« MEDIA'S PHONY GROPER ALLEGATIONS FALLING LIKE DOMINOES Common Democrat tactic used to slander, destroy opponents unravels | Main | Fwd: PLEASE FORWARD to Dr. Art Robinson: major problems with Peter DeFazio (Congressman, Roseburg, Oregon) »

Private Attorney General comments re: WaPo: Private prison industry fights Justice Department directive to end the use of contract facilities

 
Our Comment posted today:

The Credential Investigation, launched by our office in August 2001, recently requested APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS for all BOP personnel going back 10 years -- the discovery window authorized by 18 USC 1961(5). 

Not a single credential was disclosed, and every one of those FOIA Requests is now PAST DUE and also IN DEFAULT. 

The Act of Congress at 5 USC 5507 bars federal officers from being paid, if they have not executed valid U.S. OPM Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS. 

Making matters worse, the electronic SF-61 published at OPM's Internet website is a known COUNTERFEIT:  no OMB control number;  no expiration date;  no citation to 5 USC 2903 (Authority to administer);  and the misleading claim"Prior editions not usable" when the only valid SF-61s pre-date August 2002. 

Many of those SF-61s were also "administered" by HR assistants not authorized to do so by 5 USC 2903. 

This whole mess is rendered even more serious by the Oath of Office Clause in the organic U.S. Constitution, which pre-dates the Bill of Rights and has never been amended.



http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil2/  (see FOIA1 thru FOIA10 sub-folders)


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;
Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),
Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)
 
 
 

'Supreme Law Firm' via SupremeLaw

3:43 PM (7 hours ago)
 
to Supreme
 
 
 
 
 
p.s.  Case in point, the SF-61 for Sally Q. Yates is
another COUNTERFEIT:
 


 
 
 
 
Our Comment posted today:

The Credential Investigation, launched by our office in August 2001, recently requested APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS for all BOP personnel going back 10 years -- the discovery window authorized by 18 USC 1961(5). 

Not a single credential was disclosed, and every one of those FOIA Requests is now PAST DUE and also IN DEFAULT. 

The Act of Congress at 5 USC 5507 bars federal officers from being paid, if they have not executed valid U.S. OPM Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS. 

Making matters worse, the electronic SF-61 published at OPM's Internet website is a known COUNTERFEIT:  no OMB control number;  no expiration date;  no citation to 5 USC 2903 (Authority to administer);  and the misleading claim"Prior editions not usable" when the only valid SF-61s pre-date August 2002. 

Many of those SF-61s were also "administered" by HR assistants not authorized to do so by 5 USC 2903. 

This whole mess is rendered even more serious by the Oath of Office Clause in the organic U.S. Constitution, which pre-dates the Bill of Rights and has never been amended.



http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil2/  (see FOIA1 thru FOIA10 sub-folders)


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;
Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),
Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.
 

http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)
 
 

October 18, 2016 in Current Affairs | Permalink