Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« FYI: Formal Challenge to "not self-executing" Declaration in U.S. Senate's ratification of the ICCPR | Main | US Supreme Court Tipping Their Hand: Congressional intent to transfer jurisdiction from constitutional to legislative courts, to emasculate the former »

A gross example of litigation "churning" aka barratry

from: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
reply-to: supremelaw@googlegroups.com
to: SupremeLaw <supremelaw@googlegroups.com>
date: Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 8:45 PM
subject: a gross example of litigation "churning" aka barratry
mailing list: supremelaw.googlegroups.com Filter messages from this mailing list
Now, focus on Page 2:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/criminal/document.248/page02.gif

and these Exhibits:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/criminal/document.248/page14.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/criminal/document.248/page15.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/criminal/document.248/page16.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/criminal/document.248/page17.gif


14.03 Gigabytes of material
equivalent to approx. 350 banker boxes
with an estimated 2500 pages per box
or 875,000 pages of material


AND, THAT'S NOT ALL!
 
Does IRS like to waste money?  Is the Pope Catholic?


An entire Windows NTFS partition can be quickly copied
using the XCOPY command in Command Prompt e.g.:

cd \
xcopy \ D:\folder /s/e/v/d

Where,
D = drive letter of destination partition


Now, compare Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_2


Rule 2. Interpretation

These rules are to be interpreted to provide for the just determination of every criminal proceeding,

to secure simplicity in procedure and fairness in administration, and

to eliminate unjustifiable expense and delay.

 

p.s.  I filed a MOTION to require the U.S. Attorney
to itemize the evidence to be used at trial, but
that MOTION just got lost in the shuffle somewhere ;-(



--

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

March 10, 2015 in Current Affairs | Permalink