Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Why is globalresearch.ca 403, every single page forbidden? | Main | Sign up for Email listserve for JFK assassination-related news with "Treefrog" »

Q&A Re: NOTICE OF INVOICE AND DEMAND FOR PAYMENT payable to the Treasury of the United States, minus the Management Fee

On Monday, December 9, 2013 9:47 PM, "Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S."  wrote:

1.) What were the underlying causes related to filing against the California State BAR, its members and officers. Why California, and how does this impact other of the several states in actions that would bring about the same results?
 
When I commenced my copyright and trademark infringement lawsuit
against 129 named defendants, the Office of Clerk of Court issued
several SUBPOENAs to the attorneys who did initially appear:
 
All of those initial attorneys refused to produce valid licenses to practice law
in the State of California:
 
 
 
One of them tried to argue his way out of the requirements
imposed on him by Sections 6067 and 6068 of the
California Business and Professions Code:  I carefully
refuted his claims as follows:
 
 
 
2.) What, if any responses have been received by the CA BAR, et al., or Secretary of the Treasury?
 
There is presently no lawful Secretary of the Treasury, because 
both Geithner and Lew have turned up with COUNTERFEIT credentials:
 


 


Later, we served The State Bar of California with a comprehensive SUBPOENA,
and their correspondence was promptly REFUSED for failing to produce
ANY valid certificates of oath that must be indorsed upon the back of all
licenses to practice law.  The folder containing the documents related
to that SUBPOENA are here:
 
 
 
3.) Is there any lawful court which could hear the matter of the unlicensed attorneys practicing "as if" in California; is this not a a massive conspiracy of collusion? What is the evidence that would compel a lawful proceeding----OR, are the facts, as entered, a default admission of guilt by virtue of failure to respond?
 
Because the entire "legal system" in California appears to be compromised
by these numerous impostors, many of whom have infiltrated both State and
Federal Courts, it's nearly impossible to commence an impartial proceeding
anywhere in the State of California.
 
Yes, it is a massive conspiracy -- chiefly to infringe rights guaranteed by the
Constitution, such as the Oath of Office Clause as implemented by several
State and Federal statutes e.g. 4 U.S.C. 101, 5 U.S.C. 3331, etc.
 
The evidence is the failure by all 200,000+ "members" to produce ANY
evidence of a complete, valid license to practice law;  after doing this investigation
for NINE YEARS, we received ONE-HALF of one such license, and it was
the front side only, not the back side where the certificate of oath must
be "indorsed":  "in dorso" in Latin means "on the back" as when indorsing
a standard bank check:
 
 
Notice the huge overlap between missing licenses and the Federal "robes"
in California who are directly affected -- because they were also registered
as "members" of The State Bar of California:
 
 
 
Later, we confronted all California Appellate and California Supreme Court "robes"
and they ALL failed to produce valid licenses, even though they too were also
registered as "members":
 
 
 
4.) What are the procedures already in place to recall "damaged FRNs", please elaborate on where this action would originate, and the proposed mechanism (i.e.-recall of outstanding notes, replacement of present fiat notes.  (re:http://supremelaw.org/cc/bep/memo.recall.program.htm) ?
 
U.S. Bureau of Engraving and Printing in Washington, D.C.,
assisted by Federal law enforcement officers e.g. Secret Service,
U.S. Marshals, etc.
 
My Proposal to the Director of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing
gets into some of the functional details which we believe would
make this recall simple and straightforward:
 
 
 
And, here is a template letter which Americans can write and
send to their State Governors:
 
 
 
A worldwide recall of all FRNs has more than symbolic value
because Americans are presently required to pay interest
on all FRNs in circulation;  however, those interest payments
are now legally BARRED by the AUTOMATIC STAY authorized
by11 U.S.C. 362 and the DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY
filed by the United States in a U.S. Bankruptcy Court here:
 
 
 
All Federal Reserve Banks are presently IN CONTEMPT
of that AUTOMATIC STAY:
 
 
 
5.) Where can one find a record of the filing of the United States Declaration of Insolvency? What entity is represented as "bankrupt": the de jure Constitutional united States of America, or the corporation known as UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, domiciled in Washington, D.C.?
 
See above for a link to the DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY etc.
 
The bankrupt entity is the "United States" i.e. the Federal Government
domiciled in Washington, D.C., with standing to sue and be sued
conferred by 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1346.


The "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" did incorporate twice as such in Delaware,
but both corporations were subsequently revoked by the Delaware Secretary of State;
also, neither corporation ever registered to do business in any of the other States
where we checked:
 
http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/  (e.g. New York = locus of The Conspiracy)


There is a lot of mythology circulating on the Internet
claiming -- falsely -- that the Federal government is a corporation;
we refuted that myth numerous times already e.g.:
 
 
... and quite formally here at the U.S. Court of Appeals:
 
 
 
6.) What is the standing of present fiat bankers and their Federal Reserve Shell Corp's, acting "as if" legal guarantors of the present currency? Does the formation of State banks effectively end the Federal Reserve System, and return legitimate power to the BOE? What is the role of the U.S. Treasury, which, is my understanding, is also a PRIVATE CORPORATION?
 
They are in contempt of the AUTOMATIC STAY invoked formally
at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Washington (State),
and they are also implicated in a conspiracy to engage in a pattern of
racketeering activities, due in large part to all of the fraud which their collection
agency -- the IRS -- has been committing via fraudulent enforcement
of a "liability" for IRC subtitle A which does NOT exist, as a matter of FACT:
 
 
 
 
Even if it were a de jure service, bureau, office or other subdivision
of the U.S. Department of the Treasury -- the one domiciled in Washington, D.C. --
the IRS would STILL have no authority to create a tax liability solely by means
of Regulations published in the Federal Register:  seeCommissioner v. Acker:
 
 
 
IRS is now what was left over of "The Untouchables" after alcohol Prohibition
was repealed by the Twenty-First Amendment:  see U.S. v. Constantine.
 
Prohibition was secretly financed by the petroleum cartel, in order to
perfect a monopoly in automotive fuels.
 
 
 
7.) What is the proposed backing of any such currency issued through the State Banks by the BOE? Would there be a movement to asset-based currency, i.e. precious metals/commodity backed money, vs. the present toxic system of recycled debt notes churned through the financial markets at home and abroad?
 
The recall program we have proposed should be viewed as an "interim" measure,
until such time as all circulating U.S. Notes can be redeemed in gold or silver specie.
 
We anticipate a simple Act of Congress which renders them redeemable
as soon as the Treasury of the United States can execute such redemptions
with a realistic guarantee of performance.
 
FRNs have been redeemable for a long time, by the Federal Reserve Banks
have flatly refused to honor the laws which render FRNs redeemable.
 
Dr. Edwin J. Vieira, Jr. explained the importance of redemption in this lecture:
 
 
 
 
8.) What is the enforcement mechanism for the collection of the $8.6 TRILLION funds from the named parties? Would we expect to see movements to protect assets, utilize off-shore shelters, or any types of "legal dodge" to prevent seizure of assets, and how would this be addressed?
 
This is where things get very sticky, because of the intense politics
associated with the funds embezzled from the Pentagon.
 
You should know that my office has already requested the Joint Chiefs of Staff
to pursue the passenger manifest of the full El Al Boeing 747 that departed JFK
at 4:11 PM on 9/11/2001, destination David Ben Gurion International Airport
in Tel Aviv:  that jet appeared to be the "getaway vehicle" for a plane full of
9/11 co-conspirators:  its departure was assisted by U.S. Military ground crews
in violation of the grounding order issued earlier that day by Secretary of
Transportation Norman Mineta.
 
 
In the main, a large chunk of funds disappeared when $2.3 TRILLION USD
were embezzled from the Pentagon prior to 9/11/2001:
 
the forensic accountants who were reconstructing that crime
were housed in offices adjacent to the Naval Command Center,
most of those accountants perished on 9/11, and much of
their evidence was intentionally destroyed by the hit on the Pentagon.
 
Nevertheless, not all such evidence was destroyed, and my office
"followed the money" long enough to identify one key suspect and
his Principal:
 
 
When both he and his Principal fell silent, that INVOICE went into DEFAULT.
 
 
The funds payable by all 200,000 California State Bar members
can come from their professional liability insurance contracts;
or, if some of them failed to maintain such liability insurance,
the $9 Million will need to be paid from their private estates.
 
If they can't pay that amount from their private estates,
then they can go to Federal prison:  that's how the
United States views the $9 Million liability owed to the
U.S. Treasury by each of those 200,000 "members" who
never had valid licenses to practice law.
 
The $60,000 Management Fee payable to me by each
such "member" is negotiable:  for example, I can anticipate
selling my right to each such amount to someone who has
already been damaged by one of those UNlicensed attorneys.
 
Just today, for example, an article published in the Washington Post
disclosed a predatory attorney who is using foreclosure
proceedings on struggling Americans, after paying
their overdue property taxes in the District of Columbia:
 
since he never had a license to practice law in California,
the parties he has damaged now have a lot of leverage
to apply again him, e.g. for mail fraud, wire fraud, and bank fraud.
 
It may be wise for me to "assign" each $60,000 account receivable
to one or more of such damaged parties, for a modest handling
fee e.g. $500.  Even that amount is negotiable, depending the
the damaged parties' ability to pay that amount.
 
I understand that some of this predator's victims were forced from their homes!
 
 
 
9.) Please explain your role as the Manager of the triple damage multiplier funds, and how you would interface with the BEP, U.S. Treasury, and State Banks. Also, what time table would we expect in the adoption of your proposals through the remaining 49 states, upon adoption by the initial State Bank? Does this require new legislation to implement across multiple states?
 
No one was doing anything about the $2.3 TRILLION USD
which Donald Rumsfeld admitted was missing, at a
Pentagon Press Conference on 9/10/2001 (the day before 9/11).
 
As part of the pro bono work I did for U.S. Coast Guard Investigations
in San Diego, we investigated many facets of that mass murder: 
 
one of those facets was the motive for hitting the Naval Command
Center in the manner with which it was attacked:  the hit on the WTC
triggered an emergency meeting of Naval Commanders at the
Naval Command Center, and they were sitting ducks for the incoming
AGM's depleted uranium warhead, and heavily modified A-3 Skywarrior
filled with TNT and jet fuel, that both crashed into those offices
in the Pentagon's "E" Ring.
 
So, I stepped in as Private Attorney General legally representing
the United States "ex rel." -- as I have done previously many times.
 
 
There are ways in which Israel's debt to the United States
could be "monetized" e.g. by way of forgiving major portions
of that debt, in exchange for selling convertible bonds in open markets
at major stock exchanges, like the New York Stock Exchange,
Hong Kong Stock Exchange, New Zealand Stock Exchange,
etc.
 
When I wrote to the S.E.C. with this idea, they ignored my letters,
and so did the Washington State Attorney General's office:
 
 
 
I have written up a rudimentary demonstration of how that
"monetizing" could be implemented, but to date the
numbers I've used -- as example cash flows -- are not
readily understood by the average American.
 
If you wanted to do some homework on this concept,
Google "convertible bonds" and/or "convertible debentures".
 
 
Although your question about timetables is excellent,
I have no particular timetables in mind, at this time.
 
And, yes, we do anticipate needing additional legislation,
particularly in States where no State Banks are currently operating.
 
For example, I have no personal need for all of the
funds that would be credited to my own private account
in each State Bank.  And, for that reason, I intend to
work with State Government officials and State Bank officials
to identify the most beneficial ways to utilize all that money
for the public good.
 
 
 
10.) How would the "average American" benefit from your proposal, and what actions would be required to educate the "public", to advance acceptance of this new system?
 
Lots of ways, and actually too many to enumerate here,
or to mention here.
 
The average American needs to understand that:
 
(a)  they have no legal obligation to pay Federal income taxes;
 
(b)  interest payments have been payable on all FRNs in circulation;
 
(c)  the AUTOMATIC STAY now prohibits the FED banks from
collecting any more of those interest payments;
 
(d)  compensating Federal employees with United States Notes
will provide a functional vehicle by which FRNs can be "driven out"
of circulation, in conjunction with a well advertised government
program of recalling all FRNs during a reasonable transition period;
 
(e)  a lot of education will be required, and you are already
demonstrating excellent leadership by airing an open discussion
about all of these issues;
 
(f)  if Americans will focus on replacing all FRNs with U.S. Notes,
along with that focus they can and should understand that
halting a substantial amount of interest payments on the
Federal debt will help the entire economy in major ways;
 
(g)  there are a multitude of second- and third-order effects
such as voiding all currently recorded NOTICES OF FEDERAL TAX LIEN
because none of those was ever preceded by procedurally proper
ASSESSMENTS -- due chiefly to the absence of any liability STATUTE;
IRS cannot satisfy IRC 6065 without committing FELONY perjury!
 
 
(h)  ultimately, this Proposal contemplates total abolition of
the Federal Reserve System and the Internal Revenue Service,
at the same time:  I doubt that the average American will oppose
abolition of the IRS, but the need to abolish the Federal Reserve
System at the same time will need further explanation:
 
there are plenty of good resources which already explain
the need to abolish the FED:  cf. Bill Still's work on YouTube,
as one excellent example;  there are many other good examples.
 
I hope this helps.
 
 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
 


On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Randy Maugans<randy.maugans@gmail.com> wrote:
That was timely. I just drafted my 10 Questions for you. This actually informs one aspect of the questions. I have also begun promotion of the show on Friday. The details are online at:http://offplanetmedia.net. Please post out to your groups and lists. Sorry for the slowness on my part—I am still healing up slowly.
 
See below:
 
10 Questions Related to: statutory damages for racketeering (http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/invoice.1.htm)
(actually more than 10, but I attempted to "cluster" certain concepts in order to get a "flow" of information that will be useful for our discussion)
 
1.) What were the underlying causes related to filing against the California State BAR, its memebers and officers. Why California, and how does this impact other of the several states in actions that would bring about the same results?
 
2.)What, if any responses have been received by the CA BAR, et. al, or Secretary of the Treasury? 
 
3.) Is there any lawful court which could hear the matter of the unlicenced attorneys practicing "as if" in California; is this not a a massive conspiracy of collusion? What is the evidence that would compel a lawful proceeding----OR, are the facts, as entered, a default admission of guilt by virtue of failure to respond?
 
4.) What are the procedures already in place to recalll "damaged FRNS", please elaborate on where this action would originate, and the proposed mechanism (i.e.-recall of outstanding notes, replacement of present fiat notes.  (re:http://supremelaw.org/cc/bep/memo.recall.program.htm) ?
 
5.) Where can one find a record of the filing of the United States Declaration of Insolvency? What entity is represented as "bankrupt": the dejure Constitutional united States of America, or the corporation known as UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, domiciled in Washington, D.C.? 
 
6.)What is the standing of present fiat bankers and their Federal Reserve Shell Corp.s, acting "as if" legal guarantors of the present currency? Does the formation of State banks effectively end the Federal Reserve System, and return legitimate power to the BOE? What is the role of the U.S. Treasury, which, is my understanding, is also a PRIVATE CORPORATION? 
 
7.) What is the proposed backing of any such currency issued through the State Banks by the BOE? Would there be a movement to asset-based currency, i.e.- precious metals/commodity backed money, vs. the present toxic system of recycled debt notes churned through the financial markets at home and abroad?
 
8.) What is the enforcement mechanism for the collection of the $8.6 TRILLION funds from the named parties? Would we expect to see movements to protect assets, utilize off-shore shelters, or any types of "legal dodge" to prevent seizure of assets, and how would this be addressed?
 
9.) Please explain your role as the Manager of the triple damage multiplier funds, and how you would interface with the BEP, U.S. Treasury, and State Banks. Also, what time table would we expect in the adoption of your proposals through the remaining 49 states, upon adoption by the initial State Bank? Does this require new legislation to implement across multiople states?
 
10.) How would the "average American" benefit from your proposal, and what actions would be required to educate the "public", to advance acceptance of this new system?

On December 9, 2013 at 6:02:14 PM, Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (supremelawfirm@gmail.com) wrote:
Re: 
one example of implementing the INVOICE
to all "members" of The State Bar of California:


http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2013/12/08/debt-collecting-machine/

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/12/09/predatory-tax-lien-buyer-spreading-misery-across-us-but-whos-behind-it/


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:58 PM
Subject: NOTICE OF INVOICE AND DEMAND FOR PAYMENT payable to the Treasury of the United States, minus the Management Fee
To: mschwartz@williamsparker.com


You are hereby served with ACTUAL NOTICE that
you now owe the Treasury of the United States
a minimum of $9,000,000.00 USD ($3 Million x 3)
minus our Management Fee ($60,000 USD), as follows:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/invoice.1.htm


Please have your professional liability insurance underwriter
contact my office via email here, to commence settlement negotiations.

My office has no authority to negotiate any changes in the principal amount
owed to the Treasury of the United States, however.
 
 
Bcc:  The Washington PostBusiness Desk and National Desk;  other interested party(s)

--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

December 10, 2013 in Current Affairs | Permalink