Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« TEA Parties (Tax Day) scheduled April 15 | Main | RADIOACTIVE FALL OUT EVERYWHERE. TAKE VARIOUS MEASURES TO PROTECT HOME! »

"IS OBAMA INELIGIBILITY A SIDE SHOW OR THE MAIN EVENT?" Private Attorney General's OBJECTIONS

http://www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams144.htm


Mr. Williams,

What I simply CANNOT understand is how you can ignore history
and still call yourself a commentator on American history;  OR,
did somebody else pen that Bio (or is it a "bio")?

PLEASE ...
HOW EXACTLY DID THE 1866 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT AMEND THE CONSTITUTION?
INQUIRING MINDS WOULD LIKE TO KNOW, EVEN IF "OBOTS" DON'T!

You haven't cited a single relevant court case in your article above,
and that omission renders it a worthless diatribe.

You misspelled "Citizen" every single time.

Is your name "j.b. williams" perhaps?  DON'T LAUGH!!!

How about "j.b. wILLIAMS"?  IS THAT BETTER?

In the event that you may want to discover your errors,
some of the pertinent cases are summarized here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/twoclass.htm

... and a full exposition is well documented here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/citizenship.for.dummies.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/comments.on.citizenship.for.dummies.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/correct.amendment.htm


But, I am beginning to understand NewsWithViews a whole lot better now:
nobody there is checking any of the useless articles that they publish and,
even if they did, they still wouldn't recognize worthless diatribe.

They are no less guilty, because they have been shown the truth
and have failed to publish it too!

Sorry to be so stern with you (and them), but this issue is far too important
to waste on misleading, off-point, historically ignorant off-the-wall rants.


BY NOW YOU SHOULD ALREADY HAVE EDUCATED YOURSELF WITH THE
SUPREME COURT'S DECISION RECOGNIZING 3 DIFFERENT MEANINGS OF
"UNITED STATES" -- READ IT!!!

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/hooven/hooven.htm#united.states

See also the academic treatises cited in Footnote 6:

See Langdell, "The Status of our New Territories," 12 Harv. L. Rev. 365, 371;
see also Thayer, "Our New Possessions," 12 Harv. L. Rev. 464;
Thayer, "The Insular Tariff Cases in the Supreme Court," 15 Harv. L. Rev. 164;
Littlefield, "The Insular Cases," 15 Harv. L. Rev. 169, 281.



"We are ignorant of the things we choose to ignore."  -- Anonymous


p.s.  IGNORE THIS!

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/knudson/judnot09.htm#dyett  (since when does 27 = 28???)


--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

__._,_.___

April 13, 2011 in Current Affairs | Permalink