Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« 11/05/2014 Paul Andrew Mitchell Civil Number 14-3460-CV-S-MDH-P [6:2014-cv-03460 is what shows in Pacer] Mitchell a/k/a/ Mitchell Paul Modeleski v. Freudenthal et al, order of Judge Harpool | Main | 11/5/14 |#4| ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: ORDERED that: (1) plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); and (2) this case is transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming? RICO in its »

10/10/2014 |#1| PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Quo Warranto filed by Paul Andrew Mitchell a/k/a/ Mitchell Paul Modeleski. (Attachment: # 1 Exhibit)(Thoennes, Cindy) (Entered: 10/29/2014)

24 Mitchell a/k/a/ Mitchell Paul Modeleski v. Freudenthal et al List Parties mowdce 6:2014-cv-03460 540 10/10/2014
Please 'Like' this page I created on FB https://www.facebook.com/pages/International-Covenant-on-Civil-and-Political-Rights/308087676064004
___

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Sui Juris
c/o USMCFP #44202-086
P.O. Box 4000
Springfield 65801-4000
Missouri, USA

In Propria Persona (initially)
In Forma Pauperis (USDC/DWY)



United States District Court

Western District of Missouri

Central Division  / Springfield


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,       )   Case No. 2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2
                                                  )        aka 14-CR-27-F (USDC/DWY)
          Plaintiff,                           )
     v.                                          )
                                                  )
JOSEPH RUBEN HILL et al.,           )

                    Defendants.            )
______________________________)
                                                  )
United States                               )   Case No. _______________________________ x
ex relatione                                 )
Paul Andrew Mitchell,                  )   INITIAL APPLICATION FOR WRITS
                                                  )   IN THE NATURE OF QUO WARRANTO
     Civil Cross-Plaintiff,               )   AND HABEAS CORPUS:
                                                  )
     v.                                          )   28 U.S.C. 1345, 1651, 1654, 2241, 2242;
                                                  )   FRCP Rules 13(b), 13(d), 81(a)(4);
Nancy Dell Freudenthal,                )   18 U.S.C. 4, 1964(c) (Civil RICO);
Stephan Harris,                           )   31 U.S.C. 3730(h) (False Claims Act);
L. Robert Murray, and                )   42 U.S.C. 1985, 1986.
Does 1 thru 100,                          )
                                                  )
     Civil Cross-Defendants.           )
______________________________)







- 1 of 9 -

Comes now the United States ex rel. Federal prisoner Paul Andrew

Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Sui Juris, a Citizen of Washington State and

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X) under the False

Claims Act, appearing In Forma Pauperis and initially In Propria Persona

(i.e. "personally" under 28 U.S.C. 1654) -- hereinafter "Relator" --

to petition this honorable Court for:

     (a) priority Writs (in the nature) of Quo Warranto, requiring

Nancy Dell Freudenthal, Stephan Harris, and L. Robert Murray to

demonstrate by what authority(s), if any, they currently claim to

occupy the Federal offices of U.S. District Judge, Clerk of Court,

and Assistant United States Attorney in the District of Wyoming,

respectively; and,

     (b) any and all other relief which this Court deems just and

proper under all circumstances which have occasioned the instant

Application e.g. Habeas Corpus relief, relief from retaliatory actions

and from damages caused by a pattern of racketeering activities, etc.


INCORPORATION OF EVIDENCE

     Relator respectfully requests this Court to take mandatory
     
judicial notice of USDC/DWY Docket #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2, as presently

maintained at the Federal Courthouse in Cheyenne, Wyoming, and

of the attached NOTICE OF DEFAULT dated 9/12/2014, pursuant to

Rule 201(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The latter NOTICE

is hereby incorporated by reference, as if set forth fully here.

See also USDC/DWY Docket #14-CR-27-F, and the LIST OF ATTACHMENTS infra,

all likewise incorporated by reference as if set forth fully here.





- 2 of 9 -

JURISDICTION

This United States District Court for the Western District of

Missouri, Central Division, has original jurisdiction of the instant

matters pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1964(c) (Civil RICO); 28 U.S.C. 2241

and 2242 (Habeas Corpus); 31 U.S.C. 3730(h) (Relief from retaliatory

actions); 42 U.S.C. 1985(2) and 1985(3) (Conspiracy to interfere

with civil rights); 42 U.S.C. 1986 (Action for neglect to prevent

conspiracy); and, ancillary jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1651,

to issue prerogative writs in the nature of quo warranto, in order

to prevent the continued exercise of authority unlawfully asserted;

see Johnson v. Manhattan, 289 U.S. 479 (1933), and Ryder v. United

States infra. See also Rules 13(b), 13(d) and 81(a)(4) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("FRCP") re: quo warranto and

habeas corpus.

STANDING

     The United States has standing as Plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
     
1345 and 1651 supra; 18 U.S.C. 1964(c) (Civil RICO); and, 31 U.S.C.

3729 et seq. (False Claims Act); see United States ex rel. Madden v.

General Dynamics Corp., 4 F.3d 827 (9th Cir. 1993) (qui tam relator

is most properly classified as an agent of the United States, not an

officer of the United States).
















- 3 of 9 -

SUMMARY OF PROBABLE CAUSES

      In addition to the latter NOTICE OF DEFAULT, said USDC/DWY Docket
      
now contains verified factual evidence calling for the following

conclusions of law, to wit:

     (1) L. Robert Murray lacks the second OATH OF OFFICE expressly
     
         required by 28 U.S.C. 544 and Article VI, Clause 3 in the
         
         U.S. Constitution ("6:3");
         
     (2) Mr. Murray lacks power of attorney legally to represent the
     
         "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" as such before Federal courts:
         
         see 28 U.S.C. 530B, 547, 1345, 1346, 1746(1) in particular;
         
     (3) Mr. Murray is not an "authorized assistant" hence not a lawful
     
         "attorney for the government" as the latter terms occur at
         
         FRCrP Rules 1, 6 and 7 (definitions, who can be present,
         
         who can sign);
         
     (4) Stephan Harris has twice failed or refused to disclose valid
     
         U.S. Office of Personnel Management ("OPM") Standard Form 61
         
         ("SF-61") APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS expressly required by
         
         5 U.S.C. 2104, 2903, 2906, 3331, 3332, 3333, 5507, and 6:3;
         
         see also 18 U.S.C. 1519;
         
     (5) Mr. Harris has also failed or refused to disclose the second
     
         OATH OF OFFICE expressly required of Clerks and Deputy Clerks
         
         of Court by 28 U.S.C. 951, and 6:3;
         
     (6) Nancy Dell Freudenthal lacks the mandatory SENATE CONFIRMATION
     
         expressly required by 5 U.S.C. 2902(c), and by either the
         
         Appointments Clause ("2:2:2") or the Recess Appointments
         
         Clause ("2:2:3") in the U.S. Constitution (see details in
         
         the attached NOTICE OF DEFAULT and APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFI-
         
         CATIONS);
         
         
         
- 4 of 9 -

     (7) Ms. Freudenthal's PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION is incomplete,
     
         due at least to known defects in the SF-61 executed by one
         
         Eric Holder, Jr.;
         
     (8) Ms. Freudenthal's own SF-61 appears to be a counterfeit form
     
         because:
         
         (a) it lacks a valid OMB control number required by the
         
             Paperwork Reduction Act ("PRA"): 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.;
             
         (b) it lacks the paragraph citing 5 U.S.C. 2903 (Authority
         
             to administer); and,
             
         (c) as of January 1, 2014, OPM has failed to apply for
         
             periodic OMB review and approval of the electronic SF-61
             
             published at www.opm.gov, as required by 5 CFR 1320.5,
             
             the Federal Regulation implementing the PRA: 44 U.S.C.
             
             3501 et seq.
             
PARTIAL SUMMARY OF CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES

     Relator has been maliciously prosecuted, wrongly incarcerated
     
continuously since 1/28/2014, and damaged extensively by an organized

conspiracy, perpetrated by at least a dozen named suspects now formally

charged in several VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTs, ON INFORMATION ("VCC").

     The latter VCCs were duly filed -- to satisfy legal obligations
     
imposed by 18 U.S.C. 4 -- in the USDC/DWY Docket records supra,

formally charging multiple violations of Federal statutes including

but not limited to 18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 1513, 1519, 1962(d),

42 U.S.C. 1985 (Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights) and

42 U.S.C. 1986 (Neglect to prevent conspiracy). See also 44 U.S.C.

3512 here (PRA's Public Protection Clause).




- 5 of 9 -

REMEDIES REQUESTED

(1) Writs in the nature of Quo Warranto served without delay upon

    Nancy Dell Freudenthal, L. Robert Murray and Stephan Harris,
    
    case of the USDC in Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA;
    
(2) Orders dismissing with prejudice the alleged "indictment" and

    "superseding indictment" as to Relator; see all MOTIONs TO
    
    DISMISS and all SUPPLEMENTs in the USDC/DWY Docket records;
    
(3) Order releasing Relator to unfettered liberty without any

    further delays; see 28 U.S.C. 2242;
    
(4) Order appointing a competent and qualified CJA lawyer to

    prosecute indigent Relator's several cross-complaints as
    
    previously filed in the USDC/DWY Docket records supra;
    
    see 18 U.S.C. 1964, 42 U.S.C. 1985 and 1986;
    
(5) Referral of the entire USDC/DWY Docket records supra to a

    lawfully convened Federal Grand Jury within the Western District
    
    of Missouri, and supervised by this Court;
    
(6) Partial payment of ten thousand U.S. Dollars ($10,000 USD)

    to commence Relator's rehabilitation i.e. food, shelter, clothing,
    
    payable by the Office of the U.S. Attorney, District of Wyoming,
    
    to the client trust account of the CJA lawyer duly appointed
    
    by this honorable Court;
    
(7) Order directing the U.S. Marshals Service to expedite Relator's

    safe passage to Seattle, Washington State, USA; and,
    
(8) any and all other relief which this Court deems just and proper

    under the several circumstances which have occasioned the instant
    
    INITIAL APPLICATION e.g. Habeas Corpus relief, relief from
    
    retaliatory actions, triple damages etc.




- 6 of 9 -

PRELIMINARY APPLICATION FOR WRIT
IN THE NAME OF HABEAS CORPUS: 28 U.S.C. 2242

     Relator Paul Andrew Mitchell is the proper Person for whom the

requested Writ of Habeas Corpus is intended.

     He was unlawfully arrested on 1/28/2014 at his private apartment

in Seattle, Washington State, under color of an "arrest warrant"

issued by Cross-Defendant Stephen Harris in violation of 28 U.S.C.

1691 and 18 U.S.C. 1519, and signed without proper authority by

Cross-Defendant Nancy Dell Freudenthal.

     Relator was then transported some forty-nine (49) discrete times,
     
and is currently in the custody of the U.S. Medical Center for

Federal Prisoners ("USMCFP") in Springfield, Missouri.

     The "order" allegedly authorizing "formal competency restoration
     
procedures" [sic] at USMCFP was also signed without proper authority

by Nancy Dell Freudenthal, under color of Freudenthal's claim to

occupy the superior office of United States District Judge for the

District of Wyoming.

     Relator understands that this PRELIMINARY APPLICATION may be
     
amended, or supplemented, as provided by the rules of procedure

applicable to civil actions (cf. FRCP). See also 28 U.S.C. 2242 supra.

     Relator therefore reserves his right to amend and/or supplement
     
this APPLICATION timely.

FOUNDATION AUTHORITY

"We think that one who makes a timely challenge to the
constitutional validity of the appointment of an officer
who adjudicates his case is entitled to a decision on the
merits of the question and whatever relief may be appropriate
if a violation indeed occurred."

                     -- Ryder v. United States, 515 U.S. 177,
                        132 L.Ed.2d 136 (1995)



- 7 of 9 -

VERIFICATION

I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Sui Juris, hereby verify

under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of

America, without the "United States" (Federal government), that

the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct,

according to the best of my current information, knowledge and

belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1). See the

Supremacy Clause (the Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the

United States are all the supreme Law of the Land).

Dated: 10/9/2014

Respectfully submitted,

[Signed Paul Mitchell]

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (chosen name) *
Relator In Forma Pauperis and initially In Propria Persona
(28 U.S.C. 1654: "personally");
Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator
(31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.) (4X) **;
Qualified Federal Witness (18 U.S.C. 1513)
(see testimony on 7/10/2014 in USDC/DWY Docket)

*   See Doe v. Dunning, 549 P.2d 1 (Washington State Supreme Court)
    (fundamental principle and common-law right to change one's name)
    
**  See U.S. ex rel. Madden v. General Dynamics Corp., 4 F.3d 827
    (9th Cir. 1993)
    
RSVP / SHIP TO:

     Modeleski, M.P. (given name)
     USMCFP #44202-086
     P.O. Box 4000
     Springfield 65801-4000
     Missouri, USA

Thank you very much!


Attachments:  (see LIST OF ATTACHMENTS, next page)


- 8 of 9 -

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS


NOTICE OF DEFAULT  (dated 9/12/2014)

Samples of documents bearing news and/or signatures of
Nancy D. Freudenthal, L. Robert Murray and Stephan Harris, to wit
(circled for emphasis):

     WARRANT FOR ARREST  (dated July 25, 2014)
     see "Stephan Harris", "Name of Issuing Officer";
         "Clerk of Court", "Title of Issuing Officer"
         
     ORDER SEALING SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT  (July 25, 2014)
     see "NANCY D. FREUDENTHAL", "CHIEF UNITED STATES JUDGE";
         "STEPHAN HARRIS", "CLERK", "CHEYENNE"
     
     GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO UNSEAL CASE  (August 4, 2014)
     see "L. ROBERT MURRAY", "Assistant United States Attorney"
     
     ORDER UNSEALING SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT  (August 5, 2014)
     see "NANCY D. FREUDENTHAL", "CHIEF UNITED STATES JUDGE";
         "STEPHAN HARRIS", "CLERK", "CHEYENNE"
     
     EX PARTE ORDER AUTHORIZING EXPERT SERVICES AND EXPENSES
     OF DR. BHUSHAN S. AGHARKAR, M.D. PSYCHIASTRIST
     see "NANCY D. FREUDENTHAL", "CHIEF UNITIED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE";
         "STEPHAN HARRIS", "CLERK", "CHEYENNE"  (filed Sept. 2, 2014)

NOTICE TO COUNSELS, USA v. Hill et al.  (9/20/2014)

Essay:  "Clerks or Jerks? The Pivotal Duties of Federal Court Clerks"
        (April 24, 2014 A.D.)
        
Essay:  "Blowing Whistles at Hurricanes -- Marxism Meets the Big
         Sky Country," by Michael Hafter (May 1, 2014 A.D.)
         (2 Parts)

APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144  (dated 10/1/2014)

















- 9 of 9 -

NOTICE OF DEFAULT

TO:     Mr. Terry J. Harris
        Harris & Harris, P.C.
        
DATE:   9/12/2014

CC:     Unit Counselor, USMCFP/Springfield, Missouri
        Docket #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY) aka #14-CR-27-F

Hello Mr. Harris:

     As you already know, or should know by now, soon after the
hearing on 6/3/2014 at USDC/Cheyenne, I submitted a proper Request
under the Freedom of Information Act (5 USC 552), to U.S. DOJ's
Office of Information Policy ("OIP") in Washington, D.C., for the
following four (4) mandatory credentials required of one Nancy
Dell Freudenthal before she could lawfully occupy the office of
U.S. District Judge, to wit: (1) SENATE CONFIRMATION (5 USC 2902(c));
(2) PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION (5 USC 2902(c)); (3) U.S. OPM Standard
Form 61 ("SF-61") APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS (5 USC 2903, 2906, 3331,
3332, 3333, 5507; 44 usc 3501 et seq.); and, (4) OATH OF OFFICE
(28 USC 453).
     OIP timely replied to me in writing, while I was detained
at the county jail in Gering, Nebraska. OIP's cover letter,
on DOJ letterhead, confirmed that their appointment file did not
contain any SENATE CONFIRMATION for Ms. Freudenthal.
     Moreover, her PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION was incomplete, due to
known defects in the SF-61 executed by Mr. Eric Holder, Jr. dba
U.S. Attorney General; also, her own SF-61 appeared to be a
counterfeit form because it lacked a valid OMB control number
at the upper right-hand corner (cf. "50-R0118"); and, there was no
paragraph citing 5 USC 2903 (Authority to administer) on her SF-61.
See 44 USC 3512!
     I then promptly mailed OIP's cover letter and responsive
documents to the P.O. Box for your law firm, Harris & Harris, P.C.,
in Cheyenne, Wyoming. I also timely mailed a proper FOIA Appeal
to OIP, with directions for OIP to reply to that same P.O. Box.
     After being moved to the Federal Transfer Center in Oklahoma
City, I conducted further research into the Appointments Clause
at Article II, Section 2, Clause 2, Clause 3, in the U.S. Constitution.
     As a result of that research, I also mailed to the same P.O. Box
at least two (2) recent Circuit Court decisions on those Clauses e.g.
Noel Canning v. NLRB (D.C. Cir. 2013) and U.S. v. Woodley (9th Cir.).
All of the latter research confirmed the mandatory and essential
nature of the SENATE CONFIRMATION requirement. Chiefly, the latter
credential must follow or precede the other 3; and, the absence
of a valid SENATE CONFIRMATION appears to render the other 3 invalid
for having been executed withOUT the U.S. Senate's advice and consent.
5 USC 2902(c).
     In my professional opinion, the holdings in Canning v. NLRB
are correct.

- 1 of 2 -

     Therefore, all of the above call for the conclusions
that all acts of Nancy Dell Freudenthal in my case to date
were null and void ab initio, including but not limited to the
original "arrest warrant", all subsequent hearings on which she
attempted to preside, and all subsequent "orders" and "rulings"
represent me contrary to 28 USC 1654: I have always appeared
"personally" and not "by counsel". Cf. In Propria Persona.
     Her missing and defective credentials have also necessarily
rendered void her "orders" allegedly authorizing a second psycho-
logical evaluation at FDC/SeaTac, and a psychiatric evaluation
at USMCFP/Springfield, Missouri.
     Lastly, I should add that Dr. Cynthia Low, dba Forensic
Psychologist at FDC/SeaTac, has now failed to answer my FOIA
Request for her SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS!
     Copies of all the above mentioned FOIA Requests should
also be in the Court's Docket records supra.

     Thank you for your professional consideration.
     
Sincerely yours, [signed Paul Mitchell]

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell (chosen name)

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., "Qui Tam" Relator
(31 USC 3729 et seq.) (4X)
BOP Reg. No. 44202-086

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308)

- 2 of 2 -

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Quo Warranto filed by Paul Andrew Mitchell a/k/a/ Mitchell Paul Mode...

___

Exhibit #1:

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Quo Warranto filed by Paul Andrew Mitchell a/k/a/ Mitchell Paul Mode...


___

Related:

Paul Andrew Mitchell has been bundled away by the US Government
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/02/paul-andrew-mitchell-has-been-bundled-away-by-the-us-government.html

--

Re: DOJ visits this blog post: Paul Andrew Mitchell's INITIAL APPLICATION FOR WRITS IN THE NATURE OF QUO WARRANTO AND HABEAS CORPUS

 
Inbox
x
 
 
 

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

2:48 PM (3 hours ago)
 
to me
 
 
 
 
That INITIAL APPLICATION FOR WRITS is also here:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil/initial/

Thanks, Juan.


/s/ Paul


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964

http://supremelaw.org/crowd.funding.option.htm  (Join Us!)
http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:28 AM, _____ _______wrote:
They took an interest in this post:

November 8, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink