« December 2009 | Main | February 2010 »

Ron Paul's State of the Republic Address / Money bomb starts tonight at midnight

Posted: 04 Nov 2009 06:06 PM PST


The ThisNovember5th.com money bomb starts tonight at midnight EST.

Please visit www.ThisNovember5th.com for a full listing of candidates.  All contributions are to be made directly at the candidate websites.

There will be a live broadcast from Orange County, CA from 7:00pm to 8:00 PST.  Click for more details:
http://www.billhuntforsheriff2010.com/this-november-5th-live-webcast-fundraiser

Please forward this message and spread the word.

Thank you.

Trevor Lyman

January 31, 2010 in Current Affairs | Permalink

[ V I D E O ] REALITY REPORT 29 - The State of the Union Response

REALITY REPORT 29 - SPECIAL EDITION - The State of the Union Response 
 

 
RR-29 | In the first Reality Report for 2010 Gary Franchi responds to President Obama's first State of the Union speech..
 
If link is not clickable please copy and paste  above link into your browser's address bar.
 
Please help us spread the word and forward this video to your friends, family and co-workers, post it in your favorite blogs and forums, share it on Myspace, Facebook, and Twitter, publish it to Digg, Reddit, Technorati and the like. We are counting on you!
 
 
 
Video Embed Code:
<embed src="http://blip.tv/play/g68PgcGvRQI%2Em4v" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="350" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed>  
 
 
Enjoy this edition of the Reality Report and please support our efforts by sharing our videos.

Yours in Truth!

Gary Franchi
RestoreTheRepublic!

P.S. Download this show to burn to DVD for broadcast on your local public access station.
Click here for the FLV file: DOWNLOAD NOW
Click here for the MP3 file: DOWNLOAD NOW

January 29, 2010 in Current Affairs | Permalink

GM Corn Shown to Cause Organ Failure

Hi Juan,

I just read a very apt description of genetically-modified (GM) vegetables: Frankenfood. But what's scariest about GM crops is not simply that they are manipulating DNA, but that they are not testing it before they sell it to the public to be consumed!

Tell the FDA to take GM corn off the market until a 2-year study is done. >>

A recent study published in the International Journal of Biological Sciences has shown that three GM corn crops produced by Monsanto caused kidney and liver damage as well as some heart, adrenal, spleen and blood damage in rats.

This is some of the first news about this type of study because it is one of the first. The FDA allowed Monsanto to simply re-assure them that the foods were safe, and they were put on the market. Now we see that these foods are potentially hazardous to our health. This is a disgrace!

The FDA is putting the American people at risk. Tell them to put safety over profits. Act now! >>

Thank you for standing up for what's right.

Sincerely,

Emily
Care2 and ThePetitionSite Team

January 29, 2010 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Vote Ron Paul: News Update 1-29-2010

Debra Medina on the Alex Jones Show 1/28
 
Debra Medina gives a report on her Campaign for Texas Governor and discusses the importance of getting out to vote.  Mrs. Medina, "I Will Be A Governor For The People".
 
 
 
 
Ron Paul at Loyola University 1/27
 
Congressman Ron Paul spoke before a capacity audience at Loyola University in Baltimore, MD.  He urged the U.S. Congress to pass a law authorizing the auditing of "The Fed." Rep. Paul was also sharply critical of the bailout of the Wall Street Banksters and how their policies, and the policies of "The Fed," have contributed to the recession.
 
 
 
 
The Walls Street Journal covers Debra Medina
 
New Face Upends Texas Governor Race, Old Guard Caught Off Guard.
 
 
 
 
Edge of Darkness: The Return of Mel Gibson
 
Our favorite Hollywood Patriot is back in theaters today with his latest film, Edge of Darkness, Mel's first acting role since Signs in 2002.  In a recent interview UK's Daily Mail, Mel got political.
 
 
 
 
Gerald Celente on Russia Today discussing Obama's State of the Union Pep Rally
 
The morning after Barack Obama's first State of the Union speech, Gerald Celente says that the speech was just political theater and that nothing has changed. And, as Ben Bernanke comes up for a reconfirmation vote, Celente says that the system needs to cleanse itself and stop propping up failure.
 
 
 
 
Geithner Grilled! VIDEOS
 
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner questioned over the bailout of AIG.
 
 
 
 
Mossad Orchestrated Christmas Day Bomb Plot
 
The Nigerian terrorist suspect accused of attempting to blow up a US airliner on Christmas Day had been arranged by the Israeli-owned 'International Consultants on Targeted Security' to perform a "walk around" without a passport in Amsterdam.
 
 
 
 
Obama: The People Do Not Understand
 
Skimming the State of the Union address from last night, these tidbits stood out.
 
 
 
 
In Liberty,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




  










 


 

 
  
 

47 W. Polk St. Suite 100-408, Chicago, IL 60605

January 29, 2010 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Re: Private Attorney General comments re: "States Can Tell Feds to Shove It," by Sheriff Richard Mack (Ret.) (1/25/2010)

Many thanks, Robert, for your kind words below ...

See also my recent exchange with author Michael LeMieux
on this very same subject:

http://www.newswithviews.com/LeMieux/michael108.htm

Date: Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:59 AM
Subject: Re: constitutiondenied.com-Form Submission
To: Michael LeMieux <author@constitutiondenied.com>

Cc: SupremeLaw <supremelaw@googlegroups.com>


Many thanks, Michael.

You have entered into a discussion of what we believe is one of  THE most important frauds ever to originate in the CON-gress of the United States.

[IQ Test for Senators and Representatives:  What are the first three letters of "Congress"?]


Just a few more points to help clarify -- and synchronize -- the debate on this all important issue:

(1)  "Citizen" is consistently spelled with an UPPER-CASE "C" in the organic (organizing) version of the U.S. Constitution, before the Bill of Rights was ratified:

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/quals.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/18stat18.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/18stat23.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/18stat24.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/18stat26.gif


(2)  "citizen" is consistently spelled with a lower-case "c" in the 1866 Civil Rights Act and in the so-called 14th amendment [sic]:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/1866cra/
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/1866cra/1866.cra.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#14th-amend


(3)  the problem identified in the Dred Scott decision could have been easily rectified, as directed by Chief Justice Taney, by amending the Constitution
as follows:

"The status of Citizen of one of the United States of America shall not be denied, or abridged, by the United States or by any State, on account of race."

This qualifier -- one of -- also occurs in key places in the historical record e.g.:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sanmarco/complain.htm#one-of


(4)  note the careful wording above, which clearly intends to distinguish "United States of America" from "United States": this distinction is maintained in Federal statutes even today; [however] the term "United States" in those Qualifications Clauses means "States united":  People v. De La Guerra; see also 28 U.S.C. 1746:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm#Q16  (explained here)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1746.html
(latter is the ONLY place in Title 28 where "USA" occurs)


(5)  even if it had been properly ratified -- which it was NOT -- Courts have ruled that the so-called Fourteenth amendment was merely declaratory of existing law -- that "existing law" being the 1866 Civil Rights Act;


(6)  that Act is demonstrably void for vagueness for attempting to confuse "Citizens" and "citizens", and by failing to define "United States" as it should have been defined -- i.e. to refer to Congress acting in its capacity as the Legislature for the federal zone, where Congress has EXCLUSIVE legislative jurisdiction: (7)  as such, even if it is constitutional (which is entirely doubtful), the 1866 Civil Rights Act was, and still is, Federal MUNICIPAL law, limited in its territorial reach to D.C., Federal Territories and Possessions, and all Federal enclaves, but NOT within any of the several (now 50) States of the Union;


(8)  the existence of two (2) classes of citizens can even be inferred from the very language of the so-called Fourteenth amendment: note well that a second "privileges and immunities" clause would NOT have been required if State Citizenship had been conferred upon all black slaves freed by the Thirteenth Amendment, because as State Citizens they would have been automatically protected by the organic Privileges and Immunities Clause [4:2:1]:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#4:2:1


(9)  the real (dead?) giveaway in the so-called Fourteenth amendment is Section 4: the validity of the public debt shall not be questioned: WHAT DID THAT HAVE TO DO WITH CONFERRING CITIZENSHIP OF EITHER CLASS UPON FREED BLACKS? ANSWER: NOTHING!!

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/lyon/tdocws.htm
(only one error [I could find] in this essay:  "USA" is not a corporation)


(10)  when all is said and done, the vague term "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" in Section 1 means "subject to the MUNICIPAL jurisdiction of the Congress":

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm#Q6


Conclusions:  both the 1866 Civil Rights Act and the so-called Fourteenth amendment were unconstitutional ab initio. Unconstitutionality dates from the moment of enactment, not from any decision so branding the Acts in question:


http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/knudson/judnot09.htm#dyett  (27 < 28:  always has been!!!)

     In order  to have 27 states ratify the Fourteenth Amendment,
it was  necessary to  count those states which had first rejected
and then  under the  duress of  military occupation had ratified,
and then  also to count those states which initially ratified but
subsequently rejected the proposal.
     To leave  such dishonest  counting to  a fractional  part of
Congress is  dangerous in  the extreme.  What is  to prevent  any
political party  having control  of both  houses of Congress from
refusing to  seat the  opposition and then without more passing a
joint resolution  to the  effect that the Constitution is amended
and that  it is  the duty  of the  Administrator of  the  General
Services Administration (7) to proclaim  the adoption?  Would the
Supreme Court  of the  United States  still say  the problem  was
political  and   refuse  to   determine  whether   constitutional
standards had been met?
     How can  it be  conceived in  the minds  of  anyone  that  a
combination of  powerful states can by force of arms deny another
state a  right to  have representation  in Congress  until it has
ratified an  amendment which its people  oppose?  The  Fourteenth
Amendment was  adopted by  means almost  as bad as that suggested
above.



http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chaptr10.htm


            The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose;  since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.  An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed.  Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be[,] had the statute not been enacted.

 

            Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it ....

 

            A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one.  An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law.  Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.

 

            No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it.

 

[16 Am Jur 2d, Sec. 177, emphasis added]


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm
(Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm
(Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

___

From: Robert-Garvin: Moore <robertgarvin@prodigy.net>
To: paulandrewmitchell2004@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:56:42 PM
Subject: Private Attorney General comments re: "States Can Tell Feds to Shove It," by Sheriff Richard Mack (Ret.) (1/25/2010)

Excellent job Paul!

//Robert//


 

----- Forwarded Message ----

From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
To: sheriffmack@hotmail.com
Cc: Henry Makow <henry@savethemales.ca>; SupremeLaw <supremelaw@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tue, January 26, 2010 8:59:28 AM
Subject: Private Attorney General comments re: "States Can Tell Feds to Shove It," by Sheriff Richard Mack (Ret.) (1/25/2010)

http://www.henrymakow.com/the_states_can_tell_the_feds_t.html

Greetings Richard and Henry:

I do appreciate the positive sentiments and pertinent authorities which you documented in this recent essay entitled "States Can Tell Feds to Shove it".

Congratulations!  I believe that all Americans need to study that excellent piece.

I do wish you had taken the next step after citing Article I, Section 8: the Clause at 1:8:17 is a very important key to understanding why the Republic is devolved into near extinction, of late:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#1:8:17
("exclusive" here means no State jurisdiction whatsoever)

And, this key Clause is THE reason why D.C. cannot join the Union without a Constitutional Amendment expressly permitting it to do so.


If you will take the time to review the articles we have authored and assembled concerning the failed Fourteenth amendment [sic] and the ugly legal consequences of its historical aftermath, it shouldn't be too difficult for men of your intelligence to see how all of the following have served to empower the Feds and to dis-empower the States and their Citizens (UPPER-CASE "C"):

(1)  federal citizenship is a Federal MUNICIPAL franchise domiciled in D.C.;

(2)  there was only one class of State Citizens prior to the Civil War,
and thus prior to 1866;

(3)  the 1866 Civil Rights Act originally created federal citizenship, and it too was Federal MUNICIPAL law:  it could not and did not amend any of the Qualifications Clauses which mention State Citizens ONLY; in point of fact, those Clauses have never been amended;

(4)  similarly, the "Citizens" mentioned in the Arising Under Clause and in the Privileges and Immunities Clause were likewise State Citizens ONLY (there was only one class of State Citizens between 1788 and 1866);

(5)  without belaboring any of the other important historical details, it is now clear that the population of federal citizens who inhabit the 50 States are an absolute legislative democracy that is domiciled in D.C.;

(6)  federal citizens owe their allegiance to a jurisdiction which is not protected by the Guarantee Clause;  strictly construed as it should be, that Guarantee Clause only guarantees a Republic Form of Government to the 50 States, NOT to the "United States" (federal government) read "D.C.";

(7)  the consequences of this fraudulent scheme have been numerous, far-reaching and long-lasting, e.g.:

(a)  presently only federal citizens can vote and serve on juries, whether grand juries or trial juries, whether criminal or civil juries;

(b)  only State Citizens can serve in the House, Senate or White House
(remember here:  the Qualifications Clauses have never been amended: as such, they retain today the meaning they had when they were first ratified on June 21, 1788 -- my birthday, by the way :)

(c)  therefore, those who are qualified to be federal lawmakers cannot vote or serve on any juries -- State or federal, civil or criminal, grand or petit juries!

(d)  those who are eligible to vote and serve on juries are not qualified to be federal lawmakers [or to serve in the White House];

(8)  this obviously twisted situation has already been well documented in litigation, e.g. see these documents, for starters:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/twoclass.htm  (and all links at the end)
http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/before.and.after.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/bohica.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/subpoena/letter.to.consul.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/votingaz.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/jurychal.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/opening.htm#topic-a
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/usdc/staydcus.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/append-y.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/14amrec/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/knudson/judnot09.htm#dyett  (27 < 28 -- always has been, always will be!)


Now you know why the Feds persist in harping on "democracy in America": in doing so, they are using false propaganda to perpetuate a majority of federal citizens who presently populate the 50 States, while doing everything within their power to ignore the State Citizens who also inhabit those same 50 States.


Keep up the good work!



--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

January 28, 2010 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Freedom Watch

FREEDOM WATCH is information pertaining to 
government abuse of power, trashing of
the Constitution, illegal immigration,
2nd Amendment, political correctness
run amok, etc.
It is FREE and sent to you via E-mail.
To subscribe send an e-mail to:
FreedomWatch-subscribe@topica.com

FREEDOM WATCH
http://fwatch.blogspot.com/
 
"A bureaucrat is the most despicable of men, though he is needed as vultures are needed, but one hardly admires vultures whom bureaucrats so strangely resemble. I have yet to meet a bureaucrat who was not petty, dull, almost witless, crafty or stupid, an oppressor or a thief, a holder of little authority in which he delights, as a boy delights in possessing a vicious dog. Who can trust such creatures?"
 
-- Cicero
 

   ***********************
 

The State of the Nation: I am afraid
By John W. Whitehead
The Rutherford Institute
http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/commentary.asp?record_id=631
 

Judicial Watch Announces List of Washington's "Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians" for 2009
http://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2009/dec/judicial-watch-announces-list-washington-s-ten-most-wanted-corrupt-politicians-2009
 

Girl forced to get swine-flu shot despite objections
Irate dad: 'My daughter said no and they didn't bother to contact me or my wife'
--San Diego Union-Tribune
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jan/25/middle-school-investigates-flu-shot/
 

Killer way to slay the Google beast!
'They're telling us they will turn data over to the feds'
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123391
 

January 28, 2010 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Matthew Falconer for Orange County Mayor: Mortgaging our children's future

 I traveled to Tampa today to ask President Obama to stop mortgaging our children's future. I stood in the front row and asked this question and he did not answer. I went there so that he would know there are over 100 million Americans who do not agree that he should borrow money to spend on projects that taxpayers did not ask for and we cannot afford.

With our nation debt approaching $12 trillion, our government continues to spend money as if we do not have to pay it back.

Even if we ignore that fact there is no demand for high speed rail, or the fact that the additional taxes to pay for this project will cause harm to our economy, we cannot escape the fact that our mounting debt will jeopardize the future for our children.
 

My opponents, Bill Segal and Linda Stewart, where there applauding this reckless spending and mounting debt. Teresa Pelosi Jacobs and Mildred Fernandez both support unfunded rail projects. They have not figured out how we will pay for commuter rail and they are celebrating a new multi-billion dollar government project.

I pledge not to waste taxpayer money and put our children further into debt.

I pledge to put Taxpayers First

 

Please forward to all of your friends and consider a donation to our campaign
by logging onto http://www.matthewfalconer.com/contribute.htm
 

Matthew Falconer
www.MatthewFalconer.com
Matthew@MatthewFalconer.com

January 28, 2010 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Vote Ron Paul: News Update 1-28-2009

Ron Paul on Fox Business 1/27
 
Congressman Ron Paul talks about Tim Geithner's testimony at the January 27, 2010 hearing on AIG.
 
 
 
 
Ron Paul on CNN 1/27
 
Dr. Paul discusses the State of the Union.

 
 
 
Ron Paul on the Joe Scarborough Show 1/26
 
Dr. Paul discussing the economic insanity of Washington politicians.
 
 
 
Rand Paul on Freedom Watch 1/27
 
Judge Andrew Napolitano welcomes guests Rand Paul, Adam Adrzejewski and Walter Block.
 
 
 
 
Debra Medina on the Lynn Woolley Radio Show 1/27
 
Debra Medina talks to Lynn Woolley about her campaign for Texas governor against Rick Perry and Kay Bailey Hutchison. Topics covered include nullification, interposition, transportation, and the debates.
 
 
 
 
Lew Rockwell on Freedom Watch 1/26

Judge Andrew Napolitano welcomes Lew Rockwell, founder of the Ludwig von Mises Institute.
 
 
 
 
Presidential Assassinations of U.S. Citizens
 
American citizens are now being placed on a secret "hit list" of people whom the President has personally authorized to be killed.
 
 
 
 
In Liberty,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

47 W. Polk St. Suite 100-408, Chicago, IL 60605

January 28, 2010 in Current Affairs | Permalink

TRAFFIC v. DRIVING Eddie Craig tells it again!!!! TELECONFERENCE CALL - Thursday - TONIGHT

Public Service Announcement:

THIS 
  
T H U R S D A Y    CALL

 


[]

 

CONFERENCE CALL

 

 

This call is going to touch on the NEW Common Law Course in addition to the 'pearls of wisdom' that flow from Eddie Craig.

 

So, if you want to learn how you can accomplish this Offensive Posture for yourself, listen to and participate in the Free Tele-Conference Calls most every evening of the week.  See the ‘Free Tele-Conferences’ TAB at www.YourRemedyIsInTheLaw.com. There are also the Archives to view two years of historical conference calls!

 

 

I also encourage you to purchase the 24 hour JurisDictionary Course found at the products and services page at www.YourRemedyIsInTheLaw.com.  This course is the absolute minimum entry level for anyone who is anticipating having to deal with a lawful issue.   It will be the best 24 hours you have ever spent!  I have heard it said this course, when completely understood by you, could put you on par with 85% of the lawyers you may come across.

 

 

The Phone Numbers and Pins are published at http://www.YourRemedyIsInTheLaw.com behind the Free Tele-Conference tab.   Enter with your User Name and Password.  If you don’t have one, click onNew? REGISTER HERE and create your unique User Name and Password.  Information is available only to registered members.   Click on Free Tele-Conference Calls and you will see the correct information.

 

I encourage you to call in to this night's free tele-conference call with Randy Kelton

 

Best regards,

ME

January 28, 2010 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Matthew Falconer for Orange County Mayor: A Call to Action

FUN, FUN, FUN... POLITICAL THERAPY ... FUN, FUN, FUN



On Saturday, January 30th, the Matthew Falconer for Orange County Mayor campaign will have its first precinct walk of the year.  We will meet at 9:00am at the following address:

            2747 Prince John Road

            Winter Park, FL 32792
            (Dan Wall's house, near the intersection of 436 (Semoran Blvd) and University Blvd.

            Google map is here →

http://bit.ly/8XikLk

Our agenda will be as follows:

 

              9:00a.m. - Check-in and Volunteer registration

              9:15a.m. - Campaign update from Matthew Falconer

              9:30a.m. - Training: "Precinct Walking 101"

10:00a.m. - Leave for Walk

Upon return:  Light lunch & Volunteer feedback

 

To help us in our planning efforts, please RSVP to Scott Olver at: Scott@MatthewFalconer.com and review the FAQ below.

 

I look forward to seeing you Saturday!

 

Scott Olver

Campaign Manager

 

FAQ:

 

What should I wear?

We want you to be comfortable.  Please wear comfortable clothing including comfortable walking shoes.  Everyone will receive a Matthew Falconer for Orange County Mayor t-shirt that we will all be wearing during the walk. Please do not wear any other political buttons, hats or clothing.

 

Will there be anything to eat or drink?

Coffee, juice, and doughnuts will be provided during check-in.  We'll also have bottled water to keep you hydrated during the walk.  Upon returning from the walk, a light lunch will be served.

 

 Please forward to all of your friends and consider a donation to our campaign
by logging onto http://www.matthewfalconer.com/contribute.htm

 

Matthew Falconer
www.MatthewFalconer.com
Matthew@MatthewFalconer.com 

January 27, 2010 in Current Affairs | Permalink