« August 2013 | Main | October 2013 »

Please forward to Glenn Greenwald re: "The Elites Have Committed Some of the Most Egregious Crimes Imaginable!"

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S." 
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 2:29 PM
Subject: Please forward to Glenn Greenwald re: 
"The Elites Have Committed Some of the Most Egregious Crimes Imaginable!"

Re:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=lBmLwPhqYzU

http://www.theguardian.com/profile/glenn-greenwald


Greetings Mr. Greenwald:

Your Bio above states that you are a former constitutional lawyer.

During your interview with Eliot Spitzer above, several constitutional
errors were made, notably:

America is a Republic, not a "democracy".  That was Spitzer's error, btw.


Strictly speaking, the population of federal citizens who inhabit the 50 States
is an absolute legislative democracy, but not all Americans are federal citizens:
I'm not a federal citizen.


More painfully, when asked, you replied that the "most egregious" crime
during the Bush Administration was the spying on the American People.

How can you honestly hold that opinion when the current body count
in Iraq has now exceeded 2 Million casualties, and journalists as a group
continue to ignore this VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT?


http://supremelaw.org/cc/gwbush/vcc.htm  (see all Exhibits)

... and Patrick's Fitzgerald's obvious obstruction of justice 
by refusing to forward same to a duly convened Federal Grand Jury?

http://supremelaw.org/cc/libby/grand.jury.demand.htm  ("Scooter" Libby case)


Wasn't Paul H. O'Neill fired because he objected to Bush Cabinet meetings
where they were planning to hit Iraq long before 9/11/2001??

O'Neill: Plan to Hit Iraq Began Pre-9/11  [link is not working now]
Washington Post 11/01/04

« Former Treasury Secretary Paul H. O'Neill charged in remarks released Saturday that 
President Bush began planning to oust Saddam Hussein within days of taking office and 
before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 … »


In a related vein, why do you think so many journalists, 
even alternative journalists, are avoiding -- like the plague --
the extensive evidence proving that the Federal courts
in America are extensively infiltrated?

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm

http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/uoregon.edu/memo.ag01.htm

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions.htm  (all their acts are void;  can't even get paid!)

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/United.States.Notice.htm  (COUNTERFEIT SF-61 went viral!!)


You will please find the names of FISA "robes" 
among  those whose mandatory credentials are either missing 
or
 fatally defective! 

(We already made that finding on our own,
and published it on the Internet.)


But, will you insist on reporting future FISA "Court" decisions
when that "Court" is legally VACANT?


As a "former constitutional lawyer," did you or did you NOT 
execute an Oath of Office requiring you to support
the Constitution for the United States of America?

Did you ever read all the way to Article VI?

http://supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#6:3

http://supremelaw.org/cc/aol/criminal.complaint.htm

LIST OF AUTHORITIES

Plaintiff cites the following authorities in support of His VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, to wit:  Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 73 (1932) (“attorneys are officers of the court”); Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co., 987 F.2d 1536, 1546 (11th Cir 1993) (“All attorneys, as officers of the court ....”); Pumphrey v. K.W. Thompson Tool Co., 62 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9thCir. 1995) (see section “II.”);  “Let Us Be Officers of the Court,” by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen, 83 ABA Journal 94 (1997); and FRCP Rule 1, Advisory Committee Notes, 1993 Amendments (“as officers of the court, attorneys share ....”).


p.s.  The film you cited is titled "Minority Report" NOT "Majority Report" [sic]:)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0181689/

-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

September 30, 2013 in Current Affairs | Permalink

D.C. Delegate's Voicemail: "Where's My Bribe?" (Please FORWARD to the FBI in the District of Columbia)

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S."
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 11:22 AM
Subject: 
D.C. Delegate's Voicemail: "Where's My Bribe?" 
(Please FORWARD to the FBI in the District of Columbia)



Please note that Norton is NOT a voting member 
of the U.S. House of Representatives, because
the District of Columbia is not a State of the Union:

http://www.norton.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=199&Itemid=119

District Offices

90 K Street, NE, Suite 100
Washington, D.C. 20001
Phone: 202 408-9041
Fax: 202 408-9048

2041 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave., S.E., Suite 238
Washington, D.C. 20020
Phone:202 678-8900
Fax:202 678-8844 


http://xrepublic.tv/node/4949

Description

Congresswoman [sic] Eleanor Holmes Norton left a voicemail for a lobbyist in which she brazenly begs for a "contribution." 

It's a not-so-subtle reminder of how legalized bribery is the standard operating procedure in Washington. 

Until money is taken out of politics, this kind of corruption will only get worse and worse. 

The Young Turks host Cenk Uygur breaks it down. 

[end quote]


Maybe we should amend the Supremacy Clause
so that it reads:  

STUPIDITY NOW REIGNS SUPREME!

-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

September 29, 2013 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Gutter_Sludge = (Computer Technology + Corrupt Attorneys + Intensified Global Surveillance) ^ 3

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S."
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:53 PM
Subject: Gutter_Sludge = (Computer Technology + Corrupt Attorneys + Intensified Global Surveillance) ^ 3

http://www.jurinspired.com/cases/micron-v-rambus-spoliation

http://www.flhlaw.com/files/Uploads/Documents/Hackman%20Article%20%2801325419%29.PDF

http://www.ilsteamblog.com/2013/01/on-remand-court-explaines-findings-and-sanction-in-rambus-v-micron/


On Remand, Court Explains Findings and Sanction 

in Rambus v. Micron

Our last blog reviewed the ongoing patent litigation case Micron v. Rambus, Civ. No. 00-792-SLR (D. Del.), where the findings of bad faith and prejudice, as well as the sanction, were vacated. 

On remand, what did the court decide?

 
To find bad faith, the court must find the spoliating party “intended to impair the ability of the potential defendant to defend itself.” 

Thus, did Rambus implement its document retention policy to disadvantage Micron, or was it for legitimate business reasons?

Pursuant to its new policy, 1269 of 1270 back up email tapes and 400 boxes of documents were destroyed to prepare for the litigation.


...

After a review of the facts as applied to the three goals of sanctions for evidence spoliation discussed in our last blog, the court considered the lesser sanctions including monetary fines, adverse jury instruction and evidence suppression. 

As those lesser sanctions were not enough to achieve the goals of the sanction in this case, the court dismissed Rambus’ claims against Micron.



[end quote]


Plus, take note of all the UNlicensed California ATTORNeys 
who pounced like parasites on this intellectual property litigation:



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.<supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:30 PM
Subject: Fwd: Rambus was represented by ...


http://www.law360.com/articles/229465/semiconductor-cos-want-rambus-ip-claims-stayed


Micron is represented by Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP. 

Hynix is represented by O'Melveny & Myers LLP and Townsend & Townsend & Crew LLP. 

Nanya is represented by Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.<supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: Rambus was represented by ...
To: "Paul A. Mitchell" <mrfsys@gmail.com>


The case is Rambus v. Micron, case number 06-CV-244
in the U.S. District Court for the District of Northern California.

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/whyte.ronald/
http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/whyte.ronald/nad.certificate.htm  (IN DEFAULT)
 


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.<supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:24 PM
Subject: Rambus was represented by ...


Rambus was represented by:


Munger Tolles & Olson LLP

Los Angeles

355 South Grand Ave.
35th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Phone: (213) 683-9100

San Francisco

560 Mission St.
27th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: (415) 512-4000


Sidley Austin LLP

Los Angeles

555 West Fifth Street
Los Angeles, CA 90013
+1.213.896.6000
+1.213.896.6600 Fax

Palo Alto

1001 Page Mill Road
Building 1
Palo Alto, CA 94304
+1.650.565.7000
+1.650.565.7100 Fax

San Francisco

555 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
+1.415.772.1200
+1.415.772.7400 Fax


McKool Smith PC

Los Angeles

865 South Figueroa St.
Suite 2900
Los Angeles, CA 90017
T: 213.694.1200
F: 213.694.1234

Redwood Shores

255 Shoreline Drive
Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
T: 650.394.1400


-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

September 29, 2013 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Private Attorney General and Inventor Comments Re: "Rambus Loses Major Antitrust Case against Hynix and Micron": Comment dated: Thursday, September 26, 2013

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul A. Mitchell <mrfsys@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM
Subject: 
Private Attorney General and Inventor Comments 
Re: "Rambus Loses Major Antitrust Case against Hynix and Micron": 
Comment dated: Thursday, September 26, 2013

To: support@rambus.com


http://www.anandtech.com/show/5122/rambus-loses-major-antitrust-case-again-hynix-micron


Sorry to jump in so late:  

one key FACT which is being entirely overlooked by most if not all observers of the Rambus saga is the abject criminality of all California attorneys:  

extensive research has proven that not one of the 200,000+ past or present "members" of The State Bar of California has ever had a valid license to practice law in that State.  


See Sec. 6067 of the State Bar Act, for starters.  

Moreover, all U.S. Attorneys stationed anywhere in California are obligated by the McDade Act to have executed the same certificate of oath.  


Conclusion:  every attorney that appeared formally for any of those Proper Parties committed multiple acts of FELONY mail fraud (see PROOFS OF SERVICE) and multiple acts of FELONY wire fraud (e.g. every time they transmitted email or picked up the telephone).  


There were also comments above about "DOJ's Opinion":  

well, those Federal employees are now turning up in droves with fatally defective credentials, as proven by the obvious absence of OMB control numbers and other fatal defectives on their Office of Personnel Management SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS required by 5 U.S.C. 2906 and 3331.  

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/ ]

Hey, folks, I didn't make these laws;  Congress did!  

WAKE UP, California, because the global surveillance "state" is now in your face, and the ATTORNeys are still laughing all the way to the banks who "bankrolled" that R&D.  


p.s. Anand knows nothing about any of this, and I doubt that he even cares.  

Someone should invite him to post a reply here.  

I can't wait: 

one of his employees once accused me falsely of posting pornography on the Internet, but our homepage had been hacked with JAVA malware after a confidential password was stolen from my INBOX.  

Gloves are now OFF here:  I LUV a good fight.  

Now you know why I moved to Seattle.


[end]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul A. Mitchell <mrfsys@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:05 PM
Subject: Recommending that you terminate Julie A. Hopper, for pissing on a multi-million dollar opportunity
To: support@rambus.com


And you call that "public relations"?  NOT!!

(1 million units @ $150.00 MSRP = can your "smart" phones handle this one??  I seriously doubt it.)


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul A. Mitchell <mrfsys@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:49 PM
Subject: Fwd: We are not requesting anything from the Rambus Foundation + clarification of our intent
To: support@rambus.com




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul A. Mitchell <mrfsys@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: We are not requesting anything from the Rambus Foundation + clarification of our intent
To: "Julie A. Hopper" <JAHopper@siliconvalleycf.org>


That's a really lousy policy, Ms. Hopper.

It's no wonder that DDR SDRAM trounced Rambus worldwide.

You can tell your "Execs" exactly how I feel.


If you can't show respect for an IT professional with 40+ years 
of experience, then whom do you respect?
  The NSA?


p.s.  There are no "licensed" attorneys anywhere in California,
and one of your main offices is in California:


http://supremelaw.org/cc/aol2/criminal.complaint.4.htm

So, ask your company "attorneys" to show you their licenses!  

LOL!!


It's no wonder this country is in such bad shape.

-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul A. Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Instructor,
Inventor and Systems Development Consultant

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice 


On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Julie A. Hopper<JAHopper@siliconvalleycf.org> wrote:
Hi Paul, 
In line with my previous email, we do not provide any sort of unsolicited information to Rambus or its executives.
 
Thank you,
 
Julie Hopper
Corporate Philanthropy Manager
Silicon Valley Community Foundation
 
From: Paul A. Mitchell [mailto:mrfsys@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:54 AM
To: Julie A. Hopper
Subject: We are not requesting anything from the Rambus Foundation + clarification of our intent
 
Thank you, Ms. Hopper,

We're not requesting anything from the Rambus Foundation.
We are interested in requesting a Letter of Interest ("LOI")
and/or a Preliminary Quotation to finish the R&D
and manufacture a working prototype for our
utility patent pending.
If you would kindly refer us to the appropriate
Rambus Executive(s), we would appreciate it very much.

We are particularly desirous of knowing if Rambus
has adopted any plans to develop Non-Volatile DRAM.
 
For example, compare spin-torque MRAM e.g. 
http://www.everspin.com/PDF/ST-MRAM_Technical_Brief.pdf
 
Thank you very much, once again, for your time.

-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul A. Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Instructor,
Inventor and Systems Development Consultant

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Julie A. Hopper <JAHopper@siliconvalleycf.org> wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thank you for your emails. As practice, we do not provide unsolicited proposals to Rambus Foundation.
 
Thank you for your time,
 
 
Julie Hopper
Corporate Philanthropy Manager
Silicon Valley Community Foundation
 
[snipped]
  



-- 

September 29, 2013 in Current Affairs | Permalink

FINALLY! HIGHLY RECOMMENDED VIDEO "Military Cancer" exposes the U.S. Military Industrial Complex with superb graphics and passionate voice!

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S." 
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 2:14 PM
Subject: 
FINALLY! HIGHLY RECOMMENDED VIDEO "Military Cancer" 
exposes the U.S. Military Industrial Complex with superb graphics and passionate voice!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHmhrtx9C_4

Published on Aug 28, 2013
 
This video is about the Military Cancer attacking our country



-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

September 29, 2013 in Current Affairs | Permalink

State Department's "Fee Waiver Information Sheet" is REFUSED FOR CAUSE: violates the Paperwork Reduction Act, see 44 U.S.C. 3512(b)

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S." 
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 12:09 PM
Subject: 
State Department's "Fee Waiver Information Sheet" is REFUSED FOR CAUSE: 
violates the Paperwork Reduction Act, see 44 U.S.C. 3512(b)

(more than 20 "business" days have now passed!)
Miranda v. Arizona is here:

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=384&invol=436

Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, 
[ e.g. Oaths of Office required by Article VI, Section 3 ]
there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them. 


"RTS" = Returned TSender


More historical details re: Paperwork Reduction Act are here:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/vroman/visaides.htm
-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.<supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:09 AM
Subject: John F. Kerry now in BIG TROUBLE + Private AttorneyGeneral in USA Comments Re: 
"Sidestepping The 2nd Amendment - Treaty Adds Gov't Power To Regulate Guns - Judge Andrew Napolitano"

September 29, 2013 in Current Affairs | Permalink

John F. Kerry now in BIG TROUBLE + Private Attorney General in USA Comments Re: "Sidestepping The 2nd Amendment - Treaty Adds Gov't Power To Regulate Guns - Judge Andrew Napolitano"

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S."
Cc: xrepublic.tv@contactprivacy.com 
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 11:09 AM
Subject: John F. Kerry now in BIG TROUBLE + Private Attorney General in USA Comments Re: 
"Sidestepping The 2nd Amendment - Treaty Adds Gov't Power To Regulate Guns - Judge Andrew Napolitano"

I posted this comment at that web page:

No Treaty can violate the U.S. Constitution, because all Treaties must be "made under the authority of the United States".  See Supremacy Clause.  

The United States has no authority to abrogate the Second Amendment, and that Amendment remains thesupreme Law of the Land until such time as it is lawfully modified pursuant to Article V in that Constitution -- requiring three-fourths of the 50 States to ratify such a proposal.



Moreover, John Kerry's U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS will bePAST DUE
and IN DEFAULT as of tomorrow, September 27, 2013:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/kerry/
http://supremelaw.org/cc/kerry/foia.request.kerry.htm
(FOIA imposes deadline of 20 "business" days)


p.s.  We did receive written acknowledgment of that FOIA Request 
from the U.S. Department of State, but we have not yet scanned
and archived that correspondence.

-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

September 29, 2013 | Permalink

Activism Studies 101

ASH relays:

THESE COME RECOMMENDED for ADVANCED STUDIES IN "THE SAVAGES WHO OPPRESS US 101"


(Note: the last two URLS are too long, you may have to use a text editor to
rebuild them in their entirety without spaces)

http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/19025-beyond-savage-politics-and-dystopian-nightmares

here are some others I thought you should check out. ----->

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism

"Inverted totalitarianism, unlike classical totalitarianism, does not
revolve around a demagogue or charismatic leader. It finds expression in
the anonymity of the Corporate State. It purports to cherish democracy,
patriotism, and the Constitution while manipulating internal levers."

--Chris Hedges

 and check out this video... it is a must!----->

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AV_c1ElZl7Q

Before I ever heard of Chris Hedges... before I started to really get
involved with researching any of this stuff I wrote on a blog these
exact words that Chris Hedges makes in this video " what we are living
through at this moment is a coup d'etat in slow motion" when I was
referring to what the TBTF banks did in '08. I felt vindicated to hear
Hedges use the same description. Here is some more I want you to read if
you get a chance.

See:
  http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090202_its_not_going_to_be_ok

   http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9175.html

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/07/11/1222725/-Is-America-
An-Inverted-Totalitarian-State-Or-Is-It-On-Its-Way-To-Becoming-One-w-
Poll#




---->  http://www.alternet.org/story/85728/inverted_totalitarianism%
3A_a_new_way_of_understanding_how_the_u.s._is_controlled

September 29, 2013 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Reviewing Episode 2 of Joe Rogan's new show on Smells Like Human Spirit (SLHS) Episode 98

Episode 98: Joe Rogan Questions Everything...Reviewed (Pt. 2)!

Guy Evans of the Smells Like Human Spirit Podcast is joined by James Wilson once again to review the second episode of Joe Rogan's television show, 'Joe Rogan Questions Everything'. Was this episode more compelling than the season premiere? Find out by downloading the podcast!

Subscribe to the Smells Like Human Spirit Podcast on iTunes, follow us on Twitter @smellslikepod and 'like' our Facebook page at FB.com/SmellsLikeHumanSpirit for more great shows and news!

Thanks!

September 29, 2013 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Bank of International Settlements (BIS) announces crash / Urgent

MB relays:
THE BANK OF INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS QUARTERLY REPORT IS ATTACHED.  THEY HAVE BASICALLY SAID THE BANKING SYSTEM HAS FAILED.
 

September 29, 2013 in Current Affairs | Permalink