Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Vote Ron Paul: News Update 8-08-2009 | Main | Cruise for Liberty »

Orly is going to re-file Kenyan Birth Cert with "Judge" Carter + fatal errors confirmed in Carter's credentials

===========================
verification / confirmation
===========================

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol2/criminal.complaint.4.htm  (Taitz has no license;  neither did Carter or Terry J. Hatter)

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/  (see "CDCA")
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm#CDCA

Carter's credentials are defective:
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/carter.david/
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/carter.david/affidavit.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/carter.david/oath.gif

Those credentials were signed by Terry J. Hatter, Jr.,
who lacks 2 requisite credentials:
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/hatter.terry/
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/hatter.terry/nad.missing.credentials.htm
(latter DEMAND is now IN DEFAULT !!)

Both Carter and Hatter are named in the VCC above,
for never having licenses to practice law.


NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE
now follows;  delivery has been confirmed by the USPS:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/Kenya/intent.to.subpoena.htm


NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE

SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE

 

 

TO:      Hon. M. Nyambura Kamau

         Consul General

         Consulate General of Kenya in Los Angeles

         Park Mile Plaza, Mezzanine Floor

         4801 Wilshire Boulevard

         Los Angeles 90010

         CALIFORNIA, USA

 

FROM:    Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

         Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964

 

DATE:    August 2, 2009 A.D.

 

SUBJECT: intervention by United States ex rel. in

         Berg v. Obama et al., Third Circuit Appeal No. 08-4443

 

 

Greetings Honorable Consul General:

 

My office legally represents the United States (Federal Government) at the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Philadelphia, in the case of Berg v. Obama et al., Appeal No. 08-4443:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/nad02.htm

 

Please be advised that newly found evidence renders it appropriate formally to serve your good offices with a SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE, duly issued by the District Court of the United States for the Central District of California.

 

The purpose of this SUBPOENA will be to command your good offices to produce and permit inspection and copying of an authentic original of the attached CERTIFIED COPY OF REGISTRATION OF BIRTH of Barack Hussein Obama II on August 4, 1961 A.D., at Coast Provincial General Hospital in Mombasa, Republic of Kenya.

 

Please be aware that there is a separate District Court proceeding presently underway in the United States District Court for the Central District of California which also seeks to compel authentication of said REGISTRATION OF BIRTH: Keyes et al. v. Obama et al., case number 8:09-cv-82 (USDC, Los Angeles, California, USA).

 

For your convenience, we believe this is a valid link to a true and correct copy of the latest MOTION filed and served in the latter case:

 

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/kenyan-birth-motion-to-expedite-authentication.htm

 

 

Thank you very much for your timely and professional consideration.

 

Sincerely yours,

 

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

 

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13

http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)

http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)

http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)

http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


--- On Sat, 8/8/09, Newsletter@FreedomsPhoenix.com <Newsletter@FreedomsPhoenix.com> wrote:

From: Newsletter@FreedomsPhoenix.com <Newsletter@FreedomsPhoenix.com>
Subject: RE: [apfn-1] Orly is going to re-file Kenyan Birth Cert with "Judge" Carter + fatal errors confirmed in Carter's credentials
To: "Supreme Law Firm" <paulandrewmitchell2004@yahoo.com>
Date: Saturday, August 8, 2009, 6:49 AM

=============
verification / confirmation
=============

August 8, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d3ac69e20120a4d7263f970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Orly is going to re-file Kenyan Birth Cert with "Judge" Carter + fatal errors confirmed in Carter's credentials:

Comments

Well, this should be fun.

Posted by: Lola Getz | Aug 9, 2009 5:24:49 AM

You're reading the California statute incorrectly. It doesn't say you can sue in the name of the state. It says the complaint that's acted upon can come from any person. And it is not using the word "complaint" as a reference to a specific court pleading. It's talking about your average, everyday, garden-variety objection about something that has been done or not done, in other words, a lowercase "complaint."

" ... upon their own complaint or upon the complaint of any board, officer, person, corporation or association or by any person acting for the interests of itself, its members or the general public."

The above text is what you evidently think says that YOU, a non-attorney, can be a "private attorney general," but you are misreading it. That part of it is simply naming the source of the (lowercase) complaint. It is not talking about a pleading that is made when a lawsuit is filed. It's not talking about a "Complaint."

It is very clear that you are not an attorney approved by the state and are not ANY of the people described in the text:

"by the Attorney General or any district attorney or by any county counsel authorized by agreement with the district attorney in actions involving violation of a county ordinance, or any city attorney of a city, or city and county, having a population in excess of 750,000, and, with the consent of the district attorney, by a city prosecutor in any city having a full-time city prosecutor or, with the consent of the district attorney, by a city attorney in any city and county in the name of the people of the State of California ... "

You are not counsel, district attorney, city prosecutor, or any of them. How sad that you continue on your pointless path -- all based on a misreading of rather simple text.


This post is with reference to Section 17204 that appears under the headings, Private Attorney General statutes, California Business and Professions Code, on this page, http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm.


http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

Posted by: tanarg | Aug 9, 2009 11:25:46 PM

I don't use the California Statute: it was repealed anyway.

My authority is 18 U.S.C. 1964 -- Civil RICO -- always has been.
(That's Federal law, in case you didn't know that.)

I decline to debate this individual, nor to correct his many errors (see above).

S/he sounds like yet another UNlicensed ATTORNey (read FELON):

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol2/criminal.complaint.4.htm

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

Posted by: Supreme Law Firm | Aug 10, 2009 9:18:32 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.