Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Janet Napolitano already charged with multiple felonies in Arizona Grand Jury SUBPOENA case (December 1997) | Main | OBJECTION Re: OBAMA'S BIRTH ISSUE..SHELDON = "stuck on stupid"? »

The "United States" (Federal government) is not a corporation

From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Subject: the "United States" (Federal government) is not a corporation
To: bellringer@fourwinds10.com
Cc: webmaster@fourwinds10.com
Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2009, 10:02 PM

http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/bellringers_corner/hello_central/news.php?q=1249493928


Greetings,

Please see U.S. v. Cooper Corporation, for starters:

http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm


In 1871 Congress did expressly incorporate the District

of Columbia, but D.C. and the "United States" are not

one and the same.  In that Act of 1871, Congress also

expressly extended the U.S. Constitution into D.C.:


http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/intentm3.filed.htm#1871


 

In United States v. Cooper Corporation, 312 U.S. 600 (1941),

the Supreme Court wrote:


http://laws.findlaw.com/us/312/600.html

 

"We may say in passing that the argument that the

United States may be treated as a corporation

organized under its own laws, that is, under the

Constitution as the fundamental law, seems so strained

as not to merit serious consideration ."

[end quote]


Incidentally, in that Act of 1871, Congress expressly
extended the entire U.S. Constitution into D.C.

Terribly nagging little detail, that!



We tracked down your widespread falsehood here:

http://www..supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/reply.to.brief.for.appellee.htm


The “government” did not bring this suit.  The U.S. Department of Justice has no powers of attorney legally to represent any one of the 50 States of the Union, nor all of them collectively.  28 U.S.C. 547.  The 50 States of the Union are already quite adequately represented legally by their respective State Attorneys General.  28 U.S.C. 530B.

Moreover, in Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920), the Supreme Court prohibited Congress from re-defining any terms used in the Constitution for the United States of America (“U.S. Constitution”).  At 28 U.S.C. 1746, both “United States” and “United States of America” occur in correct contradistinction to each other (inside one is outside the others).  28 U.S.C. 1746 is the only statute in all of Title 28 where the term “United States of America” occurs as such.

The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA [sic] did incorporate twice as such in the State of Delaware, but certified evidence now before this Court shows that both foreign corporations have been revoked by the Delaware Secretary of State.  Neither foreign corporation was ever registered with the New Mexico Secretary of State either!  (See “Certificate”!)

Even if one or the other were not revoked, DOJ would still not have any powers of attorney legally to represent a foreign Delaware corporation.  Congress never appropriated funds for DOJ to do so.


Finally, Congress has never incorporated either the “United States” or the “United States of Americaas such.  See U.S. v. Cooper Corporation, 312 U.S. 600 (1941).  It appears that Chief Justice John Marshall was responsible for fabricating the myth that “The United States of America” are a corporation.  See Dixon v. The United States, 1 Marsh. Dec. 177, 181 (1811).  However, without citing any actual legislative authority for that proposition, Marshall’s statement is merely dictum that was later cited in Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1856), at the definitions of “Union” and “United States of America”.  In any event, Dixon has been overruled by Cooper supra because Dixon was decided by a Circuit Court in a case on which C.J. Marshall presided.

[end quote]

The punishment for false teachers and teachers of falsehood
is rather severe.  See Books of Jude and 2 Peter.


--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

August 13, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d3ac69e20120a54878e7970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The "United States" (Federal government) is not a corporation:

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.