« Ron Paul 2008: Response to The New Republic's Slanderous Hit Piece on Ron Paul | Main | Christopher Story FRSA: Global Data Theft Operation By The Criminal Cadres, Another Element Of The World Revolution Exposed »

LHS Associates RIGGED The New Hampshire Primary: Ron Paul Robbed: Must Demand a Recount!!!

Bev Harris: www.Blackboxvoting.org, Joseph Stalin "Those Who Cast the Votes Decide Nothing- Those who Count the Votes decide everything" www.votefraud.org

 

IAHF List:

Please see this ad which ran in New Hampshire's Manchester Union Leader newspaper 2 days before the Primary: http://www.votefraud.org/ron_paul_NH_newspaper_2008.pdf It was an attempt to get poll watchers to watch the polls.

If you watched the New Hampshire primary results come in as I did, you would have noticed that the distribution of votes remained constant, with no change or fluctuation over the whole state, all night. In the real world- that doesn't happen. In the real world we could have expected sudden surges as one candidate pulled ahead as votes from some towns were tallied, but that didn't happen- the percentages stayed constant- a sure sign that the fix was in from the beginning.Jim Condit clearly spells out the problem we’re facing at www.votefraud.org Especially see these key articles in his archives http://www.votefraud.org/primer_archive_articles.html

In the town of Sutton, at least 3 people voted for Ron Paul, but their votes were not tallied http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2008/by_county/NH_GOP_0108.html?SITE=NPRELN&SECTION=POLITICS yet check this out: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=82909

"My mom, aunt, and dad all voted for RP today in my hometown, My mom and aunt both work passing out ballots, and checking them off. I just looked at the politico map and it says their town has ZERO votes for Ron. Now i know that there isn't corruption on voting in that little town, so where they reported it must be. What do I do, anyone know???

Originally Posted by sstjean View Post
This was posted to ronpaul-801 tonight: "This town numbers are wrong wrong wrong on this map. I am from Sutton originally and my parents and one aunt all voted for Ron Paul today and Sutton says 0. So this is wrong. This is a town that had 20 people counting the ballots and I have no reason to believe that they cheated. Small town and I was born and raised there. The real numbers will come in by morning. The electronic machines in the big towns are the ones we have to worry about."

A YouTube video from Black Box Voting that you won't soon forget:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiiaBqwqkXs

THE CAT THAT CONTROLS NEW HAMPSHIRE ELECTION PROGRAMMING

John Silvestro and his small private business, LHS Associates, has
exclusive programming contracts for ALL New Hampshire voting machines,
which combined will count about 81 percent of the vote in the primary. And
as to Super Tuesday and beyond: Silvestro also has the programming
contracts for the states of Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Vermont.

Silvestro IS the New Hampshire chain of custody in New England -- Or at
least, a very large component in it.

Last fall, with the help of citizens like you, Black Box Voting began
working on "Chain of Custody" projects, in which we identified some of
the areas of concern that might affect many jurisdictions at once. First
on the list for the Northeast U.S. is LHS Associates, a vendor with
inside access to every memory card, as well as to the chips containing
the "brain" of the Diebold optical scan machines.

RARE VIDEO FOOTAGE

In an unusual confluence of available video, we obtained footage of
Silvestro grappling with Harri Hursti, the master hacker who had his way
with the Diebold optical scans in Leon County, Florida in the famous
exploit that was showcased in the film Hacking Democracy.

The exact same make, model and version hacked in the Black Box Voting
project in Leon County is used throughout New Hampshire, where about 45
percent of elections administrators hand count paper ballots at the
polling place, with the remaining locations all using the Diebold version
1.94w optical scan machine. Because the voting machine locations tend
to be urban, this represents about 81 percent of the New Hampshire
voters.

The video shows Harri Hursti testifying on Sept. 19 before the New
Hampshire legislature, attempting to explain significant vulnerabilities
requiring urgent mitigations; throughout his testimony, Silvestro
inserted his own comments, opinions, misstatements and speculations.

VOTING MACHINE CHECKUP

One area of disagreement between Hursti and Silvestro was the amount of
expertise needed to exploit the Diebold 1.94w optical scan system.
Silvestro claimed (in a strange contortion of reasoning) that he doesn't
hire very skilled programmers, implying that this makes New Hampshire
elections more secure.

Hursti pointed out that hiring programmers with a lack of knowledge is
generally not considered a security feature, and also that an average
high schooler can learn to exploit the system in two days to two weeks.

WE THINK IT DOESN'T TAKE THAT LONG

Black Box Voting purchased a Diebold optical scan with 1.94w firmware,
and chose a computer repair shop out of the phone book, took it in,
grabbed the first available technician. It took him less than 10 minutes
to zero in on the memory card as a point of critical vulnerability --
and oh my, did he point out some other intersting things!

NEW HAMPSHIRE HASN'T UPGRADED SYSTEM SECURITY

Silvestro tries to claim that the security problems have been fixed in
newer editions. Whether or not they have been, it's a moot point in New
Hampshire where the upgrade is not made unless the Ballot Law
Commission meets, and they have not met for ages.

Silvestro then points to extraordinary measures taken by other states
to enact special procedural safeguards, but of course none of those were
implemented in New Hampshire either, because the Ballot Law Commission
has not bothered to meet since March 2006.

IN FACT, NEW HAMPSHIRE HAS NOT IMPLEMENTED MITIGATIONS FOR KNOWN RISKS

Not only that, they have turned all the programming over to a sole
source private company, taking vote counting for 81 percent of New
Hampshire citizens out of the public domain.

LHS is not subject to public records requirements, as the government
is, at least, not in New Hampshire. The control over memory card contents
is absolute; when cards malfunction or get lost, LHS brings the
replacements.

CONTROL OVER THE "BRAINS" OF THE MACHINE: ACCESS TO THE CHIP

Since LHS maintains the machines, repairs the machines, and replaces
the machines -- often on Election Day -- when they malfunction, they have
intimate access to the chips, sockets, ports, communications devices
and other electronic components.

Silvestro stated that the chip has "read only memory" and cannot be
reprogrammed without frying it under ultraviolet light overnight.

Hursti never had a chance to examine the hardware, nor have most of the
recent university studies had access. But our friendly neighborhood
computer repair guy differed with Silvestro on the point of plug & play
reprogramming of the guts of the machine.

After I push the button to send this message out to the media and the
citizenry, I'll work on getting a short YouTube video of the Accuvote
checkup by our local computer repairman. And before you say, "But wait!
He's not a world class expert!" -- That's just the point.

Our local computer repairman may hit or miss on some of his analyses.
You'll all be able to try your hand at second guessing him as soon as
the next video is up. But if he hits even one of his ideas for how to
exploit the machine to steal votes, that's all it takes. From someone who
is not, certainly, a world class hacker or even a hacker at all.

I'll post the link to that in a follow up here:
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/71200.html?1199744175 ,
and invite you techs to weigh in.

The We the People Foundation has filed this lawsuit in all 50 states to push for verifiable paper ballots in all elections http://www.wethepeoplefoundati.....-11-06.htm They deserve everyone’s support. We must immediately challenge this rigged Primary and demand a recount. If Ron Paul’s campaign staff doesn’t do it, as far as I’m concerned that would be indicative of plants on the staff.

How could that be? Melinda Pillsbury has exposed the Cato Institute, a Libertarian Think Tank in Washington DC as being controlled by the Neocons- see her excellent article "The Enemy Within- Cato's Covert Agenda" at http://www.nolanchart.com/author18.html

Jim Condit of www.votefraud.org had poll watchers in at least some of the precincts. I talked with him yesterday, and will be in touch with him about anything they might have found out. If there were any discrepancies in those precincts that used paper ballots, he would have found them out. Also, if the result from the precincts counted via paper ballots differed noticably from those where the vote was counted by LHS associates using hackable Diebold Machines, that would also raise a red flag. Stay tuned folks, and while this gets sorted lets keep pushing full tilt for Dr. Paul. We have no choice at this point, he either gets elected, or we get the iron boot of tyranny stomping in our faces forever.

WHAT TO DO: Call Ron Paul's campaign office at 703-248-9115  and demand that they officially demand a RECOUNT!! The Supreme Court has ruled that a constitutional election entails two things 1) That we have the right to cast a vote, and 2) We have the right to have that vote COUNTED accurately

It is very evident from the information cited in this message that LHS Associates just rigged the New Hampshire primary. Every American who has contributed to the Ron Paul campaign has just been ROBBED along with the registered voters of New Hampshire including those in Sutton whose votes were not counted! Email this whole alert to Ron Paul via this contact form on their website http://www.ronpaul2008.com/contact/form

Please Donate to IAHF to Assist Us With Our Work:

IAHF 556 Boundary Bay Rd., Point Roberts WA 98281 USA or via paypal at http://www.iahf.com/index1.html

For Health Freedom, John C. Hammell, President International Advocates for Health Freedom 556 Boundary Bay Road Point Roberts, WA 98281-8702 USA http://www.iahf.com jham@iahf.com 800-333-2553 N.America 360-945-0352 World

___

Check these links out. They analyze the NH count on machines versus hand counts. They indicated highly unlikely discrepancies with Romney and Clinton.




Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 02:00:49 -0800
From: thepartyparty2001@yahoo.com
Subject: ATTN: IMPORTANT INFO re: NEW HAMPSHIRE PRIMARY RESULTS/ hand counted ballots vs. MACHINE counted....GUESS WHAT?
To: drastrov@aol.com; LoisWinter@cox.net; zyvekinc@gmail.com; wparish@verizon.net; markadamsjdmba@hotmail.com; susanpynchon@yahoo.com

Think Hillary's victory in New Hampshire was more than just an unexpected comeback?
Cause she cried and became human?
Wonder why the polls were ONLY off in the HILLARY/ OBAMA race?...ANSWERS AT THE RON PAUL SITE!
 
WHhooOOO! the RON PAUL WEBSITE is the FIRST to put together comprehensive data of the differences in the totals from the HAND COUNTED BALLOT precincts vs. the OP SCAN COUNTED precincts--and whattaya know!!!!  HILLARY gets 4.9 percent MORE votes in OP SCAN COUNTED DISTRICTS/ OBAMA gets 2.3% LESS!  And guess what else, my family/ friends and brave associates?...
 
 
And how did RON PAUL drop from a THIRD PLACE position in the polls to FIFTH in the offical total count? RON PAUL gets ROBBED of 2% from the OP SCAN COUNTED BALLOTS, while GUILIANI and ROMNEY get a little bump from the machines....
 
 
....something's fishy for sure.  Where did the extra twenty thousand, lying voters come from this time?...Excellent data mining ALREADY from the fine RON PAUL PEOPLE...even my BRAD BLOG people couldn't believe they got it together THAT quickly. 
 
They should recount New Hampshire. We should tell Obama's people not to roll over so quickly next time...you'd think he'd know better.
--J.
___

UPDATE JAN 9 9am PST: TOWN OF SUTTON CONFIRMS RON PAUL TOTALS WERE
31, NOT ZERO.  is this 2008 in the US ?  or Iraq ?

I just got off the phone with Jennifer Call, Town Clerk for Sutton.
She confirmed that the Ron Paul totals in Sutton were actually 31,
and said that they were "left off the tally sheet" and it was human
error.

This is not an acceptable answer, especially because one of the most
common forms of fraud in a hand count system is to alter or omit
results on the reporting sheet. Hand count is lovely, transparent.
They then fill out another reconciliation sheet, often in front of
witnesses, and it looks fine. Then they provide a summary or media
sheet with the incorrect results.

A Web site here: http://www.wheresthepaper.org has more on fraud
techniques with hand counted paper ballots. You'll have to dig for it
-- or Google, and the excellent research on this is Theresa Hommel
from the state of New York.
http://machinist.salon.com/blog/2007/08/16/diebold_name/
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

We must keep promoting RP but  These sites are "SCARY" .
d

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

January 9, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d3ac69e200e55084f3af8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference LHS Associates RIGGED The New Hampshire Primary: Ron Paul Robbed: Must Demand a Recount!!!:

Comments

Post a comment