++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« October 2009 | Main | December 2009 »

Re: Celerino Castillo: A few more words...

First and foremost, I would like to thank every single one of you out there who have supported my father in this time of crisis. Also, please continue with your prayers, for he is in need of them.
    My father is an honorable man, who has served his country above and beyond the call of duty. After 20 years of government service, he continued to be an activist on human rights issues. Domestically, he also became an advocate for civil rights issues, demonstrating with the Rev. Joseph Lowery and Martin Luther King III.
    Recently he became a member of "The last Patrol", in an effort to bring a Veteran's hospital to south Texas, Earlier this year he participated in a protest march from Edinburg to San Antonio to bring awareness for the need of the V.A hospital in South Texas. However, because of his heart condition, he was unable to complete the march. They now say that one out of five in the immediate family is going to prison. My father is carrying "the cross" for this family and is sitting in La Tuna Federal Prison Camp.
     My father is asking for you continuing support for him. His PayPal account is still available through his website. Most importantly, he needs you to please start a letter writing campaign to attorney general Eric Holder in an effort to accelerate the status of the Department of Justice investigation on my fathers prosecutor Mark Roomber and the agents involved in his Case. In Aug. of this year, my father received a letter from the D.O.J , office of professional responsibility, advising him that MR. Roomberg and the agents were under investigation because of his allegations against them. However, my father feels that there is a possibility, that there are D.O.J individuals who support the Bush administration's personal agenda. This whole investigation could very well be swept under the rug.
    Mr. Holders Address is a follows:
   Attorney General of the united States
Eric Holder
U.S. Dept of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC. 20530
     Back in the 1980's my father became an Iran/contra whistle blower against the Reagan/Bush administrations. He exposed our Government as an accomplice in the drug trade and arms smuggling. My fathers allegations were confirmed by several bipartisan investigations, both in the house and senate, this is certainly a pay-back for my father by the criminals in our government.
     So, I sit here and BEG you to please continue to support my father. Thank you all so much again for everything.
                                                            With my head up high,
                                                                       Crystal Castillo

Celerino "Cele" Castillo, 3rd
2709 North 28 1/2 Street
McAllen, TX.  78501

November 30, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Freedom Watch

FREEDOM WATCH is information pertaining to 
government abuse of power, trashing of
the Constitution, illegal immigration,
2nd Amendment, political correctness
run amok, etc.
It is FREE and sent to you via E-mail.
To subscribe send an e-mail to:


Get paid on every purchase by your Friends through 10
degrees of separation! Save Money! Make Money! FREE
Perils of Unrestricted Immigration
“That there are difficulties and even dangers ahead I do not doubt. The most serious seems to me to be the passing of the frontier and the coincident coming to our shores of great hordes of unassimilable immigrants. The frontier, the great manufactory of Americanism, ceased to be in 1890. From 1880 to the present time eighteen million immigrants of utterly alien stock have been added to our population. They come not from the Baltic region but from Africa, Asia, and especially from the negroid population of Southern Italy.
America welcomes and will always welcome immigrants whose social and political ideals are of kindred nature with our own. But whether we can continue unharmed to be the dumping-ground of alien stock is at least questionable. If these immigrants came as children, the case would be different, though education can do little more than bring out what is already latent: breed, at least, is more than pasture.  But every day in the year there land on our shores at least one thousand men and women not only un-citizenized but incapable of being citizenized.  They go to the crowded centres where the Americanizing influences are weakest and the disintegrating influences strongest. 
It was Chateaubriand who said: “Every institution goes  through three stages—utility, privilege, abuse.” Unrestricted or nearly unrestricted immigration served at one time the ends of utility; the great steamship companies converted it to a privilege; and it has now become a national abuse. We are imperiling our heritage of idealism because we are watering the nation’s life-blood.”
(Our Heritage of Idealism, C. Alphonso Smith, Address (excerpt) delivered at the University of South Carolina, January 11, 1912)


Phylis Schlafly
The Schlafly article in my opinion plays to the neo con schemes.
Jacob Hornberger has it right, here From ABC, I rushed over to the Fox News studios to appear on Judge Andrew Napolitano’s Freedom Watch to discuss the decision by the Justice Department to try accused 9/11 co-conspirator Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in federal district court in New York. The judge and I agreed that this was the right thing to do and that it should have been done a long time ago. As I pointed out, terrorism is a federal criminal offense, an undisputable fact that has now once again been confirmed by U.S. officials with their decision to have Mohammed indicted and tried in federal district court.
The judge and I also agreed that it is an abomination that U.S. officials are persisting in their decision to try some accused terrorists in the Pentagon’s alternative “judicial” system in Cuba. As I stated on the show, it is a fundamental violation of the principles of equal treatment under law and the rule of law to permit government officials the arbitrary and ad hoc power to treat accused criminals in two different, alternative ways, one in which the defendants are accorded the rights and guarantees of the Bill of Rights and one in which the defendants are denied such rights and given kangaroo justice.
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Advancing Liberty on ABC and Fox
by Jacob G. Hornberger
GJF - -Liberty, S.C.


If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
– James Madison


The Constitutional Bankruptcy of our Republic
Nathan Janes

Authority to Spy on Americans Unclear as Patriot Act Expires
House Defies White House and Renews Two of Three Expiring Provisions

Everything You've Always Wanted To Know About Ron Paul
Articles by and about him, and his videos, audios, and books.

November 30, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink

TONIGHT!!! ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY to Home Foreclosures with Michael Lawrence - MONDAY

Public Service Announcement:




Administrative Remedy to Home Foreclosures 


With Michael Lawrence 

Administrative Process HE WILL DO FOR YOU to STOP the foreclosure of your home.










So, if you want to learn how you can accomplish this Offensive Posture for yourself, listen to and participate in the Free Tele-Conference Calls most every evening of the week.  See the ‘Free Tele-Conferences’ TAB at www.YourRemedyIsInTheLaw.com. There are also the Archives to view two years of historical conference calls!




I also encourage you to purchase the 24 hour JurisDictionary Course found at the products and services page at www.YourRemedyIsInTheLaw.com.  This course is the absolute minimum entry level for anyone who is anticipating having to deal with a lawful issue.   It will be the best 24 hours you have ever spent!  I have heard it said this course, when completely understood by you, could put you on par with 85% of the lawyers you may come across.



The Phone Numbers and Pins are published at http://www.YourRemedyIsInTheLaw.com behind the Free Tele-Conference tab.   Enter with your User Name and Password.  If you don’t have one, click onNew? REGISTER HERE and create your unique User Name and Password.  Information is available only to registered members.   Click on Free Tele-Conference Calls and you will see the correct information.


I encourage you to call in to this night's free tele-conference call with Randy Kelton


Best regards,


November 30, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Update on Springer and Defense related to No Internal Revenue Districts under Title 26, Section 7621 as required by Title 4, Section 72

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Update on Springer and Defense related to No Internal Revenue Districts under Title 26, Section 7621 as required by Title 4, Section 72
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:49:20 -0600
From: Lindsey Springer <gnutella@mindspring.com>
To: lindsey springer <lindsey@mindspring.com>

Lindsey Springer here and in accordance with the Court’s Order of November 17, 2009, I write to express my sincere gratitude to each of you who have watched with great anticipation the events leading up to and now after the trial phase has concluded in 09cr-043. I am now in the pre-sentence phase.

I am having to defend against the United States in the case where the U.S. DOJ represents 11 Agents who left my home on September 16, 2005 with $ 19,000 and on January 10, 2006, chose to only return $ 17,000. That case is 06-156 (Northern Judicial District of Oklahoma) and on appeal at the 10th Circuit it is 09-5088 (Denver)(44 months and no discovery yet but looks like that will change soon). During the offense trial I was also required to draft a response brief to the United States in the "interlocutory appeal" in 09-5088. This is the second time the United States has appealed a Judge’s decision that went against the 11 Bivens’ Defendants to the 10th Circuit.

The central issue is whether there is any case ever that the Agents would have known about that alerted them to the potential liability they would suffer personally if they decided to steal money while conducting a raid on someone’s Fourth Amendment protected home. The U.S. tries to couch their argument in phrases like "post deprivation theft" or "after the money was seized" a theft occurred or some derivative thereof placing the theft after the currency was "seized." The District Court rejected this claim by them and held that when, where, and how much was seized, are fact issues for a jury to decide. Anyway, for those of you who have pacer you can down load my brief and the United States Opening Brief at 09-5088 if you choose.

I am also having to defend against the claim that the same attorneys representing the Bivens Defendants in 06-156 (09-5088)(10th Cir.) above have made regarding whether a lien exists against me and a Judgment should be entered against me for the amounts derived from the Bureau of Labor Statistics beginning in 1996 for 1990 through 1996. This case is 08-278 which has been on hold for several months (Northern Judicial District of Oklahoma). As most of you know, the lien was released by a "Certificate of Release" by R.A. Mitchell on August 23, 2007. This is the case where I took 11 depositions where District Director and Internal Revenue District were repeatedly testified to as terminated in or by the year 2000.

When the IRS revoked the "Certificate of Release" at the direction of the Bivens Attorneys for the U.S. DOJ, I was granted a CDP hearing option under Title 26, Section 6320. I exercised that option but on January 9, 2009, after the IRS amended their "manual" on January 9, 2009 (same day), I received a letter saying I was not allowed a CDP hearing without any explanation as to why I was being denied the hearing I had a right to have.

I petitioned tax court in 3781-09L (2009) and the Chief Judge of Tax Court ordered a hearing on September 14, 2009, which was held, and to which Tax Court Judge Paris is to issue an order on the question as to whether a proper notice was sent to me in 1999. In this case, the IRS claims the Tax Court lacks jurisdiction and that the January 9, 2009 Letter is not a "determination." The Chief Judge and Judge Paris decided if the letter deprived me of any right that the letter was a "determination" regardless of the phraseology used on the letter. In this case the IRS claim to have sent the CDP hearing notice back in 1999 to an address that was not my last known address. No one disputes the address used was incorrect. The question is consequences.

Today, November 29, 2009, I filed a Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction in 08-278 which explains the following issue (there are 7 but I only discuss my defense of this one as it relates to the criminal case against me also):


My defense is as follows:

That Title 26, Section 7621 directs

(a) Establishment and alteration -The President shall establish convenient internal revenue districts for the purpose of administering the internal revenue laws. The President may from time to time alter such districts.

(b) Boundaries- For the purpose mentioned in subsection (a), the President may subdivide any State, or the District of Columbia, or may unite into one district two or more States.

I argue that Title 4, Section 72, specifically provides "All offices attached to the seat of government shall be exercised in the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere, except as otherwise expressly provided by law." (This is a quote from Hughes) Hughes v. U.S., 953 F.2d 531, 542 (9th Cir. 1992)(they rely on 4 U.S.C. § 72..., This section does not foreclose the exercise of authority by the IRS outside the District of Columbia. The President is authorized to establish internal revenue districts for the purpose of administering the internal revenue laws, and these districts can be created outside of Washington, D.C. See 26 U.S.C. § 7621.")

My defense is further supported by the statement in Hughes which says:

"[23 Next, the Hugheses claim that the IRS cannot prevail because there is "no evidence of any delegated authority from the Secretary of Treasury to the various known or unknown agents involved." Relevant statutes and regulations demonstrate, however, that the Secretary does have the power to collect taxes, and that such power can be delegated to local IRS agents. 26 U.S.C. § 6301 provides that "[t]he Secretary shall collect the taxes imposed by the internal revenue laws." The actual task of collecting the taxes, however, has been delegated to local IRS directors. "The taxes imposed by the internal revenue laws shall be collected by district directors of internal revenue." 26 C.F.R. § 301.6301-1. District directors in turn are authorized to redelegate the levy power to lower level officials such as collection officers. See IRS Delegation Order 191. The delegation of authority down the chain of command, from the Secretary, to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, to local IRS employees constitutes a valid delegation by the Secretary to the Commissioner, and a redelegation by the Commissioner to the delegated officers and employees. See 26 C.F.R. § 301.7701-9. Therefore, the agents involved in the case at bar were acting within their authority when they collected taxes from the Hugheses."

I am arguing that the President of the United State "abolished internal revenue districts as of October 1, 2000." (I have attached an Exhibit 2 which the U.S. DOJ admitted on May 29, 2009 in 09-cr-043 that all Internal Revenue Districts were abolished)(I argue it is the President who abolished the Internal Revenue Districts under Title 26, Section 7621 and not Congress in any statute) See Exhibit 2 which cites "Testimony of David C. Williams, Inspector General, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, dated May 8, 2001, Implementation of the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Joint Hearing Before Committees of the United States Senate and United States House of Representatives." Without an Internal Revenue District there would be no boundary to identify and assign Internal Revenue District Directors. You can read his testimony at:


I argue that 26 CFR 301.6331-1 is entitled "Levy and distraint" and states "(a) Authority to levy—(1) In general. If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the tax within 10 days after notice and demand, the district director to whom the assessment is charged (or, upon his request, any other district director) may proceed to collect the tax by levy. The district director may levy upon any property, or rights to property, whether real or personal, tangible or intangible, belonging to the taxpayer. The district director may also levy upon property with respect to which there is a lien provided by section 6321 or 6324 for the payment of the tax."

I further argue that Title 26, Section 6322 clearly places the lien to arise at the time the "assessment" is made and assessments are made under 26 CFR 301.6203-1 by "The district director and the director of the regional service center" who "shall appoint one or more assessment officers. The district director shall also appoint assessment officers in a Service Center servicing his district. The assessment shall be made by an assessment officer signing the summary record of assessment. The summary record, through supporting records, shall provide identification of the taxpayer, the character of the liability assessed, the taxable period, if applicable, and the amount of the assessment."

I argue Officer Rice is not the "Secretary" under any Internal Revenue Law nor is he the Secretary of the Treasury. He likewise is no "delegate" of the Secretary or Secretary of the Treasury. The only way Officer Rice can exercise any authority of the Secretary is if he meets the definition under Title 26, Section 7701(a)(11)(B) which means the Secretary of the Treasury or his "delegate."

I point out that under

Title 26, Section 7701(a)(11) entitled "Secretary of the Treasury and Secretary" and defines (A) Secretary of the Treasury - The term "Secretary of the Treasury" means the Secretary of the Treasury, personally, and shall not include any delegate of his. (B) Secretary - The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate. (12) Delegate (A) In general - The term "or his delegate"— (i) when used with reference to the Secretary of the Treasury, means any officer, employee, or agency of the Treasury Department duly authorized by the Secretary of the Treasury directly, or indirectly by one or more redelegations of authority, to perform the function mentioned or described in the context; and (ii) when used with reference to any other official of the United States, shall be similarly construed.

I argue further that 26 CFR 301.7701-9(2009) entitled "Secretary or his delegate" defines the terms to mean "the Secretary of the Treasury, or any officer, employee, or agency of the Treasury Department duly authorized by the Secretary to perform the function mentioned or described in the context, and the term ‘or his delegate’ when used in connection with any other official of the United States shall be similarly construed."

I then argue that any Levy issued by Officer Rice would be in violation of several Federal Laws and Regulations. First, there exists no Internal Revenue District or District Director encompassing the State of Oklahoma and particularly where Springer lives.

Next, I argue that under 26 CFR 601.101(2009) the Secretary promulgates "General Procedural Rules" and in "Introduction" states "(a) General. The Internal Revenue Service is a bureau of the Department of the Treasury under the immediate direction of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The Commissioner has general superintendence of the assessment and collection of all taxes imposed by any law providing internal revenue. The Internal Revenue Service is the agency by which these functions are performed. Within an internal revenue district the internal revenue laws are administered by a district director of internal revenue."

I then argue in addition, Officer Rice is not the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary. That Officer Rice has no delegation of authority under Title 26, section 7701(a)(11), 7701(a)(12), 6301, 6331, nor any authority under 26 CFR 26 CFR 301.7701-9, 301.7701-10, 301.6301-1, and 26 CFR 301.6331-1 to levy the property interests of Lindsey Kent Springer within the boundaries of the State of Oklahoma or County of Creek.

I will let you know of any response the United States or Court makes as soon as it happens.

The last issue and probably the most important is that on Monday, a Petition for Writ of Mandamus is being docketed in the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit by attorney Jerold Barringer out of Nokomis Illinois. You all may remember he was the attorney in 08-9004 (available on Pacer) where the 10th Circuit stated that the Commissioner made a frivolous argument related to the merits of my Paperwork Reduction Act claims against the Form 1040 characterizing three previous appeal decisions by the 10th Circuit. You will also remember the 10th Circuit, in their published opinion, stated that I raised difficult issues between the tax code and the Paperwork Reduction Act involving Form 1040.

In Mr. Barringer’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus he raises the following issues for immediate relief on my behalf:

(A) whether Honorable Judge Stephen P. Friot has a commission to hold office of the United States’ Northern Judicial District of Oklahoma, based upon his commission to hold office in the United States’ Western District of Oklahoma, dated November 4, 2001;

(B) whether the undisputed fact that the Internal Revenue Districts encompassing the State of Oklahoma were abolished by the President of the United States (or his designate) by year end 1999, renders void and makes wholly absent the Jurisdiction and Venue of the United States’ Northern Judicial District of Oklahoma, over offenses derived from the "internal revenue laws" alleged in the Grand Jury Indictment dated March 10, 2009 to have began in the year 2000 through 2007. [Remember 4 U.S.C. section 72 and 26 U.S.C. section 7621]

(C) whether the Public Protection Provision, Title 44, Section 3512(a) prohibits imposition of penalty for willful failure to file Form 1040 (not withstanding any other provision of law), upon Springer by any Article III Court, where the undisputed fact is that the Form 1040, which is inexorably linked to each of the Six Counts of the March 10, 2009 Grand Jury Indictment levied against Springer, failed in every way to comply with either the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 or 1995, and/or with Office of Management and Budget Regulations requiring certification of compliance by the Chief Information Officer of the Internal Revenue Service for years 2000 through 2007.

Once there is a docket number tomorrow from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, I will send that number out so each of you can find a way to obtain what Mr. Barringer has stated as an officer of the Court in his Petition for Writ of Mandamus on my behalf.

The District Court has not restrained me from receiving support for myself so I can defend myself. I do appreciate all the support you can throw my way. I can receive support at either Paypal through lindsey@mindspring.com or I can also receive any form of currency, including checks and money orders, in the name of Lindsey Springer only and at 5147 S. Harvard, # 116, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74135. Thank you for your consideration in supporting me in these matters.

November 30, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Climate Gate Documentary from Alex Jones


Great production by Alex Jones about the CimateGate Controversy. Interviews with prominent anti-anthropogenic global warming scientists, telling how they are harassed by the GW community.  Brings to light the substance behind the hacked East Anglia Emails.  ~Jim Azzola

November 28, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Freedom Watch

FREEDOM WATCH is information pertaining to 
government abuse of power, trashing of
the Constitution, illegal immigration,
2nd Amendment, political correctness
run amok, etc.
It is FREE and sent to you via E-mail.
To subscribe send an e-mail to:


Get paid on every purchase by your Friends through 10
degrees of separation! Save Money! Make Money! FREE
No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.
– James Madison


Congress Must Stop the Trial in New York City
by Phyllis Schlafly

What Can We Learn from 1860?
By Linda Brady Traynham

An Open Letter to Glenn Beck
Tom DiLorenzo on the 5 Pledges.

ClimateGate For Dummies
Steve Watson & Paul Joseph Watson

Aaron Russo

National Inflation Association

Practical Internet Privacy – PostScript
by Paul Green

November 28, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Vote Ron Paul: News Update 11-28-2009

Shocking H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Miscarriage Stories From Pregnant Women
U.S. health authorities have made pregnant women one of the highest priority groups for getting the H1N1 swine flu vaccine, but is it actually safe for pregnant women and their babies?
Continue Reading
Lord Monckton: Shut Down The UN, Arrest The Climate Change Criminals
Appearing on The Alex Jones Show yesterday, Lord Christopher Monckton went further than ever before in his vehement opposition to the elitists running the climate change scam, calling for the UN to be shut down and for fraudulent peddlers of global warming propaganda like Al Gore to be arrested and criminally prosecuted.
Continue Reading and Listen to Interview
ClimateGate For Dummies
A plethora of documented sources.
Gold, Freedom and the Fed
With the possible exception of the Internal Revenue Service, the federal agency that is the greatest threat to the financial well-being and freedom of the American people is the Federal Reserve.
Relive the Ron Paul Presidential Campaign
The Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign was an experience like none other, as it united people from all backgrounds and beliefs in pursuit of restoring our freedoms.
Reporter Who Foresaw Subprime Crisis, Dies at 52
Mark Pittman, the award-winning investigative reporter whose fight to open the Federal Reserve to more scrutiny led Bloomberg News to sue the central bank and win, died Nov. 25 in Yonkers, New York.
The Continuing Fallacy of "Government Creating Jobs"
Will this myth never die?
Elliot Spitzer Supports Ron Paul on MSNBC
In Liberty,



47 W. Polk St. Suite 100-408, Chicago, IL 60605

November 28, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink


Please forward...
Search more than 300,000 American Manufacturers

November 28, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Relive the Ron Paul Presidential Campaign

November 27, 2009

Dear C4L Member,

C4L is happy to announce that we have now added the For Liberty: How the Ron Paul Revolution Watered the Withered Tree of Liberty DVD to our online store!

The Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign was an experience like none other, as it united people from all backgrounds and beliefs in pursuit of restoring our freedoms.  It also ultimately gave birth to Campaign for Liberty.

For Liberty: How the Ron Paul Revolution Watered the Withered Tree of Libertydocuments this pivotal moment in our nation's history - from the quiet murmurings of a possible Ron Paul presidential run in 2007 to the explosive movement that has since shaken the political and media establishment.
Learn to what lengths individuals were willing to go to combat the disintegration of the Republic, as grassroots activists and patriotic heavyweights alike recount their experiences with the Tea Parties, the historic Moneybombs, and much more.
For Liberty recaptures the emotional highs and lows of Ron Paul's 2008 presidential campaign. This grassroots-produced documentary not only preserves a piece of American political history, but it is guaranteed to encourage future generations of freedom fighters.
Bestselling author and historian Tom Woods says For Liberty, "Knocked it out of the park!"  And Marc Gallagher of LibertyMaven.com believes, "This is not just a story about the Ron Paul Revolution. It is a blueprint for a better America."
Click on the image below to view the For Liberty trailer:
You can now purchase your own copy of For Liberty: How the Ron Paul Revolution Watered the Withered Tree of Liberty from the C4L online store for $19.95. As always, Local Coordinators receive an additional 20% off - making the price only $15.96!
And for a limited time, both For Liberty and Ron Paul Presents: The Rally for the Republic DVDs can be yours for a special price of only $35.99.
Ron Paul Presents: The Rally for the Republic brings you the freedom movement's biggest celebration, when 12,000 activists gathered in Minneapolis, Minnesota to celebrate our beliefs and officially kick off Campaign for Liberty.  This 3-disc set includes speeches from Ron Paul, Tom Woods, Barry Goldwater, Jr., and more, as well as highlights from the Rally and a mini-documentary about C4L's three days of events in Minnesota.
Available in time for the holiday season, spread the message to family and friends and continue the Revolution with For Liberty and Rally for the Republic DVDs!
In Liberty,
Matt Holdridge
Director of Marketing
Campaign for Liberty

P.S. You can now purchase your own copy of For Liberty: How the Ron Paul Revolution Watered the Withered Tree of Liberty from the C4L online store for $19.95. As always, Local Coordinators receive an additional 20% off - making the price only $15.96!

November 28, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Vote Ron Paul: News Update 11-27-2009

CNBC vs. Senator Inhofe on Climate Change Hoax
James M. Inhofe is a U.S. Senator representing Oklahoma.   The CNBC anchor is totally clueless and pales before Inhofe's presentation of the truth.
Watch Video
Ron Paul on Montel Williams 11/25
Ron Paul comments on the wars, the military industrial complex, Sarah Palin, third parties and Thanksgiving.
Listen to Interview
Were Swine Flu Death Projections Hyped?
The 2009 H1N1 swine flu "pandemic" may turn out to be one of the most overblown and expensive medical crises in modern history.
Continue Reading
BBC Climate Correspondent Was Forwarded CRU Emails Five Weeks Before They Were Made Public
A BBC Weather presenter who was discussed by scientists in the "climategate" emails says he was forwarded the material more than five weeks before it was made public on the internet.
Continue Reading
In Liberty,


47 W. Polk St. Suite 100-408, Chicago, IL 60605

November 27, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink