Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« From the Fascist Perspective | Main | ZERO : An Investigation Into 9/11 »

McCain a pseudo-candidate too?; USA version 2.0: McCain's non-eligibility to be President

From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: McCain a pseudo-candidate too?; USA version 2.0
Date: Sunday, September 14, 2008, 6:24 AM

You're welcome.

See also:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/palmbeach/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/palmbeach/intervention.htm

The Clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court refused to file it, by claiming it was "late", but I specifically posted it within the deadline for same.

Moreover, these 2 "Clerks" turned up withOUT credentials:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/nad.oath.suter.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/final.nad.oath.suter.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/nad.oath.jones.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/final.nad.oath.jones.htm

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 9:54 PM, m j <relative.intel@gmail.com> wrote:

Thank you.

On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com> wrote:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: McCain a pseudo-candidate too?; USA version 2.0
To: Mark Carter <mark.carter@mail.com>
Cc: SupremeLaw <supremelaw@googlegroups.com>

Greetings,

I highly recommend that you, and others like you, read and study this recent NOTICE:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/notice.of.intent.htm


I am disappointed that the paragraphs below continue to disseminate proven falsehoods about the Constitution for the United States of America.

Those 2 paragraphs repeat the widespread misunderstanding of the organic Qualifications Clauses:

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/quals.htm

Those Clauses have never been amended; and as such, they retain the meaning and intent they had when they were first drafted, and then ratified
on June 21, 1788.

At the time they were first written, there was only one class of State Citizens aka "Citizens of ONE OF the States united":

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sanmarco/complain.htm#one-of

See Pannill v. Roanoke for a correct holding that the second class of federal citizens aka "citizens of the United States" (lower-case "c") were not even contemplated when the organic Constitution was first being drafted:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/twoclass.htm#pannill

The term "United States" in those Clauses means "States united". People v. De La Guerra.

In other Clauses of the U.S. Constitution, the term "United States" means federal government, and that is the meaning it has at 28 USC 1345 and 1346:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1345.html
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1346.html

This general essay explains the all important differences between "United States" and "United States of America":

http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm


The next quote from the law also demonstrates more tautologies, which are quite rampant throughout federal statutes:

""The term 'United States' shall be construed to mean the United States ...."

A potato is a plant that grows in a potato field?

It is a plain violation of proper English grammar to use the term being defined in the definition of that term: doing so defines nothing.


Here's another constitutional violation:

"The law that conferred this status took effect on August 4, 1937,
one year after John McCain was born — albeit with retroactive effect ...."

The Constitution expressly prohibits ex post facto legislation, even in civil cases:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#1:9:3


Please do your homework before disseminating any more hearsay offering proven Constitutional fallacies as correct propositions of Law.

And, I object to citing "Wikipedia" as an authority for anything, particularly after one of their "editors" threatened me with a knife.

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

___

On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Mark Carter <mark.carter@mail.com> wrote:

***Is McCain legally electable - or was he chosen so that he, as well as Obama, could be shunted aside at the last minute based on his birthplace? It seems an odd coincidence that there seem to be "natural-born" eligibility issues for BOTH presidential candidates this time around. Not that a potential Hillary candidacy would benefit: for Palin's in the race now, and if push came to shove I expect she'd take McCain's place and win in November (if the election is allowed to proceed). Americans like Palin, all in all. And I suspect she's eminently qualified for the position, as long as she surrounds herself with advisors of integrity and experience. Yet, ultimately, we don't need a system REFORM so much as a system REPLACEMENT....

John McCain, who ran for the Republican party nomination in 2000 and is the Republican nominee in 2008, was born at the Coco Solo U.S. military base in the Panama Canal Zone to U.S. parents. Although the Panama Canal Zone was not considered to be part of the United States,[6] federal law states: "Any person born in the Canal Zone on or after February 26, 1904, and whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, whose father or mother or both at the time of the birth of such person was or is a citizen of the United States, is declared to be a citizen of the United States."[7] The law that conferred this status took effect on August 4, 1937, one year after John McCain was born — albeit with retroactive effect, resulting in McCain being declared a U.S. citizen.[8] However, the question as to whether or not he is a citizen from birth cannot be answered by this law because (1) it took effect after his birth and (2) it does not state that the person's citizenship was acquired at birth, only that they are a citizen by means of the law's establishment (and, hence, at the time the law takes effect). Indeed, the law in 1936 stated that all persons born to two US citizen parents outside the "limits and jurisdictions of the United States" are citizens at birth, but the problem is that the Panama Canal Zone was explicitly excluded. (8 U.S.C. 173 (1925): "The term 'United States' shall be construed to mean the United States, and any waters, territory, or other place subject to the jurisdiction thereof, except the Isthmian Canal Zone.") The status of Mr. McCain's citizenship at birth nonetheless remains unsettled.[9]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_born_citizen

--

____

--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
 

September 14, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d3ac69e2010534a8e42b970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference McCain a pseudo-candidate too?; USA version 2.0: McCain's non-eligibility to be President:

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.