Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS: 5 U.S.C. 2906, 3331, 3332, 3333, 5507 #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY) | Main | MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN PARTIAL SUPPORT OF CIVIL CROSS-COMPLAINTS: 42 U.S.C. 1985-1986 #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY) »

NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE: Art. VI, Clause 3, U.S. Const.; 5 U.S.C. 2906, 3331; 28 U.S.C. 951; FREV 201(c)(2) #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY)

[Docket# 123]

NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY

JUDICIAL NOTICE: Art. VI, Clause 3, U.S. Const.;

5 U.S.C. 2906, 3331; 28 U.S.C. 951; FREV 201(c)(2)

#2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY)

 

TO: Office of Presiding Judge (duly credentialed)

       District Court of the United States (“DCUS”)

       2120 Capitol Ave., 2nd Floor

       Cheyenne 82001-3658

       Wyoming, USA

DATE: July 3, 2014 A.D.

 

In pari material with Rule 201(c)(2) in the Federal

Rules of Evidence, formal DEMAND is hereby

made of this honorable DCUS to take mandatory

judicial notice of all Federal court records

currently in the legal custody of the Office of

Clerk of Court, U.S. District Court, District

of Wyoming, all locations, with particular

emphasis on the U.S. Office of Personnel

Management Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT

AFFIDAVITS, required by 5 U.S.C. 2906 to be

delivered to the court to which the offices

of U.S. District Judge, U.S. Magistrate

Judge, Clerk of Court and Deputy Clerk

of Court pertain, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 2104,

2903, 2906, 3331, 3332, 3333, 5507, and

Article VI, Clause 3, in the Constitution for

the United States of America, as lawfully amended

(“U.S. Constitution”).

 

- 1 of 4 -

 

OBJECTION RE: DOCUMENTED

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

 

Messrs. Allan B. Johnson, Kelly H. Rankin

and Ms. Nancy D. Freudenthal are per force

disqualified from ever ruling, or otherwise

attempting to “DENY”, the above DEMAND,

for reasons including but not limited to

the following, evidencing conflicts of interest:

(1) mandatory notice leaves no discretion

      on the part of this Court: compare Rule 201(c)(1);

(2) the existence of valid SF-61 credentials

      for all the above now assumes facts

      not in evidence;

(3) all the above are now IN DEFAULT by

      failing timely to produce valid SF-61

      credentials in response to lawful requests

      for same (see all docket entries);

(4) the blanket FOIA exemption for the entire

      Judiciary at 5 U.S.C. 551 is unconstitu-

      tional for violating Article VI, Clause

      3, in the U.S. Constitution supra;

(5) “Where rights secured by the Constitution

      are involved, there can be no rule making

      or legislation which would abrogate

      them.” Miranda v. Arizona; 5 U.S.C. 551;

(6) “Stare decisis” means that no one should

      be punished for relying upon standing

      decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court.” U.S. v. Mason;

 

- 2 of 4 -

 

(7) violations of the Undersigned’s Petition Clause

      Rights have already been properly alleged,

      and verified, in multiple VERIFIED

      CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS, ON INFORMATION;

(8) the Petition Clause guarantees Rights

      conservative of all other Rights: U.S. Supreme

      Court (cites omitted);

(9) pleadings to Federal and State Courts

      are petitions to government for redress

      of grievances, as the latter term occurs

      in the Petition Clause, First Amendment;

(10) the Undersigned has already suffered

        deliberate, and premeditated, obstruction

        of Petitions for Habeas Corpus relief, FOIA

        enforcement, Civil RICO remedies, and

        rights of action under 42 U.S.C. 1985-1986:

        see Martinez v. Winner, 771 F.2d 424

        (10th Cir. 1985) re: declaratory and injunc-

        tive relief, no immunity;

(11) the Undersigned’s common law rights to

        his good name and reputation have

        also been violated with malice afore-

        thought, which rights are also expressly

        guaranteed by two (2) Human Rights

        Treaties elevated to the status of supreme

        Law by the Supremacy Clause in the

        U.S. Constitution i.e. supreme Law in

        Wyoming, Nebraska, and Washington State;

        and,

 

- 3 of 4 -

(12) the Undersigned’s DEMAND TO CEASE AND

        DESIST, Docket #101 entered 06/17/2014, has

        been ignored by continuing acts of

        defamation, malicious prosecution,

        attempted extortion e.g. forced medication,

        and false incarceration, all in violation

        of 18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 1513, 1519, 1951 and 1962(d).

- VERIFICATION -

I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby

verify under penalty of perjury, under the laws

of the United States of America, without

(outside) the “United States” (federal govern-

ment), that the above statement of facts and

laws is true and correct, according to the

best of my current information, knowledge

and belief, so help me God, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. 1746 (1).

 

Dated: July 3, 2014 A.D.

 

Respectfully demanded,

Signed: Paul Andrew Mitchell (chosen name)

Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Citizen of Washington State, Pannill v. Roanoke;

Relator In Propria Persona, 28 U.S.C. 1654;

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a),

     Rotella v. Wood, 528 U.S. 549 (2000)

        (objectives of Civil RICO)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308)

 

- 4 of 4 

NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE: Art. VI, Clause 3, U.S. Const.; 5 U.S.C. 2906, 3331; 28 U....

___

Related:

Re: Paul Andrew Mitchell | U.S. Gov. (executive and judicial), IRS targeted individual
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/07/re-paul-andrew-mitchell-us-gov-executive-and-judicial-irs-targeted-individual.html

July 11, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink