« January 2008 | Main | March 2008 »

MSNBC now admits: McCain's citizenship called into question, Candidate, born in Panama Canal Zone, may not qualify as 'natural born' + McCain: Bill Would [TRY TO] Remove Doubt on Presidential Eligibility

MSNBC now admits: McCain's citizenship called into question, Candidate, born in Panama Canal Zone, may not qualify as 'natural born'

 

Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:11:40 -0800
From: "Paul Andrew Mitchell" <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Subject: MSNBC now admits: McCain's citizenship called into question, Candidate, born in Panama Canal Zone, may not qualify as 'natural born'

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23415028

McCain's citizenship called into question

Candidate, born in Panama Canal Zone, may not qualify as 'natural born'

TO:  towwwdothello towwwdothello@yahoo.com

You missed the point:

Congress has no authority to amend the Constitution;

all Constitutional Amendments require ratification

by THREE-FOURTHS of the 50 States.  See Article V:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#5

See also Eisner v. Macomber:

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=252&invol=189

Congress cannot by any definition it may adopt conclude the matter, since it cannot by legislation alter the Constitution, from which alone it derives its power to legislate, and within whose limitations alone that power can be lawfully exercised.

[end excerpt]

Shame on you!!!

p.s.  There is much additional (and free) reading
at the links below my name here ...

http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)


All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


Our condensed list of IRS outreach resources:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm <-- START HERE
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.estopped.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.forward.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.perjury.jurats.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/psta.analysis.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/lien.or.levy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/notice.of.deficiency.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.cclists.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm



towwwdothello <towwwdothello@yahoo.com> wrote:

Sure, the Constitution can be amendend to the point where it is no
longer a Constitution; as well as adding peripherial laws like the
FIOA that compromises citizens private information opposing the 4th
Amendment.

They can amend it, create additional laws that 'enhance' the
Constitution to the point it is no longer recongizable in function--
although modern life should be taken into consideration, but not an
excuse.

Shall we commune over this concept?



dot


--- In catapultthepropaganda@yahoogroups.com, Supreme Law Firm
wrote:


>
> http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/replysup.htm
>
>
> (10) The Qualifications Clauses have never been amended,
>
> despite recent efforts to impose limits on the terms of
>
> federal Representatives and/or Senators. Appellant
>
> agrees that limits upon the terms of federal lawmakers
>
> would require an amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
>
> See U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 115 S.Ct. 1842,
>
> 131 L.Ed.2d 881 (1995).
>
>
>

> MCAC wrote:
> Does this mean McCain is NOT eligible, now???
>
> GOOGLE SEARCH: http://news.google.com/news?
hl=en&q=bill+mccain+legal&um=1&ie=UTF-
8&ncl=1137528194&sa=X&oi=news_result&resnum=1&ct=more-results&cd=1
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bill Would Remove Doubt on Presidential Eligibility

[input] [input] [input] [input] [input] [input] [input]

- Show quoted text -

 

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/replysup.htm

    (1)  The  "Right of Election"  is established and recognized
          by the  Maine Supreme  Court, Appleton concurring at 44
          Maine 528-529  (1859).    The  Maine  Legislature had
          requested that court's judicial opinion, in response to
          the  holding in  Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19  How.  393
          (1856).

     (2)  The  existence  of two (2) classes of citizenship

under
          American law, never repealed,  is also  recognized  by
          numerous authorities infra, both state and federal.

     (3)  The proper construction and common understanding of the
          Qualifications Clauses  are also  explored  thoroughly,
          with pertinent citations dating back to the California
          Constitution of 1849,  and subsequently in People v. De
          La Guerra, 40 Cal. 311, 337 (1870) infra.

     (4)  The cases  recognize that  one may  be a citizen of

the
          United States ("federal citizen") without also being a
          Citizen of  any particular Union state.  See e.g. Hough
          v. Societe Electrique Westinghouse  de Russie,  231 F.
          341, (USDC, NY, 1916).

     (5)  The cases also recognize that Americans may be Citizens
          of a  Union state  without also being federal citizens.
          See McDonel  v. State,  90 Ind.  320 (1883);  Crosse v.
          Board of Supervisors of Elections, 221 A.2d 431

(1966);
          11 C.J.,  Section 3,  page 777  and cases cited therein
          (Harding, McDonel, Fowler).

     (6)  The cases  also recognize  that, both  before and after
          the so-called Fourteenth amendment  [sic], it  has not
          been necessary for one to be a federal citizen in order
          to be a Citizen of a Union state.

     (7)  The failure to capitalize the "C" in "Citizen", as that
          term is used in the Qualifications Clauses, has created
          an immense,  nearly

immeasurable,  amount of  confusion
          among references to state  and federal  citizenship in
          all federal  and state  laws which  utilize the  phrase
          "citizen of the United States" [sic].

     (8)  It is  also clear  that this confusion was intentional,
          in order to co-opt the American People into associating
          with a political jurisdiction which is not protected by
          the  Guarantee Clause.    The  United  States  (federal
          government) is  not

required  to guarantee a Republican
          Form of  Government to  the federal  zone, only  to the
          state zone [sic]. See Guarantee Clause.

     (9)  Congress cannot  by legislation alter the Constitution,
          from which alone it derives its power to legislate, and
          within  whose limitations  alone  that  power  can  be
          lawfully exercised.   See  Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S.
          189 (1919) (holding predicated  on ratification of the
          16th amendment [sic] as

applied to the term "income").

     (10) The  Qualifications Clauses have never  been  amended,
          despite recent efforts to impose limits on the terms of
          federal Representatives  and/or  Senators.    Appellant
          agrees that  limits upon the terms of federal lawmakers
          would require  an amendment  to the  U.S. Constitution.
          See U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 115 S.Ct. 1842,
          131 L.Ed.2d 881 (1995).

     (11) It  is   a cardinal   rule  in  dealing  with

written
          instruments that they  are  to  receive  an  unvarying
          interpretation, and  that their  practical construction
          is to  be uniform.   See Cory et al. v. Carter, 48 Ind.
          327, 335 (1874); Qualifications Clauses, 3:2:1, 4:2:1.

     (12) Citizenship is  a term  of municipal law.  Prior to the
          1866 Civil   Rights  Act,   which  legislated federal
          citizenship into existence as  a municipal  franchise,
          one and

only one class of citizenship was recognized by
          the  U.S. Constitution.    Thus,  prior  to  1866, all
          constitutional references  to "Citizen  of  the  United
          States" and   "citizen  of  the  United States"  were
          identical  in all respects.   See  Roa v. Collector of
          Customs,  23 Philippine 315,  332  (1912);    Murphy v.
          Ramsey, 114 U.S. 15 (1885); People v. De La Guerra, 40
          Cal. 311, 342 (1870)

infra.

p.s. There is much additional (and free) reading
at the links below my name here ...

http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


Our condensed list of IRS outreach resources:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm <-- START HERE
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.estopped.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.forward.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.perjury.jurats.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/psta.analysis.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/lien.or.levy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/notice.of.deficiency.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.cclists.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm

 

CONGRESS CANNOT AMEND THE CONSTITUTION: McCain: Bill Would [TRY TO] Remove Doubt on Presidential Eligibility

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/replysup.htm

    (10) The  Qualifications Clauses have  never  been  amended,

          despite recent efforts to impose limits on the terms of

          federal Representatives  and/or  Senators.    Appellant

          agrees that  limits upon the terms of federal lawmakers

          would require  an amendment  to the  U.S. Constitution.

          See U.S. Term Limits, Inc.

v. Thornton, 115 S.Ct. 1842,

          131 L.Ed.2d 881 (1995).

 

MCAC <mcac@extremezone.com> wrote:

 

Does this mean McCain is NOT eligible, now???

 

GOOGLE SEARCH: http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=bill+mccain+legal&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ncl=1137528194&sa=X&oi=news_result&resnum=1&ct=more-results&cd=1

------------------------------------------------------------------

Bill Would Remove Doubt on Presidential Eligibility

 
 

Article Tools Sponsored By

 

By CARL HULSE

Published: February 29, 2008

WASHINGTON — Senator John McCain said Thursday that he had no concerns about his meeting the constitutional qualifications for the presidency because of his birth in the Panama Canal Zone. A Democratic colleague said she wanted to remove even a trace of doubt.

Skip to next paragraph

Related

McCain’s Canal Zone Birth Prompts Queries About Whether That Rules Him Out (February 28, 2008)

Times Topics: John McCain

Blog

The Caucus

The CaucusThe latest political news from around the nation. Join the discussion.

The Democrat, Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri, introduced legislation that would declare that any child born abroad to citizens serving in the United States military would meet the constitutional requirement that anyone serving as president be a “natural born” citizen.

“In America, so many parents say to their young children, ‘If you work hard and you play by the rules, in America someday you can be president of the United States,’ ” said Ms. McCaskill, a supporter of the presidential bid of Senator Barack Obama, Democrat of Illinois. “Our brave and respected military should never have to spend a minute worrying whether or not that saying is true for their child.”

Traveling on his presidential campaign, Mr. McCain, Republican of Arizona, said that he was convinced he was eligible under the natural-born definition and that from his perspective the matter had been reviewed and settled in earlier campaigns. Mr. McCain was born in 1936 on a military base in the Canal Zone, where his father, a Navy officer, was stationed at the time.

“It’s very clear,” Mr. McCain said. “An American born in a territory of the United States whose father is serving in the military could not be eligible for presidency of the United States is certainly not something our founding fathers envisioned.”

Legal scholars who have explored the issue say that a conclusive legal finding on the clause has never been delivered and that there is the potential for some uncertainty about whether someone born outside the nation proper would qualify.

To date, no president has been born outside what would become one of the 50 states. A handful of serious candidates have been born elsewhere but none were elected and the citizenship question was not tested.

Senior members of Mr. McCain’s campaign team have also said they are very comfortable that Mr. McCain meets the definition of natural born and that he could overcome any challenge should one be made.

They have asked Theodore B. Olson, a veteran Supreme Court lawyer and McCain supporter, to prepare a legal analysis of the issue.

A group of lawmakers made an unsuccessful effort four years ago to eliminate any lingering doubts about the meaning of the provision through legislation that would have said children born outside the country to American citizens are eligible for the presidency.

Ms. McCaskill said that her legislation should be noncontroversial and that Congress should move rapidly to clear up any ambiguity. She acknowledged there could be some who believe the only route to resolve the confusion is through a constitutional amendment.

“We can at least make a legislative declaration that the definition of ‘natural born’ includes children of the active military,” she said. “This should be done quickly and easily.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/29/us/politics/29mccain.html?ref=us


 

___

Ref: http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2008/02/john-mccain-ine.html

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

February 29, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Think Free Be Free: Dealing with Government Agencies

Some fine folks out in Nova Scotia are having a problem with the Nova Scotia Securities Commission.  I studied their Acts and found a great deal of deception and in seeking to help them find remedy, have created and posted a video on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YGsGhrbn7c

Please check it out to understand one of their little tricks and how they use sleight of word to create the appearance of authority, when none truly exists.

Soon we will have a new and improved Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right finished and will be serving it collectively.  It will be sent to you prior to that so you may decide if you wish to be part of this historic and momentous reclamation of freedom.

Be well ThinkFREEKs!

Rob

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

February 29, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Ron Paul 2008: Vote Ron Paul: News Update February 29th, 2008

HAPPY  BIRTHDAY MRS. CAROL PAUL!

Please make a Donation to Ron Paul's Presidential Campaign in Celebration of Mrs. Paul's Birthday

https://www.ronpaul2008.com/donate


VIDEOS

"Ron Paul Revolution"  Music Video by Aimee Allen

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBCKMTo210k

Aimee Allen on MySpace

http://www.myspace.com/aimeeallen

Ron Paul on Fox Business Channel  2-28-2008

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EZeNulOz9E

Ron Paul Interviewed by Neil Cavuto of Fox News  2-27-2008

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnijgIbm1qc

CNBC Discussing the "Amero"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOdk7vc5j54

Stop The North American Union

http://www.stopthenau.org/

Celebrate Freedom - Summer 2008

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9REAx8HYOE


ARTICLES

Ron Paul's Texas Straight Talk:  Monetary Policy and the State of the Economy

http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2008/cr022708h.htm

Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign Committee:  Keeping the Internet Free

http://people.ronpaul2008.com/campaign-updates/2008/02/28/keeping-the-internet-free/

Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign Committee:  Dr. Paul in the Wall Street Journal

http://people.ronpaul2008.com/campaign-updates/2008/02/29/dr-paul-in-the-wall-street-journal/

Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign Committee:  When Did You First Hear About Ron Paul?

http://people.ronpaul2008.com/campaign-updates/2008/02/28/when-did-you-first-hear-about-dr-paul/

Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign Committee:  A Blast From the Past

http://people.ronpaul2008.com/campaign-updates/2008/02/28/a-blast-from-the-past/

Fort Bend Now:  Paul Urges Colleagues to Support Bills Aimed at Ending "Gun Free Zones"

http://www.fortbendnow.com/pages/full_story?article-Paul-Urges-Colleagues-To-Support-Bills-Aimed-At-Ending-"Gun-Free-Zones"-%20=&page

_label=home&id=20717-Paul-Urges-Colleagues-To-Support-Bills-Aimed-At-Ending-"Gun-Free-Zones"-&widget=push&instance=home_news_lead_story&open=&


Fox Business:  Ron Paul's Inflationary Recession

http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/02/28/ron-pauls-inflationary-recession/


Media with Conscience:  Why Ron Paul Works

http://mwcnews.net/content/view/20588&Itemid=1


Nolan Chart:  Which Part of Ron Paul's "Eliminate the IRS" Didn't You Understand?

http://www.nolanchart.com/article2542.html



In Liberty,

-VoteRonPaul.com


Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign Committee
http://www.RonPaul2008.com
1-877-RON-PAUL  (1-877-766-7285)


VoteRonPaul.com
http://www.VoteRonPaul.com
Independent Grassroots Support Network

* VoteRonPaul.com is 100% grassroots and is not paid for nor approved by any candidate.



47 W. Polk St. Suite 100-408, Chicago, IL  60605

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

February 29, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

SupremeLawFirm to: New York Times re: "McCain’s Canal Zone Birth Prompts Queries About Whether That Rules Him Out," by Carl Hulse (2/28/2008)

Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:50:02 -0800
From: "Paul Andrew Mitchell" <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Subject: TO: New York Times re: "McCain’s Canal Zone Birth Prompts Queries About Whether That Rules Him Out," by Carl Hulse (2/28/2008)

Re:  McCain's Canal Zone Birth
 
Greetings Mr. Hulse:
Your article completely overlooks standing court decisions which have maintained that we have two (2) classes of citizens in America, not one class, e.g.:
 
 
All of the Qualifications Clauses refer to State Citizens, because federal citizens were not even contemplated when those Clauses were first being drafted circa 1787 A.D.:
 
 
The term "United States" in those Clauses means "States united".  People v. De La Guerra. Pablo De La Guerra was a judge who signed the 1849 California Constitution.
 
McCain cannot be a State Citizen pursuant to the common law principle of "jus soli" (law of the soil) because Panama was NOT a State of the Union in 1936.
 
And, insofar as his parents were federal citizens and not State Citizens in 1936, McCain cannot claim State Citizenship pursuant to the common law
principle of "jus sanguinis" (law of blood) either.
 
In point of fact, his Arizona voter registration affidavit states, under penalty of perjury, that he is a federal citizen;  same is true if his parents were also registered voters, because voter registration forms blatantly discriminate against State Citizens who are not also federal citizens:
 
 
Finally, The New York Times may have a lot of trouble believing that 27 is still less than 28, because it is controlled by corrupt world bankers;  nevertheless, in Dyett v. Turner the Utah Supreme Court recited verifiable historical facts proving that the so-called 14th amendment was never
properly ratified:
 
 
Accordingly, there is no constitutional authority for the proposition that
federal citizens are also Citizens of any State in which they may reside.
 
For more details on this important subject, see also all the cases and extensive analysis documented here:
 
 
Because McCain conspired with others to obstruct my fundamental Right to vote in the 1996 General Election, he has now been formally charged here:
 
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/azvmitch/crossco4.htm
(latter was a legal obligation imposed by 18 USC 4)

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/mccain/arrest.warrant.htm
(recently served on the Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. Senate) 

 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 28, 2008 8:27 PM
Subject: New York Times: "McCain's Canal Zone Birth Prompts Queries About Whether That Rules Him Out," by Carl Hulse (2/28/2008)
To: SupremeLaw <supremelaw@googlegroups.com>

 

 

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

February 29, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

[We The People] SCOTUS Says "NO" - What Must A Free People Do? Answer: STOP petitioning IMPOSTORS!!!

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1.html

 
"The Supreme Court of the United States shall consist of a Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate justices, any six of whom shall constitute a quorum."

 
There is presently no legal quorum at the U.S. Supreme Court, because of all the missing credentials, now confirmed by DOJ's written answers to our FOIA Requests, and by the habitual, protracted silence of the suspects, as follows:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm

(take it from the top!)

 

All of the following are now PAST DUE and IN DEFAULT -- in point of fact:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/roberts.john/nad.missing.credentials.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/thomas.clarence/nad.missing.credentials.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/ginsburg/nad.missing.credentials.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/breyer/nad.missing.credentials.htm (see "breyer" below also)

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/alito.samuel/nad.missing.credentials.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/breyer/nad.certificate.htm (see "breyer" above also)

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/kennedy/nad.certificate.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/oconnor/nad.certificate.htm (retired)

Bob Schulz is suffering from "not invented here syndrome": 

Because he didn't bother to investigate the credentials required of the above personnel, his behavior suggests that he doesn't think they're important. 

Are we upholding the Constitution or not, Bob??

Nevertheless, an OATH OF OFFICE is an explicit requirement that has been in the U.S. Constitution since DAY ONE -- at Article VI, Clause 3:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#6:3

It is a FELONY to impersonate any officer of the federal government:  18 USC 912:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/912.html

"All their acts as such are VOID":

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions.htm e.g.:

 

Without taking the oath prescribed by law,

one cannot become a judge either de jure or de facto, and such an individual is without authority to act and his acts as such are void until he has taken the prescribed oath.

 

[French v. State, 572 S.W.2d 934]

 

[Brown v. State, 238 S.W.2d 787]

 

Schulz needs to read the New Testament books of Jude and 2 Peter, where the punishments are rather severe for false teachers, and teachers of falsehood.

 

P.S.  There is much additional (and free) reading at the links below my name here ...

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm

 

 

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


Our condensed list of IRS outreach resources:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm <-- START HERE
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.estopped.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.forward.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.perjury.jurats.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/psta.analysis.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/lien.or.levy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/notice.of.deficiency.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.cclists.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm

   

On 2/27/08, Chet E. Davis <Chet@easypower.com> wrote:

Did he expect anything else?

 Chet

___

From: Bob Schulz (DO NOT REPLY - Unmonitored Mailbox) [mailto:LMM-1P20RAP@givemeliberty.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 4:19 PM
To: Chet E. Davis
Subject: [WTP] SCOTUS Says "NO" -- What Must A Free People Do?

 

February 26, 2008 

SCOTUS Says "NO"

What Must A Free People Do?

This Saturday: Schulz Speaks in Tampa
Next: Schulz to Speak in TX, NM, AZ 

On February 25, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States, without comment, voted again not to hear We The People v. United States. Thus, SCOTUS ducked its Constitutional duty, yet again, to declare the meaning of the last ten words of the First Amendment.

The Court elected not to be put into the position of having to declare the unalienable Right of the People to hold the Government accountable to the Constitution's essential principles, enumerated powers and explicit prohibitions.

Instead, the Court has chosen to conspire with the political branches in a collective decision to protect, preserve and enhance the treasonous notion that constitutional violations are mere issues of current public policy, subject only to the will of the majority of People voting in precincts and the halls of Congress.

Beginning this Saturday, March 1st, Bob Schulz will be speaking at various venues to discuss the matter at hand. Everyone is encouraged to attend one of these most serious meetings. There is no charge to attend. WTP will not be providing any food or beverage. The meeting will be all "business."

Saturday  March 1st, 1 - 3 PM

Radisson Clearwater Central

20967 US Highway 19 N,

Clearwater, FL

(727) 799-1181 Click here for an event flyer (.pdf).

Saturday/Sunday, March 8/9: Austin, TX: (details later)
Saturday afternoon, March 15th  Houston, TX   (details later)
Sunday afternoon, March 16th  Dallas, TX  (details later)
Tuesday evening, March 18th Albuquerque, NM    (details later)
Wednesday evening, March 19th  Phoenix, AZ   (details later)
Thursday evening, March 20th   Tucson, AZ   (details later)
Friday evening,  March 21nd    El Paso, TX  (details later)
Monday evening, March 24th Austin, TX  (details later)

Please consider a donation.
Your generous support is all that keeps our important work moving forward.

Please consider a donation to help finance the
critically important work of the WTP Foundation.

Our Home Page is www.GiveMeLiberty.org

Add Yourself To Our e-Mail List
Delete Yourself From Our e-Mail List

The Landmark Right-To-Petition Lawsuit
and Operations of the WTP Foundation
are Funded Solely By Your Generous Support. 

      
 

This message was sent to address chet@easypower.com by

 

________________________________________

 

We The People Foundation For Constitutional Education
2458 Ridge Road, Queensbury, New York 12804
http://givemeliberty.org/

 

________________________________________   

 

To send an email to Bob Schulz, click here:
mailto:bob@givemeliberty.org

___

What does the right to petition for a redress of grievances mean?  Most people have absolutely no clue as the meaning of this right has been buried under misinformation.  Is it the right to ask our government a question and get an answer?  Is it the right to make Congress consider an issue?  By the way, where does our right to institute legal proceedings come from?  Is it limited to civil proceedings or did our Founders provide a way in which the people could hold our governors criminally accountable? 

Everyone knows that the people are supposed to be able to peacefully remove bad leaders through elections, but what if those who control the machines, and their secret vote count, want bad leaders in power? Is there another way that citizens can prevent abuse of power without resorting to violence?

Yes, there is or was another way to hold our governors accountable without resorting to violence. If you want to find out about the other civil check on government abuse of power that our Founders provided for us, then read What Happens When the People Lose the Power to Control Government and What You Can Do to Take the Power Back? http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_mark_ada_080204_what_happens_when_th.htm

If you care about the safety of your family, read this article now, and send it to all of your contacts today. Now is the time for action!

For more news that you didn’t hear about from the corporate media cartel or all of those organizations which claim that they are looking out for your rights, see Project Vote Count’s Election News http://www.projectvotecount.com/ElectionNews.aspx You’ll learn the big secret that the corporate media cartel is trying to keep you in the dark about, secret vote counting is unconstitutional.

Ohio and Texas have a lot of delegates at stake in the primaries on March 4, 2008. Curiously, in spite of overwhelming public support for election reform and for restoring peace, Congressional leaders in those movements are facing challengers in these primaries. If they lose, who in Congress would dare speak out against the war or the dangers of secret vote counting after that?

Learn how you can help, and take action now! See www.ProjectVoteCount.com for information about action being taken in Texas and Ohio to make sure that our votes are counted accurately.

For more about these crucial elections, see Help Keep the Election Reform Movement and the Peace Movement Alive http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_mark_ada_080215_help_keep_the_electi.htm

Help support Project Vote Count’s efforts and spread the word like Paul Revere. The Neo-cons and their magical, secret vote counting, election fixing computers are here, and they want to get rid of the two Congressional leaders who have done the most to expose them! Take action to stop the Neo-cons. Pass this email along to all of your contacts now!



From: henrymorgan@knology.net
To: ronpaul-48@meetup.com
Subject: [ronpaul-48] FW:This Saturday: Schulz Speaks in Clearwater
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:55:29 -0500

- Hide quoted text -


 


From: Bob Schulz (DO NOT REPLY - Unmonitored Mailbox) [mailto:LMM-1GT1766@givemeliberty.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 6:45 PM
To: Henry Morgan
Subject: [WTP] SCOTUS Says "NO" -- What Must A Free People Do?

www.GiveMeLiberty.orgwww.GiveMeLiberty.org

February 26, 2008

SCOTUS Says "NO"

What Must A Free People Do?

This Saturday: Schulz Speaks in  Clearwater
Next: Schulz to Speak in TX, NM, AZ

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

February 27, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Ron Paul 2008: Vote Ron Paul: News Update February 27th, 2008

Ron Paul vs. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on CNBC

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yybFGh1sUcQ

Keep Dr. Paul Fighting to Save Our Country!

Donate to Ron Paul's Presidential Campaign

https://www.ronpaul2008.com/donate/

Donate to Ron Paul's Congressional Campaign

https://donate.ronpaulforcongress.com/


VIDEOS

Ron Paul Austin Rally Covered by Local Fox Affiliate KTBC 7

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkw0AaET3rc

Ron Paul: You Don't Need to Change the Message of Freedom

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Fo7HIzomHg


ARTICLES

Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign Committee:  Message From Ron

http://ronpaul2008.typepad.com/ron_paul_2008/2008/02/message-from--2.html

Ron Paul 20008 Presidential Campaign Committee:  Freedom March Update

http://people.ronpaul2008.com/campaign-updates/2008/02/26/freedom-march-update/

Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign Committee:  Ron Paul on the Federal Reserve

http://people.ronpaul2008.com/campaign-updates/2008/02/27/ron-paul-on-the-federal-reserve/

Crooks and Liars:  McCain Flip Flops on "100 Years in Iraq" Remark

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/02/25/mccain-flip-flops-on-100-years-in-iraq-remark/

Los Angeles Times:  Look Out, Huck, Ron Paul's People Are Gonna Be Furious

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/02/ron-pauls-peopl.html

Nolan Chart:  Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law

http://www.nolanchart.com/article2933.html

Prison Planet:  Ron Paul Trouncing Neo-Con Rival In Race for Congressional Seat

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2008/022608_paul_trouncing.htm

In Liberty,

-VoteRonPaul.com

Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign Committee
http://www.RonPaul2008.com
1-877-RON-PAUL  (1-877-766

-7285)


VoteRonPaul.com
http://www.VoteRonPaul.com
Independent Grassroots Support Network

* VoteRonPaul.com is 100% grassroots and is not paid for nor approved by any candidate.







47 W. Polk St. Suite 100-408, Chicago, IL  60605

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

February 27, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

John McCain and the USS Forrestal Fire (see photos): Did He Start The USS Forrestal Fire?,.

Related link: http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2008/06/the-three-stoog.html

Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:06:30 -0800
To: "Supreme Law Firm" <paulandrewmitchell2004@yahoo.com>
Subject: serious allegations here: John McCain and the USS Forrestal Fire (see photos)


   
 
 
 
 
 
Did He Start The USS Forrestal Fire?
 
Surviving crewmen and those who investigated the Forrestal fire case reported that McCain deliberately 'wet-started' his A-4E Skyhawk to shake up the guy in the F-4 Phantom behind his A-4.
 
 
 
 
Incompetence Or A Stunt
 
'Wet-starts', done either deliberately (the starter motor switch allowed kerosene to pool in the engine and give a wet start) or accidentally, shoot a large flame from the tail of the aircraft. 'Wet starting' was a common practice among young 'hot-dog' pilots.
 
 
 
Zuni Rockets Were Volatile Design
 
In McCain's case, the 'wet-start' 'cooked off' and launched the M34 Zuni rocket from the rear F-4 that punctured the Skyhawk's fueltank, knocked the M-65 1000 lb bomb off it's 500 lb rated mount, and touched off the explosions and massive fire.
 
 
McCain Was Shufled Out In A Hurry
 
The F-4 pilot was reportedly killed in the conflagration, along with 167 of his fellow Forrestal shipmates. McCain was quickly (they were still counting the Forrestal dead) transferred to the USS Oriskany (the only Forrestal crewman to be immediately transferred).
 
[end excerpt]
--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

___

Additional ref: http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2008/02/john-mccain-ine.html

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

February 26, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Ron Paul 2008: Vote Ron Paul: News Update February 26th, 2008

VIDEOS

Ron Paul Interviewed by Local Austin NBC Affiliate KXAN

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6KaoiXllzg

Ron Paul's Speech at Fort Hood, TX   2-23-2008

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6875369314540268218&hl=en

"Taxi To The Dark Side" Trailer - This documentary murder mystery examines the death of an Afghan taxi driver at Bagram Air Base from injuries inflicted by U.S. soldiers. In an unflinching look at the Bush administration's policy on torture, the filmmaker behind Enron: the Smartest Guys in the Room takes us from a village in Afghanistan to Guantanamo and straight to the White House. In English and Pashtu.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WX0MPcN08Zc

"Sticker Shock" Trailer - Upcoming Documentary About Election Fraud During the 2008 Presidential Race

http://youtube.com/watch?v=0gtx5UxFeho


ARTICLES

Ron Paul's Texas Straight Talk:  Taxes on Tolls on the TTC

http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2008/tst022408.htm

The Hill:  DNC to File FEC Complaint Against McCain

http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/dnc-to-file-fec-complaint-against-mccain-2008-02-24.html

News Review:  Media Has Simply Ignored Ron Paul

http://www.newsreview.info/article/20080224/PUBLICFORUM/64697104

News With Views:  Vote Fraud and the GOP Convention Delegates

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd345.htm

Nolan Chart:  America Needs Ron Paul Republicans

http://www.nolanchart.com/article2911.html

Reason Magazine:  More Texas - 14  Ron Paul Moving Up

http://reason.com/blog/show/125162.html

UTD Mercury (University of Texas - Dallas Student Newspaper):  Students Seek Exposure for Ron Paul

http://media.www.utdmercury.com/media/storage/paper691/news/2008/02/25/News/Students.Seek.Exposure.For.Ron.Paul-3229913.shtml

The Washington Post:  FEC Warns McCain on Campaign Spending

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/21/AR2008022103141.html

World Net Daily:  The Low Down on Obama

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=57222


In Liberty,

-VoteRonPaul.com

Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign Committee
http://www.RonPaul2008.com
1-877-RON-PAUL  (1-877-766

-7285)


VoteRonPaul.com
http://www.VoteRonPaul.com
Independent Grassroots Support Network

* VoteRonPaul.com is 100% grassroots and is not paid for nor approved by any candidate.





47 W. Polk St. Suite 100-408, Chicago, IL  60605

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

February 26, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Ron Paul 2008: Vote Ron Paul: News Update February 25th, 2008

Sign Up to be a Ron Paul Delegate

https://voters.ronpaul2008.com/grassroots/delegatesignup.php

Become a Precinct Leader

https://voters.ronpaul2008.com/grassroots/

Join a Ron Paul MeetUp Group

http://ronpaul.meetup.com/


VIDEOS

Ron Paul Revolution Music Video by Aimee Allen

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3b8zAdkV3Q

Ron Paul Criticizing The World Bank

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkJ58EFDa6A

Local News in Austin, TX Covers Ron Paul Speaking to Crowd of 4,000 Supporters at University of Texas

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFMceYwqR4E

Ron Paul at University of Texas - Austin  2-23-2008  (6 Parts)

part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUBHWXn47qI

part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bFbFk2D1V8

part 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyfi0lDwm8c

part 4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEv1sWjM58A

part 5

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w83fdotnLnQ

part 6

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TMpI4Zeeps

Ron Paul:  The Truth Is Coming

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jy8JJU0W8po






ARTICLES

Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign Committee: Advice From an Activist - Canvassing Works

http://people.ronpaul2008.com/campaign-updates/2008/02/24/advice-from-an-activist-canvassing-works/

Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign Committee: Journalism - The Good, The Bad and the Ugly

http://people.ronpaul2008.com/campaign-updates/2008/02/24/journalism-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/

Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign Committee: The Words "Hoist" and "Petard" Come to Mind....

http://people.ronpaul2008.com/campaign-updates/2008/02/22/the-words-hoist-and-petard-come-to-mind/

Austin American-Statesman (TX):  Paul Says He'll Stay in Race, Not Run As An Independent

http://www.statesman.com/news/content/region/legislature/stories/02/24/0224ronpaul.html

Gambling 911: McCain Scandal Opens Door for Mike Huckabee, Ron Paul

http://www.gambling911.com/McCain-Scandal-Mike-Huckabee-Ron-Paul-022308.html

Herald-Zeitung: Enthusiastic Austin Crowd Cheers Paul

http://herald-zeitung.com/story.lasso?ewcd=0222db07304e37e1&-session=HeraldZeitung:40DA3C4E05724387F6OyN3C6F1B8

KIDK (Idaho):  The Ron Paul Wagon

http://www.kidk.com/news/local/15896467.html

The New York Times:  For McCain, Self-Confidence on Ethics Poses Its Own Risk

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21mccain.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1&ei=5088&en=33711052dbdd623d&ex=1361250000&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&oref=slogin

Nolan Chart: McCain, Huckabee, Ron Paul - Whose Lips Are YOU Reading on Taxes?

http://www.nolanchart.com/article2811.html

Ron Paul War Room:  Delegates

http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=7129

Taki Mag:  Ron Paul Update

http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/ron_paul_update/

To Be Free: Suddenly the Media is Interested in Ron Paul - At Least in His Congressional Seat Defeat

http://tobefree.wordpress.com/2008/02/23/suddenly-the-media-is-interested-in-ron-paul--at-least-in-his-congressional-seat-defeat/


In Liberty,

-VoteRonPaul.com

Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign Committee
http://www.RonPaul2008.com
1-877-RON-PAUL  (1-877-766

-7285)


VoteRonPaul.com
http://www.VoteRonPaul.com
Independent Grassroots Support Network

* VoteRonPaul.com is 100% grassroots and is not paid for nor approved by any candidate.






47 W. Polk St. Suite 100-408, Chicago, IL  60605

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

February 25, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Help Save Ron Paul’s Congressional Election

Ohio and Texas have a lot of delegates at stake in the primaries on March 4, 2008. Curiously, in spite of overwhelming public support for election reform and for restoring peace, Congressional leaders in those movements are facing challengers in these primaries. If they lose, who in Congress would dare speak out against the war or the dangers of secret vote counting after that?

For more about these crucial elections, see Help Keep the Election Reform Movement and the Peace Movement Alive http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_mark_ada_080215_help_keep_the_electi.htm

Learn how you can help, and take action! For information about action being taken in Texas and Ohio to make sure that our votes are counted accurately, see Project Vote Count www.ProjectVoteCount.com

Spread the word like Paul Revere. The Neo-cons and their magical, secret vote counting, election fixing computers are here, and they want to get rid of the two Congressional leaders who have done the most to expose them! Take action to stop the Neo-cons. Pass this email along to all of your contacts now!

For more election news that you didn’t hear about from the corporate media cartel or all of those organizations which claim that they are looking out for your rights, see Project Vote Count’s Election News http://www.projectvotecount.com/ElectionNews.aspx You’ll learn the big secret that the corporate media cartel is trying to keep you in the dark about, secret vote counting is unconstitutional.

A Zogby poll shows that 92% of Americans are intelligent enough to understand that counting votes in secret is dangerous. Of course, this poll shows that 8% of Americans either don’t know what to think about secret vote counting or are actually in favor of it. That explains half of Bush’s support in the polls.

To see the Zogby poll and other important information about voting, go to Project Vote Count’s FAQ page http://www.projectvotecount.com/faq.aspx

Everyone knows that the people are supposed to be able to peacefully remove bad leaders through elections, but what if those who control the machines, and their secret vote count, want bad leaders in power? Is there another way that citizens can prevent abuse of power without resorting to violence?

Yes, there is or was another way to hold our governors accountable without resorting to violence. If you want to find out about the other civil check on government abuse of power that our Founders provided for us, then read What Happens When the People Lose the Power to Control Government and What You Can Do to Take the Power Back? http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_mark_ada_080204_what_happens_when_th.htm

If you care about the safety of your family, read this article now, and send it to all of your contacts today. Now is the time for action!

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

February 25, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack