Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« The Video Congress Does Not Want You To See | Main | Wikileaks / Cablegate / State Secrets (07/24/11) cablegate-201107241216.7z.torrent »

Re: SUPREME COURT CHALLENGE TO COLOR OF LAW TAXATION

Re: SUPREME COURT CHALLENGE TO COLOR OF LAW TAXATION

PS  I can e-mail you the two briefs if you would like to post on your web-site. 

That would be very kind of you, Jerry.


I believe the litigation to which you refer is here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/  e.g.:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/informal.opening.brief.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/07-02017_Reply_brief.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/reply.to.brief.for.appellee.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/mot.certify.challenge.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/notice.certify.challenge.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/injunction.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/injunction2.htm


Are these the 2 briefs in question?

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/intervention.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/intervene.supplement.1.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/nad06.htm  (i.e. Item (7) )


Thank you very much.


p.s.  We had tried earlier to use a FOIA Request for the missing Statute(s) at Large,
and IRS replied by citing the Sixteenth amendment -- obviously NOT A STATUTE!

On the merits, Congress proposed that amendment with a Resolution, but
Congressional Resolutions are NOT Acts of Congress:  1 U.S.C. 101, 102



--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice



On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Jerry McNeil <birdman6@cox.net> wrote:
Sir Paul:
 
On Friday, July 22nd, your two briefs entered into the 10th Circuit
in 2007 -
 
NOTICE OF INTERVENTION - and - NOTICE OF DEFAULT BY AFFIDAVIT
 
Were placed before the Supreme Court incorporated into an Apostille issued by the Secretary of State for Arkansas. 
 
This "Public Document under Seal" (FREv 902.1) is the highest and best form of evidence.
 
The Briefs were professionally done by the Cockle Printing Firm in Omaha, NE, and are posted there temporarily.
 
All other courts have just ignored the contempt of subpoena you proved in 2007, including the 10th Circuit.
 
NOTHING CAN BE PERMITTED TO INTERFERE WITH THE THEFT.
 
Thank you sir, for helping to bring the light.
 
Jerry McNeil
 
PS  I can e-mail you the two briefs if you would like to post on your web-site. 
 
They are very good looking pdf files in Supreme Court format.
 




--

July 23, 2011 in Current Affairs | Permalink