Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Objections and Possible Settlement(s) / FROM: 44202086 – MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL* – Unit: SET-D-C * given name (also a “nom de guerre”) | Main | 2014 BILDERBERG OFFICIAL ATTENDEES LIST RELEASED »

Complaint against Mr. Mark Hardee | RE: proceeding In Propria Persona, not “Pro Se” and not “represented” / TRULINCS 44202086 – MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL* – Unit: SET-D-C * given name


           * given name



FROM: 44202086

TO: Brown, Thomas; Guenette, Edward; Mullen, Jack; Saccato, Larry

SUBJECT: Complaint against Mr. Mark Hardee

DATE: 05/11/2014 07:46:31 PM



Wyoming State Bar

P.O. Box 109

Cheyenne 82003

Wyoming, USA


RE: proceeding In Propria Persona, not “Pro Se” and not “represented”


Greetings Wyoming State Bar:


Please supplement my formal Complaint against attorney Mark Hardee

with all of the following:


I am writing to explain, once again, and to all whom it may concern,

that I have been proceeding In Propria Persona, not “Pro Se” and

not “represented by” any licensed attorney(s).


“Se” is a neuter Latin pronoun which means “it” in English. Thus,

“Pro Se” means “For It” in English. I am not an “it”; I am a human being.


Neuter Latin pronouns are never appropriate to refer to human beings:

I studied Latin for 5 1/2 years, so I know what I am talking about here.


I am not now legally represented, and I have never been legally represented,

by anyone else in the case of USA v. Hill et al., #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2,

USDC/DWY (Cheyenne, Wyoming).


I have always appeared “In Propria Persona” in that case. In English,

this means “In my Proper Person”. Proceeding in this manner is

my right under 28 U.S.C. 1654 (“personally or by counsel”).


In light of the above, a serious error occurs in the docket records

where that docket incorrectly identifies me as “represented by”

Mr. Mark C. Hardee. This error must be corrected immediately,

because it is now causing many serious problems.


Please allow me to elaborate:


Pleadings being filed by the “government” are being forwarded electronically

to Mr. Hardee, but he has failed to forward any of those pleadings on to me:

as such, I have had absolutely no opportunity to review ANY of the pleadings

that may have been filed in response to my two (2) MOTIONs TO DISMISS.


Similarly, during the second “psychological evaluation”, I was shown what

appeared to be a court “order”; but, I was never provided with any motion,

any notice of any motion, any notice of any hearing, nor was I allowed to

attend any hearing on any such motion, for an order authorizing a second

“psychological evaluation”.


There can be no doubt that Mr. Hardee already knew I have been proceeding

In Propria Persona, chiefly because he attended the 2-hour hearing on 3/21/2014,

at which Ms. Freudenthal tried repeatedly to persuade me to change my mind

and retain a licensed attorney, but I did not budge.







Nevertheless, Mr. Hardee neglected to provide me with any copies

of any such pleadings which have been docketed AFTER Docket Entry #55

on 03/20/2014.


Moreover, because of unusually long delays in receiving my records --

no doubt due to the 28 moves I have had to endure since 1/28/2014 --

I did confirm the docket error described above for the first time

on 5/10/2014.


Similarly, also on 3/21/2014, I did ask Mr. Hardee to file my second

MOTION TO DISMISS, but he never confirmed the filing of same, and

he never served me with any courtesy copy(s) of same, for my records.


As of today (5/11/2014), I STILL have no idea how many docket entries

were added after #55 filed on 03/20/2014.


Making matters much worse, I recently contacted a law firm

to explore the possibility of legal representation. An attorney

at that firm examined the docket and concluded -- wrongly --

that I was already “represented” by Mr. Hardee.


As a consequence of that error, said attorney concluded, wrongly,

that he would need to apply to the Federal Court for specific

authorization to replace Mr. Hardee.


Such an application is totally unnecessary because, on 3/21/2014

I expressly reserved my right to change my mind about formal

legal representation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1654.


At a minimum, someone needs to notify the Clerk’s Office at the

USDC in Cheyenne, Wyoming, of the docket error identifying me

as “represented by” Mr. Hardee.


Mr. Hardee has never “represented” me, particularly after

I formally terminated his services as “stand-by counsel” in my

NOTICE OF TERMINATION: a copy of the latter NOTICE

has already been mailed to you by me.


I have not received minimally adequate “assistance of Counsel”

from Mr. Hardee, as the latter term occurs in the Sixth Amendment.

“Assistance” in that Amendment does NOT necessarily mean legal

“representation” nor does it necessarily imply “licensed attorney”

or “law clerk” [sic].


“Assistance” still has the same meaning which that term had when

the Bill of Rights i.e. first ten Amendments were originally ratified by

three-fourths of the several States that existed in the year 1791 A.D.


Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.


Sincerely your,

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (chosen name)

Co-Defendant, Relator In Propria Persona, and Private Attorney General:

18 U.S.C. 1964, Rotella v. Wood, 528 U.S. 549 (2000)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308)


[signed Paul Mitchell]





Paul Andrew Mitchell has been bundled away by the US Government

Blowing Whistles At Hurricanes

May 27, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink