Kefir and suero are simply wonderful and kefir with Beyond Tangy Tangerine Citrus Peach Fusion 2.0 added is even better
Recently while being in Colombia, South America I had the pleasure of being introduced to kefir and suero. Both are great for one’s health and tasty too. I had acquired Tibetan kefir grains and now have been making my own. Anybody need some kefir grains? It is so fun to make your own kefir and suero!
In any event for the healthy boost of my day I now make a novel and healthy drink with my morning kefir drink. I mix in Beyond Tangy Tangerine Citrus Peach Fusion 2.0 (BTT 2.0) which is also 100% Organic, GMO, shellfish and allergen free (and a lot more). I also mix in some chocolate protein powder on occasion and a little bit of acai juice.
In that I am an Executive Marketing Director with Youngevity and get 3 canisters of BTT 2.0 a month, I like to vary up the drinks I make with it. Adding it with the kefir has really been producing phenomenal health results. Here are the BTT 2.0 available: 1 Canister, 2 Canisters, 3 Canisters, 6 Canisters (join as an Associate or Preferred Customer on the JOIN & SAVE 30% on my above links and get the wholesale pricing).
See the Dead Doctor’s Don’t Lie banner on the upper left for a wonderful and healthy way of supplementing and helping others as well.
Stan Monteith (1929 - Sept. 29, 2014)
Stanley Monteith (born 1929 - died September 29, 2014) was a radio host, had his own radio show (Radio Liberty), was an author and a retired orthopedic surgeon, popularly known as Doctor Stan.
One of his last interviews (August 21, 2014): http://themindrenewed.com/interviews/2014/529-int060
Transcript of 'The Enemy Within' Norman Dodd interview by Dr. Stan Monteith circa 1980s on Radio Liberty
Scanned Retina's Encyclopedia of Tyranny
The Encyclopedia of Tyranny
By the time you have read all of these articles you will know how the world got so screwed up and how to restore sanity for the future of humanity. Olddog
Eric Holder Jr. resigns after having been under arrest
Share this out:
Protect and defend the Constitution? Eric Holder Jr. resigns while being under arrest, American political prisoner being tortured by US Gov (civil rights aren't just about the color of one's skin)
What is Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL)?
The Covert Origins of ISIS
SURFING THE PHOTON
Primary in creating a SHIFT in realization and accomplishment and to move to the new page in your own life as a personal challenge - is the need for purification. If you don't purify, the nervous system doesn't get handled, doesn't get smoothed out, calmed and fortified with powerful foundation of centeredness and purpose. So purification is the foundation or work that everyone needs to do to have centeredness and focus. That means purification of your body, colon, bloodstream, lungs and eventually of your brain.
When your body gets purified what happens? Your nervous system, which is connected to your thinking processes, mind and the way you feel, and the way you react, and the way you act, changes. You enter into the state that philosophers and writers call 'the superman.' It is characterised by bliss, a brain simmering with creative ideas, a feeling of love for and forgiveness toward - everyone. It's a good thing, too, so, the conditions for purification must be established. Are you anywhere close? Let's look at what's happening with you now...
What's the state of your nervous system, have trouble sleeping? What's the state of your colon, which reflects your eating habits? Toxic? Constipated? Look at your breathing habits, little nervous, shallow breathing probably. What about your exercise habits, can you run a mile? Look at your meditation habits. Can you still your mind when it's giving you yammer? Tell me what you read or watch on television. The anguish of the nightly news? Crime shows? Mysteries? Porn?
How you nutrify your brain and body and perceive life to be has to be looked at and evaluated every moment that you're alive to see if you're making the right choices in those particular things to bring about purification of your physical body which will bring about purification of your emotional body, your mental body and eventually, your spiritual body.
These are connected to your physicalness, the physical thing, what you exist in, this bag of bones. This body has a nervous system, a brain. We cannot function in this world in equanimity without doing some purification. It doesn't matter if you're a millionaire or a homeless bum. If you don't purify, you will not be able to fly. You will not be able to feel powerful. You will not be courageous. You will not be creative.
Remind yourself right now: the most important thing is to be creative, satisfied, happy, fulfilled, serving, giving, having everything you want, creating your dreams, creating your vision, being in the space called I am one with the universe, I am God, I am powerful to be a Jesus, to be a Buddha, to be an enlightened being - feeling that love and bliss.
Those guys were the simplest, most purified people that we've ever encountered. If you read the actual words of Jesus, he was the sharpest, most convoluted thinker, no country hick. He had immersed himself in the Essene texts of Jewish mysticism that were a thousand years old, copied in the Qumran monastery, stashed in jars, thousands of chapters. You know them as the Dead Sea Scrolls, full of the most sophisticated philosophy. He spent years reading and talking it over at the Synagogue with the rabbis and more years digesting and distilling his own unique take on it, bouncing it off life around him.
Then, he went out in the countryside to share the good news with the humble people who didn't read. And they just loved him. He was better than TV, a revelation to them. In those days they used to stone women for adultery, so the Gospel of love and forgiveness had them awestruck. It was bold.
He said that we who followed him could create change in people and in ourselves, intrinsically do the same as he did. He said that we'd do him one better. Therefore, we have to become the most simple, purified people to be able to be like Jesus or Buddha.. that's where the process starts and it goes on and on by being devoted to this godliness, this centeredness, this oneness, this simplicity, this egolessness, this spiritually attuned, open-minded person, every minute that you're alive. You cannot let one second escape that you're not devoted to your God self. That's where you really live, in your soul, your spirit. When you're devoted to that, you're on the right path.
To do that, you have to purify yourself from the things that are keeping you from being there. The things that make your nervous system NOT be able to do that. The entertainment that dyes your mind black, the foods that give you insomnia, the things that keep your mind reactive instead of creative, bummed out instead of blissed out, without problems. I feel that if you think you have a problem and have to deal with it - THAT is the problem. That continual, negative approach can only be eliminated by not dealing with the problem, looking at the problem or seeing any problem.
You have to go the opposite end which is to see where the solution is, where the clarity and spiritual truth is, where the fundamental reality and light of the truth is, that dispels the problem. When you shine the light in the darkness, there's no more darkness. What happened to it? Well, you found out there was no darkness, it was an illusion called darkness. As soon as the light shows up, there's no darkness, there is no problem. And you say 'What happened to the problem? I don't know, it isn't here anymore. I can't see it. I can't find any problem.'
As soon as you say 'I have feelings of not being adequate,' that's the case. When you say 'This person is a thief, this other person is a liar' you get stuck with that person tearing at you. A man says "I only feel great if I have a relationship based on possessiveness where this person wants and needs me." He's got the wrong formula to open the safe, but it'll keep him tinkering with the combination to the safe and spinning dials for most of his adult life.
These misbeliefs are all really illusions. They're problems that you created in your life and they grow long roots and take over like vines that seize hold of your entire life and strangle it. You're no longer the cause, they are.
When you believe in problems they start to grow fat. They soon exist without any solution. The clarity, the satisfaction that you need in order to create, never comes. The vines grow bigger and create nothing but more dissent in your mind. You're utterly on the path to madness. So never study your problems or lacks.
If you feel inadequate, and that sends you looking for ways to show up as adequate, you will constantly be fortifying inadequacy. We laugh at the guy in midlife crisis who buys a red convertible to advertise he's a sexy, attractive, hot guy. Certain women can read that and lo, he's created a life destroyer.
If you have a desire.. you want something.. and you constantly want this something and try to find out how to get what you want, all you're doing is fortifying and magnifying what you want and inviting total nemesis. When it seems to someone that the only solution to the problem is having what you want, you're nuts. When you actually have what you want, like the guy in the red car with the peroxide blonde, guaranteed you won't want it anymore. If you still do want it when you have it, then you're insane.
The process is too difficult to look at in terms of any logic. You have to get completely out of your mind. The creation of what you want is a process in which you act as the creator, to act out the process of being the thing that you 'wish to create.' If you want to be attractive to women and you're fifty, work out, swim, get tan, be interested in the interesting things.
If you want to be rich, be consciously rich. Be absolutely certain and secure in your richness. Feel it, live it, act it, know it in every fiber of your being. Without having any evidence for it. Be the solution not the problem.
This is the teachings and training of Science of Mind, how they heal. Don't be ill, be healed. It's the metaphysics of transformation, of higher consciousness, of God-training. How do you get someone to be Christ, to be as God, to BE God, in the moment, to see things already done - believing it is already done?
You have to first have the thought, the idea, the belief and the process. Start with the thought, idea, understanding and then transfer it into the belief, the acting out, the acting 'as if.' Follow through with every fiber of your being, with every action, with every feeling, with every re-action to be a creativeness. That's it. You can't teach this. You only have to see it, and see it, and practice it, and read it, and hear it, and then become it.
Everyone you or I know are living the opposite. They think in terms of I can or I can't, or I'm poor or I'm rich, bouncing back and forth like a ball off the wall. People think in a reactive way, they react to the way others maybe think they are. or the way they have been or the way things are that week or the way things look.
You are doomed to be the ball eternally slammed by the wall thinking those things. You are the creation of your beliefs, thoughts and reactions. What is the difference between being slammed around by your mind and God consciousness, and wanting to create in a moment the power to change things and create them the way you want them? The difference is, the wise man is busy being creative every moment and not ever being up in his head, thinking, counting, score-keeping and reactive. To be or not to be, that is the question.
So let's not let the ball play us. Let's put the ball in play. When you're on the court playing this tennis game and you're McEnroe, there's no ego there, there's only the ball and the racquet and the perfect hit and that's called the zen of tennis. Of course McEnroe wasn't perfect. When the umpire says the ball was out and McEnroe goes crazy and says it was in, he took himself totally out of the zen of the game. What happened to him? He got enough money, ego and bullshit in his life to become involved, addicted to winning and not be the zen master of tennis anymore. Now the experience of all that is a great lesson in humility, maturity and non-attachment.
Therefore, our job is to stay as the zen master, student, disciple, teacher, 'God neophyte', always playing every side at every moment. Our job is being receptive, open, surrendered and totally confident in every moment. It's the ultimate position. You're playing all the positions at every moment because there is no you. You're every side, every mind.
The part of anybody's life that is an expression of the beauty and the power and creativity, eloquence, the mastery, the talent, the real creative part of you, whether it's creating a house, sculpture, painting, novel, song, music - that part of us that is able to create that, to make a dinner or make love, clean a house, drive a car, swim in the ocean.. that part that allows us to do and master and learn those things and be able to create, is the part that is truly soulful, truly a student, truly open, accepting, willing, disciplined, aware and conscious.
The part that lives and functions as a truly magnificent, high-minded teacher or student or lover or one who is loved, one who can give and receive, that part of us which is the true creator is not ego, is not selfish, reactive, bound up in survival. That part of us is truly the one who is free and working on mastery whether you're Streisand, Monroe or Einstein. That part of those people, doing the thing they love to do, was in ecstasy and was totally free of the constraints of ego and survival and hurt and pain.
The part that lives in pain and hurt is the part involved in the conversation of the ego, 'I want more from life or from my lover, It's not good enough, I'd like to be greater, Is this all there is? Is this enough money? Do people like me? What about my next business deal, novel, movie, song or sculpture?' That part of us that speaks that way is the defensive survivalist, egotistical, needy, wanting one more big score.
As long as we stay in our desires, as Buddha said, we suffer. When we stay non-attached, then we're on the path, the open road, the path of non-attachment, the middle way.
Ego and spirit can't live in the same house. Just like problems and solutions can't live in the same house. If a person is afraid, they go in the ocean but they're afraid, they can't really enjoy the waves. So what do they have? Fear? They want to get out. If you're in a relationship and you're afraid, or jealous, it can't last. The only way you can be in the ocean, in a relationship or in a job is to be free of the self that talks to itself about 'What if?' What if she left me? What if he cheated?' Keep pushing fear away.
The state of being Godly is the state of being free, selfless. People take drugs to get there, but the problem with drugs is the downside, they exhaust and age, they mask the ego for a few hours but they don't decimate it, and next day when you're tired, the ego is worse than ever.
What's the problem with ego? It'll kill anything good in your life. You have a relationship, you fall in love. You think that being in the mating game, you will now have someone you're close to. You can depend on each other and you always will be OK.
BUT as soon as that person isn't the way you want them to be, you feel hurt, in pain. You feel lost, you feel fear. You feel like "I don't know what to do now. I don't like them anymore. I want to pull away from them." That's ego.
Or "this person is pulling away from me, now I want them, need them. I'm in love with them and they're not in love with me." All those things occur in a mind that talks to itself, being identified with desires. That's ego.
Only in the desireless state, where you don't care what occurs in the external world.. you only care about your internal state - that it's calm, peaceful, secure, happy and one with your spirit and has no fears and has no desires. It only creates. It doesn't react. Only in that state can you live in Paradise every second.
Practice gets you there. How do you play the piano? Practice. How do you make sculpture? Practice. That nagging, desiring voice of the Ego is always there, so you have to constantly silence it. You can't just clean for five minutes and when your ego tells you that you're tired, quit and hope the house is clean. You have to push beyond your usual limits of boredom. Gurdgieff taught that. He asked huge time and effort commitments from his students, and they got to that bliss place as they'd killed their own egos and all of them wrote books about the miracles of consciousness the old guy was able to squeeze from them.
You use anything, yoga, swimming, housecleaning as a push past your own ego exercise, like ancient monks in hairshirts or fakirs sitting on nailboards. You can even use more painful things, like your own insecurity and jealousy. Let the sweetheart go on that weekend without you. Let it burn. Monday morning you just say hello and give them a kiss. No questions, just silence and bliss. Assume the pose.
You use everything that's at hand to constantly practice burning up the ego until it actually dies and that practice period is ended. You have to constantly be aware of quieting the voice that is talking with you. It's about consistency.
To see then, all the phobias and mischief and foibles that we create in our life, how we are, how we listen to our crazy inner yammer, just look in the mirror and see our unhappiness, our broken hearts because our yammer drove off loving friends. We must look at our poor posture, our sagging spines, the blubber drooping down like a mudslide. We must look at our poor health, how our cruddy bodies cannot even taste or smell food anymore. So toxic are they. We must observe our poor habits, the indulgences we have whether it's drugs, sugar, tea, coffee, carbs, sugar, alcohol or envy and jealousy, or mouthing off negatively - rage. That's a big one. For some rage is wound. Whatever it is, when we see those addictions, we put that on our list. Finished with that, we write it down, we sign our name, it's a vow, we break those habits.
When you see that you're anxious all the time, you stop. When you see that you're speeding all the time, stop. And you see what's creating it. Is it coffee giving you mind yammer? Sugar giving you highs then lows? Bad food making you sludgey? Too much toxicity in your system? Too much fear? What is the habit?
Knowing your habits are wrong is hopeless. Understanding and knowing are sort of a booby prize. The real prize is wisdom which is the application of knowing and understanding. When you apply what you know and understand you practice which makes perfect. If you know sugar is bad for you, or cigarettes, being way overweight is bad for you, not exercising is bad for you, being angry all the time, speedy and anxious is bad for you, you work on changing that.
If you don't work on it, you're the mischievous one in your own life. Remember, 'Who is the problem in your life?' YOU are. 'Who is the barrier?' I am.
You have to see the program you've put into your mind. If you're using cigarettes and you know you have to give them up because they're screwing up your body, your lungs, your ability to taste food, enjoy simple food, or even exercise or make love, they're screwing up more than just the way you smell and if you keep on smoking - life continues to be miserable and you'll die.
Some people, dumb people, refuse to wake up from the sleep. They should recognize they're asleep, say to themselves 'I will wake up'. That's a great start by the way. Then, they have to work at it, read, study, get a teacher, a buddy system, 'Did you smoke today?' You know a truthteller of a pal. They have to practice, they have to remember that they are aware you have always been awake, you know, the good stuff.
They have to breath walk until their lungs come back. Breath walk as a baby, don't look at what is keeping you from walking, just keep practicing walking until your lungs and your legs get strong. You can feel the muscles get stronger. You can quit smoking and your lungs will heal and you'll feel better.
The speed junkie can quit coffee and white sugar and pop a raw green juice which will really get him high and he won't have anxieties and be speeding around dithering like an idiot with his eyes bulging and his heart going 120. And he starts digging personifying calm wisdom, not agitated yammer, nervous in the service.
You and others will see you as a powerful, healthy person when you're doing meditation, reading the great books, listening to the really thoughtful, deep FM radio talk shows (great nutrition for the mind), going to classes, swimming, doing yoga. You will impress.
There are a million ways to improve but you can't deal with improvement if you're dealing with your faults. You have to throw all memory of your faults away, burn them in the fire of willingness to let go. Surrender. You burn all your attachments, negativity in total surrender. Let it go. Drop it. Let it be in the background. Just that conversation that's constantly in your mind, put it on the back burner. Let it be. It's always there. Just like the crickets are always there, the sky and air are always there. We don't have to pay attention to that conversation in our heads. Just let it be - like you let the air be.
You can strengthen your lungs by breathing, and you can strengthen your psyche by taking in the right thoughts, affirmations, prayer, awareness of God, awareness of self, higher consciousness and putting those thoughts into your brain computer and don't worry - when they're digested, you will start to exude a sweet perfume but also you'll start to mend your own fences.
You know how when you're worried, you go to a film, you focus on something else so much like a meditation that everything else is on the back burner. It's a form of letting go of the question and then you come out of the movie and the answer comes.
You want to get past that point, where you don't have a question about the right thing to do. You do the right thing because you're conscious of what the right thing is, rather than having to make a decision. Decisions have to be eliminated eventually, replaced by choices. The choice for the truth is simple.
What is reality? What is the truth about reality? What's the real skivvy on the whole deal? It's that I'm here, you're there, they are over there, three distinct human beings, five billion distinct human beings, entities throughout the universe, there's the chair, wall and lamp, the floor, sky, ocean, the planet... all distinct and material entities, objects that we call the external world.
You can touch and rub your hand and you can say that's the external world. I can feel the skin, bone, fingernail. That's outside. Where I'm sensing, experiencing and feeling it and where I live is INSIDE. But the inside is not inside and the outside is not outside, they're just relative terms. I'm experiencing inside what is outside. What is that reality? There isn't any inside, outside. The inside is you, the experiencer, the energy. The outside is what you're touching and looking at and feeling and seeing. And it's all the same thing.
In other words, everything has an internal and external reality but it's all this God source, this creative energy that is expressing itself in different forms which we as human beings have had the power and insight to see. With our imagination and in our minds and thoughts we can actually create and mold things to be a tiled bathroom, a house, a saxophone, a swimming pool. We have the ability to write a book, to speak words that touch others so much that the words trigger a new them. Five hundred years ago, the human mind considered children were small adults. As soon as the child was weaned, it was on its own, an adult to be left to wander, starve or be misused. Was it any wonder that so many people of that day were sociopath killers and warriors? Considering the childhoods they had? Even so close as a hundred years ago, children had to work in factories 10 hours a day, until Queen Victoria's time. One writer named Dickens changed all that. His novels were about compassion for the child. The thinking about child labor, in the western world at least, changed and laws changed. Fifty years ago, a black man could be mistreated in the cruelest ways, sanctioned by popular consensus. What happened? Evolution happened. Now half of films and TV is full of happy blacks enjoying equality, and that reality has happened.
We can create evolution through sharing our thoughts whether as TV scripts, novels, laws, music or language. We function with each other and think and reflect about life and create our insights about reality and share them, and almost effortlessly life moves a click up and evolves and improves.
All of that should affirm for you the mysterious power of basic energy, the same energy being expressed everywhere, constantly, instantaneously in the now. In this moment. That's all there is. The wave upon which matter is moved. The unseen photon. The moment that just occurred and the moment that is now and the moment that is coming... that is now... is all there is. And that continuous continuum of now, that constant reality is what, who, where, when we are. Play and make things, know yourself as all there is, and above all, forward the action.
Realize that you are playing tennis with God. If you're lame, do you think He wants to stay on the court where you are stumbling about with your racket? It would be tedious for him. But if you practice and avoid petty thinking and take yourself into what works, exercise, healthfoods, charity to your brothers, watchfulness in speech and word, compassion for the amazing sensitivity of children, the spirit of service which is you forwarding the action, then God is going to want to play with you. Those God photons are going to be available on your energy continuum.
Have faith in the invisible Photon. Recognize the God principle that is your life - that is everyone's life, that is the life of the universe, and recognize that it exists everywhere simultaneously, so all truth and energy is you and is surrounding you and is intimately expressed everywhere. You wake up and 99 other monkeys will too. Have faith in that invisible law. Time and space are nothing but a projection of our inside insight and perception... just a projection of that... doesn't mean they exist as they exist, they exist as structures but the reality that sees all the structures is not a structure. It doesn't have a form. It's formless. There is something beyond that is unseen but which contains you, is you, generates you and in turn, you generate IT. This is the key to the puzzle, when you know that you who perceives and knows all the changes are changeless, that the part that knows and perceives all the forms is formless, the changeless, formless Being, the eternal, internal being that has no structure and no form. Therefore, when you know this, you know that you're one with the Creator and you're one with all other Creators because in the formless state everything is joined. Everything is. Everything is infinite throughout the universe and it's not in a state of measurement, nor in perceivability, nor in form. It just is. And that is why we can never talk about, or put into words or express that which is inexpressible but we can point to it with our words (philosophies, religions, spirituality, enlightenment) and with our actions. I'm reminded by the scene in Indiana Jones where he knows the diving board is there, though it's invisible and he walks out over the edge of the cliff on the invisible diving board. Well the feats of magic that you can do when you know you're supported by the invisible Matrix, are immense.
You have to be able to see what's not real to see what IS real. If we keep seeing the world of negativity and fear and want and greed and all this competition as real, we will never get to the real. There was an educator who won the greatest educator award and all he was saying in essence was we have to go back to the turn of the century when people went to school twelve to fourteen weeks a year and knew more and learned more and read more. There was no illiteracy because everybody taught everyone. A schoolroom was five different grades in one room with one teacher teaching eighty children who all became teachers of each other and there was no competitiveness. Now, children are kept children, little babies with balloons and birthday parties and craving the new in toys until they're twelve years old. Then, they're thrown into the zoo of having to compete and see who's going to get the best score and we have the Bell Curve and it's all insanity and the government thinks everybody needs to go to college until they're twenty-nine and then they'll be OK. The only OK is when people educate themselves to be truly their own, committed, responsible person and try to be the master of themselves. Mastery is the only game. And until that occurs, everyone has the karma of being buffeted about thinking that they have to score, to make it, to do something and be somebody, all the words involved with keeping score.
Everyone who is well-read, did it on their own. When you become a musician, it doesn't matter how many music schools you go to, it's how much you practice. My mother and your mother and all immigrants that came to this country from the old country, didn't have educations. My mother never finished grade school. She could read beautifully, read books all her life, spoke three languages. She ran a grocery store for her parents at age eleven as they couldn't speak English. My father came to Pittsburg when he was l7, had never gone to school. He put himself through college, got a master's degree and became a college professor. How did they do that? Initiative. But what makes initiative?
It's about being interested, not trying to be interesting, about being interested in the books put in front of you, the history, the English books, interested in having your life be a wondrous thing that you love and loving to do the things that excite you the most. It's about being very excited, interested and inspired and passionate about working on something, anything and everything that life is about.
Be interested, you become a person of value, a person that enjoys your life because you can do things, play, make things work. You can know about understanding others. You can travel, enjoy yourself, be in the world but not of it. You can be a child of God playing in the ocean of love and light.
See, what happens from the idea that you are God in the universe is that your word is law in the universe, that you are one with God, that there is no difference between your consciousness and the mind of God. You're not just a mind, ego or powerless victim. The truth of the thought that you're not an ego, but that you are God comes about when you give up all thought about having to want anything rather than just getting busy creating it.
Just create and enjoy your creation. That rumor that Life unfolds in a linear way is the illusion. The truth is that we live in the now always so the only time we can ever be happy is now. The only time we can feel abundant and healthy is now, no matter what it is, no matter what's happening to you. You put yourself in the now. You say "I'm having this pain but I know that it will pass because I can create whatever I want." And your consciousness extends out into the universe to see what it takes to be healthy, what it takes to be happy, it is all now, it is all right, being conscious, aware and sensitive every minute to do the right thing.
The right thing comes out of your ability to know that you are God. You are not an ego. You are spirit connected to everything in the universe and your vibes which you send out which are your actions and thoughts, your sponsoring thoughts, the real thought behind your thoughts. That vibe that you're sending out, that vibration, that wave goes throughout the universe. That's why thoughts are things that never stop creating a reality. So, the sponsoring thought of your life is the thought that is behind your thinking, behind your desires and fears. Those sponsoring thoughts are the ones you have to be totally conscious of to change. If you want things to be different, if you want your life to be a certain way and it isn't that way, then you look to yourself and see what way have you been thinking, acting. How have you been spending your time? Because it's a cause and effect role. You're the cause and the effects. You say, you think, you feel powerful, wonderful, creative, intelligent, or practice, train yourself, master yourself to be a great, powerful, masterful being. Then you will be sponsoring those thoughts which create mastery.
If you create and sponsor thoughts which create weakness, victimhood, ignorance, poverty, alcoholism, then you'll be producing those results. Nobody is out there dictating that you should be intelligent or stupid. In fact, you can come from the lowest level of stupidity to the highest level of intelligence by training. By putting your attention and awareness on the reality you sponsor.
The caution and the reality of this physical world is to realize that we have all potential, good or bad. It doesn't matter what you do. What matters is that you understand who you are - that you are God in the universe, that you have the same substance to create as God does. Be the creator.
That's the important thing, not to realize why you've failed or succeeded, but to see how you succeed and how you fail is by the way you sponsor your own feelings, language, attitude and your way of being in the world.
Underneath it all, we're all one, we're all God, all perfect. It's when we react and talk, have misbeliefs that we become imperfect, fearful, insecure, paranoid, without time for creating. When we have faith, silence and organize our time we become commanding, creative, talented. It's a choice. Study, read, go to college, learn the most important things, bring your awareness, attention to the highest level or don't. But be interested.
If you're Albert Einstein and you don't see how you're Einstein, then you're obviously not at the library looking at stimulating books on math, numbers and science, are you? If you're not looking, you're not at the highest level. The highest level is to be the interested researcher, reader, observer, experiencer, to see who you are in the matter, that you're cause, that you create your life.
Nobody is doing anything to you. You are able to control all circumstances by being the sponsor of your circumstances. No matter what comes up, you handle it. If someone hates you, causes you pain, you don't have to suffer the hurt. You can say 'this is temporary, this will pass. It's only a mistake.' Forgive them, 'they know not what they do.' Or the better thing to say is, 'If they're like that, who needs them? It's a good thing they're leaving.' And you bless it. And you're at one with how it is.
Of course, your ego can whisper to you and you can be reactive and lash out and go load a few guns and create a war with them and create more pain - centuries of Israel and Arabs killing each other - or you can stop immediately by saying we're all the same, let's love each other and live in harmony.
Order, balance, growth is what leads you to harmony. If you don't have order, you can't be balanced. Order your life, the way you spend your time, order your priorities, the way you think about what is satisfying to your inner soul.
When those are ordered, your life will create a balance of health, well-being, harmony in your relationships. When this growing self which is constantly changing to be better, closer to being God-like, happy, talented, creative and powerful creates the harmony that you wish to have in your life that gives you the God-perception that is necessary which comes because you're able to see that everything and everybody is like you, is you.
The whole universe is you. There's no difference. You're not different, better, or smarter than anybody else. Potentially, you're the same. And that's what God perception is. That everyone is God, created by him and you see God in every thing. And you perceive yourself as God perceiving God in everything. And then, what else can there be but love because you see the whole universe as one unified thing and then you can only have compassion for everything in the universe because you know to love without prejudice - without prejudice is true compassion.
Behind it all you've always been there, always OK; you were always God. You always were this higher consciousness but one day you realized it. You realize that there never was time, it was always now and all you had to do was reach this point of perception where you saw the truth. And that's the truth, you've always been there. It's all right now.
When you're asleep, you can't see this truth about who you really are so then you act out of selfishness, self-preservation, survival rather than selflessness. The definition of selfishness as juxtaposed against selflessness, is simply when you think of yourself first and others afterwards, you're selfish; when you think of others first and yourself after, you're selfless - and when you're selfless you're high as a kite. That's a very simple equation.
A Christ, a Buddha, always thought about others first. They were Christ conscious. They knew they were going to bring the light to the world. They ate light, spoke light. They never had to worry about what others were thinking, or if that belly ache was too much pork the night before. They could focus on the ideas, and how to phrase it for the level of the listener. They were out there, being effective communicators, not in here, scorekeeping.
The first meditation, action to reach a higher state of consciousness is to stop your thinking and stop your thoughts. Whatever they are, don't pay attention to them. They aren't going to get you there. The only thing that is going to get you there is to live and to be, to communicate, to serve, to forward the action. Live this consciousness. Be this consciousness. Not to think, worry, desire, fantacize about a future that isn't here yet, and how you're 'going somewhere' and always planning what you're going to have or get. That's a waste of time.
Just live in a state of God consciousness and command life to be as wonderful and powerful and abundant and beautiful as you can possibly ambition. Just command it to be that way for you. Affirm it for others. Use the verb form 'this will happen' a lot. It's very affirming.
Know that all evil things pass. When you're sick, if you're not attached to eating, you won't be sick very long. you'll get well. When you're hurt by someone, and you're not attached to what that person thinks of you, or what they did to you, you won't be hurt for very long. It will go away. This too shall pass. So it is attachments which keep us locked in to misery and suffering. It's non-attachment which keeps us happy and harmonious, where we're not allowing anything to attack our invulnerability.
God is invulnerable. He can't be hurt by anything because he's not attached to anything. He's not attached to pleasure or pain. He's not attached to tasty food and pleasureable sex and He's not attached to how dull brown rice tastes. He's not attached to the thread count of sheets or the marble floors keeping their luster. He's not attached to Bentleys and what is the plural of Lexus, Lexi? He's not attached to wealth. Whatever comes around, he ignores it and goes on with being non-attached. And because He's relaxed, guess what, He gets wealthy. Stress impoverishes us. The relaxed mind naturally evolves.
Ponder what action of non-attachment you need to take, what course of non-attachment do you need to follow to be non-attached? What way does your mind have to think, what way does your action and reaction have to be? What way do you have to control your desires and enter a little monastery up in your head to be non-attached? When you make your monk's list, you will find yourself to be in harmony.
When you're asking questions, when you're talking intellectually, when you want to know things and find things, you're already coming from a place in which the mind is talking to itself. It's saying "I want to know the difference between consciousness and being, between awareness and consciousness. I want to know the difference between reality and unreality, the ego and the real self, the difference between mind and God."
Those questions are ultimate questions, but they're coming from some idea you have about the way it is. What you want to do is give up all ideas and all thoughts and all reactions and all wanting anything, rather observe them.
What I mean by giving them up is that you don't actually express them as questions or as statements or as the way you see it or react to it. Observe, be able to see that your mind is talking to itself and constantly creating thoughts, ideas, feelings and reactions. As in Blavatsky's quote, 'the mind is the slayer of the real, slay the slayer'. Whatever your mind is doing, that is not it. So what is it? When you slay the slayer called the mind, then you see reality.
You see reality by seeing that your soulular self, your essence, the silence in you, the watcher, the experiencer, the observer, the one that notes and perceives all the changes, who is changeless.That soul, that real self, that one which is united in silence with the eternal now and the eternal presence of God consciousness, awareness, being, whatever you want to call it. Only words to describe the undescribable, pointing at your real consciousness. God, self, soul, no-thing. It is you, you the one, that notes and perceives, the one who listens and walks and talks and speaks, that one. That's the one you have to come to each moment of your existence as a blank canvas, not to try to be intelligent about it, not to talk about and not to know anything about it.
This is all a metaphor for the reality that we wish to accomplish in everything in life which means I have to stop my thoughts. This private conversation is tyrannizing me, dominating and running my life and making me think I know something, think that I am something, think that there's some value in my thoughts, reactions, whereas the truth exists in becoming silent, conscious and aware and totally in the moment, seeing my vision, my goal, my promise. What am I accomplishing, moving the action forward today to push myself in a way that I don't usually do. How am I going to change those things that I wish to change. How am I going to accomplish those things that I wish to accomplish? How am I going to become greater than I am today and yesterday? By giving up my mind. Only by giving up my thoughts, any idea I have about it, and in that space there's power. In that space of silence and awareness, there is the motivation and awareness to push me in a powerful way to react and act consciously to accomplish the very things that I envision.
The only problem that arises in all of this is our old way of being, reacting, our old posture, our old habits of being, our way of speaking, our old mind which talks and reacts. Stop paying attention to the old ways, old thoughts. Only pay attention to expanding your way of becoming more honest than you were yesterday, more real than you were yesterday. The expansion of your consciousness, that you can push yourself to accomplish right now, this now, this now, constantly paying attention to more creativity, organization, perfection, mastery, giving up your old self to have a new self. You can't pour new wine into old bottles. They have to be cleansed of the old, then you put the new wine in. There's only this now, when you're sleeping, dreaming, creating, washing the car, painting the house. The now in which you engage God, in which you involve yourself with God, in which you propose to yourself that you will love, praise, worship and adore and thank God - your true self - which is united with the true self of the whole cosmic universe. It doesn't matter what it is, but to know to be it. To be it is to know it and you can't know it with your mind. Killing the mind is total silence, awareness.
The books we read, the words we hear are inspirational. The truth that's been perennially told to us by every philosopher, poet, saint and wiseman has always been the insight into God's truth. Our job is to be one of those poets, one of those saints, one of those Christs ourself so we must consciously be an open channel to receive the word of God, the wisdom of the universe, the knowledge. And you can only do that by having a blank canvas mind on which this beautiful truth is painted every moment, every now that you exist.
Let your mind expand every minute to ask 'how, where, what' you should be doing, knowing, practicing, promising, envisioning, mastering and becoming. Whatever you're doing, no matter how low it is or how high, in terms of your evaluation, has nothing to do with reality. You can be scrubbing a floor or a toilet bowl or playing a musical instrument on a stage before a hundred thousand people, they are the same consciousness. The same consciousness is to be created doing any of those tasks. To be in conscious awareness unified and linked with the God source, your real, soulular source.. it doesn't matter what you do or where you are.
You will be led to do what your real heart, soul wants to create by being in the moment, loving and enjoying it, whether you're having a massage, mastering your instrument or writing the greatest book in the world. It's all the same. This moment is the same moment that has existed forever, it is perfect in itself. We're not going anywhere and there's no place to go. All you need to do is be in this moment now and enjoy. Praise and thank God for the love and wisdom that is pouring to you from every atom and cosmic ray of the universe. It is all vibration, unseen photons that shape matter.
There's no judgement about anything you're doing or anybody else is doing. The only thing that you ever need is to be conscious and aware, now, in this moment and have no reaction and no ego about it and constantly be in thankful gratitude, love and praise for the opportunity to be in ecstasy this moment.
The truth is always that the mind is the slayer of reality, slay the slayer. You are the changeless, soul, this silent watcher and everything that comes to your mind as a reaction, need, desire, feeling, idea has only the value of a movie. You watch it and you see if it's important to your goal and your vision that you gave yourself to accomplish.
The truth is, in essence that you can never find the truth in the false and you can never find the false in the truth. By pointing out somebody's faults, you can never get them to see the truth. And by pointing out the truth to someone who lives in the false or in their faults, they will never see that truth. The only way is to live and be the truth yourself and then to no man can you be false.
You have it today. You'll have it forever.
White House Fence-jumper
Tongue in cheek but serious as the same time: White House fence-jumper, note in hand, barges through the White House doors while exclaiming, "Have you seen this!": Ex-US Officials Demanded 30 Billion Dollar Bribe (and work closely with other ex-government and current US Congress members,.), -> http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/09/gov-sundquist-sen-sheldon-songstad-tn-involved-in-extortion-death-threat-involving-5-10-billion-doll.html <-
(Note: Please click on the above story and gathered research info. and links to get to the main meat of this, it's rather important, especially if you live here in the USA [although this does affect the rest of the world too.])
ALERT: THE GOOD GUYS ATTACKS BEGIN
These are just some of the reasons that GodAddy illegally shut down my website on back September 9, 2014, and 17 other websites by September 10. We should be back online by Monday or before.
These websites are still up and info will be posted there if my website does not come back online. http://lonewolfterritory.com http:the-1-way.info
Also remember if dot COM sites do not work try dot INFO with the same domain name. Also http://ka-ni.info is still functioning. Though, update info may be found on http://tekgnosis.typepad.com as well.
The SirDavidAndrew webpage will be temporarily posted at Lexrexx.com if the website master is able to get it to function. The front page will hopefully soon be there, however, most of the links may not work.
Obviously someone did not want me reporting on the murder of Edgar Steele by the gestapo. http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/09/us-government-murders-edgar-steele-will-the-perpetrators-get-away-with-it.html
Nor did they want me expose the attempted blackmail and plot to murder Ambassador Lee Wanta by former Governor Sundquist of Tennessee and former Senator Sheldon Songstad of South Dakota.
Folks, keep your eye on the vote in Scotland. Freedom smells so sweet. "Free, free at last!" However, there is trouble already afoot, since the International banksters are trying to force the new Scottish government before it even exists to enter into contract with them. I certainly hope that the people have sense enough to tell these bankster gangsters to take a hike. Too, I would hope that Scotland will join BRICS, which would totally destroy the Zionist banksters' death grip on this old world.
Then too, the Scots may decide to reinstate their monarchy. Oops! Queen Elizabeth abdicated the Scottish Throne in October 1996 and she returned King David's Throne Chair to Edinburgh Castle in May of 1997. The Throne of David is vacant, and the new age knocks at the door, 2016 looks to be very import year in history. I wonder who the prospective candidates may be. Hum!
Keep your powder dry and your sword handy, things are about to boil.
|Subject:||ALERT: THE GOOD GUYS ATTACKS BEGIN|
|Date:||Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:51:28 -0400|
Greg Szymanski's 2006 Interviews with Lee Wanta the 27.5 Trillion Dollar Man (Full transcript)
Some of the latest confirmations:
Gov. Sundquist (TN), Sen. Songstad (SD) involved in extortion, conspiracy to murder (involving 5-10 billion dollars) in reference to Leo Wanta the 27.5 trillion dollar man
GREG: Investigative Journal is travelling to Switzerland today and my guest [is] Leo Wanta. Tell us how this all started for you.
LEO: Okay in 1980... But going way back prior to that, I was being mentored by the Chairman of the Senate Foriegn Relations Commitee, Senator Alexander Wiley. I was trained in financials and government, intelligence and so on and so forth.
So in 1980, when President Regan won the election he retained the services of William French Smith a[n] attorney in California who was going to be his Attorney General. So then we all got together with Casey and Colby, William French Smith and President-elect Reagan.
GREG: And you're sitting in talking with these guys correct?
LEO: Yeah, I was already known within a very tight group through Senator Wiley of my background and my management training and my engineering training.
Uncle Sam, arranged for me to get a 5 year apprenticeship in tool and die. When I'm in foriegn countries, I can kind of glance at it and know what they're doing. I didn't have to have blueprints. I can design my own blueprints, because I had an engineering degree as well.
So I was introduced to the future Attorney General Wiliam French Smith, and Bill Casey, which I'd already known through Bill Colby. We started having some meetings prior to him being elected on how he could control the East European environment.
So then, after a number of meetings and discussions, it was decided by the new Reagan administration that I should be the Inspector General of the Department of Defense because that would give me kind of a chance to review things. "Cap" Weinberger, who was now the Secretary of Defense, said: "He's the last S.O.B. I need walking around me. He'll have my job in a couple of months."
So Pen James, who was the director of Whitehouse personnel, and Rick Shelby, [who] was now a senator, decided we should be doing some other stuff. So Bill Casey decided I should work hand-in-hand with him.
So they were all talking about Krushchev and the old days, and him pounding the desk at the United Nations. [How] they're going to bury us with our own shovels, and so on, and so forth.
President Reagan was a union guy in California. So they were looking at ways to get our country back through the apprenticeship programs and things of that nature; to rebuild infrastructure of the American people. The youth... give them some skilled trades, training, education, and medical services, and things of that nature.
The biggest problem was the expenses [that] were always going out to fight the Cold War on the Soviet Union. They kept spending money for the military industrial giants and nothing for the average person. They agreed to my idea going back to Maynard Keynes, 'the best way to control a country is to control the economy and the currency.'
President Reagan, he was not a politician; didn't feel he should be a politician. He was a simple person and he wanted to undermine the USSR by destabilzing their military [and] their economy, and to get the people to understand that the rubles were only of value within the USSR.
President Reagan wanted to destabilize the USSR because they were a pain and he didn't trust them at all. He could not depend on anybody over there and he still had a lot of wounds from the past. So we decided, with William French Smith and a few other guys, how we could figure out a mission to destabilze the USSR so they couldn't buy anything. This is why you had the Star Wars [Strategic Defense Initiative] and everything. So President Reagan, started all kinds of development programs to spend a lot of money, but only on paper not in actual cash. That got the Soviets. Nobody understands a Soviets a Soviet; a Russians a Russian. They're not the same.
After a number of meetings and discussions with people within the military and everything else, we agreed we would get a grant from the US Treasury for $150 billion. And we would start to destabilize their economy, their military, their GRU [Main Intelligence Directorate], and the like, by picking up their internal currency.
So we got together Mr. Kwok [Kok Howie Kwong], who was part of the Chinese intelligence group in Peking at that time. [We] were off to Vienna where we established New Republic/USA Financial Groupe, which was the security code of the Contras way back when. [Vienna] was where the core of all the Soviet rubles were because they were not allowed to leave the USSR. They could not buy any food, any refrigerators, any medicine, they couldn't buy anything. Anything you want to buy was all internal to the USSR and you couldn't take out the currency.
Yet, the Soviet Central Bank [Gosbank] said that every ruble is worth $1.20. Of course nobody's going to give you $1.20 because there's nothing to buy with a ruble.
So we were based in Vienna, in June 1988. We started to trade rubles through Brinks in Holland, into the the GRU, military, the postal savings accounts, the manufacturing facilities in the USSR. We would give them hard currency for their rubles. They knew their rubles were worth zero.
We purchased Aneko Credit Pte Ltd. Singapore which was grandfathered to do these kind of things in Singapore. We would run all of these rubles through Aneko Credit and Asia-Europa Development Group and Trans-Asia Resources and New Republic/USA Financial Groupe in Austria. So I was sent to Austria in June 1988. I was a permenent resident of Austria.
We were starting through the KGB and the GRU, and anybody and everybody that was trying to make a fast buck, to gather up all of the rubles. So suddenly, we were getting all of the rubles. They wrote stories about this in major magazines and newspapers, that we were idiots in buying all these Soviet rubles. So more people came to us all the time and we were negotiating between 18 to 28 cents a ruble. We would pay them off outside of the USSR in all the major banks, Hungarian banks as well. We had 109 accounts. If you got the rubles credited to our account we would would give you the hard currency of your choice. We had PROMIS software, four units of [equ..s?]. It's a specialized banking center software, of Inslaw in Washington, DC. So people were bringing us rubles, rubles, rubles, left and right in [to] Brinks in Holland, and other banks, and we were paying them in hard currency.
So here we are. We're all in Vienna. I speak very little German, but I'm there. We started to meet with a number of people within the Soviet bloc, and Hungary, and Iran, Iraq, so on, and so forth. And they're, shall we say, in an economic pinch because the USSR had no food, no meat, no nothing, no jet fuel. Because nobody would accept the ruble outside the country. So we used Brinks in Holland, and started to purchase rubles. Not purchase, say swap, you can't purchase currency but you can swap currencies. Something for something.
GREG: Okay. So basically, your job was to destabilize the ruble in an effort to bring the Cold War to an end, correct?
LEO: Correct. Because then they had no funds for the military. No funds for their intelligence. No funds for the KGB and the GRU and the like.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Now during this period of time, you set to work on this goal and you were pretty sucessful at it, correct? Your system worked.
LEO WANTA: Oh yes, very good at it. We had a draw from the US Treasury of $150 billion. Using the PROMIS software, we were bringing to the Russians and the postal savings accounts and certain manufacturers an opportunity to get hard currency for their rubles at a swap value much less... Well it was really much more than it was worth, because it was worth zero. And we were paying between 18 and 28 cents per ruble in hard currency of Swiss francs, Italian lira, deutchmarks?, British pounds sterling and the like.
So based on that we entertained with the Development Bank of Singapore. We sent them 70 billion rubles, worth $84 billion US. We met with the big shots at the USSR embassy in Singapore and they were screaming at us, and yelling at us, that we were destroying their economy.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And, at that point is there any particular reason why the money wasn't immediately returned? What was the whole idea behind this, how did it get lost? That's one question people ask me.
LEO WANTA: [We] have Brinks in Holland counting, and wrapping, and packaging, and sorting out all the rubles. And making sure there were no counterfeits.
And then the Central Bank of the USSR, [it] was deemed that they had to [do the] exchange because they're the ones who set the benchmark and all that.
We met with the bigshots at the Soviet Embassy in Singapore and they were telling my Chinese partner Mr. Kok that there is no way, no way in the world that they were going to give us $1.20 per ruble. And we argued back and forth, back and forth, and they said, "No, we're never going to give you $1.20."
So after a lot of arguing, and them drinking their goofy drinks, they came and said that the Kremlin authorized [them] to only pay us $1.08. I jumped up and down [on] the top of the tables and I said, "$1.08, Howie, we got more than that invested in the program!"
They were really happy that we were going to lose out. Unknown to them that we're [paying] 18, 22, 28 cents, a ruble which is a very good mark up of 4 or 5 times value. So we have the agreements with the Bank of China, that they sent all of the wire transfers to, that they would pay us $1.08. If we didn't like it we could get the hell out of town.
So I left. Howie stayed behind. They didn't trust me, being an American, but they would trust him because he was a Chinese authority. So, we have all the landmark agreements and the benchmarks at $1.08. Now, we were in the foriegn exchange of off-station rubles.
So the Russian people were now getting hard currency. Now they were bringing back in refrigerators from Budapest, and from Vienna. Everyday they were going from Budapest to Vienna, buying anything that wasn't parked. Bring it back to Budapest and trade it back for rubles.
We had a number of Budapest main banks accepting rubles on our behalf and paying them in hard currency.
They wrote articles that all the rubles were missing from the street, so they had to reprint new rubles. The finance minister was screaming that I, Wanta of New Republic, has all the rubles in my possesion and they had no rubles. So we kept bringing them rubles back to the Central Bank.
Suddenly, they were short of rubles; so we had to figure out another way to get rubles back. So Howie and I talked to India, Pakistan, China, Malaysia and all these countries and says, "Look you guys all have a national debt to the USSR and the Central Bank. What if we paid that debt off and we gave you rubles at 88 cents a ruble?"
They thought we were crazy but as long as we had the receipts and confirmation that their national debts were paid, perfect. So now all of these countries are paying their national debt to zero into the Central Bank of the USSR. Now [Sheshanko?] and everybody there are really, really excited that all of these countries are paying their debts back to the USSR. But keep in mind the rubles are worth [benchmarked at] $1.20. They took all the rubles and started paying all their national debts, based on about two-thirds the value, but getting 100% value.
So that worked out real good. They [USSR] were getting the hard currency, they were buying refrigerators, carpets, medicine in Vienna, Austria and everything else. We were bringing them meat through [authraw?] Poland.
We were negotiating with Pabst Brewery in Milwaukee to pick up their whole brewery and move it to Russia. The same with Intercontinental Baking or Continental Baking, they were closing their whole facility; we were going to bring that thing lock, stock and barrel. We bought horses from Mexico that they wanted, and everyone was having a real great time by buying something with hard currency.
All of these countries are buying them from Howie and I at 88 cents. Not buying, but trading their hard currencies for what we wanted. So now the Central Bank is flooded with rubles, but they don't have any real hard currency, because everybody is paying them in rubles. So [Greshanko?] and everybody they says, "We got 2000 [tons] bullion of gold." In 75 kilos, 35, 35.5 kilos, 25 kilos, all mixed, one-off, and all this crap. And they gave us a huge discount if we would pay them in hard currency.
So now you've got 2000 tons in hard currency that we already made three or four-hundred percent on if not more.
We missed 246 tons in Latvia/Lithuania and Jim Baker said I was not doing my job because they still had 200 some tons of gold. If nobody tells me that how do I know to find it? We still had 2000 tons of bling, which is pretty good. We had to resmelt it at [Johnson Matthey] at Singapore under heavy security and made out to our name. And paid cash.
So that worked out real good. And Gorbachev was very much involved, the Central Bank was involved; everybody knew. So suddently they were very pleased in the USSR, because they're gettting all these rubles. Everybody's paying their national debts and they had all this currency coming back into the Central Bank in Moscow. Unknown to them, that President Reagan could stop at anytime the swapping, or the trading, of the rubles for hard currency which was in Swiss francs, or German marks and so on so forth. And they were getting, running low out of hard currency because they were paying everybody $1.20, $1.08 and so on and so forth. So now they are low on hard currency of the G7 for example. So we decided that we would do them a favor. We purchased 2000 tons of their gold that was in the Central Bank in USSR, and naturally they ripped us off. They would only give us $1.08 for every ruble, still unknown to the important people that we were paying less than 28 cents a piece. So now we have 2000 tons of gold based on actual cost of 28 cents but getting market value of $1.08 per ruble.
So that went on very well and then everybody decided in the Whitehouse that there will be no more treaty arrangements of trading rubles for hard currency. Therefore, now the USSR is absolutely bankrupt, the GRU is bankrupt, the KGB is bankrupt but in reality they're really not bankrupt because Gorbachev, Yeltsin, and Yegor Gaidar the Prime Minister took all of their rubles which really had a 'Monopoly' value in a kids game and have hard currency, in German marks, and Swiss francs, and British pounds sterling, and everything else.
Now the USSR is absolutely bankrupt. They make a deal with Boris Yeltsin he has, he fakes this, uh, coup, that he was being attacked by his military, Gorbachev was you know - which was all part of his way for an exit. So therefore, we have all the hard currency, they have rubles. Nobody wants rubles. So we had agreed with Putin and everybody, who at that time was Vice Mayor in Leningrad (which turned out to be St. Petersburg eventually, it was on the [?] commission), that we would give a non-returnable grant to the USSR under the new image of the Russian Federation of $30 billion US dollars and that's to rebuild.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Where was this money earmarked for once you make this money back then?
LEO WANTA: Well, the money was earmarked for the US Department of the Treasury, except for $30 billion that was authorized by President Reagan through AmeriTrust to the Russian Federation in Mockba, which is Moscow, for redevelopment programs. As long as there are none military. We would have been monitoring all of that $30 billion. We paid back the $150 billion, that we got forwarded from the US Department of the Treasury, within 6 months.
We had a tremendous amount of real hard currency and of that $70 billion that was set aside: $5 billion was going to Canada, $5 billion to UK, and $5 billion to Mexico and so on so forth, a total of $70 billion. But at the same time down in Western American Samoa, we were setting up a $5 million oil refinery to back up the US oil needs.
We were [also] buying medium term bank... Well at that time they were called prime bank guarantees, at 7.5% annual interest, 10 year plus one day maturity. We were buying them at 68%, 66% per $100 million par value and we could either loan 'em, or sell 'em, or transfer, at 88 to 92[%]. In reality, we're making $20 million for every $100 million par value prime bank guarantee. And we're doing this repetitively, every hour on the hour. That generated a tremendous amount of money, that we would reduce any and all debt obligations of the USA. And that is what President Reagan wanted to do.
GREG SZYMANSKI: So this money, so you're sucessful at bringing the ruble down. In the meantime, you amass a lot of dollars. And you become the caretaker of this through Ronald Reagan. Who appoints you, through what you told me earlier, his trust in you.
LEO WANTA: Oh yes.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. So the years go by now, this fund is there, I mean the money is there now invested in the different things.
LEO WANTA: Yeah, in prime bank guarantees.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. Now how does that transition remain American assets, but remain out of the country?
LEO WANTA: Yeah, offshore bank deposits.
GREG SZYMANSKI: So basically Reagan must have been really pleased with what you guys were doing?
LEO WANTA: Oh, he was overly excited. The Soviet Union had no money to buy anything for military arms, and Star Wars, and stuff of that nature. That's why Gorbachev [publically] in Helsinki was so mad. Gorbachev, [meaning the USSR] had zero, zero in cash.
We paid him $10 billion through the Gorbachev Foundation. So he was happy to sell out his country. What are you going to do? It's easier to pay these guys a couple of bucks.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Now, Reagans intention was always to bring this money back. Now you guys amassed a lot of money, it was constantly compounding interest...
LEO WANTA: Reagan's first intention was to have US security thoughout the world and the Soviet Union - being [unknown] - to nothing, so he [would] not have to spend money on military.
So all of these funds then... We paid back the treasury the $150 billion. There was security throughout the world. There was no more USSR. They were gone.
The Russians had a Federation; they needed money. Boris Yeltsin and Putin, the Deputy Mayor in Leningrad, was going to receive through the Reagan Group, which was us, $30 billion to rebuild their countries. But for no arms, and no tanks, and no nothing [military].
And we were rebuilding the US dollar economy. We were buying prime bank guarantees of 66% to 69% and retrading those at 88% to 92% which was making us around $20 million for every $100 million prime bank guarantee. That was the money that was rebuilding all of the banking community, money in the United States, so the banks could give out loans and mortgages and do whatever you want. And also, more foriegn aid to the countries of acceptance to the US State Department. So this money was coming back, and it was also being used and generated to make more money for the USA to be a super-economy.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Well tell us how did you save his [Reagan's] life.
LEO WANTA: Well being in the intelligence community we, you know, we're reaching out to a number of people throughout the world at all times. We had a certain person that was a foriegner as a guest of the United States. I don't think he had a green card since he was in the political regime.
He had called me and he was extremely nervous. He said he had people staying in his Washington office for months, and months, and today was the day they were going to assassinate President Reagan. I asked really clear what was going on? How can I know for sure? He told me all of the details.
I immediately called Treasury Special Agent Bill Lecates. He got on the phone to Special Agent of the Secret Service Glen Speedy, along with Frank B. Ingram, who is a liason with the FBI. That's why his initials are F.B. Ingram.
We immediately pulled President Reagan out of the Whitehouse.
We pick[ed] up everybody that came via Texas, to come into the Washington area. They were being groomed and being hosted by this gentleman, who will remain anonymous, except [to] the people that need to know. The Secret Service came immediately to his place, grabbed him for his own security and protection. He wasn't sure who I sent to get him.
So he's there; they're coming in with all their Secret Service garb, and everything else, and the Secret Service agent said he went all over the floor. I said, "Well I would too, if they came in running with all of those machine guns and everything else."
He said, "You should have warned him."
I said, "I was kind of busy."
GREG SZYMANSKI: What year was this just to give us...
LEO WANTA: That was... I'll say a Friday the 13th. I'll let you track it back from there.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay.
LEO WANTA: But you can talk to the Secret Service, because we all got plaques and all this other good stuff. Glen Speedy, the Secret Service, and Bill Lecates who was Direc. in US Treasury and national at that time. So you know everybody was happy, happy, happy. We were all happy that the threat, [that] wasn't sure at that time, [and] when we verified that it was absolutely a threat. We picked up everybody. To the best of our knowledge, we got them all.
GREG SZYMANSKI: [Who do you work for?]
LEO WANTA: For the Office of the President. That's who I work for.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. So when did the whole problem begin, when you wanted to put the money back. But I think you were talked to by someone. Did somebody want to really take it from you, is what I'm getting at.
LEO WANTA: Well here, first of all you have to understand we have all of [this] in our control, Howie and I. We had all the money in foriegn accounts, prime bank guarantees, and other collateral, and gold bullion, and the like.
George Bush was finishing up his travel time in Singapore. This was about April, 1992, [January 3-5, 1992] because Howie died in May, 1992. He [Bush] realized that all of the assets, which was about $864 billion in Aneko Credit in Singapore, was owned by a Chinese guy named Howie Kwong. [He] was the chairman of our group bank and [with] myself as managing director. He was curious that he was now the President of the United States, and we had all these funds. Then when Bill Clinton became President of the United States, he decided that all three of us were no good. He's the only guy that can handle that kind of money with authority and maturity.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. This is one part of the story, I think you need to explain, because I gotta make that transition from the good days of Reagan; and all of a sudden things change.
LEO WANTA: Okay. Well it's really strange.
GREG SZYMANSKI: How did that happen?
LEO WANTA: The last tour of President George Herbert Walker Bush, he goes to Singapore of all places. Unknown to him, the Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, sold Aneko Credit PTA Ltd. in Singapore, to my Chinese partner and I. Now we are [running] the intel community banking. Which everybody who was anybody in the Bush Administration and previous administrations used for their, let's call it, set-aside allocations.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Now you told me you were made the trustee by Reagan.
LEO WANTA: Oh, I was the trustor sure, for the Presidential Task Force, yeah.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. Go ahead. So that gives you some power over this money still?
LEO WANTA: No. Guarded power.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Right.
LEO WANTA: That doesn't mean I can spend it. I'm just guarding it.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay, so go ahead now we're in the...
LEO WANTA: Okay, so I am in Vienna working with the Chinese against the USSR, because they are also buying rubles to take down their debts. And I'm off to Singapore to meet my Chinese counterpart, Mr. Kok Howie Kwong. His dad is a wheeler dealer within the Chinese administration and a warlord and all this stuff. We had a number of operations with the ruble with PRC [People's Republic of China] and ROC [Taiwan] in China. They're in Pakistan and India and everything else.
His father says to Howie that the Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, must sell his stock in Aneko Credit PTA Ltd. [Since] he's the Prime Minister he can't do both. So Howie's dad says to Howie and I, "[Leo] if you put up $25 million, I'll put up $25 million for my son, and you and he will own Aneko Credit PTA Ltd."
[Aneko Credit] is a grandfathered bank [with] underwriters and all of this stuff and this was great for us.
So I take $25 million from New Republic. Where his dad got the money is not material to me, but I'm sure it came out of Hong Kong/Shanghai. So I bought Mrs. Lee's one share and Howie bought the Prime Minister's one share. Now we have all of these funds, and we move in more funds that we are developing. Prime bank guarantees, because we're also now bank underwriters by contract in Singapore under the grandfather clause. The Chinese and Singaporeans had [this clause] long before I even knew Singapore existed.
So here's President Bush sitting in Singapore, in fact we gave the instructions to the Secret Service to move him from one hotel to the Shangri-La. The Secret Service guys in my hotel room at the Marina Manor agreed, let's move him to the Shangri-la which is much safer. He can still do the meetings at the other hotels but at least we'll take over the Shangri-La. So we got credit for that.
So George Bush Sr. comes on his worldwide tour at the end of his campaign and he's in Singapore. He meets Howie and I. He finds out from the Prime Minister that Howie and I own Aneko Credit and now we are holding his special set-aside allocations. We knew all of his set-aside allocations, and George Schultz, and Jimmy Baker, and everybody else.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Oh boy, you had the information now on him.
LEO WANTA: But, I wasn't doing anything with it.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Right, right.
LEO WANTA: You know it didn't bother me, because I had enough to do with what I was doing.
Howie and I [had] in our accounts, our personal accounts under the agreements we had with President Reagan, [we] had total assets in Aneko Credit of $864 billion U.S. which is entirely, shall we say, stock profit. Which would be split between Mr. Kwok and myself, $432 billion a piece.
He [George Bush, Sr.] was very upset that he did not realize that Howie and I collectively owned Aneko Credit.
Okay? See because Howie's got a share and I got a share. That's $432 billion a piece, well, [Carol Courtney's?] there from state and [George Bush] Sr. says that since I report to Bush, the Office of the President, I should consider half to go away and Howie should give half to go away [Bush wanted half of each of their $432 billion].
Howie jumped right out of that chair. He said, "You are S...H... boomp-boomp-boomp. I pay you nothing more, boomp-boomp-boomp."
We got another North Korean conflict going on. Howie died a couple weeks later.
GREG SZYMANSKI: He did?
LEO WANTA: By rat poison.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Rat poisoning?
LEO WANTA: They believe, by rat poisoning because his face got real puffy, yellow jaundice, and he was terrible. I was supposed to die within 10, 15 minutes after him.
I got a call from Singapore Internal Affairs that Howie's in the hospital, he's going into a coma, he's dying. Instead of going out the front door using the company car, I just got the first taxi. The taxi driver took me to the emergency entrance, instead of the front door, where I would naturally go as a tourist.
I got up there and Leo [Tetses?] says to me, "How the hell did you get up here?"
I said, "What are you talking about? You called me, said he's going into a coma."
"How did you get up here!"
I said, "I went out the front door, took the taxi, and the taxidriver says go through the emergency."
He said, "Ohhh!"
So then, he [Howie] died his just...
GREG SZYMANSKI: And you were sure you were slated for the same uh...
LEO WANTA: Yeah, I should never have got to the hotel room. This has been verified by General Vernon Walters. I was going to be hit long before I got to that floor.
So, what happens [is] when you get rat poison in a human being, you create a vacuum in your brain and you blow the stem. That's what happened.
[Carol Courtney's?] there from U.S. State and she's really [offended] now because a Chinese spoke so terrible to the President of the United States. But you know, trying to get Howie for $216 billion, Howie was not interested in paying $216 billion.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And where was that going to go?
LEO WANTA: Who knows?
He [Howie] jumped right out of his chair screaming, I says, "Howie, you put me in a terrible position."
He says, "You stay here with me; you still got $432 billion."
I says, "Howie, that's not the way it works in the United States. He's my superior."
[Howie makes a noise] "Rahrrrararar!!!"
A couple weeks later he died, at Singapore General Hospital.
[Then] they came to get me.
I went to Canada. Dan Qualye arranged for me to get to Canada, for whatever reason. I stayed in Toronto. And then I went per Uncle Sam to Switzerland to meet Vince Foster. And that's when I was taken down.
GREG SZYMANSKI: [Back to when] you're sitting across from Bush...
LEO WANTA: Oh yeah. He's staring at me. I was always quizzed by him in the old days with Reagan, because Reagan wouldn't trust him. Reagan wouldn't ever tell him what we were doing.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Reagan didn't trust Bush back then?
LEO WANTA: No. He never told him anything. When he would ask me or Larry Eagleburger, would ask me questions or something, I would always refer back to Dutch [Reagan]. Or, [to] William French Smith, or Casey, because [with] what I was doing, I was told to just shut up and get it done.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And that's when you were made the Ambassador [for] Somalia [to] Switzerland and Canada. To work with [William] Sessions and Vince Foster. And basically that's where we're at now.
LEO WANTA: That's correct.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And at this point you end up in a Swiss jail.
LEO WANTA: Well, it really wasn't a jail. It was a dungeon.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay a dungeon for 134 days. And really for... Did they ever give you an official reason?
LEO WANTA: Well for the first three days they didn't even know I was there. So I was starving to death.
And then they said they had a phone call from the State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue, the Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin, to hold me for tax evasion from 1982 and '88.
I kinda laughed, I thought it was a political joke. Because I lived in China since 1985. And in 1986, I spent the whole year in the Phillipines, during that coup against Marcos. We were very busy running between Singapore, Malaysia and the Phillipines. So how could I be a resident of the State of Wisconsin? My wife divorced me because I abandoned her in '82. I was too much involved in the government; which she wasn't too happy with.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. So how did they want to get their hands on this money and what did you tell them?
LEO WANTA: After Howie died, they had started giving me a lot of heat in Singapore, so I went on to Canada. I spent a year in Canada trying to figure out how I was going to get the money back into US Treasury.
We were working with Vince Foster and he was kind of a help to us.
In June 1993, I got orders through Vince Foster and [Cupper?] who I think was his boss at the time. We had some transactions that were going to help me move to Lake Geneva and I would buy a beautiful home there and I would settle up on the paybacks. And I said, "That's not a problem as long as I can pay back the US Department of the Treasury."
And they said, "What do you want to do that for?"
I said, "Because two, three years down the road you're going to say I never paid anybody; and I'm going to be arrested for embezzling US federal funds."
So I went to Switzerland and Foster's going to meet me on July 7. We transferred $250 million to the Children's Defense Fund through Credit Suisse, [through] Guy Stewart, the chairman of the board at Credit Suisse. And, I automatically went to Swiss prison, and he [Foster] automatically died on July 20.
GREG SZYMANSKI: It's said this fund that was started, the Global Security Fund, and what Bush and Clinton wanted to do now; was to somehow copycat what you were doing. But, to use the money privately, instead of bringing it back to the Treasury? Correct?
LEO WANTA: Correct and to pay taxes on that money.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. So that's what they wanted to do with you and that's really why they wanted you out of the picture, correct?
LEO WANTA: Yeah, they wanted me out of the game. But at the same time, return all of the trust assets to individuals, and not to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. I feared that in a couple of years, somebody's gonna ask for an audit and I'm not going to have the money, and I'm gonna be in prison for life.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Bingo. And we're talking about how much money, you think?
LEO WANTA: Oh, at that time we had let's see, boomp-boomp-boomp. I would estimate in 1993, we had assets well over $16-18 trillion in prime bank guarantees, 2000 tons of gold, [another] 167 tons of gold, cash-wise we probably had, oh, $500 billion assorted currencies.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Which you're still the trustor for right?
LEO WANTA: Yeah. And I'm also the owner of it because Howe's dead. And I still owe 50% of the final outlay to his estate, which he has two beautiful kids.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Clinton, Bush the rest of them [are] trying to get it into private hands. You want to take the money; put it back into the Treasury.
LEO WANTA: Per the original protocol agreements, yes.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And there, is the reason they are after you, correct?
LEO WANTA: Yeah, but they can't kill me right away because they don't know where all the money is.
GREG SZYMANSKI: They don't know where it's at?
LEO WANTA: Well, they know some of it. They have ripped off 4 or 5 of my computers already. But a lot of this stuff is based on custodial safekeeping reciepts in banks, which open up other assets and numbers and passcodes and stuff.
GREG SZYMANSKI: So the CIA has discredited you, even had you declared dead. Didn't they?
LEO WANTA: Correct. So they could go through all the banking community, and the bank managers, and say he's never showing up here; so now we're in charge of these accounts.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And they've tried discrediting you, now tell us how this backstabbing occurred and what really happened to this money?
LEO WANTA: Well, we had a trading program for 5 T [trillion] through the World Bank; and it was going to be generated by the Swiss banks.
I was in Toronto and I left Toronto [for] Paris to meet President [Haji maheelamashi?] because I was now being appointed the Ambassador of Somalia to Canada and to Switzerland. So under cover of that we had the 5 T contracts with the World Bank and the UN under Contract #4.
[This] would also rebuild Somalia and [give] us a naval supply depot there. Mogadishu Airport would have been a US Airforce station and we would have a rapid deployment force there to protect and control the Middle East from idiots that want to cause war.
So we were in Switzerland. One of the major banks started the first leg of the 5 T [trillion] contract which would have generated $210 billion. Of which $70 billion was set aside for, let's see: $30 billion to Russia, $5 billion to Canada, $5 billion to Mexico, $5 billion to London, $5 billion to France, $500 million to Western Samoa to build an oil refinery [which was] only feeding [to] the United States. We would have had a brand new high-tech refinery in Western Samoa. And $70 billion would have went back into AmeriTrust, and $70 billion would have went into the US Treasury, for whatever the Economic Presidential Council [sic] wanted to do. Laura D Tyson and all these people.
So we would have been very secure and very satisfied with the influx of cash.
Vince Foster made a special request through the Whitehouse at that time. He needed 250 million dollars set aside for the Childrens Defense Fund, which was approved by the Whitehouse at that time, by a Laura D'Andrea Tyson who was the chairperson of the Whitehouse Economic Counsel. So he was in Geneve. We arranged 250 million dollars for the Childrens Defense Fund from their request, based on the 5T [trillion] UN Contract #4.
We moved the first initial traunches of 243 million dollars, which would have gave them a face value of 300 million to start the computers working as a dry run more or less and that was three 81 million dollar transfers. [This] would give you a par value prime bank guarantee of 100 million dollars per each 81 million dollars released.
Vince Foster was staying there. Suddenly, all heck broke loose. I was arrested and detained by the Swiss Sûreté for failure to pay Wisconsin taxes, although I haven't lived in Wisconsin since 1985, being on US government seal operations.
[They] threw me in a dungeon. Vince Foster came to my rescue. He came back to Washington DC, to assist in getting my immediate release from all this nonsense.
Then he was murdered. I know he didn't commit suicide. No one with $250 million in his briefcase commits suicide.
They had me incognito. Only a handful of people knew I was in the Swiss dungeon in Lausanne.
Then Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, came to my rescue because he was part of an agreement we had between the Palestinians and the State of Israel. The Ameritrust corporation, of which I'm the Chairman of the Board, was going to grant the State of Israel 5 billion, and the Palestine government at that time, $5 billion a piece. To [encourage] a solid peace program. Which we would have controlled all the funds, so the funds would not be removed from the recovery, the redevelopment of roads and infrastructure.
He notified the Swiss government that he was coming to rearrange the furniture, as we say.
I was immediately extradited to New York, without any arrest warrants, without anything at all. Just put me on a plane, under armed guard, and shackles. I ended up in New York, and the FBI was saying, "What the hell are you doing here?"
I didn't have an American passport, I had a Somalian passport, a diplomatic passport, so they figured they were being swindled by somebody.
In the meantime, Yitzhak Rabin, got murdered.
I went to the Brooklyn House of Detention. They were supposed to remove me to Madison, Wisconsin, so I could get a hearing and get released.
The Federal Judge Alyce Ross says, "You know Mr. Ambassador, I don't know what you're here for and I don't want you here. Get the hell out of here." More or less [that's what she said].
But before she dismissed everything against me by the State of Wisconsin, which I haven't lived in since 1985, she asked me, "Why are you carrying these $1 billion notes, these securities."
I started to explain it and immediately the US Attorney jumped in and he says, "We dismiss all the charges. He's free to go, he's free to go. We make a motion, US government."
And I went to the [courthouse] steps only to be arrested by New York detectives, without a warrant, but, based on a phone call from the State of Wisconsin to hold me for civil tax evasion for 1982.
GREG SZYMANSKI: We left off where you were named the Ambassador [of] Somalia [to] Switzerland and Canada. Basically to deal with the Vince Foster issue and Marc Rich?
LEO WANTA: We had [a] tremendous [number] of security plans to use in Mogadishu And it would have helped all the people, remember the Cubans were fighting in the upper part of Somaliland.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. So...
LEO WANTA: We had a vested interest in there.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Now what happened to...You were also there for Rich, correct? Marc Rich?
LEO WANTA: Well yeah, we were there because we were doing this settlement, and we were also taking down Marc Rich. Because the FBI Director Bill Sessions, gave us a live open arrest warrant to take down Marc Rich at any cost and bring him on back. So we were going to coax him [into] going to a french casino across the lake in Lausanne. But Lorrayne Fine somehow tipped him off, and knew somehow from her cohorts, what we might be doing in Switzerland. We were going to arrest him in the middle between Lausanne and France on the ferry boat.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And what happened?
LEO WANTA: (Laughs) He refused to come at the last minute. And on July 7, 1993 I was arrested for Wisconsin civil tax evasion.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And this was...
LEO WANTA: And he was free to travel and he went back to Zug.
Keep in mind, one of the persons who had talked to him and tipped him off to what we were doing was a Miss Lorrayne Fine. We have photographs that they met at the Hotel Aulac in Lausanne. She was a Mossad agent. We feel that she's the one that told Marc we were going to take him down.
GREG SZYMANSKI: So then basically Clinton orders his release?
LEO WANTA: Yeah. You have to understand, he doesn't really have [the] pardon that he thinks he's got. He's got pardon for a crime once he's arrested. Since we didn't arrest him, we don't consider the pardon a real pardon. The pardon only releases him after somebody makes the arrest and we [still] have the arrest warrant.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay, Leo I think it would be good to maybe take us back to when you were taken away and put in that Swiss dungeon and explain to our listeners exactly why you ended up going through all these legal battles. They basically wanted to copy this. They wanted the money now into private hands, instead of Treasury hands, but [besides] this was there anything more? Is that basically it or is there more behind why you were jailed?
LEO WANTA: Well, there's a lot more behind it. Keep in mind they came to the hotel in Lausanne, Hotel Aulac, because we were now going to meet Vince Foster. Vince Foster had arrived in Geneva to meet with us.
They take my diplomatic passports. I have two of them. One for each country. I don't have an American passport because Warren Christopher, the Secretary of State, said I couldn't have passports for both countries. So I surrendered my U.S. passport, he almost flipped.
And, Mossad was with Lorrayne Fine. And they were very much involved with Hillary Clinton, on a number of financial programs with Marc Rich. He works for the Israelis. They had a number of things on their agenda which [were] contrary to what we wanted to do within the United States, and [in] the Middle East per se. So they had to get me out. They had to get the money. I had already gave Foster $250 million from Credit Suisse and Vince Foster was going to testify against Bill Clinton on a number of things. He agreed to [do this] with the U.S. attorneys.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And then he turned up dead of course.
LEO WANTA: Absolutely. But, he did come and try to save me and get me out of the dungeons. The superintendent came and said he died. Why would the superintendent want to tell me that he died? Except, somebody was sending me a veiled threat.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Right. When's the last time you saw him before he was killed?
LEO WANTA: July 7th.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay.
LEO WANTA: Of 1993 because we gave him $250 million from Credit Suisse. He needed $250 million for the Children's Defense Fund. He made lodging arrangements for us at the Hotel De la Paix in Geneva. He got his $250 million from Credit Suisse. He got murdered, and I went to the Swiss dungeon for 134 days. We still don't know who got the $250 million, but I know it was debited to our corporate account.
GREG SZYMANSKI: So you have verification that Vince Foster was with you in Switzerland two weeks before he was murdered, he was there with you correct?
LEO WANTA: Correct. And we were staying at the Hotel De la Paix. In fact we were all on his American Express card, because he wanted to keep it quiet and didn't want anyone to know we were having a group meeting.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And so you give back the $250 million to the Children's fund, both of you, well at least you not knowing, that later that the Children's fund turns out to be under an Executive Order, a slush fund really. And, so Foster gets killed. But, if they were going to run a fair investigation [of Foster's death] don't you think they would want to talk to you?
LEO WANTA: Oh yeah, but [Kenneth] Starr knew about it. So Starr doing what he did, is really not a cover-up, it's obstruction of justice.
Starr wanted to represent me [on the tax evasion charges] in the State of Wisconsin and the Department of Justice Attorney General Doyle at that time gave him a job as a contract lawyer [in the] Department of Education. So he dropped me like a cheapskate and he went with the Department of Education. We all knew Starr was given a plum job on the behalf of the State of Wisconsin to avoid me. That's another case of obstruction of justice. He knew my case inside and out and he bailed on me to go to the Department of Education.
GREG SZYMANSKI: ...they cover up their own investigations...
LEO WANTA: Yeah but you have to keep in mind Marc Rich was in the Hotel Au Lac in Lausanne, and he was going to take the ferry. His attorney at the time, of all people, was I. Lewis Libby, also known a 'Scooter'. That's one of Marc Rich's main attorneys, Scooter Libby. So how do you think they get the inside track?
GREG SZYMANSKI: That's interesting, I didn't know that.
LEO WANTA: Ken Starr knows it because we talked about it.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Interesting. And of course these things have never been investigated properly.
LEO WANTA: Why, I've been talking about it for years.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And like I said they've never been investigated. And there you sit...
LEO WANTA: I told everybody in Congress, everybody in the Senate, I told everybody and anybody.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And let's get back to Hillary. Here I'm reading something that was sent to me, that Hillary had been in control of an organization called the Children's Defense Fund and that was listed under Executive Order 12333 in 1981 under President Reagan. Okay?
LEO WANTA: I don't think so.
GREG SZYMANSKI: That's what it said here, but that's not it?
LEO WANTA: Because the Executive Order allowed us to have CIA proprietary corporations. Now, that's not saying the Children's Defense Fund wasn't a CIA proprietary corporation. I wasn't a member of the Children's Defense Fund.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay. Anyway, we have the Executive Order now. Hillary Clinton then... Basically, this corporation has been used for intelligence purposes. Money being used for intelligence purposes, not for a children's defense fund. And she basically is in control of this, and also treating it maybe, as her own private little slush fund.
LEO WANTA: She is the chairman.
GREG SZYMANSKI: So is there anything in there that you had found out about how she was using the money.
LEO WANTA: No. All we were told by Andrea Tyson, who was the chairperson of the Presidents Economic Counsel, that she [had] approved the request from Vince Foster for us to set aside $250 million for the Children's Defense Fund. Since they're in the Whitehouse, and I'm not in the Whitehouse, I'm not going to argue about it.
GREG SZYMANSKI: So then she, this money then is... What ever happened to that $250 million?
LEO WANTA: I'm in a dungeon, I haven't the slightest idea.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Right. And let's trace that then, tell me what was your... You were put in there for 134 days, correct?
LEO WANTA: Uh-huh.
GREG SZYMANSKI: What kind of treatment did you get when you were there?
LEO WANTA: I was... Well, first of all they didn't know I was there for 2 or 3 days. They were probably hoping I would have a heart attack but I didn't. It was terrible. I was in a pre-Nazi dungeon of probably 1930 vintage.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And you stayed there 134 days until Rabin got you out, correct?
LEO WANTA: Correct. They came and rushed me to the airport. And at the airport they gave me the letter from Yitzhak Rabin that he was coming to my rescue, so they flew me right to New York immediately on Air Swiss.
GREG SZYMANSKI: It seems like everybody surrounding you who tried to help you ended up dead.
LEO WANTA: I agree.
GREG SZYMANSKI: I just wanted to go step by step here, after you get out jail, out of the Swiss dungeon, what happened?
LEO WANTA: They took me in shackles and chains and they put me on Swiss Air. Flew me to New York. I end up at JFK.
I have my Somalian passport, no American passport. They look at my Somalian, my diplomatic passport, and the FBI says, "What the hell we picking you up for?"
"Hey, I'm here, take off the chains and shackles if you don't mind."
They took me right away to the Brooklyn House of Detention where I sat for a bit. And, no, no, it was the Federal, the Metropolitan uh, jail for the feds [Metropolitan Detention Center, Brooklyn]. So I spent a couple of days there; then they took me to the judge.
The judge looked at me, looked at my papers, and asked me a number of questions. [She wanted to know] how come I'm an Ambassador. I started to tell her, then she asked me why I'm carrying these $1 billion treasury notes. I started to tell her who I was and everything else. And the Assistant U.S. Attorney jumps up yelling and hollering, "We move for immediate dismissal, and stop the conversation, boomp-boomp-boomp."
And she says, "Well I didn't want to hear it anyhow, Mr. Ambassador you're free to go."
I leave, I figured that a guy had finally [come] and saved me from these characters.
I walked down the steps [of] the Federal Court House and two New York detectives come up to me and said they have a phone call from the State of Wisconsin. They're holding me for tax evasion.
I said, "You're out of your mind."
So they took me over, kept me there at the Brooklyn House of Detention for 30, 40 days.
Wisconsin finally decided to come and get me, without any extradition or anything. No papers, no arrest warrants, or nothing. Put me in more shackles. Embarassed me walking through airports, which is illegal under the Air Act. You cannot carry guns, even if you are a deputy sheriff.
So they take me to Madison, and for 2 years they put me in the county jail on the floor.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And you spent 2 years in the county jail?
LEO WANTA: Excuse me?
GREG SZYMANSKI: How long did you spend in county jail?
LEO WANTA: A couple of years.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay.
LEO WANTA: On and off. It was a county jail, that there wasn't even a crime commited in, it was terrible. And I don't like to sleep on cement floors.
GREG SZYMANSKI: So the money is now in the trillions of dollars. What happens now is, the Clinton and Bush people backstab you guys, and they begin to loot this money. Correct?
LEO WANTA: Well, they took charge of the money. My business partner he got killed by rat poison. Vince Foster met his demise in Washington, DC. Francois de Grosseurve the spymaster of France, he got murdered. [Leno Barris?] who was working with us to uncover the Red Merc 20/20 that was used by the Iraqis, against the Kurds, he got killed in Hong Kong. All of the people working special assignment and feeding [information to] President Reagan all decided to die. And they put me in a Swiss dungeon because I had all the banking codes.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And Yitzhak Rabin, he was also assasinated after...
LEO WANTA: He was getting $10 billion from President Reagan. We had the money for him for the Peace Accord.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And Rabin tries to come to your rescue and there's a letter basically verifying that.
LEO WANTA: He did come to my rescue. The moment he served the Swiss administration, they picked me out of there, and flew me to New York.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Why do you think they wanted you out of the way? Out of the picture here?
LEO WANTA: They wanted me out of the way because I controlled all of the money, all of the bank accounts. I was the holder of all of the accounts.
In the old days under Colby and Casey, they would give me the banking instructions. I would follow the banking instructions under certain passcodes to do whatever operations they required.
If you look, when I came to New York in shackles and chains from the Swiss adminitration, Judge Alyce Ross, Federal Judge Alyce Ross asked me how and why I had 18 one billion dollar Treasury notes in my briefcase. I had 18 one billion dollar notes, and now there's an argument between the Federal Court in New York and the Treasurer of the State of Wisconsin, [over] what happened to the 18 one billion dollar notes. It's in the transcripts. That's 18 billion dollars missing right now. Parked between the New York Federal Court, who denies that they have it. [They say] they gave it to the State of Wisconsin.
The State of Wisconsin, the Treasurer of the State of Wisconsin [unknown] says, "Yeah, I heard that story. I know it's here someplace but we don't know where."
Wouldn't you look in your bedroom for 18 one billion dollar notes if you wanted to buy a pack of cigarettes or something?
GREG SZYMANSKI: How much money was involved in your tax evasion charge?
LEO WANTA: According to the audit the feds did, if I was a resident I would have owed 15 cents. If I'm a resident, which I'm not. They never had a case. In fact the case was held in Dane County, I've never lived in Dane County in my life. There's statutes that say you have to be tried in the county where the crime [was commited]. The only thing I ever did in Madison, was going to a Bucks game.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Now what about getting a fair trial? Were you able to mount any kind of trial?
LEO WANTA: No, they would not allow me to have private counsel. They hired a Major retired from the US Army Adjutant General. And he did absolutely nothing except ask what he should do from the Attorney General.
GREG SZYMANSKI: It doesn't sound like the Constitution was being adhered to in the Leo Wanta case.
LEO WANTA: No and I wasn't even allowed one witness to show who I was, and where I lived, and where I resided.
GREG SZYMANSKI: No. And finally how did you ever secure your release into house arrest? How is this working?
LEO WANTA: We don't know yet. Suddenly, they decided I should not be where I was. They moved me down to Sayre, Oklahoma. We filed a number of papers with the federal courts down there, that I'd been kidnapped from Switzerland. I'm an Ambassador. They have no authority, no jurisdiction.
They kept me in a private prison under the Corrections Corporation of America, which is owned by the U.S. military. They sent me back to Wisconsin. Wisconsin didn't want to hold me any longer because they were getting all these questions and no answers. So they decided that I should not be in the prison system. I should just go on house arrest and fend for myself.
There's a lot of good people that cared in these jails and prisons. They did their check with their FBI buddies and deputy sheriffs, and said I got screwed and tattooed.
GREG SZYMANSKI: So why did they let you out of jail finally?
LEO WANTA: They couldn't get the rest of the money because I had the security codes and passwords. And also to quiet down all the exterior noise that we were making with the special investigators in Europe. They decided to quiet this thing down and try to get some kind of low cost settlement.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Yeah. Which you did and now you're sitting there with all this information. I noticed that you have made a list also, of reciepts identified in handwritten notes, on some of the transactions involving these giga-financing operations.
LEO WANTA: Yeah, I thought I was dying.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Amazing, Francis Driscoll Trust, uh, we go on and on and on. Incredible.
LEO WANTA: Those are Fed Reserve reciepts right there.
LEO WANTA: By Judge Lee's ruling, I think you have a copy of that? That says, I should recover all of this money. [When] I recover all this money 38.6% of that immediately goes to the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And then of course we have George Bush, President Clinton, and Jim Doyle, the former Attorney General of Wisconsin [who] helped to prosecute you, correct? On trumped up charges?
LEO WANTA: Correct. Knowing that I was innocent. I wasn't a resident of Wisconsin, they knew this.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Who can you trust? From your perspective, right now?
LEO WANTA: Well, the only one I can trust right now is Judge Lee who ruled in the favor of the people. He's got tremendous [sic] other judges. If all those judges get together in the judiciary, things will stop quickly because they can put a huge oar in the water, as well as a number of senators and congressmen that can no longer live with the manipulation... and take charge, the people win, win, win.
GREG SZYMANSKI: I want you to explain to us who is Judge Lee and what was his ruling.
LEO WANTA: Judge Lee at Alexandria, Virginia ruled that I am in charge of all of these government corporations and private corporations as chairman and full shareholder under the Reagan administration. [I] should legally and immediately recover all of these funds and pay it to the US Department of the Treasury. And also notify the Internal Revenue Service of the payment. This is what Judge Lee went way out of his way to [do to] help all of us.
GREG SZYMANSKI: I just wanted to verify from you that this amount of money is a real amount, correct?
LEO WANTA: The money is a real amount correct, but like you said it's the minimum amount because each day it accrues.
GREG SZYMANSKI: And so there could be at this point it's more that $27 trillion?
LEO WANTA: Oh, sure. The last time the IRS and the US Treasury did an audit, I think it was $26-$27 T and that's when they were giving me more pressure. And, I wasn't moving.
GREG SZYMANSKI: I wanted to set the record straight that this court ruling does protect this money for the American people and puts you as basically trustor, the caretaker of this money, correct?
LEO WANTA: Right, the judge ruled that I should go recover the money and pay taxes on all the recovery directly to the IRS. We're going to give copies to his clerk so he knows that he did his part.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Now, if people wanted to check this out how would they be able to find the court document?
LEO WANTA: It's 02-1363-A and it was filed April 15, 2003 by Federal Judge Gerald Bruce Lee in Alexandria, Virginia.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Now, many people say it's a rarity to see an honest judge anymore, he appears to be one...
LEO WANTA: A senior one at that, a senior federal judge. And he's got all these exhibits and sealed documents and he's shocked, absolutely shocked.
GREG SZYMANSKI: An interesting part of this story, is how much money that's been traced that's missing so far. Tell us [about] the trail to track this money down, how hard that's been.
LEO WANTA: It's really hard, because you have to keep in mind that the banks that have this money were probably told I was dead or missing. Or, they paid certain things into other private banking relationships and used it for collateral. So they're taking loans they know they don't have to pay back. Everything they borrow from us and they loan out is really all profit to the banks. Plus, the banks can use that for their asset control.
GREG SZYMANSKI: I've seen a list of some of those accounts. Some traced back to Bush and other people. That's a fact right?
LEO WANTA: Oh yes, yes. That was on the (fencin doc?) and that was a tremendous amount of money. An audit was done and that is all [in] records from the Fed Reserve that we got. Because we can use PROMIS software from Inslaw. We have four units.
GREG SZYMANSKI: So you can bring this money back to the Treasury right?
LEO WANTA: Correct. But we're going to go through Judge Lee's clerk of courts.
GREG SZYMANSKI: You've gone this route to protect yourself right?
LEO WANTA: Correct and we even filed suit in the US Supreme Court and they refused to take the case because it was too political. I didn't know the Supreme Court was under a political arm.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Tell us how you came to this agreement [to collect and turn over $4.5 trillion].
LEO WANTA: Well, we had to go to the courts in Virginia to prove that we had an agreement and [that] these funds were set aside for all of the protocol agreements.
The judge ruled that the United States had immunity, but he did not rule that I was the trustor of all the funds. He just ruled that all the powers: The CIA, and the Treasury Department, and the State Department, and everybody else had immunity. So they didn't have to testify one way or the other which was strange.
But the judge did go ahead and order that we go recover all the money. He wanted to know why the money wasn't in the US Treasury and why taxes hadn't been paid on it. And why, whoever thought they were in charge, refused to allow us to repatriate all this offshore money. So then we argued that; and started to contact a number of investigators. They went to all of the european banks of record, about 109 bank accounts. And the banks decided that, oh my god, if this program keeps going and all the audits are done, so many things are going to be exposed.
So they came and agreed to $4.5 trillion just to shut [us] up. And, no audits and life goes on. I don't talk to them and they don't talk to us. We'd get a gag order and we'd get $4.5 trillion. We immediately notified the Treasury and they agreed that right now the tax base is around 35% or $1.575 trillion [on the $4.5 trillion] and since we're incorporated in the state of Virginia, we would have to set aside $270 billion for the state. We still don't know what the city and county taxes would be.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Okay, so this agreement was signed, the money transferred on June 12, (2006) it is there. The Fed is blocking it for some unknown reason, we'll get to that later. Tell us about, who did you actually enter in to this agreement with?
LEO WANTA: Well we have gag orders, but a number of attorneys that represent the pool of all the banks. They protect their clients. They just put the money on the table and say go away.
GREG SZYMANSKI: You also met years ago with John Roberts, you think he may have helped you get this agreement together, correct?
LEO WANTA: Yeah, John Roberts. Roberts worked with all of us when we were at the Whitehouse with Reagan in '81 through '88. They all knew who I was. They could not deny who I was, because you know, I was one of the few guys that went into certain quarters underneath the Whitehouse to get from place to place. And remember that Casey at that time was in the old exec office building and at the FBI we would go behind the stage and get through the FBI without being, shall we say, filed or reported.
GREG SZYMANSKI: So you're basically dealing with US authorities, and...
LEO WANTA: And corporate attorneys and bank attorneys and so on and so forth.
GREG SZYMANSKI: Talk a little bit about why you think the Fed is holding this up?
LEO WANTA: Well I have a problem with the Fed Reserve involved with this at all because this was a private deal between the United States and us; and these bankers that consorted in the pool of $4.5 T.
Under the HR 3723, everything that we were doing was protected under federal statute. Under the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. Which protects all of our proprietary economic information. There was no reason for them to be involved. They're not invoved. We don't need their services. They're a clearing house; we have our own banks that will do all of these things.
We have got all the boilerplate protection that we need and we don't need other groups to come in and try to participate for a fee. Or not participate, by not allowing a deal to go through. They're not in charge. They have no money involved, so why should they be in charge?
GREG SZYMANSKI: And if they don't release the money? You still can, as the trustor go after the whole amount, correct?
LEO WANTA: Well, yeah. They're in default. The banks [would be] in default. The banks would be extremely upset. They settled a $27.5 trillion claim in the federal courts for $4.5 trillion and this reopens everything for resettlement. They certainly would pay more not less. They already have acknowledged that they had property of [mine] that didn't belong to them. They've been using it internally for whatever reasons, and I don't care, since we have agreed to quietly be quiet. And we get the $4.5 T and the Treasury gets paid and Virginia gets paid and life goes on at a very fast pace.
Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 11 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski
Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 12 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski
Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 13 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski
Leo Wanta Story Continues 9 14 06 Interview with Greg Szymanski
Democracy or Republic?
Henry Morgan relays:
From: joodd1 [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 3:01 AM
To: Lynda Kvasnikoff
Subject: Re: Fw: FW: Fw: Fwd: Democracy or Republic?
He's telling the TRUTH!
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: John Porter <email@example.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 6, 2014 12:36 PM
Subject: Fwd: Democracy or Republic?
September 6, 2014
To: Americans everywhere;
Thank you for your time and attention.
First, please let me be very clear, what I have written here for your consideration is not about the Republican Party, Democrat Party, Independent Party, Libertarian Party, Tea Party or any other Party. It is about an idea conceived over two centuries ago, a country, a people, a document, our current president and his intentions for America.
Two hundred and twenty seven years ago (1787) a group of men whom we now refer to as the "founding fathers," following a long and bloody battle for their independence from a dictatorial Monarchy, assembled themselves together in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and did their best to establish a country governed in a God-fearing way by representatives who were selected by the people who were to be governed.
Nowhere in the history of all mankind were there any examples or even political theory in existence that offered them any hope that a republican form of government, based on the new concept of consent of the governed, could succeed on a wilderness continent which was much larger than any European state.
These men met there on the world stage to carry out the first of three acts in this epic political drama, the drafting of the United States Constitution. The final document was the culmination of a fierce political struggle that had been waged for four sweltering summer months in secret behind guarded closed doors. The document sought to reconcile individual personal liberty with the perceived need for a central government with powers to forge a political and economic common market among thirteen separate and sovereign states.
The next two acts to be performed on this world stage were the ratification of the document and the translation from words on parchment paper to institutional form and structure. In 1789 the first congress approved and sent to the states for ratification, a bill of rights of individual liberty, and additional rights reserved to the states. Those ten amendments, ratified on December 15, 1791, became an extremely vital part of the Constitution and crucial to greatly limiting the power of the Federal Government over both that of the people and separate states. The Republic of the United States of America, an experiment in people governing themselves was now a reality for the first time in the history of man. Newcomers from other countries, willing to be governed by it's Constitution and Bill of Rights and themselves, came in droves to this new land of government by the governed.
I here bring to your attention that the United States of America was formed as a Republic and not a Democracy. All our lives you and I have been conditioned to believe we are a Democracy in America. How long has it been since you have heard of America referred to as a Republic? You see, there was purpose behind the words in the Pledge of Allegiance to our flag referring to our country as, "the Republic for which it stands." Ladies and gentlemen rest assured there is a very good reason the term "democracy" does not exist either in our Constitution or the Declaration of our Independence from the Monarchial King of England. A true Democracy is mob rule. Any government set up as a Democracy is the same government we would have if we were set up as a Socialist, Communist, or Marxist government. In these forms the government is a mob ruling over the people with absolutely no rights for individuals or minorities.
It has been written, "The Founders were extremely knowledgeable about the issue of democracy and feared democracy as much as a monarchy. They understood that the only entity that can take away the people's freedom is their own government, either by being too weak to protect them from external threats or by becoming too powerful and taking over every aspect of life." Democracy and/or Socialism is mob rule by government. The founders of America were all too familiar with democracies/socialism, and deliberately did everything in their power to prevent a Democracy. It has been written, "In a Republic, the sovereignty resides with the people themselves. In a Republic, one may act on his own or through his representatives when he chooses to solve a problem." The people have no obligation to the government; the government is a servant of the people, and obliged to them, for they are its owner. Not only have many politicians, Republican and Democrat, lost sight of this fact, but a great many of the American people.
A Constitutional Republic has a Constitution that limits the powers of the government. The goal of our founding fathers in forming a Constitutional Republic was to avoid the disastrous extremes of either tyranny (absolute ruler) or "mobocracy." (government mob).
I submit for your consideration, we are witnessing today president Barack Obama, who by way of his own actions and words, is demonstrating his aspirations of becoming an absolute ruler. When he makes public statements of, "Fundamentally changing America," he is promising us to change the workings of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, for they ARE the fundamentals of America. His promising to "redistribute the wealth because of income inequality" is purposely designed to divide the American people. When he publicly promises, and I quote, "If congress doesn't do the things I think necessary, I will not wait on them." "I will do it myself." And again only last week, "I've got a pen and I've got a phone--and I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and adminstrative actions that move the ball forward." This kind of talk is deliberately crafted to condition our minds and dumb us down to his way of Socialistic and absolute ruler thinking. It very well may be that he will never willingly relinquish the office of president.
Barack Obama is not an incompetent fool, ladies and gentlemen. He knows exactly what he is doing and why he is doing it. For five years he has been conditioning the minds of all who will listen and very carefully and cunningly crafting the country for his possible absolute rulership through ignoring the Constitution and the people's congress. Please familiarize yourself with this man's past. He is the most dangerous man in American history, to the Constitutional Republic and individual freedoms, which our founding fathers established and left for us. It will be up to us to defend and preserve it. Make no mistake, his view of America is very different than that of our founding fathers, and most Americans today.
Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution states: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of Government"...If we the American people don't stop this and start a reversal of the present trend, the free Republic of America will be lost for generations to come to a Socialist, tyrannical government mob. It begs the question, "Do we really care enough?" There needs to be a great awakening of all freedom loving Americans to the fact, that a people can become slaves to an absolute ruler, and the government, as well as a plantation owner. Do you really care enough? The voting booths will open again this November 4th for 37 Senate seats and all 435 House seats. America's destiny in in our hands!!
You have my permission to leave my information below intact as you please forward to all you can in any method you wish.
May God bless America at this critical time in our history.
Until next time:
Your friend in freedom;
118 Approach Drive
Harrison, Arkansas 72601
POWER OF THE PURSE
There was once a time when Americans could control their government simply by shutting off the money.
Citizens could get Unkle Sam's hand out of their pocket by refusing to buy imported goods, thereby avoiding Federal Excise Taxes and reducing Federal Revenue.
States could bring great pressure on Federal Senators to curb Federal spending because Senators were elected from within the State Legislatures...by the State Legislatures....to represent the States in the US Congress.....and States had to cough up the money if the Federal Government spent more than it took in....in any given year. (The People were to be represented directly by Congressmen in the US House of Representatives, the States were to be represented directly by Senators in the US Senate. )
But with the advent of the 17th Amendment (1913) which effectively removed control of Senators from States,the advent of the Federal Reserve Act (1913) which effectively allowed a private bank to create unlimited amounts of fiat money, "lend" it to the US government and charge interest on it, and with the advent of the 16th Amendment (1913) which effectively (if not legally) allowed the Federal Government to bypass the States, and go directly into the pockets of individual Americans.....to collect the interest to be paid on the "money" it "borrowed" from the Federal Reserve.....
Americans lost their ability to control the Federal Government with the "Power of the Purse".
Not only can the Federal Government now (since 1913) spend without limit, not only can the citizen not refuse to pay without enduring dire consequences, but the insult of the Income Tax is compounded by the fact that the dollars remaining in the Citizen's pocket after taxes constantly lose purchasing power due to the continuous expansion of the money supply (called inflation) through the creation of more and more government debt (money) owed to the Federal Reserve. (The Federal Reserve creates the "money" it "loans" to the government out of thin air with the flick of a computer key.)
And so Americans are no longer in control of the Federal Government.....they are effectively slaves to it....milk cows on the Federal Plantation.
Americans will never again be in control of their government....or their own financial destinies....... until they take back the power of the purse, by repealing the 16th, 17th Amendments and the Federal Reserve Act.
~~~ Henry "Jake" Morgan
"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the Earth.
Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the
flick of a pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it
away from them, and all the fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to
disappear, for this world would be a happier and better world to live in. But if you
wish to remain slaves of the Bankers and pay for the cost of your own slavery, let
them continue to create deposits."
~~~ Sir Josiah Stamp,
President of the Bank of England
in the 1920s, the second richest
man in Britain.
I bet you didn't know that.... the so-called "Federal Income Tax" was not needed to, and didn't, fund the Federal Government during the first 155 years of our history ...from 1787 until 1942.
Consider....no truly free person would ever give up the details of his personal economic life to the government....any government .... voluntarily .... even once.....never mind on an annual basis.
To do so would be to give up one's 4th amendment privacy rights to be secure in one's person, property, papers and effects. (personal finances are none of the federal government's damned business)
The recent debacle in which the IRS was used as a political weapon highlights the folly of putting up with this bizarre, ridiculous, tyrannical, anti-constitutional, fraudulent, oppressive criminal custom.
If you would like to know the proper, liberty sustaining, prosperity generating, budget balancing system for funding the Federal Government, designed early on by Tom Jefferson and Alex Hamilton, you need a copy of the little book:
"Prosperity Restored by the State Rate Tax Plan" by Edward A. Ellison, Jr., J.D. and John William Kurowski and its essential little companion on money "The Miracle on Main Street" by F. Tupper Saussy.
Together they lay out the simple economic system that made America more prosperous in 100 years than all other civilizations in all of history combined. It is the core of what really made America exceptional and a piece of American history that not one American in 10,000 today...much to their financial detriment...knows anything about.
You can learn more about them here: WWW.CurrencyAlert.US
You can usually find both books available here: http://www.bookfinder.com/
GET YOURS TODAY!!!!
Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA via meetup.com
Sep 9 (2 days ago)
Sep 9 (2 days ago)
What is Hilarious about it?
Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA via meetup.com
Sep 9 (2 days ago)
Thank you for asking why I think that this is hilarious. It's because it's comical disinformation. It floats around regularly because the masses are so clueless that they don't know the source of the word "republic" which is from the Roman Republic which had annual elections for all public offices.
Mark A. Adams JD/MBA
Henry Morgan via meetup.com
Sep 9 (2 days ago)
Picking nits ain'tcha Mark. The fact that our American Republic wasn't the first republic is irrelevant to the point of the piece......distinguishing between Republics and Democracies
Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA via meetup.com
Sep 9 (2 days ago)
Not really. The meaning or words either matters or it doesn't.
The Roman Republic was a democracy. It had annual elections for both the legislature and the counsels, a.k.a. presidents. Power was distributed between 3 branches, and it had a basic set of rules, a.k.a. a constitution, which the people in power were supposed to follow. That is what a Republic is and what the Framers intended to establish in the U.S.
Plus, as Jefferson and Madison discussed, there are in essence only two forms of government, aristocracy or democracy. Either you have to beg the ruling elite for justice or you ask citizens to do justice.
By the way, the King's attempt to undermine the means to secure justice through citizens via the grand juries and trial juries are what the Founders' generation complained about the most in that quaint old Declaration of Independence.
The "we are a Republic not a Democracy" disinformation is nothing more than an effort to belittle rule by the people and distract the clueless masses from the roots of our problems which is that we now live under an aristocracy as all of the rights which were supposed to allow us to ask other citizens to help us secure justice have been stolen. Plus, the votes are unconstitutionally "counted" in secret, but who cares about that because democracy is bad, right?
Mark A. Adams JD/MBA
Henry Morgan via meetup.com
Sep 9 (2 days ago)
In a pure democracy, a 51% majority can dispose, at its whim, of the life, liberty and/or property of the other 49%.
"Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths." --- James Madison Federalist #10
In contrast, in the Constitutionally Limited Republic crafted by the Framers in 1787, the democratic "majority" rule was restricted to 17 specific, and enumerated areas of a public nature.
I believe that it was this distinction that Franklin had in mind when, as he was leaving the Constitutional Convention a when a lady asked him.....
"What sort of government have you given us, Dr. Franklin" and he replied "A republic, madam, if you can keep it.”
so I entirely understand and agree with the desire of Mr. Porter to discourage making reference to the Constitutionally Limited Republic crafted by the Framers as a "Democracy".
Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA via meetup.com
8:05 PM (1 hour ago)
You are talking about Madison's comments about the problems with pure democracies both making and enforcing the law by majority vote while Porter doesn't understand that a socialist or communist government is rule by an aristocracy, not a democracy or a democratic republic.
In the Federalist Number 10, Madison was referring to the problem with allowing the majority to decide whether life, liberty or property could be taken by a simple majority vote as it was in ancient Athenian democracy; however, Madison was obviously aware that the British jury system prevented that problem and sought to make sure that the protections of the jury system were supposed to be guaranteed to us.
However, those rights which the Founders generation complained about being taken in the Declaration of Independence and went to war over have been stolen once again, and instead of focusing on restoring the rights which once upon a time kept the people in power from unjustly taking life, liberty and property at their whim, far too many simply regurgitate comical nonsense. Of course, those who want to rule like the kings of old understand that by keeping the masses in the dark and feeding them BS, they can get away with nearly anything. See a short film by Orson Welles explaining what Plato said about this:
By the way, in the Federalist Number 10, Madison is comparing and contrasting a pure democracy with a republic. He said, "The two great points of difference between a democracy and a republic are: first, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest; secondly, the greater number of citizens, and greater sphere of country, over which the latter may be extended." He also said, "“If a faction consists of less than a majority, relief is supplied by the republican principle, which enables the majority to defeat its sinister views by regular vote.” So, clearly as I pointed out in my email below, the Framers were basing their use of the term Republic on the Roman Republic which had annual elections for the legislative and executive branches.
Madison goes on to say, "“When a majority is included in a faction, the form of popular government, on the other hand, enables it to sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest both the public good and the rights of other citizens. To secure the public good and private rights against the danger of such a faction, and at the same time to preserve the spirit and the form of popular government, is then the great object to which our inquiries are directed.” Once again, Madison understood that the jury system injects democracy into the law enforcement function of government and that unanimous agreement of the jurors is necessary to take life, liberty or property based upon any criminal charge and a super-majority vote of the jury to take property in a civil action.
Anyway, read The Federalist Number 10 at http://constitution.org/fed/federa10.htm
Then, note that the fascist scumbags who took over our country 70 years ago have stolen the right to a jury trial in all civil actions and in criminal actions unless you are charged with a felony. If you don't believe me, see for yourself:
You Don't Have Any Right to a Jury Trial!!!
by Mark A. Adams JD/MBA
We no longer have any right to a jury trial. Those rights have been stolen by power mad, greedy, fascist scum.
Most of you are saying, "No way! My teachers told me that we did, and I read the Constitution once, and it said that we had a right to a jury trial, too! Plus, I didn't see anyone on TV, any expert or any reform organization say anything about not having a right to a jury trial anymore. You must be wrong!"
Others are saying, "Big deal. Judges are wise honest old people who almost always do the right thing like in all of those court shows on TV! I wouldn't want to have to waste my time on jury duty. Judges should make all of the decisions. It is so much more efficient."
Although most are clueless, those in power are well aware that Thomas Jefferson said, "If a Nation expects to be ignorant and free., it expects what never was and never will be.... If we are to guard against ignorance and remain free, it is the responsibility of every American to be informed."
So naturally, the rulers want to make sure that the public remains ignorant of the fundamental rights to control the government which were supposed to be secured by the Constitution. Their efforts to maintain widespread ignorance of these rights has been very effective. As a result, ironically, many people complain about government abuses, but then call for the passage of laws which clearly violate the Constitution, undermine our fundamental rights, and ignore the need to seek an amendment if anyone wants to change the Constitution while remaining a government based on the rule of law.
Unfortunately, the rulers are so afraid that the people might figure out that they have stolen the fundamental rights which we were supposed to have to control them that they have an army of enforcers and propagandists ready to attack people who undertake any meaningful action to defend those rights or raise awareness about them. Has anyone else noticed that? If not, do you really enjoy having all that sand in your eyes?
The Rights to Trial by Juries Have Been Stolen to Enslave and Impoverish You!
Now, court decisions are determined by a judge based upon who has the most influence over him. Naturally, in proceedings in which the state is not a party, this is the better connected attorney who "loses" more money to the judge on the golf course, and when the state is a party, it is the state unless you have a well connected attorney who "loses" a lot of money to the judge or has a picture of the judge with a _______ in his _______ (Fill in the blanks yourself). I'm sure that some people, such as fools and shills, will think that my claim that judges are for sale is unbelievable. However, I've been involved in many cases in which the judge ignored the law and the facts to rule in favor of a party in spite of the fact that the decision was against both the law and the facts. In fact, I was involved in one case in which the opposing party repeatedly boasted that his attorneys were connected, had the judge in their pocket and would bury my client, and they did in spite of the law and the facts and the efforts to get the authorities who are supposed to make sure that judges don't break the law to take action.
Furthermore, Alexander Hamilton, a Founder, Framer and attorney, said that trial by jury is the best way to protect our rights and secure justice because there is much more time and opportunity to improperly influence judges than there is to improperly influence a jury summoned to hear a case.
Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry and a lot of the other attorneys who were involved in founding our country thought that they had ended the tyranny of the judiciary by requiring jury trials in all proceedings; however, in 1840, the U.S. Supreme Court claimed that those Framers didn't know what they were talking about and decided that no jury trials were necessary in "equitable" proceedings, like probate, family law and mortgage foreclosure. We all know that the judges never ignore the law in those proceedings, right?
Our right to jury trials has also been eliminated in all other civil proceedings by the grant of the power of summary judgment to the judiciary without anyone bothering to amend the Constitution. The Constitution says that it is the supreme law of the land, but the judges say that their rules rule, summary judgment granted or denied depending on who has the judge's favor.
The fascist scum even had the audacity to claim that you do not have a right to a jury trial when charged with a crime unless it is a felony even though both Article III, § 2 and the Sixth Amendment clearly provide that the trial of all crimes shall be by jury. See Lewis v U.S. 518 U.S. 322(1996). By the way, this decision is supported by the so-called conservative or strict constructionist judges who found the word "serious" written in invisible ink in both clauses in the Constitution.
Please note that I'm not saying that trampling the Constitution is right. I'm saying that the powers that be are doing it, and if more people don't get a clue and demand that our rights to control the government are restored, then things will continue to go downhill. If you want to know what those rights are, read Why does the government ignore our wishes? and don't miss my speech.
Mark A. Adams JD/MBA
P.S. I talked about this problem just a couple of months ago:
Mark A. Adams, JD/MBA via meetup.com
3:45 PM (5 hours ago)
What? No one wants to try to explain that a republic is magically special and democracy is especially bad except for all of the other forms of government which are actually aristocracies?
That's right. Once again, there are only two forms of government, rule by the rulers or rule by the people. Ours was designed to be the latter, but was converted to the former although almost no one can believe it. After all, they still have jury trials on TV shows, don't they?
Mark A. Adams JD/MBA
P.S. Note that I have copied the person who wrote the Republic not a Democracy email that set me off, and I have yet to hear back from him.
Federal Judicial/Governmental Insanity Has Corrupted And Destroyed Our Republic / A Call For A Grand Jury Investigation Of Richard C. “Dick” Tallman (Ninth Circuit)
Godel's Proof on how the US Constitution has a flaw that could allow a dictatorship
Private Attorney General in USA Comments on: “Democratic Dictatorship”: The Transition towards Authoritarian Rule in America, by Dr. Robert P. Abele