++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

Liberty Dollar Founder Liberated - Liberty Brothers Exclusive Interview

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: J_White - The Liberty Brothers <jim@northwestlibertynews.com>
Date: Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 1:49 PM
Subject: Liberty Dollar Founder Liberated - Liberty Brothers Exclusive Interview
To: supremelawfirm@gmail.com

 
Liberty Dollar Founder in Exclusive Interview
View this email in your browser
 

We were very fortunate to have a great friend of The Liberty Brothers Radio Show, filmmaker 

James Jaeger, on site at the 12th annual Porcfest in Lancaster, New Hampshire.  James, adopting

the role of roving reporter, pulled aside the founder of the Liberty Dollar, Bernard von NotHaus

for an interview.

Liberty Dollar Founder - Liberty Brothers Exclusive

Be well,

Jim White, Co-host - The Liberty Brothers Radio Show
www.thelibertybrothers.com

June 30, 2015 in Current Affairs | Permalink

CARLY FIORINA

FROM THE DENVER POST ABOUT CARLY FIORINA.  WHETHER SHE CAN WIN THE NOMINATION IS AT QUESTION; I THINK THERE’S LITTLE DOUBT SHE’S ONE OF THE MOST QUALIFIED CANDIDATES.  MB
 
Header
June 26, 2015, 1:53 pm

Presidential hopeful Carly Fiorina woos, wows Colorado Republicans

 
 
Presidential hopeful Carly Fiorina and Carl Cannon with RealClearPolitics at the Brown Palace in Denver on Friday. (Lynn Bartels, The Denver Post)

Presidential hopeful Carly Fiorina and Carl Cannon with RealClearPolitics at the Brown Palace in Denver on Friday. (Lynn Bartels, The Denver Post)

Carly Fiorina told Colorado Republicans Friday morning she supports civil unions but not gay marriage, health care policy should be left up to the states and to let “The Donald go do what The Donald’s going to do.”

Fiorina, the former CEO of Hewlett-Packard and the only woman running for president in a crowded Republicans field, got her first round of applause when she talked about energy, which drives Colorado’s economy.

“We should be, we could be, we must be, we will be, if I am president of the United states, a global energy powerhouse in the 21st century,” she said.

 

Fiorina spoke at the Brown Palace in Denver at an event sponsored by RealClearPolitics. She also will address the Western Conservative Summit, which kicks off its three-day gathering in Denver on Friday. She received a warm reception — state Rep. Perry Buck, R-Windsor, cheered as Fiorina took the stage after being introduced by Carl Cannon, the Washington bureau chief for RealClearPolitics.

“I like her because she’s not a politician,” said Buck, who was one of a number of Republican state lawmakers who attended the event. “I like her business smarts and the economy is the most important thing. I do think she has some great international experience that I don’t think some of the other candidates have.”

Fiorina has taken on the Democrats’ frontrunner, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in various speeches since announcing in May she was seeking the GOP nomination for president.

Here’s some of what Fiorina had to say:

GAY MARRIAGE

I support civil unions and I have for a very long time because I do not believe government can discriminate in any way. Everyone should be protected equally under the law. It’s why I provided benefits to same-sex couples way back in 1999 when I came to Hewlett Packard.

On the other hand, marriage means something very specific. I do not think it is the purview of five people on the Supreme court, unelected and unaccountable, to think in their hubris that they have the power to change that. I hope that after this decision we will focus on preserving and protecting religious liberty because there are millions of people who disagree with this decision. I’m one of those people who believes marriage is between a man and a woman.

OBAMACARE

Whatever you thought of the Supreme Court ruling, set that aside. Here are the facts about Obamacare. The law itself was longer than a Harry Potter novel and not nearly as interesting. It was accompanied by tens of thousands pages of regulations. No one understands it. We need to repeal it because it’s too complicated. My own view is we let states manage high-risk pools.

I’m a cancer survivor — I understand you can’t bankrupt the families with pre-existing conditions. If people truly need help we need to give them that. (But the decision needs to be made) in the states, as close as possible to the people impacted by the decisions.

DONALD TRUMP

Let the Donald go do what the Donald’s going to do. I’m going train my fire on Hillary Clinton, on the policies she is trying to lay out for this nation, and talk about why our values and our principles work better to unlock the potential of every American in this country.

THIS AND THAT

* I truly know from having lived and worked all over the world that only in this nation can a young woman start out typing and filing and answering the phones, go on to become the chief executive officer of the largest technology company of the world and run for the presidency of the United States.

* I’m not a professional politician but I’m not a political neophyte. I played a very active role in two presidential campaigns, I ran my own Senate campaign in the state of California. I spent last year helping other people win, including here in Colorado with Cory Gardner.

* Of course my business record is fair game. I led Hewlett-Packard for six years. It was a very difficult time. We had the dot.com bust, 9/11, the worst technology recession in 25 years.

CEO PAY, AN ISSUE RAISED BY CLINTON

You have to let shareholders vote on it and you have to be utterly transparent. Those were the rules that applied when I was the chief executive. I changed the rule so shareholders would vote on my pay.

But I don’t hear Hillary ever saying a baseball player makes too much, a Hollywood mogul makes too much, my husband made too much when he got $500,000 for a speech, gee, it wasn’t right that we accepted tens of millions of dollars from foreign governments while I was secretary of state.

CYBER ATTACK

How is is that the Office of Personnel Management couldn’t manage to push back against a Chinese cyber attack. I’ve advised two secretaries of defense, a secretary of state, a secretary of homeland security. We have known without a doubt for at least 12 years that the Chinese were trying to hack into our federal government databases. Now we have 18 million people’s most personal records in the hands of the Chinese. That, ladies and gentleman, is ineptitude.

Afterward, Fiorina received rave reviews.

“I’m pro Carly, very much so,” said state Rep. Jack Tate of Cetennial. “I think she has a depth of intellect and a record of accomplishment that makes her stand out among all the candidates.”

Debbie Brown with the Colorado Women’s Alliance said, “I get more impressed every day.” She also said she found it interesting that Fiorina doesn’t shy away from the press.  

June 29, 2015 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Private Attorney General in the USA writes to Governor Padilla of Puerto Rico re: Island’s Debts Are ‘Not Payable’

from: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
reply-to: supremelaw@googlegroups.com
to: mensajes@fortaleza.pr.gov
bcc: supremelaw@googlegroups.com
date: Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:17 AM
subject: Private Attorney General in the USA writes to Governor Padilla of Puerto Rico re: Island’s Debts Are ‘Not Payable’
mailing list: supremelaw.googlegroups.com
Re:
http://investmentwatchblog.com/puerto-ricos-governor-says-islands-debts-are-not-payable/

Office of Governor Alejandro García Padilla
La Fortaleza
P.O. Box 9020082
San Juan 00902-0082
Puerto Rico, USA

 
Greetings Honorable Governor:

We are writing to make you aware of two (2) large INVOICEs
which are now payable to the Treasury of the United States:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/zakheim/invoice.4.htm
http://supremelaw.org/cc/zakheim/notice.of.default/

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/invoice.1.htm
http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/notice.of.intent.to.invoice.htm


Because Puerto Rico remains a Federal Territory,
you should know that Congress expressly extended
the entire U.S. Constitution into all Federal Territories
in 1873, even future Federal Territories:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/intentm3.filed.htm#1873
http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/18/18stat333.gif


If responsible executives in the U.S. Department of Justice
were doing their jobs, they would be taking appropriate steps
to recover almost $9 TRILLION U.S. Dollars now owed 
to the U.S. Treasury as a result of those PAST DUE INVOICEs.

I'm sure a generous portion of those funds would go a 
long way towards solving your current fiscal problems,
e.g. a Public Works Program similar to the one authorized
by Congress during FDR's administration (cf. "PWA").

See also the link to our "crowd funding option" below,
for another feasible solution.
 
 
We are standing by to assist your Office.  Please don't hesitate

to reply with any questions you may have in this matter.



Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964

http://supremelaw.org/crowd.funding.option.htm  (Join Us!)
http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)
 
+++
 
... and VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/gwbush/vcc.htm  (see all Exhibits, in particular)



/s/ Paul

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964

http://supremelaw.org/crowd.funding.option.htm  (Join Us!)
http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)

 
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:20 AM, HDZegzula via SupremeLaw <supremelaw@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Dear Paul:
 
Sovereigns wage law with Affidavits and Writs.
 
Namaste,
 
henry-daniel
 
In a message dated 6/29/2015 7:17:57 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, supremelawfirm@gmail.com writes:

June 29, 2015 in Current Affairs | Permalink

OBJECTIONS Re: You Owe Interest

from: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.<supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
reply-to: supremelaw@googlegroups.com
to: web@palfrader.org
cc: colintu@users.sourceforge.net,
dybbuk@users.sourceforge.net,
schnarff@users.sourceforge.net,
zaxuk@users.sourceforge.net,
weaselp@users.sourceforge.net,
domainabuse@tucows.com,
hostmaster@slashdotmedia.com,
hostmaster@palfrader.org,
dnsadmin@tucows.com,
info@tucows.com,
LChamberlain@equicomgroup.com,
compliance@opensrs.org,
abuse@easydns.com,
pam@paulandrewmitchell.com
bcc: supremelaw@googlegroups.com
date: Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:18 AM
subject: OBJECTIONS Re: You Owe Interest
mailing list: supremelaw.googlegroups.com
also known as "Jason Scott Sadofsky",
and he failed twice to answer a proper
SUMMONS, activating default:

http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/scott/


Extensive investigation linked him to 


Because criminal copyright infringement is a felony,
I was obligated by 18 USC 4 to report same:

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/textfiles.com/complain.htm

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2319

It is also a RICO "predicate act" itemized at 18 USC 1961:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1961 (cf. "2319")


For photographs:

Google "jason scott sadosfky"


See also:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Scott




I am not available to debate these facts.


RECOMMENDATION:  aiding and abetting Mr. Sadofsky
may constitute probable cause that 18 USC 2 has been violated:
appropriate precautions are highly recommended to prevent
and/or avoid further criminal liability(s) e.g. wire fraud,
racketeering.
 
Thank you for your professional consideration.


Attached:  offensive/unsolicited spam



Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964

http://supremelaw.org/crowd.funding.option.htm  (Join Us!)
http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Anonymous Remailer (austria) <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at>
Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:57 PM
Subject: You Owe Interest
To: supremelawfirm@gmail.com



LMAO,
Kill yourself  fhegget...  You are an asshole in the eyes of the court...
Your book sucks, you are a drag function on flight...  Greedy scum
fag...

Blow me
LOL
paulandrewmitchell.com
fheg

June 23, 2015 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Revolutionary Open Source Blockchain Makes Known True Cost Economics of Everything

Read article here:

http://eeng.net/index.php/11-revolutionary-open-source-blockchain-reveals-true-cost-economics-of-everything

June 23, 2015 in Current Affairs | Permalink

CIA AGENTS CROSSING MEXICAN BORDER WITH 1300 POUNDS OF COCAINE ARRESTED BY MINUTEMEN

M writes and relays:
 
YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK – OOPS, I FORGOT.  THE MINUTEMEN AREN’T THE ONES PAID BY TAX DOLLARS... THE GUYS WHO MISSED THEM AT THE BORDER ARE THE ONES WE PAY...
 

TWO CIA AGENTS ARRESTED BY MINUTEMEN WHILE CROSSING MEXICAN BORDER WITH 1300 POUNDS OF COCAINE

Cia_cocaine1

El Paso| A group of minutemen watching the Mexican Border for illegal migrants and drug traffickers, have proceeded to the citizen arrest of two men in an SUV, carrying 1300 pounds of cocaine. The volunteers were completely astonished when the two arrestees pulled out CIA ID cards and explained they were actually carrying the drug as part of their duties and that the cargo belonged to the Central Intelligence Agency.

 

The incident took place last night, in the Chihuahuan desert, near the Texan city of El Paso. A group of seven minutemen saw a large black SUV drive rapidly across the border. They chased the vehicle in their own trucks and achieved to immobilize it after a chase of more than 15 miles.

The vigilantes arrested the two men on board and called the border patrol, who proceeded to search the vehicle. They discovered dozens of packages of cocaine, totaling an incredible 618.4 kilograms (1363 pounds).

Cia_cocaine2

The search of the vehicle revealed 36 packages of cocaine, all marked with the symbol of the Sinaloa Cartel, representing a black scorpion. Cocaine finances CIA NWO Clandestine Operations.

The two men claim to be CIA operatives based in Mexico and explained that the drug was actually part of an operation of the agency. They presented identity cards that seem to validate their claim, but the CIA spokesperson, Dean Boyd, has officially denied any link between the organization and the two men.

“The CIA doesn’t take part in drug smuggling operations at the US-Mexican border” said M. Boyd. “I do not know, for now, if the men are actually affiliated to the agency in any way, but I can tell you the cocaine doesn’t belong to the CIA.”

Cia_cocaine3

American Militia

Both the border patrol officers and minutemen seem unconvinced, however, and many of them seem to believe that the secret service agency is hiding something. The U.S. custom services have even announced a thorough investigation to try and verify the two men’s story.

“Both of them had valid accreditations and a receipt for their cargo” says Shawn Francis Miller, spokesman of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection for the El Paso sector. “What drug dealer in his right mind, demands a receipt for 1300 pounds of cocaine? There is really something strange about these guys, and we believe the CIA possibly knows more than what it is ready to admit.”

Cia_cocaine4

The custom services have confirmed that the two men, who can’t be identified due to the Intelligence Identities and Protection Act of 1982, did carry valid CIA identifications and that the vehicle was indeed registered as a service vehicle of the organization.

The two men remain under the custody of the custom services at the moment, and are still being interrogated in a facility near El Paso. They are facing charges of possessing, trafficking and importing illegal drugs, and could face other criminal charges once the investigation is over.

Both the FBI and the DEA have announced that they would collaborate with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection on this case, which as already attracted a lot of attention in Southern Texas.

World News Daily

Cia_cocaine5

Militia ~ Minute Men

Related Articles:

June 19, 2015 in Current Affairs | Permalink

JFK assassination was a conspiracy - President Gerald Ford to Valery French president Giscard d'Estaing

President Gerald Ford to Valery French president Giscard d'Estaing - JFK assassination was a conspiracy: “We arrived at an initial conclusion: it was not the work of one person, it was something set up. We were sure it was set up.”

From Robert Morrow  512-306-1510
 
Weblink: 1) http://ctka.net/2013/VGEonJFK.html

 

Original article from 11-21-2013: http://www.rtl.fr/actu/international/kennedy-le-reve-a-ete-assassine-avec-l-homme-dit-giscard-7767111282

 

"'Gerald Ford (Editor's note: President of the United States from 1974 to 1977) was a member of the Warren Commission,' Valéry Giscard d’Estaing resumes. 'Once I was making a car trip with him, he was then President as I was myself.' I said to him: 'Let me ask you an indiscreet question: you were on the Warren Commission, what conclusions did you arrive at?' He told me: 'It's not a satisfactory [i.e., positive (ntr)] one. We arrived at an initial conclusion: it was not the work of one person, it was something set up. We were sure that it was set up. But we were not able to discover by whom.'"

The Kennedy Assassination: "The dream was assassinated along with the man", Giscard says. 

Radio-Télévision Luxembourg Document. The former President of the Republic tells how he learned about the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy from the mouth of a passerby, and affirms that he believes there were others behind it.

By Jérome Chapuis (21 November, 2013)

Fifty years ago "JFK" collapsed in his state convertible while riding through the streets of Dallas, Texas, struck down by several bullets. John Fitzgerald Kennedy, 35th President of the United States (a Democrat), was assassinated the 22 of October [November, (ntr)], 1963, and still today, the truth about this crime has not yet been officially established.

Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, at that time Minister of Finance for General de Gaulle, became aware of the event that stupefied the world "in a remarkable manner". "I left my office in the Louvre in order to catch a plane to Villacoublay, on the way to the Auvergne, and on the sidewalk to the right, there was a middle-aged man who was gesturing excitedly: he raised his arm, as if he were hitch-hiking", the former head of state relates for the microphones of RTL.

"I said to myself, 'what’s going on, what could be happening?', continues Valéry Giscard d’Estaing. We slowed down, I rolled down the window, he leaned over and said to me, 'The President of the United States was just assassinated, I heard it on the radio, I immediately came out of my house in order to spread the word everywhere.' And he burst into sobbing. Here was someone who had been so traumatized that he could not keep the news to himself."

For the one who performed the highest functions of state from 1974 to 1981, the emotion of this anonymous figure mirrors the shock felt by "all the French" that day. "Because in the assassination of Kennedy, there is in a sense the idea of the assassination of a dream", he says. "When one murders a dream, it is not just the person who is murdered, the dream is killed together with [that person]."

The former French President incidentally revealed a few tasty tidbits concerning his relationship with the emblematic American head of state, whom he met in the Oval Office. "He asked me for advice!", notably on inflation, he lets on. As for the atmosphere which reined at the White House during that period, "it was youthfulness which was in power. Youth, which wanted to change the world. He profoundly inspired me", he confides.

VGE convinced by the theory there was a conspiracy

But if the myth was not extinguished with the man, a blur remains over the true reasons for his death. One man, Lee Harvey Oswald, was rapidly apprehended; he was accused of having fired upon the young President three times with a carbine in a moment favored by fate. He was never brought to trial, murdered less than 48 hours after his questioning.

Two official inquiries, whose conclusions are controversial, confirm his guilt: the Warren Commission, in 1974 [1964 (ntr)], and the Stokes [commission, i.e., HSCA (ntr)], from 1976 to 1978. But innumerable theories claim something else: for the conspiracists, Oswald was supposedly remote-controlled by the CIA, the FBI or the extreme Right, depending on the version.

"Gerald Ford (president of the United States from 1974 to 1977, editor’s note) was a member of the Warren Commission", Valéry Giscard d’Estaing resumes. "Once I was making a car trip with him, he was then President as I was myself. I said to him: 'Let me ask you an indiscreet question: you were on the Warren Commission, what conclusions did you arrive at?' He told me: 'It's not a satisfactory [i.e., positive (ntr)] one. We arrived at an initial conclusion: it was not the work of one person, it was something set up. We were sure that it was set up. But we were not able to discover by whom.'"

"Thus there was an organization, which has never been brought to light, which detested, which hated or which feared President Kennedy, and which decided to get rid of him. That is my conviction", the former head of state decisively concludes. Whence we come to learn that two former presidents among the most powerful of their era support the theory of a conspiracy.

For the original interview, go here.

June 18, 2015 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Joseph Ruben Hill and Gloria Reeder have been RAILROADED: IT'S SO PAINFULLY OBVIOUS

 

from: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
reply-to: supremelaw@googlegroups.com
to: Brent Bersbach <jbb4488@gmail.com>,
Dave Pflum <ralphgerardsanto@gmail.com>
cc: SupremeLaw <supremelaw@googlegroups.com>
date: Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:55 AM
subject: Joseph Ruben Hill and Gloria Reeder have been RAILROADED: IT'S SO PAINFULLY OBVIOUS!!
mailing list: supremelaw.googlegroups.com
>  We even have the testimony of the Clerk of Court in our favor that ALL Copies served of a Subpoena must show the Clerk's Signature and the Court Seal (& NOT a 'home-made' stamped name in lieu of a signature and "SEAL" stamped in lieu of the embossed Court Seal).


I'd like to know if that was Stephen Harris, because he failed
If he testified that he was or is "Clerk of Court" THAT WAS PERJURY!!
 
THIS IS A FUNDAMENTAL ADMISSION BY ANYONE "CLAIMING"
TO BE THE CLERK OF COURT.  Here's why:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/grand.jury/request.to.appear.in.writing.htm
(the latter letter apparently was the PRIMARY REASON why I was tortured)

Here's the case law that was attached to that letter:
http://supremelaw.org/stat/62/28usc1691.case.law.htm
http://supremelaw.org/stat/62/28usc1691.case.law.2.htm

Lack of compliance with 28 USC 1691 
goes to jurisdiction in personam!


http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil/initial/clerks.or.jerks.htm

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil/initial/blowing.whistles.htm
Here's one of those bogus "subpoenas":

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/reeder/subpoena.black.coral/page01.gif

NB:  "SEAL" [sic] and no signatures!

Stephan Harris has been charged with multiple Federal FELONIES

along with several of his accomplices, all named in these VCCs:


http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/vcc.list.htm


i honestly regard Hill's Counsel, Michael Reese, as a CHEAP COWARD
for not prosecuting a CROSS-COMPLAINT against all of those crooks.

You will note that Reese is named above, for criminal defamation of me.


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964

http://supremelaw.org/crowd.funding.option.htm  (Join Us!)
http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Brent Bersbach <jbb4488@gmail.com> wrote:
Some news from Joe Hill.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dave Pflum <ralphgerardsanto@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:33 PM
Subject: Number from Joe
To: 


Brent: Sounds pretty good for Joe & all

From: Dolores:

Message from Joe H. after yesterday when I asked for a number ASAP for Tony Davis T. 18.

I met with the Senior U.S. Probation Officer yesterday, who is putting together the Pre-Sentencing Report for each of us (3 of us) convicted last month, and he said that I will NOT have a BOP jail number issued until AFTER BOP receives the Pre-Sentencing Report, and then submits their Recommendation Report to the Court before Sentencing (e.g. which FCI Camp I would be going to, etc.).

With the Sentencing date of August 6th, the BOP wouldn't have this Report out to us until next month some time.

I was also informed that each of us have a good chance to stay out of prison during the Appeal process on an Appeal Bond, as the judge definitely knows we all are appealing due to her blatant denial of almost ALL Pre-Trial Defense Motions.
Plus, it is in evidence that a lot of the official "COPY" served of the Subpoenas issued in December 2012 were "Defective", not being True Copies of the "ORIGINAL" Subpoenas - hence the reason WHY we (my clients & I as their Fiduciary/Trustee) challenged them (with Paul Mitchell's assistance) in the first place, thus the Indictment charges of Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice and Obstruction of Justice.  We even have the testimony of the Clerk of Court in our favor that ALL Copies served of a Subpoena must show the Clerk's Signature and the Court Seal (& NOT a 'home-made' stamped name in lieu of a signature and "SEAL" stamped in lieu of the embossed Court Seal).  This puts the Appeal into something of a precedence in the 10th Circuit and should be taken in by the Appeals Court seriously.

I will keep you posted.
Joe
 

___

Hello M.S.,

What crimes did the government allege were committed by Joseph Ruben Hill and Gloria Reeder?

___

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

1:58 PM (4 hours ago)
 
to jeff, SupremeLaw

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/criminal/indictment1/

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/criminal/indictment2/

June 18, 2015 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Anent Speculation on Non-Judicial Immunity

from: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
reply-to: supremelaw@googlegroups.com
to: Donald T Grahn <jd.consultants@live.com>
cc: SupremeLaw <supremelaw@googlegroups.com>
date: Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:36 AM
subject: Re: Speculation on Non-Judicial Immunity
mailing list: supremelaw.googlegroups.com
 
It's a complicated issue:

In defense of the concept, whenever a qualified judicial officer
acts in a judicial capacity, EVEN IF his ruling is not correct,
he cannot be sued for that error.  In many ways, this is
a sound approach, because the system would break down
and become much less efficient than it already is 
if every dissatisfied litigant were allowed to sue the
presiding judge for that outcome.

On the other hand, this doctrine of judicial immunity
is not unlimited:

(1)  if a judge lacks jurisdiction, then s/he is liable
to all parties for all consequential damages;
federal courts, in particular, are presumed to LACK
jurisdiction unless there is positive proof of
original jurisdiction in the INITIAL COMPLAINT;
 
(2)  of course, if a "robe" lacks credentials, 
a number of federal felonies are being committed;

(3)  the ICCPR places additional limits on
judicial immunity:  if a judge violates a Fundamental Right
of a litigant, that litigant is entitled to an effective remedy
NOTWITHSTANDING that the violation was committed
by persons acting in an official capacity.

(4)  the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges is also
very relevant here, particularly the section dealing
with their administrative and supervisory responsibilities;
but, enforcement of that Code of Conduct has become
very problematic in recent years e.g. since 1948;
 
(5)  in general, complaints of judicial misconduct
have gone nowhere, because that system is
fraught with conflicts of interest and it has become
an ugly protection racket.

 
There is a long treatise on judicial immunity here,
in the Dixianne Hawks case:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/dixianne/

e.g.:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/dixianne/appeal9c.htm

However, John E. Wolfgram is another UNlicensed
California Attorney.


Hope this helps.


p.s.  In general, feel free to search the SLL yourself 
when questions like that arise e.g.

Bing site:supremelaw.org "judicial immunity"


/s/ Paul


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964

http://supremelaw.org/crowd.funding.option.htm  (Join Us!)
http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Donald T Grahn <jd.consultants@live.com> wrote:
Paul, Any comment?


Pastor Don

Donald T Grahn - on FB & YT

Celebrating 10 + years of producing truth-telling TV on www.SeattleCommunityMedia.org Ch.77  / 23
w/ live-streaming and on-demand 24/7   3 shows per week 10 AM & PM Tues, Weds & Thurs.
& 11:30 PM Sundays for 3 hours!

  1.  Tues.  Call 4 Investigation, - 10 AM & PM & 1:30 AM Mon.   
Link:  http://seattlecommunitymedia.org/node/10434/list-shows


            2.   Weds:  
            All-Ways Pursuing Truth,   Documentaries    10 PM  & 10 AM Saturdays & 11:30 PM Sunday nites.  
Link:   http://seattlecommunitymedia.org/node/7578/list-shows

      
       3.   Thurs:  Truth vs. NEW$, Inc.       10 AM & 10 PM Thurs. & 12:30 AM Mondays.   
Link:  http://seattlecommunitymedia.org/node/10422/list-shows






Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 07:05:53 +0000
From: rcsnydersr@yahoo.com
To: ronjdav9@gmail.com
Subject: Fw: [New post] Speculation on Non-Judicial Immunity

This is very interesting but are the Supremes honest? With our system, I doubt it very much.

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Adask's law <comment-reply@wordpress.com>
To: rcsnydersr@yahoo.com 
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 4:43 PM
Subject: [New post] Speculation on Non-Judicial Immunity

Adask posted: "The following email got me thinking:   Dear Mr. Adask …………….. I sent the letter to you below back on 22 December 2014 and have been following your emails since then and so far no mention of the issue I presented.  Since then I have gone through "
Respond to this post by replying above this line
 

New post on Adask's law

Speculation on Non-Judicial Immunity

by Adask
The following email got me thinking:   Dear Mr. Adask …………….. I sent the letter to you below back on 22 December 2014 and have been following your emails since then and so far no mention of the issue I presented.  Since then I have gone through the Federal District Court System and the Federal […]
 
 
Comment    See all comments
 

___

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

10:51 AM (24 minutes ago)
 
to Donald, SupremeLaw
 
 
 
 
The writings of Dr. Les Sachs are very relevant here
e.g. corrupt robes are abusing judicial immunity
to "immunize" themselves from the consequences
of their own criminal misconduct:

http://supremelaw.org/authors/sachs/


Notice also the sheer number of Federal "robes"
in California who failed or refused to produce
evidence of their licenses to practice law
when they were admitted to the State Bar:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/aol2/criminal.complaint.4.htm
 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964

http://supremelaw.org/crowd.funding.option.htm  (Join Us!)
http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)

June 15, 2015 in Current Affairs | Permalink

OBJECTION Re: Stewardship of the Earth

from: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
reply-to: supremelaw@googlegroups.com
to: dwhitney@iotconline.com,
roger@buildingthetruth.org,
mike@mikeheath.net
bcc: supremelaw@googlegroups.com
date: Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:43 PM
subject: More Re: OBJECTION Re: Stewardship of the Earth [sic]
mailing list: supremelaw.googlegroups.com
ALL of the following are IN DEFAULT

(please note the itemized details):


http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/invoices/paugh.1996-11-30.htm

http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/invoices/paugh.1996-12-30.htm

http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/invoices/paugh.1997-01-03.htm

http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/invoices/paugh.1.htm

http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/invoices/paugh.2.htm

http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/invoices/paugh.3.htm

http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/invoices/paugh.demand.htm

http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/invoices/paugh.4.htm

http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/invoices/paugh.5.htm

http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/paugh/judicial.default.rico.htm
http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/paugh/summons.rico.gif
http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/paugh/summons.rico.proof.gif

http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/paugh/final.nad.all.credentials.htm


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964

http://supremelaw.org/crowd.funding.option.htm  (Join Us!)
http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)

 

from: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
reply-to: supremelaw@googlegroups.com
to: dwhitney@iotconline.com,
roger@buildingthetruth.org,
mike@mikeheath.net
bcc: supremelaw@googlegroups.com
date: Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:34 PM
subject: Fwd: OBJECTION Re: Stewardship of the Earth
mailing list: supremelaw.googlegroups.com
a Federal Prison, and which calls I was required
to pay for -- at a very inflated rate per minute.


/s/ Paul

from: 'Supreme Law Firm' via SupremeLaw <supremelaw@googlegroups.com>
reply-to: supremelaw@googlegroups.com
to: NewsWithViews National <subscribers@newswithviewsstore.com>
date: Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:19 PM
subject: OBJECTION Re: Stewardship of the Earth
mailing list: supremelaw.googlegroups.com
Index of /copyrite/paugh
 
 
 
 
 
 
Index of /copyrite/paugh
Index of /copyrite/paugh Parent Directory acknowledgment.doc acknowledgment.htm arrest.warrant.doc arrest.warrant.htm final.nad.all.credentials.doc final.nad.all.credentials.htm foreman1.doc
 
Preview by Yahoo
 
 
  CITIZEN’S ARREST WARRANT
 
http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/paugh/summons.rico.gif
 
http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/paugh/summons.rico.proof.gif
 
NOTICE OF JUDICIAL DEFAULT
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTICE OF JUDICIAL DEFAULT
Via First Class U.S. Mail     NOTICE OF JUDICIAL DEFAULT     TO: Irvin H. Paugh HC 63, Box 12-AA Nettie 26681 WEST VIRGINIA, USA   FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
 
Preview by Yahoo
 
 
 
 
 
image
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preview by Yahoo
 
 
 
 
 
image
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preview by Yahoo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CITIZEN’S ARREST WARRANT
CITIZEN’S ARREST WARRANT     TO:       Hon. Bill Kolender           San Diego County Sheriff           P.O. Box 429000           San Diego 92142           CALIFORNIA, USA  
 
Preview by Yahoo
 
 
 
 
 
 


All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
 
On Saturday, June 13, 2015 10:05 PM, NewsWithViews National <subscribers@newswithviewsstore.com> wrote:
News Alert for Sunday, June 14, 2015
 
Visit NewsWithViews Store to see our selection of DVDs & Books

To Whom Much is Given

This warning certainly extends to a nation that once was blessed with the liberty of Christ as well as individuals. Folks, nations are made up of individuals! Just as our bodies are made up of individual members, so is a society. When a healthy body has members that become diseased (corrupted), those members must be healed or purged from that body, or the whole body will become diseased......
http://www.newswithviews.com/Paugh/butch113.htm
by Pastor Butch Paugh

Stewardship of the Earth

While I was in California a little over a month ago I became aware that the well publicized drought there is largely man made. Not that there isn’t a lower than average rainfall, but the truth is there is plenty of water. The real problem is the governmental policies which will not allow the people to have access to that water. Instead, the Governor of California is simply going to dump billions of gallons each year into the Pacific Ocean.......
http://www.newswithviews.com/Whitney/david144.htm
by Rev. David Whitney
MIDNIGHT RIDE:
When Rogue Politicians Call for Martial Law
A Film by James Jaeger
Featuring Ron Paul, G. Edward Griffin & Others
Inspired by Works of Edwin Vieira, Jr.

Producer Screen credits Available
Want to address the police state forming around us?  Help get this documentary film made as quickly as possible.  From the director of FIAT EMPIRE and CULTURAL MARXISM (available at NewsWithViews),MIDNIGHT RIDE explains why martial law violates the U.S. Constitution and why you have the inalienable right to "keep and bear" arms.  Follow theprogress -- read the script -- watch the trailer -- then donate to one of the most important films that will ever be made  -- AND receive a screen credit as acknowledgement. 

Be Not Deceived

Then there was David Karesh in Waco, TX. He even convinced the people that he was the one that was to have sex with a woman even if she was married! Both of these men were doing things that was contrary to the teaching of the Word yet people believed every word they said.......
http://www.newswithviews.com/Anghis/roger348.htm
by Pastor Roger Anghis

Of the Father’s Love Begotten

America imagines that, in her might, she can prevail over this King, over God. But our power is nothing. It is not a matter of winning or losing. It isn't even possible to strive with this King. This fight with God, this attempt to redefine marriage, is a figment of our imagination. God isn't even fighting.......
http://www.newswithviews.com/Heath/mike108.htm
by Rev. Mike Heath
Visit NewsWithViews Store to see our selection of DVDs & Books
Advertise on NewWithViews or America's Morning News
If you would like to advertise on either the NewsWithViews website, our daily E-Mail Alerts, or America's Morning News radio show (on 130 stations across America), please contact us at:Sales@NewsWithViews.com.

Make a Donation
NewsWithViews is just a small fish in a big shark tank when compared to the major news outlets, but we cover the stories and views that the others dare not and will not touch. Please help us to continue as an alternative news website and consider donating to our cause.


Copyright © 2015 NewsWithViews, All rights reserved.
from: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
reply-to: supremelaw@googlegroups.com
to: dwhitney@iotconline.com,
roger@buildingthetruth.org,
mike@mikeheath.net
bcc: supremelaw@googlegroups.com
date: Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:34 PM
subject: Fwd: OBJECTION Re: Stewardship of the Earth
mailing list: supremelaw.googlegroups.com

June 14, 2015 in Current Affairs | Permalink