Private Attorney General and Inventor Comments Re: "Rambus Loses Major Antitrust Case against Hynix and Micron": Comment dated: Thursday, September 26, 2013

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul A. Mitchell <mrfsys@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM
Subject: 
Private Attorney General and Inventor Comments 
Re: "Rambus Loses Major Antitrust Case against Hynix and Micron": 
Comment dated: Thursday, September 26, 2013
To: support@rambus.com

http://www.anandtech.com/show/5122/rambus-loses-major-antitrust-case-again-hynix-micron


Sorry to jump in so late:  

one key FACT which is being entirely overlooked by most if not all observers of the Rambus saga is the abject criminality of all California attorneys:  

extensive research has proven that not one of the 200,000+ past or present "members" of The State Bar of California has ever had a valid license to practice law in that State.  

[ http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol2/criminal.complaint.4.htm ]

See Sec. 6067 of the State Bar Act, for starters.  

Moreover, all U.S. Attorneys stationed anywhere in California are obligated by the McDade Act to have executed the same certificate of oath.  

[ http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/530B.html ]

Conclusion:  every attorney that appeared formally for any of those Proper Parties committed multiple acts of FELONY mail fraud (see PROOFS OF SERVICE) and multiple acts of FELONY wire fraud (e.g. every time they transmitted email or picked up the telephone).  


There were also comments above about "DOJ's Opinion":  

well, those Federal employees are now turning up in droves with fatally defective credentials, as proven by the obvious absence of OMB control numbers and other fatal defectives on their Office of Personnel Management SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS required by 5 U.S.C. 2906 and 3331.  

[ http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/ ]

Hey, folks, I didn't make these laws;  Congress did!  

WAKE UP, California, because the global surveillance "state" is now in your face, and the ATTORNeys are still laughing all the way to the banks who "bankrolled" that R&D.  


p.s. Anand knows nothing about any of this, and I doubt that he even cares.  

Someone should invite him to post a reply here.  

I can't wait: 

one of his employees once accused me falsely of posting pornography on the Internet, but our homepage had been hacked with JAVA malware after a confidential password was stolen from my INBOX.  

Gloves are now OFF here:  I LUV a good fight.  

Now you know why I moved to Seattle.

[end]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul A. Mitchell <mrfsys@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:05 PM
Subject: Recommending that you terminate Julie A. Hopper, for pissing on a multi-million dollar opportunity
To: support@rambus.com

And you call that "public relations"?  NOT!!

(1 million units @ $150.00 MSRP = can your "smart" phones handle this one??  I seriously doubt it.)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul A. Mitchell <mrfsys@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:49 PM
Subject: Fwd: We are not requesting anything from the Rambus Foundation + clarification of our intent
To: support@rambus.com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul A. Mitchell <mrfsys@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: We are not requesting anything from the Rambus Foundation + clarification of our intent
To: "Julie A. Hopper" <JAHopper@siliconvalleycf.org>

That's a really lousy policy, Ms. Hopper.

It's no wonder that DDR SDRAM trounced Rambus worldwide.

You can tell your "Execs" exactly how I feel.

If you can't show respect for an IT professional with 40+ years 
of experience, then whom do you respect?  The NSA?

p.s.  There are no "licensed" attorneys anywhere in California,
and one of your main offices is in California:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/aol2/criminal.complaint.4.htm

So, ask your company "attorneys" to show you their licenses!  

LOL!!

It's no wonder this country is in such bad shape.

-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul A. Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Instructor,
Inventor and Systems Development Consultant

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice 

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Julie A. Hopper<JAHopper@siliconvalleycf.org> wrote:

Hi Paul, 

In line with my previous email, we do not provide any sort of unsolicited information to Rambus or its executives.

 

Thank you,

 

Julie Hopper

Corporate Philanthropy Manager

Silicon Valley Community Foundation

650.450.5538  | jahopper@siliconvalleycf.org

 

From: Paul A. Mitchell [mailto:mrfsys@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:54 AM
To: Julie A. Hopper
Subject: We are not requesting anything from the Rambus Foundation + clarification of our intent

 

Thank you, Ms. Hopper,

We're not requesting anything from the Rambus Foundation.

We are interested in requesting a Letter of Interest ("LOI")

and/or a Preliminary Quotation to finish the R&D
and manufacture a working prototype for our
utility patent pending.

If you would kindly refer us to the appropriate
Rambus Executive(s), we would appreciate it very much.

We are particularly desirous of knowing if Rambus

has adopted any plans to develop Non-Volatile DRAM.

 

For example, compare spin-torque MRAM e.g. 
http://www.everspin.com/PDF/ST-MRAM_Technical_Brief.pdf

 

Thank you very much, once again, for your time.

-- 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul A. Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Instructor,
Inventor and Systems Development Consultant

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Julie A. Hopper <JAHopper@siliconvalleycf.org> wrote:

Hi Paul,

Thank you for your emails. As practice, we do not provide unsolicited proposals to Rambus Foundation.

 

Thank you for your time,

 

 

Julie Hopper

Corporate Philanthropy Manager

Silicon Valley Community Foundation

650.450.5538  | jahopper@siliconvalleycf.org

 

[snipped]

  

--