« Transcript of 'The Enemy Within' Norman Dodd interview by Dr. Stan Monteith circa 1980s on Radio Liberty | Main | "A Closer Look at LBJ" by Lyle Sardie (1998 rare documentary) now up on YouTube! »
Re: Federal law says you CAN opt out of Obamacare and CAN NOT be penalized if you do
In re: http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/01/09/federal-law-says-can-opt-obamacare-can-penalized/
-
-
Jessie Jones says:
Say and I quote “No individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such amendments), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs.”
The very first words says NO INDIVIDUAL, <—–note the coma means that's the end of that statement. You sir are incorrect on your statement, please leave the stage.
-
rbodell says:
an insurance salesperson is an individual. Thank you for confirming my post but it was not necessary.
-
Juan V says:
___
6. What is the standing of present fiat bankers and their Federal Reserve Shell Corp’s, acting “as if” legal guarantors of the present currency? Does the formation of State banks effectively end the Federal Reserve System, and return legitimate power to the BOE? What is the role of the U.S. Treasury, which is, my understanding, is also a PRIVATE CORPORATION?
They are in contempt of the AUTOMATIC STAY invoked formally at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Washington (State), and they are also implicated in a conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activities, due in large part to all of the fraud which their collection agency — the IRS — has been committing via fraudulent enforcement of a “liability” for IRC subtitle A which does NOT exist, as a matter of FACT:
http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/subpoena.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.estopped.htm
Even if it were a de jure service, bureau, office or other subdivision of the U.S. Department of the Treasury — the one domiciled in Washington, D.C. — the IRS would STILL have no authority to create a tax liability solely by means of Regulations published in the Federal Register: see Commissioner v. Acker:
http://supremelaw.org/sls/2amjur2d.htm
http://supremelaw.org/sls/2amjur2d.gif
IRS is now what was left over of “The Untouchables” after alcohol Prohibition was repealed by the Twenty-First Amendment: see U.S. v. Constantine.
Prohibition was secretly financed by the petroleum cartel, in order to perfect a monopoly in automotive fuels.
___
Constitution, citizens, and the united states; an interview with Paul Andrew Mitchell
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2013/10/paul-andrew-mitchell-constitution-citizens-and-the-united-states.html___
DOA: The Federal Income Tax Officially DIED today (3/27/2007) at 13:53:58 PDT
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2007/03/doa_the_federal.html___
31 Questions and Answers about
the Internal Revenue Service
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm -
Re: 07-2017 clarification
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2012/09/re-07-2017-clarification.html
-
-
-
Related: 42 U.S.C. 18115 - Freedom not to participate in Federal health insurance programs [sic] http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/01/42-usc-18115-freedom-not-to-participate-in-federal-health-insurance-programs-sic.html
-
January 16, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink
That is the same as this, read it over, it says those who OFFER insurance are exempt. Not the individual.