Ron Paul news and information

Ron Paul Highlights – CNN Florida Debate 01/26/12

Posted: 26 Jan 2012 08:35 PM PST


Ron Paul calls out Newt Gingrich CNN Florida Republican Debate 1/26/12

Posted: 26 Jan 2012 06:36 PM PST


CNN Republican Debate Tonight

Posted: 26 Jan 2012 04:05 PM PST

CNN Republican Debate: January 26, 2012 8pm ET on CNN – click to watch Location: University of North Florida in Jacksonville, FL Sponsor: CNN, CNN en Español, The Hispanic Leadership Network and The Republican Party of Florida Participants: Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, Paul  


Ron Paul raises $250K to ‘end the TSA’

Posted: 26 Jan 2012 01:01 PM PST

Ron Paul appears headed toward reaching his latest fundraising goal: $250,000 to help end the Transportation Security Administration. The GOP presidential candidate began a “money bomb” shortly after his son, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, got stopped at the Nashville airport on Monday after setting off an alarm on a body-scanning machine. The younger Paul declined [...]


Jack Hunter Joins Jerry Doyle Show

Posted: 26 Jan 2012 12:54 PM PST

Jack Hunter Joins Jerry Doyle Show


Bill Maher -When It Comes To Things Like The Drug War & Foreign Policy Ron Paul Is So Great!

Posted: 26 Jan 2012 12:42 PM PST

Bill Maher -When It Comes To Things Like The Drug War & Foreign Policy Ron Paul Is So Great!


Ron Paul – Gold / Fiat Money

Posted: 26 Jan 2012 12:33 PM PST

Ron Paul – Gold / Fiat Money


Veterans For Ron Paul (March On The White House) Feb. 20th ,2012

Posted: 26 Jan 2012 12:14 PM PST

Veterans For Ron Paul (March On The White House) Feb. 20th ,2012


Ron Paul on Orlando, FL 8010 AM Radio 01/25/12

Posted: 26 Jan 2012 11:55 AM PST

Ron Paul on Orlando, FL 8010 AM Radio 01/25/12


Ron Paul on NPR Radio 01/25/12

Posted: 26 Jan 2012 09:57 AM PST

Ron Paul on NPR Radio 01/25/12

January 27, 2012 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Mr. Lendman, Obama cannot sign any Bills! cf. Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920)

Correct!

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/vieira/Obama.Stand.Up.Now.or.Stand.Down.htm

[begin quote]
            The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose;  since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.  An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed.  Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be[,] had the statute not been enacted.
 
            Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it ....
 
            A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one.  An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law.  Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.
 
            No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it.
 
[16 Am Jur 2d, Sec. 177, emphasis added]

[end quote]
 

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

From: Peter Ackermann <w4sfd@sccctv.net>
To: TheRevolutionaryCoalition@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@yahoo.com>; "lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net" <lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [TheRevolutionaryCoalition] Mr. Lendman, Obama cannot sign any Bills! cf. Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920)

I'll add to this:

"The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The Constitution for these united States is the supreme law of the land, and any statue, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:

"The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed.   Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

"Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it ....

"A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it superseded thereby.

"No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it."

Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177. (late Second Ed. Section 256)


On 12/18/2011 12:46 PM, Supreme Law Firm wrote:
 
I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT YOU DO NOT STORE YOUR HEAD IN THE SAND!!!

http://www.rense.com/general95/pllw.htm


NOW HEAR THIS ...

"Congress cannot by legislation alter the Constitution,
from which alone it derives its power to legislate,
and within whose limitations alone that power can be
lawfully exercised."  -- Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920)

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=252&invol=189

"Congress cannot by any definition it may adopt conclude the matter,
since it cannot by legislation alter the Constitution,
from which alone it derives its power to legislate, and
within whose limitations alone that power can be lawfully exercised."


DO NOT JOIN THE TRAITORS, PLEASE!


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@yahoo.com>
To: WAKE UP AMERICA <timetowake@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [apfn-1] ‘Indefinite Detainment’ Bill Reconciled by House, Senate

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/vcc.htm

Sixth, and perhaps most importantly, Congress can pass no law while an usurper pretends to occupy “the Office of President.”  The Constitution provides that “[e]very Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States” (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2).  Not to an usurper posturing as “the President of the United States,” but to the true and rightful President.  If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no “Bill” will or can, “before it become a Law, be presented to [him].” 

If no “Bill” is so presented, no “Bill” will or can become a “Law.”  And any purported “Law” that the usurper “approve[s]” and “sign[s],” or that Congress passes over the usurper’s “Objections,” will be a nullity.  Thus, if Obama deceitfully “enters office” as an usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as “President.”


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/ decs/agency/private.attorney. general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/ support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/ guidelines.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/ support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@yahoo. com> wrote:

Obama cannot sign any Bills!

Is your short-term memory totally gone??

 
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

From: WAKE UP AMERICA <timetowake@gmail.com>
To: paulandrewmitchell2004@yahoo.com
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 11:47 AM
Subject: Fwd: [apfn-1] ‘Indefinite Detainment’ Bill Reconciled by House, Senate


THE VERY ONES THAT CREATED THIS NIGHTMARE, WILL BE THE ONES INDEFINITELY DETAINED BY IT....MARK MY WORDS AND SPREAD THE TRUTH, STAY IN THE LIGHT, LOOK NOT INTO THE DARK...NAMASTE' BROTHERS AND SISTERS, MOTHERS AND FATHERS, SONS AND DAUGHTERS...WE ARE ALL BLESSED, PROTECTED AND SAFE....HOLD THE ENERGY OF PEACE WITHIN YOU AND SERVE ONE ANOTHER AND EVERYTHING WILL BE OK!!! I PROMISE....as long as we all come together as ONE!!!
We Can Do It!!!
Red Pill or Blue Pill? = www.TheRightofSelfDetermination.com

On Dec 16, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Jerry Pleasant wrote:

 

House, Senate Pass Reconciled DoD ‘Indefinite Detainment’ Bill

by Conservative Action Alerts on December 15, 2011
Conservative Action Alerts has been sounding the alarm over the recently reconciled and passed National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (NDAA) which threatens American Constitutional liberty by shredding the Bill of Rights.
Conservative Action Alerts has organized petitions against the bill and sent thousands of letters to Congress and Obama regarding this dangerous piece of legislation.
Senator Carl Levin (D-Mi) co-authored the bill with Senator John McCain (R-Az); they initially included language protecting American citizens from indefinite arrest and incarceration in Guantanamo Bay prison.
However, on November 17 the Executive Branch sent Senator Levin a letter claiming that the bill’s language protecting American citizens from terrorism-related arrests was too restrictive.
The DoD bill moved through a Conference Committee earlier this week largely unchanged; it passed in the House 283-136 on December, 14 and the Senate 86-13 the day after.
Harold Pease of Liberty Under Fire describes how the bill violates historic civilian protections from government military force:
The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, following the Civil War, forbade the U.S. military from performing law enforcement functions on American soil. The American Civil Liberties Union was also blunt. “Since the bill puts military detention authority on steroids and makes it permanent, American citizens and others are at greater risk of being locked away by the military without charge or trial if this bill becomes law.” When asked if it were possible for an American to be shipped to Guantanamo Bay, John McCain, a co-author of the bill, said yes. Senator Lindsey Long was more blunt. “When they say, ‘I want my lawyer,’ you tell them, ‘Shutup. You don’t get a lawyer.’”
The bill will reach Obama’s desk likely tomorrow: if he refuses to veto it, our government — in broad daylight — will have made into law the most un-American, anti-liberty piece of legislation in our history.
Any military personnel who obey any order issued under this edict are violating their oath to support and protect the Constitution and deserve to be shot on sight. ..........Jerry

We were formed as a "Republic" because:
"Democracy never lasts long,
  It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself.
 There was never a democracy that
did not commit suicide.'"
John Adams

WAKE UP AMERICA
Jurisdictionary® Get educated now!
PUBLIC & PRIVATE NOTICE - This electronic message and any attachments contain confidential information which may be subject to the company-clientel privilege and may constitute private inside information.  We will not produce the content of e-mail, as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2701 et seq., prohibits an electronic communications service provider from producing the contents of electronic communications, even pursuant to subpoena or court order, except in limited circumstances. Our e-mail servers do not retain deleted or sent e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that your use or distribution of such information, by copying, electronic mail or otherwise, is strictly and hereby with full-notice prohibited.  All laws of the Constitution for the united states of America and the Bill of Rights pertain to this communication, its contents and/or the Sovereign. NOTICE TO ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS and any other government affiliates, your offer and your sworn oath is accepted for value to the contract. This binds performance to all the Amendments to this declaration. The 4th and 5th Amendment to be pointed out protect all private property and natural rights fully and completely. This electronic transmission is legal, lawful and is a commercial notice. To all who see this, YOU HAVE BEEN NOTICED. This transmission and any and all other TRANSMISSIONS ARE PRIVATE ONLY and any and all electronic transfers sending, copying or receiving on this machine are protected by this agreement and notice. You have a commercial duty to obey without any other conditions whatsoever. [McCathy vs. Verson Allsteel Press Co.] If you have received this E-message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying electronically by e-mail and then remove ALL traces of the electronic E-mail message from your system. *** DISCLAIMER: Free Speech Only. Not intended to be construed as legal, medical, financial, or other advice. Without Prejudice, Without Recourse, All Rights Reserved from the Authority Most High, No Liability Assumed, No Value Assured. *** 
Selamat Gajun! Selamat Ja! (Sirian for Be One! and Be in Joy!)



WAKE UP AMERICA
Jurisdictionary® Get educated now!
PUBLIC & PRIVATE NOTICE - This electronic message and any attachments contain confidential information which may be subject to the company-clientel privilege and may constitute private inside information.  We will not produce the content of e-mail, as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2701 et seq., prohibits an electronic communications service provider from producing the contents of electronic communications, even pursuant to subpoena or court order, except in limited circumstances. Our e-mail servers do not retain deleted or sent e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that your use or distribution of such information, by copying, electronic mail or otherwise, is strictly and hereby with full-notice prohibited.  All laws of the Constitution for the united states of America and the Bill of Rights pertain to this communication, its contents and/or the Sovereign. NOTICE TO ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS and any other government affiliates, your offer and your sworn oath is accepted for value to the contract. This binds performance to all the Amendments to this declaration. The 4th and 5th Amendment to be pointed out protect all private property and natural rights fully and completely. This electronic transmission is legal, lawful and is a commercial notice. To all who see this, YOU HAVE BEEN NOTICED. This transmission and any and all other TRANSMISSIONS ARE PRIVATE ONLY and any and all electronic transfers sending, copying or receiving on this machine are protected by this agreement and notice. You have a commercial duty to obey without any other conditions whatsoever. [McCathy vs. Verson Allsteel Press Co.] If you have received this E-message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying electronically by e-mail and then remove ALL traces of the electronic E-mail message from your system. ***

January 26, 2012 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Tonight (Thursday Jan 26 ) Special Guest Speaker: RG will speak about the IRS Code etc.| Call ID: 39904 | 9PM est 6PM pst

You have been invited by Angela Stark to join a live Community Call. My Private Audio (Join in)
Host: Angela - mailto:angelastark@ca.rr.com
Episode: EPISODE 145 - Special Guest RG on My Private Audio

Call ID: 39904

Personal Message from the Host:
TONIGHT Thursday, January 26, 2012, our Special Guest Speaker will be RG.
RG will talk to us about the IRS Code etc. He's written a 12 part, easy to understand explanation of how its been used to trick us into volunteering. This call will be especially informative for new people, so after it's recorded, please download it and send it to your newbie friends and family members.
For more info, click on his links on this page http://www.myprivateaudio.com/AAA-Talkshoe-Guest.html
Please join us online or by phone. I hope to see you there. You wont want to miss it. And as usual, this is info you wont hear about on main stream radio or TV. This is gonna be good!
See you tonight! (Call info is below)
Love,
Angela
For more info go to http://www.myprivateaudio.com/AAA-Talkshoe-Guest.html and check out our new Talkshoe Calls discussion group on Yahoo Join here http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TalkshoeCalls/
This call will be recorded and archived. See our Talkshoe Guide for more scheduled calls http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Talkshoes.html



Call Scheduled Time:

Date: Thursday, January 26, 2012
Time:
09:00 PM EST

How to participate:

Call in:

  1. Dial: (724) 444-7444
  2. Enter: 39904 # (Call ID)
  3. Enter: 1 # or your PIN

Join from your computer:

  1. Click here to join the call or just listen along
  2. (Optional) Become a TalkShoe member

Facebook user? You can join this Call directly through the TalkShoe Community Calling Facebook application.

Listen to the Recording:
If you missed this event or want to hear previous recorded episodes click here.

__

Related:

A talk given by Paul Andrew Mitchell Private Attorney General along with questions and answers in regards to the corruption, fraud,. of United States Federal courts, Federal Government, Internal Revenue Service / Internal Revenue Code, and more. You simply can't miss listening to this recording of this given talk!

http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2012/01/talk-given-by-paul-andrew-mitchell-private-attorney-general-along-with-questions-and-answers.html

January 26, 2012 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Mergers and aquisitions (M&A)

Mergers and Aquisitions (M&A) is a quite interesting topic to research about at length in our world of increasing global commerce and especially in light of the fact that they are happening and being considered by many companies on a fairly frequent basis as can be read in the daily news. A simple search of lets say news.google.com, google.com will confirm that mergers and aquisitions are something which companies are exploring and executing to stay competitive in the global marketplace in a constant quest to gain a greater and influential foothold in their particular areas that their company or companies may happen to have a specialty in (whether it be in the banking [chemical investment banking or otherwise], transportation, or some other sector]) Mergers and aquisitions can certainly be good for the company or companies by way of increasing of shareholder value and can also be of great benefit to their employees as well in regards to their financial and professional advancement and well-being. Reading up on such topics I do tend to check out Wikipedia articles in the process so if you are interested that is definitely one website to check out that can be informative. Today I was doing a search on chemical mergers and acquisitions where I learned of The Valence Group LLC who are one of the top M&A firms who specialize in the chemicals, materials and other related sectors.

January 26, 2012 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Ron Paul news and information

Ron Paul is sweeping the GOP youth vote

Posted: 26 Jan 2012 12:00 AM PST

Across the country, the youth vote is down. Registration is low. Voter enthusiasm for Republican candidates has been lackluster. Unless that candidate’s name is Ron Paul. The 76-year-old U.S. representative from Texas has energized — and gained —young voters at a time many people under 30 are turned off to politics. Paul’s reputation for attracting young [...]


Veterans march for Ron Paul announcements – MONEY GRENADE 2/1!!!

Posted: 25 Jan 2012 12:46 PM PST

Veterans march for Ron Paul announcements – MONEY GRENADE 2/1!!!


Why didn’t Brian Williams ask Ron Paul, Mitt Romney and the others about the TSA?

Posted: 25 Jan 2012 12:25 PM PST

I realize Brian Williams of NBC grew up at the Jersey Shore like me and even went to Catholic school as I did. So we have a lot in common, but when it comes to his role moderating debates, he sure could use a bit of Jersey Shore attitude. The questions he asked at the Florida [...]


Presidential Debates 2012: Ron Paul BLACKOUT, Barack Obama’s Dictatorship, Mitt Romney’s Cash

Posted: 25 Jan 2012 11:50 AM PST

Yet another example of media bias and omission.  Join the MSM Advertiser Boycott below (more to come soon).  Just click on the image, like the page, review the list of advertisers and boycott! Boycott FoxNews Advertisers Boycott Msnbc Advertisers


O’Reilly Tries to Tie Child Molestation to Ron Paul

Posted: 25 Jan 2012 10:17 AM PST

We must begin to construct a serious, sustained boycott of the mainstream media advertisers (their lifeblood) with the goal of either fundamentally changing the msm’s behavior or ending their existence.  Yes, the media distorts Ron Paul, but that’s only part of the problem.  The truth is the mainstream media does a terrible job of keeping us informed [...]


Petition: Pelosi must tell America her Gingrich Secret

Posted: 25 Jan 2012 09:25 AM PST

In this recent interview with John King congresswoman Nancy Pelosi states that she knows something about Newt Gingrich that will keep him from winning the Presidency should he be nominated as the Republican nominee.  Watch: Well, that’s all fine and dandy but that means Nancy Pelosi is withholding information that the public should know now.  This is our [...]

January 26, 2012 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Liberty News

Libya on the verge of civil war again

Posted: 25 Jan 2012 11:33 AM PST

Libya on the verge of civil war again

January 26, 2012 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Time to face the facts that it is a two man race between Ron Paul and Romney for the nomination

-------Original Message-------
 
Subject: Time to Face the Facts
 
Please forward this to everyone on your email list.
 
~~~~~~~~~
In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way. ~Franklin D. Roosevelt
  
Time to face the facts. What the GOP fears most is what America needs most.
Neither Santorum nor Gingrich can win the Nomination for one simple reason. Neither of them can collect enough delegates to win the Nomination.

Neither man can be t
he nominee because neither one was able to get on enough states' ballots to make a difference. (564 delegates that Newt can't win ), Same with Santorum (over 700 delegates he can't win ). And the media as well as the GOP is praying to god that the American people continue to remain ignorant of this fact for as long as possible while they try to come up with a strategy that will bury Ron Paul before Romney is forced to face him on stage alone and the commentators are no longer able to marginalize Paul by giving all the questions to everyone but him.


Ron Paul and Mitt Romney are the only two candidates that made it on the ballot in every state. Romney will not beat Obama, he's too similar except he will raise taxes on anyone making 40k a year or less in favor of giving himself lower taxes. Independents are going to run to Obama if Romney is the alternative.

It is a two man race between Ron Paul and Romney for the nomination.

It is also a two man race between Ron Paul and Obama for the White House.

It's time Conservatives and people with any functioning brain cells in their heads started backing the only real candidate that will beat Obama and save America. And whether you like it or not, that candidate is, by default, Ron Paul.

The facts can't be twisted to point in any other direction. The Delegates decide who gets the nomination and you can't get delegates if you aren't on the ballots. It doesn't matter how much money gets pumped into your campaign by special interest groups. The facts are the facts.

Fact : Gingrich and Santorum cannot win the nomination no matter how much they get in " popular " votes.

Fact : Romney will fail epically against Obama in a general election.

Fact : Ron Paul will decimate Obama on his Foreign Policy stance alone. Add in his Economic and Defense policies ( All 3 of which were policies Obama ran on in 2008 and abandoned once he got in the White  House so no one would be stupid enough to believe he's going to follow them in his second term ) and you have an un-beatable candidate in the general election who the bulk of the American people will vote for when they finally get a chance to see the man unfiltered and unbiased by the media.

America is broke and the average American is tired of hearing about another war on the horizon and seeing more dead soldiers coming home in coffins for no reason...all the while the freedoms they are dying to " protect " are being stripped away from us by our own government...one by one.

Obama has 0 chance of beating Paul and Washington knows it. The GOP knows it. The corporations that own Washington know it too so they instruct the media outlets they own to hide it from you.

But now you know. Gingrich and Santorum are mathematically incapable of winning the Nomination and Romney can't beat Obama in the general election.

Ron Paul is the only choice we have. It's just nice that, for once, he's the RIGHT choice and not just the " lesser of two evils ".

January 26, 2012 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Vote Ron Paul News Update - January 25th, 2012

Vote Ron Paul

Ron Paul Responds to the President's
State of the Union Speech

Rand Paul on CNN Discussing his TSA Detainment

“Tonight, President Obama once again showed that he does not represent the fundamental change this country needs.”

Read More

 

Ron Paul on Florida Radio 01-25-2012

Ron Paul on Florida Radio 01-25-2012

Great interview with on Florida's 810AM 'The Doc Show' with Doc Holliday. Mr. Holliday treated Congressman Paul with courtesy and respect...qualities lacking in the majority of the media.

Listen to Interview

 

University of Florida Independent Alligator Editorial Board

Endorses Texas Congressman: We Pick Paul

Jon Stossel Discusses Ron Paul Non-Interventionism

You may not agree with Ron Paul on many issues, but for college-aged voters in the Florida Republican primary, Paul should be your choice.

Read More

 

 



© 2007 - 2011 VoteRonPaul.com. All Rights Reserved.

VoteRonPaul.com is 100% Grassroots and is not paid for or endorsed by any candidate.

For more information on Ron Paul please visit:

Ron Paul's 2012 Presidential Campaign Website
Congressman Ron Paul's Official Website

FAIR USE NOTICE: This website may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

 






47 W. Polk St. Suite 100-408, Chicago, IL 60605

January 25, 2012 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Ron Paul news and information

Ron Paul after Tampa Debate

Posted: 24 Jan 2012 01:07 PM PST

Ron Paul after Tampa Debate


Ron Paul: A Righteous Man

Posted: 24 Jan 2012 12:39 PM PST

Ron Paul: A Righteous Man


Ron Paul was right on Cuba; Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum were dumb and dumber

Posted: 24 Jan 2012 11:57 AM PST

Ask a stupid question … That’s what NBC’s Brian Williams did on the subject of Cuba in that Republican presidential primary debate Monday evening. Here’s what Williams asked Mitt Romney: There was a lot of talk in the last presidential campaign about that 3:00 a.m. phone call. Let`s say President Romney gets that phone call, and [...]


Welcome to Florida, Ron Paul!

Posted: 24 Jan 2012 11:17 AM PST

Welcome to Florida, Ron Paul!


John Stossel on Ron Paul’s Non-Interventionist Views

Posted: 24 Jan 2012 10:59 AM PST

John Stossel on Ron Paul’s Non-Interventionist Views

January 25, 2012 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Ron Paul Ignored In GOP Debate Once Again

Congressman was afforded less than six minutes speaking time and asked when he was going to drop out

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
January 24, 2012


During Last night’s NBC hosted GOP debate in Florida, Ron Paul was once again roundly ignored and dismissed as a potential candidate.

Paul spoke for less than 6 minutes out of the hour long debate. He was skipped over completely on three questions when everyone else got to speak, and was not offered the chance to respond to several attacks on his policies from the other candidates.

In comparison, Romney and Gingrich were afforded close to 35 minutes of speaking time, not even taking into account the now ubiquitous bickering between the two that viewers had to once again endure.

When Paul did want to speak he had to raise his hand and wave at the moderators like he was a troublesome fourth grader at the back of the classroom.

Debate moderator Brian Williams took around 15 minutes before finally asking Ron paul a question. The line of questioning from there on in essentially amounted to ‘You are unelectable so when are you going to drop out of the race?’

“To say that there has only been three races and talk about not being electable, I think is a bit of a stretch,” Paul said, once again highlighting that he had no desire at this time to run as a third party candidate.

Williams then asked Paul if he would endorse Newt Gingrich, again glossing over the fact that Paul is still as much in the race as Gingrich is. Williams even asked Gingrich if he would welcome an endorsement from Ron Paul, as if Paul was already out of the race.

The Congressman pointed out that the delegates out of Iowa have not been appointed yet. “Quite frankly we have a pretty good chance of getting a good number of those.” Paul said, adding that when matched up against Obama, he has polled as well as, if not even better than the other three remaining candidates.

The Congressman did manage to speak briefly to some important issues such as monetary policy and foreign policy, and he was able to make a salient point about Gingrich being forced out of office when he was Speaker of the House in the late 90s.

“He didn’t not run for Speaker two years later,” said Paul. “He didn’t have the votes, that was what the problem was.”

Watch all of Paul’s airtime below:

 

——————————————————————

Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.net, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham in England.

January 24, 2012 in Current Affairs | Permalink