Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Campaign for Liberty (C4L): Stop Cap and Tax! | Main | Christopher Story FRSA: Leo Emil Wanta: Wantagate: Wanta A Financial Terorist Working From Within »

OBJECTION Re: Judge Refuses to Dismiss Lawsuit Against Obama


From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <>

Subject: OBJECTION Re: Judge Refuses to Dismiss Lawsuit Against Obama
Date: Thursday, September 17, 2009, 8:57 PM

>  Obama is arguing this lawsuit was filed in the wrong court if you can believe that.

Statutes conferring original jurisdiction upon Federal District Courts
must be STRICTLY construed:  FOIA confers original jurisdiction
upon the Article III DCUS;  the USDCs established by 28 U.S.C. 132
are legislative tribunals with a constitutional origin in the Territory Clause. 
See Balzac v. Porto Rico for starters:

The United States District Court is not a true United States court established under article 3 of the Constitution to administer the judicial power of the United States therein conveyed. It is created by virtue of the sovereign congressional faculty, granted under article 4, 3, of that instrument, of making all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory belonging to the United States.

[end quote]

Much more proof is here: (see subsection 7 etc.)

See 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B) for the statute conferring original jurisdiction:  (a)(4)(B)

(B) On complaint, the district court of the United States in the district in which the complainant resides, or has his principal place of business, or in which the agency records are situated, or in the District of Columbia, has jurisdiction to enjoin the agency from withholding agency records and to order the production of any agency records improperly withheld from the complainant.

[end quote]

The latter statute must be STRICTLY construed.

See also:

I hope this helps.

p.s.  Carter's credentials also exhibit fatal defects:
were "witnessed" by impostor Terry J. Hatter, Jr.
(Carter was not appointed to preside on the DCUS,
even if his APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVIT were valid;
it also lacks the required OMB control number)  (IN DEFAULT)  (IN DEFAULT)

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13 (Home Page) (Support Policy) (Client Guidelines) (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Dennis gray <> wrote:

Subject: Judge Refuses to Dismiss Lawsuite Against Obama

Thought you'd be interested in this....

Subject: It appears that we're going to find something out... one way or the other.

I just received this from one of our Patriots that attended the hearing:
The expedited trial has been set for Jan. 26, 2010, just 4 1/2 months from now!
I and many other concerned veterans and citizens attended the hering today in Federal Court in Santa Ana in the lawsuit against Barack Obama to determine his eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief. About 150 people showed up, almost all in support of the lawsuit to demand that Obama release his birth certificate and other records that he has hidden from the American people.
 Judge David Carter refused to hear Obama's request for dismissal today, instead setting a hearing date for Oct. 5, since Obama's attorneys had just  filed the motion on Friday. He indicated there was almost no chance that this case would be dismissed. Obama is arguing this lawsuit was filed in the
 wrong court if you can believe that. I guess Obama would prefer a "kangaroo  court" instead of a Federal court! Assuming Judge Carter denies Obama's motion for dismissal, he will likely then order expedited discovery which will force Obama to release his birth certificate in a timely manner (if he
 has one). The judge, who is a former U.S. Marine, repeated several times that this is a very serious case which must be resolved quickly so that the troops know that their Commander in Chief is eligible to hold that position and issue lawful orders to our military in this time of war. He basically said Obama
 must prove his eligibility to the court! He said Americans deserve to know the truth about their President!
The two U.S. Attorneys representing Barack Obama tried everything they could to sway the judge that this case was frivolous, but Carter would have none of it and cut them off several times. Obama's attorneys left the courtroom after the approx. 90 minute hearing looking defeated and nervous.
 Great day in America for the U.S. Constitution!!! The truth about Barack Obama's eligibility will be known fairly soon - Judge Carter practically guaranteed it!
Video from the press conference after the hearing coming soon. Congratulations to plaintiffs attorney Dr. Orly Taitz! She did a great job and won some huge victories today. She was fearless!
 Jeff Schwilk, Founder

 Larry Dean
 Fight organized crime: Don’t Re-elect ANYONE!
 If you forward this, PLEASE REMOVE all email
 addresses before you send it on .

September 18, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink