Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Private Attorney General and Inventor Comments Re: "Rambus Loses Major Antitrust Case against Hynix and Micron": Comment dated: Thursday, September 26, 2013 | Main | D.C. Delegate's Voicemail: "Where's My Bribe?" (Please FORWARD to the FBI in the District of Columbia) »

Gutter_Sludge = (Computer Technology + Corrupt Attorneys + Intensified Global Surveillance) ^ 3

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S."
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:53 PM
Subject: Gutter_Sludge = (Computer Technology + Corrupt Attorneys + Intensified Global Surveillance) ^ 3

http://www.jurinspired.com/cases/micron-v-rambus-spoliation

http://www.flhlaw.com/files/Uploads/Documents/Hackman%20Article%20%2801325419%29.PDF

http://www.ilsteamblog.com/2013/01/on-remand-court-explaines-findings-and-sanction-in-rambus-v-micron/


On Remand, Court Explains Findings and Sanction 

in Rambus v. Micron

Our last blog reviewed the ongoing patent litigation case Micron v. Rambus, Civ. No. 00-792-SLR (D. Del.), where the findings of bad faith and prejudice, as well as the sanction, were vacated. 

On remand, what did the court decide?

 
To find bad faith, the court must find the spoliating party “intended to impair the ability of the potential defendant to defend itself.” 

Thus, did Rambus implement its document retention policy to disadvantage Micron, or was it for legitimate business reasons?

Pursuant to its new policy, 1269 of 1270 back up email tapes and 400 boxes of documents were destroyed to prepare for the litigation.


...

After a review of the facts as applied to the three goals of sanctions for evidence spoliation discussed in our last blog, the court considered the lesser sanctions including monetary fines, adverse jury instruction and evidence suppression. 

As those lesser sanctions were not enough to achieve the goals of the sanction in this case, the court dismissed Rambus’ claims against Micron.



[end quote]


Plus, take note of all the UNlicensed California ATTORNeys 
who pounced like parasites on this intellectual property litigation:



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.<supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:30 PM
Subject: Fwd: Rambus was represented by ...


http://www.law360.com/articles/229465/semiconductor-cos-want-rambus-ip-claims-stayed


Micron is represented by Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP. 

Hynix is represented by O'Melveny & Myers LLP and Townsend & Townsend & Crew LLP. 

Nanya is represented by Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.<supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: Rambus was represented by ...
To: "Paul A. Mitchell" <mrfsys@gmail.com>


The case is Rambus v. Micron, case number 06-CV-244
in the U.S. District Court for the District of Northern California.

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/whyte.ronald/
http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/whyte.ronald/nad.certificate.htm  (IN DEFAULT)
 


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.<supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:24 PM
Subject: Rambus was represented by ...


Rambus was represented by:


Munger Tolles & Olson LLP

Los Angeles

355 South Grand Ave.
35th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Phone: (213) 683-9100

San Francisco

560 Mission St.
27th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: (415) 512-4000


Sidley Austin LLP

Los Angeles

555 West Fifth Street
Los Angeles, CA 90013
+1.213.896.6000
+1.213.896.6600 Fax

Palo Alto

1001 Page Mill Road
Building 1
Palo Alto, CA 94304
+1.650.565.7000
+1.650.565.7100 Fax

San Francisco

555 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
+1.415.772.1200
+1.415.772.7400 Fax


McKool Smith PC

Los Angeles

865 South Figueroa St.
Suite 2900
Los Angeles, CA 90017
T: 213.694.1200
F: 213.694.1234

Redwood Shores

255 Shoreline Drive
Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
T: 650.394.1400


-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

September 29, 2013 in Current Affairs | Permalink