« Daniel Ellsberg: Edward Snowden Was Right To Leave The U.S. | Main | LIBERTY DOLLAR NEWS: June 2013 Vol. 15 No. 06 »
Private Attorney General in USA requests leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief at Supreme Court of Ireland
How the US Government Stole $23 Trillion from the American People
___
SHARE THIS
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S."
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 12:26 PM
Subject: Private Attorney General in USA requests leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief at Supreme Court of Ireland
From: "Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S."
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 12:26 PM
Subject: Private Attorney General in USA requests leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief at Supreme Court of Ireland
Judgment Title: The Attorney General -v- Snowden
Neutral Citation: [2013] IEHC 308
High Court Record Number: 2013 168 EXT
Date of Delivery: 07/06/2013
Court: High Court
Composition of Court:
Judgment by: Mac Eochaidh J.
Greetings Justice Mac Eochaidh:Neutral Citation: [2013] IEHC 308
High Court Record Number: 2013 168 EXT
Date of Delivery: 07/06/2013
Court: High Court
Composition of Court:
Judgment by: Mac Eochaidh J.
My late mother was born in New York City of Irish immigrants,
so I truly enjoy Irish blood that still courses thru my heart.
so I truly enjoy Irish blood that still courses thru my heart.
Mr. Eric H. Holder, Jr., my office is now proceeding as the
purposes and until further notice.
respectfully requests leave of your Honorable Supreme Court
to enter our letter below to President Putin, by way of filing same
as a formal Amicus Curiae Brief (see below).
all questions to us via email here, and we will do our best to answer
as promptly as humanly possible:
Thank you very much for your professional consideration.
Attachment: letter to Pres. Putin, June 26, 2013 A.D. (see below)
--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 7:37 PM
Subject: Private Attorney General writes to Russian Pres. Putin concerning Edward Snowden
c/o Embassy of the Russian Federation
to the United States of America
2650 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
Washington 20007
District of Columbia, USA
Greetings Your Excellency:
I am writing to make your Embassy in Washington, D.C.,
aware of specific reasons why the U.S. Department of Justice
in Washington, D.C., is definitely violating its own laws in the
case of Mr. Edward Snowden and in many similar
"criminal" cases:
(1) the United States (federal government) is presently
unable to assemble a lawful Federal grand jury and also
unable to assemble a lawful Federal trial jury, because
of well documented discrimination against Citizens of
the United States of America: for details please see:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/opening.htm#topic-a
(2) the U.S. Department of Justice is also historically
habituated to bringing criminal charges on behalf
of a bogus and fraudulent "plaintiff" by the name of
"UNITED STATES OF AMERICA": for details please see:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/ (revoked)
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.corp/ (revoked)
http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/barber/nom.de.guerre.defined.htm
(3) a large percentage of current "employees" of the
United States (federal government) have signed
COUNTERFEIT credentials, because the Office of
Personnel Management Standard Form 61 is now
confirmed to violate the U.S. Paperwork Reduction Act
-- by failing to display a valid OMB control number:
for details please see:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/United.States.Notice.htm
(4) of equal importance, U.S. District Courts have been
rendered effectively IMPOTENT because their employees
claiming to occupy the offices of "Clerk of Court" and
"Deputy Clerk of Court" do NOT have custody of their
own OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS; therefore,
those Courts cannot issue any "process" -- such as
routine Court "orders" -- without violating the U.S.
statute at 28 U.S.C. 1691:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1691.html
http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/
http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/28usc1691.case.law.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/28usc1691.case.law.2.htm
In this context, see also 5 U.S.C. 2906 (custody of SF-61):
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2906.html
--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 7:37 PM
Subject: Private Attorney General writes to Russian Pres. Putin concerning Edward Snowden
Hon. Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin
President, The Russian Federationto the United States of America
2650 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
Washington 20007
District of Columbia, USA
in Washington, D.C., is definitely violating its own laws in the
case of Mr. Edward Snowden and in many similar
"criminal" cases:
unable to assemble a lawful Federal grand jury and also
unable to assemble a lawful Federal trial jury, because
of well documented discrimination against Citizens of
the United States of America: for details please see:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/opening.htm#topic-a
habituated to bringing criminal charges on behalf
of a bogus and fraudulent "plaintiff" by the name of
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/ (revoked)
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.corp/ (revoked)
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/barber/nom.de.guerre.defined.htm
COUNTERFEIT credentials, because the Office of
Personnel Management Standard Form 61 is now
confirmed to violate the U.S. Paperwork Reduction Act
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/United.States.Notice.htm
rendered effectively IMPOTENT because their employees
claiming to occupy the offices of "Clerk of Court" and
own OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS; therefore,
routine Court "orders" -- without violating the U.S.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1691.html
http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/
http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/28usc1691.case.law.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/28usc1691.case.law.2.htm
(5) And, we also have confirmed documentary evidence
calling for the conclusions that U.S. Attorneys and
Assistant U.S. Attorneys are being BRIBED to the tune
of $25,000 USD per indictment and $25,000 USD per conviction
of such "whistleblowers", "tax protesters" and other
"enemies of the state" [sic]: for details, please
see "The Kickback Racket":
http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/kickback.htm
calling for the conclusions that U.S. Attorneys and
Assistant U.S. Attorneys are being BRIBED to the tune
of $25,000 USD per indictment and $25,000 USD per conviction
of such "whistleblowers", "tax protesters" and other
"enemies of the state" [sic]: for details, please
see "The Kickback Racket":
http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/kickback.htm
(6) Mr. Eric H. Holder, Jr.'s OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
are also COUNTERFEIT credentials:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/affidavit.refused.JPG
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/affidavit.GIF
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/affidavit.refused.JPG
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/affidavit.GIF
In a word, the U.S. DOJ is no longer a Department of Justice
but truly a Department of Just US!
but truly a Department of Just US!
If my office can clarify any of the points summarized above,
please extend our promise to answer promptly any and all
questions transmitted to us by your Embassy in Washington, D.C.
please extend our promise to answer promptly any and all
questions transmitted to us by your Embassy in Washington, D.C.
Thank you very much for your consideration, Pres. Putin.
--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
Related:
---
---
---
---
---
Russian President Vladimir Putin has said bilateral relations with the US are more important than "squabbles between special services".
Ex-NSA Stewart Baker Testifies at Oversight Hearing on the Administration's use of FISA Authorities
July 10, 2013 in Current Affairs | Permalink
