« DSHEA TO BE WIPED OUT BY VOICE VOTE MONDAY APRIL 30th UNLESS YOU ACT NOW!!! | Main | Fox-TV denying Ron Paul to be in the South Carolina Presidential Debate »
Wantagate: World vs. White House Bunker - Skinning the Cat Pt. 2
Nathan L McDonald will pledge Ron Paul's campaign but only if 200
others will. There is still a goodly amount left to go. I've pledged as
well. Please pledge $200 to Ron Paul's campaign. Spread the link:
http://www.pledgebank.com/RonPaul2008
Thanks,
Juan
___
WANTAGATE: ‘THE SKINNING OF THE CAT’: PART 2
THE WORLD VERSUS THE WHITE HOUSE BUNKER
Tuesday 1 May 2007 17:07
By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org
Home Page for 'Wantagate' reports since April 2006. [Note: The CLICK
HERE panel is now: NEWS. A panel giving details of our latest
publications has been added].
US CODE TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony
cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as
soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in
civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
US GOVERNMENT ‘ACT OF ECONOMIC WARFARE’ AGAINST BRITAIN
02 May UPDATE: Please take note that the following information has been
RECONFIRMED to the Principals THREE TIMES by high-level informed
financial sector and official sources within the past 24 hours.
Separately, the Editor is in touch with Scotland Yard and the City of
London Police Fraud Squad, on the basis of Misprison of Felony, which
derives from/belongs to English Common Law.
WHITE HOUSE STEALS THE BANK OF ENGLAND’S GOLD
Latent dislike of the British at the highest levels of this corrupt and
reprobate American Federal Government has led to a catastrophic
development, which was predicted to us by a US intelligence source
known to this Editor, back in 2004. This source stated that the British
would be ‘fleeced’ and ‘cleaned out’. This is exactly what happened on
29th and 30th March 2007 [see diary narrative below], behind the
familiar smokescreen of ‘preparing to settle’ indications, reinforced
by the shutting down of the British financial system on Friday 30th
March for at least eight hours. The explanation given for public
consumption to the British public was that it was necessary to ‘test
the new electronic transfer system’ (Citibank, New York City to
Brussels to Citibank New York City to Bank of England). In the course
of this operation, the Bank of England’s liened gold was diverted and
resources valued at $4.8 trillion+ were expropriated, according to
European banking sources.
During such a banking system shutdown, there is no accountability and
no recording of what transactions may be taking place behind the
scenes. It has transpired that the purpose of the shutdown, which
caused massive inconvenience to the general banking public, was not to
‘test the new system’, but rather to enable the cynical criminal
operatives at the White House and the US Treasury to consummate a
preplanned scamming operation for self-enrichment and geopolitical
purposes, in collaboration with the secret globalists at Deutsche Bank
and elsewhere, and corrupt operatives and traitors at the Bank of
England.
The European banking sources inform us that the Bank of England is now
effectively bankrupt, as a result of this ‘Economic Act of War’
perpetrated by the United States against its closest ally. The purpose
of this operation will have been to tie the hands of the incoming
British Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, WHO INTENDS TO EXTRACT THE UNITED
KINGDOM FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE AND TO REASSERT ITS
SOVEREIGN INDEPENDENCE.
AS FAR AS WE KNOW, HE HAS NEVER WAVERED FROM THIS OBJECTIVE, WHICH OF COURSE WE STRONGLY SUPPORT.
By bankrupting the Bank of England through this gross ‘Act of Economic
Warfare’, the geofinancial conspirators perpetrating the scam (and
Deutsche Bank was heavily involved), hope to box the new Prime Minister
in, and to compel him in fact to pursue the OPPOSITE strategy to what
he had (correctly) intended, so that instead of taking Britain out of
the institutionally corrupt European Union Collective, he has to scrap
the pound sterling in favour of the Euro. For the continued existence
of the pound sterling is an impediment to the realisation of plans for
secret German Eurasian hegemony.
Working with their agents in the White House, the US Treasury and
certain banks, and especially in the corrupt Bank of England, the
‘end-game’ conspirators acting as proxy for the Nazi Continuum in
Dachau, believe that they have destroyed Britain’s independence for
good, not least given that Scotland is about to vote for a Scottish
Nationalist Government which will try to secede from the union. This
will not happen, but that's what the conspirators hope will happen.
The only problem with this conspiracy is that it has sown the seeds of
its likely failure, because, as discussed at the foot of this analysis,
the Eurozone is now under unprecedented strain due to the appreciation
of the Euro on the dollar-Euro axis, consequent upon the relentless
criminal financial operations of the White House and the US Treasury –
as the Wanta Plan/Settlement is endlessly delayed while these crooks
generate fiat money for their own self-enrichment and seek to delay
implementation of the intended new ‘clean’ system.
The Bank of England needs a comprehensive audit immediately. It also
requires the immediate services of Deputy Commissioner John Yates, at
Scotland Yard or, more probably, of the City of London Police Fraud
Squad. As soon as he becomes Prime Minister, Gordon Brown must require
a thorough shake-down at the Bank of England, and must not be deflected
from pursuing the course that he knows to be right for the future of
the United Kingdom. We will support him in this.
HOW BRITAIN SHOULD RESPOND TO THE UNITED STATES'
'ACT OF ECONOMIC WAR' AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM
With reference to this expropriation of $4.8+ trillion by corrupt US
cadres from the Bank of England, the geopolitical purpose of which is
also explained in this analysis, the Editor of International Currency Review recommends the following immediate retaliatory response:
1. The American Ambassador should be kicked out of London by the
Foreign Secretary, with a demand that he retrieve the $4.8+ trillion
expropriated from the Bank of England and procure the payment of the
defaulted $4.5 trillion tagged and earmarked in the name of Ambassador
Leo Emil Wanta that should have been paid into the Securities Account
of the Ambassador's Commonwealth of Virginia-based corporation
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, last June, but which has been corruptly
diverted and exploited ever since by criminal cadres.
2. A deadline for the above of 14 days should be attached to the US
Ambassador's expulsion. If this deadline is not met, the entire
diplomatic staff of the United States should be ordered home and
Britain should sever diplomatic relations with the United States,
making it plain that they will not be restored until the above two
basic conditions are met. A further deadline of 14 days should apply.
3. If this deadline is not met, all US military personnel should be
ordered to leave British soil and bases within seven days, with no
undertaking being given for their return at any time in the future.
4. American bank accounts held with banks in the United Kingdom should be ordered to be frozen en masse, pending resolution.
5. Siren voices asserting that this would be the precise outcome
intended by the secret ongoing Nazi Continuum and the secret ongoing
Soviet Continuum strategists, should be disregarded since neither the
United States nor Germany can in practice do without the British for
long. Also, fears of retaliation by the United States should be
disregarded for the same reason.
EXPOSURE OF A PREPLANNED ATTACK ON THE TWIN CITIES
Before we go any further, it will be recalled that in Part 1 of this
report, the Editor revealed outline details of information conveyed by
the controlled Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) operative Lt. Delmart
‘Mike’ Vreeland (the man who predicted 9/11 a month ahead of the event,
from a prison cell in Toronto) concerning a devastating intended attack
against the Twin Cities of Minneapolis-St Paul. Although this was a
‘tainted’ source, the information was reported at once to relevant US
authorities and was then described by the Editor in a detailed
Affidavit which the Editor wrote and had notarised in New York.
The highly intelligent ONI ‘Monarch’ operative, though notoriously of
‘low life’ pedigree, was nevertheless sound with respect to
understanding geopolitical reality. At that time, the Editor thought
that the intended attack might have been imminent. In the light of the
recent satanic operation conducted by ‘Black Ops’ cadres of the
Luciferian components of the US intelligence community at Blacksburg,
VA, we reviewed this matter and concluded that the attack will have
been intended to occur on 1st September 2008, when (on the basis of
present plans) the Republican National Convention ahead of next year’s
Presidential election convenes in the TWIN Cities of Minneapolis-St
Paul.
The objective would have been to provide a ‘Grandfather of all
Reichstag Fires’ pretext for the scrapping of the US Constitution (as
predicted in such a context by General Tommy Franks, who can hardly
have been ignorant of such an intention. Franks, like President George
W. Bush Jr. and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran, has been
photographed performing, for the cameras, the Devil’s salute).
It should be added that further background information supportive of
this conclusion exists, which cannot be presented here for public
consumption. What the Editor did not mention in Part 1 was the weaponry
that the report suggested would be used. We withheld this information
from the Part 1 posting, although it was conveyed by others to the
relevant authorities at the time. We now reveal what the report stated
was intended.
Four megaton nuclear bombs were to be used. For reasons connected with
our inadvertent investigations at the time, the Editor knows this to be
accurate.
We believe that exposure of this preplanned satanic atrocity will have
made it impossible for that particular pretext for imposing the
intended US dictatorship, to proceed.
Preplanned and controlled atrocities such as Blacksburg are, of course,
also intended as mass Psy-Ops offensives. It is apparent to this close
observer of US society that many New Yorkers were so severely
traumatised (unconsciously) by 9/11, that they have been unable to cope
with further evidence of abominations – withdrawing instead into a
simple world from which the harsh reality that the United States is
governed by ruthless criminals who have shown that they will stop at
nothing to meet their crackpot objectives, is excluded.
And the fact that our publicising the warning of the preplanned attack
on the Twin cities scheduled for next year did not induce much
surprise, is very indicative of the ‘success’ of the Luciferians’
ongoing psychological operations against the American people, which
includes desensitisation to barbaric violence and torture inflicted
upon Iraqis by the US military and the CIA. Disconcertingly, these
abominations appear to be of very little concern to large numbers of
Americans, although many are appropriately horrified, as indeed they
should be.
GROSSLY PREMATURE 2008 ELECTION FEVER PSY-OPS
Another (linked) Psychological-Ops dimension is all this sudden frenzy
in preparation for next year’s ‘scheduled’ General Election. Both the
US and British ‘democratic’ systems are controlled and rigged by
intelligence cadres, with leading political figures routinely selected
by the agentur to provide the necessary front behind which the always
manipulated dialectical ‘democratic’ fraud is perpetrated on the
unsuspecting electorate.
It is an unpalatable fact that Professor John Robison, of Edinburgh
University, revealed in his classic 1798 expose of the Illuminati’s
modus operandi, that ‘democracy’ was developed by the revolutionary
agentur precisely so as to provide the dialectical stage upon which the
charade of democratic choice could be displayed, without disturbing in
any way the power and control mechanisms exercised by the agentur. This
explains the universal cynicism with which democracy is viewed today by
the general public – a state of affairs, by the way, with which the
agentur are entirely content, given their expectation of limited or
zero resistance to their intended seizure and usurpation of total power
at times of their own choosing. 1st September 2008 was to have been the
date selected for this to happen in the United States.
As part of this ‘democracy’ Psy-Ops softening-up operation, prominent
operatives have suddenly begun to provide the American electorate with
the benefit of boastful claims about their achievements, to assist
electors to vote for them when the time comes – even though, on the
above analysis, the agentur appears to have reserved the right to
orchestrate a nuclear catastrophe in Minneapolis-St Paul to ‘terminate’
US elections once and for all.
TOMMY THOMPSON PRESENTS HIMSELF AS A CANDIDATE
Prominent among these operatives suddenly presenting themselves a year
early for the electorate’s kind consideration is the former Governor of
Wisconsin, Tommy Thompson – the Governor who, in secret collaboration
with President Clinton (George Bush Sr.’s ‘Monarch’), presided over the
US dimension of the takedown of Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta, so that the
$27.5 trillion of assets of which he remains the sole Principal as a
consequence of his high-level international Financial Warfare and
intelligence work as taskmaster and paymaster for President Reagan,
could then be ransacked without anyone lifting an eyebrow. Or so the
criminalists naively imagined at the time.
By presenting himself as a candidate for the Presidency, Tommy Thompson
suddenly acquired a Secret Service detail. Given his ‘baggage’ and what
follows, no doubt he considered this to be essential – in view of the
‘unfolding of events’, to cite Lenin here.
For it was under the Governorship of Tommy G. Thompson, was it not, that:
1. Leo Wanta was illegally arrested by two plain clothes New York
‘policemen’ on the steps of a New York Courthouse after all charges
against him had been dismissed by US Judge Allyce Ross, was illegally
detained in a New York prison without a warrant, and was subsequently
illegally extradited to Wisconsin, having earlier been irregularly
seized contrary to international diplomatic norms in Switzerland in the
context of a conspiracy orchestrated at the Swiss end by the long-term
Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD) operative, Marc Rich, on behalf of
the Bush-Clinton crime combo, and flung into a stinking Swiss dungeon
where an attempt was made to poison him with contaminated cheese. A
prison doctor subsequently warned him that the Swiss authorities were
accustomed to committing murder through poisoning in this facility, and
advised him what prison food was safe to eat, and what was liable to be
contaminated.
2. Ambassador Wanta’s sealed diplomatic briefcase (seized in
Switzerland but made known to Judge Allyce Ross) – which had contained
18 high-value US Treasury instruments that the Ambassador, as
Chairman-designate of the Somali Central Bank, had been instructed to
use to refinance Somalia – was subjected to a search on the basis of a
stale warrant, the schedule of its contents being listed and certified
by Dennis M. Mengelt, Special Agent, Wisconsin Division of Criminal
Investigation. This list made no reference to the presence in Leo
Wanta’s briefcase of the 18 high-value US Treasury instruments (worth
$1.0 billion each) referenced by Judge Ross, on the basis of which she
had concurred with the Assistant US Attorney that all ‘charges’ against
the Ambassador must be dismissed.
3. Leo Wanta was then subjected to the worst features of the vast US
GULAG, including being stripped naked in the snow, moved frequently
from one GULAG facility to another so that his mail seldom caught up
with him, subjected to Soviet-style attempts to have him certified
insane (all of which failed), and confronted by five separate attempts
to have him murdered. The most notorious of these involved a Deputy
Sheriff who drove up to the Kettle Moraine GULAG facility, changed into
prisoner’s clothing, and attempted to murder Leo in the bathroom. When
this attempt failed, the Deputy Sheriff fled back to the administration
area, changed back into his uniform, and escaped in a County Car.
4. The Ambassador was later humiliated by a controlled State kangaroo
court charade (extensively documented by this Editor), in the course of
which the Honorable Michael J. Torphy, the County Court Judge hearing
the case, was lied to in perjured evidence submitted by an operative
masquerading as a tax collector, Dennis Ullmann, and by the then
Assistant Attorney General of Wisconsin, Douglas Haag and the man who
is now Governor of that State, James E. Doyle, who was then Wisconsin’s
Attorney General. In other words, elected and appointed judicial
officials systematically perpetrated fraud against the Court, also
known as obstructing the course of justice.
5. A nexus of deceit, lies and fraudulent activity was perpetrated and
orchestrated by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, which originally
raised a civil tax assessment for $14,129 that the Ambassador paid
twice (to dismiss such ‘nuisance’ assessments) in 1992, while operating
abroad – despite the fact that he had been a lawful resident of Vienna,
Austria, since June 1988 by order of the Austrian Court, so that no
Wisconsin State civil tax assessments on Leo Wanta from 1985 onwards
had any validity.
In July 2005, the same illegally raised civil tax assessment was paid
for the THIRD time by means of a check handed over to the Wisconsin
Department of Corrections in person by Attorney Steven Goodwin, using
funds provided out of scarce private resources by the Editor of this
service. As a consequence of that payment, the Ambassador’s
fraudulently applied probation was terminated on the instructions of
Judge Torphy, and the Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of
Corrections, Mr Michael J. Frank, appropriately signed Ambassador
Wanta’s ABSOLUTE DISCHARGE, effective 14th November 2005. For the
detailed background intelligence on the Wisconsin Taxation Gestapo
dimension of this giga-scandal, see our website posting dated 20th
March 2007 [see this website, Archive button]. In addition, the Editor
included a 24-page Supplement to the special 480-page ‘Wantagate’ issue
of International Currency Review [Volume 31, #3/4] in November 2006.
As will be seen below, there has been a very recent development out of
Wisconsin that will cause the entire conspiracy to unravel. This is one
reason why the Editor has reiterated the facts summarised above.
Given this background, which has been internationally and domestically
known since we published the 24-page special supplement on the
Wisconsin Taxation Gestapo Fraud in November 2006, and further since
our posting dated 20th March 2007, you MIGHT have thought that Mr Tommy
G Thompson should have ‘registered’ what is going on.
Well, this operative has certainly registered the need for Secret
Service protection, which may be why he plunged so early into next
year’s election charade, and why he lost no time in informing his
prospective electorate of his ‘virtues’ and abilities.
THOMPSON EMAILS LEO WANTA ASKING FOR HIS SUPPORT!!!
But what no reasonably sane person could possibly have anticipated is
that this Tommy Thompson creature has seen fit to send Ambassador Wanta
an email soliciting his support at the polls, and asking the Ambassador
to contribute to his election fund!
FACTS:
• Governor Tommy Thompson has never
accounted for the 18 high-value US Treasury instruments, worth $1.0
billion each and $18 billion in the aggregate, that were present in the
Ambassador’s diplomatic briefcase but which were not listed by
Wisconsin State Agent Mengelt in his ‘Return of Search Warrant’ dated
11th March 1994.
• Governor Tommy Thompson presided over
corrupted State judicial and taxation structures which procured that,
for a non-existent felony (not paying a non-applicable civil tax
assessment for $14,129 which has in fact been paid THREE TIMES and his
now being demanded a FOURTH time), Ambassador Wanta was deprived of 14
years of his active life, during which he could have made further
priceless contributions to the United States, comparable to the service
he rendered as paymaster and taskmaster in his Financial Warfare
operations against the USSR, and in other contexts on behalf of Uncle
Sam.
The insensitive, outrageous email to Ambassador Wanta from Tommy
Thompson was sent on 24th April at 16:45 pm local time. It bragged,
among other things, that, ‘as Governor, Tommy Thompson cut taxes 91
times to save taxpayers $16.4 billion’. We are entitled to ask: did he
deploy the missing $18 billion for that purpose, keeping the difference
of $1.6 billion, by any chance? Or were the 18 high-value US Treasury
instruments employed as collateral at corrupt foreign banks to raise
additional funds which were then, in turn, used as collateral for the
same purpose, so that $18 billion could have been multiplied to $100
billion by the cleptocracy within months?
We think we should be told.
The email also bragged that ‘As Governor, Tommy Thompson used his veto
pen more than 1,900 times to save taxpayers $247 million’. However he
didn’t use his veto pen to order the freeing from illegal custody of
his most distinguished GULAG inmate who had committed no felony and who
was languishing in his State’s filthy jails in the context of Tommy
Thompson’s orchestrated operation, in collusion with the White House,
to keep Wanta inactive and ‘dead’ – so that the criminalists and their
banking sector co-conspirators could play fast and loose with the
Ambassador’s diverted and misappropriated funds.
Tommy Thompson’s ‘veto pen’ was therefore used, it appears, somewhat selectively.
THOMPSON’S DEFINITION OF ‘CORE CONSERVATIVE PRINCIPLES’
The email to Leo Wanta soliciting his financial support further
asserted that Mr Thompson ‘has never wavered on core conservative
principles’. Therefore, the former four-term Republican Governor of
Wisconsin, now running prematurely for President, asserts that ‘core
conservative principles’ include either orchestrating or condoning the
following: repeated perjury; bearing false witness; committing fraud
against the Courts; the ransacking and stealing of a victim’s assets,
including his home, which was sold at a knock-down price, the proceeds
stolen, and is now lived in by a Wisconsin State Attorney; the seizure
of high-value monetary instruments belonging to the US Federal
Government from the custody of a diplomat; the failure to return an
illegally confiscated diplomatic briefcase (which cannot be returned
minus the 18 high-value US Treasury instruments it contained when Leo
Wanta was ‘taken down’); the illegal arrest, detention, extradition,
jailing and terrorising of a diplomat; orchestrated, long-term fraud
and scamming by State taxation authorities; the raising of fraudulent
civil tax assessments and repeated fraudulent tax authority demands for
the same civil tax assessments, even though settled under protest no
less than three times; the repeated attempted murder of a defenceless
victim in the GULAG; repeated attempts to have the victim certified
insane in the GULAG; illegal long-term incarceration of a political
prisoner, as in the Soviet Union; permitting the contracting with a
Deputy Sheriff to murder a political prisoner in a WI GULAG facility
bathroom; conspiring with others to fabricate and perpetuate a farrago
of brazen lies and diversionary operations to obfuscate these and other
orchestrated official criminal acts; and remaining long-term
co-conspirator and accessory to the fact of massive official fraud,
stealing and diversion of monetary assets, and associated crimes for
which, on a scale measured against the Ambassador’s jail tariff,
several millennia of incarceration would be wholly inadequate to fit
the crimes in question.
PRESIDENT BUSH EMAILS WANTA ASKING FOR HIS SUPPORT, TOO!
No sooner had the Ambassador digested Tommy Thompson’s email asking for
Leo’s support and monetary contributions, than the Ambassador received
a further election-oriented email, also dated 24th April – this time,
from the President of the United States, George W. Bush Jr. himself,
the operative who, with his co-conspirators Vice President Richard
Cheney, Cheney’s son-in-law Philip Perry, and the Ministry of State
Security Chief, Michael J. Chertoff, has been systematically thwarting
the Wanta Settlement since June 2006, thereby jeopardising the
financial equilibrium not just of the United States, but (as is ever
more apparent; see below) of the whole world.
This email to Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta from President Bush started out as follows:
‘Dear Ambassador Leo
Your commitment to our Republican principles and ideals is helping to
build a stronger, more prosperous future for every American’.
Note that, as has consistently been the documented case, the President
of the United States correctly addresses Leo Wanta as Ambassador. An
Ambassador is not permitted under international law to be detained,
prosecuted in a State kangaroo court, jailed, placed on probation or
otherwise disadvantaged, least of all on the say-so of the Governor of
a State of the American Union, which has no external jurisdiction.
Let us deconstruct this Presidential assertion here:
1. Leo’s commitment, as a servant of the United States, is apolitical and is of course to the United States and all Americans.
2. Leo Wanta has been systematically prevented from applying his unique
talents and expertise in the interests of all Americans and of the
whole world by the intransigence, greed and serial criminality of the
individuals itemised above, including the President of the United
States himself.
3. Accordingly, of course, the President of the United States is NOT
upholding ‘our Republican principles’, but is rather conspiring to
prevent the application of equitable principles and common sense, as a
direct consequence of his criminal behaviour, record and evident
intentions. We wish, of course, that this were not true: but it is.
4. In a later paragraph, President Bush states that ‘I have set a big
agenda for our nation’, the agenda being unspecified – whereas David
Ignatius saw fit to publish an Op-Ed article recently in the Washington
Post entitled ‘The White House Bunker’, in which he correctly revealed
that prominent Republicans are scared to death of the intransigence of
the Bush II White House in the face of insistent high-level demands
from all over the world for order to be restored at the highest levels
of the US Federal Government. The reality is that Bush Jr. has no
agenda for the nation, and that the only agenda that makes any residual
sense is one that procures the saving of his skin, which may be an
uphill task.
5. Addressing ‘Ambassador Leo’ a second time, the President’s emailed
letter stressed the necessity of ‘recruiting good candidates to run for
office who share our core principles’ (see above). In this President’s
opinion, then, ‘core principles’ may be taken to include: diverting,
misappropriating, collateralising, hypothecating and otherwise
exploiting private funds that do not belong to him, without the
sanction of the sole Principal and owner of these funds; presiding
over, specifically authorising and/or permitting innumerable fraudulent
financial operations, some of which have been described in our earlier
postings, and more of which are alluded to below; co-conspiring as an
accessory to the fact of breaches of all the US Statutes listed yet
again at the foot of this posting; feigning indifference to the mass
murder and systematic Nazi-style torture that has been perpetrated on
his instructions against Iraqis, contrary to all norms of civilised
behaviour, and contemplating the commission of crimes against humanity;
and, not least, frustrating the Wanta Plan, in so doing depriving the
American people of its demonstrable immediate and long-term financial
and economic benefits, including actual termination of the United
States’ century-old borrowing orgy: and thereby ensuring the probable
destruction of his political party in the 2008 General Election,
assuming it is not rigged or terminated following a ‘Grandfather of all
Reichstag Fires’ as pretext. That would conform with Jr.’s remark
during the 2000 election campaign, in which he asserted that everything
would be easier if the United States were a dictatorship ‘provided I am
the dictator’. You can’t get much more specific than that.
President Bush concluded his emailed letter to ‘Dear Ambassador Leo’
with the following question: ‘Will you stand with me and help lay the
groundwork for Republican victory by making a special contribution to
the Republican National Committee (RNC) today?’
To which the Ambassador would have been entitled to respond: ‘Well, er,
no, because you have hijacked my funds, thereby making it impossible
for me to be of any assistance here’.
OUT OF THEIR MINDS AND IN LUCIFER’S MIND
What kind of people, apart from rank criminals, are we actually dealing
with? Are they perpetually drunk? Are they permanently high on drugs?
Do they sit on their brains? Are they controlled by incompetent
handlers who have no clue what they are doing, or who are at
loggerheads with rivals? Are they certifiably mad? The only safe answer
to this is what we pointed out in Part 1.
These people are all out of their minds and in Lucifer’s mind, and vice versa.
UNPRECEDENTED INTERNATIONAL TENSION BEHIND THE SCENES
The foregoing is of course ‘secondary’ to the now widely understood
ongoing criminal activity at the very highest levels of the US
Government which has caused increasingly severe breaches between
previously collaborating Governments and has triggered a banking war –
with household-name institutions about to disappear as desperate
attempts are made to grasp hold of embedded financial assets belonging
to Leo Wanta in a vicious scramble for banking survival and supremacy.
At the same time, bankers and officials are reported to be disappearing
and to be dead, a shoot-out has taken place at the White House,
delegations have stormed out of a Group of Seven meeting, the President
of the World Bank, Paul Wolfowitz, is in the process of being exposed
for corruption and forced to resign because the World Bank has been
engaged in illegal transactions based on the Ambassador’s funds, while
Mr Wolfowitz’s predecessor, Mr James Wolfensohn has been similarly
alleged to have presided over such transactions; and contracts have
been taken out on the basis of high-level instructions, on the lives of
prominent foreign political figures, with the expectation of more to
come.
In order to place these and related ‘Wantagate’ developments in
context, we resume herewith our diary format, leading into the latest
events which conform in every respect with our earlier general
expectations.
BEHIND APPEARANCES, INTERNATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS ARE FRAYING
Taken together, what we are about to describe suggests that the degree
of tension gripping the international banking, intelligence, political,
official, judicial and banking communities has reached an exceptionally
dangerous level. The reader will rightly conclude from what follows
that an orchestrated ofuscation offensive has been sustained, to
provide a dense smokescreen behind which ongoing illegal financial
manipulations and precautionary adjustments have been taking place as
the criminalist co-conspirators react in ever more evident panic to the
noose that is being tightened round their necks.
And key money center banks, driven by intelligence community pressure,
are scrambling for control of institutions such as ABN Amro and La
Salle Bank (the former Harris Bank) which hold accounts belonging to
Wanta and/or fiat money accounts coveted by competing intelligence
groups.
Numerous ‘preparing to settle’ sequences are itemised here, but
underlying them a clear pattern emerges that implies the looming defeat
of the cleptocracy.
RESUMING OUR DIARY OF ‘WANTAGATE’ EVENTS AS THEY UNFOLD:
Our diary resumes with effect from 5th March 2007. The following
central point should be noted. Many of these sequences feature
variations on the ‘preparing to settle’ theme, which ‘allows’ the
perennial high-level perpetrators of these serial financial crimes who
are continuing to exploit Ambassador Leo Wanta’s $4.5 trillion to
generate untaxed fiat money profits, to sidestep the requirements of
the International Court of Justice warrants and negotiated
stipulations. These provide inter alia that so long as it can be
demonstrated that ‘efforts are being made to procure the Wanta
Settlement’, the full force of the ICJ’s decisions does not yet take
effect (so much for the US perpetrators’ disdain for the powers of the
International Court of Justice). Therefore, what we have been
witnessing is a cynical ongoing display of deceitful US ‘compliance’
with the ICJ warrants and stipulations, which falsely conveys the
impression of progress being made towards settlement, while actually
delaying the Wanta Settlement so that the criminalists can in the
meantime go on enriching themselves with fiat money generated off the
back of the $4.5 trillion funds earmarked and held in the name of Leo E
Wanta and his Virginia-based corporation, AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.
It should also be noted that in the diary listing, certain extremely
grave and momentous developments are revealed; so it should not be
assumed by the impatient reader that what you are about to read below
is a description of multiple games of charades.
05 March 2007: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., Ambassador Leo
Wanta’s Commonwealth of Virginia-based corporation, is informed by an
official at Citibank, New York, that the bank has been told of a large
transfer of funds to Citibank within 48 hours.
05 March: A US Treasury compliance officer informs one of the
associates of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., that the transfer of the Wanta
funds (to Citibank) was to be authorised by the continuing nominal US
Treasury Secretary, Henry M. Paulson, and by Deputy Treasury Secretary
Kimmitt, later on this date.
06 March: A senior official in the US military advises one of the
Principals’ associates that the transfer to the Securities Account of
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., with Morgan Stanley, New York, will
‘definitely’ be completed on this date (6th March). The same associate
had been informed by senior European financial authorities that the
transfer had already been completed by the night of 5th March 2007. All
this ‘information’ turns out to be worthless.
06 March: Intelligence is received confirming the huge financial
scamming operation orchestrated by the Vice President of the United
States, Richard Cheney, Philip Perry (Cheney’s son-in-law, partner in
the international law firm of Latham, Watkins & Co., partner of
Michael Chertoff, and Special Counsel to the Department of Homeland
Security headed by Secretary Chertoff). This scam uses US
Treasury-backed debentures and instruments – that is to say, the PUBLIC
PROPERTY of the United States and of the people of America – for the
purposes of private enrichment, an impeachable crime which, in time of
war, under US law, merits summary execution for treason. $1.0 trillion
worth of these instruments were delivered to Commerzbank in Hong Kong/
Germany, and $1.0 trillion were delivered to Chinese parties via
Commerzbank, Hong Kong. [See: Washington criminalist gangsters out of
control: our posting dated 12th March 2007].
06 March: Following notification from associates of AmeriTrust Groupe,
Inc., and from investigators, that the United Nations fully supports
the ‘Wanta Settlement and Payment’, it is conveyed that Vice President
Richard Cheney had reached an understanding to leave the Vice
Presidency with immunity from arrest and prosecution, in accordance
with the decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
06 March: US Treasury compliance informs an associate of AmeriTrust
Groupe, Inc., that the US Treasury is prepared to release the Wanta
Settlement payment, and that President George W. Bush Jr., had been
advised, in the course of ‘a secure video briefing held on 2nd March
2007’ to choose between making the belated Wanta Settlement payment in
exchange for remaining in office as President of the United States, or
else continuing to frustrate the payment and face impeachment or
Article 25 removal from office.
O6 March: The same associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. states on
authority that Her Majesty the Queen had been informed about the
‘secure video briefing’ mentioned above and fully agrees with the
necessity for the immediate release of the delayed $4.5 trillion to
Ambassador Leo Wanta/AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.
07 March: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. informs us that the
Chinese authorities have advised that our reporting of these matters is
‘right on target’ and have initiated an official Government enquiry
into the illegal financial activities of US Treasury Secretary Paulson
and Deputy US Treasury Secretary Kimmitt regarding Madame Wu and the
$1.0 trillion bribe deposited with Commerzbank (Hong Kong and Germany:
see above).
07 March: Despite all assertions to the contrary, the payment of $4.5
trillion has not been effected. This time, Secretary Chertoff, of the
US Ministry of State Security, is reported by investigators to be the
source of the problem, having “stopped the payment” in further
collaboration with “Cheney’s son-in-law Philip Perry”, whereas
President Bush was not reported on this occasion to be withholding
payment.
07 March: Investigators now inform the Principals that the US Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Secret Service have issued ‘Case
Numbers’ in the context of non-payment of the Wanta Settlement fraud
perpetrated by the President of the United States, Cabinet members, the
Department of Homeland Security, and the Treasury.
07 March: Investigators further advise that Cheney is now included in
the formal investigation initiated by the FBI and the Secret Service
into these criminal activities.
07 March: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. is informed by
bankers at Citibank that the ‘Wanta Payment of $4.5 trillion’ had been
re-transferred to a US Treasury JPMorganChase Citibank account on the
evening of Saturday 3rd March 2007 but had then been redirected on
orders from Chertoff and Cheney conveyed on Sunday 4th March, to other
accounts at Citibank, Bank of America and Wachovia, 24/7 since 4th
March.
08 March: Investigators inform the Principals that Vice-President
Cheney will not resign and has advised Chertoff: ‘Don’t pay anybody,
it’s all going to go away: hold tight’. This comment, by the way,
represents an interesting revelation of how scared Cheney and Chertoff
have become as the scandals unravel (a fact reconfirmed to us
separately much later).
09 March: A compliance officer within the US Treasury notifies an
associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that Deputy US Treasury Secretary
Kimmitt had informed compliance that the funds were authorised to be
released on the evening of this Friday (9th March). This turned out to
represent further obfuscation, because:
10 March: No payment is made.
10 March: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. is informed that
Senator Hillary Clinton is fully aware of the deceit and knows to whom
and where the overnight earnings are directed from the ‘$4.5 trillion
Wanta Settlement funds’ held at JPMorganChase, Citibank and related
accounts.
10 March: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. is advised by the
Chinese authorities that they have lost all residual faith and trust in
the integrity of the (nominal) US Treasury Secretary, Paulson, given
his overt ‘in-your-face’ fraudulent activity and lies regarding the
serial non-payment of the Wanta Settlement funds. The Chinese further
assert that they are nursing losses aggregating some $300 billion that
are directly attributable to Paulson’s non-payment and non-stop
deception and lies. These are being recorded both in ‘real time’ and
for posterity, so that his international reputation has been
permanently tarnished.
11 March: Investigators advise that ‘the Group of 13’ [sic!]
high-ranking politicians in Washington have not been paid and are
extremely annoyed. This is a reference to the non-servicing of accounts
held by entities such as Gulf Coast Holdings and Westminster Funds.
13 March: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. advises that
JPMorganChase has received, with the assistance of James A Baker III,
quote ‘the Wanta Settlement $4.5 trillion funds’ unquote, but that
payment of these funds necessitates ‘a process’, which is said to be of
undetermined duration. This strikes us as a particularly feeble attempt
at obfuscation, amid the usual cascade of empty undertakings,
double-crossing, lies and false rhetoric.
13 March: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. is advised by
Citibank officials that ‘the Wanta Settlement $4.5 trillion’ are
currently available at a Treasury JP MorganChase Citibank account
awaiting US Treasury authorisation for the funds to be released to the
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. Morgan Stanley Securities Account at Citibank.
Exc..u…us…se us: are they now recycling last year’s excuses, given that
the Devil knows no new tricks?
14 March: Investigators inform AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that Homeland
Security gauleiter Secretary Michael Chertoff is said to be ‘in the
way’ and will not allow the funds to be released to the Securities
Account of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.
14 March: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. is advised by the
Chinese authorities that US Treasury Secretary Paulson recently
travelled to China in an attempt to persuade the Chinese Government and
the Bank of China and others in Beijing to use the bank instruments
backed by the US Treasury’s $1.0 trillion (placed with Commerzbank in
Hong Kong/ Germany) as the basis for a joint venture operation in the
capital markets, but that:
• China backed out of this proposed venture with Paulson because of the lack of trust.
• The Chinese intend, instead, to approach
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., with a view to establishing a joint venture
capital markets operation. Recall that Ambassador Wanta is well known,
liked and trusted in China, as a consequence of his activities many
years ago where he became known as the only American financial
operative who could be trusted.
15 March: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. is informed, by
bankers from Union Bank of Switzerland and Deutsche Bank, and by
Deutsche Bank compliance officers, that Ambassador Wanta and AmeriTrust
Groupe, Inc. have been paid. But NO payment has been received at the
Securities Account of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. Such assertions have no
meaning and represent ongoing inadvertent or intentional psychological
warfare and obfuscation operations, enabling criminal parties to gain
more time to trade the funds illegally, and to position themselves for
the new post-Wanta Settlement regime.
15 March: Investigators inform AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that the ‘Wanta
Settlement funds, et al’ have been under the control of Secretary
Chertoff at the Department of Homeland Security and that control has
now been handed over to ‘someone else’ in the Bush Cabinet, almost like
a game of musical ‘pass the parcel’.
16 March: Investigators inform AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that the $4.5
trillion funds have been transferred to the Department of Defense (DOD)
with effect from 15th March 2007.
16 March: Investigators inform AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that Vice
President Cheney demands immunity before he releases the Wanta
Settlement funds and those associated with it. This matter has come
round, like all the other obfuscation excuses, before.
17 March: Associates of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. inform the Principals
that Secretary Chertoff was severely reprimanded by senior Department
of Defense officials and House Speaker Pelosi. As a consequence, new
authorisation codes are to be installed and release of the funds is
rescheduled for Monday, 19th March 2007.
19 March: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. is advised by a US
Treasury compliance officer that no authorisation was given for the
release of the Wanta funds.
19 March: Investigators inform AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that:
• Vice President Cheney is continuing to prevent the release of the Settlement funds.
• The Pentagon has taken over control of
the funds even though Mr Cheney fought against the transfer of control
of the funds from Chertoff.
• Compliance (at the US Treasury and the
Pentagon) signed off on the release of the funds on Friday 13th March,
but Vice President Cheney personally prevented payment actually taking
place.
19 March: CHENEY-PENTAGON SHOUTING MATCH: An associate informs the
Principals that he had been a witness to a conference call “shouting
match” between officials at the Pentagon and other departments, and
Vice President Cheney, in which Pentagon officials had attempted to
persuade Mr Cheney to release the Wanta Settlement funds, since the
Treasury Secretary, Mr Paulson, has stated that “the money is ready to
go”. However this “shouting match” was abruptly terminated when Cheney
hung up, shouting: ‘There will be no payment’.
20 March: Investigators advise that Vice President Cheney is now
motivated to step down from the Vice Presidency, although he may change
his mind at any moment.
20 March: A US Treasury compliance officer officially advises one of
the associates of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that once the Wanta
Settlement has been paid:
• All US dollars around the world will be
‘on the books’ and no off-balance sheet funds or transactions will be
permitted. This sheds an interesting light on the underlying motivation
for the banking war that is taking place ‘as we speak’. The name of the
game is: muscle in on institutions that hold tranches of the
Ambassador’s REAL assets, which will remain in situ in accordance with
the overall compromise taking effect at the Wanta Settlement. This
‘allows’ for diverted Wanta funds to then cease to be claimed by the
Ambassador.
• These assets are in a different category
from ‘fiat’ assets generated through illegal exploitation of them. In
summary, therefore, the name of the game at the banks is to buttress
balance sheets by seeking to annexe (through the current banking merger
frenzy that has gripped the City of London) as large a proportion of
the Ambassador’s account assets as possible, so that massive portfolios
of fake off-balance sheet fiat money will not trigger the obliteration
of the banks holding them.
• It’s a struggle for banking supremacy
and survival, but the underlying pressures are coming from ruthless
competing (domestic and international) intelligence communities. They
know that when the new regime takes effect, the intelligence war will
be won by those intelligence groups that have secured or retained
control over assets that will still be exempt from taxation and ‘source
of funds’ audit and disclosure because they are held in exempted
‘national security accounts’. It is believed that this will only ‘work’
in the United States, and that the CIA’s Bank of America has been
directed to ensure US control over both illegally accumulated balances
in certain ‘fiat money’ (ABN Amro) accounts and in real asset accounts
currently owned by the Ambassador as sole Principal.
• “Not a dime will be unaccounted for in the new system”.
• Due to the fact that the system is going
to change, as demanded and provided for by the Europeans, corrupt US
office holders and operatives led by President George W. Bush Jr.,
Cheney, Chertoff, Perry at al, are trying to manufacture as much
private money from exploitation of the Wanta Settlement funds ($4.5
trillion) as they can, offshore and off-balance sheet, before full
accounting becomes universally mandatory, and payment of full taxes due
on such holdings takes effect. Many of these operatives are scared to
death that, in due course, the prospective requirement to pay back tax
plus penalties on their ill-gotten gains will wipe them out financially
(if they have not already been wiped out physically). In this
connection it is reported that various bankers and officials have
‘disappeared’.
20 March: Investigators inform AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that all
relevant banks have received authorisation and direction to release the
Wanta Settlement funds today. Once this has happened, the next issue
will be to activate the un-freezing of funds within the World Bank and
to transfer such funds to authorised accounts, such as the US
Department of Defense. The role of the World Bank is coming under
intense scrutiny in this context.
20 March: An associate of the Principals confirms that the banks in question have received notice to release the Wanta funds.
20 March: A US Treasury compliance officer informs an associate of
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that “all the banks have just confirmed the
go-ahead for payment”. The final official authorisation for the release
of the funds will be forwarded by Treasury Secretary Paulson and/or
Deputy Treasury Secretary Kimmitt.
Comment: Inventing all these red herrings must by now require a
full-time staff tasked with generating fresh hourly variations on the
same deceitful obfuscation theme, because:
21 March: No payment is received at the Securities Account of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. with Morgan Stanley in New York.
21 March: Investigators inform AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that Wachovia
(serving the corrupt Bush criminal interests) and the CIA’s pocket
institution, Bank of America, have yet again “re-directed the funds and
have stolen the funds”.
This operation had been implemented under an instruction to ‘re-float
the Federal Reserve’ by providing evidence in Paris of the fraudulent
Riady US Treasury checks (ostensibly ‘worth’ $35 trillion). In other
words, the Chairman of the US Federal Reserve, Dr Ben Bernanke, and
others, are STILL trying to sustain the bankrupt Fed, which has
liabilities approaching $1,200 trillion. This is sheer madness.
21 March: A US Treasury compliance officer informs an associate of
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that late on the night of 20th March the
mainframe computer at the US Treasury had been attacked by hacker(s)…
and that Treasury Secretary Paulson had not sanctioned release of the
Leo Wanta Settlement funds.
22 March: Foreign associates inform AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that “The
White House is preventing the Wanta Settlement to be authorised…
because (someone) does not want the payment of $1.575 trillion in taxes
actually to be paid out. Hence it follows from this revelation alone
that the White House, meaning the President and Vice President of the
United States, are pro-actively impeding Federal investigations and the
remittance of collectible taxes to the US Treasury. The wilful
thwarting of a taxpayer’s duty to remit taxes is a serious felony, as
previously reported.
Note: With the Wanta Settlement, which will be taxed as previously
reported, tax will be payable to the metropolitan countries’ tax
authorities on ALL financial holdings (offshore, untaxed), across the
board. This is logical, since it would be absurd and inequitable for
the Ambassador to pay US and State tax on his compromise Settlement
assets, and for the self-styled ‘beneficial owners’ of dollar offshore
accounts to receive different tax treatment (i.e., to pay no tax). At
the present time, the offshore (and indeed some onshore) ‘fiat money’
accounts of co-conspirators who have been illegally exploiting
Ambassador Leo Wanta’s lawfully owned funds, are frozen. This has
infuriated the cleptocracy, who cannot raise money for ‘orphanages’.
When the money is unfrozen, tax will be chargeable to it at the rates
charged by the metropolitan countries, with interest and penalties.
Thereafter, the self-styled ‘beneficial owners’ will be required to
provide evidence of source of funds, which they will largely be unable
to do without exposing themselves to prosecution for criminal financial
fraud.
22 March: A US Treasury compliance officer has advised an associate of
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that Treasury Secretary Paulson and Deputy
Treasury Secretary Kimmitt had been taking part in conference calls
since 8.30 am EDT, on the vexed question of how to move and handle the
Wanta Settlement payment today.
22 March: Foreign associates inform the Principals that foreign
officials are actively reviewing with US Secretary of State Condoleeza
Rice the whole matter of the White House’s obstruction of justice and
its refusal to authorise payment of the long-agreed and successively
delayed Wanta Settlement funds.
22 March: A US Treasury compliance officer informs an associate of
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that at approximately 4.30 pm (EDT)
authorisation to make the Wanta payment had still not been received.
However the source is able to confirm that the US Treasury’s mainframe
computer system had been hacked on 21st March from Germany.
To hack into the computers of a foreign government is an offence for
which silly teenagers are being arrested and incarcerated for long
periods.
It could also be considered tantamount to an act of war.
23 March: A foreign associate informs an associate of the Principals
that Tony Blair and Her Majesty the Queen will be travelling to New
York in the near future, where they will admonish the President of the
United States for his failure to make the Wanta Settlement.
23 March: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. reports that a
Chinese representative had informed the associate concerned that the
Chinese (meaning here the Government and the Elders) are furious with
the US Treasury Secretary because of:
• His deceitful, slippery activities in
connection with agreements between the Chinese and the US Treasury
actually signed off by Paulson and other US Treasury officials, who are
not trusted in Beijing (or anywhere else, for that matter) either.
• Paulson’s illegal activity with the
Inter-American Development Bank in connection with the $2.0 trillion
worth of US Treasury-backed debt instruments referenced above.
23 March: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. now reports that the
Chinese Government has demoted Vice Premier Madame Wu Yi because of her
corrupt reported participation in the $1.0 trillion Commerzbank (Hong
Kong) deposit transaction, arranged via Paulson and Cheney, also
referenced above.
23 March: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. advises that Texas
Associates have informed him that the “Settlement funds” will be
released before 5.00 pm (Frankfurt time) today. (He failed to add that
a thousand Father Christmases would be parachuted onto the North Pole
as the funds were being released).
23 March: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. advises that European
sources have stated that “sign-off” will not take place until Saturday
24th March 2007, and that the US Treasury (meaning Paulson, Kimmitt et
al) have agreed to the sign-off, as has the British Prime Minister
Blair, European Finance Ministers, and key European Prime Ministers.
23 March: Investigators now inform the Principals that “Finance
Ministers” had met the British Prime Minister and Secretary of State
Rice, explaining the ‘facts of life’ to them, i.e. stressing the
necessity of releasing the Wanta Settlement funds immediately.
We have of course explained many times in the past why release is a
prerequisite for immediate and long-term stability – notwithstanding
the current stock market boom, which is financed by the rush of fiat
money to ‘go legitimate’ so as to avoid punitive taxation, penalties
and jail sentences. The stock market is not being propped up by the
‘Plunge Protection Team’, as widely speculated, but by panic
money-laundering of said fiat money funds from offshore.
23 March: A US Treasury compliance officer says that he has ‘not been
told of an authorisation for the transfer’ but that today’s events were
in the Ambassador’s favour.
24 March: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. states that Pentagon
officials have been insisting that the Ambassador’s Settlement is
consummated, or “George W Bush will not get his money”. This may have
referred to the $2.0 trillion that George Jr., is reported to have
hidden in an account at UBS, India, and should have been interpreted as
a less-than-veiled threat that the Swiss bank may freeze and even
confiscate these ‘assets’.
24 March: A US Treasury compliance officer advises the Principals that
he has received no authorisation up to midnight on 23rd March to
release the Wanta Settlement funds.
24 March: Investigators advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that one Finance
Minister did not sign off the Wanta Settlement release, but would do so
at 1:00 pm (European time) today.
24 March: Investigators further advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that if
the Secretary of the Ministry of State Security (a.k.a. the Department
of Homeland Security) can be kept ‘out of the way’, funds will be
released and distributed on Monday, 26th March.
Comment: It is by now more curious than ever that these endless vacuous
assurances, undertakings, descriptions of what is about to happen, and
other obfuscations, continue to be disseminated, when not a single one
of them has historically proved to be reliable. It is as though
everyone playing these games has forgotten that they are playing games,
has lost touch with reality, and is engaged in a hellish nightmare,
rather like one of those dreams in which one falls into a vortex, only
to wake up realising it’s all a dream. The only difference here is that
as these people continue to ‘mess up’, they are jeopardising not only
the world financial economy, but global security as well. Because
lurking behind this monetary chaos are latent prospective military
responses, and at any time, it seems likely that one of the madmen
perpetuating this nightmare will snap, and pull the trigger. As matters
stand, we have seen that there are already anecdotal reports of bankers
and officials ‘disappearing’. The monetary war could morph into a
hellish military war at any time. And old presumed ‘alliances’ no
longer have any meaning, especially the ‘Special Relationship’: see
below.
25 March: Associates of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. advise that the
Cheney-Chertoff-Philip Perry cabal are engaged in a newly detected
giga-scam. This has become apparent after investigators discovered that
agents for these operatives are seeking investors holding deposits of
$5.0 billion or more, in “China” (meaning Hong Kong). Under the
fraudulent scamming arrangement being touted, such investments would
ostensibly return:
• 100% per month to the investor.
• 200% per month to China.
• 200% per month to the US Treasury (supposedly)
• 200% per month to the equally corrupt Bank of England.
Quite apart from the monstrous rates of return suggested, this
proposition is fraudulent in terms of US law since the ‘trades’ are to
occur in China/Hong Kong, which contravenes Title 18, Sections 4 and
35, the Federal Reserve Act of 1916, and other legislation.
Comment: After 37 years of observing and reporting on the international
financial economy and system, this Editor is entitled to point out that
we were brought up in the distant past to be wary of offers involving
fantastic rates of return. This is the reverse of loan sharking, where
distressed borrowers, desperately in need of cash ‘down’, make reckless
decisions to accept usurious liabilities in order to satisfy their
necessary ‘quick fix’ cash requirements. Anyone who is not completely
out of his mind would, unless consumed by lustful greed, be on guard
against such a grotesque prospectus.
It follows that the planners and perpetrators of this and associated
decadent US giga-financial scams are reprobates from the dirtiest sewer
of the global financial mafia, and should be arrested forthwith and
charged with high crimes and misdemeanours, and treason against the
United States and its people, without any further facile, corrupt and
disgraceful prevarication. The United States, which prides itself on
being the most brutally powerful nation on earth, has a military class
which is either irremediably corrupt itself, or else stands in awe of
this small clique of criminals who have been running rings round them
and the whole world. This has to stop. America is making a fool of
itself before the rest of humanity due to its arrogance and serial
failure to bring these agentur criminals to book in a decisive manner.
This is long overdue and should be addressed at once.
25 March: Investigators advise, in the foregoing context, that this
desperately crooked operation represents a fraudulent ‘backfilling’
attempt to resolve the problem of some $200 trillion worth of unsecured
US dollar-denominated subprime debt languishing at US banks. The scam
implies that the financial cleptocracy has indeed reached the end of
the road, and is flailing around in the financial underworld sewer
trying to ‘fix’ the problems that they created over the years, which
they thought could never catch up with them.
Most of these operatives will have been basing their complacency upon
the ‘greater crook’ theory, which postulates that as long as a bigger
crook is perpetrating the identical crimes, it is safe to continue
perpetrating them because ‘if they can do it, so can we’. In the United
States, intelligence cadres perpetrating these financial crimes imagine
they are covered by the provisions of the National Security Act, which
condones criminal operations and is therefore rightly considered to be
a ‘crooks’ charter’. The coming purge should also include
root-and-branch reform of this legislation.
26 March: Associates of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. inform the principals
that European associates have stated that warrants for mass arrests
will be issued by 6:00 pm EDT in Frankfurt, Germany, if the authorised
release of the Wanta Settlement funds turns out, once again, to have
been aborted and stopped. It is said that the funds are supposedly to
be released by 1:00 pm EDT.
26 March: Investigators advise that there has still been no release of
the funds. In this context, the Ministry of State Security chief,
Chertoff, is reported to have wriggled: ‘We’re not holding any money…
We don’t know of anybody who is owed any money…We don’t know anything
about any money’. This is extraordinary, given that Homeland Security
is itself engaged in financing huge operations vastly in excess of its
congressionally mandated budgetary appropriations. It is also pathetic,
given that Chertoff’s deep involvement in these obfuscation operations
has been monitored in ‘real time’ for months past. Perhaps these people
holding high office really are blinded by the power they think they
wield. Or are they just conveniently schizophrenic?
26 March: European associates inform AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that the
Settlement funds MUST have been distributed by 6th April, before any
scheduled attack by the United States can be undertaken against Iran,
and that this is the agreement that has been reached with President G.
W. Bush. We are of course reporting the truth: do not shoot this
messenger.
26 March: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. now advises as follows (paraphrases):
• ‘Everyone hates the White House because of its wall-to-wall deceit and lies’.
• ‘European bankers are not going to
release any funds to the US economy until Ambassador Wanta is paid the
$4.5 settlement funds that have been illegally withheld’.
27 March: Investigators inform the principals that the headquarters of
the European Commission in Brussels has been raided, as described in
our posting dated 5th April [see Archive on this website] and declared
to be a ‘criminal enterprise’.
The dawn raids involved over 150 agents from, and operating
simultaneously in, Luxembourg, France, Belgium and Italy. See the
website posting of 5th April for full background.
[Note: This disgrace did not prevent the President of the European
Union, Jose Manuel Barroso, from addressing the bewildered and
misguided Institute of Directors in London a month later, on 26th
April, asking British industrialists and business to ‘back European
reforms’, all unspecified. No reform ever takes place of the EC’s
internal anti-fraud procedures run by OLAF, the EC anti-fraud
Commission, which exists almost exclusively to obfuscate and cover up
institutionalised financial fraud in the European Commission’s
structures. The Institute of Directors has become another pro-EU (and
therefore pro-institutionalised EU corruption), agitprop enterprise].
Following the dawn raids in Europe, it is reported that a large haul of
secret bank account details were seized and that, as a direct
consequence, the secret offshore bank accounts of 1,500+ operatives
‘inside the Beltway’ have been frozen, as reported by this service on
5th April 2007. Separately, recipients of ‘packages’ with ‘blue cards’
that supposedly authorise financial transfers in settlement of CIA
Omega scamming operations, discover that the cards are completely
useless, and it is rumoured that this reflects the fact that no such
remittances will be allowed until the Wanta Settlement funds are paid.
28 March: European associates ‘in the know’ inform AmeriTrust Groupe,
Inc. that the Bush II White House is in complete sclerotic disarray and
that, following all the deceit, lies and obfuscation over the Wanta
Settlement that has been its primary preoccupation for months, no-one
there knows how to react in the context of the European police raid
[reported by this service on 5th April], and that the White House is
now fearful that similar raids will be undertaken in Washington next,
as the belated global cleaning-up operation gathers momentum.
As matters stand, Wantagate has certainly matured into a vast
juggernaut that none of its corrupt sponsors can control any longer –
reminding us of what happened when the Sorcerer’s Apprentice couldn’t
turn off the faucet and could not activate his master’s magick broom
either.
28 March: European associates advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that the
delayed $4.5 trillion “Wanta Settlement funds remain located atCitibank
in New York City, and are appropriately unencumbered under the name
‘Leo E. Wanta’”.
28 March: European associates now advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that
several key European countries are taking legal action to file a Class
Action Levy against the reprobate George W. Bush Administration for
non-payment of the “Reagan-Mitterrand Protocol” funds, which must be
remitted out of the Settlement funds, as undertaken by the Ambassador.
28 March: European associates advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that Her
Majesty the Queen has despatched sharp letter to President George W.
Bush and the US Treasury Secretary pro tempore, Henry M Paulson, asking
for immediate settlement of the Wanta Plan funds. It may be added that
Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta knows Her Majesty, and received an honorary
knighthood from her prior to his illegal ‘takedown’ on 7th July 1993,
in recognition of the singular services he rendered to the United
Kingdom in earlier years.
28 March: Investigators advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that the
“Beltway Groups” are a complete mess. They believed themselves to be
‘bulletproof’, but 26 of their number were arrested on 27th March
during raids reported to have taken place in Washington, DC.
29 March: A US Treasury compliance officer advises an associate of
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that Ambassador Leo Wanta or Michael C.
Cottrell, M.S., will be contacted with regard to the imminent release
of the long seized and delayed $4.5 trillion Settlement funds to the
Morgan Stanley Securities Account of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.
29 March: Investigators report that according to ‘the Agency’
(collective noun covering the CIA, Department of Homeland Security, et
al), the funds and accounts are “stocked and ready for release today”,
at 10.30 am Eastern Daylight Time.
29 March: A US Treasury compliance officer advises an associate of
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that “written authorisation to release will be
given to him after 4:00 pm EDT today”, and that US Treasury Secretary
Paulson will sign off on the said release.
29 March: Investigators start advising AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that
$4.8+ trillion will be transferred, but not all in one tranche.
29 March: A US Treasury compliance officer informs an associate of
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that ‘US Treasury Direct has received approval
for $500 billion to be ledger C.H.I.P. S.W.I.F.T transferred, and that
this procedure will take 3-4 hours at a minimum via S.W.I.F.T.’.
Of course this latest attempt at obfuscation, now focusing on an
apparent sudden intention to remit the funds (which are fully intact as
stated above), in dribs and drabs, bears no relation to earlier
undertakings, which have all turned out to be false.
29 March: Investigators now advise that the aforementioned
“S.W.I.F.T./US Treasury Direct process” has suddenly become the
‘preferred methodology’ for implementation of payment. This method of
transfer would not involve the Bank of New York, Wachovia and the
Federal Reserve, so wouldn’t that be a good idea?
29 March: European associates now inform an associate of the Principals that:
• The British financial system will be
‘shut down’ on Friday 30th March for at least 8 hours. The Editor was
in New York at the time, but heard anecdotal reports of employees in
London being unable to cash end-month salary checks at their banks on
that date.
• The reason proffered for this sudden
general shutdown was that it was necessary to “test the new electronic
transfer system” (= Citibank, New York City to Brussels to Citibank New
York City to the Bank of England). This explanation failed to convince
anyone. Ordinary bank customers were left without any coherent
explanation at all. The actual reason for this shutdown was that the
White House and the Treasury needed cover for their preplanned
expropriation of $4.8+ trillion from the Bank of England [see also
above], which has bankrupted the British central bank, according to
European banking sources.
This was an act of Economic Warfare perpetrated by the United States
against its closest ally, suggesting that the United Kingdom should
take appropriate retaliatory measures [see above].
29 March: Investigators advise the Principals that $500 billion has
already been despatched via “S.W.I.F.T./US Treasury Direct” and that
this amount has been placed “on the books at the Bank of England”.
No-one is now bothering to explain why $4.5+ trillion payable since May
2006 to Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta has not yet been credited to his
Virginia-based corporation’s Securities Account with Morgan Stanley in
New York.
30 March: But then, all of a sudden, investigators inform AmeriTrust
Groupe, Inc. that the $4.8+ trillion has been placed “on the books” in
Citibank’s system, but is booked with ‘Agency’ [CIA] commercial PRIVATE
BANKING accounts with Citibank, New York City. What is happening is
that these obfuscatory manoeuvres are being monitored in more or less
real time, with the perpetrators presumably aware that we will in due
course publish details of these deliberate manoeuvres; yet they seem
nevertheless prepared to take the risk, on the basis of the
aforementioned ‘greater crook’ theory, which postulates that it is OK
to commit crimes provided that more senior officials and bankers are
doing so too. And they MUST have known that the expropriation of $4.8+
trillion from the Bank of England would not go 'unreported'. So it's an
ACT OF ECONOMIC WARFARE.
HOW MANY TROOPS HAS BRITAIN LOST IN IRAQ BECAUSE BLAIR WENT ALONG WITH THE MAD U.S. GOVERNMENT'S AGGRESSIVE EXCESSES?
AND THEY TURN ROUND AND RAPE OUR CENTRAL BANK?
30 March: A US Treasury compliance officer (surely, a weird title for
such officials in the prevailing context, surely) advises an associate
of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that “the Wanta Settlement funds were not
sent anywhere” and are still intact at Citibank, New York City. Thank
you very much.
30 March: Associates of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. advise an associate of
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that “the $4.5 trillion Wanta Settlement funds
have not been released from Secretary Paulson’s fiduciary
responsibility” and have therefore not been moved.
30 March: Citibank officials now advise an associate of AmeriTrust
Groupe, Inc. that “a lot of money booked in Citibank national security
accounts is now MISSING AND CANNOT BE ACCOUNTED FOR in accordance with
the relevant banking compliance regulations”.
SO, the $4.8+ trillion has been STOLEN?
• Late News (01 May): Its whereabouts are known and have been monitored/traced in 'real time'.
30 March: Investigators advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that Vice
President Richard Cheney and the former Deputy Secretary of State
Richard Armitage, are now accusing each other of stealing the $4.8++
trillion from the Citibank, Bank of New York and Bank of England
accounts. So you thought Armitage had disappeared to Afghanistan, never
to return, did you? Well what happened, actually, was that, having ‘got
out of town after outing Valerie Plame’, this serial Omega official
criminalist US drug trafficker duly set up his so-called ‘import-export
agency’ in Kabul, like he announced that he would, established the
criminal US Government poppy trading operation after paying the farmers
through the nose to sow poppy seeds, and after re-establishing the
Afghan drug business and making a further fortune for himself,
re-inserted himself back into clandestine USG operations back home –
despite the foul language he had reportedly directed against Ms Rice
prior to his departure to Kabul. This creep is one of the most evil of
all the Luciferian mafia drug operatives associated with the US
Government, a shamelessly amoral drug trader who should spend the rest
of his life in the US GULAG contemplating cockroaches, which he
resembles.
31 March: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. informs the
Principals that the Chinese authorities are officially pressing the
Bush Administration to release the Wanta Settlement funds and that the
Chinese Government will indeed be inviting Ambassador Wanta or Michael
C. Cottrell, M.S., to China to participate in a joint venture capital
markets operation, as previously mooted.
02 April: European associates advise an associate of AmeriTrust Groupe,
Inc. that Deutsche Bank was heavily involved in the currency exchange
operations of 29th and 30th March 2007, which resulted in the diversion
of $4.8+ from the Bank of England.
02 April: European associates advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that
Homeland Security gauleiter Chertoff is currently under investigation
for preventing [= US usage; UK usage: perverting] the course of Justice
on SIX (6) counts in the context of the continuing frauds, to procure
non-payment of the Wanta Settlement funds.
03 April: Deutsche Bank compliance officers advise an associate of
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that a crackdown on non-compliance
off-the-books operations in Europe is now taking place. This is
separately confirmed by British press reports.
03 April: Associates of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. advise as follows:
• Deputy US Treasury Secretary Kimmitt has
insisted that written authorisation to release the Wanta funds will be
forthcoming today.
• Officials at the Pentagon advise that
“everyone” has signed off for the Wanta funds release to occur today.
Their word is no more reliable, of course, than anyone else’s.
• Chinese associates reveal that a large
volume of US dollars has been gathered for and on behalf of Ambassador
Wanta and US Congressional war funding (this is precisely as was
reported to the Editor of this service).
03 April: Associates further advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that:
• The United States, driven by President
Bush and Vice President Cheney, plan to attack Iran at 4:00 am on 6th
April, but that funds must be released to Ambassador Wanta prior to the
planned attack. Russian Military Intelligence (GRU) has also been
stressing that an attack is planned for 6th April 2007.
• Both former President George Bush Sr.
and Her Majesty the Queen are most annoyed and upset that Ambassador
Wanta was not paid today.
• Both President George W. Bush Jr. and
Vice President Cheney had just been ‘spoken to’, and given the choice
of implementing the Wanta Settlement payment, or else spending the rest
of their lives in jail. On further investigation, the Editor has
established that this is a mild version of what was actually conveyed
to the President and the Vice President from certain parties (see
immediately below). Not to put to fine a point on the matter, these
operatives were advised that they must release the payment, or ‘cease
walking around’.
The ‘counsel’ came from Alpha-Omega compartmentalised sources at the
highest levels in Britain, Germany and other capitals. It was also
pointed out that the original $27.5 trillion of funds of which the
Ambassador is the sole Principal had increased in value (as reported
last year) to at least $70 trillion [although it must surely be
significantly higher by now: – Ed.] and that while the Ambassador is to
receive $4.5 trillion, the remaining, say, $65.5 trillion, is, as we
reported in successive earlier assessments, to be ‘distributed’ within
the banking system or left in situ at the banks ONLY if the ‘counsel’
mentioned above is heeded by the White House.
Since the criminalists show no signs of yielding, we may all wake up
one morning to discover that the newspapers make very unpleasant
reading. [01 May: Substitute 'WILL' here, for 'MAY'].
04 April: Against this background, investigators advise AmeriTrust
Groupe, Inc. that Department of Defense officials have observed
“private C.H.I.P.S.” moving towards destination accounts for release.
Oh really?
04 April: Associates advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that other Pentagon
officials have observed funds moving from account to account today, but
that the funds are NOT available for release to the Ambassador’s
corporate Securities Account with Morgan Stanley, New York.
05 April: As previously suggested, a full-time obfuscation team must
surely by now be engaged in generating fresh excuses on not merely a
daily, but by now almost an hourly basis, in order to keep the fog of
criminal disinformation from lifting and thereby exposing the
open-ended scamming and private enrichment operations that are taking
place behind the scenes.
Associates advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that Vice President Richard
B. Cheney has finally given authorisation for the release of the Wanta
Settlement funds, once the British ‘hostages’ have been released from
Iranian custody. HOWEVER:
• Once the ‘hostages’ had been released,
the brazenly duplicitous and lying Mr Cheney stopped the authorisation
and release process.
• US House of Representatives speaker
Nancy Pelosi is returning to the United States from the Middle East and
Europe, with written authorisation from the International Court of
Justice (ICJ) to pursue an Article 25 ‘removal process’ applicable both
to President George W. Bush and the Vice President Richard Cheney given
the serial criminality over non-payment of the Wanta Settlement.
05 April: Associates of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. inform the principals
that the Chinese Government and Governments of certain European
countries had been advised by the White House on 4th April that the
Wanta Settlement had been paid. However the Securities Account of
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. with Morgan Stanley, has not received the funds.
It appears that the White House has taken to adopting the device of
lying brazenly to foreign governments, impervious of the consequences.
That would be a logical progression, given that the Bush II White House
has lied, deceived, double-crossed, obfuscated and manufactured
diversionary smokescreens to mask its open-ended, illegal exploitation
of the Leo Emil Wanta Settlement funds since June 2006, making
President Bush’s ‘core principles’ rhetoric in the stupid email he sent
to Ambassador Wanta on 24th April not merely hollow, but open to
sustained ridicule – given that its language diverges 100% from this
President’s actual behaviour, as is unravelled in these reports. It is
also testimony to the intellectual Lilliputism of the operatives
concerned, that they cannot even comprehend how inanely hypocritical
their public protestations now appear.
BUT…
05 April: Investigators now advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that
verification has been obtained confirming that Vice President Cheney
has been systematically blocking, and continues to block, the Wanta
Settlement funds from being released by Treasury Secretary Paulson. The
same sources also confirm that people are being blackmailed and bribed
in large numbers by Vice President Cheney, Philip Perry, Michael J.
Chertoff, and other rats in this pack of serial Omega charlatans.
06 April: A US Treasury compliance officer advises an associate of
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that the banking codes in the C.H.I.P. account
have been replaced so that the $4.5 trillion+ can be “ledger drawn down
on the C.H.I.P.” directly to the Securities Account of Morgan Stanley
held by AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. with Citibank, New York City.
10 April: Associates advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that Pentagon
officials are now saying that large volumes of funds were shifted
during the preceding night (of 9th April), and that preparations are
being made to fund the Congressional/White House Iraq Supplementary
Appropriations Bill.
10 April: A US Treasury compliance officer advises an associate of
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that once again, no authorisation had been
received, as had been ‘scheduled’.
No payment was remitted to the Securities Account of the Ambassador’s
Virginia-based corporation with Morgan Stanley, New York City.
11 April: European associates advise that the Deputy Finance Ministers
of the Group of Seven (G-7) countries have confronted US Federal
Reserve Board Chairman Dr Ben Bernanke concerning key observations by
United States Supreme Court Justices regarding the continuing
non-payment of the Wanta Settlement, and the reactions of member
nations of the International Court of Justice.
No doubt one of the points that will have been discussed in this
context is the wholesale collapse of international trust in any
undertaking given by any US official in any context – a conclusion
reached by President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin when, in late April,
he set about conspicuously tearing up bilateral agreements with the
United States in retaliation for having been endlessly double-crossed
and lied to by the Bush White House over the Wanta Settlement and
consequent non-payment of the funds to be released to foreign
governments thereunder by the Ambassador.
11 April: European associates advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that “we
are being used by President G. W. Bush with Congress to get what
President G. W. Bush Jr. wants (Iraq war funding with no withdrawal
dates) before he will release the Wanta Settlement funds”.
However this represents only a fraction of the reality, which is that,
from deep inside their mental bunker, where they are trapped as a
consequence of their scheming and serial deceit and double-crossing
greed and dishonesty, Bush and Cheney are making damn sure that
everyone else finds themselves as irretrievably trapped as they are.
This will become clearer as this narrative unfolds further. They are
also perpetrating vile Economic Warfare operations against the United
Kingdom, which merit decisive retaliation by the British Treasury. AND
they want the Iraq war 'black hole' to continue indefinitely, not least
as a financial no-man's land for 'Black Ops' financial scams.
In the meantime, bear in mind that the continuing fog of disinformation
thrown up as this crisis expands, is intended to provide cover for the
colossal frauds, blackmail, criminal operations and Financial Warfare
that are being perpetrated by these mad US clowns.
12 April: European associates advise that a full-scale quasi-national
tax fraud investigation is now in progress and is focused on the
non-payment of tax on off-balance sheet US dollar funds held in
offshore accounts throughout Europe. This is immediately confirmed when
the Inland Revenue announces a tax amnesty against the holders of
offshore accounts resident in the United Kingdom, expiring on 22nd June
2007. The only carrot offered under this amnesty is that the penalty
will be restricted to 10%.
12 April: Investigators inform AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that the Swiss
Banking authorities are now “cracking down” on bank fraud. They are
paying special attention to fraudulent operations conducted by Bank of
New York, Barclays Bank in New York and the United Kingdom, Wachovia,
First Union Bank in New York City, etc, calculated to defraud the
United States and the legal beneficial owners of the funds in question.
It has also emerged, and has been revealed to investigators, that the
CEOs of Wachovia and Barclays Bank have direct knowledge of, and
participation in, such fraudulent banking operations. The CEO of
Wachovia accordingly received an appropriate warning about this
criminal activity.
13 April: European associates inform AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that
Interpol and Europol have joined in the international tax fraud
investigation into off-balance sheet, untaxed offshore US dollar
accounts. They also inform the Principals that the White House is in
total disarray, and that there are distinct signs of panic, with
officials ‘squealing’ on others, to save their own hides.
14 April: Associates now inform AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that a “Special
Committee” consisting of members from both the Senate and the House of
Representatives, formed to monitor and press for a resolution of
‘Wantagate’ – which all concerned recognise is now roiling the entire
political and financial communities both domestically and abroad – has
placed the Chairman of the US Federal Reserve Board, Dr Ben Bernanke
“on notice” to comply with the payment authorisation regarding the
Wanta Settlement and to cease collaborating with the White House to
obfuscate the issue.
In response, Dr Bernanke informed the Committee that President George
W. Bush Jr. is directly and personally responsible for issuing repeated
instructions for non-payment of the Wanta funds.
• Now that this has been authoritatively
clarified, US law enforcement has no excuse for any further
prevarication. And we understand that the prevarication may indeed have
stopped.
14 April: Investigators advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that the
President of the World Bank, Paul Wolfowitz, has now been identified as
having been “running” PRIVATE World Bank accounts for members of the
Bush II Administration, using diverted proceeds derived from the
illegal money laundering operations connected to exploitation of the
withheld Leo Wanta Settlement funds.
Investigators further advise that Wolfowitz holds dual passports (of
the United States and Israel), and is thus a citizen of both the United
States and Israel. (Your correspondent was brought up to believe that
it is not possible for a foreign passport-holder to occupy an official
position in the United States, as Wolfowitz did when he was a senior US
Government appointed official. If that no longer applies, your
correspondent would like to apply for the position of US Treasury
Secretary).
It is later confirmed that Wolfowitz’s predecessor, James Wolfensohn,
was engaged in similarly illegal financial transactions using the World
Bank facilities to exploit the $27.5 trillion of funds owned by
Ambassador Wanta as sole Principal, which the criminalist operatives
have co-conspired with crooked bankers to exploit, leverage,
collateralise, hypothecate and otherwise abuse, on the basis of the
CIA’s lie that Leo Wanta was dead.
Thus, when he ‘ceased to be dead’ with effect from 21st July 2005, Mr
Wolfensohn, a complacent operative par excellence, must surely have
been among those who, upon learning about this fact, may have missed a
few nights’ sleep contemplating the possible implications should these
criminal financial operations ever be exposed.
The unmasking of Paul Wolfowitz, under cover of the old story about the
financial favours he orchestrated for Shaha Riza, his girlfriend (who
must now be concerned for her own safety, one would have thought) has
the obvious potential to lead straight back to Wolfensohn.
17 April: Investigators inform AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that Vice
President Cheney claims to be operating under cover of a Presidential
order from President George W. Bush Jr., not to pay the Wanta
Settlement funds to the Ambassador or to anyone else, contrary to
Bush’s formal written undertakings as specified in the classified May
2006 agreement with the Ambassador.
This document is privileged and is covered by national security
legislation, H.R. 3723 and other relevant provisions. The Editor asked
again, for the record, whether it could ever be published, and the
answer is that it cannot, for reasons especially of national security,
but also for the key purpose of protecting private business secrets in
accordance with H.R. 3723.
17 April: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. advises that Chinese
associates are now present in the United States and will remain there
until Ambassador Wanta has received the Leo Wanta Settlement funds of
$4.5 trillion as a deposit in the Ambassador’s Virginia-based
corporation’s Morgan Stanley Securities Account.
THE WISCONSIN TAXATION GESTAPO SCAM ESCALATES
17 April: The State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue now issues a
‘Notice of Warrant Filing’ addressed to Leo E. Wanta (received by the
Ambassador on 19th April 2007. A copy of this 'tax' document is faxed
on 19th April to this Editor). This latest version of the aberrant
State civil tax assessment against the Ambassador is for the sum of
$46,129.21. The detailed background to this central matter was
described in our posting dated 20th March 2007, which as previously
noted may be accessed on this website: Home Page, Archive.
The documentary background of this phase of the Wisconsin Tax Gestapo
scam is hereby re-summarised immediately below. Please note that the
Ambassador had received no notification of any State tax ‘due’ since
the THIRD protest payment by Attorney Steven Goodwin on 21st July 2005,
which duly triggered Ambassador Leo Wanta’s ABSOLUTE DISCHARGE from
Probation, even though of course he never committed any crime, as the
criminal conspirators will shortly be obliged to acknowledge in the
light of developments.
1. Gregg T. Frazier, Chief, Central Audit Section [gfrazier@dor.state.wi.us] writes to Leo Wanta on 30 October 2006 [received by Leo Wanta on 2nd November 2006] as follows:
Dear Leo Wanta: In view of the Wisconsin Supreme Court decision on your
appeal of the Income Tax assessment made by the department dated
January 29, 1996, I must ask you to send us your remittance now (as
indicated on the enclosed Notice of Amount Due). Please return the
Notice of Amount Due with your remittance. Sincerely [sic!], Signed,
Gregg T. Frazier [signature], Chief, Central Audit Section [gfrazier@dor.state.wi.us]:
GTF:K1P:A923REVC2B3460/Enc. A923 (R.8/96). The letterhead on this
communication reads: State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue, Audit
Bureau, 2135 Rimrock Road, PO Box 8908. Madison, Wisconsin 53708-8908;
Telephone: 608-266 2772
; TTY
608-267 1049
; Fax: 608-267 0534; http://www.dor.state.wi.us.
2. Enclosed with this communication from Frazier was a computer
print-out ostensibly from the WI Department of Revenue (although its
name is not stated thereon), labelled ‘Amended’, displaying the
following computation:
12- Regular interest: 1988: $21,594.30; 1989: $7,581.12; Total: $29,175.42
13- 50%/100% penalty: 1988: $10,249.00; 1989: $3,880.00; Total: $14,129.00*
14- Total amount due: 1988: $31,843.30; 1989: $11,461.12; Total: $43,304.42
The computer print-out was annotated in handwriting as follows: ‘Per
Wisconsin Supreme Court Order Dated December 30, 2005’. The Ambassador
had never been informed of any such Wisconsin Supreme Court Order. One
reason he was not so informed was no doubt that the amount illegally
demanded had of course been paid by Federal Attorney Steven Goodwin’s
check on 21st July 2005 (a copy of the processed front and back of
which is held by this Editor and in certain other secure locations
internationally, and of course by Attorney Steven Goodwin himself at
his Richmond, VA office). Another possibility is that Wisconsin State
Department of Revenue communications to the Ambassador following the
payment of the funds to the Department of Corrections on 21st July 2005
were corruptly withheld from Leo Emil Wanta, a state of affairs which,
if it were to emerge in any discovery process, would render the
perpetrator(s) liable under the pending R.I.C.O. action as
co-conspirators and accessories to the fact of further fraud against
the Ambassador and the Courts.
3. On 1st December 2006, a ‘Statement of Account’ in the sum of
$43,304.42 subtitled ‘Individual Income Tax’ was issued by the State of
Wisconsin Department of Revenue to Leo Wanta. Although dated 1st
December 2006, this document was received by Leo Wanta on 30th December
2006. The spurious amount was ‘payable’ by the end of December 2006! It
contained the following details:
Filing period: 12/31/1990: Interest: $29.175.42; Penalty/Fee:
$14.129.00*; Period Balance: $43,304.42. FACTS: (A): Leo Wanta became a
lawful resident of Vienna, Austria, per the Vienna Court’s decision,
with effect from June 1988, having been resident abroad on high-level
US Government business and therefore out-of-State since 1985, so that
he could never have been assessable to any valid Wisconsin State tax
for the periods cited; and (B): Leo Wanta was languishing in the
US/Wisconsin GULAG and then under Wisconsin house arrest and on
probation from December 1993 until 14th November 2005, having had all
his very modest personal financial assets seized from him, and his
house sold at a knock-down price without his agreement and the proceeds
stolen (it is now lived in by a Wisconsin State Attorney), so that he
could therefore never have been in a position to pay any tax, even if
it had ever been due, which was never the case.
Please follow this thread carefully because there is a sensational development to follow…
4. On 16th January 2007, the State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue
issued a ‘Notice of Overdue Tax’ addressed to Leo E Wanta, labelled
‘Date of Assessment: January 1, 2007; Period Assessed: 31-Dec-1990;
Individual income Tax; Amount due: $46,119.21. ‘Interest’ of $2,814.79
had been added to the spuriously demanded amount of $43,304.42
referenced above. This document was received by Leo Wanta on 18th
January 2007 and was faxed to this Editor on that date.
* $14,129 is of course the PRECISE AMOUNT of the illegally charged
State civil tax assessment settled by Leo Wanta under protest from
Singapore TWICE by Wisconsin local Attorney checks in 1992, and settled
for the THIRD time via Attorney Steven Goodwin’s check for $30,626.97
proffered by him IN PERSON to WI Corrections Agent Michelle Riel in
Wisconsin on 21st July 2005, using funds provided from scarce private
resources by this Editor on behalf of the Ambassador: see again our
posting dated 20 March 2007 and the 24-page Wisconsin Taxation Gestapo
Supplement to International Currency Review, Volume 31, #s 3 & 4.
• This part of the narrative is continued
with entries dated 19th-27th April 2007, when a document surfaces which
will cause the entire ‘Wantagate’ conspiracy to unravel.
18 April: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. advises that he has
been informed by Chinese associates that Chinese and French diplomatic
officials are cooperating pro-actively to procure release of the Wanta
Settlement funds to the Ambassador.
18 April: An associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. informs the
Principals that Deutsche Bank officials have been exerting continuous
pressure on their German offices to clean up the off-balance sheet US
dollar accounts that have not been charged to US or German tax.
The officials advised that Deutsche Bank “exploded” over the depositing
of the $1.0 trillion of US Treasury backed debt obligations placed with
Commerzbank in “off-the-books” bank accounts (the ‘assets’ being based
upon usurped US Treasury resources commandeered for illegal private
gain from the White House and the US Treasury).
So in other words, the arrangements with Deutsche Bank were contravened
by means of separate (and illegal), parallel arrangements with
Commerzbank – revealing the White House/Treasury's further duplicity
and untrustworthiness as it plays one bank off against another (not
that this should, surely, have come as any surprise to the hardened
Deutsche Bankers concerned).
The notorious Commerzbank deposit arrangement, exploiting the PUBLIC
resources of the US Treasury, we repeat, was orchestrated for PRIVATE
self-enrichment purposes: see above. But the reason for Deutsche Bank’s
“explosion” of anger is that this arrangement manifestly fell wholly
outside arrangements agreed upon separately between Deutsche Bank and
the White House and the US Treasury, and suggested that the White House
had favoured Commerzbank with this corrupt deal. The illegal $1
trillion deposit was placed at the direction of President G. W. Bush
Jr., Vice President Richard Cheney, Philip Perry, and US Treasury
Secretary pro tempore, Henry M. Paulson Jr., and other US operatives.
19 April: A US Treasury compliance officer admits to an associate of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., that (and we quote):
“Something is wrong inside the Treasury, since no authorisation is
forthcoming despite the constant calls into the Treasury from US and
foreign Government officials demanding the payment of the Wanta
Settlement funds to AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.”.
THE BANKING AND INTELLIGENCE WAR
It should by now have dawned upon those concerned that the global
monetary furniture is indeed being rearranged, amid continuing US
criminal financial operations, with one objective being to ensure that
the most powerful and ruthless criminal ‘players’ emerge from the
biggest financial corruption and monetary scandal in world history,
with maximised ill-gotten wealth and immunity from the consequences.
This is not going to happen.
Another factor underlying this crisis is the global banking war that
‘Wantagate’ has triggered, as institutions such as the Royal Bank of
Scotland are hard-driven by their intelligence community handlers to
try to grab as large a volume of real deposits and instruments held in
accounts legally and legitimately owned by Ambassador Wanta as
possible, so that when the new ‘clean’ regime is consummated, the
institutions holding the broadest spread of such ‘real’ assets will
survive, with others going to the wall.
In parallel with all this, a ruthless intelligence war is being waged
between the United States and Britain (see also below), with British
intelligence driving the Royal Bank of Scotland to prevent Bank of
America (the CIA’s main bank) obtaining control of Wanta accounts and
closing the door to future scrutiny. And that is only one of many
similar considerations that are conflicting this truly horrendous
monetary crisis.
Is the monetary showdown a prelude to a military confrontation?
Evidently President Putin, who is disgusted with the White House’s
never-ending duplicity and lies, thinks so.
U.S. ‘ACT OF WAR’ AGAINST THE BANK OF ENGLAND
19 April: Sources advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that investigators
have again revealed that an illegal money-laundering conduit authorised
by the White House reads as follows:
• Deutsche Bank, New York City, to the
CIA’s Bank of America, California, back to Wachovia Bank, New York
City, to the Federal Reserve’s Interbank Settlement Fund, to the Bank
of England (Birmingham), via Carl Daniels, to Barclays Bank, London.
• Barclays Bank and Wachovia
(‘walk-over-ya’) Bank have been busted for the money-laundering
operation described immediately above, by the Swiss Banking authorities.
We now reveal further evidence of Financial Warfare waged by the
Bush-Cheney White House against the United Kingdom, which, not solely
in our view, amounts to an Act of Economic War and implies that the
‘Special Relationship’ is redundant mythology:
• The merry-go-round money-laundering
circuit described above uses the Bank of England’s putative gold
reserves as pledges for guarantees.
• But the cabal of fraudsters, including
Carl Daniels, sold the Bank of England’s official gold for US dollars
and then liened the funds with payment-in-kind securities. Moreover it
appears that officials at the Bank of England may have complied with US
‘instructions’.
• The net effect of this was that the
corrupt banks operating this scam authorised by the Bush-Cheney White
House have siphoned off the Bank of England’s real gold reserves, in
exchange for fiat funds.
• The question therefore arises, and we
are not joking: HAS THIS DELIBERATE SCAM, PERPETRATED ON WHITE HOUSE
INSTRUCTIONS, BANKRUPTED THE BANK OF ENGLAND? HAS THE BUSH II WHITE
HOUSE IMPLEMENTED A KEY ELEMENT OF THE LONG-RANGE DEUTSCHE
VERTEIDIGUNGS DIENST (DVD), DACHAU, PLAN TO DESTROY THE BRITISH
FINANCIAL ECONOMY?
On 30th April we were informed that $4.8 trillion was expropriated by
the United States, with inside corrupt assistance, by the United States
Government, following the sale of the Bank of England’s gold. It was
placed with Citibank.
• This $4.8 trillion central bank heist
was perpetrated during the shutdown of the British banking system to
the banking public, ostensibly to ‘test the new electronic transfer
system’.
During such banking system blackouts, there is no accountability and no
record of the transactions taking place behind the scenes. The United
States committed an ‘Act of War’ by stealing resources from the Bank of
England. THE BANK OF ENGLAND MAY NOW BE BANKRUPT, AS INTENDED BY THE
WHITE HOUSE AND THE U.S. TREASURY, ON BEHALF OF DVD, DACHAU. On 30th
April 2007, we were informed by European banking sources that it IS
bankrupt.
• A further extraordinary component of
this dimension of the crisis, noted above, is that Carl Daniels, an
employee of the Bank of England, appears to have been taking
instructions from the White House to sell the Bank of England’s gold.
If this is anywhere near the truth, Carl Daniels, and the entire Board
of the Bank of England, should be arrested for treason and fraud
against the United Kingdom and its people.
Deputy Commissioner John Yates, of Scotland Yard/City of London Police Fraud Squad:
PLEASE BE ADVISED ACCORDINGLY.
• And if, as is likely, it transpires that
the Bush-Cheney White House has orchestrated and planned this clever
scam against the Bank of England, we and others would consider this
operation indeed to represent an Act of War. In that event, the United
Kingdom should consider severing diplomatic relations with the United
States, should kick the US military out of the bases that it uses on
British soil, and should in innumerable other ways indicate in no
uncertain terms that normal relations will not be restored until such
time as the present reprobate incumbents of the White House have been
physically removed from office, replaced by honourable servants of the
United States, and the Wanta Settlement has been paid [see above].
• For this represents nothing less that a
cynical, poisonous ‘Black Ops’ counterintelligence offensive
perpetrated against the central bank of a supposedly close ally. So far
as we and most other informed observers are now concerned, there is no
such thing as the ‘Special Relationship’, and any documents that assert
the contrary should be torn up forthwith.
• It is now perfectly clear that the Bank
of England has been targeted to be ‘taken down’. This being the case,
this crisis has now escalated to a point of unprecedented tension
between the reprobate US Federal Government represented by a
criminalised White House on the one hand, and the United Kingdom under
partially corrupt and confused leadership on the other.
Also irretrievably antagonised by these criminals in the White House
are the Governments of Germany, Russia, France, Austria, the
Netherlands, China, and probably Canada and Australia.
• WHAT IS THE U.S. MILITARY GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS?
• RATHER THAN CONTEMPLATE FURTHER
UNPROVOKED AGGRESSION AGAINST FOREIGN TERRITORIES, IT SHOULD LOOK TO
THE SITUATION ON ITS OWN DOORSTEP.
U.S. BLACKMAIL AGAINST THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY: It is now evident that
a US Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) operative, handled therefore by
‘the Agency’, quite possibly also on behalf of Deutsche Verteidigungs
Dienst (DVD), Dachau, has been deployed to destabilise and blackmail
the Royal Family, although we also believe that this is not the sole US
operation of this nature against the British Monarchy. We refer
specifically to the quite dreadful state of affairs confronting Prince
Andrew, a distinguished British naval officer, whose alleged weaknesses
have been ruthlessly exploited in part by a 24-year-old ONI playboy
from New York called Paolo Liuzzo, who was carefully inserted into the
Duke’s family entourage and started dating under-age Princess Beatrice.
In 2004, this ONI gigolo had been placed on probation for assault
following a drunken brawl in which another youth had died. He later
broke the conditions of his American parole ‘and I started taking Bea
with me on business trips to Europe. I was looking for investors for a
club I was starting to help disadvantaged youth’. Have we said enough?
This Paolo conman somehow contrived to live in Eaton Square, one of the
most expensive locations in Central London, with a young ‘Count’, Alex
Clavel, in an apartment notorious for hosting all-nigh raves. Press
reports of this scandal have alluded to a drugs dimension. In the
background is the decadent Sarah Ferguson, who was ‘loosed’ from the
Royal Family years ago, but has mysteriously returned and is said to be
‘motoring through’ Prince Andrew’s funds, consuming several million
pounds annually on her excesses.
The reason this bad woman is kept around is that she knows a great deal
and literally ‘cannot be got rid of’. What she knows is the primary
focus of the blackmail that the evil US Office of Naval Intelligence,
on behave (we believe, of DVD) is directing against the Royal
Family/the Monarch in a complex ‘Black Ops’ offensive. Because Fergie
is ‘there’, her known absence of morality has been exploited by this
ONI creep to prostitute an under-age Princess, and of course in the
process to conduct close-range counterespionage against Prince Andrew
and the Royal Family generally, given Fergie’s knowledge of certain
sensitive matters that might prospectively be exploited to blackmail
the British Monarch, in the minds of these evil people. This explains
why Britain caves in to every unreasonable demand of the United States,
including submitting to the unequal and unjust bilateral extradition
treaty, and going along with such aberrations as the illegal invasion
of Iraq.
This background of US proxy blackmail may also explain why scams such
as the brazen raid on the Bank of England’s gold have proved
‘successful’. The decimation of the Bank of England’s gold reserves
implies that the pound sterling will in due course collapse – which
‘just happens’ to be what the Pan-German Nazi Continuum, DVD Dachau, is
aiming at.
Such a development would provide the orchestrated pretext for the
abolition of the pound sterling and its substitution by the European
Collective Currency, which is actually backed by no Government at all.
That is the European monetary essence of this intelligence and banking crisis, folks.
19 April: Associates advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that process of
service (delivery of a subpoena brought under the jurisdiction of the
US Supreme Court) has been attempted on several occasions, in order to
provide Vice President Cheney with notification of action being taken
against him in person. Up to this date, Cheney has avoided being
served, on each occasion. This Vice President is reliably reported
never to reside at Blair House, but always elsewhere (try Waynesboro,
PA, per Cryptome). He is seen from time to time in the Senate, over
which he presides as ‘Speaker’.
We now learn the following:
SHOOT-OUT AT THE WHITE HOUSE: On 18th April, when an attempt was made
to implement process of service under the jurisdiction of the Supreme
Court against Vice President R. B. Cheney, gunfire was heard at the
southwest corner of the White House compound. The briefly reported
episode was described in terms of two White House guards’ guns having
‘accidentally’ been fired.
Of course, that was a fabrication. What actually happened was that when
an attempt was made to serve the Vice President with the Supreme Court
subpoena, the White House guards opened fire and wounded two agents
(Gold Badges). It is believed that a third agent was killed.
So we now have the first confirmed incident of violence in Washington
D.C., a development which conforms with our expectation posted earlier.
In all likelihood, absent a change of hard heart at the White House,
this is precisely how matters will end: IN A D.C. CIVIL WAR.
19 April: Investigators inform AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that at 4:02 pm
Eastern Daylight Time, US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
signed an enforcement document requiring release of settlement funds
(including the Wanta Settlement funds), withheld by the White House,
without further ado. Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg is deservedly held
in the highest regard everywhere.
19 April: A US Treasury compliance officer advises an associate of
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that a “clear channel” of communication had
been identified from Cheney to Treasury Secretary Paulson to compliance
officers for Wanta Settlement authorisation, which was to occur
shortly.
This channel has turned out to be so ‘clear’ that it is invisible.
20 April: Associates inform AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that Vice President
Richard Cheney has stated that he “won’t accept any subpoena from
anyone”, implying with crystal clarity that he considers himself to be
above the law and can do exactly as he pleases.
Normally, arrogance of such proportions precedes a calamitous fall; and
there is no reason to believe that this normal pattern will not
eventuate in this case.
20 April: A US Treasury compliance officer informs an associate of
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that verbal authorisation to release the Wanta
Settlement funds will be provided after 4:00 pm, Central Daylight Time,
by Deputy US Treasury Secretary Kimmitt.
So, all of a sudden, no written authorisation is necessary: the Treasury has ‘gone verbal’. Whoever thought up this claptrap?
20 April: Chinese official associates advise an associate of AmeriTrust
Groupe, Inc. that both Chancellor Mme. Angela Merkel and a senior
Chinese Minister had admonished US Treasury Secretary Paulson for
withholding payment of the Wanta Settlement funds, in the course of a
pre-Group of Seven (G-7) meeting held today.
[19-]20 April: Given that the Wisconsin Department of Revenue have
continued to press for payment of the old $14,129 (plus massive extras)
for the FOURTH time, the Editor renews his contact with the Wisconsin
Department of Corrections to which the Attorney check for $30,626.97
proffered in person by US Federal Attorney Steven Goodwin in April
2007, was remitted, leaving 3 messages on the Department’s voicemail,
with the following outcome:
From: Dipko, John A – DOC; To: cstory@worldreports.org; Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 10:45 pm; Subject: RE: Leo Wanta:
‘Mr Story: I am in receipt of your April 19, 2007 voice mail and I
understand you attempted to reach Communications Specialist Alec
Loftus. Questions regarding the actions of the Wisconsin Department of
Revenue need to be directed to that agency. Thank you.
John Dipko, Public Information Director, Wisconsin Department of Corrections: (608 240-5060
)’.
We thought that Mr Dipko’s choice of the words ‘the actions of the
Wisconsin Department of Revenue’ were carefully chosen for our close
consideration, and this deduction turns out to have been correct [see
entry at 27th April below].
21 April: In response to Mr John Dipko’s email dated 20th April [see
above], the Editor replied by email to the Public Information Director
of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections as follows:
From: Christopher Story FRSA
Cc: meredith.helgerson@dor.state.wi.us; dorsecretary@dor.state.wi.us ; laura.engan@dor.state.wi.us ; audra.brennan@dor.state.wi.us; gfrazier@dor.state.wi.us ; sgoodwin@goodwinsutton.com; mg2@utah.edu ; lsandler@journalsentinel.com ; president@whitehouse.gov ; Patrick.j.fitzgerald@doj.gov ; bipp@rice.edu ; vice_president@whitehouse.gov ; wisgov@gov.state.wi.us ; docweb@doc.state.wi.us ; askDOJ@usdoj.gov
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 1:10 am; Subject: Leo Wanta:
No, this is quite incorrect. Following the Hon Judge Michael B Torphy's
Restitution Order, the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue has
nothing to do with the matter since the Department of Corrections and
the probation staff, have had 'ownership' of the case, as you know very
well.
Therefore, I am entirely within my rights to ask your Department to
intervene with Mr Roger Ervin [the Secretary of the Wisconsin
Department of Revenue: Ed.], and I request that you now speak
immediately with Mr Matthew J. Frank [the Secretary of the Wisconsin
Department of Revenue] to that effect. You have stated in writing to me
that your Department sent the check for $24,900.91 on 4th August 2005,
and it is up to your Department to procure confirmation from the
Department of Revenue that they duly received the payment and banked
the check.
In any case, this matter has escalated now and you will have received a
detailed email from me to Meredith Helgerson, spokesperson for the WI
Department of Revenue, which has been copied to appropriate parties
[see APPENDIX below]. You are passing the buck: your Department
accepted the funds and your State Department is accordingly responsible
for the correct and appropriate disposition of them. Furthermore as you
will doubtless have learned from our website [Home Page/Archive: report
dated 20th March 2007], I personally provided the funds from scarce
private resources with which Attorney Steven Goodwin paid your
Department: I therefore have an interest in this matter, and so far as
I am concerned, my funds, loaned to the Ambassador, appear on the face
of it to have been stolen or else misappropriated.
Please, therefore, procure that Mr Frank addresses this issue as a
matter of extreme urgency immediately with Mr Ervin, as I can assure
you that this affair may cause immense damage to all concerned in the
very near future since this scandal cannot and will not be allowed to
continue. You were very helpful with your email to me dated 10th
November 2006: please be of further assistance now and grasp the
severity of this matter so that it can be brought to an immediate
conclusion. It is obvious that the Department of Corrections is
responsible for the disposition of the funds: so it is, I repeat, up to
your Department, as the lead WI Department in the matter, to sort this
out without further bureaucratic stonewalling and buck-passing. Thank
you for your courtesy to date. Christopher Story FRSA cstory@worldreports.org
23 April: DELEGATES ‘STORM OUT OF G-7 MEETING’: Associates of
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. advise that both the French and the Chinese
representatives attending the Group of Seven (G-7) meeting (expanded to
include China here) ‘stormed out’ after having very severely admonished
the US representative for having played fast and loose with the funds
belonging to the Ambassador, for the United States Government’s endless
duplicity and lies, and for having still not paid the Wanta Settlement,
blocking the Reagan-Mitterrand Protocol payments to specified foreign
Governments.
24 April: At 12.17 am the Editor, having spoken on two occasions to Ms
Meredith Helgerson in the Communications Department at the Wisconsin
Department of Revenue, sent a summary of the two conversations in
question, to this Wisconsin official at 12:17 am London time. The text
of this email is given below as an APPENDIX to this report.
24 April: At 8:50 pm, Mr John Dipko, Public Information Director of the
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, emailed a reply to this Editor’s
email dated 21st April, which contained the following:
’This week, we "re-confirmed" payment of the checks by our agency to
the Department of Revenue and the Wisconsin Public Defender's Office in
the amount of $24,900.91 and $4,167.64, respectively, in accordance
with the restitution order on file for Dane County criminal case
1992CF000683’.
Recall that the sum of $24,900.91 represents the original amount of
$14,129 plus interest and penalties falsely stated by the Wisconsin
Department of Revenue to be outstanding, even though it was paid twice
in 1992.
On 10th November 2006, at 10:36 am, Mr John Dipko had emailed the Editor as follows:
‘Our records indicate that Mr. Wanta made the $30,626.97 payment that you referenced.
The Department of Corrections collected the money from Mr. Wanta and
then dispersed two separate checks dated August 4, 2005 totalling
$29,068.55: one in the amount of $24,900.91 payable to the Wisconsin
Department of Revenue, and the other in the amount of $4,167.64 payable
to the Wisconsin Public Defender's Office. The remaining $1,558.42
accounts for fees and surcharges that had been assessed to Mr. Wanta.
Mr. Wanta discharged from Department of Corrections supervision on Nov.
14, 2005’.
Thus the Editor now possessed TWO written statements from the Public
Information Director of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections
confirming formally that the Department had duly remitted the sum of
$24,900.91 to the Wisconsin Department of Corrections by official check
dated 4th August 2005. See entry at 25 April below…
24 April: Associates advise AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that a service of
process on Vice President Cheney had again been attempted today. On
this occasion, the Vice President slipped away with the assistance of
his Secret Service agents, to avoid service. These Secret Service
agents are doing their job, but at the same time they are protecting
this criminal and are helping him to avoid service, thereby obstructing
the course of justice. Put another way, they are preventing a known
criminal from being brought under the jurisdiction of the US Supreme
Court, which may mean that they are co-conspirators.
25 April: The Editor emails Mr John Dipko, Public Information Director
of the Wisconsin Department of Revenue in the following terms:
From: CHRISTOPHER STORY FRSA cstory@worldreports.org
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:18:11 +0100
To: "Dipko, John A - DOC" John.Dipko@Wisconsin.gov
Cc: dorsecretary@dor.state.wi.us; meredith.helgerson@dor.state.wi.us; dorsecretary@dor.state.wi.us, laura.engan@dor.state.wi.us, audra.brennan@dor.state.wi.us; gfrazier@dor.state.wi.us; sgoodwin@goodwinsutton.com; mg2@utah.edu; lsandler@journalsentinel.com; president@whitehouse.gov; Patrick.j.fitzgerald@doj.gov; bipp@rice.edu; vice_president@whitehouse.gov; wisgov@gov.state.wi.us; docweb@doc.state.wi.us; askDOJ@usdoj.gov
Subject: Re: Leo Wanta
Mr Dipko: Thank you for your response below.
I demand that you provide me forthwith with a time-stamped receipt to
the Wisconsin Department of Corrections from the Wisconsin Department
of Revenue confirming that the Department of Revenue duly received the
sum of $24,900.91 paid by your Department per your Department's check
dated 4th August 2005.
Failing prompt provision to myself of such a receipt, I am advised that
you will personally be considered a co-conspirator to a R.I.C.O.
violation in the context of this matter.
You may fax the necessary time-stamped receipt from the Wisconsin
Department of Revenue to the Department of Corrections to my London,
UK, fax number, which is as follows: 01144207-233 0185. My London
address is:
Christopher Story FRSA, Managing Director,
World Reports Limited, 108 Horseferry Road, London SW1P 2EF United Kingdom
25 April: Associates inform AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. that more than one
Group of Seven (G-7) member has formally notified the Bush-Cheney
Administration that they have 48 hours (or until 2:00 pm Eastern
Daylight Time on Friday 27th April 2007), to effect the Wanta
Settlement, thereby facilitating the Reagan-Mitterrand Protocol
payments. Specifically, the Chinese authorities have indicated that
they intend to dump their US Treasury holdings immediately onto the
market. To elaborate:
The G-7 Government’s Notice warned of imminent measures detrimental to
the financial and commercial interests of the United States, which can
include freezing American bank accounts, seizing other assets, and
selling US Treasury securities. It was further believed that at least
one other G-7 Government issued a similar official Notice to the White
House.
The Chinese Government has separately conveyed a formal (written)
DECLARATION, by way of NOTICE, that failing the White House procuring
the Wanta Settlement payment within the deadline, measures will be
taken to order the sale of US Treasury holdings.
At the close of business on 25th April, no payment had been made to the
Securities Account of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. with Morgan Stanley at
Citibank, New York.
25 April: The Board of the World Bank express their lack of confidence
in Paul Wolfowitz as President, and instruct him to resign. Their
reasons for this have little to do with the ‘public consumption’ story
surrounding Shaha Riza, but everything to do with the illegal use of
World Bank facilities to “run” funds diverted from Ambassador Wanta.
Wolfowitz continues to resist [as of 01 May 2007] resignation, even
after this latest blow, which followed the demand by one of his
deputies that he should step down immediately. He has probably been
asked to stay put by the White House, but this bravado ‘front’ is
expected to collapse.
No World Bank President can possibly remain in place without the
support of his Board, let alone the staff; and this has been decisively
withdrawn.
26 April: A communication is received by Leo Wanta from 20/20 Financial
Consulting Inc, out of Broomfield, CO, offering ‘immediate relief from
tax harassment’ and beginning as follows: ‘As you are probably aware, a
State tax lien was filed against your assets on April 17, 2007 in the
amount of $46,129.00’. This represents, of course, a libel against Leo
Emil Wanta, since no State tax is due and, as shown below against 27th
April 2007, we have obtained proof of payment of the civil tax
assessment paid by with this Editor’s private funds, in the form of a
copy of the relevant check from the Wisconsin Department of Corrections
to the Wisconsin Department of Revenue.
The Wisconsin Tax Gestapo have ‘goofed’ again, by disseminating
libellous information about the Ambassador; and needless to say, this
latest indication that they couldn’t care less, is being incorporated
within the R.I.C.O. legal action going forward against the Wisconsin
authorities.
27 April: The Wanta Settlement payment had not been made by 2.00 pm
Eastern Daylight Time (subsequently extended to 9.00 pm EDT), so a
further run on the dollar, followed by rapidly escalating international
financial tensions, is now inevitable.
The US stock market, inflated because so much fiat money has been
laundered into it by panicking holders of untaxed fiat money assets
held offshore, is displaying numbers that have no connection with
underlying reality – a symptom of the extreme gravity of this crisis,
against which we have been repeatedly warning for a year now.
A replay of 1929 may have become unavoidable, as the operatives inside
the White House bunker, having either deliberately or through their own
arrogance and 'too clever by half' stupidity set the international
financial system on the path to self-destruction, console themselves
with the Hitlerian thought that, if they are to go down, they will do
their best to ensure that they pull everyone else down to monetary
Hades with them.
CHECK MATE: WI CORRECTIONS CHECK FOR $24,900.91 SURFACES: PROOF OF PAYMENT
27 April: At 21:14 pm, the Editor receives the following communication
from Mr John Dipko, Public Information Director, Wisconsin Department
of Corrections:
‘Mr Story: In response to your request dated April 24, 2007, attached
is a copy of the check to document the transaction between the
Department of Corrections and the Department of Revenue. Again, the
issuance of the check was in accordance with the restitution order on
file…. John Dipko, Public Information Director, Wisconsin Department of
Corrections (608) 240-5060
’.
In the email version of this website posting, we attach the Wisconsin
Department of Corrections' pdf which shows images of the front and back
of their check dated 4th August 2005 made out to the Wisconsin
Department of Corrections HERE. If you wish to review this pdf, by all
means send the Editor an email using the CONTACT US facility on this
website, and we will forward a copy of the pdf to you. We are calling
this check the CHECK MATE check.
Production by the Wisconsin Department of Corrections of the front and
back of their check P0524844/16184456 dated 4th August 2005 for
$24,900.91 (twenty-four thousand nine hundred US dollars and 91 cents)
made out in favour of Wisconsin Department of Revenue, Attn: Karen
Sawicki, 718 W Claire Mount Avenue, Eau Claire, WI 54701, confirms that
Mr John Dipko, on behalf of the Department of Corrections, was accurate
when he stated in his emails cited above that his Department had duly
sent a check for $24,900.91 to the Wisconsin Department of Revenue.
Indeed it can now be stated that the Department of Corrections appears
to have behaved correctly throughout, according to documentation.
The same cannot be said of the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, which
we have sharply criticised both in print and in our website posting
dated 20th March 2007 [see Archive].
As indicated, this Department has continued to demand THE IDENTICAL
$14,129+++, with its latest document, entitled Notice of Warrant Filing
asserting that Leo Wanta owes $46,129.21, demanding THE SAME MONEY
(+++) that was paid per the Department of Corrections’ check for
$24,900.91, using this Editor’s private funds, as referenced above.
Again, the demand reiterates a request for THE SAME $14,129 (plus
extras) that was paid under protest TWICE in 1992, and A THIRD TIME on
12st July 2005.
The Wisconsin Department of Corrections’ check provides definitive
Proof of Payment, not least given that the payment to the Wisconsin
State Department of Revenue was made by a component of the Wisconsin
State Government itself. The reality is that the Department of Revenue
never had any right to collect tax from Leo Wanta within the timeframe
cited.
‘TAKEDOWN’ OF AMBASSADOR WANTA PROVEN TO BE 'A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE'
Since it has therefore been demonstrated that the Wisconsin Department
of Revenue’s continuing claims for the same funds are fraudulent, and
since it can be and has been separately proven by ourselves that all
the previous State civil tax assessments and demands for tax
perpetrated by the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue against
Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta within the timeframes specified have also
been fraudulent and form part of the identical ongoing ‘takedown’
fraud, it follows that the entire basis of the illegal takedown of
Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta is hereby demonstrated to be a sham, and that
the Ambassador is indeed a victim of what is now being referred to at
high levels in Washington, D.C., as ‘a miscarriage of justice’.
The WI Department of Corrections’ Proof of Payment check has of course,
as indicated above, been incorporated within documentation forming the
basis of the R.I.C.O. case that is now being brought forward on behalf
of the Ambassador in US Federal Court.
With the consequent unravelling of the ‘Wisconsin dimension’ of this
scandal, the entire domestic and international financial community has
taken decisive notice that the cover-up of the worst financial
corruption scandal in WORLD history can no longer be sustained. The
juggernaut cannot be reined back, and events will have to take their
painful course. AS THEY WILL.
28 April: At a conference in Brussels, the US Deputy Treasury, Robert
Kimmitt, made a conspicuous point of refusing to comment on the
continuing depreciation of the US dollar, which is a specific
consequence of this crisis, driven by the malevolent intransigence of
the US Treasury and the White House. Instead, he told reporters that
only his boss (pro tempore), Henry M. Paulson, the US Treasury
Secretary, is in any position to make public comments on the dollar on
behalf of the US Treasury. ‘There is only one person who can speak
about the dollar…. I will leave it there’, Kimmit said. Being
interpreted, this meant as follows: ‘If you want to know why the US
dollar is dropping like a stone, you’d better speak to the top official
who is orchestrating and responsible for it. It’s nothing to do with
me’.
We can hardly have been the only observers to attach significance to this cop-out.
30 April: CURRENCY AND MACROECONOMIC PRESSURES IN EUROPE:
The appreciation of the Euro on the dollar-Euro axis, reflecting the
adverse consequences for the US dollar of the reckless criminal
behaviour of the US Treasury Secretary and the White House in illegally
exploiting the Leo Wanta Settlement funds, is about to destroy Economic
and Monetary Union (EMU) which underpins the European Collective
Currency (the Euro).
This can hardly have been the intention of the Pan-German Nazi
Continuum strategists (DVD, in Dachau) when they planned on
orchestrating these events through their apparent puppets in the
present White House, who probably have no clue that they are in the
process of destroying the long-range Eurasian hegemony strategy of
their Nazi mentors. But the reality is that, due to the macroeconomic
pressures now being exerted, for instance on the Spanish economy, by
the Euro’s inordinate appreciation, the Spanish authorities are being
forced to tighten monetary policy into an accelerating downturn driven
by the Euro’s appreciation, without the flexibility to devalue their
exchange rate as was possible prior to imposition of the EU Collective
Currency. The former European Commission monetary official, Bernard
Connolly, now global strategist for Banque AIG, says that “Spain faces
a cycle of recession, deflation and widespread private sector default –
a depression in fact”. The situation in Greece is comparable, and
Portugal is not far behind.
The Euro is ‘stronger’ than it was in mid-1995, when two Italian
Ministers called for a return to the lira. France is squealing under
the burden of the Euro’s strength, with house prices falling in
January, the motor industry in trouble, and continued losses of
Eurozone exports share. The French cannot be expected to sit out
deflation, and will (rightly) prefer to abandon the Euro. Inflation is
taking off in Germany, with house prices rebounding and pent-up
demanding bursting out so that Germany will need higher interest rates
soon.
As for Spain, Miguel Fernandez Ordonez, Governor of the Bank of Spain,
testified before the Cortes (parliament) in late April 2007 that ‘the
single monetary policy has meant that excessively loose conditions for
our economy have been almost continuous’. The consequent Spanish boom
has been associated with house price inflation since 1995 of 270%, and
an increase in household debt from 75% of disposable income to 133%.
But the Euro’s ‘strength’ has suddenly impacted the construction and
real estate sector, with the share price of the Valencia-based builder
Astroc crashing by 62% in a single week.
In other words, as we predicted on 2nd September last year, the
degradation of the US dollar arising from the corrupt operations
orchestrated from the US Treasury and the White House is indeed in the
process of destabilising and prospectively destroying the Eurozone, a
process that will occur much more rapidly, in the absence of the Leo
Emil Wanta Settlement, than complacent analysts probably realise. One
reason for this is that the latest ‘false’ appreciation of the European
Collective Currency on the dollar-Euro forex axis follows a prolonged
period of economically unwarranted Euro ‘strength’, so that the new
currency market pressures are liable to become the ‘straw that breaks
the camel’s back’.
THE U.S. OPERATION TO BANKRUPT THE BANK OF ENGLAND
As for the bankruptcy of the Bank of England brought about by the
criminal operations perpetrated against it by the White House, this
‘Act of War’ represents a catastrophic development that will tear the
remnants of the ‘Special relationship’ apart, just as Gordon Brown
takes over power as Prime Minister. And here’s the rub.
This is a carefully planned operation orchestrated by DVD, Dachau,
through its PROXY agents in the US intelligence community and the White
House, designed to prevent the new Prime Minister from undertaking the
coup he has been preparing during the years he has served as Prime
Minister-in waiting: to remove Britain from the European Union
Collective.
The intention of the secret German-US co-conspirators has been to make
it impossible for the pound sterling – an impediment to the globalists’
ambitions – from remaining in existence, and to force Gordon Brown to
ditch his EU exit plan, in favour of ditching the now unbacked pound
sterling instead, and to replace it with the Euro.
But, as is always the case with German secret strategic intelligence
operations, these swine have miscalculated. Because the corrupt
operations, closely coordinated with Deutsche Bank, to exploit
Ambassador Wanta’s funds and to fabricate endless delays in meeting the
Settlement, are inducing terminal pressures on the Economic and
Monetary Union which is the central component of their Eurasian
hegemony strategy. The likelihood is that the Euro system will indeed
start to disintegrate, just as the criminalists think they have got
Britain cornered. While there will be pressure in London to cover this
calamity up for ‘confidence’ reasons, the expropriation by these
corrupt Americans of $4.8 trillion from the Bank of England is hereby
exposed, in the hope and expectation that Britain will at last
retaliate against these swine in a manner that will force them to
regret their actions.
Furthermore, these maniacs have severely underestimated the likely
determined response of the incoming Prime Minister. During the Second
World War, when Hitler tried to obliterate London to smithereens, the
response of Londoners and the British people generally was to stick two
fingers at Hitler and to manufacture miniature chamber pots with
Hitler’s image on the bottom (the Editor has two of these memorabilia).
It can be taken for granted that this will be the kind of response to
be expected this time round. The British have, for some reason, a very
long fuse. But when that fuse snaps, woe betide anyone standing in
their way.
In case the meaning of the above escapes anyone, we imagine that Mr
Gordon Brown’s response to this outrage will be to proceed full steam
ahead with his intended course.
• WEAK AMERICAN GENERALS SAID TO BE
TERRIFIED: The Editor was informed on 30th April that ‘the US Generals
are terrified’. It is understood that in order to keep the restless
American Generals ‘in line’, the Dark Forces ‘inside the Beltway’ and
in the Virginia area are targeting their children and grandchildren.
But the juggernaut of this crisis may force the US military to act,
sooner rather than later. They had better get moving – finally.
FIVE FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS
There are five further factors of interest that emerge from this analysis and summary:
1. What lies behind the daily, almost hourly, fabrications,
obfuscations, ‘preparing to settle’ reports and elaborations, of which
the most recent batch is reported in our diary format above? Here’s one
underlying explanation. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) system
having been shown to be susceptible to bribery and other imperfections
(not least the tell-tale refusal of the US criminal government
structures to sign up to its provisions), its partial effectiveness
nevertheless has the potential to cause extreme embarrassment,
irritation and inconvenience to arrogant US officials, as Paulson duly
discovered when he found his wrists encased in cuffs in Germany, as
reported by this service last December. Not least because of this
partial effectiveness, there is a continuing need for the ICJ to be
‘mollified’, and this requirement is being ‘satisfied’ by means of the
device of constantly conveying the (hitherto false) impression that
settlement of the Wanta Plan is imminent. This is believed to ‘get the
ICJ off our backs’, buying time for further patchwork solutions
intended to circumvent the inevitable Wanta Settlement and make more
fiat money.
2. The Banking War: As noted above, a banking war, proxy for a phase of
the ongoing, white-hot international intelligence war, is taking place.
The ‘mainstream’ media, having failed to absorb or even to inform
itself about ‘Wantagate’, appears to have no clue about any of this,
confining its commentaries to such idiotic assertions as that put
forward in The Sunday Telegraph on 29th April to the effect that ‘the
world’s biggest banking scrap is all about people’. If ridiculously
shallow assessments such as this are the best that modern British
financial journalism can offer, our substitution of the word
‘sidestream’ media for ‘mainstream’ appears to be well justified.
The FACT is that the battle for control inter alia of ABN Amro is in
reality a struggle for the control of the multiple legitimate bank
accounts owned by Ambassador Leo Wanta as sole Principal.
The bank accounts belong to some of his Title 18, Section 6
corporations, which are LEGITIMATE US Government corporations
established offshore under the provisions inter alia of President
Ronald Reagan’s 1981 Executive Order 12333, which authorised US
intelligence officers, in accordance with their instructions, to
establish corporations both onshore and offshore, for the purpose of
conducting intelligence operations on behalf of the US Government under
contract with the CIA or whichever agency needed their services.
This is not the way that your correspondent would have proceeded had he
been President of the United States, but it is an accurate historical
statement of the situation.
As such, these Wanta accounts hold real assets, on the proceeds of
which tax is payable to the US Treasury upon their repatriation. Prior
to their repatriation, Leo Wanta reported each year to the General
Accounting (now ‘Accountability’) Office, so that the authorities
always possessed financial information concerning the assets held in
these accounts prior to repatriation.
By contrast, secretly established offshore accounts holding untaxed
fiat money generated through the illegal conspiratorial exploitation of
the Ambassador’s legitimate USG Title 18 Section 6 entity accounts do
not represent assets upon which the banks can rely, because their
sources of funds cannot be verified, as is about to be tested.
Specifically, these accounts are to be subjected to taxation demands by
the various metropolitan authorities, after which their self-styled
‘beneficiaries’ will be required to justify ‘source of funds’ and will
be unable to do so without incriminating themselves. Therefore, having
now at last fully understood the extreme gravity of the situation they
face, institutions are scrambling to ‘own’ the ‘real asset’ accounts
belonging to the Ambassador, because many other ‘offshore’ accounts
have been frozen and must undergo the two-stage procedure identified
above.
The banks competing for the Ambassador’s accounts are clearly also
driven by their intelligence services, which is why we are correct in
stating that the banking war is proxy for a phase of the white hot
international intelligence war that is raging out of control.
3. ‘Transparency’: It is ironic that shareholders who have been making
their views known at Extraordinary General Meetings of the relevant
institutions have been focusing as usual upon obtaining the best price
for the shares they own, whereas of course the General Managements and
Boards of Directors in question are secretly focusing primarily upon
obtaining control over the Wanta accounts, as discussed in 2
immediately above.
This of course means that the officers of the banks that we have in
mind are FAILING TO DISCLOSE TO THE SHAREHOLDERS WHAT THIS BANKING WAR
IS ALL ABOUT, which further means in turn that the shareholders are
being misled. Shareholders reading this account of events may decide
that it would be appropriate to take legal advice about this.
4. THE U.S. ‘ACT OF WAR’ AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM VIA THE BANK OF
ENGLAND: In 2004, a US West Coast intelligence operative whose identity
is known to this Editor commented to a certain contact that the UK was
targeted for financial destruction. The comment was made in the context
of his day-to-day knowledge of the illegal financial operations that
have been manufactured inter alia on the basis of the exploitation of
Ambassador Wanta’s funds. Although this US operative, being a Dark
Actor Playing Games, purports to ‘work for’ a certain well known
Democratic figure, in actual fact, given the internal geometry of the
criminal US ‘Box Gang’, he ‘works’ for the US Pan-German Nazi Continuum
CIA cadre serving the Nazi interests of Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst
(DVD), Dachau, which exists in order to implement the ‘Thousand-Year
Reich on the Ruins of the United States’. Great Britain, which he hates
(not least because he has been precluded from entering the United
Kingdom), is rightly regarded as an impediment to the final achievement
of that Luciferian objective. The Editor concludes from this that the
gross financial operations which have resulted in the Bank of England’s
gold being stolen, WERE PREPLANNED BY THE WHITE HOUSE, operating as
proxy for the DVD – as would be logical since George H.W. Bush Sr.
remains indeed the head of that Luciferian Pan-German ‘Black’
intelligence entity.
5. Europeans come to the ‘rescue’ of the Bank of England: It is equally
ironic that, aware of the evil ‘Financial Warfare’ coup that has been
perpetrated, with inside help (see above) against the Bank of England
by the criminal US authorities, leading European institutions have
reacted by pouring huge ‘previously fiat’ financial reserves into the
Bank of England, to prevent its collapse in the face of the White
House’s unprovoked malevolent attack.
The reason for this is that it is ‘too much’ even for the basically
antagonistic European Union Governments, to contemplate the collapse of
the Bank of England, which would of course have worldwide ramifications
and ‘unanticipated consequences’.
• Late intelligence: It is understood that
this ‘rescue’ operation may not have been successful, but that,
simultaneously, British special agents have tracked down the
expropriated $4.8+ trillion. It is to be expected that US bank accounts
in the United Kingdom will, at a minimum, have to be frozen.
THE U.S. AMBASSADOR SHOULD BE ORDERED TO LEAVE LONDON
The Editor would like to see the American Ambassador ordered to leave
London at once with his entire diplomatic staff until such time as the
illegally expropriated $4.8+ trillion is restored and the illegally
delayed and diverted $4.5 trillion owing to Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta
since June 2006 is duly paid into the Securities Account with Morgan
Stanley of his Commonwealth of Virginia-based corporation AmeriTrust
Groupe, Inc.
Failing the necessary outcome, the Editor would then order all American
military to leave the United Kingdom within seven days, and would sever
diplomatic relations with the United States. Arguments to the effect
that this would consummate what the collaborating covert Nazis and the
covert Soviets have always aimed at, can safely be ignored for the time
being, pending the prompt resolution of this crisis. Neither the
Germans nor the Americans can do without the British in the medium
term, so such arguments lack any merit in this situation.
• We hope that the US military and/or law
enforcement authorities will take the necessary steps to bring this
crisis to a halt. Otherwise the cumulative consequences for the whole
world will indeed become terrible to behold.
• We have received a number of unpleasant
emails from Americans whose noses appear to be out of joint because a
‘hated’ Brit has paid for the Ambassador’s release from the US GULAG,
house arrest and probation. NOW would therefore appear to be the moment
for this Editor to say what he thinks about this dimension of the
matter. The unpleasant fact is that no American, in any capacity, was
prepared to raise the rather modest amount of $30,626.97 to procure the
necessary overdue outcome, and to ‘move’ this crucial matter forward.
The provision of these private funds was not an act of heroism on the
Editor’s part, but rather one of extreme necessity, even desperation.
Before, therefore, opinionated correspondents accuse this ‘Brit’ of
intermeddling in the domestic affairs of the United States, please take
note of the following simple facts: (1) No American was prepared to
lift one finger on behalf of the Ambassador; and (2) This is not a
domestic US crisis, it is a colossal international financial corruption
crisis brought about by the stinking corruption and criminality of the
clique that seized control of the US Federal Government many years ago.
So do not, please, complain that you are being helped to achieve what,
for some quite inexplicable reason, you appear to have been quite
incapable of doing for yourselves – even while also waging Financial
Warfare against the United Kingdom, supposedly your closest ally.
APPENDIX
The following is the full text of the Editor’s email to the
Communications Office of the Wisconsin Department of Revenue dated 24th
April 2007. Please note that this email was of course sent out BEFORE
the Wisconsin Department of Corrections disgorged their check for
$24,900.91 dated 4th August 2005 on 27th April 2007, as reported above
(= CHECK MATE).
From: CHRISTOPHER STORY FRSA
To: meredith.helgerson@dor.state.wi.us
Cc: askDOJ@usdoj.gov ; docweb@doc.state.wi.us ; wisgov@gov.state.wi.us ; vice_president@whitehouse.gov ; bipp@rice.edu ; Patrick.j.fitzgerald@doj.gov ; president@whitehouse.gov; lsandler@journalsentinel.com ; mg2@utah.edu ; gfrazier@dor.state.wi.us ; John.Dipko@doc.state.wi.us; audra.brennan@dor.state.wi.us ; laura.engan@dor.state.wi.us ; dorsecretary@dor.state.wi.us
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 12:17 AM
Subject: Record of Telephone Conversations 20 April 2007 with Meredith Helgerson: with added detail FYI: RE AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA
Dear Ms Helgerson
Re: Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta and the behaviour of the Wisconsin
Department of Revenue generally notwithstanding Judge Michael B.
Torphy's Restitution Order and Absolute Discharge from Restitution
effective 14th November 2005: refer to Title 18 USC Section 4:
Misprision of Felony in all dimensions of this specific case and
generally: Repeated illegal Wisconsin State Civil Tax Assessments for
the same amount of $14,129 (paid under protest THREE TIMES, in May and
June 1992 and again on 21 July 2005: now illegally demanded a fourth
time) of a non-resident of the State of Wisconsin/USA: see inter alia
the 24-page Supplement published with International Currency Review Volume 31, 3/4 (November 2006) and further: www.worldreports.org Home Page/Archive posting dated 20th March 2007.
I refer to our telephone conversation today timed at 7.30 pm London
(UK) time today, and thank you for your courtesy in taking the call and
for confirming that Roger Ervin, Secretary of the Wisconsin Department
of Revenue, will telephone me concerning the matter of your
Department's repeated illegal multiple civil tax assessment billings
for the same amount of $14,129 (+) and its 17+ years-long harassment of
Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta, who has been a lawful resident of Vienna,
Austria, since June 1988 and therefore is not and has not been during
the tax periods cited in your documentation liable for any Wisconsin
State tax at all. (I was directed at 7.23 pm London time today to call
your number 608-261 2271
, by Ms Terry Alexander of the Wisconsin Department of Revenue).
I asked you why your Department has raised the same civil tax
assessment against Ambassador Leo Wanta on three separate occasions and
has taken and banked the three checks concerning the same amount of
$14,129 (+), of which the front and reverse of each check are held by
myself and others, and why your Department has continued to demand,
with interest, the same amount a fourth time, notwithstanding
specifically that the full amount was paid under protest the third time
on behalf of the Ambassador, to the Department of Corrections by
Attorney Steven Goodwin on 21st July 2005.
For your further information, by way of reminder, John Dipko, Public
Information Director, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, confirmed to
me in his email dated 10th November 2006 timed at 16:36 pm UK time that
on 4th August 2005 his Department sent to your Department a check by
way of full settlement in the amount of $24,900.91 payable to the
Wisconsin Department of Revenue, thereby settling in full the third
illegally and incorrectly demanded civil tax assessment amount of
$14,129 (plus interest etc) which had already been paid twice under
protest as 'nuisance payments' in May and June 1992, as confirmed by
the documentation on file and as documented in the transcript of the
County Court of The Hon Judge Michael B. Torphy Jr./Dane County,
Wisconsin/USA.
As a consequence of the third protest payment, on 21st July 2005, of
the same illegally raised civil tax assessment, following the decision
in this matter of Judge Michael B. Torphy Jr., Mr Matthew J. Frank,
Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, issued a DISCHARGE
effective 14th November 2005 ordering that 'Leo E. Wanta is discharged
ABSOLUTELY'.
Per Judge Michael B. Torphy's Restitution Order all 'obligations' to
the State of Wisconsin (albeit charged illegally and apparently
corruptly quadruplicated by the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue),
have been paid in full.
The Department of Revenue has nothing to do with this matter, has no
right to be involved, and as stated the Ambassador has in any case been
discharged from restitution ABSOLUTELY since 14 November 2005.
Notwithstanding the above, I gather that the Ambassador should have
received a Satisfaction of Judgment document but that he has not been
provided with it, which, given that the Department of Corrections sent
your Department $24,900.91 in full settlement on 4th August 2005, is
clearly felonious. This is especially the case, given that Mr Gregg T.
Frazier, Chief, Central Audit Section, Wisconsin Department of Revenue,
enclosed with his letter to the Ambassador dated 30th October 2006
demanding a fourth payment of the same civil income tax assessment, an
'amended' printout annotated in handwriting: 'Per Wisconsin Supreme
Court Order Dated December 30, 2005', an 'order' of which the
Ambassador had and has no knowledge, since he, your victim, was not
served with any such Wisconsin Supreme Court Order at any time.
This further means, in plain British English, at any rate, that Mr
LeoWanta has no obligations whatsoever to the State of Wisconsin and
that any Wisconsin State Civil Tax Assessments against Ambassador Leo
Emil Wanta, a non-resident of the State of Wisconsin/USA since June
1988, are spurious, illegal and intermeddle with the Hon. Judge
Torphy's Restitution Order and subsequent Discharge signed by the
Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections.
We also hold of course copies of (a) the receipt Number 2270992 PP
signed by Wisconsin Department of Corrections Agent Michelle Riel
referring to Attorney Steven Goodwin's check number 1098 for $30,626.97
and confirming that the Department of Corrections duly received his
check on 21st July 2005, from which the above payment of $24,900.91 to
the Wisconsin Department of Revenue was taken; and (b) a WI/DOC
computer printout dated 22nd July 2005 signed by Agent Michelle Riel
marked 'Paid in full 7/21/05', referencing the amount of $30,626.97,
which self-evidently further confirms payment in full to the Department
of Corrections, which is the lead Department in this matter given its
'ownership' of Judge Torphy's Restitution Order and the administration
thereof throughout.
Although you represent or are the spokeswoman for the Department's
Bureau of Communications, you resorted to the statement that you cannot
comment on the tax affairs of a (purported) individual taxpayer and you
reiterated this statement four or five times, even though I was able to
understand you the first time.
However the purpose of my enquiry is also to elicit an explanation of
your Department's behaviour generally, arising out of this scandal, so
that we can be in a position to report on this matter to the
international financial community accordingly.
The purpose of your office is presumably to communicate, not to block
press enquiries, as you have done on this occasion. I pointed out
several times that the issue is not just the spurious purported WI
State tax affairs of Leo Emil Wanta, but also, as a consequence
thereof, the ethical and possibly criminal behaviour of your
Department. You then stated that 'I am familiar with your connection
with Mr Leo Wanta', and also indicated that you had read or seen our
recent website report on this matter, dated 20th March 2007, posted on www.worldreports.org Home/Archive.
Later in the conversation you stated that you are not familiar with the detail of the case.
The detail of the case, including the full text of Mr Dipko's email to
me dated 10th November 2006, is posted on our website as stated above
and was earlier elaborated in the 24-page Supplement that was published
with International Currency Review,
Volume 31, Numbers 3 & 4, last November, for the benefit and
information of the international and US domestic financial,
intelligence and political communities.
I further reminded you that on 3rd November 2005, when I also spoke
with you, I spoke to Gregg T. Frazier, Chief, Central Audit Section,
concerning these issues, and that in the course of that same
conversation he indicated to me that 'I will have to look into the
matter'. He made this statement to me twice in the same telephone
conversation.
At about 8.40 pm UK time today you telephoned me on 1-800 661 4809
and stated that you had contacted the office of the Secretary of the
Wisconsin Department of Revenue, Roger Ervin, and that he had
instructed you to tell me that (quote) 'he will not make any comment on
the Wanta case', thereby of course specifically commenting on the Wanta
case and indicating his familiarity with it.
In this second conversation I reminded you that you had stated specifically that Mr Ervin WILL call me.
You made that statement twice. I therefore asked you why you had said
this, and you replied that you had 'checked with the Secretary', which
is not consistent with what you stated to me in the first telephone
conversation of today's date (see above). I had been led to believe by
you that Mr Ervin WILL telephone me about this matter and you have not
complied with your earlier statement.
I also reminded you, in our second conversation today, that you had
informed Mr Richard N. Goldberger, a journalist in Utah, that the Wanta
'file is closed'. Specifically I have an email confirming this, from Mr
Goldberger, dated 20th January 2007 (timed at 13:15 pm UK time).
You responded: 'I apologise'.
When you stonewalled in the second telephone call above, I again
pointed out that this matter is broader than the issue of a purported
individual taxpayer's spurious tax affairs, as it impinges upon the
ethical and possibly criminal behaviour of your Department. The facts
are the facts, and they are fully documented, with the necessary copies
held in multiple locations. I closed by stating that, given your
Department's obvious stonewalling and failure to assist my enquiries,
there are many ways to skin a cat, meaning that other avenues, I
understand, will therefore be followed in order to bring this matter to
the appropriate outcome.
Should you and your colleagues decide, in the light of the above and on
further consideration, that it would be helpful for your reiterated and
specific undertaking to me that Mr Roger Ervin will telephone me, to be
fulfilled, I will of course be very pleased to take his call on 1-800 661 4809
.
Yours sincerely, Christopher Story FRSA
Investigative journalist, Editor and Publisher
www.worldreports.org cstory@worldreports.org
LAWS BREACHED BY THE HIGH-LEVEL U.S. CRIMINAL OPERATIVES
For the sake of good order, we reproduce again the list of Statutes
etc. of which the officials and institutions in question remain in
breach. This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration
condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and total contempt for
domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are
illegally diverting and exploiting Ambassador Wanta’s funds:
LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR
WANTA’S TAGGED $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT HIGHEST LEVELS IN BAD
FAITH IN MAY 2006:
US laws breached by President Bush Jr., Richard Cheney, Henry M.
Paulson, Robert M. Kimmitt, Michael Chertoff, other officials
previously named in these reports, all members of G. W. Bush's Cabinet,
and the Boards of Directors of Goldman Sachs and Co, Bank of America,
Citibank Group, Wachovia Bank, JPMorganChase, Bank of Nova Scotia,
Chemical Bank, First Union Bank and other US and foreign institutions,
including the Bank of England, which have been illegally exploiting
Ambassador Wanta’s tagged and earmarked $4.5 trillion Settlement money,
always intended for the benefit of the American people and for the
paying down of the US Treasury’s background debt:
• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC]
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions
being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [FISA]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war
Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 &
12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick
Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number
20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number:
0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number:
30203866855F001
• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review
cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or the earlier
Wanta Crisis reports. We are a private intelligence publishing house.
Subscriptions to our services may be entered by pressing SUBSCRIBE
against the selected publication title, and following the ultra-safe
web payment procedure. We have no subventions apart from our
subscriptions and books income, and cannot spend unproductive time on
Internet discussions. If you would like to enter into formal
consultation arrangements with the Editor on a fee-paying basis, you
need to go, in the first instance, to the Global Analysis Limited
section of this website and send us details about your requirements. We
charge for our time and cannot provide free advice on any of these
issues. This has been a straightforward business operation since 1963,
and has nothing to do with any outside sponsorship.
___
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington DC West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming United States South America Great Britain England Europe Middle East Asia Melbourne World
Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.
May 2, 2007 in Current Affairs | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d3ac69e200e5509593ea8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Wantagate: World vs. White House Bunker - Skinning the Cat Pt. 2:
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.