« Congressman Ron Paul has helped HUNDREDS of our veterans (Video) | Main | MISPRISION OF FELONY LETTER TO WISCONSIN JUDGE / JUDGE JAMES L. MARTIN APPRAISED OF THE WANTAGATE SCANDAL »
LEO WANTA / WANTAGATE: (Thursday 25 October 2007) BUSH AND CHENEY STEALING WITH AND FROM EACH OTHER
BUSH AND CHENEY STEALING WITH, FROM EACH OTHER
UNPRECEDENTED CRIMINAL CRISIS AT THE WHITE HOUSE
Thursday 25 October 2007 20:39
UPDATE/ADDENDUM: 27th OCTOBER:
MISPRISION OF FELONY LETTER TO THE
WISCONSIN JUDGE
On 26th October, the Editor of this service wrote to Judge
James L Martin, of the Dane County Circuit Court, Branch 17, Madison, Wisconsin,
placing the Judge on notice that we are not prepared to wait until the end of
the solar system for the Court to address the Wisconsin State tax fabrication
scandal (a.k.a. 'Wisconsingate': see our report dated 6th August 2007: Archive),
which procured that Ambassador Leo Wanta was convicted on a trumped-up State tax
charge for 22 years in the GULAG in a grotesque miscarriage of justice THAT HAS
TO BE RECTIFIED.
Furthermore, the Editor of this service requires a
proper accounting for his $35,000 two-year loan with which the Ambassador's
freedom (the ending of his probation, which would otherwise have continued until
28th November 2010) was purchased (extortion money).
In order not to
encumber the present report with this further addendum, the Editor's letter and
a brief commentary can be accessed ABOVE the present report, under the heading
given above.
To access the 27th October 'Judge' report, press Archive
and select the report ABOVE this one.
The report posted on 25th
October is as follows:
• THE QUEEN'S
GOLD HAS BEEN RESTORED TO HER OWNERSHIP
• VAST
ACCRUALS GENERATED OUT OF THE QUEEN'S GOLD
•
WHY WAS THE QUEEN'S GOLD STOLEN? SEE BELOW
•
IMF MANAGING DIRECTOR APPEARS TO LIE TO THE EDITOR
• CHENEY TRIES TO STEAL THE PRESIDENT'S STOLEN $45
BILLION
• THE IMF DEPUTY MD CONTRADICTS HIS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
• IMF OFFICIALS MAKE NO
DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN ON- AND OFF THE BOOKS
• BUT THE G-7 POWERS ALLUDE TO THE NEW 'UNIFORM' BANKING
SYSTEM
• THE NEW 'UNIFORM' SYSTEM WILL HAVE A
HEDGE FUND HOLE
• THE WANTA PLAN IS
TRANSPARENT, CLEAN AND HONEST:
• THAT'S WHY THEY
HATE IT
• THE MANDAMUS CASE CHARADE, THE
O.N.I. JUDGE, AND THE O.N.I. IMPOSTOR
• COURT
'ACCIDENTALLY' INSERTS SEPARATE DRUG CASE INTO WANTA'S RECORD
• EMBASSY SUITES ROOM PROBABLY ENTERED WHILE WE'RE IN
COURT
• ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY IS
GRANDDAUGHTER OF WANTA JOURNALIST
• BLATANT
CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE WANTA OF COURT DOCUMENTS
• CLERK OF THE COURT MAKES HER OWN FEEBLE
EXCUSES
• IMPOSTOR O.N.I. OPERATIVE PULLS DOWN
HIS PANTS
• THE PHOTO FRAME-UP IN THE BASEMENT
CAR PARK
• THE O.N.I. ASSASSIN'S DIRTY
BLACKMAIL TRICKS EXPOSED
• THE ASSASSIN
DEMANDS MONEY WITH MENACING THREATS
• THE
AMBASSADOR DESCRIBES HIS TIME IN THE GULAG
•
GETTING TO THE LIBRARY WITHOUT BEING ASSAULTED
• 147 INTERPOL AGENTS AND MASS ARRESTS OF
BANKERS
• PATTERN OF ARRESTS SINCE PAULSON
LAST DECEMBER
• THE ON-OFF EMBARGO AGAINST THE
UNITED STATES
• BROWN BACKS CROOK BLAIR FOR
THE E.U. PRESIDENCY
• POSSIBLE NUCLEAR
BLACKMAIL ON AMERICAN SOIL
• PLANNING A NUKE
EXPLOSION TO AVOID PAYING WANTA?
• TWIN CITIES
PREDICTION JUDGED TO BE ACCURATE
By Christopher
Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency
Review, World Reports Limited, London and New
York: www.worldreports.org. Press
NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for
'Wantagate' reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our
latest publications as they are made available, has been added].
• Please Make a Donation to help fund
Christopher Story's ongoing financial corruption
investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make
a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial
corruption and global financial crisis in history. This website has been calling
the shots, because of the hijacking of Wanta's Settlement.
• Emails addressed to us which lack coordinates identifying
the sender will be trashed unread. The Editor publishes all his coordinates, as
has always been the case, as he has nothing to hide.
FIVE WANTAGATE
REPORTS 'SNIPPED' BY CRIMINAL U.S. INTELLIGENCE
While preparing this update
we noticed that the following five recent reports appeared to have been
'snipped' by criminal U.S. intelligence (NSA): 8 September; 17 September; 20
September; 30 September; 04 October. These are obviously among the most
sensitive and dangerous reports for the criminal cadres. Interfering with a
foreign website is illegal. Our IT resources HAVE RESTORED THESE REPORTS as at
2.30pm EDT on 25th October 2007. Since some of the closing text on the crucial
Citibank exposure posting dated 4th October was lost, the Editor has rebuilt
that report and has added the following two paragraphs for good
measure:
IN SUMMARY, AND MOST SERIOUSLY OF ALL, ESPECIALLY FOR ALL
TRUSTEES:
• •
Citibank/Citigroup acknowledges that it has set a precedent for the bank itself
to dictate to clients and others whose funds it holds, the terms upon which it
will 'allow' owners of funds to access their money, and that it may at any time
encumber the funds for its own purposes as it sees fit, without reference to the
owner of the funds.
[Archive: Citibank as a criminal enterprise: 04
October].
• • It
has sent a clear signal to ALL TRUSTEES that if they continue to hold funds with
Citibank/ Citigroup, they do so entirely at their own risk while running the
additional risk that they may be vulnerable to being sued by the beneficiaries
for placing their funds held in trust, IN DANGER. A trustee must act at all
times strictly in the interests of the beneficiaries and must never allow his or
her fiduciary responsibilities to be compromised. Manifestly, a trustee holding
funds with Citibank who is aware of THIS CASE must take IMMEDIATE ACTION to
protect his or her beneficiaries' assets, which, given the circumstances
described in this case and in this report [04 October], MUST MEAN that funds
held in trust may require added protection, and that the trustee MUST BE SEEN TO
BE TAKING ALL MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE FUNDS HELD IN TRUST.
THAT IS THE LEGAL POSITION.
• • That may mean, given this case, removing the funds from
Citibank/Citigroup altogether.
• • WHILE THE EDITOR WAS ADDING THE ABOVE ADDENDUM, THE
BUTTON HE USES TO 'CONFIRM' THE APPLICATION OF TEXT TO THE PRESENT WEBSITE
TEMPLATE WAS BEING INDEPENDENTLY JIGGERED BY SOME THIRD CLASS, ONE-STRIPE NSA
IDIOT WHO WAS TRYING TO IMPEDE THE EDITOR'S WORK.
THE NSA IDIOT TURNED
OFF THE EDITOR’S WEBSITE SCREEN THREE TIMES, AND THEN INSERTED QUESTION MARKS IN
PLACE OF ALL QUOTATION MARKS. AS AN INTENDED RESULT OF THIS CRUDE CRIMINAL
INTRUSION, IT HAS TAKEN THE EDITOR MANY HOURS TO PUT THIS REPORT UP ON THE
WEBSITE. THESE U.S. CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WERE REPORTED TO BE ATTACKING ALL OUR
COMPUTERS, INCLUDING THOSE OF LAWYERS AND THE PRINCIPALS THEMSELVES (NOTHING NEW
FOR THEM).
Here, despite these criminal attempts to derail us, is the
latest Wantagate update. PLEASE NOTE THAT IT HAS BEEN 'SNIPPED' SEVERAL TIMES
WHILE THE EDITOR WAS TRYING TO UPLOAD.
ROGUE ACTOR PAULSON CONDEMNS
ROGUE ACTORS
'We must continue to apply robust efforts to combat illicit
money flows to safeguard the financial system from abuse, support development
and economic growth, and protect citizens worldwide'.
'By implementing
the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) international safeguards on money
laundering and terrorist financing, countries worldwide can help make the global
financial system an inhospitable venue for terrorists, proliferators, narcotics
traffickers, and other rogue actors'.
This statement, issued by the US
Treasury Department Office of Public Affairs on 20th October 2007, is taken from
the penultimate paragraph of the Statement by the rogue actor with whom we are
so familiar, namely the US Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson, Jr., at last
weekend's Meeting of the International Monetary and Financial Committee (the
IMFC) of the Board of Governors of the International Monetary Fund, held during
the Annual Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, which
closed in Washington DC, on 22nd October.
HYPOCRISY, DECEIT AND
DOUBLE-MINDEDNESS ON DISPLAY
Normal people, including almost all financial
journalists attending the Annual Meetings who work in darkness and do not yet
begin to comprehend the meaning of the word ‘double-mindedness’, and who
therefore do not understand that these high-level ‘rogue actors’, to re-use the
phrase with which Paulson described himself so accurately, routinely say the
opposite to what they do, will doubtless have been falsely reassured by these
platitudes.
Such people will therefore have missed the point that they
summarise, with pinpoint accuracy, the lawless behaviour over which Mr Henry M.
Paulson, Jr., has himself presided, and which he has facilitated, ever since he
replaced John Snow and hijacked the Wanta Settlement of $4.5 trillion remitted
by the People’s Bank of China in good faith by way of a private transaction in
favour of Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta, in June 2006.
'GENIES WHICH MOVED
OUT OF THE BOTTLE'
Following the conclusion of the International Monetary and
Financial Committee Meeting, a press conference, attended by the Editor of this
service, was held in the auditorium of the Press Rooms at the IMF Headquarters 1
Building. Addressing the entire world’s press were Mr Padoa-Schioppa, Chairman
of the IMFC, Sr. Rodrigo de Rato, outgoing Managing Director of the IMF, and Mr
Lipsky, the First Deputy Managing Director of the IMF. Mr Padoa-Schioppa’s brief
survey of what the IMFC had discussed and agreed included the following
observations:
‘The [market] turbulence has revealed a number of problems
that may be deeper than the specific episode that triggered the tensions. There
are developments in the financial system which are like genies which moved out
of the bottle and are hard to follow, to understand. There is a clear need for
supervisory bodies. But even for the very financial institutions which create
these new instruments, to understand better what their creatures are doing out
in the market. And this is clearly reason for concern’.
These comments
alluded to paragraph 4 of the Communiqué of the IMFC of the Board of Governors
of the International Monetary Fund, distributed to the media at the press
conference, which reads:
'Ministers and Central Bank Governors had a
useful discussion today on the lessons emerging from the current episode of
financial market turbulence, and are committed to continuing to work together,
including multilaterally, to analyze the nature of the disturbances and consider
lessons to be learned and actions needed to prevent further turbulence'.
'The Committee agrees that financial innovation and securitization,
while having contributed to enhanced risk diversification and improved market
efficiency, have also created some new challenges that need to be properly
addressed'.
THE EDITOR’S QUESTION TO THE IMF’S MANAGING
DIRECTOR
Shortly after the conclusion of the panel’s introductory remarks,
the Editor of International Currency
Review was privileged to be able to direct the following question to the
platform at the press conference:
‘I refer to paragraph 4 [of the
Communiqué]. In particular, to the genies which moved out of the bottle. And
lessons to be learned. The phrase lessons to be learned always means that
something has gone pear-shaped. I’m not sure whether this is a question which
you want me to ask, but I’m going to ask it. Did you discuss or are you
discussing or will you ever discuss the scandal of the massive, untaxed,
corrupt, off-balance sheet transactions which take place off-balance sheet,
which we know about, and which are the fundamental underlying cause of the
disturbances which are taking place? And why are you discussing, why do you use
the word, the adjective ‘new’, in respect of the challenges which need to be
properly addressed, at the end of paragraph 4, when if what I’m referring to is
what you are referring to, they are not new?’
‘And finally, when will the
Wanta Settlement of $4.5 trillion be paid?’
Bearing in mind that the IMF
itself presides over the Wanta Settlement and associated overdue US domestic and
delayed international settlement payments, and also recalling the (Leninist)
double-mindedness factor – which enables ‘the initiated’ to lie with ‘impunity’
– the answer to this question proffered by the outgoing Managing Director of the
IMF, was as revealing as was the fact that the transcript of the press
conference, which the Editor has in front of him as this report is being
written, spelled Wanta correctly. (Manifestly, if the staff and management of
the IMF had never heard of Wanta, they would have been liable to misspell his
name, e.g. Wonter)
IMF, IN CHARGE OF SETTLEMENT, DENIES KNOWLEDGE OF
IT
Sr. Rodrigo de Rato: ‘I don’t know what settlement you are referring to.
But what I understand from your question, first of all, there are some new
challenges, no question [about] it. Some new [challenges] because of the
circumstances that happened in August, have created new challenges by
definition, the markets, the liquidity of some markets will not happen before
August' [sic].
'And, that is a new challenge, but also, I think, the new
challenge has a broader sense, of the new challenges that the new globalization
is producing, which is linkages and is also the fact that there are new
instruments that have been very useful in spreading risk and reducing the price
of risk, but at the same time is clearly [sic] that those new instruments pose
questions of transparency, pose questions regarding off-balance sheet
operations, pose questions of due diligence by investors, pose questions of the
rating, understanding of ratings, and just to mention a few'.
‘These are
new things. New things because of the change in the global environment because
of the credit crisis of the summer, and there is new things [sic] because the
markets have innovated in such a way in the recent years that this test that the
markets have produced, have endured, is producing new questions, no question
about it, that we are facing new issues. At the same time we also face new
opportunities’.
MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE IMF APPEARS TO HAVE LIED TO THE
EDITOR
The purpose of asking loaded questions at these controlled press
conferences is not to solicit information from the bureaucrats on the podium,
since they invariably respond with platitudes, generalities and linguistic
evasions, but rather to inform both the platform and the world’s somnolent media
of the nature of the real issues that need to be addressed.
The
departing Managing Director’s statement that he had no knowledge of the Wanta
Settlement represented an egregious lie, unless key operations at the Fund take
place secretly behind the Managing Director’s back, in which case the head of
the IMF is by definition vulnerable to being exposed as nothing more than a
front by anyone from the media who knows what he or she is talking about. Since
this appears unlikely, the only possible conclusion to be reached is that Sr. de
Rato told an outright lie in front of the world’s press.
Of course the
IMF knows everything there is to know about the Wanta Settlement.
It is
in charge of implementing it.
ANOTHER JOURNALIST ASKS THE SAME QUESTION
DIFFERENTLY
Subsequently, a member of the US ‘mainstream’ press asked the
following related question, not understanding, perhaps, that he was asking
basically the same question as the Editor of this service. In his response, Mr
Lipsky, the First Deputy Managing Director of the Fund, contradicted his
Managing Director. Here is the sequence:
Q: ‘Perhaps Mr Lipsky can
comment on this, because this is with an eye to the future. One number: 416
trillion. I’m going to repeat that number: 416 trillion. That is the number
given by the Bank for International Settlements in their last report, on the
estimated value of the number of derivatives that have been written. Most of
those counterparties [are] expecting payment, should they be realized, in
dollars. Are the Fund studying that question and talk[ing] about the
transparency of that market in the future, and is it of greater concern to the
Fund than it has been in the past?’
Interrupting the sequence for the
moment: (a) International
Currency Review, the Journal of the World Financial Community, has published
an estimated figure for outstanding derivatives of $1,400 trillion, which no-one
in the public or the private sector has contradicted; (b) The Bank for
International Settlements’ estimated number of $416 trillion is universally
laughed at as being, at a minimum, at least one-third the size it should be; and
(c) the Bank for International Settlements itself, being involved in this
off-balance sheet business, has falsified its estimated number on purpose, in
order to minimise public alarm at the reality of the situation – which is as
follows:
IMF OFFICIALS TALK IN TECHNICAL GENERALITIES
Because of the
unrestrained, criminal off-balance sheet free-for all that has proliferated over
the several decades since the collapse of the Bretton Woods system, and because
criminal intelligence operatives holding the highest offices in the United
States and elsewhere treat their high office as affording them permission to
engage in fraudulent off-balance sheet, untaxed, secret financial transactions
for their own enrichment and to imagine they can continue doing so with
impunity, the US dollar is encumbered by obligations so gigantic that it stands
on the verge of a catastrophic collapse, the sole known antidote to which, that
is on the table, is the Wanta Settlement and Plan. Since the whole of the
international community at intergovernmental level knows all about the Wanta
Plan, the assertion by Sr. de Rato that he has no knowledge of it, is a
disgraceful and cynical affront and insult to the world’s media – ignorant,
headstrong and complacent though most of their members undoubtedly are, in this
Editor’s long experience.
CHENEY TRIES TO STEAL PRESIDENT’S STOLEN $45
BILLION
Nor was it likely that those on the platform were unaware of the
latest intelligence about ongoing financial corruption. On the eve of the
IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings, it was reported behind-the-scenes that a
long-serving banker of Pakistani origin based at the New York office of Crédit
Suisse diverted $45 billion for a secret personal account held by Halliburton in
Dubai for Vice President Richard B Cheney (the suffix vice’ being only too
appropriate here). It transpired that the $45 billion in question represented
stolen money held in trust for the President of the United States, George Bush
Jr. In other words, the Vice President of the United States was caught stealing
stolen funds ‘belonging’ to his colleague, the President of the United States.
This illegal transaction was frustrated by a secret fail-safe mechanism,
the banker was arrested and shortly afterwards, under interrogation, suffered a
mysterious heart attack. On 24th October it was reported that funds are still
being stolen by highest-level officials, making it crystal clear that the US
Government is controlled by organised criminals. Laura Bush was reported to have
flown hurriedly to Dubai to take care of Bush family stolen money banking
issues.
VAST ACCRUALS GENERATED OUT OF THE QUEEN'S GOLD
It is reported
that massive amounts of money were illegally generated from trading The Queen's
gold. Barclays Bank, which appears to be grossly corrupt, is alleged to have
been involved. The sums are so massive that hiding them, in the face of the
'incoming' new 'uniform' financial system (which will have a hole in it called
'hedge funds', is a serious problem for the cleptocracy, headed by George Bush
Jr. (and Sr.). It is likely that the delays that have been experienced in
finalising the Wanta Settlement are associated with the 'necessity' for the vast
fiat money generated from The Queen's stolen gold to be hidden and stashed away
in an illuminati bolt-hole beforehand. Why did they steal The Queen's gold?
Because this was 'the last chance' they had to generate the colossal volume of
funds that they need to be able to continue financing the World Revolution. Was
Laura Bush involved in 'placing' and representing the President of the United
States in Dubai? You bet.
CHENEY THEFT 'COLLAPSES' CREDIT
SUISSE
The collateral damage from the Crédit Suisse theft by Cheney’s
associate took the form of the sudden, unannounced collapse of Crédit Suisse, as
of about 2.30pm Eastern Daylight Time on Friday, 19th October, and its secret
takeover by Union Bank of Switzerland. The policy concerning this matter appears
to have been to operate a total blackout, with the practical consequence that,
for public consumption, Crédit Suisse remains ‘in business’, given the
catastrophic global consequences that would ensue if the somnolent and blinded
‘mainstream’ media, which operates as noted in the darkness, were to become
aware of the facts of this matter. It will be recalled that we have predicted
that major banks will collapse as a consequence of this open-ended criminality:
the first forecast global bank collapse duly occurred last Friday.
For
our purposes here, this incident illustrates the cynicism and hypocrisy which
envelops the public pronouncements of many of the terrified international
bureaucrats and bankers for whom the bell is tolling and whom, as the outgoing
IMF Managing Director’s response to this Editor made clear, have been scrabbling
to work out how to prevent or postpone a global calamity of their own making –
and who have steadfastly refused to want to understand that these fraudulent
financial transactions are what the holders of the highest US official offices
‘do’. That’s what they lusted after before they ascended to their lofty
positions, and what they spend most of their time in office seeking to
accomplish. Unfortunately for them, they have run out of time, yet do not even
appear to acknowledge that this is the case.
Only last August, President
George W. Bush Jr. traveled to Tennessee, did he not, where a certain drug
dealer faced a term in jail not unadjacent to 25 years. Shortly after the
President left Tennessee, the drug dealer in question received a sentence of six
months. This is a ‘taster’ for the narrative on the Wanta Mandamus kangaroo
court episode that the Editor describes below. But first, let’s complete the
sequence we have started, with Mr Lipsky’s response to that ‘mainstream’
question, in which he contradicted Sr. de Rato:
IMF DEPUTY MD CONTRADICTS
HIS MANAGING DIRECTOR
Mr Lipsky: ‘I’ll be happy to respond… First of all, the
derivatives market is not new. It has existed in various forms for
decades’.
At so-called press ‘conferences’, no actual ‘conference’ ever
takes place. On the contrary, formal statements are made, followed by
‘questions’, which are then answered by officials on the platform. There is no
discussion. If such events were ‘conferences’, the Editor would have been
afforded an opportunity to point out that the Managing Director of the IMF, Mr
Lipsky’s colleague, had just stated, in his reply to the Editor, that all these
problems are ‘new’ – ‘new’ was one of the elements of paragraph 4 of the IMFC’s
communiqué that this Editor had pulled the platform up for, in his prior
question. Notwithstanding this glaring contradiction of his boss, Mr Lipsky
sailed on regardless:
‘It has been growing rapidly. It has been, the
growth in the use of derivative instruments has been part of the broader
phenomenon of securitization of financial markets, and has been part of the
globalization of financial markets. The underlying logic of securitization is to
allow investors and borrowers to more accurately control risk exposure, leading
to broader dispersion of risk, and at least theoretically, if designed
correctly, should help to produce greater efficiency in financial markets and
enhance stability’.
NO DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN ON- AND OFF THE
BOOKS
Yes, but Mr Lipsky, this is all supposed to happen ON THE BOOKS,
ON-BALANCE SHEET, NOT OFF-BALANCE SHEET. You speak, like Mr Paulson, with a
forked tongue. The reason that the entire world stands at the brink of a
financial and economic catastrophe with no historical parallel is that the
International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the Bank for International
Settlements, the Group of Seven and its Financial Action Task Force (FATF) which
the Bush II Administration procured to be ignored when it came to office, the
toothless OECD anti-money-laundering initiatives, the corrupt European
Commission and its structures, and the implicated national governments and their
tax and compliance authorities, have generally and specifically permitted these
transactions to proliferate off the books, with the assistance of ‘special
zones’ such as Dubai (constructed inter alia from the leveraged proceeds of
Ambassador Wanta’s stolen funds). Therefore, all official talk, such as Mr
Lipsky’s response to the questioner and Sr. de Rato’s non-response to this
Editor’s question, MISS THE POINT.
Such official responses, like the
cynical remarks by Mr Paulson cited at the beginning of this report, describe
the situation AS IT SHOULD BE, but ALWAYS without making it clear that it makes
no sense to have two international financial systems – an orderly, appropriately
policed system, and an uncontrolled, wayward, illicit, corrupt, untaxed, secret
off-the-books financial system, which by definition and practice corrodes the
integrity of the formal financial system. THAT IS WHAT THESE OFFICIALS DISGUISE
IN THEIR PUBLIC STATEMENTS, while uttering platitudes about what ‘ought to be’,
for the benefit of financial journalists such as the Editor of this service who
ask the awkward questions that they cannot answer BECAUSE THEY THEMSELVES ARE
PART OF THE PROBLEM.
G-7 POWERS REFER TO THE NEW ‘UNIFORM’ BANKING
SYSTEM
Even so, the Group of Seven Finance Ministers themselves left clues in
their public pronouncements during the IMF/World Bank Annual meetings that made
it clear that the new global financial system is going ahead, whether the
Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund understands that it is
based and predicated upon implementation of The Wanta Plan, or
not.
Specifically, in the course of their deliberations, the G-7 finance
leaders endorsed, according to Reuters, ‘a broad reform agenda for the financial
sector in the wake of the subprime crisis [sic] that called on banks to improve
stress-testing and fortify access to funding in times of trouble. The IMF
External Relations Department’s summary of the Reuters report (the IMF’s
standard practice is to cite outside press reports about developments taking
place within its own buildings) continued:
‘Finance Ministers and central
bankers from the G-7 rich nations endorsed a top-level report – expected to set
the agenda for regulatory improvements through next year – that appeared to
spare hedge funds and [to] focus instead on banks, complex financial instruments
and credit ratings agencies. “We expect market participants to address many of
the shortcomings that were exposed by recent events”, the G-7 said in its
communiqué, increasing the pressure on credit rating agencies and banks to
remedy some of the root causes of the crisis. The report was done by the
Financial Stability Forum, a group of central banks, regulators and bodies like
the IMF’.
NEW ‘’UNIFORM’ SYSTEM WILL HAVE A HEDGE FUND HOLE
Thus the
‘hole’ in the new ON THE BOOKS financial system, represented by the wayward
hedge fund sector, which provides conduits and supposed safe havens for
illegitimate assets generated from leveraged and hypothecated transactions based
inter alia originally upon Ambassador Wanta’s stolen and diverted funds, is to
remain unfilled – so that the illicit assets accumulated offshore can continue
to be collectivised by hedge funds and transferred in disguise onto the books,
to comply with the requirements of the new ‘uniform’ financial system.
By
which is supposed to be meant a single-tier system that is not undermined by a
second, parallel, hidden, duplicated, lawless, wayward, off-the-books, tax-free
offshore system, as at present: a single-tier system that will be kick-started
by the delayed implementation of The Wanta Plan, following economic receipt by
Ambassador Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., of the $4.5 trillion funds remitted
in May 2006 in good faith by the People’s Bank of China, being proceeds
accumulated by Leo Wanta and his subsequently assassinated partner, the Chinese
intelligence chief, Howe Kwong Kok, which were held faithfully in trust by the
Chinese authorities during the long years of the Ambassador’s illegal
incarceration, house arrest and probation, on a trumped-up civil tax assessment
orchestrated by the ‘Box Gang’ (the Bush-Clinton organized crime clique), as
described in these reports.
WANTA PLAN IS TRANSPARENT, CLEAN AND
HONEST
As should be crystal clear by now, the whole point of The Wanta Plan,
and of the transparent stance consistently adopted by Ambassador Wanta and his
Treasurer and Executive Vice President, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., is to
kick-start, validate, energise and provide the nucleus of the new, ‘uniform’
global financial system, in which financial transactions will be conducted
on-balance sheet and will be taxed accordingly. One crucial consequence of this
will be that the US Treasury will receive not only the illegally and corruptly
delayed initial windfall tax payment of $1.575 trillion (35% of $4.5 trillion),
but will also benefit from prospective tax accruals (all paid into a special US
Treasury tax account, not diverted via the unreliable Internal Revenue Service
which has failed to enforce its tax collection remit properly) of the order of
up to $200 billion per banking day.
These real’ accruals will be
available for paying down the US Treasury’s massive background debt (aggregating
over $9.0 trillion as publicised, but which is in reality of a much larger order
of magnitude, as has consistently been explained in our financial publications),
and for the reduction of taxes, the prospective abolition of inheritance tax,
and for long overdue infrastructure and other neglected projects.
Between
six and eight large financial institutions have been standing by ever since
Henry M. Paulson Jr, first hijacked the Wanta payment, thereby illegally
interfering with a private transaction contrary to H.R. 3723 signed by President
Clinton on 11th October 1996, preventing a taxpayer from paying his taxes –
which is a serious criminal offence – and providing the basis for the
‘privileged’ closed shop of large US institutions led by Goldman Sachs,
Citibank, Bank of New York Mellon, Wachovia et al, to conduct illicit
hypothecation transactions using the Ambassador’s funds without his authority.
The fact that some of these institutions may include those which have been
illegally exploiting the Ambassador’s funds represents just another illustration
of the fundamental principal that governs the behaviour of this perverse
Luciferian elite: their double-mindedness.
FEATURES OF THE NEW SYSTEM TO
BE DETERMINED
The following features of the new ‘uniform’ global financial
system that is to be kick-started and energised by The Wanta Plan, approved
enthusiastically by the Group of Seven (8) meeting in Germany last June (which,
presumably, Sr Rodrigo de Rato slept through), need to be clarified (and may be
clarified already, unknown to the Editor of this service):
• Is there going to be a new on-balance sheet trading
program using US dollars and Euros, and will this new trading program negate the
off-balance sheet funds?
• What are the new
financial instruments that will be used in the new trading program?
• Are there enough creditworthy banks,
domestically (in the United States) and internationally, to facilitate the
intended new trading program?
THE MANDAMUS CASE AND THE O.N.I.
JUDGE
Turning now to the Mandamus Petition Court case in the United States
Eastern District of Virginia on 19th October 2007, which the Editor attended,
the Judge was His Honor T. Selby Ellis III, born in Bogotá, Colombia, educated
in law at Oxford University, who was appointed by President Reagan in 1987 and
has flown F4 Phantom warplanes off aircraft carriers. This enterprising Judge, a
naval aviation expert who continues to fly, was a partner with the law firm of
Hunton and Williams, based in its Washington DC office. This firm is a
well-known CIA legal outfit and, given his naval aviation background, it may be
assumed that His Honor may be nothing less than an Office of Naval Intelligence
(ONI) operative. He became a Senior Federal Judge in the Eastern District of
Virginia in April 2007, is authorised to sit for the United States Western
District of Virginia as well, and serves in the US Court of Appeal for the
Fourth District. He presided in the case of John Walker Lindh.
While
waiting for the Ambassador’s case to be heard, we were treated by the Judge to
lectures on the choices that those appearing before him had made in their lives,
witnessing a drug dealer who received a sentence of 180 months’ incarceration
(15 years), and a drug victim who received a remarkably lenient sentence, since
she was clearly a victim of this vicious evil. We also heard the Judge’s
argumentation as to why a firm of lawyers could not be granted their claim of
nearly half a million dollars in legal fees, with the Judge asserting that ‘a
lawyer’s job is to solve his client’s problem’ – not to milk him for colossal
legal fees that are out of all proportion to the legal result achieved. Bear
this in mind when reviewing what follows.
AN O.N.I. COLONEL ATTACHES
HIMSELF UNINVITED
On 18th October, the Principals were unexpectedly joined at
the well-known CIA hotel Embassy Suites, in Alexandria, VA, beneath the shadow
of the biggest pagan, Luciferian temple on earth, the Masonic Temple (of Satan),
by the ONI operative whose services were employed in serving the Mandamus
documents. He was not invited, but appeared at the last moment, obtaining a room
in the same hotel despite the fact that it was full, not least because it was
IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings weekend.
It was in the front area of an
‘Agency’ hotel somewhat more up-market than this one that President Reagan was
shot, that the Clintons had a blazing row in the elevator prior to William
Jefferson Clinton’s inauguration, and that Hillary Rodinsky Clinton attacked the
future President of the United States with a lampshade, on the same occasion. It
is a certainty that Ambassador Wanta’s hotel accommodation was bugged – with
cameras in the television set, chips in the lamps, and other sordid espionage
devices with which the CIA is in the habit of spying on its own personnel and on
operatives belonging to other agencies under its purview, such as the Office of
Naval Intelligence. The reason why the Ambassador and Mr Cottrell booked at the
CIA-infested Embassy Suites, close to the Alexandria Courthouse, is that because
the Principals have nothing to hide, they are content for the criminal cadres to
be aware of this reality at all times.
FEARSOME REPUTATION AS A RUTHLESS
ASSASSIN
When the Editor of this service joined the Principals for dinner on
the evening of 18th October, the third member of the party was the
aforementioned ONI operative, whose fearsome reputation as an assassin was well
known to the Editor of this service. However the Editor, having never met him
before, did not know who he was until ice cream a la mode time. Having expressed
astonishment, the Editor was immediately warned by this operative never to
reveal that he had been present. The warning was accompanied by a light-hearted
threat, but knowing how dangerous this man really is, the Editor took note of
the fact. It was repeated on three further occasions on the following day – on
the third occasion with the addendum that ‘if you do, I will send someone after
you’
The ONI operative who had inserted himself into the Ambassador’s
presence later not only accompanied us to the Courthouse but provided transport
as well. The evidence suggests that he orchestrated the entire Mandamus charade
with the Courthouse.
EMBASSY SUITES ROOM IS ENTERED WHILE WE RE IN
COURT
After Ambassador Wanta had testified pro-se, during the lunch break,
the operative – who, in an extraordinary breach of protocol, had walked right up
to the Judge’s podium and had spoken privately to the Clerk of the Court –
shuttled the party back to the hotel, where Michael Cottrell discovered that his
hotel keys were missing. We also noticed four FBI agents in the lobby. The party
returned to the Courthouse at 1.30pm, but the ONI operative, asserting the need
to park the car back in the hotel’s car park (whereas it could perfectly well
have been parked more locally), absented himself on the pretext of parking the
car back at the hotel. During the afternoon session, we believe that the hotel
room was cased by the FBI operatives, who accessed the room using Mr Cottrell’s
stolen key. They would have been engaged in extracting data from the hidden
cameras and audio facilities, photographing documents, and making such other
clandestine arrangements as the spooks considered necessary, as they cast about
desperately to find ‘evidence’ against the Principals, and possibly even the
Editor of this service.
At six minutes before 2.00pm, the Judge, who had
been taking a drink driving case, suddenly ordered a recess and entered his
chambers. It is believed that during this brief recess, the Judge may have taken
calls from authorities, the burden of which may have been: ‘Close down this case
as quickly and smoothly as possible’.
Outside the Courtroom, Ambassador
Wanta, having noted that the Assistant US Attorney’s name was Leslie McClendon,
introduced himself to this lady, who charmingly confirmed that she was the
granddaughter of the famous late columnist Sarah McClendon, the senior veteran
White House correspondent whose speciality for decades had been the exposure of
official corruption in general, and exposure of Leo Wanta’s case in
particular.
ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY RELATED TO WANTA JOURNALIST
So
here was the Assistant US Attorney, the granddaughter of the United States’ most
renowned anti-corruption campaigner, participating in an orchestrated, rearguard
kangaroo court operation, fronted by the ONI, to frustrate the Ambassador’s
exposure of the worst case of official financial corruption in US and world
history. Charming and friendly though this Assistant US Attorney was, she had
failed to recuse herself, given the obvious conflict of interest, since the late
Sarah McClendon. had published a large number of well-known articles on Leo
Wanta, as any Google search will immediately confirm.
(Type in Sarah
McClendon articles on Leo Wanta, and 210 references will
appear).
CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE WANTA OF COURT DOCUMENTS
Separately, it
may be recalled that the Ambassador never received any documents arising from
his Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, during the two months from the filing (by
the aforementioned ONI operative on behalf of the Ambassador, who points out
that ‘it is sometimes necessary to use bad people to do good things’) of the
Summonses and Returns of Service at the US District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, Alexandria, on 27th July 2007. During the 60 days during
which the Ambassador was cynically kept in the dark, despite repeated telephone
enquiries at the law offices of Steven Goodwin in Richmond, VA, the Ambassador
and his colleague Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., were denied all knowledge of any
responses by the Respondents, namely Henry M. Paulson Jr., the US Treasury
Secretary, Robert M. Kimmit, Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, James R
Wilkinson, Treasury Chief of Staff, Michael Chertoff, the Secretary of the
Department of Homeland Security, Alberto R. Gonzales, the former US Attorney
General, who has links with organized crime, and the Federal Reserve Bank of
Richmond. No explanations for this state of affairs were ever forthcoming from
the office of Steven Goodwin who, by the way, remains the Trustee of this
Editor’s two-year $35,000 loan, repayable at 7.5% annual interest to the Editor
on 10th June 2007.
GOODWIN’S LAST-MINUTE AFFIDAVIT TO THE
COURT
Instead, Mr Goodwin furnished the Court with the following Affidavit,
which was filed shortly before the hearing, on 19th October
2007:
AFFIDAVIT
Comes now the Affiant and, having been duly sworn,
says the following:
The address at 5516 Falmouth Street, Suite 108,
Richmond, Virginia 23230 is occupied by the law firm of Goodwin, Sutton &
DuVal, PLC.
I am a principal in the firm of Goodwin, Sutton & DuVal,
PLC.
I am aware of the name Leo E. Wanta and AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. as
is my staff, and I have performed various legal services for both in the
past.
I am the registered agent for AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.
My
staff obtains the mail at 5516 Falmouth Street, Suite 108, Richmond, Virginia
23230 and distributes the mail within the firm daily.
Mr Wanta had
advised me that he had filed action in Federal Court in Alexandria and advised
that mail pertaining to that case may be coming to the office.
No one
from my staff has made me aware of any mail from the Federal Reserve Bank of
Richmond received on behalf of Mr Wanta or AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., in the
matter of Wanta, et al v. Paulson, et al.
I am aware that my office has
received mail from the United States Attorney’s office on behalf of Mr Wanta
and/or AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. in the matter of Wanta, et al v. Paulson, et
al.
STATE OF VIRGINIA, COUNTY OF HENRICO, to-wit: [signed,
Affiant]
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this 18th day of October,
2007, by Steven D. Goodwin: [Signed] Notary Public, Aimee L. Angell’.
In
the penultimate paragraph of this last-minute Affidavit (Mr Goodwin did not show
up, of course), reference is made to mail from the Federal Reserve Bank of
Richmond. This represents a crude deception on the part of Steven Goodwin.
Defendants in court cases do not write to the Plaintiffs, and vice versa, as Mr
Goodwin should surely be aware.
GOODWIN IN GROSS DERELICTION OF HIS
DUTY
For reasons that are explained by this narrative, the mail that Attorney
Steven Goodwin, who is a Director of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., received in this
legal connection was never forwarded to Ambassador Wanta or to Mr Cottrell, and
Mr Goodwin chose not to inform them about it. In various phone calls with the
Principals, Goodwin had referred to the ONI operative, who appears to have
orchestrated this entire charade, by his formal title of ‘Colonel’, implying
that he may have been taking instructions from him, rather than carrying out his
ongoing responsibilities both as a Director and as an Attorney from time to time
for Leo Wanta. Even if he were to try to argue that he was ‘not instructed’ in
this matter, his responsibilities as Director obliged him to act at all times in
the interests of the corporation and his co-directors; while as a lawyer he
ought to be motivated by the Judge’s own dictum that ‘a lawyer’s job is to solve
his client’s problem’. On both these counts, Mr Goodwin’s behaviour and
performance were a disgrace.
CLERK OF THE COURT MAKES HER OWN FEEBLE
EXCUSES
During the lunch recess on 19th October, the Editor and colleagues
noticed that the female Clerk of the Court, who of course was not sworn, was
engaged in an animated discussion with the Assistant US Attorney and associates
with Counsel for the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond concerning the labels that
her system prints out when mailing papers from the Court’s premises. Having
stressed that the address labels carry the same addresses as that of the
Petitioners and Respondents, the Clerk approached the Editor and colleagues. The
Editor stated loudly that irrespective of what she was saying, the Ambassador
never received any of the documentation. The Clerk, who also admitted having
failed to scan in the Ambassador’s latest Motion, appears to have been engaged
in an obfuscation exercise to mask any interference with due process, and the
episode appears to have been designed to absolve the Court itself from
participation in conspiracy to frustrate the course of justice and to create a
prejudicial environment for the Ambassador.
THE SABOTAGING OF DUE
PROCESS
On 7th September, the Court had therefore dismissed Ambassador
Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus against the Federal Reserve Bank of
Richmond without the Ambassador’s knowledge. As soon as he became belatedly
aware of this fact, he filed a Motion with the Court to vacate the Order of the
Court granting the motion to dismiss in favour of the Federal Reserve Bank of
Richmond and against the Petitioner.
This Motion included the following
paragraphs:
• 9. On multiple instances between
the time the captioned matter was initially filed by the Petitioner and the time
the presently pending Federal Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss was received by the
registered agent office the Petitioner called the registered agent office many
times to determine if any mail had been received in the name of the
Petitioner(s).
• 10. Petitioner represents
that at no time, prior to the Petitioner being advised of the Motion to Dismiss
having been filed by the Federal Respondents and received at the registered
agent office, had the Petitioner been advised of any mail being received for the
Petitioner at the registered agent office.
•
11. The Petitioner… has not received in the United States mail and/or otherwise,
either the Motion, Brief in support of the Motion and/or the Order of the Court
and/or any other documents filed by the Federal Reserve Respondents in the
captioned case.
• 12. The failure of the
Petitioner to receive notice of a Motion or other Court filing creates a
prejudicial environment. The principal test for prejudice is whether the
“non-noticed party” was denied a fair opportunity to defend and to offer
additional evidence on a different theory.
YET THE O.N.I. JUDGE CONFIRMED
THE FRUSTRATION
Notwithstanding this blatant frustration of the course of
justice and interference with due process, Judge T. S. Ellis III, who had
treated the court to intellectual argumentation as to the difference between
right and wrong, and between the choices people have to make in the course of
their lives, dismissed Ambassador Wanta’s Motion out of hand, thereby confirming
that blatant, deliberate, cynical and instrumental legal trickery designed to
frustrate the course of justice may be perfectly Okay with His Honor, after
all.
PERTINENT FACTS PLACED IN THE LEGAL PUBLIC DOMAIN
Ambassador
Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus filed against Henry M. Paulson, Jr. et
al [see full text in our report dated DATE] placed into the legal public domain
(as opposed to the public domain generally, epitomised by our reports on this
website), the background to Leo Wanta’s claim for economic receipt of the money
paid to him personally in a private transaction by the Chinese central bank in
May 2006, only to be hijacked, to the fury of the Chinese themselves, by the
corrupt US Treasury Secretary, Henry M. Paulson Jr.
It stated, in
paragraph 4, that:
‘Petitioner has attempted to access monies that were
transferred through international bank monetary clearing systems to financial
institutions located in the United States of America. The remitting party was
the People’s Republic of China, People’s Bank. The remitting party designated
that the transferred funds were for the sole and exclusive benefit of
Petitioner. The foreign entity that originated the inward remittance designated
Petitioner as sole and exclusive recipient for the transferred money/financial
instruments’.
‘Irrespective of efforts proffered by Petitioner and/or
agents and representatives of Petitioner, private and public individuals and
entities prevent petitioner from exercising Petitioner’s legal right to the use,
transfer and unrestricted ability to freely disburse said financial assets. The
acts and/or omissions to act by named and unnamed Respondents prevent the
Petitioner (and others who are ancillary to this cause of action) from paying
their respective tax liabilities to both State and Federal taxing
auithorities’.
JUDGE GERALD BRUCE LEE’S MEMORANDUM OPINION
The
Ambassador referenced the Memorandum Opinion handed down by Judge Gerald Bruce
Lee in case number 02-1363-A on 15th April 2003, in which the Court stated that
the Plaintiff (Ambassador Leo Wanta) ‘should pursue liquidation of [his offshore
Title 18, Section 6 USG intelligence] corporations, recovery of financial assets
and pay all required taxes in accordance with the law’.
Specifically,
Judge Gerald Bruce Lee adjudicated that ’Plaintiff’s sole remedy in this matter
is to proceed with the liquidation of the corporations and report these
transactions to the Internal Revenue Service in accordance with the Internal
Revenue Code and then challenge the assessment of taxes in a refund proceeding’.
With this statement, Judge Gerald Bruce Lee acknowledged Ambassador Leo Wanta’s
sole ownership as Principal of the funds and assets in question – a stance
reiterated in the Response filed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and
heard by Judge Ellis without Ambassador Wanta’s knowledge on 7th September,
wherein the Richmond Fed suggested that the remedy for the Ambassador lies
within the Jurisdiction of the United States Eastern District Court of New
York.
In so doing, of course, the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
acknowledged the Ambassador’s claim, as we pointed out in our report on
Citibank’s criminal behaviour dated 4th October: see Archive. This report was
‘snipped’ by criminal US intelligence because it characterises Citibank as a
criminal enterprise. By ‘snipping’ this report, therefore, the NSA revealed that
it works for Citibank or that Citibank can procure the services of the NSA to
interfere illegally with a foreign website, in order to cover up the truth: that
Citibank, in the Wantagate context, is indeed a criminal enterprise. Fancy
drawing attention to the fact that this is true, by ‘snipping’ the text, from
the point where we state that Citibank acknowledges that it holds/held the Wanta
funds illegally!
FURTHER WANTA INFORMATION PLACED ON THE RECORD
At
the hearing attended by the Editor of this service on 19th October, Judge Ellis,
having heard the Ambassador place onto the record a substantial amount of
condensed information about the operations in which he had been engaged on
behalf of President Reagan, along with a detailed explanation of the source of
his Title 18 Section 6 corporate assets and funds, returned from the brief
recess ordered at six minutes before 2.00pm, and proceeded to deny the
Ambassador’s case ‘for lack of subject matter jurisdiction’.
Having
denied a lawyer her firm’s fees of half a million dollars, on the basis that ‘a
lawyer’s job is to solve his client’s problem’ and to provide value for money,
the Judge dismissed the Ambassador’s case on the basis that his Court lacked
jurisdiction, which could have been ascertained from the outset – thereby saving
the Ambassador prospective lawyer’s fees and wasting his valuable time, not to
mention that of the Court and everyone else involved. Either a Court has
jurisdiction or it hasn’t. To allow the matter to be taken to such lengths
(indeed, to any lengths at all), without reviewing at the outset whether the
Judge has jurisdiction, only to have it dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, is a
grotesque abuse of the legal process that is consistent with the apparent
manipulation of the entire operation by the Office of Naval Intelligence, which
this editor considers to be a criminal organisation.
COURT INSERTS
SEPARATE DRUG CASE INTO WANTA’S RECORD
To add insult to injury, the Court has
corruptly procured the insertion of details concerning an unconnected
drug-trafficking case that the Principals and the Editor sat through on 19th
October, into the record of Ambassador Wanta’s hearing on that date. This was
revealed when Attorney Thomas Henry attempted to retrieve the record of the
Ambassador’s testimony before the Court, from the Court’s records. To this
deliberate, malevolent and thoroughly evil sabotage of the public record is
therefore added the hideous sin of false witness, given that this outrage
represents a repulsive attempt to smear the Ambassador’s reputation with details
of a drug-trafficking case heard on the same day (to which we were witnesses),
in which the offender was sentenced to 180 months’ imprisonment. In other words,
the Court has retrospectively attempted to smear the Ambassador by inserting
this drug-dealing information, the intention being that when this is drawn to
their attention, the Court’s staff will turn round and claim that it was a
‘clerical error’.
IMPOSTOR O.N.I. OPERATIVE PULLS DOWN HIS PANTS
On
returning to the hotel following the case on the Friday afternoon, the uninvited
ONI operative, who was by now an impostor, performed a number of further tricks.
First, although an uninvited guest in the Ambassador’s hotel suite, he suddenly
undressed (took down his pants) in the presence of the Ambassador, Michael C.
Cottrell and the Editor of this service exposing himself in his vest and
underpants. He behaved in this outrageous fashion without asking permission, let
alone asking whether he could change his clothes in the bathroom. While
undressing and exhibiting himself in his underpants, this ONI Colonel stated
that he had to change into his formal attire because he had to ‘go to C Street’.
This was a reference to a CIA location, where of course he would be delivering
the proceeds of his espionage and frame-up operations against the Ambassador,
Michael C. Cottrell and the Editor of this service.
THE PHOTO FRAME-UP
IN THE BASEMENT CAR PARK
The three of us noted this display of exhibitionism
with inward disgust. After he had put on his alternative trousers and jacket,
the ONI Colonel asked the Editor to accompany him down to the basement car park
area, where he would extract two business cards – one with his bona fide
address, and the other displaying a front entity which he lightly referred to as
being his ‘legitimate’ business. On his way down to the car park, the Editor
realized that he might be murdered there, since car parks are places where these
people are in the habit of liquidating their enemies. Having opened the boot of
his car, extracted the business cards (which later vanished), he closed the
portfolio from which he had extracted them, shook hands and said goodbye. It did
not occur to the Editor until later that this operation had of course been
filmed by two CIA creeps hiding behind pillars in the car
park.
Subsequently, Mr Cottrell informed the Editor that the ONI Colonel
had also separately invited him down to the car park basement as well, and had
pulled papers out of the boot, handed them to him, and then removed them from
him. In this instance, Mr Cottrell noted the presence of two men, one of whom
had a curious piece of clothing round his midriff which plainly concealed a
camera. Therefore, this charade was filmed.
THE O.N.I. ASSASSIN’S DIRTY
TRICKS EXPOSED
No doubt the sequence in which the ONI Colonel removed his
clothes was filmed by a device in the room, probably the TV set, as well.
Memories of cynical frame-up tricks played against Senator Larry Craig recently,
surfaced in the Editor’s mind. A knowledgeable US friend of the Editor’s also
pointed out, in a phone call placed by the Editor from the IMF Press Room, that
hotel keys (especially at such a CIA establishment) routinely contain all kinds
of data, such as the hotel guest’s credit card details, and that one should
always take a pair of scissors and cut the key up in front of the hotel staff.
To do the job properly, one should see which trash bin the staff use for
discarded materials, and ensure that the pieces of the hotel key are discarded
elsewhere.
THE ASSASSIN DEMANDS MONEY WITH THREATS
That was not all.
On Sunday afternoon of 21st October, 2007, the impostor ONI Colonel, spying and
plotting against us on behalf of the ONI and the CIA, telephoned Michael C.
Cottrell, M.S. in the Alexandria hotel suite. The Editor was present when this
call was taken. In the course of the conversation, the ONI Colonel, who is a
notorious assassin, shouted: ‘You owe me’ down the line. When the tenor of Mr
Cottrell’s response did not meet with his approval, this operative said words to
the effect: ’I suppose I’ll have to sling my gun again’.
The greater
probability is that he will be arrested.
Separately, the ONI Colonel
professed to have been unaware of the fact that the Editor was the source of the
$35,000 which paid the extortion money to the Wisconsin Department of
Corrections on 21st July 2005 for (illegal) ‘restitution’ and for the illegal
payment of a Wisconsin Public Defender contrary to law and to the Ambassador’s
right to appoint his own defence counsel – even though the Richmond-based ONI
Colonel knows Richmond-based Attorney Steven Goodwin, who is the Trustee of the
Editor’s loan funds as reiterated above, and has undoubtedly coordinated the
entire Mandamus charade, given that the Judge is believed to be an ONI
operative, the Clerk of the Court appears to have been engaged in outright
interference with due process thereby frustrating the course of justice and
creating, with the apparent assistance of Steven Goodwin and/or his office
staff, a prejudicial environment for the Ambassador.
THEY THINK WE ARE
TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND
It needs to be asked: are these people all as stoned
and stupid as they behave? Do they seriously imagine that figures with the
intellect, capabilities and resources of the Principals, would be incapable of
deconstructing what has been going on? And are they so foolish as to imagine
that the Editor of this service would lack the spine to expose the sordid,
criminal and offensive antics of these US operatives whose sole purpose here was
to frustrate and obstruct the course of justice?
As in all such cases all
over the United States, these criminals are blinded by their Black power to such
an extent that they are prepared to take ridiculous risks in order to achieve
their objectives. Clearly, the ONI Colonel and assassin imagined that the Editor
would not expose this scandal; that the Editor would, as a consequence of the
meeting, be in fear of his life, given that the ONI assassin stated that ‘if you
expose me, I’ll send someone after you’. In this report, the Editor has
refrained from giving this ONI murderer the satisfaction of seeing his name in
print. But all ‘the interested’ will no doubt know his identity – and, one
assumes, will take the appropriate measures to ensure that he is not permitted
to carry out his crude separate threats against Michael C. Cottrell and the
Editor of this service.
OBJECTIVES OF THE O.N.I. COLONEL’S
INTERVENTIONS
What was the object of this shambolic, botched US
counterintelligence exercise against the Principals and the Editor? Try
blackmail. By photographing the Editor receiving his unwanted business cards in
the basement car park, and by separately photographing Michael C. Cottrell
receiving documents ditto, the intention will have been to be in a position to
fabricate a bribery offensive, or to allege that the Editor is engaged in
espionage, which is of course nonsense, not least because the Editor is not an
agent for a foreign power but is exactly what he says he is and has always been,
and nothing else. As for the undressing episode, although there was no mirror
present in the main suite area in which this ONI assassin undressed in the
presence of the distinguished company, a camera chip set inside the TV screen
may have been activated, although this seems somewhat implausible since the ONI
Colonel himself would be implicated in whatever sordid plans ‘C Street’ may have
been inclined to develop.
We imagine that this exposure will make the
brainless or drugged idiots at ‘C Street’ think twice before perpetrating crude
counterintelligence operations for financial gain like this on bona fide
businessmen in the future. On second thoughts, no we don’t. The Office of Naval
Intelligence have been intermeddling in Leo Wanta’s legitimate affairs, with
extreme malevolent intent, for many years: and they continue with their criminal
intent. It is high time these assassins (which is what many of them are) were
brought under control, or abolished.
THE AMBASSADOR DESCRIBES HIS TIME IN
THE GULAG
During the Editor’s conversations with the Ambassador in
Alexandria, Leo Wanta divulged horrendous details of his experiences in the US
GULAG, which will form the first chapter of the Editor’s intended book on
Wantagate, the purpose of which will be to expose as much of the truth as can be
published given the usual constraints, and to stamp once and for all on the
criminal disinformation that has been spun against the Ambassador for years. All
these lies were predicated upon the single base lie – that Leo Emil Wanta was
dead. Since he ceased to be dead, these lies have all been exposed. However some
lies, like rattlesnakes, require heavier and repeated blows to the serpent’s
head – which is what the Editor’s Wantagate book will provide.
Leo Wanta
described to the Editor and to Mr Cottrell what happened one night when he was
lying asleep on his bunk bed in a US GULAG jail. The door burst open (which
cannot happen without the cooperation of the prison guards) and three thugs
attacked the Ambassador with brutal blows to the head and body. He managed to
fight back, even though he had been asleep when they burst in, and gradually
somehow gained the upper hand. The guards had deliberately spread the lie that
he is homosexual (false witness), which motivated these thugs to ‘do their
thing’. When this and other murder attempts failed, a Deputy Sheriff arrived
unannounced, changed into prisoners’ clothing, appeared in the washroom, and
attempted to murder the Ambassador near the toilets. When he failed, he fled, as
we have previously reported, back to the administration area, changed back into
his official garb, and escaped in his county car.
GETTING TO THE LIBRARY
WITHOUT BEING ASSAULTED
In answer to the Editor’s question: ‘How did you
manage to get through each day?’ Leo replied that he said his prayers when he
could find a brief respite and that his main preoccupation every day was to get
to the library without being attacked along the way. He said that, when on his
way to the library, prison thugs were often waiting for him round corners, ready
to commit assault, for which they appeared to have complete impunity. The
Ambassador said that although not even the library was safe, at least he could
bury his head behind a newspaper and thereby obtain some minutes of comparative
peace and quiet. And bear in mind that the original cynical and ruthless
intention of the Clinton-Bush ‘Box Gang’ and their co-conspirators (who are now
in a state of extreme agitation at the turn of events) was to have him jailed
for 22 years. All on a trumped-up charge of having not paid a State civil tax
assessment of $14,129 that he never owed, but which he and his subsequently
assassinated Chinese partner Howe Kwong Kok, paid twice (in May and June 1992),
for which an Outagamie County Court-certified and notarised Satisfaction of
Delinquent Tax Warrant dated 1st June 1993 exists and is in the Editor’s
possession, and which this Editor paid a third time via his loan of $35,000 paid
in person by Trustee Steven Goodwin on 21st July 2005 (for details, see our
‘Wisconsingate’ posting dated 6th August 2007).
147 INTERPOL AGENTS AND
MASS ARRESTS OF BANKERS
On Tuesday 23rd October it became known, from several
sources, that 147 Interpol agents were present in the United States. By the
early evening of the same date, the Editor gathered that a large number of
individuals had been arrested in both Europe and the United States – far more,
in one sweep, than on any of the multiple earlier occasions.
Arrests of
bankers and holders of high office have been reported by reliable sources ever
since last December, when Henry M. Paulson Jr. was arrested in Germany, as
confirmed by this service. He was exfiltrated from a German piston by British
agents and flown in a British aircraft to Washington, where he was dumped at the
Washington Cathedral just in time to enjoy the extended dirge for the late
President and pornographer Gerald Ford.
PATTERN OF ARRESTS SINCE PAULSON
LAST DECEMBER
Successive waves of arrests have been reported to us from
multiple sources on and off ever since, especially from the summer months
onwards. On about 10th June, Dr Alan Greenspan was arrested and is believed to
have remained incarcerated for up to three weeks – although none of this would
have been known to the complacent bankers and others who attended, by
invitation, the Per Jacobsen Lecture, given by Greenspan on Sunday 21st October,
amid security so tight that two lines of armed police stretched along
Pennsylvania Avenue almost from the corner of IMF Building HQ2, to the
International Finance Corporation (IFC) building, where the great man, who tried
to steal $3 trillion and was thrown into jail in June this year, was giving the
invited guests the benefit of his double-mindedness.
In mid-July 2007,
the former Governor of the Bank of England, Lord (‘Eddie’) George was also
arrested, having been caught in flagrante interfering with international
financial operations intended to procure the Wanta Settlement. Subsequently we
received multiple reports from informed sources of high-level arrests. An
impeccable serving military source stated on 18th October that ‘since February
27, 2007, Cheney has been intermittently confined from time to time. On that
date, in Australia, he was taken into custody by a detached element of US
special forces, and there was a shoot-out’. This US military statement confirms
detailed reports, which surfaced last spring, to the effect that a shoot-out
occurred at the airport in Sydney, in the course of which three personnel were
killed.
The Editor has been told that there has indeed been a pattern of
arrests and releases of top officials, with Vice President Cheney arrested a
number of times, and others, including Michael Chertoff (whose name, in Russian,
means ‘Little Devil’), the Homeland Security Secretary, being mentioned in this
context. Some of these reports have only been sustained by a single source, but
in other cases the separate sources have been multiple (as many as six in one
instance). According to a recent report, arresting personnel caught Cheney,
while ‘confined’, interfering with a banking transaction, and whacked him behind
the knees, with the warning that ‘next time, we’ll hit your
face’.
THE QUEEN’S GOLD IS RESTORED TO HER MAJESTY
On 17th October
2007, ownership of The Queen’s gold, stolen by these US criminals with insider
assistance at the corrupt Bank of England, was finally restored to her. It is
not known whether Her Majesty was paid compound interest for the period since
29-30 March, when the gold was stolen during a British banking blackout. When
taking leave of Her Majesty on resigning as Prime Minister on 27th June, The
Queen told Mr Blair, in an audience lasting for 25 minutes, that she held him
personally responsible for the return of her gold. This criminal intelligence
operative, for whom an International Court of Justice arrest warrant was issued
earlier this year as we reported, has not only been let off the hook by his
Illuminati controllers, who rustled up a non-job with diplomatic status in the
Middle East to provide him with protection against arrest, but has been selected
by the corrupt European Union as its preferred candidate for the first EU
President, under the so-called European Reform Treaty. This is almost identical
to the European Constitution Treaty that the Dutch and French electorates both
rejected, and which will finally submerge the European nation states into the
Greater Germany planned by the Madrid-based German Geopolitical Centre set up by
the Nazis in 1942, and implemented by the successor to the Abwehr, the secret
German ‘Black’ intelligence and long-range strategic deception agency, Deutsche
Verteidigungs Dienst, based in Dachau, near Munich.
BROWN BACKS CRIMINAL
BLAIR FOR THE E.U. PRESIDENCY
Even Blair’s successor, Gordon Brown, backed
the former British Prime Minister’s candidacy for EU President, commenting on
19th October that Blair would be a ‘great candidate’ to become EU boss. Our
intelligence sources say that Brown’s handlers have told him that his earlier
ambivalence (secret dislike) of the European Union was unacceptable, and that he
would have to do as he is told with regard to the unpopular policy which ties
Britain to the corrupt European Union, ‘or else’. The fact that the British
people as a whole rightly have no time for the European Union and would greatly
prefer to get out as soon as possible, is of course neither here nor there,
since ‘democracy’ is considered by the World Revolutionaries to represent merely
an annoying ‘staging post’ towards the mad objective of World Dictatorship by
the corrupt and criminal élite, who ‘know best’ what is good for the Rest of
Us.
When Gordon Brown, as incoming Prime Minister appeared at the Palace
on 27th June, he was with The Queen for the unprecedentedly long period of 55
minutes. It is believed that The Queen spoke about the urgent necessity for her
stolen gold to be restored without further ado.
WE CALLED FOR THE U.S.
AMBASSADOR TO BE EXPELLED
Against the background of the theft of The Queen’s
gold, the Editor of this service called for the American Ambassador to be
ordered to leave his Embassy and to return in 30 days with the matter resolved.
Should he fail to do so, the Editor recommended that the Embassy staff should be
kicked out of London sine die, and that if the matter was not then resolved to
The Queen’s complete satisfaction within three months, the Americans should be
ordered to close and vacate their military bases on British soil, with the
understanding that they would not be invited back until such time as they had
purged the corruption from their rotten political and financial
systems.
THE ON-OFF EMBARGO AGAINST THE UNITED STATES
In the event,
the international community took the point, but resolved to address the stealing
of The Queen’s gold, the diversion and stealing of the Wanta payment, and the
purging of the US financial system, by other means. In September it became known
that one of the means adopted would be the imposition of an economic embargo
against the United States by Britain, Canada and China, which were later
allegedly joined by Japan, Germany and Russia. Although German ‘Black’
intelligence (Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst) is behind the world’s major
problems, these people draw the line at being defrauded financially, which is
where the American organised criminal cadres at the highest levels of the US
structures have miscalculated. The threat or de facto actualité of this embargo
has been one of many factors that has brought this crisis to a
head.
Others have included threats levelled by foreign and domestic law
enforcement personnel against both Vice President Cheney and the President of
the United States, who, like Cheney, has been leveraging as much off-balance
sheet profit for himself as possible, and has vacillated from signing his own
resignation papers, to arrogant defiance – depending upon the volume of alcohol,
cocaine or all of the above in his blood when he wakes up in the morning. In
order to bolster his precarious position and his collapsed standing generally,
the President’s preferred stance is to be photographed as Commander-in-Chief,
shaking hands with military officers, as on 23rd October when Mr Bush spoke at
the National Defense University, and then inspected a parade of officers
bin-laden with medals. It is worth remembering that the President of the United
States is Commander-in-Chief of the military only – not of the
people.
POSSIBLE NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL ON AMERICAN SOIL
By far the most
alarming scenario relates to the implications of the missing nuclear device
reported to have been ‘lost’ recently somewhere in the United States, which the
‘licensed’ US operative Wayne Madsen has suggested was stolen in order to
provide the perpetrators with scope for nuclear blackmail on US soil. What
Madsen failed to elaborate was the linkage here with the Wantagate crisis, which
he has consistently ignored (thereby revealing that he is an intelligence
operative). On 18th October, the Editor sent the following summary to a veteran
military and intelligence patriot and lawyer with whom he has corresponded for
many months, and who has a perfect grasp of the Wantagate issues:
'Inform
Colonel that we are down in Virginia for the Alexandria Court on Friday in
force. I am in New York and will be joining them tomorrow. The Queen got her
gold back yesterday, which divided the embargo countries (China, Britain,
Canada): very clever. Could Cheney be engaged in nuclear blackmail? You bet.
Would this have anything to do with the Wanta Settlement? It is to do with that
and nothing else. Has it been spiked? I heard that Chertoff was held in
Portland, several days ago. (A major exercise had been scheduled for the
Portland area). Does the military realise that these criminals are playing
nuclear blackmail on US soil as their leverage to avoid paying the Wanta
Settlement? If they don’t (which I doubt), they need to now!'
'Please
inform the Colonel of my views urgently'.
PLANNING A NUKE EXPLOSION TO
AVOID PAYING WANTA?
Whether these fears were well founded or not, the
ruthlessness of the cornered criminals that we have been having to deal with
these past 18 months is undoubtedly such that they would be willing to go to any
lengths to get their own way. After all, they were prepared to sacrifice the
lives of more than 3,000 people on 9/11, inter alia to procure the destruction
of the original copies of a mountain of derivatives contracts held by Cantor
Fitzgerald that were falling due imminently for settlement in US dollars. The
firm lost 658 of its staff in that abomination. During the chaos, a huge volume
of gold was stolen from the underground vaults of Bank of Nova Scotia. After
getting away with those atrocities, the idea that a man like Cheney, a former
satanic MK-Ultra and Omega controller and operative with close links to
organized crime, would cringe at a rogue operation to indulge in nuclear
blackmail on US soil in order to create conditions under which Ambassador
Wanta’s stolen $4.5 trillion could be retained and not transferred to the
Ambassador’s corporate securities account with Morgan Stanley, New York, would
be fanciful.
Mercifully, the ‘rogue actors’ mentioned by Mr Paulson in
his address before the International Monetary and Financial Committee, were
frustrated in any operation that they may have been planning, to perpetrate such
a crime against fellow Americans. But the military Colonel’s response to the
Editor’s message on this score, received by our veteran intermediary on 19th
October was: ‘He is probably correct’.
TWIN CITIES PREDICTION JUDGED TO
BE ACCURATE, TOO
It has been acknowledged by several special sources that the
Editor was ‘probably correct’ too, about the intended Twin Cities atrocity which
we exposed last April. Under that scenario, a nuclear device was to be exploded
in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis-St Paul on 1st September 2008 – the (very
late) opening date for the pre-election Republican National Convention. Using
Kabbalistic Illuminati numerology, that date devolves to 9/11 [September: 9; 1
(first of the month); 2008 = 2+8 = 10; +1 = 11]. Since it is known that these
maddened Luciferians have a hang-up about twins, the long-range strategic
takeover plan called for a catastrophic atrocity at the beginning of the Bush II
reign on 9/11 with the destruction of the Twin Towers, followed at the end of
the Bush II reign with a catastrophic abomination in the Twin Cities in the
course of which the Republican Party would be destroyed (since it is the actual
intention of the Revolution that all parties of the so-called Right’ should
cease to exist: indeed Paul Wolfowitz, the disgraced former World Bank President
and a senior Illuminati operative, has specifically stated that the Forces of
Darkness to which he belongs control both political parties, so it is neither
here nor there who wins elections, which are to be abolished, anyway) –
providing the pretext for the perpetuation of Bush II under a
dictatorship.
LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM OUR REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST
2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York
Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished
reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C.
Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the
title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in
America’:
Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which
does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The
misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather
misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes
is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis,
‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc.,
2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.
Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and
Denial) and Theft:
• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit.
Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent
[scienter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law
Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003,
s.v.: ‘Fraud’.
• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT
DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a
material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without
reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance
thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven
H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series,
Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.
Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent
Conveyance:
THEFT BY DECEPTION:
•
“FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or
circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to
disclose…”.
• “The test of whether failure to
disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or
equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a
material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being
equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.
• To suspend running of limitations, it means the
employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and
mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and
acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and
fraudulent…”.
Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law
Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v.
‘Fraudulent Concealment’.
FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:
• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of
property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him,
or to put such property beyond his reach…”.
•
“Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on
person (entity) making transfer…”.
Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A.,
‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company,
1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.
SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK
OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE
BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA,
CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:
• NASD Rule
3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
•
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
•
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
•
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD
Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
In addition to which Bank
of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13
Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of
funds, et al.
LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED
AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S.
LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER
SINCE:
• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering
Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering
restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact
[Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign
Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage
Act
• Hobbs Act
•
Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of
Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering
Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression
Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and
Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are
co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions,
to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal
activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of
high office under the United States
• Provisions
pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private
and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions
prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
[R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
•
Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation,
especially in time of war
This list shows to what extent the Bush II
Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute
contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who
are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.
The Directors and
others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and
others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or
co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the
laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency
Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages
163-168.
U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
MISPRISION OF FELONY:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission
of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as
soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or
military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.
Ambassador Leo Emil
Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram
[FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe,
Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification
Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number:
30203866855F001
• Please be advised that the
Editor of International
Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to
any of the earlier Wantagate reports.
We are a private intelligence
publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including
intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our
marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other
connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the
Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and
exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private
financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been
an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for
libel in the English Court.
___
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington DC West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming United States South America Great Britain England Europe Middle East Asia Melbourne World
Teknosis Join us at EENG - Free Blogs,.
October 27, 2007 in Current Affairs | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d3ac69e200e55088c08d8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference LEO WANTA / WANTAGATE: (Thursday 25 October 2007) BUSH AND CHENEY STEALING WITH AND FROM EACH OTHER:
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.