Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Got a symptom? Perhaps there is a cure for what ails you. Find out. | Main | YouTube - 3/19/2009 Peter Schiff On The Call: The FEDs $1.2 Trillion Gamble »

Private Attorney General finds fatal defect in James Robertson's credentials

Update:

Paul Andrew Mitchell has been bundled away by the US Government

http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/02/paul-andrew-mitchell-has-been-bundled-away-by-the-us-government.html

___

Although it appears, at first glance, that James Robertson dba U.S. District Judge in the District of Columbia, has all four (4) requisite credentials:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm#DDC

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/robertson.james/


... nevertheless, both his APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS and OATH OF OFFICE were evidently witnessed and co-signed by John Garrett Penn dba Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/robertson.james/affidavit.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/robertson.james/oath.gif



Please note that the APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVIT states clearly, at the bottom:

"The oath of office must be administered by a person specified in 5 U.S.C. 2903."

Here's that statute:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2903.html


Let's see if John Garrett Penn has all four (4) requisite credentials:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/penn.john/

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/penn.john/nad.missing.credentials.htm


Oops!  John Garrett Penn turned up withOUT the APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVIT required by 5 U.S.C. 3331:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/3331.html


Accordingly, all his acts are void.  See authorities on that point here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions.htm

Without taking the oath prescribed by law,

one cannot become a judge either de jure or de facto, and

such an individual is without authority to act and

his acts as such are void until he has taken the prescribed oath.

 

[French v. State, 572 S.W.2d 934]

[Brown v. State, 238 S.W.2d 787]

 


Conclusion:  James Robertson does not have a valid APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVIT, because the one produced for him by the U.S. Department of Justice evidently violates 5 U.S.C. 2903, due to John Garrett Penn's missing APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVIT.

Cc:  Bob Unruh and The Internet


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

___

Re: http://therightsideoflife.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/15_ResponseToShowCauseOrder_NoExhibits.pdf


Every ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE must exhibit
both the Clerk's signature and the Court's seal:  28 USC 1691:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1691.html

http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/

http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/28usc1691.case.law.2.htm

In Peaslee v. Haberstro, 15 Blatchf. 472, Fed.Cas. No. 10,884, the summons was set aside because not under the seal of court or signature of clerk. ...  To my mind, the word process,” as used in Rev. St. § 911, means an order of court, although it may be issued by the clerk.

 

[Leas & McVitty v. Merriman, 132 F. 510, 511-513]

[(C.C. W.D. Virginia 1904), emphases added]

http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/28usc1691.case.law.htm


Now, if the Clerks of Court don't have credentials either,
then no ORDERS can issue from that Federal Court, PERIOD,
because no one is available to comply with 28 USC 1691.


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

___

From: Dansmith1954@aol.com <Dansmith1954@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Private Attorney General finds fatal defect in James Robertson's credenti...
To: paulandrewmitchell2004@yahoo.com
Date: Thursday, March 19, 2009, 7:32 PM

Had a funny feeling you would find something out. I was wondering about Robertson from day 1 I was looking for your list of 129  .
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/foia.request.usdc.dpa.htm
judge orders to show cause response
http://therightsideoflife.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/15_ResponseToShowCauseOrder_NoExhibits.pdf
 

 

March 19, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d3ac69e20112797ee8bb28a4

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Private Attorney General finds fatal defect in James Robertson's credentials:

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.