Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Orly Taitz was duly served with this APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AMICUS CURIAE: Farrar et al. v. Obama (OSAH / Georgia #OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-215136-60-MALIHI) | Main | Re: U.S. Court of Appeals for D.C. is also INFILTRATED ... »

More Re: REALLY PAUL ? Fw: [apfn-1] Another Federal Court impostor turns up in Grinols et al. v Obama et al., so does Orly Taitz (no license to practice law in California)

Teknosis needs your help. * Ways to help Teknosis

___

 

Post main:

 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2013 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: REALLY PAUL ? Fw: [apfn-1] Another Federal Court impostor turns up in Grinols et al. v Obama et al., so does Orly Taitz (no license to practice law in California)

 

Attorneys are "officers of the court" and
4 U.S.C. 101 requires all State judicial officers
to execute a proper OATH OF OFFICE:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/4/101.html

That IS Federal law, Ralph, and you are ignorant of same!!

See also:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/criminal.complaint.htm

LIST OF AUTHORITIES

Plaintiff cites the following authorities in support of His VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, to wit:  Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 73 (1932) (“attorneys are officers of the court”);  Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co., 987 F.2d 1536, 1546 (11th Cir 1993) (“All attorneys, as officers of the court ....”);  Pumphrey v. K.W. Thompson Tool Co., 62 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 1995) (see section “II.”);  “Let Us Be Officers of the Court,” by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen, 83 ABA Journal 94 (1997);  and FRCP Rule 1, Advisory Committee Notes, 1993 Amendments (“as officers of the court, attorneys share ....”).


This was a State Court Civil RICO action, Ralph!

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol2/criminal.complaint.4.htm

State Courts have original jurisdiction in Civil RICO actions:

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/civil.rico.htm


The claims you make violate 18 U.S.C. 4:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/4.html

Latter is supreme Law, pursuant to the Supremacy Clause:
Rules of Court may NOT amend such a statute because
Acts of Congress can ONLY be amended by Congress,
not by the Executive and not by the Judiciary.

See Willy v. Coastal Corp., in chief.


KINDLY GO AWAY, Ralph:  you appear to be a charlatan,
keyboard commando, loose cannon, freeloader and 
rude interloper.

YOU OBVIOUSLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE 
TALKING ABOUT.



-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice 

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:34 AM, backflow.prevention@verizon.net <backflow.prevention@verizon.net> wrote:
Click Me!
Counselor AND OTHERS:
  
Mr Paul Mitchell IS unaware that Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and U.S. Magistrates MANUAL forbids a private citizen from filing criminal complaints in any Court.  Badge Carrying people can file a form AO-91 then get a warrant if OATH taken in Appearance before Judge or Magistrate who then signs witnessing Oath then issues WARRANT.  Mr. Mitchell cites TITLE 18 USC Section 4 which is Misprison of Felony stating that DEMANDS YOU PROVIDE SOMETHING ON THE BACK OF YOUR STATE ISSUED LICENSE..... Might be a State BAR requirement to sign some OATH but it is not a FEDERAL LAW !
  
Such is simply NOT TRUE PUTTING YOU AND COURTS AT JEOPARDY as Mr. Mitchell has never obtained a FEDERAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT HEARING NO DOUBT because private citizens NOT BADGE CARRYING PEOPLE cannot get it through and appear before a Judge or Magistrate under Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure low numbers SUCH AS 3,4,5,6,7,8 OR MORE which are specific.
 
Please consider FORGIVING the Slander and Defamation of Mr. Mitchell and if not remember to get Obama suits solved as statute of limitations will allow you to take legal action LATER Attorney Taitz.
 
You can block messages on your e-mail program from Mr. Mitchell to finish your work on Obama lawsuits as Counsel.
 
I have been super busy with the shooting deaths of male children black and white at the Dozier School for Boys in Marianna, Florida.  When I get finished helping various agencies FIND the bodies with bullets using Ground Penetrating Radar for burial locations in Escape Routes from THE WHITE HOUSE TORTURE CHAMBER AREA and advising USF teams plus Law Enforcement with Super Metal Detectors as used by treasure hunters then the FBI, DJJ, DOJ, FDLE and Jackson County Sheriff can open up many of the escape route areas to full exhumation and recovery of well over 49 bodies of black and white children killed by guards and others at this State Facility.  The GUARDS never removed the bullets from the bodies and simply dug shallow graves in specific areas to BURY THE VICTIMS. 
 
Sad but true plus these families need closure knowing where their children's bodies are located for proper burial not a hole in the ground with no stone or cover let alone NO DEATH CERTIFICATES OR MEDICAL EXAMINER AUTOPSY.  Exhumation will help close this chapter in American HISTORY and perhaps cause the Governor, Members of Congress and others to LOOK INTO SIMILAR STATE OPERATIONS NATIONWIDE !
 
Check E-MAIL for way to block messages from those who attempt to take up your time or let some volunteer screen the messages Orly.  Your COURT CASE is coming up with Supreme Court.  Nothing else is important other than your business and representations. We too have SKYPE.
 
ID ralphwhitleysr  when the Obama trials are over.
 
Ralph 
Former LEO
Tampa
020613 @ 11:31 AM Eastern
 
 
 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
From: Orly Taitz
Date: 2/6/2013 1:44:06 AM
Subject: Re: REALLY PAUL ? Fw: [apfn-1] Another Federal Court impostor turns up in Grinols et al. v Obama et al., so does Orly Taitz (no license to practice law in California)

February 20, 2013 in Current Affairs | Permalink