Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« 615 dead dolphins found on Peru beaches; acoustic tests for oil to blame? | Main | Anthony McKeon gives his celeb endorsement for Ron Paul: USA Election Song (2012) »

Is KIRO 7 "Eyewitness News" not interested? Re: evidence of extensive infiltration of the Federal Courts, at all levels ...

Update: 

Paul Andrew Mitchell has been bundled away by the US Government / All is well in the United States of Amerikkka
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/02/paul-andrew-mitchell-has-been-bundled-away-by-the-us-government.html

 
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
 Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 8:28 AM
Subject: 
Is KIRO 7 "eyewitness news" not interested? 
Re: evidence of extensive infiltration of the Federal Courts, at all levels ...

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

It appears that Mr. Essex Porter has become quite fascinated 
with photographs of local weapons, but cares little to nothing
about the very large cache of automatic weapons, ammunition,
grenades and stolen vehicles which the Mexican Federales
photographed recently.  

Are there any other "Reporters" at KIRO 7 who might be interested
in these fascinating photographs of recently current events?

That cache was, of course, expedited to the Mexican drug cartel
in Northern Mexico courtesy of Mr. Eric H. Holder, Jr. and his
swarm of Bolshevik subordinates, in the matter now popularly
known as "Fast & Furious".  Score:  one dead U.S. Border Patrol
Agent, and numerous fatalities on both sides of the drug war
now proceeding -- all ahead full -- at the southern borders of
California, Arizona and Texas.

What I cannot understand is this:  Why are numerous reports now
surfacing on the Internet, claiming that Das Homeland Uber Alles
recently placed an order for 450 MILLION rounds of .40 caliber
hollow-point ammunition?  They are not planning to shoot rabbits
with all that ammo, are they?  I don't think there are that many
rabbits within the territorial jurisdiction of the DHS.

No:  they are planning to shoot PEOPLE!!  But, I doubt very much
if there is a single DHS employee honest enough to admit same.
I mean, just take one look at the head of that "department":

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/azvmitch/crossco4.htm
(search for "Janet Napolitano")

http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/kidnaps.htm


Gee, if KIRO 7 Reporters would only ask they right questions,
they too might become "eyewitnesses".  

Imagine that, if you can!  

Can you?


p.s.  Eric H. Holder's APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS are also fatally defective
for omitting the OMB control number required by the Federal
Paperwork Reduction Act:  we checked!

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/foia.request.holder.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/foia.request.holder.opm.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/affidavit.refused.JPG
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/affidavit.GIF
(latter also omits the paragraph at the bottom citing 5 U.S.C. 2903)

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/page01.GIF

Now pronounced "Department of Just US".



Sometimes, if you pull on a single strand of thread, 
it ends up unraveling the entire garment:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/letter.2011-12-27/foia.request.opm.htm  (PAST DUE and IN DEFAULT)

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/letter.2011-12-27/foia.request.omb.htm  (PAST DUE and IN DEFAULT)



http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/44/3512

(b) The protection provided by this section may be raised 
in the form of a complete defense, bar, or otherwise at any time 
during the agency administrative process or judicial action applicable thereto. 



http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/Memo.to.Sheriff.Arpaio.htm



-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:09 PM
Subject: CONFIDENTIAL: evidence of extensive infiltration of the Federal Courts, at all levels ...
To: eporter@kirotv.com
Cc: chalsne@kirotv.com


TO:
Mr. Essex Porter, Reporter
KIRO 7 Eyewitness News
2807 Third Avenue
Seattle 98121
WASHINGTON STATE, USA

SUBJECT:
evidence of extensive infiltration of the Federal Courts, at all levels ...


Greetings Mr. Porter,

Thank you very much for requesting information via email, when we met moments ago 
in Seattle, not far from Lake Union.


A short narrative introduction to this widespread problem is here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/uoregon.edu/memo.ag01.htm


Evidence of the missing and defective credentials for U.S. District "robes"
seated on the U.S. District Courts throughout Washington State
can be accessed here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm#DWA

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/burgess.franklin/affidavit.refused.JPG
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/burgess.franklin/oath.refused.JPG

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/lasnik.robert/nad.missing.credentials.2.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/leighton.ronald/affidavit.refused.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/martinez.ricardo/affidavit.refused.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/mcdonald.alan/nad.missing.credentials.2.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/nielsen.william/nad.missing.credentials.2.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/pechman.marsha/affidavit.refused.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/robart.james/affidavit.refused.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/rothstein.barbara/nad.missing.credentials.2.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/shea.edward/nad.missing.credentials.2.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/vansickle.fred/nad.missing.credentials.2.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/suko.lonny/affidavit.refused.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/whaley.robert/nad.missing.credentials.2.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/zilly.thomas/affidavit.refused.JPG
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/zilly.thomas/oath.refused.JPG


Here is the original FOIA Request for the 4 credentials that are required by Federal laws
of all U.S. District Judges -- this one specifically requested credentials required of
Washington State's Federal Judges (at that time):

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/foia.request.usdc.dwa.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/foia.appeal.usdc.dwa.htm


The other FOIA Requests submitted to date are itemized here,
roughly in chronological order -- this list should give you a good
idea how comprehensive our investigation has been to date,
after commencing same in the year 1996:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/index.htm
(latter needs a little updating, with the most recent correspondence etc.)

For example, this Mail Fraud Report was mailed just yesterday
on behalf of a client of ours who is a Defendant at the USDC in Denver:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/babcock.lewis/order.2012-04-16/


Here are some pertinent Federal statutes e.g. 
defining the legal custodians of certain credentials,
and some of the legal consequence of missing credentials:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/federal.judges.htm


Federal Judges must have 4 credentials in proper order:

(1)  SENATE CONFIRMATION
(2)  PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION
(3)  APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
(4)  OATH OF OFFICE

The U.S. Department of Justice is the legal custodian of the PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSIONS;
the "court" is the legal custodian of the APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS.

Often, DOJ will have the other credentials in their "appointment file" for each robe.

We have not found any custodian statutes for the SENATE CONFIRMATION
or for the second OATH OF OFFICE (that is specific to the office of Federal Judge).


If you delve deeply enough into this evidence, you will confirm
that numerous APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS fail to display
a valid OMB control number in the upper right-hand corner.

This fact necessarily invalidates each such credential,
due chiefly to the legislative intent of the Paperwork Reduction Act:

Congress has enlisted the assistance of private Citizens 
to enforce that PRA:  a missing OMB control number renders
each such "Information Collection Request" a "bootleg" document
which should go straight into the nearest trash can.

And, the PRA's Public Protection Clause was given greater strength
with a recent amendment:  see 44 U.S.C. 3512:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/44/3512

(b) The protection provided by this section may be raised 
in the form of a complete defense, bar, or otherwise 
at any time during the agency administrative process 
or judicial action applicable thereto. 



Now, we went the extra mile recently by submitting two (2) more FOIA Requests
for proof that the Office of Personnel Management formally requested and
obtained OMB's approval to OMIT the OMB control number -and- 
to OMIT the paragraph at the bottom citing to 5 U.S.C. 2903.

Here's an evidently genuine OPM SF-61, for the late William H. Rehnquist:

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/rehnquist/affidavit.gif
(cf. the paragraph at the bottom citing 5 U.S.C. 2903 (Authority to administer) )


Both of these 2 FOIA Requests are now PAST DUE and IN DEFAULT
(chiefly because the Regulations implementing the PRA require a
response within 60 days):

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/letter.2011-12-27/foia.request.opm.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/letter.2011-12-27/foia.request.omb.htm


This SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE is also PAST DUE and also IN DEFAULT:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aouscourts/


Accordingly, my office is slowly but surely rolling out a sequence of 
"Qui Tam" Complaints, pursuant to the Federal Civil False Claims Act:
we have done four (4) such Complaints to date:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/davis/Tax%20Court/vcc1/criminal.complaint.cover.sheet.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/davis/Tax%20Court/vcc1/demand.to.file.vcc.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/davis/Tax%20Court/vcc1/criminal.complaint.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/davis/Tax%20Court/vcc2/criminal.complaint.cover.sheet.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/davis/Tax%20Court/vcc2/demand.to.file.vcc.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/davis/Tax%20Court/vcc2/criminal.complaint.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/davis/Tax%20Court/vcc3/criminal.complaint.cover.sheet.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/davis/Tax%20Court/vcc3/demand.to.file.vcc.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/davis/Tax%20Court/vcc3/criminal.complaint.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/davis/Tax%20Court/vcc4/criminal.complaint.cover.sheet.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/davis/Tax%20Court/vcc4/demand.to.file.vcc.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/davis/Tax%20Court/vcc4/criminal.complaint.htm


Lack of proper credentials means, among other things,
that the "robe" cannot be paid any compensation (cites above)
from the U.S. Treasury, and every IRS Form 1040 which s/he
has signed is at least one FELONY act of perjury and also
one FELONY act of falsifying a Federal Income Tax Return!

See 26 U.S.C. 6065:  http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/6065.html


At this point, I encourage you to read and study "Incarceration Nation" 
by Fareed Zakaria, in a recent edition of Time Magazine.

We first wrote about the "prison racket" here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/lawless.htm


     It is  no wonder  that well in excess of 80% of the American
People are  now disgusted with government, and all of its agents.
Our Chief  Justice is  clearly a  criminal  if  he  continues  to
advocate taxation  of federal judges, in the face of supreme laws
which maintain  the contrary.   Federal  judges  are  also  heavy
investors in  the United  States Prison Industries, now the fifth
largest enterprise  of the  whole American  economy.  Need we say
any more?   Yes,  we need  to say more, because the incarceration
rate in  the land of the free is now the highest in the world, by
wide margins.   You  can thank  William  H.  Rehnquist  for  that
honorable distinction.  None will dare to call it treason.


I honestly do believe that this whole matter could earn the
right Journalist a well deserved Pulitzer Prize!



If you have any questions, please ask them here via email:
this investigation has reached critical mass, and I don't care
to have a digital photo of myself "going viral" on the Internet --
not at this stage of the investigation, please.  Such a photograph 
would be like painting a large bull's eye on my back!

Thank you.


Bcc:  current clients (2x)

-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

Join my Infowars - Youngevity Business Team for health, financial success and more!
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2012/04/join-my-youngevity-team-that-has-the-best-health-products-and-other-expanding-products-and-services-.html

April 21, 2012 in Current Affairs | Permalink