at information
on Wanta and accept the disinformation it would be necessary at the same time to assume
Wanta's problems in the legal arena would extend far and beyond a State of Wisconsin civil tax
assessment turned into a criminal tax case and would expand to US Justice Dept investigations
and international law issues. The disinformation overshadows the issues with the State of
Wisconsin and even the most hardened skeptic would need to take notice. 

I would offer a few points for your consideration:

a. Wanta filed amended State tax returns in 1991. Part of the years included are 1988 and 1989.
The first line of entry on Wisconsin State return sets the basis for any tax owed in the State of
Wisconsin. The first line entry relates to your 1040 return. For the 1989 return Wanta puts a slash
on line item 1 and makes note that attached is a letter from the IRS informing Wanta that for the
year 1989 Wanta has no Federal tax liability. Wanta puts a slash at the same point for the 1988
return. When Wanta is charged and there is a "0" placed where Wanta put the slash. Wisconsin
revenue agent at the trial of Wanta admits entering the "0" on Wanta's state tax returns. The
assessment that the State claimed against Wanta is for $14,000 plus dollars. Wanta paid this
assessment under protest twice. Yes twice for a total of in excess of $28,000. The state
continued to claim at his trial etc. that he failed to pay anything. Wanta is convicted and
sentenced to loss of 22 years of freedom. 8 years in and 14 probation. Wanta is sentenced in
1995. The prosecutor in a letter to the judge represents Wanta has never paid anything to the
State. There is unquestionable documentation from cancelled check and bank wire that reflect
otherwise. In fact a print out from the State shows that in December of 1995 Wanta only owed the
state $00.15. Yes there is verifiable and confirming information for the claims and
representations made above. At the criminal trial of Wanta the prosecutor makes reference to a
book entitled "Thieves World" and stated that Wanta was an international swindler that had
bilked billions of dollars from investors and not paid one dime of tax. If this is true where have
these investors been over the last ten years. Not one has come forth to question Wanta. If he
bilked billions and spent on himself I would anticipate a letter from the IRS other than advising
no tax is owed.

b. Wanta is in Switzerland in June of 1993. Confirmed that he met with Vince Foster and set
$250,000,000 into the Children's Defense Fund. Who is the head of this fund? At the same time
Wanta is working with two other ops implementing instructions to "bring in Marc Rich". What a
coincidence. Wanta is arrested by Swiss authorities and held in prison for 134 days and as time
marches on Marc Rich receives a pardon. 

c. Wanta becomes the Ambassador from Somalia to Canada and Switzerland. In advance of the
Clinton administration arrangements are made for US navy and others to use Somalia deep water
ports for refueling etc and arrangement is made for other branches of military to use local
Somalia air bases. As part of said strategy Operation Restore Hope is to be expanded with
revenue from the sale of 90,000,000 barrels of oil contributed by a Middle East source and
bought by USA to be used for humanitarian purposes in Somalia. Oil comes to Houston, payment
is facilitated through White Cloud Petroleum and no money goes to Somalia. There are many
interesting details during the history referenced herein and can substantially fill in the blanks
and add more than mere speculation to what unspoken from the inferences in the movie
BlackHawk Down.

d. People seem surprised to read of your advanced information on 9/11. I suspect they would
even be more surprised that leads and intel information goes back prior to the Clinton
administration. As example look at the information forwarded from the Philippine authorities to
USA in 1995. The interest in this information did not just spring up in 1995. The interest in the
terrorists had been ongoing for years. Look into the background and history of Wanta dealings in
Philippines. RM 20/20, repurchase of Stinger Missiles, Russian Fusion Bomb, remodeling of Dr.
Lutz bio lab in Switzerland etc., etc., etc., all tie back to history of present problems and bring to
the dance the same players we are looking to either uproot or stop today. Maybe the reason the
networking on any advanced knowledge broke down during the Clinton admin is that the people
orchestrating the networking were locked up or shut down. 

e. At one time there was an agreement for Israel/PLO peace. Recently PLO leader mentioned.
Rabin signed and would it surprise anyone to know $10B divided 5 to each side was part of the
agreement and the same was never paid. What caused this situation to fall apart during Clinton
administration. It is probably assumed that letters from Rabin to Wanta questioning this situation
is because Rabin was part of the con job done world wide by Wanta. Is it mere coincidence that
Wanta was a witness signer to the reference peace agreement?

f. Wanta worked the PRC and Asia for years. Prior to the Clinton administration sophisticated
system to monitor technology going to Korea, China other parts of Asia were in place. At end of
Bush senior admin China had limited long distance strike capability. In fact within four months
they had 4 lift off explosions in the early 90's. This was a continual problem into the mid 90's and
then all of a sudden success. During Clinton admin they learn for some unknown reasons how to
develop their technology for long distance strikes. How interesting Dr. Lee, case dropped and
presiding judge while sealing the file suggests that maybe the Executive Branch of the USG
should be investigated.

I could ramble on and on. If there is question how the above pertains to you etc I suggest people
look at who was in the oval office when you went down and who was in the oval office when
Wanta and others went down. The present administration had been in office for 9 months. Yes
there may have been information floating around but with all known today look at whose
administration broke down the system and failed to act responsibly. Maybe the concept of "New
World Order" and wanting or thinking one could step to the throne with oil and big, big money is
really the crime of 3000 American lives being wrongfully lost on 9/11 and not an overt
orchestrated action of one or more cooperating world powers conspiring to tumble the USA.
Instead of looking to others to place blame and who planned or participated is there not a
potential that through our own stupidity and foolish greed by those at the top that rouge parties
both within and without took advantage and moved forth on the advantage. Put another way if
outside powers not all that charmed by Clinton and halfbright saw our weakness, realized there
were leads out there and we were ignoring so they just sat back and watched what happened. I
am sure there are those that could even make the Canadians look like they participated if that
was a desire within the power book plan of things. In the real realm of things maybe where we
need to look is within the four corners of the USA to place blame, clean up our own system and
look to what concept of how to Clinton run the White House maybe not intentionally but at the
very least through gross negligence allowed us into this situation. 

I could go on and on. The point is people should realize there are documents on top of
documents on top of files that substantiate, confirm, verify and endorse what both you and Wanta
represent. I am not saying you are the same as Wanta or participated with Wanta. The issue is the
current administration has the opportunity to set things right and clean up the best in a manner
that respects the rule of law. 

I look forward to what comments you have in regard to what I have written and my thoughts.



Topic: White Water

Leo Wanta: Explosive Evidence in Foster Case and Corruption in Washington

CAS Mailing List
07/21/97 Tom from Venice on Putnam & Briem Shows 

The Continuing Saga of Leo Wanta

There is an individual who calls in to the Putnam and Briem shows.
He refers to himself as Tom from Venice. [Venice, California] Putnam remarks
from time-to-time about Tom's high level Democrat contacts. Putnam seems to feel
that Tom has a fair amount of credibility. And Tom does seem to get his hands on
timely and not publicly known information. 

On August 19 and 20, Tom phoned in to the Putnam program and then
the Briem program, respectively. The following information was offered up
with the report that documents in-hand confirmed it's validity. 
I apologize in advance for the hodgepodge posting. I gleaned it from two 
different shows. It may be a little jumbled. But it's late, and this will
have to do. 

I can neither confirm or dispute the information. It may be very
accurate. Then again, it may not be. I merely present it for your access. Any references
to 'we now know' or similar statements, should be viewed as having been stated by Tom
from Venice. 

Documents were provided to Putnam by Tom, that support Tom's
conclusion that there's a potential meltdown on the horizon in Washington, D.C.
Even though our main stream press doesn't want to cover it. 

Under house arrest in Switzerland at this time is the former
Somali Ambassador to Switzerland, Leo Wanta. Mr. Wanta is a supposed lifetime operative
of the CIA, and a United States Citizen. Mr. Wanta did work for George Bush and
Republican party partisans. Wanta was appointed Ambassador on behalf of the Somalis
in April of 1993. 

Wanta goes back a long time in association with our government.
Before becoming the Somali Ambassador to Switzerland, he was Ambassador to Canada on
behalf of the Somalis. But even before this, he worked his entire life in the
Republican party, supported Ronald Reagan, then was hired by George Bush. 

Here we have a United States Citizen who worked for the CIA, the
Department of the Treasury, the US Customs Service, the US State Department, and the
NSA being appointed the Ambassador of a foreign nation. 

Tom was in contact with Mr. Wanta's attorney. Documents were
provided to Tom who passed them on to Putnam. Putnam admitted to having received
these documents. 

Now Mr. Wanta was in Switzerland one month prior to Vince Foster's
death which was ruled a suicide by Starr, but we have yet to see his
documentation and justifications for his conclusions. 

Mr. Wanta has documents showing that Vince Foster made
reservations for him and a Geneva Ferelle at the Hotel De La Pleau in Geneva, Switzerland.
Mr. Ferelle is believed to work for the Italian Secret Police. 

Carrying a valise with bearer bonds, Mr. Wanta met with Foster at
the hotel. Bearer bonds are immediately negotiable and could be tendered at a bank
in Switzerland. [most likely any bank in Switzerland] 

According to a White House document by FBI Agent Frank B. Ingram,
Attorney Foster, Attorney Marvin Grobmeyer, and Secretary Donna Shalala are
still holding a copy of Foster's letter of intent to meet Wanta, visa vi a
$250,000,000 Ameritrust Corporation withdrawal to be placed in the Children's Defense

Tom states that Wanta was essentially mascaradeing as the Somali
Ambassador to Switzerland, while working for the United States Government. He
was doing this with full knowledge that he was helping the government with anational
security situation. 

What we now know from the Ingram memo, which is an accurate memo
and not a forgery, specifically referring to paragraph nine at this point,
is that Ingram refers to Mao Palo Limited Investments of Hong Kong, and states that he
believes that MIA funds should be re- allocated to the investigation of the death of
Foster. Ingram further states that, "We now believe that Credit Swiss is either
indirectly or directly connected to Foster's demise. 

Tom continues by referencing the Mao Palo Limited [Hong Kong based
Chinese Slush funds] funds as being intelligence community related. And speaks
of documents in his possession that reveal Japanese laundered Yen currency in it's
direction by way of the Arkansas Development Finance Authority. [ADFA] These documents may
implicate Clinton... Bush... and possibly the Secretary of the Treasury at
that time, Mr. Bensen. Tom references a document at this point that shows billions headed
toward Mao Pala.

Specialist in counter-intelligence FBI Agent Frank B. Ingram's signature appears on a
document reportedly confirming that Vince Foster did arrive in Switzerland on July 7,
1993. Foster arrived in Switzerland with an irrevocable bank transfer. This bank
transfer was to facilitate a withdrawal of $250,000,000 from an
Ameritrust Corporation account kept in Switzerland. Which Wanta also had a
controlling interest in, as well as George Bush. 

According to this FBI document these funds were withdrawn for the
purpose of being deposited at a later time in the Children's Defense Fund. Of
course the Chairman of the Children's Defense Fund was none other than Hillary Rhodam. 

Other documents obtained, show involvement with this account in
some money laundering associated with computer software leading back to

Vince Foster as you know was very heavily tied to Systematics Inc, Jackson Stevens...
[interrupted here] 

Host had a scheduled guest appearing in a couple of minutes, and
had to cut this short. But Tom concluded by stating that he feels that the two NSA
binders removed from Foster's office by Deborah Ghoram, contained information relating
to Promise Software, and a $47,000,000 wire transfer that took place in 1988,
which Tom feels was related to laundered money associated with Systematics and
Steven's Inc. 

Regarding Kenneth Starr, evidently Wanta was facing Wisconsin tax charges. He
made contact with Starr for representation. Within a week of Wanta
contacting Starr, Mr. Starr was hired by the Wisconsin Education Department, with
which Donna Shalala is closely connected. 

Tom also stated that he didn't get pleasure out of bringing to
light information that might reflect poorly on the intelligence community. He felt those
agencies had been set up to support our nation. But they had been abused by greedy
individuals has subverted those organizations to their own benefit, blackmailing
anyone who could blow the lid off their operation. 

Tom wanted people to seriously consider two words. 

Washington Mafioso


Sarah McClendon
on or about 8-24-97 Sarah McClendon


3133 Connecticut Avenue
Suite 215
Washington, D.C. 20008

By Sarah McClendon

Washington, D.C. --- Leo Wanta, whose purchase of huge sums in Russian
rubles is credited with bringing down the Soviet Union in the Cold
War, will be put through a third party lunacy test in Madison,
Wisconsin circuit court on Tuesday. He has successfully been declared
of sound mind in two previous lunacy tests under the Wisconsin state
attorney general's office. His own attorney, James Shellow of Madison,
Wis., is instituting this test. Shellow says that under the rules for
attorneys in Wisconsin he has to notify the court that he thinks the
lunacy test should be given. Shellow admits to being a former attorney
for a deceased Mafia chief in Wisconsin named Belistiari. Shellow
thinks Wanta will be declared sane in the upcoming hearing on Tuesday,
but Shellow claims to know nothing as to how Wisconsin was able to
extradite Wanta in chains and shackles from Switzerland, where he was
doing business with Swiss banks after having given up his citizenship
in Wisconsin. Wanta claims that he had just been made ambassador to
Switzerland and Canada when Wisconsin state officials seized him
bodily in Switzerland. Wanta claims that they took his briefcase from
him at that time which contained billions in Treasury bills and
Promise software technical equipment which the U.S. was using to get
inside information about foreign treasuries.

Although the briefcase was taken by Wisconsin authorities in 1993, it
has never been returned to Wanta nor has he any knowledge of what
happened to its contents.

The charge is that he owed Wisconsin originally approximately $14,000.
He claims to have paid back that amount in 1992. The state attorney
general's office seized his house worth $120,000 and sold it for
$60,000, but there is no record of this in the Department of Revenue
in Wisconsin nor is there any trace of the proceeds from the sale.

Wanta was buying rubles from Russia at the request of the President,
Ronald Reagan. Wanta had worked at the White House, the National
Security Council, the Central Intelligence Agency and six other
government agencies during his career.

He and President George Bush set up the Ameritrust account in the
Credite Suisse bank for the U.S. government to use in case it needed
to counter terrorists from overseas, according to Pat Cameron, Los
Angeles attorney for Wanta. Wanta says that when former president
George Bush sought to withdraw funds from the $210 billion on deposit
that Wanta, a co-signer of the account, refused to give his signature
for the withdrawal because the funds, he said, belonged to the U.S.
government, not to an individual.


Subject: More on Leo Wanta 
Newsgroups: misc.activism.militia
View: (This is the only article in this thread) | Original Format 
Date: 1997/09/08 

From Sarah McClendon 9-7-97
Tel. 1-202-483-3791
Fax 1-202-328-1818

By Sara McClendon

Washington, D.C. --- Mystery increases as to how state officials
of Wisconsin can abduct a man no longer a resident, charge him with
state income tax evasion, shackle him in arm and leg irons, and
bring him back into this country and hold him in an arrest for four
years. Leo Wanta did not have an American passport as he had
surrendered that when he was named briefly ambassador to Canada
and Switzerland.

Wanta had lived in Austria since 1988 but was charged by
Wisconsin Attorney General with not having paid $14,000 in state
income taxes in 1989.

[Wanta] says he cannot get the Civil Rights Commission to
take any interest in his case. Wanta thinks now that only
President Clinton and Vice President Al Gore could free him.

He says he has paid Wisconsin the $14,000 twice but can
get no receipt. In the meantime he says he had billions of dollars
in U.S. Treasury certificates in his briefcase when taken and no
report on what state officials did with its contents.

Why does he not simply walk away from the imprisonment
which he describes as illegal? 

"They would charege me with walking away without bail when
I want clearance", he said.

"But what I wonder--if state officials can do this to one
citizen, could not other citizens be in danger of a similar action
from some other state officials seeking to claim back taxes"?

The case involves why the U.S. State Department is not
seemingly interested in protecting an ambassador who alleges that
he still holds that rand and why is not the Justice Department not
interested in protecting the civil rights of this man?

Wanta refuses to buy his way out with the state officials.
He says he has billions on deposit in various companies in banks
in foreign countries but he does not wish to pay any sums to
Wisconsin authorities.

His attorney, Pat Cameron of Los Angeles, has not been
able to get any information about his repayment of taxes to the
department of revenue of Wisconsin. When the $14,000 was first
levied against him, he was sentenced to 18 years in state court
for not having paid, a sentence which Cameron described as

It looks as if this house arrest of Wanta and his refusal
to assign any of his fortune in the billions to Wisconsin as a
citizen will go on forever. He claims that he once owned a house
worth about $120,000 which the state sold for $60,000 without
giving him any return or receipt.

Wanta served nine different government agencies in the
past including the Central Intelligence Agency and the White

Capital Times (Madison, WI.) 
November 21, 1995, Tuesday, ALL EDITIONS 



Leo Wanta, the Appleton man who claimed to be an international businessman
with connections to government agencies but was portrayed by prosecutors as
an international con artist, will be spending the next few years in
Wisconsin prisons. 

Wanta, 55, who was convicted in May of tax evasion, was given an eight-year
prison term Monday by Dane County Circuit Judge Michael Torphy, who also
ordered a six-year probation to follow. 

For his part, Wanta -- described as delusional by his own attorney --
continued his scam to the end, claiming the court had no jurisdiction over
him, that he was a victim of a vicious Department of Revenue and state
Justice Department. 

''I know there is a conspiracy and subterfuge here,'' Wanta said when given
a chance to speak. 

At various times he has claimed to be a CIA agent, an ambassador from
Somalia, a close friend of former Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush,
and an international businessman. 

Assistant Attorney General Douglas Haag, who prosecuted the case, and
attorney Steven Epstein, who represented Wanta, disagreed mightily over who
Wanta was and what he should get for a sentence. 

''As tax fraud cases go, this one is big-time,'' said Haag, who established
during the trial that Wanta made $ ?166,000 in 1988 and claimed to have
made nothing, and made $ ?63,000 in 1989 and claimed zero on his taxes. 

Haag said that money came from a $ ?500,000 scam in which Wanta got people
to invest in a currency exchange deal. 

''Mr. Wanta is in fact a con man, nothing more and nothing less,'' he said.
''He is a con man who cons con men.'' 

Haag said Wanta was arrested in Switzerland in 1993 for attempting an $ ?81
million bank fraud. Wanta claimed diplomatic immunity in that case,
contending he was the Somalian ambassador to Canada. The Swiss deported him
to the United States, where he was arrested in New York on the Wisconsin
tax fraud charge. 

Wanta is also described in the book, ''A Thieve's World,'' as being
involved in an attempted scam involving Russian rubles. 

''He is a world class con man,'' said Haag. ''A snake oil salesman. But he
was unable to sell that snake oil to the jury.'' 

Haag asked for a sentence of 13 years in prison and another 12 on

Epstein, on the other hand, said Wanta clearly is delusional. 

He called Haag's allegations ''a lot of shadows and smoke and allegations
of wrong doing around the world,'' but pointed out Wanta has never before
been convicted of a crime. 

''The portrait that has been painted by Doug Haag is not the real Leo
Wanta,'' said Epstein. 

''He exists in a different world,'' Epstein said of his client. ''The fact
of the matter is he is in a different orbit,'' Epstein said, adding that
Wanta actually believes the stories he tells. 

Epstein, who said the tax evasion sentences of Leona Helmsley, Michael
Milken and even the notorious Al Capone were less than Haag's
recommendation, asked Torphy to let Wanta go for the 444 days he has spent
in jail since he was arrested. 

Wanta, a portly, gray-haired man, then arose and began an extended speech
in which he blamed his woes on others, cutting short his remarks only when
Torphy reminded him that the case had already been tried. 

''I just want to be left alone,'' Wanta said, adding that if that was done,
''I won't sue them for false arrest.'' 

Torphy said he was sentencing Wanta only on the tax matter. 

''I don't purport to sentence him as a con man,'' the judge said. ''I don't
purport to sentence him as a swindler.'' 

But he said the tax evasion was serious enough to warrant prison time and
as deterrent both to Wanta and to others.


The Strange Case of Leo Wanta

 From: Dave Feustel (
Subject: The Strange Case of Leo Wanta 
View: (This is the only article in this thread) | Original Format 
Date: 1997/09/15 

Bulletin - 9/14/97

Update to the Strange Case of Leo Wanta

As of today (9/14/97) Ambassador Leo Wanta remains a political prisoner
in the state of Wisconsin. Wanta, not unlike Paula Jones, Billy Dale
and even Al Gore, is victim to the Clinton's unconstitutional use of
the power of the Whitehouse to punish and/or even silence people who
have information that could substantiate allegations of illegal
activities on the part of the Clintons.

1) NBC News reports today that Paula Jones and her husband are now to
be audited by the Internal Rev- enue Service. Coming on the heels of
reports that Hillary is giving orders to FBI Director Louis Freeh to
investigate people who have talked on the telephone to Vice President
Al Gore , one has to ask "Is Hillary now running the IRS too?"

2) Ambassador Wanta was illegally arrested in Switzerland by the State
of Wisconsin right before Vince Foster's death. Wanta was then
illegally extradited from Switzerland to the State of New York.

3) Strangely, in New York, all charges against Wanta were dropped by
the state of New York. Ambassador Wanta, (who also was a Somalian
ambassor to Canda) was then immediately arrested again by Wisconsin
Attorney General Jim Doyle as Wanta left the Federal Court in New
York. Wanta was then illegally extradited from the State of New York
to Wisconsin. Wanta has been under `house arrest' in Wisconsin for
over 3 years with no criminal charges filed to date by the State of
Wisconsin. This house arrest constitutes an unconstitutional criminal
confinement of Wanta by the State of Wisconsin.

4) A summary judgment hearing that would release Ambassador Wanta is
scheduled for Sept 23rd.

5) Ambassador Wanta should now be immediately released and be allowed
to testify in front of either the Senate Banking and/or Oversight
Committees. Wanta is prepared to provide some very interesting testi-
mony which might lead to the immediate arrest of certain people
involved in the investigation into Vince Foster's death as well as
others involved in the death itself.

Dave Feustel 


Who is Leo Wanta? - by J. Orlin Grabbe -


Justice Denied for Leo Wanta - Received via Email 12/08/97

U.S. Dept. of the Treasury Office of Internal Affairs/Sector V-New Orleans
FROM: Ambassador Leo E. Wanta/Stillpoint.ops Diplomatic
Passport No. 04362 & 12535 Ministry of Foreign Affairs WANTA LEO EMIL

Former Naval Intelligence Officer Delmart Edward "Mike"
Vreeland warned of impending terrorist attacks a month before 9-11. 


What Congress Does Not Know about Enron and 9/11


<Back to Whistleblower Page

Subscribe to apfn-1
chooser.gif (706373 bytes)
Powered by


American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
"...a network of net workers..."

Without Justice, there is JUST_US!

APFN Message Board

APFN Sitemap

APFN Contents Page

APFN Home Page




US Department of State visits Teknosis re: Gov. Sundquist (TN), Sen. Songstad (SD) involved in extortion, conspiracy to murder over 5-10 Billion Dollars USD



Create a Twitter storm:

White House fence-jumper #whitehouse RT

September 6, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Enjoying your Century of Enslavement? The History of The Federal Reserve


Click here to download an mp3 audio version of this documentary.

Click here to download an mp4 video version of this documentary.

Click here to download a color information pamphlet on The Federal Reserve (right-click and “Save Link As” to download).

Click here to download a black and white information pamphlet on The Federal Reserve (right-click and “Save Link As” to download).

See transcript. Ref:


The Money Masters





-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 4:28 PM
 finance: An Idiot's Guide To The Federal Reserve SCAM


Finance: An Idiot's Guide To The Federal Reserve SCAM


In reality the Fed was created to and continues to destabilize

the economy. Why would the owners & controllers of the Fed want

to do this? Because the goal is to bring control of the United

States into the hands of the bankers behind the Fed. The US, with

its roots in freedom and free markets, is a very hard nation to

control. Taking over financial control of a nation is one of the

best ways to control a nation. This has been done time and time

again in many other nations.




A consortium of services for people and companies.


This is a one-way announcement list. Only the list moderators are able to post a message.

To subscribe: <>

To research the free archived files:    1302 Waugh Dr. #438    Houston, Texas    77019    USA


This message was launched into cyberspace to

September 5, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

US Government Murders Edgar Steele - Will The Perpetrators Get Away With It?


Today, September 4, 2014, early afternoon, a California mortuary notified Mrs. Cyndi Steele that her husband Edgar was dead. At this time, specific circumstances regarding Mr. Steele's death are being confirmed. The Free Edgar Steele website and the Edgar Steele Defense Fund (ESDF) will release more information when available.

Mrs. Steele contacted the ESDF Board, saying she was utterly devastated by this information, and is furious that no Victorville representative contacted her in the last few days regarding his failing health and did not even call her regarding the death of her husband. It was cruel to allow the mortuary to make the call.

Based on the best knowledge at hand, the following are the most likely causes of death: drug overdoses, persistently delayed, insufficient, improper medical treatment and medical neglect.  The federal government and Victorville Penitentiary bears responsibility for the lives of the inmates who reside there and has refused to be accountable for the decline in Edgar Steele's health.

Some hours before Mrs. Steele was contacted by the mortuary, ESDF President Robert Magnuson received an email corroborating Ms. Steele's concern for her husband's health and safety that showed Mr. Steele's health has been in a sharp decline for the past month, which fact was obscured, if not hidden by the federal government.

First, Mr. Steele was the victim of a false prosecution, then he was imprisoned in the most dangerous prison facility in America. Then his wife was never allowed to visit him despite a court order allowing visitation. Then, his health was compromised because of neglect, and finally, the reports came in that he had been drugged out of his mind earlier this week, which was the final blow that killed him. Call it anything else you like, but it is murder.

The facts of this tragic situation will be disclosed as the information is gathered.



"Steele, who was a target of the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, has proclaimed his innocence to this newspaper over several occasions through audio interviews conducting from prison. This reporter interviewed Mr. Steele in June, 2011, his first interview since his arrest, which can be heard below. Additional audio interviews will be made available through this website when they are processed. - See more at:"

Steele, who was a target of the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, has proclaimed his innocence to this newspaper over several occasions through audio interviews conducting from prison. This reporter interviewed Mr. Steele in June, 2011, his first interview since his arrest, which can be heard below. Additional audio interviews will be made available through this website when they are processed. - See more at:


Steele, who was a target of the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, has proclaimed his innocence to this newspaper over several occasions through audio interviews conducting from prison. This reporter interviewed Mr. Steele in June, 2011, his first interview since his arrest, which can be heard below. Additional audio interviews will be made available through this website when they are processed. - See more at:
Steele, who was a target of the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, has proclaimed his innocence to this newspaper over several occasions through audio interviews conducting from prison. This reporter interviewed Mr. Steele in June, 2011, his first interview since his arrest, which can be heard below. Additional audio interviews will be made available through this website when they are processed. - See more at:
Steele, who was a target of the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, has proclaimed his innocence to this newspaper over several occasions through audio interviews conducting from prison. This reporter interviewed Mr. Steele in June, 2011, his first interview since his arrest, which can be heard below. Additional audio interviews will be made available through this website when they are processed. - See more at:"
Steele, who was a target of the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, has proclaimed his innocence to this newspaper over several occasions through audio interviews conducting from prison. This reporter interviewed Mr. Steele in June, 2011, his first interview since his arrest, which can be heard below. Additional audio interviews will be made available through this website when they are processed. - See more at:

Edgar Steele

Edgar James Steele was a Prisoner of War, however, he was MURDERED by the present Communist Regime on September 4, 2014. May he rest in peace. He was innocent of the charges trumped up against him by the Federal Baby Incinerators (FBI). This is another case where the Federal Government lacked jurisdiction and where they handpicked and put in place an uninformed jury - even though the so-called victims in this case testified that they were not victimized by Edgar Steele but were victimized by Federal Agents. The Federal Government sentenced Edgar to 50 years in federal prison. If Edgar was guilty of the so-called bombing it should have been a State matter of prosecution, not Federal. The jury in Edgar's lynching was most certainly not a fully informed jury. Please click on this link  for further details as to what the government does not wish to you know about the loss of liberty.


People WAKE UP! The gestapo is MURDERING us one at time. Who will they murder next? Will it be my partner Larry-Mikiel: Myers, or will it be Dan: Peterson, Russell-Dean Landers, Richard: Clark, Richard: McLaren, Erwin Schiff or Paul-Mitchell: Modeleski. I can assure you that the bureaucrats in the District of Criminals want all of these gentlemen DEAD. Just as Edgar Steele, the bureaucrats consider these men to be a threat, because of the knowledge and skills that they possess. And now bureaucrats have been caught plotting the assassination of Ambassador Leo Wanta.




The Gestapo Communist Obamanation Regime has murdered Edgar Steele. They have wanted to silence this brilliant lawyer for his outspokenness as to corrupt government; and they wish to remove his writings from public view.

Edgar wrote several articles on how to fix the problems with the federal government. His recommendation were hated by those in power. Even his wife has failed or refused to publish Edgar's writing on how to fix government. Cyndi promised me, over a year ago on live talk radio, on RBN, that she would publish those articles on Free Edgar Steele website and to this day Edgar's articles have not been published there; whether due to her refusal or failure I know not which.

I published Edgar's article entitled Modern Sense on my homepage  Please go there and scroll down to Edgar Steele and click on the link to download the PDF file. Do so quickly since there is a possibly that my website may be shutdown on September 9 or 10. I have heard rumors that Andrew Cuomo, the butcher of WACO, plans to have me taken out come October or November by his mafia controlled stormtroopers. 

Obamanation and his comrades and cronies are systematically taking out anyone who may pose a threat to the soon coming takeover. Joan Rivers was taken out on August 28, 2014, for speaking out against Obamanation. They claim that she went into cardiac arrest while having oral surgery. However, under Obamanation Care, if you are over 80 years of age and come in for treatment the doctor is to terminate you. Obamanation Euthanasia Care is working! Joan was 81, and she recently had accused Barack Hussein Obama (Barry Soetoro) of being a Sodomite and Michelle Obama (Michael Robinson) of being a transvestite. Obviously dissent will not be tolerated. Strange is it not, sodomites demand others to be tolerant of their behavior, but they are not tolerant of other people's views or right of free speech.

The gestapo gave Susan Mokdad the same treatment back in February 2003. Susan had taken badly ill, I believe the government induced her illness. On January 31, 2003, I sent out a letter stating that the gestapo was planning Susan's death. They denied Susan medical treatment, which apparently was the same method used here with Edgar Steele. The gestapo intentionally terminated Susan on February 14, 2003, Saint Valentine Day, an obvious sign of a mob hit. Susan died of internal bleeding. See articles on Pro Se Litigates on http://sirdavidandrew and Florida Republics on

I was put in state prison shortly after Susan went to federal prison. Over a three year period I was thrown into state prison three times without being tried or convicted of any crimes. In one prison they tried to poison me and I contracted skin cancer which grew extremely rapid. The prison doctor wrote in his report that I was delusional because I had self-diagnosed that I had cancer. About a month later I was released. I immediately went to my own doctor. He took a biopsy and scheduled me for surgery that very afternoon, because he stated that my condition was that serious. In prison they tried to kill me by causing me to contract a cancer virus, either through the food they were feeding or the drugs they forced me to take.

About four months later they threw me into another state prison, again without trial or conviction. At that prison they told my cellmates before they brought me to my cell that I was a white supremacist and that they should take care of me. There were five Haitians, one Cuban and one Japanese waiting to greet me as the guards shoved me into the cell block. I could hear the guards laughing as they slammed the cell door closed behind since they thought I was about to take a beating. However, one of the Haitians ran at me and threw his arms around me, and shouted for all to hear, "Mon amie, David!" I said, "Yvon, what's going on here?" He told me that the guards told them that they were bringing a white supremacist into the cell block and that they should kill him and no one would know nothing.

The two guards were Cubans. There were only two guards at that prison who were white. Guards were 75% black and 24.9% Cuban. The warden and assistant warden were black. The medical staff were mainly black or Cuban, except of the doctors who were mostly Jewish or Oriental; I saw two doctors, who were white while I was there. However, amazingly the majority of the staff were good to me and several became friends. A large number of the inmates were murderers, rapists or violent criminals - definitely not a safe place to be.

At the time I was arrested and thrown into prison, I was associate pastor of a Haitian Mission in Florida, where one of my main jobs was to translate Haitian documents from Creole into French or English for easier processing of refugees by Immigration and Naturalization.

The prison guards did not know that I had saved Yvon's life in another jail and that Yvon and I had been arrested by the same PIGS at different places and times, and he, too, had been beaten by them. In the previous jail the guards stuck Yvon in a cell block with seven white men with intent to get him hurt. But we did not hurt him, and because I speak some French, I was able to communicate with Yvon.

About a month later the guards moved us to another cell block and a couple of the new guards attempted to kill Yvon and I stepped in to stop them, which is why Yvon returned the favor at the new prison. The cops that arrested Yvon beat him up because he did not answer their questions. Yvon could not speak English.

I also speak some Spanish and a little Japanese - the guards were grossly misinformed as to my background. At the state prison they took Yvon out of the cell block and in his place they brought in a man who had full blown AIDS with open sores all over his body; and they made me sit with him in the dining hall for every meal. Do you think that they were attempting to have me catch AIDS?

Two weeks before I was scheduled to be released, they moved two COP killers in the cell block with me; and eleven days before my release the prison counselor told these two men, one Haitian and one Cuban, that I was a COP. It was arranged for them to kill me by guards slipping one a shank and the other a club. However, there was a surprise cell block search and they lost their weapons the next morning. But that night they attacked me from behind and smashed my head into a concrete wall. I ended up with two broken ribs and two broken facial bones and several lacerations. The guards just picked me up, threw me into my bed and left me there to die.

Just as the guards closed the cell door, I could hear inmates shouting up and down the halls "Jimmy, they beat David; Jimmy, they beat David." The captain of the guard came into our cell block and demanded to know what was going on. The guard told him that I had gotten hurt, but that I would be okay. Jimmy did not buy their story and demanded that my cell be opened and the lights turned on. He took a look at me all covered with blood and looked all around my cell, blood was everywhere. He reached down, pulled out his cell phone and dialed 911. The guards asked him what he was doing. He ordered them to prepare the prisoner for transport. "Hello, please send an ambulance." I spent the next 24 hours in ICU. Jimmy also assigned his three most trusted guards to watch over me while I was in the hospital, which was greatly appreciated.

What most of the guards did not know, was that Jimmy and I spent three nights per week, when no one else was around, studying the Bible together. Yah is not finished with me yet, or I would have been dead in those hell holes. And, I have a clean bill of health, no AIDS and no cancer. These are only a few of the ordeals that I was put through. I was beaten once by three city pigs and six times by jailers, pistolwhipped to unconsciousness, shot in the leg, forcefully administered intoxicating drugs for 10 weeks and attacked two other times, without explanation or provocation, by inmates, one tried to kill me. From the drugs, I was to a point where I could not stay awake for more then 15 to 20 minutes at time. They even locked me in a steel 6x8 box with no windows and only a 25 watt light bulb for for three weeks, as well as, they locked me in a cell for four days with no clothing and assigned women to guard me. For the most part so-called correctional officers are very sick and sorry individuals; several are worse animals than those whom they cage. Someone wanted me DEAD!

I know what the gestapo did to Edgar Steele: cold-blooded MURDER.  They tortured him, drugged, then they killed him; and took great pleasure in doing so. I hope that my giving details of my personal experience will help people understand what these evil demoniacs did to Edgar Steele.

These demoniacs practice witchcraft and usually do these type of ritualistic murders in threes, just as they did with the murders of Esquire Johnny Cochrane (scapegoat offered up unto Mercury, Mammon or Commerce; March 29), Terri Schiavo (sacrificial lamb offered up unto Jupiter, Zeus; March 31 at 09:05), and Pope John-Paul II (bull sacrifice offered up unto Saturn, Cronus or Baal; April 2 at 21:38) back in 2005.

The Pope was murdered by three blows to the head with a brass hammer; and his death was set at 2 and 22 minutes (222) before the stroke of midnight. Both times of Terri's and Pope's deaths total five, the number of demonology. Those in power consider that he was too old to be Pope. Their sacrifices that week were to establish euthanasia as the norm; terminate the sick, the weak and the old. 2 is the number representing destruction, and they destroyed 3 lives. The Scriptures state, "fear not those who can kill the body, but Him who can kill the body and soul."

The shootings in Arizona, 2011 of U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (the scapegoat), Christina-Taylor Green (who was 9, born 9-11-2001, the sacrificial lamb) and Federal Judge John Roll (63, the bull sacrifice).   These deaths were supposed to have brought about the "completion" of some sinister plot, however, I believe that the plot failed. 6 plus 3 equals 9. 9 is completion or the number of man.

It appears that Joan Rivers may have been the sacrificial lamb and Edgar Steele their bull sacrifice. Therefore, who was their scapegoat sacrifice? Their deaths were seven days apart. Joan was euthanized on the east coast and Edgar on the west coast. The Statue of Liberty (Semiramis - Ishtar) is in New York and the Bohemian Owl is in California (Tammuz - Molech). I suspect the scapegoat to be someone in or from the District of Criminals where the Temple of Baal (Nimrod - Saturn - Washington Monument) is located. Obamanation claims to be direct descendant of Semiramis and Tammuz. You connect the dots. These murders may be the prelude to an upcoming major orchestrated event.

May Edgar Steele never be forgotten; may his recommendations be implemented in the District of Criminals; and may those, who were responsible for his death lie dead in the streets while dogs pick their bones. Cursed are those who wrongfully and deceitfully murder us, one-at-a-time; while others stand idle, doing nothing.

Sir David-Andrew.



Framing Edgar Steele


Framing Steele: A Case Study of Sovietized American "Justice"


Written by Will Grigg  //  October 18, 2011  //  Article  //  No comments


Edgar Steele (r.) confers with political activist Paul Venable.


Yes, I’d give the Devil the benefit of the law — for my own safety’s sake.


– Sir Thomas Moore, as depicted in A Man for All Seasons


When Edgar Steele was told on the morning of June 11, 2010, that his wife Cyndi had been killed when her SUV was run off the road in Oregon, his first reaction, understandably, was shock. That reaction mutated into panic minutes later when FBI Agent Michael Sotka told Steele that his mother-in-law had also been shot and killed.


“He wanted to contact family members and find out if they were okay,” testified State Trooper Jess Spike, who was at Steele’s home in Sagle, Idaho when the dire tidings were delivered. Asked by Agent Sotka who might have perpetrated those crimes and “who his enemies were,” Steele named “a number of organizations that may have been against him,” Spike continued. “There was like the Anti-Defamation League, Southern Poverty – there were one or two others. I don’t recall the acronyms or names of them.”


Trooper Spike was referring to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which bankrupted the northern Idaho-based Aryan Nation white supremacist group in a 2000 lawsuit. Steele, a controversial lawyer who described himself as the “Attorney for the Damned,” had represented the Aryan Nation in court, thereby earning the abiding enmity of the SPLC and its allies, including the Anti-Defamation League — both of which are quasi-private affiliates of the Homeland Security apparatus.

In addition to his legal work, Steele was a polemicist on behalf of worldview that can fairly be characterized as white supremacist. The author of a book entitled Defensive Racism, Steele disavowed aggressive violence. This wasn’t true of at least some of his detractors: Prior to June 11, 2010, Edgar Steele had received death threats that the FBI had traced back to the the so-called Jewish Defense League, which has been implicated in more than adozen domestic terrorist incidents in the United States.

In the months leading up to June 11, Steele had endured a near-fatal heart attack. On the morning he received the news, he was still recuperating from a second health crisis, a nasal aneurysm that had left him hospitalized just a few weeks earlier. So he was in pretty fragile condition as horrible news accumulated suggesting that his enemies were laying siege to his family. But that wasn’t the final shock he was to endure on that crowded morning: Agent Sotka suddenly announced, “Your wife is not dead … you’re under arrest.”



As Sotka hauled the stunned and shaken Steele from his home, the FBI Agent encountered Dr. Allen Banks, a local biochemist family friend who had arrived that morning to help Steele haul a load of lumber from the Home Depot in nearby Coeur d’Alene.


Brandishing a recorder, Sotka triumphantly told Banks: “We’ve got everything we need right here.” A few hours after being led to believe that his wife and mother-in-law had been murdered, Steele was charged with hiring a local handyman named Larry Fairfax to kill them.


Trooper Spike would later admit in court that there was nothing in the June 11 conversation that indicated Steele’s guilt. The elaborate fiction created by Sotka was a “ruse” intended to get Steele to incriminate himself. Rather than reacting to a confession or a critical disclosure by Steele, Sotka arrested him when it became clear that he “wasn’t going to crack,” Trooper Spike recounted on the witness stand.


As it happens, within four days of arresting Steele, the FBI had a confession from a suspect who admitted to placing a pipe bomb on the automobile Cyndi Steele drove to Oregon City to visit her cancer-stricken mother: Larry Fairfax himself, who had reportedly carried out the plot with unnamed “accomplices.” The bomb was accidentally discovered when Mrs. Steele took the van to a Jiffy Lube. Fairfax, who we’re told approached the FBI on June 9 to report that Steele had hired him to murder his wife and mother-in-law, hadn’t disclosed the existence of the pipe bomb.


It wouldn’t have gone off — but the jury wasn’t told.


Fairfax, who had done some remodeling work on the Steele home, was supposedly asked to carry out the double murder for $25,000 that would come from an insurance pay-off. (Fairfax wasn’t aware that Steele had cancelled his wife’s insurance policy two years earlier.) This arrangement was supposedly made on May 27, just a few weeks after Steele had been hospitalized for his second life-threatening aneurysm.


Prior to Steele’s arrest, Fairfax had cashed in roughly $10,000 in silver. Edgar and Cyndi claimed that Fairfax — who knew where the family had cached precious metals on their property — had stolen the silver. Fairfax insists it was part of the pay-off for his role in the murder plot. All that is known for certain is that the silver had belonged to the Steeles before Fairfax cashed it in.


It is likewise known for sure that Fairfax — with the help of his still-unknown accomplices — built the pipe bomb and placed it on the undercarriage of Cyndi Steele’s vehicle. Edgar Steele’s only connection to the pipe bomb was a recorded June 10 conversation with Fairfax in which the phrase “car bomb” was spoken. Fairfax and the FBI insisted that the conversation made reference to an earlier, unrecorded agreement between the two of them that Fairfax would kill Cyndi Steele and her ailing mother.


During his testimony in Edgar Steele’s trial, Agent Sotka admitted that the FBI had given Fairfax and James Maher $500 and that “we decided to send Mr. Fairfax over to Portland in case Mr. Steele asked for a phone call from him.” That call, according to Agent Sotka, was intended to be Steele’s alibi, proving that he was nowhere near the scene of the crime when it occurred.


A stronger case can be made that this call was designed to be the finishing touch on the frame the Feds had constructed to entrap Steele. By calling from Oregon, Fairfax would create an interstate “nexus” that supposedly justified federal charges against Steele. It’s important to note that this element of the case against Steele involves something he didn’t do — namely, contacting Fairfax in Portland — while Sotka admitted under oath that it was the FBI that sent Fairfax to Portland.


Last May, following a trial that lasted less than a week, a federal jury convicted Steele on four counts, including conspiracy to commit murder. He faces a mandatory minimum of 30 years in prison – which, owing to his age and fragile health, is a life sentence. The prosecution case that resulted in that sentence is miraculously untainted by reliable evidence.


The alleged victim, Cyndi Steele, has been her husband’s most consistent and vocal defender, despite what she has described as intimidation by Agent Sotka. The so-called pipe bomb was little more than a stage prop incapable of exploding – a fact withheld by the Feds until the day after Steele’s trial ended, when it was introduced, without Government objections, during Larry Fairfax’s sentencing hearing.


Fairfax, who manufactured a supposedly “lethal” weapon of mass destruction as part of a plot to murder two innocent people, was charged with possession of an “unregistered firearm” and given a sentence of 27 months in prison (with credit for time served), followed by three years of supervised release. He was ordered to pay Cyndi Steele — his victim — a total of $900 in compensation. That detail eloquently testifies of the contemptuous hostility the Feds have for the uncooperative “victim.”



As with so many other prosecutions of this kind, this case shouldn’t have been in federal court in the first place.


Edgar Steele “did not `cause’ anyone to travel in interstate commerce,” points out his attorney Wesley Hoyt in a motion for a new trial. “Government informants Larry Fairfax and James Maher were dispatched from Idaho on June 11, 2010 by the Government, not the defendant. They were paid $500 by the FBI to travel to Oregon … so that FBI Agent Sotka could have Fairfax call Mr. Steele from an Oregon prefix” – thereby creating a supposed “jurisdictional link” to justify a federal prosecution.


This is a familiar FBI tactic: Where there is no clear federal “nexus,” create one through a letter or an interstate telephone call. In the 1991 case U.S. v. Coats, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that an FBI-instigated interstate phone call that “was contrived by the Government for that reason alone” did not provide the desired “jurisdictional link.”


The FBI’s claim that Steele had actually hired Fairfax to kill his wife depends on two dubious pieces of evidence, neither of which is sufficient alone but that supposedly validate each other: The ambiguous and disputed recording of a conversation between Fairfax and Steele on June10, 2010, and Fairfax’s testimony.


Judge Winmill (l.) with Russian Judge Vladimir Soloyev in 2002.


During the trial in Boise, the defense repeatedly objected to the introduction of the recording, and the Government-provided transcript, on the basis that they were offered without “foundation.”


Addressing that objection, Federal District Judge Lynn Winmill ruled that “if he [Fairfax] testifies that he has listened to it and it accurately sets forth what was said at the time, then that is the foundation.” In its closing arguments, the prosecution heavily emphasized the claim that the recordings likewise “corroborated” Fairfax’s account. The problem here is that both of those pieces of “evidence” are terminally flawed – and since each of them is thoroughly impeachable, they can’t be used to validate each other.


The chain of custody necessary to authenticate the recordings breaks down at the very first link. Fairfax’s demonstrated dishonesty (the Feds were forced to admit that he was “not completely forthcoming” about the pipe bomb) makes him unsuitable as a corroborative witness regarding their reliability. “In order to authenticate the records, the Government presented the testimony of an admitted liar … who during trial stated that on June 9, 2010 he lied to the FBI when he did not tell them about the existence of a bomb on Mrs. Steele’s car,” notes the motion for a new trial.


FBI Agent Sotka claimed that Fairfax and Steele were under constant surveillance on the Steele family’s property while the recorded conversations took place. However, the discussion took place in a barn, while the two of them were concealed from view. Since the device concealed on Fairfax was a recorder rather than a “wire,” nobody heard the conversations as they actually occurred.


On the witness stand Agent Sotka described how he downloaded the digital audio file from the recording device onto an FBI computer in Coeur d’Alene with a special proprietary software program. From there, the file was reportedly uploaded to a database at an FBI lab in Virginia. Sotka did this without listening to the recorded conversation. He then copied the file onto a compact disc, from which the file was re-copied onto a second disc. At that point, according to Sotka, he purged the original digital file from the recording device, since “part of the procedure is to delete the conversation and have the recorder clear for the next time you need to use it.”


Sotka appears to be selectively fastidious about following FBI procedures, since he did all of this by himself, without having a second Agent present, as dictated by Bureau policy. What this means is that the recordings heard by the court – and that had been played to Cyndi Steele by Agent Sotka prior to the trial – were, at the very best, a third-generation copy of the original digital file, which was destroyed by Sotka without being heard by himself or anybody else.

When the version of the recording was played for Cyndi Steele, the alleged victim and target of the purported murder-for-hire plot was not convinced that what she heard was an actual conversation involving her husband. Furthermore, the version of the recording played in court contained an odd repetitive clicking noise, which the prosecution insisted was the sound of “Tic-Tacs” rattling in Fairfax’s pocket. That noise, which wasn’t present on the pre-trial version, is the kind of audio artifact that can result when a recording is digitally assembled from several different sources.


Dr. George Papcun, a forensic scientist who has served as an expert witness and law enforcement consultant for several decades, detected numerous “transients” and other anomalies – by one count, roughly 300 of them — in the pre-trial version of the FBI recordings. Dr. Papcun concluded that there was “a reasonable degree of scientific probability that [the recordings] do not represent a true and valid representation of reality and they are unreliable.” That assessment provides ample, if not unassailable, grounds for reasonable doubt, especially in light of Dr. Papcun’s credentials.


After finishing his undergraduate degree in mathematics at the University of Arizona, Papcun went on to earn a Master’s Degree in Formal Linguistics and a Ph.D. in Linguistics (with a specialization in Acoustic Phonetics) from UCLA. As a graduate student, Papcun was awarded Ford Foundation and National Defense education fellowships; his professional work earned an award from Johns Hopkins University and a place on the R&D-100 list of top achievers in “Technological Innovation.” He has been an advisor to local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security, and an expert forensic witness in numerous high-profile cases.


Not surprisingly, the prosecution attempted to exclude both Dr. Papcun’s report and his testimony from the trial. On May 2, Judge Winmill held a hearing to determine whether the defense would be permitted to present Papcun’s testimony. At the time, Papcun was vacationing in Bora Bora, and Winmill initially ruled that he could testify via video conference on the following day. However, the prosecution complained that this arrangement would be unacceptable, since it wouldn’t permit them to “confront” the witness – a right that is guaranteed to the defendant, not the prosecution, by the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.


On May 3, Judge Winmill, exhibiting his habitual, undisguised bias in favor of the prosecution, dutifully reversed his ruling and issued an entirely whimsical demand that Dr. Papcun be physically present in Boise, Idaho no later than 8:30 a.m. the following morning – Wednesday, May 4 – in order to testify at the trial.

Since neither teleportation nor sub-orbital commercial flight is presently available, the earliest Papcun could be available was Thursday, May 5. Papcun was willing to interrupt his vacation, and the defense was willing to pay the expense. However, Judge Winmill – who was consistently flexible in meeting the prosecution’s demands – maintained that there wasn’t sufficient wiggle room in his schedule to permit Papcun to testify on Thursday. None of this would have been necessary, of course, if Winmill had simply stuck to his initial ruling and permitted Dr. Papcun to offer fully interactive testimony by way of a video conference held at the nearest U.S. consulate.


Judge Winmill’s earnest concern for the supposed right of the prosecution to “confront” Dr. Papcun stands in stark contrast to his indifference to Edgar Steele’s constitutionally protected right to confront a key prosecution witness, Ukrainian resident Tatyana Loginova – whom Steele had contacted as part of what he and his wife Cyndi both described as his research into the Russian “mail-0rder bride” scam. 


Steele’s daughter Kesley testified under oath that both she and her mother were aware of that research, and often joked about it. That account was confirmed from the witness stand by family friend Allan Banks, who said that Steele had told him about contacting several women from the former Soviet Union as “part of a legal case.”



The question of motive was probably the biggest of the numerous weaknesses in the prosecution’s case: Why would a man who had just recovered from a near-fatal aortic aneurysm seek to murder the wife whose personal care had been indispensable to his recovery?

The prosecution confected a story in which Steele – a senior citizen in fragile health – was secretly trolling the Web in search of a nubile young girlfriend, and had developed a schoolboy crush on Miss Loginova.


Loginova’s testimony was critical to the prosecution’s case, and the “right to confront” protected by the Sixth Amendment required that Steele and his counsel be given an opportunity to cross-examine her. However, Winmill permitted the prosecution to enter into evidence a videotaped deposition conducted via video conference with the aid of a Russian language translator. Loginova’s story included a claim that Steele had promised to visit her in Ukraine in August 2010.


While the Edgar Steele jury was permitted to hear Loginova’s videotaped testimony, it was not permitted to hear the testimony of Dr. Robert Stoll, who had spent several hours in Steele’s company on June 10 – the day he supposedly planned to murder his wife. Dr. Stoll, a local veterinarian, has filed an affidavit recounting how he had discussed Steele’s health problems and how he was impressed by “the manner of Edgar’s tender affection for his wife and family. I believe that this man’s intent … when I visited him was not to kill anyone, especially his wife.”


Cyndi Steele and attorney Wesley Hoyt.


To understand the deeply prejudicial nature of Winmill’s rulings in this regard it’s necessary to take into account the composition of the jury: In a case involving an alleged plot by a husband to murder his middle-aged wife, the jury consisted of eleven women and one man.


The panel that emerged from voir dire was ideal for the prosecution’s theory of the case, which could have been the plot from any of several dozen made-for-TV movies of the kind broadcast incessantly on the “Lifetime” cable network: The scheming, unfaithful husband, driven by ego and what remains of his mid-life libido, plots to murder his long-suffering wife in order to take up with a pneumatic trophy bimbo.

Edgar Steele is a widely despised figure. His legal practice was devoted to defending the rights of similarly marginalized and disreputable people out of the conviction that “it is the … politically incorrect whose rights are first infringed and then eliminated,” as he pointed out in a speech he delivered in Jekyll Island, Georgia almost exactly two years before his Stalinist show trial in Boise.

Actually, the comparison to the Soviet-era Russian legal system is unfair, given that a defendant hauled before a Soviet criminal tribunal actually enjoyed a small but measurable chance of acquittal.

After the Bolsheviks seized power in 1917, the jury system — which had been established under Alexander II in 1864 — was abolished and replaced with”People’s Courts” composed of a judge and a panel of two to six Party-appointed “assessors” who heard all of the evidence and decided all questions of both fact and law. The assessors “became known as `nodders’ for simply nodding in agreement with the judge,” wrote federal Judge John C. Coughenour in an article published by the Seattle University Law Review. “People’s assessors virtually always agreed with judges; acquittals were virtually nonexistent…. [U]nlike our adversarial system, the Soviet inquisitorial criminal justice system neither prioritized nor emphasized the rights of individual defendants, but instead paid homage to the interests of the state.”


What Judge Coughenour describes as a contrast between the Soviet and American legal systems is actually one of the strongest points of similarity. Lew Rockwell recently pointed out that in the pseudo-legal proceedings referred to as “trials” by the federal Leviathan, the defendant “wins once every 212 times” — a respectable approximation of “never.” During the late Stalin era, Soviet procurators were ordered to achieve a 100 percent conviction rate; their counterparts in contemporary U.S. federal courts have essentially accomplished that feat. This is because the federal system, like its Soviet predecessor, is designed to serve the interests of the State — and federal juries are typically purged of anyone unwilling to play the role of “nodder” in a show trial.


During jury selection in the Edgar Steele “trial,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Traci Whelan, who presided over the prosecution, carefully scrutinized potential jurors for what she called “hidden biases” against “the United States Government.” Neither Whelan nor Judge Winmill was willing to abide the presence of any juror who understood that the jury’s role is to force the government to overcome the constitutionally prescribed “bias” in favor of the defendant. They needn’t have worried.


In Idaho, the most “anti-government” state in the Soyuz, the Feds were able to win a murder conspiracy conviction in a case without a victim, a murder weapon, or a motive, using only a doctored audio recording and the self-exculpating testimony of an admitted liar who confessed to manufacturing and planting the non-functional bomb. Andrei Vyshinsky would be suitably impressed.





Edgar Steel wrote Modern Sense back in December 2002.  It was the result of a series of six emails.  I compiled those emails and put it in booklet form and then added my two cents and sent it out in the attached format the 3rd week of January 2003.

Edgar's Modern Sense is based on Thomas Paine's Common Sense and he recommends a replacement form of government.  I did not agree with all of his recommendations; however, it was better than what we have now.    It is food for thought.

Discussion on fixing the CON CON is a waste of time, since it is not possible to fix that which was fraud on its face from the beginning.  Did I mention that the CON CON was FRAUD. 

Done that, been there!  And, the exposure of this back in the mid-90s cost me 704 days and four days of my life and almost my life.

Wow!  Where have you been?  How many folks even know the true history and origin behind the CON CON?

Subject: Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
From: "Sir David-Andrew" <>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 04:33:18 -0500
To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:;;>
Twenty-sixth Day First Month, A.D. Two Thousand Three
Common Sense – Modern Sense
Edgar J. Steele has been out there shaking the trees and rattling the cages of politicians and bureau-rats
for several years. Esquire Steele is not the ordinary Attorney, however. This man knows quit a lot about
the law; as is evident in the following treatise; therefore, it would be truthful to call him a Lawyer, and
not an Attorney. Lawyers are those who are knowledgeable in the law, but Attorneys are twisters who
belong to the BAR and have been taught court procedure (Baal Worship), not law. Most Attorneys are an
incompetent lot, who lust after Mammon. The Florida Bar (one of the worst) claims 70,000+ members, but
acknowledges in its own publications that less than 2,800 are board certified as competent. However, one
must realize that in most states, membership to the BAR is mandatory in order to ‘practice law’; and
Lawyers across this great Land are rebelling and organizing against this unconstitutional requirement. It is
obvious by the following writing that even though he is, or should I say was, a member of the BAR [British
Aristocratic Regency – British Accreditation Registry], he will not be for long, for surely it is ‘off with his
Thomas Jefferson, a Lawyer and a good one I might add, despised Attorneys and stated that if they were
ever allowed to hold public office that they would be the destruction of this great Nation. He detested
them as much as he did Banksters. He, also, stated that there was need for a Revolution every 70 years
just to keep this Nation as a free Republic. [Fussy Math -- 1776 + 210 = 1996] The time for a Revolution is
long over due. All the wars for the past one hundred and five years have been sideshows to distract the
People from the real business at hand. Thomas Jefferson and Noah Webster avidly fought to keep Bible
reading in public schools; by law, when Bible reading ended in public schools, statehood ceased to exist.
The united States of America died.
Edgar Steele does not demonstrate any allegiance to the Crown or the Just-US Dynasty run by her
"Majesty’s" irresponsible Cousins here on these shores. The United States is a British Crown State and has
been since 1871. Folks wake up King Shrub is as bad, if not worse, then his double Cousins Slick Willie.
Slick is the grandson of John D. Rockefeller and Grand Nephew of Thomas Woodrow Wilson. Slick, Bob
Dole and Jack Kemp are all direct descendants of Henry VII. That is correct, they are all Cousins. In fact,
all Presidents since the War of Aggression (or second Revolution, depending upon one’s perception,) have
been direct blood descendants of the Kings and Queens of England. Then, we must not forget their Cousin
Dick and Cousin Colon, too. Daily, it is becoming more obvious that we are being scrxxxx, well you should
get the picture. Edgar Steele has poured out his soul in this following plea to conscious and sanity, Modern
Sense. He could and most likely will be disbarred for willful defiance and disloyalty to the Crown, if not
‘off with his head’.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
2 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
Am I afraid? No, but I do not like the idea of being at ground zero, the second or third wave would be
whole lot nicer. What do I have to lose by supporting Edgar’s effort? I do not have much to lose, since in
October of 1998 I was the number ONE Patriot under Siege in America. If you the reader could just
comprehend how cruel and wicked your Masters are, and when your name goes on the list "it ain’t comin’
off"; so, you might as well stand and fight. Cousin Elizabeth apparently does not like me much already,
since she has never answered any of the correspondence that I have sent to her since 1998, warning her of
this very day. It is ironic, that I am both of the House of Paine and the House of Stewart; and am known by
the troops as Major Paine. Though, too, I am a Herald, the keeper of the genealogical records and records
of crests, shields and heraldry; and I received my Heraldry without the Queen’s blessing, for I am a
servant of the King of kings, and Lord of lords; and, it is His blessings that I seek. And, being that I am of
the House of Stewart: I am David, son of David, King of Israel. My ancestral Stewart-Paine families were
Revolutionary War Soldiers, who fought King George III.
I do not believe that Edgar has written this for these British Royalties’ benefit, since they have not eyes to
see or ears to hear, and they speak with forked tongues. They are deaf, dumb and blind, worshippers of
idols and practitioners of witchcraft and sorcery. It appears that King Shrub intends to bring about an
all-out-assault upon this Land by May Day; sending almost all American soldiers overseas while using
foreign communist troops to invade our shores. It is time to buy more powder, not beer. Edgar has written
Modern Sense for your admonition; hopefully each of you will take this to heart; your future depends on
I do not agree with some of Edgar’s conclusions and recommendations, and you may not either; but that is
not important. What is important is that some reasonable directions has been brought forward and now
lies on the table for consideration. I had considered doing this every thing six years ago, but circumstance
beyond my control prevented me do much of anything of value. I comprehend the reasoning and the logic
behind certain conclusions and recommendations that Edgar has drawn; and that these may be workable
under certain conditions or restraints. We are Gentlemen who can work it when the time comes.
However, public forum is not the place to debate matters such as these, since the likes of Morris Sleeze
(who would turn the debate into a circus, majoring on prejudice, bigotry and hate, not morals, logic or
reason. And, I have a hunch that Edgar has already made Morris’ sleaze list, along with thousands of other
great Patriots. Folks, if you remember Morris Sleeze has accused some my friends and myself of being
anti-Shemites; this spelling is correct, it is Sleeze and his friends who do not know how to spell this
Hebrew word correctly. Several times his railing accusation against me have appeared on front page
News, since August 1996. How dare he, a son of Gomer, call me, a descendant of King David, an
Thomas Paine, gave the ultimate sacrifice, he died a forgotten hero. Only, five friends attend his funeral
when he was buried in southern New York state. He was without children. His only daughter died in
England at the age of thirteen, of cholera or diphtheria, I forget which. Thomas had two wives, but
neither of them ever came to America. Thomas’ body was later resumed and taken back to England to be
buried with one of his wives. Why should his body remain here, since the People too soon had already
forgotten the price that he had paid for their freedom. On January 1, 1776, his pamphlet Common Sense
first appeared.
I hope Edgar likes this and finds it to be a fitting Introduction. I have taken the liberty to cleanup the type
set, typo errors, spelling, some grammatical structure or punctuation being careful to maintain form and
intent, and general appearance and readability. In this form it should be ready for easy Pamphleteering;
start the presses.
Maybe, these Master’s of the m-asses will take time to read this; though, if they do it will make them
shake in their boots. Maybe even worse, because I imagine if they have read this far that they are already
quit angry; but that is too bad. Hang on bureau-rats it is about to get a whole lot worse for you.
Especially, if you the People take this to heart. We are about to take a walk in the light and the things
these humans do in the dark, will be exposed. Are you ready, or are you just going to sit back, pop
another beer and watch these tyrants murder your children? I am not dead yet, though Yah knows how
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
3 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
often they have plotted and tried and failed, my body still aches from the wounds, but if I should fall, who
will carry the Banner? If I should fall, who will carry the Banner? Today, Edgar is quit stately carrying the
Banner; but if he should fall, who will carry the Banner? We are on the verge of War.
"Let us not, I beseech you, deceive ourselves (any) longer. We have done everything that
could be done to avert the storm, which is now coming on. If we wish to be free – we must
fight! I repeat, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to (our Heavenly Father) is all that is
left us! They tell us, that we are weak – unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But
when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next, or the next year? Will it be when we are
totally disarmed and when a guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather
strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by
lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusion phantom of hope, until our enemies
shall have bound us hand and foot? We are not weak, if we make a proper use of those means
which (our Creator) has placed in our power...The battle, is not to the strong alone: it is the
vigilant, the active, the brave." – Christian Patriot, Patrick Henry.
A few day ago, I mailed out Common Sense written by Thomas Paine 1776, and now Modern Sense by
Edgar Steele 2003. What is that I hear on the streets of Boston, Dallas or L.A.! Is it the clanking of chains
or musket's roar? May I present, Edgar Steele with Modern Sense.
Sir David-Andrew.
Modern Sense
(Part I, revised)
(With absolutely no apologies to Thomas Paine)
by Edgar J. Steele
December 26, 2002
Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its
state an intolerable one; for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries by a government,
we might expect in a country without government, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we
furnish the means by which we suffer. --- Thomas Paine, "Common Sense" (Feb 1776)
There are a remarkable number of parallels between pre-Revolutionary America and the America of
today. It is downright spooky how, in their writings of that time, our founding fathers might have been
speaking directly to this
generation of Americans. Then again, I do not believe in coincidence so perhaps, in a sense, they were.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
4 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
How appropriate that those of us who advocate a return to the ideals of those days are called "patriots," a
word which has taken on as derisive a meaning when mouthed by government agents today as those
uttered about our
forebears by King George's men during the first American revolution.
Nor is it coincidence that those of us labeled as "Patriots" wear the mark with respect and honor. I count
myself proudly among their number and pray only that my work be worthy of inclusion.
It takes a little work to update the founding fathers' works to modern forms of language and phrasing, but
the result is nothing short of amazing, particularly when we replace "England" with "Federal Government"
and "King
George" with "The President."
I have presumed to do just that with Thomas Paine's "Common Sense" in this series, a four-part work
written and published in early 1776 as part of a broad effort to convince the American settlers to declare
independence from
In several places, I have retained Paine's wording intact, where it has particular impact in its original
form. In others, I have edited and rephrased mercilessly, while trying to hew to the apparent intent of his
I do not suggest that this is an improvement upon what Thomas Paine had to say. I believe only that this is
how he might have said it, were he alive today and speaking of the grotesquerie that our government has
As you read this section, you might find it useful to compare it with its counterpart in the original
"Common Sense." One of many on-line sources for Thomas Paine's "Common Sense":
I have maintained the original's organization and structure in this rewrite, in order to facilitate direct
To the Inhabitants of America on the following interesting subjects
I. Of the origin and design of government in general, with concise remarks on the American
Constitution. (12/26/02)
II. Of the imperial presidency and hereditary succession. (Released 12/28/02)
III. Thoughts on the present state of American affairs. (Subpart a released 1/2/03; subpart b
released 1/8/03; subpart c released 1/15/03)
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
5 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
IV. Of the present ability of America, with some miscellaneous reflections. (Released
Part I: Of the origin and design of government in general, with concise remarks on the American
Virtually all Americans have so confused society with government, as to leave little distinction between
them, though they are different and have different origins.
Society is produced by our wants, government by our wantonness. Society promotes our happiness;
government restrains our vices. Society is our patron; government is our punisher.
Society is our blessing, while government is but a necessary evil. At its worst, a government is intolerable
because we provide it the very means by which it oppresses us.
Since man is not guided always by the finer dictates of conscience, some form of government is necessary.
Thus, we choose to give up a portion of our wealth to sustain government, though that decision must
involve selection of the least among evils.
Security being the purpose of government, we prefer that which provides it at the least cost, with the
greatest benefit.
To gain a clear idea of the purpose of government, imagine a small number of people settling in a distant
land, with no connection to any others. In this natural state, society will be their first thought, since a
division of labor among them will produce the greatest common and individual good. Each member of the
society will do that for which he or she is best suited, with the whole providing protection and producing
far more than the sum of
its parts.
But, as the base necessities of life are ensured, human nature being what it is, a group discussion of
problems will ensue. Initially, rules will be informal and their violation met with mere group disapproval.
Each member
of society, naturally, will be heard at first.
As the group's members increase, so will the problems, as will the distance members must travel to
discuss the problems. It will become convenient to select a few of the group's members, who have the
same concerns as those selecting them, and who will act as the whole group would, if assembled. As the
society grows ever larger, it will be necessary to add to the select governing group, so as to ensure
representation of all the interests present in the burgeoning society.
To ensure that the members elected to the governing body not form interests separate from those
electing them, prudence dictates frequent elections, with the members elected returning to general
society. Because the elected
return in a short time to become a part of the governed, the fidelity of the government is assured and the
support of the people guaranteed. This is the basis for the strength of government and the happiness of
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
6 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
the governed.
Thus, government is seen to be necessary due to the failure of moral virtue to govern. The purpose of
government also is clear: freedom and security.
Clear reason shows all else concerning government merely to be contrived. Nature shows us that the
simplest things are least likely to fail, yet, are easily repaired when they do fail. This maxim illustrates my
idea of government and provides the basis for a few remarks on the American Constitution.
The American Constitution was noble for its time, and provided much-needed respite from a world
overrun with tyranny and disorder. But, that it is imperfect, subject to misinterpretation and incapable of
producing what it
seems to promise, it is easy to see.
Totalitarian governments have the advantage of simplicity; if the people suffer, they know who to blame
what to do and are not confused by discussions of causes and cures.
But the American Constitution has brought forth a body of federal and state laws so complex that the
nation has suffered for years with nobody able to say in which part the fault lies. Some say in one portion
and some in another, and every political physician prescribes a different medicine.
Though it may be difficult to get over old prejudices, if we examine the component parts of the American
Constitution, we shall find it to contain the remains of two ancient tyrannies, together with some new
First, the remains of monarchical tyranny in the person of the President; second, the remains of
aristocratical tyranny in the persons of the judiciary. Third, the new republican ills in the persons of the
legislatures at all level of government.
The first two, though originally derived from popular support and selected from the people, now have
become independent of the people. In a constitutional sense, they contribute nothing toward the freedom
of America.
To say that the Constitution is a union of three branches, reciprocally checking one another, is nonsense.
To say that the Congress is a check upon the President presupposes two things: First, that the President is
not to be trusted or, in other words, that a thirst for absolute power is the natural disease of those
President. Second, that Congressmen, being elected to check upon the President, are either wiser or
worthier of confidence than the President.
But, as the same Constitution gives Congress power to stymie the President by withholding spending
power, it gives the President power to stymie Congress by empowering him to veto their bills. Thus, the
supposes the President wiser than those, it has already supposed to be wiser than he, a patent absurdity.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
7 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
There is something ridiculous about the composition of the Presidency: the man is excluded from
information concerning common society, yet empowered to act in cases requiring the highest judgment.
The state of the office
shuts its occupant off from the world, yet its business requires him to know it thoroughly.
How did the Presidency come by a power, which the people are afraid to trust and always obliged to
check? Such a power could not be the gift of a wise people; neither can any power which needs checking
be from God. Yet the
Constitution supposes such a power to exist.
But the Constitution is unequal to the task; the means will not accomplish the end. As all the wheels of a
machine are put in motion by one, it only remains to know which power in the Constitution has the most
weight, for
that will govern. Though the other powers may slow its motion, so long as they cannot stop it, they will be
ineffectual. The first moving power will at last have its way, and what it wants in speed will be supplied
by time.
That the Presidency is the overbearing part in the American Constitution needs not be mentioned, and
that it derives its power from being the giver of positions and wager of war is self-evident. Though we
have been wise enough to lock the door against absolute monarchy, we have been foolish enough to
deliver the key to the President.
The prejudice of Americans, in favor of their own government by executive, legislative and judicial
branches, arises as much or more from national pride than reason. Individuals are undoubtedly safer in
America than in
some other countries, but the will of the President is as much the law of the land in America as was the
King's in old England, with but one difference: Instead of always proceeding directly from his mouth by
fiat or Executive Order, it is handed to the people under the guise of an act of Congress. The fate of kings
of old has made their modern counterparts only more subtle - not more just.
Laying aside all national pride and prejudice, the plain truth is that, wholly owing to the constitution of
the people, and not to the Constitution of America, the Presidency is not as oppressive in America as in,
say, Iraq or Zimbabwe.
An inquiry into the constitutional errors in the American form of government is necessary. As we are
incapable of meting out justice to others while we labor under the influence of partiality, neither are we
capable of critiquing ourselves while our judgment is clouded by prejudice. As a man taken with a
mistress is unfit to judge his wife, so any predilection for a rotten constitution will disable us from
discerning a good one.
Modern Sense (Part II)
(With absolutely no apologies to Thomas Paine)
by Edgar J. Steele
December 28, 2002
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
8 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
(I)t is the republican and not the monarchical part of the constitution of England which Englishmen glory
in, viz., the liberty of choosing a house of commons from out of their own body- and it is easy to see that
when the republican virtue fails, slavery ensues. ---Thomas Paine, "Common Sense" (Feb 1776)
Part II: Of the imperial presidency and hereditary succession.
All men are created equal, but they need not stay that way. Some become rich and some poor, rarely due
either to oppression or by means of avarice.
While wealth may produce oppression, it is rarely attained by oppression. And, though the avaricious may
avoid poverty, they generally lack the discipline to attain wealth.
But there is a more significant distinction between men, for which no natural or religious reason can be
given: the difference between citizen and ruler.
Male and female are distinctions of nature, good and bad, distinctions of morality. But, how a group of
men came into the world so exalted above the other, distinguished like some new species, begs
examination. Of equal importance: whether this new distinction is the source of happiness or of misery.
Originally, when there were no rulers in the world; there was no war. Generally, those countries that have
continued without strong leaders have been the most peaceful. History as recorded in the Bible shows
patriarchies, which gave way to Jewish royalty and concomitant misery. Heathens first showed the way
with Kings, idolized in their death. Christian nations have done them one better by idolizing their rulers
while still alive.
Just as setting one man above others cannot be justified from the natural scheme of things, neither can it
be defended in scripture, where the Almighty expressly disapproves of government by kings.
Three thousand years elapsed from the Biblical account of Creation until the Jews sought to replace their
republican form of government with a king. Gideon, who prevailed against the Midianites, Israel's stronger
oppressor, rejected the crown thrust upon him, saying, "I will not rule over you, neither shall my son rule
over you. The Lord shall rule over you." Gideon properly rejected not only the crown, but also the right of
the people, even, to give a crown.
One Hundred-thirty years after Gideon, Samuel also fought against the popular outcry for the naming of a
king (so that Israel might be "like other nations"). Samuel noted that, not only would the king take the
best of everything then owned by the citizens, "The Lord will not hear you in that day."
Hereditary succession, in addition to the degradation of accepting an absolute ruler, is both an insult and
an imposition on posterity. If all are created equal, then nobody by birth should have the right to set up
his own family in preference to others. While one may deserve the honor of his contemporaries, his
descendants would only rarely be worthy to inherit that honor.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
9 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
Hereditary succession includes, not just from father to son, but from circumstance to circumstance, and
the whimsical designation of one in power.
The strongest natural proof of the folly of hereditary right is that nature disapproves it, else she would
not so frequently turn it into ridicule by giving mankind the likes of George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton or any
of the House of Windsor.
As no man should possess any public honors other than those bestowed upon himself, so the givers of
those honors should have no right to give away the right of posterity. Though the people may choose one
for their ruler, they could not, without manifest injustice, say, "Your children shall rule over ours,"
because the next succession might put them under the rule of a fool.
Even true kings, traced to their first rise, likely were nothing better than the principal ruffian of some
restless gang, whose savage manners earned him the title of chief among plunderers. Hereditary
succession, in the early ages of monarchy, could not have taken place as a matter of divine claim, but
only endowed with such after the lapse of a few generations, as the result of some trumped-up
superstitious tale. Thus was hereditary right crammed down the throats of the vulgar.
The office of the American president has become akin to hereditary right, with very few able to lay claim
to it, all of a stripe with differences in appearance only, and all beholden to the moneyed class that
selects their number, time and again. None but those so chosen are offered to the citizens in the
primaries, so that it is irrelevant precisely who is ultimately elected.
America, since the first revolution, has known some good presidents, but groaned beneath a larger
number of bad ones, particularly of late.
It is no coincidence that the Twentieth Century saw the American presidency become a truly imperial
office, resplendent with the tokens and privileges of rank previously reserved to the mightiest and richest
of kings
throughout history.
It is no coincidence that the current American president is but a poor reflection of his father, who
occupied that position less than a generation previous, a man plucked from nowhere and anointed with
sufficient money and influence to carry through the entire electoral process.
It is no coincidence that the current president's father was head of the American secret police for a time.
It is no coincidence that the current president was born into a moneyed and privileged family, one that
travels in the top levels of society throughout the world.
It is no coincidence that one rumored to be preparing to seek the presidency is the wife of the last man to
hold the office.
The plain truth is that the validity of presidential succession in America will not bear looking into.
It is not so much the absurdity as the evil of American presidential succession that concerns us. As it opens
a door to the foolish, the wicked and the improper, it has in it the nature of oppression.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
10 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
Men who look upon themselves born to reign, and others to obey, soon grow insolent; selected from the
rest of mankind, their minds are early poisoned by importance. The world they act in differs so materially
from the world
at large, that they have but little opportunity of knowing its true interests.
The most plausible plea in favor of the American presidency is that it preserves the nation from civil wars.
Were this true, it would be persuasive, yet it is among the most barefaced of falsities. Abraham Lincoln,
believed to be among the greatest of presidents, fomented and prosecuted the bloodiest war known to
America, and the only one fought entirely on its own soil, a civil war of the first order.
Lincoln was the first to gather to the office of the presidency many of the rights, privileges and powers
now taken for granted to be a part of the American presidency, yet which specifically the nation's
founders had eschewed.
There have been others since Lincoln, who have singularly usurped the power of other offices, so that the
presidency has become the power unto itself now witnessed astride America. Franklin Roosevelt comes to
mind, as do Woodrow Wilson, Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon. William Clinton seemed a part of the
same class until George W. Bush showed what a piker Clinton really was.
The American presidency today is as close to being a truly imperial office as ever it has been. In terms of
real power and organization, the American presidency far outstrips the regal reach of any king in history.
In terms of effect, the Supreme Court and Congress are nothing by comparison with the executive branch,
which employs literally millions of Americans at home and abroad. The presidency has become a virtual
dictatorship through the accretion of powers by each subsequent occupant of the office.
The nearer any government approaches to a republic, the less business there is for a ruler. America's ruler
is very busy, indeed. It is somewhat difficult to find a proper name for the government of America. Its
constitution calls it a republic; but in its present state it is unworthy of the name because of the corrupt
influence of the presidency. By having all the offices of government at its disposal, the presidency has so
effectively swallowed up the power and eaten out the virtue of the Congress (the republican part of the
constitution) that the government of America is
even more monarchical than that of old England.
Men fall out with names without understanding them, for it is the republican and not the monarchical part
of the constitution of America in which Americans glory; i.e., the liberty of choosing the members of
Congress from out of their own body.
It is easy to see that, when republican virtue fails, slavery ensues. Why is the American constitution sickly?
Because the presidency has poisoned the republic, thereby appending the Congress to itself.
Yet, Congress is not blameless in its current ineffectualness. In their own right, Congressmen have become
separated from the American public. Generally, only the rich and well-connected can run for office. Only
politically-correct receive the blessings of the media, all of which is controlled by the same moneyed
interests that select and fund the presidential candidates.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
11 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
And they run again and again, never returning to private life, so that they need never feel the heel of the
governmental boot brought to bear upon the average citizen's neck. Term limits are universally stricken by
that are the lapdogs of the same moneyed interests as previously described, with the result that
congressmen continue in the same position in perpetuity, with family members often assuming that
position upon the death
of their forebear.
And Congress has proven itself to be those moneyed interests' lapdog, as well, giving over to the imperial
presidency all the powers constitutionally prescribed to itself, all the while submitting itself and its
employees and functions to executive oversight.
Truly, Congress has ceased to be the sole remaining republican element prescribed by the American
Modern Sense (Part IIIa)
(With absolutely no apologies to Thomas Paine)
by Edgar J. Steele
January 2, 2003
O ye that love mankind! Ye that dare oppose, not only the tyranny, but the tyrant, stand forth! Every
spot of the old world is overrun with oppression. Freedom hath been hunted round the globe. Asia and
Africa have long expelled her. Europe regards her like a stranger, and England hath given her warning to
depart. O! Receive the fugitive, and prepare in time an asylum for mankind... ---Thomas Paine, "Common
Sense" (Feb 1776)
Part IIIa. Thoughts on the present state of American affairs.
In the following, I offer only simple facts, plain arguments and common sense. I ask nothing more of the
reader than the setting aside of prejudice and rigidity of thinking, so that reason and feelings alone guide
one's response. Put on the true character of an independent thinker and enlarge your views beyond the
present day.
Volumes have been written concerning the emerging American police state. People of every stripe have
weighed in on the controversy, from different motives and with various designs. As all have been
ineffectual in stemming
the growth of tyranny, the debate may as well be closed. Arms, as a last resort, will not decide the
matter, save in favor of an imperial Federal government that has overwhelming firepower and resources.
Massive group
action on the part of the American citizenry is all that now is left to us.
It has been reported that Bush the Second and John Ashcroft have stated that their measures are only of a
temporary kind. Should the American public adopt this belief generally, our progeny will curse our names
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
12 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
The sun never shined on a cause of greater worth. Ours is not the affair of a city, a state, a region or,
even, a country, but of a continent – of at least one-eighth part of the habitable globe. This is not the
concern of a day, a year, or an age; posterity is bound up in this contest, to be affected, even to the end
of time, by today's proceedings. Now is the seedtime of a New America, of faith and honor.
By referring the matter from argument to action, a new era for politics is begun. All plans and proposals
predating September 11, 2001, are like the almanacs of a bygone era which, though proper then, are
superceded and useless now. Whatever was advanced by the advocates on either side of the question
then, crumbled with the World Trade Center. Before that time, the only difference was the method of
effecting change in American society by working within the system, with one side proposing force and the
other friendship. The first has failed due to lapsed opportunity; the latter has withdrawn influence in
favor of complete capitulation to neo-conservatism.
Much has been said for conciliatory methods of working within the system, which have now passed away
like an agreeable dream and left us as we find ourselves. Now we should examine the counter-argument
and inquire into some of the many injuries that the American public has sustained, and always will
sustain, by being subservient to the Federal government. Our task now is to examine that connection and
dependence, on the principles of nature
and common sense, to see what might become of us, if separated, and what we are to expect, if
Some maintain that, as America flourished under her former connection with her Federal government, the
same connection is necessary for her future happiness, and will always have the same effect. Nothing
could be more wrong. We may as well assert that the first twenty-year period of our life is to be a pattern
for the next twenty. But, even this gives up too much, because I maintain that America would have
flourished as much, and probably much more, without the burgeoning Federal government upon her back.
Commerce, by which America has enriched herself, is the necessaries of life, and will always have a
market while eating is the custom of the rest
of the world.
But the Federal government has protected us, some say. Though this is true, consider that the motive was
interest and not attachment. Our government has not protected us from our enemies on our own account,
from its own enemies on its own account, often those who had no quarrel with us on any other account,
yet who will always be our enemies solely because of the Federal government's account.
If we could shrug off the Federal government tomorrow, we would be at peace with Islam, though it is at
war with our government. The miseries of last century's wars should be enough to warn us against foreign
entanglements of the sort that has become our government's stock in trade. No Islamic country was, nor
perhaps ever would be, our enemy as Americans, but only as we are citizens of the United States of
But the Federal government is America's parent, say some. Then the more shame upon her conduct. Even
brutes do not devour their young, nor savages make war upon their own families; wherefore the assertion,
if true, turns to our government's reproach. But, it happens not to be so, or only partly true, and the
words "homeland" and "patriot" have been disingenuously adopted by the President and his parasites, with
the low design of gaining an unfair bias by virtue of the weakness of our minds. The Constitution, not the
Federal government, is the parent of America.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
13 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
America once was the asylum for the persecuted lovers of civil and religious liberty from every part of
Europe. Here they fled, not from the tender embraces of the mother, but from the cruelty of the
monster. How tragic that the same tyranny, which drove the first emigrants from home, pursues their
descendants still. Much has been said of the strength of America, that it might bid defiance to the world.
But this is mere presumption. The fate of war is uncertain, particularly given the prevalence of weapons
of mass destruction.
What have we to do with setting the world at odds, one part to another? Our plan from the start was
commerce, which, well attended to, would secure us the peace and friendship of all the rest of the world.
It has been in
the interest of other countries to have America be a free port, a trading partner.
I challenge the warmest advocate for support of the Federal government to show a single advantage to
accrue to America by imposing its will on other countries, as it has been wont to do, of late. The injuries
disadvantages that we suffer by pursuit of the Federal government's policies, both foreign and domestic,
are without number.
Our duty to mankind at large, as well as to ourselves, instructs us to renounce the path upon which our
Federal government has set us. That path directly involves America in wars and quarrels throughout the
world, and
sets us at variance with nations who would otherwise seek our friendship and against whom we have
neither anger nor complaint. As the world at large is our market for trade, we ought to form no partial
connection with any part of it. It is in the true interest of America to steer clear of Middle East
entanglements, which she can never do while she
is the make-weight on the scale of Israeli politics.
The next war may not turn out like the last, and is guaranteed only to be followed by another, then
another. It will take but one debilitating loss for the advocates of conciliation with our Federal
government to be wishing
for separation then, because neutrality then will be a safer convoy than a battleship.
Everything that is right or natural pleads for separation from the behemoth that the Federal Government
has become. The blood of the slain, the weeping voice of nature cries, "It is time to part."
Our forefathers fled tyranny by coming to America. We have no sanctuary to which to retreat, so the time
has come or a division of America into diverse parts, as many as necessary to secure internal peace, quell
current strife and insulate from the current spate of wars those of us who disagree with the policies of the
Federal government.
The current authority of the Federal government over America is a form of government, which, sooner or
later, must have an end. A serious mind can draw no true pleasure by looking forward, under the painful
and positive
conviction that what is called the "present state of freedom" is merely temporary.
As parents, we can have no joy knowing that this government is not sufficiently lasting to ensure anything
that we may bequeath to posterity. Since we are running the next generation into debt, we ought to do its
work, else we use them meanly and pitifully. To see our duty with clarity, we should take our children in
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
14 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
hand, and fix our view but a few years further into life; that eminence will present a prospect which only
wishful thinking and self delusion conceals from our sight.
Though I do not wish unnecessarily to give offense, I am inclined to believe that all those who espouse
unswerving support of our government's course abroad may be found among the following descriptions:
men, who are not to be trusted; weak men, who cannot see; prejudiced men, who will not see; and a
certain set of moderate men, who think better of the Federal government than it deserves. This last class,
by ill-judged
deliberation, will be the cause of more calamities to this continent, than all the other three.
The inevitable breaking apart of America can be seen in the intent of Mexicans, both citizen and ethnic,
to retake the southwest portion of this country, including California, Arizona, New Mexico and parts of
Nevada, Utah, Colorado and Texas, a region which they have already renamed "Aztlan." The Federal
government has facilitated this insurrection by throwing open America's borders.
Further potential breakups loom as the result of racial strife, born of the very "civil rights" revolution
which was designed by the Federal government to quell inequity between the races in America. Instead,
that inequity has
been redistributed among the populace and increased, with the result that interracial tensions today far
surpass any, which has ever been known to America.
Regardless, the separation which I advocate today is political in nature, with the Federal government and
as much of America that wishes to follow its lead, going in one direction, while the rest of us peacefully
our steps to the constitutional republic which once was the singular hallmark of America: New America, if
you will. I anticipate that would constitute much of the Midwest, some of New England, some of the South
virtually the entire West that does not fall under Mexico's sway.
Modern Sense (Part IIIb)
(With absolutely no apologies to Thomas Paine)
by Edgar J. Steele
January 8, 2003
Ye that oppose independence now, ye know not what ye do; ye are opening a door to eternal tyranny, by
keeping vacant the seat of government. There are thousands and tens of thousands; who would think it
glorious to expel
from the continent, that barbarous and hellish power, which hath stirred up the Indians and Negroes to
destroy us; the cruelty hath a double guilt, it is dealing brutally by us, and treacherously by them.
---Thomas Paine, "Common Sense" (Feb 1776)
Part IIIb: Thoughts on the present state of American affairs.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
15 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
Many in America are fortunate in being physically removed from the growing tyranny and injustice meted
out by the Federal government. The evil is not yet close enough to their doors to make them feel the
precariousness with
which all of America is now possessed.
Those more passive than others look lightly upon the many recent offenses of the Federal government
and, hoping for the best, are apt to say, "Come, come, we shall be friends again, for all this." But,
consider human nature
and tell me whether you can hereafter, love, honor and serve the power that has brought such manifest
injustice and tyranny to America. If you cannot do this, then you are deceiving yourself and, by your
delay, bringing ruin
upon your posterity.
Your future allegiance to this government will be forced and unnatural and, being formed only on the plan
of present convenience, will in time fall into a state more wretched than now.
If you say that you can overlook the transgressions, I ask:
Has your home been taken from you; because you were unable to pay the
property taxes they demanded?
Has your son been arrested and held in a secret place, without charges, now
subject to torture and summary execution because a Federal Bureaucrat has labeled him an "enemy
Have your children been denied admission to a decent school in the name of
affirmative action?
Have you been denied employment in favor of those whose only qualification
is their skin color?
Have your grandchildren been stolen by the state on trumped-up allegations
of child abuse, the sole basis for which is the fact that they are not
fat...or are home schooled...or are Christians?
Have your wages been taken in the form of taxes and given to illegal
immigrants in the form of medicine, schooling and housing, none of which
you can afford your own family in equal measure?
Have your brothers and sisters been executed in a fiery conflagration such
as Waco because they dared to be different?
Has your son been shot in the back, like Randy Weaver's?
If you have not, then you are not a judge of those who have. But, if you have, and still can shake hands
with the murderers, then you are unworthy of the name of husband, father, friend or lover, and,
whatever may be your
rank or title in life, you have the heart of a coward and the spirit of a sycophant.
I do not conjure up the horror of everyday life experienced by some Americans for the purpose of
provoking revenge, but to awaken us from our slumber. It is not in the power of the Federal government
to enslave us if
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
16 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
we do not enslave ourselves by delay and timidity. The season now upon us is worth an age if rightly
employed; if neglected, every American will suffer the misfortune that today inflicts the few among us.
It is repugnant to reason that America should longer remain subject to the grasping power that its central
government has gathered to itself. Reconciliation to this government is a false dream. As Milton wisely
"never can true reconcilement grow where wounds of deadly hate have pierced so deep."
Every quiet method for peace has been ineffectual. Our pleas have been rejected with disdain by the
courts at every level. Our petitions have only tended to convince us that nothing flatters vanity, or
obstinacy in our government more than repeated petitioning. Nothing has contributed more than such
pointless entreaties to the consolidation of power by Kings in other countries in times past. Since it
appears that
nothing but blows will do, let us come to a final separation and not leave the next generation to be
cutting throats for the sake of violated family members.
It is not in the power of the Federal government to do America justice. It has become too weighty,
intricate and inextricably bound up with the affairs of all men to afford even a modicum of the freedom
upon which
America was founded. There was a time when a central government over us all was proper...and there is a
proper time for it to cease.
There is something absurd in supposing a continent to be perpetually governed by an island the size of the
District of Columbia. In no instance has nature made the satellite larger than its primary planet. As
now reverses the common order of nature, it is obvious the time has come to effect a separation between
America, for those who wish to extend the current state of affairs, and New America, for those who wish
to reenter
the constitutional republic that once was all of America.
I am not moved by motives of pride, party or resentment to espouse the doctrine of separation and
independence. I am clearly and conscientiously persuaded that it is in the best interest of all Americans to
effect this
separation; that anything short of separation is mere patchwork that will afford no lasting peace; that it is
leaving the sword to our children and shrinking back at a time when a little farther, a little more, would
deliver to this continent a lasting peace.
As the Federal government has manifested not the least inclination toward a compromise, we may be
assured that no terms can be obtained worthy of acceptance or justifying the tyranny and injustice to
which we already have
been subjected.
If all of America must take up arms, if every man must be a soldier, it is scarcely worth our while to fight
against a contemptible ministry only. Dearly would we pay for the repeal of Acts and Executive Orders, if
that is,
all for which we fight! It is as great a folly to pay a Civil War price for law, as for land. The inevitability of
this government's demise, whether by hands domestic or foreign, makes the waging of war against our
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
17 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
own government like the wasting of an estate upon a lawsuit to evict a tenant whose lease is just
No man wished more to work within the system than myself, before the fatal eleventh of September 2001.
The moment the events of that day were made known to have occurred, at minimum, by sufferance of our
own government, I rejected the hardened, sullen-tempered Executive Branch of American government
forever. Taken together with the sure knowledge of our government's complicity in the Oklahoma City
Bombing, Waco and Ruby Ridge, along with a host of lesser-known indignities to our national conscience, I
disdain the wretch with the pretended title, Father of His People, that he can unfeelingly hear of their
slaughter and composedly sleep with their
blood upon his soul.
But, even assuming we could make our peace with the Federal government today, what would be the
result? I answer, the ruin of America, still - for several reasons:
First, the powers of governing still being concentrated in the hands of the President; he will have a
negative influence over the whole legislation of America. As each occupant of that office for the past 150
years has shown
himself to be such an inveterate enemy to liberty, and discovered such a thirst for arbitrary power, the
President is not a proper man to say, "You shall make no laws but what I please."
Is there any inhabitant in America so ignorant as not to know that, despite the American Constitution, no
laws can be made but that to which the President gives leave? After all is said and done, can there be any
but the whole power of the Federal government will be exerted to keep the common man as low,
subservient and humble as possible? We are already freer than the President wishes us to be; will he not
hereafter endeavor to
make us less so?
Is the power that is so suspicious of our freedom a proper power to govern us? Whoever says "No!" to this
question is a separatist, for separation means no more than whether we shall make our own laws or
whether the
Presidency, which is among the greatest enemies this continent has, shall tell us, "There shall be no laws
but such as I like."
The citizenry of America is only secondary in the system of American politics. The Federal government
advances the good of the people no farther than serves its own purposes. Our government's interest leads
to suppress the growth of ours in every case, which does not promote its own advantage or in the least
interferes with it.
To show that reconciliation now is a dangerous doctrine, consider the following: it would be advisable for
the President at this time to repeal the Patriot Act, the Homeland Security Act and the many Executive
issued which have further bound the population of America, for the sake of re-ingratiating himself with all
the people of America. That way, he might accomplish, via artifice and subtlety, in the long run, that
which he will
not be able to do by force and violence in the short one. Reconciliation and ruin are nearly one and the
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
18 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
Second, even the best terms which we can hope to obtain amount to no more than a temporary
expedient, which can last no longer than until America is taken by force by its foreign enemies, whose
number have become legion.
Even now, citizens have begun to dispose of their effects, moving to remote portions of the country, with
some emigrating to other countries altogether.
But, the most powerful of arguments is that nothing but true separation of America will keep the peace
and preserve it inviolate from civil war. I dread the event of reconciliation with the Federal government
now, as it is
more than probable that it will be followed by a revolt somewhere or other, the consequences of which
may be far more fatal than all the malice of Washington, DC.
Modern Sense (Part IIIc)
(With absolutely no apologies to Thomas Paine)
by Edgar J. Steele
January 15, 2003
I make the sufferers' case my own, and I protest, that were I driven from house and home, my property
destroyed, and my circumstances ruined, that as a man, sensible of injuries, I could never relish the
doctrine of
reconciliation, or consider myself bound thereby. ---Thomas Paine, "Common Sense" (Feb 1776)
Part IIIc: Thoughts on the present state of American affairs.
Thousands of Americans have been ruined by their government's invasive, intrusive and tyrannical
behavior. Thousands more, perhaps millions, will suffer a similar fate in the times ahead. Their
experience of reality is different from those of us who have suffered nothing. They certainly have nothing
to lose by refusing now to submit.
Many of us refuse to question our government's actions, fearful of a similar outcome. We believe we have
much to lose, but have already forfeited the most important of our rights in refusing to stand for the
fundamental rights of our countrymen.
A government that cannot protect us, that cannot preserve the peace, is no government at all. Many have
declined to foster confrontation, fearful that a civil war will result. There is ten times more to fear from
government at the end of our current path, and a civil war thereby more certain, than from the
consequences of choosing another path altogether. I take the part of those maligned thus far. If I were
similarly situated,
I could never support the government that has so blatantly torn asunder the lives of its own citizenry.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
19 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
If there is any true cause of fear respecting independence from our imperialistic government, it is because
no alternative yet is offered. Men do not see their way out. As an opening, I offer the following, while
affirming that I have no desire of them myself, other than they might be the means of giving rise to
something better.
Let us form a New America, forged from as much of the country as becomes desirous of change. Let there
be a parliamentary form of government, with the current Constitution modified only somewhat to serve as
its charter,
the modifications to ensure the limited scope and reach of the central government.
Convene at first a Constitutional Congress for the purpose of amending and adopting the Constitution,
with its membership chosen by popular vote, each member elected by a particular and equal portion of
the general citizenry.
Upon adoption of the Constitution, this body to dissolve and legislators, governors and other elective
officeholders to be selected by popular vote, as prescribed.
Let the States be more like sovereigns themselves, with no necessity for overriding statute or authority,
save only as is necessary to allow the central government the performance of its limited duties of common
Let the right of secession be absolute and evocable on the vote of 75% of the population of any definable
geographic region. Let the assemblies be annual, concern themselves solely with domestic affairs and
their membership serve without pay or benefit of any sort. Let there be no recurring occupancy by any
member, even of differing
position. These strictures are to apply to State and local elective office, as well.
Let the senate be of two houses: the Senate composed solely of men, two from each state; the House of
Representatives, comprised solely of women, will total the same as the Senate, with its membership
elected by districts made equal on the basis of population.
Let the assemblies select the Executive, whose tenure will be for a single one-year term, unpaid and
without benefit, other than living arrangements, whose function will be administrative and procedural,
with no ability to
negotiate with foreign entities or enter into treaties and no ability to originate or suggest legislation at
any level. All foreign entanglements, which will be constitutionally discouraged, must be individually
into by the States.
A similar representative form of government is to be guaranteed to the states and local municipalities.
States' rights will be supreme, with the right to move between states absolute.
States may hold no more than 5% of the land of a state in local or state name. Central government
landholdings are forbidden.
Government pensions, welfare and individual or corporate subsidy of every type to be abolished and
forbidden at all levels of government.
All practicing lawyers will be disbarred. All existing judges will be discharged. All existing statutes and
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
20 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
case law to be forgone. Lawyers will read for their positions, in the time-honored manner of bygone eras.
Judges will be drawn from the ranks of lawyers, to serve in their area of specialization without pay or
benefit each month, for that percentage of time necessary to satisfy the requirements of justice. Juries
will decide
all questions of fact and law, with sentences and verdicts executed immediately. Lawyers will be
forbidden from holding elective office. The right to a jury for any proceeding will be absolute, with secret
proceedings forbidden.
Victimless crimes will not be prosecuted. There will be no hate laws. Prisons will be segregated racially.
English will be the official language, with all governmental proceedings conducted solely in English.
The existing school system will be abolished, to be replaced by community-based schools, with teachers
compensated directly by student parents.
Civil rights will be absolute, with no preference to be shown by any government, at any level, to any
individual for any reason. Individual and private discrimination shall neither be illegal or discouraged.
Immigration will be an issue for each State to resolve. Illegal immigrants and their progeny are to be
ejected immediately upon adoption of the new Constitution.
The rights to assemble, freely associate or not, travel, be free of governmental intrusion, privacy, bear
arms, free speech and the free practice of religion in any and all venues to be inviolate.
The income, sales and property taxes will be abolished, with governments required to exist upon the
proceeds of tariff and import/export taxes alone. A strictly balanced budget will be required of every
entity, especially the central government, every year. Local use districts may be formed upon approval of
75% of the affected population.
No business monopolies are to be allowed. Unions are forbidden. Death sentences may be meted to
corporations for grievous crimes. Media enterprise, particularly, is to be dispersed, with no concentration
of more than 1% total ownership of a particular medium in any single person, group or entity.
All able-bodied members of society are considered potentially to be part of the militia, with participation
strictly voluntary. A modest uniformed, all-volunteer military force will be maintained for the common
only, and strictly prohibited for non-defensive use within the borders of the States.
The dollar will be repudiated, to be replaced by government-minted gold and silver coins. Any and all
currency will be produced by the central government and strictly backed by 100% value holdings in
precious metals.
Central banking is prohibited. Fractional-reserve banking is prohibited.
A government of our own is our natural right. It is wiser and safer to separate the country now and
peacefully select its governing charter, than to trust such to time and chance. Else, one may hereafter
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
21 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
arise who, laying hold of popular disquietude, may collect together the desperate and discontented and,
by assuming to themselves the powers of government, may sweep away the remaining liberties of the
continent like a deluge. Should
the government of all of America continue on its current path, there will be a temptation for some
adventurer to try his fortune and effect a coup, taking the current structure of government as his own to
use in a manner
most oppressive.
Ye that oppose separation now, ye know not what ye do. You open a door to eternal tyranny by keeping in
the seat of power that faction which has stirred up the groups of this country, one against the other,
whereby it
deals brutally by one and treacherously by the other.
Every day wears out what little remains of kindred between these (would be) Masters and us. Can there
be any reason to hope that, as the relationship expires, the affection will increase or that we will agree
better, when we
have ten times more and greater concerns over which to quarrel than before?
To those that urge harmony and reconciliation: can you restore to us the time that is passed? Can you give
to prostitution its former innocence? Neither can you reconcile America and New America. The last straw
has been
tossed. The government now prepares further to oppress us.
There are injuries which nature cannot forgive; she would cease to be nature if she did. The Almighty has
implanted in us these inextinguishable feelings for good and wise purposes. They are the guardians of His
in our hearts. They distinguish us from the herd of common animals. The robber and murderer would often
escape unpunished, did not the injuries which our tempers sustain provoke us into justice.
O ye that love mankind! Ye that dare oppose, not only the tyranny, but also the tyrant, stand forth! Every
spot of the Old World is overrun with oppression. Freedom hath been hunted round the globe. Asia and
have long expelled her. Europe regards her like a stranger, and America hath given her warning to depart.
O! Receive the fugitive, and prepare in time an asylum for mankind.
--------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Modern Sense (Part IV)
(With absolutely no apologies to Thomas Paine)
by Edgar J. Steele
January 19, 2003
The more men have to lose, the less willing are they to venture. The rich are in general slaves to fear,
and submit to courtly power with the trembling duplicity of a Spaniel. ---Thomas Paine, "Common Sense"
(Feb 1776)
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
22 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
Part IV: Of the present ability of America, with some miscellaneous reflections.
I have never conversed with anyone related to the Movement who has not seen a wholesale revamping of
America's government, if not America's outright breakup, as inevitable. The present course of foreign
welfare, citizen control (oppression), economic opportunism and privilege for the few lead inevitably to
economic catastrophe and revolt.
As so many agree as to the event, but disagree only as to its timing, let us take a general survey of things
and endeavor, if possible, to find out the very time. But we need not go far. The inquiry ceases at once,
fact, for the time has found us. Inevitability has a way of bringing things to a head.
Many bewail the fact that we seem so few in the face of the overwhelming masses of government agents
and employees. It is not in numbers, but in unity, which our great strength lies. Besides, should the
government move
against us in wholesale form, masses of the American population will rise up in number sufficient to repel
the force of the entire world.
America has, at this time; the largest body of armed and disciplined private citizens of any power under
Heaven, should armed force become necessary. Huge portions of the government's forces will refuse to
upon us and, instead, will join with us against the sweeping tyranny then apparent for all to see.
The present government never will allow formation of an organized citizen militia. Witness what has been
done in the face of small forms of organization, as at Waco. Never will we be allowed openly to organize
form an effective resistance force. Even now, the government is taking opposition leaders, our leaders,
into custody and jailing them on sundry manufactured charges. What it fails to realize is that its enemy is
an idea, a spirit, generated by its own tyranny. For every leader taken away and jailed on trumped-up
charges, ten more will take his place.
At present, we have little to defend; therefore little defense is necessary. If we actually possessed a
foothold for our People, the more would we have to defend - and lose.
Neither have we debts, for the massive indebtedness of the current American government, is attributable
to the very forces arrayed against us. When the time comes, the assumption of debt in furtherance of our
cause will be
worthy and worthwhile.
For now, to expend millions for the sake of getting a few vile acts repealed, and routing the present
Administration, only, is unworthy the charge, and is using posterity with the utmost cruelty because it is
leaving them the great work to do, with a debt upon their backs, from which they derive no advantage.
Such a thought is unworthy a man of honor and is the true characteristic of a narrow heart and the
peddling politician.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
23 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
America is burdened with a total debt of upwards of twenty-seven trillion dollars, for which she pays
interest of over a trillion dollars. Another twenty-two trillion dollars' debt burdens private American
companies and
individuals. Somewhat less than another trillion dollars' interest, for a total of about two trillion dollars in
interest alone, paid primarily to bankers, most of them foreign, a sum equal to the entirety of the
government budget today and approximately one-third America's total annual economy.
America's current budget deficit is one-fourth that paid in interest, or about five hundred billion dollars. A
similar figure is the amount by which America's foreign trade deficit grows each year, representing the
outflow of American assets to foreign shores. Another four-hundred billion dollars is spent on America's
military, primarily in support of foreign imperialism and intervention in the affairs of other countries;
funds spent on destroying other economies, all while many of America's citizens do without the necessities
of life.
A cancer both foreign and hostile to America sits astride her, sucking her dry and directing her policies
and government to ends inconsistent with those set forth by her founding fathers. This is our real enemy,
make no
mistake. Most of those employed in the service of the American government are ordinary people, like any
other, people who will rally to our cause when the time comes.
That portion of the American government, which will oppose us past the point of open and notorious
tyranny, is small. We will have a force greater, by far, should that dark and fateful day befall us.
Some say that we can reform government - just pass the right bill, repeal the appropriate act, or elect the
right president. Then, once we have made it up with the federal government, it will protect us. Common
sense will tell
us that the power which has endeavored to subdue us is, of all others, the most improper to defend us.
The average American's knowledge of government tyranny and oppression, both domestic and foreign, is
hourly improving. Resolution is our inherent character and courage has never forsaken us. Wherefore,
what is it that we
want? Why is it that we hesitate now to demand our own portion of American, free from rule by the
federal government? From the federal government we can expect nothing but ruin. While it holds sway
over us
all, this country will not be worth living in. Jealousies always will be arising; insurrections constantly will
be happening.
The economic fortunes of the average citizen, perhaps, have not yet declined sufficient to engender a
passion for change. Trade being the consequence of population, men become too much absorbed thereby
to attend to anything
else. Commerce diminishes the spirit, both of patriotism and military defense.
History sufficiently informs us that the bravest achievements always were accomplished in the birth of a
nation. With the increase of commerce, America has lost its spirit. Notwithstanding her numbers, America
to continued insults with the patience of a coward. The more men have to lose, the less willing are they
to venture. The rich are in general slaves to fear, and submit to courtly power with the trembling
duplicity of a Spaniel.
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
24 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
Youth is the seedtime of good habits, as well in nations as in individuals. Now is the time for New America
to be formed and separated from those who wish to continue the policies and plunder of Old America.
However, the vast variety of interests occasioned by an increase of trade and population has created
When William the Conqueror subdued England, he gave them law at the point of the sword. Until we form
a New America, immune to the tyranny and oppression now afoot in the land, we shall be in danger of
having the seat
of power filled by some true and awful despot, who will treat us in the same manner. Then, where will be
our freedom? Where our property?
Some say that despot already has assumed power, thus more the need for us to move swiftly. Bush the
Second has engineered passage of the Patriot Act and the Homeland Defense Act, blueprints for tyranny
passed by the Congress
without even being read. Should the general Electorate of America know the contents of these Acts and
the manner of their adoption, it would not hesitate a moment to think its elected Representatives
unworthy of their
trust. Immediate necessity makes many things convenient, which if continued would grow into
oppressions. Expedience and right are different things.
To conclude, however strange it may appear to some, or however unwilling they may be to think so,
matters not, but many reasons can be given to show that nothing can settle our affairs so expeditiously as
an open and determined declaration for separation of New America from America.
First, it is the custom of nations, when any two are at odds, for some other powers, not engaged in the
quarrel, to step in as mediators. While we call ourselves a part of America, no power, however well
disposed she may be, can offer her mediation. In our present state, we may quarrel on forever.
Second, it is unreasonable of any foreign power to lend us their support if they suppose it will go to
merely mending our internal relations, thereby strengthening America; those powers would thereby suffer
by the consequences.
Third, while we profess ourselves to be a part of America, we must, in the eye of foreign nations, be
considered as rebels. The precedent is somewhat dangerous to their peace.
Fourth, were a manifesto to be published and dispatched to foreign courts, setting forth the miseries we
have endured and the peaceable methods we have ineffectually used for redress; declaring, at the same
time that not
being able, any longer, to live happily or safely under the cruel disposition of the American federal
government, we had been driven to the necessity of breaking off all connection with her; at the same
assuring all such courts of our peaceable disposition towards them - such a memorial would produce more
good effect to this country than if a boxcar were freighted with petitions to Washington, DC.
Under our present denomination of American citizens, we can neither be received nor heard abroad. The
custom of all courts is against us, and will be so, until by independence, we take rank with other nations.
Just as America allows Mexicans to hold dual citizenship, that of Mexico and America, and Israelis, of both
Israel and America, so should we now designate ourselves citizens of both America and New America. We
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
25 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
concentrate ourselves geographically in those portions of America most likely to be allotted to a New
America in a breakup of the country, just as Mexicans have concentrated themselves in Southwest
America, which they have
taken to calling Aztlan. Already, fully a quarter of the productive white population of California has left in
the past decade, resettling mainly in Northwest America, thereby providing an example to us all.
Until a separation is effected from that portion of America over which the federal government will
continue to hold sway, we will feel like a man who continues putting off some unpleasant business from
day to day, yet knows
it must be done, hates to set about it, wishes it over, and is continually haunted with the thoughts of its
New America - an idea whose time has come. –Ed
"I didn't say it would be easy. I just said it would be the truth." --– Morpheus
Copyright ©2003 Edgar J. Steele
Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate among private individuals and groups, post on all
sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit publications. Contact author for all other rights, which are
On-line link to this article in HTML format:
Subscribe: Send email with "subscribe" in subject line to:
Unsubscribe: Send email with "unsubscribe" in subject line to:
Anti-Spam Policy and Disclaimer: If you have received this email and it was unsolicited, please accept our
apologies. If received directly from us, merely click the Unsubscribe link above and click send. Please
understand that there is nothing we can do to stop this message being forwarded by another, which you
can determine by inspecting the header that is embedded herein. Under legislation passed by the 105th
U.S. Congress, mail cannot be considered spam if it bears a noncommercial message, nor if it includes
contact information and a link for removal from the underlying mailing list.
Make a difference! The Patriot Civil Liberties Union (PCLU) needs your support to continue its work
fighting for the right of Americans to be free of government tyranny at all levels and for restoration of the
US Constitution as America’s guiding charter. Please mail donations to PCLU, PO Box 1255, Sagle, Idaho
83860. Credit cards: for:
Death to the New World Order
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
26 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM
We are on the March
The Empire is on the run
We shall prevail!
"It is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful
truth. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed
to be of the number of those, who have eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not the things, which so
nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing
to know the whole truth; to know the worst and to provide for it."
"I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided; and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way
of judging the future but the past. Let us not, I beseech you, deceive ourselves (any) longer. We have
done everything that could be done to avert the storm, which is now coming on. If we wish to be free -
we must fight! I repeat, we must fight! An appeal to arms and the (our Heavenly Father) is all that is left
"We are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the (Creator) has placed in our power.
Millions of people armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are
invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, we shall not fight our battles
alone. There is a just (Sovereign, King) who presides over the (future) of Nations, who will raise up
friends [our brothers in Ireland and Scotland, maybe even those in England] to fight our battles [with or]
for us. The battle, in not to the strong alone: it is the vigilant, the active, the brave. If we were bias
enough to desire it, it is now to o late to retreat from the contest, there is no retreat but into
submission and slavery. Our chains are forged: Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston. The
War is inevitable and let it come. I repeat Sir, let it come. It is in vein to extenuate the matter."
"The Gentleman may cry, "Peace, Peace"; but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale
that sweeps from the North shall bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms. Our Brethren our
already in the field. Why stand we here idle? What is it Gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so
dear or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty (Yah)! I
know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" -- The Christian
Patriot, Patrick Henry; speech give March 1775 in Virginia Assembly. {An honest Lawyer, one of the best.}
"If I seek to dwell in the secret place of the Most High, I shall find safety in the shadow of the Almighty. I
will say of Yah, He is my refuge and my fortress, my Salvation, in Him I will trust. Surely he will deliver
me from the snare of the fowler, and from the destroying plague. He shall cover me with His Feathers,
and under His wings I shall trust. His truth shall be my shield and buckler. I shall not be afraid because of
the terror by night: or because of the bullets that fly by day; nor for the plague [Smallpox, Anthrax] that
walks in darkness: nor for the destruction that lays waste [Case Hardened Shells and Nukes] at noonday.
A thousand shall fall at my side and ten thousand at my right hand; but it shall not come near me. Only
with my eyes shall I look and see that reward of the wicked. Because You, O Yah, are my refuge. I have
made the Most high my dwelling-place; no evil shall befall me, neither shall any plague [Chemtrails, CS,
Biological Weapons] come near my dwelling. For Yah shall give His Spirit charge over me, to keep me in
all my ways. The hands of Thy Spirit shall bear me up, lest I dash my foot against a stone. I shall tread on
the lion and adder, the young lion and the jackal I shall trample underfoot. Because I have set my love on
Yah, therefore, He will deliver me: Yah will set my on high, because I have known His Name. I shall call
on Him and He will answer me; He will be with me in trouble; Yah will deliver me and honor me. With
long life He will satisfy me and show me His Salvation." The Soldier's Prayer, Psalm 91. You do well, my
son, to learn and heed these words.
Major Paine
Common Sense-Modern Sense 2003
27 of 27 8/28/2009 9:50 PM

September 5, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Our home supercluster redefined: Laniakea (immeasurable heaven)

Superclusters – regions of space that are densely packed with galaxies – are the biggest structures in the Universe. But scientists have struggled to define exactly where one supercluster ends and another begins. Now, a team based in Hawaii has come up with a new technique that maps the Universe according to the flow of galaxies across space. Redrawing the boundaries of the cosmic map, they redefine our home supercluster and name it Laniakea, which means ‘immeasurable heaven’ in Hawaiian and would take 100,000,000 light years to traverse.


Read the research paper:

September 4, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Roger Stone's blockbuster updated 2nd edition on Serial Murderer Lyndon Johnson



Media Contact: Joe Hunter
Happy Birthday, LBJ!
Updated book exposes Johnson as America's most amoral, corrupt president
(New York, NY) - President Lyndon Baines Johnson's birthday is today, August 27th. That's the same birthday as New York Times bestselling author Roger Stone! 
To celebrate their shared anniversary, Stone has a special present for LBJ: the 40-year Washington insider just released the new edition of "The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ." The updated bestseller includes two new chapters and an afterword that supply new information on the man Stone calls "the most amoral, corrupt, greedy, coarse, ruthless, psychopath to ever occupy the White House."
Stone establishes LBJ's motive, means and opportunity to orchestrate Kennedy's murder and uses
both eyewitness testimony and fingerprint evidence to tie convicted murderer and long-time
Johnson hit man Malcolm ‘Mac' Wallace to the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository and
John F. Kennedy's murder on November 22, 1963.
Stone reveals how LBJ ordered the murder of at least 17 men, according to White House Aide Clif
Carter, to cover-up voter-fraud and corruption. "LBJ would order a murder the way you or I would order a ham sandwich," said Stone.
Stone reveals the plans of syndicated columnist Drew Pearson, who had written a story accusing
LBJ of bribery in a $7 billion dollar jet fighter contract doled out to Texas firm General Dynamics.
Bobby Baker associate Don Reynolds, in testimony on the morning of the assassination, detailed
Baker carrying a suitcase containing $100,000 to LBJ in payment for steering the contract to the
Fort Worth company. The story with details of the sweetheart deal were to hit newsstands and 700
newspapers November 24, 1963. Instead, it was spiked after LBJ became President.
Stone outlines how Attorney General Robert Kennedy intended to prosecute LBJ for corruption in
both the Bobby Baker and Billie Sol Estes cases. Johnson knew he was being dropped from the
1964 Democratic ticket and his federal prosecution were both imminent.
Stone establishes that LBJ authorized the false flag attack on the USS ship Liberty by the Israeli air
force in a military operation designed to provide a pretext for war with Egypt. 34 American servicemen were killed on Johnson's orders.
Stone reveals Johnson even found a way to desecrate the USS Sequoia, a presidential yacht that
serviced Presidents from Herbert Hoover to Jimmy Carter, with masturbatory excess: “Lyndon
Johnson would put a film projector on this table and come up here and watch stag movies,” said
boat owner Gary Silversmith, “reportedly in a robe and in his underwear so he was relaxed and
alone, and they would sail to Mount Vernon.” 
Stone names names, identifying at least three illegitimate children fathered by LBJ while President
or Vice President and revealing Johnson's simultaneous sexual affairs with five women in the
White House Secretarial pool.
Stone outlines how LBJ stole $1 B in Gold bullion from the US Government, had the gold flown to
the LBJ ranch and then later to Canada for smelting. Stone also documents Johnson's daughters
unloading the gold on the International market after LBJ's death.
Stone tells the compelling tale of the Vietnam war profiteering of Lyndon and Lady Bird Johnson. He
exposes their stock ownership in defense contractors who benefited from multi-million dollar
contracts that were part of Johnson's escalation of the Vietnam war. Stone even outlines how
contracts for military helicopters with one company, Kaman, were abruptly canceled and re-awarded
to Bell Helicopter where the Johnsons owned stock, just days after LBJ became President.
Stone exposes Johnson and his right hand man Bobby Baker's ownership of a San Juan abortion
clinic and affiliated Capital Hill Travel Agency. Pregnant women seeking an illegal abortion could
purchase a "Weekend Holiday Package" that included their round-trip flight, abortion and hotel
Stone exposes how Johnson learned about and canceled a military plane ordered by Vice President
Hubert Humphrey that was to fly a Boston brain surgeon from Boston to Los Angeles in an attempt
to save the wounded Robert F. Kennedy's life. "Is he dead yet? Is he dead yet?" Johnson barked,
when informed of Kennedy's condition.
The hardcover edition of The Man Who Killed Kennedy - the Case Against LBJ" reached number 15
on the New York Times bestseller list last Fall. Now the new updated paperback edition greatly
expands the case against the most evil and mentally unbalanced man to ever occupy the White
House. And it is out just in time for LBJ's birthday!
Order your Copy Today - Now in Paperback - The new UPDATED edition of The Man Who Killed
Kennedy the Case Against LBJ- with two new blockbuster chapters.
SPECIAL  BOOK SIGNING -- AUSTIN TEXAS -- Sept 16.  Book People, 603 N. Lamar Blvd
Austin, TX - 7 PM.
For more on Roger Stone, please visit and follow him on Twitter(@RogerJStoneJr) and Facebook.

August 27, 2014 in Books | Permalink