« Obama's Authorized Release of Inward Remittance USDollars 4.5 Trillion, of May 2006 to Bank of America-Richmond, Virginia would bring USDollars One Point Five Seven Five Trillion into United States Department of the Treasury | Main | BNVH (Bernard von NotHaus) Convicted. Liberty Dollar Dies »
Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta's message to Anonymous re: BofA (Bank of America)
Date: Sunday, March 20, 2011, 1:07 AM
Why is the United States Government allowing $1.575 trillion that belongs to the American people sit in accounts at major investment banks while taxpayers lose jobs, fight fraudulent foreclosures on their homes, and watch the indebtedness of their grandchildren grow?
In 2006, Bank of America received a CHIPS wire transfer to deposit in the account of Ambassador Lee E. Wanta. The amount? $4.5 trillion on which he agrees to pay the U.S. Treasury $1.575 trillion in taxes. The money was transferred, but Bank of America never gave the Ambassador his money… it disappeared into the black pit of the Federal Reserve System and accounts at various Wall Street investment banks.
How do I know that’s true? At http://wtsnb.blogspot.com is a Writ of Mandamus filed by Ambassador Wanta on June 20, 2007. On the same day a decision on the Writ was handed down, the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond entered a Pleading stating:
"FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND
"Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P. , Respondent Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (“FRB Richmond”) moves to dismiss the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Other Extraordinary Relief (the “Petition”). The grounds of this Motion, as amplified in the attached Brief, are as follow.
"For the purposes of this Motion only, all well pleaded facts will be taken as true."
The Ambassador’s Writ of Mandamus precisely tells of the disappearance of his funds. The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond precisely says “…all well pleaded facts will be taken as true.” No wonder the feds won’t let Bank of America go down the tube. What it must have on them!
As you read the Writ (linked above), remember that the Fed says its content is to “…be taken as true.”
From: pc93Subject: AnonymousTo: <firstname.lastname@example.org>Date: Saturday, March 19, 2011, 10:43 AM