Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Fastest star ejecting from our galaxy has unique origin | Main | Question for Pres. Spittal re: the official policy and practices of your university (MidAmerica Nazarene University) »

Start Listening at 48:00:00

from: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
reply-to: supremelaw@googlegroups.com
to: SoundSignal <soundsignal@comcast.net>
cc: SupremeLaw <supremelaw@googlegroups.com>
date: Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:37 PM
subject: Re: Paul Start Listening at 48:00:00
mailing list: supremelaw.googlegroups.com Filter messages from this mailing list
"Pursuant to Article III, Section 2 and Article VI,
all courts within the jurisdiction of the United States
as well as the Appeals Courts are required to operate
under law and equity arising under this Constitution
and the laws of the United States, not under theories
and concepts.

" ... whereas there is no place within the Constitution
does it give way for any court or any appeal court
the authority to operate in any jurisdiction or venue
in theory or concept of any law, equity, treaty or
any controversy.  The appeal court is required to follow
Article III, Section 2 and Article VI of the United States
Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, and Amendments
when it applies."

 
In that quote, he is citing the Arising Under Clause
in Article III, but Congress can also create "tribunals"
pursuant to Article I, Section 8, Clause 9:

http://supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#1:8:9

Moreover, Congress can also create such legislative tribunals
for the Federal Territories pursuant to the Territory Clause
See Balzac v. Porto Rico and American Insurance v. 356 Bales of Cotton:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/dcus.htm


1:8:9 and 4:3:2 are not "theories and concepts" but
supreme Law of the Land.


Whether a Federal Court has original jurisdiction or not
is determined by the Act of Congress which conferred
jurisdiction.  The Supreme Court is the ONLY Federal Court
created by the Constitution and the ONLY Federal Court
on which the Constitution conferred jurisdiction.

All other Federal Courts must be created by Acts of Congress
and their original and appellate jurisdictions must be
conferred by Acts of Congress.

Those Acts of Congress must be STRICTLY construed
(cites omitted).


The distinction between constitutional courts and legislative tribunals


p.s.  He also omitted any mention of admiralty, but that's another story.
Article III expressly mentions law, equity and admiralty where
"law" embraces the Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the United States:


/s/ Paul
 

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 8:39 AM, SoundSignal <soundsignal@comcast.net> wrote:



--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

March 8, 2015 in Current Affairs | Permalink