Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« February 2006 | Main | April 2006 »

Ed Asner Joins Charlie Sheen in 9/11 Questions

Ed Asner Talks On RBN Radio Show, The Investigative Journal, Calling For 9/11 Truth and Backing Charlie Sheen

Asner pulled no punches as he blasted the Bush administration and Congress over 9/11, the Iraqi War, the Patriot Act and the POW issue
29 Mar 2006
By Greg Szymanski

Actor and long time human rights activist, Ed Asner, on a radio talk show program Tuesday demanded the government come clean about 9/11, saying he supports re-opening a new investigation and backs up statements made last week by fellow-actor Charlie Sheen that 9/11 looks like an inside government job.

Asner, an Emmy ward winning actor and former President of the powerful Screen Actors Guild, made the plea for 9/11 truth on Greg Szymanski's radio show, The Investigative Journal on the Republic Broadcasting Network.

The famous television star appeared on the radio show to champion the issue of POW accountability, making a guest appearance with activist Bob Dumas who has been searching for his officially "missing and presumed dead" brother since the Korean War.

Dumas claims his brother, Roger, still may be alive despite being lied to about by the government and despite a Congress unwilling to get at the truth about thousands of GI's unknowingly left behind enemy lines.

Besides the POW scandal championed by Dumas now brewing in Washington thanks to Asner's help in narrating a video in the hands of every member of Congress, the vocal and free-talking actor not only demanded 9/11 accountability but gave the Bush administration and Congress a tongue lashing over the illegal Iraqi War and the passage of the Patriot Act.

"As for 9/11, I was suspicious from the beginning, but nothing short of getting at the truth is acceptable for the 3,000 people who died on that tragic day" said Asner, adding from everything he has researched the government is obviously covering-up the truth. "AS for the Patriot Act, how can a law be passed when only a handful of legislators even bothered to read it?"

Asner, who in 2004 also demanded for 9/11 accountability, joined Sheen who recently went public on the absurdity of the government's 9/11 story on the Alex Jones radio show, in what now has become a good "one-two Hollywood insider punch" by Sheen and Asner, a punch directed right into the credibility of the Bush administration.

With Sheen and Asner both calling the 9/11 government story a fraud in the span of a week, the outspoken Hollywood pair have taken the lead amongst their show business peers in seeking 9/11 truth in what some call a "hot potato issue" since it could lead to a loss of money and film jobs.

After Sheen's comments on the Alex Jones show, his 9/11 claims went national on CNN's Showbiz Tonight, where he trumpeted his 9/11 truth call for the entire nation to hear.

Asner was also scheduled to appear on the same CNN show Tuesday after he appeared with Szymanski, but Showbiz Tonight pulled the segment at the last minute with Asner and Sander Hicks of the Green Party because they couldn't find anyone to take the opposite viewpoint, according to
Mike Berger, media representative of 9/

Asner's entire Tuesday radio interview can be heard on at the archives page under The Investigative Journal 2006 shows.

In April 2004, Asner wrote a letter in support of the 9/11 families seeking the truth, a copy of the letter appearing on the 9/11 Visibility Project web site. The letter said in part:

"I would like to suggest to you emphatically that the 9-11 truth movement is the most pressing issue of the peace & justice movement today. Here is why. 9-11 has been used to justify "endless war" and a continual rollback in civil liberties that seems to have no end in sight. Yet, 9-11 remains the least examined tragedy in modern American history.

"Americans would have never agreed to the last two wars and the Patriot Act's disturbing policy . . . had it not been for 9-11.

"There are many disturbing issues around 9-11 that have yet to be examined in any meaningful way by our media, Congress, and even by the 9-11 Commission. These include accountability for the massive breakdown of air defense and plane intercept procedures as described in FAA and DOD regulations, which were violated on 9-11...

"This breakdown and astounding unpreparedness by U.S. domestic defense agencies is puzzling to say the least, given the detailed reports our government had of the coming attacks, that were bizarrely suppressed by key officials.

"For example, FBI Agent Coleen Rowley suggested that her offices' attempts to alert higher ups in the FBI of the pre 9-11 activities of Zacharias Moussaoui "seemed to have been consistently, almost DELIBERATELY thwart[ed] . . ." While George Tenet, Director of the CIA, had received a memo in August of 2001 (one month before the attacks of 9-11) on this report entitled, "Islamic Extremists Learn to Fly." Yet, Tenet took no action on this memo. The FBI agents responsible for the now famous "Phoenix Memo" regarding Osama Bin Laden sending students to the U.S. to attend civil aviation schools, also struggled to get their higher ups to act on this information.

"To date, no one has been held accountable for the massive defense failures on 9-11, nor for the bizarre suppression of critical warnings prior to 9-11. Furthermore, we still have no explanation for why the head of Pakistani intelligence, who was meeting with top Bush Administration officials in Washington on 9-11-2001, had wired lead hijacker Mohammed Atta $100,000.00 weeks before 9-11. We still do not know who made the insider stock trades in weeks and days leading up to 9-11, by betting "against" United and American Airlines stocks (the aircraft used as missiles on 9-11).

"What we DO KNOW is that $5 million of those insider stock trade "winnings" apparently by someone who had foreknowledge of the coming attacks, were made the day before 9-11 at AB Brown Trust. AB Brown Trust was headed until his induction into the CIA by Buzzy Krongard, who is now the Executive Director of the CIA. We also know that the current head of AB Brown Trust quietly resigned his position on 9-11, with no media scrutiny nor apparently government scrutiny. Lastly, and perhaps most bizarre is the fact that $2.5 million of those stock "winnings" against these airlines made at AB Brown Trust . . . remain unclaimed.

"We deserve to know why no one has been held accountable, and who made those insider stock trades. We also deserve to know why the Bush Administration allowed members of the Bin Laden family to quietly leave the U.S. after 9-11, with virtually no questioning by the FBI, and at a time when other Americans were not allowed to fly.

"There are many other profound, and bizarrely "unasked" questions around 9-11. I urge all to read "The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin, and endorsed by Howard Zinn, and to view "The Great Deception" documentary by acclaimed Canadian television journalist Barry Zwicker. Peace & justice leaders and activists will find these works a great resource for getting current on the 9-11 truth issue, and can be great organizing tools to educate others.

"I fear that if the underlying issues of 9-11 truth are not demanded, that Iraq may be but a flame on an ocean of gasoline that may be used to ignite war after war after war. We cannot, as a peace & justice movement only address the flames. We must look at the fuel being used to justify the flames of war and repression at home and abroad. We must look deeply at the events leading up to, on and since 9-11. We must demand full 9-11 truth."

For more informative articles, go to

Greg Szymanski



March 30, 2006 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Dam Breaking In 9/11 Cover-up?

Spread The News ~ Forward to a Friend

Source URL:

News Flash: The Dam is Breaking on the 9/11 Cover-Up

More Stars Go Public with Demands for 9/11 Investigation, Others to Follow

Infowars | March 28, 2006


Infowars received an email from author and publisher Sander Hicks this afternoon indicating that the interview with Ed Asner scheduled for this evening on Showbiz Tonight has been cancelled. Hicks, a published author on the 9/11 cover-up as well as a Green Party senatorial candidate in New York was slated to appear with Asner on the program to discuss 9/11. Infowars confirmed with sources at CNN the segment was cancelled because another guest who had agreed to appear as an opposition voice to Hicks and Asner refused to participate the interview at the last moment. The CNN source further indicated that the opposition guest was none other than a former member of the Keene 9/11 whitewash Commission.

Further investigation and probing of several other CNN sources closely connected with the production of the Asner segment on Showbiz Tonight reported that high-level members of CNN management advised the producers of the show to "kill it. " This statement was clearly made to stifle any further coverage of 9/11 despite the admitedly huge ratings boost and response garnered from the recent coverage of Charlie Sheen's statements on 9/11.

"I guarantee that this member of the 9/11 Commission pulled out at the last moment because they think that by simply replying to Asner and Hicks and the comments of Charlie Sheen, he would be giving credence to their statements. This is a strategic move on their part to quash debate and avoid having to actually answer the hard questions about 9/11 which the 9/11 Commission failed to do. This stonewalling technique will not work forever - there are too many people waking up to their whitewash." - Alex Jones

Award winning actor, director, producer, and pioneering anti-Iraq war activist Ed Asner is scheduled to appear live on the CNN Headline News program Showbiz Tonight (6pm CST). Asner is reportedly going on to support Charlie Sheen's bold and brave stance calling for a real investigation of the events on September 11th, 2001 as well as to raise his own questions.

Also on Showbiz Tonight on March 27, actress Sharon Stone defended Sheen and his First Amendment right to speak out saying that he is brave and that it is important to confront authority.

Asner and Sheen are just two more of many celebrities who have already come forward to question the official story of what happened on 9/11.

Actor James Woods began questioning the official fable in the first weeks right after 9/11. X-Files and Lone Gunmen star Dean Haglund has already gone public on the Alex Jones Show (December 18, 2004) questioning the official story. Actor Ed Begley, Jr. hosted a 9/11 Truth Symposium in New York City several months ago.

And we have recently confirmed that one of the world's most popular and beloved musicians is awake to the truth about 9/11 and in the very near future may be going public.

Many more major stars who are considering going public have contacted us in recent days.

The dam is finally breaking. Delta Force Founder Eric Haney has spoken out in the press about the "War on Terrorism" being bogus and how there is no real threat to the United States. The 9/11 Truth Movemet has reached critical mass and is now exploding. The perpitrators of 9/11 have got to be concerned as more and more people across the globe wake up to the 9/11 hoax.

See for more hyperlinks,.



March 29, 2006 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack

9/11: Charlie Sheen Confronts London Guardian

Charlie Sheen's Statement to the London Guardian
Challenges Press to Stop Slinging Mud, Confront The Science

Charlie Sheen felt compelled to respond to one of many hit-pieces against him, a column written for the London Guardian and carried by British commonwealth newspapers worldwide. Sheen sent his statement to The Australian newspaper. This is his full statement minus a phone number to his manager so that the paper could confirm its authenticity. This is a direct challenge for them to debate the facts.

Sheen Challenge to Media

I dare you to print this email in it's entirety ...

The mere fact that you did a cut and paste job of the slanderous and idiotic Marine Hyde London Journal piece, speaks volumes about your credibility as a major media entity.

Like so many other mainstream outlets, domestically and abroad, no attention whatsoever is given to the questions I raise or the evidence that stimulated those very questions.

Instead, low-brow idiotic hit pieces are spewed forth in an effort to sway the readers' opinion of the messenger while blatantly disregarding any of the potentially valuable content of the story. It's transparent sandbox propaganda as dated and cheap as the paper it's printed on.

Do a little research on Building Seven. Building Seven lives at the epicenter of my entire debate. Prove yourself worthy of genuine investigative journalism. Look at the video evidence.

Observe the same data I have. Submit a formal request to the Pentagon or the DOD to release video PROOF that flight 77 did exactly as they claim. You will be stonewalled. You will be dismissed unconditionally. If there is nothing to hide - why are they hiding it?

To avoid any confusion - I reiterate:

Building Seven - Pentagon video documentation.

If any portion, or portions of this text is any way deleted or manipulated, you will only confirm what myself and countless others have suspected all along: Media complicity with no interest in the truth.

A CNN poll at the time of this writing currently sits at 84 percent IN SUPPORT of my views.

Say what you must about me - it means nothing.

Yet, if you continue to overlook the hard questions and physical evidence regarding 9/11 - you only confirm what so many of us "Conspiracy Idiots" have suspected all along - The Official Report is, at best, an insulting work of FICTION.

Charlie Sheen


Alex Jones Comment on Sheen Statement and Challenge: Hundreds of positive and negative pieces have been written about actor Charlie Sheen's courageous stand for 9/11 truth.

The pro-Sheen pieces are well written and are brimming with facts, studies and in-depth investigations by concerned, caring people who know that the official fable of Septmeber 11 is a patent fraud.

Conversly, the snivelling hit-pieces are written at a snot-nosed 7th Grade level by jibbering establishment sychophants. These individuals refuse to challenge any of the facts that Charlie Sheen and others have raised concerning the 9/11 massacres.

There's a reason for that: they can't. If they look into that painful place where 3,000 Americans died, the place where the death of our Republic began, the tomb where the spectre of totalitarianism rose, they will be looking into the eyes of their masters -- those who caried out the attacks and those who seek in vain to hide the truth from the people that they would have as slaves.

Most people on the planet today know in their gut the truth about 9/11. Once you look at the facts, there is no denying the cold, hard data.

So, try as you may, establishment, the truth about 9/11 is coming out. The majority of you out there who are fighting to supress the truth about 9/11 may not have taken part in it, but by defending those who did you all become accomplices. So before you dismiss us, you had better investigate.

There are hundreds of prominent people in the US who have already gone public and there will be hundreds more. Charlie Sheen, no matter what mud you sling at him, is a hero for what he has done. He's the archetypal example of what a leader is.

The founding fathers were wealthy, successful men at the highest level of the British colonial government. They put it all on the line so their descendants could live in liberty. They knew what tyranny was when they saw it.

Do you?



March 28, 2006 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack

9/11 Truth,. Total Print Media Blackout Continues

Spring Breakthrough for 9/11 Truth - Alex Jones, Webster
Tarpley, and Charlie Sheen Splash on Mainstream TV - Total
Print Media Blackout Continues

Hollywood Star Sheen, Talk Radio Host Jones and Anchor A. J.
Hammer on CNN Showbiz Tonight 3 straight nights say the wildest conspiracy theory is the official line. New York Magazine features Webster Tarpley, author of "9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA."

Washington, D.C. (PRWEB) March 26, 2006 -- Around midday on Wednesday, March 22nd - my son's  birthday - Amy Schulman from CNN in New York called me up to ask if I had an author they could put on the air that very evening. They wanted an "objective and balanced" survey of the schools of 9/11 conspiracy thought for a story on Charlie Sheen. "You mean like the 'hop levels' in the New York Magazine article?" I asked. Yes, that's where she had read about my author Webster Tarpley. CNN sent a car to bring him to their Washington DC studio.

Two days before, on March 20th, two unexpected things had
happened, and one expected one didn't.

- Charlie Sheen came out of the cold on the Alex Jones show
and ripped the veil of the governmental 9/11 cover-up.

- New York Magazine did a full feature on Tarpley's
NY911Truth conference, complete with his model of the network of false-flag terror moles inside the government.

- The Euro-denominated Iranian Oil Bourse, a threat to the
dollar which Tarpley promotes as the real reason for an attack
on Iran, didn't open as scheduled after all.

Coincidence, or a coordinated counteroffensive against the
neo-con crazies? Tarpley's guess is the financier oligarchy is
not happy with its Bush-Cheney puppets, and wants them back on their leash before their mania for a war on Iran sinks the already deficit-drowning Anglo-American empire. (See his appearance on the Alex Jones show on Friday - partial transcript at

, or listen to his World Crisis News show archive from
Saturday March 25.)

That is, a more intelligent faction within the elite is
threatening to use 9/11 like Watergate tapes to take out the
"president" - without touching its "invisible government"
asset. Do not count on a free flow of information that 9/11
was fabricated by US military intelligence. This may only be
a warning shot across the White House lawn.

That seems to be why CNN aired only 30 seconds of the 15
minutes they taped of Webster Tarpley. The Wednesday show
had clips of Charlie Sheen and comments by
spokesman Michael Berger, who remembered to mention the
arch-smoking-gun collapse of WTC Building 7. The outgunned
defender of orthodoxy was Nicole Rittermeyer of National
Geographic. Tarpley says she worked for a production
company owned by a Skull & Bones Bush Brother...

On Friday, CNN invited the author of the New York Magazine
article, Mark Jacobson, for which Tarpley and his publisher
Progressive Press are infinitely thankful. On CNN, however,
he just waffled. Apparently he already took all the
liberties he can get in the article.

All three shows and the CNN poll emphasized "cover-up" and
"unanswered questions." Vague terms. One of the most
insidious cover-ups of 9/11 is a book with the title
"Cover-Up" on the cover - by a CIA operative!

Thursday's star in this series was writer Erica Jong, who
made strong statements about dictators like Hitler and
Bush fabricating foreign enemies to terrorize their own
people. Like Charlie Sheen, she emphasized that patriotism
and love of country requires us to ask tough questions. A
very constructive and intelligent approach to this issue.
Get out the truth on 9/11 to save America, not to destroy
it - Bush & Co. need no help with that.

Erica Jong: "My nephews have been saying for the past three,
four years that we are not learning everything about 9/11...
Charlie Sheen is really patriotic and brave to ask these
questions...I read the article in "New York" magazine. And I
think just asking questions is brave and patriotic... I
don't know what the answer is. I don't know if we'll ever
know. "

Well, if you don't have any idea after three, four years of
investigating, the odds are you won't. Certainly not in time
to stop World War IV from reaching Iran. Maybe after we're
all dead.

Host and guest went on to promote Erica's new book. Meanwhile the man with the answers, a book full of them, in fact, got 30 seconds - Webster Tarpley, author of "9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA."

CNN showed Tarpley telling about the Zogby poll where every
second New Yorker thought top officials had foreknowledge of
9/11. That is, they "let it happen on purpose," or "LIHOP."
But Webster's book is the bible of the MIHOP school: US
military intelligence Made it Happen from A to Z - no Arabs
or Zarqawis. His model of state-sponsored false-flag
terrorism, the rogue network of moles, patsies and
paramilitary technicians, is the opener to the New York
Magazine article.

The precedent is Operation Northwoods, a 1962 plan by the
Joint Chiefs of Staff to fabricate an atrocity and blame it
on Cuba. The plot was nixed by Kennedy. Northwoods
documents were released under the Freedom of Information
Act before Bush took power and set it aside after 9/11.

Showbiz Tonight did have full-MIHOP advocate Alex Jones on
Thursday and Friday, and intrepid host AJ Hammer let him
deliver a rapid-fire catalogue of more damning soundbytes.
The hook is that the original Charlie Sheen interview was
on the Alex Jones show. Jones had roundly assailed the media
for not covering that interview. He may even have put the
squeeze to Google, not known for squeezability, by posting
screen shots showing Google had censored all links to it.
Indeed, lately it sometimes seems necessary to use other
search engines on such matters.

The American mainstream will always try to coopt the radical
fringe when it gets too strong. CNN apparently is responding
to the challenge of the alternative news media, while
claiming fame as the first to break this story of "unanswered
patriotic covered-up questions."

9/11 was the tour de force of audacity of what the secret
services can get away with. Can they now pull off an even
greater feat of illusionism: letting only half the cat out
of the bag?



Friday, March 24 on the Alex Jones show Charlie Sheen and
Webster G. Tarpley discussed the turning point in the struggle
for 9/11 truth on CNN. All three agreed on the need for a
truly independent, international Truth Commission. Partial
transcript: More info:

Alex Jones reported how covert operatives using credit cards
keep trying to buy up his entire stock of Webster's book,
9/11 “Synthetic Terror: Made in USA” by sending the books to
false addresses. Similar scams were directed at Webster's

The exposure helped “9/11 Synthetic Terror” move up to #854 in Amazon sales rankings on Friday. Since the second edition was released in January, it is beating all other 9/11 books on Amazon. Yet censorship is blocking chain bookstores from stocking it, even though their megastores carry 100,000 titles on their shelves.

Saturday March 25th on World Crisis Radio,,
Webster Tarpley interviewed the avant garde of the 9/11 Truth Movement Dr. Jeff King (nom-de-net Plaguepuppy) and Nico Haupt. They agreed with Alex Jones and Webster Tarpley that the recent murder of 9/11 Truth Scholar and biotechnologist Michael Zubehr bore the marks of a political assassination. Play or download archive at .

On March 26th, Heinrich Buecker of in Germany reported an international print blackout on the Sheen - CNN story. Google News returned only 2 hits on [Sheen Showbiz "Alex Jones"], both from the Internet, not print sources; Yahoo News returned none. Neither Google or Yahoo had any hits on Zubehr murder 9/11. Buecker said the CNN action might continue on

The CNN poll, “Do you agree with Charlie Sheen that the U.S. government covered up the real events of the 9/11 attacks?”
moved up a notch to 84% YES answers (38794 votes). Frantic
calls by neo-con radio talk show hosts like Sean Hannity for
their listeners to overturn the results did not have the
desired effect. Please vote and send a comment asking to have Webster Tarpley back on Showbiz Tonight. Link: .


Updates and more will be posted to and at,

March 20. New York Magazine feature, The Ground Zero Grassy

March 20. Original Charlie Sheen interview on Alex Jones,
downloadable, 50 Mb. 16 Mb

March 22. First CNN Showbiz Tonight segment.

Showbiz Tonight transcripts:

March 23, Alex Jones on Showbiz Tonight,, Right click to download.

March 22-24, Progressive Press Press Release “Dam Breaking for 9/11 Truth - Alex Jones, Webster Tarpley, Charlie Sheen hit the Mainstream.” Hottest item of the month on the popular free press release site

March 24, Charlie Sheen on Alex Jones, “Challenge me on the
Facts,” and Alex on Showbiz Tonight:

March 24, Webster Tarpley on Alex Jones, partial transcript

March 11th, 18th, and 25th: Webster Tarpley on :

This page URL: or

If you learn of more great links please send to info at

# # #



March 26, 2006 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Florida Bar persecution of Mark A. Adams Esq.


Here is the latest on my experience with Florida "justice." Link to Florida Bar v Adams Website:

Thank you again for your help in spreading the news that the "news" media aren't allowed to cover.





March 26, 2006 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Google Caught Censoring Charlie Sheen 9/11 Story

Google Caught Censoring Charlie Sheen 9/11 Story

Quickly re-indexes pages during live radio discussion

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison | Updated March 24 2006 Update: Google has today started carrying Prison as a news affiliate. Was their apparant censorship just a spidering error and are they are trying to make up for it? No one promotes Google more than us as they are clearly the best search engine company but their actions still call for us to be watchdogs. Note: Before you e-mail please understand that we are aware of the fact that Google now carries links to Sheen 9/11 articles, that is not our point as you will read below. The censorship issue began before Google reversed their policy this afternoon. Google is again embroiled in a censorship scandal after being caught blocking information about Charlie Sheen's 9/11 comments, despite the fact that every other major search engine had indexed the pages. For days, major search engines like Yahoo and others contained tens of thousands of web pages relating to Sheen's comments first broadcast on the Alex Jones Show on Monday afternoon. Last night CNN aired a piece on the issue and by early this morning both the New York Post and the Boston Herald ran articles. We first noticed that there were no search results related to the story on Google the day after we broke the Sheen story. At first we decided to be fair and wait another day for Google to index an article which was by now linked on thousands of other websites and blogs. By Thursday afternoon, and with the story receiving more traffic, Google still had not indexed any material relating to the Sheen interview, from Prison or any other websites. This despite the fact that the Drudge Report had briefly directly linked to our article, sending it millions of visitors. During a live radio discussion of this issue between Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson on Alex Jones' broadcast Thursday afternoon, Google, as if they had people listening to the show, immediately re-indexed the pages and a search for 'Charlie Sheen 9/11' now returns 111,000 results at time of writing. Pictured below are screenshots we managed to cache shortly before Google re-indexed the pages with the search terms 'Charlie Sheen 9/11' and the entire headline "Actor Charlie Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story". As you can see, the Boston Herald story is linked from Google News (Google do not censor their affiliates) but the main search engine below returned no results. To stress again, this is three days after we broke this massive story. The usual index time for a story of this size is 12-24 hours and at the same time that Google returned no results whatsoever, tens of thousands were being carried by other major search engines like Yahoo. CLICK FOR ENLARGEMENTS To make it crystal clear, Google's web spidering process is automated and we have received high Google rankings in the past for nothing stories that get little traffic. The Sheen story was linked everywhere and to eliminate it from Google's search results would have required technicians to physically access the spidering control panel and exclude an enormous amount of varied search terms. Google has a history of censoring websites it dislikes within the US. Google Inc. banned and removed a mainstream news website from all its worldwide search engines, seemingly due to the website's reports on China's geopolitical affairs and military technology. Google has banned its users inside the US and the rest of the world from accessing the Space War website from its search engine. Space War speculated at the time that this was at the behest of the "boys from Beijing." Space War is a reasonably tame mainstream website that focuses on geopolitical affairs and satellite and military technology advancements. It is based in Australia and carries articles from AFP and United Press International. After a complaints campaign supported by this website, Google agreed to re-index the website. Did our defense of Space War cause Google to impose a blackballing campaign on our major articles or is this just a response to the sheer magnitude and influence of the Charlie Sheen story? To emphasize, Google is now carrying search results related to Charlie Sheen's 9/11 comments, but only after it was exposed live on nationally syndicated radio that they had stonewalled this issue for three clear days even as it raged around the rest of the Internet as a viral story and broke into the mainstream yesterday and early this morning. The floodgates on the Sheen story have opened, with CNN airing a balanced piece on the controversy. Meanwhile mainstream publications like Human Events, the New York Post, CBS and the Boston Herald used Sheen's comments to attack him and demonize anybody who questions the official line on 9/11.

Fox Covers Sheen Story

Charlie Sheen exposes 9-11



March 24, 2006 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Actor Charlie Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story

Written by    
Tuesday, 21 March 2006 

Actor Charlie Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story

Calls for truly independent investigation, joins growing ranks of prominent credible whistleblowers

Alex Jones & Paul Joseph Watson/Prison

March 20 2006

Actor Charlie Sheen has joined a growing army of other highly credible public figures in questioning the official story of 9/11 and calling for a new independent investigation of the attack and the circumstances surrounding it.

Over the past two years, scores of highly regarded individuals have gone public to express their serious doubts about 9/11. These include former presidential advisor and CIA analyst Ray McGovern, the father of Reaganomics and former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury Paul Craig Roberts, BYU physics Professor Steven Jones, former German defense minister Andreas von Buelow, former MI5 officer David Shayler, former Blair cabinet member Michael Meacher, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds and many more.

Speaking to The Alex Jones Show on the GCN Radio Network, the star of current hit comedy show Two and a Half Men and dozens of movies including Platoon and Young Guns, Sheen elaborated on why he had problems believing the government's version of events.

Sheen agreed that the biggest conspiracy theory was put out by the government itself and prefaced his argument by quoting Theodore Roosevelt in stating, "That we are to stand by the President right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."

"We're not the conspiracy theorists on this particular issue," said Sheen.

"It seems to me like 19 amateurs with box cutters taking over four commercial airliners and hitting 75% of their targets, that feels like a conspiracy theory. It raises a lot of questions."

Sheen described the climate of acceptance for serious discussion about 9/11 as being far more fertile than it was a couple of years ago.

"It feels like from the people I talk to in and around my circles, it seems like the worm is turning."

Suspicious collapse of buildings

Sheen described his immediate skepticism regarding the official reason for the collapse of the twin towers and building 7 on the day of 9/11.

"I was up early and we were gonna do a pre-shoot on Spin City, the show I used to do, I was watching the news and the north tower was burning. I saw the south tower hit live, that famous wide shot where it disappears behind the building and then we see the tremendous fireball."

"There was a feeling, it just didn't look any commercial jetliner I've flown on any time in my life and then when the buildings came down later on that day I said to my brother 'call me insane, but did it sorta look like those buildings came down in a controlled demolition'?"

Sheen said that most people's gut instinct, that the buildings had been deliberately imploded, was washed away by the incessant flood of the official version of events from day one.

Sheen questioned the plausibility of a fireballs traveling 110 feet down an elevator shaft and causing damage to the lobbies of the towers as seen in video footage, especially when contrasted with eyewitness accounts of bombs and explosions in the basement levels of the buildings.

Regarding building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane, Sheen highlighted the use of the term "pull," a demolition industry term for pulling the outer walls of the building towards the center in an implosion, as was used by Larry Silverstein in a September 2002 PBS documentary when he said that the decision to "pull" building 7 was made before its collapse. This technique ensures the building collapses in its own footprint and can clearly be seen during the collapse of building 7 with the classic 'crimp' being visible.

The highly suspicious collapse of building 7 and the twin towers has previously been put under the spotlight by physics Professor Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan of Underwriters Laboratories, the company that certified the steel components used in the construction of the World Trade Center towers.

"The term 'pull' is as common to the demolition world as 'action and 'cut' are to the movie world," said Sheen.

Sheen referenced firefighters in the buildings who were eyewitnesses to demolition style implosions and bombs.

"This is not you or I watching the videos and speculating on what we saw, these are gentlemen inside the buildings at the very point of collapse."

"If there's a problem with building 7 then there's a problem with the whole thing," said Sheen.

Bush's behavior on 9/11

Sheen then questioned President Bush's actions on 9/11 and his location at the Booker Elementary School in Florida. Once Andy Card had whispered to Bush that America was under attack why didn't the secret service immediately whisk Bush away to a secret location?

By remaining at a location where it was publicly known the President would be before 9/11, he was not only putting his own life in danger, but the lives of hundreds of schoolchildren. That is unless the government knew for sure what the targets were beforehand and that President Bush wasn't one of them.

"It seems to me that upon the revelation of that news that the secret service would grab the President as if he was on fire and remove him from that room," said Sheen.

The question of how Bush saw the first plane hit the north tower, when no live footage of that incident was carried, an assertion that Bush repeated twice, was also put under the spotlight.

"I guess one of the perks of being President is that you get access to TV channels that don't exist in the known universe," said Sheen.

"It might lead you to believe that he'd seen similar images in some type of rehearsal as it were, I don't know."

The Pentagon incident

Sheen outlined his disbelief that the official story of what happened at the Pentagon matched the physical evidence.

"Show us this incredible maneuvering, just show it to us. Just show us how this particular plane pulled off these maneuvers. 270 degree turn at 500 miles and hour descending 7,000 feet in two and a half minutes, skimming across treetops the last 500 meters."

We have not been able to confirm that a large commercial airliner hit the Pentagon because the government has seized and refused to release any footage that would show the impact.

"I understand in the interest of national security that maybe not release the Pentagon cameras but what about the Sheraton, what about the gas station, what about the Department of Transportation freeway cam? What about all these shots that had this thing perfectly documented? Instead they put out five frames that they claim not to have authorized, it's really suspicious," said Sheen.

Sheen also questioned how the plane basically disappeared into the Pentagon with next to no wreckage and no indication of what happened to the wing sections.

Concerning how the Bush administration had finalized Afghanistan war plans two days before 9/11 with the massing of 44,000 US troops and 18,000 British troops in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, and in addition the call for "some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor," as outlined in the PNAC documents, Sheen stated, "you don't really put those strategies together overnight do you for a major invasion? Those are really well calculated and really well planned."

"Coincidence? We think not," said Sheen and he called the PNAC quotes "emblematic of the arrogance of this administration."

A real investigation

Sheen joined others in calling for a revised and truly independent investigation of 9/11.

Sheen said that "September 11 wasn't the Zapruder film, it was the Zapruder film festival," and that the inquiry had to be, "headed, if this is possible, by some neutral investigative committee. What if we used retired political foreign nationals? What if we used experts that don't have any ties whatsoever to this administration?"

"It is up to us to reveal the truth. It is up to us because we owe it to the families, we owe it to the victims. We owe it to everybody's life who was drastically altered, horrifically that day and forever. We owe it to them to uncover what happened."

Charlie Sheen joins the rest of his great family and notably his father Martin Sheen, who has lambasted for opposing the Iraq war before it had begun yet has now been proven right in triplicate, in using his prominent public platform to stand for truth and justice and we applaud and salute his brave efforts, remembering Mark Twain's quote.

"In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated, and scorned. When his cause succeeds however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."



March 21, 2006 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Troubled Conscience about 9/11 Speaks Out

Troubled Conscience about 9/11

It was at least two years after the disaster before I began to look into what really happened on 9/11.  After all, it was way too big for the government to have been complicit; surely someone in the know would have spilled the beans.  But then I took a look through the agencies which seemed to deliberately stand down that day instead of doing their jobs, and I listed the ones that after 911 seemed to have as a primary task to discard or conceal relevant evidence and derail any normal criminal investigation.

Then I did the math.  An elementary momentum analysis, using a spreadsheet and data and formulas I checked and double-checked with my own hand, proved beyond any doubt that the WTC towers could not have fallen by damage or fires alone--that they were demolished.  The implications were obvious; regardless of how implausible, some alphabet agencies--or people in their employ--at the Federal, State and local levels actually were instrumental in the murders of all those people and the destruction of so much property.

But I have continued doing my job in the LP here at the state level, for years, pushing back here in Colorado at the misuse of government power in so many little ways.  All the time also pushing back in my mind the reality that these little things make no difference in a country that has essentially just had a coup d'etat, where the leadership doesn't protect the people but kills them for geo-political utility.

So I formed, with a few wonderful Libertarian friends, a private production company entirely outside of my role in the LP.  On March 31, you will have the opportunity to see the results of our dedicated effort to have a world-class event, with a thousand people in their seats here in Denver. Hope you can make it, it would mean a lot to me to have you there, to share what you may remember in years to come as the most sobering experience of your life, a moment that changed everything.

Rand (720)560-0692

p.s.: Don't forget to come this Tuesday, and bring a guest (or a dozen)
Critical Analysis: 911 Event Q&A Tue March 21 6:30pm - 8:30pm

Golden Public Library
1019 Tenth St.
Golden, CO 80401

This multi-media seminar is open to the public, and press are invited.



March 20, 2006 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Mainstream Media Blackout of 9-11 Questions Needs Stopped


Why the Media Blackout of 9/11 Questions?

It is so convenient when you govern a mindless and apathetic people. Despite defying the 'laws of nature' and ignoring actual video footage that shows otherwise, the government continuous to stonewall questions and offers of investigation into 9/11. Could they be afraid of what might turn-up?

The following piece is interesting reading and should cause any American that wishes to know the truth to ask a few questions. The bottom-line is that a growing number of physics specialists are calling their bluff and wondering aloud, how can this story be so? You be the judge!

Scholars for 9-11 Truth Press Conference: Alexandria, Va.
by Victor Thorn & Lisa Guliani (WING TV) (Alexandria, Va.)
- Once again, 9-11 truth is making every effort to break through into the mainstream arena.

On the afternoon of Tuesday, March 14, 2006, the Scholars for 9-11 Truth held a press conference outside of the Albert V. Bryan U.S. District Courthouse in Alexandria, Va. where the trial of accused 9-11 terrorist Zacharias Moussaoui is currently underway. Speakers included Professor James Fetzer, retired Air Force Colonel George Nelson, and attorney Phil Berg.

But as their press conference was set to begin before an extensive lineup of mainstream news outlets such as CNN, Fox News, the Associated Press, and local D.C. affiliate stations, attempts were made by law enforcement officials (bearing ID's that read "POLICE ICE") to prevent the Scholars from speaking to the press. (ICE = Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security)

These agents initially informed the Scholars that they would need to move their conference beyond the law enforcement perimeters of Courthouse Square - away from the press corps.

But Professor James Fetzer, organizer of this event, informed the agents that the Scholars had a right to address the press, and also provided them with the credentials of Phil Berg (a former Deputy Attorney General & former candidate for Governor, Lt. Governor, and U.S. Senate); and George Nelson (a retired United States Air Force colonel).

Upon request, the ICE agents were also provided copies of press statements by both Fetzer and Berg. They then met with the presiding judge  Leonie Brinkema  who subsequently granted permission for the press conference to proceed.

First at the podium was Professor Jim Fetzer, who stated that the official 9-11 scenario is categorically false, not merely in its specific details, but in regard to its most basic features. His remarks included:
- The Towers did not collapse from the plane impacts or subsequent jet fuel fires.
- No Boeing 757 appears to have hit the Pentagon.
- Flight 93 is a mystery.
- The official story violates the immutable laws of nature.

- The melting point of steel is at least 1,000 Degrees Higher than the Maximum Temperature attainable by Jet Fuel.

  He also pointed to other 'smoking guns' such as:
- The enormous dust clouds created by the pulverized concrete, and the enormous energy source needed to initiate them.
- The black billowing plumes of smoke, indicative of oxygen - starved/suffocating fires.

The next individual to greet the press was retired USAF Colonel George Nelson, who stated,
"I'm pushing 70 years of age, and I'm a man with a conscience. I'm about to turn this country over to my children, and I don't like what I see." Nelson also asked a number of questions, including:

1) Why weren't we allowed to see physical evidence from any of the crash sites?
2) Why weren't any accident reports filed for the four 9-11 flights?
3) Why weren't any cameras allowed within 1,000 feet of the Shanksville "crash site"?

Following these inquiries, Colonel Nelson addressed the press directly by saying,
"Airplane metal just doesn't evaporate." Reiterating this point, he said the crater at Shanksville
— was only 20 feet long by 10 feet wide; thus, how could a 757 fit into a hole that size?

Likewise, Nelson mentioned that Flight 77, which was said to have hit the Pentagon, had a
— 125 foot wingspan, yet the impact hole was only 16 feet wide.
Furthermore, this aircraft supposedly penetrated 3 of the Pentagon's outer rings and made perfectly round holes.

— Not only is this Physically Impossible, but the amateur pilot who allegedly flew this craft did not even remotely possess the skills or expertise necessary to perform such maneuvers.

Nelson continued by saying that if we're to believe that Flight 77 struck the Pentagon's ground floor, it would have first had to make contact with the Pentagon's lawn before hitting the building
(i.e. there should have been more metal wreckage outside the Pentagon than inside of it).

Yet, any 9-11 Pentagon photograph will show the lawn remained pristine and unscarred after the plane's impact. Plus, the debris field was inconsistent with that of an airplane crash.

The final speaker this day was attorney Phil Berg, whose remarks included an extensive listing
— of especially Damning Points in regard to the official 9-11 story.
These included:

- William Rogriguez (The Last Man out of the Towers) heard explosions in the Towers before they ever fell, yet his testimony to the 9-11 Commission was omitted from their final report.

- Similarly, Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta's "devastating testimony" regarding Dick Cheney's control of the military stand-down was also not included in the final whitewash report.

- Rudolph Giuliani was told that the Towers were going to fall prior to their actual collapses, subsequently causing him to evacuate his 23rd floor command bunker at WTC 7.

- The lightning-fast removal of evidence, including steel beams and other debris from the Ground Zero collapse site.

- Absolutely no investigation by SEC officials of the "put options" that occurred days prior to 9-11.

Berg went on to say that of all the people he's met since the 9-11 attacks, 90% of them feel they haven't been told the entire truth about what took place.

He then described his ongoing RICO lawsuit filed against George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and 53 others, essentially saying that, "We have a mob in the White House," and that they "had foreknowledge, and engaged in a failure to act, a failure to prevent, and a massive cover-up of 9-11."

In conclusion, Berg said,
— "This is the murder of 3,000 people," — and also commented on the differing schools of thought (LIHOP vs. MIHOP):
  "If they let it happen on purpose, then they made it happen on purpose."

Plus, the ramifications of 9-11 have had a wide-reaching affect on everybody, for right now under the Patriot Act, Phil Berg said, "They can take me away as a subversive."

Following the press conference at an impromptu photo-op, Phil Berg continued, saying that — "Bush, Cheney, and others — should be put on trial for treason and sent to jail." —

In this same vein, 9-11 researcher Webster Tarpley had the following to say about Zacharias Moussaoui:
—  "He's a psychotic, militant patsy  who is several degrees of understanding below Lee Harvey Oswald." —
After listening to over thirty minutes of hard-hitting information delivered by Fetzer, Nelson, and Berg, the press corps was invited to ask questions. Remarkably, only one reporter made an inquiry:

"Why would they do it? What were their motives?"

Professor Fetzer answered with a litany of reasons, including the infamous PNAC missive and the need for a "New Pearl Harbor" which would lead us into Afghanistan, Iraq, and beyond. After this explanation, no other questions were posed to the Scholars, despite the substantial amount of information they provided.

We did notice one journalist with tears in her eyes as she scribbled furiously on a notepad while listening to Professor Fetzer. If we hearken back to what Colonel Nelson said about conscience, the question remains:

— Will members of the mainstream media start following their conscience by exposing the lies of 9-11, or will they continue to aid and abet in the ongoing cover-up of the gravest crime ever committed against this country?


(2006-03-13) Scholars for 9/11 Truth

Experts conclude Vice President possessed foreknowledge and suggest Moussaoui trial a "distraction"
Duluth, MN: March 13, 2006 -

- A society of experts and scholars contends that the prosecution of Zacarias Moussaoui--for willfully concealing advance knowledge of the events of 9/11 -- has the status of a Soviet-style "show trial"
and functions as a diversion from the real culprits.

The nonpartisan group, Scholars for 9/11 Truth, asserts that the evidence implicating Vice President Dick Cheney of that very offense is more obvious and compelling. If they are even remotely correct, then the alleged terrorists appear to have been cast in the role of "patsies."

The experts base their conclusion on testimony presented to the 9/11 Commission by U.S. Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta on May 23, 2003, which was omitted from its final report, and on related events at the Pentagon.

Members of the society will present their findings during a press conference to be held at 1 PM on Tuesday at the United States Courthouse in Alexandria, VA, the location of a hearing to determine whether Moussaoui, who is called "the 20th hijacker", should serve a life term or receive the death sentence."Mineta's testimony is devastating," observed James H. Fetzer, Ph.D., McKnight Professor at the University of Minnesota.

Fetzer is the founder and co-chair of the scholars' society, which recently joined with Judicial Watch in calling for release of documents, films and videos, and physical evidence withheld from the public by the administration.

"It pulls the plug on the Commission's contention there was no advance warning that the Pentagon was going to be hit."

According to Secretary Mineta's testimony, which is in the public domain, when he (Mineta) arrived at an underground bunker at the White House (known as the Presidential Emergency Operations Center), the Vice President was in charge.

"During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon", he stated, "there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President,

'The plane is 50 miles out.' 'The plane is 30 miles out.'

"And when it got down to, 'The plane is 10 miles out,'" Mineta continued, "the young man also said to the Vice President, 'Do the orders still stand?'
And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said,
   'Of course the orders still stand.
    Have you heard anything to the contrary?'"
"The only reasonable interpretation of the orders," Fetzer observed, "is that the incoming aircraft should not be shot down".

Philip J. Berg, Esq., Former Deputy Atty. General of Pennsylvania, added,
"Those who made it happen were obviously in the position to know that it was going to happen and therefore could have sounded a warning alarm. The case against Cheney is more powerful than the case against Moussaoui. No one is more culpable than the perpetrators. If Moussaoui deserves the death penalty, what does our Vice President deserve?"

Other members of the society include:
Robert Bowman, head of the "Star Wars" program in both Democratic and Republican administrations;
Morgan Reynolds, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor in the Bush administration;
Andreas von Buelow, former assistant defense minister of Germany;
Steven E. Jones, a professor of physics from Brigham Young University and the society's co-chair; and
Griffin, a noted theologian and author of The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions.

Documentary support for the conclusions reported here may be found at the Scholars for 9/11 Truth web site at

For Further Information:
James H. Fetzer, Ph.D. - Founder and Co-Chair Scholars for 9/11 Truth
(218) 726-7269 (office) (218) 724-2706 (home) (218) 726-7119 (fax)
Philip J. Berg, Esq. 706 Ridge Pike Lafayette Hill, PA 19444
(800) 993-7445 (office) (610) 834-7659 (fax) (610) 662-3005 [cell]

Provided via:
If you have questions regarding information in these press release contact the company listed below. is a press release service and not the author of this press release. The information that is on or available through this site is for informational purposes only and speaks only as of the particular date or dates of that information. As some companies / PR Agencies submit their press releases once per week/month or quarter, make sure check the official company website for accurate release dates as our site displays the distribution date only. We do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of information on or available through this site, and we are not responsible for inaccuracies or omissions in that information or for actions taken in reliance on that information



March 19, 2006 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Loose Change Video 2nd Edition Asks Legitimate, Tough 9-11 Questions,.






<p><a href="" rel="tag">Alabama</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Alaska</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Arizona</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Arkansas</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">California</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Colorado</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Connecticut</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Delaware</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Florida</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Georgia</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Hawaii</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Idaho</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Illinois</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Indiana</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Iowa</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Kansas</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Kentucky</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Louisiana</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Maine</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Maryland</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Massachusetts</a>&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Michigan</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Minnesota</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Mississippi</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Missouri</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Montana</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Nebraska</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Nevada</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">New Hampshire</a>&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">New Jersey</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">New Mexico</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">New York</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">North Carolina</a> <a href="" rel="tag">North Dakota</a>&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Ohio</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Oklahoma</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Oregon</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Pennsylvania</a>&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Rhode Island</a>&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">South Carolina</a> <a href="" rel="tag">South Dakota</a>&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Tennessee</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Texas</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Utah</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Vermont</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Virginia</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Washington DC</a>&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">West Virginia</a>&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Wisconsin</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Wyoming</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<a href="" rel="tag">United States</a>&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">South America</a>&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Great Britain</a>&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">England</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Europe</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Middle East</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Asia</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">Melbourne</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="" rel="tag">World</a></p>


March 15, 2006 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack