Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Join Ron Paul in New Orleans on April 10 | Main | Heidi Beirich of Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) Spreads Hate, Caught on Tape »

Our MEMO to Jeff Rense, The "United States" (Federal government) is not a corporation

--- Forwarded Message ----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <>
Sent: Tue, March 16, 2010 5:10:24 PM
Subject: Our MEMO to Jeff Rense, The "United States" (Federal government) is not a corporation


TO:      Mr. Jeff Rense
           29201 Heathercliff #140
           Malibu 90265
           CALIFORNIA, USA


FROM:    Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
              Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)

DATE:    March 16, 2010 A.D.

SUBJECT: “United States” is not a corporation

Greetings Jeff Rense:

Why have you persisted in hosting articles and essays which repeat the proven falsehood that the “United States” (Federal government) is a corporation?

I must now assume that you are either ignoring several email messages which my office has transmitted to you, or you are complicit in propagating this falsehood via your website

If there is any one common denominator, these myriad authors stubbornly persist in citing 28 U.S.C. 3002(15)(A) as “authority” for their mistaken belief that the “United States” is a Federal corporation.

Please see the attached essay for a detailed refutation of this proven falsehood.  I will now briefly summarize the major points:

(1) section 3002(15)(A) is another example of an arbitrary re-definition of the term “United States”, which Congress has done many times in violation of the prohibition against same decided in Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920) (Congress cannot by legislation alter the Constitution);

(2) because the “United States” was not a corporation before that statute was enacted, it could not have been an existing corporation on the day that statute was first enacted;

(3) it takes a lot more text than that one liner to charter any Federal corporation e.g. the Act of Congress incorporating the Union Pacific Railroad Company is typical of the extensive details which Congress must elucidate in such an “organic” statute;  we encourage you to find and read an Act of Congress that did establish one of the several Federal corporations which Congress has created since 1788;

(4) the stated scope of 3002 is expressly limited to “this chapter” which is Chapter 176 of Title 28 of the U.S. Code, namely, Federal Debt Collection Procedure;  as such, there is absolutely no way that such a limited re-definition could result in incorporating the entire Federal government.

I encourage you to read and study the attached essay, with particular emphasis on the holding of the U.S. Supreme Court in U.S. v. Cooper Corporation, 312 U.S. 600 (1941), to wit:

We may say in passing that the argument that the United States may be treated as a corporation organized under its own laws, that is, under the Constitution as the fundamental law, seems so strained as not to merit serious consideration.

Whether you agree with any of the above or not, I certainly feel I am on very solid grounds politely to request equal time in this matter, in part because my email inbox continues to be inundated with this same false claim, much to my chagrin and disappointment with every single “freedom” writer who has fallen into this web of deceit.

I really do have much better ways to spend my professional time.

Thank you.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13 (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


See also:    (revoked)  (revoked)     (not registered)

March 16, 2010 in Current Affairs | Permalink