« Modern Sense |
Main
| The meaning of "person" in the Internal Revenue Code »
H1N1: News from New Zealand: Swine Flu Vaccine Alert
UNCENSORED
Is the Government planning to force you to have a
CONTAMINATED
VACCINE ?
In
February, 2009, Baxter International, a major contractor for the “Swine
Flu” vaccine, CONTAMINATED 72 kg of the seasonal flu vaccine with LIVE BIRD FLU VIRUS.
They then distributed the contaminated vaccine material to 16 countries.
It
was about to be released to the general public when alert laboratory
staff in the Czech Republic discovered the problem, and averted what
could have become a lethal pandemic. Baxter admitted the
contamination, but claimed that it was an “accident”.
But
was it really an accident? Many people are beginning to doubt it. For
an “accident” like this to happen would have required a serious breach
of its Level 3 Biosafety Containment protocols. Criminal charges have
now been brought against Baxter, the UN and WHO – for terrorism likely to lead to genocide.
This is one of the most important stories EVER – but mainstream media have ignored it. Why?
Incredibly, the NZ government has contracted with Baxter International
for an initial 300,000 doses of their still unproven “Swine Flu” (H1N1)
vaccine. And WHO is pushing for MANDATORY (forced) VACCINATION in 194
countries. Including New Zealand.
Scientists and doctors are warning that this is a disaster in the making. Read about it NOW:
The Plot
By
the beginning of 2009 it had become apparent that the Bird Flu virus
was not spreading much beyond birds. Business-wise, the pandemic was a
fizzle and the Great Bird Flu (H5N1) Pandemic Panic of 2009 was simply
not panning out.
To a vaccine company eager to sell millions of vaccines, Bird Flu was a loser.
However,
if combined with the highly transmissible human to human “Seasonal Flu”
virus, Bird Flu could be made to spread widely into the human
population – and cause a pandemic after all.
The Toronto Sun
reported that “While H5N1 doesn’t easily infect people, H3N2 viruses
do. If someone exposed to the two had been simultaneously infected
with both strains, he or she could have served as an incubator for a
hybrid virus able to transmit easily to and among people.”
As
mentioned above, Baxter ADMITTED to having contaminated the Seasonal
Flu vaccine with the live Bird Flu virus, but claimed that the whole
thing had been an “accident” – even though accidents like this one are virtually impossible in their Level 3 Biosafety containment.
However,
given the high fatality rate of H5N1 it was an “accident” that could
have killed millions of people. Had it not been stopped by alert
scientists in the Czech Republic, it could have been a catastrophe – but very good for the $50 billion a year vaccine business. The
contaminated “Seasonal” flu vaccine could have spread the new, more
serious “New Improved” Bird Flu, thus creating the panic market for
Bird Flu vaccines!
However,
thanks to the Czech scientists who spotted the contamination in the
nick of time, the Bird Flu pandemic did not materialise.
The “Swine Flu”
Conveniently for Baxter, “Swine Flu” suddenly “popped up” on the unsuspecting people of Mexico. And the fizzling Bird Flu Pandemic was reborn as The Swine Flu Pandemic. Just as conveniently, Baxter, Novartis and others just happened to be “ready” with patented vaccines.
One
Austrian journalist, Jane Burgermeister, who has been spearheading the
investigation of Baxter and others who may be in on the conspiracy, has
recently filed criminal charges with the FBI against the company. She
also brought charges against the WHO and the UN for conspiracy to
commit genocide. It is that serious.
Is This Just “Conspiracy Theory”?
We
wish it were. But as the evidence pours in to support these charges,
more and more people – including scientists and doctors, are taking a
new look at the vaccine industry.
They
now think that this new “Swine Flu” pandemic (and several others
before) is “man made” biowarfare against the people of the world. Even the New England Journal of Medicine has
written that the “Swine Flu” was “possibly” made in a laboratory.
(Then WHO supplied the virus to Baxter.) In addition, in the April 30,
2009 issue of Nature, a virologist was quoted as saying, “Where
the hell it got all these genes from we don’t know.” Extensive analysis
of the virus found that it contained [genes from] the original 1918
H1N1 flu virus, the avian flu virus (bird flu), and two new H3N2 virus
genes from Eurasia. Debate continues over the possibility that swine
flu is a genetically engineered virus.
In
fact, US scientists actually dug up some corpses of people who had died
of flu in 1918 and have been working for several years to recreate the 1918 flu virus.
Can Vaccines Actually CAUSE Disease?
FACT:
H1N1 VACCINES may cause serious illnesses – if only thanks to
SQUALENE-based adjuvant and/or other toxic ingredients (including
mercury). Remember the “Gulf War Syndrome” which incapacitated
thousands of men and women in the US Army? It was reliably traced back
to Squalene and other harmful substances in vaccines. Vaccines can also
cause a host of other diseases – from diabetes to cancer. This is
another “inconvenient truth” that doctors don’t tell you.
However,
vaccine companies have continued to make harmful vaccines, regardless
of the consequences. In fact, they have had laws passed in Europe, the
USA and Japan, to allow compulsory vaccination of the population
“in the event of a pandemic”. For vaccine companies it means that the
declaration of a pandemic could produce a financial windfall – since
the whole population may then be forcibly injected with their vaccine – regardless of whether or not it has been proven to be effective or safe.
One
German doctor now thinks that the “Swine Flu” vaccine could cause
cancer, as some other vaccines – contaminated with SV40, a cancer
causing monkey virus – have done.
And
there has been no serious testing of any of the “Swine Flu” vaccines.
Nor are any scheduled. They are being rushed into production with
“fast tracked” approval.
That’s not all. In the USA legislation was passed that gives vaccine companies legal indemnity,
making it impossible for people to sue for damages if they (or a family
member) suffer from injuries – or die – as a result of their injection
with the swine flu vaccine.
Why
are governments spending billions of dollars on a vaccine that is still
in development, has not been adequately tested and is being made by a
company under criminal investigation for contaminating their product to
START A SERIOUS PANDEMIC. Why, indeed?
DON’T TAKE THE SHOT!!!
Some
“Swine Flu” vaccines could well be “weaponised” – designed to kill you
or give you a serious chronic illness. Their ingredients are still
largely unknown. Would you trust a vaccine company (or a government)
that won’t tell you what’s in the vaccine they want to force you to
take?
Jane
Burgermeister has done the world a great service by exposing the
“Baxter Incident” and bringing criminal charges against the
perpetrators. Now people must WAKE UP and REJECT these dangerous
vaccines.
While
the NZ Government is currently stating that the vaccine won’t be
“compulsory”, they are under pressure from WHO and NZ vaccine-oriented
officials to do precisely that. The Health Act 1956 gives the Medical
Officer of Health the power to quarantine people until they have had
“preventative treatment”, which could well include vaccination. This
same Act in NZ empowers police to use force to assist in carrying out
directions from the Medical Officer of Health.
Vaccine Dangers – The Evidence*
Under
the 1986 US National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, VAERS (Vaccine
Adverse Events Reporting System) was established. Annually, it reports
about 11,000 serious vaccine reactions, including up to 200 deaths and
many more permanent disabilities.
Far more alarming is the following:
• The FDA estimates that only 1% of serious adverse reactions are reported; • CDC says it’s 10%;
•
Medical school students testified before Congress that they’re told not
to report these incidents. According to the National Vaccine
Information Center (NVIC), only one in 40 New York doctors reported
adverse vaccine reactions or deaths;
•
International studies show up to 10,000 US SIDS (Sudden Infant Death
Syndrome) deaths annually, and at least half of them are from vaccines.
• Another study determined that 3000 US children die annually from
vaccines;
• Poor reporting in America suggests that annual adverse vaccine reactions, in fact, number from 100,000 – one million;
•
Since 1988, the government’s National Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program (NVICP) paid families of affected children $1.2 billion in
damages;
•
In 2004, a study that reviewed data from the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Data Link, concluded that
children who receive thimerosal-containing (mercury) vaccinations are
27 times more likely to develop autism than children who do not. The
Swine Flu” vaccines contain thimerosal.
•
As authorized by the 2006 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness
(PREP) Act, HHS Secretary Sebelius, granted drug companies legal immunity (except for impossible to prove willful misconduct) to proliferate dangerous, untested Swine Flu vaccines globally;
• In settling vaccine damage suits, drug companies impose gag orders to keep vital information from the public; and
• Insurers refuse to cover adverse vaccine reactions because of the high potential liability they’d face.
* NZ uses many of the same vaccines as the US(US data)
Are Vaccines Effective? – The Evidence
Some Serious Questions About Vaccines
Although
vaccines stimulate antibody production, no evidence suggests that this
alone assures immunity. A 1950 British Medical Council-published study
found no relationship between antibody count and disease incidence. Natural immunization involves many bodily organs and systems. Artificially producing antibodies can’t achieve it.
Research
also shows how squalene adjuvants harm the human immune system, making
it susceptible to numerous illnesses and diseases, ranging from very
annoying to life threatening. In addition, the “herd immunity” notion
of mass-vaccination effectiveness is largely discredited. Just the
opposite is true as evidence shows that fully vaccinated populations have experienced epidemics numerous times in the past.
Further, vaccine effectiveness “remains scientifically unproven” because no double blind studies have been conducted to do it. Significantly,
recent disease outbreaks have affected more vaccinated children than
unvaccinated ones. And the common practice of “one size fits all” is
troublesome. It lets tiny new-borns get the same dosage as a five year
old. It tolerates dubious quality control practices producing what’s
known as “Hot Lots” - ones associated with disproportionately high
death and disability rates.
Shockingly,
the FDA refuses to act preventatively against them. In fact, individual
vaccine lots have almost never been recalled even when associated with
severe adverse reactions. Instead, they’re administered under the
assumption that all recipients respond the same, regardless of gender,
ethnicity, genetic makeup, or other characteristics.
A recent New England Journal of Medicine-reported
study found that a significant number of Romanian children receiving
polio vaccine contracted the disease. The use of antibiotic IM
injections increased the risk substantially.
Long Term Problems
Documented
long-term health problems include arthritis, chronic headaches, rashes
indicative of disease, non-healing skin lesions, seizures, autism,
anaemia, multiple sclerosis, ALS, cancer, and many others. Ingredients
common to all vaccines are at issue. Squalene adjuvants are a
biological time bomb that can harm or destroy the human immune system.
Other
ingredients are known toxicants and carcinogens, including thimerosal
(a mercury derivative), aluminium phosphate, formaldehyde,
phenoxyethanol, and numerous gastrointestinal toxicants like liver
toxicants, cardiovascular and blood toxicants, and reproductive
toxicants. “Chemical ranking systems rate many vaccine ingredients among the most hazardous substances” known, even in microscopic doses.
Millions
of children (and adults) are partaking in an enormous crude experiment,
and no sincere, organized effort is being made to track the negative
side effects or to determine the long-term consequences.
Dr.
Bart Classen’s epidemiological research found vaccines as the cause of
79% of insulin type I diabetes cases in children under 10. The sharp
rise in numerous other diseases may also be linked with
mass-vaccinations. California’s autism rate skyrocketed 1000% in the
last 20 years. In the 1990s, MMR vaccine usage in Britain (for measles,
mumps and rubella) occurred at the same time autism rose sharply. The
January 2000 Journal of Adverse Drug Reactions reported that no
adequate testing was done, so the vaccine never should have been
licensed.
New
research may reveal other unknown hazards, but public safety won’t be
addressed until government health officials act responsibly, report
accurately, and adequately protect their populations from vaccines they
never should allow.
WHAT YOU CAN DO NOW:
Ring or email your MP and The Hon Tony Ryall, Minister of Health. Tel (04) 817 6804 or email his office here:
Tell
them NOT TO USE BAXTER VACCINE WHILE THE COMPANY IS FACING CRIMINAL
CHARGES! Tell them to DISCLOSE THE VACCINE INGREDIENTS!!!! This
vaccine is not SAFE, and whether compulsory or voluntary it is NOT
ACCEPTABLE. Other countries (like the Czech Republic) have cancelled
their contracts with Baxter, and so can New Zealand.
FOR MORE INFORMATION
• www.uncensored.co.nz
___
MORE INFO:
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2009/07/h1n1-vaccine-caution-world-health-organization-who-documents-swine-flu-vaccine-dangers.html
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2009/07/60-minutes-episode-on-1976-swineflu-h1n1-vaccine-disaster-must-go-viral-today-please-forward.html
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2009/07/important-caution-about-swineflu-h1n1-virus-vaccine.html
MORE INFO:
Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines
Part III: 'It's the vaccines, Stupid!
by F. William Engdahl
.
Global Research, September 13, 2009
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15092
Vaccines which have been approved by the responsible government authorities for vaccination against the alleged H1N1 Influenza A Swine Flu have been found to contain nano particles. Vaccine makers have been experimenting with nanoparticles as a way to "turbo charge" vaccines for several years. Now it has come out that the vaccines approved for use in Germany and other European countries contain nanoparticles in a form that reportedly attacks healthy cells and can be deadly.
In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) announced in an article in the journal, Nature Biotechnology, that they had developed a "nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies." The article went on to describe the effects of their breakthrough: "At a mere 25 nanometers, these particles are so tiny that once injected, they flow through the skin's extracellular matrix, making a beeline to the lymph nodes. Within minutes, they've reached a concentration of DCs thousands of times greater than in the skin. The immune response can then be extremely strong and effective."1
There is only one small problem with vaccines containing nanoparticles-they can be deadly and at the least cause severe irreparable health damage.
Nanoparticles, promoted in the mass media as the new wonder revolution of science, are particles that have been produced vastly smaller than deadly asbestos particles which caused severe lung damage and death before being outlawed. Particles at a nano size, (nm = 0,000000001 Meter) fuse together with the membranes of our body cell membranes and, according to recent studies in China and Japan, continuously destroy cells once introduced into the body. Once they interact with the body's cellular structure, they cannot be removed. Modern medicine euphemistically terms the phenomenon, a continuing infectious reaction.
Since the asbestos scandal, it has been established that particles in size a millionth of a meter, because of their enormous attractive force, penetrate all cells, destroying all those they come into contact with. Nanoparticles are far smaller than asbestos fibers.
Beijing Tests confirm deadly effects on humans
The fact that WHO, the European Medicines Evaluation Agency, the German Robert Koch Institute and other health bodies today would permit the population to be injected with largely untested novel vaccines containing nanoparticles says more about the powerful pharma lobby in Euiropean politics than it does about the sanity or moral integrity of the civil servants responsible for health of the general public.
The September 2009 issue of the respected European Respiratory Journal, made public on 19 August, and available since 21 August online, contains a peer-reviewed article with the title, "Exposure to nanoparticles is related to pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma."
The article describes tests carried out in 2008 at the elite Beijing Chaoyang Hospital on seven young women. All seven, ages 18-47 had been exposed to nanoparticles for 13 months in their common workplace. All were admitted to the hospital with shortness of breath and pleural effusions, or excessive fluids surrounding the lungs, inhibiting breathing. None of the seven had ever smoked and none were in any special risk group. Doctors carefully tested for every possibility and confirmed that the lung problems had a common origin-regular inhalation of nanoparticles in their factory. They had been exposed to Polyacrylat nanoparticles.
The tests confirmed the nanoparticles had set off a "super-meltdown" reaction in the patients. Despite all heroic efforts of doctors, two of the seven died from the lung complications. 2
In their report, the scientists concluded something so alarming it is necessary to quote at length:
"Immunological tests, examinations of bacteriology, virology and tumour markers, bronchoscopy, internal thoracoscopy and video-assisted thoracic surgery were performed. Surveys of the workplace, clinical observations and examinations of the patients were conducted. Polyacrylate, consisting of nanoparticles, was confirmed in the workplace. Pathological examinations of patients' lung tissue displayed nonspecific pulmonary inflammation, pulmonary fibrosis and foreign-body granulomas of pleura. Using transmission electron microscopy, nanoparticles were observed to lodge in the cytoplasm and caryoplasm of pulmonary epithelial and mesothelial cells, but are also located in the chest fluid. These cases arouse concern that long-term exposure to some nanoparticles without protective measures may be related to serious damage to human lungs."3
To date Animal studies and in vitro experiments show that nanoparticles can result in lung damage and other toxicity in animals, but no reports on the clinical toxicity in humans due to nanoparticles prior to the Beijing study had been made.
The Beijing Chaoyang Hospital study has now conclusively confirmed that nanoparticles cause lung damage and other toxicity in humans as well. At this point in time, when two of the approved vaccines planned to be mass distributed in Germany and elsewhere contain nanoparticles, failure of the relevant responsible public health and epidemiology officials to order an immediate emergency freeze on distribution of any vaccine containing nanoparticles can only be considered tantamount to criminal negligence. Hopefully the responsible authorities will react in time to avert a possible human health catastrophe orders of magnitude worse than the worst case of Swine Flu reported to date.
F. William Engdahl is author of Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order. He may be reached via his website, www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net
Notes:
1 EPFL, Bioengineering researchers from the EPFL in Lausanne, Switzerland, have developed and patented a nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies, accessed in www.azonano.com/nanotechnology%20news.asp?catid=13.
2 Song Y, Li X, Du X, Exposure to nanoparticles is related to pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma , European Respiratory Journal, 9/2009, 34(3): 559-567.
3 Ibid.
F. William Engdahl is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by F. William Engdahl
September 1, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d3ac69e20120a592aa3a970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference H1N1: News from New Zealand: Swine Flu Vaccine Alert:
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.