Possible NSA T-2 Interference With Wanta Crisis Postings of Christopher Story
Close official foreign observers of these financial scandals believe that the culprits suffer from two disadvantages: first, they do not in fact understand the actual system to a sufficient extent to be able to conduct appropriate financial transactions legally; and secondly, they overwhelmingly prefer to violate the law in order to gain vast personal accruals, stashed offshore, on which they intend to pay no tax. They may also believe that since so many of them are 'doing it', none of them will ever be made to suffer the harsh penalties for their criminality.
By Greg Szymanski
The continuing saga of Ambassador Leo Wanta is not over by a long shot. It's not over until 'the Fat Lady sings', as they say, even though U.S. authorities are trying hard to make the story disappear, acting like a bunch of second rate magicians in a cheap Las Vegas night club act.
In what has been called by influential financial observers the single-most important story facing the American people, what is most disturbing about the Wanta affair is having to be subjected to the across the board complicity from U.S. lawmakers and the corrupted media barons, both hiding the fact that trillions are being diverted, stolen and hidden from the American people in offshore "off the books" accounts.
Thousands of emails and phone calls have flooded into the Arctic Beacon demanding accountability, but still the entire corrupted Congress and Senate remain quiet as church mice while they allow trillions to flow to their treasonous friends to destroy America.
And, furthermore, while the thievery continues, they have the audacity to do this and still call themselves Americans while the people are left to suffer the evil effects of a coming Luciferian one world government, standing ready to replace American freedom with a Nazi-like fascism.
With the Wanta story bringing out the worst in the corrupted Federal Reserve banking system and the corrupted officials benefiting illegally from it, the following conclusion can be drawn: since of the Congress and Senate do nothing, every last one of them are treasonous traitors and should immediately be removed from office, as they serve Lucifer not God and the good American people.
Although God may be the only one that can stop Lucifer's Illuminati controlling the U.S. government, the cold hard facts show the Wanta story puts a gigantic stumbling block into the New World Order plans to rip apart America morally, socially and financially since it uncovers the means in which this evil group has been financing their evil plans since the end of the Cold War.
It must be reiterated Ambassador Wanta's righteous quest to repatriate more than $27.5 trillion has been thoroughly documented over the course of more than a year by the Arctic Beacon and Greg Szymanski's radio show, The Investigative Journal at www.gcnlive.com from 2pm-4pm central time. Also the story has matured into a recent $4.5 trillion settlement between Wanta and U.S. authorities.
The money, earmarked for the American people, however, has been the subject of a Bush administration cover-up ever since Ambassador Wanta entered into an official written agreement in November 2005 to repatriate money for the betterment of the American economy.
Further, in May Wanta verbally agreed to the distribution of the $4.5 trillion with President Bush along with the assistance of one Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) court judge and two U.S. Supreme Court Justices.
The settlement, also negotiated with the help of two major U.S. law firms, represents only a portion of the $27.5 trillion offshore fund established at the end of the Cold War, which is now under the legal control of Ambassador Wanta, as duly appointed trustor, a position given to him by former President Ronald Reagan.
Furthermore, it was always the intention of President Reagan and Ambassador Wanta to use the money for the benefit of the American people. But after Reagan left the political spotlight, Wanta was indiscriminately and illegally jailed by operatives working for the last three presidential administrations, who have instead pilfered the trillions for their own agenda and personal gain.
After Wanta's release from a Wisconsin jail in 2005, he was instructed in a 2003 memorandum opinion by Federal Judge Gerald Bruce Lee of the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, to try and return the $27.5 trillion to U.S. coffers according to President Reagan's instructions.
The $4.5 trillion settlement is a culmination of his efforts after finding a dark and ominous financial trail of theft, bribery and deception, discovering in his quest to retrace the whereabouts of the offshore money that much of it had been stolen or diverted for private use by the last three presidential administrations.
According to Michael C. Cottrell, treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., the corporation formed to distribute the money to the American people, James R. Wilkinson, deputy national security advisor for communications, last Thursday signed off on the release of the money being held in a Clearing House Interbank Payment System credit account (CHIPS), an account credited to Goldman Sachs and Co. at Citibank.
However, according to Cottrell, after Wilkinson officially "signed-off" on the $4.5 trillion, disturbing twists and turns began to take place as the funds never were properly directed into Ambassador Wanta's account.
"We tried calling Paulson a week ago, but his secretary told us, point blank, never expect a call back from him - ever," said Cottrell Wednesday in an extended telephone conversation about the reluctance of the highest officials in the land to release trillions that would benefit the American economy.
Instead, after repeated inquiries, Cottrell learned the Bush administration had deviously devised an illegal plan to defraud Ambassador Wanta and, in turn, the American people by diverting the CHIPS account first to the Deutsche Bank/Berlin and then to two other banks.
Attempts by the Arctic Beacon to contact Wilkinson and Paulson have been ignored, following a pattern since the story of the settlement broke more than a month ago of every single top ranking American lawmaker or official remaining silent, refusing to ignore the elephant sitting right in the middle of the living room.
Although the Wanta story has been well-documented in the courts, most importantly Wanta himself holds the key documentation of account numbers and names which literally nails to the wall high ranking officials in the last three presidential administrations, including Bush Sr. and Clinton, who have been ripping off the American people to the tune of trillions of dollars.
And it is when Wanta wouldn't play ball with the powers that be, they decided to jail him first in the early 90's for 133 days in a Swiss dungeon and then on a Wisconsin state income tax evasion conviction, where he was subjected to less than due process and a kangaroo court-type atmosphere.
Wanta was accused of not paying $14,000 in state income taxes and sentenced to 22 years even though he hadn't resided in Wisconsin for years and proved he had paid the alleged tax arrears.
Further, why such a long sentence for such a trivial matter unless some powerful people wanted him put away for a long time?
Although Wanta has obtained his release about a year and a half ago after many years in jail, in an effort to fill in some of the legal gaps here is a reprinted copy of a 2005 appeal he made to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District Three, which concluded "that that claim preclusion bars re-litigation of Wanta's tax assessment for 1988 and 1989 and other issues he attempts to raise are outside the [*2] scope of these proceedings, we affirm the (original) judgment. (It should be noted that claims preclusion is a term used to denote a procedural rule used to deny rehearing of the facts of a previously litigated case.)
Here is the 2005 appeal:
LEO E. WANTA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT , v. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal No. 2005AP266
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN, DISTRICT THREE
2006 WI App 1; 288 Wis. 2d 658; 707 N.W.2d 580; 2005 Wisc. App. LEXIS 993
November 15, 2005, Decided
November 15, 2005, Filed
NOTICE: [*1] : PURSUANT TO RULE 809.23 OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION IS OF NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE AND FOR THIS REASON MAY NOT BE CITED IN ANY COURT OF THIS STATE AS PRECEDENT OR AUTHORITY EXCEPT TO SUPPORT A CLAIM OF RES JUDICATA, COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR LAW OF THE CASE.
SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: Review dismissed by Wanta v. Wis. Dep't of Revenue, 2006 WI 3, 708 N.W.2d 696, 2005 Wisc. LEXIS 1080 (2005)
PRIOR HISTORY: APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Chippewa County: RODERICK K. CAMERON, Judge. Cir. Ct. No. 2004CV340.
State v. Wanta, 224 Wis. 2d 679, 592 N.W.2d 645, 1999 Wisc. App. LEXIS 134 (Wis. Ct. App., 1999)
JUDGES: Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J.
OPINION: P1 PER CURIAM. Leo E. Wanta appeals a judgment upholding a decision of the Tax Appeals Commission that Wanta's challenge to the Department of Revenue's personal income tax assessments for 1988 and 1989 is barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion. Wanta argues that (1) claim preclusion does not apply to some of the issues he raises; (2) he is entitled to an accounting for revenues the Department received from the foreclosure sale of his property; (3) the Department should be bound by a letter from a revenue agent; and (4) Wanta should benefit from the Department's release of claims against Wanta's ex-wife under the innocent spouse provisions of WIS. STAT. � 71.10(6). [n1] Because we conclude that claim preclusion bars relitigation of Wanta's tax assessment for 1988 and 1989 and other issues he attempts to raise are outside the [*2] scope of these proceedings, we affirm the judgment.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Footnotes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[n1 ] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2003-04 version unless otherwise noted.
- - - - - - - - - - - - End Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
P2 A jury convicted Wanta of tax fraud for 1988 and 1989 by concealing income. It also convicted him of four counts of concealing properties to evade collection or tax assessment. On June 3, 1996, the sentencing court ordered restitution of over $ 14,000, representing the tax and penalties owed for Wanta's 1988 and 1989 unpaid taxes, less $ 14,129 Wanta paid in June 1992. Wanta unsuccessfully appealed his convictions. In these proceedings, the Department of Revenue seeks enforcement of the restitution order.
P3 The Commission properly concluded that Wanta's challenge to the tax assessment is barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion. Under the doctrine of claim preclusion, a final judgment is conclusive in all subsequent actions between the same parties as to all matters that were litigated or could have been litigated in the former proceeding. [*3] See Northern States Power Co. v. Bugher, 189 Wis. 2d 541, 550, 525 N.W.2d 723 (1995). Claim preclusion applies if there is identity between the parties to the two actions, claims that arise from the same transaction, incident or factual situation, and an earlier adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction. The parties, Wanta and the State, are the same, and Wanta does not contest the identity of parties. The criminal litigation and restitution order and the present litigation apply to the same underlying facts. The criminal court is a court of competent jurisdiction. Therefore, Wanta's defenses that he was not a resident of Wisconsin, did not owe the tax or had already paid the tax are barred because they could have been litigated in the criminal proceeding and restitution hearing.
P4 After the Department's motion for summary disposition before the Commission, Wanta changed attorneys, and his new attorney attempted to interject numerous additional issues into the proceedings. As the Department's briefs repeatedly indicated, the sole issue before the Commission was the propriety of the Department's calculation of Wanta's personal income taxes due [*4] from 1988 and 1989. Wanta seeks a declaration that he is not responsible for the taxes generated by one of his businesses, Falls Vending Services, Inc. [n2] If Wanta's personal tax liabilities for 1988 and 1989 included assigning him responsibility for taxes owed by Falls Vending Services Inc., any challenge to that assessment should have been raised as a defense at trial or at the restitution hearing before the sentencing court. If they were not included in that calculation, they are outside the scope of the present litigation.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Footnotes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[n2 ] Much of this argument is based on Wanta's assertion that charges raised in the initial complaint regarding Falls Vending Services were dismissed in an "amended complaint." The document he describes as an amended complaint is actually an Information. The Information appears to charge the same six crimes charged as the initial complaint. As is typically the case, the Information does not have a probable cause section and therefore does not provide details regarding the nature of the underlying charges. The documents Wanta filed with the Commission do not establish that any specific accusations in the complaint were withdrawn or dismissed.
- - - - - - - - - - - - End Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - [*5]
P5 Wanta also seeks an accounting for $ 60,000 generated from the foreclosure sale of his property. Documentary evidence shows that a $ 44,000 payment was credited against unpaid fees in connection with other assessments that pre-dated the assessments at issue here. Wanta's belated attempts to secure an accounting regarding all of his tax liabilities raise issues that are outside the scope of these proceedings. He has presented no evidence that funds received by the Department after the date of the restitution hearing were or should have been applied to his 1988 and 1989 personal tax assessments.
P6 Wanta also submitted a February 18, 1999 letter to the Commission from a revenue agent to Wanta's attorney stating "The Department of Revenue has no record of a delinquent tax account issued to Lee E. Wanta." Wanta argues that the Department should be precluded from contradicting the letter. He contends that the letter is admissible without authentication and should be construed to say that Wanta has no outstanding taxes owed to the State of Wisconsin. The Commission properly refused to consider the letter for several reasons. First, the Department reasonably contends [*6] that the words "delinquent tax account" should not be construed to indicate that no tax is owed. A tax account is not considered delinquent if the matter is still in litigation. Second, the letter refers to Lee, not Leo Wanta. Wanta argues without any evidence that the letter refers to him because it utilizes his social security number, and the revenue agent who authored the letter could not have been referring to a record search involving "Lee E. Wanta." In the absence of evidence presented by the letter's author, its meaning is subject to dispute, and it is not self-authenticating or exempt from authentication under WIS. STAT. � 909.01. In addition, Wanta offers no authority for the proposition that the Department can be estopped from collecting taxes based on one unclear sentence in a letter from one of its agents.
P7 Finally, Wanta also seeks to take advantage of a letter addressed to his ex-wife releasing her from further obligations regarding these tax assessments under the innocent spouse provisions of WIS. STAT. � 71.10(6). Nothing in that letter suggests that the assessment has been paid or that the guilty spouse [*7] should benefit from the Department's decision not to pursue penalties against the innocent spouse.
By the Court.-Judgment affirmed.
This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5.
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington DC West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming United States South America Great Britain England Europe Middle East Asia Melbourne World
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Possible NSA T-2 Interference With Wanta Crisis Postings of Christopher Story:
Lee Emil Wanta is truly a brave, courageous man. I do hope he is well-protected. I am assuming our presidential candidtes know of him? Bet Hillary does. She is the world's most dangerous woman.
Posted by: Mary Grandin | Jan 8, 2008 9:11:08 PM