Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Syria chemical weapon false flag uncovered by Yahoo! News in January | Main | Video Footage of ‘Chemical Weapons Attack’ Uploaded Before it Happened? »

Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys can not represent the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Re: DOJ Attorneys can not represent the UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN [sic]

>  Can the UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN be represented by an attorney?
In your original Subject: line, you mentioned "United States".
I think you meant "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA".
If so, the answer is NO:  that corporation was revoked TWICE 
by the Delaware Secretary of State, and it never registered
to do business in any of the other States where we checked:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.corp/
http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/
Try contacting the Secretary of State in your State:
their website may have an on-line registry of 
corporations registered to do business in that State.
One of these phantom corporations was actually
chartered in Scotland:
http://supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/THE.UNITED.STATES.OF.AMERICA.LIMITED.JPG
> However I will like to know if "18 means Title 18, 
> 241 means Section 241" are federal Laws 
Yes. Title 18 was reportedly revised, codified and enacted into positive
law on June 25, 1948:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18
This title was enacted by act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, § 1, 62 Stat. 683
>  Some activists argue that the House and Senate
actually voted on two different versions of that Title, but 
my office has not been retained to investigate those arguments.
18 U.S.C. 241 is here on the Internet:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/241.html
>  and lawfully binding all States.
Yes:  as an Act of Congress it is supreme Law 
pursuant to the Supremacy Clause at Article VI, Section 2.

>  You explain about USA.
Yes:
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/reply.to.brief.for.appellee.htm
> If the case is UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  V- JOHN DOE. 
> All caps is a "corporation". 
No.  ALL CAPS indicate a "nom de guerre" (war name, in French):
http://supremelaw.org/cc/barber/nom.de.guerre.defined.htm
>  Which also, Corporations can not sign power of attorney. 
>  Therefore the charges will be fraud.
Correct.  
The U.S. DOJ in particular have no powers of attorney
legally to represent corporations chartered in any of the 50 States,
even if they are in good standing. 
All the more so is this true when a "foreign" corporation
was chartered in one of the 50 States but then revoked
by that State's Secretary of State.
Such "willful misrepresentation" is indirectly prohibited
by the McDade Act at 28 U.S.C. 530B:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/530B.html
(U.S. Attorneys must obey all State Bar disciplinary guidelines
in each State where they are stationed)
Corporations chartered in the 50 States are legally "foreign"
with respect to the District of Columbia:
http://supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chaptr11.htm
Hope this helps.
 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Niurka Encarnacion <niurkaslim@gmail.com>
To: paulandrewmitchell2004@yahoo.com 
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 8:46 PM
Subject: DOJ Attorneys can not represent the United States

Can the UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN be represented by an attorney?
I read your information. However I will like to know if "18 means
Title 18, 241 means Section 241" are federal Laws and lawfully binding
all States.

You explain about USA.

If the case is UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  V-    JOHN DOE. All caps is
a "corporation". Which also, Corporations can not sign power of
attorney. Therefore the charges will be fraud.


Am I correct?

Thank you in advance.

Best regards,
Niurka

August 24, 2013 in Current Affairs | Permalink