Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Virginia Win and the Obamacare Class Action | Main | Finding good car insurance »

Private Attorney General accuses Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) of cowardice: FUNDAMENTAL OBJECTIONS Re: Countdown to Court Martial: Update for Tues, Dec 14

Subject:
FUNDAMENTAL OBJECTIONS Re: Countdown to Court Martial: Update for Tues, Dec 14


Mr. Puckett:

Are the chickens roosting or roasting tonight?  Inquiring minds would like to know.

The conspiracy against the People of the United States of America,
which our research and litigation have documented and verified in great detail
over a period spanning 20 years, goes far beyond deliberate federal misconstruction
of the Qualifications Clauses.  It began at least when the 1866 Civil Rights Act
attempted wrongly to bypass the key holding in Dred Scott v. Sandford,
explained in great detail here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/citizenship.for.dummies.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/comments.on.citizenship.for.dummies.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/correct.amendment.htm


Applying one of the currently popular legal theories, if both parents
needed to be Citizens in order to satisfy the Qualification Clause for President ("2:1:5"),
there was only one class of State Citizens when that Clause was ratified:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/twoclass.htm#pannill

Therefore, both parents needed to be State Citizens, NOT federal citizens.

Quot erat demonstrandum.

That conspiracy now implicates every single past and present member
of the United States Armed Forces insofar as each has failed to learn,
understand and correctly apply the mandates found in Article VI, Sections 2 and 3:
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#6:2
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#6:3
ever since June 21, 1788 A.D., and all Acts of Congress that have implemented
the same fundamental Guarantees which have never been amended either
(see FOIA Requests for pertinent citations).


It is now my honest professional opinion that they are all cowards
for failing to obey their OATHS OF OFFICE, and I must also include
in that same group all current Members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/dod/foia.request.qualification.clause.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/dod/cartwright/foia.request.qualification.clause.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/dod/casey/foia.request.qualification.clause.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/dod/conway/foia.request.qualification.clause.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/dod/mullen/foia.request.qualification.clause.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/dod/roughead/foia.request.qualification.clause.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/dod/schwartz/foia.request.qualification.clause.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/dod/letter.2010-05-10/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/dod/letter.2010-05-13/rebuttal.htm


Please forward
this entire message to
Maj. Matthew J. Kemkes
(we can't find an email address for him).

Our FOIA Requests for his credentials are now PAST DUE.

Thank you.



>   he [LTC Terry Lakin] stood before Judge
[sic] Lind
>  and over and over told her that
>  he was wrong to have disobeyed his orders



Lind is not a "judge" or "colonel" because she failed to produce the credentials required of her,
which credentials were properly requested in these Freedom of Information Act Requests
and are now PAST DUE:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/lakin/foia.request.Court.Marshal.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/lakin/foia.request.Court.Marshal.2.htm

1.  OPM Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS executed by all U.S. Department of Defense (“DOD”) personnel formally participating in any manner whatsoever in the Court Martial, e.g. arraignment, of LTC Terry Lakin, including but not limited to the designated judge Col. Denise R. Lind, prosecutor(s), defense counsel(s) and supporting staff e.g. court reporter(s).  See 5 U.S.C. §§
2906, 3331, and Paperwork Reduction Act.  [end quote]


If you do NOT care about Article VI, Sections 2 and 3 supra,
then YOU ARE NOT SUPPORTING THE CONSTITUTION EITHER!!


http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/news/update20101214.html


dsc_9162web

LTC Lakin with attorneys Neal Allen Puckett and
Army Maj. Matthew J. Kemkes


Countdown to Court Martial: Update from Dec 14, 2010


Today at his Court-Martial, Army LTC Terry Lakin pled guilty to four specifications of refusing to obey lawful orders, one of which was then dismissed as duplicative.


In so doing, he stood before Judge Lind and over and over told her that he was wrong to have disobeyed his orders, which were lawful.


He then pled not guilty to the most severe charge against him, missing the movement of US Air Flight 1123 on 12 April 2010.


His sole defense to that charge is that he was never ordered to board that flight, but instead that his orders required him to report to Ft. Campbell, KY and did not specify the means of transportation.


His new lawyer -- who has not been working with us -- convinced Terry that by changing his strategy and abandoning any argument about Obama’s eligibility, he would be able to plead for mercy tomorrow when he is sentenced.


Terry was able today, and will be able tomorrow, to explain that he was motivated by his concerns about eligibility, but of course by pleading guilty he abandons any opportunity to appeal, and thus any chance that the appellate courts would reverse Judge Lind’s rulings.


The Lakin case may now never provide an answer to the questions the nation has as to the eligibility of Barack Obama to be Commander-in-Chief.


However, Terry cannot be blamed for doing what he believes is in his, and his family’s, best interests and of course Terry had the courage and fortitude to put himself in jeopardy in the first place.


We wish him all the best tomorrow as the trial continues to its conclusion.

 


 

[end excerpt]
 

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
 


On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:20 PM, American Patriot Foundation <questions@safeguardourconstitution.com> wrote:

 

American Patriot Foundation for Terry Lakin
American Patriot Foundation: Updates on LTC Terry Lakin's Case
http://www.SafeguardOurConstitution.com
    

Countdown to Court Martial: Update from Dec 14, 2010

 

Today at his Court-Martial, Army LTC Terry Lakin pled guilty to four specifications of refusing to obey lawful orders, one of which was then dismissed as duplicative. In so doing, he stood before Judge Lind and over and over told her that he was wrong to have disobeyed his orders, which were lawful...

 

Follow the link below for the full update:
http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/news/update20101214.html

 

// Margaret Hemenway
www.safeguardourconstitution.com

WHAT YOU CAN DO NOW

Join Our Mailing List
If you do not want to receive email concerning this critical case scroll to the bottom of this email and choose "SafeUnsubscribe" and you will be excluded from all future email notifications.

Forward email
Safe Unsubscribe
American Patriot Foundation | 1101 Thirtieth Street, N.W., Suite 500 | Washington | DC | 20007

December 15, 2010 in Current Affairs | Permalink