Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Ed Brown vs. IRS Standoff Update 2/1/07 - From Keene Free Press | Main | LEO WANTA AND THE WISCONSIN STATE TAX GESTAPO »

Why the Libby "verdict" was a mistrial

"Why the Libby 'Verdict' was a Mistrial," by Paul Andrew Mitchell

Posted by: "Supreme Law Firm"      paulandrewmitchell2004@yahoo.com
   

Tue Mar 6, 2007 2:53 pm        (PST)   

Why the Libby "Verdict" was a Mistrial
   
by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 USC 1964(a)
   
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
   
   
  (1)  a panel of federal citizens can not
legally issue a valid criminal INDICTMENT;
that panel was not a lawful federal grand jury
because the Jury Selection and Service Act
expressly discriminates against Citizens of
the 50 States of the Union:
  http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/opening.htm#topic-a
   
  (2)  for the same reason, a panel of federal
citizens could not legally issue a valid
VERDICT in a federal criminal trial, because
the same Jury Selection and Service Act
is used to convene federal trial juries too;
   
  (3)  the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA have never
been granted any legal standing to sue or to be sued
in any federal courts:
  http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm
   
  (4)  the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA did incorporate
twice in the State of Delaware, but the Delaware
Secretary of State has now revoked the charters
of both Delaware corporations:
  http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.corp/
   
  (5)  Congress has never incorporated the
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA as such, nor
has the Congress ever incorporated the
"United States" (federal government) as such;
see U.S. v. Cooper Corporation:
  http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=312&invol=600
   
  (6)  in the U.S. Constitution and in Title 28 of the
U.S. Code, the term "United States of America"
means only the 50 States of the Union:
  http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/dict/bldu1.htm#union
  (Bouvier's L.D. governs the meaning of terms used in the Constitution)
  http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1746.html
  (inside the "United States" = outside the "United States of America";
  inside the "United States of America" = outside the "United States")
   
  (7)  those 50 States are already legally represented
by their respective State Attorneys General;
   
  (8)  as such, the "United States of America"
cannot be legally represented by any U.S. Attorneys
employed either by the U.S. Department of Justice
  or by the Office of the U.S. Attorney:
  http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/547.html
   
  (9)  it is also willful misrepresentation for
any DOJ's officers or employees to attempt to appear
on behalf of the 50 States of the Union, or
on behalf of 2 revoked Delaware corporations;
such willful misrepresentation violates the
McDade Act at 28 U.S.C. 530B:
  http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/530B.html
   
  (10)  Reggie B. Walton is currently missing
2 necessary credentials which are required
of all federal district judges, by law:
the APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVIT and OATH OF OFFICE:
  http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/walton.reggie/nad.missing.credentials.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm#DDC
  http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/
   
 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
   
  All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
 
Our condensed list of IRS outreach resources:
  http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.forward.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.perjury.jurats.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/psta.analysis.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/lien.or.levy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/notice.of.deficiency.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.cclists.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm

___

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

March 8, 2007 in Current Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d3ac69e200e550aaf2688834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why the Libby "verdict" was a mistrial:

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.