Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« THURSDAY'S TELECONFERENCE CALL: TRAFFIC v DRIVING Kevin Michaels and Charlie Sprinkles' Cadallac Motion!!!! | Main | Vote Ron Paul: News Update 10-23-2009 »

BREAKING NEWS: Barnett et al. v. Obama et al.: Docket Report: Obama misrepresented by attorneys lacking credentials

Related: http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2009/09/objection-re-judge-refuses-to-dismiss-lawsuit-against-obama.html

___

From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>

Subject: BREAKING NEWS: Barnett et al. v. Obama et al.: Docket Report: Obama misrepresented by attorneys lacking credentials
To: Dansmith1954@aol.com
Cc: "SupremeLaw" <supremelaw@googlegroups.com>
Date: Friday, October 23, 2009, 5:48 AM

THAT'S IT!!!  YOU FOUND IT!  NICE WORK, DAN!!


I think I had the full list here (good to get confirmation):
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/usdc-cdca/


NOTE WELL West and DeJute are claiming to have
powers of attorney to represent Obama in that Federal Court.

In point of law, the McDade Act at 28 U.S.C. 530B says both must have 
licenses to practice law as required by sections 6067 and 6068
of the California Business and Professions Code (also known
as the "State Bar Act" in California):

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/530B.html 
("to the same extent and in the same manner as other attorneys in that State")

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/cbpc/6067.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/cbpc/6068.htm

We demanded same of both here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/usdc-cdca/dejute/nad.affidavit.htm  (due TODAY)
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/usdc-cdca/dejute/nad.oath.htm  (due TODAY)
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/usdc-cdca/dejute/state.bar.record.1.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/usdc-cdca/dejute/state.bar.record.2.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/usdc-cdca/west/nad.affidavit.htm  (due TODAY)
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/usdc-cdca/west/nad.oath.htm  (due TODAY)
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/usdc-cdca/west/state.bar.record.1.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/usdc-cdca/west/state.bar.record.2.htm

By midnight ending tonight, both will be IN DEFAULT.

Obama made a VERY SERIOUS error retaining both West and DeJute in California:
they cannot represent ANY private parties nor can they exercise the
powers and duties of U.S. Attorneys without complying with the McDade Act above.

Their failure to produce credentials implicates them now in impersonating
Officers of the United States, a very serious FELONY violation of 18 U.S.C. 912,
not to mention mail fraud, obstruction of justice, and racketeering (multiple counts):
18 U.S.C. 1341, 1510, and 1961 et seq.:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/912.html
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1341.html
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1510.html
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1961.html   (see list of "predicate acts" e.g. mail fraud)

Moreover, the State Bar Act prohibits such misrepresentation
with 2 separate MISDEMEANORS:  6126 and 6128:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/cbpc/6126.htm
("guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in a county jail or by a fine of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.")

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/cbpc/6128.htm
("imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500), or by both.")


See how we formally charged these crimes in this prior
VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol2/criminal.complaint.4.htm



October 23, 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink