« May 2007 | Main | July 2007 »

Who is Ron Paul? Individual Summary of Recent Interview with Ron Paul

After the horrors of the bushes, I never dreamed I would find myself rooting for a Repuglican as U.S. president. But as U.S. congressman Ron Paul points out, today's "Republican" government has degenerated into something that traditional republicans would hardly recognise.

The Republican tradition Ron Paul supports involves limited government, the rule of law, and a foreign policy of non-intervention. (All of which ideas are alien to the Bush admin!)

Below I present my summary of Ron Paul's convictions based on a recent interview he did, but please read the full interview for a more accurate picture.

Kind regards,

James.
who says "Ron Paul 08"
___

Summarising Ron Paul:

War?
The Iraq war was wrong. Paul voted against it. Don't go to war against countries that are of no threat.
Spread freedom, yes, but not at the barrel of a gun. Avoid getting entangled in foreign alliances and instead seek peace and trade with all nations.

Israel?
The U.S., by giving billions of dollars in foreign aid to Israel, not only fuels anger and hostility towards the United States among Muslims in the Middle East, but places a heavy burden on the U.S. taxpayer. The solution: Follow the wisdom of the Founders, which means a non-interventionist foreign policy, getting rid of foreign aid to all nations, including Israel. We ought to lead by example, not by coercion or special interest: this was what the Founders had in mind.

Guantanamo?
Shut it down.

Trading with Iran?
I believe in free-markets, and I think the goal of the United States should be to have a friendly trading
relationship with all nations.

Free-market capitalism? Yes, I'm a proponent of free-market capitalism, but many politicians in Washington are woefully ignorant of economics.

The market isn't some mysterious inhuman entity, but a process grounded in the interplay of human choice, that is, in the total interplay of those with a desire to buy and those with a desire to sell, and to the extent that the bureaucratic overreach of the federal government and the influence of special interest and lobbying groups has interfered with that process, this is something I would work very hard to fix.

NAFTA?
I oppose it.

Monetary Policy?
Paul's views are heavily influenced by the Austrian school of economics, particularly libertarian thinkers/economists such as Murray Rothbard, Friedrich Hayek, and Ludwig von Mises.
http://www.mises.org/content/mnr.asp
http://blog.mises.org/archives/006763.asp
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul-arch.html

e.g.
The fiscal year 2008 budget, passed in the House of Representative last week, is a monument to irresponsibility and profligacy.

It's unsustainable and shows that Congress remains oblivious to the economic troubles facing the nation,
and that political expediency trumps all common sense in Washington.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul379.html

US Federal Income Tax and IRS?
Abolish them.

Abortion?
Ron Paul is pro-life. He says: In my medical career, I've delivered more than 4,000 babies, so naturally my professional experience has influenced my views on abortion. It's my strong belief that life begins at conception, and that children in the womb are entitled to inheritance rights.

More broadly, libertarians, like most Americans, respectfully come to different views on the issue based on their different personal feelings about when human life begins. However I'm aware of the extraordinarily sensitive nature of this subject, and that people hold different views on abortion. I think we ought to return the issue to the states so that local opinions could better determine the specific
regulations concerning this deeply personal issue.

Gay Rights and Same-Sex Marriage?
Paul is against a Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, but he's also against changing federal law to allow for same-sex marriages.

Congressman Ron Paul: Just like with abortion, I believe that marriage is an issue best decided by the states, not the federal government. I'm opposed to a federal ban on gay marriage, but it also goes both ways: I'm against the courts at the federal level pressuring the states into accepting same-sex marriage licenses.

What we're talking about in both cases is the redefinition of an ancient social institution by the federal government that's best left to the people to decide at the local level.

I have introduced legislation called the We the People Act to remove deeply personal social issues like marriage and abortion from the jurisdiction of the federal courts so the states and local governments
can make the decisions, as the Constitution intends.

Muckraker Report: So if the city council of San Francisco, if the town assembly of Burlington, if the state of New Hampshire decided to legalize civil unions between gay couples, you would be okay with that?

Congressman Ron Paul: Yes, if those decisions were made by legislatures, and not by courts.

Stem-cell Research?
I think the stem-cell issue should be determined by the market. In Washington, lawmakers either want to prohibit something, or subsidize something. How about doing neither, and letting people make the decisions!

Education?
Get rid of the bureaucratic control of education by the federal government. Return the power to the people to decide what's best for their children in terms of education,

College tuition rates?
I think the free-market should set the price. Remove the bureaucracy, and the price will go down.

Health Care?
It's time to rethink the whole system.

Immigration (into the States)?
Secure the borders. Shut down the welfare state. Mass deportation is not realistic, but he's against amnesty.

REAL ID act (May of 2008) and a national identification card?

I'm against it. The purpose of government is to protect the liberty of individuals not the secrecy of government.

Global Warming and Environment?
Yes, protect environment, but he's opposed to the Kyoto Protocols, which he sees as placing an unfair burden on the U.S. while letting polluting countries such as China off the hook.

Medical Marijuana?
In favour. It's a state issue, not a federal one.

Re-opening September 11?
If the 9/11 families aren't satisfied with the results of the 9/11 Commission, then neither am I. I'm in favor of an independant investigation, provided costs are kept in check.

Net neutrality and Free-Speech on the Internet?
I have the strongest record in Congress of opposing taxing or regulating the Internet in any way. As president, I would work with lawmakers to make sure no laws were passed inhibiting the right of Americans to communicate and do business freely.

Granting amnesty to criminals in the Bush administration?
Yes, granted we were able to take a close look at the specifics of each case.

Republicanism?

Muckraker Report: Finally, "republicanism" as a political philosophy and a form of government stretches all the way back to ancient Rome. Is there a particular tradition of republicanism that you identify with?

Congressman Ron Paul: Naturally, the tradition I aspire to is the tradition of the Founders, who in the
eighteenth century established a Constitutional Republic that has today degenerated into a bureaucratic welfare state.

More recently, however, I've stated in the debates that I uphold the old "Mr. Republican" tradition of Robert A. Taft, both in Congress and in the presidential race. This involves limited government, the rule of law, and a foreign policy of non-intervention, traditional Republican positions for the last 100 years.

- For more, read the full interview here: -

An Interview with Presidential Candidate Congressman Ron Paul
June 28, 2007
http://www.muckrakerreport.com/id447.html

___

Who is Ron Paul?

US republican congressman Ron Paul ran for US president on the libertarian ticket in 1988.

He was one of only six repuglicans to vote against the war on Iraq.

He has written for http://antiwar.com/ for years.

He has practiced medicine for 30 years.

He opposes US nation building and entangling foreign alliances. He champions limited government, the rule of law, and a foreign-policy of non-intervention.

"Peace and trade with all nations, and entangling alliances with none."
(including Israel and Iran).

He's running for the presidential race in 2008.

You can see some of his stuff here and make up your own mind about this guy...

Ron Paul for president 2008
http://ronpaul2008.com/

Iraq and foreign policy
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/html/issue-War_fx.html

Antiwar.com
http://antiwar.com/paul/

Presidential Debate
Arguing against the war and for a humble foreign policy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hfa7vT02lA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzFMo6w-hsk

Ron Paul on the the Federal Reserve, banking and
economyhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4kxTkhwR_Qhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=\
ji_G0MqAqq8&NR=1

Ron Paul on Gulf of Tonkin
Congressman Ron Paul warns of a contrived incident to provoke war with Iran,
a "Gulf of Tonkin" type incident, January 11, 2006.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6d8MIENVtKw

Neo-CONNED by Ron Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aewpvcxAwTk

Paul meets reps from Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SW4DgZH8PJM

CNN / Lou Dobbs - Ron Paul Interview
2-26-2007http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EF37-9OGblw

Ron Paul is interviewed in Aaron Russo's Freedom to Fascism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaUhGpBNBtk
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8780493827037556704&q=freedom+fascism
http://freedomtofascism.com/

Ron Paul may be ignored by the rich, the powerful, the mainstream media,
but he is loved by millions of 'ordinary' people on the 'Net!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8Vdmnc3nUw
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Ron+Paul+love

Ron Paul - Flying Under the Radar
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uem3OIp6kzU

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

June 29, 2007 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Todays (June 28th, 07) Thoughts from Ron Paul

Ron Paul <mail@ronpaul2008.com>
to me
show details
9:07 pm (2 minutes ago)

June 28, 2007

Dear friend,

From time to time, I'm going to send you my thoughts during this campaign. Your support is so important to me, and I want you to know what's happening.

Today, we had good news from the US Senate -- not exactly a normal occurrence -- when the president's immigration bill went down in flames.

Here we had a vastly expensive piece of legislation that would have made the immigration problem worse, and put more controls on the economy.  So naturally, the entire establishment was behind it.  It was a slam-dunk, or so they thought.  Then the American people got riled up, and despite all the special interests, the pressure, the media, and the money, scared the politicians enough to vote the right way.

If our campaign succeeds, this will happen on a whole range of issues.  The politicians will hear from the people on foreign wars, high taxes, Fed inflation, and all the other plagues visited on us by DC.  And listen they will.

And speaking of our campaign, I am very excited by the Iowa rally this Saturday (http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=16OCg4C1fq5W47gNJo_2bDHw_3d_3d). This is an historic moment.  Of course, the Iowa Christian Alliance and Iowans for Tax Relief had the right to exclude the most pro-life, anti-tax candidate in the race.  But when they did so, people rose up. So we are holding a rally that will reverberate around this country. Our campaign goes from strength to strength, but I am convinced that this Saturday will be very important in the fight for a free, peaceful, and prosperous America.

Maybe you can come to the rally.  In any event, I know you’ll be there in spirit, and I’ll write you all about it afterwards.  Your support in this race means everything to my family and me.

Warmest regards,

Ron

PS: Because of people like you, I don't need the $100 million the establishment candidates will have.  But I do need your help.  $25, $50, $100, or even more--whatever you can send would do so much good, and be so much help.  Thank you!

Donation Form
https://www.ronpaul2008.com/donate/

Copy of This Message for Forwarding
http://ronpaul2008.typepad.com/ron_paul_2008/2007/06/ron-paul-on-imm.html

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

June 28, 2007 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Ron Paul Discusses Ed & Elaine Brown on Fox News w/ Neil Cavuto,. Cavuto Fails to Make Ron Paul Look Bad, Paul Leaving Him Speechless

Ron Paul Discusses Ed & Elaine Brown on Fox News w/ Neil Cavuto

http://ronpaul08.blog-city.com/ron_paul_discusses_ed__elaine_brown_on_fox_news_video.htm

Ron Paul on FOX News: Neil Cavuto, May 15th

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfe9dBJ4hgc

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

June 28, 2007 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Sovereign Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath Harassed/Arrested by Sheriff's Deputies,. Highlands County, State of Florida

REPORTING TO ALL, ACROSS AMERICA OF MY ARREST

Hello everyone,

I have been tested over the last weekend by the local Sheriff's department here in Highlands County, State of Florida.  I expected it to happen in one shape or another sooner or later doing what I have done.  I am OK as always and getting better at it each time.  I am getting all the practice of being arrested so that I get to learn more from my experiences and be able to share with others my experience and how to handle it.  This is my first since I have done the Cancellation paperwork.  As I said before I have let it all go to see where life leads me, because I can not be a party to any paganist system and be away from my creator Yahweh any longer. 

What you will find attached is the "Jud icial Notice" that is being mailed out today which I will and I wish for all of you to spread across America, and another attachment is the "You will be tested for who you are", the third attachment entitled "Man on FBI watch list released after traffic stop", is my typed version of the actual front page head line news about my arrest.  The jpg file of the news paper article itself I will post to the Yahoo Group.

This is about you learning and getting knowledge through me and my experiences which I must endure and be strong at doing it with my creators help and guidance.  If I have not paid enough attention to returning your phone call, please let me know, as I have been working on this for the past three and a half days.  We will cover this entire package at length attached hereto as attachments, on our next Tuesday night conference call. 


Good luck and please read it all and I mean all.
Your fellow man and servant of Yahweh at your service
Laszlo

For I: a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath: sovereign without subjects: distinguished by my Great Seal: holding the office of the people: adhere to the Ten Commandments: with full liability: in and for the second judicial-district: Highlands: the county; country of Florida: under the authority of the one living deity: King of kings, and Lord of lords: Yahweh:
Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath:
C/o Postal Department 652
Sebring, Florida [33871]
(863) 414-2752

___

 

You will be tested as to who you really are

What you must be prepared for if stopped by law enforcement agents of the State.

A total of three sheriff deputy cars were on site along with 4-5 deputies, one of them their supervisor and once they saw my documentation they called out to the arrest site an attorney specializing in international law, and the interrogation drill began.

They were stunned by the paperwork I gave them, and stunned by my wallet with my Great Seal.  They were all on their phones running back and forth circling their cars trying to make heads or tails out of what they were being presented, and one was recording our entire conversation.

This is how I answered and you should answer the questions they throw at you without batting an eye:

  1. They were trying   to have me testify that I had a plate on the back of my motorized wagon.

       They were told no that is not a tag, but a sign for communication purposes only.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify that I made my own plate.

       They were told that the sign company up the ways made it for me.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify that I was driving on the highway.

    They were told I was restricted by registration to traveling in my motorized wagon on the common ways.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify that it is not a motorized wagon but a vehicle.

       They were told no, I am not in commerce transporting cargo in a vehicle.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify over and over, that I was LASZLO HORVATH.

    They were told no, I am Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath and I know you are trying to establish jurisdiction with a NAME, ADDRESS, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER and DOB, and that account has been closed and canceled.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify and admit that I had a social security number.

       They were told that account has been closed and canceled.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify that I had an address.

       They were told I lived in the Horvath’s house in the second judicial-district.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify that I had a physical address.

    They were told that I receive my mail in C/o Postal Department 652, Sebring, Florida 33871 and the post office has on record as the address the second judicial-district.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify in giving them directions to an address where my   house is.

       They were given directions without mentioning any streets or roads.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify as to how long I have been in the State of Florida.

    They were told I have been living here on my land without a house number or a mail box for two and a half years.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify that I was a US citizen.

    They were told that I am not under their seal as I was not a subject/US citizen, and I had my own Great Seal meaning I took full liability and responsibility for my actions covered by my silver bond and that I was a sovereign without subjects not subject to the rules of their roads.

  1. The attorney was   trying to have me testify and admit that my status as a sovereign without   subjects had no authority.

       They were told that the authority came from the Treaty of Peace and Treaty of Paris.

  1. The attorney was   trying to convince me that no such authority derived from the Treaty   of Peace and Treaty of Paris.

       They were told OK if you say so.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify and admit that I was a person who needed a license   and registration in order to drive on the highways of Florida.

    They were told that I was not under the privilege of the State of Florida because that account has been closed and canceled, and I have waived the right to exercise all privileges associated with that account and I had a right to travel on the common ways.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify and admit that the second judicial-district does   not exist, as there is no such thing as we are in the 10th   Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida.

    They were told that the second judicial-district is right here in the county, and they said no it is not; and I said OK if you say so.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify and admit that I had mental problems, being under   some kind of mental program, or on some medication.

       They were told no to all.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify where I lived before moving to Florida.

       They were told that I have lived in Tennessee, North Carolina, Virginia, and Maryland.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify and admit when asked if I have ever been arrested   before in Florida or any other State.

       They were told I was arrested before in North Carolina, and South Carolina.

  1. They came back   and said: you did mean arrested in South Carolina only, because there   was no arrest showing in North Carolina.

    They were told yes if you say so, I was arrested in South Carolina, and they did not make me come back to court to require me to get a license and registration.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify and admit to being arrested in West Virginia with   that NAME because they said they found me in the system of records as   being arrested with that same NAME in West Virginia.

    They were told I don’t know what you are talking about, as I have never been to West Virginia.

  1. They asked me if   I renounced my US citizenship.

    They were told yes the account has been closed and canceled and I have waived all rights to exercise any privileges associated with that account.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify by admitting that I did not have a license and registration,   by saying you do understand that everyone must have a license and registration   if you are going to drive on the roads and Highways of the State of   Florida.

    They were told that the motorized wagon was registered in the second judicial-district, Highlands: the county and I had my operators’ certification traveling on the common ways.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify that my paperwork was done by someone else.

       They were told that no one had anything to do with it except me, they were my papers.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify as to where I was going over and over.

    They were told that I was not requesting entry into the US and I was on my way to visit a friend.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify by admitting that my paperwork to the Secretary of   the Treasury, the Sheriff, Dispatch, chief counsel for Dept of Transportation   and chief counsel for their Division of Highway safety had no legal   basis, as it was just a Notice.

       They were told “Ok if you say so.”

  1. They were trying   to have me testify in admitting that my Great Seal, judicial-district   seal and ID’s had no legal basis or authority.

       They were told that it was under the authority of Yahweh.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify that I had weapons in the motorized wagon.

       They were told no, why would I, I would not hurt them as I have nothing against them.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify that I had friends with addresses.

       They were told that I did not recall any addresses.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify that I was born in Hungary.

       They were told yes I was created in 1951 in Hungary.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify that I did not have any citizenship anywhere and   that they were going to call INS to have me transferred to a different   facility for deportation.

       They were told that I am in the second judicial-district.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify as to my date of birth.

       They were told that the date of my creation was in the year 1951.

  1. They were trying   to have me testify and admit that everyone has an address.

    They were told that your grandfather Smith lived in the Smith’s house back in those days, to which they said: that was then, now everyone has an address, and my house is in the second judicial district confirmed by the post office as I get my mail C/o Postal Department 652, Sebring, Florida 33871, and that is what they put on the UNIFORM CITATION and the BOND.

  1. When I went in   front of the judge for first appearance, he called me LASZLO HORVATH   and I corrected him by saying that I am Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath.    After he read the charges I said to him that account has been closed   and canceled.  He proceeded to set the court date and I said again   that account has been closed and canceled and he kept on going.   

They were walking around the booking area saying to each other we have a sovereign here.

When I went to pick up my pick up from impound, they asked me for positive ID, and I told them that everything was taken from me when I was arrested, but I have a copy of what they took.  I showed them my Distinction Card, Registration Certification, Silver Bond, Operators Certification all issued in the second judicial-district, and they said fine and made a copy of it.  They did not ask for proof of ownership of my pick up or anything else.  They would not let me take the pick up off their lot without a valid Florida license, so I had it towed to my house.

I have mailed my “Judicial notice from a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath: holding the office of the people” and also by e-mail, to the three county commissioners in the county, the judge, the Sheriff, the two Sheriff deputies who arrested me, the clerk of court and the senator for my area of Florida.  I am also e-mailing the Judicial notice to every single county commissioner in Florida and as time permits to other states on the east coast, and the local paper THE HIGHLANDS TODAY which wrote a big front page story about what happened.  Look for the jpg file of the two pages.  The FBI told them to go pound dirt, as there was nothing they could do.  What the Sheriff’s department did is they tried to cover up the kidnapping, torture, extortion, sedition, felony theft and conversion by pushing it off on the FBI who basically told them to go pound sand, we have nothing on this guy and even tried to bring in the INS and Homeland Security.  These are desperate people trying to steal our equity and will go to any means to do it as you are a witness to the misleading news paper article which I am making available.  Don’t assume anything, but read it real closely, as they are watching to see if I talk the walk and act like a sovereign without subjects with full liability and responsibility, and not an asshole making claims and charges or filing stupid liens against them.

This is going to send shock waives around the country if everyone gets involved.  Send the Judicial notice to as many people as you know, for them to read and pass it on to others, as I told the bad guys that they are going to have a thousand new friends after this.

E-mail the Judicial notice to every county commissioner in your county with the subject line stating:  Urgent, important, a real concern for you!  In the message section just write:

You should be real concerned about the attached Judicial Notice which applies to you and everyone else in this county!

                                          Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath

                                          (863) 414-2752

                                          indigenous1778@yahoo.com


 

___

 

June 26, 2007 HIGHLANDS TODAY

Man on FBI Watch List Released After Traffic Stop

Sebring –The FBI would not comment on the traffic arrest of a Highlands County man who the agency listed as a person of interest on one of its watch lists.  (Because they did not want any part of what the Sheriff deputies have done - kidnapping, torture, extortion, sedition, felony theft and conversion – so the FBI Law Merchant left the Sheriffs department out to dry - why not just report the truth? Because no one knows any more, because we are dealing with a bunch of pagan liars.)

Laszlo Istvan Horvath, 56, was initially pulled over for a fraudulent license plate Saturday, according to Highlands County Sheriff’s Sgt. Chris Smith.  (It wasn’t called fraudulent when it was all said and done – never received a citation for fraudulent license plates – a misquote and lie of guilt from the get go.)

After looking up the records, a sheriff’s deputy found the driver’s name on an FBI terrorism screening center’s watch list, Smith added Sunday.  (I would love to see a copy of that hearsay without actually verifying if the man they are referring to is not another man by the same name – leading statement based on assumptions to the reader – another misquote and lie!)

Horvath, who was free Monday on $500.00 bail, was only held on the traffic infractions he was charged with, which were driving with no valid driver’s license and operating a motor vehicle he failed to register, according to the sheriff’s office.  (So the plates were not fraudulent after all)

Deputy Juan Delgado pulled Horvath’s 2000 Chevrolet Silverado over at 11:36 a.m. near The Home Depot on U.S. 27.  (misreporting, as it should be 2005 Chevrolet Silverado and I pulled it over not him, he can’t be driving his and mine at the same time – double minded talking)

Where the license plate should be, the Silverado had a solid green tag that said “Florida” “Not For Hire” and had a center seal with the words “Country of Florida, Highlands The County, Second Judicial District,” on it, with the word “Equity” on the bottom right hand corner.  (All valid under common law and equity venue and jurisdiction – not commerce and shipping, admiralty maritime venue and jurisdiction of the Law Merchant)

When asked, Horvath claimed the tag was made at Signs Now, but then argued that his Silverado was a “motorized wagon” and did not require a license tag.  (I never said I had a tag, he was told the sign was made by the sign shop, I stated a fact – but to him a sign became a tag, due to selective hearing – and I stated that my Silverado is my motorized wagon under common law and equity venue and jurisdiction not a vehicle under commerce and shipping admiralty maritime venue and jurisdiction of the Law Merchant – another misquote and a lie!)

Later, he claimed he had a dual citizenship with Hungary and diplomatic immunity.  (never claimed that, they have a copy of my notice to the Hungarian embassy cancelling and renouncing the status of citizen and nationality of LASZLO ISTVAN HORVATH “in name only” subject to the jurisdiction of Magyarország/Hungary, and have absolutely and entirely cancelled and renounced said citizenship and nationality without mental reservation, coercion or duress, together with all rights and privileges, and all duties of allegiance and fidelity thereunto pertaining; and that my allegiance under the New Covenant is for worshipping the one who holds status of the Most: High – so then how can I be a citizen of that country with dual citizenship, and how can I have diplomatic immunity without going to the Secretary of State to issue such immunity? – no such exists, another misquote and a lie to mislead readers to hide the felonies committed!)

“He made a lot of statements that just didn’t add up,” Smith said.  (Then they should not hold a public office if they do not understand the English language - and they are too image trained and ignorant being part of a training exercise by the Law Merchants)

After Smith talked to a Highlands Today reporter, Lt. Kenny Johnson, a watch commander with the sheriff’s office, called the newspaper, verbally asking to “cease and desist” its publication of the story because information contained in the report might involve a Homeland Security issue.  He added that the information should not have been released.  (the key word “might”)

Giving the sheriff’s office 24 hours to produce more information to support its position, a Highlands Today editor pulled the story from its Web site and stopped the release of the print version so that a more in-dept story could be written for today’s newspaper.

Monday, a Media General lawyer said cease and desist orders cannot be issued without the citing of law.  Media General is the parent company of Highlands Today.

Sheriff’s Maj. Mark Schrader said Monday he believed Johnson was correct in his request.

“I believe the watch commander believed it might be a Homeland Security issue,” he said.

Schrader said it is not the policy of the sheriff’s office to release this type of information and some of the information contained in Highlands Today Web report was not accurate.  (If it would have been a Homeland Security issue, you can bet your last nickel they would have been out there to pick me up in a heart beat – he believed but didn’t have knowledge so we can expect his beliefs to change from day to day depending on which way the wind is blowing – lets get away from shedding light on felonies we are committing by creating an issue!)

The FBI did not want to hold Horvath pending further investigation by its agency, Schrader clarified.  Horvath was simply listed as a person of interest.  (Interested to see if I walk the talk being a sovereign without subjects, with full liability and responsibility)

“The FBI is interested in his movements,” Schrader said.  (I’ll bet they are, to see if I am who I claim to be, a sovereign without subjects – it must scare the hell out of them, but I can’t imagine why, since I am just another ordinary man like themselves and I have nothing against anyone in the FBI or anyone else, nor do I have anything to hide.)

Schrader said the sheriff’s office first became aware of Horvath several months ago when Horvath sent a letter to the agency declaring his independence from the government.  (The double minded speaking again who don’t comprehend the English language – have them produce where I declared any independence from the government – what government?  They have a copy of the paperwork where I have cancelled and closed the Federal Reserve account LASZLO ISTVAN HORVATH “in name only” and I have waived the right to exercise any and all privileges associated with said cancelled account – by taking on full liability and responsibility – they should be happy that they do not have to look after me and baby me like an irresponsible child with his hand out for benefits and privileges from daddy government – like the majority are today with limited liability, not wanting to take on any personal liability and responsibility – I guess they are not concerned and don’t need to be given courtesy notice that they have one less man to worry about being crazy and irresponsible in the county – another misquote and lie!)

“He sent a letter stating that he was in his own sovereign nation, that he did not go by our laws, did not have a driver’s license and did not register his vehicle,” Schrader said.  (Being in the second judicial-district: Highlands: the county: country of Florida is not my sovereign nation as I have never claimed it, as the judicial-districts have been around for 5,500 years Exodus 18, and have been there since the Articles of Confederation which was based on scripture, so it is everyone’s (sovereigns) according to the Treaty of Peace and Treaty of Paris – and I adhere to the Ten Commandments not man made fictitious perverted addendumed statute liens for subjects under the Corporate Great Seal of the STATE OF FLORIDA under the authority of one dead fictitious deity without any force and effect, a fictitious GOD – as they are not law but a bastardization of the Ten Commandments to fit their cause, that is another misquote and a lie! – if I have rights then I don’t need privileges, do I?  I don’t need Sheriff Susan Benton’s permission to go to the store as she is not my mommy or daddy, and I am not in her house, I am in my house, the “Horvath house”.  I don’t need anyone’s permission because I take full liability and responsibility for what I do by respecting my fellow man and the common ways, and I bond my actions with a silver bond, i.e. 25 ounces of silver – AND THAT IS NOT A CRIME ANYWHERE ON THIS EARTH)

The reporter should study history and the scripture

maybe then he could write the truth instead of hearsay

to mislead the men and women the children of Yahweh

and shame on the Sheriff’s department in trying to hide crimes committed by them

then make up a story as this to make the front page to draw attention

away from them!

I abide by the Ten Commandments

the law is in my heart as I know right from wrong

and the Ten Commandments are the regulations

for enforcing my conscience

Let my Yea mean Yea, and Ney mean Ney

Amen!

___



Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath

C/o Postal Department 652

Sebring: Florida: [33871]

For the tribunal; the division between Commerce and Equity;

Located in the tenth judicial-circuit:

Highlands: the County: Country of Florida;

Served on: the second district court of appeal;

1005 East Memorial Blvd.,

Lakeland, Florida (33801)

Judicial notice from a man called

Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath: holding the office of the people

Whereas, a man called Laszlo-Istvan: of the family Horvath in the office of the people notices the tribunal of black market securities fraud; and

Whereas, the men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado DEPUTY SHERIFFS “in name only” created an emergency on the 23rd day of the sixth month in the year 2007; For the men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado claim injury from the man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath for not transforming into collateral for a cancelled account of the Federal Reserve; For the men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado claim injury from the truck because the truck did not convert itself into commercial cargo in a condition of constant transit and collateral in a fictional bankruptcy for a shipping bond called registration; For the men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado delivered Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath by commercial transport to a man called Ralph Artigliere JUDGE/ ADMINISTRATOR “in name only” and while under the coercion of the man called Ralph Artigliere, the man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath endured a nineteen and a half hour conversion process to paganism by imprisonment and charged five $100.00 photographs for services rendered.  For the man called Ralph Artigliere JUDGE/ADMINISTRATOR “in name only” oversees the pagan ceremonies, rituals as priest, in the sacrificing of the body of the man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath for compliance with the religion of paganism, which is hiding a more vile crime of using an official office to steal the equity and labor of men and women called the people, in the name of law and justice, translating into using the love and the trust of the people against the people; and

Whereas, the men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado DEPUTY SHERIFFS “in name only” broke their chain of command committing sedition, by kidnapping  a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath, from equity and common law into commerce and shipping, and subjected the victim, a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath, to the treachery of the Law Merchant and called the kidnapping an arrest.  For the men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado were without an arrest warrant with two witnesses signed and sealed by a judicial magistrate or three county commissioners in their magistrate capacities; and

Whereas, the men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado DEPUTY SHERIFFS “in name only” forced sold a book entry known as UCC-1 commercial liens in the form of UNIFORM CITATION No: 2856-ERN, 2857-ERN/ORDER OF ARREST “in name only”, to a fiction called LASZLO ISTVAN HORVATH “in name only”; by holding the living body in a cage, a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath until the theft was complete; and called the theft a “Bail Bond” thereby claiming a right that does not exist; and

Whereas, on March 6th, 2007, a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath surrendered, and cancelled and closed the intangible purchasers license and account communicated by a “Certificate of Live Birth” and “Certificate of Naturalization” to the men called Henry M. Paulson, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury and András Simonyi, Ambassador, Hungarian Embassy respectively; and

Whereas, the man called Ralph Artigliere JUDGE/ADMINISTRATOR “in name only” was noticed that the federal reserve account LASZLO ISTVAN HORVATH “in name only” was closed and canceled and the man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath: has waived the claim against the CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH and CERTIFICATE OF NATURALIZATION on the grounds that the sovereign cannot be involved in the transgressions generated by its use. For a book entry is not actual equity, and to proceed with the crime of theft by deception, theft of intent, conversion and theft of the actual labor of another man translates into a forced sale of worthless black market security in the form of UCC-1 commercial future performance lien using a mans actual body as collateral; and

Whereas, a man called Ralph Artigliere, while masquerading as a Judge, but is really a commercial broker, had an obligation to cancel the sale of an intangible UCC-1 future performance lien, also called a book entry and failed to do so upon First Appearance Hearing, with actions of complete indifference; and

Whereas, the broker, a man called Ralph Artigliere broke his chain of command committing obstruction of justice, in detaining a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath, when he failed to allow three commissioners in their magistrate capacity to hear the charges and investigate the injury claim first hand; and

Whereas, the broker, a man called Ralph Artigliere conspired with the merchants in commerce and shipping jurisdiction and venue; men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado collectively, in a forced sale of an off-line book entry at gun point on an unlicensed purchaser, a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath. For this act by the broker, a man called Ralph Artigliere, and the merchants, men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado translates a simple cancellation or a detain and release into a felony conversion and theft by deception with force of arms. This crime is defined as selling a three cent piece of paper in trade for tangible sweat equity of a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath, and covering up a black market securities scheme with a so called address of a commercial warehouse brokered by force.  For a man called Ralph Artigliere, and the men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado working as agents for the Federal Reserve System, stole the intent of the man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath and converted the intent to fit the commercial record; and

Whereas, the broker, a man called Ralph Artigliere, and the merchants, men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado have re-de-fined “Highlands County Detention Center” called HCSO Jail “in name only” into a “slave labor camp” an “extortion facility”, and a “debtor’s prison”, because there is no money in circulation, just actual photographs of what used to be called money.  For the intrinsic banks have been closed for seventy four years.  For the Law Merchant is still lining his pockets with the stupidity of men and women fighting for the scraps coming off of the Law Merchant’s table that are mentioned in this Judicial Notice.  For the men and women mentioned in this Judicial Notice refuse to look past their nose and realize that they have been chumped by the Law Merchant by failing to see that the men and women called the people are actually on their side and trying to wake them up; and

Whereas, a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath consistently objected to the forced slavery by the broker, a man called Ralph Artigliere, and the merchants, men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado in straight forward communication; and

Whereas, a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath did not and does not desire to violate the waiving of a right to exercise a privilege and claim against any intangible property or to avoid being involved in hiding the crime of felony conversion or any other crime because it is right; and 

Whereas, the man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath: have waived the right to exercise any and all privileges associated with the said cancelled and closed Federal Reserve account, and waived the right to exercise the privilege of involving himself into a forced sale of any worthless UCC-1 commercial lien at the point of a gun; and waived the right to exercise the following privileges:

1. Signing, executing, and issuing intangible property;

2. Selling, assigning, transferring, renewing, removing, consigning,

      mailing, shipping, trading in, and enforcing intangible property;

    3. Receiving income, increase, issues of profits of intangibles, transmitting tangibles, by will or gift, or under state laws of decent;

4. Having intangibles separately classified for taxes; and

Whereas, when a photograph of an intangible worthless black market security in the form of UCC-1 Commercial future performance lien is enforced and collected without any actual injury to anyone to claim the actual equity being levied, you have a crime called felony conversion, also called compliance through physical pain meaning torture.  A mere book entry in the form of a photograph creates an imbalance in the books by the man called L. E. "LUKE" BROOKER County Treasurer, and the only way to balance the books is to steal the actual equity from someone else and this is called “cooking the books.”  An intangible book entry called a UNIFORM CITATION/ORDER OF ARREST “in name only” is being treated the same as a tangible future performance lien, by the men and women called employees, of a fiction called UNITED STATES CORPORATION;  For the illusion of a duty or obligation to transfer actual sweat equity and labor to a fiction called a CLERK  “in name only”, which is called a forced sale of a worthless black market security in the form of UCC-1 commercial lien at the barrel of a gun, is actual slavery.  For the cardinal principle of slavery is that the slave is not to be ranked among sentient beings owners, but among things, as an article of property such as a truck mortgaged for the security of a debt subject of a qualified sale where the owner is liable for the lien; for this act is to hide the great bank heist of 1933 in the District of Columbia of which the banks have not reopened so the men and women called the people can pay debts; and everyone still remains in denial today by calling “notes”, actual pictures of notes, money; and

Whereas, the fictions called DEPUTY SHERIFFS “in name only” are attempting to sell said liens and attach the body of a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath which translates into an offer that cannot be refused, by the reputation of men holding the foreign trust JUDGE/ADMINISTRATOR, CLERK, PROSECUTOR, “in name only” owned by the men called the International Monetary Fund and the Law Merchant; and

Whereas, the men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado and the woman called Susan Benton SHERIFF “in name only” were noticed that the man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath holding the office of the people does not have a license in possession to purchase, discharge or offer any UCC-1 commercial lien in Commerce; and

Whereas, an off-line book entry does not equal equity in possession with the scale of intrinsic value; and

Whereas, the fictions called DEPUTY SHERIFFS “in name only” are offering an off line book entries, calling it a UNIFORM CITATION/ORDER OF ARREST “in name only”, masquerading it as official actual equity and physical tort; and

Whereas, in good conscience, to anyone holding the office of the people, that the men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado have attempted to impose a god status upon themselves, meaning an untouchable status because of the power they have, and the intent is displayed by attempting to sell equity where no equity exists in an off-line book entry, and calling attempted theft of equity by deception and misrepresentation, and a host of other crimes official; and

Whereas, the man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath does not desire to pledge his body or have his physical body held in a commercial warehouse called “Highlands County Detention Center” also called HCSO Jail “in name only” or held as cargo for the redemption of an off-line book entry in the form of a UCC-1 commercial lien security interest to be discharged at the barrel of a gun or by the residents of the State of Florida or the citizens of the United States; and

Whereas, with the Treaty of Peace, any harassment and torture by the private union merchants called DEPUTY SHERIFFS “in name only” is sedition because their unprovoked actions are tearing families apart.  For a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath will not hide the crime of kidnapping, extortion, felony theft, and conversion or any other crime.  If there is no contract leave the sovereign alone.  People who love limited liability and hide crimes belong to their gods.  To maintain separation between pagans and non-pagans, keep your criminal activity away from sovereigns.  For the man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath is not afraid of facing the penalty of an actual tort intentionally or unintentionally committed; but a black market court is a tort within itself.  Your presidents agree with the Word of Yahweh and if you go against the Word you are on a suicide mission; and

Whereas, a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath adheres to the “Word”, not “Commercial Law”, for I am defined as a “man” not cargo.  For the men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado in pursuit of their own creation, have become collateral for the Federal Reserve “Account” that they are trying to attach to another, because the men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado are responsible for what they have created; and

Whereas, the men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado broke chain of command, went against the word of Yahweh which is treason, because Congress does not have the authority to use the people as collateral for satisfying creditors of the Whole Federal Government, and the question remains which one of Yahweh’s creditors did he sell me to; and

Whereas, the men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado believe that the so called “driver license” and “registration” is real.   According to the rules of English, the information displayed is written in fiction. For in reality the men called Chaeffer and Juan Delgado believe and perceive that they have a driver license or registration, with the same belief and perception that the easter bunny exists; and

Whereas, the enforcement of usury through physical pain is in violation of the Word, and qualifies as paganism.  The purpose for the Great Seal is to protect the intent of the sovereign, so the intent would not be stolen or converted to fit the commercial record of the Law Merchant; and

Whereas, the Horvath house is not a commercial warehouse to hold commercial cargo on behalf of the UNITED STATES’ creditors, therefore, if the Horvath house is not a commercial warehouse, the truck does not have to be registered, licensed or regulated because the truck has been signed, sealed and delivered into the second judicial-district: Highlands: the county: country of Florida, and pledged to the one who holds the status of the most high, Yahweh, restricted by registration in common law and equity jurisdiction and venue for travel purposes on the common ways; and

Whereas, Mother earth in its actual meaning is not a goddess, therefore it is not a privilege to travel on it, and the forcing of a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath to worship false gods is the religion of paganism; and 

Whereas, the Congress does not have the authority to convert the house of Horvath into a commercial warehouse.  For the UNITED STATES’ debt “in name only” is exclusive to the UNITED STATES, no one else; and

Whereas, any off line book entry UCC-1 commercial future performance lien in the nature of a UNIFORM CITATION/WARRANT FOR ARREST is a trespass on common law and equity venue and jurisdiction.  For the trespass called a “sale” of which is done at the barrel of a gun is for the sole purpose of covering the UNITED STATES’ debt “in name only” exclusive to the UNITED STATES.  For the man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath by making any appearance in any black market Court or committee Court would be voluntarily hiding the crimes witnessed by way of communicating “voluntary compliance” in a black market security sale; and in conclusion whatever actions taken from start to finish is the will of others, not mine; and

Whereas, if any of you named in this judicial notice think that I am the only one who knows what happened here, I want to introduce you to at least a thousand of your new best friends; and

Whereas, for the men and women called the people can actually think and tie their shoes without the UNITED STATES CORPORATION.  In other words, everything that happens in the world is not always about the officers in the UNITED STATES CORPORATION.  Believe it or not; there are some men and women that don’t want to kill you and I am one of them.  Anyone that tries to help you, you slap them in the face with the utmost contempt.  The paranoia is simply the product of an inflated guilty conscience.  Quit committing crimes and stealing from people and then cover it up; and maybe you will sleep at night and won’t have to worry so much about retaliation.  For the writing is on the wall; and

Therefore, a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath holding the office of the people does not desire to gift, pledge or sacrifice his physical body and mind to the UNITED STATE CORPORATION; and does know what crime is when witnessed; and "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"; and

For I: a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath: holding the office of the people: adhere to the Ten Commandments: with full liability in and for the second judicial-district: Highlands: the county; country of Florida: under the authority of the one living deity: King of kings, and Lord of lords: Yahweh; and let my Yea mean Yea and Ney mean Ney; and

So done with peaceful intention: in reverence of the One-Living-King of kings: the Most High Almighty Yahweh.

                                    mark of the man called:

                                    Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath:

                                    sovereign without subjects: 

                                    holding the office of the people:

                                    (863) 414-2752

Copies served on:

          County Commissioner  County Commissioner 

    District 2    Guy Maxcy
    Edgar Stokes   125 Holmes Court
    PO Box 266    Sebring, Florida 33875

    Florida, FL 33857

      County Commissioner  Sheriff

    District 1    Susan Benton
    Barbara Stewart   434 Fernleaf Avenue
    72 Lake Byrd Blvd.   Sebring, Florida 33870

      Avon Park, FL 33825

      Hon. Ralph Artigliere  Deputy Sheriff

    Highlands County   Juan Delgado
    590 S. Commerce Ave.  434 Fernleaf Avenue
    Sebring, FL 33870-1827  Sebring, Florida 33870

      Deputy Sheriff Chaeffer  L.E. “Luke” Brooker/Clerk

      434 Fernleaf Avenue  Clerk of Courts

      Sebring, Florida 33870  590 S. Commerce Ave., Rm. A243

                                    Sebring, FL 33870-3809


___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

June 28, 2007 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Ron Paul on Mancow Morning Madhouse 6/26 and Attack of the Show

HERE it is folks…

http://www.ronpaulaudio.com/rpaudio/RonPaulMancowinterview062607.mp3

Attack of the Show
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CeigKXQErQ

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

June 26, 2007 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

New Headquarters Found But Funds Needed: Ron Paul Campaign Growing

Help!  More room needed.

June 26, 2007


Good news (actually, great news):  The Ron Paul 2008 campaign is growing!

Bad news:  We’ve run out of space to work.

The Ron Paul 2008 campaign started in the corner of a one-bedroom apartment. It then moved to a small office of 348 square feet, which is where we are now. But our present office has become too small to accommodate the fast-growing campaign...and we need your help to expand.

Our present office is so small that we can't hire the much-needed additional staff for a national campaign. We even have to turn away volunteers because we simply don't have room for them.

Office space in the D.C. area is expensive, and landlords expect tenants to sign at least a three-year lease; preferably a five-year lease. But after we canvassed the area by foot and called numerous leasing agents and watched the local classifieds and checked CraigsList each day, we found a place! It's a sub-lease situation with flexible terms that we just couldn't pass up.

We will have the second floor of a modest, older, two-story building in Arlington, Virginia. It's only two blocks from a Metro station, making it convenient for staff and volunteers. The office is on a busy street; across from a very busy grocery story. Large windows will be perfect for a "Ron Paul 2008" banner! But most importantly, the new office will give us the space to build a national campaign.

However, office space here is expensive regardless of how modest the building is. And most landlords require political campaigns to pay the total rent in advance.

So we need your help.

We plan to move on July 15th.  To do so, we will need to give the landlord a check for $54,000.00.

Will you help us write that check?

Enthusiasm for Ron Paul's bid for the presidency grows by the day. Our goal: put Ron Paul in the White House. And we all know why.

Help us write that check.  Donate today by going to https://www.ronpaul2008.com/donate/

Thank you!

Kent Snyder, Chairman
Ron Paul 2008

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

June 26, 2007 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Ron Paul runs a Web 2.0 campaign - ZDNet

Excerpt - "If you want to see Ron Paul in action, go to youTube and watch a video; discuss his stance on issues, go to Digg; find where is he speaking next, log onto to Eventful; want to host your own event, go to a Meetup. The list goes on."

read more | digg story

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

June 26, 2007 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Gambling911: Iowans for Tax Relief Prove They Are Not Credible by Not Including Ron Paul in their Presidential Candidates Forum

Iowans for Tax Relief Prove They Are Not Credible

In a stunning twist of events this week, the Iowans for Tax Relief (ITR) are holding a Presidential Forum in the Hy-Vee Hall in Des Moines, IA and only one presidential candidate from the nationally televised debates was NOT invited. Who is this man? Ron Paul, the best friend the American taxpayer has in Washington DC.

Congressman Ron Paul has been recognized as a top advocate for taxpayers in the U.S. Congress for the tenth year in a row, earning the nonpartisan National Taxpayers Union’s annual award as a ”Taxpayers’ Friend” for 2006. In what might be called the most ironic reason for not doing something, Ed Failor, Executive Vice President claims the reason for the decision is that Ron Paul is not a "credible" candidate.

Mr. Failor claimed in an interview on WHO New Radio 1040, that the ITR along with the Iowa Christian Alliance put this event together months ago, and they just had to "draw the line" somewhere. It seems, paridoxically, that line excluded Congressman Ron Paul who has actively worked to eliminate the IRS and end the Income Tax completely and will continue do so if elected President. That line excluded Ron Paul who wants to end the Federal Reserve, an elite group of bankers that are able to print unlimited amounts of fiat money, weakening the dollar, raising prices, and hurting the poor and the middle class with this "inflation tax". Failor's line of "credible" demarcation stopped right before Ron Paul, who has never voted to raise taxes, never voted for an unbalanced budget, never voted to raise congressional pay, and has never voted for any form of government spending not authorized by the Constitution.

So why would a group called the Iowans for Tax Relief do such a strange thing? Let's start with the fact that Ed Failor was the one doing the interview. Currently, Ed Failor is the Senior Advisor to the John McCain campaign, has donated $1,000 to his campaign and was supposed to be on leave from the ITR so there would not appear to be a conflict of interest. So much for that idea.

Now on to their stated (but not so credible) reasons: 1. They claim they decided months ago who was and who was not going to be a credible candidate. The campaign season has only just started. Did they make this decision before or after the debates started? (Ron Paul announced he was running prior to the first televised debate and has taken part in every such event). Did they choose based on how well those candidates did in the debates? Both Fox News and CNN showed Paul polling in either first or second place in their debates. (Dozens of other GOP Internet polls also show Dr. Paul leading; he has been taking the Internet by storm, and some prominent search engines state that "Ron Paul" is the most searched term placing him ahead of even Paris Hilton.) 2. Did they choose based on space? It seems every other candidate who has participated in the televised debates from either party was invited, but only six accepted; by my math that leaves a lot of empty chairs that could be filled. 3. Ed Failor's fallback position: Hey, they made a decision and by golly they are going to stick to it no matter what the polls show; no matter how many people called in and requested Dr. Paul's presence; no matter how low the polling of the other "credible" candidates goes; and no matter how many seats remain empty.

Perhaps it is the Iowans for Tax Relief that are not credible.

Further investigation reveals that the Iowans for Tax Relief may not exactly be seeking tax relief for all.

On the home page of the Iowans for Tax Relief, they have a plan for tax reform in Iowa, http://www.taxrelief.org/PDFs/DM%20Register%205-20-07.pdf
Here are some of its gems:

Iowans should sweep away many of the exemptions and credits and return to taxing property based on its market value.
Iowa could raise the sales tax by a penny. (A sales tax that the ITR presumptively claims that "people don't mind paying to relieve the property tax they hate." Do they assume this holds true for the poorest non-property owners as well?.)

Why are they excited about adding more of a burden to sales? Leaders could earmark part of the new sales-tax revenue for special projects. I doubt that will include building a deck in your backyard.

What other experts cited in the reform plan say about taxes:
According to Ed Wallace of the Iowa Tax Payers: The group opposes changing the way corporations are taxed. The group is also "willing" to consider eliminating a huge tax deduction: deducting what Iowans pay in federal taxes from their state taxes. Because of this deduction Iowans have a higher listed tax rate than they would in this other system. The group thinks the appearance of higher taxes makes Iowa less attractive for business.

Who else does the ITR cite? David Osterberg of the Iowa Policy Project writes that "While some may complain about one tax being too high, that is offset by other taxes being lower than they are in other states. For example, Business taxes are low. Corporate income taxes are a fourth of what they were 20 years ago.

What did these important groups manage to help influence in the 2007 legislative session? The governor and the lawmakers did a few things related to taxes: They raised the cigarette tax. They enacted a tax-amnesty plan to let people settle back taxes without penalty, and they may have set the stage for a gas-tax increase next year. Naturally, they blame it all on the Democrats, but this "tax relief" organization never addresses or seeks to reduce the cause of taxes: unnecessary government spending. With tax friends like these who needs enemies?

Others have noticed how uncredible the ITR appears to be. Roth and Company, P.C., a tax advisor out of Des Moines Iowa, has written a scathing article that claims the Iowans for Tax Relief has a name that "belies its purpose." They claim that ITR supports special interest carve-outs and corporate welfare tax subsidies that shrink the tax base and raise the taxes for the rest of the people.

http://www.rothcpa.com/archives/001719.php

So how did Ron Paul react to being not invited? The way all kids who are not a part of the In-Crowd should. In a stroke of genius, the Ron Paul campaign responded to this attempt to silence him and prevent Iowans from hearing his message by holding a party of his own. As soon as the Presidential Forum is over, Ron Paul has rented out Room C at the same Hy-Vee hall to share his message of freedom, peace, and prosperity. The Ron Paul rally will start immediately following the conclusion of the Presidential Candidates Forum sponsored by "those other guys" at approximately 4:30 pm. The public is invited. Food and beverage will be provided to the first 500 people who arrive.

A very "credible" response to the shenanigans of an increasingly non-credible organization; Iowans for Tax Relief.

Bet on Ron Paul to Become President in 2008

----

Jennifer Reynolds, Special to Gambling911.com

Originally published June 26, 2007 12:00 am ET

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

June 26, 2007 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Iowans for Tax Relief's exclusion of Ron Paul from Presidential Forum Backfires - Paul Coming to Des Moines Sat. June 30th

Des Moines, Iowa Rally on
Saturday, June 30th
                                                            

RSVP for the Rally
                                                            
                                                                         June 25, 2007

Congressman Ron Paul is coming to Des Moines, Iowa Saturday, June 30th to hold a rally, where he will share his message of freedom, peace and prosperity.

Everyone is welcome to attend.

We are expecting many supporters, both from Iowa and around America, to come and hear Dr. Paul.

As you may know, Congressman Ron Paul was excluded from the Presidential Candidates Forum sponsored by Iowans for Tax Relief and Iowa Christian Alliance that is scheduled to take place that same day.

Although we would have liked to have participated, we see a wonderful opportunity to demonstrate to Iowa voters, the broad base of support for Dr. Paul.

So, right after the Presidential Forum, starting at 4:30 PM, Dr. Paul will hold his own rally, where he will share his positive and compelling message for America.

Our rally will be held at the same building as the Presidential Forum. We will be at the Hy-Vee Hall, Room C, Iowa Events Center, 730 Third Street, Des Moines, Iowa.

Please come out to show your support.

Details about the event can be found here: http://eventful.com/events/E0-001-005011869-5

Help us prepare for the event by filling out this RSVP form. If you are attending as part of a larger group, please have your organizer or leader fill out this form. If you are attending as an individual, fill out this form for you and your guests.

Thank you,

Joe Seehusen
Iowa State Organizer
Ron Paul 2008
                                                            
RSVP for the Rally today!

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

June 25, 2007 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Re: Ed Brown,. IRS / US Marshal,. Persecution - Question for unionleader.com: How is a person made liable for taxes imposed by IRC subtitle A?

Questions for unionleader.com:

How is a person made liable for taxes imposed by IRC subtitle A?

Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 08:30:38 -0700
From: "Paul Andrew Mitchell" <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
To: writeus@unionleader.com
Subject: How is a person made liable for taxes imposed by IRC subtitle A?

Dear Union Leader:

Please answer these two simple questions:

In the article you wrote below:

(1) what is "this title" and

(2) how is a person made liable for taxes imposed by subtitle A?

RSVP here.

Thank you.

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm
(Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)

 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=What+the+law+says&articleId=25d2faff-a701-4cb1-8850-62012199ebda

What the law says

U.S. Code, TITLE 26, Internal Revenue Code Section 6011(a)

General requirement of return, statement, or list

When required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary any person made liable for any tax imposed by this title,

or with respect to the collection thereof, shall make a return or statement according to the forms and regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

Every person required to make a return or statement shall include therein the information required by such forms or regulations."


--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

+++

This all sounds and reads like what the IRS prints in its publications. 

Correct!

>  No correct cites of law, no definitions that are in the codes,

>  just more cloudy words.

Correct!

>  Am I correct?

Yes.

Totally correct, particularly when you noted

that they did NOT quote any definitions.

Here's one of the errors of omission

which the Union-Leader committed --

IRC section 7343 defining "person"

for purposes of Chapter 75:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00007343----000-.html

The Union-Leader has cited the penalty provision at section 7201:

that section falls within Chapter 75 of the Internal Revenue Code --

CRIMES, OTHER OFFENSES, AND FORFEITURES.

If one is NOT that "person" then one cannot violate 7201.

This is a very common error that U.S. Attorneys

and federal judges both make.

You will note the introductory qualifying phrases

in the definitions at IRC 7701:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/7701.html

(a) When used in this title,

where not otherwise distinctly expressed 

or manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof—

[please ignore, for the moment, the fact that

"intent" is not defined anywhere in the IRC either!]

(1) Person

The term “person” shall be construed to mean and include an

individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation. [WHERE NOT OTHERWISE DISTINCTLY

EXPRESSED!!  DON'T FORGET THIS QUALIFIER!!]

Well, 7343 is an "otherwise distinct expression"

which completely overrides the general definition

of "person" at 7701(a)(1) above.  The latter

definition is used ONLY where a distinct

statutory definition is NOT applicable.

So, for all penalty provisions found in Chapter 75,

the definition of "person" at IRC 7343 controls,

NOT the general definition of "person" at 7701(a)(1).

As for their citation to 6011, this is another typical error

that is made by people who are too uneducated

and/or too afraid to be objective with these "codes".

Here, we have the grammatical expression "person made liable".

This expression is in PASSIVE VOICE in formal English grammar.

Comparable ACTIVE VOICE expressions would be:

ACTIVE VOICE v. PASSIVE VOICE:

"My dog made me happy."  v.  "I was made happy by my dog."

"My brother made me angry."  [complete these others yourself]

"The weather made me sad."

"God made me."

Active Voice expressions have this form:

SUBJECT -- PREDICATE -- OBJECT

So, it is totally reasonable to ask these 2 questions: 

WHO made any person liable?

-or-

WHAT made any person liable?

And, since 7343 does NOT apply to 6011,

we must rely on the general definition of "person"

at 7701(a)(1) to understand section 6011.

These 2 questions bring us unavoidably

to ask if there is any STATUTE which makes

any person liable for taxes imposed by subtitle A:

"What STATUTE made any person liable?"

The latter is a very key question, because the

U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled that

a TAX LIABILITY can ONLY be created

by an Act of Congress, NOT by federal regulations.

Commissioner v. Acker

Moreover, there IS such a STATUTE for

taxes imposed by subtitle C:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/3403.html 

"The employer shall be liable for the payment of the tax

required to be deducted and withheld under this chapter, and

shall not be liable to any person for the amount

of any such payment."

The mere FACT that there is no comparable STATUTE

for taxes imposed by IRC subtitle A is conclusive proof

that Congress intended it that way

inclusio unius est exclusio alterius

(an irrefutable inference must be drawn that

whatever was omitted or excluded from a federal statute

was intended to be omitted or excluded by Act of Congress)

IRREFUTABLE inference!

MUST BE drawn!!

But, for now, I've asked the Union-Leader only 2 simple questions:

we'll just have to wait and see if they even bother to answer.

Hopefully, by the time they get to Commissioner v. Acker,

they will have realized the fundamental error they made made:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/2amjur2d.htm

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


Our condensed list of IRS outreach resources:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm <-- START HERE
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.estopped.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.forward.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.perjury.jurats.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/psta.analysis.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/lien.or.levy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/notice.of.deficiency.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.cclists.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm



Catherine wrote:

Paul,

This all sounds and reads like what the IRS prints in its publications.  No correct cites of law, no definitions that are in the codes, just more cloudy words.

Am I correct?

Catherine



Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Union Leader:

Please answer these two simple questions:

In the article you wrote below:

(1) what is "this title" and

(2) how is a person made liable for taxes imposed by subtitle A?

RSVP here.

Thank you.

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm
(Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=What+the+law+says&articleId=25d2faff-a701-4cb1-8850-62012199ebda

What the law says

U.S. Code, TITLE 26, Internal Revenue Code Section 6011(a)

General requirement of return, statement, or list

When required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary any person made liable for any tax imposed by this title,

or with respect to the collection thereof, shall make a return or statement according to the forms and regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

Every person required to make a return or statement shall include therein the information required by such forms or regulations."


--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

+++

>  IRS NOW SAYS: 

>  "paying the tax is, in fact, a legal requirement of all U.S. residents."

OBJECTION:  that's NOT a FACT:

the correct legal term is "resident aliens" not "U.S. residents".

Moreover, there is no federal STATUTE which makes

resident aliens (green card holders) specifically LIABLE

for payment of the taxes imposed by IRC subtitle A.

Again (to beat a dead horse into smithereens),

IRS FABRICATED that LIABILITY for "resident aliens" --

aka "aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence" --

in the federal REGULATION at 26 CFR 1.1-1(b), here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cfr/26/26cfr1.1-1.htm#b

But, that regulation violates the holding in

Commissioner v. Acker, explained in this excellent

abstract from the 1962 Edition of American Jurisprudence:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/2amjur2d.htm

IRS is lying, AND misrepresenting the law, AGAIN!!

Facts and laws are NOT one and the same thing.

It is a FACT that there is no liability STATUTE

for IRC subtitle A:  this means ...

IT IS A FACT THERE IS NO LAW!

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


Our condensed list of IRS outreach resources:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm <-- START HERE
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.estopped.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.forward.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.perjury.jurats.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/psta.analysis.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/lien.or.levy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/notice.of.deficiency.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.cclists.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm



Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com> wrote:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00006012----000-.html

The terms "liable" and "liability" do NOT even occur in section 6012 above!!

And, a "return" is not "payment" either:  a "return" is a FORM!!!

Compare IRC section 3403, which is a CLEAR LIABILITY STATUTE:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00003403----000-.html

§ 3403. Liability for tax

The employer shall be liable for the payment of the tax required to be deducted and

withheld under this chapter, and shall not be liable to any person for the amount of any such

payment. 

[end excerpt]

If the one who executes a "return" is the one whom Congress

intended to make LIABLE, then Congress would have needed

to enact a statute comparable to 3403, like this:

"The U.S. individual who signs an income tax return

shall be liable for payment of the amount owed on that return."

-or-

"The U.S. individual who receives taxable income

shall be liable for payment of the tax due on that income."

BUT, again, there is no such STATUTE.

Moreover, it is the WITHHOLDING AGENT

who is made specifically LIABLE by reason

of the statutes enumerated at the definition

of "withholding agent" at IRC 7701(a)(16):

(16) Withholding agent

The term "withholding agent" means any person required to deduct and

withhold any tax under the provisions of section 1441 , 1442, 1443, or 1461 . 

[end excerpt]

Now, examine carefully the language of 1461, for example:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/1461.html

Every person required to deduct and withhold any tax under this chapter

is hereby made liable for such tax and is hereby indemnified against the claims

and demands of any person for the amount of any payments

made in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.

[end excerpt]

Once again, NOTE WELL the language used by Congress

whenever it creates a SPECIFIC LIABILITY:

"... is hereby made liable for such tax ...."

"Hereby" means BY REASON OF THIS LIABILITY STATUTE!!

"Made liable" means exactly what it says:  that "person" must PAY!!

If a withholding agent withholds taxes,

s/he is LIABLE for payment of those taxes;

if a withholding agent does NOT pay the taxes s/he withheld,

then it's the withholding agent who has committed tax evasion,

NOT the worker from whose compensation those taxes were withheld.

The IRS continues to lie about these fundamental issues.

And, most importantly, they STILL don't know the meaning

of ESTOPPEL as applied to the SUBPOENA which

Treasury REFUSED to answer for four and one-half years.

EVEN IF THERE WERE SUCH A GENUINE LIABILITY STATUTE

FOR IRC SUBTITLE A, THEIR SILENCE HAS ACTIVATED ESTOPPEL.

MEANING:  IT'S O-V-E-R NOW:  NEITHER IRS NOR TREASURY

CAN COME INTO COURT WITH ANY LIABILITY STATUTES,

BECAUSE THEIR SILENCE FOR 4.5 YEARS NOW PREVENTS

THEM FROM CHANGING THEIR MINDS, TO OUR DETRIMENT.

Now that IRS is finally backed into a corner,

they're trying to say that the LIABILITY [sic] STATUTES [sic]

are 6011 and 6012.  WRONG!!!

To make matters much worse, both 6011 and 6012

fall within subtitle F: 

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/stF.html

(roughly sections 6001 thru 7874, inclusive)

see IRC 7851(a)(6)(A) for a very key, and controlling, statute

concerning the date of enactment of "this title" and

the legal implications if "this title" is NOT yet enacted.

I realize that "this title" has a secret meaning:

that alone nullifies the IRC for vagueness.

The consistent legislative practice by Congress

is to use the term "this title" to refer to a

Title of the United States Code, e.g. see all

occurrences of "this title" in Title 28 of the U.S. Code --

the laws which govern all federal courts!

LET'S ASSEMBLE A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL JURY,

AND PUT THIS SIMPLE QUESTION TO THEM:

WHAT DOES "THIS TITLE" MEAN AT IRC 7851(a)(6)(A), PLEASE?

And, no coaching prior to this verdict, ok?

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


Our condensed list of IRS outreach resources:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm  <-- START HERE
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.estopped.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.forward.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.perjury.jurats.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/psta.analysis.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/lien.or.levy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/notice.of.deficiency.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.cclists.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm



On 6/24/07, lockski <lockski@comcast.net> wrote:

· IRS Answer to the Brown's

IRS official cites federal tax code

By KRISTEN SENZ
Sunday News Correspondent
18 hours, 29 minutes ago 


Frank Keith knows some people will never be convinced of their obligation to pay federal income tax. Nevertheless, he said, paying the tax is, in fact, a legal requirement of all U.S. residents.

Keith, chief of communications and liaison for the IRS, said two specific sections of Title 26 in the United States Code establish tax liability for individuals.

Sections 6011(a) and 6012(a), he said, are the basis for the "hundreds" of court cases in which anti-tax activists like Plainfield's Ed and Elaine Brown have been convicted of felony tax evasion.

Section 6011(a) reads in part: "When required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary any person made liable for any tax imposed by this title, or with respect to the collection thereof, shall make a return or statement according to the forms and regulations prescribed by the Secretary . . ."

Keith said multiple courts have ruled that the "regulations," or IRS rules, to which the statute refers carry the same weight as laws. "I think there's ample case law that says regulation has the strength of law," he said.

The Browns and many of their supporters argue that the federal court system is corrupt and invalid, and that court decisions are not the same as laws.

Section 6012(a), titled "Persons required to make returns of income," reads:

"Returns with respect to income taxes ... shall be made by the following: Every individual having for the taxable year gross income which equals or exceeds the exemption amount, except that a return shall not be required of an individual who: is not married, is not a surviving spouse, is not a head of a household and for the taxable year has gross income of less than the sum of the exemption amount plus the basic standard deduction applicable to such an individual ..."

Keith, who refused to talk specifically about the Browns' case, said he understands that the language used in the statutes may not satisfy all citizens.

"I'll agree that I may never be able to point to a section that's written in a way that they would like it to be written," he said.

But, he added, the U.S. Code can't be dissected to suit one's arguments.

"You can't always take one section of a code all by itself," he said.

Keith also pointed to a document on the IRS Web site that attempts to debunk "frivolous" arguments about tax liability. The 61-page document (available at www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/friv_tax.pdf) addresses several claims the Browns have made, including improper ratification of the 16th Amendment of the United States Constitution.

"The arguments are well laid out right there in that document," Keith said. "There are a number of arguments, and I think what most of them have in common is they are not persuasive in a court of law."

Yet some people with views similar to the Browns' have won their court cases.

When a defendant convinces a jury that he honestly believed no tax liability existed, the jury must acquit due to a lack of criminal intent.

But the duty to pay federal income taxes is a very real one, Keith said.

"If certain conditions are met, you're required to file a tax return," he said, "and there are civil and criminal consequences for those who don't."

Keith said those "conditions" have to do with income, a term the Browns say isn't defined in the statutes and seems to deal only with corporate or off-shore activities.

"I point to a section in a code that I and hundreds of judges and juries have said creates the requirement," and still tax protesters argue about definitions and technicalities, Keith said. "The statute gives you the requirement."


., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SupremeLaw" group.
To post to this group, send email to supremelaw@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to supremelaw-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/supremelaw?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

+++

Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 18:09:13 -0700
From: "Paul Andrew Mitchell" <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
To: SupremeLaw <supremelaw@googlegroups.com>
Subject: IRS caught lying again ... this time about "residents of the United States"

The IRS is also trying to deceive everyone about the meaning

of "resident of the United States" -- i.e. by misrepresenting

that term to mean everyone who inhabits one of the 50 States.

WRONG!!

Here's the statutory definition of "resident alien",

found at IRC 7701(b):

(b) Definition of resident alien and nonresident alien

(1) In general

For purposes of this title (other than subtitle B)--

(A) Resident alien

An alien individual shall be treated as a resident of the United States with respect to any calendar year

if (and only if) such [alien] individual meets the requirements of clause (i), (ii), or (iii):

(i) Lawfully admitted for permanent residence

Such [alien] individual is a lawful permanent resident of the United States

at any time during such calendar year.

(ii) Substantial presence test

Such [alien] individual meets the substantial presence test of paragraph (3).

(iii) First year election

Such [alien] individual makes the election provided in paragraph (4).

[end excerpt]

NOTE WELL that the term "resident alien" legally applies ONLY

to alien individuals, because they are the only "persons" who

can possibly meet one or the other of the three tests itemized above.

For relevant historical details, see the Chapter entitled "The Matrix" here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chapter3.htm

(written LONG BEFORE the famous film by the same name)

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


Our condensed list of IRS outreach resources:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm <-- START HERE
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.estopped.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.forward.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.perjury.jurats.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/psta.analysis.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/lien.or.levy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/notice.of.deficiency.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.cclists.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm

+++

Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:16:14 -0700
From: "Paul Andrew Mitchell" <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
To: "wrh@whatreallyhappened.com" <wrh@whatreallyhappened.com>
Subject: The IRS LIE 6-24-2007: paying the tax is a legal requirement of all U.S. residents [sic]

Here's the IRS LIE:

Frank Keith knows some people will never be convinced

of their obligation to pay federal income tax.

Nevertheless, he said,

"paying the tax is, in fact, a legal requirement of all U.S. residents"

See prior message for PROOF that this is a LIE.

HINT:  The term "resident of the United States" means "resident alien"

and it ONLY applies to aliens who satisfy one of the three (3) tests

for "resident aliens" at IRC 7701(b):

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/7701.html (b)

(b) Definition of resident alien and nonresident alien 

(1) In general

For purposes of this title (other than subtitle B)—

(A) Resident alien

An alien individual shall be treated as a resident of the United States

with respect to any calendar year

if (and only if) such [alien] individual meets the requirements of clause (i), (ii), or (iii):

(i) Lawfully admitted for permanent residence

Such [alien] individual is a lawful permanent resident of the United States

at any time during such calendar year.  [these are GREEN CARD recipients]

(ii) Substantial presence test

Such [alien] individual meets the substantial presence test of paragraph (3).

(iii) First year election

Such [alien] individual makes the election provided in paragraph (4).

[end excerpt]

And, by definition a "nonresident alien" is any individual

who is neither a federal citizen nor a resident alien:

(B) Nonresident alien

An individual is a nonresident alien if such individual is

neither a citizen of the United States [read "federal citizen"]

nor a resident of the United States (within the meaning of subparagraph (A)).

[end excerpt]

These three (3) categories are mutually exclusive:

(1)  federal citizen (aka "citizen of the United States")

(2)  resident alien  (aka "resident of the United States" aka green card holder)

(3)  nonresident alien (legally equivalent to State Citizen like Frank Brushaber)

If one is a federal citizen, then s/he cannot be a resident alien or a nonresident alien.

If one is a resident alien, then s/he cannot be a federal citizen or a nonresident alien.

If one is a nonresident alien, then s/he cannot be a federal citizen or resident alien.

The legal meanings and inter-relationships among these terms

are fully explained in Chapter 3 entitled "The Matrix" here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chapter3.htm

The official IRS "Publications" are another excellent source of evidence

which supports the validity of The Matrix

These publications can be obtained by ordering them directly

from the Internal Revenue Service. 

For example, Publication number 519, U.S. Tax Guide for Aliens,

begins with the following statements: 

Introduction

For tax purposes,

an alien is an individual who is not a U.S.** citizen

Aliens are classified as nonresident aliens and resident aliens.  ....

[emphasis in original]

To simply this horribly complex situation --

created by a deliberately deceptive tax Code --

if you are not a federal citizen then you are an "alien" for tax purposes.

And, there are only two kinds of aliens: resident aliens and nonresident aliens.

Because of the law of jurisdiction, State Citizens are legally equivalent

to nonresident aliens, just like Frank Brushaber.  See Treasury Decision 2313

for proof:

http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/append-c.htm

... as fully explained in the book "The Federal Zone" here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm
(Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


Our condensed list of IRS outreach resources:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm  <-- START HERE
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.estopped.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.forward.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.perjury.jurats.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/psta.analysis.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/lien.or.levy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/notice.of.deficiency.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.cclists.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: lockski <lockski@comcast.net>
Date: Jun 24, 2007 3:33 PM
Subject: IRS RESPONSE 6 24 2007
To: supremelaw@googlegroups.com

· IRS Answer to the Brown's

IRS official cites federal tax code

By KRISTEN SENZ
Sunday News Correspondent
18 hours, 29 minutes ago 


Frank Keith knows some people will never be convinced of their obligation to pay federal income tax. Nevertheless, he said, paying the tax is, in fact, a legal requirement of all U.S. residents.

Keith, chief of communications and liaison for the IRS, said two specific sections of Title 26 in the United States Code establish tax liability for individuals.

Sections 6011(a) and 6012(a), he said, are the basis for the "hundreds" of court cases in which anti-tax activists like Plainfield's Ed and Elaine Brown have been convicted of felony tax evasion.

Section 6011(a) reads in part: "When required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary any person made liable for any tax imposed by this title, or with respect to the collection thereof, shall make a return or statement according to the forms and regulations prescribed by the Secretary . . ."

Keith said multiple courts have ruled that the "regulations," or IRS rules, to which the statute refers carry the same weight as laws. "I think there's ample case law that says regulation has the strength of law," he said.

The Browns and many of their supporters argue that the federal court system is corrupt and invalid, and that court decisions are not the same as laws.

Section 6012(a), titled "Persons required to make returns of income," reads:

"Returns with respect to income taxes ... shall be made by the following: Every individual having for the taxable year gross income which equals or exceeds the exemption amount, except that a return shall not be required of an individual who: is not married, is not a surviving spouse, is not a head of a household and for the taxable year has gross income of less than the sum of the exemption amount plus the basic standard deduction applicable to such an individual ..."

Keith, who refused to talk specifically about the Browns' case, said he understands that the language used in the statutes may not satisfy all citizens.

"I'll agree that I may never be able to point to a section that's written in a way that they would like it to be written," he said.

But, he added, the U.S. Code can't be dissected to suit one's arguments.

"You can't always take one section of a code all by itself," he said.

Keith also pointed to a document on the IRS Web site that attempts to debunk "frivolous" arguments about tax liability. The 61-page document (available at www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/friv_tax.pdf) addresses several claims the Browns have made, including improper ratification of the 16th Amendment of the United States Constitution.

"The arguments are well laid out right there in that document," Keith said. "There are a number of arguments, and I think what most of them have in common is they are not persuasive in a court of law."

Yet some people with views similar to the Browns' have won their court cases.

When a defendant convinces a jury that he honestly believed no tax liability existed, the jury must acquit due to a lack of criminal intent.

But the duty to pay federal income taxes is a very real one, Keith said.

"If certain conditions are met, you're required to file a tax return," he said, "and there are civil and criminal consequences for those who don't."

Keith said those "conditions" have to do with income, a term the Browns say isn't defined in the statutes and seems to deal only with corporate or off-shore activities.

"I point to a section in a code that I and hundreds of judges and juries have said creates the requirement," and still tax protesters argue about definitions and technicalities, Keith said. "The statute gives you the requirement."

 

+++

Has anyone here read a book called "The Law that Never Was?"   Its premise is that fed. "Income Tax" Act was never properly ratified, so is not current law.

Yes:  it's listed in the Bibliography of "The Federal Zone":

http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/

See Chapter 13 in particular:

http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chaptr13.htm

You should consider other books on the subject too,

chiefly because several high Court cases have held that

a ratified 16th "amendment" did NOT repeal 2 Clauses

in the Constitution requiring that all federal direct taxes

must be apportioned among the 50 States:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#1:2:3

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#1:9:4

Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company is particularly

noteworthy in this context, because it held that the Constitution

can NOT contradict itself!  If a ratified 16th "amendment" was

intended to repeal the latter 2 Clauses, it would have needed

to say so ... but it did NOT.

Repeals by implication are never favored.

Compare the 21st Amendment which expressly

repealed Prohibition aka 18th Amendment:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#21st-amend

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#18th-amend

Thus, the omission of any repealing provisions must be

taken as an intentional act of the 16th "amendment's"

original proponents.  Confer at "inclusio unius est

exclusio alterius" in Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.

Because of considerations like those above,

we shifted our focus to the Internal Revenue Code,

and to the requirement that a specific LIABILITY for taxes

must be created by Act of Congress and NOT by

regulations published in the Federal Register:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm

I hope this helps.  There is much additional reading

at the links after my name below ....

Thank you for contacting the Supreme Law Firm.

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


Our condensed list of IRS outreach resources:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm <-- START HERE
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.estopped.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.forward.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.perjury.jurats.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/psta.analysis.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/lien.or.levy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/notice.of.deficiency.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.cclists.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm



Zounds456@aol.com wrote:

Sorry, a couple of meaningless messages were sent. 

Has anyone here read a book called "The Law that Never Was?"   Its premise is that fed. "Income Tax" Act was never properly ratified, so is not current law.  Very interesting subject.



**************************************

+++

6/22/07 Ron Paul on Ed & Elaine Brown
VIDEO:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4710607797448605118&q=ron+paul+ed+elaine+brown&total=10&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=5

+++


Jim Jones
to Undisclosed-Re.
show details
11:35 am (9 hours ago)
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spread The Word ~ Forward to a Friend
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Hey folks,
This came from a relative of mine. This is THE issue that can break the NeoCON's so-called election wide open. Support & focus must be brought to bear on the fight being led by Ed & Elaine Brown. If anyone out there knows Cindy Sheehan or Joe Bannister, please encourage them to head to Ed & Elaine's home...that is where we need to dig-in and fight. I believe that by bringing public light to this issue we could push the whole house of cards over. Pandora's Box is wide open...the time is now for a revolution in public opinion. This issue would do it.
Please forward to all on your lists...
- J.J.
 
1040 Checkmate?
 
DOJ Dismisses Felony Tax Prosecution
-- With Prejudice -- After PRA Defense Raised
 
Evidence OMB Complicit In Income Tax Fraud
 
DOJ & IRS Petitioned To Explain
 
On May 12, 2006 in Peoria, Illinois, the attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) begged the court to dismiss all charges against IRS victim Robert Lawrence in federal District Court.
 
The motion for dismissal came on the heels of a surprise tactic by Lawrence’s defense attorney Oscar Stilley.
 
The tactic threatened exposure of IRS’s on-going efforts to defraud the public. The move put DOJ attorneys in a state of panic that left them with only one alternative: beg for dismissal, with prejudice.
 
Stilley’s tactic paid off. Sixty days earlier, the DOJ had indicted Lawrence on three counts of willful failure to file a 1040 form, and three felony counts of income tax evasion. The federal Judge dismissed all charges with prejudice, meaning the DOJ cannot charge Lawrence with those crimes again.
 
The trial was to have started on Monday morning, May 15th.
 
On Wednesday, May 10, Stilley mailed a set of documents to the DOJ in response to DOJ’s discovery demands. The documents revealed to DOJ for the first time that Lawrence was basing his entire defense on an act of Congress, 44 U.S.C. 3500 – 3520, also known as the "Paperwork Reduction Act" (PRA).
 
In Section 3512 of the Act, titled "Public Protection," it says that no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with an agency’s collection of information request (such as a 1040 form), if the request does not display a valid control number assigned by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in accordance with the requirements of the Act, or if the agency fails to inform the person who is to respond to the collection of information that he is not required to respond to the collection of information request unless it displays a valid control number.
 
In Section 3512 Congress went on to authorize that the protection provided by Section 3512 may be raised in the form of a complete defense at any time during an agency’s administrative process (such as an IRS Tax Court or Collection and Due Process Hearing) or during a judicial proceeding (such as Lawrence’s criminal trial).
 
In sum, the PRA requires that all government agencies display valid OMB control numbers and certain disclosures directly on all information collection forms that the public is requested to file. 
Lawrence's sole defense was he was not required to file an IRS Form 1040 because it displays an invalid OMB control number.
 
Government officials knew that if the case went to trial, it would expose the fraudulent, counterfeit 1040. They also must have known that a trial would expose the ongoing conspiracy between OMB and IRS to publish 1040 forms each year that those agencies knew were in violation of the PRA. That would raise the issue that the Form 1040, with its invalid control number, is being used by the Government to cover up the underlying constitutional tort -- that is, the enforcement of a direct, unapportioned tax on the labor of every working man, women and child in America.
 
Any information collection form, such as IRS Form 1040, which lacks bona fide statutory authority or which conflicts with the Constitution, cannot be issued an OMB control number. If a control number were issued for such a form, the form would be invalid and of no force and effect.
 
Under the facts and circumstances of the last 24 years, it is safe to say that IRS Form 1040 is a fraudulent, counterfeit, bootleg form. Government officials responsible for this fraud should be investigated and face indictment for willfully making and sponsoring false instruments.
 
Caught between a rock and a hard place, the DOJ and IRS decided not to let the Lawrence case proceed because it would reveal one critical and damning fact:
 
The PRA law protects those that fail to file IRS bootleg Form 1040
 
The DOJ knew that it stood a significant chance of losing the case, and if that happened, the press and others would quickly spread the word, and leave only fools to ever file a 1040 again. Oscar Stilley’s pleadings and documents made these points quite clear:
 
* IRS Form 1040 violates the federal Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) and is therefore a legally invalid form.
 
* Under the Public Protection clause of the PRA, no person can be penalized for failing to file a 1040 if the IRS fails to fully comply with the PRA.
 
* The PRA statutes explicitly provide that a PRA challenge is a complete defense and can be raised in any administrative or judicial proceeding.
 
* The IRS Individual Form 1040 has not and cannot comply with the requirements of the PRA because no existing statute authorizes the IRS to impose or collect the federal income tax from individuals. 
That lack of bona fide authority makes it impossible for IRS to avoid violating the PRA.
 
We The People Foundation has researched the facts, law and circumstances surrounding this case, and has determined that:
 
* A public trial would have opened a “Pandora’s Box” of legal evidence and government testimony under oath that would establish the IRS 1040 form as both fraudulent and counterfeit.
 
* Oscar Stilley’s PRA defense “checkmated” the DOJ and IRS
 
* The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) appears to have been complicit with IRS in deceiving the public and in helping perpetuate the 1040 fraud by promulgating federal regulations that negate the plain language of the PRA laws passed by Congress and by allowing the IRS to continually skirt the explicit requirements of those statutes
 
Accordingly, We The People Foundation has petitioned the U.S. Attorney General, the IRS Commissioner, and Director of the OMB, requesting an official explanation of their conduct in Peoria.
We The People Foundation
For Constitutional Education, Inc.
 
2458 Ridge Road, Queensbury, NY 12804
Telephone: (518) 656-3578 Fax: (518) 656-9724
 
June 9, 2006
 
Read the booklet Common Sense by Founder Thomas Paine, click here: http://www.ushistory.org/Paine/commonsense/index.htm
*******************************************************************
"Lose this day loitering 'Twill be the same old story, Tomorrow and the next, Even more dilatory.
Whatever you would do, Or dream of doing, begin it!
Boldness has power, genius, and magic in it. Begin it now."
~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
 
WE ARE THE MEDIA!!! ~ THE INFO WAR IS OURS!
RESTORE THE REPUBLIC NOW!
Just Say NO to the New World Order!

 
THE ONLY REAL AMERICAN RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT!
Just Say NO to Neo-Con Corporate Fascism & Global Socialist Amerikanism!
         
 

THIS MESSAGE OF INSPIRATION WAS BROUGHT TO YOU BY,
The Conspiriosity Shop Vintage Patriot T-Shirts - www.newworldordertshirts.com
VINTAGE PATRIOT T-SHIRTS

WARNING: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice.
 
They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection...
Have a nice day!

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

June 25, 2007 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack