« Private Attorney General's OBJECTIONS Re: The most important lawsuit in American history [sic] that no one in the mainstream media is talking about | Main | Private Attorney General's REPLIES Re: Got a sandwich? by Dinesh D'Souza »

Re: Chris Hedges: The NDAA and the Death of the Democratic State - Truthdig

Teknosis needs your help. * Ways to help Teknosis

___

 

Post main:

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: Chris Hedges: The NDAA and the Death of the Democratic State - Truthdig

 

http://www.blacklistednews.com/VIDEO_-_Chris_Hedges%3A_NDAA_Lawsuit_Update/24190/0/0/0/Y/M.html

Chris Hedges at the hearing for the second court of appeals in the Hedges v Obama NDAA lawsuit. Hedges explains what has happened in the lawsuit to date, the next steps and what he sees in America’s upcoming future.  [end excerpt]




For a list of missing and/or defective credentials for
"robes" seated on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit,
see:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm#SECOND

i.e. click on "NAD" links:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/calabresi.guido/nad.missing.credentials.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/cardamone.richard/affidavit.refused.jpg

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/droney.christopher/affidavit.refused.jpg
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/droney.christopher/commission.refused.jpg

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/feinberg.wilfred/nad.missing.credentials.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/hall.peter/affidavit.refused.jpg

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/katzmann.robert/nad.missing.credentials.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/leval.pierre/nad.missing.credentials.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/livingston.debra/affidavit.refused.jpg

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/lohier.raymond/affidavit.refused.jpg
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/lohier.raymond/commission.refused.jpg

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/parker.barrington/nad.missing.credentials.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/pooler.rosemary/affidavit.refused.jpg

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/sack.robert/affidavit.refused.jpg

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/sotomayor.sonia/nad.missing.credentials.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/straub.chester/affidavit.refused.jpg

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/wesley.richard/affidavit.refused.jpg


http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/United.States.Notice.htm

-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice 

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>wrote:
But ... BUT ... Hedges et al. have done NOTHING
about all the missing credentials:
  REPEATING ...

>  the alternative media is abuzz with this week’s hearing on the constitutionality of the clearly unconstitutional NDAA


And, nobody except a few SupremeLaw subscribers, 
talks about Article VI, Section 3, NOT EVEN the alternative media:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#6:3

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/  <-- see United States' NOTICE below

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/harwood/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/harwood/affidavit.refused.jpg
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/harwood/affidavit.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/harwood/foia.request.1.htm  (IN DEFAULT)

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/torrance/foia.request.1.htm  (PAST DUE)

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm#SECOND

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/lohier.raymond/affidavit.refused.jpg
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/lohier.raymond/commission.refused.jpg

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/droney.christopher/affidavit.refused.jpg
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/droney.christopher/commission.refused.jpg

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/chin.denny/  (has all 4 required credentials)

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/letter.2012-11-19/page01.refused.jpg
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/letter.2012-11-19/page01.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/letter.2012-11-19/page02.refused.jpg
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/letter.2012-11-19/page02.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/letter.2012-10-01/transmittal.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/order.2012-10-02/page01.refused.jpg

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/United.States.Notice.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/opm/letter.2012-08-06/page01.gif (OPM's ADMISSION)
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/omb/letter.2012-08-23/page01.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/omb/letter.2012-08-23/page02.gif (OMB's ADMISSION)
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/omb/letter.2012-08-23/page03.gif


-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice 

February 20, 2013 | Permalink