Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« FORMAL COMPLAINT OF INTIMIDATION AND HARASSMENT: 18 U.S.C. 1513, 1514, 3771 | Main | CITIZEN'S ARREST WARRANT: 18 U.S.C. 4 (misprision) »

RE: Ken Ditkowsky asks who you are?

From: MITCHELL PAUL MODELESKI (44202086)
Date: 12/4/2014 4:19:58 PM
Subject: RE: Ken Ditkowsky asks who you are?
Message:
Ask the guy to produce the U.S. OPM Standard Form 61
APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS and second OATH OF OFFICE
required of Mr. Stephan Harris by 5 USC 3331, 3332, 3333,
and 28 USC 951.

A blank SUBPOENA can be obtained under Rule 17
of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Stephan Harris is claiming to be the "Clerk of Court"
at the USDC in Cheyenne, Wyoming.

HINT: Stephan Harris has refused to do so for more than 7 YEARS now:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/

/s/ Paul
-----Schoch, Juan on 12/4/2014 2:36 PM wrote:

>

Let's be candid. Who is

Paul Andrew Mitchell
Specifically prior to his objection to Obama's qualifications to be president:

1. What did he do for living?
2) Where did he reside and what did he do for a living? What is his education? Does he have a family?
3) Did he have a criminal record, and if so for what?
4) When was he charged for a crime, if at all?
5) what are the facts that relate to the charges? The version of the government first and then Michell's version.
6) did he have trial. When did it take place? What is the citation.
7) the facts upon which it is claimed that he is a political prisoner.

Charges are easy to bring but not necessarily easy to sustain. The internet does not yield a flattering portrait of Mitchell.. I'd like to know what facts exist that portray Michell as a political prisoner! Conclusions suppositions and attempts at intimidation do no credit to Michell or his cause. The fact that a litigant is unhappy with his legal counsel and the rules of court do not make him a political prisoner nor do they give rise to anything other than sour grapes.

There is real political and judicial corruption out there - every day hundreds of senior citizens and disabled people are being deprived of their civil rights as they are elder cleansed. /tears for miscreants who wish to be on our side of the fence are a waste.
Ken Ditkowsky
www.ditkowskylawoffice.com

___

From: MITCHELL PAUL MODELESKI (44202086)
Date: 12/4/2014 7:50:36 PM
Subject: LET'S BE "CANDID" -- Who is Ken Ditkowsky?
Message:
You can console him with the fact that LOTS AND LOTS
of legal professionals have neglected the far-reaching
"back office" duties of Federal Court Clerks.

When those personnel turn up withOUT credentials,
that one fact results in rendering the entire Federal Court
totally IMPOTENT because it cannot issue ANY process
that satisfies 28 USC 1691:

www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/

The case law we found also held that satisfying 1691
goes to jurisdiction e.g. if a SUMMONS does not
exhibit signature -and- seal THEN it fails to perfect
jurisdiction in personam over the person served.

In legal parlance, such a defective "summons" is "sewer service"!

And, of course, if those personnel lack credentials,
they are not "Clerks" or "Deputy Clerks" --
they are IMPOSTORS!!

Did-Cows-Ski down that mountain, or was I day dreaming?

They may as well dip their dog's paws into an ink well
and "seal" subpoenas with a dog print -- LOL!!

WOOF! WOOF!!

/s/ Paul

Related:

Paul Andrew Mitchell has been bundled away by the US Government
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/02/paul-andrew-mitchell-has-been-bundled-away-by-the-us-government.html

December 4, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink