Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Rule of Law Radio dot Com - traffic issues and subject matter jurisdiction | Main | Obama Joker: 1st Amendment at Work »

First "Extension Statute" is cited in Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901): "to put at rest all doubts"

From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Subject: first "Extension Statute" is cited in Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901): "to put at rest all doubts"
Date: Friday, August 14, 2009, 8:32 AM

There are "all doubts";
there are "some doubts";
there are "few doubts";
there is "one doubt";  AND,
there is "no doubt".


WHICH ONE OCCURS BELOW?


http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/intentm3.filed.htm#1871

click on "Downes v. Bidwell":

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=182&invol=244

... and find:

It may be added in this connection, that to put at rest all doubts regarding the applicability of the Constitution to the District of Columbia, Congress by the act of February 21, 1871 (16 Stat. at L. 419, 426, chap. 62, 34), specifically extended the Constitution and laws of the United States to this District.


[end excerpt]


"to put at rest all doubts"


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support..policy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:40 AM
Subject: OBJECTIONS Re: Fw: SHELDON FOR ATTORNEY JERRY LEAPHART RE: PROVING FLU VACCINES LETHAL...
To: Byron Wine <byronw1@verizon.net>
Cc: SupremeLaw <supremelaw@googlegroups.com>


Author, Historian & researcher Ralph Epperson taught me that
>  some Supreme Court Ruling ( a Railroad vs. unknown person ? )
>  back in 1938 Effectively made the Constitution NULL & VOID


The guy can't even remember the name of the case:
the Named Defendant is an "unknown person" because
he's too lazy to look it up.

No.  Erie Railroad v. Tompkins did NOT do that!

Here, read it yourself:

ERIE R. CO. v. TOMPKINS, 304 U.S. 64 (1938)

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=304&invol=64


CHEEESH!


"There are a million lies, but only one truth." 
--- Anonymous


He may have developed that mistaken belief
after one of Howard Freeman's theories was later
mangled by second- and third-hand transmission
(read "hearsay"):

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/freeman/freeman4.htm

The change  in our  system of  law from  public  law  to  private
commercial law  was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United
States  in  the  Erie Railroad v. Tompkins  case  of 1938,  after
which case,  in  the  same  year,  the  procedures  of  Law  were
officially blended with the procedures of Equity.  Prior to 1938,
all U.S.  Supreme Court  decisions were based upon public law  --
or that  system of  law that  was  controlled  by  Constitutional
limitation.   Since 1938,  all U.S.  Supreme Court  decisions are
based upon what is termed public policy.


Freeman made a demonstrable error in that essay, however;
here it is:

The same  national Congress  rules the  Continental United States
pursuant to  Constitutional limits  upon its  authority, while it
enjoys exclusive  rule, with no Constitutional limitations,  as it
legislates for the Federal United States.

Howard Freeman was, evidently, ignorant of the Act of 1871
which expressly extended the entire U.S. Constitution
into the District of Columbia:  therefore, whenever Congress
legislates for the "Federal United States" aka the federal zone
http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/
it is STILL subject to all guarantees and limitations in the
U.S. Constitution, such as the Bill of Rights:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/intentm3.filed.htm#1871

http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/16/16stat426.gif

See Sec. 34, last sentence.



Are we going to spend our time here chasing down
those million lies, or are we going to pursue truth?


BE VERY WARY OF ANYONE WHO PERMITS
THEIR PET THEORY TO MORPH INTO A FACT!!

I have seen even well meaning investigators
fall victim to this fallacy.



Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy..htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Byron Wine <byronw1@verizon.net> wrote:

----- Original Message -----

From: Sheldon Day
To: Jsleaphart@cs.com
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 12:55 AM
Subject: SHELDON FOR ATTORNEY JERRY LEAPHART RE: PROVING FLU VACCINES LETHAL...

ATTN: Attorney Jerry Leaphart ( Dr. Judy Wood's Attorney )
 
Thx Jerry for your input.. I greatly appreciate it....  I just don't have the time though to do what you're recommending but I'll forward this onto the Pandemic Flu Prevention team members and others who might consider your proposal..  I think all I can do is hand out flyers, notify school officials, etc. because the Court system is corrupted beyond belief and according to former Talk-Show Host Bill Cooper, Judges are awarded lump sum $10,000.00 Incentive rewards for fulfilling the objectives of the New World Order, and by that, I intend to convey the message that the Judges have taken silent judicial notice to IGNORE the Constitution because it's been NULL AND VOID since at least 1938 and that's WHY Phil Berg WILL NEVER GET ANY REPLY FROM THE COURTS about Obama's Birth issue !!!!!!  Author, Historian & researcher Ralph Epperson taught me that some Supreme Court Ruling ( a Railroad vs. unknown person ? ) back in 1938 Effectively made the Constitution NULL & VOID... Ralph recommends I watch his Video entitled "America's Secret Destiny" which is probably available Online for free...
 
Sheldon

August 14, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d3ac69e20120a54e3737970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference First "Extension Statute" is cited in Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901): "to put at rest all doubts":

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.