Fwd: PLEASE FORWARD to Dr. Art Robinson: major problems with Peter DeFazio (Congressman, Roseburg, Oregon)

 

Greetings Dr. Robinson:

I have lived in Roseburg since January 2016, and
I am having very serious problems with Peter DeFazio.

Before I summarize, please know that one of
the 2 Trustees of my private estate has been a
long-time resident of Roseburg, and he can
verify everything I am sharing with you here
and now:
 
My office has been leading a Credential Investigation
at since August 2001, to acquire, archive and inspect
the credentials required of Federal officers and
employees by numerous Federal laws.

The evidence disclosed to us by the U.S. Department
of Justice grew to be such a huge embarrassment
for key suspects -- like many Federal "judges" --
IRS personnel conspired to target individuals like me,
in addition to conservative organizations and
Tea Party affiliates.

Although the latter organizations suffered long delays
processing their applications for tax-exempt status,
I was criminally targeted with malicious prosecution and
numerous related Federal felonies, all of which I was
required to report timely, to satisfy 18 U.S.C. 4:
 
I was falsely arrested in January 2014, moved 55 TIMES in 11 months,
3 times in solitary confinement, and tortured with threats
of forced administration of brain-damaging drugs at the
U.S. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Missouri.

It's hard to say exactly why all charges were eventually dismissed
in December 2014:  while detained at USMCFP in Springfield,
I did succeed in commencing two (2) separate lawsuits
 
On the advice of our Trustee, I have now lodged a
Federal Tort Claim with the principal agency --
the U.S. Marshals Service, for "time only":
7,805 hours of false arrest and unlawful incarceration,
using an hourly rate authorized by the Second Circuit
Court of Appeals in New York State.
 
USMS "Policy Directives" make it very clear
that the USMS have legal custody of all federal inmates
and all inmate transportation, no exceptions.


How does Peter DeFazio enter into this sad picture?

Initially, he agreed to assist with the FOIA Requests
which I submitted to the USMS, for their credentials
and for all of my inmate transportation records.  But,
as the evidence started to pile up in his 3 offices
(Roseburg, Eugene, and the District of Columbia)
he abruptly changed his mind.
 
Our Trustee also wrote to Peter DeFazio with a polite
request for referrals to arbitration, mediation or
other alternative dispute resolution method ("ADR").

In reply, DeFazio promptly defamed me in a letter to our Trustee,
transmitted via U.S. Mail:  that was defamation, and mail fraud.
 
Our Trustee then objected in writing with a DEMAND TO
CEASE AND DESIST.

(This correspondence can be shared with you,
upon receipt of a written request for same.)
 
No, I am not mentally incompetent, just very intelligent,
very experienced, and very well informed as
the Principal Investigator of The Credential Investigation:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/credential.investigation.facts.and.laws.htm

I graduated from UCLA in 1970 and scored in the
top 10% of California college graduates on the GRE
(Graduate Record Exam).  I went on to get an M.S.
in Public Administration at U.C. Irvine in 1973.
 
We have provided DeFazio with extensive documentation,
including an email message that directly implicates
Lois G. Lerner with personnel of the IRS Chief Counsel's
Office who are presently obstructing my Federal Tort Claim.

IRS has absolutely no jurisdiction of that Federal Tort Claim!
 
If you don't already know about the "Lois Lerner Scandal"
just Google her name and get ready for a few shocks.

Judicial Watch have commenced lawsuits to compel
disclosure of her numerous email messages while
employed as a high-level IRS official e.g.

Google "Lois G. Lerner" "Mark S. Kaizen"
 
Although I was always in the legal custody of the
U.S. Marshals during my ordeal lasting 7,805 hours,
their General Counsel casually referred my Tort Claim
to the IRS Chief Counsel. 

High-level personnel of the latter office have now turned up
withOUT credentials!
We believe it is very revealing, and indicative of his
real posture towards American constitutional law,
that DeFazio returned that email evidence, even though
our mailing envelope was annotated:

"EVIDENCE:  DO NOT DESTROY"


By refusing to admit that evidence into the
custody of the U.S. House of Representatives,
DeFazio may have also violated several other
FELONY Federal statutes e.g. 18 U.S.C. 1001, 1519
(to name a few).
 
If you are interested in reviewing any of the
Exhibits attached to my pending Federal Tort Claim,


If I can be of any further assistance to you and/or your campaign,
either before or after Election Day 2016, please do not
hesitate to contact me here, preferably via email.

(I haven't used telephones for a long time, because
of all of the illegal wiretaps which Federal agencies
are now conducting without Court ORDERs.)

 
Allow me to suggest that you schedule an informal lecture,
perhaps 60 to 90 minutes, during which I will be happy to
brief your chosen audience with all of the relevant details
of The Credential Investigation, and all of the documentary
evidence, and pleadings, inspired by my 325-day ordeal.

A more ambitious idea is to schedule a 4-hour recorded lecture
on some convenient weekend, when interested people
are not at their regular jobs.
 
 
Thank you, Dr. Robinson, for your earnest consideration.


Cc:  Larry Saccato, Trustee, Estate of Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;
Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),
Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)

October 18, 2016 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Private Attorney General comments re: WaPo: Private prison industry fights Justice Department directive to end the use of contract facilities

 
Our Comment posted today:

The Credential Investigation, launched by our office in August 2001, recently requested APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS for all BOP personnel going back 10 years -- the discovery window authorized by 18 USC 1961(5). 

Not a single credential was disclosed, and every one of those FOIA Requests is now PAST DUE and also IN DEFAULT. 

The Act of Congress at 5 USC 5507 bars federal officers from being paid, if they have not executed valid U.S. OPM Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS. 

Making matters worse, the electronic SF-61 published at OPM's Internet website is a known COUNTERFEIT:  no OMB control number;  no expiration date;  no citation to 5 USC 2903 (Authority to administer);  and the misleading claim"Prior editions not usable" when the only valid SF-61s pre-date August 2002. 

Many of those SF-61s were also "administered" by HR assistants not authorized to do so by 5 USC 2903. 

This whole mess is rendered even more serious by the Oath of Office Clause in the organic U.S. Constitution, which pre-dates the Bill of Rights and has never been amended.



http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil2/  (see FOIA1 thru FOIA10 sub-folders)


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;
Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),
Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)
 
 
 

'Supreme Law Firm' via SupremeLaw

3:43 PM (7 hours ago)
 
to Supreme
 
 
 
 
 
p.s.  Case in point, the SF-61 for Sally Q. Yates is
another COUNTERFEIT:
 


 
 
 
 
Our Comment posted today:

The Credential Investigation, launched by our office in August 2001, recently requested APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS for all BOP personnel going back 10 years -- the discovery window authorized by 18 USC 1961(5). 

Not a single credential was disclosed, and every one of those FOIA Requests is now PAST DUE and also IN DEFAULT. 

The Act of Congress at 5 USC 5507 bars federal officers from being paid, if they have not executed valid U.S. OPM Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS. 

Making matters worse, the electronic SF-61 published at OPM's Internet website is a known COUNTERFEIT:  no OMB control number;  no expiration date;  no citation to 5 USC 2903 (Authority to administer);  and the misleading claim"Prior editions not usable" when the only valid SF-61s pre-date August 2002. 

Many of those SF-61s were also "administered" by HR assistants not authorized to do so by 5 USC 2903. 

This whole mess is rendered even more serious by the Oath of Office Clause in the organic U.S. Constitution, which pre-dates the Bill of Rights and has never been amended.



http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil2/  (see FOIA1 thru FOIA10 sub-folders)


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;
Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),
Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.
 

http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)
 
 

October 18, 2016 in Current Affairs | Permalink

MEDIA'S PHONY GROPER ALLEGATIONS FALLING LIKE DOMINOES Common Democrat tactic used to slander, destroy opponents unravels

MEDIA'S PHONY GROPER ALLEGATIONS FALLING LIKE DOMINOES

Common Democrat tactic used to slander, destroy opponents unravels


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/medias-phony-groper-allegations-falling-like-dominoes/#vfjR0HukLCxfrVGr.99

October 18, 2016 in Current Affairs | Permalink

United States District Court (USDC) has no criminal jurisdiction whatsoever

The Yalta Conference at end of WWII is a MAJOR CLUE ... USDC has no criminal jurisdiction whatsoever

One essential component of the MAJOR THEORY we are pursuing
goes like this:

World War II was contrived to make money for Daddy Warbucks
and family (War Bucks, get it??)  WWI had already poured
huge sums into their coffers, so they knew how lucrative
another "world war" would be for them. 

The U.S. debt to the bankers had jumped
from $1 Billion before WWI to $25 Billion after WWI.
 
I wasn't paying attention during a lecture given by one of
my fellow seminarians, I believe it was Junior Year High School
at Queen of Angels Seminary in San Fernando, California:
the focus of his lecture was the Yalta Conference.

Now, consider this:  at Yalta we see photos of
FDR, Winston Churchill and Joseph Stalin --
very famous photographs.
 
By the time that Conference started, the defeat
of the German Wehrmacht (military machine) was in sight:
February 4-11, 1945.  Germany formally surrendered on May 7, 1945
-- just 3 months later.
 
What we do NOT see in any of those historical photos
are the bankers, hiding behind the scenes like
the Wizard of Oz (oz = gold, get it?)

What I strongly suspect happened at Yalta was
some kind of secret "deal" which FDR consummated
with the banks:

The United States was running out of money,
and it needed lots more to finish off Japan,
particularly if a land invasion of Japan
was decided necessary to end WWII.

So, I do believe that FDR secretly accepted
massive loans from the international bankers,
in return for agreeing to turn American Courts
into collection agencies.

This plan or "scheme" had been hatched
even BEFORE the United States entered WWII --
with a RESOLUTION and NOT an Act of Congress,
mind you!

The evidence of this timing is found in the
history of revisions to Titles 18 and 28
of the U.S. Code.
 
As such, the lucky men and women who
were allowed to stay home, back in D.C.,
went to work quietly re-writing the entire
Federal Criminal Code (Title 18) and
the entire Judiciary Code (Title 28).

Both were eventually revised, codified
and enacted into positive law on the
same day -- June 25, 1948 -- one right
after the other in the Statutes at Large:
where the Title 18 revision ends
the revision of Title 28 begins --
no other pages in between the two!
 
I was only 4 DAYS old on that day.

Thus, with these historical facts in sharp focus,
it makes perfect sense that the Federal Courts
effectively "morphed" into legislative tribunals
with an unstated purpose of collecting interest
payments on behalf of world bankers who
financed the end of WWII.

Remember also that the United States was secretly
bankrupted by FDR et al. in 1933.

As such, FDR's solution to paying off war debts
was obviously different from Pres. Lincoln's approach --
greenbacks!
 
And, the debts which the United States agreed to pay
were engineered as COMPOUND INTEREST:
interest accruing on interest. 

Ah, what magic!!  I'm sure U.S. creditor banks were thrilled.
 
Unfortunately for that conspiracy, the U.S. Supreme Court
has now held -- correctly -- that Rules of Court may NOT
expand or restrict original jurisdiction already conferred
upon Federal District Courts by prior Acts of Congress:
Willy v. Coastal Corp.

We have now proven that the switch from DCUS to USDC
was ATTEMPTED by means of amendments to the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure, and Federal Rules of Evidence.

If you know what to look for, the Congress tried to
make this appear AOK by adding an "Abrogation Clause"
to the Rules Enabling Act:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2072

(b)  Such rules shall not abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right.
All laws in conflict with such rules shall be of no further force or effect
after such rules have taken effect.

That Abrogation Clause is obviously unconstitutional:
the Supreme Court may not make law, and Congress
may not delegate law-making authority to 9 black robes.
 
A similar Abrogation Clause was also added to the
Title 18 revision, at the former 18 U.S.C. 3771;
however, that statute was later repealed and
replaced with a different statute dealing with
Crime Victims' Rights ("CVRA").

It's highly unusual for a section in the
U.S. Code to be repealed and then
REPLACED with entirely different text
but retaining the same section number!
 
Now that the Abrogation Clause in Title 28
has been proven to be unconstitutional,
the holding in Willy v. Coastal Corp. bars
all United States District Courts from
claiming any criminal jurisdiction whatsoever.

We know full well that they do make that claim,
but they cannot prove it!
 
The general rule in all Federal jurisprudence
is that statutes conferring original jurisdiction
upon Federal District Courts must be STRICTLY
construed.  Just read it for yourself and
confirm that section 3231 granted criminal jurisdiction
to the Article III DCUS:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3231

The district courts of the United States shall have original jurisdiction,
exclusive of the courts of the States, of all offenses against the laws of the United States.

Check out this extra ZINGER, in the Notes under that section:

Senate Revision Amendment

The text of this section was changed by Senate amendment.

See Senate Report No. 1620, amendment No. 10, 80th Cong.

 

There is no evidence of any vote by the U.S. House of Representatives,

and no evidence of any Presidential signature on that "Senate amendment".

As such, this "Senate amendment" is further evidence of a

fraudulent attempt to tamper with section 3231, so as to

make it APPEAR that the USDC had been conferred with

criminal jurisdiction, when such a claim simply cannot be

sustained in light of Willy v. Coastal Corp. and the

obvious unconstitutionality of the Abrogation Clause

still found at 28 USC 2072(b).

 

Further reading:  Hovind was released
soon after this MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
was filed and served in his case:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hovind/recon1.htm


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;
Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),
Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:23 AM, SoundSignal <soundsignal@comcast.net> wrote:

October 17, 2016 in Current Affairs | Permalink

In-depth story of Bill Clinton's shunned and banished son, Danney Williams (Full interview)

In depth story of Bill Clinton's banished son, Danney Williams

Banished - Bill Clinton's 'Son' Speaks Out - Please Share.

Hillary Banished Me From My Father: Bill Clinton's 'Son' Speaks

Bill Clinton's Estranged 'Son' Breaks His Silence (Full interview) 

October 12, 2016 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Did Laugh In Interview After Successfully Defending a Child Rapist

http://www.breitbart.com/live/second-presidential-debate-fact-check-livewire/fact-check-yes-hillary-clinton-laugh-successfully-defending-child-rapist/

 

October 10, 2016 in Current Affairs | Permalink

9/11/16 - Hillary Clinton Has Another Fainting Episode, aka When will she drop out?

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=hillary+feint&oq=hillary+feint&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i53.6554.8178.0.8509.13.9.0.4.3.0.85.533.9.9.0...0.0...1ac.1.gVvSyOrjkyA#hl=en&gl=us&authuser=0&tbm=nws&q=hillary+faints+911

 

Apparently Hillary had an "over-heating" problem and this is what happens when it is 78 degrees Fahrenheit on a breezy New York day.

__

Related:

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/09/rockin-pneumonia.php

PS:

There are many people and quite a few physicians who believe Hillary has Parkinson’s and the leading cause of death for those suffering with this disease is aspiration pneumonia. So this is one report from the NY Times that I could believe.

FD:
Pneunomia--due to aspirating fluid into the lungs due to loss of motor control of throat/swallowing muscles (seen as frequent long dry cough and choking spells)--is the leading cause of death in Parkinsons disease, which Hillary was diagnosed with before 2012.

September 11, 2016 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Hillary Clinton: No Regrets re: Qadhafi's Extrajudicial Execution - and Tick-tock email

In re: Hillary Clinton laughing and having no regrets about fostering ISIS in Libya and hence the untold deaths of tens of thousands of human beings, Muslims or otherwise, in Iraq, Libya, Syria (Middle East), Europe as well as those in the United States, including that which happened in Benghazi (that she tried to blame on some psyop, false flag video that denigrated Mohammed). I had referenced the clip of Hillary's laughing re: Qadhafi's extrajudicial execution and through further research had found a video clip of an interview between Chris Wallace and Hillary on YouTube that showed she had no regrets. I was sharing those links on different occasions on Facebook and elsewhere and on the last occasion that I did I had followed the link of the latter and found out that it had been taken down for content violation because more than likely some Hillary supporter(s) complained to YouTube in that the particular clip was making her look very bad. After that I couldn't find this "no regrets" clip on YouTube or on the entire internet (and still can't) but it happens that I was just now able to reference the actual transcript of the October 23, 2011 Chris Wallace/Hillary Clinton interview on a Hillary supporters blog, further research led me to find it on the U.S. Department of State's website! So here is the information again, minus the actual video in question (because it seems to have been scrubbed from the entire internet):

QUESTION: Secretary, let’s turn if we can to Libya. The UN and human rights groups are calling for an investigation, saying that if, as it appears from the videotape, that Qadhafi was executed, it was a war crime. And you’re also coming under fire for what you said:

(Clip played) SECRETARY CLINTON (in a state of mirth and laughter) We came, we saw, he died!

QUESTION: Question. Do you regret what you said, Secretary?

SECRETARY CLINTON: No.

QUESTION: And if I may, do you regret what you said, and do you feel Qadhafi was wronged or that he got what was coming to him?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, let’s have an investigation. I fully support the United Nations investigation, and I fully support the Transitional National Council’s own call for an independent investigation. I support it on the merits because it’s important to find the facts, and I support it as part of what will be a challenging transition process.

The Transitional National Council today is going to declare the liberation of Libya. They are then going to announce a new government. They need to make it clear that it will be a government to unify the country, to seek reconciliation, to make everyone who supported the former regime – as long as they don’t have blood on their hands – feel safe and included in a new Libya. And so from my perspective, I think such an investigation would be very important to establish accountability, rule of law, and pave the way for the inclusive democratic future that the Libyans tell me they want.

QUESTION: Secretary, do you regret what you said?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I’m not going to comment on that. We didn’t even know what was happening at that time because it was an unconfirmed report.

___

No, lying and very pathetic, Hillary, this was the unconfirmed report of Qadhafi's "capture" which WAS NOT being played back for you in this interview and to which the question wasn't referring:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfnwWVCToQ4 (embedding disabled on this YouTube video clip)

And this is the one that was actually played back to you in this interview asking if you regretted what you said, and yet you continue dissemble and show that you do not regret it and refer to something else entirely on that same occasion, and yet you want to be the leader of the free world:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlz3-OzcExI (embedding disabled on this YouTube video clip)

"Weapons flow going into Syria, pushed by Hillary Clinton, into jihadist [possession] within Syria, including ISIS, that's there in those e-mails." - Julian Assange [Why I Created WikiLeaks' Searchable Database of 30,000 Emails from Clinton's Private Server - July 25, 2016 - Democracy Now interview between Juan Gonzalez and Julian Assange]

Julian Assange has asserted that Tick-Tock is the most damaging Hillary Clinton email

https://bitbillions.com/assange-tick-tock-is-most-damaging-hillary-email/

Transcript from David Knight’s coverage of this email:

'A major failure of the Trump campaign and the Bernie Sanders campaign,' he [Assange] said Friday, is that 'Hillary Clinton tried to run on her having judgment and experience in the State Department.'

'Later on, those campaigns – too late in the process, in my view – started picking up that the experience was mostly a bad experience.'

'So for exampe, Libya: We published 1,700 emails about her involvement in Libya. Benghazi is just a small part of that.'

'She was the leading architect, the leading political force driving to destroy the Libyan state,' Assange said.

“The generals in the Pentagon, not all of them, but a number, were pushing strongly the Libyan State should not be destroyed because radical jihadi groups would move in and take it over, which they did.” And, of course, Assange said the most damaging information was yet to come. But I thought it was interesting that he didn’t focus on the memos that showed pay for play, that patterns that had come out, that had been released by Reuters when they had to sue to get this information, to look at her schedule, correlate that. But he focused on the tick-tock menu, and what this does as he pointed out in that clip. This is something that has been sitting here, not used by Sanders, not used by the Trump campaign, she was working to put herself out there as the driving force behind Libya and this was of course before Libya blew up in everbodys faces, before Libya set the Middle East on fire, and Benghazi, with arming ISIS, with the Syrian civil war. And this is what the Tick-Tock menu says. This is an article from DC Whispers which says: They say the tick-tock e-mail outlines how Hillary Clinton did the bidding of her Saudi masters and turned Libya into an ISIS hellhole. Well, we all know that it’s an ISIS hellhole and we do know she does the bidding of her Saudi masters but their just part of a larger coalition of donors, that would also include the bankers who wanted to shut down Qadhafi because he was setting up a gold backed currency to compete with the western central bankers, but let’s take a look what they actually did with the memo. If you look at this memo, this is from Jake Sulliven and it goes to Cheryl Mills, close confidant of Hillary Clinton and Victoria Newlan the person who revived the cold war for us in Ukraine, and it says: This is basically off the top of my head, but it shows S’ leadership/ownership/stewardship of this country’s Libya policy from start to finish.

That’s the key thing. Hillary Clinton needs to own the Libyan foreign policy. She wanted to 5 years ago, but she doesn’t want to now. She wants to put some distance there and say “What difference does it make!” They own it from start to finish. She (Cheryl Mills) says let me know what you think, Victoria who else might be able to add to this list? And she puts Secretary Clinton’s leadership on Libya and key paragraph right there: HRC has been a critical voice on Libya in administration deliberations, at NATO, and in contact group meetings – as well as the public face of the U.S. effort in Libya. She was instrumental in securing the authorization, building the coalition, and tightening the noose around Qadhafi and his regime, in other words as she cackled “We came, we saw, he died.” She put this together. And they go through a very long list, a chronology of the various things that she did, meeting with her donors, meeting with foreign governments, and as I pointed out, meeting with the French and telling them, look, you want to keep your neo-colonialist influence that you got going here in Libya, we can help you do that, we’re going to take out Qadhafi because he’s going to become a leading person in this area. And of course these emails showing what was going on, we knew that back in 2011, we reported on it, New American reported on it, many outlets reported on the fact that we all knew that Qadhafi was making no secret of setting up a gold backed currency to go into competition with the fiat currencies of central banks, with the petrodollar that we created, again, and yet we see in their deliberations that was a key factor. We’ve saw that back in January of this year, actually it was on New Years Eve, when they like to release information, the State Department  released and declassified 3,000 emails back on New Years Eve, 2015, just like we saw this information coming out on July 4th, they pick the holidays where nobody is watching, to put that in…

#NeverHillary

September 4, 2016 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Oswald's Raleigh Call: An amazing presentation given by Dr. Grover Proctor with Question and Answer session

Published on Dec 21, 2015

Just hours before his death, Lee Harvey Oswald tried to call Raleigh, North Carolina from the Dallas jail on the evening of Nov. 23, 1963. For years, this significant information was ignored by assassination investigators and concealed from the public.

In the early 1980s, independent researcher Dr. Grover Proctor broke new ground on Oswald’s attempted call. Because of Dr. Proctor’s work, Oswald's attempt to reach former U.S. Intelligence officer John Hurt has become known as “The Raleigh Call.”

 

Related:

 

JFK Murder Truth telling - Heading to the Grassy Knoll on November 22nd - 51st Anniversary
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2013/11/jfk-murder-truth-telling-heading-to-the-grassy-knoll-on-november-22nd-50th-anniversary.html

August 21, 2016 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Clinton Cash - Director's Cut

Published on Jul 31, 2016

Taking the internet by storm, based on Peter Schweizer’s bestselling book!!!
Hillary Clinton went from being “dead broke” after leaving the White House to amassing a net worth of over $150M, with over $2B in donations to their foundation.

 

Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton Rich. New York Times bestselling book by Peter Schweizer, in which he investigates donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities, paid speeches made by Bill and Hillary Clinton, and the Clintons' personal enrichment since leaving the White House in 2001.

 

Mr. Schweizer claims: foreign governments and organizations that donated to the Clinton Foundation, and to the Clintons themselves in speaking fees, received favors in exchange from the State Department, headed by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

 

Ed Pilkington, The Guardian, wrote that "Even in the hyper-partisan world of American political publishing, the storm generated by the latest book about the Clintons has been impressive."

 

James Freeman, The Wall Street Journal "Almost every page of the fascinating Clinton Cash...will be excruciating reading for partisans on both sides of the aisle" and that "The fact that even liberal media outlets are taking the book seriously suggests that a post-election payday is getting harder to achieve."

 

"This film was not made to make money. It was made to alert the public to the appalling — and dangerous — corruption of the Clintons....

 

Who could deny the malignant corruption of a couple that used their political power to make money by propping up the world’s worst dictators, cutting down the rain forests, selling off our nuclear resources to our enemies, and bartering off the assets of the poorest nations on earth while their people live in abject poverty?
Stopping the Clintons is not about being a good conservative or a good progressive. It’s about being a decent human being." Andrew Breitbart

 

Eleanor Clift,The Daily Beast: The Clintons have a standard template for pushing back, and they’re going to use it to make questions about their finances seem part of the vast right-wing conspiracy, but character assassination only goes so far.

 

Galactic Connection: The chicanery and fraud of the Clinton Foundation is absolutely revolting, especially in the case of the so­-called Haitian earthquake relief effort. It’s sickening and appalling how the super rich were enabled to become richer in the wake of a major natural disaster in the poorest nation in the Western Hemisphere. These lowdown grifters cannot be allowed to occupy the White House again!
FACT SHEET FOR “CLINTON’S CASH” http://edukcentral.com/KBfX0FIM


CLINTON CASH,Director's Cut, MOVIE,Bill & Hillary Clinton, Clinton Foundation, "Haitian earthquake relief", Peter Schweizer, Hillary Clinton, Donations, New York Times bestseller, White House, Secretary of State, The Guardian, The Wall Street Journal, money, dictator, rain forests, nuclear resources, poverty, humanity, Breitbart, fraud,Haiti

August 21, 2016 in Current Affairs | Permalink