++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« BREAKING Michael Hastings Contacted Lawyer About FBI Investigating him just hours before his death | Main | Hero of the Week »

NOTICE OF REFUSAL FOR CAUSES, BY AFFIDAVIT to Washington State Bar Association

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S." 
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 7:32 PM
Subject: now hyper-linked: NOTICE OF REFUSAL FOR CAUSES, BY AFFIDAVIT to Washington State Bar Association

Now fully hyper-linked:


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Date: Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:51 PM
Subject: NOTICE OF REFUSAL FOR CAUSES, BY AFFIDAVIT to Washington State Bar Association
To: [email protected]
Cc: Mayor McGinn 


TO:       All Personnel
          Washington State Bar Association
          1325 Fourth Avenue, Suite 600
          Seattle 98101-2539
          Washington State, USA
FROM:     Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
          Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
DATE:     June 18, 2013 A.D.
SUBJECT:  unsigned letter dated June 17, 2013 + enclosures
Greetings WSBA Personnel:
I am obligated to return your U.S. Mail postmarked June 17, 2013, for reasons including but not limited to the following:
(1)     the addressee styled “PAUL ANDREW MITCHELL” [sic] is anom de guerre implying a state of war or mixed war against the Undersigned;  warring against the People of the 50 States is defined as treason in the Constitution for the United States of America, and one of the penalties for treason is death;
(2)     as employees of an organization which is required to take note of evidence that past and present members of the Washington State Bar Association have been, and continue to remain, engaged in a pattern of racketeering activities, you can be held civilly liable under 42 U.S.C. 1986 (neglect to prevent / failure to remedy) and criminally liable under 18 U.S.C. 2, 3, 4, and 1962(d) (for starters);
(3)    the attached NOTICE OF MISSING AND/OR DEFECTIVE CREDENTIALS was duly verified on Page 7 of 18 of that pleading;  as such, executive officers of the Washington State government are obligated under 4 U.S.C. 101, at a minimum, to give full faith and credit to such a judicial record, as duly served and filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York;  see Full Faith and Credit Clause in the Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully amended (“U.S. Constitution”);
(4)    federal personnel claiming to occupy the office of full-time U.S. Magistrate Judge must have been members in good standing of a State Bar, in order to be eligible to occupy such an office in the first instance;  among the documents we sent to you were several demands styled NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS as duly mailed to personnel now employed by the U.S. District Court for the District of Washington State (see attached);  each such NOTICE AND DEMAND stated a clear DEMAND FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE and a reasonable deadline for production of a document that is expressly required by the federal statutes at 5 U.S.C. 2906 and 3331 and the Oath of Office Clause at Article VI, Section 3 in the U.S. Constitution;
(5)     the federal Paperwork Reduction Act effectively creates a “Right to Inspect” all such U.S. Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS (“SF-61”) for the existence or absence of valid OMB control numbers and the paragraph at the bottom citing 5 U.S.C. 2903 (Authority to administer);  said NOTICE OF MISSING AND/OR DEFECTIVE CREDENTIALS explains in sufficient detail why the current SF-61 which OPM published on the Internet is fatally defective for displaying no OMB control number and no paragraph at the bottom citing 5 U.S.C. 2903;  moreover, both OPM and OMB have now admitted in writing that OPM has neither requested nor obtained OMB’s approval of the electronic SF-61 which OPM published at its Internet website;
(6)     for your information, very similar infiltration of the Ninth Circuit offices in San Francisco has already been confirmed by the ongoing investigation which my office begancirca 1996;  therefore, your referral to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit strongly suggests that you are either totally ignorant of verified material evidence which has been published and freely available in the Supreme Law Library on the Internet, or you are simply attempting to “pass the buck” in the manner to which most if not all petty bureaucrats have become habituated, whenever they are confronted with material evidence of FELONY criminal conduct and racketeering by members of the “legal profession”;  and,
(7)      as a matter of long-standing policy, my office does NOT accept unsigned letters, particularly when there exists probable cause that said “legal profession” members are, in fact, actively engaged in a combination of protection rackets and extortion rackets e.g. by premeditated acts of felony mail fraud, wire fraud, and a myriad of RICO “predicate acts” itemized at 18 U.S.C. 1961.
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, Private Attorney General, hereby verify under penalty of perjury, under the laws of theUnited States of America, without the “United States” (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, and that all attached documents are true and correct copies of the corresponding originals, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1) (Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the United States are supreme Law of the Land, notwithstanding anything in the Constitution or Laws of Washington State to the contrary.  See Supremacy Clause.)
Dated:   June 18, 2013 A.D.
Signed:  /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Sui Juris
         Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)

June 19, 2013 in Current Affairs | Permalink