++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« THE LYNCHPIN TO BUSH'S IMPEACHMENT | Main | The People Asked If Would Like To Help USSC Eminent Domain Ruling's Lost Liberty Hotel Project »

London Underground Bombing 'Exercises' Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack Culpability cover scenario echoes 9/11 wargames

update.gif (1754 bytes)July 14, 2005 --

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet | July 9 2005

A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the London Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as happened in real life on the morning of July 7th.On a BBC Radio 5 interview that aired on the evening of the 7th, the host interviewed Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor Consultants, which bills itself as a 'crisis management' advice company, better known to you and I as a PR firm.Peter Power was a former Scotland Yard official, working at one time with the Anti Terrorist Branch.Power told the host that at the exact same time that the London bombings were taking place, his company was running a 1,000 person strong exercise which drilled the London Underground being bombed at the exact same locations, at the exact same times, as happened in real life.The transcript is as follows.    

POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway       stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.

HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?    

POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.

Click here for a clip of this dialogue. Click here for a longer clip where the comments can be heard in their full context.

The fact that the exercise mirrored the exact locations and times of the bombings is light years beyond a coincidence. Power said the drill focused around 'simultaneous bombings'. At first the       bombings were thought to have been spread over an hour, but the BBC reports just today that the bombings were in fact simultaneous.    

Mr. Power (pictured above) and Visor Consultants need not have been 'in on the bombing' or anything of that nature for this to be of importance. The British government or one of their private company offshoots could have hired Visor to run the exercise for a number of purposes.

The exercise fulfils several different goals. It acts as a cover for the small compartamentalized government terrorists to carry out their operation without the larger security services becoming       aware of what they're doing, and, more importantly, if they get caught during the attack or after with any incriminating evidence they can just claim that they were just taking part in the exercise.

This is precisely what happened on the morning of 9/11/2001. The CIA was conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning.It is clear that at least five if not six training exercises were in operation in the days leading up to and on the morning of 9/11. This meant that NORAD radar screens showed as many as 22 hijacked airliners at the same time. NORAD had been briefed that this was part of the exercise drill and therefore normal reactive procedure was forestalled and delayed.The large numbers of 'blips' on NORAD screens that displayed both real and 'drill' hijacked planes explain why confused press reports emerged hours after the attack stating that up to eight planes had been hijacked.The Anglo-American establishment that controls the military-industrial complex of the West has been caught over a hundred times carrying out bombings and other terrorist attacks around the world to further their corporate aims and to blame their enemies.    

The US government has been caught planning to carry out attacks and carrying out attacks. The British government has been caught red-handed as well. Members of Vladimir Putin's FSB were caught planting bombs in a Russian apartment building in 1999 by the Moscow police.

This is not speculation. Kermit Roosevelt admited on NPR radio that in 1953 the CIA and British intelligence carried out a wave of bombings and shootings in Iran. He then went on to brag about how they subsequently blamed the bombings on Iran's President, Mossadegh. Do you understand, these people brag about what they do 40 years later?The London bombings have the same signature as the Madrild bombings of 3/11. Both of these bombings are almost indistinguishable from the Bolognia bombing in 1980 that killed over 80 people. 

The bombing in Bolognia was part of a CIA operation code named Gladio, where the US government would pay right-wing terrorists to carry out bombings to be blamed on leftists in Europe. All of this was blown wide open when two of the Bolognia bombers were convited in an Italian court, forcing them to spill their guts admitting that they were neo-fascists contracted by the CIA. Operation Gladio documents have since been declassified.

The London terror alert level was lowered before the bombings took place. This gave the purpotrators extra cover to plan and execute the attack without having to evade the most stringent security.

In any crime you look at history and motive, The British government has been caught in multiple examples of carrying out bombings in London which were then blamed on the IRA. They even had one of their own MI5 agents wihin the Omagh bomb squad. Click here for an archive of this evidence.

The wider agenda will become clearer when Blair firmly points the finger at the selected patsies designated to take the fall. But for the moment he's happy to grandstand as the courageous leader who immedately returned to London to take control of the chaos.

BBC polls that were showing 80 per cent plus opposed the ID card will now likely flip back in the opposite direction. Support for the European Union and increased globalization through the G8 will rise. Who stands to gain from all this? Who has the motive?    

From Putin blowing up his own apartment buildings to Israel being behind Hamas, the evidence is consistently clear that large scale terrorism is always state sponsored.

The Madrid train bombing is another example. The bombers were found to be police informants with close links to the Spanish security services. They had access to the most secure areas of the Madrid train system. The Spanish government initially tried to blame the Basque group ETA for the blast in the hope that the people would rally behind the government and get them re-elected. After ETA denied involvement and the people started saying the government was involved, the Spanish government had to blame Al-Qaeda and kill some patsies by claiming they blew themselves up during a raid.

The London Underground exercises were used as the fallback cover to carry out the attack. This is the biggest smoking gun yet pointing directly to the most secretive levels of the British establishment itself being behind the attack.

More on this story as and when it develops.


World Renown Internet Magazine and Radio Program

World's Most Trusted Source for Truth-In-News

"These documents reveal that the CIA was used as a "cash cow" for George W. Bush, Senator John Kerry, and Bill and Hillary Clinton. Daddy Bush was a part of this CIA Black Ops Proprietary company that handled TRILLIONS of dollars for Queen Elizabeth II" 

-- Sherman Skolnick,
World Famous Crime-Fighter & U.S. Corrupt Judge-Buster.


Quick Link to Next Page

Archive Members Enter Here






CLICK (right-click ‘save as’)


(Cloak & Dagger News_7 _9_05: Chicago)

In the CIA leak case,Special Federal Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald is about to release Criminal Indictments against George W. Bush. Result? White House threatens to assassinate Fitzgerald.

The source did not elaborate about how the suspect was reportedly identified so early, although suggested he was onboard bus 30 that exploded outside of the British Medical Association at 9:47 local time. We are continuing our investigation.

July 8, 2005: British authorities are seeking a Moroccan man identified as Mohamed Guerbouzi, in connection with yesterday’s bombing attacks in London. Guerbouzi has been under investigation in Great Britain in connection with two previous attacks, a 2003 suicide bombing in Morocco and the Madrid train bombing on 11 March 2004. Guerbouzi held a senior position in the Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group, or GICM, according to investigators, and has been living in the UK for the last ten years.

July 8, 2005; 5:30 AM ET: Just a few short hours before the first explosion ripped through London, there was a significant sell-off or “selling short” of the British Pound in the financial market. This activity took place absent of any economic news or other known market-driven factors that would sufficiently explain the sell off. This activity also occurred without the normal corresponding pricing action in the other major currency pairs. In summary, a large amount of GBP was sold to liquidate a “long position” and secure profits, or to take a “short position” to profit from an anticipated drop in the value of the British Pound. In either case, the market activity warrants further investigation

Video: Bombing Exercises In London Underground


MI6 operative on London Bombings

Rested after a good night’s sleep in the Gleneagles Hotel, Tony Blair glanced nervously at his watch and wondered if the bombing of the London transport system would take place on schedule. London’s Chief of Police, Sir Ian Blair, and MI5 boss, Eliza Manningham-Buller, had promised to keep him firmly in the loop; and Jack Straw had advised him that the Israelis had been placated.

Blair caught a glimpse of himself in the dresser and checked his profile. Carole, his personal image advisor, had told him to soften the pronounced jaw when seated next to Bush. “You’re overdoing the Winston thing,” she had said pointedly. “Killing people was yesterday; starving Africans and rainforests is now the thing.” She was wrong about the killing, of course. The good Miz Caplin would never understand his rites of passage, at least not in the Brethren’s sense of the term. And yet something was still bothering him.

The intelligence services had been caught off balance by Mossad’s unwelcome intrusion into matters they considered a strictly British affair. Having the headline “Israel Warned Blair Two Days Before Attack” splashed across the front pages of an otherwise complicit print media was something to be avoided at all costs. Binyamin Netanyahu would go ahead with preparations for his press conference and allow himself to be “advised” by Scotland Yard shortly after the first blast. If MI5 were to dally in their attacks on commuters, he would have no choice but to claim that Scotland Yard had warned him prior to the event, and the Blair government would have to hope that the British people would not notice the obvious irregularity.

Back in London, Netanyahu dropped security protocol and looked cautiously out of his hotel window. Reflecting on his long years of experience in helping to finance and organise terror attacks on Israeli citizens to provoke world outrage against the rightful inhabitants of his stolen country, he knew that errors would be made and officials would let their tongues slip when the heat was on. Press reports would have to be altered at short notice and the volume turned up loud until all the world would hear nothing but “al Qaeda, alQaeda, al Qaeda". It had worked before and it would work again. The Goyim, whether American or British, would once more be led by the nose to believe the official version of events. Binyamin snickered inwardly at Eliza Manningham-Buller’s chosen title for the fictitious terror group. The nonsensical “Secret Group of the al Qaeda Organisation in Europe” suggested to him that Manningham-Buller had probably spent her childhood reading nothing other than Enid Blyton’s “Famous Five” and “Secret Seven” adventure books. Yes, that was it, the Secret Seven on the seventh of July. How apt. How very Qabalah.

Whatever, the British had insisted on bombing close to the venue at which he had been billed to deliver an important seminar, if only to give the attacks, in the words of an MI6 liason officer, “a real whiff of al Qaeda". The Liverpool Street bombing would even lift the hotel in which former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani was staying. The Prime Minister of Ontario, Dalton McGuinty, was also close to the epicentre. The British government and their Freemason paymasters in the City of London were sure sending a message to the Americans and Canadians: “We’re back in control of the terror game now. This time, the British Crown is playing for keeps.”

But the clock was ticking, and still no word. “Hashem,” Netanyahu growled softly, “deliver us from the ignorant Goyim and their slow-witted ways.”

At 8.40 am, “Mad Dog” Spencer stepped into the third carriage of a subway train bound for Aldgate and Liverpool Street Stations. He knew he would have very little time to leave the package behind in a shabby plastic bag and put sufficient distance between himself and the ten pounds of high explosives strapped to a timer. The latex treatment, which had given him the facial appearance of a down-and-out, was beginning to itch. Such inconveniences would have meant nothing to him back in the days when working in Kabul with his old MI6 friend, Clive Newell. It was Newell who had introduced him to the legendary CIA asset, Osama bin Laden, then known by his American codename “Tim Osman". Those were the days: fighting the Soviets back-to-back with artificial Islamic terror groups financed out of London, courtesy of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International.

Spencer remembered Clive fawning over Osama as “our baby", and his raging against the CIA’s unwarranted incursions on the British Crown’s right to use the fledgling al Qaeda gang as it saw fit. After all, the British had established the occultic Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt during the 1920s for the express purpose of destroying pro-American Arab nationalism as a counterforce to continued British imperial rule and as a means to defame the world’s fastest growing religion. America had paid for her obstinacy on September 11, 2001, although the Bush administration had deliberately left the gate wide open to all comers, including Mossad and the mercenary wing of the British SAS. Bush got what he wanted. Now it’s our turn.

Had “J-boy” been telepathic, he would doubtless have been sharing Spencer’s thoughts. They were old pals and had been through much the same thing. J-boy scanned the faces of his fellow commuters on the southbound Piccadilly Line train. They will all be dead in less than three minutes, he thought. Still, it all works to the good of Queen and country, and Tony will get his shiny new National Identity Cards. A shame it had to be a “wet job", but his many years of experience in helping the IRA to carry out terrorist atrocities in Northern Ireland and on the British mainland had shown him that only the proactive approach toward bringing things to a head delivered the political goods.

The 1974 Birmingham pub bombings. Yes, sir, that was us; and six innocent Paddies went to prison. It didn’t stop there. The good times for J-boy only started in earnest when working for the maverick Gordon Kerr. As an operative for the DET 14th Intelligence squad, J-boy had killed both Republicans and Loyalists, changing sides as frequently as was required by both MI5 and the SAS. The slaying of pensioner Francisco Notarantonio was J-boy’s finest moment because, in contrast to bombings with a high civilian body count, it required a level of deception unmatched in any previous MI5 assassinations in Ireland and Britain. Sir John Stevens finally ended the fun, despite MI5’s efforts to kill him too. But still, Her Majesty’s Government saved the day by forbidding the press from revealing any further names. Not that the press requires censorship these days - the mainstream boys do it themselves. It’s a cakewalk.

J-boy allowed the package to slip neatly between his feet, and he gently sidled it into the corner of the standing room in front of the double doors to the carriage. When the train pulled into the station, J-boy was gone. He would disappear into the crowd and make an expeditious exit before the explosion would claim the lives of twenty-one “useless eaters", and leave at least one hundred survivors without vital body parts for the rest of their lives.

As J-boy vanished into the back seat of an Astra Cabrio before being driven to an MI5 safe house, Tony Blair entered the foyer of the Gleneagles Hotel with a smile on his face. He knew that the first three bombs had been detonated just split seconds apart. Mentally, he quickly ran through the lines he had prepared the night before. He would say something Churchillian with an allusion to the wartime blitz and the unfailing courage of Londoners. It would be a bravely defiant speech. Nobody would suspect that the bombings were his own handiwork. Still, until such time he would have to play dumb and wait for Jonathan Powell or Ian Gleeson to brief him officially. Powell, he knew, had not been informed, but would know soon enough once John Scarlett had apprised him of the matter.

Sir Ian Blair, London’s Chief of Police, tried to sound surprised when informed of the bombings. The transport police had, as agreed in prior exercises, already briefed the press about an unexplained power surge. The rationale for such an explanation would be based on the alleged need to minimise panic and, as a helpful corollary, to maximise any potential casualties at sites where bombs had yet to be detonated. MI5 had quite deliberately misbriefed Sir Ian on the number of detonations they had planned, just to keep him sharp. This was the first time that such a hugely complex operation was known to senior figures within the British executive, Scotland Yard and the intelligence services. In fact, considering the potential for accidental disclosure, it was unprecedented in its scope and daring.

Sir Ian was nervous, and rightfully so. He had wanted to suspend all cell phone network services, but had been overruled by both Eliza Manningham-Buller and Tony Blair, the latter saying that “commuters should be given the chance to digitally record the full horror of the attacks". Yet Sir Ian knew that journalists would be curious as to why services were allowed to continue, given the widely known fact that the Madrid bombings had been detonated by mobile devices. It would be a tough call. He wouldn’t, of course, be able to say that he knew well in advance that timers had triggered the explosives. He would just have to HOPE THAT JOURNALISTS WOULD IGNORE THIS SMOKING GUN and fall for the mantra their editors would insist on repeating: “al Qaeda, al Qaeda, al Qaeda.” Sir Ian took a deep breath and quietly thanked Moloch in his heart for making real investigative journalism a thing of the past.

Eliza Manningham-Buller discovered a spring in her step. This was the first time she had been allowed to participate in the killing of large numbers of innocent people. It was a great day for England. It meant that she and John Scarlett would regain full control over al Qaeda and all the other terror front groups that had deserted to the CIA following Clinton’s symbolic and disciplinary cruise missile attacks on the Taliban. Eliza had also been cleaning house. There were no more David Shaylers around to be blowing whistles on payments made to Osama. No more attempts to expose her protection of British-trained and financed terrorists, such as Abu Qatada, a pro-British, anti-American gentleman with impeccable manners and a heart for the Queen.

Department K had already confirmed that both Spencer and J-boy were safe and in debrief. With the Edgware Road detonation also a success, Simpson wouldn’t be far behind. That just left ’Green Eagle’, Lawton and Pettigrew. Blair would now have been fully informed and she would take the conference call alone. There was still the matter of the fake al Qaeda website. The DNS was still POINTING TO AN INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER IN MARYLAND, AMERICA. The Israeli intern had, according to one duty officer who speaks fluent Farsi and classic Arabic, done a poor job of the grammar and had even misquoted the ayahs selected from the Koran. MSNBC TV translator Jacob Keryakes was already saying that al Qaeda would never have posted a statement on a secular website and that the claim of responsibility contained give-away errors. The whole thing is phoney, he scoffed. “This is not something al-Qaeda would do,” he said.

Eliza, being a perfectionist and the first to laugh at the CIA’s obvious home movie and audio productions of fake al Qaeda PR, was not entirely happy with substandard work. The press, however, would be cowed, online bloggers dismissed as nutty conspiracy theorists and the website pulled as soon as it had served its purpose. She could only hope that the ad hoc team charged with planting “clues” and tampering with forensic “evidence” in the subway stations would make a much better job at framing fictitious Islamic extremists. But, darling, no mini-vans full of Korans or miraculously intact Arab passports to be found within the eye of the blasts. Manningham-Buller sniggered into her coffee cup at the crass ineptitude of the Bush administration. British terrorism had always had a touch of class.

Meanwhile, all hell had broken lose in Tel Aviv. Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom had been barking down the phone to Israeli Ambassador Zvi Heifetz, enraged that the British had not acted on his warnings of an attack on the subway system, but had instead failed to communicate that this was an inside job. How dare they endanger Netanyahu’s life? Now they’re claiming the finance minister was warned before the attacks and are preparing a damage limitation exercise that points to Mossad in the event that things go awry. Shalom had the soon-to-be redacted Associated Press report in front of him:

(Jerusalem-AP) July 7, 2005 - “British police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes before Thursday’s explosions that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the city, a senior Israeli official said.

“Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had planned to attend an economic conference in a hotel over the subway stop where one of the blasts occurred, and the warning prompted him to stay in his hotel room instead, government officials said. … Just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say they had received warnings of possible attacks, the official said. He did not say whether British police made any link to the economic conference.

“The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the nature of his position.”

Shalom was aware of the political fallout this would cause. The British were trying to spin things their way and his opposite number, John Scarlett, was refusing to take his calls. All this despite repeated warnings from the Israeli side since July 4. Yes, we told them it was going to happen, and TONY BLAIR SAT ON THE INFORMATION AND DID NOTHING.

Shalom knew that AP would eventually redact the news report (and they did: nomorefakenews.com); so he was pleased to read what Stratfor had put out:

“Contrary to original claims that Israel was warned “minutes before” the first attack, unconfirmed rumours in intelligence circles indicate that the Israeli government actually warned London of the attacks “a couple of days” previous. Israel has apparently given other warnings about possible attacks that turned out to be aborted operations. The British government did not want to disrupt the G-8 summit in Gleneagles, Scotland, or call off visits by foreign dignitaries to London, hoping this would be another false alarm.

“The British government sat on this information for days and failed to respond. Though the Israeli government is playing along publicly, it may not stay quiet for long. This is sure to apply pressure on Blair very soon for his failure to deter this major terrorist attack.”

Heifetz ended his conversation with Shalom and eyed his liquor cabinet. If the press runs with this, he thought wistfully, Blair will be exposed as a murderer of his own people. You can kill Israelis and get away with it. You can kill Americans and they’ll make you President for a second time. But the Brits are made of wiser stuff. They’ll hang Blair from the highest lamppost in London.

Heifetz had also been told that Sir Ian Blair had refused to disable the cell phone networks. That’s an open admission that Blair knew well beforehand that explosions were not to be triggered by cell phones. Heifetz whistled at the audacity of it all, and wondered if just one curious journalist would push the matter to its logical conclusion. Not any of the media whores from the Murdoch press, of course. Or even from the Fabian socialist Guardian newspaper. The BBC would naturally report the government-approved version of events and any embarrassing questions would be drowned out in the general cry for revenge and increased police state powers.

As reports of bus explosions hit the airwaves, Tony Blair’s face animated the live feed. Flanked by Chirac and Bush, Blair went into Churchill mode and began the spin. Trying to look shocked and concerned, but inwardly full of glee, Blair let loose the repertoire he had prepared the night before. He would be returning to London to meet with police and intelligence chiefs, and he would preside over a press and propaganda control operation known as COBRA.

“A co-ordinated effort is slowly bringing order out of the chaos,” Sir Ian Blair told Sky News in a telltale direct translation of the Freemasons’ Satanic motto “Ordo Ab Chao".

The British people had been fooled again. Another war is on the cards.

On Saturday July 10, a British freelance journalist with a wealth of experience in sniffing out illegal MI6 activities in Germany took a stroll along the Muenchner Strasse in Frankfurt and recalled the warm summer evening in 1997 when a gun-wielding MI6 operative tried to shoot him dead: an incident witnessed by several passers-by and still on file with Inspector Werner Dietz at Frankfurt’s central police headquarters. The attack only strengthened Michael James’ determination to return a popular politician from enforced exile to his homeland in Kenya and to continue on African soil his investigation into the MI6 assassination of Robert Ouko, Kenya’s anti-British foreign minister.
The same journalist was mulling a call from a former MI6 agent who, back in 1997, had warned him of the clear and present danger to his life. Even though he already knew that Tony Blair had been informed of the impending attacks on London, what he had been told in terms of Blair’s direct involvement sounded almost too fantastical. That Tony Blair enjoyed killing Arab children was a proven fact. But British citizens on British soil? “Then tell it as a short story with the outline of events I have provided, my friend,” his confidante implored. “The facts will speak for themselves.”

And these are the facts: Tony Blair played a direct executive role in the false flag terror attacks on London, killing over sixty innocent civilians and maiming hundreds, possibly thousands, more. He worked in close cooperation with his namesake and fellow occultist, Sir Ian Blair, and with the head of MI5, Eliza Manningham-Buller. Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, was also kept informed of events leading up to the atrocities.

The first expositor that will surely hang Tony Blair came in the form of reports by the Associated Press and the intelligence specialists Stratfor that the Israelis had been repeatedly warning the British government since July 4, and that Blair chose to ignore both Shalom and Heifetz. The AP reports, which were quickly withdrawn from public view, have been salvaged from the Google cache and are on display at nomorefakenews.com, among many other websites. The second is represented by a major blunder in planning and response, namely Sir Ian Blair’s decision not to shut down the cell phone networks. That decision was based entirely on his foreknowledge that the explosives would not be detonated by means of mobile phones, as was the case with the equally suspicious events that struck Madrid on March 3, 2004, and his deferring to Tony Blair’s desire for graphic images of the carnage. A third expositor lies in the fact that MI5 made a number of glaring and very telling errors in their presentation of the “al Qaeda” website, even allowing a simple DNS trace to a server in the United States.

Another anomaly may emerge in the fact that the perpetrators seem to have somehow escaped being filmed by London’s vast network of CCTV cameras - a remarkable feat when one considers that the average Londoner is caught on camera three hundred times a day, and certainly more evidence that these operations were carried out by sophisticated insiders. Without a doubt, a number of Arab men will be rounded up in the days ahead and questioned by police until charges can be made to look credible.

When Tony Blair told the press that the bombings bore all the hallmarks of al Qaeda, he broke with tradition and actually told the truth. The fall-guy al Qaeda network is the bastard child of the British intelligence services and the Freemasonic terror school, the occultic Muslim Brotherhood. MI5, MI6 and al Qaeda are virtually indistinguishable. Yes, Mr Blair, the bombings bore all the hallmarks of MI5 - and you know it, precisely because it was you who authorised the attacks.

It’s not the first time that MI5 has been active in perpetrating acts of terror against the British people. Recent exposures have shown that most of the bombings carried out by the Irish Republican Army during its long campaign against the illegal British occupation of Northern Ireland were, in fact, provoked, instigated and executed by undercover MI5 agents posing as Irish patriots.

This pattern of subterfuge and deception in creating terror to manipulate public perceptions has been a specialty of American and British governments for the best part of fifty years. Diligent researchers and real journalists who aren’t fooled by government propaganda and the mainstream media, already know that the CIA, MI5 and MI6 financed al Qaeda during its heyday as the main organiser against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. They also know that Osama bin Laden was, and probably still is, on the CIA payroll, operating under the name “Tim Osman". The business relationship between the mercurial and sinister Bush family and the bin Ladens is well known. All of these facts can now be verified on the public record, thanks to the efforts of independent journalists and truth campaigners. Less well known is the integral role played by the British intelligence services (both MI5 and MI6) in creating, steering and financing the terror network, and also in protecting key operatives from public exposure and arrest.

Blair has obtained the results he wanted: the collapse of all resistance to the imminent introduction of National Identity Cards, the inflaming of public rage against Islam in preparation for an attack on Iran and Syria, and a distraction from the continued illegality of the Iraq war and issues that threaten to overwhelm his administration, such as the Downing Street memo, which evidences fraud and treason at the highest levels of state.

Tony Blair has one other ambition that remains unfulfilled. He has stated that he wishes to become the first ever president of a European superstate, a project recently derailed by the stunning French and Dutch rejection of the proposed European constitution. He also wishes, in his capacity as the new Prince of Europe, to remodel the European entity as a UK-US-Israeli forward base for imperial expansion in the Middle East and Central Asia; and he wishes to stamp this initiative with the imprimatur of the British Crown, forcing the United States to play the junior role in a new world order shaped by international bankers in the City of London.

The attacks on London and the forthcoming attacks on France and Germany are therefore also designed to resurrect the failing European project as the answer to the demands for increased security and surveillance and the continued negation of civil liberties - demands that will now be heard and amplified throughout the European Union by frightened and gullible citizens.

I was the first, long before Harold Pinter, to publicly call for the lawful arrest and execution of Tony Blair for mass murder and high treason, and I would like to renew that call here and now. With a wry nod in the direction of the British Consulate in Frankfurt, which has already tried to nail me for honest journalism, allow me in my capacity as one who possesses pre-degree qualifications in British Law, Constitution and Government to stress that such measures are not only lawful, but are indeed obligatory under the code governing statutes on Citizens’ Arrests.

Tony Blair is a dangerous psychopath who must be stopped before he kills and maims again. According to psychologist Dr Paul Broks, his repeated lies and his lust for the blood of innocent people evidence “a plausible psychopath - charming, intelligent, emotionally manipulative, ruthlessly ambitious and self-serving.” How much longer do we permit Blair to remain at large? How many more deaths and fake terror attacks will it take before men and women of courage invoke the law and apprehend this monster?

To paraphrase another serial killer, George W. Bush, if we can’t bring Tony Blair to justice, we must bring justice to Tony Blair.

[Copy & Paste Cross-Post Repeater Beacon]

   It's too Coincidental to be a Coincidence ~ Yogi Berra
       "Nothing ---- would be what it is,Because
         everything would be,  what it isn't.
          And contrary-wise     what it is,         
            it wouldn't be. And  what it            
                wouldn't be, it would.
                         You see?"
                    Alice in Wonderland.
                     ~ Lewis Carrol
Military Men are Just DUMB STUPID ANIMALS to be Used as Pawns
in Foreign Policy."   ~ Henry Kissinger quoted in
"Kiss the Boys Goodbye:How U.S.Betrayed Its Own POW's in Vietnam"
     The Z**nists have said for a long time that
"Once 10% of the Goyim Understand, the Game is Over."

Nothing in Politics Happens Without Being Planned. ~ F.D.R.

Never doubt that a Small Group of Thoughtful,Committed Citizens
can change the world.Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.
                                                 ~ Margaret Mead


Hard Choices: Bombing al-Qaeda’s Server in Houston
Sunday July 10th 2005, 8:04 pm

  I’d like to know when the intrepid invaders Bush and Blair
will attack Houston, Texas. If we are to follow the unvarnished logic
of the “war on terrorism,” the United States and Britain will attack
terrorists and those who support terrorists. Qalaah Qalaah
in Abu Dhabi runs the al-qal3ah.com web site and the server
for that web site is located in Houston, Texas.

As we know, the al-qal3ah.com site posted a claim taking
responsibility for the terror attacks in London.
According to Whois,
the street address for the company hosting the site, is
Everyones Internet, Inc.,
2600 Southwest Freeway, Suite 500, Houston, Texas.

A quick check with MapQuest reveals this to be a densely populated
area on a main thoroughfare surrounded by residential neighborhoods
(and even a park). No problem. As the bombing of Baghdad demonstrates,
the United States has plenty of experience attacking urban areas.

“In hospitals there are 207 people, woman, children and other civilians,”

Mohammad Saeed al-Sahaf, Iraqi information minister at the time,
said on March 22, 2003, after a “precision” attack on Baghdad.
“We have calculated in a small area of Baghdad, 19 missiles fell.
I went there and saw parts of these missiles—19 missiles
in a very small area,” al-Sahaf added.
It will probably not require 19 missiles to take out al-Qaeda’s
server situated near a busy intersection in Houston.
A couple cluster bombs will do the trick.

As for Tony Blair, he should waste no time bombing Willesden,
north-west London, where the Saudi dissident Saad al-Faqih lives.
Mr. al-Faqih, according to the normally reliable Israeli sources,
runs the Movement for Islamic Reform in Arabia (Mira)
and owns the Qal3ah forums, according to the U.S. Treasury.

“Al-Faqih has had contact with both UBL [Osama] and Khaled al Fawwaz,
who acted as UBL’s de facto representative in the U.K.
According to information available to the U.S. Government,
al-Faqih and al Fawwaz shared an office in the late 1990s,
and al-Faqih worked with and provided assistance to al Fawwaz,
who served as the intermediary between UBL and al-Faqih.”

Of course, taking out the whole Willesden neighborhood
to get one man may be a bit extreme, but then this was hardly
a concern when the U.S. military used a B-1 bomber
and a number of 2,000lb joint direct attack munitions bombs
on a restaurant in the Mansour district of Baghdad
where it was rumored Saddam and his sons Uday and Qusay
were hanging out in April, 2003.

“Iraqi officials said they found two bodies in the rubble
and were searching for another 14 they thought were still buried,
but said no members of the leadership had been killed,”

the Guardian reported at the time. I guess the dead
were restaurant patrons and staff, hardly worth concern.

And so, when Bush drops a few 2,000lb joint direct attack
munitions bombs a few dozen feet from the intersection
of Southwest Freeway and Kirby Drive, a couple minutes walk
from Levy Park and overlooking the heavily traveled US Highway 59,
the same steely resolve at work when the restaurant where Saddam
was not meeting his cohorts should hold sway.

After all, as Bush tells us, sacrifices will need be made in this
“war on terrorism,” a sort of non-war (in war, two sides are more
or less equally paired) promised to last a couple decades.


THESE are DANGEROUS TIMES, Where Nothing is as it Appears to be!
  Welcome to Alice in Blunderland. - SR
14 Characteristics of Fascism: http://www.ericblumrich.com/14.html
Beware the Troll: http://www.teamtechnology.co.uk/troll.htm

Everything You Always Wanted To Know About DU, but were Afraid to Ask!
Depleted Uranium: Lessons in "Humanitarian" and Other Warfare
81 Links at: http://www.livejournal.com/users/mparent7777/106502.html
This is (Possibly) copyrighted material, We believe this constitutes
a 'Fair Use' as provided for in Sec.107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material 
is distributed without profit. For more information go to:

The London Atrocity.
Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:00

There are a lot of very peculiar things surrounding the London Horror Bombings.

One reads about the exercise which was being carried out on the same day.

One reads about travellers on the Tube noticing that something was wrong on the Tube that fateful morning BEFORE the bombings.

I was personally watching TV when the announcer was asked if Scotland Yard had received a warning, and his reply was "No, the only place which received a warning was the Israeli Embassy".
Then there is the date 07-07-07, and we were told originally that 7 bombs had gone of and 7 people died on the bus and 21 people (7 three times = 777) per killed on the underground.

The above stirs something in the mind of even people who are not into conspiracy theories. Sad to say, that I have to join the ranks of those who feel that this ghastly atrocity was a result of US and UK policies towards Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine.

It may be comforting to hear Muslims in the UK joining ranks with those who condemn the horror, but let's face facts and be honest if YOU were a Muslim and if YOU were being interviewed a few days after such a bloody carnage against innocent civilians, would YOU say anything different? How long do you think you would be walking the street if you said you agreed with them?

Now comes even stranger things. Let's apply just a touch of logic to this situation. Here you are a Muslim, perhaps disenchanted with being jobless, vulnerable to being persuaded to do something against the country you are living in. You and 3 of your friends manage to get hold of explosives - not ordinary commercial explosives, not a home made fertilizer bomb, but high-grade MILITARY explosives and detonators. We won't even bother to look into how they got it in a country with so much security.

You and your three friends make up 4 bombs and decide that you are going to die and get your 77 virgins. So you pack you knapsacks with explosives and off you go to Luton in your car. Hang on - if you KNOW you ain't ever coming back, why would you leave hard to come by explosives in your home? Why wouldn't you either use them or give them to another group / person who also wanted to become a "martyr"?

Worse, you pack additional explosives into the car you take to Luton and, knowing full well you will NEVER return to the car, you leave explosives in the car as well. Why? You also make sure that you take all your identification documents with you, so you can carefully scatter them at the crime scene.

Either these people were utter morons OR they thought that they WERE coming back. Why would they think that? Were they not perhaps told that a so-called timing mechanism would allow plenty of time for them to get away before the explosion? If so, this tells me that they were manipulated by someone, someone who KNEW what they didn't, namely that they too were going to die that fateful day.

Suddenly, only a couple of days after the atrocity, the British Police "crack the case". They rush out to the other end of England and raid houses in Yorkshire. Once again like 911, the bombers had conveniently left ID documents scattered around the scene of their murders!

The cops were obviously "tipped off" hence the amazingly quick raids and discovery of "quantities of explosives". Who better to tip them off than the people who had "set up" the bombers and sent them to their deaths?

The police now find the car at Luton containing explosives, explosives which are evidence, that's right E-V-I-D-E-N-C-E, so what do they do? Keep it to present in Court? Nope, they destroy it in a series of "controlled explosions" - fingerprints, DNS, marks of origin the works.

They do exactly the same at the house in Yorkshire and once again destroy the evidence. Are we going to believe that high grade military explosives are unstable and dangerous? Anyone who believes that is a bigger moron that the bombers must have been. Military explosives are extremely safe and stable and require a detonator before they become dangerous.

Perhaps bringing the explosives into Court would have been very embarrassing for someone, especially if the origin was made public. Who is trying to kid whom?

Al-Qaida nukes already in U.S.
Terrorists, bombs smuggled across Mexico border by MS-13 gangsters

Posted: July 11, 2005
12:22 p.m. Eastern

Editor's note: Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin is an online, subscription intelligence news service from the creator of WorldNetDaily.com – a journalist who has been developing sources around the world for almost 30 years. The subscription price for the premium newsletter has been slashed in half and is now available for only $9.95 per month. 

© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

WASHINGTON – As London recovers from the latest deadly al-Qaida attack that killed at least 50, top U.S. government officials are contemplating what they consider to be an inevitable and much bigger assault on America – one likely to kill millions, destroy the economy and fundamentally alter the course of history, reports Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin.

According to captured al-Qaida leaders and documents, the plan is called the "American Hiroshima" and involves the multiple detonation of nuclear weapons already smuggled into the U.S. over the Mexican border with the help of the MS-13 street gang and other organized crime groups.

Al-Qaida has obtained at least 40 nuclear weapons from the former Soviet Union – including suitcase nukes, nuclear mines, artillery shells and even some missile warheads. In addition, documents captured in Afghanistan show al-Qaida had plans to assemble its own nuclear weapons with fissile material it purchased on the black market.

In addition to detonating its own nuclear weapons already planted in the U.S., military sources also say there is evidence to suggest al-Qaida is paying former Russian special forces Spetznaz to assist the terrorist group in locating nuclear weapons formerly concealed inside the U.S. by the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Osama bin Laden's group is also paying nuclear scientists from Russia and Pakistan to maintain its existing nuclear arsenal and assemble additional weapons with the materials it has invested hundreds of millions in procuring over a period of 10 years.

The plans for the devastating nuclear attack on the U.S. have been under development for more than a decade. It is designed as a final deadly blow of defeat to the U.S., which is seen by al-Qaida and its allies as "the Great Satan."

At least half the nuclear weapons in the al-Qaida arsenal were obtained for cash from the Chechen terrorist allies.

But the most disturbing news is that high level U.S. officials now believe at least some of those weapons have been smuggled into the U.S. for use in the near future in major cities as part of this "American Hiroshima" plan, according to an upcoming book, "The Al Qaeda Connection: International Terrorism, Organized Crime and the Coming Apocalypse," by Paul L. Williams, a former FBI consultant.

According to Williams, former CIA Director George Tenet informed President Bush one month after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that at least two suitcase nukes had reached al-Qaida operatives in the U.S.

"Each suitcase weighed between 50 and 80 kilograms (approximately 110 to 176 pounds) and contained enough fissionable plutonium and uranium to produce an explosive yield in excess of two kilotons," wrote Williams. "One suitcase bore the serial number 9999 and the Russian manufacturing date of 1988. The design of the weapons, Tenet told the president, is simple. The plutonium and uranium are kept in separate compartments that are linked to a triggering mechanism that can be activated by a clock or a call from the cell phone."

According to the author, the news sent Bush "through the roof," prompting him to order his national security team to give nuclear terrorism priority over every other threat to America.

However, it is worth noting that Bush failed to translate this policy into securing the U.S.-Mexico border through which the nuclear weapons and al-Qaida operatives are believed to have passed with the help of the MS-13 smugglers. He did, however, order the building of underground bunkers away from major metropolitan areas for use by federal government managers following an attack.

Bin Laden, according to Williams, has nearly unlimited funds to spend on his nuclear terrorism plan because he has remained in control of the Afghanistan-produced heroin industry. Poppy production has greatly increased even while U.S. troops are occupying the country, he writes. Al-Qaida has developed close relations with the Albanian Mafia, which assists in the smuggling and sale of heroin throughout Europe and the U.S.

Some of that money is used to pay off the notorious MS-13 street gang between $30,000 and $50,000 for each sleeper agent smuggled into the U.S. from Mexico. The sleepers are also provided with phony identification, most often bogus matricula consular ID cards indistinguishable from Mexico's official ID, now accepted in the U.S. to open bank accounts and obtain driver's licenses.

The Bush administration's unwillingness to secure the U.S.-Mexico border has puzzled and dismayed a growing number of activists and ordinary citizens who see it as the No. 1 security threat to the nation. The Minuteman organization is planning a major mobilization of thousands of Americans this fall designed to shut down the entire 2,000-mile border as it did in April with a 23-mile stretch in Arizona.

According to Williams' sources, thousands of al-Qaida sleeper agents have now been forward deployed into the U.S. to carry out their individual roles in the coming "American Hiroshima" plan.

Bin Laden's goal, according to the book, is to kill at least 4 million Americans, 2 million of whom must be children. Only then, bin Laden has said, would the crimes committed by America on the Arab and Muslim world be avenged.

There is virtually no doubt among intelligence analysts al-Qaida has obtained fully assembled nuclear weapons, according to Williams. The only question is how many. Estimates range between a dozen and 70. The breathtaking news is that an undetermined number of these weapons, including suitcase bombs, mines and crude tactical nuclear weapons, have already been smuggled into the U.S. – at least some across the U.S.-Mexico border.

The future plan, according to captured al-Qaida agents and documents, suggests the attacks will take place simultaneously in major cities throughout the country – including New York, Boston, Washington, Las Vegas, Miami, Chicago and Los Angeles.

In response to the G2 Bulletin revelations, Chris Simcox, founder of the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps, a citizen action group demanding the U.S. government take control of its borders, said an immediate military presence on the borders is now imperative "to stop the overwhelming influx of unidentified, potentially hostile and seditious persons coming across at an alarming rate."

"Terrorists have carte blanche to carry practically anything they want across our national line at this time," he said. "As ordinary citizens have warned this government for years, the only surprising part about the new information reported here is that nothing apocalyptic from Mexican-border weapons trafficking has yet happened. Terrorism has reared its ugly head in London again these past few days, and as we know all too well we are not immune in this country. At this point, the next attempt to attack America at home is just a matter of 'when,' not 'if.' And our unsecured borders have surely contributed to this threat – yet our government officials continue to fiddle while our nation's margin of security and safety burns away. The president and Congress had better wake up before they have to answer for another devastating terrorist incursion on our own soil."



12 july 2005

Related: Department of Homeland Security reader for emergency responders on explosive devices:


And other readers on chemical, biological and radiological WMD:


B. adds:

As well as the radio interview, Peter Power of Visor has also done one on TV, which is at the following places:



Here is a transcript of the relevant part of the interview:


POWER: Today we were running an exercise for a company - bear in mind now that I'm in the private sector - and we sat everybody down in the city - 1000 people involved in the whole organization - with the crisis team. And the most peculiar thing was it was we based on a scenario of simultaneous attacks on a underground and mainline station. So we had to suddenly switch an exercise from fictional to real. And one of the first things is, get that bureau number, when you have a list of people missing, tell them. And it took a long time -

INTERVIEWER: Just to get this right, you were actually working today on an exercise that envisioned virtually this scenario?

POWER: Almost precisely. I was up to 2 oclock this morning, because it's our job, my own company. Visor Consultants, we specialize in helping people to get their crisis management response, how you jump from slow time thinking to quick time doing. And we chose a scenario with no assistance, which is based on a terrorist attack because they've been close to a property occupied by Jewish businessmen there in the city, and there are more American banks in this city than there are in the whole of New York - a logical thing to do.

INTERVIEWER: How extraordinary today must feel for you as it unfolds. You mentioned a few moments ago there our experience with Irish Republican terrorism. And of course it was very different wasn't it because however perverted their behavior, the IRA believed itself to have some sort of code of honour, and tended to issue some kind of warnings, of course they often came too late to do any good.


What does he mean by 'get that bureau number'?

Which company is he talking about?


And B. writes again:

For all his clipped posh 'confident' tones, the guy uses a lot of sentence fragments.

I think there are some mistakes in the transcript:



     "we chose a scenario with no assistance"

what he actually says is:

     "we chose a scenario with their assistance"




     "they've been close to a property occupied by Jewish businessmen there in the City"

what he actually says is:

     "they're very close to a property occupied by Jewish businessmen. They're in the City"

Also, what is he talking about when he says "get that bureau number"?

What bureau??

The non sequitur regarding American banks in the City suggests that the company may be an American bank (Merrill Lynch? UBS Warburg?)

Other possibilities:

  the Conran organisation (part-owns the Great Eastern hotel)

  Benfield/Benfield Grieg/Benfield Hazard

  Deutsche Bank (co-organised the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange Conference at the Great Eastern Hotel with the Israeli embassy)

11 July 2005

B. writes:

There is smoking-gun evidence to prove UK State involvement in the recent terror attacks in London. An 'exercise' was planned by an organisation called 'Visor', run by former senior police, security, and military personnel. This exercise was planned to take place in London on THE SAME DAY, and involved the 'simulation' of SIMULTANEOUS BOMB EXPLOSIONS at the SAME TUBE STATIONS close to which bombs did actually explode. The head of this organisation admitted this in an interview broadcast by BBC Radio 5 on Thursday evening. The transcript of the relevant part is below, and I have also uploaded the audio file.


The broadcast is also at:





POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.

HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?

POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.


Information about senior people at 'Visor' - former police, security, and military personnel, is at:


Further ref. 1

Tony Blair Served With Subpoena by US Embassy Official
From:"Stew Webb" <stewwebb@stewwebb.com
Official Press Release
Tuesday July 13, 2005 8:PM

Tony Blair Served With Subpoena by US Embassy Official in Valerie Plume Case
By Tom Heneghan & Stew Webb Federal Whistleblowers
Heneghan-Webb Presidential & Vice Presidential Candidates 2004

Today England's Prime Minister Tony Blair was served a subpoena by US Embassy Officials in London, to answer questions in the Deaths of CIA Valerie Plume Agents Network & 1700 American Soldiers who have died in the Iraq War. Chicago's US Attorney and Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald had the Subpoena served.

Will Tony Blair now run for cover or stand up like a man and answer Mr.Fitzgerald's questions before a US Federal Grand Jury? George W. Bush has refused and avoided his Grand Jury Subpoena. More to come, stay tuned to www.stewwebb.com

US Intel Breaking News

Official Press Release

Tuesday July 12, 2005 2:PM
Tony Blair Wanted.
For the Deaths of CIA Valerie Plume Agents Network & 1700 American Soldiers.
By Tom Heneghan & Stew Webb Federal Whistleblowers
Heneghan-Webb Presidential & Vice Presidential Candidates 2004

Tony Blair has been Subpoenaed by Chicago US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald. Blair is claiming Diplomatic Immunity. US Attorney Fitzgerald readied extradition request.
More Details Coming, stay tuned www.stewwebb.com
Stew Webb & Tom Heneghan
stewwebb@stewwebb.com, stewwebb@sierranv.net
816 478-3267
Official Press Release
July 7, 2005 6:00 AM Central Time
London Terrorist Attack Bush and Blair the Culprits

By Tom Heneghan & Stew Webb Federal Whistleblowers
Presidential & Vice Presidential Candidates 2004

The attacks on London were orchestrated by Bush & Blair using PE-2 Elements of Team Iraq and have been identified by the American French Alliance. Team Iraq was secretly setup to do insurgency attacks in Iraq by Bush, Blair and Answar Bin Shari of Israel to further the Iraq War Machine into Iran and Saudi Arabia for personal gain, and control of the World Oil Reserves for their own personal benefits.

PE-2 Consists of Rogue British MI-5, Mossad and US Pentagon Secret Teams under Bush, Blair and Shari's Control.

PE-2 also known as Propaganda Dewey was set up by George H. W. Bush when he was Vice President under President Ronald Reagan. After Iran Contra was exposed Bush set up PE-2-Propaganda Dewey. This the Bush CIA Shadow Government within the US Government that is behind the Terrorist attack on America 9-11 WTC and the Oklahoma City Bombing Shadow Government Players.

PE-2 is the Bush Illegal Dirty Illegal Shadow Government within the Government.

This attack in London today upon innocent British People was for their own Satanic Political Agenda.

Expect possible more attacks by Bush, Blair and Shari's PE-2 Terrorist Rouges in England, Israel and the USA.

This is all to undermine Chicago U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald's investigations of Bush and Cheney's leaks of CIA Valerie Plame, Ambassador Joseph Wilson wife's CIA Team investigating Bushes and Cheney's involvements into the orchestrated 9-11 attacks on America.

Plame's CIA network was compromised and many were killed as a result of The White House Bush-Cheney leaks in violations of National Security Laws and murder of U.S. CIA Federal Agents.

Judith Miller, a Mossad Stooge, was jailed for her involvement in the leaks of the CIA Plame investigations which violated National Security laws and the murder of many CIA agents. Miller was not protecting Whistleblower sources but was in fact part of the Bush espionage plot to stop the Plame team from uncovering Bush Cheney's plotted, planned and orchestrated  9-11 attack upon America on September 11, 2001 which is Treason. Judith Miller stated in the Courtroom July 6, 2005 when asked if she was ready to reveal her source stated: "I cannot take the risk. It is too grave, this Government is too powerful."

US District Judge Lefko of Chicago who's Husband and Mother were murdered several months ago issued the order for Judith Miller and Matt Cooper to turn over their notes regarding their sources. Claiming this was not a First Amendment Right but was in Violation of US National Security Laws because of the murders of several CIA Agents.  Miller and Cooper appealed and July 6, 2005 Miller went to jail.  Judge Lefko's Family was murdered by 2 FBI Division 5 Agents, who left cigarette butts of an FBI Informant-stooge on the crime scene with the informants DNA, the informant was murdered by the 2-FBI Agents.

Matt Cooper is now Obstructing Justice by claiming The White House Bush Brain Karl Rove was his source. This is additional Obstruction Of Justice.

Congressman Conyors in a June 2005 Congressional hearing called for Impeachment hearing to proceed in July 2005 against George W. Bush after testimony by Ambassador Joseph Wilson and CIA Analyst Ray McGovern. Sources says Conyors now has 130 plus Congressman ready. Impeach The White House Occu-punk George W. Bush.

PE-2 Terrorist Cell Fox News reported MI-5 British agents warned Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to remain in his hotel room 30 minutes prior to the London attacks.

Intelligence sources have revealed Michael Shipton, MI-5 British Agent, is tied to the London Terrorist attack, Grab Him.

The Signal man walked with a clipboard in his hand down the street, there are enough cameras to identify this terrorist.

Expect possible attacks in America by these PE-2 Bush-Blair-Shari terrorist teams in order to further their Martial Law agenda over the coming weeks.

Bush will keep pushing for more support of his war machine expansions into Iran and Saudi Arabian for Oil Fields for his families personal gain, with possible attacks on United States Soil.

Crisis Creation, Crisis Solution for Crisis Control. Further remember Adolph Hitler's Mein Kemp strategy of evil.

Fear, Fear, Fear. False Evidence that Appears Real.  George W. Bush save us from your created Big Bad Boogie Man Terrorist Al Qaeda.

American Militias and Patriots be prepared to defend America. Bush intends on declaring Martial Law to avoid his coming Indictments, Impeachment and his going to Jail for Treason and murder for his terrorist attacks on 9-11-2001. This has now been investigated and proven by U.S. Intelligence agents and others.

America's enemy has been identified as Bush-Cheney. End.

Tom Heneghan and Stew Webb,
Top Secret Bush Crime Family Narco,  Weapons and Murder Indictments.


WARRANTS AGAINST TOP U.S. SHADOW GOVERNMENT BUSH CRIME FAMILY PLAYERS: Ollie North, Casper Weinberger, John Poindexter, Assistant Attorney General William Richard Scruggs, Carl Lindner owner United Fruit-Chiquita Bananas and George H. W. Bush. These Indictments for Drug & Gun running, Murder, Narcotics money laundering is by The Senate & Congress of Costa Rica.

The Costa Rica Government has pending requests with the US State Department, The US Congress & Senate, The US Courts, which are being ignored. This document is 93 Pages There are rewards being offered by The Government of Costa Rico if someone wants to collect them. There are only 3 copies in existence, now there will be millions. Make your copy today.

Breaking News July 3, 2005 Bush Crime Family Goon British Stooge Bob Woodward of the Washington Post exposed the Headquarters of the American French Alliance Good Guys in the CIA and French Intel Good Guys who oppose Nazi Bushes. The AFA have repeatedly stopped Terrorist attacks inside the USA that Bushes plotted since July 2004. Bush Stooge Woodward did this in retaliation for the AFA exposing his Nixon Deep Throat source FBI Feldman.

Woodward was involved in the murder of Neil Moody Cooper, White House Aide Vince Fosters cousin. Foster also was murdered by the Bush Clinton Crime Family for turning States Witness against the Bush-Clintons.

Breaking News Exclusive Top Secret John F. Kennedy Jr. Interpol Classified Reports. Classified Top Secret until 2025 Many more top secret documents released by Federal Whistleblower Stew Webb, only on www.stewwebb.com see Breaking News pages.www.stewwebb.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe from Stew Webb's Breaking Newssimply type the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the message bodyof your email and send to listname-request@stewwebb.com






CLICK (right-click ‘save as’)



In the CIA leak case Special Federal Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald is about to release Criminal Indictments against George W. Bush. Result? White House threatens to assassinate Fitzgerald.

(Cloak & Dagger News_7 _14_05: Chicago)

The Madness of it all

By Judith Moriarty

 courtesy BBC

Jean Charles de Menezer (blue T-shirt in picture), a young (Catholic) Brazilian, was shot dead by police in London in the ongoing hysteria of a ‘shoot to kill’ policy, which targets those who appear out of place in dress or behavior.

Police announced July, 22, 05, “We are now satisfied that he was NOT connected with the incidents of Thursday July 21, 2005”. The news of Jean’s senseless death was met with a hardly a murmur amongst the citizens of London/or elsewhere.

Jean was followed from the apartment building where he resided, to a  Mother weeps for son mistaken as terrorist, courtesy Mirror, UK subway station, where he was then accosted by ‘plain clothes officers’ who chased him down to the train, tripped him, jumped on him, and then shot him five times in the head. Jean’s crime was that he did not appear British; absent a monocle, tweed attire, complete with bowler head wear. He, being from Brazil, made the mistake of wearing a fleece jacket in the cool London weather. Those from tropical climates are a bit more sensitive to the gray chill of London, on even the balmiest of days.

Common sense might surmise that if one was indeed suspected of harboring a bomb beneath his jacket, you would hardly follow him to a subway station (packed with people), before investigating! You would hardly trip the man, jump on him, and shoot him five times in the “head”, as reported by witnesses; setting at risk your own life and numerous passengers!

With London having the highest rate of crime in Great Britain, up consistently 37% year in and year out, one might guess that this foreign man, was fearful for his life, when this strange gang of men (not in uniform) yelled at him and took up chasing him? We’ll never know since without provocation they killed him.

Astoundingly, London’s Mayor Ken Livingstone stated, “The police acted to do what they believed necessary to protect the lives of the public. This tragedy has added another victim to the toll of deaths for which the terrorists bear responsibility”. Jean was not killed by ‘terrorists’ but by police. Overzealous and incompetent, they followed a man from his apartment building- to a crowded train station, before they insanely jumped on him and shot him. They apparently gave little heed to the “public” who might have died, had there been a device strapped around Jean’s abdomen! Jean, the Mayor of London needs to be reminded, was the “public”. He wasn’t protected on his way to work, or business of the day, but set upon and killed.

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Ian Blair stated that, “I think we are quite comfortable that the policy is right (shoot to kill) but of course these are fantastically difficult times.” I wouldn’t hesitate in thinking that it was most “difficult” for young Jean! Blair added, “Somebody else could be shot”. With dress and suspicious behavior (?) being the criteria for a ‘shoot to kill’ policy, one might warn the thousands of homeless people in London to beware!

Upon hearing of Jean’s death, and reports from eyewitnesses of his terrified look as this group of men jumped him; I thought of the numerous homeless persons I worked with in a large city (CT.), who would meet the suspicions of a “shoot on sight” policy. Not having shelter they were apt to wear their wardrobes on their backs. With medical services and mental health clinics closed, or woefully under funded, there are many folks wandering about who might be exhibiting bizarre or questionable behavior.

Most telling in this tragedy is how desensitized society has become to the death of the one. Carnage and death seem to be newsworthy only if it involves mayhem visited on certain lands and populations? Our nightly infotainment announces a blurb about numerous deaths in Iraq; and then spends countless hours in the telling of a bug-eyed run-away bride, Tom Cruise spouting his Scientology philosophy, or of Michael Jackson, off to recuperate from his trial, at the palace of some Saudi Arabian prince!

In the recent bombing of London; Mr. Blair and President Bush, were conveniently close at hand (Scotland) at the G-8 meeting to offer condolences and assurances; that as the two world leaders against terrorism, they would not falter in pursuing terrorism to the ends of the earth. Guarded as they were at this meeting; by thousands of police, helicopters hovering overhead, concrete barriers, and isolated by five miles of fencing, specially constructed at a cost of one million dollars---it wasn’t hard to imagine why they were so confident.

An innocent man is dead, which should cause all to fear. With a ‘shoot on sight’ policy; that excuses any and all overt acts in the name of fighting terrorism—the next innocent victim could be anybody, given their behavior or choice of wardrobe when leaving the house. The homeless need to pay special heed-and those from tropical climates not acclimated to cooler temperatures!


July 9, 2005 in Current Affairs | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference London Underground Bombing 'Exercises' Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack Culpability cover scenario echoes 9/11 wargames:


Notice how the people killed and injured in the London bombings were those compelled to use London’s public transport system during rush hour. Not a household name among them. The sort of people MI5 would choose to sacrifice for the greater good. I realise "soft option" was a factor, but if you were a bomber, with only one chance to make your point, wouldn't you want to attack those at a higher strata of society; thus rather more culpable or at least supportive of Britain's foreign policy in Iraq? Hardly anyone with real evidence is disclosing it, and you can never be sure that those posting on the web are not misinformation artists. So all you can do is use your powers of deduction and look for inconsistencies and illogicalities in the official version, before government agency spinners have time to practise their black art. My suggestion: Identify similarities between 9/11 and London.

Posted by: Andrew Milner | Jul 17, 2005 2:50:30 AM

London plot thickens, as does propaganda

6 comment(s).

July 18, 2005-As was the case following 9/11 and all post-9/11 "terror" events, an official new propaganda legend is being constructed to justify whatever Anglo-American-Israeli aggression that is sure to follow.
Meanwhile, the list of unanswered questions, irregularities, and inconsistencies continues to grow, along with dramatically zigzagging cover stories and anti-Muslim agitation. Another large-scale government and media deception is well underway.

Two recent observations by the astute (but anonymous) Xymphora at "Birth of the London Bomb Official Story" (July 13) and "Yet more on the London Bombings" (July 15) provide analysis on the mounting anomalies. William Bowles and Edward Teague ask, "Were the London Bombings a set up?" "The 7/7 London Papers" is another site that provides a timeline exposing problems with the official version. Independent researchers like these, not the mainstream media, are the only ones undertaking this important investigation.

It is already known that the UK authorities received advance warning of a terrorist attack-from Israel. So did Benjamin Netanyahu. Stratfor confirms evidence of foreknowledge in this report: "Israel warned UK about possible attacks" (July 7). The analysis of Bowles/Teague casts doubt on many aspects of the emerging legend of the four bombers-today’s version of 9/11’s "19 hijackers."
London is already playing out in a way all too similar to the byzantine 9/11 terror propaganda construct described by Chaim Kupferberg. As Bowles and Teague wrote, "without the four men to tell their side of the story, it’s all too easy to make the facts fits the theory as it serves the larger ideological objective of the state to present them as ’fanatics.’"

Other parallels with 9/11 (and Bali, Madrid, etc.) are too obvious to ignore. Researcher and activist Jeff Strahl notes:
"The media obediently follow the cues provided by the US and British governments, and read the handed-down script regarding the London bombings, even as crucial details are being changed daily; not even a pause in the face of mounting inconsistencies. And this includes the "progressive" media, be it The Nation or Pacifica Radio, eager to prove they are, of course, not supportive of ’terrorists.’ Read or listen all you want, you will find virtually no reference to many questions being raised about the official accounts. This is quite similar to how the 9/11 events have been treated. If people don’t seriously press the media, the latest propaganda will become ’fact,’ as has happened with 9/11, whose crucial details remain unexamined, whose official story remains accepted across the political spectrum.

"Why and how did former Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu get a warning to stay away from a place where he was to speak, located above one of the blast sites? How does ’suicide bombers’ square with earlier police claims of timing devices? Why did the ’suspects’ leave a car full of explosives in a parking lot in Luton, 30 miles from London? (Did they expect someone to find the car and put the explosives to good use?) What about the anti-terrorism exercises scheduled for the same hour in which the bombings took place? How did former head of the Mossad, Efraim Halevi, writing in the Jerusalem Post on July 7, the day of the attacks, know that the bombs went off simultaneously, (when the London police did not say so for days)? And how could he claim they were ’nearly perfect’? Why did the ’suspects’ take credit cards along on a suicide mission?

"Authorities now say the explosives used were not military grade after all, but home brews. Seems like they had a tough time explaining how the supposed culprits could get military grade stuff. The Boston Herald reported yesterday that one of the supposed culprits carried not only his own ID, but also documents of one of the others. How did such documents survive the blasts, which should have torn their bodies into small pieces? This is the same as the magic 9/11 passport that appeared in the rubble.

"The supposed mastermind has been arrested in Egypt today, but he denies any connection. Not content with a car full of explosives, he left behind a house full of explosives, for someone to find and put to good use. Shades of 9/11 again, i.e., the car left at an airport parking lot with a Koran and a flight manual for a 767 in Arabic."
The London event also fits the post-9/11 pattern in other ways. There continues to be no mention of the fact that 1) "Islamic terror," including Al-Qaeda, is a creation of Anglo-American military intelligence; 2) these groups remain key instruments of Anglo-American policy-directly and indirectly guided, and controlled, by CIA, MI6 and affiliated intelligence agencies, such as Pakistan’s ISI.

According to new reports, some of London’s four bombers were trained in Pakistan-but there has been nothing in the media reports about the nature of this training. Pakistan, and its ISI, remains one of biggest elephants in a stinking post-9/11 living room.
As Bush and Blair bluster for the cameras, as the only beneficiaries of the horror, backlash against Muslims has reignited. Time Magazine’s coverage (July 18) was typical. Across a number of articles on London, Time immediately attributed responsibility to "jihadists," "jihadism," "bin Ladenism," "lumpen jihadists" and Al-Qaeda "terrorists," quoting conspiracy theories from officials and "security experts" desperate to tie the bombings to "Al-Qaeda fanatics." All before any factual evidence was available to support these conclusions.

Somewhat more revealing, but not in the way intended, is where Michael Elliot’s Time headline article offered this:
"According to a confidential report produced the day after the bombing by a private London security firm, Aegis Defense Services, Ltd., which was seen and read by Pentagon officials, the team was probably four to six strong . . . The Aegis report says it is possible that the explosives were ’constructed by an experienced bomb maker, possibly coming to the U.K. for that very purpose.’"

Aegis and its chief Tim Spicer are intimately involved with the Pentagon’s Iraq operations. Spicer is also implicated for murders in Northern Ireland in the 1990s. Aegis is also tied to the sponsoring of an aborted coup in the West African nation of Equatorial Guinea, which resulted in the arrest of Sir Mark Thatcher, son of former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.

How did Aegis conclude that the foreign origin for the bomb maker, when no such evidence was available? What role does this British security firm serve in helping drive Washington-London "war on terrorism" planning, and what was this confidential report "seen and read by Pentagon officials"?
Britain and "Terrorism"
British terrorism goes back to the days of the old British Empire, and since the 1970s, includes the creation and running of "Islamic terror" groups all over the world, right alongside US and US-backed intelligence counterparts playing the same game. These connections persist to this day.

It is a matter of documented fact, exposed by Michel Chossudovsky (War and Globalisation) and others, that mujahadeen mercenaries and "Islamic jihad" from the Middle East and Central Asia were recruited and trained by Britain’s MI6 and British SAS Special Forces, to fight in the ranks of the KLA, supporting NATO’s war effort.

In Crossing The Rubicon, Mike Ruppert noted:
"Great Britain-one of the major players supporting the KLA in Kosovo-also maintained secret relationships with bin Laden and al Qaeda that served its interests. In 1996, Britain’s exterior intelligence, MI6, actually funded and worked with al Qaeda in a plot to assassinate and overthrow Libya’s Muammar Qaddafy. Details of the relationship emerged after a British domestic intelligence (MI5) officer, David Shayler, went public with documents detailing the relationship between Britain and bin Laden.

"In November 2002-in the wake of 9/11-as Shayler’s trial brought the case to public attention, the British government invoked measures of the State Security Act to hide embarrassing information. The government’s efforts went so far as to the issuance of a "D" notice by Prime Minister Tony Blair requiring that previously published news stories on the case be withdrawn and removed from public websites . . .
"Britain’s dealings with Osama bin Laden have extended to allowing him to visit their country while he was a wanted man. As noted in 1998, ’the French Internet publication Indigo reported that bin Laden had been a London guest of British Intelligence as recently as 1996, and his treasurer recently defected to the Saudis as different factions shifted alliances for new campaigns in the Middle East.’"
The Real Enemy

More- http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=7082

Posted by: skinny | Jul 19, 2005 6:59:22 PM

The London Attacks - Latest

Prisonplanet | July 19 2005


BRITISH police are considering the possibility that the four key suspects in the recent London attacks may have been tricked into setting off their bombs.

"We do not have hard evidence that the men were suicide bombers. It is possible that they did not intend to die,¡± a Scotland Yard spokesman said.

According to one police hypothesis, the bombers were tricked by a "master" who told them they would have time to escape - when, in fact, the devices were set to go off immediately.

"The bombers' master might have thought that he couldn't risk the four men being caught and spilling everything to British interrogators," an unnamed security official has said.

Lending weight to the theory is the fact that all four men had paid up their parking tickets before boarding a train at Luton for King's Cross and that they all bought return tickets to the Capital.

Moreover, the paper said, the men were carrying their explosives inside rucksacks, as opposed to strapped to their bodies, as is common practice among suicide bombers.

None were reported to have cried "Allah-o-Akbar" before setting off their charge - something which most suicide bombers do.

So the official line is now leaning towards the theory that an "Al Qaeda" Mastermind duped the "pawn" bombers into their actions, covering for all the inconsistencies we have thrown up so far.

This comes as no surprise, after the mainstream media have been questioning the official line all weekend. Both the London Mirror and the Independent published articles directly challenging the suicide bomber theory. The bombers were certainly duped, yet there is absolutely no evidence to suggest there was an Al Qaeda guiding hand. The fact that these men had been to Pakistan in 2004 seems to be, for some outlets, stone cold proof that they were Al Qaeda terrorists.

One of the suspected "masterminds" behind the attacks, Egyptian Magdy el Nashar, challenged officials to find any credible evidence to implicate him. It seems they have failed as he has been cleared of involvement by Egyptian authorities.

Meanwhile bigger stories have gone unnoticed. Firstly, on Saturday we published an article highlighting the various instances of elite connections to the bombings and the drill that was taking place on the same morning.

Secondly the fact that the British Government had tracked and possibly arrested and then released their so called suspects has not hit the front pages. Could it be that the plot was discovered and then allowed to happen or aided in some way. The media should be jumping all over the fact that the terror alert level was DOWNGRADED for the first time in four years one month prior to the attacks.

Thirdly, it has gone virtually unreported that the Pound fell 6% in 10 days before London terror attacks, a clear indication of prior knowledge on the part of London's financial establishment.

And we now also have an admission by Israeli authorities that they did indeed receive prior warning of the attacks and warned Benjamin Netanyahu to stay inside his London Hotel.

This clearly indicates first that the story of power surges on the underground was prepared beforehand and used as a cover for over an hour to confuse the media and keep away those who seek the real stories. If Israel knew it was bombs before they went off then why wouldn't British police? It's a tried and tested method and serves the purpose of keeping the public and the media in line at the scene of such events.

Also the scramble to alter the initial AP reports of this story indicates that someone was attempting to cover up this smoking gun.

We've been told that there will be 'No internal inquiry' into the blasts so we might as well shut up and just believe whatever they tell us no matter how many times they change the story.

More as the story develops (and the official line changes again)

Posted by: spy vs spy | Jul 20, 2005 12:39:45 AM

Post a comment