« May 2014 | Main | July 2014 »
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST : 5 U.S.C. 552 / [SEALED] # 2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY)
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
REQUEST : 5 U.S.C. 552
[SEALED] # 2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY)
TO: Office of the U.S. Attorney, Disclosure Officer
U.S. Department of Justice
c/o U.S. District Court (via docket email)
2120 Capitol Avenue, 2nd Floor
Cheyenne 82001
Wyoming, USA
DATE: 6/5/2014 A.D.
Greetings Disclosure Officer:
This is a proper Request under 5 U.S.C. 552 (“FOIA”).
Please reply to this proper FOIA Request
by filing a true and correct copy of
the following documents in the docket
records shown above:
(1) valid U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS executed by Dr. Cynthia A. Low
dba Forensic Psychologist, Federal
Detention Center, Seattle/Tacoma.
Please forward as needed to correct Disclosure Officer.
Sincerely yours,
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (chosen name)
Relator In Propria Persona, 28 U.S.C. 1654;
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308; 44 USC 3512)
-1 of 1-
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST : 5 U.S.C. 552 / [SEALED] # 2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY)
___
Previous:
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE : 28 U.S.C. 1654; and, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights / (“SEALED”) Case No. #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 [sic] (“ICCPR”)
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/notice-of-motion-and-motion-to-strike-28-usc-1654-and-international-covenant-on-civil-and-political-.html
Subsequent:
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST : 5 U.S.C. 552 / # 2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/freedom-of-information-act-request-5-usc-552-214-cr-00027-ndf-2.html
FIRST NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST / #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY)
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/first-notice-and-demand-to-cease-and-desist-214-cr-00027-ndf-2-usdcdwy.html
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND TRANSCRIPTS (“SEALED”) [sic] / #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY)
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/notice-of-motion-and-motion-to-compel-discovery-and-transcripts-sealed-sic-214-cr-00027-ndf-2-usdcdw.html
___
Related:
US Gov / IRS is using diesel therapy against IRS targeted political prisoner
Blowing Whistles at Hurricanes
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/05/blowing-whistles-at-hurricanes-from-44202086-modeleski-mitchell-paul-unit-set-d-c-given-name-also-a-.html
Paul Andrew Mitchell has been bundled away by the US Government
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/02/paul-andrew-mitchell-has-been-bundled-away-by-the-us-government.html
June 20, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE : 28 U.S.C. 1654; and, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights / (“SEALED”) Case No. #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 [sic] (“ICCPR”)
Update:
Are you a traitor? RT http://goo.gl/VXH1vF #TortureGate #IRS #IRSscandal #FreePaulAndrewMitchell
___
NOTICE OF MOTION AND
MOTION TO STRIKE : 28 U.S.C. 1654; and,
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
(“SEALED”) Case No. #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 [sic] (“ICCPR”)
TO: Chief Judge (duly credentialed)
U.S. District Court (cf. 18 U.S.C. 1964(c))
2120 Capitol Ave., 2nd Floor
Cheyenne 82001 RE: false arrest,
Wyoming, USA false imprisonment,
DATE: June 5, 2014 A. D. fraudulent concealment
The Undersigned appears personally under 28 USC 1654. (NOT “by counsel”, i.e. NOT represented)
The Court is hereby moved to strike
the following items from the record:
(1) government MOTION requesting ORDER
authorizing a “psychological evaluation”;
(2) “ORDER” allegedly authorizing a [second]
“psychological evaluation”; and,
(3) report by Dr. C. Low dba forensic
psychologist at FDC SeaTac (Seattle/Tacoma)
Justification:
Item (1) above was never served upon
the Undersigned, who has always appeared
In Propria Persona (cf. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition), and was never legally
“represented” by any licensed attorney(s).
No notice of any such MOTION, and no
notice of any hearing(s) on any such MOTION,
were ever served upon him. And, no
hearing on any such MOTION was ever
conducted in the presence of the Undersigned.
-1 of 4-
Item (2) above suffers from the same
deficiencies as Item (1) above i.e.
no MOTION, no notice of any MOTION, and no
notice of hearing were ever served on
the Undersigned; and, no hearing was
ever conducted with the Undersigned being
present. Moreover, Item (2) bore a
stamp (ICCPR; 28 USC 1691, signature and seal) exhibiting the name “STEPHAN HARRIS”.
The latter has refused to produce any
credentials for at least six (6) YEARS,
and has now been charged with violating
18 U.S.C. 1519 (concealing Court records) (5 USC 2906, “court”).
As such, item (2) was fraudulent
ab initio for violating due process of law. (5th Amend.)
Item (3) was written without a lawful
ORDER authorizing any “psychological
evaluation” of the Undersigned. Moreover,
he provided Dr. Low with three (3)
court cases which held, as a group, that:
(a) the Undersigned had a Right to assistance
of counsel during all interviews; (6th Amend.)
(b) Dr. Low was required to inform him
of that Right before interviews began; (5th Amend.)
(c) Dr. Low was required to inform him
that his statements during interviews
-2 of 4-
were not protected by physician-patient
confidentiality, nor by attorney-client
confidentiality or attorney-client privilege; (5th Amend.)
(d) Dr. Low was required to inform him
that her “report” would be conveyed
to the prosecution; (5th Amend.) and,
(e) all interviews needed to be tape-
recorded, but none were tape-recorded!
In all respects (a) through (e) above,
the so-called “psychological evaluation”
and related “report” both failed on
requirements imposed by the guarantees
in the Fifth and Sixth Amendments,
read: the Undersigned’s Fundamental
Rights, none of which he has ever waived.
If Mr. Mark C. Hardee was considered the
Undersigned’s “stand-by counsel” (or his
“legal representative”) when Dr. Low’s
Interviews were conducted, Mr. Hardee
was NOT present during ANY of those interviews!!!
Neither Dr. Low, nor the staff Psychiatrist
at FDC SeaTac, ever asked the Undersigned
if he wished to waive the assistance of
counsel during those interviews.
As such, items (1), (2), and (3) all violated
the long-standing requirement for Miranda Warnings!
See Miranda v. Arizona: re: rights secured.
-3 or 4-
Statements made by the Undersigned
to Dr. Low were made under duress
of unlawful arrest and unlawful
incarceration; as such his statements
under duress did NOT constitute competent
waivers of any fundamental Rights.
See Brady v. U.S. (re: high standard
established for waivers of fundamental
Rights, such as those guaranteed by
the Fifth and Sixth Amendments) (5th Amend.; 6th Amend.; ICCPR)
-REMEDY-
This Court should strike from its official
records the MOTION requesting, and the “ORDER” allegedly
authorizing, a “psychological evaluation”,
and the report prepared by Dr. C. Low
in connection with interviews conducted
at FDC SeaTac without proper Miranda
Warnings, and without adequate technical
assistance of counsel, to the Undersigned--
who consistently reserves all Rights without prejudice.
Respectfully submitted June 5, 2014 A. D.
Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (chosen name)
Relator In Propria Persona, 28 U.S.C. 1654
All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308, ICCPR)
-4 of 4-
Related:
Previous: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR A CHANGE OF VENUE : RULE 18 / #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (“SEALED”)
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/notice-of-motion-and-motion-for-a-change-of-venue-rule-18-214-cr-00027-ndf-2-sealed.html
Subsequent:
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST : 5 U.S.C. 552 / [SEALED] # 2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY)
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/freedom-of-information-act-request-5-usc-552-sealed-214-cr-00027-ndf-2-usdcdwy.html
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST : 5 U.S.C. 552 / # 2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/freedom-of-information-act-request-5-usc-552-214-cr-00027-ndf-2.html
FIRST NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST / #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY)
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/first-notice-and-demand-to-cease-and-desist-214-cr-00027-ndf-2-usdcdwy.html
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND TRANSCRIPTS (“SEALED”) [sic] / #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY)
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/notice-of-motion-and-motion-to-compel-discovery-and-transcripts-sealed-sic-214-cr-00027-ndf-2-usdcdw.html
___
Blowing Whistles at Hurricanes
Paul Andrew Mitchell has been bundled away by the US Government
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/02/paul-andrew-mitchell-has-been-bundled-away-by-the-us-government.html
June 20, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR A CHANGE OF VENUE : RULE 18 / #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (“SEALED”)
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION
FOR A CHANGE OF VENUE : RULE 18
#2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (“SEALED”) [sic]
TO: Office of Presiding Judge (duly credentialed)
U.S. District Court [“USDC/DWY”]
2120 Capitol Avenue, 2nd Floor
Cheyenne 82001
Wyoming, USA
Comes now the United States ex rel. [28 USC 1345]
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Citizen
of Washington State and Private
Attorney General [18 USC 1964], to move this
honorable Court for a proper change
of venue to the Western District of
Washington [“WDWA”] at Seattle, pursuant to
Rule 18 [FRCvP Rule 18] of the Federal Rules of Criminal
Procedure. Venue is not proper in
the District of Wyoming [“DWY”] for the following
well established reasons:
(1) Relator has repeatedly raised the issue
of venue at several hearings, beginning
1/28/2014 e.g. identity hearing;
(2) no rebuttals have been forthcoming
from any authorized personnel of the
United States; see 28 U.S.C. 544, 5 U.S.C. 3331-3333;
-1 of 3-
(3) Relator has stated verbally, and
in writing, that he did not step one foot
anywhere in Wyoming between a
college ski trip to Jackson Hole
in December 1968, and the false
arrest on 1/28/2014;
(4) no evidence contradicting the latter
statements has been forthcoming
from any authorized personnel of
the United States; see 28 U.S.C. 1345, 1346;
(5) the forty-two (42) discrete moves
Relator has had to endure, at the hands
of the U.S. Marshal Service, appear to
be motivated by a specific intent
to separate Relator from his Seattle
apartment and the extensive legal
and patent research Relator had
accumulated there, chiefly to assist
Relator’s private clients; and,
(6) said 42 moves also appear to be
motivated by criminal intents to inflict
cruel and unusual summary punish-
ment [18 USC 1513, 8th Amend.] on Relator, also in connection with
defamation per se of Relator by libeling
Relator as an “Extremist Montana Freeman
Associate [sic] e.g. in booking records.
-2 of 3-
Venue is proper in the Western District
of Washington [“WDWA”], at Seattle, for the
following well established reasons:
(7) Relator lived and worked in
Seattle, and no where else, between
his arrival there on 6/18/2009, and the
false arrest on 1/28/2014, ~ 4 ½ years;
(8) during the latter period, Relator did
not travel outside the State of Washington, and
(9) one of Relator’s five (5) meetings with
a Deputy U.S. Marshal [“USMS”] occurred
in Relator’s private Seattle apartment;
as such, said deputy was an eyewitness
to the residential situs of Relator’s
consulting practices, performed under 18 U.S.C. 1964.
REMEDY REQUESTED
In light of all the above, this court should
ORDER a routine change of venue from
the District of Wyoming [“DWY”] to the Western
District of Washington at Seattle [“WDWA”],
pursuant to FRCvP Rule 18, and to honor
Relator’s fundamental Rights.
Respectfully submitted, All Rights Reserved,
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (chosen name)
Relator In Propria Persona, 28 U.S.C. 1654;
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
[13 JUN 2014]
-3 of 3-
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR A CHANGE OF VENUE : RULE 18 / #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (“SEALED”)
Related:
Next docket entry:
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE : 28 U.S.C. 1654; and, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights / (“SEALED”) Case No. #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 [sic] (“ICCPR”)
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/notice-of-motion-and-motion-to-strike-28-usc-1654-and-international-covenant-on-civil-and-political-.html
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST : 5 U.S.C. 552 / [SEALED] # 2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY)
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/freedom-of-information-act-request-5-usc-552-sealed-214-cr-00027-ndf-2-usdcdwy.html
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST : 5 U.S.C. 552 / # 2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/freedom-of-information-act-request-5-usc-552-214-cr-00027-ndf-2.html
FIRST NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST / #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY)
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/first-notice-and-demand-to-cease-and-desist-214-cr-00027-ndf-2-usdcdwy.html
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND TRANSCRIPTS (“SEALED”) [sic] / #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY)
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/notice-of-motion-and-motion-to-compel-discovery-and-transcripts-sealed-sic-214-cr-00027-ndf-2-usdcdw.html
___
Other related:
Blowing Whistles At Hurricanes (a good overview)
Interview with Paul Andrew Mitchell (a must listen):
NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR RETRACTION OF FALSE AND DEFAMATORY DESCRIPTIONS / #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 / Paul Andrew Mitchell (#45396) Scotts Bluff County Detention Center
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/notice-and-demand-for-retraction-of-false-and-defamatory-descriptions-214-cr-00027-ndf-2-paul-andrew.html
Paul Andrew Mitchell has been bundled away by the US Government
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/02/paul-andrew-mitchell-has-been-bundled-away-by-the-us-government.html
June 20, 2014 | Permalink
I'm giving away another AR-15
Dear Juan,
The Founders knew there can be no freedom without the ability to defend it.
So they included the Second Amendment in the U.S. Constitution as a bulwark against government tyranny.
In honor of our Second Amendment freedoms, I'm pleased to announce that Campaign for Liberty is giving away a brand new Colt LE6920MP-B AR-15 equipped with a red dot sight.
The AR-15 will come with Magpul stock, pistol grip, handguard, and vertical grip and back-up sight. The giveaway is free to enter, and you can learn more at the page linked below.
Just click here to enter Campaign for Liberty's AR-15 gun giveaway for your chance to win!
Campaign for Liberty will contact you via email if you are the winner.
Thank you for your support of Campaign for Liberty.
For Liberty,
Ron Paul
Chairman
June 17, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink
FEMA Camp Proof / Camp FEMA
Camp Fema ---FEMA CAMP PROOF-- SHARE W/ ALL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87Z_h3eVSy4
===================================================
Fema Camp Coffins Investigated Thu Jun 21, 2012 APFN FEMA CAMPS... FEMA CONCENTRATION CAMPS: Locations and Executive Orders http://www.apfn.org/apfn/camps1.htm Fema Camp... more
-
- FEMA Camp Footage (Concentrations Camps in USA). — APFN, Sun Jun 15 20:23
-
- Camp Fema ---FEMA CAMP PROOF-- SHARE W/ ALL — APFN, Sun Jun 15 20:38
Related:
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2005/09/fema_and_katrin.html
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2008/05/the-executive-o.html
June 16, 2014 | Permalink
Dead Doctors Radio daily broadcast and podcast via KSCO featuring Dead Doctors Don't Lie with Dr. Joel Wallach / Youngevity
Get your free Dead Doctors Don't Lie store & daily podcast replicated site by joining us today!
+++
See: http://beyondtangytangerine2dot0.wordpress.com/ for the big picture or for your convenience I have included the info here (Questions? I will be happy to try to answer any. Call me at 407-925-4141):
Dear Potential Youngevity Associate/Distributor:
Welcome! Now is your chance to take advantage of being in the downline of ZBS Radio Associates (with the ability to offer the same to others). The producer and syndicator of the Dead Doctors Don’t Lie Radio Program (“DDDL”), hosted by Youngevity Founder Dr. Joel Wallach, would like to welcome you at part of our team.
We have been producing this live program each weekday since mid-September 1996, over 18 years.
This radio program has been used all this time quite successfully to help Doc Wallach spread his message of health, wealth, and longevity – made available ONLY to FCC-licensed radio stations in the USA – AND as a POWERFUL TOOL to SIMULTANEOUSLY build Youngevity downlines for those stations. Some stations actually bring in more revenue from Youngevity downline checks than from all of their advertising sales combined!
Now, and throughout 2015, we have a whole new world of media, powered by computers, tablets, smartphones, the internet, and PASSIONATE, EXCITED PEOPLE like YOU!
Today ANYBODY is capable of starting his or her own media network via blogs, podcasting, websites, and social media with little or no cash investment.
No government agency, or lack of a sufficient bank account is going to prevent you from communicating with millions of people.
So why limit the DDDL radio program to radio station affiliates ONLY? Why not make it available to EVERY potential Youngevity distributor in the ZBS downline to use as a wonderful tool to build the Youngevity business – and help Doc Wallach’s message GO VIRAL TO BOOT?
Starting immediately, all ZBS distributors can THEMSELVES be affiliates of the Dead Doctors Don’t Lie Radio Program and HAVE THEIR OWN Dead Doctors Radio website to direct all potential customers and associates to.
It will be like having Doc Wallach put on a health meeting for you each and every weekday!
Your free site will feature live streaming of current DDDL shows, as well as SEARCHABLE archives of many years of past Doc Wallach shows. It will also contain a shopping cart connected directly to the Youngevity computer system so visitors can IMMEDIATELY purchase specific Youngevity products recommended by Doc Wallach or his fill-in hosts, Pharmacist Ben Fuchs or Dr. Peter Glidden – and the website owner, YOU, will automatically be designated Enroller and Sponsor of each new signup through your site!
Join us by becoming a Dead Doctors Radio affiliate. Once you sign up a member of our team will contact you and get you set up right away. Sign up here:
https://extranet.securefreedom.com/Youngevity/csSignup/EnrollNew.asp?RepDID=100767917
Thank you.
MZ Michael Zwerling
Chairman, ZBS Radio Associates
Michael L. Zwerling Owner,
KSCO NewsTalk AM 1080
Monterey-Salinas-Santa Cruz-San Jose
+++
Dead Doctors Radio
Featuring Dead Doctors Don't Lie (DDDL)
with Dr. Joel Wallach
http://deaddoctorsradio.com/100767917Listen to the Latest Dead Doctors Don't Lie Show Below
Or Search the Archive for Specific Illness or Deficiency
Dead Doctors Don't Lie Program 13 June 2014
Monologue
Pharmacist Ben Fuchs fills for Dr. Wallach today. Beginning the show discussing thyroid hormones explaining what the are and how the work in the body. Outlining many of the health challenges that can occur when the thyroid is not functioning properly. Contending that with a proper diet and nutrional supplementation these health challenges can be avoided.
Pearls of Wisdom
Doug Winfrey and Ben Fuchs discuss a news article regarding a new study of vitamin D deficiency. The study from the University of California San Diego is a meta analysis of 32 previous studies. The studies included 566,583 participants from 14 countries an average age of 55. The study found those with the lowest blood levels of vitamin D were twice as likely to have a premature death. Researchers say that two thirds of the U.S. population has lower blood levels.
Callers
Sandy has several health challenges including renal failure, hypertension, type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis.
Allison has a friend who has recovered from cancer three times and has been recently diagnosed with a mass in her lungs.
Evelyn has several health challenges including obesity, high blood pressure, congestive heart disease, type 2 diabetes, noduls on her kidneys and edema.
Gottfried has questions concerning scar tissue on his eyes.
+++
Dead Doctors Radio
Featuring Dead Doctors Don't Lie (DDDL)
with Dr. Joel Wallach
http://deaddoctorsradio.com/100767917June 12, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink
Why Should Anyone Trust a Government...?
See http://agovernmentofwolves.com/2014/06/09/why-should-anyone-trust-a-government-that-kills-maims-tortures-lies-spies-cheats-and-treats-its-citizens-like-criminals/ by attorney John W. Whitehead. See http://agovernmentofwolves.com/about/
Spread the news.
Mark A. Adams JD/MBA
___
Related:
Case no. #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 / RELATOR’S FOURTH VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/case-no-214-cr-00027-ndf-2-relators-fourth-verified-criminal-complaint-on-information.html
---
Federal Judicial/Governmental Insanity Has Corrupted And Destroyed Our Republic / A Call For A Grand Jury Investigation Of Richard C. “Dick” Tallman (Ninth Circuit)
June 10, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink
Case no. #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 / RELATOR’S FOURTH VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION
This is from Docket Entry 72 (Judge Nancy Freudenthal is an Obama appointed judge from 2010 and is the wife of former Governor David Freudenthal (2003-2011). She is presiding over Paul's case. Paul has a continued (now RESET from June 24 to July 10) competancy hearing in the J.C. O'Maloney Federal Building | 2120 Capitol Avenue | Cheyenne, WY 82001 | Courtroom #1 on 7/10/2014 at 10:00am; and Docket Entry 93 was results of first competancy hearing held 6/3/2014 and indicates: Competancy Hearing - Plaintiff requests that subject to the findings by Dr. Low, defendant be detained for four months to attempt to restore his competancy. Defendant's counsel (note: who was never his counsel according to Paul) states that he has submitted a motion to withdraw from the case. Mr. Modeleski objects to the hearing as a whole due to lack of notification. He strenuously objects to request of the Plaintiff because he has not seen the report. Court grants the motion to withdraw as counsel. Mr. Modeleski will have a new attorney appointed. The competancy hearing will be continued. Competancy hearing reset on 6/24/14 at 1:30 p.m. [Paul is not crazy or an extremist. Paul was never a flight risk. How long does it take to get a fair and speedy trial? Competancy hearing? What a total crock. Paul has been illegally held in federal detention/confinement since January and has been moved around between several states over 42 times since that time (can anyone say diesal therapy) Now the US gov wants 4 more months to restore his competancy? Restore his competancy?! Those US gov officials are the ones who need a head check IMHO. Looks like the prosecution/judge is going to get away with doing a Dusky]:
Case no. #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2
RELATOR’S FOURTH VERIFIED CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION : 18 U.S.C. 242
1964(a)-1968; 28 U.S.C. 1345 (United States as Plaintiff)
TO: District Court of the United States
c/o Office of Clerk of Court
Cheyenne 82001
Wyoming, USA
Comes now the United States (federal
government) ex rel. Paul Andrew Mitchell,
Citizen of Washington State, qualified
Federal Witness, and Private Attorney
General, formally to charge the following
named and unnamed individuals, to wit:
Nancy D. Freudenthal with:
infringing Relator’s Right to petition the
government for redress of grievances,
particularly Relator’s “PETITION FOR
HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF, FOIA ENFORCEMENT,
AND VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON
INFORMATION,” as filed in the official
records of the USDC/DWY’s Case No. supra
in violation of the Federal misdemeanor
statute at 18 U.S.C. 242 (ONE COUNT, to date);
and,
- 1 of 4 -
Does 1 thru 20 with:
infringing Relator’s Right to petition the
government for redress of grievances,
particularly Relator’s “PETITION FOR
HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF, FOIA ENFORCEMENT,
AND VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON
INFORMATION,” as filed in the official
records of said Case No. supra, in violation
of the Federal misdemeanor statute at
18 U.S.C. 242 (ONE COUNT, to date).
- DISCUSSION -
Pleadings to Federal courts are petitions
to government for redress of grievances,
as the latter phrase occurs in the First
Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court has
already ruled that said Petition clause
guarantees the Right conservative of
all other Rights (cite omitted). It is,
therefore, no exaggeration to allege that
those misdemeanors, charged above, have
necessarily resulted in violating, and/or
infringing, all of Relator’s Rights,
no exceptions. Moreover, and more to
the merits, the Writ of Habeas Corpus
is a PRIORITY Writ. See All Writs Statute.
- 2 of 4 -
- AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE -
During a 2-hour hearing commencing
at 10:30 AM on 3/21/2014, Relator personally
witnessed Nancy D. Freudenthal attempt
repeatedly to “deny” Relator’s PETITION
supra, as if it were some sort of “motion,”
of which she had jurisdiction to “deny”.
Similarly, Ms. Freudenthal also repeated
her erroneous attempts to “deny” mandatory
judicial notice, invoked by Relator
pursuant to Rule 201(c)(2) of the Federal
Rules of Evidence. All of the above attempts
occurred without ever addressing
Relator’s frequent challenges to jurisdiction,
particularly jurisdiction in personam,
as fully explained in standing case law
already decided under 28 U.S.C. 1691. That
case law was correctly cited, and quoted,
on documents of which Relator properly
requested mandatory judicial notice.
Discretionary judicial notice is properly
invoked by Rule 201(c)(1) of the Federal
Rules of Evidence. All such Rules of Court
are binding obligations of Ms. Freudenthal!
- 3 of 4 -
- INCORPORATION OF RECORDS -
Relator hereby incorporates the
Petition supra, now filed as Docket
Entry #33, and all other Docket
Entries filed by Relator to date,
as if all were set forth fully
here. See Full Faith and Credit Clause.
- VERIFICATION -
Relator hereby verifies, under penalty
of perjury, under the laws of the United
States of America, without (outside)
the United States (federal government),
that the above statement of facts and
laws is true and correct, according
to the best of My current information,
knowledge and belief, so help Me
God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
Dated: 3/25/2014 A.D.
Signed: Paul Andrew Mitchell
Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Relator Sui Juris and
In Propria Persona
All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308)
without Prejudice to any Rights
- 4 of 4 -
___
In re: Freudenthal's personal liability:
TRULINCS 44202086 – MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL* – Unit: SET-D-C * given name
(also a “nom de guerre”)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FROM: 44202086
TO: Brown, Thomas; Guenete, Edward; Mullen, Jack; Saccato, Larry
SUBJECT: FORMAL OBJECTIONS TO “PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION” #2
DATE: 04/19/2014 01:22:11 PM
TO:
Dr. C. Low
dba Forensic Psychologist
FDC SeaTac
Dr. Low:
By now you should have received a Courtesy Copy of my
NOTICE OF TERMINATION to attorney Mark Hardee.
I am writing to expand upon the points of fact
itemized in paragraphs numbered (6) thru (9)
in that NOTICE.
The Federal statute at 28 U.S.C. 1691 is obviously
very important in my case: If you have not received it yet,
that law requires the Clerk’s authorized signature -AND-
the Court’s official seal on all Federal Court “process”.
On the Internet, try:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1691.html
The term “process” embraces everything a Federal Court
issues, such as subpoenas, orders, writs, warrants,
summonses, and so on. Sec. 1691 was enacted on
June 25, 1948 (4 days after I was born), and it has
never been amended by any Act(s) of Congress.
The case law at 28 USCA and 28 USCS 1691
all agree that failing to satisfy its two (2) simple requirements
results in depriving a Federal Court jurisdiction
in personam (over Persons).
I am proceeding In Propria Persona (in my Proper Person).
See also 28 U.S.C. 1654.
USCA = United States Code Annotated
USCS = United States Code Service
As I have already confirmed to you, in your private office
this past week, the so-called “order”, allegedly authorizing
a [second] “psychological evaluation” of me, clearly violated
Sec. 1691 because it was not signed by any Clerk of Court,
and it did not exhibit any official Court seal.
The machine-generated date-and-time stamp is NOT
the official seal of the United States District Court
for the District of Wyoming.
Moreover, as summarized in paragraph (8) of my
NOTICE OF TERMINATION, Mr. Stephan Harris
cannot legally sign any such “order”, even if he tried,
because he has chosen to conceal the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management Standard Form 61 (“SF-61”)
1
TRULINCS 44202086 – MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL* – Unit: SET-D-C
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS required of him by
Article VI, Clause 3 in the U.S. Constitution, and
by the Federal statutes at 5 U.S.C. 2104, 2903, 2906,
3331, 3332, 3333 and 5507.
Because Mr. Harris has failed to produce his own SF-61
for more than six (6) YEARS now, he has been formally
charged with violating 18 U.S.C. 1519 (a FELONY Federal
offense). He is IN DEFAULT and now legally ESTOPPED
by his silence for such a long period of time.
On the Internet, try:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1519.html
Here, I should emphasize that 5 U.S.C. 2906 expressly
designates the “court” as the legal custodian of the SF-61
required of Mr. Harris and of ALL other Court officers:
that means he must have custody of his own SF-61.
See also 28 U.S.C. 951 (re: duties of Clerks).
Moreover, such a Court “officer” cannot even get paid until
and unless the second AFFIDAVIT required by 5 U.S.C. 3332
is timely executed by each such “officer”. See 5 U.S.C. 5507.
Ms. Nancy D. Freudenthal is also implicated in all the above
violations. She is now personally liable to me chiefly because
the U.S. District Court in Cheyenne, Wyoming, was never
able to prove jurisdiction in personam: it CAN’T, as long as
Clerk’s Office personnel neglect, or refuse, to produce their own
SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS.
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved,
there can be no rule making or legislation which would
abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona (re: Miranda warnings).
Article VI, Clause 3, guarantees such a “fundamental” Right!
Moreover, failure to ensure effective assistance of Counsel
has necessarily resulted in OUSTING her Court of jurisdiction.
See Johnson v. Zerbst. As you should already know by now,
Mr. Mark Hardee has totally abandoned me. Of course,
a Federal court cannot be “ousted of jurisdiction”
if it never had jurisdiction in the first place!
Two (2) other Federal Public Defenders were also terminated
in my case, for obvious incompetence and gross negligence.
See the Sixth Amendment here re: assistance of Counsel
(NOT representation by a licensed attorney). The Framers
knew the difference between Counsel and licensed attorney.
Now, I must address the legal risks to which you are being
exposed, insofar as you are, or may be, aiding and abetting
any of the violations mentioned above, or merely being an
accessory after the fact to those same violations. Here,
see 18 U.S.C. 2 and 3, respectively.
Because I have now proven to you that Freudenthal’s “order”
is not valid, I am under no obligations to submit to a second
psychological evaluation allegedly authorized by that invalid “order”.
2
TRULINCS 44202086 – MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL* – Unit: SET-D-C
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In conclusion, therefore, I decline to answer any more of your
questions unless I am accompanied by a capable and qualified
stand-by counsel who can provide me with timely, and reliable,
legal advice about possible attempts to induce me to be a witness
against myself, in obvious violation of the Fifth Amendment.
Here, see 18 U.S.C. 241, 242, and 1513 in particular.
Thank you for your professional consideration in this matter.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (my chosen name)
Private Attorney General
See 18 U.S.C. 1964; Rotella v. Wood, 528 U.S. 549 (2000)
All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308)
[Signed Paul Mitchell]
3
Ref:
___
Related:
Blowing Whistles At Hurricanes (a good overview)
Interview with Paul Andrew Mitchell (a must listen):
NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR RETRACTION OF FALSE AND DEFAMATORY DESCRIPTIONS / #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 / Paul Andrew Mitchell (#45396) Scotts Bluff County Detention Center
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/notice-and-demand-for-retraction-of-false-and-defamatory-descriptions-214-cr-00027-ndf-2-paul-andrew.html
US Government has settled with Paul Andrew Mitchell; or?
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/us-government-has-settled-with-paul-andrew-mitchell-or.html
My message on FB in regards to this:
Re: Paul Andrew Mitchell.This is from Docket Entry 72, Judge Nancy Freudenthal is an Obama appointed judge from 2010 and is the wife of former Governor David Freudenthal (2003-2011). She is presiding over Paul's case. Paul has a competancy hearing in the J.C. O'Maloney Federal Building | 2120 Capitol Avenue | Cheyenne, WY 82001 | Courtroom #1 on 6/24/2014 at 1:30pm - Paul is not an extremist. Paul was never a flight risk. Paul is a blue blooded American (his words). How long does it take to get a fair and speedy trial? Competancy hearing? What a total crock. Paul has been illegally held in federal detention/confinement since January and has been moved around between more than several states over 29 times since that time (can anyone say diesal therapy). At what point are the American people going to put their foot down and rally to Paul's support?:
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/case-no-214-cr-00027-ndf-2-relators-fourth-verified-criminal-complaint-on-information.html
June 10, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink
NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR RETRACTION OF FALSE AND DEFAMATORY DESCRIPTIONS / #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 / Paul Andrew Mitchell from Scotts Bluff County Detention Center
NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR RETRACTION OF FALSE AND DEFAMATORY DESCRIPTIONS
(“demand” implies a right: cf. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th)
TO: U.S. Marshals Service Case No.:
c/o U.S. District Court #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2
Cheyenne 82001 (USDC/DWY)
Wyoming, USA
DATE: 5/28/2014
SUBJECTS: (1) “SOVEREIGN CITIZEN LAWYER” [sic]
(2) “EXTREMIST MONTANA FREEMAN ASSOCIATE” [sic]
The above false and defamatory descriptions were confirmed by the Undersigned in documents which he was required to sign upon his second “booking” yesterday at the Scotts Bluff County Detention Center (“SBCDC”) in Gering, Nebraska. Each is accurately refuted as follows:
(1) “SOVEREIGN CITIZEN LAWYER” [sic]
The Undersigned is a Private Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. 1964 (Civil RICO), but NOT a licensed attorney. The latter fact could be very easily confirmed by querying the member registrations of The State Bar of California and the Washington State Bar Association. Those registrations are readily available on the Internet. See also Rotella v. Wood, 528 U.S. 549.
The phrase “SOVEREIGN CITIZEN” is a misnomer that results in part from standing decisions
-1-
of the U.S. Supreme Court (e.g. Dred Scott v. Sanford [1856]) which have often described the American People as “sovereigns without subjects.” Thus, as a group e.g. voting for Senators and U.S. Representatives, the People are sovereign under American laws never repealed. As a Citizen of Washington State, the Undersigned is one of those People.
A problem arises, however, whenever an individual State Citizen is described as a “Sovereign”. The Sixth Amendment authorizes compulsory testimony, and a State Citizen is subject to that law. As such, a State Citizen is not, and cannot be a “Sovereign” in the same sense that a King, a Queen, is a “Sovereign” (cf. Monarchy v. Republic). Therefore, the phrase “SOVEREIGN CITIZEN” is an oxymoron when used to describe an individual Citizen of one of the United States of America, who is not also a federal citizen, by Right of Election. (28 USC 1746 USA v. US) Here, cf. “federal citizenship in Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition. The phrase “Right of Election” refers to the Right to “elect,” or choose between, one of two (2) classes of citizenship in America. See Pannill v. Roanoke.
-2-
(2) “EXTREMIST MONTANA FREEMAN ASSOCIATE” [sic]
The latter phrase is false and defamatory as applied to the Undersigned: in 1996 A.D. (18 years ago!), he was invited to provide on-site legal assistance to supporters and associates of the late Leroy Schweitzer, at a private residential dwelling near Billings, Montana. That invitation followed his pro bono Petition to the Montana State Courts for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”), restraining Federal (U.S.) government personnel from applying lethal force against Schweitzer’s group. Upon arriving in Billings, the Undersigned reviewed several documents possessed by that group, participated in several discussions, and filed the civil case of People v. United States as an original action in the District Court of the United States in Billings, Montana (“DCUS” at 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)). The undersigned did confirm what he honestly believed was a serious flaw in one of Schweitzer’s legal theories, specifically: signing a criminal confession for someone else is prohibited by the Fifth Amendment, insofar as the accused remains silent.
-3-
Such a “criminal confession” is not valid, and cannot be used, as a basis for perfecting any lien(s) against the accused.
Whether or not it was ever accurate to describe Schweitzer’s group as being “extremist,” the Undersigned never joined that group, merely by agreeing to provide legal assistance for a small fee. Moreover, his on-site assistance ended after about one month, no doubt due to basic disagreements that developed between the Undersigned and Schweitzer’s associates who were not incarcerated (see above).
General Objections: It is now apparent to the Undersigned that certain personnel employed by the federal government are effectively branding some Americans with the “SOVEREIGN” and “EXTREMIST” labels, in order to target those Americans with discriminatory and prejudicial abuses, such as false arrest, unlawful incarceration, and summary punishment. For example, names in ALL CAPS are correctly described as a “nom de guerre” in French, i.e. “war name” in English, implying a state of war, or mixed war, upon the American People.
-4-
DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE RETRACTION AND ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS CORRECTIONS (cf. defamation)
(“demand” implies a right: cf. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition)
The Undersigned hereby demands: an immediate retraction of the false and defamatory phrases “SOVEREIGN CITIZEN LAWYER” and “EXTREMIST MONTANA FREEMAN ASSOCIATE” from all government records maintainable at locations including but not limited to:
(a) Federal courts in Seattle and Cheyenne;
(b) U.S. Marshals in Seattle and Cheyenne;
(c) Federal Detention Center, SeaTac;
(d) Southern Nevada Detention Center;
(e) Oklahoma City Federal Transfer Center;
(f) Washington County Justice Center, Akron, Colo.;
(g) Grady County Jail, Chickasha, Oklahoma;
(h) Scotts Bluff County Detention Center, Gering, Nebraska, concerning the Undersigned (#45396, Note from Teknosis: This number was in the margin notes on the line and item 'h' referring to the SBCDC and the Undersigned - I don't know what it represents); and, immediate correction of all such government records by substituting “Private Attorney General” for all such false and defamatory phrases. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely yours,
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (chosen name)
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964, Rotella v. Wood,
All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308) 528 U.S. 549 (2000)
FDC Reg. No. 44202-086
-5-
Paul Andrew Mitchell Docket Entry 92
Directly related to the above Federal government false and defamatory actions in typing Paul as a Sovereign Citizen Lawyer and Montana Freeman Associate in their databases:
Private Attorney General comments re: FBI: DOMESTIC TERRORISM The Sovereign Citizen Movement
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2010/04/private-attorney-general-comments-re-fbi-domestic-terrorism-the-sovereign-citizen-movement.html
Related:
US Government has settled with Paul Andrew Mitchell; or?
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/us-government-has-settled-with-paul-andrew-mitchell-or.html
June 9, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink
US Government has settled with Paul Andrew Mitchell; or?
Update: Nix the below as I am now able to access the Docket Report with the docket information. It still doesn't answer as to where Paul is at the moment... [After reading the document at docket entry 92 apparently Paul has once again been moved. This time the Feds "diesal therapy" torture tactics on Paul dictated his being moved to and detained at the Scotts Bluff County Detention Center in Gering, Nebraska. He is also being falsely presented (in various of the US Governments documents or databases, - and in the various locations he has been detained/moved/"diesal therapied" to - as being a "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN LAWYER" and an "EXTREMIST MONTANA FREEMAN ASSOCIATE". A competancy hearing has been set for 6/24 before Obama appointed Judge Nancy Freudenthal (wife of former Wyoming Governor Freudenthal) presiding. J.C. O'Maloney Federal Building | 2120 Capitol Avenue | Cheyenne, WY 82001 | Courtroom #1 on 6/24/2014 at 1:30pm. More to come...]
___
The US Government has settled with Paul and released him on 5.28.14 thereby? Hence Paul cannot post on the internet because of said settlement? Or was Paul put into a federal witness protection program; or in the alternative was he just simply disappeared by the District of Criminals? Are there any other possibilities?
See below. Paul's Docket Report no longer exists. If there was a settlement with Paul did that involve making his docket and all documentation disappear? If so why does the main entry (no. 6) to get to the Docket Report even exist? Can they even do that (i.e. disappear public records)?
The mystery deepens.
Note: Those who are in federal court cases here in the US should definitely study Paul's credentials investigation (and much more) of federal judges and other high profile US officials at his supremelaw.org before it is possibly taken down, as well as those who have an interest in federal, federal municipal and constitutional law, etc. or would like an understanding of many things including there being over two classes of citizens, important information about the IRS being in estoppel for many years now, Fed insolvency etc and as I said much much more, should also take an interest. I have also posted a lot of his communications over the years to my blog. A veritable treasure trove IMO.
This should be like wildfire right about now. (But as usual hardly anyone has a clue!)
___
Via Pacer (CMECF)
When going under Docket Report for Paul Andrew Mitchell under entry 6 there are no longer dockets listed:
|
6 |
USA v. Hill et al - Paul Andrew Mitchell |
|
wydce |
01/15/2014 |
__
Query
__
Docket report (no docket entries exist anymore, the screen is blank, zip, zilch, zero, everything I have typed up is no longer in the public record except what is on my blog or if it can be ferretted out of Recap, Scribd,. and wherever whatever material in particular was duplicated on the net)
https://ecf.wyd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/iqquerymenu.pl?26663
__
Either there was a settlement with Paul (where he cannot mention anything or say where he is or communicate via internet), he was put under witness protection or the US Government disappeared him?
No word from Paul since a little before 5.28.14, the supposed day of his release. It is easy to contact me to let me know what is happening if you (a particular reader) have any further information.
___
Related:
NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR RETRACTION OF FALSE AND DEFAMATORY DESCRIPTIONS / #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 / Paul Andrew Mitchell (#45396) Scotts Bluff County Detention Center
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/notice-and-demand-for-retraction-of-false-and-defamatory-descriptions-214-cr-00027-ndf-2-paul-andrew.html
Paul Andrew Mitchell (an interview): Constitution, citizens, and the united States
Update:
Case no. #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 / RELATOR’S FOURTH VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/case-no-214-cr-00027-ndf-2-relators-fourth-verified-criminal-complaint-on-information.html
___
NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR RETRACTION OF FALSE AND DEFAMATORY DESCRIPTIONS / #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 / Paul Andrew Mitchell (#45396) Scotts Bluff County Detention Center
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/06/notice-and-demand-for-retraction-of-false-and-defamatory-descriptions-214-cr-00027-ndf-2-paul-andrew.html
___
Paul Andrew Mitchell released from federal detention?
More docket entries / documentation submitted into the record can be found toward the bottom of the following post:
June 9, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink
