Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Another Federal Court impostor turns up in Grinols et al. v Obama et al., so does Orly Taitz (no license to practice law in California) | Main | Orly Taitz was duly served with this APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AMICUS CURIAE: Farrar et al. v. Obama (OSAH / Georgia #OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-215136-60-MALIHI) »

Re: REALLY PAUL ? Fw: [apfn-1] Another Federal Court impostor turns up in Grinols et al. v Obama et al., so does Orly Taitz (no license to practice law in California) [1 Attachment]

Teknosis needs your help. * Ways to help Teknosis

___

 

Post main:

 

 

[Attachment(s) from Supreme Law Firm included below]

 


----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2013 4:49 AM
Subject: Re: REALLY PAUL ? Fw: [apfn-1] Another Federal Court impostor turns up in Grinols et al. v Obama et al., so does Orly Taitz (no license to practice law in California)

Ms. Taitz,

You and 200,000+ other "members" of The State Bar of California
have failed to produce any certificate of oath that is required to be
indorsed -- on the back -- of the license to practice law in California,
as expressly required by sections 6067 and 6068 of the California
Business and Professions Code:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/cbpc/6067.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/cbpc/6068.htm


These statutes have been thoroughly documented in this pleading:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/contest.ehlers.htm


The front side ONLY of one such "license" is here
and also attached:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/rainmaker/azar/State.Bar.License.1.JPG
http://supremelaw.org/cc/rainmaker/azar/nad.reverse.side.htm  (IN DEFAULT)


A SUBPOENA to The State Bar of California for all such "licenses"
is now IN DEFAULT and that Bar are now IN CONTEMPT of 
this SUBPOENA:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/


Accordingly, as required by 18 U.S.C. 4, all 200,000+ "members"
of The State Bar of California were formally charged here
with multiple State and Federal offenses:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol2/criminal.complaint.4.htm


All "robes" seated on the California Supreme Court and
California Courts of Appeal are likewise IN DEFAULT:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/calcourts/


You are in fact also IN DEFAULT, after my office politely 
requested you to produce PROOF of your certificate of oath:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/usdc-cdca/taitz/nad.oath.htm (IN DEFAULT)


The investigation we are conducting into missing and defective credentials
is being assisted by the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C.
with the full knowledge of the U.S. Marshals Service:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/index.htm  (see letters from DOJ)


See also:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/United.States.Notice.htm


We have not "slandered" you:  we are telling the truth and
have been telling the truth. 

It is YOU are now IN DEFAULT, just like all the other criminal impostors
confirmed by the following carefully assembled MATERIAL EVIDENCE:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm


-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice 

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Orly Taitz <orly.taitz@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't know, who this Paul Mitchell is, but his actions are a total slander and defamation of character.
My license is current, no adverse actions against my license and I am not in default 
Mr. Mitchell owes me an apology
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:17 PM, backflow.prevention@verizon.net <backflow.prevention@verizon.net> wrote:
Click Me!
Guess YOU need to use California Bar Dot Org to verify your information.
  
Apologize perhaps ?  Attorney Taitz is SUPER BUSY right now Paul. 
  
VERIFY YOURSELF OR TAKE ME OFF YOUR E-MAIL LIST !
  
Ralph
Tampa
020513
 
 
 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: 2/3/2013 7:48:11 PM
Subject: [apfn-1] Another Federal Court impostor turns up in Grinols et al. v Obama et al., so does Orly Taitz (no license to practice law in California)

February 20, 2013 in Current Affairs | Permalink