« April 2008 | Main | June 2008 »

C-51 / C-52: IAHF: TRUEHOPE: 50 Conservative MPs Just REBELLED Against Clement/Harper Due to OUR PRESSURE re C-51!!! KEEP THE PRESSURE ON!!!

"I'm as MAD AS HELL AND I'm NOT GONNA TAKE IT ANYMORE!!!"      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dib2-HBsF08                      KILL C-51 & C-52// KILL CODEX!!

Vitamin consumers in the US and Canada can breathe a bit easier today, but we cannot ease up!

Our pressure is working! C-51 is not on the Order Paper for the coming week, (the last week before Parliament goes out for the summer, they'll be back in October.) In all likelihood, the Canadian government's strategy re C-51 will be to let it die with this Parliament, then attempt to bring it back under a different bill after the election, which will most likely be in October. (With all this heat over C-51 the Conservatives are very unlikely to call an election before then.)

Last Wednesday night on CTV News an announcement was made that Prime Minister Harper will be announcing a "wide ranging Cabinet Shuffle to occurr in early June or July." http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080527/cabinet_shuffle_080527/20080527/  CTV speculates that current Health Minister Tony Clement could be tapped as the new Minister of Trade.

THIS IS HAPPENING DUE TO OUR PRESSURE AGAINST C-51 !!!

What CTV did not announce but which we know to be true is that this announcement came as a result of an UPRISING against Clement by a group of 50 Conservative MPs who stormed into his office on Wednesday to read him the RIOT ACT over C-51 because they're getting so much HEAT from angry constituents who are foaming at the mouth and ready to burn Ottawa to the ground!

I have just confirmed this from a conversation with Tony Stephan at Truehope Inc. who has confirmed that the information contained in the following email that was forwarded to me by someone in the UK is true! (I have removed the name of the person who sent it for that person's protection, and have made one change to the information to protect the source in Parliament who leaked this to us.):

Hello,

We seem to be winning this one.  I have this from the horse's mouth
and will only tell you over phone who told me this:

Wednesday around lunch time, shortly after Clement's CBC
radio appearance no less than 50 (!!!) Conservative MP's ran as a
group into Tony Clement's Parliament Hill office and tore a strip
off him after his interview by Anna-Maria Tremonti. They yelled at
him because, as one told him, he had received about 50,000 calls  -
not a biblical number, he said it was a rough count: his office
froze as nothing worked anymore due to those many e-mails and faxes
as well as unannounced visits from people re C-51. They (not the
PM) demanded his resignation which he handed to the PM that same
night. They also went to the PM's office, who is not used to being
treated that way, and gave him hell, threatening to have a change
of leader, no less.

In my view this means "full steam ahead" to ensure that C-52 stops
as well, as it is the more dangerous of the two.

WHATS NEXT: WHY WE MUST KEEP THE PRESSURE ON!!

Last week www.stopc51.com was hacked by someone trying to stop our efforts and two internal files were stolen forcing site admins to have to recreate all their internal links. They also were forced by enormous traffic to the site (over 2.5 million visitors), to relocate the site to a different server. The site was hacked because it is causing enormous problems for the ruling elite who seek to kill large numbers of us by blocking our access to micronutrients.

As discussed in previous alerts about C-51, the bill not only threatens Canadians, but also Americans due to the FDA's clandestine efforts to create one harmonized set of food and drug regs for Canada, US and Mexico as if a North American Union were already in existence. (See http://www.nocodexgenocide.com/page/page/3113337.htm especially http://www.thepetitionsite.com/5/congressional-oversight-needed-to-stop-fdas-trilateral-cooperation-charter

PARLIAMENTARIANS UNDER MICROSCOPE NOW, HEALTH CANADA BUREAUCRATS NEXT

If you go to http://stopc51.com/c51WhatMPsSaid/index.html you will see that we're just starting to create a spread sheet showing the positions of every member of the Canadian Parliament on C-51. We will have this completed as a voting guide in time for the next election in October. Any MP who fails to back away from C-51 will have committed political suicide and will be ridden out on a rail, because we intend to keep increasing the size of our grass roots rebellion over the summer (while the ruling elite are hoping we'll "go away".)

We're going to continue putting so much heat on this issue of consumer access to natural health products that after we're done reading the riot act to members of Parliament, we'll THEN take the NEXT steps to identifying members of Health Canada who we must ALSO get rid of since they're the ones really behind C-51 and C-52 in the FIRST place!

We're going to force Parliament to make the CHANGES to the Food and Drug Act that we need so they don't continue blocking NHPs from being brought to market the way they are now. Here you can see that Clement and Health Canada are responsible for driving several Canadians to suicide when they blocked their access to Empower Plus http://stopc51.com/c51WhatMPsSaid/index.html

By continuing to build our grass roots base, and by continuing to pound the Canadian Parliament and the US Congress on health freedom issues, we intend to secure our freedom against this tyranny, not only today, but for generations to come!

If you are Canadian, keep taking these actions http://www.stopc51.com/c51/what_you_can_do.asp If you are American, I need your help to get Congressional oversight on FDA's Trilateral Cooperation Charter with Canada and Mexico. http://www.nocodexgenocide.com/page/page/3113337.htm

Its very important that health freedom fighters around the world connect the dots on whats happening, how and why its happening because it doesn't matter anymore what country we live in, we must join forces internationally against the ruling elite's efforts to block our access to healing nutrients.

The Ruling Elite want to block our access to healing nutrients via the UN's Codex Alimentarius Commission and related harmonization efforts for the following reasons:

1. The patents on many pharmaceutical drugs are due to expire soon and they have nothing new in the pipeline so they really don't want the competition from natural, unpatentable substances: read "A Bitter Pill For Big Pharma" http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/sunday/commentary/la-op-peterson27jan27,0,5254811.story

2. They want to kill off large numbers of us:

The late Jacques Cousteau, a famed advocate for the oceans and the environment, was quoted in a November 1991 UNESCO Courier saying, "One American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangladeshis. This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world populations, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say it." http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/34/26/

Watch "None Dare Call it Genocide" by Dr. Stan Monteith http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4604856575726473042 read  http://www.radioliberty.com/pca.htm

3. They have an agenda to force us into a psychocivilized society with everyone to be put under electronic mind control and specific micronutrients interfere with both implanted microchips and with directed energy in the form of microwaves.

As incredible as this may seem to believe, by just doing some reading, you can readily see that its true. John Mecca built this site in an effort to warn us http://www.us-government-torture.com John had some patents that were of interest to the US Department of Defense, so they stole them. When he attempted to retaliate, they sent goons to his house who drugged him and implanted him with microchips. When he started finding ways to thwart their efforts, they next started attempting to control him using microwaves, but he started discovering countermeasures to that too- all of which he reveals on his site. He discovered that certain specific micronutrients interfere with their control efforts.

In addition to his site, also see http://www.mk-resistance.com/ , http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/akwei.htm and http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/ Grasp that the ruling elite have the technology waiting in the wings to literally be able to see through our eyes, hear through our ears, put thoughts directly into our minds, and to induce heart attacks and strokes any time a monitoring computer program has decided we've stepped over certain lines they don't want crossed, and controlling our access to specific micronutrients figures heavily into this equation.

Once this information gets spread widely enough, the 100th monkey syndrome will kick in heavily and the ruling elite won't have a chance to foist scams such as C-51 or anything related through on us, but we're going to have to continue to put the pressure on, and with your ongoing help, IAHF will be able to do this more than we have EVER been!

Please send your most generous donation to: IAHF 556 Boundary Bay Rd., Point Roberts WA 98281 USA  or contribute via paypal at http://www.iahf.com/index1.html and together we'll DESTROY the New World Order!

For Health Freedom, John C. Hammell, President International Advocates for Health Freedom 556 Boundary Bay Road Point Roberts, WA 98281-8702 USA http://www.iahf.com jham@iahf.com 800-333-2553 N.America 360-945-0352 World

__

Additional info/links:

http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2008/06/c-51-c-52-iahf.html

http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2008/06/c51-c-51-c52-c.html

May 31, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Help Us Take The Infowar To The Next Level This Saturday

Saturday is the big day - the day when you can make a statement and pledge your support for one of the most exciting and ambitious developments that the alternative media has ever undertaken, by participating in the Infowars Money Bomb.

read more | digg story

Friends,

Alex Jones here to inform you that, thanks to you, the Infowars Money Bomb is a huge success.

In the first twelve hours, the money bomb has raised more than $80,000.  This is important for so many reasons. 

I want to personally invite you to join me tonight for a webcast-only radio show from 8pm-midnight central time.  We have a bunch of special guests lined up and we will be taking your calls as we all track the final hours of the money bomb together.

From the bottom of my heart, I want to thank all of you who have supported us in the past and those who have contributed to the money bomb.  I want to encourage those of you who are on the fence to donate, even if it's just five dollars, so that you can be part of this historic event.

Some of you may not be aware of what we are planning to do with the funds that are being graceously given to us.  I invite you to click the link below to get the full story.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2008/053008_next_level.htm

I am humbled by your support.

God bless you,

Alex Jones

 

Track the money bomb here: http://cache-a.infowars.com/moneybomb/index.html

Article - "Countdown to the Infowars Moneybomb" http://www.infowars.com/?p=2461

Article - "Help Us Take The Infowar To The Next Level This Saturday" http://www.infowars.com/?p=2452

Listen Live Tonight 8pm-midnight: http://www.infowars.com/infowars.asx

 

May 31, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Ron Paul 2008: More Powerful Aspects of the Freedom Revolution

Learning about & spreading Constitutional principles is what Ron Paul’s message is all about.  Anything supporting that message by default then, supports Ron Paul.  A major unalienable Constitutional right we have is the Right to Redress Grievances.  Seems this overlooked right is extremely powerful.  Click the links in order presented below & listen to Bob Schulz explain it & how he’s using it against our intolerant Big Brother.

1)  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ld9XUay9yMU  (3.5 mins)

2)  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qPkZWDsf3U (10 mins)

3)  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNwXSuL2CnY (5 mins)

Web site for more info:  http://www.givemeliberty.org/revolution/

 
 John

 

 [More below.]

***********************************************************

I N C R E D I B L E   Q U O TE: "[W]hen a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security." (The United States of America’s Declaration of Independence, Dec. 1776)  [Principles many of you fought for.

Problem here:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ky-YXvxYbck&feature=related

Solution here:  http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6015291679758430958&hl=en-CA

  @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

About your wealth. . .or lack thereof. . .Click here & learn.  (Watch Money As Debt, 1-5 parts; watch in sequence ~1 hr.) http://youtube.com/results?search_query=Corrupt+Banking+System+-+Money+is+Debt&search_type


&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

You into the fast track of learning?  Watch the Esoteric Agenda documentary (2 hrs) by clicking here:  http://videovault.morrisvideos.com/videos/esoteric-agenda


##############################

Killer information:  Visit http://www.wtprn.com/listen.shtml  & listen to We The People Radio Network. Once there, click the 'Listen Now' button on one of the three streams available.  It's great FREE radio!  Learn about your true power here.  (Please. . .Take the time to figure out how to download the stream; it really isn’t that difficult (play w/ possibilities if necessary—you’ll be glad you did—what information(!)).)

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

http://www.brasschecktv.com/ Book mark this site—brasscheck tv—great collection of videos in one site.  5*

May 31, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Rediscover our state Sovereign Roots - Part 78

Posted by: "apokolypsis_m" apokolypsis_m@yahoo.com apokolypsis_m Fri May 30, 2008 11:24 am (PDT)

Who overthrew the Founding Fathers Federation of Sovereignties, the united Republics?

We, the people, rebel not as a last act out of desperation but rather as a first act of creation.

Current Blog Post:

Rediscover our state Sovereign Roots - Part 78 – Who Overthrew the founding fathers Federation of Sovereignties? <http://dayspringgatheringscircle.org/OurSovereignRoots/?p=30>

Past Blog Posts:

Rediscover our state Sovereign Roots - Part 77 - The Guarantee of All to Preserve Each <http://dayspringgatheringscircle.org/OurSovereignRoots/?p=29>

Rediscover our state Sovereign Roots- Was the Hurricane Katrina aftermath of destruction the Obligation of protection, defense and REMEDY to the People, the Sovereign or the Subject's? The Grantor or the Grantee's? The Principal or the Agent's? The Master or the Servant's? <http://dayspringgatheringscircle.org/OurSovereignRoots/?p=28>

Rediscover Our state Sovereign Roots, Part 75 – When were The people the King, overthrown? <http://dayspringgatheringscircle.org/OurSovereignRoots/?p=24>

Rediscover Our state Sovereign Roots, Part 74 –When was the American Revolution Nullified? <http://dayspringgatheringscircle.org/OurSovereignRoots/?p=23>

Part 78 Simple Inquiry Of Fact Part 78

Exodus to Self-Government PART 78, Our Sovereign Roots

An Historical Record Knowledge UPDATE and No Cost Downloads for further private research and self - inquiry.

We can learn from history how past generations thought and acted, how they responded to the demands of their time and how they solved their problems. We can learn by analogy, not by example, for our circumstances will always be different than theirs were. The main thing history can teach us is that human actions have consequences and that certain choices, once made, cannot be undone. They foreclose the possibility of making other choices and thus they determine future events. Our ignorance of history causes us to slander our own times. Flaubert

Gabriel Paul Friday, May 30, 2008

Subscribe via Email and RSS Feeds to DaySpring Gatherings Network Blog(s) by Gabriel Paul here:Toxic Winds – Aerial Aerosol Wars! By Gabriel Paul <http://feeds.feedburner.com/dayspringgatheringscircle/pxwi>

and here: DaySpring Gatherings – Our Sovereign Constitutional Roots by Gabriel Paul <http://feeds.feedburner.com/DaySpringGatherings-OurSovereignConstitutio\nalRoots>

Love & Truth the Greatest Disinfectant of Light against Hosts of Wickedness, Rulers of Darkness, Principalities & Powers of Deception Disinformation, Lies and Spin

CONTINUED FROM PART 77:

The liberticides of American pretend that keeping up the "form" satisfies the obligation. So they rule states from Washington, while keeping up simulacra for republican governments. All will admit that a monarchical form means a monarchy; an aristocratic form an aristocracy; and a "republican form a republic."

Washington, Franklin, and all the founding fathers considered and called the present federal system an experiment. Indeed, all human systems must be such, owing to the finite wisdom which makes them. This is why Massachusetts and other states declare, what indeed makes common-sense teaches: that "that the people alone have an incontestable inalienable and indefeasible right to institute government, and to reform, alter, or totally change the same when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it."

Dedicated to all living souls of human civilization, who have dared to yearn, breath, serve and sacrifice for Liberty and Peace, past and present.

The True Character of the Government—By the action of their wills, the states give existence, life, and power to the visible government, and at the same time, and in the same act, they federalize themselves. No possible political will could delegate or grant, but that of the state, while the only possible grantee is the federation of states. "The government"—is so called—cannot have any capacity to be a grantee, for decisive reasons which will now be presented.

"The government of the united states," like that of any state, is tripartite, i.e. three institutions, co-existing, but independently acting. It was not constituted a unit, so as to be a moral person, with a mind and a will. The "unity of government" which Washington spoke of, simply meant one system for all the states—without reference to its character—which should effectually provide for the "common-defence" and "general welfare" of "the people" as organized.

To get a definite conception of the system, let us see how distinct and exclusive these institutions appear in the federal pact. Article I.united states;" Article II. declares that "the executive power shall be vested in a president of the united states;" and Article III. declares "the judicial power of the united states shall be vested in one supreme court" and subordinate courts. declares that "all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the

The founding fathers of institutional liberty, knowing the tendency of all government towards tyranny, recognized this natural separateness of these governmental functions and agencies, and in some constitutions expressed and carefully guarded it. [ See the constitution of Massachusetts.] Their aim, especially in forming the federal government, was to subject every measure of the rulers to several successive and independent examinations, tests and vetoes, so as to ensure the wisest and most efficient, and at the same time the most conservative, efforts to secure "tranquillity," "justice," "defence," "welfare," and "liberty," and, above all, to prevent the injury or destruction of the great palladium of all these blessings—the American constitutional polity. This is precisely the theory of those "checks and balances" so many talk of, and so few seem to understand and properly appreciate.

The three agencies under review are the mere mouthpieces, instruments, tools, or slaves of their creator, owner, master, and sovereign—the league of commonwealths, "the united states," "the people"—to speak and effectuate the legislative, executive, or judicial will, as the case may be, of the said sovereignty.

The Unheeded Form of Consolidation is the Worst—Now the most dangerous form of consolidation in America is that which is least noticed and guarded against, and that is the breaking down, by these agencies, of the walls separating them; their getting together and acting covertly with one mind, under the greatest temptations, without check and without responsibility; or what amounts to the same, the gradual gaining by one of them of a mastery over the others, so as to get undivided sway. In either case "the government" becomes a unit, and a corporate despot of the vilest imaginable character. If it did not, it would be superhuman.

Reasons why it cannot be a Grantee—The only seat of that "endowment of the soul" called "will," which must be used in government, is in "the people" as organized, and "it never leaves them."

Their right of freely exercising it, is sovereignty.

Not only is this "the faculty of the soul" resident in the people, but the government has no will, because it has no unity, and no corporate mind. Hence it cannot be a grantee of powers, rights, or anything else; but its capacity is simply that of an agent, or trio of agents, who hold nothing of right, must do as told, and remain abjectly submissive, so that without resistance, or even murmur, it, or they, can be kicked out of the way whenever the mighty mind of the people shall move their mighty foot to that end.[1] <../../../../../American -Citizens-for-Truth/post

?referer=/group/American\ -Citizens-for-Truth/messages%3fo%3d1%26yguid%3d208120019&use_rte=1#_ftn1\ >

Again, "the government" is never mentioned as grantee, while the association called "the united states" always is. All titles to federal property, and to the occupation, use and jurisdiction of federal footholds—as have been shown—are made by the respective states, and to the "united states." Nay, more, the tenth amendment declares expressly that all the powers in the constitution are "delegated to the united states."

Again, there is no grant whatever in the sense of alienation; but powers are delegated, i.e. entrusted to be used for the owners, "the people"—the users necessarily being "agents" and "servants" and "subjects."

The expounding words "cede," "surrender," "part with," "relinquish," etc., that mean alienate, are quibbles, subterfuges, and fallacies; and they found in the writings of every "expounder."

Again, the language of the pact shows everything still to belong to the states. Note the numerous possessive phrases—"the government of the * states;" "the territory and other property of the * states," etc.

Again, the government could not be the grantee, because it did not have a being till long after the constitution had been completed by the only parties that then existed, or could exert will upon it, and the association of states had been, ipso facto, formed.

In the fall of 1788, the congress of states declared the new federalizing instrument to be complete, according to its tenor, by " the ratification of the convention of nine states..between the states so [i.e. by conventions] ratifying the same;" and the said congress provided for carrying it into effect, by notifying their constituents, the states, of the "sufficient" "establishment," and recommending that they should elect their government. Whereupon the respective state legislatures passed laws for elections.

In accordance therewith, the states elected THEIR OWN SUBJECTS as senators; THEIR OWN SUBJECTS as representatives; THEIR OWN SUBJECTS as electors to elect the president. And when, in the spring of 1789, the elected persons, AS SUBJECTS, representatives, and agents under the law, had organized themselves to work in the vocation whereunto called, the government for the first time existed; and, as I have shown, it had no unity of body or mind, no will, no inherent and original rights and powers, but was composed entirely of SUBJECTS AND AGENTS who remained individually and collectively under the law, whether home or general, constitutional or statutory.

What! are these mighty "government" men under state constitutions and laws? Yes, verily, even under the laws of town councils, if applicable. Let the president, or all his government, go into Gettysburg and violate an ordinance, and he would learn the fact. The wills of the states have declared the federal law to be supreme.

What conflicts is no law. What does not conflict is law, and binding even on the proudest magnate or corporation in the land, whether governmental or not.

How then could this poor agency, instrument, or machine, be a party to the compact, and the grantee of delegations, of federal tenures of property, and the use and occupation of sites for forts, navy-yards, etc.? The idea is absurd.

It was the league or federation that was grantee. Each state granted to the states, as is proved by the tenth amendment, providing that all powers not delegated to the united states, are reserved. And, I repeat, every grant was a delegation or giving in trust, and not an alienation.

As Judge Parsons said, "The people divest themselves of nothing." Said Judge Marshall, in the ratifying convention of Virginia: "Federal and state officers are alike servants of the people, who hold their powers in their own hands, and delegate them cautiously for short periods, to their servants, who are accountable for the SMALLEST MALADMINISTRATION." [II. Ell. Deb. 89; III. Ibid. 232.] [Italics and Bold, mine.]

A Misleading Misnomer—The phrase, "the government"—particularly when the big G is used—misleads the unthinking, unless the purely derivative, delegative, and agential character of the institution so named, is kept in view; for the real government of the republic, or of any republic, is necessarily the state itself—the so called government being a mere agency or commission, created by the people, and empowered by them to adminster their governmental affairs.

The American bodies-politic govern themselves—separately in domestic, and unitedly in general affairs. They, then, are the government.

Hence it is that the first article of the constitution, as unanimously adopted by the convention of 1787, and never reconsidered, though left out by the revising committee, reads as follows: "Article I. The style of this government shall be the United States." "The government," then, is "the United States." And, in the nature of things, the government of each republic is the republic itself, while the government of the united republics is the united republics themselves.

Let us Symbolize the Polity—The whole subject, then, in all its parts, being matter of fact or inference, we can present the grades and impartations of authority.

1. Suppose thirteen or more figures in a horizontal line to symbolize the organizations of people named in the constitution, and those since admitted. Part of the people were named Massachusetts; part Delaware; part Georgia; and so of the rest. The original commonwealths are still so named, and are unchanged; and the new ones are their political equals.

2. Next below, suppose the same figures to be grouped as the united states, and a line to be drawn from each of the above states to this association, to indicate the delegating of power, by each state, to the union of them. Each state is the delegator, and all of them united are the delegatee.

3. In the third grade, let us suppose a three fold figure to represent the three co-ordinate institutions which form the federal agency of government, through which the individual people are ruled. This figure shows, "the government of [i.e. belonging to] the united states," subordinate to the said states, of course.

4. At the bottom we might place a figure to represent the same people that we see atop, but in their capacity AS SUBJECTS, the republican idea of self-government requiring that while they appear at the top, and above the institutious of government, in a corporate and sovereign capacity, they should also appear below the said institutions in an individual and subject one.

This process will lastingly impress the reader with the grades of our system—1. the sovereign societies of people associated; 2. their governmental "agents and depositaries of power," as Mr. Curtis calls them—the congress, the president, and judiciary; 3. the members, citizens, or subjects of the states, and their belongings. The first are the sovereign people, the last the subject people.

Facts Must Prevail—Unless we wish plain facts of history and the sacred records of our country to be subjects of contention forever, we must make up distinct issues, and charge either the sons or the sires with deliberate falsehood.

Let those who Devised described the Polity—The sires who planned, our constitution of general government described it as follows. Apology for the repetition can hardly be necessary—

ALEXANDER HAMILTON said the present union is "an association of states or confederacy;" and that "the people of New York are the sovereigns of it" [Fed. IX.; his address, 1789].

CHANCELLOR LIVINGSTON said our general polity is a "league of states" [II. Ell. Deb. 274].

JOHN JAY said "the states adopted" "the present plan;" and that it is a "union of states" {I. Ell. Deb. 496; II. Ibid. 282].

JAMES MADISON said "the states are regarded as distinct and independent sovereigns" "by the constitution" [Fed. XL.]

GENERAL WASHINGTON wrote of the constitution as a "compact or treaty;" and the union formed by it as " the new confederacy" [Letter to Gen. Pinckney, June 28, 1788; do. To. D. Stuart, Oct. 17, 1787].

DR. FRANKLIN said the senate was to secure in the union "the sovereignties of the individual states" [V. Ell. Deb. 266].

JAMES WILSON said the sovereignty "is in the people before they make a constitution, and remains in them after it is made," and that the said people are "thirteen independent sovereignties" [II. Ell. Deb. 443; Mass. Centinel, Oct. 24, 1787].

JOHN DICKINSON called the new political system " a confederacy of republics," and he recognized therein "the sovereignty of each state" [II. Pol. Writings of J.D., 107].

GOUVERNER MORRIS said the constitution was " a compact..between political societies,…each enjoying sovereign power" [III. Life of M., 193].

ROGER SHERMAN said "the government….was instituted by a number of sovereign states" [see his letter to John Adams in VII. Writings of J.A.].

OLIVER ELLSWORTH called the states "sovereign bodies" [II. Ell. Deb. 197].

TENCH COXE said the union was of "separate sovereignties, joining in a confederacy" [Am. Mus. 160, 244].

CHANCELLOR PENDLETON, the president of the Virginia ratifying convention, said the people of Virginia were "the fountain of all power," and the new system was "uniting the strength of thirteen states," each state " a sovereign state" [III. Ell. Deb. 297, 549].

JOHN MARSHALL (afterwards chief justice) spoke of the state in the union as "the sovereign power" [III. Ell. Deb. 555].

SAMUEL ADAMS said "each state retains its sovereignty" in the present union. [II. Ell. Deb. 131].

GOVERNOR JAMES BOWDOIN spoke of the union as " a confederacy;" and of the states as "distinct sovereignties" [II. Ell. Deb. 129]. See also the same effect, the utterances of JAMES IREDELL [IV. Ell. Deb. 133]; FISHER AMES [II. Ell. Deb. 46]; THEOPHILUS PARSONS [see his Life, p. 98]; CHRISTOPHER GORE [II. Ell. Deb. 18]; GEORGE CABOT [II. Ell. Deb. 26].

The founding fathers then, describe the American political system as a federation of sovereignties.

[1] <../../../../../American-Citizens-for-Truth/messages%3fo%3d1%26yguid%3d2\ 08120019&use_rte=1#_ftnref1> The federal supreme court said " the constitution was written by the mighty hand of the people.? Why then can they not have and use a mighty foot?

To be continued……………..

Audere est facere, Veritas odit moras

Vitam impendere vero

Gabriel Paul

Open Air Chemical & Biological Testing on private

American inhabitants, Legal without YOUR FULLY INFORMED CONSENT!

If you find the law as it stands for legal sanctioned governmental genocide an outrage and/or a complete violation of human liberties, please DO spread it forward, thank you.

Been sick lately?

Recurring Sinus, Respiratory, Bronchial Infections that don't go away, endocrine/stomach aches?

?

Out of the blue, typically healthy?

Weather acting funny, droughts, tornado's, radical temperature fluctuations?

Next, shouldn't we ask ourselves, does ANY matter of activism we pursue, political, environmental, social, religious, tax, legal, civil, immigration, etc., EVEN matter if American families inherent liberty to LIFE without trespass and violation without REMEDY, upon the soil of your State, is being destroyed, lawfully, by a federal government?

Democrat, Republican, Independent, Green, Yellow, Purple or Black, how can it even begin to matter, when all of the above ordain and sanction genocidal Law as below?

TITLE 50 <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/usc_sup_01_50.html> > CHAPTER 32 <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/usc_sup_01_50_10_32.html> > § 1515

Prev <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/usc_sec_50_00001514----000-.html> | Next <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/usc_sec_50_00001516----000-.html> § 1515. Suspension; Presidential authorization After November 19, 1969, the operation of this chapter, or any portion thereof, may be suspended by the President during the period of any war declared by Congress and during the period of any national emergency declared by Congress or by the President.

TITLE 50 <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/usc_sup_01_50.html> > CHAPTER 32 <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/usc_sup_01_50_10_32.html> > § 1520a

Prev <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/usc_sec_50_00001520----000-.html> | Next <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/usc_sec_50_00001521----000-.html> § 1520a. Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents

(a) Prohibited activities

The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)—

(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or

(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.

(b) Exceptions

Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e) of this section, the prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:

(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.

(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.

(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.

(c) Informed consent required

The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) of this section only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject.

(d) Prior notice to Congress

Not later than 30 days after the date of final approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department of Defense (whether directly or under contract) involving the use of human subjects for the testing of a chemical agent or a biological agent, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report setting forth a full accounting of those plans, and the experiment or study may then be conducted only after the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date such report is received by those committees.

(e) "Biological agent" defined

In this section, the term "biological agent" means any micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable of causing—

(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;

(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or

(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.

June 2007, National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell gained White House approval to update a 1981 presidential order on how US spy agencies operate. Potentially up for review in the highly secretive overhaul, referred to as Order 12333, is the topic of human experimentation.

Cay anyone say PERPETUAL WAR on terror

The DaySpring Gatherings Network Blogs & Websites:

The DaySpring No-Cost Down load 600+ Digital PDF Library <http://dayspringgatheringscircle.org/dayspring_library.html>

No Cost & Text Search DaySpring Electronic Text 18th Century Law Dictionary & Glossary <http://dayspringgatheringscircle.org/an_18th__century_law_dictionary__g\ lossary_a-act.html> Updated Regularly.

Toxic Winds – Aerial Aerosol Wars! By Gabriel Paul <http://dayspringgatheringscircle.org/blog>

DaySpring Gatherings – Our Sovereign Constitutional Roots by Gabriel Paul <http://dayspringgatheringscircle.org/OurSovereignRoots>

Fear knocked at the door…..Faith Answered……..There was no one there.

Truth cannot be bought and sold, only temporarily obfuscated by falsehood.Yet all falsehood and illusion will themselves ultimately be crucified upon the cross of the omnipotent Sword of Truth when it pierces the heart in purification.

There is something within me that might be illusion as it is often case with young delighted people, but if I would be fortunate to achieve some of my ideals, it would be on the behalf of the whole of humanity. Nikola Tesla

`When the Gentiles, who have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves."-Rom. ii. 14.

I don't know what your destiny will be, but one thing I do know; the only ones among you who will be really happy are those who have sought and found how to serve.

"History is nothing but a procession of false absolutes, a series of temples raised to pretexts, a degradation of the mind before the improbable."

Men with great knowledge are easily enslaved if they do nothing to defend their freedom. Knowledge by itself is not power, but it holds the potential for power if we have the courage to use it as such, and therein lies our hope for the future. If we act upon this knowledge, it is an opportunity, not just to know about history, but actually to change its course.

"Remember when it was give me freedom or give me death? Now it is save me from death and take my freedom, please." NOTICE : This non commercial no tender for access or use private research resource contains unpublished, protected in perpetuity, private work product. This private non commercial speech and thought is expressly not intended for by anyone, of any kind, in whole or in part, whatsoever, to diagnose, treat or cure any disease or illness; mental, physical, spiritual, political, religious, individually or collectively, or otherwise. "DaySprings Gatherings Network" unconditionally does NOT endorse, advocate or promote the use of non-self defense violence or prejudice of any kind nor paper terrorism nor belligerency against any government(s) or instrumentality(s) or government officer(s), agent(s), official(s), representative(s) or any and all men and women of different religions, beliefs or ethnic backgrounds. We cannot over emphasize enough that we deplore all acts of terrorism, prejudice, oppression, suppression, theft or deception (past, present or future) and further we offer no physical, political or economic threat to any government, people or religious practice. We make all such non commercial speech and electronic communication within this resource available in our private efforts to stimulate well being, good, peace and harmony for the common good, that includes but is not limited to spiritual principals, human liberties, as well as to stimulate healthy and positive environmental, religious, economic, scientific, historical, social and political ideas, discourse and self inquiry. The information throughout each page of this resource hereto is provided at no cost and should only be used by anyone willfully intending to read this material at their own risk and strict sole enjoyment and benefit for expressly informational historical research purposes only (expressly not for commercial or re-sale use, in whole or in part, whatsoever) that will request the information and all content herein is expressly not intended nor offered nor presented nor published as commercial speech or legal, tax or medical advice, in whole or in a part whatsoever as we are not licensed attorney(s) in at law nor accountant(s) nor doctor(s) nor be construed as legal, medical or tax speech, advice or services, in whole or in part, whatsoever. You are hereby advised that you should seek your own appropriate independent advice relating to all your private matters by advisors of your choice, please get a second opinion, third opinion.This is not an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any public or private security, book, manual, workshop, recording, legal, tax, accounting or medical advice, products or services in whole or in part whatsoever. If you wish to use any part of this unpublished private work product for purposes of your own that go beyond your personal enjoyment and benefit in any manner, in whole or part, whatsoever, ( Limited Use Disclaimer-the downloaded and private personal research/historical use by anyone constitutes agreement that all private work product via DaySpring Gatherings Network Website & Library & DaySpring Gatherings Network Blog by Gabriel Paul will not be RESOLD, or Republished, in whole or in part, whatsoever by anyone), you must first obtain prior written permission from gabriel @ dayspringgatheringscircle.org Unpublished protected work product, In the year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Eight, Anno Domini

--
'The Revolution: A Manifesto'
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0446537519?ie=UTF8&tag=rc020-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0446537519

May 30, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Ron Paul 2008: Battle in Spokane

http://www.nolanchart.com/article3927.html

May 30, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Ron Paul speaks outside Republican convention

            Ron Paul speaks outside Republican convention
http://www.startribune.com/local/19388704.html?location_refer=Local%20+%20Metro

May 30, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Infowars: Vital Info from Alex Jones

Hello folks, this is Alex Jones. This is just a reminder that tomorrow, Saturday May 31st 2008, is the Infowars Money Bomb. This is a chance for you to help me reach millions more in the Infowar by expanding this operation. All funds will be directed straight towards building a new studio, purchasing cameras and equipment, expanding office space, and hiring additional staff to run the operation. Spread the message, and let everyone know about this moneybomb. Nothing like this has ever been undertaken by a truly independent media outlet but we can only achieve our goal with your support! Let’s make history!

Respectfully,
Alex Jones

Find out more here:  http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2008/053008_next_level.htm

May 30, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Videos: Murdered CIA Black Ops Assassin (tortured body found on beach in Panama in 1997) - whistleblowing 82 min

 
Friday, May 30, 2008
 
'Presidential Secrets'- - Former CIA Operative Chip Tatum Speaks
 
'Presidential Secrets'- with Gene "Chip" Tatum, a former CIA Black Ops Assassin  who was also an Iran-Contra and OSG2 NWO Insider. 

- Former CIA Operative Chip Tatum Speaks
- 82 min - Dec 20, 2007
 
In this video, you'll hear Chip discuss his involvement  in Operation Red Rock, Task Force 160 and OSG2.   Hear him reveal the names of high profile officials  who were integrally involved in these CIA covert  killing sprees and/or narco-trafficking, directly or indirectly: Oliver "Ollie" North, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton.
You'll learn from an "insider" about outrageous  U.S. government felony crime and corruption  and the impending New World Order destruction of America.

You'll hear his amazing insight concerning the Nixon Admin  and the dirty politics of the Vietnam War.
This is the last interview prior to his sudden disappearance in 1998.  LATEST UPDATE: Chip's tortured body was reported  to have washed up on a beach in Panama in early 2007.
See the other video interview with Chip Tatum  called 'Black Ops Interview' below.

May 30, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Hotel UK Gets You Set For A Stay

In consideration of a stay in the UK one will more than likely be exploring what UK hotels are available. This is as easy as Hotel UK. Hotel UK is a premier place to go for hotels in Great Britain. Whether you will be visiting the most popular destinations of Central London, Blackpool, Birmingham, Manchester or otherwise and whether you will be flying in to Luton, Edinburgh Gatwick, Heathrow or Manchester you will definitely be looking for a great place to sleep, where you can also work, play, explore, dine, during your visit. In your search for UK hotels you will be provided with the best of all possible service with the lowest prices as well as promotional offers. You can book your hotel and more via live chat, via the website or by calling their London Hotel Hot Line at 020 7127 4349. Navigation in search of UK hotels on their website can be done from the Home page or via UK By City, UK By Country and London Hotels tabs. Check out the Google maps features. Browse by categories whether you are looking for Airport, Upscale, Tourist, Budget hotels or otherwise and receive helpful information on the cities in which you will be staying in a helpful Did you know? section. See the photos of the places you are interested in possibly staying and check the rates. Find yourself a place to stay and arrange it today!

May 30, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Scott McClellan's Confession: More Info: Prosecutors Can Prosecute George W. Bush for Murder according to Vincent Bugliosi

NEWS: "State and Local Prosecutors Can Take Down Bush"

Posted by: leaontomson@aol.com

Thu May 29, 2008 3:43 pm (PDT) OK TO FORWARD FAR AND WIDE

(http://www.populum.com/tellafriend.php?page=http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_david_sw_080527_state_and_local_pros.htm)

Former prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi's new book "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder" is not just a particularly good addition to the ten-foot high stack of rants against Bush's crimes and abuses of power. It's also an argument that state and local prosecutors have the necessary jurisdiction to try Bush for murder and for conspiracy to commit murder, at least once he's out of office. This is not a scheme based on some harebrained theory that Bush faked the suicide of a former staffer. In fact, this scheme is based on nothing more than universally accepted facts. Bush chose to send US troops into Iraq. He did not do so in self-defense or as a last resort or under an international mandate, but rather went out of his way to concoct false motives for war and to rush its launching. By sending troops into war, Bush was knowingly and needlessly but certainly condemning some of them to death. The Iraqis who killed those soldiers in predictable and legally justifiable defense of their country fall into the legal category of "third-party innocent agent." This does not mean they are innocent, but rather that their actions do nothing to lessen the guilt of George W. Bush as murderer of those soldiers. Bugliosi calls this the "vicarious liability rule of conspiracy." Bugliosi explains: "In other words, if Bush personally killed an American soldier, he would be guilty of murder. Under the law, he cannot immunize himself from his criminal responsibility by causing a third party to do the killing. He's still responsible. George Bush cannot sit safely in his Oval Office in Washington, D.C., while young American soldiers fighting his war are being blown to pieces by roadside bombs in Iraq, and wash his hands of all culpability. It's not quite that easy. He could only do this if he did not take this nation into war under false pretenses. If he did, which the evidence overwhelmingly shows, he is criminally responsible for the thousands of American deaths in Iraq." In addition, Bugliosi argues, Bush could be found guilty of murder under the rule of "aiding and abetting," because he instigated the killing of American soldiers by ordering the invasion of Iraq.

Did Bush have "malice aforethought"? Yes, according to Bugliosi. We convict people of murder for driving 100 mph through a school zone and hitting a child, or for blowing up a building while unaware that someone is inside. These are cases where the murderer does not know he is committing murder but where he is reckless enough to take an unreasonable risk of doing so. In Bush's case, he absolutely knew that invading Iraq would involve US casualties, and yet he ordered the invasion, thereby acting with the intent that American soldiers be killed. Bugliosi strengthens this argument by pointing out that we often convict people of murder for accidental killings that occur in the act of committing other felonies: "A robber, for instance, was convicted of first degree murder under the felony-murder rule where, as he was leaving the store in which he had robbed the owner, he told the owner not to say a word or he'd be harmed, and fired into the ceiling to scare the owner. The shot, after two or three ricochets, pierced the head of the owner, killing him. In fact, the felony-murder rule applies even where the defendant is not the killer! There have been cases where the proprietor of the store fired at a robber, missed him and hit and killed a customer. And the robber was convicted of first degree murder of the customer."

Bugliosi missed an opportunity here to further strengthen his case by noting that in the act of ordering the invasion of Iraq, Bush was committing a number of felonies. When Bush submitted his March 18, 2003, letter and report to the United States Congress providing reasons for attacking Iraq, he violated the federal anti-conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. - 371, which makes it a felony "to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose..."; and The False Statements Accountability Act of 1996, 18 U.S.C. - 1001, which makes it a felony to issue knowingly and willfully false statements to the United States Congress. Bush also committed a felony by misappropriating funds to secretly begin the invasion prior to this date. Bugliosi notes that there is no statute of limitations for murder. Bush could be prosecuted by any future federal prosecutor who had the nerve to do so and could do so while keeping his or her job. But Bugliosi writes that a state attorney general or any district attorney in any city or county could bring a murder charge against Bush for any soldiers from that state or county who lost their lives in Iraq. And not just Bush, but Cheney, Rice, et alia. Bugliosi provides some truly talented proposals for questioning Bush in court and adds:

"I would be more than happy, if requested, to consult with any prosecutor who decides to prosecute Bush in preparation of additional cross-examination questions for him to face on the witness stand. I believe the cross-examination would be such that they'd have to carry the arrogant son of privilege off the stand on a stretcher." I know the same offer to assist stands from former federal prosecutor Elizabeth de la Vega, author of "United States versus George W. Bush et al." Bugliosi argues that such trials could only take place once Bush is out of office, but is uncharacteristically weak in his explanation of why. Bugliosi thinks it was a mistake to allow the Paula Jones case to take time away from Clinton's duties as president, but he clearly does not believe taking time away from Bush's duties as president could possibly harm anyone or anything. And Bugliosi cites no decisive constitutional or legal basis for preventing a prosecution from beginning while Bush is still president. The question, in any case, is where we can find (or elect) one or two or a dozen prosecutors willing to stand up to the biggest murderer of our age. We need a project to identify the most likely combinations of prosecutors and gold star families, and work together with those families to urge prosecution. We are working on this at http://convictbushcheney.org

Why do I call Bush the biggest murderer of our age for a mere 4,000 murders, not counting his neglect prior to Katrina and 9-11, his exacerbation of global warming, his opposition to workplace safety standards or medical research, etc.? I have in mind, of course, the over 1 million Iraqis who have died as a result of his invasion of Iraq. Bugliosi does not see any legal case to try Bush for the murders of Iraqis, but he also openly admits that he cares more about the deaths of Americans. In addition to that disgusting confession, Bugliosi repeatedly cites the figure 100,000 as the number of Iraqi deaths, but never indicates where he came up with that number or how he ignores the fact that every serious study has placed the count above a million. Bugliosi also repeatedly claims that Bush won the 2004 election, and expresses his belief that congress members who voted to invade Iraq actually believed the White House lies about weapons. Bugliosi's is not a perfect book, but it is a brilliant one, and is as good a one as any to offer to anyone not yet devoted to putting Bush and Cheney behind bars. Bugliosi concludes his book with an excellent analysis of what happened on 9-11 and how the media and the public have responded. His account of how often Bush was warned prior to 9-11 and how little (nothing) he did in response is very well done, but includes at least one glaring error (at least glaring to those of us privileged to get our own briefings on these things from Ray McGovern). George Tenet did indeed, as Bugliosi recounts, tell the 9-11 Commission on April 14, 2004, that he did not speak with Bush for the whole month of August, 2001. But a CIA spokesperson called reporters that same evening to claim that Tenet had "misspoken" and that Tenet had briefed Bush on August 17th and 31st. In his book, At the Center of the Storm, (2007) Tenet refers to the August 17th meeting as a follow-up to the August 6th memo on Bin Laden. A White House press release suggests that Tenet was also in Crawford a week later, on August 24th. President Bush, addressing a group of visitors to Crawford on August 25, told them: "George Tenet and I, yesterday, we piled in the new nominees for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, the Vice Chairman and their wives and went right up the canyon." Bugliosi notes in his book that more evidence will continue to pile up. His claim, like so many others', is only that the evidence he has compiled is more than sufficient to put Bush away for life. On that point, if you read this book, I think you'll agree there can be no doubt whatsoever.

http://www.davidswanson.org

DAVID SWANSON is a co-founder of After Downing Street, a writer and activist, and the Washington Director of Democrats.com. He is a board member of Progressive Democrats of America, and serves on the Executive Council of the Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild, TNG-CWA. He has worked as a newspaper reporter and as a communications director, with jobs including Press Secretary for Dennis Kucinich's 2004 presidential campaign, Media Coordinator for the International Labor Communications Association, and three years as Communications Coordinator for ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. Swanson obtained a Master's degree in philosophy from the University of Virginia in 1997.

Contact Author (http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/contact.php?sid=9&storyid=60267)

May 29, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack