Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« November 2014 | Main | January 2015 »

911 False Flag - American Traitors & Mossad



Why are the Executive Offices of Raytheon keeping tabs as to Paul Andrew Mitchell

"911 and the cover up" by Ryan Dawson / Israeli van with mural painted of an airplane diving into New York City and exploding / Exploding Israeli van, etc. Israeli Mossad or assets blaming/pointing their fingers at Palestinians

Re: NOTICE OF DEFAULT served on State of Israel et al. for $6.9 TRILLION USD + applicable interest

December 27, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Re: FW: Check out "Paul Andrew Mitchell released from jail" on Sovereign Warriors

Larry sent me a "hit piece" written by DHS
which identified "Sovereign Citizens" as extremists
and terrorists:  DHS was eventually forced to withdraw
that document from their Internet website.

The REAL story is that the Feds are at war with State Citizens
i.e. the class of Americans who are qualified to serve in the
House, Senate and White House!
I am not a "sovereign" in the sense of a King or Queen,
because I can be compelled to testify:  Sixth Amendment;
and I DID testify on 7/10/2014, #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/DWY)

The following statement is patently false:

"What happened was that he ran a business of helping people setup common law trusts"

It was Mr. Hill's business to help people set up trusts;  and,
trusts are authorized by several sections in the Internal Revenue Code:


I honestly do NOT know why it is "arrogant" to advocate abolition
of the Internal Revenue Service:  they are a known extortion racket:

So, is everyone arrogant who wants the IRS to disappear?

Or, am I being singled out for that special dishonor?

Sounds to me like irrelevant "ad hominem" nonsense
(when you can't address the issue, attack the person instead).

On the merits, "strawman" theory does not appear to be
mentioned or discussed by any known decision of the
U.S. Supreme Court, and for that reason we do NOT
recommend that theory.

Compare U.S. v. Mason:  "no one should be punished
for relying upon the standing decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court".

That means we can rely upon U.S. v. Mason too!  :)

And if the doctrine of stare decisis has any meaning at all, it requires that people in their everyday affairs be [412 U.S. 391, 400]   able to rely on our decisions and not be needlessly penalized for such reliance. Cf. Flood v. Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258, 283 (1972); Wallace v. M'Connell, 13 Pet. 136, 150 (1839).

I have always asked "Redemption" advocates to cite one single
U.S. Supreme Court case that supports their positions, and
every time they have fallen totally silent.

p.s.  I never "threatened" anyone when we were investigating
all the copyright infringements of "The Federal Zone":

It reveals their ignorance when people confuse "notice of intent" with "threat".
We did confront suspected violators and, if they did NOT
remove the counterfeit copies of that book from the Internet,
after amnesty offers and numerous requests, THEN we did
sue them here:  (~129 named Defendants)
(latest "skip tracing" results)

This person has not adequately identified himself,
so I cannot share the evidence folder that we may
have archived of the Internet evidence and correspondence
with him.

I hope I am wrong about this guy, but his words sound
like those of an agent provocateur.

Since 1990, some "supporters" sent me donations so they could
discover the bank accounts I was using  :-)
And, the IRS did steal $5,000 we had deposited
in a bank account to pay for printing more hard copies,
after the first 2,500 were sold.

Authority:  Rev. 2:9,  3:9

/s/ Paul

The poster "Jaro"''s comments are in blue and he doesn't seem to be very fond of you and I don't think the info. is correct in various of what he says as to what happened in the case of J. R. Hill. . Note: I corrected Larry's last name in the comment section.

Paul Andrew Mitchell released from Federal incarceration after US wisely decides not to open Sell v United States Pandora's box in his case after approx. 11 months of illegal detainment/torture
A very merry Christmas to you Paul!



December 27, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink


What follows is the Notice of Motion and Motion for Protective Order mentioned in a talk with Paul on MyPrivateAudio (<- right-click "Save as") on Talkshoe:

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
c/o USMCFP #44202-086
P.O. Box 4000
Springfield, 65801-4000
Missouri, USA

In Propria Persona (initially)
In Forma Pauperis

United States District Court

Western District of Missouri

Southern Division / Springfield

United States                                         ) Case No. 14-3460-CV-S-MDH-P
ex relatione                                          )
Paul Andrew Mitchell,                            ) NOTICE OF MOTION AND
                                                            ) MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
Civil Cross-Plaintiff,                              ) SUA SPONTE:
v.                                                         ) 18 U.S.C. 1514(b)(1), 3771.
Nancy Dell Freudenthal,                         )
Stephan Harris,                                     )
L. Robert Murray,                                  )
Linda Sanders,                                       )
Scott W. Skavdahl                                  )
Kelly H. Rankin,                                    )
Christopher Crofts, and                          )
Does 5 thru 100,                                    )
Civil Cross-Defendants.                          )

Comes now the United States ex rel. Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.,

Citizen of Washington State (expressly not a federal citizen), Private

Attorney General under Civil RICO and Agent of the United States under

the False Claims Act, to petition this Court for a protective order,

as authorized by 18 U.S.C. 1514(b)(1) and 3771(a), (d)(1) and (d)(3),

for a preponderance of reasons including but not limited to those

considered in the following discussion, taken together with all other

pleadings previously filed by Relator and incorporated by reference

as if set forth fully here.

Relator now substitutes Scott W. Skavdahl, claiming to be a

U.S. District Court Judge, for John Doe #2; Kelly H. Rankin, claiming to

be a U.S. Magistrate, for John Doe #3; and, Christopher Crofts,

claiming to be a U.S. Attorney, for John Doe #4.

- 1 of 9 -

The Federal Statute at 18 U.S.C. 1514(b)(1) authorizes this

Court, upon its own motion (“sua sponte”) to issue a protective

order prohibiting harassment of a victim or witness in a Federal

criminal case or investigation, if the Court, after a hearing,

finds by a preponderance of the evidence that:

(a) harassment of an identified victim or witness in a

Federal criminal case or investigation exists; or,

(b) such an order is necessary to prevent and restrain

offenses under [18 U.S.C.) section 1513 (Retaliating

against a witness, victim, or an informant).

At 18 U.S.C. 1514(d)(1)(B), the word “harassment” is expressly

defined by Act of Congress as follows:

(i) causes substantial emotional distress in such a person;
(ii) serves no legitimate purpose . . . .

Similarly, “serious act” is also expressly defined by Congress

at 1514(d)(1)(F):

the term “serious act” means a single act of threatening,
retaliatory, harassing, or violent conduct that is reasonably
likely to influence the willingness of a victim or witnesses
to testify or participate in a Federal criminal case or
investigation . . . .

“Course of conduct” is also expressly defined by Congress at


the term “course of conduct” means a series of acts over a
period of time, however short, indicating a continuity of
purpose . . . .

“Specific person” is also expressly defined by Congress at


the term “specific person” means a victim or witness in a
Federal criminal case or investigation, and includes an
immediate family member of such a victim or witness.

- 2 of 9 -

And, the above terms combine to define “intimidation” at 1514(d)(1)(D):

the term “intimidation” means a serious act or course of conduct
directed at a specific person that –
(i) causes fear or apprehension in such person; and,
(ii) serves no legitimate purpose . . . .

Accordingly, the verified facts already found in this Court's

official records, and in the DWY Docket as already incorporated by

reference, call for the conclusions that:

(1) as a documented victim, qualified Federal witness and

Civil RICO investigator, Relator has suffered serious acts of

harassment (as defined above), including but not limited to a

course of conduct with a continuity of purpose to cause substantial

emotional distress, fear and apprehension, by means of false

search “warrant”, false arrest, multiple periods of solitary

confinement, continuous false imprisonment, “diesel therapy” torture,

sleep deprivation, and overt acts of retaliation, all serving no

legitimate purpose, in multiple violations of 18 U.S.C. 1513; and,

(2) as a documented victim, qualified Federal witness and

Civil RICO investigator, Relator has also suffered serious acts of

intimidation (as defined above), including but not limited to a

course of conduct with a continuity of purpose to cause substantial

emotional distress, fear and apprehension by means of malicious

and selective prosecution, vicious defamations per se, elder abuse,

written and spoken threats of forced and involuntary medication

using mind-altering and potentially dangerous psychotropic drugs,

threats of further solitary confinement, tortious interference with

his livelihood, with his professional education and business plans,

and with his utility patent pending and related computer storage

research, all serving no legitimate purpose, in multiple violations

of 18 U.S.C. 1513.

- 3 of 9 -

On the Internet, for example, please see:

All of the above are serious acts of threatening, retaliatory

and harassing conduct that was intentional, premeditated and likely

to influence Relator's willingness to testify and to participate

as a witness, and Civil RICO investigator, in a Federal criminal

case, and in an ongoing investigation of missing and defective

credentials required by Law of Federal officers and employees.

Furthermore, violations of 18 U.S.C. 1513 are also RICO

“predicate acts” as defined by Congress at 18 U.S.C. 1961(1)(B).

Only two (2) such RICO predicate acts during any given 10-year period

constitute a “pattern of racketeering activity” as defined by Congress

at 18 U.S.C. 1961(5).

The sheer number of RICO predicate acts Relator has now endured

-- after volunteering to search for an estimated 2,500 children

reportedly missing in Tucson, Arizona circa 1996 -- easily exceeds

one hundred (100). For example, on the Internet please see:

Although it was never codified anywhere in the U.S. Code,

Congress also expressly authorized a liberal construction rule for

the RICO laws, as follows:

The provisions of this title shall be liberally construed
to effectuate its remedial purposes. P.L. 91-452, 84 Stat. 947,
October 15, 1970 (cf. Notes under 18 U.S.C. 1961)

In conclusion, a prompt protective ORDER is justified and

necessary to prevent and restrain any and all further violations

of 18 U.S.C. 1513 directed at Relator, regardless of the source(s)

or motive(s) of those felony violations.

- 4 of 9 -

The Court should not stop here, however. In point of well

documented facts, the retaliations directed against Relator began

in earnest when his classic book “The Federal Zone” was stolen,

corruptly modified, and widely distributed via the Internet --

all without his knowledge or consent. After initial publication

in early 1992, he first discovered some of those criminal copyright

violations in December 1995, several months after the market for

that book was effectively saturated by all those “free” electronic

copies. Here, see 18 U.S.C. 2319 (Criminal infringement of a


In August 2001, he sued 129 recalcitrant suspects in the

Federal District Court in Sacramento, California, but all 48 defense

attorneys eventually turned up without proper licenses to practice

law in the State of California. On the internet, please see:

That civil case was ultimately appealed to the U.S. Supreme

Court, and all 48 of those attorneys either fell totally silent,

or they formally waived their clients' right to answer this carefully

written and thoroughly researched brief:
(read no rebuttals from any opposing parties)

There are presently more than 110,000 discrete files maintained

at the latter Internet website. Relator is fond of pointing out a

simple numerical fact: if Users read just one file per day, then

after 100 years they will have read 36,525 files, or only one-third

of the files in the moderately large database! (Don't forget leap


- 5 of 9 -

For purposes of justifying a protective order sua sponte,

Relator's Civil RICO case, filed in the Superior Court of California

with numerous Exhibits, does catalog many of the RICO “predicate acts”

which had already occurred by that time:

Notably, the Act of July 2, 1996, added 18 U.S.C. 2319 -- criminal

copyright infringement -- to the list of RICO predicate acts itemized

at 18 U.S.C. 1961(1)(B).

As defined by Congress at 18 U.S.C. 1961(5), the pattern of

racketeering activity did not stop with the Civil RICO complaint,

however; on the contrary, more obstruction of justice occurred when

many of the same Unlicensed ATTORNeys corruptly colluded with known

Federal impostors to prevent any jury trial(s). Relator never got

near a jury! The right of trial by jury is preserved to the parties

inviolate by Rule 38(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

One major finding did emerge from that Civil RICO lawsuit:

all Federal District Judges in California, about one-third on the

Ninth Circuit, and three (3) Associate Justices on the U.S. Supreme

Court turned up without valid licenses to practice law when they

were first admitted to The State Bar of California -- Kennedy, Breyer

and O'Connor:

Relator therefore submits what should now be painfully obvious:

his ongoing investigation of missing and defective credentials,

required by Law of all Federal officers and employees, is the single

most powerful hypothesis explaining the bulk of all the criminal

retaliations he has suffered. To date, and to his knowledge,

not one single suspect has been prosecuted, despite numerous verified

- 6 of 9 -

criminal complaints (“VCC”) duly lodged, or filed, to satisfy legal

obligations imposed by 18 U.S.C. 4 (Misprision of felony).

It is not hard to prove that Civil Cross-Defendant Stephan Harris

has also conspired corruptly to retaliate against Relator for merely

requesting the U.S. Office of Personnel Management Standard Form 61

APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS and second OATH OF OFFICE required of Mr. Harris

by Article VI, Clause 3, by 5 U.S.C. 2104, 2903, 3331, 3332,

3333, and by 28 U.S.C. 951.

Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure was obviously

and painfully violated by DWY personnel when Relator's two (2) MOTIONs

TO DISMISS were never ruled on, nor was Relator ever allowed to see

any pleadings in opposition to those 2 MOTIONs.

Since when it is illegal to “request” oaths of office?

Is not such a “request” protected by the First Amendment?

And, is it not a felony violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 to conspire

with specific intent to infringe the free exercise and full enjoyment

of such a Fundamental Right?

As if the above were not already more than sufficient to justify

a prompt protective ORDER, this Court is also encouraged to review,

and possibly also to study, the several documents assembled in support

of Relator's Mail Fraud Report (PS Form 8165), as lodged against one

William M. McCool:

Google “The Case Against William M. McCool

A man meeting his description showed up in the private parking

lot of Relator's Seattle apartment building in July 2013, and

proceeded to harass and intimidate Relator without providing any

forms of identification, even when asked to do so.

- 7 of 9 -

Relator pointed out that he needed an appointment, and had none;

but, the suspect and his companion refused to leave (read “trespass”).

The suspect did admit his “reason” for being there was a recent first-

class letter which Relator had mailed to the Director of the U.S.

Marshals Services in Washington, D.C., concerning probable cause of

malfeasance in the Office of the U.S. Attorney General. Relator

promptly reported the latter incident to three (3) Federal District

Judges seated on the USDC in downtown Seattle (USDC/WDWA).


Relator now submits that more than sufficient justification exists

for a prompt protective ORDER detailing, at a minimum, each of the

following elements for his benefit:

(1) Relator's immediate release from any and all forms of detention
to unfettered Liberty, which is his Fundamental Right;

(2) a guarantee expediting Relator's safe passage back to Seattle,
Washington State e.g. U.S. Marshal escort from the USMCFP in
Springfield, Missouri thru airport security;

(3) an emergency stipend of $10,000 USD cash to commence Relator's
immediate rehabilitation e.g. food, shelter, clothing, computer
and telecommunications equipment, and Internet access;

(4) appointment of a capable, qualified, experienced and zealous
civil rights lawyer legally to represent Relator with all
further adjudication of the instant case, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
section 1915(e);

(5) a preliminary injunction enjoining and restraining all Federal
and IRS personnel from any further harassment or intimidation
of Relator, as those terms are defined at 18 U.S.C. 1514 supra;

(6) a preliminary injunction enjoining and restraining all past and
present “members” of The State Bar of California from any further
harassment or intimidation of Relator, as those terms are defined
at 18 U.S.C. 1514 supra;

(7) a preliminary injunction enjoining and restraining all Federal
and all IRS personnel from any and all forms of interference
with Internet domain, or with any of Relator's
several email accounts;

- 8 of 9 -

(8) dismissal with prejudice of all charges alleged in the
“superseding indictment” still pending against Relator at the
USDC/DWY, Docket #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 aka 14-CR-27-F; and,

(9) any and all other appropriate relief which this honorable Court
deems just and proper for purposes of issuing a completely
satisfactory protective ORDER sua sponte in this case.

The above elements are really not too much to ask, given 18 YEARS

of frequent suffering Relator was forced to endure -- for research,

writing, teaching, counsel and court activism -- none of which ever

injured anyone or damaged any property.

Thank you very much for your professional consideration.

Dated: 11/25/2014

Sincerely yours, [signed Paul Mitchell PM]

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (chosen name)

Relator In Propria Persona (intially)
and In Forma Pauperis

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308)

- 9 of 9 -


TO: Psychologists and Psychiatrists
USMCFP / Springfield

DATE: November 10, 2014 A.D.

RE: 18 U.S.C. 241, 242


The following court case abstracts were provided to Cynthia Low
dba Forensic Psychologist at FDC/SeaTac on 4/26/2014, and to you
and your subordinates as Exhibit B-1.1 attached to my written
refusal of your BP-A0959 properly annotated to identify major errors:

“If defense counsel is not present at [a] psychiatric examination,
defendant should be asked by examiner whether he understands
that counsel is entitled to be present and if he consents to be
examined in the absence of counsel; defendant should further be
informed that examination is conducted on behalf of prosecution
and its results will be available for use against defendant
-- State v. Mains, 295 Or 640, 669 P.2d 1112 (1983)

“Statements made during course of [a] court ordered psychiatric
examination are 'testimonial' in nature; thus, compelled
utterances during course of examination must be viewed
as implicating [the] privilege against self-incrimination;
statements obtained under compulsion of court ordered
examination are not available to prosecution even for
limited impeachment purposes.”
-- Blaisdell v. Commonwealth, 372 Mass 753, 364 NE.2d 191 (1977)

“Protection of defendant's constitutional privilege against
self-incrimination and right to assistance of counsel
at [a] pre-trial court-ordered psychiatric examination requires
that [a] tape-recording of entire interview be given to his
and government's lawyer, and [an] in camera suppression hearing
be held to guarantee that court-ordered psychiatrist's testimony
will not contain any incriminating statements.”
-- State v. Jackson, 171 W Va 329, 298 SE.2d 866 (1982)

At no time on 11/6/2014 or 11/7/2014 did you or any of your subordinates
observe or comply with the clear requirements of the Fifth and Sixth
Amendments as stated above, even after you were provided with printed
hard-copy NOTICE of same no later than 10/1/2014.

Please also be informed hereby that a Counselor at USMCFP has now
threatened me, to my face, with destruction of evidence I authored
in my case. Destruction of material records may be a violation of
18 USC 1001 and/or 1519 and/or 2071. If “shredding” documents is
a standard “practice” at USMCFP, that may fully or partially explain
why some of you may have not received the case abstracts repeated above.

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. [signed Paul Mitchell PM]
BOP Reg. No. 44202-086
[written: 14-3460-CV-S-MDH-P]

[new page]

[- C O P Y - PM]

5 As we have stated: “[The] individual's right to the protection of his own good name 'reflects no
more than our basic concept of the essential dignity and worth of every human being-a concept at the
root of any decent system of ordered liberty.'” Gertz v Robert Welch, Inc., 418 US 323, 31 L Ed 2d
789, 94 S Ct 2997 (1974) (quoting Rosenblatt v Baer, 383 US 75, 92, 15 L Ed 2d 597, 86 S Ct 669
(1966) (Stewart, J., concurring)); see also Milkovich v Lorain Journal Co., 497 US 1, 12, 111 L Ed 2d 1,
110 S Ct 2695 (1990) (“[H]e that filches from me my good name / Robs me of that which not enriches
him, And makes me poor indeed'” (quoting Shakespeare's Othello, Act III, scene 3)); Paul, 424 US, at
706, 47 L Ed 2d 405, 96 S Ct 1155 (“The Court has recognized the serious damages that could be
inflicted by branding a government employee as 'disloyal,' and thereby stigmatizing his good name”);
Wisconsin v Constantineau, 400 US 433, 437, 27 L Ed 2d 515, 91 S Ct 507 (1971) (emphasizing the
importance of “a person's good name, reputation, honor, [and] integrity”; holding that respondent was
entitled to due process before notices were posted stating that he was prohibited from buying or
receiving alcohol); In re Winship, 397 US 358, 363-364, 25 L Ed 2d 368, 90 S Ct 1068 (1970)
(“[B]ecause of the certainty that [one found guilty of criminal behavior] would be stigmatized by the
conviction . . ., a society that values the good name and freedom of every individual should not condemn
a man for commission of a crime when there is a reasonable doubt about his guilt”); Wieman v
Updegraff, 344 US 183, 190-191, 97 L Ed 216, 73 S Ct 215 (1952) (“There can be no dispute about the
consequences visited upon a person excluded from public employment on disloyalty grounds. In the
view of the community, the stain is a deep one; indeed, it has become a badge of infamy”).

Indeed, vindicating one's reputation is the main interest at stak in a defamation case, and that that
interest has always been held to constitute a sufficient “personal stake.” See, e.g., Paul, 424 US, at 697,
47 L Ed 2d 405, 96 S Ct 1155 (“[R]espondent's complaint would appear to state a classical claim for
defamation actionable in the courts of virtually every State. Imputing criminal behavior to an individual
is generally considered defamatory per se, and actionable without proof of special damages”); Gertz, 418
US, at 349-350, 41 L Ed 2d 789, 94 S Ct 2997 (“We need not define 'actual injury' . . . . Suffice it to say
that actual injury is not limited to out-of-pocket loss. Indeed, the more customary types of actual harm
inflicted by defamatory falsehood include impairment of reputation and standing in the community,
personal humiliation, and mental anguish and suffering”); L. Eldridge, Law of Defamation § 53, pp.
293-294 (1978) (“There is no doubt about the historical fact that the interest in one's good name was
considered an important interest requiring legal protection more than a thousand years ago; and that so
far as Anglo-Saxon history is concerned this interest became a legally protected interest comparatively
soon after the interest in bodily integrity was given legal protection”).










© 2014 Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., a member of the LexisNexis Group. All rights reserved. Use of this product is subject to the restrictions
and conditions of the Matthew Bender Master Agreement.

[written: # 14-3460-CV-S-MDH-P]

[stamped: 44202086]




Paul Andrew Mitchell special guest speaker on Angela Stark's Dec. 25th call (9PM EST)

Paul Andrew Mitchell released from Federal incarceration after US wisely decides not to open Sell v United States Pandora's box in his case after approx. 11 months of illegal detainment/torture

December 27, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Paul Andrew Mitchell special guest speaker on Angela Stark's Dec. 25th call (9PM EST)

9PM eastern
Call in 724-444-7444
Call ID: 39904

Subject: Re: Greetings -- Paul Andrew Mitchell HAS BEEN RELEASED!
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 10:24:43 -0800

Great Paul!
9PM eastern
Call in 724-444-7444
Call ID: 39904
I cant wait!
Christmas Joy and Love,
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 8:31 PM
Subject: RE: Greetings -- Paul Andrew Mitchell HAS BEEN RELEASED!
Sure, Angela.  What time?

MERRY CHRISTMAS to you and yours too!

/s/ Paul

Subject: Re: Fwd: Greetings -- Paul Andrew Mitchell HAS BEEN RELEASED!
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 11:23:19 -0800

Congratulations! Glad to see you are out of that hell hole.
Would you honor us by being our special guest speaker on our Dec 25th call?
Many blessings,




Paul Andrew Mitchell released from Federal incarceration (case terminated) after US wisely decides not to open Sell v United States Pandora's box in his case after approx. 11 months of illegal detainment/torture

December 24, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

SupremeLaw Renewals are now due ...

Dear Friends, Supporters and Students of the Supreme Law:

Please continue to support the Supreme Law Library ("SLL")
by sending your annual subscription for $120 --
only $10 per month prepaid for 12 months --
to Mr. Larry Saccato at the following SHIP TO address:

Mr. Larry Saccato
1224 N.E. Walnut #257
Roseburg 97470
Oregon, USA

If you are sending a check or money order,
please leave the PAY TO line blank so that
Larry can negotiate that payment freely.
Also, please send me a brief note here confirming
your subscription, as a way of cross-checking all

Larry will manage these funds while I am busy
looking for temporary housing in the Lake Union area
of downtown Seattle, and getting re-settled in my
beautiful home town e.g. re-assembling my computer
network, checking out all hardware and software, etc.
Larry's email address is:  <>

This area of downtown Seattle is BOOMING with new
development, so I'm expecting that apartment rents
have increased a lot during the 11 MONTHS of absence
due to false arrest and false imprisonment.

Funds will be used initially to help me pay utility deposits
and first and last month's rent on a small apartment
(my former apartment has already been rented to
another tenant).  Also, I may  have some overdue bills
for electricity and high-speed Internet.
If you would like an autographed had copy of "The Federal Zone" classic,
please add $100 for printing, binding, shipping and handling, and allow
30 days to fulfill your order(s).  As you know or should know, the electronic
11th Edition is available FREE here in 3 different electronic formats:

THANKS, everyone, and MERRY CHRISTMAS to you and yours too!!

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964 (Home Page) (Support Policy) (Client Guidelines) (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
Paul Andrew Mitchell released from Federal incarceration after US wisely decides not to open Sell v United States Pandora's box in his case after approx. 11 months of illegal detainment/torture

December 22, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Paul Andrew Mitchell released from Federal incarceration (case terminated) after US wisely decides not to open Sell v United States Pandora's box in his case after approx. 11 months of illegal detainment/torture

Paul Andrew Mitchell's case is officially terminated, 12-19-14:

Merry Christmas Paul. Many blessings! Please give support to Paul for him to get settled in after his long and tortuous ordeal.

Paul Andrew Mitchell&#x27;s case is officially terminated

from: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <>
to: SupremeLaw <>
date: Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 2:13 PM
subject: escaping the psycho parasites needles attacks
>  how in the heck did you escape the psycho parasites needles attacks

First of all, when the SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT was issued,
that added 4 more co-defendants, and those 4 co-defendants
all hired private attorneys.

Two of those private attorneys then formally identified me as a
"critical defense witness" i.e. critical to the defense of their clients.

I also testified on my own behalf on July 10, 2014 e.g.
about my work looking for missing children in Tucson, Arizona,
and my 7 years of pro bono assistance to the U.S. Coast Guard
in downtown San Diego.  Indirectly, I received word that the
U.S. Marshals were VERY impressed with that testimony
e.g. how I analyzed the cctv frames acquired by the Pentagon's
(see the crucial FRAME ONE which shows how the fuselage
forward of  the visible tail section was "spray-painted" with a
purplish color taken from a different region of that frame:
that purple color was NOT present at those pixel locations
in ALL PRIOR FRAMES on the 2 surveillance video sequences!)
Thus, harassing, intimidating or threatening such
a Federal witness with mind-altering (read "brain-damaging")
psychotropic pharmaceuticals was a FELONY violation of
Also, there were the following:
Robert Sarrazin, M.D. as "Chief of Psychiatry"
Christina Pietz, Ph.D. as "Psychologist"
at the U.S. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners
in Springfield, Missouri ("USMCFP")

Latter CITIZEN'S ARREST WARRANT (1X) was served
on the USMCFP Case Manager and Mental Health Unit Manager,
Michael McIntyre and Jon Roberts, respectively.
*  CITIZEN'S ARREST WARRANT (1X) for the arrest of
Nancy Dell Freudenthal as "Chief U.S. District Judge" in Cheyenne, Wyoming
and Stephan Harris as "Clerk of Court" at USDC in Cheyenne, Wyoming
and L. Robert Muray as "Assistant U.S. Attorney" in Cheyenne, Wyoming
Latter CITIZEN'S ARREST WARRANT was served on the Director of the U.S.
Marshals Service in Washington, D.C. via first-class U.S. Mail.
*  2 new lawsuits, for a total of five (5) litigation "fronts"

(a)  original "criminal" case and "superseding indictment"

18 USC 1964, 28 USC 2241, 2242, 31 USC 3730(h)
and 42 USC 1985-1986, Docket #14-3460-CV-S-MDH-P (USDC/WDMO)

"MDH" = the Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, U.S. District Judge
(c)  FOIA Enforcement Application
Docket #14-3506-CV-S-MDH-P (USDC/WDMO)
(d)  APPEAL to the Tenth Circuit in Denver, Colorado
for WRIT OF PROHIBITION, Appeal #14-8081 (now pending:
a preliminary ORDER was issued on 12/19/2014)
(no Docket number assigned, as of today) requested under
the Crime Victims' Rights Act, 18 USC 3771


Of great interest to the whole nation, perhaps, are my two (2) FOIA Requests for
the OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS of all U.S. Bureau of Prisons ("BOP")
personnel during the past 10 years, and of all USMCFP personnel
also during the past 10 years.

I'll try to get everything uploaded to the SLL, but it's going to take
quite a lot of time:  many of those pleadings will need to be re-typed.

The "criminal case" alone now has more than 200 discrete Docket entries at present,

with no sign of taping off any time soon.

Also, Juan Schoch has been uploading many of my pleadings and
related email messages to his own website:  contact "Juan Schoch" <>

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964 (Home Page) (Support Policy) (Client Guidelines) (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:38 AM, 'Ronald Gust' via SupremeLaw <> wrote:
Hello Paul, nice you see your back, Marry Christmas 
how in the heck did you escape the psycho parasites needles
attacks, you need to write a book on your ordeal.

On Monday, December 22, 2014 10:09 AM, "Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S." <> wrote:

Got this TODAY, Bill! 

I can't thank you enough for greeting me at the bus terminal,
for your immense generosity, and for the fabulous conversation
we enjoyed together yesterday.

I am hoping and praying that we will become BEST FRIENDS
with no hesitation  :-) 

So, consider that an offer you may NOT and can NOT refuse !!

God bless you and yours, Bill.  You have helped me in more
ways than you know!

/s/ Paul

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Paul A. Mitchell <> wrote:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bill Zavales <>
Date: Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 7:33 PM
Subject: Hello and thankyou

Bumped into your writings almost 2 1/2 years ago and thought you might have NW connections per box office address. You have opened my eyes and I share your sites to whom ever will listen. I live in Kirkland ,Wa. and would like to extend an offer to contribute to the valuable service you have given.  Bill Zavales, small business owner,former employer(1099s now),Dad,Husband and 20 word p/m
typist. 206 465 4288

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul A. Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Instructor,
Inventor and Systems Development Consultant

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964 (Home Page) (Support Policy) (Client Guidelines) (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


Related: SupremeLaw Renewals are now due ...

'Bundled Away' Megapost

Ref(s) (mentions):


Truth Terminated: US Court Wisely Decides Not To Open Pandora's Box Sell v U.S...

December 24, 2014

Exposure of treason on the people will not be heard in any U.S. courtroom... it would eliminate all the hard work that has been done up to this point to enslave the people.

Paul Andrew Mitchell had been behind bars since January or February, 2014. He steadily wrote motions and affidavits, etc., ever since. Many of our earliest posts about that situation were lost when a hacker deleted most RMN post files on Sept 25.

Today, however, it's reported that Paul has prevailed, is totally free and back in Seattle. :)

The Paul Andrew Mitchell case would have revealed the truth and the facts that he exposed in 2012. The U.S. did not want to open the truth box, that would bring down the shadow government and those who have been on board for the ride... [more at link below]

December 22, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Alvin Boyd Kuhn - Theosophy: Modern Revival of Ancient Wisdom + Author letter, Gerald Massey ex-Libris with Notes and marks in his own hand + more

An eBay member wants to show you this item
Hi! I found this on eBay and thought you might like it! Check it out now!
Alvin Kuhn - Theosophy: Modern Revival of Ancient Wisdom + Author letter, Massey
Alvin Kuhn - Theosophy: Modern Revival of Ancient Wisdom + Author letter, Massey
Buy It Now price:
$8,500.00Buy It Now
End time: Jan-13-15 09:44:06 PST
Check out this item


December 19, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

More legal mail returned as "Returned to sender not at this address"

Teknosis: Please share this with others (friends, contacts, organizations that might be able to help Paul, etc.) Paul is in great need of a capable attorney because right now he is even being denied competent "technical assistance of counsel" and his court-assigned counsel, (whom he has fired, who has not removed himself, has betrayed him (herein documented, and herein extensively collated). Nor is the court listening to Paul [mooting all his motions]. As well he is in need of a CJA attorney to prosecute his 4x Qui Tam lawuits.
More legal mail returned as "Returned to sender not at this address"​ by the BOPs in Missouri. You can see from the postmark that Paul was still at the facility when the mail was rejected. It seems amazing that they can expend hundreds of thousands of dollars moving Paul all over the western United States 50+ times since 1/28/14 and they cannot figure out how to forward legal mail within the prison system.
As I recall one of the counts in the complaint against Paul is allegedly "obstruction of justice", well how would the handling of moving Paul over 50 times to different locations and intentionally obstructing his legal mail not warrant similar charges on whoever is orchestrating this treatment/torture of Paul and blocking his ability to properly defend himself which is a fundamental due process right?

Paul not there when he was there

Comment received:

RM relays:

It is intentional. On high value prisoners they intentionally move them around to keep them out of the media and away from friends and lawyers.


Legal Documentation confiscated,. from Whistleblower Paul Andrew Mitchell

Free Paul Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell has been bundled away

December 19, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

JEB BUSH was running a drug & alcohol ring in prep school at Andover. Call it “training wheels” for Jeb’s Crimes in Iran-Contra

Gs0drasJEB BUSH was running a drug & alcohol ring in prep school at Andover. Call it “training wheels” for Jeb’s Crimes in Iran-Contra.

From Robert Morrow   (512)306-1510    Austin, TX
 The books that one should read to fully understand the Bush-Clinton connection to the Iran-Contra CIA drug trade of the 1980s are:
a) Barry & ‘the Boys:’ The CIA, the Mob and America’s Secret History by Daniel Hopsicker (2005).
b) Compromised: Clinton, Bush and the CIA by Terry Reed (Feb. 1, 2004).
c) Crossfire: Witness in the Clinton Investigation by L.D. Brown (April, 1999).
d) The Conspirators: Secrets of an Iran-Contra Insider by Al Martin (2002).
e) The Tatum Chronicles by Chip Tatum (1996). Just google “Chip Tatum Pegasus” and you will learn bucketsful. [Also check:]
f) Dark Alliance: The CIA, the Contras, and the Crack Cocaine Explosion by Gary Webb (1999).
g) Defrauding America: Encyclopedia of Secret Operations by the CIA, DEA, and Other Covert Agencies (1994) and Drugging America: A Trojan Horse (1999) - both excellent books by Rodney Stich.

[Look the following up for full article]:

The Jeb Bush Illegal Drug and Liquor Distributorship at Andover
By John LeBoutillier:
In 2006 at my 30th Harvard Reunion, during a casual conversation one evening, a classmate told me about his years at Andover. Out of the blue he told me this story:

Former Florida governor Jeb Bush

Jeb Bush and one other fellow student back then ran an illegal drug and liquor distributorship on the Andover campus. When the heat started coming down, Bush ratted out the partner to the school authorities and saved his own skin. Jeb got away with it, was never caught, never punished, graduated unscathed and went on to the University of Texas at Austin.

To this day no one outside the Andover community even knows about this illegal activity. The media is apparently unaware of it. Through three statewide campaigns for governor of Florida, it never came up.

In 2012 at another Harvard event, this same Andover alumnus brought over another one of his Andover classmates – and one of our Harvard ’76 classmates and a staunch Republican – to speak to me about the Jeb Bush matter. This second alumnus confirmed the story – and added in this detail: “I never knew why Jeb walked around Andover with his jaw hanging open until someone told me he was stoned all the time.”

Forty years later does this matter? Does what someone did in high school matter if they run for president?

In fact, yes.

In the summer of 2012, the WASHINGTON POST ran a huge story on Mitt Romney’s behavior at the Cranbrook School in Michigan, with the focus on an alleged incident where Romney and some other boys cut off the blond bangs of a classmate.

If that event is worthy of the front page of the WASHINGTON POST, then the Jeb Bush Illegal Drug and Liquor Distributorship is certainly something the voters – especially GOP primary voters – have a right to know before they begin to choose a 2016 candidate...
Additional info. re: Iran/Contra, etc.

From above

Al Martin’s conversation with Jeb Bush just days after the Feb, 1986 Murder of Barry Seal in Baton Rouge. Jeb Bush had been at a meeting in Sept, 1985, where the assassination of Barry Seal had been discussed
Al Martin: "In this discussion, I had mentioned the recent assassination, only a few days before, of Barry Seal [Feb, 1986, outside his halfway house in New Orleans].

I said to Jeb, "Isn't it convenient that Barry Seal was assassinated when he was? And now suddenly all the information and documents he had are gone missing?"

Jeb had a rather broad smile on his face, and he concurred that it was convenient. He added a little snicker - as he often had a tendency of doing. Also little beads of sweat formed on his forehead, as when he gets nervous. It's something you can notice when he's on television. He still has a tendency to have little beads of sweat around his forehead, when he is either lying about something, or he's nervous about what someone is saying."
     My conversations with Jeb at this meeting were overheard by the two Secret Service agents who were always assigned to Jeb when he was in his office at 1390 Brickell Avenue in Miami.
            I had intimated that if certain parties in Washington were not prepared to come to my aid pursuant to my grand jury testimony, that it would be entirely possible that certain details of a certain meeting occurring in September of the year [Sept., 1985] before might be leaked out to the press.
            Jeb asked me what I was talking about.
            I specifically mentioned a September meeting of the Dade County Latin America Chamber of Commerce, which Jeb chaired, and which, of course, was not used as a Chamber of Commerce meeting at all. It was essentially used as a political meeting for covert operational planning pursuant to Iran-Contra.
            As I've said before, Oliver North, Richard Secord or Dewey Clarridge or, in a few cases, even Sam Watson and Fred Ikley himself, would show up at these meetings.
            Anyway, I had recounted to Jeb, as if he didn't know what the text of that meeting was that he chaired - the conversations he had with Oliver North and Richard Secord and Dewey Clarridge, all of whom attended that meeting.
            Dewey seldom attended the meetings, but this time the four of them were discussing the assassination of Barry Seal and how it was to be carried out, since Barry was becoming an increasing liability.
            I had told Jeb that I had substantial corroboration of that meeting. And I think Jeb understood what I meant.
            It would certainly place him into a conspiracy to assassinate a CIA drug runner for the sake of political expediency.
            When I was through speaking, Jeb became quiet and his demeanor became serious and changed. He became flushed, as he often does when he's frightened.
            Jeb responded by telling me that it would be most unfortunate if I were to do that, since I might wind up like George Morales or Johnny Molina.
              [ Al Martin, "The Conspirators: Secrets of an Iran-Contra Insider," p. 194-195]
Jeb Bush and the Murders of George Morales and Johnny Molina
            [ Al Martin, "The Conspirators: Secrets of an Iran-Contra Insider," p. 195-198 ]
            What he was referring to, of course, was that, a number of months earlier, George Morales had been set up on a cocaine charge – to distance what Morales was doing from the CIA.
            As any serious student of Iran-Contra would know, Morales absolutely screamed “CIA, CIA.”
            But ultimately he was convicted.
            He was bound and gagged in the courtroom before the Republican Judge Hoover, who allowed him to present no CIA defense. He couldn’t mention any Bush names, or North, or Secord, or anything.
            He got the standard fifteen-year sentence for cocaine trafficking. At the time, in the State of Florida, you had to serve six years nine months mandatory.
            Jeb then went on to mention to me about Morales. He said “Of course, Morales will never leave prison alive.”
            Fast forward to the time when Morales was due to be released from prison in early 1992.
            The day before Morales was to be released, he did, in fact, slip on a bar of soap in the prisoner’s shower and supposedly died as a result of the fall.
            The following day, Morales was due to be picked up at the Miami International Airport by a Congressional charter flight arranged for him by Congressmen Alexander, Rose, Brooks and Gonzalez. He was to be taken to Washington to have a detailed discussion with them and their investigators about his knowledge of Iran-Contra.
            At that moment, the threat Jeb was making to me – the sublime threat about not wanting to wind up like Johnny Molina – really didn’t mean anything to me because I knew as of the day before that Molina was still alive and well.
            I didn’t think anything of it until the next day when I got into my office and opened the Miami Herald.
            I read that Mr. Molina had in fact “committed suicide” that evening in the parking lot of a restaurant in Pensacola, Florida.
            He had “committed suicide” by discharging an entire twenty-round clip of a MAC-10 into his own body.
            Of course, by the following day, the body had quickly been cremated – before his family was notified and before an autopsy could be done.
            It’s the same old story.
            It was interesting to note that Jeb had issued that threat at that meeting which was held at about 10:30 a.m.
            Molina “committed suicide” at about 9:30 p.m. that evening.
            I found the connection rather humorous, but also salient in that Bush knew what was going to happen a number of hours before it actually did.

Snippet from "related" link below:

11/4/99 12:50:35 AM

In Houston, from 1977 until 1980 I rented the garage apartment next to my
business attorney, David C. Cobb.  His father is Daniel W. Cobb, retired
Houston Chronicle Executive Managing News Editor of some 40 years.  Dan
Rather’s first boss.  We became good friends over the years.  Dan happened
to be late for a holiday function one evening in 1979.  He was animated
and filled with excitement as I had ever seen him.  “You won’t believe
what just happened” he stated.  There were a number of people present
there in the kitchen and dining room, among them was a girl I happened to
be seeing at the time, Ms. Katherine Farenthold.  Kathy had recently
become the ex-wife of Dudley Farenthold.  Dudley was the son of Francis
(Cissy) Farenthold, a prominent state Democratic Party official and former
gubernatorial candidate.  Dan went on to say, “Dudley, John Connaly Jr.,
and Jeb Bush had just been picked up by HPD and arrested on charges of
cocaine possession.” Zarko Franks, Chief Investigative Reporter for the
Chronicle, had gotten a call from contacts inside Houston Police
Department and immediately went down to investigate the story.

Needless to say, this caused quite a stir in a room full of socially
prominent people.  Everyone wanted to know the obvious which was “Are we
going to read all about this in the morning or see it on TV tomorrow? “
“No way!” was his response.  He then went on to explain that the phones
lit up, agents came out of nowhere pressures were applied, the boys were
released and there wouldn’t be any record of it.  There was a definite air
of disappointment after that.  Dan didn’t seem so upset, stating that he
doubted we had heard the absolute end of the story. The future has a way
of catching up with you, I believe is the way he put it.

I asked Kathy if that had anything to do with her divorce from Dudley. She
affirmed that it was Dudley’s use of cocaine and his association with the
Bush brothers that had her upset all right, but the last straw was the
trips to Panama they had made to return cocaine shipments under diplomatic
immunity.  She wouldn’t stay with him after that.  Also present that night
was Linda Cobb, David’s wife, and Christine Fitzgerald, all friends.  
Some years passed.  I moved to Hawaii and lost touch with the girls after
David and Linda’s divorce.  I did keep in touch with Dan.



Cocaine, Assassination Politics and the 2000 Election


Jeb Bush - The Early Years

- Jun 16, 2015
Jeb and Grandfather Prescott
Jeb Bush - The Early Years


Jeb Bush's CIA "NOC" work in Venezuela

by Wayne Madsen  

Former Florida Governor and 2016 presidential hopeful Jeb Bush may have thought he could pass himself off as "Hispanic" when he ticked off that ethnic option on his 2009 voter registration form but he was not able to easily pass himself off as a "banker" in Venezuela in the late 1970s.

One of the last things then-Central Intelligence Agency director George H. W. Bush did for his son Jeb, whose actual name is John Ellis Bush from which the "Jeb" is derived as an acronym, is to have him hired by the international division of the Texas Commerce Bank as a CIA "non-official cover" officer or "NOC." Texas Commerce Bank was an optimal cover for CIA activities. The bank was founded by the family of James Baker. All the elder Bush had to do was to call his close friend Baker to have his son hired by the bank's international division, the usual branch where CIA NOCs were placed within banks and investment firms. Other banks used by the CIA for NOC embeds included Bank of America, Chase Manhattan Bank, and Manufacturers Hanover.

Texas Commerce Bank, bought by Chemical Bank in 1987 and which is now part of J.P Morgan Chase, had the right pedigree to enable it to work closely with the CIA. In 1977, its board members included Lady Bird Johnson and the recently-defeated President Gerald Ford. In the 1980s, Kenneth Lay, who founded the CIA-connected Enron, became a board member of Texas Commerce Bank. Howard Hughes's CIA-linked Summa Corporation used Texas Commerce Bank to purchase a number of properties on the Las Vegas strip.

In 1977, a short time after his father left the CIA as director, Jeb, fluent in Spanish as a result of his time as an exchange student in Guadalajara, was sent, along with his Mexican wife Columba, to Caracas, Venezuela to work as a "branch manager" and "vice president" at the young age of 24. But Jeb was no ordinary "branch manager." He was, officially, Texas Commerce Bank's top point man in the Venezuelan capital and, unofficially, the CIA's main financial liaison to the Venezuelan oil industry and the Colombian narcotics cartels. Jeb would regularly report to his CIA "official cover" counterpart attached to the U.S. embassy in Caracas as a State Department "diplomat."

Jeb as a CIA "NOC" in Caracas for Texas Commerce Bank, owned by James Baker

Jeb helped lay the groundwork for the future Reagan-Bush administration's 1980s covert war against Nicaragua and leftist guerrillas in El Salvador by establishing banking and money laundering links between the CIA and the Medellin and Cali drug cartels. Jeb's friends in the Colombian cartels, particularly Medellin cartel boss Pablo Escobar, would helped finance the Nicaraguan contras in return for CIA-supplied weapons. While in Venezuela, Jeb cleverly managed to hide the Colombian cartel's drug revenues as oil industry revenues of "front" companies. Texas Commerce Bank was the bank of choice for Latin American drug cartels. It was later discovered to have stashed $7 million in drug profits for the Gulf cartel of Mexico.
Jeb ready to continue the CIA's lock on the White House

Baker sold Texas Commerce Bank's Houston skyscraper to the head of the National Commercial Bank of Saudi Arabia, Sheikh Khalid bin Mahfouz, in 1985. Bin Mahfouz was later identified as a key member of Saudi Arabia's support network for the 9/11 terrorist attacks against the United States, which is noted in the still-classified 28 pages of U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee Report on 9/11 intelligence failures. Bin Mahfouz, who lived in the River Oaks section of Houston near George H. W. Bush, died suddenly in 2009 at the age of 59. Bin Mahfouz, who was also an Irish citizen, threatened with confiscatory lawsuits any publication that reported his links to 9/11 and his family ties to Osama bin Laden.

Jeb had no problems with the Venezuelan government in providing financial support for the Colombian cartels. For much of Jeb's stay in Venezuela, the extremely corrupt Carlos Andres Perez, known as "CAP," was president. His extravagant spending using Venezuela's revenue from the recently-nationalized oil industry earned his government the nickname of "Saudi Venezuela." Although CAP nationalized the oil industry and created the Petroleos de Venezuela (PdVSA) state-owned oil firm, he also was generous to American firms bidding for work with PdVSA. One of them was Bechtel Corporation, the firm of future Reagan-Bush cabinet members George P. Shultz and Caspar Weinberger. With a number of Bechtel employees in Venezuela, Jeb was not the only CIA "NOC" present in the country. But, he was the most influential.

During CAP's second term as president from 1989 to 1993, a young army officer named Hugo Chavez attempted to overthrow the corrupt CAP in a coup. Many of Venezuela's elite who Jeb befriended during his days as Langley's main NOC in Caracas later became involved with repeated CIA attempts to overthrow Chavez and his successor, Nicolas Maduro. Today, they and their progeny live in the Miami-Dade area, particularly in Doral, nicknamed "Doralzuela," and are among Jeb's strongest and most deep-pocketed political supporters.

In 1989, CAP crushed popular protests against his government by killing as many as 3000 protesters. The massacre is known as the "Caracazo" massacre. After leaving office the second time, Andres Perez was convicted of corruption and sentenced to 28 months in prison.

After leaving Venezuela in 1980 to help with his father's presidential and vice presidential campaigns, Jeb hooked up with Cuban-American Miami businessman Armando Codina, who had his own connections with CIA-supported anti-Castro Cuban exiles in south Florida. It was Codina who helped Jeb make millions of dollars in the real estate business and eventually help launch him on his political career that took him to the Governor's Mansion in Tallahassee. Jeb, as a principal of the Codina Group, was able to arrange the sale of high-priced condos and mansions in the Miami area to his elite friends in Venezuela, with Jeb receiving handsome sales commissions.

One of Jeb's close Miami associates was Cuban terrorist Orlando Bosch. Bosch was a key figure in the CIA's Operation Condor, which was an alliance of Latin American military dictatorships that targeted leftist leaders for assassination across international borders. Bosch helped carry out the October 1976 bombing of Cubana Airlines flight 455, which was en route from Barbados to Jamaica. All 73 passengers and crew were killed in the attack, including children and the Cuban fencing team.

The Cubana bombing plot was discussed at a 1976 meeting in Washington between Bosch; another Cuban terrorist, Luis Posada Carriles; and Michael Townley of the CIA. Jeb's father, the CIA director, was fully aware of the plot, as well as another plot to kill former Chilean Foreign Minister Orlando Letelier. Letelier and Roni Moffitt, his American associate, were killed when their car exploded on Sheridan Circle in front of the Irish embassy in Washington on September 21, 1976, a few weeks before the Cubana airliner was blown out of the sky off Barbados.

Codina, Bosch, and Posada Carriles were all part of Jeb's inner circle of friends, which also included Cuban businessman Camilo Padreda, a former spy for Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista, and Hernandez Cartaya, both later indicted for systematically embezzling funds from the Jefferson Savings and Loan of McAllen, Texas. Padreda and Cartaya were also identified as CIA agents who helped skim funds from Jefferson and other S&Ls to fund the Nicaraguan contras. Jeb's work for the CIA in Caracas in 1977 came a few months after the CIA's worst terrorism spree in history, which also happened to coincide with George H. W. Bush's single year as CIA director.

After his father became Vice President, Jeb served as the liaison for the Nicaraguan contras and he arranged meetings between them and their supporters and the White House point man for covert assistance to the Nicaraguan rebels, one Marine Corps Lieutenant Colonel by the name of Oliver North. Another one of Jeb's Cuban cronies, Miguel Recarey, owner of Miami-based International Medical Center, an HMO, was awash in ill-gotten Medicare funds. Recarey and his brother, who had close ties to the CIA, were also funded by Florida Mafia boss Santo Trafficante, Jr., a co-conspirator in several CIA plots to assassinate Fidel Castro and a suspected co-plotter in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

A Jeb Bush presidency would maintain the CIA's lock on the White House. Barack Obama's and his family's CIA connections are a historical fact. George W. Bush ensured the CIA's control over the presidency for eight years and before him, Bill Clinton, who had his own links to the CIA's contra-cocaine network through Mena, Arkansas, has seen his Clinton Foundation benefit from a $1 million contribution from one of Jeb's old Cuban-Venezuelan friends, Gustavo Cisneros, the multi-billionaire "Berlusconi of Venezuela." Cisneros, now exiled in the Dominican Republic, was involved in the CIA's 2002 abortive coup against Chavez
Last modified on Tuesday, 16 June 2015 14:38

Report: Jeb Bush’s CIA briefing in 1977 led to covert action, wealth, politics

Monday, June 15, 2015 12:46

(Before It's News)

As Jeb Bush’s presidential campaign prepared to launch June 15, an investigative reporter has revealed that the CIA provided the future candidate with a high-level briefing in 1977 that helped launch his career.

Wayne Madsen Report logoReporter, author and former Navy intelligence officer Wayne Madsen published a CIA document disclosing Bush’s briefing by the agency as Bush prepared in 1977 to become the Venezuela branch manager and a vice president for the influential Texas Commerce Bank.

Madsen headlined his June 12 column, Jeb Bush received comprehensive CIA briefing when he worked for bank in Caracas. 

Published on the subscription site the Wayne Madsen Report (WMR), Madsen wrote:  

A June 7, 1977 letter on Texas Commerce Bank stationery from “Jeb Bush” of the bank’s International Banking Division, using post office box 2558 in Houston, to Robert W. Gambino, director of security for the CIA, thanks Gambino, who was in charge of issuing clearances for CIA official cover and NOC agents alike, for “arranging such a comprehensive and informative briefing” for Bush during his recent trip to Washington.

The Justice Integrity Project has independently confirmed that the document is authentic.

Madsen used the briefing and his sources to portray the banking job as a gateway to power for the younger Bush in the family Jeb Bush at CPAC 2015 by Gage Skidmoretradition. Bush is shown in a photo by Gage Skidmore at this year’s CPAC convention organized by the American Conservative Union.

Madsen noted also that Gambino resigned from the agency to support the George Bush for President campaign in 1980, and subsequently received political patronage jobs from the Reagan and Bush administrations that extended into the Clinton administration.

The bank, co-founded by an ancestor of Bush family ally James Baker, has a long history of sensitive operations, including help in funding the 1950s business operations of Jeb Bush’s father, George H.W. Bush.

The elder Bush became a covert CIA operative in the early 1950s while also a businessman co-founding Zapata Petroleum in 1953. Its affiliate Zapata Offshore was formed in 1954 with the help of funding from Texas National Bank, a major predecessor of the Texas Commerce Bank, according to the bank history But Also Good Business, co-authored in 1986 by professors Walter L. Buegner and Joseph A. Pratt.

The Bush family, Baker, their allies virtually never talk about such matters even though research indicates that all recent U.S. presidents have established secret relationships with the CIA or FBI before they entered politics. This enables politicians on the way up to establish strong bonds with the agencies and the powerful backers of the agencies on Wall Street and in such key sectors as energy, agri-business and media. Details are provided in Madsen’s book, The Manufacturing of a President (2010) and our own Presidential Puppetry  (2013), among other places.

Regarding the media, Operation Mockingbird was the CIA’s secret program to coordinate agency-friendly messaging among the nation’s top broadcast networks, magazines and newspapers. Author Deborah Davis first revealed the program in her 1979 book Katharine the Great: Katharine Graham and Her Washington Post Empire, which publisher Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich reputedly pulverized under pressure from the Post and CIA.


December 16, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink

Legal documentation confiscated,. from whistleblower Paul Andrew Mitchell

Update: Paul Andrew Mitchell released from Federal incarceration after US wisely decides not to open Sell v United States Pandora's box in his case after approx. 11 months of illegal detainment/torture

Paul is still in need of a CJA attorney to go forward with his 4 Qui Tam lawsuits as well as to proceed with possible false imprisonment,. lawsuits.


Teknosis: Please share this with others (friends, contacts, organizations that might be able to help Paul, etc.) Paul is in great need of a capable attorney because right now he is even being denied competent &quot;technical assistance of counsel&quot; and his court-assigned counsel, (whom he has fired, who has not removed himself, has betrayed him (herein documented, and herein extensively collated). Nor is the court listening to Paul [mooting all his motions]. As well he is in need of a CJA attorney to prosecute his 4x Qui Tam lawuits.


Civil Rights Attorney needed NOW to represent Civil Plaintiff
at U.S. District Court, WDMO, Springfield, Missouri, USA
under Civil RICO, False Claims Act, FOIA, 18 USC 1514, 3771,
28 USC 2241-2242, and 42 USC 1985-1986 (conspiracy).
Attorney's fees are authorized by Acts of Congress. 
Plaintiff is indigent proceeding In Propria Persona, but 
FCA requires licensed attorney per Eighth Circuit.
Per 28 USC 1915(e), Court cannot compel representation.
RSVP ASAP with rates, minimum retainer(s), and other
negotiable items to: Larry Saccato <>.
Contingency fees preferred (no recovery/no fee). 
Cf. PACER #6:2014-cv-03460 . Thank you!


Civil Rights Attorney needed NOW to represent Civil Plaintiff
at U.S. District Court, WDMO, Springfield, Missouri, USA
under Civil RICO, False Claims Act, FOIA, 18 USC 1514, 3771,
28 USC 2241-2242, and 42 USC 1985-1986 (conspiracy).
Attorney's fees are authorized by Acts of Congress. 
Plaintiff is indigent proceeding In Propria Persona, but 
FCA requires licensed attorney per Eighth Circuit.
Per 28 USC 1915(e), Court cannot compel representation.
RSVP ASAP with rates, minimum retainer(s), and other
negotiable items to: Larry Saccato <>.
Contingency fees preferred (no recovery/no fee). 
Cf. PACER #6:2014-cv-03460 . Thank you!]

Larry Saccato <> relays:

Attached is a picture of the legal  documentation (20 lbs) I recieved from Paul, confiscated by the guards at Springfield Federal Detention Facility prior to his transfer to Grady Detention Facility in Oklahoma.  They managed to rifle through the documentation and leave it in a disarray.

Move no. 50 since January 29, 2014. Additionally 2 letters from him in the mail today.

The stack on the right is today's and the stack in the middle is over the last 90 days. This is clearly an attempt to obstruct Paul's defense to trumped up charges, witness tampering, elder abuse, and numerous due process rights violations.

News on torture happening right here on us soil, don't need to look to Gitmo or overseas, sleep deprivation, diesel therapy, on this 66 year old that hasn't even been to trial yet!




04-Paul not there_returned to sender


More legal mail returned as "Returned to sender not at this address"

12/8/2014 Communication from Paul Andrew Mitchell | The torture continues

12/09/14 Communication of Paul Andrew Mitchell | Still stuck in the Grady County jail – no email, no law library...

Litigation involving Paul Andrew Mitchell

Mega post:
Paul Andrew Mitchell has been bundled away (01-28-14)

Stop USA Torture, Free Paul Mitchell
Why are the Executive Offices of Raytheon keeping tabs as to Paul Andrew Mitchell's status?


Ref'd: Cryptome (

2014-00801            Whistleblower Mitchell Legal Papers Confiscated  December 16, 2014

December 16, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink