Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

«'s Poll leaves out Ron Paul | Main | Student Held Down and Tazered (Tasered) for asking John Kerry if he's in a Death Cult »

Wantagate: Wanta $$ Embezzled by Agents for Clinton, Cheney,.



Monday 17 September 2007 21:17




The latest Wantagate report, which immediately follows the worldwide distribution of the new Wantagate double issue of International Currency Review, last Friday, is now posted at [NEWS, Home Page].
It contains detailed information which has come to light enabling us to PROVE that operatives working for Cheney and Clinton pillaged a certain bank account owned by Ambassador Leo Wanta. On 10th September, we received a package at our London office Fedexed from the United States containing certain banking documents. The US party sending the Fedex package did not know that the Editor possesses a vast store of Wanta documents, as a result of which we have been able to match bank documents Fedexed to us with bank documents held here on file. The papers sent to us diverge from those we hold on file, although they purport to be the same documents. The upshot is that we can PROVE that the Wanta bank documents in question have been doctored, revised, fabricated and forged. This implicates Clinton and Cheney directly in fraudulent finance.
The Fedexed package also contained an implied threat to assassinate the Editor. Don't be concerned: he is not phased. It's been reported, and the publicity on that score generated by the new posting is not 'accidental'.
In the new report, we have identified and exposed the US operatives who conducted this embezzlement operation. Our new forensic investigation concerns just ONE bank account: as you will be aware, we have published many pages listing Wanta Title 18, Section 6 USG authorised corporate bank accounts, arranged in alphabetical order [see Archive, and International Currency Review, current double issue, and passim].
I would like all concerned to know that we have won this war, and that the new global financial system that we predicted is imminent. However since we are dealing with the wayward, Luciferian, double-minded mentality, the financial crisis is being allowed to run out of control as these operatives at the highest levels bicker about the details. The new environment that will emerge will, let it be clearly understood, be a direct and exclusive consequence of 'Wantagate': by which is meant that, because the US fraudulent finance specialists took it upon themselves to hijack the Wanta Settlement in June 2006, they created conditions which have enabled us to expose their ongoing marketing of unbacked trash paper to the Rest of the World, as well as to unsuspecting fellow Americans. In the vernacular, the organised criminal operatives embedded at the highest levels of the US Government and of leading financial institutions, have been rumbled. Their game is well and truly up.
The theft of The Queen's gold (that grotesque 'Act of War' perpetrated against the United Kingdom by the United States, with traitorous assistance inside the Bank of England's structures), has not yet been rectified. However expert opinion consulted by this service has surmised that it is hard to see how the new regime can take effect without that outstanding issue having been settled. There is a possibility that the Queen's gold may be used as the underlying basis for the new system, in which case the objective reality would be that the United Kingdom OWNS the United States (just as Leo Wanta currently 'OWNS' all the big US banks). But that, somehow, would be, how shall we say, too good to be true? If The Queen's gold is indeed to be used as suggested, then its 'theft' may have been a clever cover to disguise this monumental development. My new report does not go into this yet, because we don't have enough inside information on that dimension. Some US analysts have suggested all along that Britain has always 'wanted America back'. As a very close student of both countries, I personally have NEVER encountered ANY evidence to support this theory. But the foregoing paradigm may well have 'happened' without anyone realising it.
Anyway, there is quite enough exclusive intelligence in the new report to keep you going for the time being!
With best wishes,
Your humble servant,
Christopher Edward Harle Story FRSA
Investigative journalist, Editor, Author, Publisher
De facto arms' length Wantagate Rapporteur
International Currency Review
World Reports Limited
108 Horseferry Road
London SW1P 2EF, United Kingdom
The Editor's book exposing the World Revolution from every angle, 'The New Underworld Order', may be ordered from our website, or you can go directly to We have no subventions from any source, so we have to be commercial at all times. If you would like to donate, please contact the Editor: we have been 'running on empty' for several years. All contributions most gratefully received.



Monday 17 September 2007 21:17





By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the Home Page for 'Wantagate' reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications as they are made available, has been added].

The British press is plastered with pictures of customers of the secondary bank, Northern Rock, standing in long lines outside branches of this institution all over the country, waiting to pull their savings from the bank. Nothing has been seen in Great Britain like this since 1973, which was the last occasion that the Bank of England acted as lender of last resort for a high street bank.

The bank run continued on Saturday, is accelerating ‘as we speak’, and has been aggravated by the first-ever online bank run, with customers withdrawing their funds online all weekend. When was the world last treated to press pictures of distressed savers lining up outside their bank branches anywhere in the West, to withdraw their deposits? In early 2000, when Argentina was going down the tubes. As in Argentina at the turn of this century, so in Britain today.

The British authorities are pleading with depositors, almost screaming at them, to stay calm, after the shares in other UK secondary banks – Bradford and Bingley, and Alliance and Leicester – fell sharply when the market opened on 17th September.

The Editor of this service was Editor of International Currency Review in 1973, and reported on most of the subsequent banking crises – which, it has since become clear thanks to our Wantagate exposures, have ALL been attributable ultimately, behind-the-scenes, to criminal financial fraud operations perpetrated by CIA-linked operatives applying their evil scamming skills to exploit the fiat money system for their own and their handlers’ benefit, and to procure the independence of the US intelligence community as an arrogant and malevolent ‘state within the state’.

‘PANIC ON THE HIGH STREET’ screamed The Daily Telegraph on 15th September: ‘RUN ON THE BANK’ echoed Murdoch-Greenberg’s subversive newspaper, The Times. Within just a few days of the Governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, having intimated publicly that the central bank would, as far as possible, stand aside from the ‘credit crunch’, Mr King stood on his head, with the agreement of Alistair Darling, the new Chancellor of the Exchequer, and the Financial Services Authority, and made a facility of nearly £40 billion available to this distressed secondary bank, as the value of its shares collapsed by 32.7% in one day, and other institutions felt obliged to issue reassuring noises to prevent customers at their branches following suit.

Northern Rock’s computer system collapsed under the pressure of customers seeking to withdraw their funds, while Christopher and Fiona Howard, hoteliers, entered the Cheltenham branch of Northern Rock demanding their money (about £1.0 million), and blocked the doorway after being told that the bank did not keep such a large quantity of banknotes on the premises.

After the female bank manager had dialled 999, the police arrived and the situation was ‘resolved’ with police assistance. Long queues built up outside Northern Rock branches around the country, as customers who had spent three or four hours trying to access their funds via the institution’s on-line banking service, appeared at branches instead – or else turned up at the branch where their savings were booked, to withdraw the lot. The panic was reported to be especially acute among people who have had their fingers burned with the earlier corrupt mishandling of their pensions, and who now feared that their savings were going up in smoke, as well.

Meanwhile certain surviving hedge funds have made a killing overnight by shorting Northern Rock’s shares. The institution’s business model, relying more than any other British secondary institution on the wholesale money markets, collapsed when ‘fear and loathing’ destroyed banking relationships, after banks realised – in the face of the exposure of fraudulent finance operations by this service – that they could not trust other institutions to which they were accustomed to lending surplus funds overnight, as in the past.

In the United States, there are now fears that defaults on car loans may follow the ‘sub-prime’ mortgage crisis, implying the likelihood of fraudulent finance in that sector, as well.

None of this would have happened, you ought by now to understand, had Henry M. Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary, and his corrupt colleagues at the highest levels of the US Federal Government and its structures – who seized illegal control of the $4.5 trillion compromise Settlement finalised in bad faith in May 2006 by the President of the United States, leading US legislators, Supreme Court Justices, and other eminences – fulfilled their formal undertaking to enable Ambassador Leo Wanta to take economic receipt of the $4.5 trillion with which he would at once have embarked upon on-the-books capital markets operations for the long-term benefit of the US Treasury, the American people, and ‘the whole of humanity’, to cite the message of Her Majesty the Queen to the Group of Eight Meeting in Germany last June.

On the contrary, had the payment been completed, the illegal transactions which Wantagate has exposed, would all have been brushed under a gigantic Iranian carpet, and few would have been any the wiser. Certainly, it would not have fallen to this veteran Editor of International Currency Review – guided by the Ambassador and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., Executive Vice President and Treasurer of Leo Wanta’s Commonwealth of Virginia-based AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, as primary sources – to expose, by instalments, the gigantic US cesspool of fraudulent finance and iniquity which has led the world into this unprecedented state of financial turmoil.

But the operative Paulson and his cronies disregarded the clear statement of risks attending their corrupt financial conduct which we published on this website back on 2nd September 2006, and chose instead to enable the CIA to play fast and loose, as usual, with Leo Wanta’s funds – while the named co-conspiring financing institutions could, under their illegal auspices, continue to trade and leverage the Ambassador’s assets back and forth, generating mountains of untaxed and illegal fiat accruals for stashing offshore, as they had been doing ever since the Ambassador was ‘taken down’ by the farcical means that we have exposed, on 7th July 1993.

The most recent financial sub-scandal perpetrated by these criminals that we have been able to deconstruct and pin down, has been illustrated by means of two charts labelled ‘Organised criminal theft and diversion of Wanta’s funds inside the US banking system’, which we have displayed on pages 30 and 31 in the Second Supplement that has just been published along with International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 1 and 2, mailed from London on 14th September.

For, while the panicking Northern Rock customers were lining up all round the United Kingdom to withdraw their funds in the face of the collapse of confidence, your correspondent and colleagues, aided by Royal Mail workers, were engaged in loading a 7.5-ton Post Office vehicle from one end to the other with the new double issue of International Currency Review and its two Supplements.

Control copies were delivered to us on Saturday morning, indicating that, much maligned as it is, Royal Mail are capable of super-efficient service, as on this occasion. Central banks, financial institutions, investors, intelligence communities, official agencies, international institutions, and others all over the world will therefore be receiving their copies in short order. The timing has, dare we suggest it, been fortuituous.

This is because the latest, 544-page special Wantagate issue of International Currency Review, and its two Supplements, provides meticulous documented proof, which will of course remain ON THE RECORD worldwide for evermore, of the financial frauds, diversion, embezzlement and criminal financial operations perpetrated by and under the supervision inter alia of President George W. Bush Jr., Vice President Richard B. Cheney, and the respondents to the Ambassador’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus [Case #: 1:2007cv00609-TSE-BRP] filed en bloc at the United States Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division, on 27th July 2007 by Colonel Dana Wilcox (US Office of Naval Intelligence). These are: Henry M. Paulson, Jr., US Treasury Secretary; Robert M. Kimmitt, Deputy US Treasury Secretary; James R. Wilkinson, Chief of Staff at the Treasury; Michael Chertoff, Secretary for Homeland Security; the former US Attorney General, Alberto R. Gonzales (who finally left his post on 14th September); and the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.

The Presiding Judge for this case is the District Judge T. S. Ellis III, and the Referring Judge is Magistrate Judge Barry R. Poretz [see outline details below]. The full text of the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus was posted on this website on 24th June 2007, and may be accessed via the Archive. The case cannot be sealed until Ambassador Leo E. Wanta has been paid the $4.5 trillion of his Settlement that has been illegally diverted, exploited, leveraged and otherwise abused under the supervision of Henry M. Paulson, the former CEO of Goldman Sachs, since June 2006. On arriving at the US Treasury, Paulson retained sole signatory power over the funds, which had originally been parked at Goldman Sachs, in what we have described as the most disgraceful conflict of interest in world financial history.

As this world financial crisis has escalated following the reprobate decisions of Paulson and his superiors to steal, divert and abuse the Ambassador’s Settlement funds – enabling their associates and the CIA to ‘run the money’, and its controlled and co-conspiring institutions to contravene US Statutes and securities regulations on a scale without historical precedent, several awkward circumstances have been ‘creeping up’, on these operatives:

In the first place, since we have published, and continue to publish, a list of the Statutes of which they and their co-conspiring financial institutions are in breach, all concerned have forfeited any prospect of ‘special consideration’, leniency and/or immunity from prosecution now or in the future, because any such treatment would reconfirm to the whole world that the Rule of Law is a total farce in the United States, which would therefore be universally seen to have reverted to a system of corrupt, barbaric banditry. The cynical assumption that these criminal operatives can still rely upon Presidential Pardons to let them off the hook, is largely fanciful. We have reiterated these Statutes and Securities Regulations in order for us all to be quite sure that no-one in the United States who has been following Wantagate, can remain under illusions on this score.

Misprision of Felony: In addition, we have repeatedly cited the US Federal Misprison of Felony law [see again, below] with recent reports, along with the aforementioned familiar list of Statutes and Securities Regulations, which of course has placed not only the perpetrators of these financial crimes, but also all US readers of these reports, on the spot. For that Federal law requires anyone in the United States who possesses any knowledge of crimes, to report such knowledge to ‘some Judge’ or other person of military or civil authority ‘under the United States’, on pain of three years’ imprisonment or a fine, or both.

This means exactly what it says. Equipped with the knowledge that YOU, dear U.S. citizen, now possess from reading these reports, YOU are required to report these crimes to some Judge or other military or civil official under the United States, forthwith – not least in order to avoid running the risk of suffering three years’ GULAG imprisonment and/or a hefty fine. Whether the US Judge or other official corruptly fails to take the action required by law is not your problem: BUT REPORTING THESE CRIMES TO THE U.S. FEDERAL AUTHORITIES MOST CERTAINLY IS YOUR PROBLEM.

You may very well assume, cynically, that this law is redundant, dead and buried, and therefore does not apply to you. In which case, you are severely mistaken. On pages 99-108 of the very latest Wantagate double issue of International Currency Review [Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, just mailed] we have listed the recipients of Presidential Pardons granted by former President Bill Clinton (mainly to his buddies for unpardonable crimes such as drug-running, financial scamming, fraudulent finance and money-laundering).

Among the crimes (the precise details and Statutes concerning which, by the way, are exhaustively listed therein), Misprision of Felony is quite prominently featured. This specific evidence makes it plain that Misprision of Felony remains, to this day, a Federal crime in the United States for which imprisonment is liable to be handed down by the courts, notwithstanding the decadent condition of the US system of ‘justice’ generally. YOU are therefore enjoined and strongly advised to report the Federal crimes that YOU read about on this website to some Judge or other person of authority in military or civil life under the United States, without delay.

The same ancient law, which of course is derived from English Common Law, prevails in the United Kingdom. The Editor has fulfilled his own personal legal obligations in this score, with respect to egregious financial crimes committed by British subjects of which he is aware, by reporting them publicly in these website reports. The crimes of which those individuals and institutions concerned in the United States are variously in breach, together with the Securities Regulations flouted by these criminals, are again listed with this report.

Further relevance of the above arises from the fact that parties in the United States have taken it upon themselves to bombard the Editor of this service, for very many months now, with ‘evidence’ of the alleged ‘fact’ that the United States is a corporate entity, that Washington DC is ditto, that US States and official structures are corporate entities, and that therefore, the Editor’s references to the Federal Statutes of which these criminals are in breach (made of course under appropriate authoritative direction) are all misplaced.

The arrogance and insistence with which these fairytales are promulgated needs to be seen to be believed. In a recent circular, a certain operative – who, unlike the Editor of this service, hides in cowardly fashion (like so many others do) behind a pseudonym, and omits any coordinates on his emails – complains, with reference to the preceding report in this series, that ‘the most recent Christopher Story update poo poos [sic] the corporate US and Admiralty Law demonstrating that regardless of how well versed he may be regards Wanta or international finance, he does not know doodly squat about the constitutional crises in this country, regarding the demise of the Federal Reserve, Executive Orders and Presidential Emergency Powers. Without any knowledge of these things and how the corporate U.S. under Illuminati control, stole our nation from ‘we the people’, it may be hard for him to understand the many implications involved and why G.W. Jr./ Clinton, the banks, etc are fighting so hard for the status quo’.

By means of this gratuitous attack, the source who hides behind a pseudonym (so that he must have something to hide) reveals that he himself knows ‘doodly squat’ what he is talking about. In the first place, he has obviously not read the Editor’s book ‘The New Underworld Order’ which is probably the most comprehensive exposure of the Illuminati’s clearly failing World Revolution ever published: he can order a copy via this website. Secondly, here are just a few basic, elementary points that will squash his irrelevant misconceptions.

First, as has been stated above, pages 99-108 of the latest Wantagate issue of International Currency Review, just published, lists a huge number of US Federal legal cases of operatives, criminals and others who were convicted NOT under imaginary, putative Admiralty Law (whereby the victim is guilty until proven innocent), but under the US Federal Statutes that we have cited IN DETAIL against each case.

Manifestly, if these Statutes were inapplicable because a different system of law existed, these offenders would not have been sentenced and incarcerated under the laws so precisely cited in our report. Among them is, as stated above, the Misprision of Felony Statute.

Secondly, the anonymous US pundit appears to be unaware that this corporatist ‘line’ is an OLD, Fascist DUPLICATION operation traceable back to the Eisenhower era, when the DVD*-penetrated (and therefore Fascist-Nazi) CIA had already embarked upon its covert ‘Fifth Column’ subversion of the United States (certainly, ultimately on behalf of the Illuminati, as the anonymous correspondent points out), as a means of undermining the Rule of Law – within its broader offensive against the nation state. This offensive has NOT overthrown the American Federal legal system – despite its reputation for inefficiency, complacency, rampant loopholism, decadence and partial corruption.

On page 81 of the latest International Currency Review, we display a Nazi ‘Labor Day Emblem’ which illustrates a bas-relief of Karl Marx, a Hammer and Sickle, and a Nazi Swastika.

This image graphically confirms what every thinking person ought by now to understand – namely, that Communism and Nazism (Zionazism, Fascism) are two heads of the same serpent. Both are dedicated to the primary objective espoused by Lenin – namely, the subversion and abolition of the nation state, which stands in the way of the globalists’ world hegemony objective.

Hence, the corporatism gobbledegook cited by these self-appointed US ‘experts’, claiming that this putative, duplicated ‘Admiralty Law’ corporatist-Fascist ‘legal system’ has subverted and destroyed the Rule of Law in the United States, which would in turn suggest that the nation state has failed, serves the obfuscation purposes of those Dark Forces whose objective is indeed the destruction of the state (and the Republic).

No, the Rule of Law in the United States has NOT been undermined by this duplicated, diversionary Fascist legal gobbldegook. It has quite simply been subverted by the illegal activities of organised criminal operatives flourishing under cover of the crooks’ charter called the National Security Act of 1947 et seq, within and affiliated to the self-serving criminal ‘enterprise’ known as the Central Intelligence Agency and its subordinate criminal intelligence organisations, which both individually and collectively, are nothing less than a menace to the stability and peace of the whole world.

The CIA, after all, has designed and cynically implemented innumerable criminal financial scamming offensives designed not only to fleece fellow Americans, but also targeting unsuspecting investors and institutions all over the world. The Agency's problem today is that, thanks to Wantagate, these organised criminal financial scamming frauds over which it presides have been, or are now in the process of being, unmasked. And they are being unmasked because the hijacking of Ambassador Wanta’s Settlement by Paulson, Cheney, Bush Jr. et al, gave us the opportunity to expose some of the inner workings of these ruthless US specialists in global fraudulent finance.

Finally, those misguided US operatives and CIA disinformation specialists who have taken it upon themselves to bombard the Editor with these all diversionary corporatist-Fascist ‘legal’ assertions, appear to have overlooked the fact that the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934, the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, the Federal Reserve Acts, and (concerning the Internal Revenue Service) TEFRA (2) of 1986, all apply, as do all the other laws we continually cite in these reports. Parties are being sued, indicted, sentenced, imprisoned and fined under these and other Rule of Law Statutes all over the United States every week of the year. And it is universally accepted that the Securities Regulations of which the cited institutions are in breach [see below], are applicable in real time, whether these self-appointed disinformation pundits like it or not.

So, all this idle, unsolicited confusion-building talk is accordingly nothing less than DELIBERATE, DIVERSIONARY U.S. INTELLIGENCE-ORIGINATED VERBAL CLAPTRAP, the main purpose of which is to downplay and to OBFUSCATE the realities that the parties cited in these reports ARE IN BREACH OF THE U.S. STATUTES AND SECURITIES REGULATIONS THAT WE HAVE CITED.

Obviously, the more ‘Useful Idiots’ out there who can be persuaded by CIA disinformation cadres to run after these diversionary red herrings, the greater the confusion that the US criminal operatives and their co-conspiring institutions think they will be able to hide behind. In response to which seriously misguided aspiration, we simply reiterate that these people have nowhere left to hide.

No-one who has their feet on the ground is being fooled by irrelevant diversionary disinformation operations that are designed to throw sand in everyone’s eyes, so that the crooks can continue their fraudulent financial operations ad infinitum. They cannot.

After all, having taken the fateful and risky decision to steal, divert, exploit, leverage and multiply Ambassador Leo Wanta’s Settlement funds in June 2006 with the arrival of Henry M. ‘Conflict-of-Interest’ Paulson at the Treasury, these people handed us the obligation and the opportunity to UNMASK AND EXPOSE THEIR ENDLESSLY FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL SCAMMING OPERATIONS – WHICH UNAVOIDABLE OBLIGATION WE HAVE FULFILLED, AND CONTINUE TO FULFIL.

It is manifestly not our fault that the international financial system is in turmoil, that the fuse has been lit for an inflationary conflagration, and that the worst possible scenario outlined in our report dated 2nd September 2006, may be about to befall humanity. It is uniquely and specifically the fault of the cynical, arrogant and merciless US criminal operatives and their co-conspiring institutions that this predicted state of affairs is coming to pass. They have indeed been fighting to preserve their ability to exploit the fiat money system that they set up in the first place, for self-enrichment and control purposes. They are desperate, cynical losers.

Accordingly, some of their number – recognising their general predicament – have, one by one, been emerging from the woodwork and seeking to ‘join’ themselves to the Ambassador’s case, like drowning men grabbing what they believe to be a lifeline moored on terra firma.

But whereas the Ambassador, as the sole Principal and the Trustor of the original $27.5 trillion of assets held in the foreign-based bank accounts that we have listed, all belonging to his Title 18, Section 6 corporations, is indeed grounded on terra firma, these people are grabbing ropes that may be tied to sinking stones.

Some appear to labour under the groundless misapprehension that ‘their’ funds are somehow linked to or associated with, the assets that belong to the Ambassador as sole Principal and Trustor. We have already dealt with this illusion, in spades.

Quite why this belief survives, long after we were able to explain that the original $27.5 trillion was DUPLICATED in 1992, inter alia for OBFUSCATION purposes, is rather unclear. Presumably it is partly because old lies take their time to decay. As was pointed out last July, the $27.5 trillion raised from 200+ international banks in 1992 was intended to match precisely the aggregate original value of the $27.5 trillion amassed by Leo Emil Wanta in the course of implementing the Financial Warfare instructions given to him by President Reagan.

One cynical purpose of this (Leninist) DUPLICATION operation was to make it possible for the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ operatives to claim ownership of assets which were and remain in fact the sole property of Leo Wanta, as was previously described. Duplication of the Ambassador's $27.5 trillion provided the pretext for the ‘source of funds’ to be endlessly disputed, whenever this suited the criminal operatives’ purposes – because the two aggregate amounts of $27.5 trillion (base funds) could be deliberately muddled up and confused, for obfuscation purposes.

However the bottom fell out of this deception when Ambassador Leo Wanta ceased to be dead with effect from July 2005, when the Editor of this service paid ‘extortion money’ to the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections [see the Editor’s ‘fourth reading’ of ‘Wisconsingate’, posted here on 6th August 2007] – and the criminal CIA was then obliged, after having deceived its compartmentalised cadres and the international financial community into assuming that Ambassador Wanta was dead, to concoct another strategic deception, while at the same time triggering Internet disinformation offensives in a failed attempt to discredit the Ambassador and the Editor of this service.

As the scale of the officially sanctioned, long-running US fraudulent finance operations became common knowledge internationally as a direct consequence of our exposures, and governments around the world finally understood that the CIA and its corrupt cadres had been systematically marketing unbacked trash derivatives paper internationally on a colossal scale, the world’s central banks realised that they were having to bear the burgeoning costs of these frauds perpetrated by US intelligence and its co-conspiring institutions.

Accordingly The Wanta Plan and the comprehensive financial sector reforms that it entails received the unequivocal backing of the world’s central banking community, which has now decided that it has had enough of these US criminal operations, and that it will not tolerate this state of affairs any longer. The upshot is that The Wanta Plan is to be buttressed by a global financial system which will, in principle, preclude untaxed, off-balance sheet financial transactions, and in which ‘every dime will be taxed’. It is for this reason that the ‘great gulf fixed’ between on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet financing has become so critical. In Europe, and especially in the United Kingdom, off-balance sheet funds ‘can’ be brought onto the balance sheet, which explains why Barclays Bank (one of the most egregious offenders) has been bringing off-balance sheet funds onto its balance sheet in recent weeks. In the United States, this practice, however, is prohibited.

Offshore-based, off-balance sheet ‘funny money’ has therefore been seeking ‘painless ways’ of being transferred onto balance sheets, whether through the collectivisation services offered by hedge funds, or by being deployed to service bank loans raised to finance the purchase of on-balance sheet ‘real assets’. At the same time, certain institutions and the White House have been scrambling to set up ‘closed shop’ mechanisms for by-passing the intended new financial system so that they can continue off-balance sheet, untaxed ‘business as usual’. The several means being adopted to achieve this subversive objective, are discussed towards the end of this report.

Meanwhile this and other related developments, all triggered by the Wantagate-driven intended introduction of the new financial system, has left those with supposed claims arising from past US ‘funny money’ operations likewise scrambling to seek belated ‘legitimisation’ of their claims.

Hence attempts by certain operatives to ‘attach’ their claims to Ambassador Wanta’s funds – all of which attempts are mistaken and delusional. The reason for this is that their claims are not in any way related to Leo Wanta’s wholly-owned $27.5 trillion but, if at all, to the DUPLICATED $27.5 trillion raised under Bush Sr.’s direction from the 200+ banks in 1989-92. These funds do not belong to the Ambassador, and have nothing to do with the Ambassador.

As for spurious financial claims which might, if investigated, be thought by those bringing them, erroneously, to be related to funds of which the Ambassador is the sole Principal, any such claims are false because they are liable to have been based upon embezzlement of the Ambassador’s assets, as will now be specifically explained by examining one example of such embezzlement.

Please be patient because what follows is critical.

During the week ending 14th September 2007, the Editor’s office in London took delivery of a Fedexed package containing papers which will serve to illustrate this particular state of affairs. Sent by an anonymous party from Michigan, but in two stages (evidently common practice when the source of such a delivery is intended to be disguised), with a covering letter dated September 2, 2007 at 5:00pm EST (which should of course read EDT), the package arrived in London on the 10th September, which is to say that it supposedly took as much as eight days to arrive. It takes TWO days, maximum, to send a package from anywhere in the United States by Fedex to Central London.

The covering letter contained a pack of misconceptions and outright lies, including the incredible statement that the US intelligence operative Gwendolyn Ann Waymark ‘became Gwendolyn Wanta’. Ambassador Wanta has no recollection of ever having been married to Ms. G. A. Waymark, let alone having been her fiancé (as the covering letter alleges). The Editor and other sources have always been under the impression that this operative, an intermediary between Cheney and the Clintons, was formerly married to an MI6 officer (from whom she is divorced), based in London.

The letter contained the following observations:

‘We have been getting calls since last summer that just do not add up and our teams are on full alert. We have also done our own investigations and we are prepared to take immediate action if necessary’.

‘The mailing of this letter had to be delayed because as of August 29, 2007 one of our men was gunned down in front of his apartment. He was shot in the back once and then finished off by one or more in the front of the head'.

'We are now ramping up our investigations and our wrath will be realized’.

‘Feel free to call me for more information. Along with this letter I have included a few copies of the information that we have, to confirm our legitimacy…. Also, if there is any protective service that anyone may need in regards to this matter, we are available 24/7 for an immediate response. Working together is only a win win situation for everyone’.

When Leo Wanta was languishing in the horrendous American and Wisconsin GULAGs, no-one in the United States sent him so much as a single dollar bill with which to purchase a bar of candy.

To suggest, at this late stage – accompanied by a blatant implied threat to assassinate the Editor of this service, in the event of our ‘non-cooperation’ – that these people sustain legitimate financial claims which the Ambassador can help them to realise, when any such claims are based upon the brazen theft and diversion of the Ambassador’s funds while he was held illegally in the GULAG, reveals to what extreme lengths these desperados are now prepared to go, as they fear that the rope that they are clinging to is indeed tied to a sinking stone. The Ambassador has no obligations outstanding to any of these people, who have been deluded by the lies and obfuscation operations perpetrated by corrupt CIA cadres for many years, into believing that they hold authoritative claims.

Naturally, we have had to take appropriate measures to inform the US authorities, in the face of the brutal implied threat contained in this Fedexed prose providing the Editor with unsolicited detail about a murder, and with offers of 24/7 ‘Executive Protection’. The whole point of exposures on this website, and in International Currency Review, is that since everything that we have published is based upon authoritative FACT, rather than upon fiction and lies, no such services are required. People who are not committing crimes do not need protection.

But wait.

The Fedexed letter contained a document dated 27th December 1991 ostensibly issued by Status-Credit-Bank, Moscow, an institution with which Leo Wanta held a bank account holding 70 billion Soviet Rubles (then equivalent to about $84 billion US dollars) in the name of his Title 18, Section 6 USG intelligence corporation, Asian-Europe Development, Pte. Ltd, based in Singapore.

This Moscow bank document is labelled ‘No 82’, with ‘82’ written in Russian handwritten script.

The Editor holds on file the SAME Status-Credit-Bank document, labelled ‘82’ (as well as documents numbers 79 and 81 of the same series of documents issued by Status-Credit-Bank, Moscow). The Editor’s file copy of document ‘82’ diverges from the version Fedexed to the Editor’s London office and received on 10th September 2007.

Specifically, both versions of Status-Credit-Bank book entry document ‘No. 82’ have the following paragraph, which is highlighted in yellow pentel on the Fedexed copy: ‘The bank guarantees that the company Asian Europe Development Pte. Ltd will not be able to use the funds received according to contract 81/4c without Paul Bauer’s special permission’.

Thereafter the two versions of ‘No. 82’ diverge. Thus the Editor’s file copy of the alleged Status-Credit-Bank document ‘No. 82’ concludes:

‘The payment of the contract no. 81/4c in favour of the firm ‘Fenix’, shall be transferred to First National Bank of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois ABA 071000013, account 53-05-705, owner Merryl [sic] Lynch for credit on account 585-25C29. Bogdanov’.

‘Copy to Paul M. Bauer 1-215-296 5919.
Copy to: Gwendolyn Waymark: 1-413 789 9549’.

By contrast, the copy of THIS SAME ‘No.82’ Status-Credit-Bank document Fedexed to the Editor OMITS THE ABOVE (from ‘The payment of the contract no. 81/4c… to: Waymark: 1-413 789 9549’), replacing those details by the following sentence, heavily indented and using the American abbreviation ‘thru’ which is NOT used by Russians (who mainly use British English spelling):

‘Transfer and guarantee thru First National Bank of Chicago account: 53-05-705’.

The above-referenced text has been inexplicably omitted: ‘The payment of the contract no. 81/4c in favour of the firm ‘Fenix’, shall be transferred to First National Bank of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois ABA 071000013, account 53-05-705, owner Merryl [sic] Lynch for credit on account 585-25C29. Bogdanov’. This of course suggests that there were reasons for the omission of this information, concerning the bank account with First National Bank of Chicago, about which we do not have enough information to comment further at this stage.

Immediately beneath this alteration, a handwritten annotation, believed to be a false handwriting used by Waymark, reads: ‘retype so you could read’.

We are informed that Paul Michael Bauer, whose address in 1992 was 3527 Oaklawn Avenue Suite #560, Dallas, Texas 75219-4689, ‘worked for’ Clinton.

We are informed that Gwendolyn Waymark ‘works for’ Cheney.

Two of the ‘purported’ Status-Credit-Bank, Moscow, banking documents that were Fedexed to the Editor were faxed from Kinko’s Copies, Dallas, at 5:50 and 5:51pm on 13th March 1993. One of the relevant banking documents that are held on file here by the Editor – addressed ostensibly by the Soviet Unicombank to Paul Michael Bauer at the aforementioned Dallas address – was faxed from another Kinko’s Copies location in Dallas, on 14th April 1992.

It was in 1992 that Leo Wanta’s Chinese partner, Howe Kwong Kok, died suddenly after ingesting rat poison, shortly after a visit to Singapore by George H. W. Bush Sr. Following that incident, and certain other impediments imposed through internal US sabotage on Leo Wanta’s Singapore-based investigations for the FBI and the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) into shipments of illicit drugs via Thailand to the United States, Leo Wanta appealed from Singapore to the US Vice President of the day, Dan Quayle, for emergency (SOS) assistance – in response to which Quayle, an intelligence operative, arranged for Leo Wanta to be exfiltrated to the US West Coast, from where he was subsequently accommodated in a safe house in Toronto, Canada. All this occurred in 1992.

From there, Leo Wanta proceeded in June 1993 to Paris and Switzerland, having been formally appointed Ambassador for Somalia to Switzerland and Canada, as well as Chairman-designate of the Somali Central Bank, which was why he carried in his sealed diplomatic briefcase 18 US Treasury instruments with an aggregate face value of $18 billion, to be used as the base for the geopolitical refinancing of Somalia and the replacement of the decadent Somali dinar with the US dollar, as part of a White House-authorised operation to convert Somalia into a US-controlled and refurbished state, with new ports, airports and the infrastructure fit for the late 20th century.

This project was turned on its head and aborted when Leo Emil Wanta was illegally arrested in Switzerland on 7th July 1993, and flung into a stinking Swiss dungeon for 134 days, in preparation for the looting – by his own corrupt US intelligence colleagues, NOT by foreign intelligence cadres – of the assets held in foreign bank accounts owned by his wholly-owned Title 18, Section 6 USG authorised intelligence corporations.

His diplomatic briefcase was confiscated, and when an inventory of its contents was signed off by Wisconsin special agent Dennis M. Mengelt on 14th March 1994, as previously reported, the list of its contents OMITTED any reference to the 18 high-value US Treasury instruments. The briefcase has never been returned to the Ambassador – because, naturally, it would ‘need’ to contain the 18 high-value US Treasury instruments, which have been stolen.

Please remain patient, because what we are about to report is of exceptional importance in relation to our overall exposure of the worst official financial corruption scandal in world history. The three Status-Credit-Bank documents referenced above relate to alleged ‘contract no. 81/4c’. The Status-Credit-Bank document Fedexed to the Editor of International Currency Review and received on 10th September 2007, references ‘Letter of Credit no. 81/4c-1’ and underlying ‘Contract no. 81/4c’.

However Ambassador Wanta informs the Editor that no such contract was held at Status-Credit-Bank, Moscow, in relation to any business conducted at any time by Leo Wanta: ‘We had no contract no. 81/4c’. Nor was this Paul Bauer fellow ever empowered by Leo Wanta to dispose of any financial assets of which Wanta is sole Principal to this day, and neither has Bauer ever had any authorised standing relating to Leo Wanta’s assets and business operations.

Likewise Gwendolyn Ann Waymark was not authorised to alienate any of Leo Emil Wanta’s funds, or monies derived therefrom, at any time [see below].

When the anonymous US party in Michigan sent the Editor these documents under his threatening covering letter dated 2nd September 2007, he could not have known that the Editor holds a copy of the SAME purported Status-Credit-Bank document ‘No. 82’. Therefore, the US party responsible for Fedexing these papers to us in Central London could not have known that, from these documents and those held in the Editor’s files alone, the following intelligence is proven:

The documents, which relate to funds held at Status-Credit-Bank, Moscow, for that bank’s client Asian Europe Development Pre. Ltd, a Singapore-registered Title 18, Section 6 USG intelligence corporation under President Reagan’s Executive Order 12333, of which Leo Wanta owned two-thirds of the shares (the other one-third being owned by his Chinese partner Howe Kwong Kok, deceased as indicated above), are fraudulent.

The documents provide proof of ongoing US financial fraud, probably against Status-Credit-Bank, Moscow, and certainly against Leo Emil Wanta, Asian-Europe Development Pte. Ltd, and therefore against the United States Government, given that Leo Wanta is the sole Principal and Trustor of funds held in bank accounts owned by Asian-Europe Development Pte. Ltd., an authorised US Government intelligence corporation owned by Wanta as the surviving majority shareholder. THE CIA LIED TO THE BANKS THAT HE WAS DEAD, REMEMBER?

The documents prove that Leo Wanta’s funds have been corruptly embezzled and/or tapped by the US operatives Paul Michael Bauer and Gwendolyn Ann Waymark, who have direct links to, and were/are respectively ‘working for’, former President Clinton and the current Vice President of the United States, Richard B. Cheney – who in turn are accordingly DIRECTLY IMPLICATED IN THESE U.S. BANKING FRAUDS AND FORGERIES, as demonstrated by these documents alone.

The documents expose conspiracy by these US intelligence operatives and their principals to procure tax evasion, as a consequence of such embezzlement, since not only has the Ambassador been precluded from repatriating the funds and paying tax upon them in conformity with US law because the funds have been embezzled, but given that tax will hardly have been paid upon any proceeds of these frauds.

As indicated below, some of the monies were alienated to Vaduz, Liechtenstein.

It should be added here that we are examining ONE CASE OF EMBEZZLEMENT ONLY. The Editor's files contain hundreds of Wanta banking documents which, when subjected to meticulous forensic examination, would likely reveal similar frauds, forgeries and embezzlement by free-wheeling US financial operatives, both against Wanta and against banks all over the world. (The documents in the Editor's files are replicated in 26 other locations worldwide).

Looked at even more closely, the ‘amended’ Status-Credit-Bank’ document ‘No. 82’ Fedexed to the Editor on 10th September 2007 provides as follows (as does the version of ‘No. 82’ held in the Editor’s files): ‘Letter of Credit no. 81/4c-1: We, Status-Credit-Bank, in accordance with A.M.1. code and Contract no. 81/4c in favour of our client on behalf of firm ‘Fenix’, hereby, in accordance with Letter of Credit no. 81, present irrevocable assignable freely transferable letter of credit in favour of our client Asian Europe Development Pte. Ltd on subaccount no. 1345602 to Paul M. Bauer in amount equivalent to (two billion) US dollars with possibility of further prolongation after agreement with the firm ‘Felix’’.

As previously noted, Paul M. Bauer had and has no legitimate connection whatsoever with Leo Wanta’s Asian-Europe Development, Pte. Ltd, based at 101 Cecil Street, Suite 12, 04/05, Tong End Building, Singapore 0106 [telephone (65) 223 2800; fax: 223 3585], which was/is two-thirds owned by Ambassador Wanta, whom the CIA certified to be dead, and one-third by Howe Kwong Kok, who, as noted, died after ingestion of rat poison following a visit to Singapore by George Herbert Walker Bush Sr.. Bauer therefore had and has no authority to dispose of funds from any bank account owned by Asian-Europe Development Pte. Ltd., under any circumstances or at any time.

He is a criminal impostor.

The documents in the Editor’s files show that a transaction involving Asian-Europe Development, Pte. Ltd. funds with an account with the CIA’s Bank of America office in San Francisco referencing Paul Bauer had been switched (between the creation of Status-Credit-Bank document nos. 79 and 81) to an account with Indosuez London EC2 for the benefit of Paul Michael Bauer (presumably so that the CIA itself would not notice the embezzlement?), providing (in document no. 81, dated 27 December 1991) that:

‘We, Status-Credit-Bank, guarantee an irrevocable, assignable, divisible, freely transferable Letter of Credit in favour [note the British English spelling of ‘favour’ here, in document no. 81, compared with the American English spelling of ‘favor’ in both versions of document no. 82 – Ed.] of our client Asian Europe Development Pte. Ltd on subaccount no. 1345602 for Paul M. Bauer, performed after contract no 81/4c with A.M.1 code in amount of (ten billion) Soviet roubles with revolving filling of the subaccount up to 140 (one hundred and forty) billion roubles gradually during payments of contract 81/4c. These roubles are of non-criminal origin, clean, clear and free from any financial obligation’.

The same bank text referencing the Bogdanov account with First National Bank of Chicago, and requiring copies to Bauer and Waymark, concludes document ‘No. 81’. Since Leo Wanta was fully operational in December 1991, the date of these documents, it is possible that the fraudulent paperwork was ‘backdated’ to that timeframe, after Leo Wanta had been removed from the scene following his takedown in Switzerland on 7th July 1993. Alternatively, the ‘backdating’ took place while Leo Wanta was operating in Singapore, being exfiltrated with the help of Dan Quayle to the US West Coast, and subsequently accommodated in a safe house in Toronto. What is certain is that Leo Emil Wanta authorised none of these illegal transactions, which represent bank embezzlement operations conducted by Bauer and Waymark.

A separate, undated, ‘Irrevocable Payment Order’, in favour of Gwendolyn Ann Waymark, enclosed with the documents Fedexed to the Editor and received on 10th September 2007, reads as follows

TO: Gwendolyn Ann Waymark
Transaction Codes: Buyer’s: L05001-123091-01

I, Paul M. Bauer, hereby guarantee and acknowledge that this instruction constitutes a guarantee, irrevocable, unconditional and irretractable direction to pay the following commission to the named participant beneficiary in respect of the above transaction.

Completed under terms as agreed.

Fee: $4,721, 969.70

Acceptance by: [followed by Waymark’s signature]: Gwendolyn Ann Waymark.

This amount been [sic] the total due to me from: Currency exchange of 18.699 (eighteen point six hundred ninety-nine) billion SURubles to US dollars such payment shall be freely negotiable bank draft or cash transfer in United States dollars in one payment [sic].

Payment beneficiary: Gwendolyn Ann Waymark
Bank Name: Bank of Massachusetts
Address: East Long Meadow Branch

For the account of: Gwendolyn A. and Diane M. Waymark
Account Number: 76947573
Swift Code: ABA 011000138
Payment “Same Value Date Immediately”.

The aforesaid disbursement/commissions are to be made immediately upon closing the transaction, without restrictions, imposts, or taxes imposed or impediments, delays of any kind of nature [sic] whatsoever including bank fees.

The details referencing Bauer, Waymark, the amount and the bank account details are highlighted in yellow pentel on the Pay Order document Fedexed to the Editor in September 2007.

A separate ‘Irrevocable Payment Order’ for commission of $20,237,012.99, authorised by Paul M. Bauer enclosed with the highlighted Status-Credit-Bank Asian-Europe Development, Pte. Ltd. documents Fedexed to the Editor and received in London on 10th September 2007 using Bauer’s transaction code L05001-123091-01 in favour of one Daniel Reis and accepted by this operative, requires the aforementioned sum to be paid to the account of Eastern Commercial Services for Daniel Reis as beneficiary to the Verwaltungs-Uno Privat Bank in Vaduz, Liechtenstein (Telephone (075) 23434), account number 257377011, for payment ‘same value date immediately’.

Thus funds stolen from or proceeds arising out of transactions illegally exploiting assets held in the Asian-Europe Development, Pte. Ltd. account at Status-Credit-Bank, Moscow, were embezzled inter alia via illegal Payment Orders issued by Paul Michael Bauer. These were never authorised, of course, by Leo Wanta, given not least that Bauer, Waymark and Ries have never had any standing or legal powers to perform such transactions. Besides, Leo Wanta’s Payment Orders were always endorsed by the paying bank, which is not the case with these fabricated Pay Order forgeries.

When the Editor first embarked upon these investigations, he was informed by an American source purportedly knowledgeable about such matters that the leaks exposing isolated and uncoordinated information about these grotesque US financial misdeeds – leaks which started to proliferate after 9/11 – reflected the fact that a large number of US intelligence operatives were disgruntled and disaffected ‘because their Pay Orders have not been honoured’. For some time, the Editor of this service assumed that this assertion reflected an accurate assessment of the situation.

However the sudden, belated surfacing from an ‘anonymous’ American source of the Fedexed documents, especially the re-doctored version of Status-Credit Bank document ‘No. 82’, and our possession of related documents including a divergent version of Moscow Status-Credit-Bank document ‘No. 82’, has confirmed that the Pay Orders referred to in that context were and remain fraudulent. As noted, Leo Wanta’s legitimate Pay Orders are all endorsed by the paying bank – and are held in one or more secure banking locations pending their fulfilment, which the Ambassador has been precluded from undertaking since 7th July 1993.

Finally, the Editor’s files hold two further bank documents in this series. First, there is a document, covered in handwritten annotations probably appended by Waymark, from Unicombank, another Soviet institution, faxed from Kinko’s Copies, Dallas, at 12.26pm on 14th April 1992, to Paul Michael Bauer at his Dallas, Texas home address (annotated in handwriting: ‘Hold for Ms. Waymark’), citing Raiffisenbank, Vienna, which states:

‘We, Unicombank, on behalf of our client, Asian Europa Development Pte. Limited [sic], hereby present this irrevocable, assignable, divisible, freely transferable Letter of Credit in favor [sic] of Paul Michael Bauer, in the amount of equivalent up to 5,000,000,000 USD (five billion United States dollars) with rolls. This letter abides by all the rules and regulations of the International Chamber of Commerce. Unicombank, being fully responsible, guarantees, on the bank’s side, that funds, presented in the name [sic] Letter of Credit are of non-criminal origin, clean and free from any financial obligation, and blocked for this transaction’.

The bank’s assertion that the funds in question ‘are of non-criminal origin’ could not have been true, given their unstated ‘source of funds’

From the files, too, we have unearthed an even more improbable document issued by the Moscow-based Inter Ciber Bank address to Bank Indosuez, 52/62 Bishopsgate, London EC2, ‘for the benefit of Paul Michael Bauer’, who as stated above ‘worked for’ Clinton. The lower part of this document has been severely jumbled, with the line-spacing squashed up in an apparent, clumsy attempt to accentuate obfuscation; but the text in question can be deciphered. It reads:

‘Letter of Credit n. 1002-92SU’: We, INTER-KIBER BANK on behalf of our client Asia Europ Development Pte. Ltd [sic] hereby present this irrevocable, assignable, divisible, freely transferable letter of credit in favor [US spelling – Ed.] of Paul Michael Bauer to the amount equivalent to 500 mi [this number is handwritten, doctored – Ed.] US dollars’.

Beneath the usual ‘bank guarantee’ and ‘acceptance of full responsibility’ text, there appears, in an entirely different typeface, the following (familiar) rubric:

‘Transfer and guarantee thru First National Bank of Chicago account: 53-05-705’.

Where have we seen this before? Ah! It appears at the foot of the ‘re-doctored’ Status-Credit-Bank’ document ‘No. 82’ Fedexed to the Editor and received in Central London on 10th September 2007, referenced above.

And guess what?

It’s THE SAME sentence, the words and line break is THE SAME, and the type used is EXACTLY THE SAME as in the Fedexed Status-Credit-Bank ‘No. 82’ document’; but the type used diverges harshly from the crude type used for the rest of the Inter-Ciber Bank document, onto which it has clearly been imposed. In other words, the above phrase has been copied from the Status-Credit-Bank document onto the Inter-Ciber Bank document.

So this is another fraudulent document, a forgery. The fact that THE SAME typed rubric, taken from the doctored Status-Credit-Bank document, is appended on the Inter-Ciber Bank document that we hold in our files, reveals of course that the funds in question are ALL being embezzled from the assets, or proceeds derived from, the Status-Credit-Bank account of Asian Europe Development, Pte. Ltd – owned to this day by Leo Wanta as sole Principal. In other words, his assets are proven to have been ransacked and embezzled by US operatives ‘working for’ Clinton and Cheney.

And by the way, at the outset of our investigations, we were lied to concerning whom Gwendolyn Ann Waymark ‘works for’. We were told it was Bush Sr.. Not so: it’s Cheney.

(Two months or so ago, according to one source whose information has not yet been confirmed by a second and third source, George Bush Sr.’s Alzheimer’s-linked decline compelled him to hand over control of his chaotic affairs to President George W. Bush Jr. Whether this is true or not, it is known that Bush Sr.’s assets have been frozen).

In order to illustrate what has been happening both more specifically and generally, it will now be helpful to cite in full the covering letter Fedexed to the Editor and received on 10th September 2007 by someone calling himself ‘Robert’. The document was dated the 2nd September 2007 but elsewhere 5th September 2007, even though such a Fedex delivery should only take two days to reach Central London from anywhere in the United States. It was addressed to Christopher Story, World Reports Limited, London SW1P 2EF, omitting the Street address, which was later inserted by Fedex. It was sent by Eric Robert [Illegible], 1044 Timken Avenue, Warren, MI 48034, USA giving a telephone number which is repeated in the covering letter. The letter will be broken up so that issues raised therein are addressed in context (items preceded by a bullet point):

Dear Mr Story
I am writing this letter in regards to the Leo Wanta story that you have been covering on your wed [sic] site WORLDREPORTS.ORG. My name is Robert and I am Chief of Staff for Mr John Titus…

We have no idea who Mr John Titus is. He has no relationship to Leo Wanta, is not and has never been Leo Wanta’s associate or partner at any time.

… he was formally [sic] in Executive Protection in the early nineties…

Being interpreted, Titus was a ‘bodyguard’, or provided ‘protection’.

… and performed duties under contract with Mr Paul Bauer…

Whom we have identified as a US operative ‘working for’ Clinton, and who was not and is not and has never been an associate or a partner of Leo Wanta at any time.

… as well as had verbal agreements with Gwendolyn [sic] Waymark…

Whom we have identified as ‘working for’ Cheney, and acting as an intermediary between Cheney (for Bush Sr.) and the Clintons.

… Those duties included at [that] time being a paymaster of monies that were made by the conversion of Soviet Union Rubles to US dollars that Mr Wanta and Paul Bauer were involved in…

Paul Bauer had no dealings with, was not an associate of, was not a partner of, and had no status at any time in connection with, the intelligence business operations of Leo Wanta.

This purported ‘intermingling’ of the affairs of Paul Bauer with those of Leo Emil Wanta (ordered personally by President Ronald Reagan) is a deception and has no basis in fact. Its purpose here is to obfuscate ‘source of funds’ and to represent that Paul Michael Bauer could dispose of Leo Emil Wanta’s funds held at Status-Credit-Bank, Moscow, which is not true. Paul Bauer has no status in connection with Wanta’s funds.

… He (Bauer) mainly dealt with Gwendolyn Waymark from Wilbraham, Mass. At that time she stated that she was Leo’s fiancée…

Which claimed assertion has no basis in fact [see below], but reveals that Waymark concocted this fiction for use as an ‘introductory’ legend.

… and [Waymark] requested that John [ who provided ‘executive protection’] could keep the Russians off her back and for her piece [sic!] of mind.

Why did Waymark allegedly fear ‘the Russians’, asking ‘John Titus’ to keep them ‘off her back’, and why did she allegedly crave ‘peace of mind’? Simple: ‘Working for’ Cheney, she had been/was engaged in, embezzlement or tapping of funds belonging to Leo Emil Wanta while certain powerful Russians [see below] were being ‘screwed’ as well.

… In doing this it would allow time for Leo and Paul to accomplish their job…

Leo Wanta was not working with and never worked with Paul Bauer, they did not and do not collaborate, and have never had any dealings [see above]. The implication here is that Waymark needed ‘protection’ from possible assassination by the Russians because she was engaged in embezzlement of funds held in Moscow in one or more accounts owned by Leo Wanta from which certain key Russians might be paid; and the ‘protection’ that ‘Titus’ would provide for Waymark would ‘allow time’ for Bauer/Wanta to ensure that the intelligence parties concerned all ‘got paid’, so that the ‘pressure’ she felt, which was disturbing her ‘peace of mind’, would cease.

… In conversatiosn with Gwen she made John (Titus) feel that there was a lot of stalling going on with Paul and Leo…

This implies that Waymark ‘did not know about’ Leo Wanta’s US-induced problems in Singapore, his emergency exfiltration to the West Coast of the United States, his accommodation in a safe house in Toronto, his assignment to Switzerland inter alia in the aforementioned Somali context, and his sudden ‘takedown’ on 7th July 1993, and/or some or all of the above (depending upon the timeframe in question, which is left vague in this letter: so we cannot be sure which of the above would have applied). Given whom Waymark was ‘working for’, such ignorance is hardly credible – although such is the extent of compartmentalisation and fearful mistrust within the hellish US intelligence environment, that she might conceivably have been as ignorant as the letter implies. (However we show below that this was not the case).

… As far as with the Russians [sic] it seemed that John was going to be the fall guy. The Russians understood that John [Titus] was the man with the money and was to pay them. Gwen said to John that he should keep doing his job because if Paul did not pay him that Leo would take care of him on the finances.

This is all convoluted nonsense. As reiterated above, Leo Wanta had nothing to do, and does not know, this ‘Titus’ fellow. Since Waymark may have been engaged in embezzlement or the tapping of funds originated from Moscow accounts owned by Leo Wanta, she needed ‘protection’ and in order to obtain it ‘to keep the Russians off her back’ and for her ‘peace of mind’, she allegedly lied to this John Titus that she was Leo’s fiancée and was therefore in a position to ‘know’ that Leo Emil Wanta would ‘see him right’. This is all a farrago of convoluted lies, allegedly invented by Ms. Waymark, who has a daughter (Diane) and has been married twice according to information available to the Editor – her second marriage (to an MI6 officer) having long since been dissolved. Anyone doing their homework would have known such details.

… John Titus is 50/50 partner with Paul Bauer at that time [sic] and still is to this day’.

This statement is irrelevant to Leo Wanta and his affairs. It is not material.

… We have found money transacted from banks where Paul Bauer lodged billions and trillions of dollars from I assume to be the special talents of Mr Titus…

See above. Paul Bauer was engaged in the embezzlement of funds belonging to Asian Europe Development, Pte. Ltd, the Title 18, Section 6 corporation two-thirds owned by Leo Wanta and one-third owned by (the late) Howe Kwong Kok. These funds were ransacked against the background of the facts that (a) Howe Kwong Kok had been murdered in Singapore, and (b) Leo Emil Wanta had been ‘exfiltrated’ out of the way to Toronto, prior to being removed from the scene altogether as we have repeatedly narrated, on 7th July 1993. Both the murder of Leo’s partner Howe Kwong Kok and the ‘takedown’ of Leo Wanta, were implemented by Leo Wanta’s US intelligence colleagues under the direction of President Clinton and in collaboration with the Bushes/Cheney, also known together as ‘the Box Gang’. The reference to ‘the special talents of Mr Titus’ implies that Bauer was able to remove, embezzle and otherwise exploit Mr Wanta’s Status-Credit-Bank funds thanks to the ‘special talents’ of this Titus fellow – whereas of course all that was happening was that Bauer was ransacking Wanta’s Moscow bank account(s). The letter's author did not know this.

… I would also like to mention a couple of calls that John received from Danny Reis from Russia where he asked ‘WHERE IS MY MONEY’ in a heavy Russian accent. John [Titus] did not realise at the time who he was, but after checking pay order sheets he understood who the man was, and why John was getting the call at 1:00AM EST at his personal residence. Another call he received was the most worrisome and most threatening [sic] came from Mr Yegor Gaidar and President Boris Yeltson [sic] alleging that Mr Wanta took 4.5 billion [sic] of Mr Yeltson’s gold. Mr Gaidar wanted to know if John [Titus] was going to pay him again because Mr Titus was the paymaster. They demanded to know the whereabouts of Leo Wanta’.

Titus (who as indicated Leo Wanta does not know) never had any status as paymaster with respect to Wanta’s funds. Leo Wanta was the master paymaster at all times, and absent his $4.5 trillion Settlement, remains so to this day. He has been instrumentally removed from the scene since 1992/92 as described. Further, this passage makes it clear that Yegor Gaidar, the former Russian Prime Minister under Yeltsin, and President Yeltsin himself, with whom Leo Wanta had entered into business arrangements [see immediately below] were now baffled as to why Wanta had vanished from the scene.

Under a Protocol of Financial and Commercial Regulations pursuant to [a General Agreement] reached between Leo Wanta’s New Republic/USA Financial Group, a Title 18, Section 6 corporation based in Vienna, and Gennadiy I Filshin, Deputy Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the Russian Socialist Federative Republic, the Russians had agreed to the formation of a new 50/50 joint stock company, Russ, for which Wanta’s Vienna-based Title 18, Section 6 corporation was to provide base capital of $50 billion (derived from his operations). The signatories of relevant financial/banking documents were to be Leo Emil Wanta, General Dierctor of New Republic/USA Financial Group, Ltd., G.m.b.H, and Mr Victor N. Yaroshchenko, Minister of Foreign Economic Affairs of the RSFSR. These arrangements were ‘facilitated’ by President Yeltsin and the first Prime Minister that he appointed, Yegor Gaidar. It would appear that ‘Danny Reis’ was a Soviet operative working on their behalf, but that he also expected to be paid via a pay order, for his ‘work’.

Interjection: This background necessitates a ‘correction’ to this Editor’s overview of the entire crisis. In past analyses, the Editor has incorrectly implicated Yeltsin and Gaidar in the ‘takedown’ of Leo Wanta. It is quite clear from the Fedexed letter and the above passage in particular, that this cannot have been the case. They were ‘miffed’ for a time that they had not been paid, but they did not collaborate with Clinton et al to ‘take down’ Leo Wanta, not least since [see below] they were evidently subsequently paid (using funds embezzled from Leo Wanta’s Moscow-based assets). Moreover as we now read, they wanted to know what had happened to their colleague Leo Wanta and were not told that Leo Wanta had been placed in a Toronto ‘safe house’ (because he had been engaged in the exposure of drug-running operations implicating corrupt US cadres).

… Being a loyal soldier though, Mr Titus denied any knowledge of the whereabouts of Leo Wanta, but in fact Paul and Gwen told John [Titus] that Leo was in Canada…

This of course makes the position of Bauer, Waymark and Titus much worse, because it makes it clear that these operatives knew perfectly well what had become of Leo Wanta at that stage, and were nonetheless engaged in the illegal ransacking of Leo Wanta’s funds. Now read this:

… We now understand that Gwendolyn Waymark became Gwendolyn Wanta.

Consider this folly! Waymark appears, according to this Fedexed source, to have seen the ‘need’ to reinforce her ‘introductory legend’ to ‘merge’ her intermeddling, with the affairs of Leo Wanta. The comment also reveals that the senders of the Fedexed document have been lied to along these lines, to this day. That in turn provides an object lesson in the perpetration of lies by CIA intelligence oepratives. If you start lying, you had better think your lies through logically, from the get-go: how will you get out of having to keep on lying, and imposing new lies on top of your old lies, for ever? No wonder Waymark’s ‘peace of mind’ was in shreds.

… After everyone got paid through, and disappeared, John stopped getting all the harrassing calls were [sic] he was screamed at and threatened…

So, the false ‘Irrevocable Pay Orders’ were actually fulfilled, using funds embezzled from Leo Wanta’s account(s). The Russians had been pressurising ‘Titus’, whom they imagined was the paymaster, screaming at him down the phone, whereas in fact they were dealing with US impostors.

Now it all becomes even more interesting:

… Just this past Christmas, though, John received a very strange call from someone advising us about Leo Wanta’s predicament.

So, these people only became aware of Leo Wanta’s situation 17 months AFTER the Editor of this service procured, through his private payment to the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, the procedure which resulted in Leo Wanta’s absolute discharge effective 14th November 2005? Is compartmentalisation so tight that it took them 17 months to learn of this development (or some 13 months, if reckoned from the ending of Leo’s probation on 14th November 2005)?

… There should have been no reason for them to do this without having an alternative motive. I doubt that certain people would want John to go public with this information because it certainly can confirm quite a bit about Mr Wanta’s claim…

We have now accompanied Alice through the Looking Glass, and we are talking jibberish to the Red Queen. What on earth are these people talking about? Leo Wanta’s claim does not require to be ‘confirmed’. This service has been publicising the financial corruption crisis that we have called ‘Wantagate’ for the best part of two years, on the self-same website that they reference at the beginning of their covering letter.

The reports have provided a colossal amount of detail, including an alphabetical list of many of the Wanta bank accounts, information about the arrests of Paulson, Greenspan and others; and they have only just cottoned on that they, too, have been deceived? Attributing ‘an alternative motive’ to the party who telephoned Titus, implies, though, that these people suddenly realised that the financial transactions with which they were associated, had been fraudulent, being based upon embezzled assets. As for this general ongoing business of ‘requiring proof’ that Wanta’s ‘claim’ is ‘justified’, this is the height of idiocy. We have published several massive issues of International Currency Review providing chapter and verse on this issue, and anyone who does his research properly before indulging in unfounded suggestions, should have read and absorbed what we have published, by authority. And it gets worse…

… We have been getting calls since last summer that just do not add up and our teams are on full alert. We have also done our own investigations and we are prepared to take immediate action if necessary.

So, since the summer of 2006, when our reports were already appearing regularly, detailing the theft of the $4.5 trillion compromise Settlement by Paulson, Cheney, Bush Jr. et al, these people were ‘getting phone calls that just do not add up’? In other words, they had been unable, for some reason, to reconcile the accurate reports and Wantagate information that we have been obliged to publish, with the exotic fairytales, lies, deceptions and other murky perceptions that they thought represented the truth prior to receiving these phone calls? Such as that the funds referenced above have been embezzled? Why then did they not read our reports for themselves?

As for the statement that ‘our teams’, manifestly meaning ‘assassination teams’, are on ‘full alert’ and ‘prepared to take immediate action if necessary’, the Editor can only interpret this as a further direct threat of assassination, based upon the misconceptions and illusions of these people, who have almost certainly been double-crossed and deceived, like everyone else, by these ruthless CIA criminals. But threatening the messenger will get them nowhere: if the Editor is assassinated, the whole world, and every major Government that is demanding the Wanta Settlement, will know about it, and the fragile global situation will become completely unmanageable. They say that they have ‘done their research’, and yet they retain their illusions!

The high-level official crooks responsible, in part, for their predicament (although caveat emptor applies), and who are responsible for putting Ambassador Leo Wanta through this purgatory, have been mentioned above, already. Our job is exclusively to disseminate the truth of these matters – an obligation that we are fulfilling whether scales fall off victims’ eyes in sync, or not. As indicated above, the letter then descends into unsolicited and revolting graphic detail about a murder, in order to alert the Editor of this service to what they mean by the phrases ‘our teams are on full alert’ and ‘we are prepared to take immediate action if necessary’:

… the mailing of this letter had to be delayed because as of August 29 2007 one of our men was gunned down in front of his apartment…

This does not account for the apparent two-stage delivery of the Fedex package, referenced above. But it provides a 'context' for the graphic implied threat that follows:

… He was shot in the back once and then finished off by one more in the front of the head. We are now ramping up our investigations and our wrath will be realized.

We have no idea, specifically, what this is all about, other than to illustrate what the implied threat contained in this letter means in practice. However the likelihood of a bloodbath has been pointed out to us in the recent past – a bloodbath arising from the harsh fact that, as the onion is unpeeled to its core, an ever larger number of parties, both from the underground economy, and from among their decadent intelligence community collaborators, will feel so badly let down, angry and aggrieved, that ‘sudden death syndrome’ may be liable to become commonplace.

The latest huge issue of International Currency Review revisits ‘In Memoriam’ – the listing of bankers and others, including the former President of the European Central Bank, who have suffered ‘sudden death syndrome’ as a direct consequence of having been implicated in these financial corruption operations, and whose complicity was being exposed by Wantagate from 2005 onwards [see pages 241-248, and the report on the simultaneous Iron Mountain warehouse fires in London and Ottawa in July 2006, which contained documents stored inter alia by Deutsche Bank, one of the most prolific derivatives operators in the world: page 252].

… feel free to call me for more information…

Excuse us? WE are the primary information source. Our only interest is the truth, and in order to understand the truth, one requires discernment…

… Along with this letter I have included a few copies of the information that we have to confirm our legitimacy…

This of course is a reference to the documents analysed above. These are heavily marked with yellow pentel markings, to draw the Editor’s attention to names, bank account details, contracts etc that we are supposed to assume ‘confirm’ the legitimacy of these people. But of course, far from doing anything of the kind, the provision to the Editor of these forged and illicit documents shows that the parties concerned have no legitimacy (although we concede that they may well have been unwisely deceived into believing that they have legitimacy) – and has very helpfully enabled us to obtain additional, definitive confirmation of the following facts:

(1) Wanta-related banking documents have been forged and fabricated, a fact that is easily proven even from a straightforward initial ‘forensic’ study of the documents, as summarised above;

(2) Vice President Richard Cheney and former President Clinton are/have been directly implicated in these document forgeries and fraudulent financial transactions, in embezzlement, in the risky organised ransacking of funds, and in egregious felonies against the United States, not least by depriving the sole Principal and owner of the funds of the opportunity to pay his taxes to the US Government and to conduct business transactions for the benefit of the United States and the American people, as has always been his intention and aspiration;

(3) US criminal operatives Paul M. Bauer, ‘working for Clinton’, and Gwendolyn Waymark ‘working for Cheney’, have been exposed as embezzlers and thieves of Wanta’s funds; and:

(4) Fantastic lies allegedly perpetrated by Waymark have apparently persisted to this day.

… Any good reporter can confirm the phone records of the calls from Russia, and of course, the conversations to Gwen during that period of time…

Why do we need such confirmation? As the source of the truth, and evidently the sole source thereof in this context, we do not need confirmation of lies, when we know them to be lies, and can prove them to be lies from our own detailed knowledge and documentation.

If these people have grievances, let them lay them at the door of Vice President Richard B. Cheney, former President Bill Clinton, and any of the other inhabitants of the rancid nest of US intelligence criminal vipers that Wantagate is exposing, thanks to Mr Paulson’s hijacking of Wanta’s $4.5 trillion compromise Settlement.

… We have much more to give and say. So again feel free to call me at (248) 914-0634. For a possible meeting to be arranged. Also to add [sic] if there is any protective service that anyone may need in regards to this matter we are available 24/7 for an immediate response. Working together is only a win win situation for everyone…

So the Editor of this service needs protection? From whom? From disgruntled US operatives whose fake Pay Orders have never been honoured? From the vengeful wrath of the criminal US operatives whose reprobate behaviour to the detriment of the American people and the whole world has been exposed by these reports? From retaliation by operatives and hangers-on whom the Wantagate reports have exposed as egregious liars?

And why is it assumed that Ambassador Wanta ‘needs’ to ‘work with’ such people? As the master paymaster, he is not, and never has been, under any legal or moral obligation to anyone towards whom he has no responsibility, or who may have embezzled his funds, or who may have been deceived by others into believing that funds they have been handling or over which they may imagine they have a claim, are legitimate.

Nor would such collaboration represent a ‘win win’ situation for anyone at all. It is fantasyland.

The only ‘win win’ situation is that which ought to have been implemented in June 2006, when Mr Henry M. Paulson, Richard B. Cheney et al hijacked Leo Wanta’s $4.5 trillion Settlement funds, for their own ends. Final implementation of the Settlement will still generate a ‘win win’ situation, even, believe it or not, at this late stage.

But grovelling around in the sordid intelligence undergrowth of illegitimate claims and criminal financial operations and aspirations based upon lies, the double-cross, fraudulent finance and deception, will lead nowhere. This very suggestion makes it quite clear to us that a large number of aggrieved people, who obviously continue to harbour unsound illusions, have STILL not grasped the reality of the situation.

This is evident, in any case, from other approaches with which the Editor of this service continues to be bombarded. For instance, several hyperactive US parties have been attempting for months to ‘attach’ themselves and/or their claims to Ambassador Wanta’s situation. Certain such ‘intruders’ even go so far as to assert that their permission is required for Wanta’s Settlement to be paid, or for funds from the accounts of which he remains sole Principal to be paid to him!

None of these people seems yet to have grasped basic dimensions that we have painfully and laboriously explained until blue in the face – such as the purposes of Bush Sr.’s DUPLICATION in 1992 of Leo Wanta’s $27.5 trillion (see late July reports) which provided the green light for open-ended US obfuscation by means of ‘mental’ intermingling of the borrowed $27.5 trillion with Leo Wanta’s $27.5 trillion, resident in the accounts of his Title 18, Section 6 corporations).

The endless confusion of these people has been aided and abetted by the disgraceful failure of the so-called ‘mainstream’ media in both Great Britain and the United States to begin reporting Wantagate – an initiative for which they would have no option but to work from our published reports and from International Currency Review.

Take ‘Newsmax’: this secondary service continues to report the so-called ‘sub-prime’ crisis and the credit crunch situation without any mention of Wantagate, even though the Editor is well known to the founder of the organisation and to one of its analysts. Likewise, in the City of London, pundits are emitting knee-jerk responses to the alarming and rapidly spreading banking crisis in Britain, without having a clue as to how this situation came about in the first place. As for the British media punditry, their failure to understand the clash between the on-balance sheet world and the illicit off-balance sheet environment, has been painful to observe.

Even so, chinks in their coverage have started to appear. For instance, interviewed last week, the new British Chancellor of the Exchequer, Alistair Darling, used language implying that he would be engaged in ‘launching’ a new financial environment – taking credit in advance for what the world’s central banks and the Group of Eight financial powers, and the Chinese, have all agreed is to be introduced: the new financial system under which ‘every dime will be taxed’.

The central banks reached this accord earlier this year, after their realisation that the United States had been foisting worthless unbacked trash paper upon their institutions and investors, in the biggest financial scamming operation in world history, had hit home as the Wantagate unravelling exposures assumed alarming proportions. The media now have a great deal of ‘catching up’ to do.

Life ‘through the Looking Glass’ has of course been given an added veneer of ‘reality’ by the contributions of operatives such as Dr Alan Greenspan, whose new book ‘The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World’, makes no mention of facts such as that this ‘fallen god’ was caught trying to steal $3.0 trillion, that he has been ‘running the paper’ for decades, both in and out of office, that he has been imprisoned once (and probably twice), and that his ongoing resistance to implementation of The Wanta Plan has been among the most egregious barriers to its realisation.

Furthermore, Greenspan lies in his book that the attack on Iraq was ‘all about oil’. That was a factor, as we know from Richard B. Cheney’s activities, but it was by no means the primary motive: and by emphasising that the control of Iraqi oil was THE motive, this financial operative has contributed materially to the ongoing OBFUSCATION operations which baffle the naïve financial media. Nothing is ever solely about resources: the only motive for all of this hellish activity is MONEY.

We have long since pointed out that the attack on Iraq represented a bank raid. The immediate financial objectives of the White House were twofold:

1. To seize control of the Central Bank of Iraq, steal its gold and its cash, and through White House control of the Central Bank:

2. To procure the installation of compliant General Management at Rafidain Bank, which had long been used by Saddam Hussein and his family as their own private resource. According to British intelligence, this institution held at least $100 trillion of derivative-derived fiat money ‘assets’ and contracts in March 2003, with the assets located mainly in London. Naturally, we have been unable to establish whether the British confiscated these ‘assets’, but any such confiscation would induce no surprise. If this happened, it may even account, in part, for the White House-directed stealing of The Queen’s gold during the unscheduled UK banking shutdown on 29th-30th March this year – an ‘Act of War’ perpetrated against the United Kingdom by the United States (with traitorous inside assistance at the Bank of England) which has not been rectified. The UK and foreign media have failed to report this heist, to their absolute disgrace.

The attack on the Central Bank of Iraq was closely controlled, and after the institution had been raided and seized, at least 100 US special operatives (by some reckonings, considerably more) were deliberately sacrificed to ‘enemy fire’ in order for this bank raid to be covered up.

The deliberate and cynical sacrificing of these agents is known about thanks to eyewitness reports of the atrocity, which have survived scrutiny.

All of which leads us, finally, to broader considerations as they emerge from these exposures.

But first, let us recall that if Messrs Paulson, Cheney, Bush Jr. et al had not shiftily reneged on their undertakings and had instead fulfilled their formal obligations towards Ambassador Leo Wanta by ensuring that he could take economic receipt of the $4.5 trillion Settlement – on receipt of which, the latent Wanta claim on the remaining $23 trillion (base funds) would be released (as we have explained) – the US Treasury would by now have received windfall tax accruals in excess of $8.0 trillion, while massive US domestic infrastructure projects, repairs and other desirable end-uses such as the proper funding of Amtrak, could have been well advanced; and the Republican Party, which President George Bush Jr. evidently couldn’t care less about (see below), would not be facing virtual annihilation in 2008, as we warned on 2nd September 2006 would be the case and is now a certainty (absent the Wanta Settlement).

What has Wantagate achieved to date? Its most concrete and lasting achievement is agreement among the world’s central banks and the key financial powers that a new international financial system is absolutely essential to create a ‘break with the past’, and to impose a tangible degree of discipline upon the fiat money system. That this system will be imposed is a certainty: indeed, we are aware that a transition team has been working for many months on its installation, and that its specifics, influenced almost to the point of being designed by Leo Wanta, have been worked out and agreed. The speed and momentum of this train is such that it cannot and will not be stopped. (Although we are aware of imminent developments on this score, it would be irresponsible on the basis of incomplete timing information, for us to elaborate further at this stage).

On 13th September, The Daily Telegraph came closest to acknowledging that the new system is imminent in the previously mentioned article – entitled ‘The Chancellor wants G-7 to tighten credit rules’: ‘Europe’s leading Finance Ministers, led by Alistair Darling, Chancellor of the Exchequer, are to ask the G-Seven group of industrialised countries to examine a newly developed transatlantic regulatory agreement to help maintain global financial stability and avoid a repeat of the current liquidity crisis that has paralysed parts of the world’s money markets’, the report asserted – implying that what was intended was still at the planning stage, which is not the case:

‘Mr Darling has been holding talks already with his French, German and Italian counterparts ahead of this weekend’s Ecofin meeting of Finance Ministers in Portugal, and intends to discuss a new regulatory environment with Mr Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary, in the UK on Monday’.

[Note: Paulson met with both Alistair Darling and the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown. This makes it a certainty that they discussed the new financial system. One would have hoped that the new Prime Minister threatened Paulson with being arrested on British territory, and that he would have had a great deal to say, on behalf of Her Majesty The Queen, concerning the United States' 'Act of War' against the United Kingdom arising from its theft of The Queen's gold on 29th-30th March].

In other words, the long since agreed fait accompli is being spun, for global public consumption, as though it is still languishing at the planning stage, and represents a response by the G-7 and the European authorities to the PRESENT situation – which, of course, distorts the reality here. This is that the new regime was agreed upon months ago by the world’s central banks and the Group of Seven powers – in direct response to the scandalous state of affairs arising from the exposures triggered by Paulson’s hijacking of the Wanta Settlement, and the consequent opening provided for us to expose the permissive ongoing fraudulent finance activities spearheaded by the United States, followed by Germany and Britain, that have led the world to the very brink of financial and economic catastrophe, as predicted in our report dated 2nd September 2006.

Press coverage, to the extent that it was addressing the issue so far at all, seemed geared to starting to prepare public opinion for changes which were to be presented as though they had become necessary BECAUSE OF the ‘sub-prime’ crisis – whereas the reality is that the world’s central banks, which have had to bear the financial costs of the financial scams perpetrated by the CIA’s collaborating operatives and financial institutions, have demanded these changes, because they have had more than enough of the United States’ continuing financial arrogance.

After mentioning, in his Daily Telegraph interview, what was to be discussed at the Ecofin meeting in Portugal (starting on 14th September), Mr Darling added: ‘Beyond that, when we discuss these things with the Americans at the IMF in the autumn, we will discuss that we need to get the G-7 to be able to tighten these things up’.

Since Henry M. Paulson, Darling’s opposite number, has been the primary cause of the crisis in the first place, and was to visit London on 17th September, it was somewhat unclear whether the new British Chancellor was being naïve, or whether his mild language reflected the usual, understated, counterproductive British penchant for diplomacy.

It will have been observed that this service long ago dispensed with diplomacy when addressing these criminal officials who are occupying the highest offices in the United States. Unfortunately, being ‘nice’ to hardened criminals is a complete waste of time: they despise you for it, think you are weak, and carry on regardless.

Indeed, Henry M. Paulson, the official who hijacked the Wanta Settlement, has had the effrontery to accuse US financial institutions of causing the financial crisis – even though he, by illegally and recklessly diverting Leo Wanta’s $4.5 trillion, created the conditions for our exposure of fraudulent financial practices that he, as the former CEO of Goldman Sachs, has known about all along.

Only last week, fresh from a meeting with New York bankers and mortgage lenders, Paulson pronounced that ‘unlike periods of financial turbulence I’ve witnessed over many years, this turbulence wasn’t precipitated by problems in the real economy. This came about as a result of some bad lending practices’. Being translated, it was 'nothing to do with him'.

So, given that the new system is a certainty, what has been the attitude of those parties whose understanding of the situation remains ‘behind the curve’, and/or who would prefer the free-wheeling, untaxed, off-balance sheet world to continue?

Their instinct, given the inevitable, has been to devise various surreptitious means of complying with the incoming regime, while at the same time pre-emptively drilling holes into its fabric – so that they can continue untaxed, off-balance sheet fiat money-generating ‘business as usual’. The most conspicuous example of this response on Wall Street has been the establishment, reported in The Wall Street Journal on 13th September 2007, of what is pompously described as the 'Open Platform for Unregistered Securities', to be operated inter alia by Bank of America (the CIA’s main bank), Credit Suisse Group and UBS AG. The system, established in August by Citigroup Inc., Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Merrill Lynch & Co., Morgan Stanley, and Bank of New York Mellon, is to be known as Opus-5, with Bank of New York Mellon acting as administrator of the system.

According to its accompanying publicity, Opus-5 is intended to ‘promote liquidity and efficiency for qualified institutional buyers’ trading unregistered securities, and to ‘enhance issuers’ capital-raising efforts’. It is intended as the answer to Goldman Sachs’ model, which was unveiled last May in response to the upcoming introduction of the new global regime, to be called GS TRuE (Goldman Sachs Tradable Unregistered Equity).

The Wall Street Journal added that these ‘markets’, which will generally be closed to individual investors, ‘reflect a business community backlash against increased regulation of public company accounting practices’. Actually, they reflect a perverse and unlawful intent to disregard egregious breaches of the 1933 and 1934 Securities Acts, which require all securities marketed in the United States to be registered. They also reveal that these institutions assume that their power is such that they are free to establish, with impunity, an unsupervised, closed-shop system which will be linked to and dependent upon the Federal Interbank Settlement Fund, which remains a closed, unaudited, unregulated inter-central bank network within which these abuses have proliferated – and which has been routinely used over the years to finance terrorism, arms and drug-trafficking operations, and other unspeakable activities at the intergovernmental level.

It is of course the case that, at this level, we are dealing with a culture of double-mindedness, in which DUPLICATION, as has been stressed in our recent reports, is the norm. One would therefore expect the leading central banks to behave, as they have done in the past, in a typically two-faced, duplicitous manner, on this score. The only problem is that the Rest of the World is adamant that the new system must have no holes in it. Accordingly, we have been authoritatively advised that the Opus-5 and GS TRuE arrangements will ‘collapse’, as the new global system takes effect. They may function for a while, but as a reformed culture takes hold, they may wither or cease to be of value to the institutions concerned – which may currently assume that they are so large and of such importance that they can do as they like.

As has been mentioned, no ‘black hole’ in the new system can survive outside the central banking network. And as we have seen, the attack on Iraq represented a bank raid, which resulted inter alia in the White House controlling the Central Bank of Iraq in Baghdad. The practical meaning of this is that the White House controls a central bank that appears to be ‘independent, but which in reality acts – as also used to be the case at one time under Saddam Hussein, until he and Mr Bush Sr. fell out – as the very unsupervised ‘black hole’ that the Bush Jr. White House nrequires, to be able to continue running its secret financial scams beyond any scrutiny.

It will be doing this, as at present, inside the Federal Interbank Settlement Fund, which links the Federal Reserve System with the Bank of England, the Bundesbank, the Bank for International Settlements, the other central banks and monetary agencies, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund – and the Central Bank of Iraq. No doubt the Interbank Settlement Fund will survive any delayed abolition of the Federal Reserve, and the assumption of its powers by the US Treasury.

On 13th September, President George W. Bush Jr. announced that the United States’ military presence in Iraq would be ‘enduring’. Substantial numbers of troops, Bush announced from the Oval Office, would need to remain in Iraq for many years, given that there would be an ‘enduring relationship with Iraq requiring US political, economic and security engagement that extends beyond my Presidency’. In the same breath he said that US military ‘successes’ (redefined yet again) will ‘now allow us to begin bringing some of our troops home’.

The reality, however, is that redeployment has become indispensable, given that tours of duty have been so stretched that in the absence of troop reductions, the United States would legally need to switch to a full war footing, a war economy, accompanied by introduction of the draft.

A survey in Iraq, details of which were released during the week ending 14th September, indicated that at least 1.2 million people have died as a direct consequence of the invasion and its aftermath. This ‘just happens’ to match estimates successively published in The Lancet, the British medical journal, although the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health reported its own findings in The Lancet in October 2006, which suggested 654,965 deaths had been inflicted up to September last year. The Lancet's surveys were criticised by President Bush and by compliant British officials. However, in private, Sir Roy Anderson, who is the Chief Scientific Adviser to the British Ministry of Defence, has described The Lancet’s estimates as ‘close to best practice’.

The death toll in Iraq, thanks to George Bush Jr.’s bank raid, now exceeds the Rwandan genocide, in which an estimated 800,000 people died.

To wrap up these observations, let us take an updated look at ‘The Big Picture’. In parallel with the above, the US disinformation apparat orchestrated the release of yet another ‘Bin Laden’ video. In the latest ‘new’ images of this supposed menace to humanity – master of the most complex modern technology of Luciferian destruction – his beard was completely black.

Even the British media were alert enough to notice that in the earlier videos, the centre of ‘Bin Laden’s’ beard had been white. A cartoon therefore appeared in The Times, London, showing two images of ‘Bin Laden’ – one with his beard complete with its old white patch, and the second, in which ‘Bin Laden’ was holding a pot of black dye, with which he had painted its white patch black. Such idiocies remind us of that nonsense surrounding the ‘discovery’ of Saddam Hussein in a hole, late one year – despite the fact that fig trees in the video images of that event were laden with figs, which do not hang on Iraqi trees in the winter months.

All of which background is appropriate to illustrate our main point – namely, that the so-called ‘War on Terror’ is actually, as many concerned observers have deduced without adequate evidence to support their suspicions, a contrived strategic deception cover for something else. Bin Laden died somewhere in the boondocks in the United States on 26th December 2001. The ‘Bin Laden’ videos are all, therefore, clumsy, amateurish, fake CIA ‘Psy-Ops’ disinformation and propaganda rubbish – unworthy even of Dr Josef Goebbels, who would have done a much better job.

Al-Qaeda does not mean ‘the toilet’, as some amusing wags have suggested, but rather ‘the data base’ – namely, the data base of agents originally recruited by the CIA when operating against the Soviets in Afghanistan. It is understood that this riff-raff consisted at the time of no more than around 200 ‘actives’. That CIA operation was later given 'new instructions'.

Now, given that the ‘War on Terror’ is indeed a strategic deception (as the preceding basic facts, obtained from the most authoritative intelligence sources, confirm), what is its actual purpose?

The answer to that question is simple: to provide a blanket, lasting cover mechanism to mask the colossal avalanche of fraudulent global financial operations over which the free-wheeling criminal organisation known as the CIA, penetrated by DVD*, Dachau, has presided.

The sources confirm to us definitively what everyone who is not sitting on their brains knows full well – that 9/11 was an ‘inside job’ (orchestrated by the senior ‘MK-ULTRA’ officer, Mr Richard B. Cheney). Recall, for instance, that the entire staff of Morgan Stanley was absent from the firm’s offices in the Twin Towers on the morning of the 9/11 atrocities. Recall further that at least 4,000 employees of Jewish extraction were also mysteriously absent from their Twin Towers offices, although unfortunately many were also killed.

Recall further that the financial services firm and money broker, Cantor Fitzgerald, which lost 658 employees on 9/11, had custody of a vast portfolio of original copies of derivatives contracts, all of which, following the disaster, were forgiven.

Finally, it is not yet adequately known that Building Number 7, which suddenly exploded for no apparent reason at around 5.30 in the afternoon of 9/11, was the building in which Enron-related derivatives contract records and relevant documents were held. As for the Deutsche Bank building which recently caught fire adjacent to the site, it may have contained documents that were not destroyed in the Iron Mountain warehouse fires in London and Ottawa in July 2006.

So what, then, was President Bush announcing in his Oval Office address on 13th September 2007?

Why, that he had opted for 'Plan B', given that 'Plan A' has been destabilised by the Wantagate exposures and their consequences:

Plan A: ‘Twin’ atrocities at the beginning and at the end of Bush Jr.’s reign. Specifically, the Twin Towers abomination on 9/11, an ‘inside job’ (presided over by Cheney) was to be ‘twinned’ at the end of Bush’s ‘elected’ tenure by atrocities scheduled for the first day of the planned Republican Party National Congress on 1st September 2008, to be held in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis-St Paul. As discussed in our report dated 16th April, these mad people have a psychological hang-up about ‘twins’ (about which we could say much more, but not yet).

And Kabbalistically-numerologically, 1st September 2008 devolves to 9/11: 1st of the month (1) + 2 + 8 (2008) = 10 = 11; September = 9: 9/11. These Luciferians are invariably 'guided' by numerology, astrology, or any other form of mind control that their handlers have embedded in their psyches.

The second ‘twinned’ abominations planned for 1st September 2008, which we have exposed on the basis of special intelligence, were to have provided the pretext for the establishment of the 'Nazi' dictatorship by the DVD*-hardened control clique, as has been widely speculated.

Having been exposed, this plan is now out of the question, not least since the US military will not, we understand, have anything to do with it. The dictatorship would, you see, have provided the financial scamsters and banksters with the cover they may have imagined that they would need in order to ensure their ‘perpetual immunity’, so that their financial frauds could continue indefinitely without adverse consequences for the perpetrators personally.

When George Bush Sr. spoke of ‘a thousand points of light’, in referring to the ‘New World Order’ in 1990, he was actually alluding obliquely to the fulfilment of Herr Hitler’s project to 'establish the Thousand-year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’. First-hand evidence of this intention, taken from Nazi documents seized by the Allies after the Second World War, is given in the Editor’s book ‘The New Underworld Order’ [Edward Harle Limited, London and New York, available from this website]. This long-range strategy was buttressed by the ongoing Nazi pledge, also extensively documented and exposed in the Editor’s work, that ‘fur uns ist der Krieg niemals vorbei’ (‘for us the war never ended’). Wantagate has closed off this evil option.

Plan B: ‘Permanent’ White House control of the Central Bank of Iraq, so that George Bush Jr. and his associates, at least, can continue their exotic fraudulent finance operations within the closed, corrupt central banking system using the services of the Federal Interbank Settlement Fund, the World Bank, and other closed, unsupervised conduits. By ‘permanent’ in this context, is meant ‘for the duration of the intended Hillary Clinton Presidency’.

And here, finally, we must add a few closing considerations.

By his irresponsible conduct, not least in presiding over the hijacking and abuse of the Wanta Settlement funds, thereby all but closing off any chance of the Republican Party’s Government redeeming itself ahead of the 2008 General Election (which can hardly now be avoided given the folding of Plan A), President George Bush Jr. has shown his complete contempt of the Party and his indifference to its fate. That this is the case has been recognised by prominent Republicans, who have had more than enough, and are therefore stepping down ahead of 2008, in droves.

Therefore, the continued survival of the Central Bank of Iraq ‘black hole’ in the new global financial system will depend upon the elevation to the Presidency of the second Clinton, Ma Hillary (who was probably the de facto President the first time around). As a key member of the Bush-Clinton criminal intelligence ‘Box Gang’, Mrs Hillary Rodinsky Clinton is now President Bush Jr.’s most preferred successor. Bush might (just might) be able to keep the Iraqi ‘black hole’ operative with another successor; but with the heavily implicated Hillary Rodinsky, he could be certain that he would be free of ‘Blowback’ for another eight years into the future.

The problem for President Bush Jr., however, is that Hillary Rodinsky is so gravely encumbered by troublesome baggage from her past (the money stolen from Crozier Bank, Grenada, for instance, when the video cameras in the bank, which subsequently went to the wall, were found to have malfunctioned at precisely the time she was visiting the bank), that she is almost certainly never going to make it. Corruption allegations are already swirling in the ‘mainstream’ media.

That leaves Bush Jr., who has blocked The Wanta Settlement for the past 15+ months, with only one remaining precautionary option: to release Wanta’s funds – whereupon the integral gag order will take effect, and the on-balance sheet capital markets operations between the Ambassador’s firm, Michael C. Cottrell’s investment banking corporation, and six or eight financial institutions, for the benefit of the US Treasury’s coffers, can begin in the final quarter of this year.

The resulting prospective improvement in the US and global financial and economic environment by the time of the Presidential Election, coupled with the announced and unavoidable US troop reductions in Iraq, might then be JUST enough to allow the most corrupt President in American history, off the hook.

But continuation of the prevailing wilful, perverse and treasonous US official and financial sector felonies will most certainly ensure that the financial implosion that is already many weeks old, will mature into the full-scale global financial and economic catastrophe that we predicted more than a year ago, when no-one was listening. Things are getting worse and worse by the day.

Given the Luciferian mentality we are all having to confront, whether the pride of these people will be set aside pragmatically in order to ensure a belated ‘soft landing’ ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’ – to cite Her Majesty The Queen once more – remains uncertain at this writing. There has been no sign at all (that we know of) that The Queen’s gold has been restored, and thus that the American ‘Act of War’ against the United Kingdom has yet been put into reverse.

Meanwhile, the deadline for the Respondents to the Ambassador’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division, following the Court’s decision to give the Respondents an unusually extended 60 days, expires on the 27th September 2007.

Against this background, on 12th September, Ambassador Wanta sent the following Memorandum to the President of the United States:

Subject: US dollars 4.5 trillion Financial Settlement:

Dear Mr President

I am absolutely shocked and surprised that your Administration, your policymakers and Presidential counsellors, simply have no idea as to the domestic/international scope of this financial incident. Constructively, there is no way our great nation can lawfully structure a newly revised, delayed, ignored Wanta Plan programme, without trust, and prevent bankrupting our country and destroying our US dollar, as well as your legacy: unless you again re-authorize and DEMAND the FedRes/Banks (s) to release my personal repatriation/cash funds forthwith: Refer to: HR 3723, Title 18 Section 4, 35, US Securities Act 1933, 1934. Thanks, Lee.

White House authorisations of the payment expire after 72 hours. Hence Leo Wanta’s request, yet again, for the President to re-authorise the Settlement.

* DVD = Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, successor of the Nazi Abwehr, as the Nazi long-range strategic deception Continuum, located in a nondescript building in Dachau, near Munich.

Here are the main references for Case #: 1:2007cv00609-TSE-BRP in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division:



Case Number: 1:2007cv00609  –  TSE  –  BRP
Filed: 20th June 2007
Petitioner: Lee E. Wanta
Respondents: Henry M. Paulson, Jr., Robert M. Kimmitt, James R. Wilkinson, Michael Chertoff, Alberto R. Gonzales and Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Richmond
Presiding Judge: District Judge T. S. Ellis III
Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge Barry R. Poretz
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause: 28: 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury demanded by: None

Note: This case cannot be sealed until Ambassador Leo E. Wanta has been paid the $4.5 trillion of his Settlement diverted and exploited illegally since June 2006.

Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

“ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scienter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

“THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:


“FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

“The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.


‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

“Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.


NASD Rule 3120, et al.
NASD Rule 2330, et al
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.


Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
Anti-Drug Abuse Act
Applicable international money laundering restrictions
Bank Secrecy Act
Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
Economic Espionage Act
Hobbs Act
Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
Maloney Act
Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
Money-Laundering Control Act
Money-Laundering Suppression Act
Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
Securities Act 1933
Securities Act 1934
Terrorism Prevention Act
Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.


‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001

Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.



Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.

September 17, 2007 in Current Affairs | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Wantagate: Wanta $$ Embezzled by Agents for Clinton, Cheney,.:


The comments to this entry are closed.