On 5/29/14: Join a Constitutional Assembly in Washington, D.C., to Free the CIA/JFK Files

Exclusive to OpEdNews: 
General News 4/15/2014 at 11:32:35

5/29/14: Join a Constitutional Assembly in Washington, D.C., to Free the CIA/JFK Files

By  (about the author) 

JFKvigil.com by from original portrait by Jamie B. Wyeth

PRESS RELEASE -  April 14, 2014

A peaceable assembly in petition for release of all Kennedy assassination-related records still withheld by the Central Intelligence Agency will begin on Thursday, May 29, at 12:30 p.m. on public terraces of the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts, 2700 F St., NW, Washington D.C.

Initiated by Karl Golovin, a retired U.S. Customs special agent, "the right to peaceably assemble, and petition for redress of grievances may not be suppressed or prohibited, as 'under color of law' by, for example, imposing inherently unconstitutional permit and regulatory requirements," says Golovin. "In the United States, the government isn't to make people create an organizational hierarchy, submit plans and ask permission before publicly assembling to require that the government immediately change and stop doing something evil.  Of course, the nature of governing authority through most of human history has been to avoid or manage criticism, to maintain absolute control and discourage public gatherings large enough to establish undeniable awareness of a need for change.  But in America, the Constitution says that if we have a grievance, we have the right to show up," he said. "Those we've placed in governing responsibility should welcome this process of receiving feedback and requiring their accountability - and not mischaracterize it as 'protesting' or 'civil disobedience.'" 

Operation Nutcracker - CrackTheNut.com by Karl Golovin


Golovin is hoping many will heed this call to peaceably assemble and prompt the President to require the CIA's immediate release of the records. "If as many people show up as have expressed outrage about the government's conduct in this matter over the 50 years since November 22, 1963, the government will promptly release the records.  Peaceably assembling, not just online blogging and submitting written or electronic petitions, is the means provided by the Constitution whereby the American people may actually begin regaining control of our constitutional republic," Golovin said. 

JFKvigil.com by Karl Golovin

"There is no legitimate reason for continued withholding of information about JFK's assassination," said Golovin.  "In 1985, sworn testimony in a Miami federal trial - never publicized by mainstream media - implicated E. Howard Hunt, Frank Sturgis, and other CIA personnel in the assassination.  Before dying in 2007, Hunt taped his own confession - thin on details of self-described 'benchwarmer' status in the plot - yet implicating the involvement of not just Sturgis, but other CIA figures, including William King Harvey, David Sanchez Morales, and David Atlee Phillips.

E. Howard Hunt by google image by Live Auction Group

"How can the CIA delay releasing operational or other records of those who have confessed or been so implicated in President Kennedy's murder?" asks Golovin. "'National Security?' No, 'National Security' rather requires genuine unraveling of the lies that 'Oswald acted alone' and 'Ruby acted alone;' Even reining in the CIA to its original, intelligence-only mandate and terminating its operational duties, as recommended a month after JFK's murder by the man who signed into law establishment of the CIA, President Harry Truman." Golovin notes, "Trying to make the world a better place by just killing all the right people obviously hasn't worked so well.  The founders were wise to agree on the requirement in the U.S. Constitution that Congress, the peoples' collective representation - not just a president, or CIA - must  declare war prior to unleashing acts of war, like assassinations and destructive interference in the internal affairs of other countries.  We have moved far enough in the wrong direction since JFK's assassination; it's time to correct our direction."

Golovin said that in part due to the proliferation of social media, the people of the United States have become complacent and forgotten the power of simply showing up in large numbers. "The government can't treat assembly as civil disobedience. It is actually the heightof civil obedience to peaceably show up and hold our government accountable," Golovin stated. "It would be highly uncivil of authorities to prevent or disrupt it."

Golovin remembers a quote by Kennedy, "One person can make a difference, and everyone should try."  He hopes hundreds, thousands, or more may heed that call.

JFKvigil.com by Karl Golovin

There are no plans for speakers during the assembly. "This is not about people gathering to be entertained, and any making the effort to be here will no doubt already understand the issues at stake.  We have become far too comfortable with routinely gathering only online, or just to hear experts speak and then ourselves go home, buy more books and continue always studying, always preparing, yet perhaps never taking demonstrable action.  This assembly is about experiencing the importance and power of our collective presence, gathering in expectation that those in government will promptly initiate a meaningful response; release of the records," Golovin said. 

Following the assembly, the group may disperse and peaceably reassemble elsewhere, perhaps at the White House or CIA Headquarters, "to emphasize the immediacy of our grievance," Golovin said. "In first assembling, we are creating a moment for spontaneity.  In that moment and those to follow, none should instigate or participate in disorderliness or violence - any persons doing so should be immediately shunned, as likely planted by others to discredit the assembly; this is a day for peaceably assembling, in petition for redress of specific grievances."

Golovin recently hosted on March 21st, during "Sunshine Week," showing of a film, "JFK: A President Betrayed," at the Goethe Institute in Washington D.C., followed by a video produced by Golovin and discussion of the potential for what he terms "Constitutional Activism" in the context of the JFK assassination records issue.

HonorJFK.com by Karl Golovin

Concurrent with this press release, Golovin is placing on YouTube an updated version of the original video on this topic, which received about 1700 views after initial posting on January 4, 2014.  The current video may be viewed by going to the domain names www.HonorJFK.com orwww.CrackTheNut.com, as are forwarded to the video, or on the link provided at the Facebook Event page for the May 29th assembly, as is easily reached via:  www.JFKvigil.com

The video released by Golovin and related Facebook Event page issue a call to action:

"On JFK's birthday, peaceably and simultaneously assemble in communities across the U.S. and world, but especially on the public terraces of The Kennedy Center, Washington, D.C., petitioning by your presence for: 1) Immediate release, in full, of all still secret assassination-related records; 2) Reining in of the CIA to its original, intelligence-only mandate; 3) Establishing a specific date for annual, global recognition of John Kennedy's life by vigilance in ending the intimidation of government secrecy and the violence it perpetuates, shining the light of transparency in  governments everywhere."

JFKvigil.com by Karl Golovin


Between this press release and May 29th, Golovin anticipates publicly displaying a sign and distributing flyers calling for the May 29th assembly:

  1. On April 21st, 2014, at both the John F. Kennedy National Historical Site (JFK Birthplace) and JFK Presidential Library and Museum, Boston, MA;
  2. On the morning of April 22, 2014, during the broadcast of "Good Morning America," from the Rockefeller Center, New York, NY.
  3. Between April 22, 2014 and May 29th, on Pennsylvania Avenue, in front of the White House, and other appropriate venues in and around Washington, D.C.

On May 29th, Golovin anticipates release of a still further updated video, addressing matters to include E. Howard Hunt's confession and President George H. W. Bush's association with the CIA before his appointment as the agency's director in 1976.  Of note, FBI director J. Edgar Hoover took pains to carefully document that on November 23, 1963, "Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency" received an assassination-related FBI briefing, the day after JFK's murder.  

Also on May 29th, if all records related to JFK's assassination are not released on or before that date, Golovin anticipates calling for subsequent reassemblies on the public terraces of the Kennedy Center, on November 22, 2014, the 51st anniversary of JFK's murder, and thereafter as necessary, including on the date yet to be announced for filming of the 2014 Kennedy Center Honors.

For more information contact Karl Golovin at Twitter at @karlgolovin, Phone 305-531-8381,  email address removed; Website www.JFKvigil.com is currently under construction, but that domain address forwards directly to the Facebook Event page for the May 29th Constitutional Assembly in Washington. Copies of all posters/flyers are available for free download via http://www.JFKvigil.info.

Ref: http://www.opednews.com/articles/2/5-29-14-Join-a-Constituti-by-Karl-Golovin-Assassination_CIA_Free-Speech-Censored_Free-Speech-Online-140415-427.html

Related: http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2013/11/jfk-murder-truth-telling-heading-to-the-grassy-knoll-on-november-22nd-50th-anniversary.html

April 15, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Why Are They Still Lying To Us Re: JFK Assassination?

Exclusive to OpEdNews: 
General News 4/13/2014 at 19:26:23

The JFK Assassination: Why are They Still Lying to Us?

By  (about the author)   

Dealey Plaza Nov 22,2013 by ©Lance Moore

    A few days after the 50th Anniversary of the assassination of John F. Kennedy, my wife and I chatted with a new acquaintance in an upscale bar in D.C., a spot frequented by Congressmen. Leaning toward us across the table, a dapperly-dressed man confirmed my suspicions about the CIA and a certain magazine. His wife, he confided, works for the internationally-prestigious magazine, and she had told him the CIA frequented her workplace to spy on a nearby embassy--with full cooperation by her employers. I found her story credible, in part because it is now well-established that the CIA infiltrated and influenced a long list of newspapers and magazines.1 Initially, I had been surprised that the magazine in question, an organization with great credibility in the academic community, risked their reputation to broadcast blatant lies about the JFK shooting. Why fib about something that happened half-a-century ago? The answer is astounding: the CIA --fifty years on--still believes it cannot afford the hit to its credibility... it refuses to admit that Lee Harvey Oswald was a company man. And it still has a vise-like grip on the mainstream media.

    I am not a kook. Several parchments from prestigious institutions hang on my wall to assure me that I'm not crazy. I'm not a 911 "Truther" or a "Man didn't land on the moon" conspiracy nut. Yet, when I began promoting my book about the JFK assassination, I observed some curious things. Major news outlets circled their wagons around the "official" government story that Lee Harvey Oswald was a lone nut, nixing any dissenting opinions. Pro-Warren Commission, pro-lone-gunman pundits (a dying breed) were trotted out on CBS, ABC and even PBS. Credible experts who offer proof of government complicity were disinvited. Others in the assassination-research community told me similar stories of how they had been scheduled for cable news/network appearances, but were cancelled at the last minute--without explanation. Even my local city newspaper, which has featured my writing on other topics, refused to print a rebuttal I had written to counter a "lone-gunman did it" fluff-piece they ran in November 2013. 

    I have been harassed. Nasty, over-the-top attacks were posted on the Amazon review page of my JFK book (despite four and five star reviews by 95% of readers). Correspondence between myself and Vince Palamara (a Secret Service expert who has been featured on C-SPAN, the History Channel, etc.) was sliced open and contents stolen, apparently with the blessing of the U.S. Postal Service.2 At the 50th anniversary event in Dealey Plaza November 22nd, an ABC-TV cameraman pulled out his iPhone and snapped a picture of my book's cover, saying he was personally interested in it... but made it clear his network was not. A CBS reporter and his cameraman interviewed me, but the footage never aired. At the end of the day, outside the Dallas JFK museum in the Texas School Book Depository, I was assaulted--choked without any provocation--by the bodyguard of former Secret Service Agent Clint Hill, as I tried to shake hands with Hill after his book-signing.3  These are things happening now, not 50 years ago.

    But let's back up and look at the long media history. The few times the networks dared examine the topic, the reporting was one-sided. CBS, for example, gave extended screen-time to so-called "conspiracy debunker" Gerald Posner, but allowed only short, benign snippets from lone-gunman critics like Dr. Cyril Wecht (and Dr. Wecht is a top-notch forensic scientist; Posner is not). I challenge doubters to put a stopwatch on any major network's coverage of the JFK assassination and see how much time is afforded the debunkers vs. the conspiracy "nuts." (one man's "nut" is another's "credentialed expert.") Though I am personally convinced that the CIA helped kill Kennedy, I concede there are two sides to this debate. So, mainstream media, give us both sides! The one-sided press coverage should scare the hell out of us.


    For those who have only heard the propaganda, allow me this brief rebuttal. One of the few intelligent debunkers is attorney and author Vincent Bugliosi. But he squanders his credibility by repeatedly insisting: "There is not a shred of credible evidence of conspiracy." If he had argued his side calmly and honestly, he might deserve our ears. He is, in the end, no different than most debunkers: shrill, uninterested in truth, stretching logic just for the sake of winning--as if this were a High School debating club. He stands in front of a mountain of credible evidence, countering each challenge with clever but speculative workarounds, a hundred times repeating the mantra "there is not a shred of evidence...."An ironic choice of words: a shred. We have amountain of stench and garbage that stands as a sick monument to the conspiracy, and a lot of that evidence was, literally, shredded! Despite the concerted cover-up, facts have trickled out. Below are five huge indications of government complicity in the murder of our President, all based on established facts, many from the government's own documents:

1. The Impersonation of Oswald: The strongest proof of a conspiracy is also the least reported: someone was impersonating Oswald six weeks before cameras in Dallas made him infamous. This is not rumor or speculation. White House tapes, FBI memos, and CIA photosoffer irrefutable, solid proof that someone was trying to forge the appearance that Lee Harvey Oswald had been in Mexico chatting with communists. In a still-available White House tape of a phone call between LBJ and J. Edgar Hoover the day after JFK's death, the FBI Director revealed that "we know for a fact" that while "a man... was using Oswald's name" in Mexico, the real Oswald was in New Orleans. This "Mexico thing," as Hoover called it, was "puzzling" because his agents and Dallas police had reviewed the recording and all said the voice on the CIA tape was not Oswald's.4  If Oswald was a loner and a "nobody," as the government portrayed him, why would anyone be pretending to be him at the Soviet Embassy in Mexico? The obvious answer is that the initial frame-up plan had included painting Oswald as a traitor in league with Soviets or Cubans. That constitutes a conspiracy. Moreover, President Johnson showed no surprise at this blockbuster news, and no interest in pursuing it. Perhaps at first Johnson wanted to blame the killing on the Soviets, but upon reflection, realized this would be flirting with nuclear war. So he changed tactics: LBJ began using that threat--a thermonuclear battle with Russia--as a rationale for persuading innocent folks (Chief Justice Earl Warren, for example) to assist him in a whitewash, making Oswald a lone scapegoat. Posner, Bugliosi and the other debunkers have no explanation for this "Mexico thing."

2. The Head Wounds: An exiting bullet caused a massive rear head wound, so the fatal shot came from the front. This required a second gunman, a conspiracy, and a cover-up. The government released autopsy sketches, and later a fake photo, showing the back of JFK's head nearly-undamaged, with short hairs all neatly in place. This is in stark contrast to the other photos showing a tangle of very long hair at the back of his crown, and in conflict with the best and earliest witnesses, all who reported a "gaping" occipital (rear) wound over 4" across and frontal entrance wounds. The proof is found right in the pages of the Warren Commission Report itself, in the testimony of doctors and of two Secret Service agents. Special Agent Clint Hill was spread-eagled on top of the Kennedys as they sped to the hospital. Other than doctors, Hill was the closest observer of JFK's rear head wound as he hovered over the President as they sped to Parkland--the closest in proximity and in time (before any medical person or mortician altered the look of the wounds). And Hill's sworn testimony is unequivocal: he saw a gaping rear head wound of exit. Counsel Arlen Specter led the WC interview:

Mr. Specter: "What did you observe as to President Kennedy's condition on arrival at the hospital?"

Mr. Hill, under oath: "The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car.... There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head."5

    What Hill saw--"a gaping wound... in the right rear" --is consistent with the location of the large wound described by over a dozen of the Parkland medical staff. Doctors described specifically the occipital, or lower rear of the skull. This should not be confused with theparietal or temporal, terms which could apply to another wound on the side of JFK's skull. The parietal can also refer, in part, to the rear, but it extends forward toward the side/ temporal region, where the WC wants you to think the bullet "exited" --on the right side. Thus the WC favored the word "parietal" rather than "occipital" whenever possible, since it was less specific. The separate right-side wound is visible in the Zapruder film, and was also a gruesome wound. But five Secret Service Agents and a flock of doctors described a larger wound at the back of the head, fully in the rear. Here's a partial list of Parkland medical personnel who described a wound irreconcilable with the autopsy photo: Nurse Diana Bowron, Nurse Doris Nelson, Dr. Charles BaxterDr. James CarricoDr. Robert McClellandDr. M. T. Jenkins, Dr. Ronald Coy JonesDr. Gene AkinDr. Kemp ClarkDr. Charles CrenshawDr. Malcolm Perry. A dozen doctors wrote immediate reports and/or gave sworn testimony. They had no reason to lie, and they certainly qualify as expert witnesses trained to be careful observers. (The Bethesda autopsy, by contrast, was done by three inexperienced military autopsists under pressure to do and say as little as possible.) No reasonable explanation has ever been offered for this irreconcilable difference, other than conspiracy. The WC simply ignored the clash between the Washington version vs. the Dallas version of JFK's skull, hoping that the few Americans who actually read the Warren Report would not realize that "occipital" means "rear." Dr. Crenshaw summed it up best by stating that the WC Report is "a fable," an "insult to the intelligence of the American people."

    To pour salt on the wound, so to speak, the House Select Committee on Assassinations reported that it re-interviewed most of the medical personnel, who clarified earlier statements so that now, the HSCA claims, there is a consensus: no large exit wound on the rear of JFK's skull. A lie. Their own records prove otherwise. There was no consensus or consistency. One quick example: look at the testimony of Dr. John Ebersole from Bethesda. Dr. Ebersole plainly told the HSCA that he had seen a gaping occipital wound. The HSCA ignored him and several other dissenters to falsely claim that everyone at Bethesda verified the autopsy photos. The HSCA continued the cover-up begun by the Warren Commission. Over 25 medical personnel (most at Parkland but several at Bethesda) and 5 Secret Service Agents are on record stating there was a large wound at the rear (mostly occipital).6  The alteration of autopsy photos to hide that fact required government complicity. 

3. Every single piece of evidence used to indict Oswald is problematic.  I'm not exaggerating. Every major and minor bit of evidence has a puzzle or flaw in it. We expect all criminal cases to have some evidentiary blemish, some i not dotted or t not crossed, and certainly eye-witnesses get details wrong. But cut into the Swiss-cheese case against Oswald (which includes the murder of Police Officer J.D. Tippit), and every slice is riddled with holes:

    Witnesses described men on the sixth floor who did not match Oswald's description, as well as different men at Tippit's shooting--balding, dark-complected, stocky suspects wearing different colored clothes than Oswald. Oswald was near the scenes of both crimes (necessary for framing a patsy), yet the timing doesn't work right for Oswald to be at either location at theexact time. Within two minutes of each crime, he was seen by credible witnesses, standing calmly: a) five floors down in the Book Depository, near the Coke machine, and later, b) at a bus stop a mile away from the Tippit shooting.

    For every witness saying shots were fired from the sixth floor, we have an equal or greater number saying shots were fired from the Grassy Knoll. Not a single line-up "I.D." of Oswald would have stood up in court. Witnesses heard Oswald loudly complaining, while being herded into the police line-up, that of course the witnesses would point to him, dressed in a shabby T-shirt with a black-eye and unkempt appearance. He stood out like a sore thumb. Howard Brennan, the only witness to claim he could identify Oswald as the sniper, claims he saw Oswald in the shadows, through a window pane, six floors up, and from across the street. Brennan wrongly described the sniper as standing at the window (when the shooter had to be kneeling to clear the closed window). So not surprisingly, Brennan failed to I.D. him in the first line-up--despite seeing the efforts by law enforcement to "sore thumb" Oswald.

   The problematic evidence continues with every detail: the bag that Oswald allegedly used to smuggle the rifle into the building was not large enough to envelop the rifle --even disassembled-- nor would it have fit under his armpit, as a witness described Lee carrying it that morning. No prints of any kind were found on the rifle until it had been spirited away to Washington by a complicit FBI, and no one explained why only one print (Oswald's palm) was found later (remember, no gloves were found on Oswald or anywhere he'd been... it is impossible to assemble that rifle without putting fingerprints all over it). Tests failed to show any gunfire residue on Oswald's cheek, another impossibility if he had fired the telescopic rifle. There were serious problems with identification and provenance of the bullet/shell casings atboth crime scenes. There are problems with the records: no police tapes or transcripts (just a few notes) were kept of Oswald's hours of interrogation; records for the Post Office box where the guns were shipped were "lost"; autopsy notes were burned; a note from Oswald to FBI days before the assassination was destroyed by FBI Agent James Hosty; thousands of CIA documents were hidden or heavily redacted, and CIA tapes (allegedly) of Oswald in Mexico were erased.

    A long list of highly-suspect actions (and inactions) by the Secret Service before and during the crime also continued after the crime: illegal removal of JFK's body from Texas; cleaning the limo (a crime scene) before it was forensically examined; dry-cleaning Governor Connally's clothes before they were examined, etc. Evidence and film from the autopsy (JFK's brain, skull fragments and photos) are missing.

    Back to the rifle: the scope was misaligned and the gun could not be fired fast enough to allow for the separate shots that hit JFK, Connally, and bystander James Tague. To work around that case-destroying problem, the Commission invented (without any evidence to warrant it) the so-called Single Bullet Theory. We call it the Magic Bullet, because none of the angles work without magical turns.* Dr. Cyril Wecht, past President of the American Academy of Forensic Science and a top forensic expert, deemed the Single Bullet Theory "impossible." No wonder that then-Commissioner Gerald Ford fudged the wording in the WC's report about the location of the bullet's entry into JFK's back. Correct placement of the back wound and front throat wound prove the shot could not have come angling down from the sixth floor.

    Given space, I could continue to list a thousand highly-questionable aspects of this case. In any murder trial, we can expect some mistaken eye-witnesses, some unanswered questions, and even some botched or incomplete evidence gathering... but not in every single aspect of the case.

    It took author Vincent Bugliosi 1,500 pages to try to explain away the hundreds of problems with the case against Oswald. He failed. Half of his case is based on opinion and exaggeration, and the other half presumes a false "straw man" argument: that conspiracy buffs claim Oswald was a shooter, or that he was completely uninvolved. Neither is the case; what we are claiming is that Oswald was involved, but only as a framed patsy who thought he had a future as an undercover agent. That is the only scenario that explains his history and actions. Overwhelming evidence shows Oswald had ties to the FBI and CIA and yearned to be, like Jethro Bodine, a "double-naught spy." Oswald's ties to Guy Bannister (FBI and Naval Intelligence) and David Ferrie (CIA) have now been proven. In addition to a photo showing David Ferrie and Oswald together, I have new, never-published testimony from the son of an Eastern Airlines pilot from New Orleans who worked with Ferrie and saw him with Oswald. Oswald's adult life intersected the intelligence community at every point.

4. The eyes and ears closest to the incident almost all agree that the final, fatal shot came from in front. Many "ear-witnesses" in Dealey Plaza heard shots from the Texas School Book Depository behind JFK--not surprising, since much larger crowds had gathered nearer the building than at the tail end of the route, where the final shot made impact. But a large number heard shots from the Grassy Knoll in front of the President (or from both directions). Some even saw gun-smoke and smelled gunpowder at that location. Fresh footprints were found behind the fence where the witnesses saw smoke and a "flash of light."


    The Warren Commission's explanation of "echoes" does not explain away the strong testimonies of eyes, ears and noses. Scores of people followed a half-dozen policemen up the knoll to chase a suspected gunman behind the fence, leading to the railway yard" this is on film. I've been to Dallas, and the Grassy Knoll is a far superior "sniper's nest" than the one on the sixth floor of the Depository: hidden behind a fence and the shadow of trees, the "second gunman" had a perfect angle slightly above the roadway, three times closer and a less obtuse angle than from where Oswald was purported to be crouched. The fenced area allowed for an instant getaway by car or through the rail-yard--and that area had been cleared of bystanders by a man with a badge, an agent or officer that we now know was an impostor. To recap overfifty witnesses heard a shot(s) from the Grassy Knoll area, half of whom were well-experienced with gunfire... so this is the first and only murder case to dismiss fifty witnesses as "unreliable" or "not credible."

5. Several investigations --huge efforts by the government-- not only failed to explain the many inconsistencies in evidence, they also abetted the cover-up. When journalists or debunkers claim, "the government had three investigations and found nothing," they are either ignorant of the full story... or they lie. Let's remember that the first investigations were by the Dallas law enforcement and the FBI (not the Warren Commission). The result? Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry concluded there was a conspiracy, and stated, "We don't have any proof that Oswald fired the rifle, and never did. Nobody's yet been able to put him in the building with a gun in his hand." His initial order--the first law enforcement response to the shooting--was a radio command to send officers up the hill at the Triple Underpass/Grassy Knoll. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Roger Craig was convinced there was a conspiracy. TwoFBI agents, James Sibert and Frank O'Neil, who attended the autopsy, are on record saying the (altered) autopsy photos do not match the wounds they saw in person. Sibert has publicly condemned the Warren Commission and insists there was a conspiracy. Even FBI Director Hoover, an ally to LBJ, is on record speaking of the Oswald impostor (which, by definition, indicates another conspirator). As for the Warren Commission, whole books have been written exposing it as error-ridden propaganda. Congressman Hale Boggs, one of the Commissioners, reluctantly signed off on the final report under pressure from LBJ, but later told people privately he could not accept the "Magic Bullet Theory." Boggs told friends that "Hoover lied his eyes out to the Commission," but then Boggs' plane mysteriously disappeared in Alaska, silencing his dissent.7 Likewise, another Commissioner, Senator Richard Russell, later denounced the Commission's no-conspiracy conclusion, saying, "we have not been told the truth about Oswald."

    The House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) was also a politically-manipulated cover-up. Several high-level attorney-staffers, and its Chairman, resigned from the HSCA, in protest of yet another government whitewash. Robert K. Tanenbaum, an early Deputy Chief Counsel for the HSCA, stated, "They played politics with our investigation and subverted it." Then came the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB), which was not a new investigation but a thorough review of records by an independent board (with the aid of the National Archives). If you read their report, you will find repeatedly words like "mystery" and "vexing" to describe inconsistencies in the record and their frustration with the CIA's refusal to produce non-redacted documents. One ARRB board member, Douglas Horne, released his own five-volume report on what he learned from the experience. He became absolutely convinced JFK was killed by a conspiracy involving LBJ, Hoover, and the CIA. Horne concluded in his book, (Inside the AARB, p. 1467) that "the intelligence community... actually planned and carried out the assassination...." So, contrary to the debunkers' claims: all the government investigations, beneath the veneer of their propagandized conclusions, found evidence of conspiracy.

Why this is still relevant: The fact that no one has ever gone to prison for the assassination is a product of a continued CIA cover-up and propaganda campaign. The Senate "Church Committee" investigated the CIA in the mid-seventies and learned that the spy agency had indeed been involved in political assassinations (of Latin American leaders). The Church Committee also discovered that the CIA regularly spent hundreds of millions of dollars on propaganda, mainly by infiltrating media outlets, releasing disinformation, or bribing journalists. Foreign and domestic. This practice continues unabated. In 1999, William Schapp testified that, "About a third of the whole CIA budget went to media propaganda operations... close to a billion dollars are being spent every year... on propaganda." Carl Bernstein, Jack Anderson, and other award-winning journalists have reported how the New York Times, the Washington Post,TIME/LifeNewsweek and others have been in league with the CIA. Some of the failure of mainstream media to lift the veil from the JFK assassination is a function of ego, of being unwilling to admit their own failures at investigative journalism. But, without a doubt, part of the cover-up is the product of CIA influence and intimidation. That means we are no longer a true democracy. There was a coup d'état in 1963, and now there continues to be a massive cover-up in the media. But it is less scary to just dismiss me and my "ilk" (ilk meaning attorneys, doctors, law enforcement experts, and PhD's and ministers) as kooks; it's far safer to put on a pair of emerald-colored glasses and keep ignoring the Wizard behind the curtain.


-Dr. Moore's recently-released book contains substantiation for his assertions here. Some specific Endnotes for this article follow:

1. see S.H. Loory's report, "The CIA's Use of the Press," Columbia Journalism Review, September/October 1974; Carl Bernstein's essay, "The CIA and the Media," Rolling Stone, October 20, 1977, or google "Operation Mockingbird."

2. Vince Palamara posted photos of our "burgled" mail on his Facebook page.

3. I have this on video. Clint Hill intervened and called his "goon" off, but no one offered an apology for my being pushed and choked.

4. Read the transcript here: click here=807.

5. Warren Commission Report, Volume II, pp. 140-142, emphasis added.

6. SS Agents on record having seen a gaping rear head wound: Sam Kinney (in interview with Vince Palamara), Winston Lawson (to a local Virginia newpaper in 2010), Roy Kellerman (in Warren Commission Report and HSCA drawing) Bill Greer (WC), and Clint Hill (in Warren Commission Report and in his own book). See Palamara's book, Survivor's Guilt.

7. http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.php/Warren_Commission

*The subject of the Magic Bullet is too long and complex to cover here, so I refer interested readers to my book, Killing JFK: 50 Years, 50 Lies--From the Warren Commission to Bill O'Reilly, A History of Deceit in the Kennedy Assassination. Excerpts from it are used with permission of Sky-Fy Publishing, at http://www.Sky-Fy.com


Ref: http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/The-JFK-Assassination-Why-by-Lance-Moore-Assassination_Assassination-Attempt_Conspiracies_Conspiracy-140413-711.html

Related: http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2013/11/jfk-murder-truth-telling-heading-to-the-grassy-knoll-on-november-22nd-50th-anniversary.html

April 15, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

U.S. gov, BLM back down from starting a shooting war in Nevada re: Harry Reid land deals with China?

Wow, BLM spent 3 million USD on their dumb little operation? Makes sense?

Militia Push Feds out of Nevada: Sheriff of Clark County Announces Feds Leaving Bundy’s Land


covertnorcal Guest
Rank 0
Insider from homeland security- the Bundy ranch issue is just starting.....BLM will not give up. 
Paul Arnold 
From Doug Hagmann 
At 1750 hours ET, I was contacted by my source within the Department of Homeland Security regarding the current situation at the Bundy Ranch. To put it bluntly, the people are being hoodwinked into believing that the situation is being resolved. It is not. It is a strategic de-escalation to fool the public. This source stated that the retreat of the BLM agents and the release of the cattle was actually crafted as a potential plan yesterday (Friday, 11 April 2014) based on the following: 
1. A military assessment of satellite and drone surveillance imagery of the “patriot resistance. Drones under the control of the U.S. military were in use, taking real-time photographic images of not just the activity at the ranch, but "identifying the protesters, any arms and any supplies they might have or be carrying. “Mission accomplished.” 
2. Real-time communication intercepts between patriots on-site and their off-site support; 
3. Active monitoring of internet traffic regarding the coverage of events at ranch; 
4. The monitoring of real-time video from the scene. 
This source stated that a response by the patriot movement was anticipated, although exceeded their expectations. Although this was a real operation, they also ran this as a test case for future government operations once they saw the response. They were also actively managing the media, in some cases threatening to cut off White House access to anyone covering the event. 
Despite this, the coverage by the alternative media began to create a public relations problem that was not easily managed. . . PLEASE MAKE THIS VIRAL« less


Quinn Sysmith and 4 others shared Debbie Paulsen's video.

This is as American as it gets! The Cavalry today at the ‪#‎BundyRanch‬!! This is fromStand with The Bundys ~ video by Sam Suazo ~ (had to save it and repost it as the group's closed)

Ripples of Nevada range showdown spreading in West


Live updates of militia conference call about Bundy Ranch SPECIAL

 0  150  19  0 GOOGLE +1
Las Vegas - As tensions diminish and the standoff between militias supporting Cliven Bundy and federal agents winds down, various militias and supporters conduct a conference call to discuss events and strategy.
As the standoff ends in what can only be considered a win for Cliven Bundy and the militias in the United States, supporters and participants hold a conference call to discuss the events. Similar calls have been conducted over the last several days to coordinate resistance to the federal operation.
Callers are identified by a four-digit numerical designation or a call sign.
Digital Journal will be providing exclusive updates of the discussion every ten minutes.
A cow grazing in wild countryside
A cow grazing in wild countryside
Call summary:
Host: Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has stood down and the situation is defusing.
Unidentified Caller: BLM has returned some of the cattle seized during the standoff.
Host: Expresses gratitude that the situation seems to have ended peacefully.
5710: Woman calls in to state that a police scanner call says that federal forces are conducting a uniform change, and have not ended the standoff. Report is unconfirmed.
Host: Asks for intelligence reports via Twitter marked with the hastag #OathBeforeOrders.
California 2: Advises continued presence and encourages people to keep the communication network up through "Operation American Spring."
Host: States that militia alerts levels remain elevated, and will remain elevated until the situation has completely diffused.
Host: Advises the call is open to all supporters. Number is 559-726-1300. The access code to enter the conference call is 276125.
Justin King: Notified callers that press was on the call and that the conversation was being summarized and posted via Digital Journal.
Unidentified caller: Dispels rumors of shots being fired today at the ranch.
Host: Minutemen notice states that the Bundy family is still requesting support in the ongoing battle with the federal government.
Host: Discusses the value of the communication network to the opposition's desire for peace.
Host: Requests reports from personnel at Bundy Ranch regarding numbers of federal personnel still in area.
Several callers: Discussion of the possibility of the withdraw being an opportunity for federal forces to regroup. Consensus of participants is that the battle of Bundy Ranch is not over.
2 Million Bikers: Advises that BLM has not backed down and that government forces are waiting for the withdraw of militia forces.
5814: Reports in for North Carolina. Supports idea that BLM is regrouping and that the confrontation has not ended.
8748: Reports in from District of Columbia. Advises a social media post contained the wrong access code for the call.
Host: Personal remarks about a homeless friend.
Unidentified caller: Asks about detained militia members from Oklahoma and Texas.
Host: Verifies that some of the militiamen had been released, but no confirmation as to whether or not all those detained have been released.
Host: Advises everyone in the area abide by local firearms laws and keep a low profile.
3035 "Chicago Girl": Discusses a potential Presidential candidate.
Host: Makes jokes about the candidate's birth certificate.
Florida 1: Northeast Florida Minutemen report in.
Host: Discusses the cattle already in the possession of BLM that have been auctioned or destroyed.
Florida 1: Discusses reported National Guard presence in Nevada.
Host: Discuss necessity to have date and time of photos to be used for militia intelligence operations.
Montana 1: Questions the validity of the conference call. Discussion about federal disinformation operations.
0773: Alternative media notifies they are streaming the call via their website.
Unidentified Caller: States Lt. Colonel Alan West has stated that BLM does not plan on leaving for "at least a day or two." Then discusses a recording of federal agents telling protesters "If you come any closer, we will shoot."
Host: Discusses the possibility of Constitutional convention.
Makethemlisten: Discusses immigration reform.
7357: Comments on the lack of elected officials commenting on an armed standoff between militias and federal agents. States that Harry Reid's connections to the property were at fault.
Host: Discusses an "awakening" in the United States to federal tyranny. Cites google searches for the term "False Flag."
Alaska 1: States 40 State Senators and Representatives from Arizona have issued a letter of recognition in favor of Cliven Bundy.
Nevada: Report from Bundy Ranch from Oregon Militia stating that federal agents are at a Holiday Inn near the ranch regrouping in fatigues. Militia is currently pulling up BLM signs near the ranch and will dump them in the Holiday Inn parking lot to let federal agents know that the militia units are aware of their presence.
1907: Discussion with measures necessary to join the Illinois Militia.
1371: Intelligence update from Red River site where a similar action by the federal government is occurring. Discussion about sending some militia forces to the area to reinforce that location. Illinois Sons of Liberty forces heading to ranch.
Houston Oath Keepers: Advises participants to become more involved in local politics and election of Sheriffs.
Host: Advises law enforcement to begin filing charges against other officers that engage in police brutality and corruption.
Houston Oath Keepers: Reinforces the advice of host in regards to officers keeping silent in the face of police brutality.
Louisiana 1: Questions stance of militia deployments in regards to areas left unprotected by the deployments.
Host: Advises those arriving to come as peaceful protesters in civilian clothes that "just happen to have munitions and weapons to be used in self defense."
Louisiana 1: Requests more intelligence on Red River site.
Host: Advises militias are maintaining elevated alert levels.
7711: States a source has informed her that the federal operation was to secure land to meet international obligations.
This article will now be updated every thirty minutes throughout the call.

Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/world/live-updates-of-militia-conference-call-about-bundy-ranch-breaking-news/article/380698#ixzz2yjgwrNwx
This article will be updated every ten minutes throughout the call.

Ref: http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/world/live-updates-of-militia-conference-call-about-bundy-ranch-breaking-news/article/380698

Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/world/live-updates-of-militia-conference-call-about-bundy-ranch-breaking-news/article/380698#ixzz2yjbXGquf

Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/world/live-updates-of-militia-conference-call-about-bundy-ranch-breaking-news/article/380698#ixzz2yjKbcxX0




Published on Apr 11, 2014


Citing armed protesters, BLM returns seized cattle to Nevada rancher



Is Harry Reid behind the actions of BLM in Nevada?


Stun gun used on rancher's son in cattle roundup


BLM to 'conclude' roundup of Bundy cattle


Let's recap:

Q+A: Behind the Bundy, BLM battle



Here we go again.  Westerns it is time to lock and load, and ready your pack.  This is worthy of YELLOW ALERT!   Local militias in Nevada need to be on the ground.  This is another attempt by the FEDS to put farmers out of business.  Do you really want your beef shipped from China?

Sir David-Andrew.

Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher

Ruby Ridge-style standoff brewing as Bundy says he is prepared to be killed

            bundyA Ruby Ridge-style standoff is brewing in Nevada, where dozens of armed federal agents are closing in on cattle rancher Cliven Bundy over claims that Bundy has allowed his cows to graze illegally on government land, endangering a protected species of tortoise.

8 News NOW

Vowing to take a stand for, “your liberty and freedom,” Bundy says he is prepared to be killed as authorities surround a 600,000 acre section of public land as a result of Bundy violating a 1993 Bureau of Land Management ruling which changed grazing rights in order to protect the endangered desert tortoise.

“With all these rangers and all this force that is out here, they are only after one man right now. They are after Cliven Bundy. Whether they want to incarcerate me or whether they want to shoot me in the back, they are after me. But that is not all that is at stake here. Your liberty and freedom is at stake,” Bundy said.

Bundy’s refusal to recognize federal authority over the land under dispute and his failure to pay tens of thousands of dollars in grazing fees stems from his assertion that his family’s history trumps bureaucracy.

“My forefathers have been up and down the Virgin Valley ever since 1877. All these rights I claim have been created through pre-emptive rights and beneficial use of the forage and water. I have been here longer. My rights are before the BLM even existed,” Bundy said.

Accusing feds of seizing Nevada’s sovereignty, Bundy says he has fought the battle legally, through the media, and is now gearing up to fight it physically.

“Armed agents are forming a a military-like staging area to prevent anyone from approaching the area,” writes Mike Paczesny.

Bundy asserts that his case is emblematic of how America has been transformed into a “police state,” labeling the government’s actions “pathetic”.

Hundreds of federal officials, aided by helicopters, low flying aircraft and hired cowboys, began rounding up Bundy’s cattle on Saturday as Bundy accused them of “trespassing,” adding that the impact will only serve to raise beef prices for residents of Las Vegas 80 miles away.

Feds postponed a similar raid in 2012 over fears the action would spur violence. Bundy has drawn a lot of support from the local community and protesters are heading to the area to demand authorities back off. Officials have created a taped off “First AmendmentArea” where demonstrators can voice their concerns. A sign placed inside the area reads “Welcome to Amerika – Wake Up” alongside a hammer and sickle logo.

“The rights were created for us,” Bundy told the Las Vegas Review Journal. “I have the right to use the forage. I have water rights. I have access rights. I have range improvement rights, and I claim all the other rights that the citizens of Nevada have, whether it’s to camp, to fish or to go off road.”

Addressing the justification of seizing the cattle to protect a species of tortoise, Bundy stated, “I’ll never get it. If it weren’t for our cattle, there’d be more brush fires out here. The tortoises eat the cow manure, too. It’s filled with protein.”

The standoff has echoes of the 1992 Ruby Ridge incident, during which Randy Weaver, accused of selling an ATF agent two illegal sawed-off shotguns, became embroiled in a tragic confrontation with the the United States Marshals Service (USMS) and the FBI, resulting in the death of Weaver’s son Sammy, his wife Vicki, and Deputy U.S. Marshal William Francis Degan.

The story also brings back memories of New Hampshire couple Ed and Elaine Brown, who were involved in a nine month standoff with armed law enforcement and feds as a result of their refusal to pay income tax. The Browns were later convicted of “plotting to kill federal agents” because of their refusal to surrender and were both given de facto life sentences.

In a series of YouTube videos, Cliven Bundy and his wife outline the background behind their decision to take a stand against the feds, arguing that their fight is a constitutionally-driven line in the sand to push back against the usurpation of big government.



Last Man Standing, Rancher: armed feds are surrounding my farm


Government vehicles and
                personnel outside of the Bundy ranch / Cliven and Carol

Government vehicles and personnel outside of the Bundy ranch / Cliven and Carol Bundy

April 8, 2014 7:34 pm

A two-decades-old battle between a Nevada rancher and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has resulted in officials armed with machine guns surrounding the ranch and forcibly removing the owner’s cattle, according to the rancher’s family.

Cliven Bundy, the last rancher in Clark County, Nev., has been fighting a “one-man range war” since 1993, when he decided to take a stand against the agency, refusing to pay fees for the right to graze on a ranch run by his family for centuries.

After years of court battles, the BLM secured a federal court order to have Bundy’s “trespass cattle” forcibly removed with heavy artillery, the family said.

“The battle’s been going on for 20 years,” Bundy told theWashington Free Beacon. “What’s happened the last two weeks, the United States government, the bureaus are getting this army together and they’re going to get their job done and they’re going to prove two things. They’re going to prove they can do it, and they’re gonna prove that they have unlimited power, and that they control the policing power over this public land. That’s what they’re trying to prove.”

Bundy said the government has brought everything but tanks and rocket launchers.

Armed men outside the Bundy ranch / Cliven and Carol Bundy

“They’re carrying the same things a soldier would,” he said. “Automatic weapons, sniper rifles, top communication, top surveillance equipment, lots of vehicles. It’s heavy soldier type equipment.”

His wife, Carol Bundy, said that roughly 200 armed agents from the BLM and FBI are stationed around their land, located about 75 miles outside of Las Vegas. Helicopters circle the premises, and the airspace and nearby roads remain blocked.

“We’re surrounded,” Carol Bundy said. “We’re estimating that there are over 200 armed BLM, FBI. We’ve got surveillance cameras at our house, they’re probably listening to me talk to you right now.”

A National Park Service spokesman denied there were armed guards rounding up the cattle in a conference call on Tuesday. However, she confirmed that there was “security” in place, citing threats to the contractors who are removing the cattle.

“Contractors are here and they are in place to round-up the cattle and to bring them to the impound area,” Christie Vanover said. “As for security, there [is] security in place, but that is merely to protect the contractors.”

“As you know, we have received threats and the contractors have received threats,” Vanover said. “Our personnel here and throughout the park service and throughout the BLM have received threats, as well. So security is in place to merely protect the contractors so that we can complete this operation.”

As of Monday, officials have seized 234 of Bundy’s 908 cattle. Impounding the cattle alone could cost the government as much as $3 million.

“They just brought a load down today,” she said. “They kind of harass us as well. When we leave they follow us.”

This afternoon eight helicopters surrounded the family after they began taking pictures, according to Bundy’s daughter, Bailey. Their son, Dave Bundy, was arrested for taking pictures on state road 170, which has been closed, and is being held by BLM.

Government helicopters circle the Bundy ranch / Cliven and Carol Bundy

The BLM said they took Dave Bundy into custody following his “failure to comply with multiple requests by BLM law enforcement to leave the temporary closure area on public lands.”

Carol Bundy said five officials took Dave and “threw him on the ground.”

“One put his knee on his head, the other put his boot on his head and pushed him into the gravel,” she said. “He’s got quite a bruised head. Just bruised him up pretty good.”

Environmentalists are praising the government’s forceful actions, which are being taken to protect the “desert tortoise.”

“We’re heartened and thankful that the agencies are finally living up to their stewardship duty,” said Rob Mrowka, a Nevada-based senior scientist with the Center for Biological Diversity. “The Gold Butte area has been officially designated as critical habitat for threatened tortoises—meaning the area is essential to their long-term survival as a species.”

“[Cliven] Bundy has long falsely believed that Gold Butte is his ranch,” added Terri Robertson, president of Friends of Sloan Canyon.

The BLM designated 186,909 acres of the Gold Butte off-limits for the “critical desert tortoise” population in 1998. Bundy had already lost his grazing permit five years earlier for refusing to pay fees for the land, which his family has ranched since the 1870s.

The “federal grazing fee” is $1.35 per “Animal Unit Month,” or the amount of forage needed per animal, each month. Bundy said he owes roughly $300,000 in back fees, while the BLM asserts he owes over $1 million. The BLM defended the removal because Bundy did not “voluntarily” give up his cattle.

“We’ve tried to do this through the legal and we’ve tried to do it through the political, and what we’re at right now, I guess we’re going to have to try to stand,” Cliven Bundy said. “We the people have to stand on the ground and get our state sovereignty back, and also take some liberty and freedoms back to where we have at least access to this land.”

“The story is a lot about the cattle, but the bigger story is about our loss of freedom,” Carol Bundy added. “They have come and taken over this whole corner of the county. They’ve taken over policing power, they’ve taken over our freedom, and they’re stealing cattle.”

“And our sheriff says he just doesn’t have authority, our governor says he doesn’t have authority, and we’re saying, why are we a state?”

“I’m a producer,” Cliven Bundy said. “I produce edible commodity from the desert forage, and all of these things are governed under state law. So, in other words, this type of government has eliminated all of our state law, eliminated our state sovereignty, and has took control over our public lands and even took control over our Clark County sheriff. They’ve taken the whole county over. The whole state, almost.”

“This is just about power of the government,” Carol Bundy said.

Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval (R.) voiced his concern about so-called “First Amendment Areas,” designated locations set up by the BLM where citizens can protest the removal.

“Most disturbing to me is the BLM’s establishment of a ‘First Amendment Area’ that tramples upon Nevadans’ fundamental rights under the U.S. Constitution,” he said in a statement Tuesday.

“To that end, I have advised the BLM that such conduct is offensive to me and countless others and that the ‘First Amendment Area’ should be dismantled immediately,” he said.  “No cow justifies the atmosphere of intimidation which currently exists nor the limitation of constitutional rights that are sacred to all Nevadans.  The BLM needs to reconsider its approach to this matter and act accordingly.”

Sandoval also said his office has received numerous complaints about the BLM’s conduct, including road closures and “other disturbances.”



Militias Are On Route: Is the 2nd American Revolution Starting in Bunkerville, Nevada?

As I stated on Tuesday this deserved a YELLOW ALERT.  However, these PIGS, Obamanation's stormtroopers upped the ante on Thursday, by capturing Cliven Bundy's son, which was an act of war, and their tazing unarmed protesters.  Others across the country have seen what I see, and it is now ORANGE ALERT, and boots are on the ground and in motion.

I posted information last week that the United States will default at two o'clock on Friday, April 11, 2014, on a debt of several trillion dollars, which means the Federal government will be out of business, and shutdowns will follow.  Therefore, Obamanation needs to create a war by any means necessary in hopes of securing another loan and causing everyone to look the other way.  It is as usual, watch my right hand while I steal from you with my left hand.  To these evil tyrants, war is a necessity.

If he wants a war let's give him a war.  Everyone, who is not in motion for Nevada, pick your targets.  I am certain that you need not look very far from you doorstep.  If war breaks out, then let's give them war in every city, town and countryside across the country.  If you do not know who your enemies are, then here is a good place to find them.  Just look for corrupt bureaucRATS, politicians, attorners and banksters; these are primary targets when it comes to WAR.  The sooner such targets are taken out (The cutting off the head.), the sooner their war machine grinds to a halt.  When head is cut off, tail no longer wages!  On your marks, get set,..............!

People have been asking me where to find others of like mind.  If you cannot find any in your back door, here is a good place to start. http://militias.info  and click on button near bottom of the home page that states MILITIA UNITS.  There are all sorts of books, videos and other training materials that can be found on this website or over one hundred other websites linked, thereto.

Sir David-Andrew.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Militias Are On Route: Is the 2nd American Revolution Starting in Bunkerville, Nevada?
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:24:56 -0400
From: M M

UPDATE: Up to 5,000 Armed Militia Members Will Be Arriving in Bunkerville, Nevada Today

Update: Word on the street from sources close to the militia movement is that up to 5,000 armed militia members will be arriving in Bunkerville, Nevada sometime today. (See full report below)

SHTFplan.com Editor’s Note: It is apparent that the Federal government was under the impression that they could simply move into the ranch land surrounding Bunkerville, NV and have their way with the property and livelihood of the Bundy family. What they didn’t count on was the outcry from Americans across the country. And now things may be headed to the next level. As Kim Paxton of The Daily Sheeplenotes, citizen militias in several states have been called up. Many members of those organizations are taking up arms and are making their way to Nevada.

And it’s not just the citizen militias that are preparing to take action. The governor of Nevada has officially condemned the federal government’s actions, though he has yet to take any steps afforded to him under State law. Sheriff Richard Mack of Gilbert, Arizona has weighed in and calls the actions “terrorism.”

At last count there were some 200 federal agents from various agencies on the ground in Nevada and it appears that hundreds, perhaps thousands, of armed militia members will soon arrive to confront them.

The Federal government will no doubt step up their efforts, as they are facing the possibility of a widespread rebellion resulting from their actions against a private citizen whose only “crime” was to graze his cattle on the land his family has used for this purpose for over a century. It would not be at all surprising to see the President of the United States call up National Guard troops and more militarized law enforcement officials for fear of having this spiral out of control. A declaration of martial law to go along with already established First Amendment Areas is not out of the question.

We may well be on the cusp of a serious stand-off involving thousands of people. Keep in mind that most of them will be armed.

Given the circumstances, things could turn very bloody very quickly.


Militias Are On Route: Is the 2nd American Revolution Starting in Bunkerville, Nevada?
By Kim Paxton via The Daily Sheeple

An area just outside of the little town of Bunkerville, Nevada, with a population of around a thousand people, may go down in history.  This little spot in the desert may be compared with Lexington, Massachusetts, the site of the “shot heard round the world” – the first shot fired in the American Revolution.  Because it looks like the second American Revolution may start there…and soon.

Yesterday, The Daily Sheeple reported that tensions were running high outside of Bunkerville. It seems that the US government, in all of their infinite wisdom, has declared war on a cattle rancher named Cliven Bundy.

In a stand-off that has been likened to Ruby Ridge and Waco, the federal government has now deployed armed agents in a case of what the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has deemed “trespass cattle,” escalating a 20-year battle over grazing rights and what actually constitutes “public land” use in Southern Nevada.

Cliven Bundy, a 67-year-old rancher says his family has worked the 600,000-acre Gold Butte area since the late 1800s and that they were there well before the government’s Land Management Bureau ever came along. (source)

Armed federal officers have arrived to steal Bundy’s cattle and close down the land he is using.  What’s more, they have declared a zone around the area to be free of the restrictions of the Constitution, specifically, the First Amendment right to assemble and speak freely. They’d like to keep their reprehensible actions quiet and out of the public eye. It’s really difficult to mow down a bunch of protesters ala Waco with the whole world watching.

Yesterday, tensions began to rise even further and numerous protestors were tazed and assaulted.  (You can see the actions of those brave BLM officers on this video HERE).
{HOGWASH!  Armed mercenaries or gestapo agents are not brave, they are bullies who gang up on people who are unable to stand against them.  As in this case, two hundred thugs have come kill an old man (67) and his family.  Brave, I think not, the correct term is cowards. -SDA}

It looks like tensions will rise even further because Americans have had enough.

Militias have been mobilised. It’s going to get real.

Bundy may be facing down a bunch of armed federal thugs but he’s going to be backed up by militia members from across the country.

This is the day that Patriots have been talking about and training for. They will not stand down.


CBS reports that militias from Texas, Montana, Utah, New Hampshire, and Florida will be standing with Bundy against the Bureau of Land Management.

If you aren’t a combatant, this doesn’t mean that you can’t participate in this revolt against tyranny.  This is a call to action.

Here are the pertinent email addresses and phone numbers:


Share information in support of these people who refuse to stand idly by while theft, violence, and tyranny occurs at the hands of the government.  If we all spread the word, there is no way that another Ruby Ridge or Waco can quietly occur. We can combat the disinformation spouted by the mainstream media by publishing REAL photos, REAL videos, and REAL accounts of what is happening. We can keep the communication open and tell the world what the United States government is doing to its own people.

Share this and other stories through email, through social media, through links in the comments sections of mainstream news sites.  Whatever you do, don’t wait for someone else to take action. Now is the time to speak up for liberty.  Make this story too viral for the mainstream to ignore.  Do not allow these brave people staring down the barrel of a gun to do so without our support.

The Bureau of Land Management has picked up a snake by the tail, and it looks like that snake is going to bite.

blm nevada

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

This content may be freely reproduced in full or in part in digital form with full attribution to the author and a link towww.TheDailySheeple.com.



The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Live On The Ground Report From Bunkerville... Not Many Militia Yet, But Blackwater (XE) SF Dressing Out In BLM Uniforms

Posted By: Watchman
Date: Thursday, 10-Apr-2014 18:28:57


BREAKING: Militia Arrives at Bundy Ranch
This is what happened in a similar case back in 2011.
The article was too lengthy to post to this email and contains several videos and photos.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fw: Fwd: Sheriff DeMeo, Nye County, Nevada
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 02:58:18 -0700 (PDT)

----- Forwarded Message -----
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 1:46 AM
Subject: Fwd: Sheriff DeMeo, Nye County, Nevada

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:47 PM
Subject: Fwd: Sheriff DeMeo, Nye County, Nevada

Impressive Sheriff

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Starrett Chris <tigtorch2@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:59 PM
Subject: Fwd: Sheriff DeMeo, Nye County, Nevada


Sean Hannity is again interview Cliven Bundy as I am sending this from yesterday.  I will post today's interview as soon as available.


Nevada rancher threatens 'range war' against federal government

Published April 09, 2014 | Hannity | Sean Hannity

With: Cliven Bundy

This is a rush transcript from "Hannity," April 9, 2014. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

SEAN HANNITY, HOST: My next guest, Cliven Bundy, is a Nevada rancher waging a battle against the federal government over his cattle grazing on public land which is overseen by the Bureau of Land Management.

This all started in 1993 when the government declared the land habitat for the federally protected desert tortoise. Following that move, Bundy refused to pay new grazing fees and continued letting his cattle graze on the land. He argued that his ancestors worked this land since the 1870s, long before the Bureau of Land Management was formed, granting him the rights to the property.

Then in 1998, the Bureau of Land Management revoked Bundy's grazing permit. A federal judge issued an injunction ordering the cattle off Bundy's land, igniting more than a decade long series of legal filing.

Last year the judge authorized the government to impound the cattle, and just this past weekend that impoundment began. And as ofMonday, authorities seized 134 cattle, many of which belonged to Bundy. He is now threatening to wage a quote, "range war" with federal officials and say he's not backing down.

Joining me now to explain the situation for himself is the Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy. Cliven, welcome to the show.Thanks for being with us, sir.

CLIVEN BUNDY, RANCHER: Thank you, Sean. I'm happy you called this public land. You know, this is public land that we the people of Clark County, Nevada, and I'm glad you called it public land.

HANNITY: It is interesting. Your cattle -- this is public land. It's not being used. In my mind, and I'm not a rancher, but I would think the federal government would be thankful because you're cutting the lawn for free, and they're charging huge amounts of money to let your cattle graze there with these fees?

BUNDY: Well, you got to remember they are not letting me graze here. I have no contact with the United States government and I do not buy my grazing or feed from the United States government. I graze on public land long part of Clark County, Nevada.

HANNITY: Explain how the desert tortoise, is their rationalization here. I mean, there was a case of a drought out in California and they were protecting the Delta smelt over the ability of farmers to do their job. Explain how the desert tortoise got involved in this?

BUNDY: Well, the desert tortoise is a circuit animal for all other excuses for the bureaucracies to control. The desert tortoise does use the same habitat, uses the same type of feed as livestock, so they could be encountered, in other my cattle ate all the feed or the tortoise ate all the feed. But that's not the case here on this desert. It's impossible to use up all the feed for the desert tortoise.

HANNITY: Let's take a look at where we're talking about here. We have an 80-mile look here as we go to the HANNITY big board. And then we also have this issue of the timeline. This all started in 1993 as we went through the series of events that have been unfolding there. This has gone on for a long period of time. Now, the money that the federal government claims that Cliven owes them. Look at this fee that they have. They are saying you owe $1 million in grazing and trespass fees. Tell me if I'm wrong, this land is not being used by them, is it?

BUNDY: No. Let me explain the use of the land a little bit. This is south, you know, southwestern desert. There is a renewable resource out here that can only be harvested by livestock. And what I do is I -- my livestock eats the grass, prunes it, and it uses that forage to make an edible commodity for we the people of the United States. So when you get a piece of meat on your table, remember where it come from.


BUNDY: That's what we do. We turn this resource into a renewable -- a usable commodity good for man.

HANNITY: By the way, when your cattle graze there, that keeps the price of meat down for every American consumer.

Let's take a look, American land owned by our government, we're talking about 28 percent of U.S. landmass, up to 640 million acres the government owns here -- which by the way, why do they own all that land?

Let me ask you one more question, Cliven. You talked about a range war with the federal government. There is a lot of people out there, now that they are taking your cattle, that are fearful this is another Waco situation. Ruby Ridge has come up in some articles. What do you mean by range war? How far are you willing to take this?

BUNDY: Well, you know, my cattle is only one issue -- that the United States courts has ordered that the government can seize my cattle. But what they have done is seized Nevada statehood, Nevada law, Clark County public land, access to the land, and have seized access to all of the other rights of Clark County people that like to go hunting and fishing. They've closed all those things down, and we're here to protest that action. And we are after freedom. We're after liberty. That's what we want.

HANNITY: How far are you willing to go? How far are you willing to take this?

BUNDY: My statement to the American people, I'll do whatever it takes to gain our liberty and freedom back.

HANNITY: All right, we'll follow the story closely and we'll watch what the federal government does. Thank you for being with us, sir. Appreciate it.


Here is an update as to movement and deployment of men.  However, I must warn you be really careful as watching and listening to what Stewart Rhodes states.  Five years ago we did a two hour interview with him on Militia Radio.  I was very obvious from that interview that Stewart is a FASCIST, and therefore cannot be trusted.  He has too many times since then attempted to set good people up to be arrested or be killed.  Stewart wants to become a good victim.  YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!

Remember is an objective of the militias to see to it, that FASCIST, COMMIES and FABIAN SOCIALIST become the victims, with no regrets.  They wish to steal our natural resources, therefore, we shall give one of our most precious metals, a few grams at a time.

Sir David-Andrew.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Message just issued by Stewart Rhodes of Oath Keepers
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 07:43:02 -0400
From: Tom

--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hyde 
Date: Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:02 PM
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Message just issued by Stewart Rhodes of Oath Keepers

Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 6:14 PM
Subject: Message just issued by Stewart Rhodes of Oath Keepers

Message just issued by Stewart Rhodes of Oath Keepers
Oath Keepers,
We need a presence there immediately to help prevent the feds sparking another Ruby Ridge or Waco incident in the Bundy stand-off.
Nevada State Rep. Michele Fiore (a strong patriot who has attended many of our meetings) is on site right now at the protest site outside the Bundy ranch, and she is helping us assemble a coalition of Nevada state legislators. We are also working with WA State Rep Matt Shea to put together a delegation of other Western State Representatives to go there to support Rep. Fiore and her coalition, and we are working with Sheriff Mack to bring a delegation of current serving CSPOA Sheriffs to stand vigil there. We need Oath Keepers to also show up and stand vigil and support this family and the patriot legislators and sheriffs who are taking the lead in defending them. This is critical. The goal is to stand vigil to prevent another Waco or Ruby Ridge, and to put pressure on the Nevada Governor to honor the oath he took by standing up for this family and for the state of Nevada.
I fly to Vegas tomorrow. Sheriff Mack is coming too, along with the current serving Sheriffs he is rallying to the cause.
All who can make it, need to be there. We need numbers - boots on the ground. The more the better.
For those who are coming, please rally at the public protest site near the ranch in Bunkerville, Nevada. To get there, take I-15 North, toward Mesquite, and get off at exit 112. Go right two miles (you can only go right). You will see tall flag poles and signs. Can't miss it.
Per Ammon Bundy, here are some rules:
First, NO MILITARY CAMMO. This is a protest by rural Americans. Dress accordingly. (from me: Oath Keepers can wear Oath Keepers polos if you have them, or OK T shirts, but please no cammo. Let's respect the Bundy family request).
No open carry of rifles. Any rifles people may have with them need to stay in the vehicles.
When you arrive at the protest rally point, ask for Ammon Bundy, Cliven Bundy's son, to check in. If he is not there, he will have designated another family rep for you to check in with. DO NOT go past that first rally point/protest site with the flags that the family has set up on private land. Beyond that is the road to their ranch, and no one is to drive to the ranch without express permission and escort by Cliven Bundy or his sons. Please respect their need for security and privacy.
No volunteer is to give any media interviews. Refer all media first and foremost to the Bundy family members present, in particular Cliven Bundy, Ammon, or one of the other sons. And/or refer them to one of the current serving Nevada State legislators who will be there, such as Michele Fiore (she is gathering a coalition of Nevada representatives), or one of the current serving Sheriff's who will be coming. We are there to support them, and let them handle the media.
If any media ask to interview Oath Keepers, please refer them to me, but I will likely just refer them to the family until we do a press conference once Sheriff Mack arrives - and even then, the focus will be on the coalition of current serving Western State Legislators and Sheriffs that we are helping to gather. They and the family will be the main effort, and we are there as support.
BRING CAMERAS. Film everything. The more cameras, the better.
Bring relevant signs about honoring the oath, respecting property rights and free speech rights. We are there to stand up for rural Americans who are under attack and to pressure the Governor and the Clark County Sheriff to do their duty.
Ammon said volunteers can camp on private property that is on the side of the road at the main protest site the family has set up (the first gathering place you will come to with signs and flags once you get off I-15 at exit 112 and go about two miles). Again, please ask the family members present where to park and where to camp if you want to camp.
To control which emails you receive on American Prepper Nation, click here
Ranch Riot!! Bundy Ranch Protesters Tasered by Federal Agents and Attacked by K9's.
Back in January 2014, here in the northeast, we had a protests and disputes over this fracking racket.  The government was attempting to infringe upon Onkwehonwe (Indian) rights and lands.  The government did not fair well here, therefore they went west to see what they could steal there, thinking that no one would notice or care.  The people do care, and have had enough, as to the theft of our natural resource and destroying of the land for the benefit of the international banksters.

see http://ka-ni.info and http://lonewolfterritory.com 

Sir David-Andrew.


BLM fracking racket exposed! Armed siege and cattle theft from Bundy ranch really about fracking leases


Thursday, April 10, 2014
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)
Tags: BLM liesfracking leasesBundy ranch

(NaturalNews) The Bureau of Land Management says its 200-man armed siege of the Cliven Bundy ranch in Nevada is all about protecting an "endangered tortoise." But a Natural News investigation has found that BLM is actually in the business of raking in millions of dollars by leasing Nevada lands to energy companies that engage in fracking operations.

This document from the Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology(1) shows significant exploratory drilling being conducted in precisely the same area where the Bundy family has been running cattle since the 1870's. The "Gold Butte" area is indicated on the lower right corner of the document (see below), and it clearly shows numerous exploratory drilling operations have been conducted there.

What's also clear is that oil has been found in nearby areas and possibly even within the Gold Butte area itself.

It is, of course, customary for the U.S. government to bring armed soldiers to an oil dispute. (Operation "Iraqi Freedom" for starters...) Heavily armed snipers, helicopters and militarized soldiers have never been invoked over tortoises. (Anyone who thinks this siege is about reptiles is kidding themselves.)

Here's the map showing the oil exploration conducted on the land where Bundy runs his cattle (all the red crosshairs are oil and gas exploration drilling operations):

BLM collects $1.27 million in shale fracking leases

The Bureau of Land Management has just cashed in with $1.27 million in oil and gas leases in Nevada. This was just reported two weeks ago in ShaleReporter.com, which states:

U.S. Bureau of Land Management geologist Lorenzo Trimble tells the Las Vegas Review-Journal the Elko County oil and gas leases soldTuesday for $1.27 million to six different companies. The auction took place in Reno. The leases are near where Houston-based Noble Energy Inc. wants to drill for oil and natural gas on 40,000 acres of public and private land near the town of Wells. The Review-Journal reports the project would be the first in Nevada to use hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, to extract oil and gas from shale deposits.

The way this works, of course, is that BLM runs land theft operations by claiming they are "managing" the land and thereby kicking everyone else off it. They then invoke a reptile, an owl, a bird, a snake or some other animal which they claim to be "saving," even while they are stealing and destroying hundreds of cattle belonging to a private rancher trying to make an honest living in a nation where productive Americans are increasingly branded "enemies of the state."

Once control of the land is established via court order or by bringing armed men with automatic weapons, BLM then turns around andleases the land to fracking companies who proceed to exploit the land using hydraulic fracturing techniques that inject toxic chemicals into groundwater supplies (and have been linked to earthquakes). The money collected by the BLM is then used to increase BLM salaries and bonuses.

In essence, the BLM is a criminal mafia racket, and Cliven Bundy just happened to be in the way of their next target, the Gold Butte area of Nevada. That is why they brought hundreds of heavily armed men to a "save the tortoise" operation.

"Endangered tortoises" is merely the government cover story for confiscating land to turn it over to fracking companies for millions of dollars in energy leases. In truth, the BLM was rapidly euthanizing these very same reptiles en masse last year.(2)

As part of its police state intimidation to control the land, BLM unleashed attack dogs on a pregnant woman.

See the brutality invoked by the BLM against peaceful protesters in this video of a near-riot just outside the Bundy ranch:


Does anyone really believe this is still about a tortoise?

Sources for this story include:
(1) http://www.naturalnews.com/files/Petroleum-D...
(2) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/25/des...

More details from Pete Santilli on location:


Adams Kokesh comments on this story via Adam vs. the Man:


I received word from Nevada at 18:30 ET that the BLW pulled out.
It is Friday.  If this be the case.
The FEDS love doing armed assaults at five AM on Saturday and Sunday mornings.
DO NOT give them the opportunity of such pleasure.

The raid the FEDS conducted in Kentucky was on Sunday morning.
But the Kentucky militia was not sleeping, it was the last raid those thugs will ever conduct.
But then, no one in government wants to talk about those eight dead gestapo agents.

Hold your positions.  Do not, DO NOT, withdraw.   DO NOT WITHDRAW!

The FEDS have used this tactic before.
They withdraw, and then wait for the militia to withdraw; and then return the next morning or two days later with massive show of force.

They played this game at Indianapolis Independent Baptist Church (Pastor Dixon) and at Browns in New Hampshire.
As soon as the militias pulled out the FEDS came back and seized the properties.

The militias stayed in place at Freeman, Montana, therefore, the FEDS were not about to kill everyone, who were there.  If the militias would have withdrawn, eighteen people would have been murdered by the FEDS.

The FEDS are after the minerals, which they intend to give to China for payment debt.  This has nothing to do with turtles, and the turtles are not endangered.

Please send this warning to everyone member of the militias as possible.  Do not allow the FEDS to steal this land.  Stay in place.  It is now a matter of a waiting game.  The United States went bankrupt at 14:00 ET on April 11, 2014, come Monday morning Obamanation may have a difficult time in finding any funds with which to pay these mercenaries.  In fact, a lot of Federal employees come Mondaymorning may be sent home.  This evil machine is about to grind to a halt if they cannot secure some funds by Monday.  

DO NOT ALLOW THE FEDS TO TAKE THIS LAND.  If they cannot deliver the land they cannot receive the funds that they were hoping to receive.  Then Obamanation's tyrannical regime will be out of business, without the militia having to fire a shot.  Mercenaries will not fight, if they cannot collect their pay.  Time is of the essence, staying in place for a week should break the machine.  The bansters wanted their money before Passover, April 15.  Do not allow that to happen.

Please forward this to everyone, who you believe has the need to know, especially, militia members.  ASAP!

Again, everyone is watching what is happening in Nevada, and no one paid attention to what happened today in Washington, District of Criminals.  Folks the United States went into default at 14:00 this afternoon, which means if Obamanation does not come up with some fund before Monday morning the government will go into shutdown.

The Feds have to take possess of this land before Monday morning, to secure more funds.  It is a last ditch effort to bail a sinking ship.  Do not allow the FEDS to seize this ranch, and then watch this evil empire grind to a halt.

I have seen no mention of the default anywhere in the news.  What a scam!  Go back to sleep sheople you are about to be fleeced and maybe even lead to slaughter.


Sir David-Andrew.

Home Schooling, Home Mortgages and more, in:

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

A Rancher Tells All --- BLM Has Royally Screwed The Pooch On the Cattle Theft... Caught 'em Flat Out Rustling...

Posted By: Watchman
Date: Friday, 11-Apr-2014 15:55:32

A Rancher TELLS ALL:

B Hunt wrote:

I live in SW Utah. I grew up on a ranch less than 100 miles from the Bundy’s ranch. My father knows Cliven Bundy. I know Cliven’s son Ryan. This is not a hoax, it is an action of force by the BLM.

The BLM was going to sell the cattle at one of the smallest cattle markets in Utah. No cattle markets in Nevada would take the cattle without a properly signed brand inspection (which the BLM cannot obtain without Cliven Bundy’s signature). The BLM paid the owner of the Utah cattle market $300,000 to do the sale (‘R’ Livestock Connection in Monroe, Utah, owned by one Scott G. Robbins, according to the Utah Business Entity Search). Utah Governor Herbert stepped in and forbid them from bringing the cattle into Utah without the legally required health and brand inspections (which again, require Bundy’s signature) and that no feral cattle are allowed to be imported at all (per Utah statute). Because Bundy claims ownership over maybe 350-500 head of branded cattle, the other 500-700 estimated head of cattle would all be considered feral. BLM officially backed off, but we suspect they are still secretly shipping them through Utah without any permission to do so, to “private” buyers in Colorado. The contract cowboys that the BLM hired to do the roundup are from Sampson Livestock in Meadow, Utah (traitors one and all).

From what I understand, Cliven Bundy owns both the Water Rights and Grazing Rights to all of the land where his cattle run. If Bundy failed to use them, the Grazing Rights would revert to the BLM and would be retired, while the Water Rights would revert to the State of Nevada, likely to be sold to the highest bidder (which would probably be a bidding war between mineral companies that are behind this action with the BLM and the City of Las Vegas which is thirsty for water and has had multiple attempts to buy water–through eminent domain from Utah farmers and ranchers–from Utah, which were all blocked by the Utah Legislature and Utah Governor Herbert). Chances are, the BLM has already filed a claim on the water rights so that they can sell to the highest bidder (instead of the state) and are trying to get the cattle off to show that Bundy cannot use the water beneficially (much like what the US Forest Service and BLM both tried to do to Wayne Hage).

Now, for Cliven Bundy, he’s not fighting this for his cattle or his own livelihood. He recognizes that he will probably die before this fight is over. He has said multiple times that he is fighting this to wake people up about the tyranny of the Federal Government and also to help wake up the western states about getting the rights to their own land back from the federal government, which has repeatedly shut down ranchers and closed off land. (MO = 1st, get all the ranchers, farmers, Native Americans, and foresters that use the land for positive, sustainable production off of the land; 2nd, grab up all the resources; 3rd, close off the lands to public access including camping, hiking, horseback riding, hunting, fishing, boating, shooting, etc; 4th, sell off the resources to the highest bidder regardless of what that will do to the land, the local environment, or the economy; 5th, collect royalties on the resources in perpetuity; 6th, reduce and eliminate all SLS and PILT payments to the states, impoverishing them beyond belief.)

Anyway, thanks for posting about this. It is important for us to be able to raise the appropriate resistance. 
My Response:

Thank you for sending your valuable insight. This contained the details we were all missing.

From this we can now firmly conclude:

1. The BLM’s actions are not only flatly illegal, they are unlawful, and not only unlawful, they are so unlawful that it took bribing someone with a $300,000 payoff to get them to accept stolen cattle from a Government agency. I do not think that could be topped ANYWHERE else in the world, other than with something like a Mexican drug cartel.

So we have a clear cut case of unlawful and prosecutable actions by the BLM in this case.

2. The real goal is to shut down public access to these lands. Obviously Cliven Bundy was not a jerk, and he let people go back there to explore. I myself have done a LOT of back country exploring, and noticed in the early 2000′s that they closed down all the back roads about a half mile before the destination they used to go to to discourage people from exploring the wilderness.Rather than drive the whole way, you had to get out and walk a considerable distance to scenes such as Swazy’s leap, Paul Bunyans Wood Pile, and practically anywhere else you would want to go while out 4 Wheeling. And in the desert sun, that long of a walk was usually tough to do. This resulted in these types of locations no longer being visited, which effectively equaled a shut down.

3. The motives are for profit. Rather than manage the lands responsibly, the BLM is stealing it from it’s rightful holders via corrupt actions and legal loop holes, and selling it off to corporate interests. This is cold hard proof that America is not a democracy, or more importantly a Republic, it is in fact a facist dictatorship where corruption rules and rights, freedom and honor are irrelevant. 
The BLM killed hundreds of desert tortoises on purpose

They say they had to kill them because they did not have the funds to care for them. Here are two really good solutions to that “problem.” 1. Just take them out in the desert and turn them loose. -OR- 2. They could have taken the three million dollars they said the Bundy raid will cost them, CALLED OFF THE RAID, and SAVED THE TURTLES with that three million. If they had three million to destroy Bundy, they had it for the turtles as well but did not use it for that because tyranny comes first.

Steeped in arrogance and incompetence, once again a Federal agency fails to see the obvious. Or perhaps they do see it but they could care less about nature and instead operate as the enforcement arm of a band of high ranking thugs.




BREAKING: Militia Arrives at Bundy Ranch — APFN, Fri Apr 11 20:13
BREAKING: Militia Arrives at Bundy Ranch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfOVg5R4ngA BUNDY RANCH: Cell Towers Shut Down According To Reports – Gov’t Endgame Massacre Near? April 11, 2014 / Clark Kent / 5 comments Should this be true and not some coincidental hot spot issue, then the government wants to make sure that... more
BUNDY TO BE KILLED BY MONDAY — William Mount, Fri Apr 11 09:32
We have been calling around to find out what is happening in Nevada an all of the Directors of theAnencies and all Nevada Politicians are unavailable. Please pray Lucifer fails nhis attempt. Apparently someone in the White House has ordered the arrest of BUNDY and then Suicide him with a Heart Attack. The same Jesuit... more
ALERT: Rancher Cliven Bundy Speaks: — APFN, Fri Apr 11 04:06
Rancher Cliven Bundy Speaks: “I Don’t Recognize Them Having Any Jurisdiction or Authority Over This Land” April 11, 2014 Update: [16:00 PST] – This video interview follows reports that up to 5,000 militia members are on their way to Nevada to stand with the Bundy family against massive government overreach. Earlier... more


April 12, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Lyndon B. Johnson flubs up re: Kennedy assassination, Warren Commission report, etc. in interview with Walter Cronkite

Watch and listen to Lyndon disemble and flub up in his interview with Walter Cronkite

Lyndon Johnson Admits To Walter Cronkite That He Knows Who Killed JFK



JFK Assassination: George Joannides’ CIA Files - Can They Help Determine Who Killed President Kennedy?


April 5, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink













By Roy L. Schaeffer

(Copyright 2012-2013, Roy Schaeffer - All Rights Reserved)

<Edited by Robert D. Morningstar>

The linchpin of the theory that a lone assassin assassinated President John F. Kennedy depends solely on the credibility of the Single Bullet Theory, also known (derogatorily) as “The Magic Bullet Theory.”

The Single Bullet Theory (or SBT), also called “The Magic Bullet Theory”, was created by Warren Commission attorney Arlen Specter (with Warren Commissioner Gerald Ford).. 

The mass media, with the exception of Fox Cable News (and the History Channel) generally “fall into line” with the party-line SBT, but thinking people still ask:

“Is it correct?”

The entire Warren Commission theory is based on the premise that three bullets (and ONLY 3 bullets) were fired from a 6.5mm Mannlicher-Carcano rifle by Lee Harvey Oswald from a sniper’s lair on the 6thfloor of the Texas School Book Depository.

The “Single Bullet Theory” (SBT) begins as the Presidential limousine turns from Houston to Elm Street where the Warren Commission supposes that ONLY one “lone assassin” was waiting. Their theory proposes that ONLY 3 shots were fired, in total (while ignoring witness testimony claiming as many as 6 to 9 shots fired, including several from the Grassy Knoll).

According to the Warren Commission Report (WCR):

1. The first bullet fired at the President missed.

2. The second bullet currently known as the “Magic Bullet” CE-399 caused all seven wounds to both President Kennedy and Governor John B. Connally.

According to Warren Commission lawyer Arlen Specter, the 2nd bullet struck President Kennedy in his upper back (between the shoulder blades), transited through his throat and continued its path, exiting from JFK’s throat going on to strike Governor John Connally in the back. According to Specter, the “Magic Bullet” transited through governor Connally’s back, through his rib cage, coming out through the front and then transiting through his right wrist and then ending up in his left thigh.

This explains to the reader exactly why Arlen Spector’s theory is also ridiculed and called “The Magic Bullet Theory,” for only in a world of magic (and fantasy) could anyone ever believe that such a thing could really happen, except through “magic.” In this case, it is the “black magic” of mass deception through disinformation, exclusion of evidence, exclusion of undesirable witnesses’ testimonies, and the performance of radical editing and alterations to the Zapruder Film to hide the real facts.

3.  The WCR supposes that the third (3rd) bullet struck President Kennedy in the back of his head causing a massive explosion of his head as seen in frame Z-313 of the Abraham Zapruder film.

Over the decades, media supporters of the WCR and Arlen Specter’s theory make their assumptions appear to be “iron-clad,” but they actually they are not.

Quite to the contrary, my JFK research over 5 long decades on this issue proves otherwise.

The Main Deception - The Alteration of the Zapruder Film.

There are 486 frames in the Zapruder Film (aka The Z-Film), which was used by Specter and the Warren Commission as an accurate timepiece to support his theory. Because the Mannlicher-Carcano can only be fired a single shot at a time, reloading the next shot requires a minimum of 1.6 seconds minimum time consumed, between shots. This interval of time, 1.6 seconds requires (at least) 42 frames of the film because it takes 1.6 seconds = 42 frames @ 18 frames per second). 

This knowledge and understanding its significance will prove important shortly.

According to the Warren Commission, the first shot missed and was fired sometime prior to the Presidential limousine passing behind the Stemmons Freeway road sign as seen in the Zapruder Film.

In the early 1990s, I spoke personally with JFK Assassination witness and photographer, Phillip Willis, and talked to him by phone on several occasions in 1992 (negotiating my purchase of copies of his JFK assassination slides). And in one conversation in particular, before we closed the deal to buy his slides, Willis told me that he actually took his 5th photo at Z-189 immediately after hearing what he considered to be the first shot. 

This is important: -> Philip Willis told me that after hearing the first shot and taking his 1st photo, he noticed that after being shot, the President slid off his seat and fell forward into the car.

Secret Service Man’s Testimony Affirms Phillip Willis’ Account

Willis’ statement to me was also verified by Secret Service Agent Glenn Bennett who also noticed Kennedy being struck in the back after he made a passing glance at the President after hearing the noise of the first gunshot.

In 1990, I obtained two color photos taken in the White House garage and two additional color negatives taken in the White House garage on the weekend of the JFK Assassination.

After purchasing the color photo of CE-352 from the National Archives, I noticed upon close examination that there appeared to be a hole with a bullet protruding from the rear seat that upon checking, the hole aligned with the bullet that would have entered Kennedy’s back at exactly the level of  T-3 (the 3rdthoracic vertebra of his spine, i.e. between the shoulder blades.

Going back to the exact date of 11/23/1963, I personally handled the James Altgens fax photo that came across the AP Wire while I was working in the “composing room” at the Dayton Daily News. I saw the first wire copy of the ORIGINAL James Altgens photograph of JFK’s assassination, showing the President as seen through the front windshield, clutching at his throat and with Jackie offering support.

Then during the first week of December 1963, I went with Ralph McGill, syndicated columnist (for Hess and Eisenhardt) in Cincinnati to examine the Presidential limousine that had arrived in Dayton and was driven to Hess’s garage to be repaired for Lyndon Johnson, the new president.

From memory, I can recall that I talked to Willard Hess who told me that the Presidential windshield was being replaced because of some “bullet damage” to the windshield, which had been removed in Detroit prior to the limousine’s arrival at his Cincinnati garage.

Then on December 14, 1963, I purchased a copy of the Saturday Evening Post, which showed an almost complete copy of the Altgens  photo in that edition. Looking closely at the photograph, I noticed what appeared to be a bullet hole just to the right of the centered rear view mirror!

In 1989, I obtained a color negative, showing the front of the limousine in the White House garage. In examining a color print I made from the negative, I noticed micro glass traces where it appeared to be the entrance area into the windshield where a spiral bullet hole is seen in the Altgens photo, which had appeared in the Saturday Evening Post edition of December 14th, 1963, noted above.

Vincent DiMaio’s “Gunshot Wounds”

In 1985, I had purchased a book called Gunshot Wounds” by Vincent DiMaio. The book on forensic aspects of gunshot wounds dealt with wounds caused by shots that had killed individuals, fried through glass. This book proved to be very important to me after noticing a color photo owned by James Fox that showed near to where a tracheotomy was performed at Parkland to enhance Kennedy’s breathing. In comparing glass stippling that occurred when bullets passed through glass the bullet produced small glass shards that surrounded the point of entry, where a bullet or glass shards entered some of the bodies shown in DiMaio’s book.

It appeared to be the same or similar type of scarring that appeared around President Kennedy’s throat as it was later learned that a bullet hole entry had occurred where the tracheotomy was performed by Dr. Malcolm Perry in the Parkland Hospital Emergency Room.

This in my opinion confirms an entrance wound causing the throat wound to the President throat.  The direction of the shot (frontal) through the windshield, and the scarring mentioned in DiMaio’s book and seen around the throat wound suggest  that the throat wound was the result of a frontal entry shot with more solid proof supporting it (including Parkland Hospital medical witnesses, both doctors and nurses) than the SBT and the Magic Bullet Theory, which have no supporting evidence (beside the altered US Navy corpsman drawing ordered to be altered by Gerald Ford, who had the Navy artist re-render the drawing with the back wound MOVED UP 6-8 INCHES to appear to be on the neck region rather than the 3rd thoracic vertebra, between the shoulder blades.

In a LIFE Magazine article about Governor Wallace’s shooting in 1968, it was mentioned (and shown) that when the Governor was shot, a Secret Service agent was also shot in the throat from the front. If one examines the Agent’s reactions after being shot in the throat, he reacted exactly like President Kennedy did, placing his left hand over his throat wound.  The reason for this reaction was in order to be able to take a breathe IN, the man had to cover the wound entry hole, to plug it, so as to be able to take a breath IN. After taking a gasping breath in, the victim had to cough strongly to expel the air and the blood inhaled.

This can be proven by studying certain frames of The Zapruder Film

Click the link below to study sequential frames Z-001 through Z-489, courtesy of The Deep Politics Forum


If one closely examines frame Z-222 of The Z Film, one will notice a white spot that appears embedded in the right hand corner of the Stemmons Freeway road sign (at Z-222) as the Kennedy limo emerges from behind the Stemmons road sign. If you study this frame closely, a white object appears suddenly. 

That object is in truth was a white dog, a puppet or dog doll, that Jackie Kennedy had received by hand as a gift at Love Field during that brief interaction with the crowd as they walked to the limousine.

The puppet was a “white dog” that she testified (before Arlen Specter) affirming having seen as the Presidential approached her and AFTER President Kennedy was shot.

Jean Hill testified before Arlen Specter that she had seen the “white dog” in JFK’s lap (not shown in the early parts of the doctored version of the Zapruder Film).  

This white dog puppet, given to Jackie by a fan at Love Field, can be seen as a white spot that appears after the limo passes the Stemmons Freeway sign an becomes more visible as Kennedy comes into view. The apex of the rising of the white spot is seen in frame Z-230, which begs the question: What made the white dog puppet rise up and fall back down?

The answer is that when President Kennedy was shot in the back, the President reacted strongly standing and falling back down. 

Warren Commission Exhibit CE-352 - Back Seat of Presidential Limousine

Photo Taken at Parkland Hospital shows white puppet (seen  in Z Frames Z-223 through Z-227)  in back seeat.  

Enhanced photo, enlargement and inset by Robert D. Morningstar (Copyright 2014)

In 1992, I obtained a color photo from the National Achives, namely, CE-352. In this photo, we can see that Jean Hill observed on President Kennedy’s lap is really there in the photo. The white puppet is in the left hand corner of the bloody rear seat. 

The object is, in fact, exactly what Jean Hill described as “a white dog” to Arlen Specter. The WC Counsel’s arrogant response was to tell Jean Hill: 

“You’re crazy!”

However, the object seen in CE-352 turns out to be a white stuffed animal, validating Jean Hill’s testimony, and discrediting Arlen Specter whom history is showing to be one of the masterminds of the cover-up of the murder of the President of the United States, and thereby, a co-conspirator in the assassination of JFK.

So, when we take note of the object seen in Z-230, it is clear that Kennedy had been shot at least 1/3 of a second earlier. By then closely examining frame Z-224, we can see that Governor John B. Connally showed no sign at all of having being struck by any bullet at that time.

It should be mentioned that in frame Z-224 that both Governor Connally’s lapel and Secret Service Agent William Greer’s suit lapel both flipped at the same time.

How could this happen?

In Dallas 1996, while riding in JFK’s position in Paul Crute’s 1964 Presidential reproduction Lincoln limousine convertible, as we drove by on a Dallas street, a sprinkler head watering a lawn broke off. When it did so, a jet of water from the broken head hit me. At that moment, Paul Crute tapped the brakes and I was jolted and thrust violently forward.

This showed me that the 2 simultaneous “lapel flips” could only have been caused by Secret Service Agent Bill Greer tapping on the brakes, slowing the car (as indicated by Senator Ralph Yarborough in his WCR testimony, more details below).

The flipping over of the Governor Connally’s Stetson’s hat is also explained by the same cause… Greer hit the brakes several times, sometimes slowing and twice stopping the limousine completely (as testified to by many witnesses in Dealey Plaza, most notably, Senator Ralph Yarboroug who described both stops (a “near stop” at the sign, and “a complete stop” near the Grassy Knoll “before the cavalcade got going.”

In 2003, I presented a poster board exhibiton in Pittsburgh at the 40th anniversary of Kennedy’s death. It was called: “The Case Against the Single Bullet Theory, as is this article.

In it, I present a theory that Governor Connally was first shot at Z-237 from the knoll.

My theory was backed by blood groupings appearing in photo CE-352 near where Jacqueline was sitting.

In CE-837, I noticed a knife cut in the same area to remove what I considered a bullet. Later I learned that th entire rear seat was cut up prior to it being delivered to Detroit where the windshield was destroyed.

Now, going back in time to 1993,  I attended “The Midwest Symposium on Political Assassinations” in Chicago, to learn more, and specifically to hear the midnight speech that Robert Morningstar presented on Gestalt psychology, which he demonstrated to have been employed to alter the Zapruder film radically. 

At the same lecture, Morningstar revealed a still frame, Cray supercomputer enhanced photo of the condensation vapor trials captured in the Zapruder Film, proving that the assassination was carried out by multiple shooters some from the front and some from behind. Moreover, the vapor trails uncovered by Robert Morningstar also revealed the positions of the shooters, atop the Dallas County Records Building and on the Grassy Knoll.

In his presentation, Robert Morningstar showed a vapor trail that can be seen in the Zapruder Film at Frame Z-295. 

This trail was seen and described as a “high head shot” seen by Secret Service Agent Glen Bennett and described in the Warren Commission report, in which Bennet described seeing “a bullet strike the right side high of the President’s head.”  

I had also noticed this in the movie “JFK,” by Oliver Stone, and I traveled to Dallas 2 years later to meet Robert Morningstar at the Dallas Lancer JFK Assassination Conference. We met yet again in Dallas 2 years later in 1996 when we were both invited by Prof. James Fetzer to be part of a closed panel of JFK assassination experts who gathered together at the Lancer Conference to analyze the alterations and to “disassemble the illusions” created by the alterations used to hide the presence of multiple shooters that the undoctored, untampered version of the Z-Film really shows.

By chance, many years before, in 1958, I attended a science fair at the University of Chicago in which I presented a home-made Wilson Cloud Chamber. It was made with a one-gallon fish tank, dry ice in the bottom of the tank and at the top a copper plate to which I applied a hot iron to create a “Cloud Chamber.”

In it, as the iron heated up a fine water vapor mist appeared inside the fish tank. Then, using my old camera, which contained Kodachrome film, I was able to photograph Alpha and Beta particle trails (aka “Cosmic Rays”) that were revealed to be streaking through in the aquarium tank (then become a “Wilson Cloud Chamber”). So, the “condensation trail” phenomenon is a well known one and operant from the atomic level to the molecular level in ballistics, as demonstrated by Robert Morningstar in Chicago and in Dallas.

Investigating the Dallas weather report for the morning of November 22nd, 1963, it turned out that in Dealey Plaza the morning of the assassination it had rained steadily all night, and the temperature was 37* (degrees F.) at 9:00 a.m. 

But by 12:30, the Sun had broken out and the temperature rose rapidly to 68* F. with the air becoming extremely hot and humid. The high temp that day reached 70* F., rising 33* degrees in just the time it took to slay the President.

This change in temperature, as well as uncomfortable humidity was described explicitly and in detail by Jackie Kennedy during her Warren Commission testimony. Jackie stated that because she was wearing a woolen dress she was feeling very hot and in the muggy atmosphere as the air conditioning going full blast was useless in the open car.

The temperature of 67* confirmed by Willis’s photograph #12 as the temperature was recorded on the billboard of the Hertz sign atop the TSBD.

Jackie stated to the Warren Commission that she had looked ahead and seen the Triple Underpass coming up ahead and thought of it as a welcome source of momentary shade that would relieve them for an instant from the glaring sun, the heat and the humidity. 

It was within a few moments after that thought passed through her head that President Kennedy was killed as bullets from behind and from the front passed through his head, one from behind and 2 from front, and NOT from the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD).

Using this information, applied to bullets going faster than 1100 feet per second, and because Kodachrome film used by Abraham Zapruder (containing Silver halide), I found that Zapruder’s Bell & Howell Optronic Eye movie was perfectly capable of capturing a ballistic trails moving through the atmosphere and could be tracked on the film going on directly to strike the President’s skull, at Z-295 and at Z-313, which when compared to each other, prove that Z-295 came from a high position to the REAR LEFT of the limousine, and that the shot at Z-313 came directly from Zapruder’s right side from the area of the Grassy Knoll.

All 8mm films used in 1963 by other camera men and women (Nix, Towner, Hughes, Bell, et al) also contained silver Halide in the Kodachrome film that they used to film the Presidential limousine as it traveled  slowly down Elm Street on its fateful journey.



In closely examining frame Z-295 of the Zapurder film it becomes clear that a vapor trail appeared to hit near the right side parietal area of the President’s skull as he is hit from behind.

This bullet, as shown by Robert Morningstar in 1992, struck the top right side of the President’s head and then went on to strike Governor Connally, with the bullet, which continued on ricocheting off President Kennedy to leave another  visible vapor trail showing that it continued on to strike Governor Connally in the back where it transited through his chest. 

In my opinion, Frame Z-295 is the most valuable frame in the Zapruder film because it proves conclusively that Governor Connally was first struck in the back at that moment, not any earlier as assumed by the Warren Commission counsel (Arlen Specter), and thus destroying the Single Bullet  Theory, finally putting to rest the “Magic Bullet Fraud.”

In closing, my investigation indicates that there were (at least) six shots;

1. Z-189, President Kennedy was struck in the back from the rear, angle indicates source to be the Dal-Tex Building;

2. Z-216, a front shot through the windshield causing President Kennedy’s throat wound, a ballistic (vapor) trail can be seen  over Stemmons Freeway road sign.

3. Z-237 Governor Connally was shot from the Front, shattering his right wrist.

4. Z-295 proves rear shot causied Kennedy’s rear side skull wound and Governor Connally’s back. Take note that the wound to Connally’s left thigh was a partial fragment that was never removed because it lay too close to the femoral artery and so was left inside the Governor, and which he carried to his grave.

5. Z-313 head shot to Kennedy from the front from three possible locations;

6. Z329 a shot from behind missed the President, striking the chrome strip between the two visors from the rear, causing damage to the stem holder of the rear view mirror, breaking it, with the front of the rear view mirror to be pushed inward.

Roy Schaeffer

Dayton, Ohio

April 4th, 2014

Ref: http://ufodigest.com/article/case-against-single-bullet-theory/4-04




April 5, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Roger Stone speaks re: The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ



Lyndon Johnson Admits To Walter Cronkite That He Knows Who Killed JFK


watch LBJ disemble and flub up 


JFK Murder Truth telling - Heading to the Grassy Knoll on November 22nd - 50th Anniversary http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2013/11/jfk-murder-truth-telling-heading-to-the-grassy-knoll-on-november-22nd-50th-anniversary.html

April 2, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

How LBJ Killed JFK: Money, Attorneys, and the Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy Theory

Oliver Barr McClellan, entrepreneur, counsel and author, born in 1939 in Cuero (aka Rawhide), Texas, became widely known by his 2003 book Blood, Money & Power on the Kennedy assassination. He has also written on globalization. McClellan published Blood, Money & Power: How LBJ Killed JFK, which became a best-seller in November 2003. In the book, McClellan presents the theory that Lyndon B. Johnson and Austin attorney Edward A. Clark were involved in the planning and cover-up of the Kennedy assassination. McClellan also names Malcolm Mac Wallace as one of the assassins. The book includes allegations surrounding the theft of the 1948 Senate election,[1] an Austin murder by Wallace, and a belated grand jury action regarding Johnson in another murder by Wallace. The killing of Kennedy, McClellan alleges, was paid for by oil millionaires, including Clint Murchison, Sr. and H. L. Hunt. McClellan purports that Clark got $6 million for this work, including a $2 million bonus. McClellan notes the conspiracy background disclosed in the book shows how some power lawyers abuse the legal and political systems. Extensive citations are in the book. French journalist William Reymond published a book the same year in which he claims that Cliff Carter and Malcolm Wallace were key to helping plot the murder of JFK. McClellan's book has been translated into Japanese. McClellan is completing the sequel to his first book, which purportedly will disclose what he alleges to be a continuing cover-up, as well as new insights into the Kennedy family. After McClellan repeated his allegations against Johnson in the documentary The Men Who Killed Kennedy, broadcast on The History Channel on November 18, 2003,[2] former presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter protested, and former LBJ staffers Bill Moyers and Jack Valenti asked The History Channel to investigate the charges. On April 2, 2004, after having three historians examine the charges, The History Channel issued a press release stating that the claim of LBJ's complicity is entirely unfounded and does not hold up to scrutiny. [The show] fell short of the high standards that the network sets for itself. The History Channel apologizes to its viewers and to Mrs. [Lady Bird] Johnson and her family for airing the show.[3] In addition to disclosing the many motivations for Johnson, McClellan states that the assassination of Kennedy allowed the oil depletion allowance to be kept at 27.5 percent. It remained unchanged during the Johnson presidency. According to McClellan this resulted in a saving of over 100 million dollars to the American oil industry. In 1970, during President Richard Nixon's term, the oil depletion allowance dropped to 15 percent. It was not until the arrival of President Jimmy Carter that the oil depletion allowance was removed. McClellan also wrote Made in the USA: Global Greed, Bad Tax Laws and The Exportation of America's Future published in June 2010 by Hannover House. Taking a positive look at the greatest generations since 1945, McClellan notes Pax Americana was in place by 1990. He traces the subsequent collapse of the economy to government-induced programs for an unacceptable imbalance of trade, declining family income, unworkable mortgages, high prices at the pump, and collapsing billfolds forcing homeowners to walk away from their homes. Banks also collapsed and then the economy collapsed. This tragedy for individuals and families is not acceptable; however, after two years, the economy has not recovered and jobs have not been available. Recommending initiatives to buy America with strong support for private enterprise, McClellan says open trade must replace free trade in the new paradigm of ten common markets. The budget and trade deficits will be corrected by encouraging American free enterprise. Extensive citations are in the book. Emphasizing the human side, the book shows the impact on individuals from economic policies



JFK Murder Truth telling - Heading to the Grassy Knoll on November 22nd - 50th Anniversary


April 1, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group (JTRIG) The Art of Deception: Training for Online Covert Operations

One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction. It’s time to tell a chunk of that story, complete with the relevant documents.


March 28, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

FW: THIS IS MAJOR GOOD NEWS!!!!!!! New Hampshire Adopts Jury Nullification Law

Henry Morgan relays:

Wooo hoooo   this is a major milestone towards restoring the People's  control over law and government.    While I would have favored stronger, more explicit language......New Hampshire is the first state to return, by law, to recognizing the right of the defendant and/or his counsel to inform the jury of their right to judge the law as well as the facts!!!!! ......


which flies in the face of the almost universal position of the judiciary......that while the jury does indeed have the right to nullify the law (find not-guilty in spite of the facts) that neither the defense nor his counsel may inform/remind the jury of that right......nor argue that issue as a defense. (ie "I should be found not guilty because the  law itself is ridiculous and shouldn't be a law in the first place.")   (That's how we got rid of the runaway slave laws....by the way.  Juries in the North began to universally exercise their right to nullify the law by refusing to convict.)


Given this monumental achievement in New Hampshire ....... hopefully the other states will follow suit.....and

perhaps there's even reason to be hopeful of restoring direct grand jury access to the People as well!!!!

(So that criminal complaints can be lodged directly by citizens against police and public officials who abuse their power, for example.)  




From: Gordon Curtis [mailto:gordoncurtis@bellsouth.net
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 4:13 PM
Subject: Jury Nullification... New Hampshire Adopts Jury Nullification Law



New Hampshire Adopts Jury Nullification Law


Jury nullification, in which jurors refuse to convict defendants under laws they find objectionable or inappropriately applied, is a favored tactic of many libertarians who advocate individual liberty. They like the idea of a tool that can be wielded on the spot to shield people from powerful control freaks. But nullification is useful only if people know about. And last week, New Hampshire’s governor signed a law requiring the state’s judges to permit defense attorneys to inform jurors of their right to nullify the law.

On June 18, Governor John Lynch signed HB 146, which reads:

...a Right of Accused. In all criminal proceedings the court shall permit the defense to inform the jury of its right to judge the facts and the application of the law in relation to the facts in controversy.

Short, simple and to the point. Nullification advocate Tim Lynch, of the Cato Institute, thinks it’s a step in the right direction, though not necessarily a game-changer. Says he:

"This is definitely a step forward for advocates of jury trial.  Allowing counsel to speak directly to the jury about this subject is something that is not allowed in all the courthouses outside of New Hampshire. So, this is good.  I am concerned, however, that this language does not go far enough. We don’t know how much pressure trial judges will exert on defense counsel."


At last! Jury nullification is brought into the open and breathing new life into the Constitution. It's about time.


Somebody finally figured out that the common people who comprise juries are the final arbiters of the law, not prosecutors or judges. It means that, from now on, juries in New Hampshire will be guaranteed their Constitutional right to judge the law.


Remember New Hampshire's state motto... "Live Free or Die."  The people of New Hampshire are certainly showing us the way to guarantee every man a fair trial.   


Jury nullification




God bless America! 


Gordon  Curtis


Spread the word

March 24, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Cocaine, Assassination Politics and the 2000 Election

Cocaine, Assassination Politics and the 2000 Election
Copyright November 04,1999
by Steven Mark Coble

The matter of the Kennedy Assassination has long been an investigative
hobby of mine, almost since the day JFK was shot.  How that all relates to
politics, the cocaine trade, Iran Contra, the invasion of Panama and
election 2000 will begin to make sense in a few pages. I was 10 years old
at the time. Nov 23rd ’63 our family had to console a friend, Joan
Barnett, the daughter of Ben Truly, of Texas School Book Depository fame.  
Truly was visited by “government people”, supposedly FBI, and urged to
give Oswald that job. The poor man died believing himself as responsible
as anyone for that assasination.  His daughter died, I feel like before
her time, for reasons I still don’t understand.  A couple of years later,
my doctor and I were talking about Jack Ruby.  He informed me then that
the supposed treatments they were giving him for cancer would kill him
much faster than the cancer itself.  I have another personal friend whose
father was a wealthy Ft. Worth businessman.  He and his sister still claim
Jack Ruby was a regular visitor to their home, and that on at least one
occasion was accompanied by Lee Harvey Oswald.

By the time I entered college, I had developed a passion for the subject
and elected “Extremist Politics – Right and Left” as my pilot program, and
“Assassination Politics” as my topic.  My partner was a divinity major,
Russell Clark.  Our instructor was then Texas Republican Gubernatorial
candidate David Reagan.  My partner’s dad was a Presbyterian minister,
whose long time military friend, Waxahachie newspaper editor and author
“Penn Jones”, offered to host Mr. Clark and myself to an evening at his
home.  He promised only that it would be enlightening at the very least.  
It was to say the very least.

Penn Jones conversed with us at length that evening, beginning with where
he was and what he was doing when it happened.  He went on to explain that
one of his war buddies was a guy named Jim Garrison.  At the time Nixon
was taking Life Magazine to court over posession of the Zapruder film.  
Mr. Jones explained that he and Garrison had sources inside the magazine
who managed to smuggle out copies of both films. For those of you who are
not aware, there was a SECOND film of the assassination.  It was a black
and white 8mm shot from Dealy Plaza near the center looking directly at
the President, Abraham Zapruder, and the gunnman behind the fence.  The
figure could be seen even shadowed to resemble a police officer, as could
the gun a rifle, as could the blast from that gun precisely coordinated to
the kill shot of the President’s head.  This I saw with my own eyes, and
in addition, the following.

 With the Zapruder film, came the frame by frame voice account of the
assassination.  It was the voice of an obscure KRLD-TV Dallas news
reporter as the only journalist allowed to view the Zapruder film and
report on it to the public.  The voice was that of Dan Rather, and his
frame by frame account of the head shot was that “ the bullet clearly
entered the back of the President’s head as then the President’s head
lurched FORWARD with considerable force”. His account was precisely the
opposite of what the film clearly showed, and Dan Rather was lying to the
public and the government was sanctioning this!! We all three agreed that
fall evening in 1971, that Dan Rather was “going places”. He did not
disappoint us.

Long before that evening, I had already taken note of George Bush in Texas
politics, but would still not visit him with suspicion for years yet to
come.  He had run for congress and lost.  Ran against Lloyd Bentson for
the senate and lost.  Then, the new president (Nixon) made him Texas State
Republican Party Chairman.  Then National Party Chairman, then UN
ambassador, and finally Whitehouse chief of staff during the Saturday
Night Massacre.  Ford gave him the CIA.  He ran for President in 1976 and
lost.  Ran again in 1980 and lost, but Nixon cut a deal with Reagan to put
him on the ticket in 1980.  The rest still is not history.  Suffice it to
say the man’s entire career in politics was the result of his association
with Nixon.  And as it turned out, Nixon owed most if not all of his
political career to Bush and his dad.  All of this might sound quite
innocent on the surface, were it not for information still being uncovered
linking Nixon to Bush and CIA covert ops back in the Eisenhower
administration, then, the Bay of Pigs, arms for hostages, guns for coke
and money, deals with the Ayatollah, and a growing list.  Now, enter the
Bush brothers, cocaine arrests in Miami and Houston, my associations in
Texas, the invasion of Panama, and General Manuel Noriega (who just this
week was moved from a Florida prison and is now under military guard,
sentence reduced)

After that evening in 1971, my life would take a turn and would never be
the same………I had a lot of issues and the journey was it’s own reward.

To this day, George Bush has a host of e-mail addresses inside the CIA
government computer system.  Among a 06-99 “e-mail Ferret” search in
government and CIA banks the most curious was drugs@cia.gov/, but there
were a host of others, many using the name of his dead dad Prescott Bush.  
Try it yourself.  Download “E-Mail Ferret” at www.ferretsoft.com/ .  
Also, check out http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/cocaine2/index.html
and http://www.weberman.com/

Statement of Fact Regarding Cocaine Trafficking and the Bush Family:


11/4/99 12:50:35 AM

In Houston, from 1977 until 1980 I rented the garage apartment next to my
business attorney, David C. Cobb.  His father is Daniel W. Cobb, retired
Houston Chronicle Executive Managing News Editor of some 40 years.  Dan
Rather’s first boss.  We became good friends over the years.  Dan happened
to be late for a holiday function one evening in 1979.  He was animated
and filled with excitement as I had ever seen him.  “You won’t believe
what just happened” he stated.  There were a number of people present
there in the kitchen and dining room, among them was a girl I happened to
be seeing at the time, Ms. Katherine Farenthold.  Kathy had recently
become the ex-wife of Dudley Farenthold.  Dudley was the son of Francis
(Cissy) Farenthold, a prominent state Democratic Party official and former
gubernatorial candidate.  Dan went on to say, “Dudley, John Connaly Jr.,
and Jeb Bush had just been picked up by HPD and arrested on charges of
cocaine possession.” Zarko Franks, Chief Investigative Reporter for the
Chronicle, had gotten a call from contacts inside Houston Police
Department and immediately went down to investigate the story.

Needless to say, this caused quite a stir in a room full of socially
prominent people.  Everyone wanted to know the obvious which was “Are we
going to read all about this in the morning or see it on TV tomorrow? “
“No way!” was his response.  He then went on to explain that the phones
lit up, agents came out of nowhere pressures were applied, the boys were
released and there wouldn’t be any record of it.  There was a definite air
of disappointment after that.  Dan didn’t seem so upset, stating that he
doubted we had heard the absolute end of the story. The future has a way
of catching up with you, I believe is the way he put it.

I asked Kathy if that had anything to do with her divorce from Dudley. She
affirmed that it was Dudley’s use of cocaine and his association with the
Bush brothers that had her upset all right, but the last straw was the
trips to Panama they had made to return cocaine shipments under diplomatic
immunity.  She wouldn’t stay with him after that.  Also present that night
was Linda Cobb, David’s wife, and Christine Fitzgerald, all friends.  
Some years passed.  I moved to Hawaii and lost touch with the girls after
David and Linda’s divorce.  I did keep in touch with Dan.

In 1992, Jeb Bush decided to make a run for Florida Governor.  I was
living here in Hawaii when I heard about it.  I had been on line since
late 91 and decided to cruise through CompuServe’s political forums.  I
found one for Florida and logged on to a Republican forum.  After
contacting Dan Cobb to confirm whether or not he would stick by his story
of that night.  He affirmed that he did indeed stand by the story.  He
also affirmed that chief reporter Zarko Franks would reiterate the same.  
I returned to the forum with a series of stinging accusations, and warned
Florida Republicans of Jeb’s background.  I was met the next morning with
e-mail from Florida State Republicans threatening to sue me if I did not
print a retraction.  I printed what was NOT a retraction and reiterated
that the Chronicle team would stand by the story.  That was the last we
heard of Jeb Bush that year.  Had I not been so debelitated from a near
death injury, I would never have let this pass the last election cycle.

I state uncategoricaly again, this incident happened, and George Herbert
Walker Bush covered it up.  The trips to Panama happened as well, of this
I have no doubt.  Kathy Farenthold had no bones to pick with anyone at the
time she told me these things and she indicated all the brothers were

Steven Mark
             *******Also refer to http://www.copvcia.com


To:  Assasination Records Review Board  -

My question is in regard to the below mentioned black and white Dealy
Plaza film.  I personally saw the film in the home of late author Penn
Jones in 1971.  I under-stand it disappeared in FBI hands.  Since I
personally know it exists, I would like to know of it's whereabouts.

        Steven Mark Coble


        (Correspondence to Dan Rather)

        Dear Mr. Rather (fellow Texan)-

        I once had the privelege of knowing your first boss, Dan Cobb,
and of calling him my friend.  He's passed on now,
        but what I learned about one of the two most burning issues in
my life have stuck with me, because of him.

        I also had the privelege, in 1971, of viewing the TWO Kennedy
assasination films one night in the home of Penn
        Jones, noted author on the subject and personal friend of Jim
Garrison.  You know the sound track I speak of.  We
        agreed that night that Dan Rather was going somewhere, and to
no one's surprise you did. I am sitting here now
        listening to your interview with Geraldo Rivera, and I'm
telling you.....you had better break ranks on your
        association with the Bush's.

        What I learned through associations and events in Texas,
Houston in particular, about the Bush boys, their drug
        arrests in Houston, trips to Panama for cocaine through General
Manuel Noriega as far back as the late seventies
        and early eighties, have all figured in to what is now becoming
blatantly obvious.

        I warned of another assasination in the making LESS than 24
hours before JFK jr.'s plane went down.  How that
        affects the political careers of the Bush boys is yet to be
determined…. if I have anything to say about it.





I have been stirring this pot now for 10 years.  My correspondence has
gone far and wide. Believe me,  It is my
        intention to see the Kennedy assasination case prosecuted
before I die, and the remaining assasinations and attempts
        as all part of the same conspiracy. It is time for Dan Rather
to break the story of the century, or go down in
        history as one of the dark characters in this sordid drama.
The choice is yours, but it is going to happen.

        I hope you find the following paper off the webb of interest.

        Steven Mark Coble


                               The Kennedy Assasination:
                              The Nixon-Bush Connection

                                          by Paul Kangas

     A newly discovered FBI document reveals that George Bush was
directly involved in the 1963 murder of
     President John Kennedy. The document places Bush working with the
now-famous CIA agent, Felix Rodriguez,
     recruiting right-wing Cuban exiles for the invasion of Cuba. It
was Bush's CIA job to organize the Cuban
     community in Miami for the invasion. The Cubans were trained as
marksmen by the CIA. Bush at that time lived in
     Texas. Hopping from Houston to Miami weekly, Bush spent 1960
and '61 recruiting Cubans in Miami for the
     invasion. That is how he met Felix Rodriguez.

     You may remember Rodriguez as the Iran-contra CIA agent who
received the first phone call telling the world
     the CIA plane flown by Gene Hasenfus had crashed in Nicaragua. As
soon as Rodriguez heard that the plane
     crashed, he called his long-time CIA supervisor, George Bush. Bush
denied being in the contra loop, but
     investigators recently obtained copies of Oliver North's diary,
which documents Bush's role as a CIA supervisor of
     the contra supply network.

      In 1988 Bush told Congress he knew nothing about the illegal
supply flights until 1987, yet North's diary shows
     Bush at the first planning meeting Aug. 6, 1985. Bush's "official"
log placed him somewhere else. Such double sets
     of logs are intended to hide Bush's real role in the CIA; to
provide him with "plausible deniability." The problem is,
     it fell apart because too many people, like North and Rodriguez,
have kept records that show Bush's CIA role
     back to the 1961 invasion of Cuba. (Source: The Washington Post,

     That is exactly how evidence was uncovered placing George Bush
working with Felix Rodriguez when JFK was
     killed. A memo from FBI head J. Edgar Hoover was found, stating
that, "Mr. George Bush of the CIA had been
     briefed on November 23rd, 1963 about the reaction of anti-Castro
Cuban exiles in Miami to the assassination of
     President Kennedy. (Source: The Nation, 8/13/88).

     On the day of the assassination Bush was in Texas, but he denies
knowing exactly where he was. Since he had
     been the supervisor for the secret Cuban teams, headed by former
Cuban police commander Felix Rodriguez,
     since 1960, it is likely Bush was also in Dallas in 1963. Several
of the Cubans he was supervising as dirty-tricks
     teams for Nixon, were photographed in the Zagruder film.

     In 1959 Rodriguez was a top cop in the Cuban government under
Batista. When Batista was overthrown and fled
     to Miami, Rodriguez went with him, along with Frank Sturgis and
Rafael Quintero. Officially, Rodriguez didn't join
     the CIA until 1967, after the CIA invasion of Cuba, in which he
participated, and the assassination of JFK. But
     records recently uncovered show he actually joined the CIA in 1961
for the invasion of Cuba when he was
     recruited by George Bush. That is how Rodriguez claims he became
a "close personal friend of Bush."

     Then "officially" Rodriguez claims he quit the CIA in 1976, just
after he was sent to prison for his role in the
     Watergate burglary. However, according to Rolling Stone reporters
Kohn & Monks (11/3/88), Rodriguez still
     goes to CIA headquarters monthly to receive assignments and have
his blue 1987 bulletproof Cadillac serviced.
     Rodriguez was asked by a Rolling Stone reporter where he was the
day JFK was shot, and claims he can't

     George Bush claims he never worked for the CIA until he was
appointed director by former Warren Commission
     director and then President Jerry Ford, in 1976. Logic suggests
that is highly unlikely. Of course, Bush has a
     company duty to deny being in the CIA. The CIA is a secret
organization. No one ever admits to being a member.
     The truth is that Bush has been a top CIA official since before
the 1961 invasion of Cuba, working with Felix
     Rodriguez. Bush may deny his actual role in the CIA in 1959, but
there are records in the files of Rodriguez and
     others involved in the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba that expose
Bush's role. The corporations would not put
     somebody in charge of all the state secrets held by the CIA unless
he was experienced and well trained in the
     CIA. (Source: Project Censored Report, Feb 1989, Dr Carl Jensen,
Sonoma State College).

     Recently I interviewed former CIA liaison officer L. Fletcher
Prouty. He is a consultant for the excellent new
     movie on how the CIA killed JFK, being made by Oliver Stone. He
told me that one of the projects he did for the
     CIA was in 1961 to deliver US Navy ships from a Navy ship yard to
the CIA agents in Guatemala planning the
     invasion of Cuba. He said he delivered three ships to a CIA agent
named George Bush, who had the 3 ships
     painted to look like they were civilian ships. That CIA agent then
named the 3 ships after: his wife, his home town
     and his oil company. He named the ships: Barbara, Houston &
Zapata. Any book on the history of the Bay of Pigs
     will prove the names of those 3 ships. Again, this is more finger
prints of George Bush's involvement in the Bay of
     Pigs invasion. Yet Bush denies his role in this great adventure.
Why would Bush be so shy about his role in this
     war? What is the secret? Is there something dirty about this war
that Bush & Nixon don't want the public to know

     Answer: Yes there is. The same people involved in the Bay of Pigs
were the people involved in the Watergate
     burglary. Why was the Watergate burgalarized [sic]? The CIA was
trying to plug up a possible news leak. They
     were trying to stop the Democrats from publishing the photos of
Hunt & Sturgis under arrest for the murder of
     JFK (May 7, 1977, SF Chronicle.)


     Presently, there is a law suit attempting to force the government
to release the records about the Bay of Pigs
     invasion. Why are those documents still secret? Why are they
locked in the National Archives along with all the
     photos from [the] Dallas assassination of JFK? Why are the 4000
hours of Watergate tapes in which Nixon is
     babbling about the mysterious connections between the Bay of Pigs,
Dallas and Watergate also being sealed in the
     National Archives? Is it because all three incidents are

     Yes. We must demand the secret files on these 3 cases be released
now. For a copy of the petition to release the
     files, please write to: Paul Kangas, private investigator, POB
422644, SF, Ca 94142. Thanks to Oliver Stone's
     blockbuster new movie on JFK there is now sufficient national
movement to reopen all these cases. The White
     House fears Stone's new movie so much that they have hired more
CIA journalists to slander the movie & Stone.
     Don't fall for it. Every serious investigator now agrees that
Oswald did not shoot JFK. That James Earl Ray did
     not shoot Dr. Martin Luther King and that Sirhan Sirhan did not
shoot Robert Kennedy. These cases must be
     reopened so that Sirhan and Ray can be set free. The only bar that
keeps Sirhan in prison is the tremendous
     anti-arab racism in Americans: in both blacks & whites.

     According to a biography of Richard Nixon, his close personal and
political ties with the Bush family go back to
     1941 when Nixon claims he read an ad in an L A. newspaper, placed
by a wealthy group of businessmen, led by
     Preston Bush, the father of George Bush. They wanted a young,
malleable candidate to run for Congress. Nixon
     applied for the position and won the job. Nixon became a
mouthpiece for the Bush group. (Source: Freedom
     Magazine, 1986, L.F. Prouty).


     In fact, Preston Bush is credited with creating the winning ticket
of Eisenhower-Nixon in 1952.(Source: George
     Bush, F. Green, Hipocrene, 1988).


     Newly discovered FBI documents prove that Jack Ruby has been an
employee of Richard Nixon since 1947.
     That that [sic] FBI document Ruby is listed as working as a spy &
hit man for Nixon. On Nov. 22, 63 Ruby was
     seen by a women who knew him well, Julian Ann Mercer,
approximately an hour before the arrival of JFK's
     motorcade, unloading a man carrying a rifle in a case at the
Grassy Knoll from his car. Ruby later was seen on
     national TV killing a witness who could link Nixon & Bush to the
killing of JFK: Oswald. On the Trail of the
     Assassins, Garrison, p xiii.

     Richard Nixon was Vice President from 1952 until 1960. In fact,
Nixon was given credit for planning Operation
     40, the secret 1961 invasion of Cuba, during his 1959 campaign for
President After Batista was kicked out by the
     starving people of Cuba, and Fidel Castro came to power, Castro
began telling American corporations they would
     have to pay Cuban employees decent wages. Even worse, Pepsi Cola
was told it would now have to pay world
     market prices for Cuban sugar.

     Pepsi, Ford Motor Co., Standard Oil and the Mafia drug dealers
decided Fidel had to be removed since his
     policies of requiring corporations to pay market wages was hurting
their profits. So the corporations asked then
     Vice-President Nixon to remove Fidel. Nixon promised he would,
just as soon as he'd won the 1960 elections
     against some underdog, an unknown Democrat named John Kennedy. It
would be an easy victory for Nixon. The
     polls had Nixon winning by a landslide. Besides, Kennedy was a
Catholic, and Americans would no more elect a
     Catholic President than they would elect a woman, a black or a
Jew. This was 1959.

     Nixon told Pepsi, Standard Oil and other corporations who lost
property given back to the farmers of Cuba, that
     if they would help him win, he would authorize an invasion to
remove Castro. To further impress contributors to his
     campaign, then Vice-President Nixon asked the CIA to create
Operation 40, a secret plan to invade Cuba, just
     as soon as he won.


     The CIA put Texas millionaire and CIA agent George Bush in charge
of recruiting Cuban exiles into the CIA's
     invasion army. Bush was working with another Texas oilman, Jack
Crichton, to help him with the invasion. A
     fellow Texan, Air Force General Charles Cabel, was asked to
coordinate the air cover for the invasion.

     Most of the CIA leadership around the invasion of Cuba seems to
have been people from Texas. A whole Texan
     branch of the CIA is based in the oil business. If we trace Bush's
background in the Texas oil business we
     discover his two partners in the oil-barge leasing business: Texan
Robert Mosbacher and Texan James Baker.
     Mosbacher is now Secretary of Commerce and Baker is Secretary of
State, the same job Dulles held when JFK
     was killed. (Source: Common Cause magazine, 3-4/90).

     On the Watergate tapes, June 23, 1972, referred to in the media as
the "smoking gun" conversation, Nixon and his
     Chief of Staff, H.R. Haldeman, discussed how to stop the FBI
investigation into the CIA Watergate burglary.
     They were worried that the investigation would expose their
conection to "the Bay of Pigs thing." Haldeman, in his
     book The Ends of Power, reveals that Nixon always used code words
when talking about the 1963 murder of
     JFK. Haldeman said Nixon would always refer to the assassination
as "the Bay of Pigs."

     On that transcript we find Nixon discussing the role of George
Bush's partner, Robert Mosbacher, as one of the
     Texas fundraisers for Nixon. On the tapes Nixon keeps refering to
the "Cubans" and the "Texans." The "Texans"
     were Bush, Mosbacher and Baker. This is another direct link
between Bush and evidence linking Nixon and Bush
     to the Kennedy assassination.

     In the same discussion Nixon links "the Cubans," "the
Texans," "Helms," "Hunt," "Bernard Barker," Robert
     "Mosbacher" and "the Bay of Pigs." Over and over on the Watergate
tapes, these names come up around the
     discussion of the photos from Dallas that Nixon was trying to
obtain when he ordered the CIA to burglarize the
     Watergate. (Source: Three Men and a Barge", Teresa Riordan, Common
Cause magazine, March/April
     1990, and San Francisco Chronicle, May 7,1977, interview with
Frank Sturgis in which he stated that "the
     reason we burglarized the Watergate was because Nixon was
interested in stopping news leaking related
     to the photos of our role in the assassination of President John


     After Nixon's landslide victory in 1972, he knew he had to
centralize all power into the White House to keep his
     faction in power, not only to hold power, but to prevent the media
from digging into how he secretly shot his way
     into the White House, just like Hitler shot his way into control
of Germany. The first thing Nixon did was to
     demand signed resignations of his entire government. "Eliminate
everyone," he told John Ehrlichman about
     reappointment, "except George Bush. Bush will do anything for our
cause." (Source: Pledging Allegiance, Sidney

     The reason why Bush will 'do anything" is because his hands have
as much of Kennedy's blood on them as do
     Nixon's, Hunt's, Sturgis's, Felix Rodriguez's and Gerald Ford's.
This White House gang fears that if the public ever
     realizes how they shot their way into power it could set off a
spark that would destroy their fragile fraud and land
     them in jail.

     Other famous Watergate members of the CIA invasion that Bush
recruited were Frank Sturgis, E. Howard Hunt,
     Bernard Barker and Rafael Quintero. Quintero has said publicly
that if he ever told what he knew about Dallas
     and the Bay of Pigs, "It would be the biggest scandal ever to rock
the nation."

     Meanwhile, in 1960, Preston Bush was running Nixon's campaign.
Nixon was sent to South Vietnam to assure the
     French- connection government there that if France pulled out, the
U.S. would step in to protect the drug trade
     from the GoIden Triangle. (Source: Frontline, 1988, "Guns. Drugs
and the CIA"; Alexander Cockburn;
     "Cocaine, the CIA and Air America," S.F. Examiner, Feb. 2, '91;
The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia,
     Alfred McCoy, 1972.)


     In 1959, Vice President Nixon was flying all over the world,
acting just like presidential material. It was an easy
     race for Nixon. Congressman Jerry Ford was doing a great job
fundraising for Nixon, as was George Bush. The
     rich loved Nixon. The media picked up every bone Nixon tossed out
to them. The biggest problem was that
     Nixon was afraid to speak openly of his plan to invade Cuba. The
plan was a secret. No sense in alerting Cuba to
     the coming invasion. But Kennedy was taking a harder line on Cuba
than Nixon, because Kennedy was not aware
     of the corporate/CIA planned invasion.

     Nixon lost the 1960 race by the smallest margin in history. At
first Bush, Nixon, Cabel and Hunt decided to just go
     ahead with the invasion, without informing President Kennedy.
Then, at the last second, at 4 a.m., just two hours
     before the invasion was set to go, General Cabel called JFK and
asked for permission to provide U.S. air cover
     for the CIA invasion. Kennedy said no.

     The CIA was furious with JFK but decided to go ahead with their
private invasion anyway. Due to poor
     intelligence, the CIA landed at the worst possible beach. A swamp.
The invasion failed. The CIA lost 15 of its
     best men, killed, with another 1100 in Cuban prisons. It was the
worst single blow the CIA ever suffered.
     (Source: F. Howard Hunt, Give Us This Day.)

     Bush, Nixon and Hunt blamed Cabel for asking Kennedy and blamed
Kennedy for saying no. They were livid with
     anger. Nixon's corporate sponsors ordered JFK to make any deal
necessary to recover the 1100 CIA agents
     imprisoned in Cuba. JFK did. Once the CIA had its well-trained
Cubans back, they decided to continue the
     invasion of Cuba just as soon as they could get rid of that S.O.B.

     The 1964 election was fast approaching. Nixon was running against
Kennedy again. Bush, Ford and Nixon knew
     that they had to get rid of JFK now, or else the Kennedy clan,
with Robert and Ted in the wings, could control the
     White House until 1984. They decided not to wait until '84 to get
back in the White House. The Cuban teams of
     "shooters" began following Kennedy from city to city looking for a
window of opportunity to shoot from. They
     came close in Chicago, but couldn't get the cooperation of Mayor



     But in Dallas they had an ace. The mayor was the brother of
General Cabel, whom the CIA blamed for the failure
     of the invasion. The general prevailed on his brother, Earl, and
the motorcade was changed to pass the grassy
     knoll at 7 m.p.h. Hunt and Sturgis shot JFK from the grassy knoll.
They were arrested, photographed and seen by
     15 witnesses. But the media turned a blind eye to the photos, and
for 25 years the world has been searching for
     the truth.

     On the day JFK was murdered, Nixon, Hunt and some of the Watergate
crew were photographed in Dallas, as
     were a group of Cubans, one holding an umbrella up, like a signal,
next to the President's limo just as Kennedy
     was shot. The Cubans can be seen holding up the signal umbrella in
the Zapruder film and dozens of stills taken
     during the assassination. After the murder they can be seen calmly
walking away.

     Nixon denied he was in Dallas that day, but new photos and stories
prove he was there. Nixon claimed to the FBI
     he couldn't remember where he was when JFK was killed. (Source:
FBI memo, Feb. 23, 1964, published in
     Coup d'etat in America, Weberman & Canfield). Bush, too, claims he
can't remember where he was. Jack
     Anderson did a TV special in 1988 proving beyond any shadow of
doubt that two of the tramps arrested in Dallas
     behind the grassy knoll were Hunt and Sturgis.

     After the murder, former Vice President Nixon asked President
Lyndon Johnson to appoint Nixon's friend, former
     FBI agent Jerry Ford, to run the Warren Commission. Nixon also
asked LBJ to appoint Nixon's long-time
     supporter, Judge Earl Warren, to head the Commission. LBJ agreed.
Ford interviewed all the witnesses and
     decided which ones would be heard and which ones eliminated. It is
no coincidence that Nixon selected Ford as
     his Vice President after Spiro Agnew was ousted. When Nixon
himself got busted in the Watergate scandal, Earl


     Warren offered to set up another special commission if it would
help get him out of trouble again. Ford, of course,
     pardoned Nixon for the Watergate burglary but Nixon is still not
out of the woods. There are 4000 hours of
     Watergate tape. On the June 23, 1972, discussions with John
Ehrlichman and Haldeman there is clear evidence
     that Nixon is openly "confessing" to hiring Hunt to kill JFK. That
is why the Watergate "investigation" went into
     secret session after Congress heard some of the tapes. This is why
only 12 hours of 4000 hours have been
     released to the public.


     Did Congress realize that Nixon and Bush had openly discussed
killing JFK for stopping the air cover for the Bay
     of Pigs invasion of Cuba? Remember, Nixon taped virtually every
discussion he had with anyone in his inner circle,
     including Bush, in order to blackmail people later. There is a
photo of Bush reporting to Nixon in the White House
     in 1968. It will be interesting to see what they were talking
about on that day, when the full 4000 hours are finally
     released. The key to unlocking the secrets behind the 1963 murder
of JFK is hidden in the 3988 hours of
     unreleased White House tapes. Bush was in Dallas the day Reagan
was shot. (Source: George Bush, F. Green,
     1988.) That must have given Bush a flashback to November 22,1963.

     Paul Kangas is a private investigator in California. This article
is reprinted from The Realist with permission.


March 24, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink